WEBVTT - The President Speaks in Jerusalem

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Runt you by Bank of America Mary Lynch. With virtual reality,

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 1>virtually everything will change. Discover opportunities in a transforming world.

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Be of a, mL dot Com, slash VR, Mary Lynch,

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Pierced Fenner and Smith Incorporated. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best of economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg. Right now, in Jerusalem,

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>President Trump meeting with the President of Israel, Ruben Rivlin.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>He fought in the Six Days War fifty years ago.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Here is the President of the United States together and

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>now today being in Israel is just very very special

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for us. So we expect to have some very interesting talks. Absolutely,

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we are praying for peace, and we are pushing for

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>peace for the last one other tears and with God's head,

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody will bring us peace all together, all together. Thank you,

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, thank you, thank you, thank you. Yeah,

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a photo opportunity. Now you can hear the cameras going

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>behind the United States and Israel flags. Israeli flags and attendance.

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>UM can't really guess the crowd size. I would guess

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe a hundred journalists as well. And we're again shifting

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to another scene where perhaps we'll have more formal comments

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>by Mr Trump. He is in Jerusalem, landing at Tel

0:01:55.840 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Aviv earlier today and by helicopter to Jerusalem. Uh and uh.

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now with David Gurray in Boston. I'm Tom keenan

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>New York Jerome Schneider with us with Pimco in our

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>New York studios. Jerome, thank you for all of us

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>for being so patient with the news flow up this morning.

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's get basic here on a Monday, we've seen the

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump trade fade, steeper yield curve we've rolled over clearly

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>based on news events. To a pro like you, what

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>does curve flattening mean? Ultimately, it means that we should

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>be expecting rates to move higher over the over the

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>new yer term. And I think that you know with

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that mind, it's also a relatively healthy economy that one

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>could point to, and and and and ultimately that what

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>we see in the market is very different, very different

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>than what we should project to the market. Let maybe

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>be clear about that ultimately, when you look at short

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>term interest rate expectations, that we've seen a very drastic

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>move over the past week or two in terms of

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the expectations of a June rate hike. The reality is

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is that when you look at the ottening of the yolker,

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>specifically over the past few days, we should expect those

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>rates to move higher more more probably probability awaited than

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the market is expecting. So simply put, rates are moving

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>higher and we should be preparing for that. Well, we

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>should be preparing for that, and I guess I see

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it with a one point two nine percent two year

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>yield as well. It's away from your remit in short

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>term paper. But nevertheless, I know you're wired at PIMCO

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 1>on weaker dollar, stronger oil. Which is the horse and

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>which is the cart? Well, ultimately, you know, I think

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at the dollar because that, ultimately

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is what the FED is going to key off of.

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the Fed's transition from this data

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>dependent model to more of a conditions dependent model, financial

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>conditions dependent model back in two thousand sixteen, that's really

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>what we have to focus on. The data is there

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>for the for the rate hike The only reason that

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.119
<v Speaker 1>the FED doesn't increase rates over the next six months

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>or so by one or maybe even two times is

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that the financial conditions tightened. So being being conditions dependent

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is simply driven by data, I'm sorry, driven by volatility

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and currency, specifically the view of the dollar. So I

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>put more weight on the dollar than oil right now.

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>But it is interesting, Tom, and this is noteworthy, is

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that we basically have seen whatever it takes policy from

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>OPEC and and some of the producers, and that sort

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of found a floor and that could have actually pretty

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>positive implications potentially for not only global comedy but really

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the domestic economy as you looked forward to that stabilization,

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it could lead to other things including capex, capital expenditures increasing,

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately you know that that creates stability and upward

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>propensity for the economy. Let's play that a little bit here.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>We saw news from the Saudi oil minister over the weekend.

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>That's Audi rabing other participants in that OPEQ and non

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>opic dealer willing and eager to continue it. What does

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>that mean for the economy going forward? Well, ultimately, the

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>downside risk if you will, to lower oil prices, UH

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>is something that domestic producers are going to be willing

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to increase their capital expenditures or at least maintain it.

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it sort of seen it in Rigg growth

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>here over the past few months. But ultimately it's sort

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of been a seesaw, you know, when when one when

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>one party producing party has cut the other sort of

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>increase slightly or vice versa. And I think, what we

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>what what the goal is to try to achieve a

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 1>healthy balance centered around fifty dollars, maybe it depths slightly below,

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately create that stability and that and that's ultimately

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>what all producers want so that they can forecast and

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>maintain profit margins without being whip sled in terms of

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>putting out lays that may ultimately prove to be at

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>least in the near term, unprofitable. I want to go

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>back to that distinction you were drawing between data dependence

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and conditions dependence. Is this something that we see the

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>FED embracing talking about. Help me understand just the difference

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more well, Yes, And and ultimately you

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 1>can look at even you know, the speeches from you

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>know Cleveland President Meister and and and others, you know,

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>from even the most dubbish to the to the most hawkish.

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Everybody points to, here's the situation, but if this happens,

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>then we may not be moving. Everybody wants to normalize

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet. Everybody wants that normalization process to continue,

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>but if that you know, does if a certain situation

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>at all, then they might have to react. So that

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>conditions dependency is critical to the markets, and we can

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we know, generally speaking the data it's sort of firm.

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>We sort of no idea sure. Q one GDPs was

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit disappointing, but jobs data, even even even wage

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>pressures are are relatively stable, although inflation, immittedly from the

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>headline perspective is a bit disappointing. Those are things that

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.559
<v Speaker 1>they can quote look through and we're all well aware

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of that. But this conditions is the factor that toggles

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the decision making process of the Fed. This June, within

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the debate, drump sider of PIMCO with us within the

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>debated PIMCO about how the American economy will prosper. We

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>can all agree their gains occurring right now, but once again,

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>are the gains going to the few versus being spread

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>across a wider part of the American populace. Well that

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that has to be Ultimately, there's gonna be a few

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>policy implications in this, and you can look at it

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and from retrospect, and clearly, you know, since the financial crisis,

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it's been skewed one way. But I think ultimately we've

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>looked tom about what the policy is looking forward. You know,

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>we have a period of time here where animal spirits

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>have been relatively constructive. Therefore, you know, they've basically been

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>fermenting over periods of time, and we see that in

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>both the corporate world and also in the retail the

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>individual investor world. But as we move forward, we have

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to really look and see if there's risks on the horizon.

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, we were very concerned about at the beginning

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Trump presidency about things like protectionism and trans

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to deglobalization. But it's quite possible those don't materialize to

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the severe point that people had expected, and so those

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>are positive implications ultimately that that sort of tilt to

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the positive site. I'm not being I'm not being pollyannish here,

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not being overly optimistic. It's not allowed, of course,

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>not if you've been to any one of our investment

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>committee meetings. You know, we we we all, we all

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have to put our real hats on and sometimes our

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>hard hats. But at the same time, this is something

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be the tradeoff. If animal spirits

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>are going to continue, how does it off? And policy

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>implications of one of the key factors in the next

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>six months to drive that. Final thoughts with Jerome Schneider

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of PIMCO this morning, are are we just clipping coupons?

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Is is the gold chrome? Given all the noise that's

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>out there in your statement of a higher rate environment,

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is a goal just to make the coupon and defend

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the goals preserve capital, the goals to preserve capital with

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the notion that inflation is gently increasing, so purchasing power

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and preserving and purchasing power is the essential element of

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>proper investing these days, specifically with those bent for fixed

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>income allocations. And I think once you moved to a

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>higher rate paradigm, which we're clearly moving and edging towards

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that over the next one to maybe even three years,

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, it becomes ever more apparent that that becomes attractive.

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So maintaining optionality to defend against higher rates by having

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>limited exposure to effectively two interest rates at the same time.

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Ability to embrace those higher interest rates predominantly through items

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>such as hedging and even as simple as owding floating

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>rate floating rate notes is essential. One thing just to

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>highlight tom here is you know, we see libelar and

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of the money market instruments, although it's clearly not

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a harbinger of doom or stress in the marketplace, but

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>one month libelar crossed one percent for the first time

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>since December of two thousand eight. Last week, and so

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a noteworthy that we are finally seeing some tip

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of the hat at least to a normalization happening in

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>front end markets as we moved to to the FED.

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>That is, obviously, as I mentioned previously, more conditions dependent.

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Jerome Pimco had this big confab a couple of weeks back,

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the secular form uh Newt Gingrich was there, Larry Summers

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>was there, the whole lot. What did you take away

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>from that about where things are headed in Washington, How

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that's going to devetail with the work that you do. Yeah, well,

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, once every year we'd like to bring in

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>bringing folks on the outside to help help show shut

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>some light on the corners of the realm, corners of

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the universe that we normally don't see. And as you mentioned,

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and we did have our normal normal lineup of you, uh, Bernankey,

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Entriche and Gordon Brown. But at the same time, we're

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>really focused on how the world will evolve, looking at

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>ultimately at animal spirits with that and how they'll effectively

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>move move the economy going forward, both domestically and globally.

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Implications of things we obviously are well aware of populism,

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>political populism, uh ebbing and flowing, you know, obviously France

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and the election outcome there was very was very it

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>was very pointing in that and then ultimately, you know,

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>figuring out where we stand in the world. We're at

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a point where clearly we've been utilizing monetary policy in

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>excess for the past seven eight nine years and is

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that remain or or how do we evolve out of

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that situation? And those aren't uh, those aren't concurrent clearly

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>as the Fed debates one side of it and other another. Uh,

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy committees are debating the other side. But ultimately

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that quote endgame will be very important so we debated

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that as well. So those ideas will be forthcoming, and

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>we encourage everybody to look at the PIMCO website for

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>them to be published in the forthcoming days. There was

0:10:55.840 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 1>a shameless plug I teed that up. But we get

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a budget tomorrow, We're headed toward a government shutdown in

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>September if we don't have a spending figured out by that.

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>How worried are you about all of that? Yeah? Ultimately

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>am I worried right this second? No, But this is

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a sort of festering in the background, and ultimately, you know,

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you cannot overlook the debt ceiling implications later on this year.

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>So when we come back later on this summer, you know,

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>while we might view it as a quiet summer, uh,

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is going to be at the forefront

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of the implications for us to pay attention to Truro.

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Rup Schneider. I'm more than patient

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>with the global news flow this morning. He is with Pimcom,

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>impatiently waiting in Boston with the Red Sox one game

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>above five, losing three straight grow to the Oakland A's.

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>He's up there to assist John Ferrell, David Gurral yes, Tom,

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>thanks a much here with her and timber Of the

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>director of Global Macro Fideli Investment. He was given me

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the lay of the land here, beautiful bureau. You are

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Studios, high up overlooking a lot of the city.

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>You're great to have you with us. And let's start

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>with with oil. We heard Karen Mosko a few moments

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>go talking about the potential for an exten extension of

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that opaque and non OPEC production freeze agreement. Gives your

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>sense of your optimism for that and sort of what

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that means for for markets going forward. Yes, well, a

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>very good morning to you. You know, I'm pretty bullish

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>on oil. I think eventually we're going to go higher.

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>The oil complex will be trading indeficit, which will be

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a big change from where it has been. And most

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>people probably agree with that. It's just a matter of

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>timing and how long does it take to work off

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>all of that excess inventory. So certainly the news out

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of OPEC is helpful if you're if you're bullish, and

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the communicators I tend to look

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 1>at is a CRB ROW industrial CRB. You know R

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I N D on your Bloomberg again, that's been in

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty sustained up trend, and I think it's a

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>better measure than for instance, coppera iron or which have

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>been under pressure lately as well as oil. So um,

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I think commodities are in a good place here to

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>continue to rally. Is in a good place You look

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>at the the U S economy overall, what's your sensitive

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>what's what's still lacking? We're lagging when you look at

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it now. So there's so much noise and headlines and

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, tweeting and this and that, and um, I

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people tend to attribute everything that's

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>happening to the latest headlines, and the way I see

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it sort of sort of the force through the trees,

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>if you will. There are really two major issues that

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we have to get right. One is China. You know,

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>China just pumped a lot of credit into the system

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to reflate yet again. Uh, there are credit impulse, which

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>actually is an indicator that you guys developed on Bloomberg

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is running at airt of GDP rate. But the year

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>over your change has gone from plus ten to now

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>minus one, so that credit impulse has come and gone.

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 1>So one question is what is the aftermath that I'm

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>going to look like? My sentence at the global reflation

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>is still intact. And I have liked non US equities

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>all year and I continue to do. And the other

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>one is what kind of late cycle in the US

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>are we actually heading in? And this is where the

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stuff comes in, because the wrong fiscal kind of

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>stimulus that foot pushes the demand side could actually shorten

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the cycle, which is kind of ironic because they could

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>push the FED into overdrive and therefore earth the cave

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and then lead us into a recession. But less actually

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>could be more in that sense, you're in timor with

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>us with fidelity. Out of Babs in colleges, you know

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you're in. There is no bad house in the neighborhood

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>around Babs in college. It's in a pretty fancy climb

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of Boston, Massachusetts. I like in your note you provide

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>clarity by saying the US is the best house in

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the neighborhood, but there are other places to buy right now.

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Why the shift, because we are in a global reflation

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>from since about five quarters ago, so from twenty from

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the US was the best house in the neighborhood, but

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>now it's actually only one of a number of good houses.

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is why non US equities, whether it's developed

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>or emerging markets, have actually done very well. They're actually

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>up more since the election in the US market, which

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>very few people would have would have predicted six months ago.

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So I do think this is a global story. China

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>is very much behind it, and as long as China

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>can sort of keep it it's it's stuff together, I

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>think global equities will continue to not only go up,

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>but actually I'll perform the US. Do you see cash

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>flows sustained? I mean one of the big surprises here

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>has been UH the rise in UH earnings and revenues.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean they were pretty good, weren't they. Yes. Q

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>one earnings for the SMP are of four year over

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>year UM, and that's in that that force. Those are

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>easy comps, of course, because the Q one of last

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>year was the bottom of the cycle when earnings were

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>falling at seven. But it's a global story. Earnings are

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>inflecting higher everywhere, and you have a pretty significant p

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>discount you know in e M at twelve, which of

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>course is is justified. You just have to look at

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Brazil last week to know why. But even non US

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>um equities are training at a fourteen multiple, whereas the

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>US is at an eighteen multiple on a forward earning spaces.

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>So the earning story is good if if you look

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>at the county year numbers for seventeen and you adjust

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>for the normal downward drift that happens to estimates, earning

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>should be up eight percent over sixteen, and in twenty eighteen,

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>which of course is still miles away, would be up

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>six percent on on that math, And those numbers don't

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>really reflect any potential boost from either tax cuts and

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>or deregulations. So UM, I don't think it's fair to

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>say that on the earnings estimate side people have um

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>unusually optimistic expectations. If there if there's a premium built in,

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it's on the valuation side, which I do think can

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>be an issue going forward. There was for such a

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>time for many months now political risk driving so much

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>has that dissipated. Now are you returning now to to

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a sense that monetary policy, central banking is back in

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the driver's seat once again? It's political risk off the

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>table to agree that it was with France with the

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>French election now over with Yes, I've been very bullish

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>on on Europe, sort of expecting that to be the

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>sleeper hit of teen. And you know, but people were

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>very focused on election risk, certainly after Bregson and after

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the U S election and when that didn't materialize, and

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>actually the Dutch election a few months earlier was already

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a hint that that populism might actually be contained in Europe.

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>And I suspect that that seems to be that that

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>is the case. So but there is political risk always,

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, but when we're seeing on the trade front,

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>which is really where the international risk is, so far,

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>things have been pretty benign. You know, We've had summits

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and meetings with international leaders and uh, it's been kind

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 1>of dovish on the trade side and on the fiscal side. Domestically,

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we're we're still waiting and there doesn't seem to be

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of momentum. So it's steady as she goes

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, Very good room. You're into timor with this

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with fidelity in Jerusalem at the Presidential Residents with the

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>garden is assembled, the US delegation with President Trump, and

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 1>this includes comments by Reuben Rivlin, the President of Israel,

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>not the Prime Minister. Mr you know, the president and

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of course with Mr Trump, it is UH to podium

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>with the U. S. Flag on the left, the Israeli

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>flag on the right, UH, and the President's flag I

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>believe in the center of the national flag. I should

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>state as well, it is a spectacular backdrop at the

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>presidential residence. And of course this creates great residents within Israel,

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>really pretty much in the heart of Jerusalem. So the

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>President President Rivlin uh speaking right now. I think we'll

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>wait on that and wait for Mr Trump to begin

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>his comments. Uh. Here in a moment, David Gura, all

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of Washington is watching his trip, but busy on an

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>airplane returning as Mr pre Mr Bannon. Do we know

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>David this morning wide Prebous and Bannon are returning to Washington.

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that we have a great sense of that.

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>The White House is saying that that was in the

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>plans all along. Secretary of Commerce S. Woolber Ross also

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>heading back to to Washington as well. Marty Shank and

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I were talking a little earlier about the complement of

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 1>staff the President brought with him to Saudi Arabia. Of course,

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>through a number of big business deals that were announced there.

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>The President cave that speech to regional leaders on Sunday afternoon.

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So the White House maintaining here this was in the

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>cards all along for those two men to have back.

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>But you're right in pointing out the drama that exists

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in Washington continues to exist and persist. Uh. There will

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>be the reports here that there could be hearing with

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>James Coby this week on on Capitol Hill, the former

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>FBI director. So that story, which the White House had

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>desperately wanted to leave behind, is certainly continuing in Washington,

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>d C. This week. Now, the symbolism from Saudi Arabia

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to Israel and then on to the Roman the Vatican

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>on an extended trip. I will point out that the President,

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>just as a casual observer from a distance like all

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>of us, looks a lot more rested today than he

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>did when he gave his speech to David in Saudia.

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.959
<v Speaker 1>There's no question that he looked exhausted here twelve and

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours, a nine day trip with two summits.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Marty Shanko commenting earlier as well, you know, foreign travel

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>is difficult, as is the first foreign trip that the

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>president has taken, the first official trip that he's taken overseas.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>It has jam packed, involves a lot of geographical breath

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>as you're as you're mentioning, and just it's a lot

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to get one's head around. Anyone who's traveled with the

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>government official at that kind of rank knows that everything

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is tightly scheduled. You're in a bubble um. Everything, every

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>minute is taken kind of like when you go to Davos,

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>tom every minute is pre scheduled in. But I I

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>will take issue and that I once to the trip

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>where it was every day day here, day yere day there.

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>The moving city to city is a whole another level exhaustion,

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Asia, Europe and North America. As a presence

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>doing and of course many of our listeners, particularly C

0:20:54.960 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>class officers are doing as well. Yeah, thank you very

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>much and shalom. I'm honored to be in the great

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>State of Israel, the homeland of the Jewish people. I

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>am awed by the beauty and majesty of this sacred

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and very holy land. President Rivlin, Mrs Rivlin, thank you

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>so much, thank you, thank you for opening your wonderful

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>home and welcoming Milani and myself to your amazing country,

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's what it is. It is an amazing country.

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>What you've done is perhaps has virtually never been done before.

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>When my first trip overseas, I've come to this ancient

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>land to reaffirm the during friendship between the United States

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and the State of Israel. And it will always be enduring.

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's number one to me. We're not only longtime friends,

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>we are great allies and partners. We stand together always.

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>This moment in history calls for us to strengthen our

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>cooperation as both Israel and America face common threats from

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>ISIS and other terrorist groups. Two countries like Iran that

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>sponsor terrorism and fund and foment terrible violence not only

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>here but all over the world. Together, we can work

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to end the scourge of violence that has taken so

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>many lives here in Israel and around the world. Most importantly,

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States and Israel can declare with one voice,

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 1>the Iran must never be allowed to possess a nuclear weapon,

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>never ever, and must seize it's deadly funding training and

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>equipping of terrorists and malicious and a must cease immediately

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>on those issues. There is a strong consensus among the

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>nations of the world, including many in the Muslim world.

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>I was deeply encouraged by my conversations with Muslim world

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>leaders in Saudi Arabia, including King Solomon, who I spoke

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to at great length. King Salmon feels very strongly and

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you would love to see peace between

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Israel and the Palestinians. Many expressed their resolve to help

0:23:54.720 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>and terrorism and the spread of Radicalizai. Many Muslim nations

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>have already taken steps to begin following through on this commitment.

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>There is a growing realization among your Arab neighbors that

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>they have common cause with you and the threat posed

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>by Iran, and it is indeed a threat, there is

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>no question about that. I thank both you and Prime

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Minister net for your commitment to achieving peace between the

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Israelis and the Palestinians. I also look forward to discussing

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the peace process with Palestinian President a Bus. Young Israeli

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>and Palestinian children deserve to grow up in safety and

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to follow their dreams free from the violence that has

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>destroyed so many lives. The United States and Israel can

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>also bring safety and greater presberry to our people through

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>stronger ties of trade and commerce. Already our two countries

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>do a great deal of business together. We have a

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>strong foundation on which to build an even closer trading

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>relationship that benefits both of our countries. I'm gonna try

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>and narrow that trade deficit just a little bit. Is

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that okay? Unless he doesn't mind. He wants to keep

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it the weather. As I understand today, we have so

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>many incredible opportunities before us, and my hope for this

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>visit is that we seize every single one of them.

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I am thrilled to be here on behalf of the

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>American people. I know Israel and America share the same goals,

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and I have great confidence that we can achieve tremendous

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>success together. We can achieve all of our goals together.

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>President Rivlin, I look forward to working with you and

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>just seeing more of the sacred land and getting to

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 1>spend time with the remarkable people of Israel. Thank you

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>very much. Thank you the President United States, shaking hands

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>with the President of Israel, Mr Rivlin. This at the

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Presidential Residence in the heart of Jerusalem, in the rows

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>and chairs, the first Lady in the front row listening

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>to the comments, with a beautiful backdrop of flags and

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>artwork in Jerusalem. President uh looks more spirited than he

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>looked in Riad. To be honest, it looks like he's

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>had a little bit of rest, which you can do

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>on air force one miles roughly from Riad to Tel

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Aviv and then thirty six miles by helicopter from Tel

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Aviv to Jerusalem to the UH southeast as well. The

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>President just now making comments with Mr Rivlin, is some

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>people gather, not too many in the first lady we

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>see as well. I saw Secretary Tillerson as well in

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the front row out for what appears to be photo

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunities with flags right down a sun drenched patio in Jerusale.

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm enough of the travel UH lawd Greg Delier just

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>out with his note. We had the courtesy of speaking

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.719
<v Speaker 1>with him earlier this morning. He says, an epic battle

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>over fiscal policy begins this week. Urian Timor is with Fidelity. Urian,

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.959
<v Speaker 1>how do you link fiscal policy and the raging battle

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to come on it into investment? How does that work? Well?

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>When you look at all the things that are unfolding

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in the markets of the dollar, nominal yields, real rates, tips,

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>break evens, financial conditions, commodities of the relative performance of

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the Russell versus the SMP. They're all manifestations of the

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>same theme, and that theme is what kind of late

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>cycle will the USC So we've been in this prolonged

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:04.360
<v Speaker 1>midside expansion of the Goldilocks period really from two thousand

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and ten until now, and we're still in it, and

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect to transition into late cycle, you know, tomorrow,

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>but it is usually the next phase in the business cycle.

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>You go early, mid, laid down, and the late cycle

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>is when things get kind of messy, because no late

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 1>cycle is is the same. And so where the fiscal

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>question comes in, um A, when is it going to happen?

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.199
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to happen? How much? What kind right?

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>If it pushes up the demand side with an economy

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>at full employment eight years into an expansion, the risk

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is that the FED has to offset that and therefore

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>not only lower the fiscal multiplier of that stimulus, but

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>also raise rates and you know, get us closer to

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the risk of an inverted yield curve down the road,

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, you know the relationship between inverted

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>curves and recessions. So that's one potential playbook the other

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>one is that the fiscal either is less than we

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>think or it's more supply side oriented, because we need

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>productivity to go up in order for the economy speed

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>limit to go up. And if that happens, the FED

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to offset it as much, and we may

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>have a more benign environment, more benign late cycle environment

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>where the curve is not overred. So this, I think

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is the big question other than China and it's stimulus.

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>This is really the big question. And that's why whenever

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we see headlines going to or fro in terms of

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>when we get how much fiscal all of these market

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>components move in unison because it's all one trade. Basically

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you're in termor where this fidelity And we will continue

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the President of the First Lady Walking where the President

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and Mrs Rivlin within the Presidential Residents, they visited the garden.

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>They take immense pride in Israel with the Presidential Garden

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>at the Residents. It was completely restored in two thousand

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>nine to represent the flora of the land of Israel.

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Looks now like a red carpet in flags assembled as

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a president moves on to the next moment. Believe I

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>see a car in the distance, Urine. When I look

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>at investment right now, do you know where the risk

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>free return is? It's so important to your managers, your

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>portfolio managers in the great distortion? Do I know where

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the risk free rate is? Yes? And this is no,

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't act well, we can guess right because we're

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>supposed to say, Peter Lynch knows, but no one else does.

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Where is it? So when you when you look at

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>valuation right, valuation is driven by the numerator in the

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>discount of cashlow model, which is earnings growth, and then

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the denominator which is the discount rage which rate, which

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is the sum of the risk free rate and the

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>equity risk premium. And right now, one of the issues

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that I have in the market is that not only

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is the equity risk freamum very low because it basically

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>collapsed after the election. The risk preum is about two

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>point three percent, which is almost half of what it

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>historically has been. But also the rest free rate, as

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you just indicated, is depressed because we had multiple years

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of financial repression. And you know ZURP and QWI and

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>where does the ten year yield belong? Because that is

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the risk free rate, and once we know that, then

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>we can sort of figure out what the valuation is

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of of all these other asset classes. But because the

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>risk free rate is artificially depressed, all asset classes become

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, more highly valued as a result, you know,

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>from bonds to cash, to equities to credit, and so

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>we can we can make some analyses on where the

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>term premium is and should be if the FED was

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>completely in a normalized environment where GDP growth was historically

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>at trent, which of course it isn't. You know, real

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>GDP growth over the last ten year ten years is

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>at one point three percent. It's very very low. Um So,

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>but if if growth returned to something normal three four

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>percent real or five six percent nominal, you could argue

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that the ten years should be you know, four percent

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>or four and a half percent. But but we're not there. Uran,

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, and particularly for the back and

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>forth through the President in Jerusalem, Mr timur Is with

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Fidelity in Boston. Runch you by Bank of America, Mary

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Lynch with virtual reality, virtually everything will change. Discover opportunities

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in a transforming world, be of a mL dot com,

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>slash VR. Mary Lynch pierced Fenner and Smith Incorporated. There's

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>something new from Bloomberg. It's called Lens. Starting right now,

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you can use the Bloomberg iOS app off your iPhone

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>or iPad, or our new Google Chrome extension to read

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>any news story on any website, scan it, and then

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>instantly see the news stories relevant market data from Bloomberg.

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>In addition, see all the bios of the key people

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the story. It's called Lens, and it is

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>just that, a lens into the people and the data

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of any story you may be reading. Again. Lens brings

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you the power of Bloomberg's news and data. Download or

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>io s app or search for the Bloomberg extension at

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the Chrome Store to try lens out. Learn more at

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>bloomberg dot com slash lens. Michael McKee a studio with

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>us right now. Mr Guras on assignment in Boston. Good morning, Michael,

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Good morning. It's nice to be back in Richard Truman

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Is is produced. It's like the old day. It's like nostalgia.

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>They put back together. It's final tap. This show goes

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to eleven. It may go to eleven. Uh, We're gonna

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>get to Bruce Barlett here in a moment. I just

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>want to continue with the day's events. In Jerusalem. We're

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing images now on our feed of the Church of

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the Holy sepul Curve back to the fourth century. Mr

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump and the First Lady schedule to visit, as well

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>as the Western Wall. No activity there's yet, but we'll

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>bring you a dialogue of that as we see uh

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it on our images here right now. A dialogue is

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.959
<v Speaker 1>necessary on the future of the Republican Party. I turned

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to our care and Buchanan a week ago and I said,

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to one person only, the guy

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that helped Jack Kemp, Bruce Bartlett a few years ago

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>out of Georgetown, assisted Mr Kemp in moving tax reform forward. Bruce,

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>take us back to that moment. How impossible was it

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to do tax reform then? In his same impossibility now? Well,

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:41.439
<v Speaker 1>for one thing, a lot of people knew a lot

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>more about the idea of tax reform because we've been

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about it since the late nineteen sixties. We had

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a big tax reform bill in nineteen sixty nine and

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>another one in nineteen seventy six. So in the nineteen

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>eighties when Kemp started talking about doing another tax reform,

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the ground was pretty well plowed. People had an understanding

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:07.439
<v Speaker 1>about the problem of tax loopholes and how they could

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>be UH harmful to the economy by causing investment to

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:17.919
<v Speaker 1>be misallocated and things of that sort. And UH and

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>he started working on a tax reform plan with Senator

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Bob Caston of Wisconsin, and simultaneously Senator Bill Bradley of

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey and Congressman Dick Gephardt we're working on something similar.

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>And they were both Democrats. Kemping uh casting we're both Republicans.

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 1>And when they finally came up with their legislation and

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 1>put them, people put him side by side. They discovered

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of overlap, and I think that

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>was the real impetus that got things going, the the

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>idea that this was potentially a win win bipartisan deal.

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Since course Congress has meddled in the tax code, you

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:06.839
<v Speaker 1>won't get any argument I don't think from any economists

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that the tax code exemptions and UH and loophole's distroyt

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:17.800
<v Speaker 1>economic activity. So what's the difference between two thousand seventeen

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>and the early eighties when this was just dating in

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of why we need to do taxes? Why why

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:29.359
<v Speaker 1>are people in so much disagreement about tax cuts now

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 1>compared to them. Well, the problem is that the Tax

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Reform Act of eighties six was essentially a deal whereby

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>taxes were raised on corporations and that revenue was used

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>to reduce tax rates on individuals. That's a political deal

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that that worked. The problem today is almost everybody in

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the tax field thinks that the most important thing we

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:00.959
<v Speaker 1>need to do is lower the corporate at tax rate.

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But there aren't enough corporate tax loopholes to pay for

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>more than a small reduction in rates, which means that

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in principle, you'd have to raise taxes on individuals to

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>pay for a corporate tax cut, assuming it was done revenue.

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Neutrals want to come back on the Republican Party, but

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 1>just one more tax question, if we could, do you

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>have any optimism we can see, Speaker Ryan Ronald Reagan,

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>tax reform not really. I think we're still at too

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>earliest stage of discussion, and you're seeing to be to

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a fault line of a group of Republicans say screw reform,

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we just want another style, big tax cut. We don't

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 1>give a damn what happens to the deficit, and then

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you have another side which says, you know, we're concerned

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>about the deaths that we want to pay for this

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>tax reform. But more wortantly, there's a rule in the

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 1>Senate which says, if you pass legislation that reduces that

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>increases the deficit in over a ten year budget window, uh,

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it can't be made permanent. And and so this is

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:19.839
<v Speaker 1>a very powerful argument for doing something reform that would

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>be paid for that would be revenue neutral, because then

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it would be permanent and businesses could plan beyond that

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>ten year window. Bruce Bartlett is a Republican, and he

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>has been harshly critical of modern Republican theology. Bruce Bartlett

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 1>is the president a Republican. Well, of course he is.

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>He used a nominee of the Republican Party, which means

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>he is a Republican insofar as the Republican Party itself

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is concerned. Is he a conservative, I guess is the

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>real question. Well, he's certainly much more of a populist,

0:38:56.640 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, than a traditional conservative. On the other hand,

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 1>it's quite clear that he is pursuing an agenda that

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is very much in the mainstream of the conservative movement

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>as it exists today. Which may or may not have

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:20.719
<v Speaker 1>any connection whatsoever to historical conservatism or the conservatism of

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the Reagan era, which was was my era. Well, that's

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.720
<v Speaker 1>an interesting um point you make, because in your book

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand nine, UM, The New American Economy, the

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Failure of Reagonomics in a New Way Forward. Um, you

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 1>suggest supply side economics was appropriate for the nineteen seventies

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and eighties but doesn't do not work today. Um. Do

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you still feel that way, And if so, tell us

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 1>why given that that's being cited by many people around

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the administration for what they want to do. Well. I

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in cookie cutter economics, Okay. I think you

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the situation, you analyze new developed policies that

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>are appropriate for those circumstances. And I think there's a

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of people out there, such as my old friend

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Larry cut Low, who just say task cuts, task cuts,

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 1>task cuts. No matter what the situation is, you know,

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:17.959
<v Speaker 1>it's always time to cut taxes. And I think sometimes, uh,

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it isn't. And I think cutting taxes in the early

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>eighties was something that was clearly necessary. The fact that

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we had inflation, uh, was was strong evidence that the

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>supply side of the economy needed to be built up.

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think in the in the twenty one century,

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we've had mostly the opposite problem. We've had a very uhh.

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 1>We have not had inflation, We've had a borderline deflation.

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we're still suffering from a lack of aggregate demand.

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we need different policies for a different situation, Bruce.

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the present dynamics, in the present politics,

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's out there. I guess it's great luck. I've called

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it Trump luck as well. It's good luck, a good

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>thing right now. Or do you feel there's a huge

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>pressure by Republicans to actually find the compromise you've called

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>forward for decades. Uh, it's hard to see Republicans compromising

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:20.320
<v Speaker 1>even with themselves at this point on some key issues. Uh.

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Taxes is a key one. Uh. It looks as if

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the administration has adopted a let's just cut taxes and

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>forget about all this reform stuff. But the House of

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Representatives at least seems to be quite determined to do

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful tax reform bill. And H it's not entirely

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>clear where the House or the Senate is. And again,

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I think you've got differences among the Administration, the House,

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>and the Senate on health reform and a number of

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>other issues. So I think just getting Republicans on the

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>same page is going to be an enormous effort. Uh.

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Before we let you go, I have to go back

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to Texas for a second and ask a question. I've

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>been dying to find an expert who could tell me,

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 1>and you're probably exactly the person. The administration goes out,

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>we want to cut taxes. They put out a rough

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>idea of what they want to do, and everybody says,

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>tax cuts for the rich, tax cuts for the rich.

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And when you look at obviously the rich pay more

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in taxes, so dollar wise, they pay more. But why

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>can't somebody design a tax plan that gives the same

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>percentage gain to everybody. Well, for one thing, you've got

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a huge percentage of the population that pays no federal

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>income taxes at all. So you've got a problem with

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>how to in effect give them a tax cut when

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 1>they don't pay any And the answer has been over

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 1>the last several years, let's give them refundable tax credits. Uh.

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And so you you and once you do that, you

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>blurred the distinction between taxes and spending. You're sending checks

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to people who pay no taxes and saying we're going

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to give you a rebate on your taxes, and and

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and this has kind of opened the door to a

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:07.839
<v Speaker 1>spig at a spending that that many Republicans in fact

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>are concerned about. First, thank you so much for your time,

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and a busy newsday, Bruce Bartlett, UH of Virginia. And

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of course a Republican symbolism. And at the Church of

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the Holy Spolker right now in Jerusalem is remarkable the

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 1>President and Mrs Trump entering the church along with their

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:28.799
<v Speaker 1>daughter and Mr. Kushner as well, and a few of

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the American dignitaries. And they are surrounded Michael McKee by

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that imagery of Jerusalem, of the Greek Orthodox, the Armenian Orthodox,

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Catholic Church joining us now in Boston. Karen Mills.

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:59.839
<v Speaker 1>She is a former Small Business Administration Administrator three head

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of s p A now at the Harvard County School. Uh, Karen,

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 1>good morning. What did you learn in small it's a

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 1>small business administrator? What was the shock? If there's always

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a shock when you enter the bureaucracy, what you learn? Oh,

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Tom it's it's great to talk to you. I think

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the thing that UM I learned in that we really

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>learned in the recession in this country is how important

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 1>small businesses are to the economy, because half the people

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>who work in this country own to work for a

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>small business. So I used to say, I woke up

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 1>at night worrying about half of America's jobs. The issue

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is that small business doesn't really have a big voice

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in Washington because big businesses voice is much more at

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the table. So my job was to be allowed voice

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>at the table for small business. Karen, We're going to

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:55.239
<v Speaker 1>interrupt right now and go to a big business. Eight

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:59.760
<v Speaker 1>miles west of Detroit is Dearborn, Michigan. Here is Bill Ford.

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:03.879
<v Speaker 1>And he did that and of course they still made

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 1>furniture throughout the whole and they still make furniture. But

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 1>in doing so, he grew the company, took them to

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 1>first in the in the industry UM worldwide. Uh. And

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the culture was one of optimism and a feeling that

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 1>they could get things done easily because they had a

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:26.839
<v Speaker 1>very clear view of the future. Then Jim went to

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the University of Michigan, and you can say, well, is

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that relevant to Wentford has got going, I would say yeah,

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and a couple of respects. Look at what again? What

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 1>he did? He walked into an athletic First of all,

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it shows his loyalty because having played football for boun

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Bechler UM, he loved the University of Michigan and when

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:51.360
<v Speaker 1>they asked him could he come fix the athletic department,

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Jim said sure, you know I'd be happy to Um.

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, walking into a very difficult and very public situation.

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So what did he do there? Um? He first got

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the students back because they were feeling alienated. Then he

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 1>got the all the volunteers that are the heart of

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:11.879
<v Speaker 1>any program like that they were feeling alienated. He got

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 1>them back. Um, he negotiated UH and brought home the

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Nike deal, which was groundbreaking for any university. UM. He

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:30.960
<v Speaker 1>then hired Jim Harbaugh UM and UH, and then he

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>helped select his successor and then left the athletic department

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 1>in much better shape than he found it. So you say, well,

0:46:39.800 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>what does that have to do with Ford? Well, nothing

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>directly except I think it shows that Jim can be

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>successful and operate in multi environments m a corporate manufacturing

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:55.319
<v Speaker 1>environment and steelcase where he reimagined it and delivered a

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:59.800
<v Speaker 1>very uh not only solid set of results, but delivered

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a very convincing future. By the way, he also got

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:05.280
<v Speaker 1>them through oh eight oh nine, which in the furniture

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 1>business was tougher even than the auto business. UM. So

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it shows his operating acumen as well as his visionary thinking. Um.

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:17.759
<v Speaker 1>And then you know he's been a part of our

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>board for he was for three years. And then I

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 1>asked him, I said, hey, you know we need to

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 1>um build a new business and you know, could you

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>help us do that or frankly, would you go do

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that for us? And so again very selflessly. And you

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:37.560
<v Speaker 1>see that there's a pattern here. He left our board,

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 1>joined our management team when again when he didn't have

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to do that and life had more probably appealing options.

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 1>But and he's in a year he's done an amazing

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:53.479
<v Speaker 1>job at Ford Smoth. Little technical difficulty there with Bill

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Ford and his discussion really something won a story of course. Uh.

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 1>He was born like other's uh, with every advantage and

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty much ignored. And then out of Hotchkiss

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Princeton and m I T has dazzled people with his

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:12.719
<v Speaker 1>ability to avoid bankruptcy a number of years ago, and

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of course with the ascendency and management of Mr Malally

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and then challenges as we hear from the board with

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Mr Fields and they go on to new management. This

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:25.280
<v Speaker 1>morning he mentioned in the University of Michigan UH linkage

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 1>there we continue with Ms Mills, Karen Mills, the former

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:33.440
<v Speaker 1>SPA administrator UH joining us UH this morning. Karen I,

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I look at all of this, and you know, whether

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it's Bill Ford in big business or Karen Mills and

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 1>small business, at the end of the day, it's all

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>about people, isn't it. How did you manage the expectations

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of you need people to make the sp A go.

0:48:46.880 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 1>How did you do that? Well, you know with Bill Ford,

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this is actually really important for a small business too

0:48:54.760 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 1>because UM, as you see there, you know they're making

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 1>a change there. So you're right, people are everything. But

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the number of suppliers for it

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 1>has they have to get it right or we're in

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:08.880
<v Speaker 1>real trouble. And small business land, particularly in the Midwest.

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 1>One of the great things UM I did was travel

0:49:13.760 --> 0:49:17.960
<v Speaker 1>all around the country and talk to small business suppliers

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and what you really need in Washington if somebody who's

0:49:21.800 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>got the sensibility of the small business owner and can

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>help Congress figure out how to make a bill that

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:32.319
<v Speaker 1>actually works for small business. It's not about the big

0:49:32.360 --> 0:49:36.160
<v Speaker 1>top headline. It's about the nuts and bolts and how

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 1>much you know, pain and suffering the small business owner

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 1>has to go through. There's a question what would help

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the small business owner? And I asked that because everybody

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:47.640
<v Speaker 1>says cut their taxes, cut their taxes. When you when

0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you look at the list of things that small business

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 1>owners tell, uh, you know the polsters on a regular basis,

0:49:56.080 --> 0:50:00.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not at the top of the list. Well, I

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:03.360
<v Speaker 1>actually have a list, but I have a plan for

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:06.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of getting it through Congress. So while the President

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is out traveling in um around the world, I think

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:16.360
<v Speaker 1>his economic team should get together and go to Congress

0:50:16.560 --> 0:50:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and work with both parties in Congress and do a

0:50:20.640 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 1>small business bill. And maybe we would call it the

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Small Business Growth Act of and we could stuff it

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:33.319
<v Speaker 1>with all these things that small businesses like. Um, you know,

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:36.960
<v Speaker 1>start with a few tax credits, because that's the best

0:50:37.000 --> 0:50:40.120
<v Speaker 1>thing for small business. Rather than wait for a big

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 1>tax bill, small businesses really getting anxious. I think waiting

0:50:45.320 --> 0:50:49.759
<v Speaker 1>for tax legislation. So let's do some taxes, let's do

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 1>some regulatory simplification, and make sure there's taccess to capital

0:50:55.600 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 1>things that people agree on already. One of the things

0:50:58.160 --> 0:51:00.239
<v Speaker 1>that Michael McKee and I agree on, Karen, and we

0:51:00.239 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 1>can ask you this because you're living it, is the

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 1>value of a liberal arts education. Bill Ford has a

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 1>history degree out of a small school in New Jersey.

0:51:08.800 --> 0:51:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe you did the right thing and took a

0:51:10.680 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 1>ten at Harvard a few years ago, and you're you

0:51:14.280 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 1>very much know the efforts of Bowden College. How important

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is liberal arts to small business and any business education today. Well,

0:51:24.520 --> 0:51:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big believer in liberal arts education. You know,

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:30.719
<v Speaker 1>it really helps you figure out how to think. And

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 1>as you said, at Bowden and at Harvard and really

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>around the community, you want somebody who can have a

0:51:37.320 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 1>sense of, you know, what is what is the way

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:44.879
<v Speaker 1>the path forward? And that's not just figuring out how

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to do the numbers. That's about making judgments and studying

0:51:48.760 --> 0:51:53.360
<v Speaker 1>history and thinking about how other people have coped um

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>with difficult situations. And when you look at Boden College,

0:51:57.760 --> 0:51:59.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one of the reasons why they have

0:51:59.840 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>its proportionate number of leaders Joshua Chamberlain, George Mitchell for

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a very small college in Maine. It's set up how

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you think about living a principal of life and making decisions.

0:52:12.520 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Plus you have to survive the black Frau flies every spring.

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Karen Mills thanks. Yeah, the winder goes some October to

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the third week of June. Karen Mills, thank you so much,

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciate it. Uh the former administrator for the Small

0:52:29.160 --> 0:52:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Business Administration, Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:52:42.840 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:52.440
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene.

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:56.920
<v Speaker 1>David Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast, you

0:52:56.920 --> 0:53:11.320
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg. Ray. You brought

0:53:11.400 --> 0:53:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you by Bank of America Mery Lynch. With virtual reality,

0:53:15.160 --> 0:53:20.600
<v Speaker 1>virtually everything will change. Discover opportunities in a transforming world.

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Be of a mL dot Com, slash VR, Mary Lynch,

0:53:25.360 --> 0:53:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Pierced Fenner and Smith Incorporated,