WEBVTT - Full Episode - A Daring Rescue Can’t Distract From Disastrous Iran War + Trump’s Profanity Laced Easter Morning Message 

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>by Ethos and what Ethos does is it helps you

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>find life insurance. Let me tell you why life insurance

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>bailed me out. My father died when I was sixteen.

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have a lot of money when it happened,

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and we were in a pretty tough financial spot after

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it happened. I'm an only child. Suddenly my mother's single,

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>single mother. She had a job, suddenly lost a job,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>looking for another job, and we were struggling. You know,

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>my dad didn't leave us in the best financial situation,

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but he did make one purchase. He bought a life

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>insurance policy. Wasn't a huge chunk of change, but it

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>was enough when we found it. And when I say

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>we found it, meaning we went through his desk and

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we found, oh, look at this, let's see if there's

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>anything here. And it helped us out at a time

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that we really needed it. And that's why I think

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.319
<v Speaker 1>it's important that if you can, especially if you have

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>young children, if you can get life insurance, you should

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>get it. Life is full of unexpected emergencies, unexpected things happen.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It is an extra bit of security, something you can

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>leave and help out at a time when you're not

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not there to help. So what does Ethos do well?

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Ethos makes getting life insurance fast and easy, and it's

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent online. You can get a quote in seconds,

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you can apply in minutes, and you can get same

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>day coverage. They will find you the right fit. There's

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>no medical exam. You just answer a few simple health

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>questions online. You can get up to three million dollars

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in coverage and some policies are as low as thirty

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month, and you'll get your lowest rate from

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>their network of trusted carriers. So take ten minutes to

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>get covered today with life insurance through Ethos. Get your

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>free quote at ethos dot com slash chuck That is

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>e t hos dot com slash chuck. Application times may

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>vary and rates may vary. Hello, They're happy Monday. Happy

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Easter Monday for those of you'd celebrate. It is Easter

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>egg roll Day here in Washington. Normally in a tremendous event,

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>with half the White House destroyed right with the East wing,

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a construction zone. I am a little curious how

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it goes today, whether they ended up limiting tickets. They

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't say, but it will be something that I am

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>curious about a little bit for you know, never mind

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>who's in the White House. The tradition itself is something

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that many particularly locally. There's many people who love to

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>go every year, who find a way to go every year.

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I'm sorry that politics gets from the way of

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>some fun traditions that people have, but there's no doubt

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>politics is going to get in the way of that.

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So that is what it is. I want to give

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 1>you a few things that I'm doing this week. Yes

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it's called promotion, before we get to the meet and

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the heart of what I've got today, because boy do

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot today on the Iran War and

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>where things are headed in a variety of methods here.

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>But before we get to that. Number one, you know

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>about my new sports history podcast. With my partner Jaaatdande,

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>both formerly a ESPN and The La Times, we launched

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a new sports history podcast called Dynastic where we look

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>at the dynasties some of the all time sports dynasties,

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>both in pro and college. Our first deep dive is

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Dodgers. It is up now. Yes, we

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>have snuck it into my audio feed. But you can

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>subscribe directly wherever you get your podcasts or on YouTube

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Dynastic d y n A SDIC. Just look

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>up Dynastic, follow us on Dynastic on socials. Because I'm

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>trying very hard, I am going to try to create

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a bright line. You will not see political commentary on

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the dynastics stuff, which you might see some sports commentary

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on this feed, but that's neither here nor there. But

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>we also so once a month we do a deep

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>dive and then at the two week mark of the month,

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we do a deep dive interview with some iconic member

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of that franchise. Well, the iconic member of the franchise

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Dodgers, Jimi Hereen. Jimy Herene is the Hall

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of Fame Spanish language broadcaster of the La Dodgers. He

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>basically was the Dodgers decided to have a Spanish language

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>broadcast when they moved to La in nineteen fifty nine,

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and Jimi Herene was the voice of the Dodgers for

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>many Spanish language fans for decades. So I mean, imagine

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you have Vince Scully and Jimi Heren. I mean it

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>was literally two Hall of Famers that the Dodgers had.

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>He is tremendous. It's a tremendous interview. He's a JA

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>has known him a long time and he's in his nineties,

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>but you would think he was in his sixties. He

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>is just as excited about a baseball game today as

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he was back in the late fifties, early sixties.

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>His stories are terrific. But we also feature greatest games,

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.119
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff. So anyway, that is hitting the feed

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday, this interview with himI aren So, I want

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>you to take a look at that. Also, as you know,

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck toodcasts been a big supporter of Local News Day. Well,

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>guess what happens this Thursday. Thursday is the day, April ninth,

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Local news Day. I will have another interview later this

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>week in my feed featuring another prominent news organization that

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>has gone the independent route. It's a legacy media company

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that is going new, going independent. It's about the Salt

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Lake Tribune. So we will you will hear that later

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>this week, but again be aware of Local News Day.

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>I hope at this point I've gotten many of you

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to find out who's doing local news in your neck

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.239
<v Speaker 1>of the woods, and hopefully you've signed up and taken

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>a look at least if it's a quality product. But

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the news organizations at the local

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>news day website of who's participating, because it's a great

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>way to find out if somebody in your neighborhood is participating,

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>which also means they've been kind of vetted and we

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>know that they're truly independent and they truly are with

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>journalistic standards. And then finally, on Thursday night, I'm going

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to be in Chicago at the University of Chicago or

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be moderating a debate between Chris Christi

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and New York Times columnists David French. And the issue

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is on gambling. Has it become the new pornography? So

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Chris Christy is going to be essentially on the supportive side,

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>David French is going to be on the skeptical side.

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I am moderating with my own biases about it having

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to do I enjoy betting. I enjoyed lots of aspects

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of this. I have also expressed my reservations on certain

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>aspects of how fast we've legalized and how we do it.

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Should we have more friction. So it's going to be

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a nuanced conversation. Because this is the University of Chicago.

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>They don't expect a sort of he said, he said

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>food fight, even though both Chris Christi David French are

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly capable of participating in that kind of conversation. But

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not what they want to have. It's not what

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to have, it's not what the University of

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Chicago wants to have. But it's going to be. You'll

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to see it, I hope eventually, courtesy of

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the University of Chicago. So if you want to check

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that out, we'll be doing that. I'll be doing that

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday. So I thought i'd let you know all

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of the various things we've got cooking here at the

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>world headquarters of the Chuck Podcast. And so, without further ado,

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>let's get into the precarious moment we continue to live

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in in this Trump era. We're going to start today

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>though with what is a sigh of relief that has

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>turned pretty quickly into a cold sweat, because over the weekend, obviously,

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>when most of you were getting ready if you celebrate Easter,

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>preparing for Easter, the White House was in something close

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to paralysis. In fact, the lack of commentary by the

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>President himself led to all sorts of Twitter rumors and

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>social media rumors because it was strange not to hear

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>from the President. But there was a reason for this,

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>because we had pilots that were shot down in Iran,

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and this was a potential nightmare for the United States.

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>An American F fifteen E Strike Eagle, one of the

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>most advanced aircraft we have, was knocked out of the

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>sky over Isfahan, Iran, and for a stretch of hours,

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it was longer, the scenario everyone feared was the

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>one nobody wanted to say out loud, and American pilot

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>captured and paraded through perhaps even paraded through the streets

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of Turan. I don't know if they would have parrated

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>this person through the st the streets of Tehran, but

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it would have been a huge psychological blow to the

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>United States and a huge psychological help to the regime.

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So that is why I think you had a paralyzed

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>White House where even the President knew how much he

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>had at stake. But thankfully that didn't happen. Thank goodness

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for our special forces, how good they are, and they

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>were able to extract both the pilot and the weapons

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>expert eventually out, and the stories were hearing. I hope

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they're true. I'm sorry I have to say that, but

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you and I both know that that's the case. You

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have to always take the stories you're getting directly from

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>this administration with a grain of salt. But the heroism obviously,

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>these special forces going in harm's way. Clearly this is

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>not a safe place to be, despite all of the

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>bluster from Pete Haikseth earlier in the month, and I'm

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get to that, but we got a rescue,

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's extraordinary what the special ops folks did, and

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the President is celebrating it, and I think it's celebrating

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>out of relief because this would have been a huge below.

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>But here's the problem. We are now in a moment

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>where the success of the rescue is being used to

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>obscure the failure of the premise itself and in fact

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>be on the lookout. I'm not going to prejue. You

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>never know what Trump's going to say at a one

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>pm news conference, but he's going to have one later today.

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>My guess is he wants to bask in the glow

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of this rescue mission and hope that it obfuscates the

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that did we mislead these pilots, let alone the public,

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>into how safe the skies were. But let's be very

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>clear here, because if you have to rescue a pilot

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>from Isfahan, then you were never operating in what Pete

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Haikseth boasted a couple of weeks ago, uncontested airspace. That's

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>not interpretation, it's simply geography. Isfahan is deep inside Iran.

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>This isn't a coastal town, which means one of two

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 1>things is true. Either the battlefield is far more contested

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>than the military leaders have told you the American taxpayers,

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>or we put American pilots in harm's way based on

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>assumptions that weren't true. Is either outcome good. Either your

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>government was lying to you or they were lying to

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>themselves and put our pilots in harms way. This should

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>be a huge concern, and we've seen this pattern before.

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>We are very good at celebrating the moment of heroism,

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the rescue, the extraction, the comeback. We don't leave people

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>behind for and this is good, this is who we are.

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But we are much worse at asking a harder question.

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>When these things happen, why did we need the rescue

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in the first place? Right, And a lot of times

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you will get it presidential administrations. When you start asking

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>these questions, they will question your patriotism, They will question

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>things like that. These are important questions we have to ask,

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>because remember, it wasn't just the F fifteen that was

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>struck down and a black clowk that was hit. Iran

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>also down an A ten attack aircraft on Friday, undercutting

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>all of these claims by Trump and Hegseth and other

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>officials that the US had unchecked dominance of this guise

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>from over Iran. Now, the good news was the pilot

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>of the A ten attack aircraft was able to essentially

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>extract himself in friendly territory and ejected safely. So that's

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the good news. But let's not pretend that things are

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>going well in this war, because they're not. And that

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>brings us to this man, to the man at the podium,

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, pretty much the propaganda

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Pete as I've tried to nickname him, and I know

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that sounds snarky, but the guy doesn't appear to ever

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>tell us the truth, and he has been caught with

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>his pants down with this one. For the last month,

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:02.239
<v Speaker 1>we've been getting a very consistent message from heg Seth certainty.

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Let me just walk through in a March fourth, Pete

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>hagg Seth, the Secretary of Defense, complete control uncontested airspace

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>March tenth, the Iranian Air Force is no more. We

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>control their faith. Last week iron as toast, it's not

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>even a fair fight. And as for the radar systems,

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent annihilated. Okay, so let's ask the obvious question.

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 1>If the airspace is uncontested, how do you lose a

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>strike ego over Isfahan? If the radar is gone, how

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>do they get a lock on one of our advanced

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>fighter jets. If it isn't a fair fight, why are

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>we running rescue missions in the middle of Iran? Look,

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>this isn't about rhetoric and for its own sake, this

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is about credibility in wartime. These guys are not telling

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>us the truth. We just don't know what they're not

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>telling us. But if they were telling us the truth,

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>then we wouldn't have had what we had happen over

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. Okay, they're not telling us the truth. Are

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they lying or are they withholding information that's something that

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>an inspector general. We used to have this entity called

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the US Congress that would do things like this. I'm

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>not sure. I think they've been totally castrated or neutered.

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm being a little obviously sarcastic here, but this is

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>what their job should be in a moment like this,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 1>because if we don't have credibility in wartime, how the

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>hell are we going to win this thing? Because there's

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a huge credibility gap. Either the Secretary is being given

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>overly optimistic battle field assessments, or they're lying to the

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>president to mislead him, or they're withholding obviously bad information

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>from the president, which is also possible, or he's simply

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>presenting him that way to the public intentionally lying. Either way,

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the story we're being told no longer matches the reality

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing, and historically that's when things start to drift.

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So while the Pentagon is trying to explain all this

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and wrap it up in heroism, and there is heroism

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 1>to go around for the special forces that had to

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be called in to do this, but it's nothing to

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>celebrate that we put our pilots in harms way like this. Then,

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of course you had the president on social media on

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Easter morning. Easter Sunday morning, people are getting ready to go.

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, imagine some of the president's more religious supporters

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>who just love the man, and they open up and

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>they see that they see him say the following again,

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Easter Sunday morning, Tuesday will be power plant Day and

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>bridge Day all wrapped up in one. In Iran, there

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>will be nothing like it. Three exclamation points. Then in

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>open the fucking straight, you crazy bastards, or you'll be

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>living in hell. Just watch Praise be to Allah. The

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>American President of the United States uttered the following. Let

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>me repeat what the American President of the United States

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>set open the fucking straight, you crazy bastards, or you'll

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>be living in hell. Just watch Praise be to Allah.

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Is he mocking Islam with that last comment. I'm not Muslim.

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I will let others speak if they're offended or not.

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I know I have if I were saying that, I

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>don't in that context. I don't think I would be

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>honoring the Islamic any sort of Islamic traditions like this.

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether he thought it was funny. Perhaps

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>he thought it was funny again, all of this on

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Easter morning, a very religious holiday to Christians, extraordinary important holiday. Look,

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>as I taught my kids when they were young, they

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>were like, so, asking me about Easter, and I said, well,

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I said, the easiest way is it's where Jews and

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Christians diverge. That's usually the polite way I say it.

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>But all of this on Easter morning? Are there evangelicals

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>left with any sort of moral or ethical code that

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you can defend this? But hey, you can just do

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want with them, right, you just grab them

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>by the huh oh right, same guy. Nothing's changed. One

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>thing about Donald Trump is he's consistent. So he's threatening

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>what he called a power plant day, a bridge day

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>now on its own. That kind of language is familiar.

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>It's Trump, right, We've heard it before. But here's what's changed.

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>It's no longer landing as leverage. He thinks it's leverage

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>because after three weeks of similar threats, the Strait of

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Hormuz is still constrained, the conflict is still extraordinarily active,

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and the underlying strategic position has not shifted one bit,

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>which raises a more fundamental question what happens when escalation

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>becomes repetitive, and repetition becomes background noise, because it's kind

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of already there, right, We're kind of used to him

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>these weirdly weakly escalations. By the way, he also he

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>also claimed to Axios that there were talks going on

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>with some with some key folks in the Iranian of

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>who's alive in this Iranian government, of which Axios his

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>own sources said, there's no, there's nothing that serious going on.

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>But hey, it's Sunday that he said that. And what

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 1>does he do on Sundays during the start of this war,

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>tries to jaw bone down the price of oil in

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>time for the markets. I'm not sure the markets are

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>listening to Donald Trump these days, but we shall see.

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think he's increasing the pressure he thinks

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>he's doing. He's actually revealing the limits that we have

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>right now. We have very few limits, I mean, the

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>only thing that can be done. And he's very frustrated

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>by this, which is why he used the F word.

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>He's frustrated because he has no choice if he wants

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 1>this war to ever be seen as successful, if he

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to at all get his strategic goals, because if

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>he walks away with the Iranians using the Straight of

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Hormuz as a toll road, then he actually set the

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>entire world back with his decision and did nothing in return,

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>did not help the Iranian people nothing. So he knows

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 1>he's probably going to have to order ground troops in

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>order to secure the Straight of Horror moves to have

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>any leverage over this over the Iranians, because right now

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>he is none, and that's the problem. Now, this is

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>where I want to tell you about an interview I

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>did for Newsphere. Now, those of you, I hope that

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>those of you, if you've liked what you've seen on

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what I've done with Newsphere. It's a standalone news app

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 1>of independent journalists from around the world. Every Sunday I

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>have a new interview on there with a newsmaker or expert,

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and this week I sat down with Daniel Jurgen, sort

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of probably the world's foremost expert on energy markets. He's

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.479
<v Speaker 1>author the Pulitzer Prize win the Prize. I think I

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>promoted it before, but here it is. I know it's

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a very familiar book on my bookshelves's been there a

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>long time, and I wanted to share with you some

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of the things he told me because I think it

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>are important points here and why the president, why the

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>straight of Horne moves is the whole ballgame. So I

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>asked him how big is this? And he didn't hedge.

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>He called it the biggest disruption in the history of

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>world energy. Hardstop. This is bigger than nineteen seventy three,

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>bigger than nineteen seventy nine. So just let that sink

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>in for a second. And if you know Daniel Jurgen,

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he is not He's not a guy who likes to

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>live in likes to use hyperbolic vocabulary. It's just not him.

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>But those two crises were huge. They were the crises

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>that reshaped the global economy, reshaped the American economy. It

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>triggered recessions, stagflation, reowned and an American forum policy for generation.

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And what is Jurgen saying right now is all ready bigger.

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And here's the part that should make you really uneasy.

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>This isn't some black Swan event that nobody saw coming.

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>This is the scenario, the one policymakers have been gaming

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>out for forty years. The nightmare scenario centered on the

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>strait of horror moves. It has always been about this.

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Daniel will tell you this, the narrow passageway that a

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>huge percentage of the world's energypply has to pass through.

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And now it's not theoretical anymore. It's happening because what's

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>changed isn't just conflict, it's control. There used to be

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>a kind of uneasy system Iran oman the UAE managing traffic,

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>keeping things moving, preventing catastrophe. Now you have Iran effectively

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>saying we're in charge here. It's almost more important than

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>them developing a nuclear weapon. And once that becomes real,

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 1>once that becomes the operating assumption of global markets, you're

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>not dealing with the temporary disruption. You're dealing with a

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>new reality and reversing that. Even Jurgen very carefully makes

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>clear there it's not something you do easily, not without escalation.

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And here's where the story gets even bigger than oil,

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>because we learned something during COVID and then again they're

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Ukraine War. The global economy is far more

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>interconnected than we like to admit, and it's far more

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>interconnected than it was during those crises in the seventies,

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>which is why this is worse. You don't just get

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>oil from the golf. You get fertilizer, You get helium,

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>which is essential for semiconductors, for mir machines, for advanced manufacturing.

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>How about Taiwan's chip industry. It depends on inputs coming

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>through where that same region, right through the strait. So

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>when that system gets disrupted, you don't just feel it

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>at the gas pot. You're going to feel it everywhere.

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>And even if this stopped tomorrow, even if it froze

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>right now, you're gonna says, you're still looking at the

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>better part of a year just to get supply chains

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>back to normal. So this is why I have been

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>very declarative. These midterms are over. For the reports, books

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and Trump, they are over. There is no recovering from this. Economically,

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.199
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a crappy economy for the

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year at best. If he manages this

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and gets the straight open, maybe we don't get into

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a full fledged recession, but it is not going to

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 1>be a popular economy. Inflation. Inflation. Inflation is coming. Let's soap,

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it does not stagflation. This episode of the Chuck Podcast

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the first bake from frozen subscription box for sour dough breads,

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.959
<v Speaker 1>arteisonal pastries and fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>baked in twenty five minutes or less. Unlike many store

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>brought options, Wild Grain uses some simple ingredients you can

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>pronounce and a slow fermentation process that can be a

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>lot easier on your belly, little gut health there right,

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>and richer in nutrients and oxidants. There's also no preservatives

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and no shortcuts. The Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable.

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>In addition to their variety box, they have a gluten

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>free box, a vegan box, and a new protein box.

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you I have done the gluten free box.

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I have done it a second time. I have also

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>used the code, the todcast code. If you use the

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>promo code podcast at check out, you get thirty dollars off.

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I've already used it as a gift to somebody else

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>who loves this bread. It is hard to find good

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>gluten free bread. It is fantastic. They give you step

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>by step instructions. I really dig this. There is nothing

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>like having an artesian bakery in your freezer to chase

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>away the winter chill. Now is the best time to

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>stay in and enjoy some comforting homemade meals with Wildgrain.

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I obviously highly recommend it. It is worth giving Wildgreen

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to try. Right now, Wildgrain is offering my listeners thirty

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars off your first box plus free croissants for life.

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Come on when you go to wildgrain dot com slash

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>podcast to start your subscription today. That's thirty dollars off

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>your first box and free croissants for life when you

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>visit wildgrain dot com slash podcast, or simply use the

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>promo code toodcast at checkout. This is a sponsor I

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely embrace, so use that code. But sadly, back here

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, we have yet had a real public hearing

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>about this war, not one, not one. No full accounting

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to the American people, no sustained debate, just classified briefings

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in a skiff, and leadership basically saying trust us, and again,

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>who when have they told the truth? They have no

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>track record of telling the truth, rankly about anything, including

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the president's wait and to height remember that it's not

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but Congress is doing nothing here and they're going to

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>pay a price. There's no oversight. It's just pure avoidance

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>because they're afraid of the questions that are going to

0:24:55.600 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>get asked. And it's basically the Constitution the is streaming

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>at them to do their effing job. Since we're dropping

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the F word, we might as well say it. It's

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous mismatch that we're in right now, because the

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>global system is already adjusting to this crisis, even if

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>our political system isn't. And that brings me to another

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>story that got overlooked over the weekend, And it's going

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>to get really serious, and I think it shows the

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>beginning of what is going to be more erosion of

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>support for this war from the Republican side of the

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>app Do you have a member of the president's own

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>party stepping in not to critique the messaging, but to

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>challenge the structure of the war itself. Senator John Curtis,

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.959
<v Speaker 1>he's the Republican that replaced Mett Romney from Utah. Hit

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>an obed in the Deseret News over the weekend and

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it is absolutely must read. Desert News is the news

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>organization that is owned by the Church Litterday Saints and

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>many Utah politicians. When they've got something to say to

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the public, they choose the Desert News to say it,

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>especially if they themselves are also Latter Day Saints. So

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Curtis starts with something very straightforward, right he talks about

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that are being asked. We got one point

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>five trillion ask for the Pentagon budget, and we've heard

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that ask. Now, remember any when the initial budget asks

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>are made by administrations are always laughed at by Congress.

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So one point five is a goal, is a target number.

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>But there is also a very specific ass of two

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion for a supplemental request in order to essentially

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 1>replenish the cost of this war, because we've been averaging

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>somewhere around a billion to two billion dollars a day

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in there. So we've already spent some thirty to

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty five billion dollars in this war. And that's probably

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 1>a conservative estimate. And it's going to force a question

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that Washington tries to avoid, what are we committing to

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>with all this money? Because Curtis in his op ed,

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is invoking the War Powers Resolution Act of nineteen seventy three,

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 1>which includes a sixty day clock. So this war, let's

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>call the start February twenty eighth. We've had thirty one

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>days of March. Today is April sixth. Let's give one

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>day in the twenty eighth. That's thirty two. We'll add

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the six or in day thirty eight, so we had

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty two days left on the sixty day clock. If

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a real war, then John Curtis is saying

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>he's not voting for any supplemental until there's a vote

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>on this war, and it requires a real vote. It's

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>an important number there. You subtract Curtis, you're already losing

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Rand Paul, you may lose Lisa Murkowski, you could lose

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Tom Tillis, you may gain Fetterman. There may be a

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>couple of other Democrats on there. So's we'll see. But

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a lesson here from Vietnam, and that's what Curtis

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is trying to warn folks about. This is where Curtis

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is being more historically grounded than most lawmakers in Washington.

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And I have to tell you I appreciate it. John

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Curtis might be the only Republican outside of Rand Paul,

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>expressing the constitutional responsibility that Congress has here. Because Curtis

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is looking at Vietnam, not as an analogy, but as

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 1>a warning. Vietnam didn't begin as a declared war. It

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>began as a limited commitment advisors support containment, and then

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it expanded, not because there was a single decisive vote,

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but because there was never a forcing mechanism to stop

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and ask do we want to keep going? So that's

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>what this sixty day clock, right, that's seventy three. The

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>War Powers Resolution Act was about avoiding another Vietnam, and

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what this sixty day clock is supposed to be.

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>A forcing mechanism. And what Curtis is saying, I'm not

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>supporting any supplemental without a vote on this. But Curtis

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't just focused on authority, He's focused on conduct because

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>while Congress is being asked to fund this war, the

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>legal framework for how it's being fought is shifting in

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>real time. The administration is leaning on the idea of

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>dual use infrastructure, basically attacking power plants and bridges and

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>water systems. Many would say, isn't that a war crime

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>because you're targeting civilians essentially, And what the Trump administration

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>is looking for is lawyers to give them cover by saying, well,

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>those systems also support military, so you can make them targets.

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>But even under that theory, the law still requires proportionality.

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>So to send them back to the quote Stone Age,

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not proportionality. You don't destroy a civilian water

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>system to eliminate a marginal military advantage. And that's where

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>strategy crosses into something else. And then you layer on

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>top of that the rhetoric from Secretary Hegset who has

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>also said lethality over legality not just a sound bite,

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a doctrine. He does not care about human rights,

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>nor the rules, nor the Geneva courts. And it carries

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>consequences because once legality becomes secondary, you're no longer just

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>fighting a war. You're redefining the rules of it. And

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this is why Curtis matters, because he's connecting all of it,

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the cost, the authority, and the conduct, and he understands

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>something Washington often forgets in real time. When you move

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>outside the rules, you don't just change the war, you

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>change your position in the world. And we've done it.

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I see some on the right who are angry that

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>our NATO allies haven't stepped up for us, that some

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of them have gone as far as to say, hey,

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't land your planes at the bases that are

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in our countries. Well, if you're angry about the behavior

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of our NATO allies, you should be angry at the

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States, not at those allies. President

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States has treated them like shit. And apparently

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I need to use four letter words for people to

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>understand what I'm saying. He's treated our allies terribly. He's

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>berated them with tariffs, he has all done all of

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>these things, and he says and then he wants just

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to help. By the way, the United States has been

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>not been a good partner for Ukraine, has done everything

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>they can to help Russia in the war, everything they

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>can to make Europe less safe, and he wonders why

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not standing by us in this those look I get.

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Some of my friends in the right are so focused

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>on getting rid of this Iranian regime that they're angry

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that others don't see the threat the way they see it.

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>And I understand that, I understand your frustration. I'm not

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>going to sit here and dismiss that frustration, but stop

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>lashing out of our allies. You know who did this this,

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>You're our commander in chief has been a terrible ally

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to Israel, has been a terrible ally to Europe, has

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>been a terrible ally to the Golf State. He is

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>not a reliable ally to anybody, not to America's closest

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>allies in Europe, not to Israel. He's doing Israel no

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>favors here. He's doing the Golf States no favors here.

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>He's potentially chasing them into China's arms. So realize why

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we're here. We're here because of his diplomatic mismanagement, his

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous rhetoric, and his appointment of some of the most

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>unqualified people in the national security positions that we've ever had.

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>That's why we're in this position. One person did this,

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>one individual put us in this position. Seventy five years

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of American leadership, popular and unpopular presidents, liberal and conservative presidents,

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>moderates and non moderates have all made sure not to

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>alienate American allies the way this man has, and he

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>has put us all more. We are less safe today.

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And then they're lying to you all the time. They

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>are not telling you the truth. So here we are.

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>We had a rescue that we should absolutely celebrate, But

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it exposed a reality we haven't fully reckoned with. We

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>have a credibility gap between what we've been told and

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>what's actually happening on the ground. We have rhetoric escalating

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>without clear evidence that it's changing the outcome. And now

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>we have a constitutional clock that's ticking because of that

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty day clock. It's not there radical it should be

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a forcing mechanism. Congress needs to get off its ass

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and do its fucking job. There. There's some presidential rhetoric

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>for you. And if the president wants to continue this war,

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>he has to going to have to go to Congress

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>ask for permission if he wants all of this money,

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>which he says he wants to take away from the

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>social safety net. By the way, talk about more political

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>problems for his party. He explicitly said last week that

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon budget is priority over social security and medicare

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>good luck. Anybody want to go to the campaign trail

0:33:55.760 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and back up that statement, Try it, trust me, just

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>try it so we'll see. But he lost. This is

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge look. John Curtis right, he's not He's I'm

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 1>not a household name, but he's an independent Republican. He's

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>an independent conservative. He's no Maga guy, and he's no

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>sickaphan and apparently he's read the Constitution. All right, I

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do one more thing before we get to

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.359
<v Speaker 1>my interview today, and the interview is Mike Pesca. You

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 1>know him from the Just List. Some of you probably

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>listen to his podcast fairly regularly. Mike, can I do this?

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>We're now doing this fairly regularly. I think this is

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the third time he's been on this pod that I've

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>been on his twice, and you know, it's sometimes less interview,

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>more debate, more trying to spitball different issues. We talked

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>about the redistricting problems. We talk about a lot of

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, but we also get into what's wrong with

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>NBA and the tanking issue as well. So it's a

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>lively conversation. But before we get to that, amidst all

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>this crisis that President Trump is introduced on himself and

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the world in our political system, he he issued a

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>new executive order in college sports and I kind of

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 1>wanted to just quickly go through it. You know, I'm

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>an obsessive college sports fan. I care about this issue

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and you know, the president his role in

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>this has been unhelpful. I think probably you know, yes,

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:39.800
<v Speaker 1>he's got the power to convene, but he really wasted

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:41.919
<v Speaker 1>the time of that meeting a couple of weeks ago,

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>where it was just there to you know, essentially, you know,

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>puff up his ego. Look at all the cool and

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>famous people I got here, rather than actually trying to

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>solve the problem or come up. But I thought I

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>would go through it for those of you that care

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>about this issue. Look guess what, I know some of you.

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>If you don't care about college sports, you can you

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>can fast forward through. But I just wanted to get

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>into this for a few minutes. So the core thesis

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:12.240
<v Speaker 1>was this this executive order that he wrote over the weekend.

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It has there are some things that have there is

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>like that resemble teeth into this not quite teeth, but

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 1>they resemble teeth. I'm going to get into it. So

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>it's written to sound very muscular, but it is architecturally

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>incredibly weak, and it kind of knows that the White

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>House knows Congress is the only entity that can actually

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>fix college sports, and they actually say so. It's buried

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in the preamble of this executive order. Everything else in

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the Executive order is either delegation to agencies with limited authority,

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>suggestions to the NCAA, or legal theories that may not

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>even survive a court challenge. So, and he even says

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it right there in the document itself, the Congress is

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>strongly encouraged to expeditiously pass legislation. Translation, I'm issuing a

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>press release, but I'm not going to call it a

0:36:57.280 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>press release. I'm going to call it an executive order.

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So in the order itself, the whiteness is admitting it's

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 1>simply a placeholder. It's just a list of suggestions. But

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>here's the one thing to understand about how this order

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is constructed. All right, it's a classic use of the

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 1>bully pulpit plus federal procurement power two levers. A president

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>actually does control layered over a sector where the president

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>has almost no direct legislative authority. So once you see

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the architecture, then the whole document reads differently. So let

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>me quickly follow through it. So here's what it actually does.

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a federal contractor leverage that he is using as

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 1>his authority. It's real, but it's extraordinary limited, and it's

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the orders. Really, it's the only credible threat in this

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>executive order, and the mechinism actually has a specific name,

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>suspension and disbarment, and it directs federal agencies to evaluate

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>whether NCAA rule violations are serious enough to affect a

0:37:56.320 --> 0:38:01.399
<v Speaker 1>university's status as a responsible contractor or grantee. Translate, if

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>they think you're abusing the NIL system and you're somehow

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>taking money away from programs that might be giving getting

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:12.240
<v Speaker 1>government funding in order to pay for your football program,

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>they could theoretically ban that university from receiving any federal

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>research grants at all. Now would they actually do it?

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Would it up even survive court challenges if they attempted it?

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>But it is a This would really be a nuclear option, right,

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:35.399
<v Speaker 1>This is the one power this order technically has That

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>one would be shocked if he actually enacted it, because

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:41.319
<v Speaker 1>you'd be attacking a lot of state universities. And we

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:45.719
<v Speaker 1>know this. Nuclear options usually don't get used casually. But

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 1>ask yourself, this is the Department of Energy going to

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>shut down a billion dollar physics project because a booster

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 1>overpaid for a quarterback. The threat of an audit or

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a funding suspension is a real deterrent. Right. Universities hate it,

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>but actual disbarmment is so disruptive to federal research relationships

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 1>that it functions more as a sword to waive than

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a sword to swing. There's also a technical problem. The

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>trigger requires violations of NCAA rules that are applicable, lawful,

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and operative. Well, given the courts, it basically struck down

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>every NCAA rule there's ever been into football, then there's

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 1>really nothing for it. The universe of operative rules may

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>be legally thin by the way this order technically becomes

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>functional August first, twenty twenty six. So the government is

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>threatening to enforce rules that are simultaneously being litigated into oblivion.

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>And that's the one part of this order that had

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>teeth okay. Also in here the twenty million dollar threshold definition.

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Quietly important buried in the definition section is a provision

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>that actually focuses the order's enforcement universe by limiting its

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:00.439
<v Speaker 1>scope to schools generating at least twenty milli million dollars

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 1>annually in athletics revenue. So that means the order is

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 1>targeting somewhere between one hundred and thirty and one hundred

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and fifty programs, essentially the Power four plus the group

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of it's the power four plus the group of five schools.

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, some not all group of five schools, but

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I put Gonzaga in there. They don't a football program,

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 1>but they would qualify on the athletic side, right, But

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it's schools like that, So it exempts basically every D

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>two and D three program. It's meaningfully narrow, and it

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:29.839
<v Speaker 1>tells you where the White House actually intends to apply pressure, right,

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's on the big schools. Now, there is another directive

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Federal Trade Commission, and it directs the FTC

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:43.359
<v Speaker 1>to enforce existing statutes against bad actor agents. Now this look,

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody wants to see agents held to account,

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:49.879
<v Speaker 1>make sure they're following the law. The FTC already has

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>its authority. They don't need a law to do it.

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>It just redirects existing enforcement priority. So this is actionable,

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.760
<v Speaker 1>but it addresses agents at the margins about the systemic

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>NIL and revenue sharing problem. So if agents are taking

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 1>too big a chunk of change from the NIL, that's bad,

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't actually deal with the system itself. Then

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 1>there's the Department of Justice challenge to state laws, and

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that directing the Attorney General to pursue actions

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>against these state NIL laws using the commerce clause and

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 1>contracts clause. It's a legitimate theory of law. But some

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>state laws, particularly those that apply only to insatee schools

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>or discriminate against out of state transfer competition, may be

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 1>genuinely vulnerable. But it's expensive litigation. Federal government has not

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>been winning these cases very easily. They'd be suing Florida,

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Republican states, Florida, Texas, Tennessee, and they'll fight this. Do

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>we really think this administration is going to go after

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the state of Florida, the state of Texas. Ken Paxton

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>still the Attorney general last time I checked. So look

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>reporting acquirements. This matter of education shall consider requiring reporting

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>on roster spots and athletic aid by gender. This is

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 1>helpful if it allows Title nine enforcement to be used,

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and it could. It's important data to gather so that

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in itself, Look, more data is better than no data.

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 1>But everything else is wish casting zero enforcement right. This

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest tell in the document. Section four B

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a wish list sent to the nc double

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>at it should, in its discretion adopt rules of eligibility, transfers,

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 1>revenue sharing, nil and more. While the nc DOUABA is

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a private organization. The White House can't control anything it does.

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Every single item is aspirational that they list, and there's aspirational,

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not mandatory. The word should appears where shell would

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 1>appear if this had actual force, Right, should versus shell.

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a keyword there. If you see shell, that's enforceable.

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>If you see should, it's just a suggestion. Now, this

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 1>is handing the nc double life some political cover, right.

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 1>The White House is handing the NCAA a document it

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>can point to when implementing unpopular rules. Hey, we're not

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 1>doing this because we want to. The federal government directed

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>us to do it, so that's the functional purpose. But

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>this administration and the government is so unpopular. Do we

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>think that this gives the NCAA the cover that the

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 1>White House thinks it's giving them. There's a fraudulent nil definition.

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:26.720
<v Speaker 1>It's legally untested. It almost certainly will be challenged in court.

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>The order tries to define paying above fair market value

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for nil services as fraud Well, who the hell decides

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 1>what fair market value is the market? Who's deciding the market? Right?

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:39.240
<v Speaker 1>This is it's a novel legal theory. But we don't

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 1>really have any sort of enforcement mechanism here. Trust me,

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 1>it would be litigated to death, and to its death.

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 1>The revenue sharing prohibition legally circular. The order calls for

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:56.280
<v Speaker 1>prohibiting federal funds from being used for nil revenue sharing payments,

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>but schools aren't currently using federal funds for that. But again,

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to try to use fungible money.

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And this where this is where I guess if he

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to be the college sports are and just

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>start punishing certain schools, the problem is he would look

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>like he's trying to essentially go back to the old system,

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:16.920
<v Speaker 1>which was actually more unfair to the players, more unfair

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to the schools, and only allowed about fifteen or twenty

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 1>schools to do it. So bottom line, this executive order

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is a press release with an August first state stamp.

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 1>It has three legally credible mechanisms, federal contractor leverage, FDC,

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 1>agent enforcement, and a DG challenge to certain state laws,

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 1>but all three face meaningful legal and practical obstacles. None

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of them address the core structural problem. College football generates billions.

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 1>The courts have said players deserve a share, and Congress

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 1>has not passed a framework to govern any of it.

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>What this order does most effectively is give the White

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>House a political talking point on college sports. That's it

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 1>hands the NCAA a document to hide behind if they

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>want to implement unpopular parts of this. But the order

0:44:57.200 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>cannot restore the NCAA's enforcement authority, not grant anti trust immunity.

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.880
<v Speaker 1>It cannot settle the employee question. Only Congress can do

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 1>those things. And the order admits it right there at

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the top, if you know where to look. So that's

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 1>your president trying to insert himself in a situation of

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>which he has no controlling legal authority what so ever.

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>But we always kind of knew that. Speaking of no

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>controlling legal authority, the real question is does even have

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>one to conduct the war he's doing in Iran that

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in twenty two days technically expires. All right with that,

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>let's sneak in the break and my conversation with my

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 1>friend Mike Pascot. This episode of the Check podcast is

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by Soul. So if you love that

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the day unwined but hate the hangover, Soul's

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 1>out of office is for you. These sparkling THHC. Drinks

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and gummies give you the same relaxed social feeling without

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the alcohol, without the calories, and without the crash. Soul

0:45:57.680 --> 0:45:59.759
<v Speaker 1>is a wellness brand that believes feeling good should be

0:45:59.800 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 1>fun and easy. Soul specializes in delicious hemp derived, THCHC,

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:07.879
<v Speaker 1>and CBD products designed to boost your mood and help

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you unwind. They're best selling out of office gummies were

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 1>designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz, boost your mood,

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five different strengths, you

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:21.720
<v Speaker 1>can tailor the dose to fit your vibe. So also

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>has a variety of products specifically designed to help you

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>get a better night's rest, including their top selling Sleepy Gummies,

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a fan favorite for deep, restorous sleep.

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Look.

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I have made no secret. I am a believer in

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, in cannabis and hemp derived. I do not

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 1>partake in alcohol. For the most part. I think this

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:41.919
<v Speaker 1>stuff is a lot safer than alcohol, a lot less

0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 1>addictive than alcohol. And yes, I have to say I

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 1>love these drinks. It is the glass of wine and

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you know after work, that's what this is. So no

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:55.359
<v Speaker 1>hangover and no excess calories like this. I'm a big fan,

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So bring on the good vibes and treat yourself to

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Sold today. Right now, SOL is offering my audience thirty

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:03.919
<v Speaker 1>percent off your entire order. Go to getsold dot com

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and use the word podcast that's getsold dot Com promo

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 1>code podcast for thirty percent off. And yes, I too

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 1>am a customer. Well, coming back for a return engagement

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 1>as we would like to do regularly. I think we're

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:23.280
<v Speaker 1>almost doing this quarterly. It's my my pal Mike Pesca

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Just List and all sorts of his his world.

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 1>We were just talking about each other's each other's digital world,

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:35.319
<v Speaker 1>and we like to have our world's collide. Mike, It's

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:35.920
<v Speaker 1>good to see you.

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Hey, thanks for having me. Speaking of quarterly, what happened

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:42.200
<v Speaker 2>to the Trump proposal to do away with quarterly reports

0:47:42.360 --> 0:47:44.319
<v Speaker 2>and only do by any l I guess it would

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 2>be Actually just so there's that's still moving its way

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 2>through the SEC.

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:49.359
<v Speaker 1>I think I actually just saw an update on.

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 2>That there is which I've talked to like that.

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's a good idea I talked to. You know,

0:47:56.360 --> 0:48:00.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a so Jack Welch is considered the he

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.319
<v Speaker 1>got the sort of the godfather of that idea right,

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the quarterly reports to goose stock prices. Back in his

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>old ge days and towards the end of his life

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:15.320
<v Speaker 1>he started expressing like he admitted, I probably that the

0:48:15.400 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterly report idea was it is past. He wouldn't, you know,

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:24.359
<v Speaker 1>because no person of his ego will ever admit they

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:27.359
<v Speaker 1>were wrong. He just sort of admitted that they were

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it was no longer useful, and that in some ways

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it was probably hurting companies. He was he was pre right, Yes, yeah, exactly,

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you know the way somebody with a huge ego like

0:48:37.000 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>his son.

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The downside to that that I've heard is that

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 2>back when Jack Welsh was pioneering that things were a

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:49.239
<v Speaker 2>little more stable, and now quarterly reports at least give

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:54.640
<v Speaker 2>some visibility into possible meltdowns. But also the Ft. There's

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 2>an FT podcast, I know you like the Ft, and

0:48:57.400 --> 0:48:59.879
<v Speaker 2>they were having a debate where I think they said,

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:03.319
<v Speaker 2>just financially good idea, but what you don't want to

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:06.399
<v Speaker 2>do is give Donald Trump any wins ever, And these

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:09.840
<v Speaker 2>were FT journalists right now, but they were embracing I

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:12.840
<v Speaker 2>guess their activism, which is once he comes up with

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:15.799
<v Speaker 2>a good idea, that's the most dangerous thing of all.

0:49:16.080 --> 0:49:18.319
<v Speaker 2>And I was contrasting that I did a thing on

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:22.360
<v Speaker 2>the Gist my show with The Dispatch where viewed Emily Auster,

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:24.880
<v Speaker 2>who was saying, you know, some of this maga stuff,

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:27.920
<v Speaker 2>not the vaccines, but the meat and the food pyramid,

0:49:28.080 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 2>that is a good idea, And then she got blowback,

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:33.439
<v Speaker 2>how are you giving Trump credit? So even journalistically, it's

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 2>interesting the Dispatch, you know, these former Republicans are maybe

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 2>still identified conservatives. They're saying, we have to be honest,

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:42.920
<v Speaker 2>and if we need to give Trump a win, we

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 2>give him a win. And the Financial Times, which definitely

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:50.879
<v Speaker 2>sees himself outside the activism continuum, said no, we can

0:49:50.920 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 2>never give Donald Trump a win.

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:55.960
<v Speaker 1>No. Well, you know this is at the core of

0:49:56.000 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the redistricting fight in Virginia. This is a bad idea,

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 1>this is bad for democracy. But the counter argument from

0:50:05.800 --> 0:50:07.960
<v Speaker 1>people that even admit, yeah, this is not a good

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 1>idea long term, you got to fight fire with fire,

0:50:11.719 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's the whole, this whole mentality. And I just think,

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>look what we've turned into is I think both parties

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:23.920
<v Speaker 1>have become reactionary parties. Right, they don't really they define

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>themselves right own the Libs and Trump resistance is really

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 1>the same ideology, don't you think, yes?

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 2>And all we're doing and evall Levine writes about this,

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 2>we're just in this era of going back and forth

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 2>and to and fro, and I don't see how we

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:42.719
<v Speaker 2>get out of it now as far as the redition.

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I do, but we got out of this before. I

0:50:45.120 --> 0:50:48.960
<v Speaker 1>obsessed over this. This is actually the I'm going to

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 1>pull a muscle padding my promoting something I'm doing here,

0:50:53.239 --> 0:50:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but on my substack this week I sort of go through.

0:50:56.680 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm obsessed with the period between Jackson and lincol in

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>American history because it was this we had technically eight

0:51:05.080 --> 0:51:07.719
<v Speaker 1>presidents in twenty four years because of deaths, but it

0:51:07.880 --> 0:51:12.080
<v Speaker 1>was really seven presidencies in twenty four years because you

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 1>had the thirty one day president and each one of

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:21.480
<v Speaker 1>them and essentially it was like each president was elected

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:24.359
<v Speaker 1>claiming they were going to solve it. They were going

0:51:24.400 --> 0:51:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to bring the country together, they were going to quote

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:29.680
<v Speaker 1>solve this problem, right, but not necessarily solve the problem,

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>meaning at that time it's slavery. But it would be

0:51:33.200 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>all these papering over ideas, right, So you had whether

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it was the Democrats nominating a Northern or at one

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:43.160
<v Speaker 1>point in Franklin Pierce or the joint Tickets.

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Which was Harrison and Title dough Face.

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>What's it the dough Face, right, Yeah, the signing of

0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the Fugitive Slave Act that Millard Fillmore thought was going

0:51:51.760 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to finally, you know, to break some peace. Right, it was,

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 1>but it was a It was just a series of

0:51:57.760 --> 0:51:59.719
<v Speaker 1>presidents that were trying to paper over right and then

0:51:59.760 --> 0:52:03.160
<v Speaker 1>find only the Whigs were just too weak to deal

0:52:03.200 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 1>with the issue. And then finally we got a new

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:08.840
<v Speaker 1>party in the Republican Party. So it led me to

0:52:08.880 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 1>think which party is going to be the Whigs because

0:52:11.160 --> 0:52:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm convinced one of them is going away in the

0:52:13.120 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>next decade or so out of frustration by their bye

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 1>by like you can't you're not you're not accomplishing. You know,

0:52:19.960 --> 0:52:21.960
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a moment and I think, you

0:52:22.000 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 1>know Trump won, everybody thought it'd be the Republicans. I'm

0:52:26.040 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>not thinking, well, it could very easily be the Democrats,

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:32.440
<v Speaker 1>right because they're in some ways performing like the Whigs.

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:34.880
<v Speaker 1>At the moment where there's a divide inside the party,

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:39.200
<v Speaker 1>do you go full resistance or do you try to

0:52:39.239 --> 0:52:42.399
<v Speaker 1>persuade those you know, a few more from the other

0:52:42.440 --> 0:52:46.880
<v Speaker 1>side to try to have a more durable majoritarianism. And

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, bottom line is we're not

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:52.319
<v Speaker 1>We're not done yet with this back and forth we had.

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:56.800
<v Speaker 1>We went through six presidencies between Jackson and Lincoln. Nobody

0:52:56.840 --> 0:52:58.880
<v Speaker 1>got re elected, no party got reelected. Right, it was

0:52:58.920 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 1>just a series of this stuff, and we're we're in

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 1>our third one right now, twenty eight get going to

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:07.640
<v Speaker 1>resolve this. So I think we will eventually resolve it.

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:09.600
<v Speaker 1>The question is how many people have to get hurt

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:10.839
<v Speaker 1>before we sober up?

0:53:10.960 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what I was saying. So all it will

0:53:12.960 --> 0:53:15.799
<v Speaker 2>take is six hundred thousand dead, although normed for the

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 2>current population now would be like what two million? Great?

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I know, I'm we're not advocating civil war here, guys.

0:53:22.840 --> 0:53:26.000
<v Speaker 1>No the boat. We're actually hoping we can resolve it

0:53:26.040 --> 0:53:27.239
<v Speaker 1>with it, you know, just short of that.

0:53:27.960 --> 0:53:30.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there are different party systems. I wanted I heard

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:35.840
<v Speaker 2>your commentary on Virginia. So you think that even without

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 2>this redistricting it would go from now it's six Democrats,

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 2>five Republicans. You think we'd go to nine two eight

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 2>three without eighty three?

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Without it, you got the first and the second. Wait, man,

0:53:46.880 --> 0:53:50.239
<v Speaker 1>you think you think ten to one with it. I

0:53:50.239 --> 0:53:53.279
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they get the ten one ten one max. Yeah,

0:53:53.320 --> 0:53:54.759
<v Speaker 1>but it could end up at nine two. So if

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:58.239
<v Speaker 1>you end up at nine two, you basically did all

0:53:58.239 --> 0:54:01.440
<v Speaker 1>this work. You sort of peed away political capital of

0:54:01.480 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama and Abigail Spamberger from one seat.

0:54:05.200 --> 0:54:09.799
<v Speaker 2>Right. But do you think, as a general principal Democrats

0:54:09.800 --> 0:54:13.880
<v Speaker 2>who have always said we are better than redistricting for

0:54:13.960 --> 0:54:17.239
<v Speaker 2>political gain, do you think that's what they should say

0:54:17.320 --> 0:54:20.320
<v Speaker 2>or they should be recognizing the moment right now where

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the headwinds are that we don't need to do it

0:54:22.640 --> 0:54:26.000
<v Speaker 2>right now because as a principle, I do not believe

0:54:26.400 --> 0:54:29.239
<v Speaker 2>in unilateral disarmament.

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I understand that concept. Yeah, I just think the

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:38.239
<v Speaker 1>problem is, I guess I'm even more Pollyannish about it.

0:54:38.320 --> 0:54:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I think having more swing basically you're taking away swing districts.

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you actually have Republicans in light red districts,

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:50.560
<v Speaker 1>then you have more possibility. Would we be better off

0:54:51.080 --> 0:54:55.440
<v Speaker 1>if a third of the Republican caucus were Don Bacon people, right?

0:54:56.040 --> 0:54:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Or do you create a situation where no, you're just

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:01.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a whole bunch of James Comers, is that

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:05.040
<v Speaker 1>what you want? And then then there's no ability to

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:09.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of bridge any device, so that I actually think

0:55:10.000 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's the other part of this is that what

0:55:11.680 --> 0:55:14.920
<v Speaker 1>do you what do you are we really gaining in

0:55:15.000 --> 0:55:18.759
<v Speaker 1>this other than a fight bridge just you know, a

0:55:18.800 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 1>gavel And again I'm I'm this. Look, we've gone through this.

0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Anytime you want to temporarily suspend anything because you think no, no, no, well,

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:36.120
<v Speaker 1>first of all, how often have parties you know who

0:55:36.120 --> 0:55:37.920
<v Speaker 1>said no, no, no, we'll come back to this have actually

0:55:37.960 --> 0:55:38.480
<v Speaker 1>come back to this.

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, I think that that's wise, but very specific

0:55:44.800 --> 0:55:47.960
<v Speaker 2>to the moment. And I remember it was before we

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:51.360
<v Speaker 2>started seeing polls or knew much more than there's usually

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:54.839
<v Speaker 2>the swing back in the midterms. But New York had

0:55:54.840 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 2>the choice whether to really to throw out a fairly

0:55:58.000 --> 0:56:02.240
<v Speaker 2>drawn electoral map or the Democrats could try to force

0:56:02.320 --> 0:56:06.320
<v Speaker 2>through their pro democratic map. And I remember thinking to myself,

0:56:06.800 --> 0:56:09.319
<v Speaker 2>these are the Democrats right now kind of violating their

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:11.640
<v Speaker 2>own principles. And I don't know if they'll be punished

0:56:11.680 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 2>by the voters for it, but they're showing themselves to

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:17.680
<v Speaker 2>be cynical. And it is I said, not a good look. Now,

0:56:17.719 --> 0:56:20.760
<v Speaker 2>this was before I thought that they would win anyway.

0:56:20.760 --> 0:56:22.880
<v Speaker 2>And in New York it doesn't really matter that My

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:25.040
<v Speaker 2>matter is a little bit. You know, Upstate New York

0:56:25.440 --> 0:56:27.400
<v Speaker 2>elects Repubsi Valley.

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:31.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole bunch of places where right now, New

0:56:31.200 --> 0:56:36.360
<v Speaker 1>York is Ohio without the New York City meaniway.

0:56:35.600 --> 0:56:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, Pennsylvania's Alabama with a tea in the middle. But

0:56:41.400 --> 0:56:44.000
<v Speaker 2>as a principle, I don't think people really vote on it,

0:56:44.080 --> 0:56:46.400
<v Speaker 2>especially because of the primacy of the primaries. And I

0:56:46.400 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 2>think this is the biggest problem in American politics. You

0:56:49.080 --> 0:56:51.720
<v Speaker 2>were talking about money. I think whatever can be done

0:56:52.000 --> 0:56:54.239
<v Speaker 2>to make the because we're so polarized. I mean, if

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:56.439
<v Speaker 2>you want to go back to the EPI phenomenon, the

0:56:56.480 --> 0:56:59.440
<v Speaker 2>primaries of the EPI phenomenon on, our polarization is the worst.

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:00.799
<v Speaker 2>And I have a b' end and a guy I know,

0:57:00.880 --> 0:57:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Bradley Tusk, and he's tried to get essentially app voting,

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and I think that would be a real game changer

0:57:06.600 --> 0:57:09.440
<v Speaker 2>if it could be done successfully. And he's convinced me

0:57:09.480 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 2>it can be done, So I don't want to.

0:57:11.680 --> 0:57:13.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's a lot of they're going to experiment

0:57:13.960 --> 0:57:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in Alaska with this first.

0:57:14.880 --> 0:57:17.240
<v Speaker 2>One Alaska, and it's done in West Virginia and it's

0:57:17.240 --> 0:57:20.680
<v Speaker 2>been done successfully, and he specifically tried to bring it

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:22.920
<v Speaker 2>to non blue states. He tried to bring it to

0:57:23.000 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 2>places where they might be suspicious of this online voting app.

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 2>And think about all the things that we do that

0:57:28.680 --> 0:57:30.920
<v Speaker 2>need to be secure on an app, from you know,

0:57:30.960 --> 0:57:34.520
<v Speaker 2>registering for a citizenship or for our IDs and everything else,

0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 2>so it can be done. And once it's done and

0:57:36.280 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 2>once it's easy, it takes primaries from something with eleven

0:57:39.560 --> 0:57:42.240
<v Speaker 2>percent participation to you know, fifty, And I think that's

0:57:42.280 --> 0:57:45.160
<v Speaker 2>a huge game changer and it's the number one reform

0:57:45.160 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that really can change things.

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Look and I actually think state I think I think

0:57:50.480 --> 0:57:55.560
<v Speaker 1>we've had this conversation before. I think taxpayer funded partisan

0:57:55.680 --> 0:58:00.880
<v Speaker 1>primaries I think are unconstitutional because you're telling me I

0:58:00.920 --> 0:58:05.440
<v Speaker 1>have to join a private organization in order to participate

0:58:05.480 --> 0:58:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in a taxpayer funded event. I think that's a violation

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of equal protection. And now they I don't think they're

0:58:13.720 --> 0:58:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm I am pretty I would just call

0:58:19.760 --> 0:58:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it supportive of the folks over at open primaries, and

0:58:23.080 --> 0:58:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I've like pushed this as as sort of I think

0:58:25.480 --> 0:58:28.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a legal I think there's actually you can you

0:58:28.560 --> 0:58:31.040
<v Speaker 1>can sue some of these states that have these that

0:58:31.200 --> 0:58:36.120
<v Speaker 1>essentially bar independence and bar non registered voters from this.

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But looked all party primary, I mean, it is the

0:58:40.040 --> 0:58:43.960
<v Speaker 1>better answer. There's no you know. The fact is, think

0:58:44.000 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 1>about the office that is the least partisan in America

0:58:47.320 --> 0:58:51.560
<v Speaker 1>these days, it's mayor. And a majority of mayors are

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:55.000
<v Speaker 1>elected in all party primaries, where the top two candidates

0:58:55.040 --> 0:58:57.200
<v Speaker 1>usually they don't even put parties. A lot of them

0:58:57.200 --> 0:59:00.360
<v Speaker 1>are none are you don't put your party, lay on

0:59:00.480 --> 0:59:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the ballot and top two play. I mean. And the

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:06.560
<v Speaker 1>thing is is that I love to use the example

0:59:06.600 --> 0:59:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of a congressman named Carlos Sumenez. He's a Republican congressman

0:59:10.680 --> 0:59:14.640
<v Speaker 1>from Miami. When he was mayor of Miami Dade, I

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:17.760
<v Speaker 1>had no idea he was a conservative Republican because he

0:59:17.760 --> 0:59:20.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't govern that way. He governed the whole county. He

0:59:20.800 --> 0:59:24.280
<v Speaker 1>was elected in a county wide vote. He never put

0:59:24.360 --> 0:59:29.440
<v Speaker 1>his party. You knew he leaned right, okay, and let's

0:59:29.480 --> 0:59:32.880
<v Speaker 1>just see you govern based on how the votes that

0:59:32.960 --> 0:59:34.920
<v Speaker 1>get you in office. And then of course he got

0:59:34.920 --> 0:59:38.680
<v Speaker 1>elected in a partisan Republican primary where the Republican primaries everything,

0:59:38.720 --> 0:59:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's voted a lot more. Conserve even even challenged

0:59:41.720 --> 0:59:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that the elect didn't certify in January sixth, right, And

0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember being surprised that he didn't because I knew

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:50.600
<v Speaker 1>what kind of Mary was. But I actually chalk it

0:59:50.680 --> 0:59:53.040
<v Speaker 1>up to I always say this, our issue is incentives.

0:59:53.320 --> 0:59:56.400
<v Speaker 1>There are bad people can do good things with good incentives,

0:59:56.400 --> 0:59:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and good people can do bad things with bad incentives.

0:59:59.280 --> 1:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And our primary system is mostly a bad incentive.

1:00:02.600 --> 1:00:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Right and are and to be a mayor you have

1:00:04.680 --> 1:00:08.080
<v Speaker 2>to deliver actual material benefits to your voters and you

1:00:08.120 --> 1:00:10.520
<v Speaker 2>will be judged on that. And snow days matter not

1:00:10.560 --> 1:00:13.040
<v Speaker 2>in Miami, but definitely in the Northeast. And then when

1:00:13.080 --> 1:00:17.320
<v Speaker 2>you were a part of an anonymous or by choice,

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:21.000
<v Speaker 2>a powerless organization like the House of Representatives, then your

1:00:21.040 --> 1:00:24.120
<v Speaker 2>incentives are all to be either a free agent who

1:00:24.160 --> 1:00:26.160
<v Speaker 2>is a burr in the side of your party or

1:00:26.280 --> 1:00:30.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, a party apparatic. Absolutely, what do you.

1:00:32.640 --> 1:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of these independent candidacies and do

1:00:35.920 --> 1:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you buy into them or are you one of those

1:00:37.760 --> 1:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that just doesn't believe these are going to work.

1:00:40.560 --> 1:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Duverger's law, we only have two parties? Do you remember

1:00:43.760 --> 1:00:46.080
<v Speaker 2>that from your political science training? What was it whose

1:00:46.160 --> 1:00:49.640
<v Speaker 2>law Duverger might be du Viage. This was the idea

1:00:49.680 --> 1:00:52.120
<v Speaker 2>that in a first past the post system such as ours,

1:00:52.160 --> 1:00:54.280
<v Speaker 2>you only ever get two parties. But it was one

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>of these laws with so many exceptions. I don't know.

1:00:56.360 --> 1:00:58.440
<v Speaker 2>It wound up being like a Tammany Hall law. Like

1:00:58.560 --> 1:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>look at India, they have first passed the post, then

1:01:00.560 --> 1:01:03.200
<v Speaker 2>they have votre parities. Of course it's India. So I

1:01:03.200 --> 1:01:06.160
<v Speaker 2>think in some of the cases, you know Nebraska, it's

1:01:06.480 --> 1:01:10.400
<v Speaker 2>an imperative, it's the the In that case, the brand

1:01:10.480 --> 1:01:13.760
<v Speaker 2>of the Democrats are so toxic that it makes sense

1:01:14.040 --> 1:01:18.240
<v Speaker 2>to run as an independent, say with McMullen in Utah.

1:01:18.360 --> 1:01:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Not that he could win, but it makes sense to

1:01:20.520 --> 1:01:23.200
<v Speaker 2>win to run that way. And I also think on

1:01:23.240 --> 1:01:26.959
<v Speaker 2>the presidential level there's a real chance at a breakthrough

1:01:27.280 --> 1:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>of a third party candidate. I think it's so much

1:01:29.920 --> 1:01:32.680
<v Speaker 2>harder at the state level. I kind of support it.

1:01:32.720 --> 1:01:37.000
<v Speaker 2>I like experimentation and mixing up, but you know, just

1:01:37.040 --> 1:01:40.240
<v Speaker 2>because of all the incentives and all the everything that's

1:01:40.280 --> 1:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>in place, it makes it hard. It would be easier

1:01:42.560 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 2>with that jungle primarya I think first past, not first

1:01:45.120 --> 1:01:47.800
<v Speaker 2>past the post, but top two. Oh and one other

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:50.920
<v Speaker 2>thing I wanted to say, it's a light criticism. I

1:01:50.960 --> 1:01:54.920
<v Speaker 2>think that the activists who were so behind ranked choice voting,

1:01:55.360 --> 1:01:59.280
<v Speaker 2>they my rank choice of electoral reforms that would be

1:01:59.320 --> 1:02:02.120
<v Speaker 2>way down the I'd more for it than against it,

1:02:02.400 --> 1:02:05.320
<v Speaker 2>But ninety something percent of the time it doesn't have

1:02:05.640 --> 1:02:08.440
<v Speaker 2>a real impact. There is a certain percentage of the

1:02:08.480 --> 1:02:10.720
<v Speaker 2>time where you could plausibly argue is the are the

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:13.720
<v Speaker 2>will of the people really being reflected? And they did

1:02:13.760 --> 1:02:16.240
<v Speaker 2>put a lot of effort into that, as opposed to

1:02:16.320 --> 1:02:18.880
<v Speaker 2>jungle primers, which I think would have helped things a

1:02:18.960 --> 1:02:19.439
<v Speaker 2>lot more.

1:02:19.920 --> 1:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, look the concept of top four then you know

1:02:26.280 --> 1:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of top four advance. You know the Alaska law

1:02:28.840 --> 1:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is everybody's on the same ballot and top four advance.

1:02:33.520 --> 1:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Then it becomes ranked choice for the general I'd preferred it.

1:02:37.800 --> 1:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. My issue with ranked choice goes back

1:02:40.080 --> 1:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to my days explaining what was explaining the vote count

1:02:43.360 --> 1:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>as it was coming in on election nights, and nobody

1:02:47.240 --> 1:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>can explain the black box that is ranked choice voting.

1:02:49.840 --> 1:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>There is no way for me to be able to

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>open up on election night. Okay, here's the initial run

1:02:55.240 --> 1:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, here's what we know about the second choices.

1:02:58.240 --> 1:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>There appears to be this case and it has more

1:03:00.560 --> 1:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>second choices of this, and you know, do I think

1:03:03.800 --> 1:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>we could get there with states and local officials getting

1:03:07.720 --> 1:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>better at figuring out how to report these things out? Yeah?

1:03:11.520 --> 1:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>But are we better off not trying to have them

1:03:14.240 --> 1:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>do two or three different counts on election nine and

1:03:16.680 --> 1:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>just focus on the main thing being the main thing,

1:03:19.520 --> 1:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the actual the first count and then you have a runoff,

1:03:23.960 --> 1:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, look, I'm for Louisiana had the

1:03:28.920 --> 1:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of all the jungle primary systems, it was Louisiana was

1:03:31.960 --> 1:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>my favorite jungle system because they did it where the

1:03:36.400 --> 1:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>all party primary actually was like in October or September,

1:03:40.400 --> 1:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>was late, and then top if nobody got fifty, top

1:03:43.920 --> 1:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>two met in the general election itself. So that way

1:03:47.760 --> 1:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you had because the fear is that if you have

1:03:49.520 --> 1:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a runoff after the general election, you get fewer, lesser turnout,

1:03:52.400 --> 1:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's less well of the people. That's why the

1:03:55.360 --> 1:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>timing of the Louisiana system made the most sense of

1:03:59.560 --> 1:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>how he did it, and then you don't have to

1:04:01.160 --> 1:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>worry about rank choice voting, but you get all the

1:04:04.080 --> 1:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>but you get the you get exactly what rankd choice

1:04:07.440 --> 1:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>voting wants to deliver.

1:04:09.520 --> 1:04:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And I think that I still think it's true

1:04:12.120 --> 1:04:14.520
<v Speaker 2>that ninety something percent of the vote would be the same.

1:04:14.560 --> 1:04:16.760
<v Speaker 2>And that's why these other reforms I think would deliver.

1:04:17.040 --> 1:04:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that Louisiana system has the potential to deliver

1:04:20.760 --> 1:04:23.720
<v Speaker 2>vastly different and more in line with the will of

1:04:23.760 --> 1:04:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the people results unlike us.

1:04:25.680 --> 1:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Look, I think that by the way, look at the

1:04:27.600 --> 1:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>last you know, Louisiana, it's basically created a Republican primary

1:04:31.360 --> 1:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>system for this cycle just to beat Bill Cassidy. Right,

1:04:34.040 --> 1:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it became a but they got there getting rid of

1:04:36.200 --> 1:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>their They got rid of the system just to defeat

1:04:37.960 --> 1:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill Cassidy because in the old system, Cassidy would have won.

1:04:41.000 --> 1:04:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:04:42.160 --> 1:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And the point being, if you actually look at Louisiana

1:04:44.800 --> 1:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>election results over the past twenty five years, before you

1:04:47.480 --> 1:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>know they put this system in, you had a competitive

1:04:51.520 --> 1:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>two party system. Sure, you had the land Drew dynasty

1:04:55.640 --> 1:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>was that's right, And you also had you know, John

1:04:58.080 --> 1:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Bell Edwards. By the way, Washington State, which has a

1:05:01.880 --> 1:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>version of this system too, also has had even though

1:05:05.280 --> 1:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a very blue state, it's been a very competitive

1:05:08.760 --> 1:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Republican party for some time up there because of this system.

1:05:13.240 --> 1:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I just think it actually gives minority voices

1:05:16.840 --> 1:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>more of an opportunity to have to get their say.

1:05:21.800 --> 1:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And I look at Washington, Louisiana, who have Now you know, again,

1:05:25.040 --> 1:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we're in this era where each party feels like they

1:05:27.680 --> 1:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>have to do everything they can to maximize their ability

1:05:32.200 --> 1:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to win. In fact, so a buddy of mine who's

1:05:35.360 --> 1:05:40.439
<v Speaker 1>a big consultant in California, I asked him, so, what's

1:05:40.440 --> 1:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that What happens if the two Republicans end up in

1:05:43.480 --> 1:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the top two and that's the general election, right, Steve

1:05:46.160 --> 1:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Hilt and Bianca? And he said Hilton would win, and

1:05:51.840 --> 1:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in less than a year there'd be a recall and

1:05:56.040 --> 1:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the top two and then the legislature would he and

1:05:58.640 --> 1:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>then there'd be a a ballot prop to get rid

1:06:01.720 --> 1:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of the all party primaries in California would return to

1:06:06.320 --> 1:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>this old system, basically eradicate all the Arnold Schwarzenegger election

1:06:10.840 --> 1:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>reforms within essentially eighteen months. Yes, if that is, if

1:06:15.760 --> 1:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the scenario, and the way he at I said,

1:06:17.760 --> 1:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what, he's probably right. There would probably be

1:06:19.960 --> 1:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a successful recall. Hilton probably would get recalled pretty quickly.

1:06:23.680 --> 1:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you could just see that because we're

1:06:25.920 --> 1:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>so partisan right now, particularly out on the coasts, that

1:06:29.760 --> 1:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>would happen pretty quick.

1:06:31.120 --> 1:06:35.200
<v Speaker 2>So there's a classic conundrum there where Stier and Porter

1:06:35.360 --> 1:06:37.520
<v Speaker 2>and Swowell looking at each other, and the mayor of

1:06:37.520 --> 1:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>San Jose McMahon, who you had on the show the

1:06:40.040 --> 1:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>other day. You know, he thinks it's on fairies at

1:06:42.760 --> 1:06:45.840
<v Speaker 2>four percent or whatever. I guess you could say, hoo

1:06:45.880 --> 1:06:49.600
<v Speaker 2>blinks first, But is it if someone has to do it?

1:06:49.640 --> 1:06:52.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's the classic conundrum of they're all incentivized

1:06:52.800 --> 1:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>not to go, but but some of them, one of

1:06:56.720 --> 1:06:58.800
<v Speaker 2>them has to go for the good of the trust.

1:06:58.800 --> 1:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Don't you trust the voters to figure it out? And

1:07:01.040 --> 1:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I just think they'll tune in.

1:07:02.560 --> 1:07:05.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I think that if Styr or Porter

1:07:05.760 --> 1:07:09.720
<v Speaker 2>or swallwell, if one of them doesn't go, the risk

1:07:10.160 --> 1:07:15.040
<v Speaker 2>is so far outweighs their individual choice of a chance

1:07:15.080 --> 1:07:18.400
<v Speaker 2>of becoming governor. It could even ruin all of their careers, right,

1:07:18.400 --> 1:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>That's maybe how they should think about it. But they

1:07:20.400 --> 1:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>were so selfish that them would step down.

1:07:34.800 --> 1:07:37.479
<v Speaker 1>I could look at it another way. Isn't this isn't

1:07:37.480 --> 1:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the fact that no Democrat has jumped out and indictment

1:07:40.240 --> 1:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of the candidates themselves who are running. I mean, you know,

1:07:43.720 --> 1:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you do have a lot of I remember remember the

1:07:49.080 --> 1:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>since you're you're you and I are pretty close in age.

1:07:51.760 --> 1:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>You remember the nineteen ninety two presidential field when it

1:07:54.800 --> 1:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>was in nineteen ninety one and called the seven Dwarfs. Yep,

1:07:57.800 --> 1:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I remember that because none of them ever all that,

1:08:01.120 --> 1:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>none of the major Democrats that everybody thought were going

1:08:03.760 --> 1:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to be the front runners. They thought, oh, Bush is unbeatable,

1:08:06.040 --> 1:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not running. I'm going to wait till ninety six. Right,

1:08:07.840 --> 1:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you're Bill Bradley's you're out, Gorge, your dicktep parts, all

1:08:10.880 --> 1:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>these Jay Rockefeller, all these say I'm none. There were

1:08:13.160 --> 1:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>all these people that said I'm waiting, and you know,

1:08:16.880 --> 1:08:19.599
<v Speaker 1>so there were those that said, well, every nomination's worth having,

1:08:19.920 --> 1:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>so why not. And it does feel like the California

1:08:24.080 --> 1:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>right that the mayor of San Francis. I've talked to

1:08:26.280 --> 1:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>so many Democrats who are like, I wish the Mayor

1:08:27.800 --> 1:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of San Francisco were running. Luriy or you have those

1:08:30.240 --> 1:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in southern California. I wish Rick Caruso were running, but

1:08:32.920 --> 1:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not. I've heard others say I wish Kamala Harris

1:08:36.080 --> 1:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>are running. I wish Alex Padill were running. There's a

1:08:38.080 --> 1:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of It is amazing when you look at the

1:08:40.479 --> 1:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>number of high profile people that don't want to lead

1:08:45.400 --> 1:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the world's fourth largest economy. It's surprising how many people

1:08:49.200 --> 1:08:50.439
<v Speaker 1>have taken a pass on that seat.

1:08:50.880 --> 1:08:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, maybe some of those names you listed

1:08:54.280 --> 1:08:57.080
<v Speaker 2>have more of an accurate sense of their chances of winning.

1:08:57.120 --> 1:08:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if Kamala Harris ran for that and lost,

1:09:00.439 --> 1:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I think she'd be forever done in politics in any way.

1:09:03.960 --> 1:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it helps her to be Richard Nixon.

1:09:06.360 --> 1:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Richard Nixon lost to California governor's racing, became president within

1:09:09.880 --> 1:09:10.479
<v Speaker 1>six years.

1:09:10.560 --> 1:09:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I know we didn't. So you're saying we won't have

1:09:12.960 --> 1:09:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris to kick around anymore with there you got

1:09:15.280 --> 1:09:18.880
<v Speaker 2>democratic cloth code. Yeah. I do think that it's going

1:09:18.920 --> 1:09:20.760
<v Speaker 2>to shake out, and I think that one of them

1:09:20.800 --> 1:09:22.919
<v Speaker 2>will leave, And I don't know if it'll be pressure

1:09:23.040 --> 1:09:27.360
<v Speaker 2>or polling or Tom Steyer really thinks he's going to

1:09:27.400 --> 1:09:28.000
<v Speaker 2>be governor.

1:09:28.479 --> 1:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Cash Patel is going to get Eric Swawall

1:09:34.720 --> 1:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the nomination. If they go and leak that file about

1:09:38.160 --> 1:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>his in a weird way, that will you know, if

1:09:42.360 --> 1:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>he becomes a quote target of the Trump administration, right,

1:09:46.200 --> 1:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it probably helps him in that primary.

1:09:48.840 --> 1:09:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Also, but also the voters aren't paying attention and

1:09:51.960 --> 1:09:54.040
<v Speaker 2>they're turned off by it. I mean, I think I

1:09:54.479 --> 1:09:56.040
<v Speaker 2>don't sense that the voters are paying attention.

1:09:56.080 --> 1:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>How about the fact that Gavin Newsom doesn't seem to

1:09:58.240 --> 1:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>have an heir apparent and has no in Tristan. And

1:10:00.880 --> 1:10:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if any of them would want Gavin's

1:10:02.920 --> 1:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>endorsement out.

1:10:03.960 --> 1:10:07.200
<v Speaker 2>There, which is odd republic I mean, Democratic front runner,

1:10:07.240 --> 1:10:10.880
<v Speaker 2>but wouldn't even have a positive effect in the race.

1:10:11.000 --> 1:10:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Right now, you know this gets too I know it's

1:10:14.120 --> 1:10:16.559
<v Speaker 2>your show, but let me segue here. So if the

1:10:16.560 --> 1:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Democrats gained power.

1:10:17.840 --> 1:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Of this is like saying, back of the days when

1:10:19.400 --> 1:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I used to have Tom Broke on Meet the Press,

1:10:21.000 --> 1:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it would be like, are you going to anchor.

1:10:22.400 --> 1:10:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Meet the Press?

1:10:23.320 --> 1:10:25.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know I always said, you know Tom

1:10:25.600 --> 1:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>was a okay passenger, that he always be instinctively wanting

1:10:30.160 --> 1:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to grab the wheel, right, but go ahead, go ahead.

1:10:32.960 --> 1:10:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, I could ask you how to question to plug

1:10:35.400 --> 1:10:37.280
<v Speaker 2>my later show how to Know what I wanted to

1:10:37.280 --> 1:10:42.439
<v Speaker 2>ask you was interesting and important for them and everyone.

1:10:42.800 --> 1:10:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Should the Democrats gain power, But what are the things

1:10:46.320 --> 1:10:49.760
<v Speaker 2>they want to do? I know on the national scene

1:10:49.760 --> 1:10:53.920
<v Speaker 2>it's save our democracy, but what are the things in

1:10:54.040 --> 1:10:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the Senate There've been a couple of gigantic bills. Corey

1:10:58.080 --> 1:11:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Booker wants spend seven trillion dollars to give tax cuts

1:11:00.960 --> 1:11:03.280
<v Speaker 2>to everyone except the rich. That would be a rather

1:11:03.479 --> 1:11:07.400
<v Speaker 2>bad program. Chris van Holland has a similar, smaller program,

1:11:07.720 --> 1:11:11.000
<v Speaker 2>but a thing that has gain steam because we're told,

1:11:11.000 --> 1:11:13.400
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's true that this is the affordability

1:11:13.439 --> 1:11:17.840
<v Speaker 2>moment and election is There are different words for it,

1:11:18.160 --> 1:11:24.560
<v Speaker 2>surveillance pricing, predatory pricing, predictive pricing. This is the technology,

1:11:24.800 --> 1:11:27.439
<v Speaker 2>very simple technology that you could change the price based

1:11:27.479 --> 1:11:28.599
<v Speaker 2>on a lot of different things.

1:11:28.760 --> 1:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Look, I want to get into this a minute, but

1:11:30.400 --> 1:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I actually want to get at the at this specific

1:11:34.920 --> 1:11:38.599
<v Speaker 1>So if Democrats get Congress and they have a Donald

1:11:38.600 --> 1:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump as president for two years, and this is a

1:11:42.080 --> 1:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>question that I've had a lot of Democrats freeze up

1:11:45.840 --> 1:11:49.559
<v Speaker 1>on me when I ask them this question, do you

1:11:49.640 --> 1:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>try to pass legislation with Donald Trump.

1:11:52.760 --> 1:11:53.200
<v Speaker 2>How can you.

1:11:53.240 --> 1:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Answer there is a real the base won't be excited

1:11:57.240 --> 1:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>if you know they negotiate with Donald Trump, you know.

1:12:02.280 --> 1:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>And yet I'll give you an I'll give you an

1:12:05.080 --> 1:12:08.479
<v Speaker 1>item that I think you could get Jade Vanson to support,

1:12:09.439 --> 1:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know if they would want to help

1:12:10.960 --> 1:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>jd Vance potentially help his presidential campaign. And that is

1:12:16.320 --> 1:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the childcare tax credit. Right, that is something that Vance

1:12:21.160 --> 1:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and could get Trump to support. That a lot of

1:12:24.360 --> 1:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sort of main you know, sort of

1:12:26.200 --> 1:12:29.479
<v Speaker 1>the There was plenty of Republican opposition to it, right,

1:12:29.560 --> 1:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But this is one of the areas where there is

1:12:31.120 --> 1:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>some there is some agreement between sort of one wing

1:12:34.280 --> 1:12:38.639
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party and one wing of the Republican Party.

1:12:38.800 --> 1:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>But to me, I think that's the hardest. I think

1:12:42.360 --> 1:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the hardest thing. Forget what they're going to do

1:12:46.600 --> 1:12:50.479
<v Speaker 1>when in office. Do you want your bills signed by

1:12:50.479 --> 1:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump? And are you going to be comfortable if

1:12:52.840 --> 1:12:54.639
<v Speaker 1>you pass things that Donald Trump likes?

1:12:54.720 --> 1:12:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Hey, listen, I don't want my money signed by Donald Trump,

1:12:56.920 --> 1:12:58.759
<v Speaker 2>and I'll still spend it, you know what I'm saying.

1:12:58.960 --> 1:13:02.840
<v Speaker 2>How can you get into office and say we are

1:13:02.880 --> 1:13:05.680
<v Speaker 2>such an alternative to the do nothing Republicans, and we're

1:13:05.680 --> 1:13:08.160
<v Speaker 2>going to prove it by doing nothing. So there's a

1:13:08.240 --> 1:13:10.880
<v Speaker 2>number of people in their constituency who really want to

1:13:10.920 --> 1:13:13.439
<v Speaker 2>do something. There's some who look at they know that

1:13:13.439 --> 1:13:14.760
<v Speaker 2>the map's not going to be as good as it

1:13:14.800 --> 1:13:17.000
<v Speaker 2>was in twenty six and actually working with Republicans and

1:13:17.040 --> 1:13:20.599
<v Speaker 2>being bipartisan will be rewarded. There's a bunch that, you know,

1:13:20.760 --> 1:13:24.479
<v Speaker 2>Democrats tend to be more policy wonks. They actually are

1:13:24.520 --> 1:13:28.200
<v Speaker 2>excited to get some things done. You add that all up.

1:13:28.320 --> 1:13:30.479
<v Speaker 2>I think that the we need to do nothing to

1:13:30.920 --> 1:13:34.439
<v Speaker 2>make a point or to not give JD or Donald

1:13:34.439 --> 1:13:36.799
<v Speaker 2>a win. I think that's a small caucus. Of course,

1:13:37.400 --> 1:13:42.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, just a small faction can have devastating, outsized impacts.

1:13:42.320 --> 1:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say, I don't disagree that

1:13:44.320 --> 1:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a small faction, but I think the loudest voices

1:13:48.160 --> 1:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in the world we occupy right in new media are

1:13:54.280 --> 1:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be one. And don't forget you're going to

1:13:56.120 --> 1:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>have presidential candidates on the trail. That's the other thing.

1:13:59.040 --> 1:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>You're going to have president candidates who are going to

1:14:01.040 --> 1:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>do nothing but piss on Washington, right, and they're going

1:14:04.960 --> 1:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to look for opportunities to run against those that establishment

1:14:09.320 --> 1:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>crowd whatever it is. So I think we are absolutely

1:14:14.360 --> 1:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>going to see nothing get done if there's a democratic Now,

1:14:17.880 --> 1:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>some might argue that's what they want, right, just paralysis

1:14:20.800 --> 1:14:22.559
<v Speaker 1>is better than giving anything.

1:14:22.640 --> 1:14:25.280
<v Speaker 2>These two investigations, they'll count that as the thing.

1:14:25.479 --> 1:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But Noia, I think that will be the highest profile stuff,

1:14:28.880 --> 1:14:32.639
<v Speaker 1>and it won't be. It won't be Trump administration officials

1:14:32.680 --> 1:14:35.479
<v Speaker 1>who will all hide under executive privilege. But I'll tell you,

1:14:37.240 --> 1:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and I've told this to my friends in the business

1:14:39.280 --> 1:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>community when they ask me, what should we be telling

1:14:43.040 --> 1:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>our business that the you know, corporations who are trying

1:14:45.880 --> 1:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what's happening. Why, I said, be prepared

1:14:49.400 --> 1:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>for lots of subpoenas, because because congressional democrats aren't going

1:14:54.160 --> 1:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to get these Trump officials to answer subpoenas,

1:14:58.200 --> 1:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>because they'll all hide behind executive privilege and finding out

1:15:01.280 --> 1:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>what these deals were that were cut with the administration

1:15:03.720 --> 1:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and all this stuff. But the private sector doesn't get

1:15:06.320 --> 1:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to hide behind executive privilege. And I have a feeling

1:15:08.960 --> 1:15:13.679
<v Speaker 1>that the most high profile impact of a democratic Congress

1:15:13.760 --> 1:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to be that.

1:15:14.800 --> 1:15:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would think that there are a number of

1:15:17.160 --> 1:15:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Democrats who would say, we'll have done our job if

1:15:19.800 --> 1:15:23.559
<v Speaker 2>our investigations by the time we're done lead in two

1:15:23.680 --> 1:15:28.720
<v Speaker 2>years to subpoena's credible subpoenas of Elon Musk. That's a

1:15:28.760 --> 1:15:32.519
<v Speaker 2>big target. He's subpoenable based on his beach.

1:15:32.520 --> 1:15:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Entire AI, all the Tech I mean, I think they're

1:15:34.560 --> 1:15:36.479
<v Speaker 1>coming after Tech in a big way.

1:15:37.200 --> 1:15:38.800
<v Speaker 2>This is with them. I don't know that Tech has

1:15:38.840 --> 1:15:42.000
<v Speaker 2>committed crimes, but you know, there's a plausible case that

1:15:42.120 --> 1:15:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Musk has with how he you know, his website which

1:15:45.240 --> 1:15:47.560
<v Speaker 2>would only register, which would crash if you wanted to

1:15:47.640 --> 1:15:51.880
<v Speaker 2>register as a Democrat, and even guys like Stephen Miller,

1:15:52.000 --> 1:15:53.120
<v Speaker 2>I think our subpoenable.

1:15:53.240 --> 1:15:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Not that he'll answer. I think he's not that privilege.

1:15:56.479 --> 1:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>He's in the West Wing. Yeah, I think he absolutely

1:15:59.479 --> 1:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>hides behind executive privilege.

1:16:01.800 --> 1:16:05.400
<v Speaker 2>But investigations that show that, you know, he went to

1:16:06.120 --> 1:16:11.640
<v Speaker 2>California officials and said, forget due process and forget reasonablelek

1:16:11.640 --> 1:16:15.160
<v Speaker 2>cause just go to parking lots of home depots. I

1:16:15.160 --> 1:16:17.479
<v Speaker 2>mean he did say that, or he allegedly or has

1:16:17.520 --> 1:16:18.760
<v Speaker 2>been reported to have said that.

1:16:19.400 --> 1:16:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Now surveillance price, Okay, I know you're you're obsessed about this.

1:16:23.640 --> 1:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Let me tell you a fun Let me tell you

1:16:25.439 --> 1:16:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a fun little nugget I got on this. I had

1:16:27.520 --> 1:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>interviewed Brad Carson, former Democratic congressman from Oklahoma, who's essentially

1:16:32.200 --> 1:16:35.519
<v Speaker 1>the front person for the anthropic AI super Pac, meaning

1:16:36.160 --> 1:16:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the AI superPAC that is pro regulation versus the open

1:16:40.720 --> 1:16:42.679
<v Speaker 1>AI super pac. Right, you know, there's all this money

1:16:42.680 --> 1:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>flowing around. So were I threw this in there and

1:16:47.080 --> 1:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>he told me. He says, well, I thank good. Now

1:16:49.280 --> 1:16:51.599
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about AI regulation and I said why

1:16:51.960 --> 1:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you're pro and he says, yes, and I want to

1:16:53.840 --> 1:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>see the states regulate. And he gave me an example.

1:16:56.320 --> 1:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>He goes, I'm a subscriber to the Washington Post and

1:16:59.200 --> 1:17:03.439
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the law New York, you know, I really

1:17:03.439 --> 1:17:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, which said that, you know this has been

1:17:05.920 --> 1:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>done with surveillance pricing. You know essentially that he was

1:17:08.760 --> 1:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>being And that was his way of using an example

1:17:12.160 --> 1:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>why it's good if the state's way in and in

1:17:15.040 --> 1:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>one state law could actually help people living in other states.

1:17:19.840 --> 1:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>In one regulatory decision by New York to force disclosure

1:17:24.400 --> 1:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>on surveillance pricing at least gave a consumer in Oklahoma

1:17:28.960 --> 1:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to find out what this was all about.

1:17:32.240 --> 1:17:34.080
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, I like Brek Carson. By the way, I

1:17:34.120 --> 1:17:36.880
<v Speaker 2>think his heart is actually in it. He's not just

1:17:36.960 --> 1:17:40.800
<v Speaker 2>taking a gig. He's a former secret under Secretary of

1:17:40.840 --> 1:17:43.360
<v Speaker 2>the Army and ran University of Tulsa for a while.

1:17:43.880 --> 1:17:45.880
<v Speaker 2>I've had him on my show, not even mad. I

1:17:45.880 --> 1:17:48.200
<v Speaker 2>think he's a straight shooter. And you know, back back

1:17:48.240 --> 1:17:50.000
<v Speaker 2>in a time when you could get elected as a

1:17:50.040 --> 1:17:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Democrat from Oklahoma, maybe that time will come again. So

1:17:52.960 --> 1:17:55.800
<v Speaker 2>the deal with surveillance pricing, which, depending on how much

1:17:55.840 --> 1:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>you like it or hate it, is called dynamic pricing.

1:17:59.000 --> 1:18:02.679
<v Speaker 2>That seems good the stores, the retailers call it dynamic pricing.

1:18:03.040 --> 1:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think the remember dynamic scoring. Remember that phenomenon

1:18:07.000 --> 1:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in Congressional Budget Office?

1:18:08.479 --> 1:18:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh right, yes, yes, no, so.

1:18:11.240 --> 1:18:14.599
<v Speaker 1>Tax cuts, no, no, no, dynamic scoring. The debt doesn't

1:18:14.640 --> 1:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>go up, it goes down with dynamic scoring.

1:18:17.400 --> 1:18:19.439
<v Speaker 2>For the first time ever, an account and gets accused

1:18:19.479 --> 1:18:22.880
<v Speaker 2>of dynamism. The worth of dynamic duo meaning he has

1:18:22.920 --> 1:18:24.519
<v Speaker 2>the pencil and I have the ice shade.

1:18:24.680 --> 1:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, dynamic scoring, dynamic price pricing, surveillance pricing, predatory pricing,

1:18:30.000 --> 1:18:30.719
<v Speaker 1>you could change.

1:18:30.880 --> 1:18:33.200
<v Speaker 2>That's if you hate it, you call it predatory pricing.

1:18:33.400 --> 1:18:36.040
<v Speaker 2>And if you adopt a bill or propose a bill

1:18:36.320 --> 1:18:41.000
<v Speaker 2>like Letitia James in New York and McMorrow is campaigning

1:18:41.040 --> 1:18:45.599
<v Speaker 2>on this in Michigan. You talk about the egregious example.

1:18:45.720 --> 1:18:50.719
<v Speaker 2>So McMorrow always talks about if you go to book

1:18:50.720 --> 1:18:53.800
<v Speaker 2>an uber but your phone shows that it's under five

1:18:53.840 --> 1:18:57.200
<v Speaker 2>percent battery, it boosts the price because it knows you're desperate.

1:18:57.439 --> 1:19:01.120
<v Speaker 2>No one likes that. That's pretty bad. But another aspect

1:19:01.160 --> 1:19:03.479
<v Speaker 2>of dynamic pricing, and this made the front page of

1:19:03.520 --> 1:19:06.479
<v Speaker 2>the New York Post, is Wendy's was charging more for

1:19:06.600 --> 1:19:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Hamburgers at noon than they were at eleven. And I

1:19:10.760 --> 1:19:13.240
<v Speaker 2>got to say, all this to me is is a

1:19:13.280 --> 1:19:15.600
<v Speaker 2>discount for the eleven o'clock hamburg.

1:19:15.560 --> 1:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't bother me. That's not to me. That's different

1:19:19.120 --> 1:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>because in theory everybody's eligible for the discount.

1:19:23.040 --> 1:19:26.400
<v Speaker 2>But what about the prices. Here's another one, the prices

1:19:26.479 --> 1:19:29.840
<v Speaker 2>on store shelves. That there are a lot of bills

1:19:29.960 --> 1:19:34.680
<v Speaker 2>in different legislators that would illegalize electronic price tags, like

1:19:34.960 --> 1:19:37.720
<v Speaker 2>what is this nineteen seventy eight, because the idea is

1:19:37.800 --> 1:19:40.439
<v Speaker 2>you could use dynamic pricing, and what they always say

1:19:40.479 --> 1:19:44.479
<v Speaker 2>is charge two people different things. And I guess the

1:19:44.479 --> 1:19:47.800
<v Speaker 2>people who are against this all democrats, think that it

1:19:47.880 --> 1:19:51.080
<v Speaker 2>is just inherently bad to charge two people different things.

1:19:51.360 --> 1:19:54.679
<v Speaker 2>But this is what the circulars and discounts and even

1:19:54.840 --> 1:19:58.160
<v Speaker 2>be longing to Sam's Club gives you. Right, different people

1:19:58.479 --> 1:20:02.360
<v Speaker 2>have different things. The classic example that the retailers use

1:20:02.520 --> 1:20:05.840
<v Speaker 2>is if the bananas are going bad, we could price

1:20:05.880 --> 1:20:08.120
<v Speaker 2>them at ten cents a pound instead of thirty five

1:20:08.200 --> 1:20:10.400
<v Speaker 2>cents a pound, and essentially we might even be taking

1:20:10.400 --> 1:20:12.920
<v Speaker 2>a loss. But what we're really doing is incentivizing the

1:20:12.920 --> 1:20:15.360
<v Speaker 2>shopper to take the bananas home with them instead of

1:20:15.439 --> 1:20:17.800
<v Speaker 2>us putting it in a compost team. So there's so

1:20:17.880 --> 1:20:21.439
<v Speaker 2>much about dynamic pricing that's just modern and that actually

1:20:21.560 --> 1:20:24.920
<v Speaker 2>just helps everyone and is being thought of as a boogeyman.

1:20:24.960 --> 1:20:28.120
<v Speaker 2>And there are bills, literally bills in front of Congress

1:20:28.400 --> 1:20:33.240
<v Speaker 2>that would eliminate the banana pricing scheme. And I identify

1:20:33.320 --> 1:20:37.600
<v Speaker 2>this as though the outrageous examples concentrate the mind. I

1:20:37.600 --> 1:20:41.679
<v Speaker 2>think that if you just publicize them, my libertarian instincts

1:20:41.680 --> 1:20:44.200
<v Speaker 2>would say that the companies wouldn't want to be associated

1:20:44.240 --> 1:20:47.960
<v Speaker 2>with them. I think of it as so if affordability

1:20:48.000 --> 1:20:50.800
<v Speaker 2>is the issue, it's very hard for Democrats not to

1:20:50.920 --> 1:20:54.439
<v Speaker 2>jump on this trend. But are they really improving things

1:20:54.520 --> 1:20:56.320
<v Speaker 2>for the media and voter and consumer.

1:20:57.000 --> 1:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a look. I think it all depends and what

1:21:00.360 --> 1:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>you're putting your throwing into this bucket of what we're

1:21:02.640 --> 1:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>going to call surveillance pricing or whatever. I think the

1:21:06.439 --> 1:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>where I the problem I have is what the airlines

1:21:09.320 --> 1:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>want to do, which is use the data, use the

1:21:11.880 --> 1:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>data that I have voluntarily given them against me to

1:21:15.280 --> 1:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>price some things right, And that is wait a minute,

1:21:18.640 --> 1:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, so now it looks like now I'm almost

1:21:21.240 --> 1:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>regretting ever becoming a frequent flyer because I've given them

1:21:24.760 --> 1:21:28.679
<v Speaker 1>so much information that you know, they now every time

1:21:28.720 --> 1:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I book, they know certain things and I'm going to

1:21:31.400 --> 1:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>get quoted a price. You know, they know where I'm

1:21:34.360 --> 1:21:36.599
<v Speaker 1>They can look at my history to know how price

1:21:36.640 --> 1:21:39.400
<v Speaker 1>sensitive I am on various things and various routes and how.

1:21:40.200 --> 1:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And so the I think it's how the how the

1:21:45.200 --> 1:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>data you've handed over to them, if that's being used

1:21:48.439 --> 1:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to inform your individual price. I think when you're saying

1:21:53.280 --> 1:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>floating price based on supply and demand, that seems very normal,

1:21:59.400 --> 1:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>fair part of the free market economy. When you're changing

1:22:03.200 --> 1:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>price based on what you think an individual will do,

1:22:09.000 --> 1:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that feels a little bit. That feels like you're bordering

1:22:13.360 --> 1:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>on discrimination.

1:22:15.120 --> 1:22:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you write the bill narrowly so it doesn't

1:22:19.000 --> 1:22:22.000
<v Speaker 2>go through broad I guess I support it, but I don't.

1:22:22.080 --> 1:22:25.479
<v Speaker 2>I listened to the rhetoric of Greg Caesar and Luhan

1:22:25.680 --> 1:22:28.640
<v Speaker 2>of New Mexico, and they and Letitia James, and this

1:22:28.840 --> 1:22:31.400
<v Speaker 2>is not what they're saying. They're not allowing I never

1:22:31.479 --> 1:22:34.400
<v Speaker 2>hear the clause, and I listen of now. Of course

1:22:34.479 --> 1:22:38.599
<v Speaker 2>we understand that businesses. It's not just in their ability,

1:22:38.640 --> 1:22:42.479
<v Speaker 2>but helps the business stay afloat and also helps the

1:22:42.520 --> 1:22:46.040
<v Speaker 2>consumer dev different prices at different times. They're just all

1:22:46.120 --> 1:22:49.200
<v Speaker 2>seen as a boogeyman, and in this moment of affordability

1:22:49.200 --> 1:22:52.599
<v Speaker 2>above all else, it's tantalizing to reach for. I also

1:22:52.680 --> 1:22:58.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know do voters really reward you for these small,

1:22:58.320 --> 1:23:04.320
<v Speaker 2>bore quality of life improvements. When Biden tried, and maybe

1:23:04.320 --> 1:23:05.759
<v Speaker 2>this was messaging jump.

1:23:05.560 --> 1:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Fees, it was weirdly popular. Though it pulls well.

1:23:09.040 --> 1:23:12.680
<v Speaker 2>It does ask people the question flat out, you want

1:23:12.680 --> 1:23:14.800
<v Speaker 2>to pay more or less? They'll say less, But does

1:23:14.840 --> 1:23:18.760
<v Speaker 2>it really accrue to the statesman who is there and

1:23:18.800 --> 1:23:21.240
<v Speaker 2>trying to fight for you in a big way. Maybe

1:23:21.240 --> 1:23:23.840
<v Speaker 2>on the smaller level it will. I don't think this

1:23:24.040 --> 1:23:27.599
<v Speaker 2>is I am suspicious. I understand why Democrats are reaching

1:23:27.600 --> 1:23:30.400
<v Speaker 2>for I don't think that it is the killer blow

1:23:30.439 --> 1:23:31.479
<v Speaker 2>that some think it is.

1:23:31.840 --> 1:23:33.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a killer blow. But I do

1:23:33.720 --> 1:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>believe if you're always seen on the side of the consumer, right,

1:23:38.840 --> 1:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>not thinking of this as voter, and if you want

1:23:41.200 --> 1:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>to have a conversation with people that are just not

1:23:43.560 --> 1:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in your tribe but are actually members of other tribes,

1:23:49.400 --> 1:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>then I think it's a way in. Again. Look, I

1:23:55.200 --> 1:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>believe this. I think part of the news media's trust

1:23:58.840 --> 1:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>issue is on the national level, we don't think of

1:24:02.160 --> 1:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>ourselves as consumer advocates. Very often. Local news actually used

1:24:06.320 --> 1:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to be. That was the differentiator. Your local news operation

1:24:10.200 --> 1:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>was much more of a consumer advocate than and I

1:24:13.680 --> 1:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>think gutting and I've always said when we gutted local news,

1:24:17.160 --> 1:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we actually gutted the first line of trust defense, meaning

1:24:21.560 --> 1:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>because the local news operators were the consumer advocates finding

1:24:26.240 --> 1:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>out who was getting scammed and hey, there's some bad

1:24:28.960 --> 1:24:33.559
<v Speaker 1>phone calls, right, Always Shasmer protection on you that it

1:24:33.680 --> 1:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>gave actually media a little bit more trust generally. So

1:24:38.520 --> 1:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I agree it's not a single killer app issue. But

1:24:41.880 --> 1:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I actually think anytime you're caught being a consumer advocate,

1:24:45.120 --> 1:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gaining trust.

1:24:46.560 --> 1:24:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and if you agree with us, we'll also send

1:24:49.360 --> 1:24:52.320
<v Speaker 2>you a copy of the fight back theme song. That

1:24:52.479 --> 1:24:56.799
<v Speaker 2>was the other David Horowitz they show from the eighties. True,

1:24:57.560 --> 1:24:58.719
<v Speaker 2>then again, and then.

1:24:58.640 --> 1:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>David Horowitz became a a huge right winger. I remember

1:25:01.720 --> 1:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>different guys, was it a different there were two David

1:25:05.120 --> 1:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>there Barwitz does. I remember being very confused, Wait a.

1:25:08.320 --> 1:25:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Minute, right, why are we fighting back?

1:25:11.840 --> 1:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>But in fact I think the right wing David Horwitz

1:25:14.720 --> 1:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>became more prominent.

1:25:16.200 --> 1:25:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, and he the right wing David horror Whitz

1:25:18.760 --> 1:25:21.719
<v Speaker 2>started off as an extreme left wing you know, smashed

1:25:21.760 --> 1:25:24.840
<v Speaker 2>the state guy, as is often the arc. I also,

1:25:24.960 --> 1:25:27.280
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder though, if the idea of the local

1:25:27.320 --> 1:25:30.519
<v Speaker 2>news and the tip off to a ripoff is of

1:25:30.600 --> 1:25:33.960
<v Speaker 2>a piece with an older era where Chuck Schumer would

1:25:34.000 --> 1:25:36.880
<v Speaker 2>have a press conference every week at a gas station

1:25:37.320 --> 1:25:40.280
<v Speaker 2>and talk about exactly these issues, but he also knew

1:25:40.320 --> 1:25:42.840
<v Speaker 2>that he could get coverage of it. And now what

1:25:42.960 --> 1:25:45.519
<v Speaker 2>are we really paying attention to. Do you think there's

1:25:45.560 --> 1:25:48.639
<v Speaker 2>going to be a ripoff talk, a shame on you talk?

1:25:48.920 --> 1:25:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you think this is going to be a predatory

1:25:51.880 --> 1:25:54.400
<v Speaker 2>pricing talk. I don't know that these are the issues

1:25:54.439 --> 1:25:56.679
<v Speaker 2>that are grabbing our attention these days.

1:25:56.720 --> 1:25:58.880
<v Speaker 1>No, but it is a piece of the larger issue

1:25:58.880 --> 1:26:01.719
<v Speaker 1>that we have less control and that somehow we've given

1:26:01.920 --> 1:26:05.559
<v Speaker 1>tech too much control of things in general. So I

1:26:05.600 --> 1:26:07.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's a piece of something bigger. That's why I

1:26:07.920 --> 1:26:08.880
<v Speaker 1>think it resonates.

1:26:09.080 --> 1:26:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think MGP. I think Marie Glufenkan Perez

1:26:12.240 --> 1:26:15.400
<v Speaker 2>is the ultimate example of someone who's very much on

1:26:15.439 --> 1:26:17.840
<v Speaker 2>the side of consumer and she's mostly associated with the

1:26:17.880 --> 1:26:20.160
<v Speaker 2>ability to fix your own washing machine, and that's her

1:26:20.200 --> 1:26:22.479
<v Speaker 2>brand and it helps her. So yeah, that would be

1:26:22.600 --> 1:26:25.479
<v Speaker 2>an example of where some of it does break through.

1:26:25.720 --> 1:26:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I wonder, I mean, if the Republican Party didn't go

1:26:27.880 --> 1:26:29.960
<v Speaker 2>as crazy as it did. I had wondered for a

1:26:30.000 --> 1:26:33.200
<v Speaker 2>long time, might she defect because she seems very very

1:26:33.240 --> 1:26:35.800
<v Speaker 2>upset with the Democrats, and often is. If you hear

1:26:36.080 --> 1:26:39.240
<v Speaker 2>three Democrats voted against the bill and she's off from one.

1:26:49.760 --> 1:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I am and maybe this is the Polypanish in me.

1:26:52.880 --> 1:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I am hopeful that what Kevin Kylie did when he

1:26:55.360 --> 1:26:57.519
<v Speaker 1>decided to put an eye next to his name and

1:26:57.600 --> 1:27:01.679
<v Speaker 1>leave the Republican Party. You know that if you told

1:27:01.680 --> 1:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>me MGP decided to become an I and then you know, look,

1:27:07.600 --> 1:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty fluent and certainly I converse a lot with

1:27:12.200 --> 1:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the folks in the in the forward space, the Andrew

1:27:16.120 --> 1:27:21.599
<v Speaker 1>Yang world, Christy Weapons involved, and and you know, they're

1:27:21.840 --> 1:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they're trying they're sort of fighting a two front war. Right.

1:27:24.400 --> 1:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>One is they're trying to improve ballot access for independent candidates.

1:27:27.240 --> 1:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, and that's a that's the thing you

1:27:29.400 --> 1:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of have, that's almost like a that's the long game.

1:27:32.200 --> 1:27:35.360
<v Speaker 1>The short game is they're looking to do a better

1:27:35.479 --> 1:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>version of what problem Solvers and no Labels tried to

1:27:39.080 --> 1:27:42.479
<v Speaker 1>do and didn't do it very well, which is create

1:27:42.520 --> 1:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a caucus of independent thinkers whatever that is independent Dems,

1:27:46.240 --> 1:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>independent ours, independent independence right that collectively vote together on

1:27:52.400 --> 1:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>leadership elections and and become the folkrum like in the

1:27:56.120 --> 1:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Senate if you just got you know, take Dan Osborne, right,

1:28:00.200 --> 1:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the thing that's keeping him from winning that center race

1:28:03.240 --> 1:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that he you know, it's you know,

1:28:06.360 --> 1:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it's he's going to be a vote for Schumer. He's

1:28:08.160 --> 1:28:10.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be a vote for Democrats. So how does

1:28:10.760 --> 1:28:13.519
<v Speaker 1>he convince the voters that he's not a vote for

1:28:13.560 --> 1:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Schumer and then he's not a vote for Democrats? Right?

1:28:16.120 --> 1:28:18.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, if he's working with you know, if his

1:28:18.400 --> 1:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>answer is I'm going to work with Lisa, I'm going

1:28:20.280 --> 1:28:24.759
<v Speaker 1>to Lisa Murkowski, and I'm going to you know, Bernie

1:28:24.800 --> 1:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Sanders and Lisa Murkowski and Angus King and you know,

1:28:29.439 --> 1:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and John Curtis in Utah, you know, you sort of

1:28:32.040 --> 1:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm you know, I'm going to try to forge

1:28:33.840 --> 1:28:37.559
<v Speaker 1>an independ I refuse to have to pick between Donald

1:28:37.600 --> 1:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump and Chuck Schumer. You're not going to make me

1:28:39.800 --> 1:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>pick here, because I actually think my election is going

1:28:43.120 --> 1:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to create an opening with to work with a whole

1:28:47.320 --> 1:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>bunch of independents and will make the two parties court

1:28:50.439 --> 1:28:55.559
<v Speaker 1>us to decide who should get the majority. But until

1:28:55.560 --> 1:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we have that breakthrough, that's what makes it I think

1:28:59.200 --> 1:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>tough in these independent Senate campaigns.

1:29:02.080 --> 1:29:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that the structure of it. Yeah, I

1:29:06.920 --> 1:29:10.920
<v Speaker 2>think that it's structurally tough. I think that our politics

1:29:11.560 --> 1:29:15.200
<v Speaker 2>is sclerotic, and it doesn't it doesn't at all comport

1:29:15.280 --> 1:29:18.200
<v Speaker 2>with our media and our attention. And I think that

1:29:18.240 --> 1:29:20.960
<v Speaker 2>there's been a bigger there hasn't ever been a bigger

1:29:21.000 --> 1:29:26.000
<v Speaker 2>mismatch in our lifetime. It's like we're running analog politics

1:29:26.320 --> 1:29:31.679
<v Speaker 2>with next gen digital. Not just this goes to think

1:29:31.720 --> 1:29:32.400
<v Speaker 2>about the world.

1:29:32.479 --> 1:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, this goes to whether it's it's infrastructure right to

1:29:35.960 --> 1:29:40.439
<v Speaker 1>improve the small de democratic infrastructure like online voting or

1:29:40.479 --> 1:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing things like this, Like we haven't modernized

1:29:43.640 --> 1:29:48.479
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure of politics to match the needs of today.

1:29:48.560 --> 1:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Just like and I'd argue our constitution needs updated, doesn't

1:29:52.160 --> 1:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>need we don't need to redo it, but there are

1:29:55.200 --> 1:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a few things that like, okay, that's sort of that

1:29:57.400 --> 1:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work anymore, and we kind of need this, like

1:29:59.400 --> 1:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the garden power. I'm really into this constitutional amendment that's

1:30:03.200 --> 1:30:06.639
<v Speaker 1>been introduced in the House that gives Congress the ability

1:30:06.640 --> 1:30:10.439
<v Speaker 1>to essentially overturn a presidential pardon using sort of but

1:30:10.880 --> 1:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>realizing it has to be a constitutional amendment. And I

1:30:13.360 --> 1:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>actually think the parameters they created, which was it has

1:30:15.840 --> 1:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a super majority to do it, and all

1:30:17.439 --> 1:30:21.559
<v Speaker 1>this stuff feels very founding fatherlike, oh, sort of like okay,

1:30:21.920 --> 1:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and the type of modernization that probably is necessary out

1:30:25.200 --> 1:30:26.679
<v Speaker 1>of you know, for the life of me, I don't

1:30:26.680 --> 1:30:30.719
<v Speaker 1>know why there's soul why an individual was given pardon

1:30:30.760 --> 1:30:32.519
<v Speaker 1>power by a bunch of people who were afraid of

1:30:32.520 --> 1:30:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a king. But needless to say that I did happen.

1:30:35.800 --> 1:30:38.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, from reading the history. It was a huge

1:30:38.320 --> 1:30:43.400
<v Speaker 2>compromise and didn't really conceptualize what the president would. I

1:30:43.479 --> 1:30:46.120
<v Speaker 2>give them a lot of leeway. Those guys in those wigs,

1:30:46.200 --> 1:30:47.840
<v Speaker 2>drinking the weak beer they were.

1:30:48.160 --> 1:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty good. What they did come up with

1:30:50.080 --> 1:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>has been it, yes, right, they were reaffected. They didn't

1:30:54.200 --> 1:30:56.599
<v Speaker 1>think of you know, remember our first constitution didn't even

1:30:56.640 --> 1:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>last a decade, so so a pretty good thing is

1:30:59.800 --> 1:31:02.679
<v Speaker 1>the most of It's so hard to amend the constitution,

1:31:02.760 --> 1:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and the moment to amend the Constitution is a post

1:31:05.400 --> 1:31:06.519
<v Speaker 1>Watergate moment when.

1:31:06.400 --> 1:31:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Everyone realizes, oh my god, that went horribly wrong. And

1:31:10.080 --> 1:31:12.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we're going to have that. I don't

1:31:12.160 --> 1:31:14.360
<v Speaker 2>think we're going to have that in twenty twenty eight.

1:31:14.360 --> 1:31:15.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we're going.

1:31:15.040 --> 1:31:17.519
<v Speaker 1>To have no, but I think we will buy twenty forty.

1:31:18.479 --> 1:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you look at the eras when we

1:31:20.439 --> 1:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>have done multiple constitutional amendments in a ten year period.

1:31:24.640 --> 1:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>They have happened after huge moments. Right. We had a

1:31:28.840 --> 1:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>period around the Civil War. We had a period essentially

1:31:34.080 --> 1:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in the industrial right, the Industrial Revolution and the pushback

1:31:36.960 --> 1:31:38.799
<v Speaker 1>on that. That's why we got direct election of senators

1:31:38.800 --> 1:31:43.679
<v Speaker 1>when we suffrage the ability to tax rich aggressive. Right.

1:31:44.280 --> 1:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, do I think it's twenty twenty eight? No?

1:31:48.160 --> 1:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But do I think remember all of those constitutional amendments

1:31:51.000 --> 1:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that passed were like introduced twenty years earlier.

1:31:53.200 --> 1:31:53.439
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:31:53.600 --> 1:31:55.559
<v Speaker 1>It is one of those things that it does take

1:31:56.320 --> 1:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it takes time to do it, and you know,

1:31:59.280 --> 1:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we will eventually get there. Hey, let me,

1:32:03.120 --> 1:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>are you an NBA fan?

1:32:04.760 --> 1:32:06.240
<v Speaker 2>I am, in fact.

1:32:06.280 --> 1:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, because I thought this would be a good way

1:32:09.720 --> 1:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>for us to close. We're buttoning up here in the

1:32:13.400 --> 1:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>forty five close seven times during the interview. Shock, yeah,

1:32:16.120 --> 1:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you have you keep trying to get out. That's really

1:32:18.240 --> 1:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the sneaky little thing. I have this annual conversation with

1:32:22.640 --> 1:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a whole group of friends of mine and it always

1:32:25.280 --> 1:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>happens at the same time a year. Why during March

1:32:29.360 --> 1:32:32.439
<v Speaker 1>madness do I end up realizing how much I hate

1:32:32.720 --> 1:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the NBA sucks? NBA regular season sucks, And it's like

1:32:36.439 --> 1:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it like it always, just it's a stark reminder that,

1:32:41.439 --> 1:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>like the NBA has a massive regular season problem. I'll

1:32:45.120 --> 1:32:47.439
<v Speaker 1>say this both as a fan of basketball and as

1:32:47.479 --> 1:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a gambler. Okay, I enjoy gambling. I know that's not

1:32:50.960 --> 1:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>popular to say that, but.

1:32:52.680 --> 1:32:54.479
<v Speaker 2>It's not popular to say that. It's popular to do

1:32:54.560 --> 1:32:55.679
<v Speaker 2>it exactly.

1:32:56.640 --> 1:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>But I also want I also believe in honest I

1:32:59.720 --> 1:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>want to gamble honestly, meaning if you know, I don't

1:33:03.880 --> 1:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>gamble on the NBA because I don't believe every team

1:33:06.080 --> 1:33:08.479
<v Speaker 1>is trying every night, and if I know that people

1:33:08.479 --> 1:33:10.559
<v Speaker 1>aren't trying, then I don't want to. I'm not risking

1:33:10.600 --> 1:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>my money on something that is that is that is

1:33:13.080 --> 1:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to be, that is not going to match

1:33:17.000 --> 1:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>what the data indicates generally it should match, right. And

1:33:23.320 --> 1:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I think the NBA has a

1:33:25.040 --> 1:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>massive regular season problem. And I don't know how they should,

1:33:29.120 --> 1:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to fix it, but I think they've

1:33:31.160 --> 1:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>got to fix it. I'm embarrassed about the Wizards, you know,

1:33:34.800 --> 1:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but if they're not alone here with this tanking mess,

1:33:37.360 --> 1:33:39.519
<v Speaker 1>but it really has made the NBA is useless to

1:33:39.560 --> 1:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>watch when a tanking team is playing anybody It doesn't

1:33:42.800 --> 1:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>matter if they're playing Wemby or if they're playing you know,

1:33:45.160 --> 1:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it is baseball. Yeah, think about baseball, baseball, whatever you

1:33:50.360 --> 1:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>think of baseball in September. Of the teams that are eliminated,

1:33:53.520 --> 1:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>those players try hard because.

1:33:56.120 --> 1:33:57.799
<v Speaker 2>They want to all up and it's their slot.

1:33:57.920 --> 1:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, And somehow the I mean literally you have

1:34:01.720 --> 1:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the Wizards. As soon as a player does well that

1:34:03.920 --> 1:34:06.559
<v Speaker 1>he gets benched. Yes, I mean literally, the coaches get

1:34:06.600 --> 1:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>involved to do this, and I do think it's screwed

1:34:09.040 --> 1:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>up the product. And I do think the NCAA tournament

1:34:12.240 --> 1:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>always becomes this moment to remind people, oh yeah, boy,

1:34:17.280 --> 1:34:19.479
<v Speaker 1>this time. I can't wait for the NBA playoffs because

1:34:19.479 --> 1:34:21.679
<v Speaker 1>we're literally at the crappiest time of year to watch

1:34:21.720 --> 1:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the NBA.

1:34:22.720 --> 1:34:25.639
<v Speaker 2>Right, So my counters, I don't know if they're counters.

1:34:25.840 --> 1:34:27.599
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, this would make a great how too.

1:34:27.600 --> 1:34:29.679
<v Speaker 2>You should come on my new show how to Fix

1:34:29.720 --> 1:34:30.120
<v Speaker 2>the NBA.

1:34:30.160 --> 1:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And I don't have a good answer this.

1:34:32.680 --> 1:34:35.840
<v Speaker 2>We need question askers, so you would ask, how how

1:34:35.840 --> 1:34:37.880
<v Speaker 2>do I fix the How do I gamble correctly and

1:34:38.080 --> 1:34:38.320
<v Speaker 2>do this?

1:34:38.680 --> 1:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And I want to get I enjoy Well, put it

1:34:41.640 --> 1:34:44.439
<v Speaker 1>this way, the NCAA Tournament's been great. This has been

1:34:44.560 --> 1:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>great cause basketball. By the way, a reminder, money can't

1:34:47.920 --> 1:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>improve things creating financial incentives to you know, we have

1:34:52.080 --> 1:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the most competitive basketball and improved quality that

1:34:57.080 --> 1:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>we've had in thirty years. This feels like the eighties. Again,

1:35:00.120 --> 1:35:02.240
<v Speaker 1>how good college basketball is right now.

1:35:02.280 --> 1:35:05.160
<v Speaker 2>So I'm a huge Saint John's fan. Without Mike Ropole

1:35:05.280 --> 1:35:08.320
<v Speaker 2>of Vitamin Water and some horses inchecting tens of million

1:35:08.400 --> 1:35:11.479
<v Speaker 2>dollars into that franchise to get Patino and to pay players,

1:35:11.680 --> 1:35:14.120
<v Speaker 2>they'd be regular old probably not even gonna make the tournament.

1:35:14.120 --> 1:35:16.559
<v Speaker 2>Saint John's. I agree with you on an il. I

1:35:16.600 --> 1:35:18.760
<v Speaker 2>definitely think they need a bunch of reforms, Like you

1:35:18.840 --> 1:35:21.080
<v Speaker 2>need to know how much the players will pay.

1:35:21.200 --> 1:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>You need to know that everybody's following the same rules.

1:35:23.720 --> 1:35:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we need to We need to know what the

1:35:25.240 --> 1:35:28.080
<v Speaker 2>market is. It screws the players. It's opaque, it's not

1:35:28.120 --> 1:35:30.840
<v Speaker 2>working for anyone except the agents. Would you rather have

1:35:31.200 --> 1:35:34.680
<v Speaker 2>It's almost unfair because the NBA is a one and

1:35:34.760 --> 1:35:39.320
<v Speaker 2>done situation. So that's unbelievably exciting. But it's a six. Yes,

1:35:39.520 --> 1:35:42.800
<v Speaker 2>sorry March Maddis is that's a six game tournament, and

1:35:42.880 --> 1:35:47.240
<v Speaker 2>not only for money and attention, but even for the

1:35:47.280 --> 1:35:53.080
<v Speaker 2>actual the actual pace of play and how sophisticated these

1:35:53.120 --> 1:35:55.720
<v Speaker 2>guys are. You want longer series in the NBA, not

1:35:55.800 --> 1:35:58.280
<v Speaker 2>by being selfish and trying to milk the fans. Long

1:35:58.320 --> 1:36:01.040
<v Speaker 2>series where teams get to know each other and get

1:36:01.080 --> 1:36:04.679
<v Speaker 2>to know each other's every move are amazing. They're great.

1:36:05.200 --> 1:36:09.200
<v Speaker 2>So I'd rather have an NBA where people are trying,

1:36:09.240 --> 1:36:13.000
<v Speaker 2>where teams are trying, than in NCAAA, which gins up

1:36:13.360 --> 1:36:16.479
<v Speaker 2>this March Madness excitement because of the one and done

1:36:16.560 --> 1:36:19.000
<v Speaker 2>nature of the tournament. In fact, I think the tournament

1:36:19.040 --> 1:36:22.799
<v Speaker 2>itself is this great product, and people don't view NCAA

1:36:23.080 --> 1:36:25.800
<v Speaker 2>basketball is this great product. They do a little bit lately.

1:36:25.840 --> 1:36:27.840
<v Speaker 2>People are interested in the fresh better.

1:36:27.880 --> 1:36:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I think it's quality of play. Look, March Madness

1:36:32.840 --> 1:36:36.280
<v Speaker 1>kept the conversation about the crappiness of college basketball over

1:36:36.320 --> 1:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years at Bay because the tournament was

1:36:38.680 --> 1:36:41.280
<v Speaker 1>still good right even at the team, even if we

1:36:41.320 --> 1:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>saw a lot of just crappy games.

1:36:43.280 --> 1:36:47.240
<v Speaker 2>The tournament is a great product. Absolutely, it's great marketing,

1:36:47.360 --> 1:36:50.960
<v Speaker 2>gambling helps, and one and done. In Jacka's drama into it.

1:36:51.240 --> 1:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that the improved the fact that you

1:36:54.439 --> 1:36:56.760
<v Speaker 1>have players now staying longer. Right, anybody under six to

1:36:56.800 --> 1:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>six isn't isn't leaving to go play in Europe anymore,

1:37:00.160 --> 1:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>staying here because they can make the same money here

1:37:02.240 --> 1:37:04.639
<v Speaker 1>that they could make playing in Turkey or in France

1:37:04.720 --> 1:37:07.639
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. So you've got you know, you've got these

1:37:07.720 --> 1:37:11.559
<v Speaker 1>veteran teams, right, So you've got just in the same

1:37:11.600 --> 1:37:14.559
<v Speaker 1>way four year point guards were the key to winning

1:37:14.560 --> 1:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the tournament in the eighties. Four year point guards again

1:37:17.320 --> 1:37:20.840
<v Speaker 1>have become important in the n club a. So I

1:37:20.880 --> 1:37:23.639
<v Speaker 1>think that in that sense, let me throw an idea

1:37:23.680 --> 1:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>at you. It at the NBA. So look, I hear

1:37:26.720 --> 1:37:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you on a seven game series. There's nothing like it

1:37:28.840 --> 1:37:32.720
<v Speaker 1>for the NBA finals and for the conference finals. But

1:37:32.800 --> 1:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, baseball would have a bigger problem about the

1:37:35.640 --> 1:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers if it wasn't for the fact that they have

1:37:37.920 --> 1:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a five game series in their playoffs.

1:37:39.880 --> 1:37:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Because it introduces randomness, correct, And if you had a

1:37:43.439 --> 1:37:46.479
<v Speaker 2>little bit more randomness in the NBA in that first round.

1:37:46.520 --> 1:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Now, remember they used to have it two out of

1:37:48.600 --> 1:37:50.720
<v Speaker 1>three was a bad idea. They tried that once and

1:37:50.800 --> 1:37:52.840
<v Speaker 1>eliminated the Lakers. In the first round. That was a

1:37:52.840 --> 1:37:55.559
<v Speaker 1>disaster for them, so they quickly got rid of that.

1:37:55.640 --> 1:37:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember this back in Green was heard, but like

1:37:58.960 --> 1:38:00.800
<v Speaker 1>they loose to the Rockets two out of three the

1:38:00.880 --> 1:38:03.240
<v Speaker 1>year after they win the title, is just screw it.

1:38:03.280 --> 1:38:03.599
<v Speaker 2>Eighties.

1:38:03.640 --> 1:38:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but a five game series in the first round

1:38:07.640 --> 1:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and allowing some randomness in the first round. My thesis

1:38:12.240 --> 1:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is those nine, ten to eleven teams. You know, and

1:38:17.439 --> 1:38:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a big fan of the play in as much.

1:38:19.400 --> 1:38:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I get why they tried it, but instead of doing

1:38:21.439 --> 1:38:23.559
<v Speaker 1>the play in, I'd rather see the five game first

1:38:23.640 --> 1:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>round series because it then makes the eighth seed and

1:38:27.160 --> 1:38:30.280
<v Speaker 1>seven seed worth having as it is, and you might

1:38:30.360 --> 1:38:34.439
<v Speaker 1>get more nine through twelve teams who are deciding do

1:38:34.479 --> 1:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I tank or not. You're not beating Oh, you're not

1:38:37.160 --> 1:38:38.720
<v Speaker 1>going to win a one You're not going to beat

1:38:38.720 --> 1:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>a one seed in a seven game series. It's happened

1:38:40.760 --> 1:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>once or twice, but it mostly doesn't. But you could

1:38:44.200 --> 1:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>do it in a five game and then suddenly that's

1:38:47.200 --> 1:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>an incentive to get into the playoffs. Just like in baseball,

1:38:51.000 --> 1:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the eighty eight win team that sneaks in with a

1:38:55.400 --> 1:38:58.400
<v Speaker 1>great pitcher can knock off the one seed in a

1:38:58.439 --> 1:39:00.840
<v Speaker 1>five game series because that picture can pay twice.

1:39:01.760 --> 1:39:03.880
<v Speaker 2>And I know that's exciting, but I don't know that

1:39:03.880 --> 1:39:06.760
<v Speaker 2>that's fair. Just on the baseball side of things, I

1:39:06.840 --> 1:39:08.960
<v Speaker 2>used to analogize it too. There was a lot of

1:39:09.080 --> 1:39:12.000
<v Speaker 2>u There was a lot of discussion about if college

1:39:12.040 --> 1:39:15.400
<v Speaker 2>admissions were fair or not fair, and I said, well,

1:39:15.479 --> 1:39:17.560
<v Speaker 2>what you could do is inject a lot of randomness,

1:39:17.640 --> 1:39:20.360
<v Speaker 2>which is your SAT score would just correlate to the

1:39:20.400 --> 1:39:22.679
<v Speaker 2>number of spots you had on a big prize wheel,

1:39:22.840 --> 1:39:25.280
<v Speaker 2>and that would be if you got into college. So

1:39:25.320 --> 1:39:28.080
<v Speaker 2>that would be more I guess fair or random, or

1:39:28.080 --> 1:39:31.120
<v Speaker 2>it would deprioritize the SATs. But I don't think that

1:39:31.160 --> 1:39:33.640
<v Speaker 2>would be a fairer system. But what we want in

1:39:33.680 --> 1:39:37.040
<v Speaker 2>sports is entertainment. So I definitely want to say this

1:39:37.080 --> 1:39:39.000
<v Speaker 2>one thing. I have a solution, And I have a

1:39:39.000 --> 1:39:41.080
<v Speaker 2>critique of something. You said you don't bet because you

1:39:41.120 --> 1:39:43.559
<v Speaker 2>don't know if the teams are trying. That is true.

1:39:43.560 --> 1:39:46.599
<v Speaker 2>I think you're probably over indexing for the Wizards, who

1:39:46.640 --> 1:39:49.800
<v Speaker 2>are horrendous on this score, Absolutely shameful.

1:39:49.880 --> 1:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I've had to deal with this for three years now.

1:39:51.640 --> 1:39:55.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, your best DC could be a great basketball market.

1:39:55.640 --> 1:39:58.400
<v Speaker 1>It's the d the NBA and the Wizards have just

1:39:58.400 --> 1:40:00.519
<v Speaker 1>been you know, made screwed it up.

1:40:00.640 --> 1:40:03.080
<v Speaker 2>The players, of course always try, but like you say,

1:40:03.160 --> 1:40:05.280
<v Speaker 2>the management doesn't give you the good players, or they

1:40:05.320 --> 1:40:08.519
<v Speaker 2>shut you down, or the coaches will pull you out

1:40:09.280 --> 1:40:11.719
<v Speaker 2>if you weren't you bet. I mean on the Nuggets

1:40:11.760 --> 1:40:13.840
<v Speaker 2>are playing the Rockets, or the Knicks are playing the Rockets,

1:40:13.920 --> 1:40:15.880
<v Speaker 2>or the Nuggets are playing the Lakers. These guys are

1:40:15.880 --> 1:40:18.640
<v Speaker 2>going at it. Let's right, Luca is going at it

1:40:18.680 --> 1:40:21.720
<v Speaker 2>as hard as he could. I'm seeing Jamal Murray with

1:40:21.840 --> 1:40:24.960
<v Speaker 2>facial lacerations as he drives down the lane. There is

1:40:25.040 --> 1:40:27.559
<v Speaker 2>a lot of effort and the way to stop the tanking.

1:40:27.600 --> 1:40:30.360
<v Speaker 2>It's very interesting because they thought that, well, instead of

1:40:30.400 --> 1:40:33.960
<v Speaker 2>giving teams the guaranteed number one pick, we'll just give

1:40:34.000 --> 1:40:36.360
<v Speaker 2>them the highest odds at the number one pick. And

1:40:36.400 --> 1:40:38.960
<v Speaker 2>I think a behavioral economists will say that will never

1:40:39.120 --> 1:40:42.400
<v Speaker 2>change behavior. If all you're doing is saying, well, do

1:40:42.439 --> 1:40:44.559
<v Speaker 2>I have any chance of it? Is it a better

1:40:44.640 --> 1:40:46.519
<v Speaker 2>chance than everyone else? I'm still going to do it.

1:40:46.560 --> 1:40:49.240
<v Speaker 2>The downside of tanking, isn't that bad what you do.

1:40:49.560 --> 1:40:53.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a fundamental change, But really, if you think about it,

1:40:53.000 --> 1:40:55.959
<v Speaker 2>it's fine. It works. It solves a lot of problems.

1:40:56.360 --> 1:40:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Rotate the number one pick among all thirty two teams

1:40:59.280 --> 1:41:02.240
<v Speaker 2>in the league, or we expand thirty five thirty eight.

1:41:03.240 --> 1:41:06.800
<v Speaker 2>So that's fine. I mean, one year Oklahoma City will

1:41:06.840 --> 1:41:10.559
<v Speaker 2>have it after winning the National Championship and one or

1:41:10.640 --> 1:41:14.320
<v Speaker 2>the NBA Championship, and one year the Spurs will have

1:41:14.360 --> 1:41:17.080
<v Speaker 2>it after being in last place, as they did when

1:41:17.400 --> 1:41:20.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, when they picked David Robinson. So if you

1:41:20.760 --> 1:41:24.519
<v Speaker 2>just do a rotation and then some modification, I don't

1:41:24.520 --> 1:41:26.960
<v Speaker 2>think teams are jockeying so much to get the three

1:41:27.040 --> 1:41:29.360
<v Speaker 2>or four or five pick. I think it's a lot

1:41:29.400 --> 1:41:31.320
<v Speaker 2>better than what we have now. You have to address

1:41:31.360 --> 1:41:35.240
<v Speaker 2>tanking silver I think could lose a job over how

1:41:35.280 --> 1:41:37.080
<v Speaker 2>bad the tanking issue has become.

1:41:38.800 --> 1:41:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, and the other thing is, I think more transparency.

1:41:41.400 --> 1:41:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, it is true. Am I gonna see

1:41:46.000 --> 1:41:50.479
<v Speaker 1>certain players when they come to my city once? Right?

1:41:50.960 --> 1:41:53.760
<v Speaker 1>When they come to my city once and then I

1:41:54.360 --> 1:41:56.679
<v Speaker 1>spend all this money, you know, and then you don't

1:41:56.680 --> 1:41:59.720
<v Speaker 1>get to see that one star playy you kind of

1:41:59.720 --> 1:42:03.760
<v Speaker 1>want to to see, right, And that's the fact. I mean,

1:42:03.800 --> 1:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>they try to mess around with load management by having

1:42:05.920 --> 1:42:08.879
<v Speaker 1>a mandatory number of games to qualify for awards and stuff.

1:42:10.880 --> 1:42:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's worked right. I think we still

1:42:14.120 --> 1:42:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we still have it, and part of the load management

1:42:16.360 --> 1:42:18.280
<v Speaker 1>gets it too. This is why I think tinkering with

1:42:18.360 --> 1:42:23.479
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, where you incentivize making the regular season matter more,

1:42:24.160 --> 1:42:26.559
<v Speaker 1>you've got and I think ultimately, if the regular season

1:42:26.600 --> 1:42:29.880
<v Speaker 1>matters more, you will over time have less handing. And

1:42:29.920 --> 1:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you do. When you allow twenty

1:42:33.000 --> 1:42:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of the thirty teams to make the playoffs, have you

1:42:35.360 --> 1:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>made the regular season matter anymore?

1:42:37.760 --> 1:42:40.000
<v Speaker 2>No, it doesn't matter that much. But you know, I'm

1:42:40.000 --> 1:42:41.880
<v Speaker 2>sure you've been watching it for a while. If you

1:42:41.960 --> 1:42:45.000
<v Speaker 2>compare a random second quarter of an NBA game now

1:42:45.080 --> 1:42:48.400
<v Speaker 2>just the defense that's being played to the eighties or nineties.

1:42:48.439 --> 1:42:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I used to think, are they even really trying? And

1:42:50.120 --> 1:42:51.439
<v Speaker 2>they weren't, and just go to a.

1:42:52.000 --> 1:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Defense we know And I get it. But again I

1:42:56.120 --> 1:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>go back, Baseball doesn't have this problem.

1:43:00.920 --> 1:43:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, baseball has a lot of other problems.

1:43:03.479 --> 1:43:04.840
<v Speaker 1>They have other problems. I'm not going to sit there

1:43:04.880 --> 1:43:07.559
<v Speaker 1>and say they don't, but they don't have this problem.

1:43:07.680 --> 1:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And they have, you know, even fewer teams that make

1:43:10.200 --> 1:43:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs in a given year. By the way they've

1:43:13.200 --> 1:43:15.240
<v Speaker 1>they have a rule that seems like a pretty simple

1:43:15.320 --> 1:43:17.280
<v Speaker 1>rule on their lottery. If you got the number one

1:43:17.360 --> 1:43:21.439
<v Speaker 1>pick this year. I remember the Nats. One year they

1:43:21.439 --> 1:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>got the first overall pick, and they were ineligible to

1:43:24.720 --> 1:43:26.880
<v Speaker 1>get the first overall the next year the mat the

1:43:26.960 --> 1:43:29.960
<v Speaker 1>highest they could get was eleven. Yeah, so you know,

1:43:30.000 --> 1:43:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that seemed like a pretty so that way you're not

1:43:32.320 --> 1:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>doing the process i e. The Sixers where you're tanking

1:43:35.120 --> 1:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>three years in a row or what the Astros did,

1:43:38.280 --> 1:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>right that was that was what happened in baseball. The

1:43:40.200 --> 1:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Astros did a huge tank job in twenty ten, twenty eleven,

1:43:43.000 --> 1:43:48.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve, which got them to a corea Bregman, and

1:43:48.960 --> 1:43:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then they ended up, you know, having

1:43:51.000 --> 1:43:51.679
<v Speaker 1>this great run.

1:43:52.040 --> 1:43:54.200
<v Speaker 2>And the Rains were sort of doing a tank job

1:43:54.400 --> 1:43:57.320
<v Speaker 2>except when they weren't, but they just didn't want to

1:43:57.320 --> 1:43:59.640
<v Speaker 2>spend any money. But the baseball draft matters a lot

1:43:59.720 --> 1:44:03.720
<v Speaker 2>less than the NBA draft, just for in terms of predictability,

1:44:03.760 --> 1:44:06.960
<v Speaker 2>but also in terms of development. The guys making the picks,

1:44:07.160 --> 1:44:09.439
<v Speaker 2>probably if they screw it up too often, won't be

1:44:09.439 --> 1:44:12.160
<v Speaker 2>in the front office years later, whereas in the NBA

1:44:12.400 --> 1:44:14.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, those are your picks that are that you

1:44:14.560 --> 1:44:15.439
<v Speaker 2>hang on the GM.

1:44:16.520 --> 1:44:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's just it's just funny. I can't tell you.

1:44:19.040 --> 1:44:21.439
<v Speaker 1>It feels like every April there's this group of friends

1:44:21.479 --> 1:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of mine and I we have this argument about God,

1:44:24.040 --> 1:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>what's wrong with the NBA and it and I think

1:44:26.120 --> 1:44:28.479
<v Speaker 1>part of it is again, it's recency bias. The tournament

1:44:28.520 --> 1:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is so much fun, right, and and you're just sitting

1:44:31.120 --> 1:44:34.840
<v Speaker 1>there going, oh, there's no urgency. And we're at the

1:44:34.880 --> 1:44:36.920
<v Speaker 1>tail end of the season, right, We're at this and

1:44:37.400 --> 1:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so you do have that, you know, there's a little

1:44:40.040 --> 1:44:42.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of let's save people a little bit for the playoffs.

1:44:42.840 --> 1:44:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So it is, and it's a if I'm the NBA,

1:44:45.920 --> 1:44:47.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a bummer. You've got a whole bunch of people

1:44:47.760 --> 1:44:51.240
<v Speaker 1>excited about basketball, they tune into the pros, and you're

1:44:51.240 --> 1:44:55.920
<v Speaker 1>not giving them nearly the same urgency. And you know,

1:44:56.280 --> 1:44:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a missed opportunity for the NBA as well.

1:44:59.200 --> 1:45:01.439
<v Speaker 2>I've always thought on and that first Thursday of the

1:45:01.560 --> 1:45:03.840
<v Speaker 2>NCAA Tournament, which is one of the best days in

1:45:03.880 --> 1:45:06.280
<v Speaker 2>sports structurally the same as the next day, but just

1:45:06.400 --> 1:45:09.559
<v Speaker 2>wall to wall games that the NBA even plays a

1:45:09.640 --> 1:45:13.120
<v Speaker 2>game or two is kind of laughable. It's just setting itself.

1:45:13.160 --> 1:45:14.599
<v Speaker 2>Get out of the way, parata failure.

1:45:14.880 --> 1:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>More importantly, make the Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday of the following

1:45:19.160 --> 1:45:22.719
<v Speaker 1>week some of the best matchups you you know, make

1:45:22.800 --> 1:45:27.400
<v Speaker 1>sure Lakers Celtics, make sure thunderspurs, make sure, you know,

1:45:27.960 --> 1:45:31.719
<v Speaker 1>have a big prime time, you know, something like counter.

1:45:31.960 --> 1:45:35.599
<v Speaker 1>You know, take advantage of this moment that you have

1:45:36.720 --> 1:45:37.639
<v Speaker 1>on those days.

1:45:38.160 --> 1:45:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that the NBA just has too many

1:45:41.200 --> 1:45:43.640
<v Speaker 2>games in the season, and of course they do, but

1:45:43.880 --> 1:45:45.559
<v Speaker 2>this is what you're going to get. The last ten

1:45:45.600 --> 1:45:47.840
<v Speaker 2>games of the NBA season is always going to be boring.

1:45:47.880 --> 1:45:50.800
<v Speaker 2>If there are more than fifty games in the NBA season. Hey,

1:45:50.800 --> 1:45:53.800
<v Speaker 2>if you want to balm for all of this. WNBA

1:45:53.960 --> 1:45:56.000
<v Speaker 2>they've gone to a forty four game season, but they

1:45:56.000 --> 1:45:58.920
<v Speaker 2>have three game series and it's all tight and taut.

1:45:59.240 --> 1:46:03.160
<v Speaker 2>And though again with the new deal, which I congratulate

1:46:03.200 --> 1:46:05.360
<v Speaker 2>the players for, as more money comes into the league,

1:46:05.400 --> 1:46:08.000
<v Speaker 2>they're going to want to if they can fill an arena,

1:46:08.040 --> 1:46:09.479
<v Speaker 2>as they will, and that's what's going to happen with

1:46:09.479 --> 1:46:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the WNBA, and they will be grousing about this. We'll

1:46:12.040 --> 1:46:14.840
<v Speaker 2>be saying, oh, the Links always get the number one pick.

1:46:17.000 --> 1:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, it seemed like in the eighties, don't you remember it,

1:46:19.120 --> 1:46:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like the Lakers and Celtics always ended up with the

1:46:21.240 --> 1:46:21.920
<v Speaker 1>number one pick.

1:46:22.720 --> 1:46:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was.

1:46:23.880 --> 1:46:27.560
<v Speaker 1>It was just like but somehow the Clippers traded the

1:46:27.680 --> 1:46:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Lakers the number one pick, and you're like, how did

1:46:29.600 --> 1:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was? I mean, that's why they had

1:46:32.040 --> 1:46:34.799
<v Speaker 1>to create the lottery, because too many teams were dumping

1:46:34.840 --> 1:46:36.759
<v Speaker 1>their picks to the to the better teams.

1:46:36.880 --> 1:46:39.360
<v Speaker 2>But if there were, if there's ever a counter argument

1:46:39.400 --> 1:46:42.559
<v Speaker 2>to good old days with the sport of basketball in

1:46:42.600 --> 1:46:46.680
<v Speaker 2>the fifties, they had the regional picks, so that the

1:46:47.040 --> 1:46:50.120
<v Speaker 2>this is why, this is why the Celtics got everyone

1:46:50.120 --> 1:46:52.840
<v Speaker 2>who went to a New England institution. And the draft

1:46:52.880 --> 1:46:57.240
<v Speaker 2>went like fifteen rounds. I don't understand. There were ten

1:46:57.280 --> 1:47:00.559
<v Speaker 2>teams in the league. How are they picking fifteen players?

1:47:00.720 --> 1:47:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Although you know you always hear Dave Debusha a thirteenth

1:47:03.479 --> 1:47:03.920
<v Speaker 2>round pick.

1:47:04.040 --> 1:47:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I know, well, but that NFL was that way. Bart

1:47:06.360 --> 1:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Star famously was a seventeenth round pick.

1:47:08.840 --> 1:47:11.879
<v Speaker 2>But seventeen on a roster of fifty two versus fifteen

1:47:11.920 --> 1:47:12.080
<v Speaker 2>on a.

1:47:12.120 --> 1:47:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Rock you only had like twelve. But back then you

1:47:14.360 --> 1:47:16.719
<v Speaker 1>only had like twelve teams, right, right, So it made

1:47:16.760 --> 1:47:18.880
<v Speaker 1>sense that you had you had all these rounds. But

1:47:19.560 --> 1:47:22.439
<v Speaker 1>then again, remember Mike Piazza was famously drafted in like

1:47:22.479 --> 1:47:23.759
<v Speaker 1>the twenty ninth round, and you're.

1:47:23.760 --> 1:47:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Right as a favorite of Tommy Lasorda because their dads

1:47:26.360 --> 1:47:28.000
<v Speaker 2>were friends or maybe just Italian.

1:47:28.040 --> 1:47:33.519
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, that's exactly. Well, you've got some technical

1:47:33.760 --> 1:47:34.880
<v Speaker 1>issues that you're going to mess with.

1:47:34.960 --> 1:47:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Huh, it's just the camera. Somebody like microphone sound great?

1:47:39.560 --> 1:47:42.479
<v Speaker 1>They do, and ninety percent of my audience, I think.

1:47:43.479 --> 1:47:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the interviews are more audio. Do you know

1:47:46.320 --> 1:47:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the distinction between your audio and your video? Yes, it's

1:47:49.600 --> 1:47:52.920
<v Speaker 1>uh ninety five to five ninety five, yeah, yeah, and

1:47:52.960 --> 1:47:54.880
<v Speaker 1>so that it seems like if you don't offer video,

1:47:55.080 --> 1:47:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that's an important five, you're you're missing out.

1:47:57.520 --> 1:47:59.680
<v Speaker 2>It is true. It's the cutting edge five and they're

1:47:59.720 --> 1:48:02.439
<v Speaker 2>gonna going to lose them. To call your daddy. I fear.

1:48:05.520 --> 1:48:10.160
<v Speaker 1>A couple shows, please, Okay. I think I think I'm

1:48:10.200 --> 1:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>due to be in our Home and Away series. I

1:48:11.960 --> 1:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>think I'm due on here soon and.

1:48:13.200 --> 1:48:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait.

1:48:14.080 --> 1:48:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I've got more to plug there. I've got a new

1:48:15.880 --> 1:48:16.559
<v Speaker 1>sports show.

1:48:17.200 --> 1:48:19.160
<v Speaker 2>And I do have this show how to I said,

1:48:19.439 --> 1:48:21.280
<v Speaker 2>we can pair you with a how to bet better

1:48:21.680 --> 1:48:24.599
<v Speaker 2>the episode that is up right now. So every week

1:48:24.640 --> 1:48:27.880
<v Speaker 2>we someone asks how to question, we get an expert, uh,

1:48:27.920 --> 1:48:30.280
<v Speaker 2>my friend Nate Silver, who I'm sure I don't know

1:48:30.280 --> 1:48:32.960
<v Speaker 2>if you've interviewed him. He's a brilliant thinker and he's

1:48:33.000 --> 1:48:36.160
<v Speaker 2>a good talker, but he uses these filler words like

1:48:36.280 --> 1:48:39.360
<v Speaker 2>right and um. So this week's episode is how not

1:48:39.479 --> 1:48:42.400
<v Speaker 2>to say um with Nate Silver, and he's not embarrassed

1:48:42.439 --> 1:48:44.680
<v Speaker 2>about he gets created it by the end. Let me

1:48:44.720 --> 1:48:47.640
<v Speaker 2>tell you. So, we've had how to Emigrate as a

1:48:47.680 --> 1:48:51.120
<v Speaker 2>throuble to the to Europe. We've had how to be

1:48:51.160 --> 1:48:53.880
<v Speaker 2>a Ghostbuster. We're doing next week how to Talk to

1:48:53.960 --> 1:48:57.160
<v Speaker 2>My Cats? Some good practical advice there. I do have cats,

1:48:57.439 --> 1:49:00.720
<v Speaker 2>So tune into how to for you please clectic and

1:49:00.920 --> 1:49:03.479
<v Speaker 2>practical pieces of advice, and i'd let you want to

1:49:03.520 --> 1:49:04.200
<v Speaker 2>ask a question.

1:49:04.280 --> 1:49:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Seriously, I love the series, and I do hope how

1:49:06.920 --> 1:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to fix the NBA. Count me in, all right, count

1:49:10.120 --> 1:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>me in for that. But by the way, the cat,

1:49:12.640 --> 1:49:16.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's plain to algorithms, aren't you. That's play

1:49:16.479 --> 1:49:18.840
<v Speaker 1>into the algorithm there, How to Talk to Cats?

1:49:19.160 --> 1:49:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Except my experts like, don't don't try, just operate in

1:49:22.160 --> 1:49:25.240
<v Speaker 2>their world. She's a very good cat expert. The guy

1:49:25.280 --> 1:49:27.760
<v Speaker 2>asking the question said, am I doing it right? My

1:49:27.880 --> 1:49:30.240
<v Speaker 2>cat named mister Bad wakes me up at four thirty

1:49:30.240 --> 1:49:32.000
<v Speaker 2>in the morning and I lock them in the closet.

1:49:32.240 --> 1:49:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Then at six I show them my watch and say

1:49:34.439 --> 1:49:36.240
<v Speaker 2>now it's time for feeding. And it turns out that

1:49:36.520 --> 1:49:37.719
<v Speaker 2>wasn't how to talk to a cat.

1:49:38.320 --> 1:49:40.439
<v Speaker 1>By the way, how do people get your daily newsletter?

1:49:40.520 --> 1:49:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I love it and I find so many fun little

1:49:43.280 --> 1:49:45.360
<v Speaker 1>stories from it. Tell people how to get it.

1:49:45.560 --> 1:49:49.120
<v Speaker 2>The gist list is at Mike Pasca dot substack dot

1:49:49.160 --> 1:49:52.200
<v Speaker 2>com and they also have some I've been doing going

1:49:52.800 --> 1:49:56.559
<v Speaker 2>some deep diving information on the pit and their background,

1:49:56.640 --> 1:49:59.240
<v Speaker 2>character and why you're obsessed.

1:49:58.680 --> 1:50:01.720
<v Speaker 1>With all the A holes. Yeah, that's just been a

1:50:01.760 --> 1:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>running gag of yours, hasn't it.

1:50:03.280 --> 1:50:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Well, I'm keeping the official tracker. You know, you

1:50:06.240 --> 1:50:07.320
<v Speaker 2>gotta have someone doing it.

1:50:08.000 --> 1:50:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I have a I have a submission for the just list.

1:50:10.680 --> 1:50:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a pencil running for governor of Oregon.

1:50:13.600 --> 1:50:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh really a pencil, Yes.

1:50:15.160 --> 1:50:17.519
<v Speaker 2>A pencil and it actually is a series running is

1:50:17.520 --> 1:50:18.400
<v Speaker 2>a writing candidate?

1:50:18.600 --> 1:50:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey, there you go.

1:50:20.120 --> 1:50:22.720
<v Speaker 2>See it just writes itself. Is he hoping to come

1:50:22.760 --> 1:50:23.360
<v Speaker 2>in number two?

1:50:23.800 --> 1:50:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Well?

1:50:24.800 --> 1:50:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Does he believe in carbonations?

1:50:28.120 --> 1:50:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Man? This is I had We did not plan this.

1:50:30.560 --> 1:50:32.599
<v Speaker 1>I just threw it up there and there it is.

1:50:32.920 --> 1:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You know you dad pund it out of the ballpark.

1:50:35.600 --> 1:50:36.519
<v Speaker 2>Make a good point.

1:50:36.920 --> 1:50:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Guess who's lasting reading on K through three? The state

1:50:39.760 --> 1:50:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of Oregon?

1:50:40.560 --> 1:50:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Is it really?

1:50:41.600 --> 1:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? So that's the irea that.

1:50:44.040 --> 1:50:46.639
<v Speaker 2>The Mississippi miracle. Someone has to.

1:50:47.120 --> 1:50:50.439
<v Speaker 1>It's exactly what needs to happen is go learn about

1:50:50.520 --> 1:50:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, go get hooked on phonics. I think we learned.

1:50:53.200 --> 1:50:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Go get hooked on phonics. It works.

1:50:55.479 --> 1:50:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Found it out people. I love the pencil all right.

1:50:58.040 --> 1:51:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, go check out Governor penns. So we need that's

1:51:01.120 --> 1:51:04.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think people would be happier with inanimate

1:51:04.479 --> 1:51:07.240
<v Speaker 1>objects as our political leaders as it is. So, you know,

1:51:07.400 --> 1:51:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the stapler is next.

1:51:09.439 --> 1:51:12.439
<v Speaker 2>I hope a red stapler that I think has niche appeal.

1:51:12.920 --> 1:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, you have the red staples. You have the red

1:51:15.040 --> 1:51:17.560
<v Speaker 1>staples and the blue staples. They don't always you know,

1:51:17.600 --> 1:51:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it gets a little polarizing.

1:51:18.840 --> 1:51:21.640
<v Speaker 2>And that's what third party paper fastener.

1:51:22.120 --> 1:51:25.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, the big bulky clip people. You know

1:51:27.800 --> 1:51:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike Pasca. It is always a pleasure.

1:51:29.360 --> 1:51:31.439
<v Speaker 2>Oh, thank you, Chuck. Pleasure for me too.

1:51:39.360 --> 1:51:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey, I'd love to hear your taking thoughts. By the

1:51:43.960 --> 1:51:46.960
<v Speaker 1>way I went through the cut, I went through Nate

1:51:47.080 --> 1:51:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Silver's convoluted. And I say convoluted because you got to

1:51:49.960 --> 1:51:52.400
<v Speaker 1>read the whole thing idea of turning the draft into

1:51:52.400 --> 1:51:55.360
<v Speaker 1>an auction and then creating a whole new currency system

1:51:55.400 --> 1:51:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in the NBA of auction dollars or auction box or

1:51:59.400 --> 1:52:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe call them silvers, little Adam silvers and

1:52:02.160 --> 1:52:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Nate silvers. Are you gonna call them silvers? You don't

1:52:04.080 --> 1:52:06.400
<v Speaker 1>know whether an homage to Nate or homage to Adam,

1:52:07.360 --> 1:52:09.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know, how many silvers do you have to

1:52:09.360 --> 1:52:13.280
<v Speaker 1>participate in this draft? I didn't hate the idea of

1:52:13.320 --> 1:52:16.879
<v Speaker 1>somebody who prefers auction over snake drafts and fantasy sports,

1:52:19.800 --> 1:52:21.880
<v Speaker 1>but the tanking problem is just a real problem. And

1:52:22.040 --> 1:52:25.080
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is we go through this what's wrong with

1:52:25.120 --> 1:52:28.519
<v Speaker 1>the NBA. It's always at this time of year, and

1:52:28.560 --> 1:52:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's all because of how great the NCAA tournament is

1:52:31.360 --> 1:52:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and how great especially if the basketball is really good,

1:52:33.400 --> 1:52:35.840
<v Speaker 1>which this year it is, and we sit there and

1:52:36.760 --> 1:52:43.280
<v Speaker 1>so anyway, I'm curious your tanking solutions. It's really it

1:52:43.400 --> 1:52:46.240
<v Speaker 1>really bothers me. I want to be a good Wizards fan.

1:52:47.320 --> 1:52:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm embarrassed. It bothers me. I don't like I don't

1:52:50.880 --> 1:52:53.280
<v Speaker 1>like not competing for multiple years in a row, and

1:52:53.320 --> 1:52:58.439
<v Speaker 1>they have not competed. Right, even when baseball teams tank,

1:52:59.120 --> 1:53:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the on the field is an effort. That's what bothers.

1:53:04.200 --> 1:53:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really gross. But anyway, you know, it is Monday,

1:53:10.640 --> 1:53:18.400
<v Speaker 1>so let's jump into the time machine. So let me

1:53:18.439 --> 1:53:22.679
<v Speaker 1>tell you this week was a doozy, right. This week

1:53:22.720 --> 1:53:25.639
<v Speaker 1>in history, with the anniversaries they have in this coming

1:53:25.920 --> 1:53:28.360
<v Speaker 1>seven day period, is one of those weeks that simply

1:53:28.360 --> 1:53:31.519
<v Speaker 1>stops you when you actually look at it. April twelfth,

1:53:31.560 --> 1:53:34.559
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty one. The Battle of Fort Sumter. The Civil

1:53:34.600 --> 1:53:38.920
<v Speaker 1>War begins. April ninth, eighteen sixty five. Surrender of Appomatics

1:53:39.000 --> 1:53:42.639
<v Speaker 1>at the Appomatics Courthouse. The Civil War ends. April sixth,

1:53:42.760 --> 1:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventeen. US entry and too World War One, the

1:53:46.120 --> 1:53:49.960
<v Speaker 1>United States enters its first global war. Just sit with

1:53:50.040 --> 1:53:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that a second, right, This week alone two wars one week.

1:53:56.479 --> 1:54:01.120
<v Speaker 1>One of those wars this week both its beginning and

1:54:01.160 --> 1:54:06.360
<v Speaker 1>its end. Both fall within the same seven days fifty

1:54:06.360 --> 1:54:11.200
<v Speaker 1>four years apart. That's not something historian engineers. It's just

1:54:11.240 --> 1:54:14.639
<v Speaker 1>the calendar being strange and almost poetic at the same time.

1:54:17.000 --> 1:54:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, history geeks and history in general loves

1:54:19.320 --> 1:54:22.559
<v Speaker 1>weeks like this. They're clean markers, their dates. We can

1:54:22.600 --> 1:54:25.920
<v Speaker 1>teach their moments, we can point to and say they're

1:54:28.320 --> 1:54:31.639
<v Speaker 1>that's when it started, that's when it ended. But here's

1:54:31.680 --> 1:54:33.880
<v Speaker 1>what I keep coming back to. When I looked at

1:54:33.880 --> 1:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this week and I thought about what should I do

1:54:35.560 --> 1:54:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the deep dive on, what should I make the history lesson?

1:54:38.520 --> 1:54:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, you know, we kind of knew we

1:54:42.240 --> 1:54:45.720
<v Speaker 1>there may be something deeper here. We're really good at

1:54:45.720 --> 1:54:48.760
<v Speaker 1>marking the beginning of conflicts, and we're also good at

1:54:48.800 --> 1:54:52.640
<v Speaker 1>marking the end of them. What we are almost never

1:54:52.640 --> 1:54:56.960
<v Speaker 1>good at is resolving the argument that caused them. We

1:54:57.000 --> 1:55:00.600
<v Speaker 1>stop fighting the actual war, but we don't don't resolve

1:55:00.600 --> 1:55:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the argument itself, not slowing it down, not changing its shape,

1:55:04.480 --> 1:55:09.280
<v Speaker 1>actually resolving the argument. And this week makes that uncomfortable

1:55:09.280 --> 1:55:12.920
<v Speaker 1>truth almost impossible to ignore. Because these two wars, in

1:55:12.960 --> 1:55:16.520
<v Speaker 1>particular World War One in the Civil War, they both

1:55:16.560 --> 1:55:21.480
<v Speaker 1>have end dates, but neither were resolved Let's start with

1:55:21.480 --> 1:55:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the Civil War, because if you're looking for a clean

1:55:23.960 --> 1:55:27.880
<v Speaker 1>ending in American history, it doesn't get any cleaner than appomatics. Right,

1:55:28.840 --> 1:55:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you just have to say it. Sometimes people will

1:55:31.680 --> 1:55:34.440
<v Speaker 1>reference or we're going to have an appomatics moment. Right,

1:55:35.280 --> 1:55:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that's how that's how important this moment is in American history.

1:55:40.720 --> 1:55:45.040
<v Speaker 1>April ninth, eighteen sixty five, Roberty Lee surrenders to Ulysses s.

1:55:45.520 --> 1:55:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Grant's terms are notably generous. Lee's officers keep their side arms,

1:55:50.400 --> 1:55:54.760
<v Speaker 1>his soldiers keep their horses. There's no triumphalism. There's almost

1:55:54.800 --> 1:55:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a deliberate effort to make it feel like a closing.

1:55:57.960 --> 1:56:02.960
<v Speaker 1>The fighting stops most immediately, the country begins telling itself

1:56:03.000 --> 1:56:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a story. The war is over the nation as whole.

1:56:07.720 --> 1:56:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's move forward. But what exactly was resolved? Slavery, yes,

1:56:13.480 --> 1:56:17.080
<v Speaker 1>formally abolished, but the argument underneath the war, the one

1:56:17.080 --> 1:56:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that made the war necessary in the first place. Who

1:56:19.560 --> 1:56:23.960
<v Speaker 1>belongs in the country, on what terms, with what rights?

1:56:24.320 --> 1:56:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Who gets to be an American? That did not end

1:56:27.120 --> 1:56:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen sixty five. We did not resolve that argument.

1:56:30.040 --> 1:56:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Three years later, the fourteenth Amendment of the United States

1:56:32.280 --> 1:56:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Constitution put birthrights citizenship directly into the Constitution settles it supposedly,

1:56:41.640 --> 1:56:46.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're born here, you're an American, full stop. Except

1:56:46.400 --> 1:56:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't full stop. Even with that language in the Constitution, Citizenship,

1:56:50.960 --> 1:56:56.080
<v Speaker 1>its meaning, its application, its daily lived reality, has remained

1:56:56.120 --> 1:57:02.200
<v Speaker 1>bitterly contested. On paper, black Americans were citizens. In practice,

1:57:02.240 --> 1:57:05.840
<v Speaker 1>they were systematically denied what citizenship was supposed to guarantee

1:57:06.360 --> 1:57:10.920
<v Speaker 1>for nearly a century, through law, through violence, through deliberate exclusion.

1:57:14.400 --> 1:57:16.200
<v Speaker 1>And here's the part that should give us some pause,

1:57:17.360 --> 1:57:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that argument who gets to be an American? What birthright

1:57:20.240 --> 1:57:24.640
<v Speaker 1>citizenship actually means? Who qualifies? It's not a historical debate,

1:57:25.080 --> 1:57:27.680
<v Speaker 1>It's an active one right now. Just last week, right

1:57:27.840 --> 1:57:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in front of it was argued in front of the

1:57:29.800 --> 1:57:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. We didn't resolve the question at appomatics. We

1:57:35.760 --> 1:57:39.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't resolve it with the fourteenth Amendment. We didn't resolve

1:57:39.680 --> 1:57:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it with the court case that settled birthright citizenship. We

1:57:45.120 --> 1:57:48.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to relitigate it in different forms ever since. So

1:57:48.960 --> 1:57:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the Civil War ended the argument that caused it did not.

1:57:52.920 --> 1:57:57.760
<v Speaker 1>We just keep finding new occasions to happen. Guess what,

1:57:57.920 --> 1:58:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not just an American problem. Now, take that same

1:58:01.280 --> 1:58:04.600
<v Speaker 1>pattern and scale it globally. On April sixth, nineteen seventeen,

1:58:04.640 --> 1:58:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the US formally enters World War One, the Great War,

1:58:07.080 --> 1:58:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it was called at the time. Frame me is explicit

1:58:10.000 --> 1:58:13.160
<v Speaker 1>make the world safe for democracy, hard stop. This was

1:58:13.160 --> 1:58:17.040
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be the war to end all wars. November eleventh,

1:58:17.120 --> 1:58:23.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighteen, the war ends. Armistice Day, remember that celebration

1:58:23.920 --> 1:58:28.240
<v Speaker 1>relief another clear clean marker, another date we can point to.

1:58:28.720 --> 1:58:33.320
<v Speaker 1>We've now changed into Veterans Day, because it's not like

1:58:33.360 --> 1:58:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that was a real peace day, was it. I actually

1:58:36.680 --> 1:58:38.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's wrong to try to celebrate Armistic's Day if

1:58:39.000 --> 1:58:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you ended up with another World war essentially some twenty

1:58:42.040 --> 1:58:46.680
<v Speaker 1>years later, because the peace that followed wasn't resolution, it

1:58:46.720 --> 1:58:50.960
<v Speaker 1>was rearrangement. The Treaty of Versailles punishes Germany without stabilizing Europe,

1:58:51.520 --> 1:58:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and across the broader conflict, empires collapsed, most consequentially the

1:58:55.720 --> 1:58:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Ottoman Empire, which I had controlled much of the Middle

1:58:58.800 --> 1:59:02.760
<v Speaker 1>East for centuries. And into that vacuum, some outsized powers,

1:59:03.240 --> 1:59:08.320
<v Speaker 1>outside powers, primarily Britain and France, drew new borders. They

1:59:08.360 --> 1:59:12.320
<v Speaker 1>created new states, assigned new rulers. You get a kingdom,

1:59:12.360 --> 1:59:15.000
<v Speaker 1>You get a kingdom. Hey, we've decided this straight line

1:59:15.080 --> 1:59:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is a border. Let's paper over ethnic, religious, and national

1:59:18.840 --> 1:59:23.840
<v Speaker 1>claims that had never actually been resolved. Well, guess what.

1:59:25.240 --> 1:59:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Their maps didn't settle anything. They didn't settle those competing claims.

1:59:29.720 --> 1:59:33.600
<v Speaker 1>They just drew lines through them and moved on. And

1:59:33.640 --> 1:59:36.080
<v Speaker 1>this is what I want you to think about. We

1:59:36.120 --> 1:59:37.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about the modern Middle East as though it's a

1:59:37.920 --> 1:59:41.960
<v Speaker 1>series of separate crises, as though each conflict is its

1:59:41.960 --> 1:59:45.560
<v Speaker 1>own thing, But it's not much of what we're navigating

1:59:45.560 --> 1:59:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in that region today. The instability, the competing claims, the

1:59:48.240 --> 1:59:51.600
<v Speaker 1>borders that don't match the people living inside them. That

1:59:51.760 --> 1:59:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is the direct, unresolved consequence of a map drawn in

1:59:54.760 --> 1:59:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the aftermath of World War One, as I used to joke,

1:59:57.520 --> 1:59:59.480
<v Speaker 1>by a couple of drunk Frenchmen and Brits. Maybe they

1:59:59.480 --> 2:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>weren't drunk, but I hope they were, because they made

2:00:03.720 --> 2:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>so many mistakes that I'd like to chalk it up

2:00:05.880 --> 2:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to their brains not fully functioning. But they were drawn

2:00:11.720 --> 2:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>by people who weren't from there, settling claims they didn't

2:00:15.000 --> 2:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>fully understand, and for interest that often had very little

2:00:18.360 --> 2:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to do with the people actually living inside those manufactured lines.

2:00:24.360 --> 2:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not ancient history, that's the architecture virtually every conflict

2:00:28.240 --> 2:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States has been involved in over there for

2:00:30.040 --> 2:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the last half century. We ended World War One in

2:00:33.920 --> 2:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighteen, we declared another World War in nineteen thirty nine,

2:00:38.160 --> 2:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and more than a century later, we are still dealing

2:00:40.200 --> 2:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>with what was left unresolved when the first one ended.

2:00:45.800 --> 2:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>The fighting stopped, the argument did not. This is the

2:00:49.960 --> 2:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>pattern I keep coming back to, not just in these

2:00:52.960 --> 2:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>two wars cross history again and again. We treat wars

2:00:55.880 --> 2:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>like chapters, beginning, middle, and an end. We closed the book.

2:00:59.080 --> 2:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>We build the monuments in the holidays. But most wars

2:01:02.840 --> 2:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't chapters. They're arguments. And arguments don't end when the

2:01:07.080 --> 2:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>shooting stops. They end if they end when you actually

2:01:10.160 --> 2:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>attempt to resolve the thing that made people willing to

2:01:12.320 --> 2:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>fight in the first place, identity, power, belonging, who controls what,

2:01:17.120 --> 2:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>who counts as whom. That's a lot harder than winning.

2:01:22.480 --> 2:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>That requires the real diplomacy. It requires more than a

2:01:28.520 --> 2:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>surrender ceremony and generous terms. It requires a willingness to

2:01:32.320 --> 2:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>actually finish what you started. That just keeps, not just

2:01:34.840 --> 2:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>stop fighting about it, and that willingness, historically speaking, is

2:01:39.280 --> 2:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty rare. So that brings us back to this week.

2:01:42.720 --> 2:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Fort Sumpner appomatics America entering World War One. They're some

2:01:47.080 --> 2:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of the cleanest markers in history. Dates, we teach, moments,

2:01:50.920 --> 2:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we commemorate stories with supposedly a satisfying shape of a

2:01:54.800 --> 2:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>beginning and an end. But what those dates don't tell

2:01:58.680 --> 2:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you is that argument underneath them are still running. Who

2:02:02.400 --> 2:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>gets to be an American is still being litigated, the

2:02:05.480 --> 2:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>consequences of the post World War One map still being

2:02:08.600 --> 2:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>lived today. We marked the endings, we celebrated them, we

2:02:13.720 --> 2:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>built monuments to them. What we didn't do, and what

2:02:17.520 --> 2:02:21.839
<v Speaker 1>we almost never do, is finish the argument. And unfinished

2:02:21.920 --> 2:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>arguments don't disappear. They don't respect the calendar. They don't

2:02:25.280 --> 2:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>care about anniversaries. They just wait for the next occasion,

2:02:29.320 --> 2:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>for the next generation to pick up where the last

2:02:31.480 --> 2:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>one left off. History gives us dates to remember, it

2:02:35.600 --> 2:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>almost never gives us the resolution we thought we earned.

2:02:41.520 --> 2:02:44.480
<v Speaker 3>And we still got a lot to learn about World

2:02:44.480 --> 2:02:47.240
<v Speaker 3>War One if we're still in the middle of fighting

2:02:47.280 --> 2:02:56.480
<v Speaker 3>another war there today, ask Chuck.

2:02:59.280 --> 2:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>All right. First question comes from Tom l and he

2:03:01.760 --> 2:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>goes first time writing, I was introduced to you by

2:03:03.640 --> 2:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>watching me the press as you help keep my wife

2:03:05.320 --> 2:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and I stay sane during the chaos of Trump one point. Oh, well,

2:03:08.480 --> 2:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you for saying that finding your podcast now is

2:03:10.560 --> 2:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>again helping me through the next level of chaos and

2:03:12.560 --> 2:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump two point zero and your level headed analysis of

2:03:15.960 --> 2:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>current events. Loving the time machine too. What are your

2:03:18.200 --> 2:03:20.879
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on ranked choice voting. You've mentioned that electing independence

2:03:20.880 --> 2:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>could help our dysfunctional Congress. To me, voting for an

2:03:23.160 --> 2:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>independent risks throwing away your vote and allowing a candidate

2:03:25.880 --> 2:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you oppose win. Ranked choice seems to be a way

2:03:27.720 --> 2:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to safely take a chance on an independent, you prefer

2:03:30.320 --> 2:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>by choosing a traditional party candidate as a backup. And

2:03:33.400 --> 2:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>then he adds go Dodgers, Well, Tom, the theory of

2:03:37.440 --> 2:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>ranked choice voting I like a lot. And why do

2:03:39.800 --> 2:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I say it's a theory because of this idea of hey,

2:03:44.560 --> 2:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>when you're voting, rank them, And I accept the premise

2:03:48.360 --> 2:03:51.879
<v Speaker 1>that maybe if we implemented it within ten years, everybody

2:03:51.920 --> 2:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>would get comfortable and then we'd be like, what's the

2:03:53.760 --> 2:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>big deal? That's also true, but getting from there to

2:04:00.080 --> 2:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically, from point to point B. I think's

2:04:02.000 --> 2:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily difficult. I think the challenge is, Look, what we're

2:04:06.160 --> 2:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is solve for a problem, right, and

2:04:08.720 --> 2:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>problem one is primaries have way too much impact on

2:04:17.960 --> 2:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>our politics. It sort of independence don't really have much say,

2:04:21.720 --> 2:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of underrepresented. They don't get to participate in

2:04:24.040 --> 2:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>these primaries. They don't get to have much choice into

2:04:26.960 --> 2:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>actually who shows up in the ballot. So, you know,

2:04:29.920 --> 2:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>ranked choice voting is a way to try to fix,

2:04:33.120 --> 2:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to try to improve. Essentially, we're not dealing with the

2:04:37.040 --> 2:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>core problem, which is primaries themselves, and instead rank choice

2:04:40.560 --> 2:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>voting sort of papers over it. My issue with rank

2:04:44.720 --> 2:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>choice voting is I think you have a hard time.

2:04:47.040 --> 2:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's too easy to exploit. It's too easy

2:04:53.960 --> 2:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to make people think that you're messing around with the numbers. Right,

2:04:57.880 --> 2:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to follow the ballot all the way. Like

2:05:00.800 --> 2:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I just think about what I did for over a

2:05:03.800 --> 2:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>decade on NBC, almost two decades, right, basically explaining returns

2:05:07.200 --> 2:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>as they came in, And you could explain the first

2:05:09.800 --> 2:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>count and you're like, all right, but it is hard

2:05:12.360 --> 2:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to cleanly audit for the average American to consume cleanly

2:05:18.560 --> 2:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>audit that second choice, third choice, and all of that.

2:05:22.000 --> 2:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>It's doable. It's just you've got to rely on the

2:05:26.400 --> 2:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>government giving us more access to these ballots. You're going

2:05:29.560 --> 2:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to show a lot of the ballot itself. It's very difficult. Ideally,

2:05:37.160 --> 2:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd like the what ranked choice vote voting gives us,

2:05:40.600 --> 2:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>but to just do it in stages. So I think

2:05:43.960 --> 2:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the ideal system is a combination of California, Washington, and Louisiana.

2:05:49.680 --> 2:05:53.160
<v Speaker 1>All three states have had jungle primaries. What do I

2:05:53.200 --> 2:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>mean by that? Everybody appears in the same primary ballot.

2:05:56.480 --> 2:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Now they each resolve how and now Alaska's that way,

2:06:00.200 --> 2:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>but with the rank choice voting. Right, So the idea

2:06:02.760 --> 2:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is everybody votes, it's just round one of the general election,

2:06:07.320 --> 2:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>rather than call it prime. But it's sort of round one.

2:06:10.320 --> 2:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It's the first round, and the top four advance. Right now,

2:06:16.000 --> 2:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>California has a top two, Washington has a top two,

2:06:19.760 --> 2:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and one the top from each party meets. Louisiana was

2:06:23.560 --> 2:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>just top two generally, kind of like California, but some

2:06:27.160 --> 2:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>form of that. I think Alaska is top four and

2:06:32.600 --> 2:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>then they go to rank choice voting. So, however, you

2:06:35.760 --> 2:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>want to.

2:06:36.000 --> 2:06:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Look at it.

2:06:37.200 --> 2:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I'd like to say I think we are.

2:06:40.560 --> 2:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the American electorate is better divvied up in

2:06:44.720 --> 2:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>four than by two. I think we're not cleanly left right.

2:06:48.320 --> 2:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there really is. There's plenty of degrees there

2:06:51.480 --> 2:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>on the spectrum. But I think having progressive center, left,

2:06:56.280 --> 2:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>center right, and pop and sort of nationalists is probably

2:07:02.680 --> 2:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a better populoist right nationalists kind of same thing. So

2:07:05.720 --> 2:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of nationalists, progressive right on and so those four

2:07:10.040 --> 2:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>flavors if you're looking for avatars, so Sanders on the left,

2:07:13.480 --> 2:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump on the right, and then some combination of oh,

2:07:17.680 --> 2:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>let's say Jos Shapiro, Glenn Younkin, all right, or maybe

2:07:21.200 --> 2:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe a better version of it is Josh Shapiro,

2:07:26.280 --> 2:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Nikki Haley all right, how's that right? Sort of occupy.

2:07:29.720 --> 2:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>So there's your sort of avatars for the four and

2:07:33.440 --> 2:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>then top two. You know, if somebody gets fifty out

2:07:37.560 --> 2:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of that top four, they don't have to go to

2:07:39.280 --> 2:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a runoff. But you sort of hold it right. We

2:07:41.920 --> 2:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>might have April, you know, sort of regional primaries throughout

2:07:45.960 --> 2:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the month of April. Each week is a different region

2:07:48.760 --> 2:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that votes, say October, you'd have the all four and

2:07:53.600 --> 2:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>if somebody got over fifty, This is the way Louisiana

2:07:55.680 --> 2:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>used to work. Somebody got over fifty, they didn't have

2:07:57.840 --> 2:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to go to a runoff, they got they won the

2:07:59.240 --> 2:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>election right there. But if you know, nobody got fifty,

2:08:02.960 --> 2:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>then the top two ended up in a runoff that

2:08:05.640 --> 2:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>was held on the November election day. So that, to

2:08:10.800 --> 2:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>me is my ideal. So what rank choice voting is

2:08:15.000 --> 2:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to accomplish I agree with. I think the execution

2:08:18.200 --> 2:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of it though papers over the larger problem of the

2:08:20.400 --> 2:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>primaries themselves and the fact that all voters don't have

2:08:24.600 --> 2:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a say it who gets to be who gets to

2:08:26.960 --> 2:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>represent you know, team A, Team B, TEAMC, and TMD

2:08:32.480 --> 2:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, and all part putting and giving independence.

2:08:36.320 --> 2:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the state sanctioning a primary but then excluding

2:08:42.840 --> 2:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>certain residents because they've chosen not to become members of

2:08:45.320 --> 2:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a private club feels like a violation of your constitutional rights.

2:08:50.920 --> 2:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think, frankly some of these taxpayer funded primaries

2:08:54.560 --> 2:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>can be attacked on those grounds lack of equal protection.

2:08:58.520 --> 2:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think you're seeing my friends over at the

2:09:00.920 --> 2:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>open primaries are trying to do. So that's where I

2:09:04.040 --> 2:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>come down on ranked choice voting. It's a solution to

2:09:07.080 --> 2:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the primary problem. If you're not going to fix the

2:09:09.720 --> 2:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>primary system, but if we can attack the root cause,

2:09:12.680 --> 2:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>which is how we do this primary system, then maybe

2:09:16.080 --> 2:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>ranked choice voting would be less necessary. Just my two cents,

2:09:23.960 --> 2:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we're disagreeing on how to implement, not on

2:09:27.240 --> 2:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the larger solution that.

2:09:28.920 --> 2:09:29.600
<v Speaker 2>We're looking for.

2:09:30.440 --> 2:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from George RSIs Chuck Levy show is

2:09:32.560 --> 2:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a proud Stetson grad. I have to correct you. I

2:09:35.280 --> 2:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that Stetson's main campus is into Land, which I

2:09:38.480 --> 2:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>did get correct, But the law school is in Gulfport,

2:09:41.040 --> 2:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>which is a small sitting next to Saint Petersburg. And

2:09:43.640 --> 2:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>since BONDI went to Stetson, they also have another law

2:09:46.280 --> 2:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>school campus in Tampa, so go hatters there and literally yes,

2:09:51.680 --> 2:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Stetson hats, so they adopted the hatters. On that front,

2:09:57.960 --> 2:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I did not know that. I probably should have known it.

2:10:00.000 --> 2:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>George Mason's law school is in Arlington. It's not in

2:10:02.480 --> 2:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>fair fact, so I should know better on that. A

2:10:05.440 --> 2:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>lot about Georgetown's law school is not on the campus

2:10:07.400 --> 2:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of Georgetown. It's actually in your Capitol Hill. So that

2:10:11.680 --> 2:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is an error on me and I wish I do it.

2:10:14.680 --> 2:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the correction, so thanks George. Next question comes

2:10:17.840 --> 2:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>from Patrick C. With your end of round snake draft

2:10:21.560 --> 2:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>picks I employ you to take. To take two questions

2:10:24.240 --> 2:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>from Patrick in Los Angeles, I'd enter the Chuck Tad

2:10:26.400 --> 2:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>two timers club and three way club. One. What current

2:10:29.320 --> 2:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>player or manager in the big three sports leagues would

2:10:31.480 --> 2:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>best transition into politics?

2:10:33.680 --> 2:10:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Two?

2:10:34.000 --> 2:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Convince me otherwise China sweeps in to secure the straight

2:10:36.520 --> 2:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in exchange to peg oil, to the Ewen, ending the

2:10:40.000 --> 2:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Petro dollar, and tanking the US economy. Interesting, all right,

2:10:45.640 --> 2:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>So I got to take I see you're quite all right.

2:10:51.120 --> 2:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>The first quote, which current player or manager in the

2:10:53.320 --> 2:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>big three sports leagues for NHL? Right, you're assuming doing MLB?

2:11:00.080 --> 2:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Have to say? I think right now? I think right now,

2:11:07.360 --> 2:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably go Steve Kerr. I think he's become fairly

2:11:11.880 --> 2:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>active on the left a little bit. I think he's

2:11:16.600 --> 2:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I think if you told me in four years he's

2:11:21.520 --> 2:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>being recruited to run for governor of California or something

2:11:25.640 --> 2:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>like that, because their last it's been a debacle and

2:11:28.880 --> 2:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the party's infighting, right like, I could see him transitioning

2:11:31.920 --> 2:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to it. I saw a nice story about him writing

2:11:35.640 --> 2:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a handwritten note to the manager of the Toronto Blue

2:11:38.640 --> 2:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Jays just after they lost Game seven John Schnyder. Schnyder

2:11:41.960 --> 2:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>shared the note. Curtdn't right. Schnyder shared the note. It

2:11:45.160 --> 2:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>was just a hand written note from courgasing how much

2:11:47.920 --> 2:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>he admired Schneider and how prepared his team was, and

2:11:52.720 --> 2:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>how just he knows it's painful that he'd been there,

2:11:56.520 --> 2:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and it was just the type of thing that just

2:12:00.840 --> 2:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to you know, he didn't that's something he didn't have

2:12:03.920 --> 2:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to do. He didn't know, John Snyder. He might have been,

2:12:06.360 --> 2:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>as he admitted, he was rooting for the Dodgers, but

2:12:09.360 --> 2:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>he admired how well Schneider was managing that game. Clearly

2:12:15.680 --> 2:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>he sort of was on top of things, had sort

2:12:18.400 --> 2:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of gotten there was you know, look, let's be realistic,

2:12:23.280 --> 2:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers. The Dodgers won the World Series by a

2:12:25.760 --> 2:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>cleat if those of you that recalled that Game seven,

2:12:31.160 --> 2:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>but it was interesting the athletic story on that. Sin

2:12:34.360 --> 2:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Kerr was asked about how he got how what inspired

2:12:39.360 --> 2:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>him to do this? And he's done this six or

2:12:40.920 --> 2:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>seven times, not very often, and he didn't say which

2:12:42.880 --> 2:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>coaches he's sent it to but because he said he

2:12:45.880 --> 2:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>got a note out of the blue from Sean Payton

2:12:49.000 --> 2:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>after his first NBA Finals appearance, and he says he

2:12:52.920 --> 2:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't know Sean Payton. This was now the coach of

2:12:54.880 --> 2:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos, then was the coach of the Saints, and

2:12:58.400 --> 2:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>just sort of a similar message like merely impressed with

2:13:01.360 --> 2:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you know how you've transitioned to coaching, et cetera. And

2:13:06.600 --> 2:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm always I always admire people when they

2:13:09.040 --> 2:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>get when when they're doing something that they didn't They

2:13:12.000 --> 2:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't do for public praise. They just did it because

2:13:15.840 --> 2:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to make somebody they did un They literally

2:13:19.040 --> 2:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>followed the golden doing to others that you hope someone

2:13:21.040 --> 2:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>does unto you or maybe you passed it, you paid

2:13:24.320 --> 2:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it forward because someone did it for you. So I'd

2:13:27.840 --> 2:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>probably put Steve Kerr in that in that first category.

2:13:30.920 --> 2:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think of a few others. Look, Bruce

2:13:35.200 --> 2:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Burrow may end up running for office, and you know,

2:13:41.080 --> 2:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he you know, I'm not. I'm not sure.

2:13:45.000 --> 2:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Alabama is an odd place for him. I don't know

2:13:47.640 --> 2:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>if it. If I know he's he's he wouldn't be

2:13:51.040 --> 2:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the first former Auburn coach to try to win state

2:13:53.000 --> 2:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>white office. But I do wonder if you have to

2:13:55.720 --> 2:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have this othern accent to win state white office in Alabama,

2:13:59.040 --> 2:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that would be that That's my strong curiosity there. But

2:14:02.240 --> 2:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you already have a guy like Bruce Pearl's thinking about it.

2:14:04.160 --> 2:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I know, like I said, if

2:14:06.080 --> 2:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you follow Bruce Pearl on Twitter, you're at and you

2:14:11.120 --> 2:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>follow him for basketball, but you get his political stuff,

2:14:13.440 --> 2:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you might say, oh, he seems to be decidedly on

2:14:15.640 --> 2:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>one side of the aisle. And I know it makes

2:14:18.200 --> 2:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>some people, you know, judge him just based on his politics,

2:14:20.600 --> 2:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>But I tell you, I really enjoyed his commentary, you know,

2:14:24.920 --> 2:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what his politics are on this front. And

2:14:28.040 --> 2:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>he's pretty pretty defensive of the state of Israel in general.

2:14:32.360 --> 2:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But he clearly I think has the I think he's

2:14:36.560 --> 2:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>got the ambition, So I think he's somebody else I

2:14:38.440 --> 2:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>would I would throw into there, and I think they

2:14:41.680 --> 2:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>would both manage politics better than Tommy Tupperville. Put it

2:14:44.240 --> 2:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>this way, I've never had Tommy Tupperville on my calendar,

2:14:46.120 --> 2:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and I still don't think he makes a really good politician.

2:14:48.280 --> 2:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's burming that every day. And while I don't, well,

2:14:52.720 --> 2:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I assume he does become governor, I have a feeling

2:14:55.920 --> 2:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that ain't gonna go well. You know, he's not known

2:14:59.640 --> 2:15:01.879
<v Speaker 1>as a hard worker, and I don't think he realizes

2:15:01.920 --> 2:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>big governors actually work. Being a senator ain't a real job.

2:15:06.960 --> 2:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Being a governor is a real job. So I'll be

2:15:11.440 --> 2:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>let's just say I'm not I'm I've set the bar

2:15:14.920 --> 2:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty low for him there, and he's facing a pretty

2:15:17.720 --> 2:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>tough candidate for the Democrats and Doug Jones and who

2:15:21.440 --> 2:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of course won that senate's special Senate election a few

2:15:24.360 --> 2:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>years back against Roy Moore. Topperville's no Roy Moore as

2:15:28.000 --> 2:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>far as the morality stuff is concerned. But I think

2:15:32.080 --> 2:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling that's going to be a close race.

2:15:34.560 --> 2:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people are going to be

2:15:35.720 --> 2:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>aware that Tommy ain't up to this job. He probably

2:15:39.760 --> 2:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>wins because that state's pretty conservative, but this is the

2:15:45.520 --> 2:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>whiff of one four year term, and I'll just leave

2:15:47.440 --> 2:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it at that. As for your second one, look, that's

2:15:52.440 --> 2:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the conversation I had with Thyke Friman. I mean, in well,

2:15:56.280 --> 2:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that's an And as far as China, you're taking avantage

2:16:00.560 --> 2:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of this Trump term to get what they want. In

2:16:03.800 --> 2:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>my interview with Daniel Jurgen, I asked him if not

2:16:06.440 --> 2:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the United States to secure the Strait. He basically said,

2:16:08.680 --> 2:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>there's only one other country that can, and that's China.

2:16:11.280 --> 2:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And he says, look, he says, going back to Jimmy Carter,

2:16:13.760 --> 2:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>we basically have made a deal with the Golf States

2:16:16.760 --> 2:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that we had them. We were their defense umbrella. And

2:16:19.520 --> 2:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if we're not there to open up the straight and

2:16:21.240 --> 2:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't do it, they will turn to China. And

2:16:24.280 --> 2:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>China would love to have those golf States as their

2:16:26.520 --> 2:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>number one ally rather than right now, those Golf States

2:16:30.600 --> 2:16:33.959
<v Speaker 1>they play us their eyes with bo but we're in

2:16:34.000 --> 2:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the number one camp. China's decidedly number two. We do

2:16:38.560 --> 2:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>not want that to flip. And you're right, that is

2:16:41.560 --> 2:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the price that would be. But they don't want to tank.

2:16:46.840 --> 2:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Remember it's actually not in China's interest to tank the

2:16:49.160 --> 2:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>American economy. The Chinese economy would tank if they tanked

2:16:52.840 --> 2:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the American economy, so that actually is something they wouldn't

2:16:55.520 --> 2:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>want to do. But do they want more influence in

2:16:58.440 --> 2:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the golf, Yes, they would want that. Next question comes

2:17:01.600 --> 2:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>from Johnny Goes. Hello from a two timer working towards five.

2:17:04.800 --> 2:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for the Mattman interview. He will have my vote

2:17:07.400 --> 2:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>for governor. Much has been made about Congress since Operation

2:17:10.000 --> 2:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Desert Storm relinquishing its authority to commit the country to

2:17:12.520 --> 2:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>foreign wars is required by the Constitution. Has their inaction

2:17:15.280 --> 2:17:17.879
<v Speaker 1>produced a precedent that would be difficult to overcome? What

2:17:17.920 --> 2:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>would be required for Congress to take this power back

2:17:19.920 --> 2:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>from the executive branch? John, it's sitting right there, hold

2:17:23.600 --> 2:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a vote. I think they have. You know, the Constitution

2:17:28.879 --> 2:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is pretty clear. But if they fail to the precedent

2:17:33.120 --> 2:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>they set is that they if they fail to attempt

2:17:37.400 --> 2:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to use their power, then yes, what the what the

2:17:40.440 --> 2:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>executive does? They can't They don't do anything about unless

2:17:44.680 --> 2:17:46.959
<v Speaker 1>they deny him money. And I think that's the point

2:17:46.959 --> 2:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of John Curtis's op ed saying, Hey, the clock is

2:17:49.879 --> 2:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>ticking and we're twenty two days away from the expiration

2:17:53.520 --> 2:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of the sixty day clock. But this administration has a

2:17:58.400 --> 2:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>unitary view of the executive and every administration has. Every

2:18:05.160 --> 2:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>president since the passage of the War Powers Act has

2:18:07.600 --> 2:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>at least abided by its rules. But most anybody that

2:18:18.240 --> 2:18:26.039
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of constitutional lawyers who believe that

2:18:26.120 --> 2:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the War Powers Act does is not that does not

2:18:30.959 --> 2:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>have the constraints that the Act thinks it does. Ultimately,

2:18:36.680 --> 2:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the real power Congress has is the purse. That's the

2:18:40.400 --> 2:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>power hard stop period and that they can use any

2:18:46.080 --> 2:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>time they want. None of this has been precedent per se,

2:18:53.000 --> 2:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's not as if. But I do think if

2:18:58.800 --> 2:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>if Congress is says, actually went to the courts and

2:19:01.560 --> 2:19:04.039
<v Speaker 1>claimed that the President was violating the War Powers Act,

2:19:04.800 --> 2:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they'd lose that court fight. I don't

2:19:07.600 --> 2:19:11.039
<v Speaker 1>think the administration would want that court fight. But it

2:19:11.080 --> 2:19:13.039
<v Speaker 1>may not be a slam dunk and we and it

2:19:13.080 --> 2:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>would be something that might get litigated for months while

2:19:16.240 --> 2:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the administration just continues to opt to to conduct this war.

2:19:23.120 --> 2:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>All right. Last question comes from Natalie or Nathalie, an

2:19:31.200 --> 2:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>expat nat in Skien, Norway. He says, Hey, Chuck, big

2:19:35.920 --> 2:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Nuggets fan here, and while this was one of the

2:19:39.959 --> 2:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>best times to be a basketball fan, the Joker Wenby

2:19:42.120 --> 2:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>matchup the other night was a masterclass. Hey, I caught

2:19:44.800 --> 2:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the last five minutes. I will thank Bill Simmonson a

2:19:48.360 --> 2:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>tweet who said, I hope you're catching this match up

2:19:52.800 --> 2:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>here at the end I was like, first of all,

2:19:54.240 --> 2:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it took me three apps to go find the game.

2:19:56.840 --> 2:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I first went to YouTube TV, not there. Then I

2:19:59.640 --> 2:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>went and to my NBA app, Nope, Prime. Then I

2:20:04.800 --> 2:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>finally found it on Prime and caught the last minute

2:20:08.280 --> 2:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half plus the overtime. I mean, just amazing,

2:20:12.320 --> 2:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And it was a reminder the Nuggets can that was

2:20:17.720 --> 2:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it's Wemby's league. Now we're just it's Wemby's world. We're

2:20:21.000 --> 2:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>just lucky to be want to be a part of it.

2:20:24.120 --> 2:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, but I digress. Let me continue with your question.

2:20:28.640 --> 2:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>The stain on the NBA right now is tanking. So

2:20:30.280 --> 2:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>here's my question. Is relegation structurally possible in the NBA.

2:20:33.200 --> 2:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>The idea of being the three lowest ranked teams dropped

2:20:35.200 --> 2:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to the G League and have to earn promotion back

2:20:37.120 --> 2:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it would make tanking suicidal overnight. But the G League

2:20:39.800 --> 2:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't an independent division like the Championship the way the

2:20:42.720 --> 2:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Championship League works over in Europe. It's a network of

2:20:45.320 --> 2:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>franchise owned affiliates, and relegated teams would likely hemorrhage broadcast

2:20:48.400 --> 2:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>revenue in ways that could make major market valuations impossible

2:20:51.400 --> 2:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to sustate, has anyone actually modeled this or does the

2:20:54.680 --> 2:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>franchise ownership structure make it a non starter? By definition?

2:20:58.160 --> 2:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>You just essentially and asking your question also made the

2:21:03.120 --> 2:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially the rest of your question explains why it's never

2:21:08.360 --> 2:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. There's a chance that if you told

2:21:13.160 --> 2:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>me in thirty years that the European League and the

2:21:16.120 --> 2:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>North American NBA League were in the sort of original

2:21:20.720 --> 2:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>NBA in the European NBA were sort of on par leagues,

2:21:25.040 --> 2:21:28.959
<v Speaker 1>could we see something that way where the punishment for

2:21:29.000 --> 2:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>tanking in the United States would being, No, you're stuck

2:21:30.920 --> 2:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>with an overseas. You're gonna be stuck with overseas. You're

2:21:34.320 --> 2:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>still playing professionally. Maybe the revenues are somewhat equal, but

2:21:37.800 --> 2:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you you know, your fan base isn't happy because you're

2:21:40.240 --> 2:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>playing all these European teams that nobody knows. Like. As

2:21:44.640 --> 2:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the NBA develops a league in Africa, a league in Europe,

2:21:47.920 --> 2:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>plus expansion of the North American situation, I think you

2:21:52.280 --> 2:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>could eventually see a structure that does this, But not

2:21:55.360 --> 2:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>with the G League at the moment because of all

2:21:57.280 --> 2:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the reasons. You just stay right now. But this making

2:22:00.240 --> 2:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>things a gigantic problem. You know, do you expand rosters?

2:22:05.160 --> 2:22:05.400
<v Speaker 2>You know?

2:22:05.720 --> 2:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that an answer that would help I? You know, look,

2:22:13.920 --> 2:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Pasca and I went through a whole bunch of this

2:22:15.560 --> 2:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>or in earlier in this in this full episode, if

2:22:17.879 --> 2:22:20.279
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to these questions after you've heard my past interview,

2:22:20.560 --> 2:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>we go through a bunch of things, like I'd like

2:22:22.720 --> 2:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to see a best of five in the first round

2:22:24.200 --> 2:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of the playoffs. I wonder if you add them a

2:22:26.080 --> 2:22:28.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit of randomness the way baseball is a little

2:22:28.360 --> 2:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of randomness in it the playoffs because of their

2:22:30.480 --> 2:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>best of fives. Because look at the Dodgers, the big

2:22:33.200 --> 2:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>great evil Empire. The Dodgers have been denied the World

2:22:36.000 --> 2:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Series essentially because of losing in the five game. They

2:22:41.560 --> 2:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>don't know, haven't lost in the seven games very often.

2:22:44.120 --> 2:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>But the Nats won the title in nineteen because they

2:22:47.040 --> 2:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>beat the Dodgers in a five game. Could they have

2:22:49.040 --> 2:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>beaten them in a seventh game a seven game series?

2:22:51.800 --> 2:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. The Diamondbacks when they got to the

2:22:55.560 --> 2:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>World Series, they did it. They beat the Dodgers in

2:22:59.080 --> 2:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a five game. When the Philly got to the World Series,

2:23:01.480 --> 2:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they beat the Padres who beat the Dodgers in a

2:23:03.640 --> 2:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>five game, you get the thing. So I kind of

2:23:06.240 --> 2:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you had the five game, if more

2:23:08.160 --> 2:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>teams would think, hey, I could win around in the

2:23:10.879 --> 2:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>playoffs and get to the second round. Would that discourage something?

2:23:14.600 --> 2:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So I anyway, I think there's a few things to

2:23:17.200 --> 2:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>try first on this tanking thing. But it's embarrassing, it's terrible.

2:23:23.000 --> 2:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>And again, I know we go through this. We beat

2:23:24.720 --> 2:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>up the NBA, and it's always right around n C

2:23:26.959 --> 2:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>double a time because those college players always try that.

2:23:30.640 --> 2:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>We that we know. All right, I got a few

2:23:37.160 --> 2:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>odds and ends in the sports world real quick. I

2:23:39.360 --> 2:23:44.959
<v Speaker 1>went to the Nats home opener. Everything looked great except

2:23:44.959 --> 2:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>the makeup of the of the Nats bullpen and then

2:23:47.959 --> 2:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>some I am already lamenting the idea that we're going

2:23:52.800 --> 2:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to trade C. J. Abrams. I worry about that. I

2:23:56.040 --> 2:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>think that if you were, if you believe you're going

2:23:59.560 --> 2:24:01.039
<v Speaker 1>to be a win in the next two to three years,

2:24:01.080 --> 2:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you should keep c. J. Adams. If you've decided you're

2:24:03.360 --> 2:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to be a winner for five years, then

2:24:05.440 --> 2:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>sure be my guest, trade him. So a trade of C. J.

2:24:10.400 --> 2:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Adams will be more Another reminder that this team is

2:24:15.280 --> 2:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>not serious about trying to put a competitor on the

2:24:17.360 --> 2:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>field sooner rather than later, because I don't think you're

2:24:22.560 --> 2:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>going to get from Abrams what you think. Look, if

2:24:24.600 --> 2:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>you get a haul that looks like the Hall you

2:24:26.920 --> 2:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>got for Sodo, sure do it. But that ain't gonna happen.

2:24:31.200 --> 2:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't, don't trade him unless it's for

2:24:33.440 --> 2:24:36.199
<v Speaker 1>that kind of hall, Just don't do it. I think Abrams,

2:24:36.760 --> 2:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a I think he and Wood are

2:24:40.600 --> 2:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>collectively could be an interesting foundation. Speaking of what he's

2:24:44.560 --> 2:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>got a problem with his swing, he's clearly either the

2:24:48.120 --> 2:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>word is out on it. I noticed that when he

2:24:54.360 --> 2:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>swings at the first pitch, he has better luck than

2:24:56.560 --> 2:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>when he takes pitches. The minute he starts taking pitches,

2:24:59.560 --> 2:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>it's almost inevitable that he's going to get strike out. Looking.

2:25:03.400 --> 2:25:05.640
<v Speaker 1>But he seems to have an issue. We need. There

2:25:05.680 --> 2:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>needs to be some coaching there. There needs to be

2:25:08.000 --> 2:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody there. Something's off there. Basically, he's not been the

2:25:11.560 --> 2:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>same since the home run, since participating in the home

2:25:14.200 --> 2:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>run derby in the All Star Break. I mean, you

2:25:15.959 --> 2:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>look at it, it's a definitive line and he's beginning

2:25:18.959 --> 2:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the season. The way he ended the season, it's a

2:25:21.680 --> 2:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit of cause for concern. I'd like to know

2:25:25.320 --> 2:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>what the Nats are doing to help him and fix that.

2:25:32.400 --> 2:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>But I want to be mindful of another thing. The

2:25:35.440 --> 2:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers are just like, right, the top three. First of all, right,

2:25:39.720 --> 2:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing like the Nats home opener to be the

2:25:42.440 --> 2:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>elixir for the supposedly struggling top of the order of

2:25:45.840 --> 2:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the Gnats. Right. I was at the game that the

2:25:48.840 --> 2:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>number one guy in the batting order show Aotani Homer,

2:25:50.959 --> 2:25:52.959
<v Speaker 1>the number two guy in the batting order Kyle Tucker Homer,

2:25:53.000 --> 2:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the number three guy in the batting order Mookie Betts Hobert,

2:25:55.320 --> 2:25:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and the number four guy Freddie Freeman said hey, I

2:25:57.720 --> 2:26:01.959
<v Speaker 1>want a part of this. Will Smith seemed the only

2:26:01.959 --> 2:26:03.640
<v Speaker 1>one that didn't get to go to the home run party.

2:26:04.760 --> 2:26:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Andy Pie is wow. Right. The point is the Dodgers

2:26:07.959 --> 2:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have such depth in that lineup. Task for Fernandez is

2:26:10.600 --> 2:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>into the seventh hole. So I don't want to crush

2:26:14.440 --> 2:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the Nats too much here. The Dodgers are essentially they're

2:26:20.000 --> 2:26:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the number one team. There is no number two, right,

2:26:23.600 --> 2:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's it. There's nobody close to them that

2:26:27.520 --> 2:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean they can't lose a series. That doesn't mean

2:26:29.520 --> 2:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>they didn't come a cleat away from losing to the

2:26:31.160 --> 2:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Blue Jays. But on paper, there's nobody close to them. Now.

2:26:35.520 --> 2:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>They've got some starting pitching issues, but they had them

2:26:38.200 --> 2:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>last year and they will figure out how to you know,

2:26:40.280 --> 2:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll just buy themselves another picture that I'm convinced of.

2:26:47.720 --> 2:26:52.360
<v Speaker 1>We brought up the Wemby stuff that was unbelievable. Just it.

2:26:52.600 --> 2:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>It really was worthwh and I am looking forward. These

2:26:55.720 --> 2:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>NBA playoffs could be great, particularly in the West. It's

2:27:00.600 --> 2:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>sad about what's happened to the Lakers that a healthy

2:27:03.600 --> 2:27:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Lakers inserted into this sort of three team juggernaut that

2:27:07.520 --> 2:27:15.279
<v Speaker 1>is the Thunder, the Spurs, and the Nuggets. It's a bummer,

2:27:15.840 --> 2:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>but those hamstring strains are tough. Are tough, so enjoy

2:27:20.520 --> 2:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Lebron in the playoffs kind of by himself. I have

2:27:23.760 --> 2:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a feeling we might see a game or two where

2:27:25.480 --> 2:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Lebron just has a game one more reminder, forty one

2:27:27.879 --> 2:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>year old Lebron, and he'll will them to a sixth

2:27:30.720 --> 2:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, to probably sneaking out a first round win

2:27:33.720 --> 2:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and then probably inevitably running into one of the top

2:27:36.160 --> 2:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>three Juggernauts and then it's over. But that's a bummer,

2:27:40.200 --> 2:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and the only other people more bummed are the TV

2:27:42.840 --> 2:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>rights holders on that losing both Luke and Austin Reeves.

2:27:47.400 --> 2:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a tough situation, all right. It was a long

2:27:50.959 --> 2:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Monday episode. We got through a lot. There's a little

2:27:54.000 --> 2:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>something for everybody in here. I will see you in

2:27:56.360 --> 2:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>forty eight hours.