WEBVTT - Watch Bitcoin's Super Cycle Destroy Old Models | Dan Held

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:01.840
<v Speaker 1>So I love cycles. Like I said, I'm kind of

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>working on this big thesis pulling a few different cycles,

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and I love them because you can kind of use

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>this historical reference to kind of maybe help predict the

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>future a little bit. And Mark Twins says, it doesn't

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>repeeve it a rhymes. That's a big value problem of

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>bit coin is that there's a limited twenty one million supply. Now,

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>there had to be a certain way to issue those

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>coins until we reach that mark. And what Sotshi came

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>up with was an idea where every four years, the

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>number of newly issued coins per block, every ten minute

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>approximate block is reduced by half what we're seeing across

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>all markets. And I am really the base of economics

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.919
<v Speaker 1>is people rushing to scarce assets. You could almost look

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>at this kind of like Radalio's short and long term

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>debt cycle theory, where he's got these oscillating waves of

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>short term debt cycles and you've got the long term one.

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I talk so much about how much how many dollars

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>have been created by the FED, but bitcoins that a

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>global reserve asset, and so it really you need to

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the total amount of global dollar but then

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>COVID hit and that's like a mega, mega bearish event.

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>But that bearish event brings in focus why bitcoin is valuable.

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to trust your government, you don't have

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to trust banks. It seemed to kind of actually respond

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>like gold did um has done. If we look at

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>gold compared to stocks, and like the two thousand eight crash, um,

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it takes an initial dip but then immediately rebounds really quickly.

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot of folks think, oh, it's a store value asset,

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a risk off asset. It must perfectly be like

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>have a perfect, perfect inverse correlation with the markets. Well,

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>nothing perfectly does that. It there's there's an evan flow

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to how prices move relative to other asset prices. What

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>happened in golden bitcoin in March twelve, that was a

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>liquidity crunch. Uh, investors across the world, we're gonna be

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>margin called because a lot of the institutional folks go

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a leverage the juice the returns they're getting margin called,

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and they were selling anything they could, even safe haven

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>store value sets assets like golden bitcoin. Hey everyone, welcome

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to another episode of the Market Destructor Show. And today

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I am joined by Dan held for a second time.

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>He's the director of growth Marketing at Cracking. Um. He's

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>really good at mark keting, but he's also really good

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>at forecasting or talking about where some of these kind

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of trends that are growing are going. And so M

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>he's written a bunch of papers. If you haven't seen him,

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you definitely should. Will link to the latest one down below.

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>But Dan, thanks so much for joining Mark. Thanks for

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>having me excited to jam on a couple different topics today.

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah awesome. So, UM, I know you're the director of

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>growth marketing Cracking, but you've also been involved in a

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of other roles inside kind of the bitcoin space

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. UM, maybe just give us a little bit

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of background on, like you know, what you've been working on,

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Like how long you've been doing this kind of thing? Sure? Yeah,

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>so I've been in the crypto space eight years, which

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of makes me a dinosaur. Yeah, I'm thirty three

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>years old and I've got gray hairs. I don't know

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>if you can see it on my webcam. I've got

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>some gray hairs coming in. Um, I sort of stumbled

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and bubbled my way into tech. I would use this

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>as a word of encouragement for folks who want to

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>get into tech. It's definitely possible. UM. I was formerly

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>worked on a small investment firm. I built a mobile

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 1>app with my buddy. It was an app that was

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>called zero block at real time market data news feeds,

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a block folio equivalent in terms of

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>functionality and popularity. Back in we got up watching dot com.

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>From there, tried out different hats of product marketing, growth marketing,

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and UM product across a couple of different crypto companies.

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I worked at Uber on writer growth and growth marketing team,

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 1>so over at HQ. From there, came back to came

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>back to Bitcoin crypto, co founded a company we got

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>bought by Cracking. At Cracking, I stood up the growth

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 1>marketing team and that's how I'm here today. But yeah,

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>my my marketing background has been kind of a fun

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>mix of working and UM different crypto companies, working at

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>companies like Uber, and then also my personal brand. So

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's been pretty exciting. Yeah, and yeah, you've you've

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>been working on your personal brand doing a good job

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>with that. I've I've been impressed, and I'm a marketing

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>guy as well, so that's cool. UM So someone that's

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>been around for this long. I mean, you've you've seen

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot, right. Uh, it doesn't sound that long, but

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it but it is right when you look at the

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>time that bitcoin has kind of been here. UM. So

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to jump right in and hey, guys, let

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>me just interrupt this interview real quick, just to plug

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the show sponsor, and that is block Fi. Now. Block

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>five is doing amazing things in the bitcoin finance space.

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, they've cracked some really big

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>news by bringing on the x c f TC UM

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>chair Chris gian Carlo Um. And they are one of

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the most transparent, most heavily regulated UM companies inside the

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>United States, which gives me a lot of trust into

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>what their services are. Now, I've recently did a video

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about how to retire off bitcoin and you can

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>do that by leveraging debt and interest against bitcoin. And

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Block five is the number one company in the United

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>States or maybe in the world to go to and

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>use UM. They are leading the charge their paying interest

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>on your bitcoin if you park it with them, or

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you can borrow against it. Now, as I broke down

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>in that video, you can borrow against your bitcoin and

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>when you take debt against it. It's not taxable. It's

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>not a taxable event. You can use that debt for

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>anything that you want, including to live off of, to

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>leverage up and buy more, or roll it into another asset. UM.

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>You can do something like I've done recently, like sell

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>some real estate put that money into bitcoin. Now as

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin price has risen, I'm able to borrow against

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it and go back and buy the same real estate

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>or something similar, and I still own the bitcoin, and

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>I also own the new asset as well. Lots of

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>ways you can do this UM. And Block five is

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 1>the company that I recommend. Down in the description, I

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>have a link that you can click on. If you

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>choose to use that link, you can earn up the

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>two d fifty dollars in bitcoin just for using that link.

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>So check out block Fine, now let's just start talking

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>about um kind of the space and talking about the cycles. UM.

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like and I know you've done extensive

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>research and writing on these subjects, and so that's why

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I love having you on to talk about this kind

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. But UM, right now, obviously bitcoin has is

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>in this bowl market cycle. UM, it's it's starting to

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>attract a lot of attention right now. Um, but it

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>seems like there, you know, there are these cycles and

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm actually working on the big thesis about all

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>different types of cycles. But bitcoin has these cycles that

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>like seem to operate in four years based off of

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>having cycles. Um, you want to just explain that for

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Yeah, So for those unfamiliar, those who

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>may be new to bitcoin, bitcoin has an issuance curve.

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>So bitcoin are issued over a certain curve over a

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>very long period of time, and bitcoin will be issued

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>until we hit a twenty one million hard cap. That's

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a big value prop of bitcoin is that there's a

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>limited twenty one million supply. Now, there had to be

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a certain way to issue those coins until we reach

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that mark. And what Stoshi came up with was an

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>idea where every four years, the number of newly issued

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>coins per block every ten minute approximate block is reduced

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>by half, and that that happens until it's like an

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>asum totic curve, until it hits twenty one million at

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a very far day in the future. Now, when we

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>look at bitcoins price in conjunction with these havings, so

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the moment in which that reward has dropped, or that

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>subsidy duly minted coin is dropped in the block reward.

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>We see a corresponding bull run occur a year or

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>two later, and this is ocurred three times now. So

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>you could say it's coincidental. You could say it doesn't

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>predict the future, but certainly it means something because we

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>see bitcoins boom bus cycle or a big bull run

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and then a drop correspond from that. You go having

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>ten bull run, having bull run, having and now we're

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a bull run. So these cycles

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>are kind of like the micro cycles of bitcoin's economy, um,

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and they've largely let a lot of development volume, users interest,

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're in the middle of one right now. Yeah,

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>So I love cycles. Like I said, I'm kind of

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>working on this big thesis pulling a few different cycles,

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and I love them because you can kind of use

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>this historical reference to kind of maybe help predict the

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>future a little bit. You know. Mark Twain says it

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't repeat it at rhymes um. And so if we

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>look at that, now, three havings is not a lot

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of data. I mean, it's not conclusive evidence, but it

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is something, right, It's all we have, Um, it looks

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>cych um that we kind of have. Maybe it peaks

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>out about eighteen months after the Having cycle. Um, is

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that kind of what you've seen through your research. Yeah,

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a window of time that it typically

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>peaks within. And there are the last two cycles there

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>have been a certain amount of you know, they're within

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a few months of each other or within a few days.

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Actually I forget. I forget how granular it gets. I forget,

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you know it Also it depends on do you do.

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you look at the cycle based on the Having

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to the top of the cycle, or do you look

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom like the bear the lowest part of

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the cycle to the top of the Having. And so

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I forget which one has which sort of time period.

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 1>But yes, generally a year and a half and a

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>half and we're looking at the peak of the next

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.719
<v Speaker 1>bull run. I think it was May that we had

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the Having, so a year plus that is May add

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>add three to six months and we're looking at Q

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 1>three Q four. Right. But um, you know, one of

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the things I really want to dig in with you

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 1>today is that you wrote you wrote a paper talking

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>about a supercycle, and so obviously we're having cycles, and

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>there's three cycles that we've had so far, but you

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>have this thesis that there's this super cycle. I like,

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I like that word. It sounds sounds pretty dramatic. I

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people like that. Um. But I

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>guess I guess that's kind of sits on a premise

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 1>that maybe this time is different. I've been saying quite

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit that the world we're going into is not

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the one we've come out of, right, the FED, COVID,

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>every change everything. But you also kind of agree that

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe I think, for your paper, um, that this time

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.079
<v Speaker 1>is different, and maybe this cycle is going to be

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit different than the last ones. I totally agree.

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>I do think this cycle is different. And what's funny

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>about data is if you wait till you have all

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>the data, then the moment is probably too late. Right, So,

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to investing and when it comes to

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>product decision making, because I've worked on both products and

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>marketing teams, you have to operate with limited information. That's

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>always the operating environment. You don't have perfect information. So, yes,

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got a couple havings. We've seen a couple of

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>bull runs. Some go, well, we don't. This is you know,

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>data science wise, this isn't correlated. I'm like, that's the

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>best we've got, and it's pretty good. And certainly there's

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>some qualitative reasons because we've got the quantitative side. There's

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a qualitative reason why, um, these cycles occur. Now, is

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>this cycle different than the other cycles? This is where

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I coined the term supercycle most people, by the way,

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not even sure if you know this. I

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>coined that term in during the bear market. UM I

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>wrote in the Held Report, my weekly news that are

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I wrote in December the sort of revisiting of the

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>um of the supercycle theory. Now in twenty you were

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of you were back then and you were kind

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of predict predicting that we were going to go into

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.839
<v Speaker 1>that at some point. Yeah, And so I think that

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>gives it a lot more credence than a lot of

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>people thinking thinking that I made it up during the

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>bull run, because it's easy to be bullish in the

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>bull run. This was in the middle of the bear

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>market where I basically postulated that what if this cycle,

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>what if bitcoins microcycle, this four year boom and bus cycle,

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>what if a boon correspond with a macro bust, a

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>macro recession, a macro depression. So macro would be like

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream financial world, your typical they typically have eight

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to ten year cycles. You could almost look at this

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Ray Dalio's short and long term debt

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>cycle theory, where he's got these oscillating waves of short

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>term debt cycles and you've got the long term one.

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.839
<v Speaker 1>This is bitcoins equivalent of that. So if you're Raydalio fan,

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll find this analogy kind of fun um.

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And what I hypothesize is if we have a recession

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>while bitcoins in a bowl run, that is the make

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 1>magic moment. And Bitcoin was born in the two thousand

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and eight financial crisis as an antidote to poor central

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>banking policy. But Bitcoin's existence has been in largely a

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>very very productive bull market. So what happens when people

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>start to question the nature of their money and question

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the nature of their government's control over money, then Bitcoin's

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>value props shines the most. And that's what we have now. COVID,

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean I put the COVID. It was a negative event.

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to celebrate COVID. COVID certainly made people

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>go wake up and go, wait a second, I'm not

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>sure if I can trust my government with my money,

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and it just takes that sort of moment. But this

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>was much more intense than I even hypothesized, because I

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was like, Oh, there'll be a normal recession, we're due

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>for one. But then COVID hit and that's like a mega,

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>mega Barish event. But that Barrish event brings in focus

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>why bitcoin is valuable. You don't have to trust your government,

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to trust banks, and that's where the

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>supercycle theory, I think has a largely got a huge

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>check mark from that event. And there's other check marks

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>too that we can dig into later, but that one

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>on a micro macro cycle. I think like we're having

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a Bitcoin bowl run in the midst of a moment

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>when everyone comes to realize the value of bitcoin. I

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're going to see a normal price movement

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of We can go into some numbers, some of the

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>predictions that you know, I would say an aggregate analyst

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>are predicting, Yeah, yeah, I want to dig into that. Well, well,

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna leave that towards in make sure everybody sticks

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>around and listen to kind of those numbers of where

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we were maybe we're going. But I guess to kind

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of dig into what you said, obviously that makes sense, right,

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>people are all of a sudden starting to go, what

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the heck is happening to our money? The money sippply

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>was created the last twelve months, all those things. UM,

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think there was that distrust that

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>was like the psychological factor. But then we did have

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>six seven trillion dollars dumped into the markets, so we

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>have we have that as well, So I think it's

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of it's getting it from both sides, right, a

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 1>rush of liquidity into the markets. Um. And the other

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>thing I think is that what we're seeing across all markets,

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and i'm's really the base of economics is people rushing

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to scarce assets. And so we're seeing you know, the

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>best beach runner lake from property going up way more

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>than other properties, for example. And so bitcoin might be

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the most scarce financial asset, and maybe that's one reason

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>why it's going to more than others. Certainly bitcoin's moment

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>to shine as a twenty one million fixed supply comes

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>into focus. In this sort of moment, we're seeing other

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>scarce assets like gold and real estates start to go

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>up in price. Two. I'm going to Austin this weekend

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>of visits of friends, and I've noticed that the apartment

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>has come back. I'm I'm moving out there in a

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>month and a half. Yeah, it's it's already set in stone.

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>We're just figuring out where we want to live. I

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>did a scouting mission before in terms of checking out

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>different neighborhoods, but now it's time to go put some

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>ink on paper and make it happen. So I'm thrilled.

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Texan. So I've been out in California, in

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco for eight years, working in tech. Still gonna

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>work in tech. It's time to come home. Um, tax

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>wise and personal belief wise. I just feel like I'm

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable out there. Um when it comes to you know,

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the what we're seeing is, you know, when we look

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>at inflation numbers, and we look at inflation calculations like CPI,

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't include a lot of metrics or a lot

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of prices that are inherent to living. They exclude some

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of these costs, which is ridiculous, Like, for example, they

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>only include rent, but they don't include the the rise

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in in the average home price. So we're seeing acid

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>bubbles occur in equities and in real estate, where it's

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>very symptomatic of all this money printing. And by the way,

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I looked this metric up recently, it's twenty five trillion

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars that have been printed globally during COVID by governments

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>trillion and bitcoins only at a trillion dollar market cap. Yeah,

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>these are the sort of moments when you just realize

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the size and the enormity of the value prop for

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin, the the total dress ball market of what

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin can evolve and grow into in terms of size. Yeah,

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a great point. You know, I talked so much

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>about how much how many dollars have been created by

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the FED, but bitcoins are a global reserve asset and

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>so really you need to look at the total amount

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of global dollars and so that's a that's a great

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>point you bring up. Now, Um, you did mention that

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin was created, you know, in the two thousand nine

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of as a response to two crash um, and

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's you know, pretty apparent that bitcoin hasn't

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>really seen a big bear market, and so you know,

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>there's always the debate between you know, is it risk on,

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is a risk off? You know, where does that fit? Um?

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think that you know, what happened last year

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and that COVID plunge or whatever you want to call that,

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it seemed to kind of actually respond like gold did

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>um has done. If we look at gold compared to stocks,

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and like the two thousand eight crash, UM, it takes

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>an initial dip but then immediately rebounds really quickly. And Uh,

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we kind of saw that. Does that kind

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of give you maybe a little bit of taste of

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>what we may expect from that in the future. Yeah,

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>great question. So a lot of folks think, oh, it's

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a store value asset, it's a risk off asset. It

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>must perfectly be like have a perfect, perfect inverse correlation

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>with the markets. Well, nothing perfectly does that. There's there's

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>an ebb and flow to how prices move relat to

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>other asset prices. What happened in golden bitcoin in March

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that was a liquidity crunch. Uh, Investors across the world,

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we're getting margin called because a lot of the institutional

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>folks go leverage to juice the returns. They're getting margin

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>called and they were selling anything they could, even safe

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>haven store value sets assets like golden bitcoin. So I

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>think that um, that moment was a good example of

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a liquidity crunch, not necessarily a lack of confidence in

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin or gold as a global store of value asset. Um,

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>what's kind of cool about bitcoin is that bitcoin as

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>referenced by Jerome Powell, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve,

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.959
<v Speaker 1>he states that bitcoin is a speculative store of value.

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that encapsulates this perfectly. It's inherent properties make

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it a good long term risk off asset, but it's

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>price volatility is very much a speculation as to its

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>future utility of a store of value asset. But what's

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>funny is that this speculative nature of bitcoin is entirely

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>how we heard about it and how it is gains adoption,

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>price goes higher. You hear about it, you talk about it,

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you buy it, you tell your friends about it, and

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the loop continues. It's a viral loop. It's essentially a

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>viral loop baked into bitcoin. And um, you know, when

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>we look at this from how does like a money

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>go from zero? From a white paper and a group

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of nerdy dudes who want to talk about cryptotomy. Hey,

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>sorry to interrupt this video just one more time. I'm

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>not running Google ads, so it's actually way less interruption

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>than I normally would have on a video. UM, and

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that's because it's sponsored by block five. UM. They are

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>opening up the world of bitcoin and financial products offering

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>to pay you interest on your bitcoin. Um better than

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>own in a rental property that you have to manage

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and control and have the risks. You can just earn

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>interest on it, or you can leverage against it. Now,

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I plan to hold my bitcoin forever and literally never

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>sell my bitcoin. So how do you do that? Well,

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>if I need money, I don't want to sell that bitcoin.

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pay tax on it, all right, I'm gonna

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>end up with less and I don't have the bitcoin anymore.

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>So a better way to do it is to borrow

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>against the bitcoin. So I've put all my money into bitcoin.

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>If I want to buy a car, or I want

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to buy a house, I can borrow against it at

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>very very low competitive rates. Get my house, get my car,

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever that may be, and get to keep the bitcoin.

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I've done a whole video on this. You can find it.

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll link it down to the description below. How to

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>retire off a bitcoin without paying taxes, and you can

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>do that with block five services. I'll link to the

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>video game, but though I'm also going to put a

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>link to block fire. If you choose to click on

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that link to check them out, you can earn up

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to two in free bitcoin just for using that link.

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>And that's it. Let's go ahead and get back to

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the interview biography. How does it go from that to

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream? And bitcoin has done this through these speculative cycles.

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't use the word speculative and a negative connotation.

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>It's simply people discovering discovering bitcoin to discovering why it's valuable.

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Some stick around it because they realized the value. Some

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>just came in to speculate. Um. But yeah, with this,

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, Bitcoin I think is increasingly being recognized as

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a goal two point oh. And this was a checkmark

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>for the supercycle theory. In no one recognized bitcoin is

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>gold two point other than us, other than us, other

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>than our our group of believers. All the institutions though

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you've got, You've got investment banks, hedge funds, and hedge

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>fund managers who are legends. Tesla micro Strategy either putting

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin on their balance sheet. These are gigantic check marks

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for like a supercycle theory. Now again, I'm not saying

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>it's likely to happen. I'm saying it could happen. You know,

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>big bitcoin moves in mysterious ways. Who knows how what

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the future holds. I can't predict the future. I'm just

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>describing a potential outcome that no one was describing at

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the time, because I think this time might be different.

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean we're seeing every institution across the

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>world say bitcoin is gold two point Oh, I've waited

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>eight years to see this moment. This is not like

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the other cycles, the other cycles where we were considered

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is considered a very risky investment that only retail

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>traders get into. No, you've got like giant investment banks

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>going oh yeah, Bitcoin's like gold. Yeah, this is huge.

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a huge moment, a huge moment for a bitcoin. Yeah.

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, you know, obviously we don't we don't

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>know the future. But looking at cycles and understand how

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>technology rolls out, and I'll understand all these different things

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>that gives you different perspectives and so um, I always

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>like take like the macro view because, UM, I think

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it's easier to kind of see the future, the long

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>term future than the short term future. And when you

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>see these actions being taken, as you said, by these institutions,

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you know where that leads to eventually. But before we

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>get into that, I want to I do want to

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.479
<v Speaker 1>talk about, um, how the makeup of the people in

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the space has changed and what that means for the future,

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>because I think that really builds into that super psychle

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>But before we do that, UM, having you know, someone

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>like you that's been in Silicon Valley for this long, UM,

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's interesting and I'm curious your perspective on this

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>because you mentioned Jerome Power calling it like a store value.

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I think China came out like last week and said

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like a store of value. I mean, we're seeing

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that from these even City Bank and JP have been

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>coming out and kind of saying these things. But yet

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we still have all these other people like, uh, you know,

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Mark Cuban or we have you know, seemingly

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>very smart technology driven people. Um tally recently came out

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the same thing is that it's it's not a currency,

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not a store value. It's too speculative, and it

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>seems that like they've completely forgotten that technology has to evolve,

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Like just because it's not something today doesn't mean it's

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 1>not going to be something in the future. So, as

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a Silicon Valley kind of tech guy, what's your thought

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on that? Yeah, there's a couple of things here. One

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>to address the val Tildy question, where a lot of

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>people are just kind of put off by that, Like,

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>how did you think how did you think any major,

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>gigantic valuable company ever got that big right? It wasn't

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a nice, perfect linear function from zero dollar market share

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to like a one dollar markets or two dollar markets,

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was like these ebbs and flows of

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>investor interest and execution. Bitcoin in a similar function, does that,

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you know a silicon value though it's been a little

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>bit disappointing. Silicon Valley tech people inherently don't get bitcoin

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>their first inclination. And I wrote about this too because

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it was a very rare thing and a bunch of

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>folks agreed with me too, which at first I wrote

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 1>this and I didn't. I was like, man, I'm I

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna put myself out here and are people are gonna

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>be like cool? Dan, that's a nice opinion. A bunch

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of people in tech who are in a bitcoin came

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>out and they were like, this is exactly how the

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>system works. Silicon Valley has two primary uh function to

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>primary players vcs, so venture capital or people who fund

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>startups and startups. Vcs are constantly looking at what's next,

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>whatever is hot they want to pile in on. They

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>don't care, and most of them aren't subject matter experts.

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>They can't be experts on every single sector. So they

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>either outsourced that bringing people, or they just choose a theme.

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>They're thematic. It's a thematic investment into a R v R, drones, bitcoin,

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>chat bots, you name it. And what happens is you

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>go deploy capital and the vcs, no one out of

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a hundred make it. So they just look for whatever

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is hot, super hot, and and they put in capital there.

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>It was one of the most disappointing things to find

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>out ever about Silicon Valley. Venture capitalists are not risk tickers.

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Risk tickers at all. They claim to be, but they're not. Yeah,

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 1>so what happens is they will never go against the

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>grain versus all the other vcs. There's top it's like

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a top four VC couple of VC firms, they choose

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>what's hot. And if they don't choose what's hot, what

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>happens is that the LPs, so the investors in your fund,

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they go, well, why aren't you talking about this other

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>subject that they're talking about. Why are you investing in

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>something else? That's not the common narrative, And it's very

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>counterintuitive because you would expect vcs to be into contrary

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and investments. That's the whole point, right. What happens is

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're beholding to the LP still and the LPs

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>will give them a lot of uh, you know, they'll

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>they give them a lot of ship if they don't

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.959
<v Speaker 1>get into these like more thematic plays that are endorsed

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>by the hot hot vcs. There's also a joke, you know,

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>if you get into there's the hot vcs, and if

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you can get in with them, it's kind of like

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the same no one ever got fired for buying an IBM. Well,

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>no one ever got fired for investing alongside a six, right,

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so the same. So that was kind of a big element.

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'll weave this all together at a big point

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>here pretty quick. So that's a big element that they're

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>not contrarian, and that they're largely chase narratives, and the

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>narratives evan flow very quickly. Like does anyone anyone talk

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>to talk about chatbots? Yeah? Remember that whole trend for

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a while, super hot or a r v R. I'm

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>not wearing an air headset and I'm a gamer, like

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and I've got a high. Do you think it's also though,

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>because like, um, why the medical industry won't embrace CBD,

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, or you know, cannabis right because they it's natural.

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>They can't own it. There's no money to be made there,

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>so they want to they want to create their own

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>version of uh, you know, a synthetic version of it.

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 1>They can patent, is it something maybe like that where

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you know vcs they can't make any money off bitcoin,

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>so they want to create the next all cooin kind

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Yeah, that's certainly an element. I think part

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of this as well is like um, VCS prescribed the

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>narrative to bitcoin that like, oh, bitcoin is good to

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>disrupt PayPal. Vcs don't even grock the idea of like

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>disrupting governments, and that is that is next level, like

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>next level revolutionary, and how do you make money? Off that.

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, they can't really go pitch their LPs. Hey,

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I bought bitcoin. It is hoddled. You need to be

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>an active investor, actively investing in companies. And what's interesting

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is that hoddling Bitcoin will likely outperform any company that

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you invest in the crypto space. So it certainly has.

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>It certainly has even coin based I think it's maybe

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>on par like the best performing startup in crypto. I

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>think like if you look at Series A check or

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>seed check to I p O, bitcoin is still outperforms,

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>which is wild, which is nuts, and your risk is

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>far lower with bitcoin. So yeah, one they can't make

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>they can't make money off of it. To the themes

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>have ebbed and flowed and they don't really rock Bitcoin's corps,

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Like how do you make money on Like I want

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 1>to disrupt the government, Like they can't go pitch their

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>LPs like you. By the way, bitcoin is gonna disrupt

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>central banking and make all the banks ops lead. Also

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna remove power of government to do all these things.

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>These the LPs, I think they're nuts. So they latched

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>on the narratives like cheap PayPal replacing visa replacing master card,

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>which were totally incongruent with why bitcoin is valuable. And

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>then you also have like dats decentralized dat platforms, but

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you could own the token, so you do. The vcs

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>could eventually take their little cut, right, so the ebbs

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and flows of the space, the vcs latch onto whatever

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>narratives are hot, um and so bitcoin's narrative. Bitcoin is

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>old and boring and that's why I don't like it.

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got the operators. So when you're an operator,

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>you constantly have to ship and build. So cracking is

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>constantly building new apps, new sorry, new functionality to go

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>execute and compete against coin base. If we don't execute,

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>then coin based well, and we're gonna be left in

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the dust. So you have to constantly iterate. That's tech,

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>that's tech mindset. With money, you don't want to tinker

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>with it all the time. Bitcoin needs to stay ossified.

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>It needs to be slow moving and eventually become ossified

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>because that ensures that trust can be built around this

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>open this open network, this open framework versus a weather app.

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>You need to keep pushing a new update to it

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that people find it relevant and useful. Um.

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 1>So for money, it's the opposite. You don't want to

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>touch it a lot. And that's where they don't like bitcoin,

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>but they like ethereum because ethereum is constantly tinkered with,

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 1>and tech builders are tinkerers. They want to tinker with everything.

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>They want to tinker with the monetary policy, they want

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to tinker with like block time, they want to tinker

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>with proof of workers at prove mistake. Constantly tinkering and

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>tinkering and tinkering, and the idea that a product could

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:12.360
<v Speaker 1>be perfect or a a protocol could be perfect is unfathomable.

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>They're like, no way, they're they're they're like, that's that's impossible.

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>There's no way that the first try you got it right.

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>They don't. You don't You don't see them going and

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>tinkering with the t c P i P, you know,

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Internet protocol Um. They're tinkering with all the things that

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>are built on top of that. So maybe that's also

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.239
<v Speaker 1>an evolution thing. So over time they're gonna, Okay, well

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>accept this protocol and we'll just tinker with what's on

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>top of it. Totally exactly. That big one is like

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a t c P i P. You don't tinker with that. However,

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>most younger developers weren't even around back when TCP, t

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>c P I P was was talked about in debated

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>versus other protocols. So I mean, actually, I think if

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you're around then you're probably pretty old. Like if you

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>were in your thirties and forties when they were discussing

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that might be so old that you're not on social right.

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So like there's a whole generation of kind of lost

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>context there. But there's been some really cool folks on

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in the big points space. We've pulled out old debates

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and old I think there was one that was kind

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of like a joke, like a joke comic book about

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>how many protocols they were thinking of doing. They were

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking of doing protocols for every type of application back then,

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and instead they just came up with t c P

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I p UM. There's more nuance of this and a

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>lot more to dig get on in a lot of

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>context I'm leaving out. But yeah, essentially you've got a

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>bunch of like more like front end front end devs

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>who are building they're building io s apps and web apps,

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, oh, I want to tinker with stuff,

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, They don't think about the implications of like

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the protocol level, which is like, this is a huge responsibility.

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>This isn't your fucking weather. App Like, if you mess

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>up something, you've got the entire world's financial system building

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>being built on this. This isn't it's not going to

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>break and you can just fix it, you know, like

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>if you break it, you might lose trust for forever.

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And almost no engineers in the world, a very few

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>operating that premise maybe like aircraft aircraft, software engineers or

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, they have to think about crazy up time

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that everything, like a plane doesn't crash with

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>people on it. Type of engineers the right wants to

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>think about protocol design. Yeah. Yeah, that's that's some good context.

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for sharing that. Let's say, let's pivot into back

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to this this supercycle. So um I think you know,

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and if you were around in seventeen, it was like,

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's like retail fomo. All the individuals are coming

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>in and that that's interesting in itself how it was

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the first time that retail had come

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to technology before the institutions and funds um But at

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the same time we were talking all the institutions are

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna come. They're gonna come. But now we've seen a

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>completely different type of buyer, and I think that really

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>feeds into what you're calling this supercycle. Absolutely. Yeah. The

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>market before was retail retails, individual like Mark and I

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>who were not we're not professional. I don't know if

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>market is or not, but you know we we don't

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>want run hedge funds, um and and so the institutions

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>had largely stayed out of bitcoin, and in seen where like,

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the institutions are coming, the herd is coming. It was

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a little too early. Now the herd is here. The

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>herd is storming through the house. We can hear the herd,

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we can smell the herd. The herd is here, and um,

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this represents a huge moment for bitcoin, not just because

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the institutions, and I'll get to the second part in

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>your second it's the institutions bring about large amounts of

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>capital which gets deployed in a bitcoin. They bring around

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>large amounts of stability in terms of infrastructure, but the

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>legitimacy factor I think a lot of bitcoiners are underestimating. Look, guys,

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm a libertarian. I'm a libertarian freedom fighter to like

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>corporations buying bitcoin is not a bad thing. They can't

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>do anything if they buy bitcoin. They can't change the protocol,

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>they can't change the governance. We still control bitcoin. But

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>they're opting into our free world. This is a great moment.

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>These institutions are opting into a world that we designed

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of permission less nature. Um, they're not going to change bitcoin,

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not possible given how bitcoins architected and we are

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the resilient core, and that won't happen. But what the

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>bitcoiners don't realize is that by institutions buying bitcoin, now

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>more retail will buy bitcoin. Because retail it looks to

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>institutions for legitimacy. You know, they're not libertarian like us.

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>They don't question the nature of the reality. So when

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>these trusted institutions like banks by bitcoin, then they buy.

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So now we're hitting that moment and that stride in

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the market. These institutions are buying bitcoin, and retail goes

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>wait a second. These institutions are the smart people that

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I trust. They started to buy bitcoin, and so that's

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>why this could all feed into a supercycle where we've

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>never had that before. We've had a very small retail segment,

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.239
<v Speaker 1>a retail segment that was very risk on. They were

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>willing to reject institutional buy in, reject government buy in.

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>And now we're starting to get that, which I think

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>increases the legitimacy of bitcoin in the eyes of the

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>retail trader. Yeah, so the retail trader, I mean, they

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>came in chasing pumps. So you know, at the end

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of seventeen, their their friends said, oh, I just turned

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>five thousand and twenty, so they jumped in. But as

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>soon as it started going down, they didn't understand why

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they bought. They just thought they were going to make

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:53.959
<v Speaker 1>it rich overnight. As soon as you started going down,

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>they sold. So that not only did it push it

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>up faster, but it also brought it back down faster.

0:32:57.960 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why the volatility is always the most at the top.

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>But then, as you're kind of explaining, now, with these

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors, you have like not Warm Buffet, but like

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Warm Buffet's own Coca Cola since like the sixties, like

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>they buy things like Forever and so um. You just

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>have a different makeup of the person there um, And

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>so they're not quickly that they understand why they're buying.

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>They're not buying to make twenty grand and if it

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>automn if it starts dropping, they don't automatically sell out.

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So I guess that kind of changes that volatility kind

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of curve for that sharp ratio totally. Yeah, definitely changes

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the volatility structure. I think bitcoin is still gonna be volatile,

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>quite volatile compared to other currencies and other assets for

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>some time, but it certainly changes the the the holdler mix,

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the mix of individuals buying bitcoin, and I do think

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>most institutions will skew towards a longer hoddle period than

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a retail trader. Retail traders typically fomo in because their

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>buddy told them about it, and then they're not very convicted,

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the nor are they managing people's money to

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>where it like a hedge fund manager or fund can

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>hold onto it for a longer duration and they have

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>an investment thesis um And they were like, sure, we'll

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>wait five years, and the vcs holder their investment for

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>five to ten years UM. Now, headpunds are the same

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>thing as vcs, but in a similar vein there can

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>they have a can they have a conviction in this

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 1>trade and they're gonna go with this investment thesis and

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go do it. I was a retail trader

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>wakes up and they had two cups of coffee and

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>they bought bitcoin, and three days later they're drunk with

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>every buddies at the bar and they panic sell. You know,

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>so they're quite a different dynamic. The other thing I

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>would say is that you know, kind of like what

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>you were saying about the vcs, where nobody wants to

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 1>be the first guy, and then they all want to

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>jump onto the trend. I think that we also see

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with the funds and institutions as well,

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>where nobody wants to be the first guy. But once

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the first guy buys a little bitcoin and they outperform,

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>then everybody else has to jump in, and then that

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of becomes this self fulfilling prophecy. More people jump in,

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they outperform. More people jump in, they outperform um. And

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 1>we see that now I know, we've got to kind

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of start wrapping this up, so maybe we can just

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of move along, um where this cycle takes us

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and kind of what you're thinking now, Michael Sailor said

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that like all models are broken at this point, which

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you know might be true. You're kind of saying the

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>same thing right this time is different or whatever. Um

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>we've heard. You know, Cathy would from ARC said that

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 1>she she thinks that SMP five companies should put ten

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>percent of their treasury in it, and if they did that,

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 1>it puts it to five hundred thousand dollars a coin.

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Seems pretty logical, Michael Saylor. You know she's just going

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 1>to three hundred chillion, and and there's there's reason behind that.

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>But in this cycle, kind of what are you what

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking or seeing? Yeah, so, I mean if

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we talked, if we look at historical cycles and project

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 1>the future, we would see between a hundred and three

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>three hundred thousand dollars a bitcoin. This is also what

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of analysts are predicting based on on chain data, etcetera. Typically,

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>if everyone's guessing the same thing, it's probably not going

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to be that. It's probably not what's going to happen. Um.

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's kind of how what's to define is

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like the classic outcome here, the supercycle outcome would be

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>anything above like three d thousand up to like a million. Think, well,

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:53.919
<v Speaker 1>there's no limit to it, but I think anything past

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.879
<v Speaker 1>a million would be insane. Even people think about crazy

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to even say a million or half a million, But

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I think anything around there the half a million to

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a million dollar range would be in like super cycle territory.

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Um I'd say, like entering that is a cycle that

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>was predicted to be much smaller but was bigger than expected.

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Or it could be a normal cycle and there's no

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 1>bear market or a limited bear market, so it goes

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>to two hundred dollars bitcoin and only drops to two

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and stays flat to the next bowl run something like that.

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, something that's very atypical, so basically doesn't break

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the pattern, does it break the mold. I think we've

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 1>got all the elements that show that this time is different.

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what happens. I'm happy either way. Bitcoin doesn't change.

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Either way, bitcoin doesn't fail or succeed. Bitcoin would even

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>succeed in these lower bound scenarios of a hundred thousand

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and three thousand supercycle is just what I think could

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>happen if the whole world wakes up to bitcoin at

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the same time, and certainly the price isn't going to

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>be the same, it should be much higher. Than what

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we expect or have a less intense bear market. Yeah,

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and and as you said, all the catalyst is there.

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>We have you know, the pandemic and an unlimited money printing. Um,

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we have this younger generation. If you look at some

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>cycles like the fourth turning, we have rapid change is

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be happening in this decade. Um. You know,

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>all these things are kind of lining up so it

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>could happen. So UM, I know we got to wrap

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it up, but you left us with a lot of thoughts,

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:16.399
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully everybody enjoys that. Anything you want to say

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>closing it out, well, Mark, thanks for having me on.

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate it. Um. If you want to follow me,

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>check out my Twitter account at Dan held That's where

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I post all my thoughts. Um. Yeah, but thanks for

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 1>having me Mark. Yeah, we'll go ahead and linked to

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:30.720
<v Speaker 1>your Twitter and your news letter down below for everybody

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and without we'll wrap it up. Thanks so much, Dan

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:33.320
<v Speaker 1>sures