WEBVTT - Full Episode - Trump Has Two Options For Iran: Escalate… Or Capitulate + Does Georgia Reveal The Future Of Post-Trump Republican Politics?

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>by Ethos and what Ethos does is it helps you

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>find life insurance. Let me tell you why life insurance

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>bailed me out. My father died when I was sixteen.

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have a lot of money when it happened,

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and we were in a pretty tough financial spot after

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it happened. I'm an only child. Suddenly my mother's single,

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>single mother. She had a job, suddenly lost a job,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>looking for another job, and we were struggling. You know,

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>my dad didn't leave us in the best financial situation,

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but he did make one purchase. He bought a life

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>insurance policy. Wasn't a huge chunk of change, but it

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>was enough when we found it. And when I say

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>we found it, meaning we went through his desk and

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we found, oh, look at this, let's see if there's

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>anything here. And it helped us out at a time

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that we really needed it. And that's why I think

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.319
<v Speaker 1>it's important that if you can, especially if you have

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>young children, if you can get life insurance, you should

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>get it. Life is full of unexpected emergencies, unexpected things happen.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It is an extra bit of security, something you can

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>leave and help out at a time when you're not

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not there to help. So what does Ethos do well?

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Ethos makes getting life insurance fast and easy, and it's

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent online. You can get a quote in seconds,

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you can apply in minutes, and you can get same

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>day coverage. They will find you the right fit. There's

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>no medical exam. You just answer a few simple health

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>questions online. You can get up to three million dollars

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in coverage and some policies are as low as thirty

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month, and you'll get your lowest rate from

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>their network of trusted carriers. So take ten minutes to

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>get covered today with life insurance through Ethos. Get your

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>free quote at ethos dot com slash chuck. That is

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>ETOs dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary and

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>rates may vary. Well. Hello there, Happy Monday, and welcome

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to another episode of the Check podcast. I will be

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>honest with you. I sort of have a I have

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>like seventeen thousand topics. I feel like I should share

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a few a few quick takes for you on or

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a few different ways to be thinking about it, or

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at least share with you how I how I'm thinking

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>about it and see how much that informs you. That's

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>one thing I try not to do is I'm not

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to tell you what you think. I'm trying to

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of lay out, lay out a structure to understand

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>why whatever the situation is we're in. Look, there were

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.679
<v Speaker 1>two dominant stories that I'm going to spend a lot

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of time on. Obviously, the biggest one is Iran. Iran

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of is everything because of its massive impact on

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the global economy, which of course means our economy, which

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of course means Campaign twenty twenty six. But the Eric

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Swawell implosion out in California also is a really really

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>b FD, as Joe Biden might whisper in the ear

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of Barack Obama, and it's something that we need to

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of time on because it's actually two stories. Right. One,

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it's going to trigger a bunch of show votes in

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>cong VERUS, so Congress can make itself feel better by

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>kicking out men behaving badly. But the other shakeup is

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen in California. I think what we

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>will we know for sure, and I think this has

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>now been more likely than we You know, I just

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>think now the swallow thing trigger it. Here's the bottom line.

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be another election for California governor before

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty. That I promise you. I do not believe

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>whoever wins this governor's race will be able to survive

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the inevitable recall effort that is coming. We are slip

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>sliding into one of those Californy governor's races. It's going

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to look a lot like two thousand and two Gray

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Avis versus Bill Simon, where everybody hates their choices. So

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>those are the two dominant stories. A bunch of other

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff percolating. Not going to leave it on the cutting

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>room floor. I want to want to get to a

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>bunch of it. My guest Martha z Aller, and she's

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. She's a conservative talk radio host in Georgia,

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>but she's not somebody who's sort of stuck in her

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>own bubble. And you know, as you know, I'm always

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>desperate to find people not stuck in their bubble. I

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>don't you know mine left and right, you know, center, progressive,

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you name it. It's that you accept the premise that

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you may believe you're right, but not everybody agrees with you.

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>The point is, I think Martha will give us a

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>nice little I think she did, certainly she did for me,

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.679
<v Speaker 1>give us a nice little insight on where the Georgia

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party is. I think it's the most interesting Republican

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>party in the country because it's no less conservative than

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>it's been. But it is interesting that the that the

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Republicans who feel the most comfortable pushing back at Trump,

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>other than Utah, which pushes back more on character the

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>publicans in that state. It really there is a bit

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of it's both character driven in policy driven. Right, both

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Brian Kemp and Marjorie Taylor Green have separated themselves with

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Trump and lived to see another day. So I just

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>think what's happening inside the Georgia Republican Party is interesting,

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and Martha's got her finger on it, and she's sort

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>of she's got feet in all the camps, and I

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot to learn and it's very instructive.

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I hope it's instructive for you about where the GOP

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is headed as it transitions from a Trump party to

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a post Trump party. But let's get to Iran. So

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the ceasefire is I guess kind of intact, but make

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>no mistake, a naval blockade, which President Trump ordered on

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Sunday is an act of war. That's you know, that

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 1>is what it is. Now we are still at war

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>with Iran. I think Iran still at war with us.

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>The question is does either country break the ceasefire? Is

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>this considered breaking of the ceasefire? Will the Iranians respond

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>or just part of a stalemate until we hit the

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>end of the two weeks or until we see negotiations

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>pick up. Because one thing that it is important. Neither

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>jd Evans for the American side nor the Iranians indicated

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that they both behaved as if they knew there would

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be another round of talks. They didn't say another round

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>was coming, but you get the impression another round is coming.

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Still no deal, no framework, and no actual next step

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>just yet. But in some ways the blockade is an

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>acknowledgment by President Trump that the United States has less

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:51.239
<v Speaker 1>leverage in this deal than we want to admit. Certainly,

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the President doesn't want to man it. He

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.119
<v Speaker 1>keeps declaring victory, and that's a huge problem. If you've won,

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>then why are you negotiating? If you've won Why are

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you potentially floating the idea of a joint venture with

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Iran to patrol and maybe even collect tolls for the

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>straight of Horn moves and the tolls being used as reparations. Right, So,

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>this is why his rhetoric is not harmless. The stupid

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric he makes untruth social, the dumb rhetoric where he

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>beats his checks, declares victory or sort of the secretary

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of the fence who constantly loves to beat his chest

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I guess probably you know, choose on

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>too much creatine before he does any of his press

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>briefings and declares these capital v victories. Okay, then why

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>are we negotiating? Right? So, the bottom line is we

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have leverage. They do. They came out of this

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>ceasefire with the single most important piece of leverage, control

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of the straight of Horror moves, control of the global economy,

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and essentially control right now of the Trump presidency. So

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that's why Trump in some ways had no choice but

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to do this with the straight of hormones. The He's

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>got to find and see if he can get some

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>leverage to force the Iranians to back off a little bit.

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So the question is is there a next step? Right?

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it. The blockade is intended to get around

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>back to the table and to start having a conversation

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>about the Strait and about the nuclear deal. If there

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>is no The question though, is will the president escalate

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>further if this does not get the deal he's looking for?

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Does he then send in ground troops to didn't try

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to militarily take control of the Straight and essentially operate

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the Straight in behalf of the world. Now there's all

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of look the where to morning quarterback this war. Obviously,

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the total misunderstanding of the power of the Strait that

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians would have is the initial blunder of this war.

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the I swear to you, there's WMDs right this.

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to say, if there was any like,

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>what is the failure of this administration for going into war?

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It is underplaying and underrealizing the leverage the Iranians had

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>with the Strait. And had they understood it from the

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning and they chose to do this, my guess is

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>they would have immediately tried to get control of the

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Straight first, then you start worrying about everything else. But again,

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the problem here is the president surrounded himself with sycophants,

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and even though we have learned that these folks did

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>not want to endorse his strategy, here they were afraid

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of telling him the truth. They were afraid of telling

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>they They just danced around the edges of the issues

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>and allowed him to hear what he wanted. And now

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 1>we're in this potentially intractable situation that we're in where

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we may have no choice but escalate because of the

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 1>initial blunder at the beginning, or you're going to have

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to cut a deal with the Iranians that leaves the

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>regime in power, legitimizes the regime, gives them acknowledges their

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>control over the Strait, and essentially makes the hardliners like

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>John Bolton are going to wish they had the Iran

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>nuclear deal, because the best thing that Trump can get

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>now is essentially naftaizing the Iran nuclear deal. And what

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>do I mean by that by naftaizing? He said he

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>hated NAFTA, so he ripped it up, renegotiated the same

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>deal with the Mexicans and the Canadians and called it

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:05.319
<v Speaker 1>us MCA the United States Mexican Canadian right accord whatever. See,

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>there's there's no NAFTA. That's what's coming here. He's gonna

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>hope he can get the Obama nuclear deal. If he's lucky,

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>he can get the Obama Obama nuclear deal. And that's

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>if this this is the best, the best version of this,

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. And again we can sit here and talk

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>about all the all the problems going into this thing. Right,

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a mistake, and everybody advised him. It was

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>most people around him advised him. It was a mistake

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>outside of John Bolton and and and the Gulf States

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and Israel. And this is a case where the president

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>consistently listens to outside voices rather than his own military

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>advisors and his own intelligence. He did it all the

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>time in his first term, and he's doing it again

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in his second term. And that is an issue that

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>does not get enough attention. He trusts the Israeli intelligence

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>more than he trusts the US intelligence. The Israeli said

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this was going to be easy regime. James was going

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to happen and the people were going to rise up,

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And the CIA said that was bullshit. And the CIA

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is fronted by somebody who is a trumper, John Radcliffe,

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>who wants to tell Trump what he wants to hear,

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>but can't bring himself to tell him bullshit. But the

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>President refuses to listen to his own his own folks

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on that front. So the next look that I expect

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the markets to panic a bit. I mean, I kind

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of think they've been under panicking. I'm a bit hopeful

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that somehow, you know, the resilience of the markets in

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the past, just like they were during the pandemic, just

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>like they have been during the Russia Ukraine War, that

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen again. But the lack of a

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.719
<v Speaker 1>clear resolution it is, you know, here's what we do now.

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>President does not want to restart the war. There's no

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>doubt he probably read rats ever starting it, and considering

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the situation he's in, you know, he could have you know,

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in hindsight, right, should he have tried to squeeze him more,

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Should he have tried to find more ways to isolate Iran,

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>do more to it, to increase the stranglehold so that

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>the people would rise up and be angry at their leaders,

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and instead, in a weird way, he's even united. If

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys have started following my friend, my Suzanne kan

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Poor she's her reporting is indicated that they're you know,

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>even those that don't like this regime, uh now feel

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>as if that it's everybody versus America, which is a

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>very dangerous place to be. And it's you really got

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to bungle this as badly as this administration has bungled

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this to put put ourselves in this situation. Well, we're

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>basically begging iron to come to give us some deal

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 1>so Trump can save face and the and that's the thing.

0:13:58.600 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>The Iranians know it.

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 2>They know.

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>They know it. They know he can't handle the economic

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>fallout from this, they know it's politically beyond painful for him.

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>They know it screws up his trade negotiations with China

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>next month, It messes up all sorts of aspects of him.

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And look, the Iranians, they will negotiate, negotiate, negotiate, negotiate,

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to keep dragging this out. So the

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, he had to find some leverage.

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if doing a blockade of the Strait does that.

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But it is going to have you know, this is

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be it's probably going to be an

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>ugly day in the markets because now whether we're questions,

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is the straight open or not? Now it's we know

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not open, right, it is definitely closed. But I

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>go back to something right. The problem, Right, the president

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>has already declared victory and he continues to try to

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>declare victory. So if we've already won, why do we

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>have to keep doing all of these things? And this

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is the position he's put himself in. Right, when you

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>define victory early then compromise later starts to look like retreat.

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And right now the Iranians know it, they see it.

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>It looks like retreat because it is retreat. The president

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>can't afford to do this. We didn't have we don't.

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>He can't politically, he does not have the political capital

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to get even his own party to give him time

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to put in ground troops to get control the straight.

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he's just you know, and then there's

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>who he is, right, he doesn't have the patience to

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>do things methodically. He's always looking for a shortcut. It's

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>been it's defined his career. And the thing is is

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that he's had so much success with short cuts that

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>he forgets the failures with shortcuts. That also, right, he

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>was able to become a star because of short cuts,

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but bankruptcy. He was still the only one of the

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>few casino operators to find a way to go bankrupt

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>oning casino because he was taking a shortcut on competition

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and try to buy up all his competitors. You know,

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>he shortcuted his way into politics, but he didn't really

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>build a coalition in order to support him and use

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>his political capital. So when you take all these shortcuts,

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>right he's trying to shortcut his way into getting an

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Iranian victory. He's trying to shortcut his way and trying

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to get a Venezuelan victory. But he's no longer promoting

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>democracy anymore. In America is not on the side of

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>democratic freedom. We are not on the side of democratic

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>freedom in Venezuela right now, and we're doing a poor

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>job of being on the side of freedom, democratic freedom

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and Iran. But ultimately that's what you have to remember here.

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>In conflicts like this, the side that understands the other

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>side better usually has the advantage. President Trump does not

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>understand this Iranian regime. He thinks they're all just as

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>transactional as he is. He sees everybody through the himself.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>He assumes everybody behaves the way that everybody's motivation is

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>what his motivation is, power, money, et cetera. And he

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>just assumes those same motivations and certainly loosely the motivations

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>are similar, and they may rhyme, but he did not

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and does not. And you know, again, he didn't bother

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to study, right. You know, he doesn't listen to the

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 1>experts who have studied the Iranians for decades, not just weeks,

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>months or even years. He doesn't listen to those experts.

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>But here we are in some ways, this is this

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is why Iran is starting to look like our failed

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>military expeditions. Vietnam second Iraq war are the two most

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>are the two biggest ones, and now this one because

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>we succeeded militarily right sort of, but we didn't get

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>our strategic end goal. And even with Iraq we kind

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of ended up, I guess what we wanted. There is

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>no a rock with a nuclear program, so that's good.

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>There's no a rock with Saddam Hussein. But boy was

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the cost worth it? Right? And I think to this

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>day we're not even sure that the cost was worth it.

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>So bottom line is the good news is the talks

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to have There's going to be another round

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 1>of talks. Both sides did not indicate that there was

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>no room for more talks. This was the first meeting,

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>was always inevitably going to be a feeling out. Meaning.

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think the one thing that the that President

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump ought to take away is an understanding. And I

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>think again his move to try to blockade the Straight

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>is in some ways any acknowledgment of this, which is

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have enough leverage destroy you know, and and

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you know right now, the Iranians care about one thing,

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>control of that straight. So Trump is right to try

0:18:57.960 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to go after the one thing they care about in

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>order to see if he can regain some leveragere But

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, the most likely endgame here is not a

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>restart of the war. It is not a sending ground

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>troops in to get control of the stray. The most

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>likely dgame here is the Iran Nuclear deal two point zero.

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump will call it then, you know USMCA of

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Nuclear Deals brand new. It won't do this, won't do that,

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>but it'll give them some money. And remember, you know

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>why Iran doesn't want to give up the idea that

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it may never pursue a nuclear weapon Libya. Right, the

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Libya example is always the reason Libya gave up its

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>nuclear ambition and regime change happened. North Korea has not

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>given up his nuclear ambition, and that Kim Jong n

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>he just named his daughter the latest air parent. If

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>something happens to him, and we may end up with

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a fourth generation of North Korean leaders, all because they

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>have a nuclear weapon. So it's not irrational how the

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Iranians are thinking. Right, this is a case and there's

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>no doubt the United States, the North Korea is a

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>reason why to do whatever it takes to not let

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Aron get there. Carrots and sticks. Trump has been all stick.

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>He's going to have to now have to give some carrots,

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and he ain't gonna like it, and he's going to

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>find out. Remember, we don't trust them and they don't

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>trust us. And in situations like this, whatever agreement you

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>come into is a leap of faith. You're going to

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>have to trust somebody you don't trust. That's why you

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>put in verifications and all sorts of things in there.

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>But it is in if you want to deal, well,

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it's inevitable you're going to get one where you have

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to give up something you don't like. And in that sense,

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, this is where he is a terrible deal maker.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>He has never been. He does not believe in win win.

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>He wants to get the best of somebody, and he

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>thinks caving into any demand of the other side makes

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.880
<v Speaker 1>him look weak. Well, you know what makes him look weak?

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Presiding over this economy that's deteriorating by the hour. That's

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>something that makes you look weak. And in case you're

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>wondering the economic hit, it's already happening. Consumer confidence is

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>now lower, lower than it was during the pandemic. We

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>are now in this We're lowest in the Michigan Index.

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>We're talking as bad as the seventies were. And remember

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>we now have a fertilizer issue, We've got food transport issues,

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and we got supply chain issues. So this is not

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>going to get better anytime soon. This is and we

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>have not felt the worst parts of this. Every expert said,

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>come about mid April, then all of a sudden, it's

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>going to feel like things went off a cliff. Well,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the week where we hit mid April gas

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>prices biggest one month spike since the sixties. Hiring is

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>slowing wages are flattening. Uncertain economic future means companies start

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>freezing everything they're doing. You pull back on new investments,

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you hold off on new hires, because you're not sure

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>where this economy is going. And in this case, this

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is why the bad shoots that we're seeing on the economy,

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>and it's opposed to green shoots. It could accelerate because

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of that situation. Before I leave the Iran issue here,

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I know Trump doesn't care about optics anymore, but I

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>thought Marco Rubio might as talks are deteriorating with the

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>war with Iran, which of course is going to probably

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>could probably trigger a global recession. I'm glad to know

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that the commander in chief and the Secretary of State

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>were whooping it up at a UFC match in Miami.

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Not the best look, I know. If I were a

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Republican on the ballot, I'd be like, does the President

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.959
<v Speaker 1>take any of this seriously? I mean, sometimes is it?

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, he just, you know, the celebrity parts of

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the presidency matter more to him than the actual job itself.

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's moments like Saturday night where he's whooping it

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>up at at at a at a at a UFC

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>match while JD. Vance is negotiating in his behalf and

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>having to walk away. And here's the thing, you know,

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Marco Rubio, you know, you know who would have been

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>really critical of a Secretary of State behaving this way,

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Senator Marco Rubio. If John Kerrey at all had done

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>anything even close to this, gone to a Bruce Springsteen

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>concert while there was a negotiation on the rand nuclear

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>dew right, I promise you a Senator Marco Rubio would

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>be beating his chest about it. You have one job.

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>All this stuff. Deep down inside, he knows it's a

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>bad look, you know. And with Rubio and I wonder, look,

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm some people think I'm too tough on Rubey, and

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>some of you think I give Rubia too much credit.

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I've heard that too. Oh you keep thinking, you know,

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>when you know, I just know he knows better, and

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody who knows him knows he knows better. And he's

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>allowed himself to get caught up in this. And maybe

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a little celebrity, maybe it's the middle class chip

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>on his shoulder. I get it.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 2>I have it.

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I have that chip. You know, he wasn't born on

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>third base and then and handed everything. I wasn't born

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>on third base, so I get it. I get the chip,

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>but you got to have the character to sort of

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>understand how to draw some lines and how to compartmentalize it.

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, he seems to have gotten It's almost like

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he's more caught up on the celebrity than I thought

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>he would. It's just a disappointment. I know that's not

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a new criticism for me, but I know he knows better.

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>And that was a bad look. And that's one of

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>those that you feel like, I know, nothing matters, right,

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump can shoot somebody and put that on and blah

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. But it just chips away again, chips away,

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>chips away. You know, this is serious stuff. I'm sorry

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>they can't they am you know, nobody's saying don't watch

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the match, but you know, send a message to the

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>country that you're worried about what's happening in their lives.

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You have made decisions that have upended the lives of

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:06.239
<v Speaker 1>millions of Americans. But I'm glad you're having a good

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 1>time at a UFC match. That's awesome. That's awesome. Well,

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this episode of The Chuck Podcast is brought to you

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 1>by Quints. This time of year always makes me rethink

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>what's in my closet. I'm trying to keep fewer things,

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>but better ones, pieces that are well made, easy to

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>wear all the time. Trust me, I am constantly on this.

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I have given up ties, so I'm looking for upscale casual,

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>nice casual. Right. That's why I keep coming back to Quints.

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>The fits are thoughtful, pricing actually makes sense, dirty little secret.

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Some of my birthday gifts came from members of my

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>family using the code and ordering from Quints, and I

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>love what I got. Quin's makes some high quality everyday essentials.

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>They use premium materials like one hundred percent European linen,

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're insanely soft, flow knit active wear fabric. Their

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>men's linen pants and shirts are lightweight, breath the comfortable,

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>basically the perfect layer for spring. I've got some of

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the linen shorts on right now. They're fantastic, trust me.

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And the best part is that their prices are fifty

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to sixty percent less than similar brands. How well Quint's

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>works directly with ethical factories, cuts out middleman, so they're

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>paying for quality, not the markup of the brand. Everything

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is designed to last and make getting dressed easy. This

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is one I wholeheartedly endorse. I wear the products I

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>really like it. I can find my comfort zone here

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>literally what I'm comfortable wearing and comfortable ap peering in

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>on air. So refresh your wardrobe with quints. Go to

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>quints dot com slash chuck c uhck for free shipping

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and three hundred and sixty five day returns. Now available

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in Canada too, so go to q u I n

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>CE dot com slash chuck for free shipping three hundred

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>and sixty five day returns quints dot com slash chuck

0:27:55.760 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>use that code. Speaking of unserious people, let's go talk

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about Eric Swallaller and the sort of the fall of

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Eric Swalwell. You know, this is one of those and

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I've seen some back and forth on this. They're shocked

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>but not surprised, surprised but not shocked, whatever way you

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>want to whatever however you want to use those two

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>words interchangeably. Right. We have this all the time. With Trump,

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>he finds ways to surprise us, even if we're not shocked.

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>With that, he surprises us. But with Swawell, this is

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those things you're like, well, everybody kind of

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>knew or thought they knew, but the stakes were never

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>high enough where you thought it was important to report

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>about it. All right, That's the best explanation I can

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>give you as a reporter. And you know, do you

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>chase every rumor and every politician you hear about, because

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I promise you I've heard a rumor about every single

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>politician that's ever remotely thought about running for president. Swawell

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>run for president there, and I'm sure ninety percent of

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the rumors are unsubstantiate. The problem is there's always enough

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>things that are true that it makes you constantly in

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the back of your head as a political reporter. You know,

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you file the other accusations away. You're like and you

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>start to like, you know, look for smoke. A lot

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of times there's no smoke, so you don't keep going.

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes you know, look, I know you're if you're

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>right now still defending Eric Swallow, you'll say, how come

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>this is all coming out right when he's you know,

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the front runner. Well, a lot of times people have,

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, compartmentalized their bad experiences with somebody until that

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>person's back in the news, or until that person's about

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to get even more power, and then they think, whoa

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.719
<v Speaker 1>if I don't speak out now when you know before

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>while they're still a chance if they really believe this

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>person is too irresponsible to have power. So I think

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.719
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be careful when you're questioning the timing

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of accusations. In some ways, the political campaign season, the

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>primary campaign, is exactly when we should be having these,

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, conversations. We're trying to find out who these

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>people are. Do they have the character to handle the job,

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>do they have the qualifications to handle the job? Do

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>they have the knowledge to handle the job. So, you know,

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in Swalwell's problem here is that he's only denying a crime.

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I did not sexually assault anybody. He's saying, he's not

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>denying that he had a wondering eye. And unfortunately, for

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>those of us that have covered Washington for as long

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>as we have, there are a lot of Eric Swawall's

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>out there. And you can sit here and say, well,

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the system that creates it. I think there's some

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>truth to that. These sitting senators and sitting members of

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>House have these enormous stabs that are just voted to

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>keeping them happy, and it just can create a bubble

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>or a filter or for the truly weak character. You know, it,

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, makes you think more of yourself. You think

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you're above it all, or you think you can get

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>away with anything, or you think you're just you think

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.719
<v Speaker 1>your personality is just that magnetic. Why else would all

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>these people not be so devoted to you? So you do,

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you've had you know, it's one of

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>those things, if you if you have a little bit

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of of the narcissistic gene in you, the way getting

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>elected to Congress in some ways can can amplify it,

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>if that's possible. And when you look at some of

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of his mo that the various allegations are out there,

0:31:55.120 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it right, it's it's sadly familiar, right. He seems to

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>be looking for those that look up to him, right,

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that's who he prayed upon, you know. And you could

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>say whether it was consensual, and I'm sure in his

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>mind it was consensual, but he you know, he's trying

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>really hard to say I'm not Bill Cosby, I'm Bill Clinton. Well,

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.239
<v Speaker 1>even that I don't think people accept anymore because there

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>was still a power dynamic issue. So you did it,

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>You're not You're not sneaking in date rape drugs still

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you're qualified to be the next governor of

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>California as far as the American public or the California

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>public is concerned. So, you know, in some ways, it's

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a very familiar story. So now let's talk about the fallout.

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I think there's going to be the first thing we're

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>going to see is we're going to see Congress. Right,

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>You've got two other members of Congress that have been

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>who's behavior with women have been an issue, and there's

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>been some threats to expel them from Congress. Tony Gonzalez,

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Republican from Texas, who has since dropped out. He pulled

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>out of that runoff, but he hasn't resigned from Congress,

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Corey Mills, Republican from Florida. Then you have another member

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of Congress who's accused of essentially stealing money from FEMA,

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and there may be a vote to expel her. So

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we may have like four expulsion votes. You need two

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>thirds of a vote to do this. And I'll just

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>say I think this is you know, are there's going

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to be political votes of convenience, right, Both parties just

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>want to sweep their bad apples under the rug, so

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you may see a vote. Is it one vote?

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Is it?

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Two votes?

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Is it?

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Four votes? Right? Three of them are inappropriate behavior with

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>women Tony Gonzalez, Corey Mills, and Eric Swalwell. The fourth,

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Sheila Sherphyllis McCormick, is the one of where she's accused

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of basically stealing COVID money in using it for her campaign.

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>She hit the public trial with the Ethics Committee. So

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it is it is certainly politically convenient for both parties

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and for a Jeffreys and a Johnson to almost agree

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to this and just sort of saying, let the will

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>of the House happen, whatever happens happens, and they clean

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it up. I will just say this the law of

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:30.399
<v Speaker 1>unattended consequences. One. If the votes fail, and they might,

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>there might be other members of Congress who think there

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:35.879
<v Speaker 1>but for the grace of God go I and who

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 1>may think do and may think they're going to practice

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>their own version of the Golden Rule, and they're going

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to do not unto others, what they hope will be

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>done unto them. And if they fear that they've got

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>something in their past that could come out, what precedent

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 1>do they want to send, so you could have some

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of that, You could have some of it. In the

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>other way, where the news of Swawell and Gonzales and

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Mills trigger there's even more accusations and more staffers decide

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to hold these four accountable, then we

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.760
<v Speaker 1>need to hold these other folks account So it's possible.

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>It's an important moment for Congress to sort of draw

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a line and to try to raise the bar because,

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>let's be honest, the quality of member of Congress has

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>been going downhill for some time. They're more and more

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of them are not role models. Now you could say, hey,

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they just are you know, a reflection of us. Man,

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>They're a perverted reflection of us, because these congressional districts

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't fairly reflective of the country. So it's a perverted version.

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 1>It's a fun house mirror version of us. And then

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>there's always been a small part of me that we

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>as American citizens, you know, we've always punched, we've always

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.359
<v Speaker 1>punched down in Congress. We want to believe that we're

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>all better than them, and this is only going to

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>be more proof of that. But I am you know, look,

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to be it's probably going

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to be swift justice. But it's a version of sweeping

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:03.919
<v Speaker 1>all this under the rug all at the same time,

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>rather than maybe having a better come to you know

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>what moment where you say, you know, you know, how

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>do we demand a better quality of behavior, How do

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>we draw some better lines, and how do we root

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>this stuff out sooner? And how do we But it's

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's just the nature of the beast. And we

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>know we've lived with politicians like this for this long

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and part of it is are we going to hold

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Is Congress going to hold individual members of Congress to

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>a higher bar than they hold the President of the

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>United States?

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the uncomfortable shadow that hangs over all of this, folks, Right,

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, think about it. Every single accusation against Mills,

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>against Gonzales, against Swawell, and against and even on the

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>funding stuff against Sherphyllis McCormick, all of it. There are

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.399
<v Speaker 1>accusations against Donald Trump for versions of this, whether it's

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>essentially using government money, using power to enrich himself. That's

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>basically been the second term. Never mind the various accusations

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>for women, including a civil court that said he was

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:27.720
<v Speaker 1>credibly accused of rape, of which he still not paid

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the fine that a civil court adjudicated against him. So

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that's also a part of this. That's just like, like

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I said, just hovers over all of this. The real

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>question is does this have a I think this ends up,

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of, if it's possible to lower the

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 1>approval rating of Congress generically overall, it will. And this

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is a pox on everybody who's running as an incumbent,

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>which is why they're going to want to try to

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>wash their hands because there's also an Epstein angle to this, right,

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 1>they've done so little on the Epstein front, they better

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>make sure they're willing to hold accountable any one of

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>their members at a minimum, because of their failure to

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>do so when it came to all things Epstein. So

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we know what's going to happen here to

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 1>these four members. I do think these votes are going

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to happen. My guess is they all do get expelled

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:28.280
<v Speaker 1>because of the desperation of the members that are currently

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>running to look a little less dirty. But I think that,

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the cynic in me says, hey, this is

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>this is this is small stuff, and maybe you could say, hey,

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>a small improvement here of trying to raise the bar

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>anywhere is better than not trying at all. I grant

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you that, But there are a bunch of elephants in

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the room on these stories that we're not touching, that

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>are certainly having a little bit of it back there.

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>As for the ubernatorial follow in the obviously the primary

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 1>is coming up. Democrats had been reluctantly rallying around Swallwell.

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And this is all a reflection by the way that

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think most California Democrats that are in some

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 1>power have little interest in seeing Tom Stier as their

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>standard bearer. And it has been in anybody but Styre

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of mindset, right. And so this is why you

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:34.359
<v Speaker 1>had a whole bunch of folks hoping that Kamala Harris

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 1>would jump in, Alex Padia would jump in, And I

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.800
<v Speaker 1>understand why both of them didn't. If you're not interested

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in the job, don't run. And I think Kamala Harris

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>wants one more bite at the apple of president. That's

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 1>been made clear and clear. Alex Padia, he might have

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>been able to win the governorship, but he'd be giving

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>up a Senate seat for life. Essentially, there's no term

0:39:57.840 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>limits on running for the Senate, there is termal limits

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 1>on running for governor, and maybe he wants to spend

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the next twenty years in the Senate. Ditto Adam Scheff.

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 1>And then there's another uncomfortable aspect of I'm just I've

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 1>been constantly trying to figure out why is this field,

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, why is this California gubernatorial field so weak?

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a whole bunch of people that don't

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>want the job, that don't think the job is worth having.

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>In the first time after news now I've explained to

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you why I think some major Democrats were against. I

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>think another is that there's been sixteen straight years of

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>democratic governorship of rule of the governorship. There is going

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 1>to inevitably be fatigue on Democrats. So the likelihood that

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 1>the next governor was at best going to get one

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>term might not survive a recall, I think was quite

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 1>high and quite likely. So that may explain why some

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>people didn't want to do it. Then think about the reality,

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>right the next governor is going to be dealing with

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a very active presidential campaign of a former California governor,

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Newsom, and he'll be high profile, and he'll be

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.439
<v Speaker 1>running on what he believes as his record that will

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>be questioned. It will be a constant sort of. It

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:23.359
<v Speaker 1>will make the the pr side of running the state

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit harder. If you want to hit Gavin

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>for not having an air apparent, I think it's a

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>fair hit. I'm now I know why he didn't. He

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't like it when he sort of got pushed aside.

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think he his feeling was let let

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a thousand flowers bloom because he wants He didn't like

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the way he was treated. He was sort of forced

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:50.760
<v Speaker 1>await his tournament. Then he had a run for Lieutenant governor,

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and then and then the you know, the sea's parted

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>for him essentially, but he didn't he didn't really have

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>an air parent. But now they've got a real problem Becauesswallwell,

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously that candidacy is dead, whether he sees the light

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and drops out or not. As another story, everybody that

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>was anybody who has pulled their endorsement there if Tom Steyer.

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I just look at all the money Toms Tire has

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>spent to promote Tom Steyer, especially in the state of California,

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and when you look on the ROI of the amount

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of money he spent and the translation that money and

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 1>that how much money that has translated to support for him,

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>It is one of the worst investments you could ever have.

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean the amount of money he spent. He should

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he's already be and they should be in first place,

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 1>up by ten over anybody. Unless the dogs don't like

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the dog food. One of the old axioms. Sometimes the

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 1>dogs don't like the dog food. It doesn't matter what

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the brand says. It doesn't matter how much money you

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 1>spent on advertising. The dogs won't eat your dog food

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>if it ain't alpo or it ain't whatever, right, And

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you got to ask yourself. Stire's done all these he's

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>just whether. I don't think he comes across very likable.

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he's sort of the angry billionaire. Look without

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>any charm. Right, Trump has the angry billionaire. You know,

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:30.759
<v Speaker 1>he's the angry, fake billionaire who used the presidency to

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>become a billionaire. But he's got a little charm. And

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in politics you need a little charm. Doesn't matter who

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you are, gotta have a little charm. And Stier's missing

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the charm thing now maybe you can just lean into

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>being the a hole billionaire I would if I were him.

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't try to be something you're not. Just try that.

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it works, maybe he gets there, But the point

0:43:56.280 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is he's pretty much alienated. He is not seen as

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 1>somebody that's easy to work with, which is why they

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any major supporters that aren't supporting him without

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:11.880
<v Speaker 1>being paid by him. Now, he's not the first billionaire

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>candidate to pay people to support him, pay influencers things

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like that. That's sort of now. There's a lot of

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:21.319
<v Speaker 1>influencers that are getting paid by outside actors that don't

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 1>say who they are. I'm not one of them. In

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>case you're wondering, I don't think anybody knows which side

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>could buy me off very well. But the point is,

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 1>as I just I just look at you know, the

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>facts are the facts. Tyra spent all this money and

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it's never translated to anything. So then the question is,

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:50.720
<v Speaker 1>what does you know If you're Gavin news, some Kamala Harris,

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Adam Schiff, Alex Padilla, foremost prominent Democrats in the state,

0:44:57.040 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 1>do you all endorse the same person? Does that help

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>or hurt them? I think in this unique race, it

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 1>would help them because, you know, because the last two

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Democrats that most of the party wants to see, and

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that's in that slot, or Tom Styron, Katie Porter. So

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 1>if they want somebody else, maybe it's Matt Mayn. You know,

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 1>he's gotten little. He had plenty of resources to get

0:45:25.040 --> 0:45:30.320
<v Speaker 1>into this thing. He's not caught fire. Maybe he's not

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:33.319
<v Speaker 1>well known enough. Maybe he got in too late. Maybe

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you're just never going to be able to make the

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 1>mayor of San Jose a statewide figure. Okay, I don't know.

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>There was one candidate that I do think would have

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>would have been their best candidate, and it's the mayor

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of San Francisco, Daniel Lurie. Now he is just there.

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a little early, and it could be that some

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of these folks like Caruso, Lurie, maybe even Padilla, maybe Harris,

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe they all said, you know what, I'm going to

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:01.319
<v Speaker 1>run for governor in twenty thirty. I am not want

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to try to follow in this sixteenth Street. You know,

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:08.239
<v Speaker 1>let me follow somebody that it's in debacle. I don't

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 1>want to be governor. Well, Gavin's running for president, right,

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:18.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole I understand that line of things, but

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:20.720
<v Speaker 1>they have to avoid a debacle. They've got to find

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:24.839
<v Speaker 1>a viable candidate. And look, maybe maybe they just say, fine,

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>let's die or have it. At least he'll spend money

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:30.800
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of the ticket. I don't think money is

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the problem though for the California Democrats. So it'll be

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>curious to see. I think those four if they choose

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to sort of be their own version of a of

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a of of king and queen makers here but Shift Padilla,

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Harrison Newsom, if they care about the state party and

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 1>try to strengthen, and if they want the eventual governor

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that gets elected to have some credibility when they get elected,

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they probably ought to try to rally behind somebody in

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 1>this primary. I think it could be Javier Bisera. I

0:47:07.480 --> 0:47:09.720
<v Speaker 1>think if it wasn't for the Biden baggage, maybe Beisera

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>would be the guy. It's a state ag you know,

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 1>he's got the correct resume, but the Biden baggage is

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>not unheavy. I think everybody else looks like they're retreats

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 1>via Ricosa, Katie Porter, all these people that feel like

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>they've been trying to you know, sort of the also rants.

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I go back. This feels a lot

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:42.200
<v Speaker 1>like nineteen ninety eight, two thousand and two California politics,

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 1>where none of the big names would run. No Diane Feinstein,

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 1>she still wouldn't run for governor. That was still the

0:47:47.760 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of the hope that some Democrats had, no barber

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>boxer running or anything like that, and the lesser known

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of nebbish at the time, not everybody was thrilled

0:47:57.160 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>with it. Gray Davis sort of sneaks through because they

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:02.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't want the They didn't want a rich guy owning

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the party from on the outside. Now, Checki and for

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:08.839
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, Jane Harmon didn't take off, you know, I mean,

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Harmon and Checky beat each other up and

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it cleared the path for Davis a little bit. But

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 1>I do think this. I think the most likely new

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:24.759
<v Speaker 1>thing that has happened here is no matter that we

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 1>are likely to have two unpopular figures running for governor

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:32.400
<v Speaker 1>by November. Steve Hilton and whoever the Democrat is. My

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>guess is they'll both be underwater, just like Great Davis,

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Bill Simon twenty two, and whoever becomes governor is just

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 1>swimming uphill. And it's so easy to put a recall

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:46.120
<v Speaker 1>initiative on there, and if things are south, you know,

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:48.759
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things that will be well. It

0:48:48.920 --> 0:48:53.240
<v Speaker 1>will only sort of reinforce the likely weakness of whoever wins.

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But the other unintended consequence to this debacle could be

0:48:59.160 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that the Democrats and the legislature decide to get rid

0:49:02.239 --> 0:49:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of the all party primary and try to put a

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 1>put a referendum back on the ballot to get rid

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of it. Personally, I hope not. I think all party

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:13.640
<v Speaker 1>primaries long term are healthier for the system. But the

0:49:13.719 --> 0:49:16.160
<v Speaker 1>two parties have viewed all party primaries always through the

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>lens of is it good for them or bad for them?

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And if they think it's bad for them, then they're

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:22.160
<v Speaker 1>going to fight to get rid of them. And in

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this case, both parties think this all open primary is

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:28.920
<v Speaker 1>actually bad for them. They've never liked it, and not

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>having this type of control over their nominee and over

0:49:32.080 --> 0:49:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the process when you have a tobacco like this, I

0:49:35.920 --> 0:49:38.400
<v Speaker 1>fear is going to make a lot of California Democrats

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:41.680
<v Speaker 1>decide they don't want this all party primary anymore. So

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I hope that's not the unintended consequence one of them.

0:49:45.120 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But I fear it could be. All Right, a few

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:52.680
<v Speaker 1>other quick hitters of a whole bunch of stuff. These

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:55.799
<v Speaker 1>are just literally things that I've pondering in the back

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of my head, and I thought I would share them

0:49:57.200 --> 0:49:59.760
<v Speaker 1>with you. News that Roger Stone is who saved Tulsa

0:49:59.800 --> 0:50:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Gas does not. Let's just say, if you're still deep

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Russia ties to Trump world story, well, the

0:50:11.120 --> 0:50:14.279
<v Speaker 1>two of the top four or five people that have

0:50:15.960 --> 0:50:20.400
<v Speaker 1>had some ties to that world, two of them are

0:50:20.560 --> 0:50:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Telsa Gabard and Roger Stone. I'm not saying anything, but

0:50:25.000 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to me that it took Roger Stone to

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>tell Donald Trump not to fire Telsa Gaard. Roger Stone,

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:37.680
<v Speaker 1>who was mister WikiLeaks, who seemed to know everything that

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 1>was going on there, you know it. Roger anyway, put

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it this way, It's not the best look for this

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:54.400
<v Speaker 1>administration that somebody with all of Roger Stone's interest in

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:59.520
<v Speaker 1>questionable and intriguing ties to overseas oligarchs is the one

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:03.759
<v Speaker 1>telling Trump not to get rid of Tulsa Gabbard. All Right,

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal pardon story, the sweeping pardons anybody

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:11.879
<v Speaker 1>to inter fee from the Oval office. Look, we knew

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:13.840
<v Speaker 1>this was likely that he would be thinking about this,

0:51:14.320 --> 0:51:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sorry. This is why those Joe Biden pardons,

0:51:17.160 --> 0:51:19.839
<v Speaker 1>preemptive pardons, were such a huge mistake, because it only

0:51:20.000 --> 0:51:24.360
<v Speaker 1>gives him cover to do exactly this is what Trump

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:28.360
<v Speaker 1>going to do, worse than what Biden did. Probably and

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I know some of you are going to what are

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you both siding this? Because there is no reward for

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:39.120
<v Speaker 1>being less bad. I only robbed half of your house.

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't rob all of your house. You're still a

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:47.880
<v Speaker 1>bad You're still a robber. Be better. This is why

0:51:47.960 --> 0:51:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this was a mistake. Here's the good news. I hope

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this accelerates interest in the constitutional amendment to create a

0:51:56.000 --> 0:52:00.800
<v Speaker 1>congressional nullification on pardons if we've ever needed that in

0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:04.600
<v Speaker 1>place asap. This story better be the trigger for that.

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And then finally there were I have to tell you.

0:52:11.200 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I want you know the tech world has a real

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:17.560
<v Speaker 1>problem because the most prominent people in the tech world

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't actor behave like the rest of us. And

0:52:22.600 --> 0:52:28.480
<v Speaker 1>when you read this uh Altman Biergra profile in New Yorker,

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and when you read the Lauren Bezos said chez inn

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Say Lauren Sanchez Bezos interview in the New York Times, Man,

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:45.120
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't need more evidence that the pitchforks are coming,

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and that when the look, it's your own behavior and

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 1>your own sort of borderline sort of compartmentalization of how

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:59.360
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous you people look, you super wealthy people look, you

0:52:59.480 --> 0:53:02.239
<v Speaker 1>power hung folks look, and then you're going to be

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 1>angry when government's coming at you. Well, government's made up

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of the people. So when the pitchforks come and you

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:14.560
<v Speaker 1>don't like the level of regulation that's coming, just remember

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:18.560
<v Speaker 1>only have yourselves to blame, all right? With that, I've

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>gone on a while and then some since it was

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:25.120
<v Speaker 1>two pretty big stories this weekend, but hey, there was

0:53:25.160 --> 0:53:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on. All of that plus an incredible

0:53:28.480 --> 0:53:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Masters tournament, right, but let me steak it a break.

0:53:30.920 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, let's talk Georgia Republican politics with

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Martha Solmer. This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to you by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:50.239
<v Speaker 1>bake from frozen subscription box for sour dough breads, artisanal pastries,

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently baked in

0:53:53.600 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty five minutes or less. Unlike many store brought options,

0:53:57.760 --> 0:54:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Wild Grain uses some simple ingredients you can pronounce and

0:54:00.960 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a slow fermentation process that can be a lot easier

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on your belly little gut health there right and richer

0:54:07.239 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in nutrients antioxidants. There's also no preservatives and no shortcuts.

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:14.759
<v Speaker 1>The Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable. In addition to

0:54:14.840 --> 0:54:17.279
<v Speaker 1>their variety box, they have a gluten free box, a

0:54:17.400 --> 0:54:21.200
<v Speaker 1>vegan box, and a new protein box. I will tell

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:23.759
<v Speaker 1>you I have done the gluten free box. I have

0:54:23.880 --> 0:54:27.440
<v Speaker 1>done it a second time. I have also used the code,

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the todcast code. You use the promo code podcast at checkout,

0:54:31.280 --> 0:54:34.799
<v Speaker 1>you get thirty dollars off. I've already used it as

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a gift to somebody else who loves this bread. It

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:41.719
<v Speaker 1>is hard to find good gluten free bread. It is fantastic.

0:54:41.960 --> 0:54:44.880
<v Speaker 1>They give you step by step instructions. I really dig this.

0:54:45.719 --> 0:54:48.960
<v Speaker 1>There is nothing like having an artesian bakery in your

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:51.719
<v Speaker 1>freezer to chase away the winter chill. Now is the

0:54:51.760 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 1>best time to stay in and enjoy some comforting homemade

0:54:55.120 --> 0:54:58.480
<v Speaker 1>meals with Wild Grain. I obviously highly recommend it. It

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is worth giving a Wild grea to try. Right now.

0:55:01.000 --> 0:55:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Wildgrain is offering my listeners thirty dollars off your first

0:55:03.800 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 1>box plus free croissants for life. Come on when you

0:55:07.840 --> 0:55:11.239
<v Speaker 1>go to wildgrain dot com slash podcast to start your

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:14.440
<v Speaker 1>subscription today. That's thirty dollars off your first box and

0:55:14.680 --> 0:55:17.759
<v Speaker 1>free croissants for life when you visit wildgrain dot com

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:22.240
<v Speaker 1>slash podcast, or simply use the promo code podcast at checkout.

0:55:22.680 --> 0:55:30.279
<v Speaker 1>This is a sponsor I absolutely embrace, so use that code. Well,

0:55:30.320 --> 0:55:33.279
<v Speaker 1>my guest today is somebody who's coming on. We're going

0:55:33.360 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to talk a lot about a topic that I'm very

0:55:36.040 --> 0:55:40.800
<v Speaker 1>fascinated with. There's a couple of states that within the

0:55:40.920 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 1>debate in where's the Republican Party headed? Particularly where's the

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party headed post Donald Trump? There are two state

0:55:49.280 --> 0:55:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Republican parties that I'm most fascinated to watch. One is

0:55:52.640 --> 0:55:55.960
<v Speaker 1>out west in Utah, and for a variety of reasons,

0:55:56.000 --> 0:55:59.839
<v Speaker 1>and Utah has been a fascinating state to watch as

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:02.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of the conservative movement has been realigning in which

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:04.759
<v Speaker 1>way we've seen it's not just Mitt Romney, but we've

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:07.040
<v Speaker 1>seen you know, you've got one senator in John Curtis

0:56:07.280 --> 0:56:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in one direction of the party, Mike Lee going in

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:13.239
<v Speaker 1>another direction. But the other state that is seen in

0:56:13.880 --> 0:56:16.000
<v Speaker 1>where the where I think you can't say that the

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party is just totally trumpified as Georgia. Well, my

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:25.160
<v Speaker 1>guess there's somebody who works both in Georgia Republican politics,

0:56:25.280 --> 0:56:30.000
<v Speaker 1>talks Republican politics, knows the media landscape. Well. Her name's

0:56:30.080 --> 0:56:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Martha Zalor those of you down in Georgia probably very

0:56:32.719 --> 0:56:35.719
<v Speaker 1>familiar with her, whether it's listening to her podcast or

0:56:36.160 --> 0:56:39.360
<v Speaker 1>listening to her or her talk show in and around

0:56:39.400 --> 0:56:42.879
<v Speaker 1>the Gainesville, Georgia area. And I'm looking forward to talking

0:56:42.920 --> 0:56:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a little Georgia politics. As I was telling my listeners

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:49.759
<v Speaker 1>last week, Martha, I thought it was interesting that the

0:56:49.960 --> 0:56:53.759
<v Speaker 1>first state to act on a gas tax holiday was

0:56:53.800 --> 0:56:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Georgia and Governor Brian Kemp, and I thought, well, that'll

0:56:57.560 --> 0:57:03.239
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting talking point a hypothetical campaign and say

0:57:03.280 --> 0:57:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the state of New Hampshire. And so anyway, let's just

0:57:09.920 --> 0:57:12.000
<v Speaker 1>say it's just a little taste of where I hope

0:57:12.040 --> 0:57:14.040
<v Speaker 1>our conversation goes. Martha, Welcome to the podcast.

0:57:14.680 --> 0:57:16.880
<v Speaker 2>It's great to be with you, Chuck, it's nice to

0:57:17.040 --> 0:57:18.480
<v Speaker 2>e meet you or whatever. Zoo.

0:57:18.640 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, absolutely, I mean I am, like I said, I

0:57:23.360 --> 0:57:28.400
<v Speaker 1>call myself a political anthropologist. These days, desperately studying the

0:57:28.480 --> 0:57:32.320
<v Speaker 1>crazy tribes of American politics, right, and we know, and

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty clear to me that both parties are really coalitions, right,

0:57:36.520 --> 0:57:39.640
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of collections of There is a lot more

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>diversity underneath the umbrellas, underneath that red umbrella and that

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:46.840
<v Speaker 1>blue umbrella. And I think sometimes both parties get defined

0:57:46.960 --> 0:57:49.960
<v Speaker 1>by just one individual or one part of the party.

0:57:51.080 --> 0:57:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think what's interesting is george has been sort

0:57:53.760 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of the one place where conservatives have not been punished

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:02.080
<v Speaker 1>for swimming in a different direction every now and then.

0:58:02.760 --> 0:58:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And I guess let me start there. What what do

0:58:05.920 --> 0:58:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you what do you make of the fact that the

0:58:07.760 --> 0:58:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Republican Party and whether it's Marjorie Taylor Green, who's

0:58:10.920 --> 0:58:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I think feels let down by the MAGA movement or

0:58:13.680 --> 0:58:15.880
<v Speaker 1>at least let down by Donald Trump, or it's a

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Brad Raffinsburger, right, who's in a totally another part of

0:58:19.120 --> 0:58:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the party. I know what it looks like from the outside,

0:58:22.920 --> 0:58:24.080
<v Speaker 1>What does it look like from your seat?

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's interesting you mentioned such of state Raffensburger, because

0:58:30.040 --> 0:58:31.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, he went from the guy that no one

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 2>would have lunch with to winning very decidedly with not

0:58:37.440 --> 0:58:41.360
<v Speaker 2>only Republican votes, but independence and Democrats to in his

0:58:41.480 --> 0:58:44.360
<v Speaker 2>re election in twenty twenty two and is now running

0:58:44.400 --> 0:58:47.720
<v Speaker 2>for governor. And so he's an interesting thing. And he

0:58:47.840 --> 0:58:54.480
<v Speaker 2>did it by going to every lunch, every invitation, Democrat, Republican, Independent,

0:58:54.800 --> 0:58:58.640
<v Speaker 2>and taking every question. I remember, right after the twenty

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:02.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty election, but Miller and I, Butch Miller was a

0:59:02.280 --> 0:59:05.600
<v Speaker 2>state senator, we had to go face the Republican Party

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:08.800
<v Speaker 2>for the first time in March of twenty one before

0:59:09.080 --> 0:59:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the world shut down, I mean, while we were still

0:59:12.520 --> 0:59:16.800
<v Speaker 2>in that kind of weird place after COVID. And one

0:59:16.840 --> 0:59:18.840
<v Speaker 2>thing we did is we paid the bar tab because

0:59:18.880 --> 0:59:21.080
<v Speaker 2>it was out of winery, because we didn't want people

0:59:21.120 --> 0:59:23.800
<v Speaker 2>to be mad. Because Butch and I laid out what

0:59:23.960 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 2>happened with the Georgia election, what the good things were

0:59:26.800 --> 0:59:29.720
<v Speaker 2>and what the bad things were. And it wasn't about corruption, okay,

0:59:29.920 --> 0:59:32.240
<v Speaker 2>it was about something we had been saying since two

0:59:32.280 --> 0:59:35.360
<v Speaker 2>thousand and six that we had a pretty big loophole

0:59:35.480 --> 0:59:38.280
<v Speaker 2>in our rules around absentee ballots. Using a loophole is

0:59:38.320 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 2>not breaking the law. Using a loophole is not corruption.

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:44.160
<v Speaker 2>It's just there was a pretty big loophole in how

0:59:44.360 --> 0:59:47.600
<v Speaker 2>absentee ballots could be done. And as Karen Handel, who

0:59:47.680 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 2>was the Secretary of State when this law was passed, said,

0:59:50.640 --> 0:59:52.760
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats figured out how to drive a mack truck

0:59:52.840 --> 0:59:56.520
<v Speaker 2>through it, and they used the rule to their advantage,

0:59:56.680 --> 0:59:58.880
<v Speaker 2>and that's what ultimately happened with the election. There's a

0:59:58.960 --> 1:00:01.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of Republicans today to still disagree with me about that.

1:00:02.120 --> 1:00:04.280
<v Speaker 2>As early as today on my show when I was

1:00:04.640 --> 1:00:08.080
<v Speaker 2>talking to all the candidates for secretary of State, there

1:00:08.200 --> 1:00:12.440
<v Speaker 2>is one candidate that is looking forward and all the

1:00:12.520 --> 1:00:14.840
<v Speaker 2>rest of the secretary of state candidates on the Republican

1:00:14.920 --> 1:00:17.440
<v Speaker 2>side are looking backward. And I just don't think that's

1:00:17.480 --> 1:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the answer for anything. Number one. But yeah, George has

1:00:20.520 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 2>been very interesting, and there are these different buckets, and

1:00:24.600 --> 1:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>I just wouldn't allow myself to be categorized. I mean,

1:00:28.840 --> 1:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>I supported President Trump. I voted for him three times.

1:00:31.520 --> 1:00:34.800
<v Speaker 2>I gave money in twenty twenty to his campaign. I

1:00:34.920 --> 1:00:36.560
<v Speaker 2>was one of those people that got caught up in

1:00:36.640 --> 1:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>that wind red thing where it was supposed to be

1:00:38.360 --> 1:00:40.200
<v Speaker 2>a one time donation and they tried to take it,

1:00:40.720 --> 1:00:44.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, every month. And so I have been a

1:00:44.440 --> 1:00:48.160
<v Speaker 2>supportive person. Don't like everything that he does. I think

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:51.720
<v Speaker 2>he's the reason why we have two Democrat senators. He

1:00:51.880 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>came to Georgia for that runoff and he told people

1:00:56.080 --> 1:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>you can vote, which your vote might not count, and

1:00:58.320 --> 1:01:02.440
<v Speaker 2>four hundred thousand Republicans stay home, and you know, and

1:01:02.560 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>it was heaviest in the two cities he went to.

1:01:05.720 --> 1:01:08.880
<v Speaker 2>So I've had my own issues with President Trump related

1:01:08.920 --> 1:01:10.920
<v Speaker 2>to that. I don't get invited to any of the parties,

1:01:11.000 --> 1:01:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't get to do any of that stuff. But

1:01:12.960 --> 1:01:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I have met him several times. And everybody in Georgia

1:01:16.680 --> 1:01:18.920
<v Speaker 2>is not a Trump Republican, but they are. There are

1:01:19.040 --> 1:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>more Republicans than Democrats, and if we get out to vote,

1:01:22.880 --> 1:01:25.320
<v Speaker 2>we will still win. But we've had a tough run

1:01:25.520 --> 1:01:29.200
<v Speaker 2>the last six statewide elections. Now a lot of more

1:01:29.280 --> 1:01:32.840
<v Speaker 2>special elections to be fair, but you can't deny we've

1:01:32.880 --> 1:01:35.960
<v Speaker 2>had six races that have gone Democrat in the last

1:01:36.080 --> 1:01:40.920
<v Speaker 2>three years, and you know, we can't continue to run

1:01:41.000 --> 1:01:44.920
<v Speaker 2>the state the way we want to as Republicans if

1:01:44.960 --> 1:01:46.160
<v Speaker 2>we continue to lose races.

1:01:46.880 --> 1:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>How'd you handle David Purdue primarying Brian Kemp.

1:01:51.960 --> 1:01:54.360
<v Speaker 2>It was very difficult because I had because.

1:01:54.120 --> 1:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>You were part of both both the administers both for

1:01:57.120 --> 1:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>both of them, right, So.

1:01:58.360 --> 1:02:01.720
<v Speaker 2>I had already asked David if he was running. He

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:04.840
<v Speaker 2>said no, And so I had worked for Kemp in

1:02:04.920 --> 1:02:08.200
<v Speaker 2>his first election, and so I committed to Brian Kemp.

1:02:08.480 --> 1:02:10.840
<v Speaker 2>And so I got an invitation to go to dinner

1:02:11.400 --> 1:02:13.680
<v Speaker 2>I want with Senator Purdue. I won't discuss what we

1:02:13.760 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>talked about other than he was running, and you know,

1:02:17.600 --> 1:02:22.280
<v Speaker 2>I said, I'm already committed, and so you know I can't.

1:02:22.640 --> 1:02:24.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm not going to take that away. And

1:02:24.120 --> 1:02:25.720
<v Speaker 2>you said you weren't going to run, And then I

1:02:25.880 --> 1:02:26.360
<v Speaker 2>saw that.

1:02:28.960 --> 1:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>That he was.

1:02:29.760 --> 1:02:31.680
<v Speaker 2>He had made his mind up, and I said, don't

1:02:31.760 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 2>talk about the election. Talk about something like both of

1:02:35.080 --> 1:02:38.240
<v Speaker 2>his parents were public school teachers. Fifty five percent of

1:02:38.280 --> 1:02:40.840
<v Speaker 2>the budget Georgia is paid on it is spent on education.

1:02:41.440 --> 1:02:42.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, we have a lot of work to do

1:02:43.080 --> 1:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>on education, so I said. But he didn't listen to me.

1:02:46.480 --> 1:02:48.640
<v Speaker 2>But I still got the first interview with him when

1:02:48.720 --> 1:02:52.040
<v Speaker 2>he when he announced his race, and I just navigated

1:02:52.240 --> 1:02:55.600
<v Speaker 2>being fair, you know, to both sides, all the way throughout.

1:02:55.760 --> 1:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>But he was, you know, it was an embarrassing loss.

1:02:59.280 --> 1:03:00.520
<v Speaker 2>It was seventy's he doing.

1:03:00.640 --> 1:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Now I mean, I have to tell you, I'm gonna look.

1:03:03.560 --> 1:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed him during his first run in twenty fourteen.

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>It was right when I was just starting to meet

1:03:10.200 --> 1:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the press, and we did this fun little bus tour

1:03:12.720 --> 1:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of battleground states, and Georgia was one of them.

1:03:17.080 --> 1:03:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I was working on that campaign.

1:03:18.800 --> 1:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I remember interviewing both that was Michelle nun Race I believe, right, yes, right,

1:03:24.760 --> 1:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and David Perdue. And I'll tell you you know, and

1:03:30.960 --> 1:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I say this, this is not meant to anything other

1:03:32.920 --> 1:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>than an easy descriptor for sort of the average viewer

1:03:35.560 --> 1:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and listener here, which is he struck me as a

1:03:37.680 --> 1:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Mett Romney Republican, a businessman, Republican, the chamber of whatever.

1:03:42.720 --> 1:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And I say this, it's not meant to be disparaging,

1:03:44.760 --> 1:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not meant to be anything other than descriptive that

1:03:47.720 --> 1:03:51.479
<v Speaker 1>this is a pro business guy, this is a small

1:03:51.520 --> 1:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>government guy. And I just look at it. I don't

1:03:56.840 --> 1:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>want to put words in your mouth that he kind

1:03:58.400 --> 1:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of lost his political identity in getting caught up in

1:04:01.720 --> 1:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump world. And this is he's not alone. I watch

1:04:04.320 --> 1:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Republicans who had a set of a

1:04:08.520 --> 1:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>set of things that they had been advocating for and

1:04:11.440 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>been principled about for decades. They get caught up in

1:04:15.920 --> 1:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the Trump sort of whatever you want to call it, right,

1:04:18.240 --> 1:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the whirlpool, whatever it is, and you just the vortex,

1:04:22.040 --> 1:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and they sort of lose their own identity. Governor Kemp

1:04:25.160 --> 1:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>never did, Senator did? How did Senator Purdue get caught

1:04:29.560 --> 1:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>up in this so much?

1:04:30.400 --> 1:04:32.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think it's interesting because in this social

1:04:32.760 --> 1:04:35.720
<v Speaker 2>media world to live in where everything's under a microscope,

1:04:35.760 --> 1:04:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I would argue more than ever, I think the kind

1:04:38.120 --> 1:04:40.520
<v Speaker 2>of corruption that's going on now has been going on forever.

1:04:40.880 --> 1:04:43.320
<v Speaker 2>We just didn't see it the way we see it now.

1:04:43.480 --> 1:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Look, it's an MR. I look at the Trump era

1:04:45.640 --> 1:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in this one way, in a very positive way, which

1:04:47.680 --> 1:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>is it's been an MRI for me, meaning I have

1:04:50.880 --> 1:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot about people, good bad and otherwise, institutions

1:04:55.240 --> 1:05:00.040
<v Speaker 1>good bad or otherwise, about the problems in our what

1:05:00.120 --> 1:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I would call our small D democratic infrastructure that need fixing,

1:05:03.720 --> 1:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that have been exposed. You know, you pointed out one

1:05:06.520 --> 1:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in Georgia politics there about you know, how should absentee

1:05:09.680 --> 1:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>battling work? Is this a loophole? You know? I think

1:05:13.200 --> 1:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the point is is that he's an MRI, and if

1:05:15.720 --> 1:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you're if you care about the country, then use it

1:05:17.840 --> 1:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>for good. And that's been my choice. But it's been

1:05:20.520 --> 1:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>an MRI for a lot of people.

1:05:22.560 --> 1:05:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, Senator Purdue was more of an establishment guy, but

1:05:27.640 --> 1:05:29.960
<v Speaker 2>he did get on the Trump train very early. He

1:05:30.280 --> 1:05:32.880
<v Speaker 2>liked Donald Trump, he liked the way he did things,

1:05:33.280 --> 1:05:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and he actually when Trump was thinking about running after

1:05:37.480 --> 1:05:40.520
<v Speaker 2>he won Purdue one in twenty fourteen, one of the

1:05:40.560 --> 1:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>first meetings that Trump took was with Purdue up in

1:05:44.040 --> 1:05:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Trump Tower to talk about how he is a businessman.

1:05:47.520 --> 1:05:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Won and so they kind of hit it off in

1:05:51.160 --> 1:05:54.480
<v Speaker 2>that area. Well, he's currently the ambassador to China, so

1:05:55.160 --> 1:05:57.960
<v Speaker 2>he you know, he is serving there and he has

1:05:58.040 --> 1:05:59.280
<v Speaker 2>been extremely loyal.

1:06:00.200 --> 1:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Sort of ironic. I don't mean it. I remember the

1:06:02.200 --> 1:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>whole His relationship with China was such a huge part

1:06:04.440 --> 1:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of that first campaign, if I remember it.

1:06:06.840 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I this is my again, my personal opinion,

1:06:10.440 --> 1:06:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and I'm always transparent. I don't think that Donald Trump

1:06:13.640 --> 1:06:16.960
<v Speaker 2>was loyal to him, Okay, because he did not really

1:06:18.000 --> 1:06:20.440
<v Speaker 2>help him as much in his runoff. He did not

1:06:20.520 --> 1:06:21.600
<v Speaker 2>help at all on the runoff.

1:06:21.760 --> 1:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh I think Look, I thought your analysis. The fact

1:06:24.320 --> 1:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is Democrats got the Senate majority because of Donald Trump. Yeah,

1:06:28.800 --> 1:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's buzzy campaign. If he doesn't show up on

1:06:31.760 --> 1:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>January fifth and campaign in Georgia, maybe it's one Senate

1:06:37.200 --> 1:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>seat that goes, not both.

1:06:39.040 --> 1:06:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Because we forget and when we talk about the Georgia landscape,

1:06:42.320 --> 1:06:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that it's a done deal that a

1:06:45.280 --> 1:06:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Democrat's going to win a statewide race this time again

1:06:48.280 --> 1:06:50.080
<v Speaker 2>for the Senate races, but I don't think it's a

1:06:50.120 --> 1:06:53.720
<v Speaker 2>done deal because Center oss Off only won by fifty

1:06:53.760 --> 1:06:57.360
<v Speaker 2>thousand votes. Brian Camp only won by one hundred thousand

1:06:57.440 --> 1:07:01.880
<v Speaker 2>votes in his second election, So it's tight margins, okay.

1:07:02.440 --> 1:07:07.960
<v Speaker 2>And we have these four counties Fulton to cab Gwinnette,

1:07:08.560 --> 1:07:13.280
<v Speaker 2>and Cobb that are Democrat counties, okay, but they are

1:07:13.360 --> 1:07:16.600
<v Speaker 2>about a million and a half Republican votes. So in

1:07:16.680 --> 1:07:19.320
<v Speaker 2>those four counties there's about it's about two to one

1:07:19.480 --> 1:07:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Democrat to Republican, So there's about a million and a

1:07:22.600 --> 1:07:23.880
<v Speaker 2>half for Publican votes.

1:07:24.120 --> 1:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Their vote counts just as much in a statewide race.

1:07:27.360 --> 1:07:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and so our when you're dealing with margins of

1:07:30.440 --> 1:07:33.160
<v Speaker 2>one hundred thousand and fifty fifty thousand for the Democrats,

1:07:33.200 --> 1:07:35.880
<v Speaker 2>for the Senate one hundred thousand for the Republicans for governor.

1:07:36.480 --> 1:07:39.400
<v Speaker 2>You have a guy like say Mike Thurman, who is

1:07:39.520 --> 1:07:42.800
<v Speaker 2>a moderate Democrat who's running in this race. He's the

1:07:42.880 --> 1:07:45.240
<v Speaker 2>only moderate Democrat running in the race, and who knows

1:07:45.280 --> 1:07:48.280
<v Speaker 2>if he's got a chance. But he's well liked in

1:07:48.440 --> 1:07:52.000
<v Speaker 2>those four counties because he served as Dacab County CEO.

1:07:52.280 --> 1:07:55.240
<v Speaker 2>He was the superintendent of Dacab County schools. And if

1:07:55.280 --> 1:07:57.200
<v Speaker 2>he you're going to laugh at this, but it's true.

1:07:57.520 --> 1:08:00.880
<v Speaker 2>If he can peel off a hunt or two hundred

1:08:00.920 --> 1:08:04.120
<v Speaker 2>thousand squishy Republican women who were the people I have

1:08:04.240 --> 1:08:06.920
<v Speaker 2>to deal with in my work all the time, because

1:08:06.960 --> 1:08:09.320
<v Speaker 2>they voted for Clinton in ninety six, they voted for

1:08:10.640 --> 1:08:14.640
<v Speaker 2>for I've forgotten Gore, in two thousand they voted for Bush,

1:08:14.680 --> 1:08:17.599
<v Speaker 2>and four they voted for Obama, and eight they voted

1:08:17.640 --> 1:08:20.439
<v Speaker 2>for Trump in sixteen, not in twenty but then in

1:08:20.560 --> 1:08:23.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. If you can peel off one hundred or

1:08:23.439 --> 1:08:26.439
<v Speaker 2>two hundred thousand on either side, if a Republican can

1:08:26.520 --> 1:08:29.320
<v Speaker 2>do it or a Democrat can do it, there's the

1:08:29.400 --> 1:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>one who wins.

1:08:31.640 --> 1:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, Well, you go, Republican women.

1:08:33.880 --> 1:08:36.120
<v Speaker 2>You can quote me on that what.

1:08:36.280 --> 1:08:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Makes somebody what do you count as a squish?

1:08:39.800 --> 1:08:44.400
<v Speaker 2>They don't like the style of most negative campaigning, and

1:08:44.520 --> 1:08:49.200
<v Speaker 2>obviously negative can more style than substance, more style than substance.

1:08:50.320 --> 1:08:53.040
<v Speaker 2>They're not as much one issue people anymore. I mean

1:08:53.120 --> 1:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>it used to be was we could get them back

1:08:55.080 --> 1:08:58.080
<v Speaker 2>on the right to life issue. That's not as much

1:08:58.120 --> 1:08:59.920
<v Speaker 2>of an issue that they want to talk about anymore.

1:09:00.520 --> 1:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Actually, let me put a let's put it. Let me

1:09:02.360 --> 1:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>let me I want to get more into this, but

1:09:04.200 --> 1:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you a very specific question on abortion,

1:09:07.640 --> 1:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>because I've been curious that with rogue gone as a

1:09:12.000 --> 1:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>rallying cry, has that actually made courting Republican Republicans on

1:09:19.160 --> 1:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that issue harder because they think the issue solved well, especially.

1:09:23.040 --> 1:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>In Georgia, it has because we've got Heartbeat Bill, and

1:09:27.680 --> 1:09:30.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, our biggest my as a person who's been

1:09:30.120 --> 1:09:32.759
<v Speaker 2>involved in the movement, I served as the executive director

1:09:32.800 --> 1:09:35.400
<v Speaker 2>of the Georgia Life Alliance. I helped start the Georgia

1:09:35.439 --> 1:09:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Life Alliance, which is a more I don't want to

1:09:37.680 --> 1:09:39.720
<v Speaker 2>use the term moderate, but it was a more reasonable

1:09:39.880 --> 1:09:42.560
<v Speaker 2>right to life group which understood that we live in

1:09:42.600 --> 1:09:44.519
<v Speaker 2>a world where this happens and we want to make

1:09:44.560 --> 1:09:46.479
<v Speaker 2>it and we were more like Clinton, I don't want

1:09:46.520 --> 1:09:49.360
<v Speaker 2>to say that, but more legal and rare as well.

1:09:49.439 --> 1:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the Clinton that there isn't a Democrat that says

1:09:52.360 --> 1:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>that anymore. But it was his mantra was safe, uh, legal,

1:09:58.520 --> 1:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>safe and rare or something like that.

1:10:00.840 --> 1:10:03.479
<v Speaker 2>And so for me, my biggest issue related to the

1:10:03.520 --> 1:10:07.880
<v Speaker 2>life issue now is that right now most abortions are

1:10:07.920 --> 1:10:12.320
<v Speaker 2>done through the clinic, the chemical abortion over the you know,

1:10:12.479 --> 1:10:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the abortion hill that they like to call it. And

1:10:16.120 --> 1:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>the problem with that is it has a seven percent

1:10:18.160 --> 1:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>complication rate. It has a seven percent complication rate, which

1:10:21.960 --> 1:10:24.400
<v Speaker 2>today the FDA would never approve something like that, not

1:10:24.920 --> 1:10:28.040
<v Speaker 2>because of Trump, but because most anything over four percent

1:10:28.160 --> 1:10:32.080
<v Speaker 2>complication rate. And what I'm trying to get accomplished, not

1:10:32.240 --> 1:10:34.560
<v Speaker 2>just in Georgia but across the country is that you

1:10:34.680 --> 1:10:36.840
<v Speaker 2>need to see a doctor. You shouldn't just take it,

1:10:37.080 --> 1:10:39.760
<v Speaker 2>not do it. In twenty twenty four, there were a

1:10:39.760 --> 1:10:43.240
<v Speaker 2>couple of women who died that were used in ads,

1:10:43.920 --> 1:10:45.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, because they said it was because of the

1:10:45.479 --> 1:10:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Heartbeat Bill. It wasn't that, it was that they didn't

1:10:48.000 --> 1:10:50.840
<v Speaker 2>go to a doctor. And all you need to know

1:10:51.120 --> 1:10:53.800
<v Speaker 2>about that that's the safer way to do things, is

1:10:53.840 --> 1:10:56.240
<v Speaker 2>that planned parenthood requires you to come back the next

1:10:56.320 --> 1:10:59.600
<v Speaker 2>day to be sure everything's okay. And so for me,

1:10:59.680 --> 1:11:02.439
<v Speaker 2>it's a health a women's health issue. And I tell you,

1:11:02.479 --> 1:11:05.559
<v Speaker 2>I've had such a hard time getting Democrat women. They'll

1:11:05.600 --> 1:11:07.519
<v Speaker 2>agree with me in the meetings, but then when we

1:11:07.680 --> 1:11:09.600
<v Speaker 2>have to go out and talk about legislation because I

1:11:09.680 --> 1:11:12.160
<v Speaker 2>help with things like that, can't get them to come along.

1:11:12.240 --> 1:11:15.599
<v Speaker 2>But I feel encouraged because after my heart attack, which

1:11:15.720 --> 1:11:17.479
<v Speaker 2>was the reason why we didn't get together the last

1:11:17.560 --> 1:11:21.479
<v Speaker 2>time I got was honored by a group of women

1:11:21.560 --> 1:11:25.519
<v Speaker 2>at the Georgia Legislature last week, mainly for surviving but

1:11:25.640 --> 1:11:29.320
<v Speaker 2>also for using my platform to talk about women's heart health.

1:11:30.040 --> 1:11:34.120
<v Speaker 2>And it was Democratic women that did that initiative. So

1:11:34.160 --> 1:11:36.519
<v Speaker 2>that makes me feel good. Because I'm a conservative, I'm

1:11:36.560 --> 1:11:39.400
<v Speaker 2>not apologetic about it. I think our ideas are better.

1:11:39.720 --> 1:11:41.519
<v Speaker 2>But I've always worked with everybody.

1:11:50.479 --> 1:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So let's go back to this descriptor of squish and

1:11:53.479 --> 1:11:59.519
<v Speaker 1>substance versus style, because I I you know, let me

1:11:59.680 --> 1:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>ask a different way. What do you think we're polarized

1:12:03.240 --> 1:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>as a country? Right? We're pretty evenly divided Georgia's as

1:12:06.040 --> 1:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>good of an example of this as anything. Right, This

1:12:09.479 --> 1:12:12.599
<v Speaker 1>is a I'm with you. I think that it's slightly

1:12:12.720 --> 1:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>right leaning. Right, it's light like I consider Georgia light ping.

1:12:16.320 --> 1:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But maybe I'm wrong, maybe it is deep purple. Okay,

1:12:18.960 --> 1:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>so we'll we'll find out for sure over the we'll

1:12:22.120 --> 1:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>know for sure after Trump leaves. Right, it could be

1:12:24.400 --> 1:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that this is a Trump hangover type of thing, but

1:12:27.800 --> 1:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>my instinct has been that it's that I'm surprised at

1:12:32.760 --> 1:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>ours off strength. Let me put it that way so far,

1:12:36.000 --> 1:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and we'll find out when there's a's a nominee. But

1:12:38.920 --> 1:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in this larger question, right, America is divided? If Alexis

1:12:43.040 --> 1:12:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Detokfeld came back to life right and was trying to

1:12:45.520 --> 1:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>study America again and write about democracy in America, what

1:12:49.680 --> 1:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>would you tell him that we're divided about? What is

1:12:52.520 --> 1:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>this big issue? In the nineteenth century, we knew what

1:12:55.479 --> 1:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we were divided about. There was a specific thing this

1:12:58.560 --> 1:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>country was divided about. It is hard for me to

1:13:02.080 --> 1:13:05.839
<v Speaker 1>say there's this one thing we're divided about. But it's

1:13:05.840 --> 1:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>almost more of a feeling. Right, we know it, and

1:13:08.840 --> 1:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>someone will say, well, it's culture, okay, but what is

1:13:10.800 --> 1:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>what would you how would you describe the divide in

1:13:13.720 --> 1:13:16.599
<v Speaker 1>America today and what animates well?

1:13:16.680 --> 1:13:19.560
<v Speaker 2>And I would also note that Georgia is a we

1:13:19.640 --> 1:13:21.400
<v Speaker 2>don't register by party, right, and.

1:13:21.560 --> 1:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think personally I think party registration. I think

1:13:27.200 --> 1:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it's great. But if you us as a voter, can

1:13:30.479 --> 1:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>just register and pick the primary we want to participate in.

1:13:33.800 --> 1:13:37.439
<v Speaker 2>And independence are growing in Georgia, or people that call

1:13:37.520 --> 1:13:40.680
<v Speaker 2>themselves independence are growing in Georgia. I think independents are

1:13:40.680 --> 1:13:43.639
<v Speaker 2>actually just disaffective Republicans, but that's.

1:13:43.520 --> 1:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Just me, but I think they're disaffected. I think some

1:13:46.720 --> 1:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of them are disaffected Democrats. I think I think the independent.

1:13:50.360 --> 1:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you what I feel as an independent,

1:13:52.280 --> 1:13:55.479
<v Speaker 1>which is I don't feel comfortable. Either party doesn't really

1:13:55.520 --> 1:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>represent everything I believe in, but I'm not ready to

1:13:58.600 --> 1:13:59.479
<v Speaker 1>throw them both out either.

1:14:00.080 --> 1:14:02.519
<v Speaker 2>Right. I'm going to answer your question, but I want

1:14:02.520 --> 1:14:04.280
<v Speaker 2>to tell you about someone. There's a guy named Justin

1:14:04.320 --> 1:14:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Gibney that was a Democratic operative. He became a pastor,

1:14:08.640 --> 1:14:11.479
<v Speaker 2>and I wouldn't say he's left the Democratic Party, but

1:14:11.560 --> 1:14:14.680
<v Speaker 2>he's more in that. I'm uncomfortable because he leads a

1:14:14.720 --> 1:14:19.680
<v Speaker 2>group of urban Christian blaques and who do things, and

1:14:19.720 --> 1:14:22.160
<v Speaker 2>they call it the and campaign instead of saying, but

1:14:22.520 --> 1:14:26.200
<v Speaker 2>you say and and and he said, we agree with

1:14:26.360 --> 1:14:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Republicans about the social issues, the cultural issues, but we

1:14:30.040 --> 1:14:32.320
<v Speaker 2>don't like the way they talk about them, and we

1:14:32.520 --> 1:14:37.400
<v Speaker 2>disagree with how the Democratic Party looks at family and

1:14:37.520 --> 1:14:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I think I think the big issue is the difference

1:14:41.240 --> 1:14:45.840
<v Speaker 2>between I'm going to sound so eighties when I say

1:14:45.920 --> 1:14:50.360
<v Speaker 2>family values, but it's about traditional family values versus this

1:14:50.600 --> 1:14:53.840
<v Speaker 2>far left progressive like you see at these protests. I mean,

1:14:54.120 --> 1:14:55.960
<v Speaker 2>I saw a woman on one of the protests and

1:14:56.000 --> 1:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>no King's processes. I've been protested for everything since the

1:14:58.920 --> 1:15:02.280
<v Speaker 2>nineteen sixties, and I'm thinking to myself, you know, I

1:15:02.439 --> 1:15:04.120
<v Speaker 2>know these women. I used to and I'm going to

1:15:04.160 --> 1:15:05.680
<v Speaker 2>get in trouble for this. I used to say, the

1:15:05.720 --> 1:15:07.559
<v Speaker 2>meanest people on the face of the earth are old

1:15:07.600 --> 1:15:10.680
<v Speaker 2>white Democrat women that I never got yelled at by

1:15:10.760 --> 1:15:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Republican women like I have by Democrat women.

1:15:13.720 --> 1:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And I just think that what.

1:15:16.760 --> 1:15:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Separates us are these are not so much abortion or

1:15:21.280 --> 1:15:24.720
<v Speaker 2>same sex marriage or whatever the issues were, but it

1:15:24.960 --> 1:15:29.120
<v Speaker 2>is more of a cultural family, you know, because I

1:15:29.200 --> 1:15:30.840
<v Speaker 2>think there's a lot of people out there, a lot

1:15:30.880 --> 1:15:34.360
<v Speaker 2>of millennials, especially that have put off having families, that

1:15:34.479 --> 1:15:36.559
<v Speaker 2>have put off all these things. They thought they were

1:15:36.600 --> 1:15:38.439
<v Speaker 2>supposed to work and do this and that and the

1:15:38.520 --> 1:15:42.240
<v Speaker 2>other thing. And now they're sitting there with either no

1:15:42.439 --> 1:15:47.240
<v Speaker 2>children or one child, and they feel like life has

1:15:47.720 --> 1:15:50.360
<v Speaker 2>passed them by. And I know, in my own family,

1:15:50.439 --> 1:15:53.519
<v Speaker 2>my youngest daughter, you know, and I agree with her

1:15:53.560 --> 1:15:56.840
<v Speaker 2>about this, is that they've waited and hopefully they will

1:15:57.040 --> 1:16:00.200
<v Speaker 2>have children. And she's very liberal, you know. I mean,

1:16:00.240 --> 1:16:03.320
<v Speaker 2>I raised kids to think for themselves, and I think

1:16:03.400 --> 1:16:07.160
<v Speaker 2>that what happens is is that that we have been

1:16:07.240 --> 1:16:10.479
<v Speaker 2>telling people things they knew were not true about the world,

1:16:11.280 --> 1:16:14.679
<v Speaker 2>and media was a part of it, and this idea

1:16:14.920 --> 1:16:18.200
<v Speaker 2>that happened, and now a lot of people are second guessing.

1:16:18.280 --> 1:16:21.120
<v Speaker 2>But I will say that she's right that she doesn't

1:16:21.160 --> 1:16:23.519
<v Speaker 2>have it as easy as I had it. It is

1:16:23.640 --> 1:16:26.879
<v Speaker 2>harder for her to buy a house. These affordab ability

1:16:26.960 --> 1:16:30.840
<v Speaker 2>issues are real things, and neither party is offering any

1:16:31.320 --> 1:16:35.200
<v Speaker 2>solutions for it. They're just fighting. I mean, this DHS

1:16:35.360 --> 1:16:37.920
<v Speaker 2>thing is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen. I

1:16:38.000 --> 1:16:40.920
<v Speaker 2>wrote a column this week on my substack about we

1:16:41.040 --> 1:16:43.799
<v Speaker 2>need to go back to pre gram Redman because before

1:16:43.880 --> 1:16:46.720
<v Speaker 2>that you didn't have shutdowns. The understanding was you're going

1:16:46.760 --> 1:16:49.320
<v Speaker 2>to be grown ups because money is coming into the

1:16:49.360 --> 1:16:52.679
<v Speaker 2>federal government every day check you can continue to pay people.

1:16:53.000 --> 1:16:55.559
<v Speaker 1>Well it is look, I went, now, it's a weapon.

1:16:55.720 --> 1:16:56.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a weapon.

1:16:56.880 --> 1:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Well it goes back to is lovely bipartisan the legal opinions.

1:17:05.880 --> 1:17:08.360
<v Speaker 1>One was in Carter's Justice department and one was in

1:17:08.439 --> 1:17:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Reagan's Justice department. Within essentially an eighteen month period, two

1:17:13.160 --> 1:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>different partisan justice departments made the same analysis about that

1:17:18.080 --> 1:17:21.519
<v Speaker 1>once there's a funding dispute in Congress, then government has

1:17:21.560 --> 1:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to cease spending money. It's ridiculous, it's absurd, and it

1:17:27.280 --> 1:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is your only Actually, you know, I have a friend

1:17:30.000 --> 1:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of mine who's been in a government contractor basically he's

1:17:34.000 --> 1:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in this one of those public private areas in the

1:17:37.000 --> 1:17:39.479
<v Speaker 1>world of nukes, Okay, and it's about all he can

1:17:39.520 --> 1:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>tell me. But the point is is that it's this

1:17:41.479 --> 1:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>public private and he goes the amount of times they've

1:17:45.120 --> 1:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>literally had to stop in the middle of a research

1:17:47.240 --> 1:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>product because of a continuing resolution, Like if people understood,

1:17:52.360 --> 1:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>he gets he harps on this with me all the time.

1:17:54.320 --> 1:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>He goes, I wish you guys could meaning us in

1:17:56.160 --> 1:17:58.599
<v Speaker 1>the media could do a better job of explaining how

1:17:58.720 --> 1:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>even continuing resolutus quote keeping the lights on, actually prevent

1:18:04.080 --> 1:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>us from doing certain research spending. Sometimes it takes a

1:18:07.800 --> 1:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>little extra money to figure out something or to be

1:18:10.040 --> 1:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>able to do something extra. We are sometimes just literally

1:18:13.160 --> 1:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>waiting in place while we fill out another form or

1:18:17.320 --> 1:18:19.519
<v Speaker 1>wait for something that we know we're going to get

1:18:19.520 --> 1:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in the next budget. But in the meantime, we can't

1:18:21.960 --> 1:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>use spend that money until they officially pass it and

1:18:25.120 --> 1:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>he goes. We're literally paying people to do nothing, and

1:18:28.720 --> 1:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it is just ridiculous the budgeting process in America that

1:18:33.040 --> 1:18:35.599
<v Speaker 1>has put us in this and it incentivizes both parties

1:18:35.680 --> 1:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to weaponize the budget process.

1:18:37.560 --> 1:18:39.320
<v Speaker 2>And look, I mean, let's look at something that's a

1:18:39.320 --> 1:18:45.160
<v Speaker 2>little more you know, everyday kind of business other than news. Agriculture. Okay,

1:18:45.760 --> 1:18:47.680
<v Speaker 2>I have people that are friends of mine in the

1:18:47.760 --> 1:18:51.400
<v Speaker 2>agriculture world where they do things like they work on

1:18:51.520 --> 1:18:53.840
<v Speaker 2>vaccines on chickens and they do other things. Well, if

1:18:53.880 --> 1:18:56.400
<v Speaker 2>you're dealing with animals, you can't have two months at

1:18:56.400 --> 1:18:59.880
<v Speaker 2>a time continuing resolutions because the animals have to be

1:19:01.320 --> 1:19:03.040
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean, these things, so they can't

1:19:03.120 --> 1:19:06.360
<v Speaker 2>start stuff because they're afraid they can't finish it, and

1:19:06.439 --> 1:19:09.559
<v Speaker 2>it's just very inefficient. But you asked me something about Asoff,

1:19:09.640 --> 1:19:11.200
<v Speaker 2>and I just wanted to know if you wanted to

1:19:11.320 --> 1:19:12.400
<v Speaker 2>talk a little bit about him.

1:19:12.920 --> 1:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, I well, what I mean, well, I'm going

1:19:16.080 --> 1:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to pick up on something you said you were talking about.

1:19:18.560 --> 1:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about what the divide is and you

1:19:20.439 --> 1:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>thought it was cultural and unfamily and that, and you

1:19:25.120 --> 1:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>did something and I totally respect it. But at the

1:19:27.640 --> 1:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>same time, I feel like it's part of I think

1:19:31.439 --> 1:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that each party is viewed as a caricature by folks

1:19:36.000 --> 1:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that are in the other party, And like, I sit

1:19:40.000 --> 1:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>here and I'm like, and sometimes I look at both

1:19:43.760 --> 1:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>parties as caricatures, and I try really hard not to

1:19:45.840 --> 1:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that we're all three dimensional figures. And I kind of

1:19:49.000 --> 1:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's part of the problem. Meaning you asked, why

1:19:51.960 --> 1:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like some won't cross the aisle to

1:19:54.000 --> 1:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>help on certain things that you're working on, And I

1:19:58.280 --> 1:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>think the problem is there's this, and the two parties

1:20:02.080 --> 1:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>do this a lot. Media can do it too, and

1:20:04.640 --> 1:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>categorizing creates this guilt by association that the minute you

1:20:08.280 --> 1:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>work with the other side. Oh yeah, right, you immediately

1:20:12.400 --> 1:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>are seen as a traitor or a turncoat.

1:20:15.840 --> 1:20:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Was famously said. He said, I don't like c SPAN

1:20:19.360 --> 1:20:21.439
<v Speaker 2>because every time I walk across the aisle to work

1:20:21.439 --> 1:20:23.360
<v Speaker 2>with somebody, somebody's going to use it in an ad

1:20:23.520 --> 1:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>against me.

1:20:24.640 --> 1:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is insanity that we have done this,

1:20:26.880 --> 1:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>because none of us would want to be treated that

1:20:29.200 --> 1:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>way individually, right, we all actually have. We're all usually

1:20:34.160 --> 1:20:36.479
<v Speaker 1>pretty proud of the relationships that we have in our

1:20:36.720 --> 1:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>personal lives because they are diverse, they're unique. We all have,

1:20:41.439 --> 1:20:43.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, the family members that we all just we

1:20:43.560 --> 1:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with, and all these other things. And yet

1:20:47.160 --> 1:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we then hold the political parties and members of it

1:20:50.760 --> 1:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to a standard that does create this caricature element to

1:20:55.000 --> 1:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it that I think almost it's what it does, is

1:20:59.479 --> 1:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>what I think it does, is it turns off the volume,

1:21:01.560 --> 1:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>meaning people will just stop listening and tell me what.

1:21:04.160 --> 1:21:07.200
<v Speaker 2>You think about this. Because this goes back to historical

1:21:07.280 --> 1:21:09.720
<v Speaker 2>references and things like that. You know, there was all

1:21:09.800 --> 1:21:12.920
<v Speaker 2>this hooplaw about members of Congress not being in their

1:21:12.920 --> 1:21:16.200
<v Speaker 2>districts more, and so the work schedules changed dramatically in

1:21:16.240 --> 1:21:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the last way twenty five years. Maybe, Oh, it's been

1:21:19.080 --> 1:21:19.559
<v Speaker 2>a disaster.

1:21:19.720 --> 1:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Personally, i'd think it up.

1:21:20.800 --> 1:21:24.160
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, because what happens is when you when you

1:21:25.920 --> 1:21:29.479
<v Speaker 2>wear a badge of honor of living in your office. Okay,

1:21:30.000 --> 1:21:33.040
<v Speaker 2>and you didn't bring your family up and they did it.

1:21:33.240 --> 1:21:36.240
<v Speaker 2>And granted I used to joke about with Senator Nune

1:21:36.280 --> 1:21:38.960
<v Speaker 2>we were great friends. I said, your kids didn't broke

1:21:39.000 --> 1:21:41.200
<v Speaker 2>in Georgia, they grew up in Washington, DC. And he

1:21:41.240 --> 1:21:44.120
<v Speaker 2>would laugh about it. But what happened with that is

1:21:44.200 --> 1:21:48.120
<v Speaker 2>you made relationships with all different kinds of people. And

1:21:48.240 --> 1:21:49.880
<v Speaker 2>now we don't do that because they come in on

1:21:50.000 --> 1:21:52.679
<v Speaker 2>Tuesday or maybe Monday night and they go back whenever.

1:21:53.400 --> 1:21:55.559
<v Speaker 2>And I think they should work twenty four to seven

1:21:55.600 --> 1:21:57.519
<v Speaker 2>if they're not going to fund the government, and they

1:21:57.560 --> 1:22:00.120
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be paid for it. But I just think that

1:22:00.840 --> 1:22:04.000
<v Speaker 2>it didn't make those relationships that you normally have, you know.

1:22:04.320 --> 1:22:07.439
<v Speaker 1>And no, I mean it was done out of campaign, like, hey,

1:22:07.520 --> 1:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you better be in your district. And then if like

1:22:09.479 --> 1:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>if you spend too much time in Washington, it was

1:22:11.960 --> 1:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>somehow a negative And I'm like, well, wait a minute.

1:22:13.800 --> 1:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>You're the elected member of Congress. That's your job is

1:22:17.280 --> 1:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to spend time in Washington. And the fact that We

1:22:20.560 --> 1:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>turned it into if you spend too much time in Washington, basically,

1:22:24.200 --> 1:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>if you spend too much time trying to be good

1:22:25.880 --> 1:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>at your job, we're going to hold that against you

1:22:28.000 --> 1:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>in a political app and we did. They created the schedule.

1:22:31.920 --> 1:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>They work three days a week. Right. They fly in

1:22:35.200 --> 1:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>now Tuesday more. It used to be they came in

1:22:37.439 --> 1:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a Monday. Now they've pushed it. Especially if you're on

1:22:40.000 --> 1:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the East coast. You grab that six am flight. They

1:22:43.000 --> 1:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>get there for the Tuesday hearing that they have to

1:22:45.280 --> 1:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>do and the caucus lunch whatever it is, and then

1:22:48.720 --> 1:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the smell of jet fumes by two. I mean, you know,

1:22:51.640 --> 1:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>they basically work Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday. Yeah, that's it.

1:22:55.120 --> 1:22:57.640
<v Speaker 2>It's really crazy. And you know, I don't know if

1:22:57.640 --> 1:22:59.600
<v Speaker 2>you knew. I ran for Congress in twenty twelve and

1:22:59.680 --> 1:23:02.799
<v Speaker 2>I got which district in the ninth district of Georgia,

1:23:02.920 --> 1:23:06.000
<v Speaker 2>and I got through the primary, but I lost in

1:23:06.040 --> 1:23:10.160
<v Speaker 2>the runoff to Doug Collins, who's now the Vasa. And

1:23:10.640 --> 1:23:13.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, for me, you know, it's not good for

1:23:13.800 --> 1:23:16.400
<v Speaker 2>a media person to run for office because there was

1:23:16.479 --> 1:23:19.360
<v Speaker 2>ten thousand hours of me talking about issues and.

1:23:19.640 --> 1:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>This is like reason number seven thousand why I won't

1:23:22.120 --> 1:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>run for office. But I've had plenty of people I'm like,

1:23:24.400 --> 1:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>why would I. No matter which party I picked, you

1:23:27.040 --> 1:23:30.519
<v Speaker 1>could find thirty things that would make me a problem

1:23:30.600 --> 1:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>within that party, and you can pick either one of them.

1:23:33.000 --> 1:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's no you know, to me, I made

1:23:35.280 --> 1:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a choice. This is the choice I make, and this

1:23:37.920 --> 1:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is how I want to contribute.

1:23:39.200 --> 1:23:41.880
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, but it was funny because I remember saying

1:23:41.920 --> 1:23:43.920
<v Speaker 2>that the thing I said, yeah, and some poor person

1:23:44.040 --> 1:23:46.040
<v Speaker 2>had to sit down and find the two and a

1:23:46.080 --> 1:23:48.400
<v Speaker 2>half minutes that they were going to use, and somebody

1:23:48.439 --> 1:23:50.000
<v Speaker 2>from the back of rom goes that was a lot

1:23:50.080 --> 1:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>more than that, Martha. So, and you know, when you

1:23:53.320 --> 1:23:57.560
<v Speaker 2>do what we do, sometimes you're asking questions just to

1:23:57.920 --> 1:24:01.600
<v Speaker 2>get answers, and you're not necessary really saying that you

1:24:02.000 --> 1:24:03.000
<v Speaker 2>believe in whatever.

1:24:03.439 --> 1:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a devil's advocate. It's all about getting I'm trying.

1:24:06.200 --> 1:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I always said this when meet the press, I wanted

1:24:08.479 --> 1:24:11.679
<v Speaker 1>to know two things, actual information and then the why

1:24:12.439 --> 1:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>yes and the questions. Most of the questions I asked

1:24:15.360 --> 1:24:17.400
<v Speaker 1>were about trying to answer the question of why, well,

1:24:17.439 --> 1:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>why did you choose to do this? Why do you

1:24:19.320 --> 1:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>believe this? What you know that's because ultimately, if you

1:24:22.560 --> 1:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>choose to watch to me, if you choose to watch

1:24:24.600 --> 1:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a Sunday show, or if you choose to listen to

1:24:26.640 --> 1:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a political talk show, you're not interested in the what

1:24:29.439 --> 1:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you already know, the what. Right, You're you're trying to

1:24:32.400 --> 1:24:35.479
<v Speaker 1>get a why, because you're it's more than just the information.

1:24:35.600 --> 1:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>You're looking to understand, well, how did we get to

1:24:38.680 --> 1:24:44.120
<v Speaker 1>this position. You're trying to get more information, more context.

1:24:44.320 --> 1:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>You're not there just for the what. So you're already

1:24:46.880 --> 1:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a pretty well informed person, so you're then if they're

1:24:51.120 --> 1:24:54.120
<v Speaker 1>coming to you, your job or my job is to

1:24:54.120 --> 1:24:55.519
<v Speaker 1>add more context to the situation.

1:24:55.600 --> 1:24:58.280
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right. And sometimes you say things just

1:24:58.400 --> 1:25:00.720
<v Speaker 2>to you know, get a reaction and to see what

1:25:00.800 --> 1:25:04.000
<v Speaker 2>people are going to say. And uh, it's and look,

1:25:04.160 --> 1:25:07.599
<v Speaker 2>I long for the time where people work together better.

1:25:08.680 --> 1:25:11.439
<v Speaker 2>We even you know, I'm in a plus twenty six district, Okay,

1:25:11.880 --> 1:25:14.960
<v Speaker 2>so it's it's not an area that's going to likely

1:25:15.160 --> 1:25:19.200
<v Speaker 2>have a Democrat representative. But because the Democrats in Georgia

1:25:19.280 --> 1:25:21.960
<v Speaker 2>see blood in the water, because we've lost several races

1:25:22.520 --> 1:25:26.240
<v Speaker 2>along the way, they I got to give them credit.

1:25:26.320 --> 1:25:30.400
<v Speaker 2>They got we got a contested Democrat primary in our district, okay,

1:25:30.680 --> 1:25:32.880
<v Speaker 2>which they have no chance, they have no chance, but

1:25:33.000 --> 1:25:35.000
<v Speaker 2>they couldn't get a few more Democrats out for the

1:25:35.040 --> 1:25:37.759
<v Speaker 2>state wide races, you know, if there's a good Democrat

1:25:37.840 --> 1:25:38.240
<v Speaker 2>in the race.

1:25:38.320 --> 1:25:40.679
<v Speaker 1>So, by the way, you know who was the godfather

1:25:40.800 --> 1:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of that strategy, Howard No, No, no, No. Goes back further,

1:25:44.760 --> 1:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>there was this young conservative activists from Georgia named Newt Gingrich.

1:25:50.200 --> 1:25:53.559
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and you know, I can't tell you how

1:25:53.600 --> 1:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>many members of Congress I know over the years who

1:25:56.320 --> 1:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>told me that they first learned how to run from

1:25:59.720 --> 1:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>office by listening to Newt gingridg piscept tapes. Yeah, from

1:26:03.720 --> 1:26:07.519
<v Speaker 1>the old Gopak era. But the point was, I remember

1:26:07.560 --> 1:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>he was a big advaty of this basically fill the tree.

1:26:10.960 --> 1:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>If you have a candate in every race locally, up

1:26:13.840 --> 1:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and down the ballot, well, all of a sudden, you

1:26:16.400 --> 1:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>have that many more people going out to ask for Republicans,

1:26:19.080 --> 1:26:21.120
<v Speaker 1>having somebody to go vote for a Republican or in

1:26:21.160 --> 1:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>this case, and I've always you know, there's a pretty

1:26:24.680 --> 1:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>good correlation if you study this via data, where the

1:26:27.840 --> 1:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>party that has the fewest empty ballot slots is usually

1:26:34.400 --> 1:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the party that's going to win that cycle.

1:26:36.400 --> 1:26:39.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and for fifteen years there were no Democrats on

1:26:39.600 --> 1:26:42.639
<v Speaker 2>the other side running. Okay, And you know it's funny

1:26:42.760 --> 1:26:45.280
<v Speaker 2>because John Ausoff and I have a pretty decent relationship.

1:26:45.360 --> 1:26:47.120
<v Speaker 2>I got him to come on my show. He didn't

1:26:47.120 --> 1:26:48.400
<v Speaker 2>want to come on my show because I worked for

1:26:48.479 --> 1:26:51.839
<v Speaker 2>David Purdue, and I completely understand that. But I convinced

1:26:51.920 --> 1:26:53.920
<v Speaker 2>him by saying, you know what, you might you're not

1:26:54.080 --> 1:26:57.200
<v Speaker 2>just helping yourself, but for the first time in twenty years,

1:26:57.360 --> 1:26:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Democrats are running up and down the ballot in our area.

1:27:00.200 --> 1:27:02.000
<v Speaker 2>If you come on my show, you can help them too.

1:27:02.040 --> 1:27:04.840
<v Speaker 2>And he goes, wow, you're really good. And you know,

1:27:04.960 --> 1:27:07.160
<v Speaker 2>but I did have to apologize for calling him a

1:27:07.200 --> 1:27:09.360
<v Speaker 2>thirty three year old intern, because I did do that.

1:27:09.840 --> 1:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, don't you think his youth was an

1:27:13.120 --> 1:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>asset At the end of the day, it was.

1:27:15.200 --> 1:27:18.000
<v Speaker 2>And I tell you what, he is much better looking

1:27:18.040 --> 1:27:21.960
<v Speaker 2>in person. And when he came to the studio and

1:27:22.280 --> 1:27:24.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, the salespeople got to see him and all

1:27:24.200 --> 1:27:25.880
<v Speaker 2>the people got to see him, and he looks really

1:27:25.920 --> 1:27:28.599
<v Speaker 2>great in a suit. Okay, I'll admit that even though

1:27:28.640 --> 1:27:30.360
<v Speaker 2>you're not. I mean, I'm old enough to be his mother,

1:27:30.520 --> 1:27:33.479
<v Speaker 2>so I can say those things. And when he left,

1:27:33.520 --> 1:27:35.360
<v Speaker 2>all the women were like, Oh, who was that? Who

1:27:35.439 --> 1:27:37.719
<v Speaker 2>was that? It's kind of like the way Tom Graves

1:27:37.880 --> 1:27:40.800
<v Speaker 2>was to mention a Republican too. Tom was a really

1:27:40.880 --> 1:27:44.559
<v Speaker 2>good looking guy and still is, of course, and same

1:27:44.680 --> 1:27:46.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing happened. He came in, he had this

1:27:46.760 --> 1:27:50.479
<v Speaker 2>charisma and after he left, all the girls were like,

1:27:50.560 --> 1:27:54.120
<v Speaker 2>who is that? Who was that? And you know, John

1:27:54.280 --> 1:27:57.400
<v Speaker 2>is I think John has a good chance my thing.

1:27:57.479 --> 1:27:59.040
<v Speaker 2>And I said this to him. I said, look, I

1:27:59.080 --> 1:28:01.560
<v Speaker 2>want you to lose. I'm a Republican. I said that

1:28:01.640 --> 1:28:05.360
<v Speaker 2>you've forgotten who you are. Your your your fundraising letters

1:28:05.400 --> 1:28:07.920
<v Speaker 2>sound like you're a far left progressive, but yet your

1:28:07.960 --> 1:28:10.080
<v Speaker 2>press release is say all these things you're doing on

1:28:10.160 --> 1:28:13.280
<v Speaker 2>a bipartisan basis. You know, I said, I'll give you

1:28:13.320 --> 1:28:15.320
<v Speaker 2>a piece of advice that I usually charge people for,

1:28:16.000 --> 1:28:19.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's that don't forget that nobody's going to remember

1:28:19.439 --> 1:28:22.600
<v Speaker 2>the name of your consultant. You know, they only know

1:28:22.720 --> 1:28:26.320
<v Speaker 2>your name, and so so if you if you're doing

1:28:26.439 --> 1:28:29.160
<v Speaker 2>this kind of crazy fundraising emails and I don't know

1:28:29.200 --> 1:28:31.960
<v Speaker 2>how many people actually see those, but I noticed that

1:28:32.080 --> 1:28:35.200
<v Speaker 2>it didn't sound the same. He's not a far left progressive, Okay,

1:28:35.240 --> 1:28:38.439
<v Speaker 2>He's probably kind of like Barack Obama in that I

1:28:38.520 --> 1:28:41.640
<v Speaker 2>think Obama was much more progressive than he governed. He

1:28:41.800 --> 1:28:44.519
<v Speaker 2>kind of governed center left, even though I think if

1:28:44.680 --> 1:28:46.839
<v Speaker 2>he were if he didn't have to negotiate with Congress,

1:28:46.880 --> 1:28:48.639
<v Speaker 2>he probably would have been a lot more far left.

1:28:49.120 --> 1:28:52.920
<v Speaker 2>And the fact that he allowed the the economy it

1:28:52.960 --> 1:28:55.640
<v Speaker 2>grew in about one percent a year. It wasn't gangbusters,

1:28:56.000 --> 1:28:58.280
<v Speaker 2>but it wasn't what it was when he came in.

1:28:59.040 --> 1:29:02.040
<v Speaker 2>So he was a to win some people over because

1:29:02.040 --> 1:29:03.360
<v Speaker 2>of that. But I think if he was left to

1:29:03.439 --> 1:29:08.240
<v Speaker 2>his own devices, he's very progressive. But it'll be interesting

1:29:08.320 --> 1:29:10.599
<v Speaker 2>to see how John does. I kept trying to get

1:29:10.760 --> 1:29:13.599
<v Speaker 2>We have a Palestinian woman who was running for governor

1:29:13.720 --> 1:29:17.200
<v Speaker 2>that is from Decab County, and I was joking. I said,

1:29:17.240 --> 1:29:18.880
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to get her to switch over to

1:29:18.920 --> 1:29:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the Senate race so we could see how far left

1:29:20.840 --> 1:29:23.240
<v Speaker 2>John would go. But she didn't do that. She got

1:29:23.280 --> 1:29:23.880
<v Speaker 2>out of the race.

1:29:32.720 --> 1:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about that Republican primary for the Senate. I

1:29:35.840 --> 1:29:38.479
<v Speaker 1>will just I will like said it a few times

1:29:38.520 --> 1:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>on this show, so I will say it again. I

1:29:41.080 --> 1:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>think the worst name to have in politics in twenty

1:29:44.000 --> 1:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty six is going to be Congressman. Okay, if your

1:29:47.720 --> 1:29:50.519
<v Speaker 1>first name is Congress. If that's your first name, I

1:29:50.560 --> 1:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's terrible. I'd rather be coach. I'd rather be

1:29:56.120 --> 1:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>former football coach than current member of Congress. So I

1:30:00.240 --> 1:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>don't care what party I'm int, but particularly in this

1:30:04.760 --> 1:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>political environment we're living in where we don't really have

1:30:08.000 --> 1:30:11.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of positive views of how Congress has worked

1:30:11.640 --> 1:30:14.639
<v Speaker 1>and all of that. But that's not what the polling

1:30:14.720 --> 1:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>has been showing. Derek Dooley is having a lot of

1:30:17.320 --> 1:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>trouble getting traction. Arguably all of the candidates are having

1:30:20.320 --> 1:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>some trouble getting traction, but not like Dooley. What you know,

1:30:23.880 --> 1:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is there any way of doing this without Donald Trump?

1:30:30.800 --> 1:30:35.280
<v Speaker 2>I like and Trump has not gotten involved in the

1:30:35.320 --> 1:30:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Senate race yet, but I don't know if he will

1:30:38.479 --> 1:30:38.640
<v Speaker 2>or not.

1:30:39.439 --> 1:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But well, he won't take Kemp's candidate. I know that.

1:30:42.439 --> 1:30:45.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know that, Derek. I like Derek Moore every

1:30:45.479 --> 1:30:48.920
<v Speaker 2>time I meet him. Derek Dooley, I think he's learning

1:30:48.960 --> 1:30:52.080
<v Speaker 2>as he goes. I think that with Mike Collins, I

1:30:52.160 --> 1:30:56.680
<v Speaker 2>think you cannot underestimate the power of his championing the

1:30:56.760 --> 1:31:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Lake and Riley Act among Republican primary vote. I mean it,

1:31:02.000 --> 1:31:04.120
<v Speaker 2>it was in a you know, and especially in the

1:31:04.240 --> 1:31:08.120
<v Speaker 2>area where most of the Republican voters are in and around.

1:31:08.520 --> 1:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's got a geographic advantage on that.

1:31:11.160 --> 1:31:16.160
<v Speaker 2>And a geographical advantage, and he, you know, he worked

1:31:16.200 --> 1:31:18.280
<v Speaker 2>the halls, and I've told him he needs to show

1:31:18.320 --> 1:31:21.479
<v Speaker 2>more of that side of himself about how he went

1:31:21.560 --> 1:31:24.040
<v Speaker 2>to these offices. He went to every Democrat's office, he

1:31:24.120 --> 1:31:26.600
<v Speaker 2>went to every Republican's office, and he pushed for this

1:31:26.720 --> 1:31:28.960
<v Speaker 2>bill and pushed for this bill and got it passed

1:31:29.560 --> 1:31:34.479
<v Speaker 2>into two Congresses, and you know, it was you can

1:31:34.680 --> 1:31:38.120
<v Speaker 2>underestimate that with primary voters. So I think it's Mike's

1:31:38.160 --> 1:31:41.960
<v Speaker 2>to lose of the primary. Buddy Carter's working very hard

1:31:42.200 --> 1:31:44.760
<v Speaker 2>and I think he's working smart, but it's hard to

1:31:44.920 --> 1:31:49.720
<v Speaker 2>win from that first district, just ask Jack Kingston. But

1:31:49.880 --> 1:31:52.559
<v Speaker 2>I do think that with the with Rick Jackson getting

1:31:52.560 --> 1:31:55.639
<v Speaker 2>in the race on the governor's side, that is another

1:31:55.840 --> 1:31:59.040
<v Speaker 2>outsider that could help Derek Dooley. But I still think

1:31:59.080 --> 1:32:01.440
<v Speaker 2>if the election were real today and be Mike Collins.

1:32:03.120 --> 1:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. Let's go to the governor's race. Rick Jackson

1:32:06.240 --> 1:32:10.599
<v Speaker 1>really seemed to be a shock to the Bert Jones campaign.

1:32:10.760 --> 1:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>They did. Was this truly a blind side? They didn't

1:32:13.800 --> 1:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>know this was coming. There were no whispers. I mean,

1:32:16.160 --> 1:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll be honest. It certainly looked to me that there

1:32:18.080 --> 1:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>was no giant killer in the race. And I had

1:32:22.320 --> 1:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>heard whispers of concerns about Jones and a general fear

1:32:26.160 --> 1:32:28.439
<v Speaker 1>that he couldn't win a general So there had been

1:32:28.560 --> 1:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>some there'd been some whispers, but the way they acted

1:32:33.320 --> 1:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is if they just couldn't believe this happened.

1:32:35.920 --> 1:32:40.000
<v Speaker 2>It was completely quiet. And I know Rick, I've known

1:32:40.080 --> 1:32:43.479
<v Speaker 2>him for years. He brought me into his office when

1:32:43.479 --> 1:32:45.439
<v Speaker 2>I ran for Congress. That's when I first met him,

1:32:46.000 --> 1:32:49.600
<v Speaker 2>and I'd worked with him on foster care stuff. I mean,

1:32:49.640 --> 1:32:52.679
<v Speaker 2>he's been very involved in politics. He's given money to everyone,

1:32:54.040 --> 1:32:56.120
<v Speaker 2>and that's running gotten him a little bit in a

1:32:56.160 --> 1:32:59.120
<v Speaker 2>little bit of trouble. But it was totally unknown, and

1:32:59.240 --> 1:33:03.280
<v Speaker 2>it completely upended the entire race. For three or four weeks.

1:33:03.360 --> 1:33:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Jones's people were completely on their back feet for three

1:33:05.840 --> 1:33:07.840
<v Speaker 2>or four weeks. They're kind of gaining it back and

1:33:08.360 --> 1:33:09.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit now.

1:33:09.560 --> 1:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>But they're doing Trump has he still is holding a

1:33:12.280 --> 1:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump endorsement.

1:33:12.920 --> 1:33:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, he's holding a Trump and.

1:33:14.400 --> 1:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>It's active, right, It's an active endorsement, right, It's.

1:33:16.920 --> 1:33:17.839
<v Speaker 2>An active endorsement.

1:33:17.880 --> 1:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>He says, say that because you never know, like Trump

1:33:19.840 --> 1:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>as the ones where he's endorsed everybody he's endorsed previously

1:33:24.479 --> 1:33:25.759
<v Speaker 1>candidates fudge.

1:33:25.920 --> 1:33:30.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, there are trips back back and forth to

1:33:30.200 --> 1:33:32.840
<v Speaker 2>mar A Lago by Rick Jackson, though, so you know

1:33:33.120 --> 1:33:34.320
<v Speaker 2>it's happening.

1:33:34.920 --> 1:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>We know the president likes a winner. And if somebody

1:33:37.120 --> 1:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>suddenly looks like a winner and they're rich, and mister

1:33:40.080 --> 1:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Jackson is rich, mister Trump can be persuaded, and he has.

1:33:45.040 --> 1:33:47.200
<v Speaker 2>I tell you, I went to several of his events

1:33:47.920 --> 1:33:50.880
<v Speaker 2>and what is so amazing to me is the women

1:33:51.520 --> 1:33:54.759
<v Speaker 2>that have shown up that are not Republican, not regular

1:33:54.840 --> 1:33:57.719
<v Speaker 2>people that you see at Republican events. They came because

1:33:57.760 --> 1:34:01.439
<v Speaker 2>of the commercials and they love the fact that he

1:34:01.760 --> 1:34:05.120
<v Speaker 2>came from nothing. He lived in techwood homes, you know,

1:34:05.360 --> 1:34:08.920
<v Speaker 2>he lived in the projects. He and he broke the cycle.

1:34:09.200 --> 1:34:11.280
<v Speaker 2>He's had a long term marriage since he was nineteen

1:34:11.360 --> 1:34:15.200
<v Speaker 2>years old. He's got three successful children that are doing

1:34:15.280 --> 1:34:18.000
<v Speaker 2>great and that are running the businesses now for him,

1:34:18.520 --> 1:34:23.759
<v Speaker 2>and he you know he he's made some missteps because

1:34:24.200 --> 1:34:26.879
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't know. You know, he's not a politician. He's

1:34:26.880 --> 1:34:30.640
<v Speaker 2>a guy that's running business. But Bert seems to be

1:34:30.880 --> 1:34:33.320
<v Speaker 2>getting his feet under him again. But I'm sure he

1:34:33.439 --> 1:34:35.760
<v Speaker 2>can't wait for sine die on Thursday, which is the

1:34:35.800 --> 1:34:38.160
<v Speaker 2>last day of the legislative session, because then he can

1:34:38.640 --> 1:34:40.679
<v Speaker 2>raise money and get out on the main trail.

1:34:40.720 --> 1:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Again, where's the governor on this? Does he have a

1:34:43.360 --> 1:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>strong preference?

1:34:44.600 --> 1:34:46.439
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't think all he cares about is getting

1:34:46.439 --> 1:34:48.479
<v Speaker 2>Derek Duley across the finished line.

1:34:48.520 --> 1:34:51.439
<v Speaker 1>So he's got it he is. That is more his

1:34:51.600 --> 1:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>focus is that center race, really and he's just sort

1:34:54.400 --> 1:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of staying above the fray and the governor's And I

1:34:57.640 --> 1:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you, I.

1:34:58.080 --> 1:35:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Wish that he had run because of Bryan Kempin run,

1:35:00.800 --> 1:35:03.120
<v Speaker 2>we wouldn't have this fruit basket turnover that we've had

1:35:03.280 --> 1:35:05.880
<v Speaker 2>in the Republican Party. We've got about half of the

1:35:06.000 --> 1:35:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Senate running for other offices. We're going to have a

1:35:08.720 --> 1:35:10.920
<v Speaker 2>George is going to look different next year. I just

1:35:11.040 --> 1:35:13.120
<v Speaker 2>don't know, you know, what the makeup's going to be

1:35:13.200 --> 1:35:15.559
<v Speaker 2>because there are so many people running for higher office.

1:35:15.600 --> 1:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Then Martha, it is miserable being in Congress right.

1:35:19.800 --> 1:35:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Now, Okay, well, and going from governor to Senate, they

1:35:22.840 --> 1:35:23.360
<v Speaker 2>don't like it.

1:35:23.920 --> 1:35:27.840
<v Speaker 1>It's you talk to any former governor in the Senate,

1:35:28.360 --> 1:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and every one of them I've had this conversation. Whether

1:35:30.920 --> 1:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it's Lamar, Alexander, Mark Warner, doesn't matter. It doesn't matter

1:35:34.400 --> 1:35:38.519
<v Speaker 1>if a democratic governor Republic. They hate the Senate once

1:35:38.600 --> 1:35:40.559
<v Speaker 1>they've gotten there. And that's why you see, I think

1:35:40.560 --> 1:35:42.720
<v Speaker 1>we have a record number of sitting Senators running for

1:35:42.800 --> 1:35:47.280
<v Speaker 1>governor this year in other states across the board. And

1:35:47.400 --> 1:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>then the other problem, I mean the problem is what

1:35:50.520 --> 1:35:53.720
<v Speaker 1>used to make the Senate fun and actually, frankly a

1:35:53.880 --> 1:35:56.519
<v Speaker 1>great place for a former governor to go, is that

1:35:56.600 --> 1:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that it was a place to be somewhat independent. I mean,

1:36:00.120 --> 1:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you were expected to sit on one side of the

1:36:02.600 --> 1:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>aisle or the other, but nobody expected to you know,

1:36:07.080 --> 1:36:10.360
<v Speaker 1>they'd look at Ted Kennedy and John McCain and think, okay,

1:36:10.560 --> 1:36:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I can mess around, It's okay to work with the

1:36:13.960 --> 1:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>other side. And it was a very accepted practice in

1:36:16.720 --> 1:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the Senate in some ways. It was a feature, not

1:36:19.720 --> 1:36:22.599
<v Speaker 1>a bug, of the Senate. And I think the Senate

1:36:22.680 --> 1:36:25.559
<v Speaker 1>in particular, in our new polarize and I say new

1:36:25.600 --> 1:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>polarized climate obviously, where the politics that you and I

1:36:28.439 --> 1:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>grew up with in the seventies and eighties is not

1:36:31.200 --> 1:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>today's politics. Right. The divides may look familiar, but it's different.

1:36:35.840 --> 1:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And you keep bringing up Sam Nun. Sam Nunn was

1:36:39.720 --> 1:36:42.760
<v Speaker 1>my father's dream candidate for president. He was recovering, you know.

1:36:42.880 --> 1:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>He was a Reagan Democrat who never went back to

1:36:46.000 --> 1:36:48.559
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party, and he loved Sam Nun. Sam Nunn

1:36:48.600 --> 1:36:51.800
<v Speaker 1>was always the last, the one Democrat alive that he

1:36:51.880 --> 1:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to vote for next before he passed away. So

1:36:56.439 --> 1:37:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you cannot do that anymore in the Senate because that

1:37:00.520 --> 1:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, maybe it's our partisan media, right, we

1:37:04.000 --> 1:37:08.320
<v Speaker 1>have a very there's robust liberal media, there's robust conservative media,

1:37:08.360 --> 1:37:11.720
<v Speaker 1>there's robust mega media, there's robust influencer media, whatever you

1:37:11.800 --> 1:37:13.639
<v Speaker 1>want to call it these days, right, and it's all different.

1:37:14.439 --> 1:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And if Governor Camp asked me could he get anything

1:37:17.960 --> 1:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>done in the Senate, I tell him you can't unless

1:37:20.800 --> 1:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you become a leader. And you know, especially it's really

1:37:24.479 --> 1:37:27.720
<v Speaker 1>miserable being in the Senate when your party's in the

1:37:27.720 --> 1:37:31.599
<v Speaker 1>White House, because you cannot ever criticize your party, even

1:37:31.640 --> 1:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>if you really want to you become a heretic, as

1:37:35.520 --> 1:37:38.639
<v Speaker 1>ask Joe Manchin or ask Lisa Mrkowski.

1:37:39.560 --> 1:37:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think it's so. You know, the

1:37:41.760 --> 1:37:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Senate was always like my dream job, you know. I

1:37:44.479 --> 1:37:46.679
<v Speaker 2>always thought that would be like the most fun because

1:37:46.720 --> 1:37:48.920
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't have to be as political because it's a

1:37:49.000 --> 1:37:51.760
<v Speaker 2>six year term, you know, And it's just not that

1:37:51.880 --> 1:37:55.880
<v Speaker 2>way anymore. But I kind of blame where we are

1:37:55.960 --> 1:37:59.760
<v Speaker 2>in politics today on the decision in nineteen thirteen to

1:38:00.040 --> 1:38:03.640
<v Speaker 2>change the constitution and make the Senate elected instead of appoint.

1:38:03.360 --> 1:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, you're one of those you want to repeal that.

1:38:05.920 --> 1:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a I blame about thirteen years later. I

1:38:09.479 --> 1:38:13.519
<v Speaker 1>blame Congress no longer expanding the size of the House

1:38:13.880 --> 1:38:17.400
<v Speaker 1>every ten years. Not just that's interesting. I don't know

1:38:17.439 --> 1:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>if I want state legislatures. Well, he's cited. Tell you what,

1:38:20.720 --> 1:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>there's always maker case. I'll shut up.

1:38:22.800 --> 1:38:25.640
<v Speaker 2>There's always going to be corruption in politics. Okay, But

1:38:26.400 --> 1:38:28.800
<v Speaker 2>at least when you were dealing with the Senate, I mean,

1:38:28.880 --> 1:38:31.639
<v Speaker 2>with the legislature, you didn't need all this money to run.

1:38:31.960 --> 1:38:34.439
<v Speaker 2>And I remember David Produce saying to me, you know,

1:38:34.560 --> 1:38:36.479
<v Speaker 2>well then then I would have never won in a

1:38:36.520 --> 1:38:38.720
<v Speaker 2>situation like that. I said, but maybe you wouldn't have

1:38:38.800 --> 1:38:41.639
<v Speaker 2>wanted to leave retirement and run if we had had

1:38:41.680 --> 1:38:44.320
<v Speaker 2>those kind of senators, because I believe the problem with

1:38:44.400 --> 1:38:47.439
<v Speaker 2>the Senate they're not beholding to their states anymore. They

1:38:47.520 --> 1:38:50.160
<v Speaker 2>care more about their donors and their caucus than they

1:38:50.240 --> 1:38:53.040
<v Speaker 2>do about their states. They do not put their states first,

1:38:53.080 --> 1:38:55.960
<v Speaker 2>whether it's Rafayel Warnock and John oss Off or it's

1:38:56.760 --> 1:38:59.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, what's a state with two Republicans it doesn't matter,

1:39:00.200 --> 1:39:03.280
<v Speaker 2>or they're not as they're not as behold and they

1:39:03.360 --> 1:39:07.360
<v Speaker 2>care more about the DSCC and their caucus and their donors.

1:39:07.680 --> 1:39:10.400
<v Speaker 2>And that's when that kind of money raising started. You know,

1:39:10.439 --> 1:39:11.760
<v Speaker 2>they didn't need money before then.

1:39:12.000 --> 1:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's my thought.

1:39:13.000 --> 1:39:14.400
<v Speaker 2>I am one of those twenty three.

1:39:14.439 --> 1:39:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Well I say that, you know, you know, the trigger

1:39:17.120 --> 1:39:20.840
<v Speaker 1>for that amendment, like the last straw, was a bribery

1:39:20.960 --> 1:39:25.839
<v Speaker 1>scandal of the Illinois state legislature. And I know Illinois shocking,

1:39:26.720 --> 1:39:29.519
<v Speaker 1>but it was a bribery of the Illinois state of Basically,

1:39:29.600 --> 1:39:34.519
<v Speaker 1>they were handing out ten thousand dollars checks in nineteen nine,

1:39:34.960 --> 1:39:38.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ten. That's a lot of money in nineteen ten.

1:39:38.680 --> 1:39:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, my grandmother's house in Jersey City was about ten

1:39:42.880 --> 1:39:44.599
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars around that time.

1:39:45.040 --> 1:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>See that's how much a that's how much per legend,

1:39:48.240 --> 1:39:51.360
<v Speaker 1>per vote they were purchasing. You know, it's no wonder

1:39:51.439 --> 1:39:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Rod Blgoyevitch didn't want to give up that Obama sendency

1:39:54.439 --> 1:40:01.000
<v Speaker 1>for zero. You know that his famous quote, Well, I

1:40:01.040 --> 1:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>don't I I don't know. I look at state less.

1:40:04.960 --> 1:40:09.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll be honest, I believe the least corrupt legislature in

1:40:09.760 --> 1:40:13.439
<v Speaker 1>America's Congress, and that the lower you go, the more

1:40:13.560 --> 1:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>corruptible it is. And there's a variety of reasons for

1:40:16.120 --> 1:40:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that one.

1:40:16.920 --> 1:40:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Money.

1:40:18.080 --> 1:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, there are more more eyeballs on Congress. There's more reporters.

1:40:22.200 --> 1:40:24.760
<v Speaker 1>You can hate them, hate us, or love us. There's

1:40:24.880 --> 1:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>just more of us covering Congress. Fewer are at state legislatures,

1:40:28.680 --> 1:40:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and even fewer at city councils. Right. I would say

1:40:31.280 --> 1:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the most corrupt is usually the most local, because no

1:40:34.240 --> 1:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>one's watching.

1:40:35.439 --> 1:40:37.840
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't disagree with that. And the joke I

1:40:37.960 --> 1:40:40.960
<v Speaker 2>used to tell when Cassim Read was the mayor of Atlanta,

1:40:41.240 --> 1:40:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I said, yeah, the money comes in down the hall,

1:40:43.240 --> 1:40:46.439
<v Speaker 2>and that's very tempting. You know, it's like you can't.

1:40:46.840 --> 1:40:49.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's it's a it's a it's a challenge.

1:40:49.400 --> 1:40:52.439
<v Speaker 2>And I think that you're right. I think the more

1:40:52.479 --> 1:40:54.439
<v Speaker 2>local stuff is more corrupt. And I don't know that

1:40:54.560 --> 1:40:56.880
<v Speaker 2>the I'm not saying so much that the Senate's corrupt.

1:40:57.200 --> 1:40:59.439
<v Speaker 2>It just takes too much money to become a senator.

1:40:59.760 --> 1:41:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm I mean, I think we spent a half a

1:41:01.760 --> 1:41:05.000
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars last time in that cycle.

1:41:05.439 --> 1:41:07.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's North Carolina. It's probably going to be the

1:41:08.000 --> 1:41:11.600
<v Speaker 1>first billion dollar center. Yeah, it's crazy, insanity, it is.

1:41:11.680 --> 1:41:14.320
<v Speaker 2>It's too much money. It's like when I had a

1:41:14.439 --> 1:41:17.680
<v Speaker 2>meeting for that Senate seat appointment that Kelly Lefler got,

1:41:17.960 --> 1:41:21.040
<v Speaker 2>and I was very frank with the governor. I said,

1:41:21.080 --> 1:41:23.240
<v Speaker 2>I can't raise twenty million dollars. I'm not that good

1:41:23.320 --> 1:41:27.479
<v Speaker 2>at it, you know. And I thought Kelly Leffler was great,

1:41:29.000 --> 1:41:32.120
<v Speaker 2>but she got forced because Doug Collins got into the race.

1:41:32.200 --> 1:41:34.840
<v Speaker 2>She got forced to go right instead of being that

1:41:34.920 --> 1:41:36.000
<v Speaker 2>suburban woman she was.

1:41:36.240 --> 1:41:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I got the sense that Kelly Leffler lost her

1:41:39.360 --> 1:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>political identity pretty quickly. It sounds like you agree with

1:41:43.080 --> 1:41:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that that it felt like who she was when she

1:41:47.479 --> 1:41:50.280
<v Speaker 1>who Governor Kemp thought he was appointing a bunch of

1:41:50.360 --> 1:41:53.599
<v Speaker 1>political consultants got ahold of her and turned her into

1:41:53.640 --> 1:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a two dimensional just caricature.

1:41:56.320 --> 1:41:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's the consultants all the time, isn't it. You've

1:41:58.960 --> 1:42:01.000
<v Speaker 2>got to be really strong in that area. But one

1:42:01.120 --> 1:42:03.519
<v Speaker 2>thing I do love about her is that she didn't

1:42:03.520 --> 1:42:05.879
<v Speaker 2>take her ball and go home. She started this organization

1:42:06.040 --> 1:42:08.600
<v Speaker 2>called Greater Georgia that was dad or driven and that

1:42:08.960 --> 1:42:12.599
<v Speaker 2>that identified a bunch of conservative households that weren't voting

1:42:12.640 --> 1:42:16.320
<v Speaker 2>regularly and got out and did the grassroots stuff to

1:42:16.400 --> 1:42:18.560
<v Speaker 2>get him out to vote. And so I think, you know,

1:42:19.040 --> 1:42:20.720
<v Speaker 2>that's one thing I loved. She did not take her

1:42:20.760 --> 1:42:25.080
<v Speaker 2>ball and go home, and she continued being an operative

1:42:25.120 --> 1:42:26.080
<v Speaker 2>in Georgia politics.

1:42:28.280 --> 1:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Brian Kemp for President's it sounds to me it's like

1:42:31.520 --> 1:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen. I think if he I think

1:42:33.760 --> 1:42:35.519
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons you don't run for the Senate

1:42:35.560 --> 1:42:38.720
<v Speaker 1>see Look, I think there was a lot of job

1:42:38.880 --> 1:42:41.080
<v Speaker 1>description reasons why you don't run for the Senate. See.

1:42:41.520 --> 1:42:43.599
<v Speaker 1>But if you're at all thinking about running in twenty eight,

1:42:43.640 --> 1:42:46.479
<v Speaker 1>it's an insult of voters to immediately run for one

1:42:46.520 --> 1:42:48.639
<v Speaker 1>thing in twenty six and then another thing in twenty eight.

1:42:48.760 --> 1:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So if he was thinking about president it makes a

1:42:51.240 --> 1:42:54.519
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense for me at least, then don't run

1:42:54.560 --> 1:42:57.720
<v Speaker 1>for the Senate, because that'd be you know, to leave

1:42:57.880 --> 1:43:00.280
<v Speaker 1>after two years. You know, immediately you're running, and you'd

1:43:00.320 --> 1:43:01.320
<v Speaker 1>immediately be running.

1:43:01.880 --> 1:43:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think people will know after we get through

1:43:04.960 --> 1:43:08.479
<v Speaker 2>this session and actually the primary. He's probably not going

1:43:08.560 --> 1:43:10.599
<v Speaker 2>to do anything to take the light off of Derek

1:43:10.640 --> 1:43:13.519
<v Speaker 2>Dooley at all. I have not talked to him about

1:43:13.520 --> 1:43:18.040
<v Speaker 2>a presidential run, but you know, it all depends on Marty.

1:43:18.439 --> 1:43:21.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, they are a very very strong couple, and

1:43:21.800 --> 1:43:24.719
<v Speaker 2>if she is not interested in doing that, they won't

1:43:24.760 --> 1:43:28.040
<v Speaker 2>do it. And I don't think that's a bad idea

1:43:28.200 --> 1:43:30.360
<v Speaker 2>for couples to be that way actually, because it's a

1:43:30.400 --> 1:43:32.800
<v Speaker 2>big commitment. You know, it's a big commitment to do that.

1:43:33.240 --> 1:43:36.479
<v Speaker 2>And it's easier for women to not have their husbands

1:43:36.520 --> 1:43:39.599
<v Speaker 2>everywhere than it is for men to not have their

1:43:39.640 --> 1:43:42.120
<v Speaker 2>wives everywhere. You know, my husband was you know, he

1:43:42.160 --> 1:43:44.040
<v Speaker 2>would put signs up, but he wasn't a guy that

1:43:44.160 --> 1:43:46.040
<v Speaker 2>was going to come to an event with me and

1:43:46.160 --> 1:43:50.000
<v Speaker 2>be the little man. But it's more acceptable for a

1:43:50.600 --> 1:43:53.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, a husband of a female candidate not to

1:43:53.040 --> 1:43:53.879
<v Speaker 2>show up everywhere.

1:44:03.120 --> 1:44:07.679
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting that that's an observation that I've not heard before.

1:44:07.720 --> 1:44:10.519
<v Speaker 1>But I think you're right. I think there is. It

1:44:10.680 --> 1:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is one of these how would you do? It's it's

1:44:16.320 --> 1:44:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a stereotype that it's not fair. But

1:44:18.479 --> 1:44:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just that people ask.

1:44:19.920 --> 1:44:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Me who's going to take care of my kids? Who's

1:44:22.160 --> 1:44:23.960
<v Speaker 2>gonna I mean, my kids were all grown by then.

1:44:25.160 --> 1:44:27.280
<v Speaker 2>You know when women start. I did my whole thesis

1:44:27.439 --> 1:44:31.960
<v Speaker 2>on women's electoral success in the Republican Party, and women

1:44:32.080 --> 1:44:34.799
<v Speaker 2>start later because they think they need to be ready.

1:44:35.000 --> 1:44:37.439
<v Speaker 2>Men will just run for every anything. But the funt

1:44:37.520 --> 1:44:39.439
<v Speaker 2>the hardest thing is you've got to let You've got

1:44:39.520 --> 1:44:41.800
<v Speaker 2>to put aside the time to get your hair done okay,

1:44:41.920 --> 1:44:44.479
<v Speaker 2>because there are no gray haired women in politics or

1:44:44.520 --> 1:44:48.080
<v Speaker 2>television or very few. And who's going to carry your purse?

1:44:48.160 --> 1:44:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Because it never looks good to walk out of a

1:44:49.920 --> 1:44:52.759
<v Speaker 2>room with your purse, So you got to do those things.

1:44:53.800 --> 1:44:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Do you What do you make of Marjorie Taylor Green's

1:44:56.520 --> 1:45:02.360
<v Speaker 1>critique She's been typically on this that that MAGA doesn't

1:45:02.439 --> 1:45:03.479
<v Speaker 1>make it easy for women.

1:45:05.560 --> 1:45:09.559
<v Speaker 2>I agree with that, and I think that Okay, Marjorie

1:45:10.120 --> 1:45:12.559
<v Speaker 2>should have talked a lot more throughout her career about

1:45:12.640 --> 1:45:17.280
<v Speaker 2>this great third generation construction business that she was keeping

1:45:17.360 --> 1:45:19.880
<v Speaker 2>going and growing. I mean, and that was my advice

1:45:20.200 --> 1:45:23.000
<v Speaker 2>to her when she first started running. Nobody really knew

1:45:23.040 --> 1:45:24.840
<v Speaker 2>that side of her. They just knew the bomb throwing

1:45:25.080 --> 1:45:27.519
<v Speaker 2>side of her. I have a lot of problem with

1:45:27.600 --> 1:45:31.120
<v Speaker 2>people that leave office before their term is up. To

1:45:31.280 --> 1:45:33.760
<v Speaker 2>your point that you were talking about earlier, it's a

1:45:34.479 --> 1:45:37.760
<v Speaker 2>two year office that you asked for, you begged for,

1:45:37.920 --> 1:45:40.680
<v Speaker 2>you raised money for. And even if she decided she

1:45:40.880 --> 1:45:43.840
<v Speaker 2>wasn't going to run, she just could not run and

1:45:43.920 --> 1:45:46.160
<v Speaker 2>then finished out her term instead of doing what she's

1:45:46.240 --> 1:45:49.919
<v Speaker 2>doing to her people right now, is which a primary

1:45:50.040 --> 1:45:52.680
<v Speaker 2>and run a general, I mean a jungle primary and

1:45:52.720 --> 1:45:54.400
<v Speaker 2>a runoff, and then they're going to have a general

1:45:54.439 --> 1:45:56.200
<v Speaker 2>primary and a runoff and then they're going to have

1:45:56.240 --> 1:46:01.880
<v Speaker 2>another election. And so I just hate that, okay. And

1:46:02.000 --> 1:46:04.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the only time I have ever agreed with

1:46:04.680 --> 1:46:08.080
<v Speaker 2>AOC is when she said Donald Trump's been giving you

1:46:08.160 --> 1:46:10.120
<v Speaker 2>a hard time for a week. He's been doing it

1:46:10.240 --> 1:46:12.880
<v Speaker 2>to me for five years, and you're leaving, so I

1:46:13.479 --> 1:46:16.599
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think AOC is the most overblown person

1:46:16.640 --> 1:46:19.000
<v Speaker 2>that I've ever seen in politics. I think she does not.

1:46:19.400 --> 1:46:22.120
<v Speaker 2>I think she's very attractive, and even men on my

1:46:22.280 --> 1:46:24.599
<v Speaker 2>side think she looks great. But I think she doesn't

1:46:24.680 --> 1:46:28.000
<v Speaker 2>understand what the real world is like. But she was

1:46:28.120 --> 1:46:30.080
<v Speaker 2>right about that. I mean, you get picked on by

1:46:30.120 --> 1:46:32.559
<v Speaker 2>the president for a week and you quit your job.

1:46:34.400 --> 1:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think is there any credence to her criticism?

1:46:37.280 --> 1:46:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Though that? It is harder for that. It is harder

1:46:42.439 --> 1:46:47.720
<v Speaker 1>for women to get traction with the Maga wing of

1:46:47.760 --> 1:46:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the party.

1:46:48.439 --> 1:46:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Not just magawing. It's harder for women to get traction everywhere.

1:46:51.240 --> 1:46:54.240
<v Speaker 2>The Democrats do a little better job than the Republicans do,

1:46:54.680 --> 1:46:58.240
<v Speaker 2>but it's still not anywhere near their percentage of who's voting.

1:46:58.280 --> 1:47:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Because women are the hardest on other women. You know,

1:47:01.320 --> 1:47:02.639
<v Speaker 2>I got a lot more problem.

1:47:02.720 --> 1:47:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's what missus Todd would tell you. Yeah, she

1:47:05.640 --> 1:47:08.720
<v Speaker 1>feels like you know, she used to argue, you know,

1:47:09.479 --> 1:47:12.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly for our generation, there would be one seat at

1:47:12.640 --> 1:47:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the table for a woman, right and so hey, it's

1:47:16.800 --> 1:47:19.800
<v Speaker 1>more seats than there were from the boomers, and you

1:47:19.880 --> 1:47:23.080
<v Speaker 1>get that one seat, and other women would instead of

1:47:23.240 --> 1:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>fighting to get a second or a third seat, they

1:47:26.080 --> 1:47:29.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't send and said they all, you know, keeping other

1:47:29.439 --> 1:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>women from making it right rather than fighting for more.

1:47:33.840 --> 1:47:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I think in general, it's easy for easier for men. Period.

1:47:37.400 --> 1:47:39.880
<v Speaker 2>We've come a long way, baby, and I consider myself

1:47:39.920 --> 1:47:43.879
<v Speaker 2>a feminist and I really resent it when liberal feminists

1:47:43.920 --> 1:47:46.080
<v Speaker 2>say I can't be a feminist because I'm a conservative.

1:47:46.479 --> 1:47:48.760
<v Speaker 2>I think being a feminist is all about having the

1:47:48.880 --> 1:47:52.599
<v Speaker 2>choices you know before you you know, I stayed at

1:47:52.600 --> 1:47:56.640
<v Speaker 2>home for ten for eight years, and I did you know,

1:47:56.720 --> 1:47:58.880
<v Speaker 2>I say, you can have it all, just not at

1:47:58.880 --> 1:48:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the same time. And there's just it's harder for women

1:48:02.880 --> 1:48:05.639
<v Speaker 2>and everything, okay, even though we've come a long way

1:48:06.000 --> 1:48:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and we've done great, but you know what, I don't

1:48:07.960 --> 1:48:11.120
<v Speaker 2>focus on that. I have a great husband and a

1:48:11.200 --> 1:48:14.960
<v Speaker 2>fantastic family, and especially being eight weeks out from a

1:48:15.000 --> 1:48:17.360
<v Speaker 2>heart attack, I'm thinking, you know, there's a lot more

1:48:17.400 --> 1:48:19.920
<v Speaker 2>important things in life, so you just got to make

1:48:19.960 --> 1:48:21.599
<v Speaker 2>sure you got all your priorities straight.

1:48:22.160 --> 1:48:24.479
<v Speaker 1>Let me close with this. I had Jack dan Forth

1:48:24.560 --> 1:48:28.080
<v Speaker 1>on recently, who's just I mean, it's amazing at ninety

1:48:28.160 --> 1:48:31.920
<v Speaker 1>two and he's you think he was seventy two. He's

1:48:32.400 --> 1:48:35.800
<v Speaker 1>just one of the great gentlemen of the US. Senate back.

1:48:36.360 --> 1:48:38.360
<v Speaker 1>You know when people say the good old days, he's

1:48:38.439 --> 1:48:40.599
<v Speaker 1>one of the people I would vision envision in my head.

1:48:40.840 --> 1:48:42.240
<v Speaker 2>He's one of the people that made it good.

1:48:44.280 --> 1:48:49.720
<v Speaker 1>He's really he really is. What really animates him negatively

1:48:49.840 --> 1:48:53.320
<v Speaker 1>about this about President Trump and about MAGA is the

1:48:53.600 --> 1:48:59.360
<v Speaker 1>nastiness of it, right, the personal and look, it is ugly.

1:49:00.000 --> 1:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm got to sit here and says, politics ain't being

1:49:02.120 --> 1:49:05.360
<v Speaker 1>bag right, all's fair and love and politics right, Okay,

1:49:05.479 --> 1:49:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I've been around long enough to understand that.

1:49:08.880 --> 1:49:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we've crossed the line though in where

1:49:12.439 --> 1:49:16.760
<v Speaker 1>our rhetoric is? And you know, I mean, I'm sure

1:49:16.760 --> 1:49:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you run into this, right, Why do why do suburban

1:49:21.400 --> 1:49:24.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of squishy Republicans, why are they willing to cross

1:49:24.760 --> 1:49:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the aisle against Trump? It's usually for character in style,

1:49:28.720 --> 1:49:31.280
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily for substance, It's true.

1:49:31.479 --> 1:49:33.880
<v Speaker 2>And look, I have this theory that there are these

1:49:33.920 --> 1:49:37.280
<v Speaker 2>fifty year cycles and we get just far enough away

1:49:37.320 --> 1:49:39.679
<v Speaker 2>that we don't remember. So like in the nineteen twenties

1:49:39.720 --> 1:49:42.479
<v Speaker 2>you had prohibitions, so you had lawlessness and crime in

1:49:42.520 --> 1:49:46.480
<v Speaker 2>the cities and all this stuff. In the nineteen seventies,

1:49:46.600 --> 1:49:50.080
<v Speaker 2>you had in the late sixties and seventies, you had assassinations,

1:49:50.120 --> 1:49:53.360
<v Speaker 2>you had political assassinations, you had you know, all that

1:49:53.560 --> 1:49:56.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of thing that happened, and then you know, we're

1:49:56.840 --> 1:49:59.680
<v Speaker 2>now in the twenty twenties. We've got the same sort

1:49:59.720 --> 1:50:03.080
<v Speaker 2>of side. We had some political political assassination last year,

1:50:03.240 --> 1:50:05.519
<v Speaker 2>we had other things that were going on, and you've

1:50:05.560 --> 1:50:08.400
<v Speaker 2>got people now not moving from the cities to the suburbs,

1:50:08.439 --> 1:50:11.639
<v Speaker 2>they're moving whole states. And so I think we're kind

1:50:11.680 --> 1:50:14.720
<v Speaker 2>of I'm an optimistic person, so I think things will

1:50:14.760 --> 1:50:15.200
<v Speaker 2>get better.

1:50:15.640 --> 1:50:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not.

1:50:17.520 --> 1:50:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't think this is all Trump's fault. You know,

1:50:20.040 --> 1:50:24.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that he was a symptom. I've often said

1:50:24.200 --> 1:50:26.800
<v Speaker 2>that I think Barack Obama and Donald Trump were two

1:50:26.880 --> 1:50:29.040
<v Speaker 2>sides of the same coin. People wanted to check.

1:50:29.160 --> 1:50:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Voters wanted not just change, they wanted full disruptions. Yes,

1:50:35.160 --> 1:50:38.559
<v Speaker 1>and Obama was one kind of disruption, and then Trump

1:50:38.720 --> 1:50:42.400
<v Speaker 1>was was, you know, another kind of disruption. And I

1:50:42.479 --> 1:50:44.599
<v Speaker 1>don't disagree with that. Yeah, I think there's some truth things.

1:50:45.000 --> 1:50:49.000
<v Speaker 2>My theory is President Obama actually really wanted to belong more.

1:50:49.439 --> 1:50:51.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, he said he was the change agent, and

1:50:51.439 --> 1:50:54.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess he was because he was the first black president.

1:50:54.640 --> 1:50:57.160
<v Speaker 2>He wanted to be in the club, and so he

1:50:57.360 --> 1:51:00.679
<v Speaker 2>wanted to kind of function the way way it always

1:51:00.720 --> 1:51:03.760
<v Speaker 2>had been done. And he strikes me as somebody that

1:51:03.840 --> 1:51:07.120
<v Speaker 2>they thought he was this guy that wanted to change everything,

1:51:07.240 --> 1:51:08.080
<v Speaker 2>but maybe he didn't.

1:51:08.120 --> 1:51:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Now granted he was a blessed I can argue that

1:51:10.040 --> 1:51:13.960
<v Speaker 1>anybody that breaks the ceiling, yes, the first, all firsts

1:51:15.320 --> 1:51:20.320
<v Speaker 1>feel as if they have to be extraordinarily cautious. Yeah,

1:51:21.080 --> 1:51:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and a bit risk averse. And whether it's political risk

1:51:27.360 --> 1:51:31.439
<v Speaker 1>averseness or cultural risk averseness. You know, there's this great

1:51:31.520 --> 1:51:33.840
<v Speaker 1>line about that I got when I was reporting out

1:51:34.200 --> 1:51:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Biden being the running mate, you know, rather than and

1:51:37.560 --> 1:51:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the line that I kept being told that Barack Obama

1:51:40.800 --> 1:51:46.080
<v Speaker 1>said is I'm enough change and it is always stuck

1:51:46.160 --> 1:51:50.280
<v Speaker 1>with me because you're right. I mean, he chose. I

1:51:50.360 --> 1:51:53.599
<v Speaker 1>think he saw it as, Hey, I can't be too radical,

1:51:53.840 --> 1:51:57.559
<v Speaker 1>I can't be to this because I am breaking a barrier.

1:51:58.640 --> 1:52:00.759
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's true of anybody that's broken a barrier.

1:52:00.760 --> 1:52:03.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you you know you don't want to be

1:52:04.320 --> 1:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to leave the place where nobody that

1:52:07.280 --> 1:52:09.439
<v Speaker 1>looks like you doesn't have a shot again.

1:52:09.680 --> 1:52:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I think too that he and this is

1:52:11.840 --> 1:52:14.640
<v Speaker 2>one of those woman things, Okay, because I looked at

1:52:14.640 --> 1:52:17.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of pictures of him as a child, and

1:52:17.240 --> 1:52:19.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of pictures there. If you notice and you

1:52:19.680 --> 1:52:21.320
<v Speaker 2>go back and look at you pictures of him as

1:52:21.360 --> 1:52:23.400
<v Speaker 2>a child, he was sitting alone a lot. You know,

1:52:23.479 --> 1:52:25.360
<v Speaker 2>if there was a group of kids, he was over

1:52:25.439 --> 1:52:28.120
<v Speaker 2>by himself. It was like, I think he felt very

1:52:28.479 --> 1:52:31.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's different now being biracial than it was.

1:52:31.600 --> 1:52:34.519
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like lift it up now being biracial, it's

1:52:34.640 --> 1:52:35.719
<v Speaker 2>very positive in the UAE.

1:52:35.720 --> 1:52:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, when he was born it was his parents.

1:52:38.479 --> 1:52:39.000
<v Speaker 2>It was different.

1:52:39.080 --> 1:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Relationship was illegal and about the States.

1:52:42.439 --> 1:52:45.519
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, so yeah, so you saw this kind of guy,

1:52:45.520 --> 1:52:47.680
<v Speaker 2>and I think he's been trying to fit in, you know,

1:52:47.760 --> 1:52:49.719
<v Speaker 2>whether it was to go to the right church, marry

1:52:49.760 --> 1:52:51.680
<v Speaker 2>the right person, do the right kind.

1:52:52.520 --> 1:52:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I've always chalked it up to the island mentality, you know,

1:52:56.680 --> 1:52:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, he he grew up differently than most of

1:52:59.439 --> 1:53:02.519
<v Speaker 1>us do. You grew up on an island, and you

1:53:02.680 --> 1:53:04.840
<v Speaker 1>have to work with others because you're got to. You're

1:53:04.840 --> 1:53:07.920
<v Speaker 1>all stuck in this island. Good, better and different. By

1:53:07.920 --> 1:53:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the way you'd see it during COVID, right the island

1:53:10.080 --> 1:53:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Nations handled it much better than anybody else did, just

1:53:12.800 --> 1:53:15.760
<v Speaker 1>because they're kind of used to, hey, oh hey we've

1:53:15.760 --> 1:53:17.519
<v Speaker 1>got we've got an outbreak of something. We got to

1:53:17.520 --> 1:53:18.960
<v Speaker 1>be careful or we got to do this. We got

1:53:19.520 --> 1:53:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And Hawaii is such a melt you know, we talk

1:53:22.080 --> 1:53:24.640
<v Speaker 1>about being a melting pot. Hawaii is a melting there

1:53:24.720 --> 1:53:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is nobody's at fifty percent right. You've got a Japanese population,

1:53:28.160 --> 1:53:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a Native Hawaiian population, a North you know, sort of

1:53:32.240 --> 1:53:33.920
<v Speaker 1>expat if you want to call it that, people that

1:53:34.000 --> 1:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>grew up on the continental United States over there, and

1:53:36.640 --> 1:53:39.559
<v Speaker 1>it's just a it's a it really is a full

1:53:39.640 --> 1:53:44.200
<v Speaker 1>fledged melting pot. So yeah, I think all of that

1:53:44.640 --> 1:53:47.759
<v Speaker 1>is true with him. Well, just like with with Trump,

1:53:48.240 --> 1:53:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, he had a different sort of you know,

1:53:51.120 --> 1:53:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he also had a lonely job. But because

1:53:53.840 --> 1:53:56.400
<v Speaker 1>here's something that's always bugged me, and it's a bug's

1:53:56.400 --> 1:53:58.360
<v Speaker 1>not the wrong word, but it's an observation you meant

1:53:58.360 --> 1:54:00.519
<v Speaker 1>about Obama. And I'm curious if you notice it was

1:54:00.520 --> 1:54:02.599
<v Speaker 1>about Trump. You know what, you know what you never

1:54:02.680 --> 1:54:07.960
<v Speaker 1>hear about Donald Trump. Childhood friend came to visit him today.

1:54:08.920 --> 1:54:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Guy he went to college with came to visit at

1:54:11.080 --> 1:54:14.320
<v Speaker 1>mar A Lago today. Person he grew up with, he

1:54:14.400 --> 1:54:16.559
<v Speaker 1>went golfing with today. And I don't say that as

1:54:16.600 --> 1:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>any judgment. It's just interesting. And it's like he also

1:54:20.560 --> 1:54:23.200
<v Speaker 1>went to boarding school. He also sort of I think

1:54:23.280 --> 1:54:28.040
<v Speaker 1>he was raised weirdly isolated from other kids.

1:54:28.120 --> 1:54:30.599
<v Speaker 2>Probably a lot of them are dead, Okay, that are

1:54:30.720 --> 1:54:31.880
<v Speaker 2>is it would be his child.

1:54:32.600 --> 1:54:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we forget he's out there.

1:54:34.480 --> 1:54:37.120
<v Speaker 2>And we forget that when he came across the bridge

1:54:37.160 --> 1:54:38.960
<v Speaker 2>from Staten Island or wherever it was that he grew

1:54:39.040 --> 1:54:42.560
<v Speaker 2>up to Manhattan, he was a destructor because you didn't

1:54:42.600 --> 1:54:44.960
<v Speaker 2>come over and get into the Manhattan real estate business

1:54:45.000 --> 1:54:48.200
<v Speaker 2>if you didn't have that connection to the Manhattan real

1:54:48.320 --> 1:54:51.600
<v Speaker 2>estate business. And it's so interesting. He's an interesting guy,

1:54:51.680 --> 1:54:54.800
<v Speaker 2>he really is. I mean, I don't like all the

1:54:54.920 --> 1:54:57.680
<v Speaker 2>things that I don't like a lot of the things

1:54:57.720 --> 1:54:59.800
<v Speaker 2>that he says. I don't like that way he presents himself,

1:55:00.160 --> 1:55:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing about Rob Reiner and then about Mueller,

1:55:03.960 --> 1:55:06.640
<v Speaker 2>when you know he can act right. When he was

1:55:06.800 --> 1:55:11.320
<v Speaker 2>asked about RB. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, he was gracious and

1:55:11.400 --> 1:55:12.720
<v Speaker 2>he was kind and he didn't.

1:55:12.480 --> 1:55:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Like her act. Does I tell you when you can't

1:55:14.240 --> 1:55:21.040
<v Speaker 1>fake it when you what what do you mean? I mean,

1:55:21.120 --> 1:55:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I was just like, can't you just not give you

1:55:23.760 --> 1:55:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a hold off a week? I mean, I had a

1:55:26.040 --> 1:55:30.680
<v Speaker 1>boss who had a very strong feelings about Richard Nixon.

1:55:31.640 --> 1:55:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And when Richard Nixon died, and he had worked very

1:55:35.240 --> 1:55:37.400
<v Speaker 1>closely with Nixon Rofe, closely with that version of the

1:55:37.440 --> 1:55:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party, he goes, he said, I'm not going to

1:55:41.120 --> 1:55:43.720
<v Speaker 1>say anything until after he's buried, and after all the

1:55:43.760 --> 1:55:46.200
<v Speaker 1>tributes have happened, there was like this. He believed that

1:55:46.280 --> 1:55:49.280
<v Speaker 1>there was like some level of respect, like this was

1:55:49.360 --> 1:55:52.360
<v Speaker 1>not the week to tell you, you know. But when

1:55:52.400 --> 1:55:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it was over, he called an all staff meeting. Let me,

1:55:54.840 --> 1:55:57.040
<v Speaker 1>let's sit down and let me tell you about him.

1:55:57.120 --> 1:55:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And he had some things to say, but there was

1:55:59.760 --> 1:56:02.720
<v Speaker 1>this pay some respect to the dead.

1:56:03.200 --> 1:56:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, no, I agree he didn't. LVJ was a horrible person,

1:56:07.120 --> 1:56:09.560
<v Speaker 2>but nobody said anything about it, you know, on the

1:56:09.680 --> 1:56:13.440
<v Speaker 2>day he died, you know. And I just think that

1:56:14.160 --> 1:56:17.160
<v Speaker 2>there's there's like a Jenson Franklin who's a pastor in

1:56:17.240 --> 1:56:20.240
<v Speaker 2>our community, who's part of the faith community. For Trump

1:56:20.320 --> 1:56:24.400
<v Speaker 2>said he has a problem with the compassion gene. But

1:56:24.720 --> 1:56:27.240
<v Speaker 2>but then you also see these really gracious things he

1:56:27.360 --> 1:56:30.520
<v Speaker 2>does with little kids at the Easter egg thing or

1:56:30.760 --> 1:56:33.320
<v Speaker 2>people that he brings into the Oval office so he

1:56:33.560 --> 1:56:36.320
<v Speaker 2>can do it. I just wish he would do it,

1:56:36.440 --> 1:56:38.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, I kind of wish X would or truth

1:56:38.760 --> 1:56:40.480
<v Speaker 2>social whatever you use, go back to one hundred and

1:56:40.520 --> 1:56:43.640
<v Speaker 2>forty characters, because it would you know, it's that last

1:56:43.760 --> 1:56:47.440
<v Speaker 2>line that's the problem. They get you in trouble.

1:56:47.960 --> 1:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he Uh, You're not the first person who said

1:56:51.480 --> 1:56:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember I had somebody who worked for him and said,

1:56:53.320 --> 1:56:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I like when you interview him because you keep him

1:56:54.880 --> 1:57:02.440
<v Speaker 1>on message. Because but it's he look someday we'll study

1:57:02.560 --> 1:57:05.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe somebody will study him in science. Trying to figure

1:57:05.200 --> 1:57:08.879
<v Speaker 1>that out, because it he only would have to modify

1:57:08.920 --> 1:57:12.040
<v Speaker 1>his behavior this much, it need be in a better place.

1:57:12.280 --> 1:57:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that he won't modify his behavior that

1:57:14.720 --> 1:57:19.480
<v Speaker 1>much is also a curiosity. Why, right, he's willing to

1:57:19.560 --> 1:57:22.840
<v Speaker 1>do so many other things transactionally, Why won't you do that?

1:57:23.360 --> 1:57:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Because the benefits you would get if you would do

1:57:25.920 --> 1:57:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that could be pretty big politically, but he chooses not to.

1:57:30.960 --> 1:57:33.440
<v Speaker 2>But I do think that so far the second term

1:57:33.560 --> 1:57:34.960
<v Speaker 2>is much better than the first term.

1:57:35.320 --> 1:57:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that really that voters. The voters

1:57:39.200 --> 1:57:41.640
<v Speaker 1>are agreeing with you on that his numbers are worse

1:57:41.720 --> 1:57:43.640
<v Speaker 1>now than they were anytime during the first term.

1:57:44.960 --> 1:57:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Well that may at the moment, you know, pulling his

1:57:47.040 --> 1:57:48.600
<v Speaker 2>snapshots anyway.

1:57:48.600 --> 1:57:51.320
<v Speaker 1>True in this war is not popular coupled with affordability,

1:57:51.400 --> 1:57:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a mess.

1:57:52.040 --> 1:57:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I obviously this election is the Democrats to lose. Okay,

1:57:56.280 --> 1:57:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats should pick up in November. We've had what

1:58:00.120 --> 1:58:01.760
<v Speaker 2>was it two thousand and two, I guess the last

1:58:01.840 --> 1:58:03.720
<v Speaker 2>time that this card.

1:58:03.720 --> 1:58:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And that was arguably a war, right, it was the war.

1:58:06.200 --> 1:58:08.560
<v Speaker 2>It was war time, and it was we had been attacked,

1:58:08.760 --> 1:58:11.600
<v Speaker 2>and so you know, it's it'll be interesting to see

1:58:11.640 --> 1:58:13.840
<v Speaker 2>how it plays out. I just don't I don't pay

1:58:13.920 --> 1:58:16.280
<v Speaker 2>attention to poles as much as I used to because

1:58:16.320 --> 1:58:18.640
<v Speaker 2>the just you don't know if they're AI generated, you

1:58:18.720 --> 1:58:20.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know where they come from and what they do.

1:58:20.840 --> 1:58:23.440
<v Speaker 2>And I know, I don't answer the polling calls that

1:58:23.520 --> 1:58:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I get. And I know I'm a weirdo, you know,

1:58:25.480 --> 1:58:29.120
<v Speaker 2>because I'm a political person, But but I just don't know.

1:58:29.800 --> 1:58:32.080
<v Speaker 2>It is funny though, because my daughter will I'll sometimes

1:58:32.160 --> 1:58:34.080
<v Speaker 2>get calls from my daughter and it's always a left

1:58:34.160 --> 1:58:36.200
<v Speaker 2>linging poll, and so I do answer that one.

1:58:36.400 --> 1:58:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So I just try to mess it up, all right,

1:58:39.560 --> 1:58:42.040
<v Speaker 1>let me get you out of here on this. Now

1:58:42.120 --> 1:58:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that Miami's going to be dominating college football again and

1:58:44.680 --> 1:58:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the Big Ten keeps winning national titles, is Kirby Smart

1:58:48.040 --> 1:58:50.800
<v Speaker 1>on the hot seat yet? I mean, how many? How long?

1:58:51.120 --> 1:58:54.600
<v Speaker 1>How long does this drought? How expected are you, as

1:58:54.640 --> 1:58:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Bulldog fans for this winning now like this? How much?

1:59:00.000 --> 1:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>How much does he how much time does he buy?

1:59:02.400 --> 1:59:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't disagree that we're in a drought. We won

1:59:04.400 --> 1:59:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the SEC championship, and you know it's it's I think

1:59:09.560 --> 1:59:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Georgia Bold. He's there as long as he wants to

1:59:11.840 --> 1:59:13.880
<v Speaker 2>be there, because the thing about Georgia is we don't

1:59:14.080 --> 1:59:16.920
<v Speaker 2>like to hire coaches that have already made it. You know.

1:59:17.240 --> 1:59:20.040
<v Speaker 2>We like to hire coaches we can grow, and that's

1:59:20.080 --> 1:59:21.240
<v Speaker 2>what that's what we like to do.

1:59:21.600 --> 1:59:24.120
<v Speaker 1>But I'm so you've had better success when you've hired

1:59:24.600 --> 1:59:28.360
<v Speaker 1>coaches that can grow versus right. I mean, both both

1:59:28.520 --> 1:59:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Ricked and Smart weren't head coaches. The first head coaching

1:59:33.840 --> 1:59:36.080
<v Speaker 1>job was Georgia right for both cases, yes.

1:59:36.120 --> 1:59:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, and Vince Dooley too.

1:59:38.160 --> 1:59:42.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, way back when well, I you know, I

1:59:42.840 --> 1:59:46.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the weird things about Miami and Georgia is

1:59:46.920 --> 1:59:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that they've both been big college football powers off and

1:59:49.280 --> 1:59:51.040
<v Speaker 1>on for the last thirty years, and they never play.

1:59:52.360 --> 1:59:54.680
<v Speaker 1>It really bugs me that Miami and Georgia. In fact,

1:59:54.720 --> 1:59:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I was looking forward and then to Miami playing Georgia

1:59:57.920 --> 2:00:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Carson Beck's return, and yet you guys blew it against

2:00:01.520 --> 2:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Ole Miss. I mean, you know, you ruined what would

2:00:03.840 --> 2:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>have been a rare unique I think it had been.

2:00:06.400 --> 2:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Miami, it only played Old Miss like three times.

2:00:08.640 --> 2:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>It is strange how in the hotbed of the South

2:00:13.080 --> 2:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that Miami and some of these SEC schools have rarely played.

2:00:16.440 --> 2:00:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Don't count the SEC out and our applications are way

2:00:19.720 --> 2:00:22.160
<v Speaker 2>up because we handled all the problems with the protests

2:00:22.240 --> 2:00:25.480
<v Speaker 2>better than anybody else. And and look, All Miss is

2:00:25.600 --> 2:00:30.240
<v Speaker 2>fantastic because they built this back. They have the best tailgating.

2:00:30.280 --> 2:00:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you've ever tailgated.

2:00:31.720 --> 2:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I have, I've been there. I look, look, all I'll

2:00:34.400 --> 2:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>say is an ACC apologist is the only difference between

2:00:37.480 --> 2:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the ACC and the secs. You guys got better stadiums, okay,

2:00:40.800 --> 2:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and you've got better tailgates. I will concede that. Whether

2:00:43.880 --> 2:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it's Fayetteville, whether it's Oxford, whether it's Athens, Auburn, I

2:00:49.080 --> 2:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>will concede college station. You know these adopted SEC towns

2:00:52.960 --> 2:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that I still can't quite believe their SEC town I

2:00:57.320 --> 2:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>will give you that you guys have better stadiums, but

2:00:59.520 --> 2:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I just question whether the football is actually that much better.

2:01:02.200 --> 2:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>That's all right, well it you.

2:01:04.560 --> 2:01:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Know, the numbers back it up. We're going to see

2:01:06.920 --> 2:01:09.120
<v Speaker 2>what happens though with n I L I mean, and

2:01:09.520 --> 2:01:11.000
<v Speaker 2>all the things that are going on there. I'm so

2:01:11.080 --> 2:01:13.840
<v Speaker 2>glad that Rick Saban was on that Nick Saban was

2:01:13.920 --> 2:01:16.960
<v Speaker 2>on that committee though, because he's you know, he knows.

2:01:16.840 --> 2:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>How to do it so well. Look, I appreciate that

2:01:19.960 --> 2:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the president wants to insert himself in this. This is

2:01:21.920 --> 2:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a congress job. Congress has to get involved. This is

2:01:24.760 --> 2:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a this is they've got to get involved. University president's

2:01:28.360 --> 2:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>got to go in some ways. The president is a

2:01:31.000 --> 2:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>distraction from this. He cannot solve this with an executive order.

2:01:35.280 --> 2:01:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, my my friend Saxby Chambliss, he's living

2:01:39.280 --> 2:01:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the life of Riley Man.

2:01:40.360 --> 2:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>He's got he's got this the handicapp down to he

2:01:43.480 --> 2:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>had the most handicap for a long time.

2:01:45.720 --> 2:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>But he also had he dealt with the PGA live thing, right,

2:01:50.640 --> 2:01:53.640
<v Speaker 2>which is cool. And then he's doing nil too, so

2:01:54.680 --> 2:01:57.680
<v Speaker 2>he's he's really staying relevant. We're going to talk tomorrow actually,

2:01:57.760 --> 2:01:59.880
<v Speaker 2>and then he's going to be on the show Wednesday.

2:01:59.560 --> 2:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And oh interesting, Well, that that is something I'm gonna

2:02:03.360 --> 2:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to be I'm gonna have to check

2:02:05.680 --> 2:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that out. I was always curious about mister Chambliss, and

2:02:09.720 --> 2:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad to know he's still as active as as

2:02:11.800 --> 2:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you described.

2:02:12.440 --> 2:02:15.480
<v Speaker 2>And he's recovered from the stroke he had several years

2:02:15.520 --> 2:02:17.320
<v Speaker 2>ago and he's just doing great.

2:02:18.520 --> 2:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Well. Martha, this was a pleasure, And I have no

2:02:20.960 --> 2:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>idea whether your listeners would want a home in a way, but.

2:02:23.040 --> 2:02:25.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, let me know I appreciate it very much.

2:02:25.720 --> 2:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>We'll have you on sometime, all.

2:02:27.280 --> 2:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, Martha, got you podcast time Machine time. So let

2:02:44.680 --> 2:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>me tell you. I'm not gonna lie to you. This

2:02:47.400 --> 2:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>was not the easiest week to decide what was worth

2:02:51.480 --> 2:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>your time doing a deep dive on And I say

2:02:54.080 --> 2:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you were time because that's how I try to look

2:02:55.520 --> 2:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>at these things. What is something that I think, what

2:02:59.280 --> 2:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>are a what's what's the topic that people, you know,

2:03:01.640 --> 2:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>they know they know something, but they don't really know

2:03:04.560 --> 2:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>as much about it as they probably should. And that's

2:03:08.280 --> 2:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of how I try to choose it right in

2:03:10.720 --> 2:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>those terms, which I won't go with the most obvious.

2:03:14.080 --> 2:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And this week, I mean, I'll be honest, there was

2:03:15.920 --> 2:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>just a ton of anniversaries that hit this week. In history,

2:03:21.440 --> 2:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, April nineteenth, seventeen seventy five, the battles of

2:03:24.600 --> 2:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Lexting and Concord, Right, that's that, you know, when protests

2:03:28.240 --> 2:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>becomes a revolution April fourteenth, eighteen sixty five, the assassination

2:03:32.600 --> 2:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of Abraham Lincoln April nineteenth, nineteen ninety five, the Oklahoma

2:03:36.200 --> 2:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>City bombing and domestic terrorism. And in culture April fifteenth,

2:03:41.520 --> 2:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty seven, Jackie Robinson steps onto a baseball field

2:03:44.560 --> 2:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Brooklyn Dodgors. April sixty, two thousand and three,

2:03:46.960 --> 2:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael Jordan steps off the court for the very last

2:03:50.040 --> 2:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>time as a Washington Wizard. Yeah, he probably forgot, that's right,

2:03:54.560 --> 2:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>he did play for the Washington Wizards. I've never forgotten it.

2:03:57.920 --> 2:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>And I have the basketball cards in pas say ten

2:04:00.440 --> 2:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>holders to prove it. Okay, but I define, but I

2:04:03.400 --> 2:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>diverge and look. And while all of those could easily

2:04:09.360 --> 2:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>be worth its own dime, dive and we could have

2:04:12.200 --> 2:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>tentacles of the impact the long term impacts of all

2:04:14.680 --> 2:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of them, it's a group of exiles on a beach

2:04:18.440 --> 2:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in Cuba that we're about to define the limits of

2:04:21.640 --> 2:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>American power that I want to focus on, because there's

2:04:25.080 --> 2:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>echoes here for the current situation in Iran and of

2:04:27.840 --> 2:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>course what could be coming next in Cuba. So let

2:04:32.840 --> 2:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>me start with that. So we're doing the Bay of

2:04:34.360 --> 2:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Pigs in case you're wondering, and it's the lung shadow

2:04:39.720 --> 2:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of this. Before we get to the invasion, we have

2:04:41.760 --> 2:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to start with something a bit uncomfortable. The United States

2:04:45.560 --> 2:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't just lose Cuba, it misread it. For years, the

2:04:48.440 --> 2:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>US backed a gentleman by the name of Flujencio Batista

2:04:53.440 --> 2:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>until he became indefensible. So when Fidel Castro takes power

2:04:57.880 --> 2:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen fifty nine, Washington doesn't immediately slam the door

2:05:01.280 --> 2:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and working with Castro. But it wasn't warm either. Castro

2:05:06.560 --> 2:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>comes and visits the United States, but Dwight Eisenhower refuses

2:05:10.400 --> 2:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to meet with him. He goes golfing and Richard Nixon

2:05:15.440 --> 2:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>meets with him instead the vice president, and it tells

2:05:18.720 --> 2:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you everything you need to know. This wasn't a clean break,

2:05:21.960 --> 2:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>but it also wasn't a real opening. By the time

2:05:25.000 --> 2:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Washington decides that Castro is a problem, the relationship is

2:05:29.240 --> 2:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>already slipping away. Now I have my own little interesting

2:05:33.280 --> 2:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>history here, a little bit. My grandfather I stumbled across

2:05:36.360 --> 2:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>some things he was building sugarcane help. He was an

2:05:40.960 --> 2:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>engineer on sugarcane plants that they were building in Cuba

2:05:44.200 --> 2:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>in the mid to late fifties. And one of the

2:05:47.520 --> 2:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>stories he says is he said he would be visited

2:05:50.360 --> 2:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>by Cia folks every once in a while to ask

2:05:53.360 --> 2:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>them about Castro because he was in the role part.

2:05:55.600 --> 2:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So he met Castro. And in order for Castro's rebels

2:05:59.040 --> 2:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to sort of leave your business this alone, if you

2:06:00.880 --> 2:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>agreed to just put a photo up in your sort

2:06:03.320 --> 2:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of trailer office, if you can think about those trailer

2:06:06.880 --> 2:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>offices that are parts of these you know sort of

2:06:10.920 --> 2:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, his factories are being built right and things

2:06:13.000 --> 2:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like that. And because I remember I found this eight

2:06:17.840 --> 2:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>by ten glossy of my grandfather while we were cleaning

2:06:20.720 --> 2:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>some stuff up. Fidel Castro was like, Grandpa, what's this

2:06:24.160 --> 2:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>And he said it was basically it was basically proof

2:06:27.960 --> 2:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that you that you paid to get left alone. But

2:06:32.560 --> 2:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that was the point he would make. He told me

2:06:35.040 --> 2:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that he would make to these CIA sort of whatever

2:06:38.200 --> 2:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to call them, officers, people that were just

2:06:40.280 --> 2:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to find out information, What could you tell us

2:06:42.080 --> 2:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>about Castro? And he'd say, Hey, it's not a good guy,

2:06:45.160 --> 2:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so be careful. But there was a real back and forth.

2:06:50.240 --> 2:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>How much should they be they were they were trying

2:06:52.320 --> 2:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to see it was it worth sort of wrapping their

2:06:55.560 --> 2:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>arms around Castro? And it was a constant back and

2:06:58.280 --> 2:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>forth at that time. But let's zoom out, okay, because

2:07:03.640 --> 2:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>none of this is happening in isolation. This is early

2:07:05.840 --> 2:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty one, when the Bay of Pigs itself happens.

2:07:10.400 --> 2:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a world that's still rattled by Spotnik and shaped

2:07:13.920 --> 2:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>by the fear of a missile gap that the new

2:07:16.000 --> 2:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>young president John Kennedy had run on. So Cold War

2:07:20.560 --> 2:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>tensions are super high, and just months after the Bay

2:07:25.640 --> 2:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of Pigs August nineteen sixty one, they'd be construction of

2:07:28.840 --> 2:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the actual Berlin Wall begins, right, So the Bay of

2:07:32.320 --> 2:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Pigs happens just before that sort of iron curtain becomes

2:07:37.360 --> 2:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>permanent for a period of time, Ambiguity fading sides hardening

2:07:41.880 --> 2:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in Cuba, ninety miles from Florida, is now part of

2:07:45.400 --> 2:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that global equation.

2:07:49.200 --> 2:07:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Now.

2:07:49.400 --> 2:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>One thing that people need to remember about the Bay

2:07:51.720 --> 2:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of Pigs invasion is that it wasn't a It wasn't

2:07:56.000 --> 2:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy's plan. This plan didn't begin with Kennedy. It begins

2:07:59.840 --> 2:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>with 'white Eisenhower in March of nineteen sixty he's still president,

2:08:04.320 --> 2:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and he directs the CIA to develop a plan to

2:08:06.480 --> 2:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>remove Castro. So by the time John F. Kennedy takes office,

2:08:10.800 --> 2:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>this is already a presidential approved operation and the CIA, well,

2:08:18.760 --> 2:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this isn't the CIA of today. This is the CIA event,

2:08:23.480 --> 2:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a much different CIA than we had now. It's coming

2:08:27.680 --> 2:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>off what appears to be a winning streak. In nineteen

2:08:30.760 --> 2:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty three Iranian coup, something that the time Machine tackled

2:08:34.360 --> 2:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago. Guatemala nineteen fifty four was a

2:08:38.000 --> 2:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>successful CIA inspired coup. Small operations, weak resistance, quick wins,

2:08:44.800 --> 2:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>so it created a bit of a trap. Success becomes

2:08:47.520 --> 2:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>confidence for the CIA. Confidence becomes assumption, and assumption becomes strategy.

2:08:53.120 --> 2:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>They think they've seen this before. Well they hadn't and

2:08:57.000 --> 2:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they were fighting the last war. Well, Kennedy walks in.

2:09:01.000 --> 2:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>He's the youngest elected president in American history at the time,

2:09:03.680 --> 2:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>forty three, so he's new, he's unproven, and he's under pressure.

2:09:09.000 --> 2:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>And this plan, it was already moving. The training camps

2:09:14.240 --> 2:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>were already happening, the exiles to participate were already recruited,

2:09:19.280 --> 2:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the logistics were in place. So the machinery is running.

2:09:22.880 --> 2:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So here's the problem Kennedy's facing. It's easier to approve

2:09:26.800 --> 2:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>something already in motion than to stop it. This is

2:09:30.760 --> 2:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>what happened to Barack Obama and Bush at the end

2:09:34.280 --> 2:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of his term, decided not to approve an increase in

2:09:37.040 --> 2:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>troops in Afghanistan and let it. Let it be a

2:09:39.360 --> 2:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>decision the new president makes. Well, he wasn't crazy about it,

2:09:43.880 --> 2:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but what was he going to do stop it? It

2:09:46.400 --> 2:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>was too early in his presidency to do that. So

2:09:48.280 --> 2:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>what does he do. He ends up adding more troops

2:09:50.560 --> 2:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to it. So this is how a previous president can

2:09:54.040 --> 2:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>somehow tie the hands of an incoming president. And we've

2:09:56.600 --> 2:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>seen it. This isn't the This is arguably one of

2:09:59.720 --> 2:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the earth first times that this happens that you see

2:10:02.800 --> 2:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it become a problem for that president. So it is

2:10:07.080 --> 2:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>easier to approve it, that's something that's already in motion,

2:10:10.080 --> 2:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>than to stop it. So he doesn't cancel it, but

2:10:12.240 --> 2:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>he does try to shape it. And this is where

2:10:14.400 --> 2:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>he makes a mistake. The plan depends on air superiority.

2:10:19.800 --> 2:10:23.839
<v Speaker 1>The CIA uses B twenty six bombers pointed to painted

2:10:23.920 --> 2:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to look like their Castro's plans. The cover story that

2:10:27.360 --> 2:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a mutiny, but the strikes on April fifteen miss

2:10:30.640 --> 2:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>some key targets, Castro's air force survives and the cover collapses.

2:10:35.880 --> 2:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>At the United Nations, Adelie Stevenson, the second defends the

2:10:39.160 --> 2:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>story that he doesn't know is false. When he learns

2:10:42.320 --> 2:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the truth, he's humiliated and he reportedly considered resigning. That's

2:10:48.960 --> 2:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the cost of plausible deniability. So now Kennedy has a choice,

2:10:53.240 --> 2:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>does he escalate or pull back? Well, he cancels the

2:10:57.040 --> 2:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>second air strike, and that's the moment the operation and dies. Now,

2:11:03.360 --> 2:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the entire plan rested on one assumption that the Cuban

2:11:06.360 --> 2:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>people were going to rise up. They don't because by

2:11:11.080 --> 2:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>then many of the opponents had already fled. The bombings

2:11:15.800 --> 2:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>ended up rallying support for Castro, and Castro moved fast.

2:11:21.320 --> 2:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>He arrests more than one hundred thousand suspected opponents, dissidence

2:11:26.200 --> 2:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>clergy journalists, CIA networks. He clamps down art. The invasion

2:11:31.520 --> 2:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't just fail to spark an uprising, it does almost

2:11:33.840 --> 2:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. It helps make one impossible. So April seventeenth,

2:11:41.160 --> 2:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Brigade twenty five oh six Lands includes fourteen hundred Cuban exiles.

2:11:47.400 --> 2:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>They believe they're going home at the Bay of Pigs.

2:11:51.200 --> 2:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Bahia de Cochinos was actually named not for pigs, but

2:11:55.920 --> 2:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>likely for a local fish kind of called a hogfish,

2:12:00.320 --> 2:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>got shorthanded the Bay of Picks. History gave it a

2:12:03.000 --> 2:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>better name right, the Bay of Hogfish. By the way,

2:12:07.360 --> 2:12:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the Bay of Pigs ended up giving me my favorite

2:12:09.880 --> 2:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>laugh line from the nineteen eighties. Being a Green Bay

2:12:11.920 --> 2:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Packer fan, the great late Pte Axe Thelm then, I

2:12:14.840 --> 2:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>write a sportswriter for Newsweek Previews. Back then when Tampa

2:12:19.520 --> 2:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Bay and Green Bay meant in football twice a year

2:12:21.880 --> 2:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>because they were both in the NFC Central, he started

2:12:25.000 --> 2:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>referring to the matchup as the Bay of Pigs. But

2:12:27.800 --> 2:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I digress, so now we're back in nineteen sixty one,

2:12:32.240 --> 2:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>within forty eight hours. By April nineteenth, the mission is over, defeated,

2:12:37.080 --> 2:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>exiles captured. And it wasn't because of cowardice. It was

2:12:39.880 --> 2:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>because the assumptions were wrong from the start. The aftershocks

2:12:45.440 --> 2:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we're still living with them. The consequences don't stop there.

2:12:48.480 --> 2:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The failure ends up strengthening Castro shapes. How Nikita Krushchev

2:12:52.120 --> 2:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>sees Kennedy, that perception carries forward a year later, Soviet

2:12:56.680 --> 2:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>missiles in Cuba they test the young president again. Most

2:13:00.280 --> 2:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>dangerous moment in the Cold War may not have ever happened,

2:13:02.880 --> 2:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cuban missile crisis, if not for the failure of

2:13:06.200 --> 2:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bay of Pigs invasion. So that was first evidence

2:13:10.480 --> 2:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that the Bay of Pigs didn't stay. In nineteen sixty one,

2:13:13.840 --> 2:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>more than eleven hundred members of Brigade twenty five oh

2:13:16.120 --> 2:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>six are captured. Eventually they're released in exchange for fifty

2:13:19.640 --> 2:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>three million dollars in food, in medicine. But the defining

2:13:22.960 --> 2:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>moment came after in Miami, before tens of thousands of

2:13:26.280 --> 2:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Cuban exiles, Kennedy receives the brigade's flag. He's not yet

2:13:31.160 --> 2:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not angry at Kennedy yet, and he makes a

2:13:33.400 --> 2:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>promise that it will be returned to a free Havana.

2:13:37.400 --> 2:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>It never has and that's when failure becomes memory. It

2:13:42.760 --> 2:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>got turned into a betrayal for Cuban exiles. This wasn't

2:13:45.640 --> 2:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>about just the United States. This is about John F. Kennedy,

2:13:48.680 --> 2:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the belief. He encouraged it, he launched it, and then

2:13:51.000 --> 2:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>he didn't follow through. That's the way the Cuban axile

2:13:53.880 --> 2:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>community saw it, and that became a political identity and

2:13:58.920 --> 2:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it would stain the Democrat in the eyes of Cuban

2:14:01.040 --> 2:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>exiles for a lifetime. Now, it didn't happen right away.

2:14:08.280 --> 2:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Cubans didn't automatically become Republican right away. It took time.

2:14:11.320 --> 2:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>In the sixties, the Cuban American voters were still split.

2:14:14.360 --> 2:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>The memories there, but it's not yet partisan. That changes.

2:14:17.920 --> 2:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen eighty Ronald Reagan wins roughly eighty percent of

2:14:21.160 --> 2:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cuban American vote. He ends up carrying Florida decisively

2:14:24.440 --> 2:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>as state Jimmy Carter carried in seventy six. He activates

2:14:27.600 --> 2:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the identity and from that point on, Florida becomes something different,

2:14:30.560 --> 2:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>not just a southern state, but a Cold War state

2:14:34.000 --> 2:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>shaped by exile, anti communism and memory. And that framework

2:14:37.880 --> 2:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>expands and later with the waves of immigrants from Venezuela, Nicaragua,

2:14:43.640 --> 2:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>plug into really the same political model. And if you

2:14:47.720 --> 2:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>want to see the impact, there's probably no better campaign

2:14:51.640 --> 2:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>here than the year two thousand. Florida's decided by five

2:14:55.040 --> 2:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty seven votes, a state shaped in part

2:14:57.800 --> 2:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>by the identity born in nineteen sixty one. So when

2:15:04.120 --> 2:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you think about this week in history, you think about revolutions, assassinations,

2:15:08.000 --> 2:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>cultural breakthroughs. Right, the revolutions we just talked about, the

2:15:12.560 --> 2:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>assassinations Lincoln, the cultural breakthroughs Jackie Robinson, it was moments

2:15:19.280 --> 2:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>where individuals redefine what's possible. With the Bay of Pigs,

2:15:22.680 --> 2:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it's where a group of exiles revealed the limits of

2:15:24.840 --> 2:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>something else, American power and the power of political memory.

2:15:29.280 --> 2:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Because every time a candidate steps onto a stage in

2:15:31.600 --> 2:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Miami today, they're not just campaigning, they're still walking in

2:15:35.560 --> 2:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the shadow of that beach, the Cochinas, the Bay of Pigs.

2:15:47.960 --> 2:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Ass chuck. All right, it's some ass chuck time, So

2:15:53.760 --> 2:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>let's dig in. First, one comes from David S. Colchester, Connecticut,

2:15:57.320 --> 2:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and he writes, Dear Chuck, thanks for the podcast when

2:15:59.280 --> 2:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>news breaks Part two often these days, I appreciate your

2:16:02.000 --> 2:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>reasoned perspective. Well, thank you. My question is, when a

2:16:04.160 --> 2:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>US president can launch massive military actions that deplete our

2:16:07.480 --> 2:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>arsenal and potentially leaving our military vulnerable, will Congress realistically

2:16:11.000 --> 2:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>vote to prevent rebuilding? If not, is the power of

2:16:13.640 --> 2:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the purse still a viable check on the executive branch.

2:16:16.600 --> 2:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's a fair question, David, because I know

2:16:18.760 --> 2:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>if I were a member of Congress and I didn't

2:16:21.160 --> 2:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>approve of this war, I probably would feel uncomfortable not

2:16:24.960 --> 2:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>replenishing the stockpiles in the Pentagon. And so you're absolutely

2:16:30.680 --> 2:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>right to sort of, you know, I would, you know,

2:16:34.160 --> 2:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to think i'd be a rational member. And

2:16:38.040 --> 2:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is it is. This is I think

2:16:42.080 --> 2:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the the difficulty in using your vote in Congress as

2:16:46.320 --> 2:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a protest Bihle and it and it it is a

2:16:52.080 --> 2:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>way that sometimes presidents know how to jam Congress with this.

2:17:00.760 --> 2:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But this is a fair I think this is a

2:17:03.920 --> 2:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>fair observation. There are no This proves to you there's

2:17:07.600 --> 2:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>no good options left on this right at number one,

2:17:11.400 --> 2:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you just you got to you gotta win the argument

2:17:14.520 --> 2:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>at the ballot box. Number two, You've got to figure

2:17:19.240 --> 2:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>out how to I think that it's clear that even

2:17:24.440 --> 2:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the war powers act as it stands, we're still got

2:17:29.000 --> 2:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>questions of whether it's constitutional or not because it's really

2:17:31.640 --> 2:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>not been fully litigated. That even that gives too much

2:17:38.800 --> 2:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>leeway and takes away so much of Congress's authority when

2:17:44.680 --> 2:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes to who makes war, and this you know

2:17:52.680 --> 2:17:56.959
<v Speaker 1>when I don't. What I don't understand is why there's

2:17:57.000 --> 2:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>not even further attempts to restrict I mean, it goes

2:18:01.879 --> 2:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>back to why did the founder You know, if you

2:18:04.320 --> 2:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>care about founders intent, and there's a lot of my

2:18:06.440 --> 2:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>friends on the right care about founders intent, well, the

2:18:09.400 --> 2:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>founders never you know, the whole point of this is

2:18:12.080 --> 2:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want you know, they all had memories of

2:18:15.320 --> 2:18:20.199
<v Speaker 1>what these monarchs in Europe did. Remember how I view monarchs.

2:18:20.200 --> 2:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>They're just dictators with a nicer name. But they made

2:18:24.920 --> 2:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>They would decide willy nilly when to go to war,

2:18:27.760 --> 2:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and they would never send their own folks to war.

2:18:29.600 --> 2:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>They would send the their populations to war, and you'd

2:18:33.280 --> 2:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>have to fight on behalf of some treaty that the

2:18:36.320 --> 2:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>king or your queen signed with another king or queen,

2:18:39.560 --> 2:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that treaty had to do with marriage, and

2:18:41.680 --> 2:18:43.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe that treaty had nothing to do with anything other

2:18:44.040 --> 2:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>than that, and you would end up going to war

2:18:46.879 --> 2:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>because you had ties to the right family or wrong family,

2:18:49.959 --> 2:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>depending on the given time. The point is is that

2:18:52.480 --> 2:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the founders did not want an American president to be

2:18:55.400 --> 2:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>able to do the same thing, and yet in theory

2:18:58.360 --> 2:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what we already have. So I think there needs

2:19:02.600 --> 2:19:05.199
<v Speaker 1>to be better clarification here, and that the War Powers

2:19:05.320 --> 2:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Act doesn't do it in sixty days is probably too much.

2:19:10.360 --> 2:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>It probably needs to be I think a commander in

2:19:13.520 --> 2:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>chief needs to be able to respond in defense of

2:19:15.720 --> 2:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Hard stop was a run at all

2:19:20.720 --> 2:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in defense of the in the immediate needs to defend

2:19:24.320 --> 2:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States and the immediate It's hard to come

2:19:27.560 --> 2:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>up with evidence that it is. But look, you point

2:19:32.200 --> 2:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>out a real gap here in that, Yes, Congress is

2:19:36.360 --> 2:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the power of the purse, but basically they would have

2:19:39.120 --> 2:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to they're cutting off their nose despite their faces. Essentially

2:19:43.560 --> 2:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>what you're pointing out if they decide not to replenish

2:19:46.280 --> 2:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>our stockpiles, because then We're suddenly more vulnerable and that's

2:19:49.440 --> 2:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>also bad. Thanks for the lose lose question there, David.

2:19:54.160 --> 2:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>But it's an important thing you pointed out, and I'm

2:19:56.920 --> 2:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>sorry I didn't sooner, so thank you. Zach has an

2:19:59.800 --> 2:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>next question. He writes, Hey, Chuck, the Zach from Cleveland,

2:20:02.280 --> 2:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>your resident Buckeye. I have a lot of people who

2:20:06.040 --> 2:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>want to claim resident Buckeye Zach, just so you know,

2:20:09.680 --> 2:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but I'll let you be a resident buck Eye. I'm

2:20:14.320 --> 2:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to be like my buddy TK. You know,

2:20:17.959 --> 2:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to come up with very specific title names

2:20:21.040 --> 2:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to be the to be the resident. Maybe you're the

2:20:22.920 --> 2:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>resident buck Eye from Cleveland. Names act anyway, But I digress.

2:20:28.040 --> 2:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>You believe this is your fourth time getting a question

2:20:31.040 --> 2:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>on the show, and if so, congratulations. We will start looking.

2:20:35.959 --> 2:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>We gotta we gotta find some merch We're gonna start

2:20:39.480 --> 2:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>working on that. But he said, just a quick one

2:20:42.920 --> 2:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>here for you. Why is the market not really reacting

2:20:45.120 --> 2:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to this war? I keep hearing it's probably the worst

2:20:46.840 --> 2:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>ever oil crisis, or it will be, but I thought

2:20:49.280 --> 2:20:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the markets would fare worse, even though gas is four

2:20:51.440 --> 2:20:54.039
<v Speaker 1>dollars is because of market manipulations. Axtra starting a correct

2:20:54.080 --> 2:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>or is it just too early to tell go guards?

2:21:01.080 --> 2:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that the accepted sort of shortening of the Guardians?

2:21:06.040 --> 2:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm I still struggle. I still say the

2:21:09.800 --> 2:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>eye word every once in a while. Guards. I think

2:21:14.520 --> 2:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we all agree Guardians, the fact that they're named after

2:21:19.280 --> 2:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>bridge statues guarding traffic. I don't know's. I know it's

2:21:24.560 --> 2:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>harder and harder to copyright nicknames than ever. I mean,

2:21:28.000 --> 2:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>trust me, I went through the process with my with

2:21:29.959 --> 2:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>GW and the Revolutionaries, not exactly, I mean, go revs.

2:21:34.440 --> 2:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>We like that it's a little close to REVS. I

2:21:36.560 --> 2:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if everybody loves that, but you know, it's

2:21:40.680 --> 2:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it could have been worse, and I guess that's probably

2:21:43.320 --> 2:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the way to look at the Guardians. It could have

2:21:44.840 --> 2:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>been worse. Let me do it with the question yourself,

2:21:48.240 --> 2:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>because I'd like to think I dealt with a little

2:21:49.760 --> 2:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of monologue. I I think that there's I think

2:21:53.400 --> 2:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit of of AI. There's still a

2:21:56.520 --> 2:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of an the AI bubble that sort of kept

2:21:58.440 --> 2:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>things up. It does take longer for the oil shocks

2:22:03.280 --> 2:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to break through because a lot more countries have been

2:22:05.840 --> 2:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>smarter about keeping a stockpile and things like that, and

2:22:09.000 --> 2:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>there's still some diversification and energy. But I do think, well,

2:22:16.000 --> 2:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the market can make every predictor look like

2:22:19.040 --> 2:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>an idiot. And I'm taping this before the market's open

2:22:22.320 --> 2:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>this morning. You may be listening to it after the markets,

2:22:25.560 --> 2:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>but I have a feeling this is the week that

2:22:27.400 --> 2:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>we start to see the to see the real negative

2:22:30.560 --> 2:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>impact start to start to hit. And then you know

2:22:33.760 --> 2:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get You'll start to get the next

2:22:35.920 --> 2:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, that next round of quarterly earnings reports that come,

2:22:40.440 --> 2:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that'll that'll be coming, you know, May and June and

2:22:42.959 --> 2:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>all of that. That's you know, that's where you'll start

2:22:45.840 --> 2:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to see. I mean that Michigan consumer confidence number lowest

2:22:49.240 --> 2:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>ever essentially since they started taking it. It's coming. I

2:22:53.720 --> 2:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>hate the you know, so just don't don't get rid

2:23:00.720 --> 2:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of the sandbags. You know, you may think that you know,

2:23:05.800 --> 2:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you've been told to prepare for a category five storm.

2:23:07.959 --> 2:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh the storm. Maybe it's not coming. Don't take down

2:23:11.400 --> 2:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the sand bags, don't take off the ply one. Next

2:23:15.840 --> 2:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>question comes from John and mil Milwaukee. Hey, you said,

2:23:18.280 --> 2:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Democrats responding to Republican redistaputing with similar tactics may not

2:23:21.160 --> 2:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>be the right approach, But is there an argument for

2:23:23.040 --> 2:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>using every available tool while they still have the power

2:23:25.120 --> 2:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to do so? More broadly, as political norms continue to

2:23:27.600 --> 2:23:29.440
<v Speaker 1>be tested, do you think Congress will step in to

2:23:29.520 --> 2:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>assert its role as a check or are we moving

2:23:31.280 --> 2:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>into a period where those guardrails are even weaker For contexts,

2:23:34.200 --> 2:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not coming at this from the far left. I

2:23:35.760 --> 2:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>vote a Republican from seventy six to eight. Just trying

2:23:38.320 --> 2:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to understand where things stand. John and Milwaukee. Well, can

2:23:41.680 --> 2:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I go back to another point in the redistricting thing.

2:23:46.240 --> 2:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that you have a better mandate if you win,

2:23:53.920 --> 2:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>if you win space with fair maps, if you have

2:24:00.360 --> 2:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to rig the maps to get control of Congress, is

2:24:02.640 --> 2:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it going to be a majority? That is take that

2:24:05.480 --> 2:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>that is that has I mean, I think it has

2:24:12.000 --> 2:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>legitimacy in the eyes of the public. That's what I

2:24:15.000 --> 2:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>would fear, and that should be a fear. And I

2:24:18.040 --> 2:24:26.039
<v Speaker 1>go back, Look, I get I'm specifically I specifically focus

2:24:26.120 --> 2:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>on this Virginia thing, obviously because I live here. But

2:24:28.879 --> 2:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a lot of it's a lot of effort,

2:24:33.480 --> 2:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of political capital being spent for two districts,

2:24:37.240 --> 2:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and if two districts are the difference between winning power

2:24:39.600 --> 2:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and losing power. You're not going to have it is

2:24:41.560 --> 2:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>literally control and name only, so you know it's it's

2:24:46.840 --> 2:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a It's one of those things that I just think

2:24:56.520 --> 2:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking to rep do you want to be

2:24:58.800 --> 2:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the party that can repair things are not? And if

2:25:02.000 --> 2:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you're also if it's all reactionary, I just I don't

2:25:06.600 --> 2:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>think the public is going to fully embrace that either.

2:25:14.600 --> 2:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I understand you got to look it's I think the

2:25:19.000 --> 2:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>real lesson here is use power better when you have

2:25:21.160 --> 2:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it right. And Democrats have watched it the last couple

2:25:25.720 --> 2:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of times they've had it. I can't botch it this

2:25:27.840 --> 2:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>next time when they have when they get all three

2:25:35.879 --> 2:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>or it's just impossible to ever succeed when you have

2:25:38.440 --> 2:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>all three. It's not like any party can hold it

2:25:42.160 --> 2:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>for more than two years. The question is what do

2:25:44.760 --> 2:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you get done into you turn the corner? And I

2:25:49.240 --> 2:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>think sometimes we look at and I think it's fair.

2:25:52.480 --> 2:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I think some some on the left look at the

2:25:54.560 --> 2:25:57.360
<v Speaker 1>election of Trump and sixteen and think, well, it turns

2:25:57.360 --> 2:25:59.440
<v Speaker 1>out Obama should have done more, should have pushed harder.

2:25:59.440 --> 2:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't have if Trump was coming anyway, what would

2:26:02.120 --> 2:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you have done if you knew that? Right? So I

2:26:05.959 --> 2:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>guess that that's going to be that's going to be

2:26:07.920 --> 2:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the arguments. But as for Congress, I think

2:26:11.920 --> 2:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a I think that's a guardrail. I think it's

2:26:15.800 --> 2:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>so weak that it can't get weaker that I do

2:26:18.200 --> 2:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to have more and more members of

2:26:20.200 --> 2:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Congress getting elected hoping to stop imperial presidencies. Maybe I'm

2:26:25.080 --> 2:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm being Pollyannish here, but I you know.

2:26:30.280 --> 2:26:30.600
<v Speaker 2>It is.

2:26:32.120 --> 2:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>We have we have when you go through as many,

2:26:34.879 --> 2:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the more one term presidents we have, the more we're

2:26:37.080 --> 2:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>going to look to strengthen the other elected institution, the

2:26:40.040 --> 2:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>legislative branch. So I think that even though the presidency

2:26:45.520 --> 2:26:48.360
<v Speaker 1>keeps getting strengthened, one term presidencies or a sign of

2:26:48.440 --> 2:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>weakness of the president. So in theory, Congress should have

2:26:51.400 --> 2:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>should be able to accumulate its power back. But I

2:26:55.720 --> 2:26:57.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have a good I'm going to answer for you,

2:26:57.480 --> 2:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>because I get it you have one side that's willing

2:26:59.480 --> 2:27:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to cheat. I just don't think and break norms and

2:27:02.520 --> 2:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>rules and all those things. And I just you know,

2:27:06.160 --> 2:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe that that the elections that the Democrats have

2:27:09.160 --> 2:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>succeeded in are because they've made the case to this

2:27:12.600 --> 2:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>group of voters in the middle. They're not in the

2:27:14.560 --> 2:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>middle because of they're ideologically. They're in the middle because

2:27:17.480 --> 2:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>they should. They don't expect to get one hundred percent

2:27:20.560 --> 2:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of of everything. They understand that this is essentially a

2:27:24.959 --> 2:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>compromise system, and they don't like the hardcore partisanship, and

2:27:29.520 --> 2:27:33.199
<v Speaker 1>they keep voting against any party that behaves too partisanally.

2:27:34.560 --> 2:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>And there's a difference between partisanship and ideology, right you

2:27:39.840 --> 2:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Bertie Sanders is a good example of this.

2:27:42.560 --> 2:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>He's super progressive, but he wasn't so progressive that he

2:27:45.720 --> 2:27:49.119
<v Speaker 1>said no to the to basically the Mitt Romney Obama

2:27:49.280 --> 2:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>version of how you do healthcare. He doesn't believe in it,

2:27:52.720 --> 2:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't think it's good, but he didn't let the

2:27:55.640 --> 2:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>enemy the perfect be the enemy of an improvement, and

2:27:59.320 --> 2:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>that was what our fact. Look, you can come from

2:28:02.120 --> 2:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>far left to far right, but if you incrementally feel

2:28:06.800 --> 2:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>as if you're making incremental progress, do you just stand

2:28:09.040 --> 2:28:12.360
<v Speaker 1>on ceremony or do you try to help the majority function?

2:28:14.280 --> 2:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's I think that's Democrats have had

2:28:18.840 --> 2:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>more success winning over that voter because the Republicans have

2:28:23.560 --> 2:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>been behaving so parsonally, and when Democrats start behaving the

2:28:26.240 --> 2:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>same way as they did during the first two years

2:28:30.800 --> 2:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of Biden's presidency, it's why there was such a revolt

2:28:34.720 --> 2:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>by the same group of voters the other way. It's

2:28:37.840 --> 2:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>not that they liked the policies of the right, they

2:28:39.760 --> 2:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't like the hardcore partisanship on either side. Next one

2:28:46.280 --> 2:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>comes from Jane New York. He says, check love your

2:28:48.400 --> 2:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>weekly top five list, especially when you revisit the year's

2:28:50.680 --> 2:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>most flippable Senate races. But I'm beginning to wonder whether

2:28:53.360 --> 2:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the top five might soon be sentenced. Tone I am too,

2:28:56.600 --> 2:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and am therefore more curious about the races that would

2:28:58.720 --> 2:29:01.199
<v Speaker 1>make up slots six through ten. I like where you're thinking,

2:29:02.720 --> 2:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and let's just say this is an idea that I

2:29:05.000 --> 2:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>might put into practice sooner than I realized. Anyway, if

2:29:07.560 --> 2:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you were going to compile a six through ten list today,

2:29:09.959 --> 2:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>would you be more inclined to include Democratic health seats

2:29:12.280 --> 2:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>like Georgia, New Hampshire and Michigan, Or might you be

2:29:14.640 --> 2:29:17.279
<v Speaker 1>more inclined to include Republican health seats like Texas, Iowa,

2:29:17.320 --> 2:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and Florida. My opinion six or ten is where we

2:29:19.560 --> 2:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>will have see the Senate mapp changing the most in

2:29:21.879 --> 2:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>real time. That's an excellent observation, and I think you're

2:29:27.959 --> 2:29:30.879
<v Speaker 1>right right. I think right now both Georgia and New

2:29:30.920 --> 2:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Hampshire they're not in the in, you know, and there's

2:29:36.520 --> 2:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>no way I would have them outside the top ten.

2:29:39.480 --> 2:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a If you know a race is going

2:29:41.160 --> 2:29:43.279
<v Speaker 1>to be decided by less than ten points, it's probably

2:29:43.360 --> 2:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten, right And when I start thinking

2:29:45.080 --> 2:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>about the less than ten point center races, you know,

2:29:53.200 --> 2:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I'm not one hundred percent sure North

2:29:55.280 --> 2:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Carolina stay single digits anymore. I think Cooper's got that

2:29:59.080 --> 2:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>big of the lead. Look Whatley will spend money and

2:30:02.520 --> 2:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>one will assume the partisan stuff. But if this war

2:30:04.959 --> 2:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>keeps going as badly as it does, I could easily

2:30:09.240 --> 2:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>see a Bob Casey like, not quite the Bob Casey

2:30:12.760 --> 2:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>size of victory over rick a citting senator in Rix

2:30:15.360 --> 2:30:18.279
<v Speaker 1>s Aintrum, but I could I could see a fifty

2:30:18.360 --> 2:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>six forty four race there. But going down the rest

2:30:22.600 --> 2:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate map sort of in order right now

2:30:24.840 --> 2:30:26.959
<v Speaker 1>where my head is at right, the next one that's

2:30:27.000 --> 2:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>most likely to flip would be main right, that's too.

2:30:30.080 --> 2:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>The next one for me is probably Ohio. Now that's three.

2:30:33.640 --> 2:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>The next one after that I would go ahead and

2:30:35.120 --> 2:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>put Alaska at four, and then you know, right then

2:30:39.400 --> 2:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you then you sit there is at Michigan because the

2:30:41.720 --> 2:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Democratic primary is still so unstable or is it Texas

2:30:45.160 --> 2:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>or the Republican primary is still unstable? Right, you know,

2:30:48.000 --> 2:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I would say if corn and wins, I put Michigan there.

2:30:51.560 --> 2:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>If but if Si ed else, I'll do all sied wins,

2:30:56.080 --> 2:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>then I might put Michigan there too, right, so you

2:30:59.400 --> 2:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>have that. I'm not I don't think Miss I am

2:31:03.920 --> 2:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>surprised at how little national the Washington Republicans are viewing,

2:31:10.240 --> 2:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>how little they're They're spending more time in New Hampshire

2:31:13.480 --> 2:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>than they are Minnesota, and I think that's just a mistake.

2:31:16.120 --> 2:31:17.879
<v Speaker 1>I think they have a better shot at flipping Minnesota

2:31:17.920 --> 2:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>than do New Hampshire. I think Pappas, I think, especially

2:31:22.200 --> 2:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>if a more progressive lieutenant governor who you know, the

2:31:26.160 --> 2:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>lieutenant governor, the Tim Walls, who's not very popular in

2:31:29.080 --> 2:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota right now, and that's who Peggy Flann again, maybe

2:31:32.480 --> 2:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Michelle Tafoya, Peggy Flanagan. I think Republicans are

2:31:36.160 --> 2:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a better shot oft Tafoya upsetting flannagain than so New

2:31:39.280 --> 2:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>New upsetting Pappas. But I get that New Hampshire on

2:31:47.560 --> 2:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a partisan scale looks slightly more, you know, has a

2:31:53.040 --> 2:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>higher floor for Republicans and Minnesota does. But either way,

2:31:57.879 --> 2:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I expect those to be single digit races. So they

2:32:00.040 --> 2:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>sit out there, you know, I do think Minnesota is

2:32:02.320 --> 2:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the sort of in any other year would probably be

2:32:06.080 --> 2:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>getting a little more attention. But I am I am surprised,

2:32:09.440 --> 2:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and clovers are will probably guarantees that that she'll carry

2:32:12.160 --> 2:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody over the finish line on the DEMB side. And

2:32:15.320 --> 2:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>then may be why they look and would rather have

2:32:17.959 --> 2:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire because you have a Republican incumbent that's likely

2:32:20.440 --> 2:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to win reelection in Kelly a Ya. Who remember in

2:32:23.280 --> 2:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire they run every two years and she'll be

2:32:25.480 --> 2:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the top of the ticket. But you start looking around, right,

2:32:30.160 --> 2:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Iowa looks like it's gonna be a single digit race.

2:32:33.240 --> 2:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey what about Eugene Vinman down in Florida? Right, He's

2:32:37.720 --> 2:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>raised a ton of money. I'm a bit skeptical, but

2:32:42.879 --> 2:32:44.959
<v Speaker 1>could I see it become a single digit race?

2:32:45.000 --> 2:32:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I could.

2:32:48.800 --> 2:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>There's Nebraska, which looks like it's definitely I think it's

2:32:52.040 --> 2:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>more likely to be five points or less no matter

2:32:53.879 --> 2:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>what they're so, and we haven't gotten to Kansas. We

2:32:57.200 --> 2:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen that race mature yet. There's Montana. So to

2:33:02.920 --> 2:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of get at the heart of your question, you

2:33:05.200 --> 2:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>have made six through ten. That's a lot of fun

2:33:10.680 --> 2:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna have to really sort of I can't

2:33:13.440 --> 2:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>just spitball it because I sit here and you're like, well,

2:33:15.560 --> 2:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we got and some of this is still undeveloped, right,

2:33:18.400 --> 2:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to see where it can. I still feel

2:33:20.160 --> 2:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>like we're not done yet with Kansas, so we get there.

2:33:23.680 --> 2:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>But what a great idea and look for it, you know,

2:33:28.240 --> 2:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of how do we say that? And for this

2:33:31.160 --> 2:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>week's top five, it's the next five? I don't know,

2:33:34.640 --> 2:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Lauren and I will work on that, coming up with

2:33:36.800 --> 2:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>something for that. But it's a good idea. Next question

2:33:39.400 --> 2:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>comes from Troy says, here's my idea for the NBA.

2:33:41.520 --> 2:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Eliminate conferences and divisions, move to a shorter home and

2:33:44.320 --> 2:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>away schedule, Take the top sixteen teams for the playoffs,

2:33:47.000 --> 2:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>regardless of vocation. To make up for fewer games at

2:33:49.959 --> 2:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a preseason, single elimination tournament with semifinals on Christmas to

2:33:53.000 --> 2:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>drive fan interest in revenue. It could also create multiple

2:33:55.600 --> 2:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>championship opportunities each season, tournament, regular season or playoffs. Troy,

2:33:59.360 --> 2:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like the Champions League a little bit in

2:34:02.480 --> 2:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Europe and all the various European leagues. Look, this is

2:34:05.640 --> 2:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>an I don't I like what you're what you're thinking.

2:34:10.280 --> 2:34:13.760
<v Speaker 1>The reason, you know, this biggest impediment in his owners

2:34:13.840 --> 2:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>make owners get to pocket the money that takes place

2:34:17.560 --> 2:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in their arenas. So taking away opportunities in their own

2:34:20.680 --> 2:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>arenas is just not on the table. So we all

2:34:23.200 --> 2:34:25.240
<v Speaker 1>know they probably should shrink the regular season schedule, but

2:34:25.280 --> 2:34:29.119
<v Speaker 1>they won't. And you know, you're right to find other

2:34:29.160 --> 2:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>ways to replace it. Is it tournaments? Maybe that doesn't.

2:34:32.400 --> 2:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I was thinking about something else about

2:34:34.560 --> 2:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the NBA, and I was wondering. You know, I was

2:34:39.600 --> 2:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>watching John Rahm play at the Masters, and I was like,

2:34:45.840 --> 2:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have a chance. But you know, every everything

2:34:50.480 --> 2:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>he moves up right, there's other things you play for

2:34:52.680 --> 2:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Masters. If you win, you get into the

2:34:54.800 --> 2:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>certain I think if it's if you're in the top twenty,

2:34:57.560 --> 2:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you automatically get an invite the next year. I think

2:35:01.120 --> 2:35:05.280
<v Speaker 1>then there's certainly you get there's different financial rewards depending

2:35:05.320 --> 2:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>on the place you finish, and so it got me thinking,

2:35:08.160 --> 2:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is there a way to create a financial reward for

2:35:10.600 --> 2:35:16.119
<v Speaker 1>players based on their regular season? You know that that essentially,

2:35:16.320 --> 2:35:19.240
<v Speaker 1>just like with golf, if you finish thirty fifth, you

2:35:19.320 --> 2:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>make more money than if you finish thirty six. So there's,

2:35:21.920 --> 2:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in theory, an incentive to keep playing hard. So if

2:35:26.680 --> 2:35:29.280
<v Speaker 1>there is more money on the table, more bonus money,

2:35:29.360 --> 2:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>more this money, more that money. Maybe it's maybe it's

2:35:32.200 --> 2:35:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the playoff TV revenue that players get, you know, maybe

2:35:35.760 --> 2:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a pool of it that all players get to

2:35:39.320 --> 2:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>get some of it depending on where their team finishes

2:35:44.920 --> 2:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in the overall standings of the league. But for if

2:35:50.000 --> 2:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you if you you know right now, it's the franchises

2:35:52.720 --> 2:35:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that I've on the incentive and the players have no

2:35:54.440 --> 2:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>skin in the game, right if they're you know, the

2:35:57.080 --> 2:36:00.360
<v Speaker 1>players play hard, I've I don't. I don't sit here

2:36:00.360 --> 2:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and say the players aren't playing hard. They all are

2:36:02.000 --> 2:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>playing hard. It is the coaches being ordered by the

2:36:05.240 --> 2:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>GMS and the and the and the team presidents to

2:36:08.160 --> 2:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>not play certain players to keep them out, you know,

2:36:11.240 --> 2:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to bench them in the fourth quarter. Players would fight

2:36:15.680 --> 2:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and push back harder if there were financial penalties for

2:36:18.959 --> 2:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>losing a more likely to lose a game. So you know,

2:36:23.000 --> 2:36:26.440
<v Speaker 1>is there something to borrow from golf that keeps people

2:36:26.560 --> 2:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>playing competitively even when they have no shot at winning

2:36:29.520 --> 2:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the tournament. Just something to think about. But look, there's

2:36:34.120 --> 2:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a million ideas to fix this. Hey, Adam Silver, just

2:36:36.640 --> 2:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>pick one and do it. Thank you, buddy. Last question,

2:36:42.959 --> 2:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I love this. I'm going to call you John from

2:36:45.000 --> 2:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati because of the damn HBO show. I'm sure you

2:36:48.680 --> 2:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>don't like that. Maybe you do. Let me know. By

2:36:51.480 --> 2:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the way, I'm still waiting for I didn't get my lyrics.

2:36:58.400 --> 2:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>We didn't start the fire lyrics. One of you still

2:37:00.200 --> 2:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>ows me we didn't. You're updated, we didn't start the

2:37:02.200 --> 2:37:05.879
<v Speaker 1>fire lyrics. And I await that, and so many people

2:37:05.920 --> 2:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>await that because they would like me to carry ok it.

2:37:08.000 --> 2:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, last question, John from Cincinnati, and he writes,

2:37:12.080 --> 2:37:14.119
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard of a single report of President Trump

2:37:14.200 --> 2:37:16.800
<v Speaker 1>going to Camp David in his second term. Does anyone

2:37:16.920 --> 2:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>use it? Since he doesn't isn't loaned out of political donors?

2:37:20.040 --> 2:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Or possibly misused. I was never a big fan of

2:37:22.200 --> 2:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the Lincoln Bedroom being used that way by presidents of

2:37:24.280 --> 2:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>any party. I've been listening to your show for about

2:37:26.080 --> 2:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>three months and really enjoy it. Thanks and go Buck

2:37:28.160 --> 2:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Guys and Reds John in Cincinnati. That's a good question.

2:37:32.879 --> 2:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, Look, we know why Trump didn't like it,

2:37:35.840 --> 2:37:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and he likes the golf right, and he likes his

2:37:40.280 --> 2:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>set up any and he's actually not an introvert like

2:37:43.320 --> 2:37:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Camp David is for the presidents. You know, he's one

2:37:46.840 --> 2:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of the few people, you know, most celebrities I've ever

2:37:49.760 --> 2:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>gotten to know, the last thing they want to do

2:37:52.280 --> 2:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is to be in public. That's not Donald Trump. He

2:37:56.240 --> 2:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>loves to be around people. I've got my own theories.

2:38:01.640 --> 2:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have a lot of personal friends, so there's

2:38:04.040 --> 2:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>not really a group of people he wants to hang

2:38:05.680 --> 2:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>out with. He doesn't have and if you don't have

2:38:08.080 --> 2:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>close friendships, a retreat like Camp David doesn't work for you, right.

2:38:12.680 --> 2:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, it's so funny about it, presidents.

2:38:18.600 --> 2:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>It's probably a good thing for a president to have,

2:38:21.879 --> 2:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>but it is. I think what's made it less popular

2:38:26.040 --> 2:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>with some presidents is the lack of a golf course

2:38:28.160 --> 2:38:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to be fully transparent, like Obama just would go to

2:38:33.240 --> 2:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>golf every weekend and Andrew's and then go back to

2:38:36.560 --> 2:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the White House. He's used Camp David a little, but

2:38:40.160 --> 2:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>he didn't love it per se either. Look, it's on

2:38:43.200 --> 2:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>my bucket list of things that I've never gotten to

2:38:45.600 --> 2:38:47.640
<v Speaker 1>see that I'd still like to see. So if there's

2:38:47.640 --> 2:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>any president that would have liked to invite me to

2:38:49.680 --> 2:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>use Camp David, here's my pledge to you. If I

2:38:52.959 --> 2:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>ever get access to Camp David, John, I will try

2:38:56.600 --> 2:38:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to get you there and invite you as well as

2:38:59.400 --> 2:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>my plus one if that's possible. Don't tell missus Todd Night,

2:39:03.640 --> 2:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>but we've got to get some other people in here.

2:39:06.240 --> 2:39:10.440
<v Speaker 1>It is one of these like I've heard stories, I've

2:39:10.760 --> 2:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>had people tell me what it's like, right, but it

2:39:12.800 --> 2:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is one of the few things we've seen no pictures of.

2:39:17.240 --> 2:39:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps those that run Camp David that don't want

2:39:19.360 --> 2:39:21.280
<v Speaker 1>people to know what it looks like, or glad Trump

2:39:21.320 --> 2:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hasn't come because of the more Trump goes, the more

2:39:25.640 --> 2:39:28.520
<v Speaker 1>likely it will come out. So you're right, I'm sure

2:39:28.560 --> 2:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>there are people using it that we don't know about.

2:39:32.959 --> 2:39:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But on the list of outrages to cover. It's probably

2:39:36.520 --> 2:39:39.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty seventh or fifty eighth on the list these days.

2:39:40.200 --> 2:39:44.199
<v Speaker 1>All right, with that, we're going to take my forty

2:39:44.200 --> 2:39:47.760
<v Speaker 1>eight hour break. Unless you know, news happens and we

2:39:47.879 --> 2:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>insert something in there. I always reserve the right to

2:39:50.240 --> 2:39:52.480
<v Speaker 1>see you on YouTube. I had a few things that

2:39:52.560 --> 2:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I did over the weekend that I want to tell

2:39:54.160 --> 2:39:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you more about, and I'm going to save it for

2:39:55.520 --> 2:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday's episode, including fascinating debate that I'm moderated between Chris

2:40:00.280 --> 2:40:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Christy and David French about sports gambling. We actually came

2:40:04.400 --> 2:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>up with a potential compromise. I will share with it

2:40:07.040 --> 2:40:08.959
<v Speaker 1>with you on Wednesday. If you want to go take

2:40:08.959 --> 2:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a look at the debate, it's on YouTube under the

2:40:11.480 --> 2:40:14.440
<v Speaker 1>University of Chicago. They hosted it and sponsored it. And

2:40:14.520 --> 2:40:18.440
<v Speaker 1>on Friday at the Illinois Local New Summer, Marada moderated

2:40:18.480 --> 2:40:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a panel of what I referred to as the venture

2:40:20.879 --> 2:40:25.360
<v Speaker 1>capitalists of local news, the philanthropic organizations that have been

2:40:25.400 --> 2:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to fill the gap here. John Palfrey, who's president

2:40:29.080 --> 2:40:33.039
<v Speaker 1>MacArthur Foundation, Maybel Perez Wadsworth, whose presidency of the Knight Foundation,

2:40:33.800 --> 2:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and Julie Mourta who's presidency of the Joyce Foundation, which

2:40:37.200 --> 2:40:40.039
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit more regional in the Chicago area

2:40:40.120 --> 2:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Great Lakes region. But all of them have

2:40:43.120 --> 2:40:46.800
<v Speaker 1>been investing in trying to help local news startups get

2:40:46.840 --> 2:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>off the ground. And yeah, I called them vcs because

2:40:50.640 --> 2:40:54.400
<v Speaker 1>they really are, except they're not trying to They don't

2:40:54.640 --> 2:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>try to get their money back once they give the money,

2:40:57.840 --> 2:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>but they are trying to be smart about putting money

2:41:00.720 --> 2:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in places that can be used to grow an organization

2:41:04.680 --> 2:41:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that can eventually be self sustaining, and that is I

2:41:07.800 --> 2:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>think the real challenge there. So a few things I

2:41:11.160 --> 2:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted to share with you on both of those topics,

2:41:13.200 --> 2:41:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and because I've gone long here, we will share that

2:41:16.320 --> 2:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>with you on Wednesday. So with that, I'll see and

2:41:19.040 --> 2:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>put it out