WEBVTT - Biden's Inner Circle and the Cost of Denial

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>This whole story is just so tragic, and it really is.

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:09.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know everybody thinks their stories, what they

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>write about is Shakespearean, but there is just an element

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of centuries old drama to this. The man who rises

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>to the top to save the nation from Donald Trump

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and guarantees the reelection of Donald Trump by denying his

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>own fallibility.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 2>And his own hubris.

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Hi everyone, I'm Kitty Kuric and this is next question.

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 2>On May fourteenth, I headed down to Washington, d C.

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 2>On the seven to twenty five am Regional Amtrak. Huh

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 2>nice sound effect. I was on my way to the

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 2>nation's capital to participate in a health conference that had

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>been organized by Axios, and since I was going to

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 2>be in the neighborhood, my producers reached out to Jake

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Tapper of c and Alex Thompson of Axios to see

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 2>if we could sit down and discuss their explosive new book,

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Original Sin. It's a deep dive into the decision made

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 2>by President Joe Biden to run for reelection and about

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 2>the people in the Biden inner circle who were behind it.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Alex Thompson, Jake Tapper, authors of Original Sin. Hi, guys,

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 2>how are you good?

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing good?

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 2>To say him, It's great to see you both. After

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 2>the interview, when we jumped on the Essella heading home

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 2>later that afternoon, there was someone in my assigned seat.

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 2>That's someone was Joe Biden, mister Amtrak himself. How crazy

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>is that he had about five Secret Service agents with

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 2>him and was heading back to Wilmington, Delaware after meetings

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 2>in Washington. I've known Joe Biden for decades, and so

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 2>in between other passengers asking if they could take their

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 2>photos with him, he was incredibly gracious by the way.

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 2>I sat down next to him at it for a bit.

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I can't share our conversation because someone in his detail

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 2>said this is all off the record, right, and I agreed.

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 2>But I did find him his usual affable self and

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 2>wrote to Jake that he was cogent and conversant. Jake responded,

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 2>not surprised. In fact, his assessment echoed what he and

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Alex had reported in the early pages of their book.

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 2>As of early twenty twenty five. They wrote, Biden can, still,

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 2>of course, engage in a coherent conversation if he is

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 2>prepared and rested. He didn't need preparation to have mostly

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 2>small talk with me, but he was for sure coherent

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 2>and he didn't think I was Diane Sawyer. That following Sunday,

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 2>it was announced that Joe Biden has been diagnosed with

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 2>aggressive prostate cancer that has spread to his bones. The

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 2>speculation about some kind of cover up about his health

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 2>issues began again. But according to to experts I spoke to,

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 2>this is an unfair conclusion. We simply don't have enough information.

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 2>But original Sin may do nothing to allay those concerns. Now,

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 2>if you peruse social media regularly, you'll see a lot

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 2>of people raging about this book. Why now, and in

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the view of some critics, why write it at all.

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 2>So that's what I started our conversation with when I

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 2>sat down to talk to Jake and Alex last Wednesday

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 2>in Washington. Reading the comments on social media this morning,

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 2>I was like.

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Never read the comments. Don't you know that you never

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>read the.

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 2>I actually do. I don't know why, because I do

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 2>like to take the temperature of some people, and given

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 2>some of them are taken with a grain of salt,

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 2>but I like to see what people are saying, and

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of folks are really taking you to to tasks.

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 2>I want to read some of the comments from a

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 2>post on the New Yorkers Instagram about your book, not

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>look Back. Let's get working on fixing the future, get

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 2>a grip, Let's talk about the real issues and get

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 2>over Biden. What the hell? Slow news day, Jake? And yeah,

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 2>once again, let's not blame the Republicans at all. Maybe

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Jake Tapper could get away from behind the desk and

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 2>investigate how journalists like himself don't hold Trump to account

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and ask crappy questions. Okay, so you get the drift,

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>you guys, and good morning.

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>By good to see you morning, Nice to see you.

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 2>So you know, what would you say to those people

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 2>who are really giving you a hard time about looking

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 2>at this issue and Joe Biden's kind of cognitive ability

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 2>at this point?

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I have many thoughts. One of them is

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I do cover President Trump with aggressive analysis every day,

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>two hours a day, and then every other Sunday. So

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would suggest that that writer might want

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>to turn on CNN at five o'clock Eastern and see

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>because we do do that coverage. But beyond that is

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>what George Clooney said to me, said to me, and

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Alex the other day when I talked to him at

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of his play on Broadway, good Night and

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Good Luck. Have you seen it?

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes? It has great right, Yeah, I thought it was

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 2>really good.

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's entirely said in nineteen fifty four except the

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>very end where he shows this montage of what television

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>has become since then. And in addition to I mean,

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>there's lots in that montage, but one of the you

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>see lies about the twenty twenty election from Republicans, and

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>then you see lies about Biden's acuity from Democrats. And

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I asked him about the importance why he felt that

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>was important to include, and he said, it's about speaking

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>truth to power, no matter who's in power. But also,

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.559
<v Speaker 1>how do you think we got Trump? That was Clooney's answer.

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think Democrats need to reckon with this fact

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that one of the reasons why even as Trump's pull

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>numbers go down, democrats pull numbers are not going up.

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think the lies, the gas lighting that the

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Biden White House and President Biden himself told the country

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>about his aque are and albatross not unlike what the

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Iraq War was for Republicans, you know, more than a

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>decade ago.

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Do you think, Alex that the lack of transparency shown

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:16.679
<v Speaker 2>by the Biden administration and about his health or mental condition,

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 2>do you think that is contributing to the low approval

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 2>ratings for Democrats. As Jake points out.

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think some voters feel gaslet by the Democratic

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Party by saying that this guy could serve his name

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 3>in that he was. They were saying he was on

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 3>top of it, running circles around his aides at the time,

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 3>but also like this guy could serve another four years

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 3>till he was eighty six.

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 4>I do think the.

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Democrats, according to voters I've talked to, like Democrats have

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 3>a credibility problem because they were insisting. And I'd say,

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, also in response to those comments, I mean,

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 3>those are the same comments I got whenever I reported

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 3>on Biden's age going back to twenty twenty one and

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 3>especially starting in twenty twenty three, and you know, focus

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 3>on Trump and it's like, well, you know, first of all,

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 3>our job is not to necessarily meet vote like readers expectations.

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Our job is just to say, like, well, this is

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 4>what's happening.

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 3>And if people don't like to read the truth, then

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 3>that's on them.

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>The George Clooney fundraiser he did with Jeffrey Katzenberg and

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Julia Roberts came. You described it in the summer of

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four, write in Los Angeles. That seemed to

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:38.679
<v Speaker 2>be a real aha moment obviously for George Clooney. Why

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 2>did you focus so much attention or why was that

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 2>anecdote Jake so important to include?

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, it was important to include because the op ed

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that George Clooney wrote in The New York Times between

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the debate and on June twenty seventh and Biden dropping

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>out in July twenty first, that op ed by George

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Clooney was incredibly important and impactful. It just was here,

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you have a very respected, very beloved Hollywood star and director,

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>big democratic donor.

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 2>And serious personious person.

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>His activism when it comes to Darthorn Sudan is incredibly respected.

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And he comes forward and says, I love Joe Biden.

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>It's time for him to drop out and notes in

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a line that Jeffrey Katzenberg wanted him to remove. The

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden that we all saw at the debate is

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the Joe Biden I saw backstage at the fundraiser. I'm

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>paraphrasing when Joe Biden walks over to George Clooney and

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't recognize him, somebody that he's known for more than

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years, somebody who is the co host of this

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>incredibly lucrative fundraiser, record breaking Democratic fundraiser, and somebody who's

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the most recognizable faces in the world. That

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>was really really disturbing to everybody in that little clotch

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>who saw it happen, and Biden's behavior in general that

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>night behind the scenes was disturbing to President Obama. It

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't as bad on stage, but even people in the

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>audience there, Democratic congressman and Any Custer of New Hampshire,

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Obama people like John Favreau, former director

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of Speech Running, they were all very disturbed by what

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they saw, and they all left that fundraiser thinking, oh

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>my god, this is not going to work.

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people were making excuses for Joe Biden's

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of lack of being with it that day by

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 2>saying he had a grueling travel schedule.

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Good, he did have a grueling travel schedule. Presidents have

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>grueling travel schedules. That's part of the job.

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 2>You write in the book Alex and your author's note

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 2>that you spoke to around two hundred people lawmakers, white

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 2>house staff, campaign insiders, but many of them opened up

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 2>to you only after the election. I think the word

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 2>after is pivotal here. How do you explain the fact

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 2>that so many people remained silent when it really mattered

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 2>and could have made a differ friends.

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 3>I think it was a sincere in the case of

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.319
<v Speaker 3>most of them. I think some people were just looking

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 3>out after their own self interest in keeping their jobs.

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 3>But I think for a decent number of people, it

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 3>was a sincere fear of Donald Trump winning and a

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 3>belief that going public with their concerns was only going

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 3>to have the effect of helping Trump. And if you

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 3>believe that he's an essential threat to democracy, you can

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 3>rationalize a lot. And I think it was a combination

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 3>of those two factors, and I.

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 4>But not to let them completely off the hook.

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 3>I think some people just were like, if he wins,

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 3>I get to keep my job, and we're doing the

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 3>right thing for the country. So I think it was

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 3>a combination of those things.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Even now, very few people spoke on the record to

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 2>you all well, there were a lot of There were

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of anonymous sources.

0:10:57.880 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of anonymous sources, but there are

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of is that it's very clear that we

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>spoke with you know, when you're reading certain stories, you know,

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we wrote it as a narrative. We didn't

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>like as Bob Woodward does. We didn't write it as

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>according to three sources, according to two sources. But it's

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear. I mean, almost everybody in the book we

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>spoke with. Anybody named, almost all of them we spoke with.

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>But yes, you're right, there are still people who are.

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Afraid why why do you think that is, Jake.

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to be seen as disloyal, they don't

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>want to be seen as helping Trump, which I mean,

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it's still so part of the DNA. I mean my thesis,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and I can't speak for Alex, but I think you

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>agree that the Democrats really need to reckon with this.

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>In terms of twenty twenty eight, At some point some

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Democratic presidential candidate is going to acknowledge that President Biden

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>his family in the inner circle were lying to people

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>about what was going on. But they haven't. They haven't

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>done that yet. And I'm guessing by the time this

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast drops it, they will not have done it by then.

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Either, but they think they'll do it ever.

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Jase, Yes, I think they'll have to, and I think

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>because this is a really I mean, it's going to

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>be a progress. Politicians love to wait for the parade

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and then run in front of it, but at some

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>point people are going to I mean, most people right

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>now don't know the George Clooney story, that Joe Biden

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't recognize George Clooney, but I do think at some

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>point there's going to be some saturation of that, and

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be shocking for people.

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 2>For Democrats, Alex, I know that you made a speech

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 2>at this year's White House Correspondent Stinner because obviously the

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 2>role of the press in all this is going to

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 2>be paramount as people are really evaluating what happened and

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 2>why you said. Quote. President Biden's decline and its cover

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 2>up by the people around him is a reminder that

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 2>every White House, regardless of party, is capable of deception.

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 2>But being truth tellers also means telling the truth about ourselves.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>We myself included mist a lot of this story, and

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 2>some people trust us less because of it. We bear

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 2>some responsibility for faith in the media being at such lows.

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk about the forces that were at work

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 2>for members of either the White House Press Corps or

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 2>the press in general that prevented the story from getting

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 2>out there and getting in front of the American people,

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 3>I think it depends on every reporter. And the reason

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 3>I even said the comments was it just to me

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 3>just internally, it felt odd to especially after Jake and

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 3>I reported the book, I realized even though I had

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 3>been aggressive in reporting it, I realized how much I

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 3>didn't know, and it just felt weird winning an award

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 3>for something that I thought was something we fell short on.

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 3>So I just felt like I had to say something.

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 3>As for the forces you're talking about, I mean, I

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 3>think it depends, you know. I think some reporters carried

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 3>the White House's water right. They wanted access, they wanted

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 3>like the people to reach turn their calls, you know.

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 4>I think there is some of that.

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 3>I think some people let probably their own like you know,

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 3>internal political biases like affect them. And I think some

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 3>people just believed their sources. I have like empathy and

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>sympathy where you know, people were not telling the truth.

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 3>And sometimes even like the press flags didn't even know

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 3>what the truth was because they didn't really have access

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 3>to the president and they were just being told they

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 3>were trusting their own bosses, and then they were telling

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 3>reporters what their bosses had told them, and the reporters

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 3>trusted them because a lot of reporting is based on trusts,

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 3>and so I think it was a combination of of

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 3>all of those things.

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 4>But Washington journalism, you.

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Know, does have a tendency to have instances of groupthink,

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 3>and I think this was one instance of that.

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to that there were some psychological factors going

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 2>on to as reporters are actual human beings, and it's

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 2>very uncomfortable, I think, to talk about age or aging

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 2>and talk about sort of cognitive decline. I think we

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 2>have all experienced it, perhaps with older people in our lives,

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 2>our parents. It's like taking the car keys away from

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 2>your father. You'd like, don't want to deal with it

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 2>on some level. And every time people would mention it,

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, like David Axelrod or rom Emmanuel, you know,

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 2>there was this backlash of sort of shame and trying

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 2>to make the people feel embarrassed for even bringing it up.

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 2>So I almost saw it as a microcosm of a larger,

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 2>just plain uncomfortable conversation. Do you see that at all?

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>First of all, it's impossible for me, and I did

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>cover this a bit, his cognitive decline or his age,

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's impossible, knowing then what I know now, to

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>not feel humility when I look back at my coverage.

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And even though Alex broke a ton of great stories

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>about this, we knew a fraction a fraction of what

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we know now and what readers will learn. There is

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>group think. I mean, I look back at my coverage

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Iraq War, and I was skeptical of the

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>WMD claim, the weapons of mass destruction claim, but in

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>retrospect not skeptical enough. But then, yeah, there is this discomfort.

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And there is also this legacy in this town where

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>age is treated differently than in any other business.

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 2>You mean, in politics and politics in you.

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Know, there are very few. There are no eighty five

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>year old or eighty year old anchors on teav right

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>are no, well no, I'm sure I'll be put on

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the ice flow long before that, but but there are

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>usually there is usually in any other institution sports, uh,

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>at corporate America. For sure, there's a board of trustees

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that they have to uh or that they have to

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>deal with, and on and on, Hollywood. I mean, there

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is somebody else making the decision in politics. In politics,

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>really it's just the voters. There's nobody, especially if you're

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>very powerful, like the President of the United States, there's

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>no one that can say it's really time for you

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to hang it up. I mean, we see this day

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in day out in this town.

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, look at Strom theremy strom Thurman.

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Look at kayuh what was it named Kid Granger? Kid Granger,

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>who was the chair of the House Appropriations Committee, Diane

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and Feinstein, there's the longlist, Thad Cochrane, John Conyers, and

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:55.199
<v Speaker 1>and there is and it's it's obviously worse with President Biden,

0:17:56.080 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>but there is an an infrastructure, a family staff, people

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>making money off of that politician that are doing.

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 2>It ane empowering as that politician.

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>And all you have to do is snooker the voters.

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 1>That's all you have to do. There are people in

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Congress right now who are too old to be in Congress.

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But even raising that issue is still in this town

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>seen as rude or partisan. If you're depending on the

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>party of the person you're saying it about.

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 2>You know, you mentioned that you did try to cover

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 2>the story and concede you could have done more.

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But it's been a lot more. To be clear, I

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>could have done a ton.

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 2>More, and we'll talk about that in a second. But

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 2>in September of twenty twenty, Jake, you interviewed Joe Biden.

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 2>You asked him point blank about his health. You said,

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 2>if you're elected, you would be the oldest president ever.

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 2>The American people have been lied to before by presidents

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 2>about the president's health. Fdr jfk Ronald Reagan. We don't

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 2>know still what happened with Donald Trump and his visit

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 2>to Walter Reid last year. Will you pledge that if

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 2>you're elected, you will be transparent about your health? What

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 2>did he say to you? Shake back?

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Then he interrupted, He interrupted the question to say yes

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that he would. And that's actually the very end of

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the book is that scene is him promising that he

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>would be fully transparent and to be honest. Like obviously

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>we had all seen him older in the twenty nineteen

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty two en campaign. He seemed fine in that interview.

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I only had one more interview with him in twenty twenty,

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>where he seemed like twenty years older but still functioning.

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But what we learned in our reporting was that starting

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in about twenty nineteen, twenty twenty, if not before after

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the death of Bo, there were basically two Bidens. There

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:51.239
<v Speaker 1>was Fine Salvagable, Fine on the stomp Joe Biden, and

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>then there was non functioning Biden. The non functioning Biden

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is the one who couldn't remember the names of top aides,

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>who lost his train of thought in a way that

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>was disturbing. We all lose our train of thought, but

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>beyond just normal losing her train of thought, and a

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden who was adult, and that non functioning Biden,

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>who I did not see really in twenty nineteen twenty twenty,

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>started showing up more and more behind the scenes, really

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in a pronounced way in twenty twenty three, twenty twenty four,

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's what Alex and I learned. He was not

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>transparent about it. He violated that pledge to the American people,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, there was an infrastructure around him that

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>worked to hide it.

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about that infrastructure in a moment,

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 2>but first, preparing for this interview, some people are pointing

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 2>to a conversation interview you had with Laura Trump in

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:46.239
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty, and she talked about Biden's mental acuity, and

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you remember this. You believed and said you

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 2>felt she was mocking his stutter. She said she didn't

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 2>even know he had a stutter, but was really talking

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 2>about his cognitive struggles. You dismissed her, Jake, I think

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 2>in a rather taciturn way, with all due respect, having

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 2>watched the interview looking back, would you have handled it differently?

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Of course, of course. I mean on a conversation about aging,

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>what Laura Trump said aged well and what I said

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>aged poorly one hundred percent. Now, she obviously saw the

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>non functioning Biden in a way that I had not

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>really seen at that point. She was right, I was wrong,

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent.

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 3>I would also just want to add, like, the Joe

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Biden of twenty twenty three is different than the Joe

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Biden of twenty twenty and that clip is from twenty twenty, right,

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 3>I know it is, so I just wanted to add that, like,

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 3>there there was a much more pronounced decline beginning late

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 3>in the presidency.

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 2>Hi, everyone, it's Katie couric. You know I'm always on

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 2>the go between running my media company, hosting my podcast,

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>and of course covering the news, and I know that

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 2>to keep doing what I love, I need to start

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 2>caring for what gets me there, my feet. That's why

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 2>I decided to try the Good Feet stores personalized arch

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 2>support system. I met with a Good Feet arch support

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 2>specialist and after a personalized fitting, I left the store

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 2>with my three step system designed to improve comfort, balance

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 2>and support. My feet means and back are thanking me already.

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 2>Visit goodfeet dot com to learn more, find the nearest store,

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 2>or book your own free personalized fitting. I'm curious in

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 2>this bifurcated media environment that we all live in now

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 2>if you think, if you think about it, I don't

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 2>know why I'm psycho you guys, but I wonder if

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 2>the coverage on Fox, which was particularly cruel I think

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 2>towards Joe Biden, mocking his falling, making snarky comments about

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 2>when he seemed to be confused. I wondered if that

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 2>might have influenced you a bit, make you on a

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 2>human level not want to cover his decline because Fox

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 2>was doing it so mercilessly.

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 3>I think there were definitely some people that didn't want

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 3>to give oxygen to people that were acting in bad faith.

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 3>I'd also say that there was there's a difference between

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 3>making a meme of him stumbling up the stairs of

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Air Force one and reporting actually what people inside the

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 3>White House were feeling about his limitations, which is what

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:57.479
<v Speaker 3>I was trying to do, Jake was trying to do,

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 3>and what we eventually were able to find the breakthrough

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 3>with this book. But yeah, I agree that, you know, Fox,

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, some people in Fox are taking a big

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 3>victory lap now, But I do think and there are

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 3>some good reporters there and people that I like, but

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, the fact is that they were not reporting

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 3>stuff inside the room about how people in the Biden

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 3>White House were feeling. And I just I think they

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 3>were aggressive on this issue. But I do think there

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 3>is a difference in those two things.

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 2>The kind of reporting they were doing. And I'm curious

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Jake to get your take on that.

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't look at Fox coverage that way. I

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>actually look at Fox coverage. I mean, I follow progressive

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and I follow conservative media to see where the holes

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>are in my coverage. And Fox would report things and

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 1>I would say behind the scenes, I'd be like, is

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that did that happen? Is that true? Why aren't we

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>reporting that? That's I don't look at Fox the way

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that that it's being suggested. I did cover I know

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>this now because of all the challenges. I did cover

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Biden's stumbling at the Air Force Academy commencement. I did

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>cover biden falling off. No, I didn't. I was off

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the day for that he fell off his bike. But

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the other one, there was another fall. What was the

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>other fall?

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 4>Up the Air Force one?

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I've covered his falls, and I will say that, as

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Alex said, there's a tremendous difference between looking at an image,

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>however important it was at the time, and however more

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>important it is in retrospect of Joe Biden falling and

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>saying something's going on here, right. There is a difference

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>between that and Alex and I talking to more than

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>two hundred mostly Democratic sources, almost all after the election

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>and saying, listen to what these Democrats are telling us

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>about how much worse it is behind the scenes.

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Right. But at the time, that could have signaled, hey,

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I think something might be wrong here. I need to

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 2>dig more. And that's something that you have acknowledged.

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I yes, one hundred percent. I will say also, though,

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we have learned in our

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>reporting is that the Biden white House, led by the president,

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>first Lady and Hunter and also top aids, they were

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>lying not just to the media, they were lying not

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 1>just to the public. They were lying to other Democrats.

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>They were lying to donors, they were lying to cabinet secretaries,

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they were lying to democratic lawmakers. We talked to one

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Democrat and this is in the book, who said he

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>would call and he would be told he's fine, he's fine,

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>he's fine. And then after Biden dropped out, this Democrat

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 1>sat down with the President and the first Lady is

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>a very high ranking person but didn't want to be named,

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and said he's not fucking fine. Jill had to pop

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in and finish his sentences. As we saw in the

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:55.239
<v Speaker 1>view not long ago, he's not fucking fine. So the

0:26:55.320 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 1>deceit was the main issue. But yes, journalists should have

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>been poking and priding most especially believe me, there's no

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>one that flagellates me more than me. And yes, of

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>course I could have done more, and I should have.

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I just want to just add one last point, which is,

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, the media loves talking about itself.

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, I know, and reading about it and.

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 4>Reading about itself.

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 3>But I just think it's important to say, like, yep,

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 3>media can't even organize a happy hour if you've ever

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.719
<v Speaker 3>been in a newsroom, right, Like, they have trouble organizing that.

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 3>Like the people that did the cover up with the

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 3>people close to the president.

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 2>Well let's talk about them, the enablers or the infrastructure

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 2>what you refer it as the polup bureau.

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's not our term. That's other people in the

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 1>administration came up with that term. But it's a good term.

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay, Well whoever came up with it, It includes

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Mike Donaldan, Steve Rochetti, and Bruce.

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Reid, mainly Donaldin and Rochette.

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, tell us about why it's so important to understand

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the role they played and the dynamics of that politbureau,

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 2>if you will.

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 3>You had a group of true believers of that had

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 3>been with Biden for decades, that believed he had been

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think we call him the book and

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 3>this was Jake's idea was sort of the theology of

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:28.959
<v Speaker 3>Biden or the Biden theology, and they were the most

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 3>reverential followers of that theology, that he could always come back,

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 3>that he would, that everyone always counts him out, and.

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 4>When you're surrounded by people.

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 3>In some ways, they loved him too much and as

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 3>a result, they didn't like bringing him bad news. They

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 3>didn't like, you know, telling truth to power, but not

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 3>sometimes out of fear, because Biden did have like some

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 3>temperament temper and had some term of issues, but also

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 3>I think just like out of love for him. And

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 3>in some ways it's their representative of you know, like

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 3>any the representative of the.

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Darks of how loyal there's a dark side of loyalty.

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that they were afraid of losing their jobs?

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how much it was affection for Biden and

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 2>how much was just job security?

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, putting a percentage on it is difficult, but it

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 3>was definitely both. And we report in the book that

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Mike Donalan made several million dollars off this campaign, and

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, ste Verschetti also deeply wanted to become chief

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 3>of staff. I don't think you can separate out their

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 3>self interests from those emotional feelings.

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>But they were zealots, as Alex notes in this Theology

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of Joe Biden, just like you can't count him out,

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>he can beat anything. The stuff about Biden the public likes,

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the kid with the stutter, the guy

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>who had the horrible tragedy in his family when he

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>was newly elected, the the you know, the guy that

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>had two brain aneurysms and was told he might never

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>talk again, et cetera, et cetera. I mean, the stuff,

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the get he calls it. Get up. That's what Biden

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>calls it. Get up. His dad always told him get up.

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>That part of him is a charming part of him,

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>It's an American part of him. But it also led

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that he thought that at the end

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of the day he was indispensable. Only he could beat Trump,

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>only he was the right man for the time to

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>face down Putin, And it led to a hubris. I mean,

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this whole story is just so tragic, and it really is.

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know everybody thinks their stories, what they

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>write about is Shakespearean, but there is just an element

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of centuries old drama to this. The man who rises

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to the top to save the nation from Donald Trump

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and guarantees the reelection of Donald Trump by denying his

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>own fallibility.

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 2>And his own hubris, right, or doesn't recognize his own hubris,

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 2>I think, and I think that was part of Joe

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Biden's appeal, is he seemed like a you know, a

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 2>regular Joe, right. But in some quarters it's also viewed

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 2>as he had a real chip on his shoulder too,

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, he never quite felt embraced by sort of

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 2>the elite, the hyper intellectual sort of people within the

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Party, at least that's what I've read.

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean that chip had grown to the size

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 3>of a boulder by the time that he's he's older,

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 3>and you know, in some ways, and people around him

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 3>have told us, you know, the you know, Obama basically

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 3>choosing Hillary over him as his Busney successor in twenty

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:43.959
<v Speaker 3>sixteen just made it even bigger, right, like he just

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 3>what he wanted credit.

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 4>And you know, you talk to the.

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Biden people and you ask about like the age stuff,

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, back in twenty twenty three, twenty twenty four,

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 3>and they would just be like all presidents get two terms,

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, like as if it's like just it was

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 3>to him, he deserved it.

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 2>And yet he did make that statement, flanked by Corey

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Booker and Gretchen Whitmer.

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 4>The bridge.

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 2>You know who else was Kamala Harris, Yes, Kamala Harris.

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 2>How could I forget? And said I will be a

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 2>bridge to a new generation Now implicitly and explicitly, I

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 2>think that meant he was going to be a one

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 2>term president. But understandably, Jake, I'm sure he didn't want

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 2>to say that because he didn't want to be a

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 2>lame duck at the beginning of his presidency.

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but everybody had the impression that he was going

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a one termer. And one of the reasons

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>was even before the bridge was in December twenty nineteen,

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>before the primaries began, four different senior staffers to Biden,

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Biden campaign did a what Ryan Lizza, the

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Politico who reported this he thought was a

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>strategic leak, which was they called him and said he's

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>only going to be a one term president. It was

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>basically part of the selling point because they knew people

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>were concerned about Biden's age, so the idea was, Hey,

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>he's only going to be a one term president. He's

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>only going to be a one.

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Term president, which sounds very craven, doesn't it.

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, it just sounds like they were making

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a promise that they weren't going to honor. But it

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just like an impression. It was created by the

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Biden campaign and by Biden himself. People thought that that

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 1>was going to happen, and then enough things happened, including

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a less than horrible although still not good midterm election

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two, that he thought that's it, I'm

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>going to run again. And there was no process. There

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>were people behind the scenes, we haven't needed done in

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the book of White House senior advisor saying like, what

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>are we doing here? There was a polster, John Anzelone saying,

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I assume we're going to pull for this. We're going

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to see, like what the vulnerabilities are, see if this

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>is actually a good idea running a second running a

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>second term. At the end of the second term, he

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>would be eighty six, right closer to ninety than eighty.

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>That's literally what they were proposing. They still argue to

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>this day he could have done It's crazy, but in

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.959
<v Speaker 1>any case, and Anita told Angeloni, no, no, we're not

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 1>pulling for this. The decision has been made.

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 2>So was Anita done part of the problem and her husband,

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 2>I know, yeah, Bob Bauer.

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't think anyone in that in our circle was

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 3>not part of the problem, right, And the fact is

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 3>that Nia Dune, even if she had private concerns, no

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 3>one got in the president's face and said this is

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 3>a bad idea.

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I think some of that is on the president for

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:33.879
<v Speaker 3>not creating a culture in which dissent was welcomed or embraced.

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 3>But also I think it's on the people in their circle,

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 3>who also, to your point earlier, had like a vested

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 3>self interest in keeping this going. So you know, they're

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 3>the true believers that believe he could have been president

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 3>eighty six. And there are people that had concerns and

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 3>they also never you know, as Jack was referring to

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 3>this other Democrat earlier who also told us, there's a

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 3>point when you have to Yes, it's the president's decision,

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 3>but there there's a point when you have to sit

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 3>your principal down and say you're not up for this,

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 3>and no one did that.

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 2>I wonder, Jake, if you experienced what I did. I

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 2>saw him at an event and he seemed to be

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 2>very happy to see me. I've known him for probably

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 2>even longer than you have, Jake, because I'm older than

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 2>you are. But you know, I had long conversations with

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.800
<v Speaker 2>him after Tim Russert's funeral. You know, I've just covered

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 2>him for a long time too. And he said I

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 2>miss you, And I said, if you miss me, let's

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 2>do let's sit down and do an interview. You can

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 2>spend more time with me, and he said great. And

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 2>then after he spoke, he came back to me and said,

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 2>I really want to do an interview with you. Well,

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 2>I thought, great, you know, and then I talked to

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 2>his press team Kareem Yeah, and then I talked to

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 2>some other people who were there. I wrote to Anita

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:56.879
<v Speaker 2>Dunn the run around I got sending me to some

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty six year old kid who runs digital for them.

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 2>It was borderline insulting first off, but secondly, it was

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 2>so clear that they had absolute zero intention of allowing

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 2>him to sit down to have a conversation with me.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Did you face similar frustrations?

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Look, the last time I had an interview with him

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>was in October twenty twenty two. He seemed super old.

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>It was only fifteen minutes they.

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Did fifteen minutes. I mean, how much can you talk

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 2>about him? Fifteen minutes?

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot. And it was obviously in the middle

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of the day. It wasn't it wasn't in the evening,

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you can't really that's not a good

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You can't really do a good interview in fifteen minutes,

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>especially because he's rather long winded. And then it became clear.

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, this is the thing. We talked to

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>people in the White House, communications people in the White House,

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and somebody told me that the interview he did with

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 1>me in twenty twenty two he could not have done

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:56.879
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three. A senior White House person told

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>me he was not capable of doing it in twenty

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. Again, I wish I could tell you who

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that was. It told me that it's a name, you know.

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, there was just a behind the scenes

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:09.919
<v Speaker 1>and acknowledgment of this, And that's part of that's why

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we say it's a cover up, because if it wasn't

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>to cover up, what do you call that decision to

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>not let you do an interview with him, even though

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>he says he wants to or not forget me, I mean,

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>or not do a serious sit down with anyone other

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>than I mean, what interviews did he do in twenty

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, twenty twenty four. Very few. In twenty twenty four,

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it was only after he was fighting for his job

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>that he sat down with Sephanopoulos and Lester.

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 2>And they did a lot of podcasts that were kind

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 2>of very friendly Shafy to talk about things like his

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Irish herited sure, things like that, not about public policy.

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>He did do a couple interviews that I have to

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>say were good. I mean, it wasn't like he was

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>not capable of ever doing it. His interview on John

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Stewart in the spring of twenty twenty four was fine.

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>His interview with Howard Stern was interesting, although you know,

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't like policy probing. It was like get to

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>know Joe Biden.

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 2>What about the interviews he did with George and Lester,

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 2>those weren't exactly there.

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Were disasters, to be honest. I mean, and you know,

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>George asked him, have you seen the debate and his

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>answer was I don't think so.

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about the debate in a moment, because you know,

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:21.919
<v Speaker 2>you were moderating that well, I remember, yeah, yeah, I'm

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 2>sure you remember it well, but I want to ask

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 2>you about sort of the inner circle a little more.

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 2>What about Jill Biden's role in all this?

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 4>I think it was.

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 3>I think other people within the White House have called

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 3>her one of the most powerful first ladies in American history.

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 3>And it's remarkable also because she used to be a

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 3>reluctant political spouse. She has this anecdote in her memoir

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 3>where when Biden was considering running in two thousand and four,

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 3>she went through the sort of meeting with the consultants

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 3>wearing a bikini and a sharpie written no on her

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 3>stomach because she was like, we are not running for as.

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 2>One does, so well, good on her right.

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:11.280
<v Speaker 3>She made her views clear, and you know, but that changes.

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 3>By twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen, she is an

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 3>enthusiastic political spouse, and she sort of replaces Joe Biden's

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:22.280
<v Speaker 3>sister of Val Biden, who had been the campaign manager

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 3>for some many of his campaigns. You know, Val Biden

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 3>is skeptical of him running for president because of the

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 3>toll it was going to take on the family, given

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 3>all of Hunter's problems and Ashley's problems, and what they've

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 3>been through with Bo's death, but Jill becomes sort of

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:42.359
<v Speaker 3>a much more enthusiastic uh and pushing force. Her top aid,

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 3>who is mentioned along the book, you know, becomes a

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 3>deputy campaign manager on the twenty twenty campaign, eventually becomes

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 3>one of they, by the accounts of people inside the

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 3>White House, becomes one of the most powerful people in

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 3>the entire Biden administration. Is Jill Biden's top aid that

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 3>he had control over personnel. He is vetting people constantly

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:07.320
<v Speaker 3>for loyalty. People referred to him as the loyalty Police.

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 4>And you know, Joe and.

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:15.399
<v Speaker 3>Jill, I think they have this very like authentic love

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 3>for each other. But so if you have people whispering

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 3>in their ear this person's loyal, this person's not loyal,

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 3>it creates this culture of paranoia.

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you know, a lot of conversations I had with people,

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 2>both in the political world and outside it about Jill Biden.

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:38.400
<v Speaker 2>And there's so much obvious speculation involved here and projection.

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 2>But so many people were like, how can she not

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 2>protect her husband?

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.760
<v Speaker 1>She thought she was She thought she was protecting her husband.

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>She thought she was protecting Hunter from a Republican president

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 1>who was going to prosecute him. She thought she was

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 1>protecting the country from Donald Trump.

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 2>How big a factor was the Hunter stuff?

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it was considerable. I think Hunter was driving

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.239
<v Speaker 1>the decision making for the family in a way that

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 1>people he was almost like a chief of staff of

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the family.

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Does that strike you as pretty bizarre?

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>It's bizarre because I think he is provably, demonstrably unethical, sleazy,

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and prone to horrible decisions.

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:22.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, tell me how you really feel well, I mean.

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I just look at the record. I mean he after

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 1>his brother died, he cheated on his wife with his

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:32.439
<v Speaker 1>brother's widow and then got her addicted to crack. That's

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 1>just one thing I could say. I mean it there.

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a lot of personal regard for him,

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and just based on having nothing to do with I

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:44.319
<v Speaker 1>barely have ever met him. I've met him like once

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 1>or twice. But I knew Bo Bo was a great,

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:49.479
<v Speaker 1>upstanding guy.

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I knew him too.

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Really a real loss for the country too, not just

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>for his family, for the country. But Hunter is not

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>that And the idea of him drive the family car

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>as it were, is just really really questionable. But one

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of the things we heard from somebody who is close

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to the family. Shall we say is that denial is

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a big part of the family ethos. There is a

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's all of these my word. I'll give

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you my word. As a Biden that's a thing that

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 1>President Biden likes to say. A less well known family

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:25.280
<v Speaker 1>maxim is don't call fat people fat, which means don't

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge ugly truths. I didn't make it up. It's not

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:30.439
<v Speaker 1>a nice maxim. I don't use it. But that's don't

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>call fat people fat, and it means it means don't

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge ugly truths. It means that's why they hid bo

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Biden's illness. It's why they didn't really acknowledge Hunter's problems

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>until it was too late. And it's why they didn't,

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in my view and Alex's view, acknowledged Joe Biden's problems

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 1>until the country saw them and said, oh my god.

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, and I'd say that, and there's still denile. One

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 3>thing I would just want to add about the Hunter

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 3>piece of it is, I don't think you can understand

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 3>why Hunter was so important if you don't understand that

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Hunter is the only living person from the accident in

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:12.399
<v Speaker 3>nineteen seventy two. Right, Bo, his wife, his daughter, they're

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 3>all dead. Hunters the last thing of this cataclysmic, searingtic,

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 3>traumatic part of Joe Biden's life, and he almost lost them,

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 3>right like a Hunter. He almost lost Hunter too, because

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 3>he was off the rails. And you know Hunter, I

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 3>think at times abuse that relationship, relationship, and there was

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:42.320
<v Speaker 3>this feeling among Biden's aids that you know, if Biden

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 3>doesn't keep like Hunter would say something and say and

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Joe was scared Hunter would commit suicide if he didn't

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 3>do what Hunter wanted.

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Or overdose accidentally. But yeah, that he would be driven

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to I mean by Hunter. Biden has said this publicly

0:43:57.320 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 1>that he thought that the prosecutions of him were too

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>him to suicide or overdose to destroy his dad. And

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that is our reporting suggests that that was one of

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the main reasons for his deterioration.

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I was going to ask you about that, the stress

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 2>of Hunter situation, the tremendous grief over the loss of

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Bo from glioblastoma. Do you think that those two huge

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:34.760
<v Speaker 2>life events did contribute to his decline.

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 3>That's what everyone around him has told us, is that

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 3>the Joe Biden of twenty fourteen is different than the

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden of twenty nineteen. In between Bo obviously died,

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 3>and then the Joe Biden twenty nineteen is not the

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 3>same as Joe Biden of late twenty twenty three. And

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 3>in that time Hunter was under prosecution from his dad's

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 3>own justice department and had a plea deal unravel and

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 3>then was headed towards a trial which was ended up

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 3>and being in the same month as that debate, a

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 3>trial that exposed the family started laundry to the entire world.

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the three moments that people close to President Biden

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have said just were utterly destroying of his psyche. Was

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Bo dying in twenty fifteen. One aid to him described

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it like pouring water on sand, just to watch psychically

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>what happened to Joe Biden. And then, as Alex just said,

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the plea deal and then the guilty verdict, two of

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the moments that were just like he in twenty twenty

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:38.839
<v Speaker 1>three and twenty twenty four where he just seemed to

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>melt and lose it and we look, we're not unsympathetic

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:48.319
<v Speaker 1>to that. It must have been horrible. You've lost a

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:50.799
<v Speaker 1>wife and you've lost two children, and you think you're

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:54.319
<v Speaker 1>going to lose a third. I can't imagine going through that.

0:45:54.600 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 1>It's absolutely devastating. But that is what happened to him

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and why when he stepped on that stage, his attlement

0:46:04.840 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>was there for everybody to see because it had been

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:11.320
<v Speaker 1>happening for at that point at least a couple of years.

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:14.720
<v Speaker 3>And I think, are you know, I think we both

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 3>have sympathy, and the people around him have sympathy, and

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that also contributed to why people weren't willing

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 3>to get in his face and say tell him hard truth,

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 3>tell him hard truth, because like he's been through so

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 3>much and everything, which is true. But also it's I

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 3>think what some people in the arcycle laws side of

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:35.880
<v Speaker 3>is it wasn't just about him.

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 4>He was president.

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Hi everyone, it's me Katie Couric. You know, if you've

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:49.879
<v Speaker 2>been following me on social media, you know I love

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 2>to cook, or at least try, especially alongside some of

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:56.840
<v Speaker 2>my favorite chefs and foodies like Benny Blanco, Jake Cohen,

0:46:56.960 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Lighty Hoyke, Alison Roman and ininegart So. I started a

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:04.960
<v Speaker 2>free newsletter called Good Taste to share recipes, tips and

0:47:05.080 --> 0:47:08.800
<v Speaker 2>kitchen mustaves. Just sign up at Katie Couric dot com

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 2>slash good Taste. That's k A T I E C

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:15.760
<v Speaker 2>O U R I C dot com slash good Taste.

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:21.879
<v Speaker 2>I promised your taste buds will be happy you did.

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Did anybody at any point you guys say anything to

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 2>him like mister President or Joe or honey aka chill,

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, are you really up up to this?

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 1>That?

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 2>Was there ever even a conversation about I.

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 3>Mean, the closest is blinken second favorite say Tony blink

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 3>and ask them in twenty twenty three, are you sure? Basically,

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 3>basically you're going to be eighty six by the end

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 3>of the next term. You should you want to run?

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:02.839
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't. I don't think you can.

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's gentle.

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean there were questions, you know, there were conversations

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:12.240
<v Speaker 1>like that, but nothing never serious. Yeah, nothing like nothing

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>like what frankly, my wife would say if I were

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 1>losing it and it was time for me to retire

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 1>from reporting or TV or whatever. Like. I have a

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>very direct wife. It's one of the things that's great

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:29.760
<v Speaker 1>about her. It's I recommend it. When you find a spouse,

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Alex get one who's going to tell you the truth.

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not always fun, but it's incredibly valuable. And yeah,

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:36.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing like that.

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 2>That's why I think everybody wonders about Jill Biden, like

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 2>did she was she enjoying the job too? I mean,

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 2>was it something beyond hunter? Was it something beyond protecting

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:51.879
<v Speaker 2>her husband? Was there something that understandably? And I think

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 2>you can appreciate someone feeling this way, like I'm enjoying

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 2>this gig. I don't really want to give it up.

0:48:58.239 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a good gig.

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:04.839
<v Speaker 3>Some people referred to as she got Jackie oed that

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:07.560
<v Speaker 3>she fell in love with the life of being first Lady.

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 3>They noted that she had three Vogue covers in four years,

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:17.280
<v Speaker 3>which was as many as Michelle Obama had in eight years,

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:22.080
<v Speaker 3>and that she did and Bernal her top aid. They

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 3>would they were planning in twenty twenty two, all the

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:27.799
<v Speaker 3>things they were going to do, all the trips she

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 3>was going to do in the second term. They would

0:49:30.760 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 3>frequently say, we'll do that in the second term. So yeah,

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:36.840
<v Speaker 3>I think there's also like she fell in love a

0:49:36.880 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 3>little bit with the life. According to people around her.

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 3>It's not like our opinion where it's the people that

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:43.360
<v Speaker 3>we talked to That's what they said.

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Can I just say one other thing that does touch

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:49.720
<v Speaker 1>on this, which is one of the reasons Barack Obama

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:53.400
<v Speaker 1>President Obama did not support Joe Biden running for president

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen, is because he saw what happened to

0:49:56.680 --> 0:49:59.400
<v Speaker 1>him after bo died, and he saw that he wasn't

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:06.400
<v Speaker 1>emotional only ready to do that. And so Biden Biden's

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:10.920
<v Speaker 1>resentment towards Obama and David Pluff and David Axelron and

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:14.920
<v Speaker 1>David Seamus, who was Obama's polster. These are three Davids

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that Obama basically dispatched to say bad idea under president

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen twenty sixteen. And you know there are other

0:50:22.160 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 1>reasons too. Of course, Hillary and Bernie had a lot

0:50:25.000 --> 0:50:30.759
<v Speaker 1>of the support sewed up already for various reasons. But

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the anger and the resentment that Biden felt about that,

0:50:33.920 --> 0:50:36.960
<v Speaker 1>which he still feels to this day, that he wrote

0:50:36.960 --> 0:50:40.200
<v Speaker 1>about in his memoir. I think he says something like

0:50:40.280 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the president was not supportive, not encouraging, and not encouraging,

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>which is it's a big thing to put in your

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in your in your memoir that is so animating that

0:50:52.600 --> 0:50:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not on my team. I'm not going to listen

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to you, And people would say, when people would say

0:50:57.120 --> 0:50:59.919
<v Speaker 1>to Barack Obama in twenty twenty three and twenty twenty four,

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:02.840
<v Speaker 1>can't you say something to him, he's too old, he

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:05.919
<v Speaker 1>would say, he's still mad at me about Hillary. That's

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:08.240
<v Speaker 1>what Obama would say, He's still mad at me about Hillary.

0:51:09.040 --> 0:51:13.680
<v Speaker 1>He won't listen to me. So when you cross Joe

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Biden in any way, even if it's calling a fat

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:18.839
<v Speaker 1>person fat like it is.

0:51:19.960 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 2>The penalty is a palty. Yeah, but you know that's

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 2>so funny, Jake. You must have read my mind because

0:51:25.120 --> 0:51:28.120
<v Speaker 2>that was going to be my next question about why

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Barack Obama didn't step in And okay, he was mad

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:36.719
<v Speaker 2>at him in twenty sixteen, but like somebody should have

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 2>put their big boy pants on and had a real

0:51:39.600 --> 0:51:43.840
<v Speaker 2>conversation with this guy. There was nobody in the Democratic Party. Nobody,

0:51:43.920 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, finally, Nancy Pelosi, I understand, you know, had

0:51:47.200 --> 0:51:49.960
<v Speaker 2>to come to Mamma commers conversation.

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Chesh Schemer was really the one who ultimately said you

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:54.560
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't run.

0:51:54.640 --> 0:51:58.440
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, doesn't it strike you as not exactly

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:04.239
<v Speaker 2>profiles and courage that nobody could actually call a gathering

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:08.759
<v Speaker 2>and you know, deal with the consequences of telling Joe

0:52:08.760 --> 0:52:11.719
<v Speaker 2>Biden that this was not good for the country or

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:12.280
<v Speaker 2>his party.

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:15.960
<v Speaker 1>You started this interview reading these nasty notes on Instagrams.

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 1>It's no, no, no, I'm not I'm fine. But like,

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 1>imagine that times a million, because I mean, this is

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:27.319
<v Speaker 1>just anonymous people on Instagram for a story that is

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:30.360
<v Speaker 1>true that we just shared. You know, we're just sharing

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 1>an ugly fact of a story that at least as

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of now, nobody has disputed. And that's nothing, but it's notable.

0:52:41.600 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 1>It's notable that there is that blowback. I don't question

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:48.520
<v Speaker 1>your citing it, but imagine that coming from Democratic members

0:52:48.520 --> 0:52:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of Congress, Democratic senators, members of the administration cabinet secretaries

0:52:52.360 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 1>to the one person trying to say he shouldn't run

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>for reelection. David Ashrod says something in twenty twenty two

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:00.120
<v Speaker 1>by it needs to think about whether or not he

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:02.879
<v Speaker 1>should run. He gets an anvil dropped on his head.

0:53:03.120 --> 0:53:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden calls him a prick. Dean Phillips runs against him,

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:10.959
<v Speaker 1>says the President is a wonderful president, but he's too old.

0:53:11.280 --> 0:53:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a debate. Let's let's show the country like that.

0:53:15.280 --> 0:53:16.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, his plan was to get Biden on a

0:53:16.760 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 1>debate stage, so what happened in June would happen in January.

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:21.960
<v Speaker 1>But he has an anvil dropped on his head. He's

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:24.719
<v Speaker 1>out of politics, he's a persona non grata, and on

0:53:24.760 --> 0:53:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and on and on. Chevn Hughes and Andy Laski from

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:33.360
<v Speaker 1>The Wall Street Journal write a story in June bringing

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>some of these some of these issues to light, and

0:53:36.600 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>an anvil drops on them. They get destroyed on social media.

0:53:40.040 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Senators come out and dispute them and attack them. Some

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of the same senators who weeks later behind the scenes

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>would be like saying, Joe Biden, you should not run

0:53:50.239 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for reelection, are on the record attacking those reporters. I mean,

0:53:54.320 --> 0:53:55.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not a small thing.

0:53:55.880 --> 0:53:59.279
<v Speaker 3>I would say, your question to think is a really

0:53:59.280 --> 0:54:03.040
<v Speaker 3>good one. That's the reason we wrote the book was

0:54:03.239 --> 0:54:07.040
<v Speaker 3>because in our minds, the most important moment of the

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:09.680
<v Speaker 3>entire election was Joe Biden decided to run for election

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:13.000
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that no one stood up and they

0:54:13.120 --> 0:54:16.759
<v Speaker 3>sort of SlutWalk the party supwalk their way to there.

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Even though I think we I think our reporting pretty

0:54:20.080 --> 0:54:22.759
<v Speaker 3>conclusively proves there were a lot of people that knew better.

0:54:23.920 --> 0:54:27.520
<v Speaker 2>There seems to be, or seemed to be, a prevailing

0:54:27.640 --> 0:54:33.000
<v Speaker 2>sentiment within the Biden's circle that while he struggled with

0:54:33.120 --> 0:54:37.040
<v Speaker 2>some of the more performative tasks of the presidency like

0:54:37.120 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 2>press conferences, speeches, debates and I'm going to talk about

0:54:40.680 --> 0:54:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the debate, that he was still fully capable of doing

0:54:45.160 --> 0:54:50.359
<v Speaker 2>his job, that he was capable of running the country.

0:54:50.440 --> 0:54:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Does that narrative hold true? After all your reporting? Was

0:54:54.960 --> 0:54:57.680
<v Speaker 2>he capable of running the country And if he wasn't,

0:54:58.000 --> 0:54:58.560
<v Speaker 2>who was?

0:54:58.960 --> 0:55:03.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean, members of his were worried told us anonymously

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:06.839
<v Speaker 3>that they were worried if there was a crisis at

0:55:07.000 --> 0:55:10.440
<v Speaker 3>two am and how he'd be able to respond. And also,

0:55:11.120 --> 0:55:14.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, I do find this interesting. You know, as

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:17.959
<v Speaker 3>we reported the book, a lot of people would concede, Okay, yes,

0:55:18.520 --> 0:55:19.960
<v Speaker 3>like he had to have meetings in the middle of

0:55:19.960 --> 0:55:23.480
<v Speaker 3>the day ten to four, Yes, like could he speak

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 3>not really? Yes, he was not, you know, as quick

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:33.920
<v Speaker 3>on the stump as he was. Yes, he had trouble

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:38.200
<v Speaker 3>moving and walking. But then at the end of the day,

0:55:38.320 --> 0:55:40.920
<v Speaker 3>But they said, like, but they're they're the hill they're

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:44.560
<v Speaker 3>dying on is but his decision making was still the

0:55:44.640 --> 0:55:46.960
<v Speaker 3>same as it was twenty years ago.

0:55:47.200 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 1>That's that's their argument today. That's the rebuttal to this book.

0:55:50.280 --> 0:55:53.400
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, Chris Meeger, Joe Biden spokesperson, I'll just

0:55:53.480 --> 0:55:55.840
<v Speaker 2>read this while we're on the topic, said the former

0:55:55.920 --> 0:55:58.279
<v Speaker 2>president's team had not yet seen a copy of the

0:55:58.320 --> 0:56:01.960
<v Speaker 2>book and had not been consulted, and it's fact checking quote.

0:56:02.040 --> 0:56:04.080
<v Speaker 2>We are not going to respond to every bit of

0:56:04.080 --> 0:56:07.680
<v Speaker 2>this book, mister Meagher said. We continue to await anything

0:56:07.719 --> 0:56:11.320
<v Speaker 2>that shows where Joe Biden had to make a presidential decision,

0:56:11.400 --> 0:56:14.480
<v Speaker 2>or where national security was threatened, or where he was

0:56:14.680 --> 0:56:18.920
<v Speaker 2>unable to do his job. In fact, the evidence points

0:56:19.000 --> 0:56:22.440
<v Speaker 2>to the opposite. He was a very effective president.

0:56:22.680 --> 0:56:25.319
<v Speaker 1>So whether or not he was an effective president's up

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to the historians, and it's up to the American people.

0:56:28.200 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 1>They the American people, according to Poling, did not think

0:56:31.000 --> 0:56:36.000
<v Speaker 1>he was an effective president, but that's subjective. We have

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>two senators in the book, and their stories are significant

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Democratic senators pro Biden senators. One of them is Senator

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Mark Warner, who was at the time the chairman of

0:56:45.760 --> 0:56:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the Senate Intelligence Committee. Biden calls him shortly after October seventh,

0:56:49.640 --> 0:56:53.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three after the attack of Bi Famas on Israel,

0:56:53.880 --> 0:56:57.879
<v Speaker 1>because Warner is on a separate issue. Upset because it's

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:00.400
<v Speaker 1>not just Warner, actually many members of the Senate very

0:57:00.440 --> 0:57:03.600
<v Speaker 1>upset because the Biden team is about to release eleven

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Yemenis from Gitmo and send them to I think Oman

0:57:08.920 --> 0:57:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and there are a lot of Senators, Mark Warner among

0:57:12.520 --> 0:57:15.680
<v Speaker 1>them who think they're just going to go and join

0:57:15.719 --> 0:57:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the fight, whether with Hamas or Hazbola or the houthis Like,

0:57:19.640 --> 0:57:22.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a bad idea. Do not do this. So

0:57:22.800 --> 0:57:26.320
<v Speaker 1>he reaches out to Jake Sullivan, and the National Security Advisor,

0:57:26.400 --> 0:57:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Jake Sullivan has Biden call him. Mark Warner is shaken

0:57:30.840 --> 0:57:34.200
<v Speaker 1>by the conversation. He thinks that Biden doesn't really have

0:57:34.240 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a grasp on what's what's going on and why he's concerned.

0:57:38.480 --> 0:57:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's one story. Another story takes place in June

0:57:41.560 --> 0:57:45.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four when Senator Michael Bennett of Colorado, a

0:57:45.120 --> 0:57:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Democrat pro Biden, goes to the White House for a

0:57:49.760 --> 0:57:54.560
<v Speaker 1>immigration event and Biden has a really weird moment in

0:57:54.600 --> 0:58:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that immigration event where neurologists told us it looked neurological

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in nature. It's like a kind of like freezes and

0:58:04.040 --> 0:58:07.040
<v Speaker 1>then whispers into the microphone in a way that like

0:58:07.080 --> 0:58:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very off putting. I'll send you the I'll

0:58:11.200 --> 0:58:13.480
<v Speaker 1>send you the clip, but it's it's off putting, and

0:58:13.560 --> 0:58:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Bennett thinks to himself, this is why our immigration policy

0:58:18.160 --> 0:58:22.120
<v Speaker 1>is such a mess. Our president, I'm paraphrasing, but our

0:58:22.200 --> 0:58:27.440
<v Speaker 1>president is not capable of managing this issue. And in fact,

0:58:28.280 --> 0:58:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Phone Land Security thought that there was

0:58:30.360 --> 0:58:32.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be an order at the beginning of the

0:58:32.520 --> 0:58:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration to help with border security. It never comes,

0:58:36.920 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and the border policy is something of a mess, like

0:58:40.960 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>millions of people across the border illegally. It's not clear

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:47.240
<v Speaker 1>like what exactly the policy is. There really isn't anything

0:58:47.400 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 1>done to try to do to crack down on the

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:53.360
<v Speaker 1>border until it becomes an obvious political liability in the

0:58:53.400 --> 0:58:59.600
<v Speaker 1>fall of twenty twenty three. So the assertion by the

0:58:59.680 --> 0:59:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Biden team that you can't point to any like effect

0:59:03.040 --> 0:59:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that his deterioration has had, which is interesting by the

0:59:07.360 --> 0:59:09.840
<v Speaker 1>way that they're not challenging the notion that a lot

0:59:09.880 --> 0:59:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of people have stories of deterioration is one that I

0:59:14.200 --> 0:59:16.200
<v Speaker 1>think those two senators that the very least would take

0:59:16.200 --> 0:59:18.960
<v Speaker 1>issue with and that's just what we know about, Like

0:59:19.000 --> 0:59:21.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't have subpoena power, you know. I'm sure there's

0:59:21.760 --> 0:59:24.240
<v Speaker 1>much more, but that's what we're able to find out.

0:59:24.080 --> 0:59:27.120
<v Speaker 2>And that is a hard thing to gauge, right, especially

0:59:27.200 --> 0:59:30.840
<v Speaker 2>from the outside. He had several falls during his term,

0:59:30.920 --> 0:59:34.520
<v Speaker 2>and you report that his physician, doctor Kevin O'Connor, privately

0:59:34.560 --> 0:59:38.040
<v Speaker 2>said that if he had another batfall, a wheelchair might

0:59:38.080 --> 0:59:41.160
<v Speaker 2>be necessary, which has gotten a lot of attention. I'm

0:59:41.200 --> 0:59:44.440
<v Speaker 2>wondering if you could shed some light on what some

0:59:44.520 --> 0:59:48.479
<v Speaker 2>of the physical ailments were, because it's unclear. We sort

0:59:48.520 --> 0:59:52.440
<v Speaker 2>of wondered if he had neuropathy, you know, in his feet.

0:59:52.560 --> 0:59:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I know that. I think you mentioned he had some

0:59:54.600 --> 0:59:59.040
<v Speaker 2>spine issues. What was going on with Joe Biden physically?

0:59:59.080 --> 1:00:01.760
<v Speaker 2>What did your report find.

1:00:01.200 --> 1:00:04.680
<v Speaker 3>There was significant degeneration of his mind, which may have

1:00:04.800 --> 1:00:09.960
<v Speaker 3>made it not just uh, you know, advise, but necessary

1:00:10.080 --> 1:00:13.400
<v Speaker 3>for him to use a wheelchair in a second term. Now,

1:00:13.440 --> 1:00:17.400
<v Speaker 3>the White House throughout twenty twenty four tried to uh

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:20.480
<v Speaker 3>say that, you know, his halting walk was because when

1:00:20.520 --> 1:00:23.240
<v Speaker 3>he fractured his foot in twenty twenty, you know, he

1:00:23.280 --> 1:00:27.760
<v Speaker 3>didn't want to wear the walking boot that much and

1:00:28.200 --> 1:00:31.920
<v Speaker 3>as a result, so he was undone by his own vigor. Essentially,

1:00:31.920 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 3>it's like the is the spin and that just wasn't candid.

1:00:36.080 --> 1:00:41.480
<v Speaker 3>The doctor O'Connor at the time said that his foot

1:00:41.600 --> 1:00:44.840
<v Speaker 3>had heels as expected after ten weeks and when they

1:00:44.840 --> 1:00:48.800
<v Speaker 3>took the boot off, and if you look at the

1:00:49.240 --> 1:00:52.120
<v Speaker 3>it was there to see. If you wanted to read

1:00:52.160 --> 1:00:57.240
<v Speaker 3>between the lines on his medical evaluations that his you

1:00:57.280 --> 1:01:02.320
<v Speaker 3>know that he had significant spinal arthritis that would have

1:01:02.440 --> 1:01:06.200
<v Speaker 3>required him not to be in a wheelchair in order

1:01:06.280 --> 1:01:07.479
<v Speaker 3>to do the job.

1:01:07.920 --> 1:01:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Just months before his fateful debate with the Trump, O'Connor

1:01:13.200 --> 1:01:16.680
<v Speaker 2>released a physical exam and wrote in a public memo

1:01:16.760 --> 1:01:19.480
<v Speaker 2>that the president quote continues to be fit for duty

1:01:19.520 --> 1:01:24.480
<v Speaker 2>and fully executes all of his responsibilities without any exemptions

1:01:24.600 --> 1:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>or accommodations. Yet he never gave him a cognitive test.

1:01:28.960 --> 1:01:32.240
<v Speaker 2>And you note that these tests were pretty much standard

1:01:32.240 --> 1:01:35.040
<v Speaker 2>procedure for any one sixty five or over. In fact,

1:01:35.080 --> 1:01:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I think I need to call my doctor for you guys.

1:01:38.400 --> 1:01:41.200
<v Speaker 2>But why not? Why didn't he give him a cognitive test?

1:01:41.240 --> 1:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, the official answer was that the president passes a

1:01:44.840 --> 1:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>cognitive test every day with the job he does. That's

1:01:47.560 --> 1:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>their official explanation, But there were people closer to the

1:01:50.080 --> 1:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>White House or in the White who's the thought the

1:01:51.720 --> 1:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>only reason to not give a test like that is

1:01:54.160 --> 1:01:56.479
<v Speaker 1>because you don't want to know the answer, you don't

1:01:56.480 --> 1:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>want to have to release it. And in fact, at

1:01:58.720 --> 1:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the end of the book, doctor John Nathan Reiner, who

1:02:01.560 --> 1:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>has been an advisor to the White House Physician's Board

1:02:04.200 --> 1:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>for many many terms of various presidents, he had some

1:02:09.400 --> 1:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>harsh words for vaguely phrased but harsh words for doctor O'Connor,

1:02:14.040 --> 1:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and also thinks that the White House Physician Letter, which

1:02:17.360 --> 1:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>basically is not required by law and can be as

1:02:22.760 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>detailed as any White House wants it to be or not.

1:02:25.960 --> 1:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>As you noted in my question about it in twenty twenty,

1:02:29.200 --> 1:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>we still don't know why Trump went to Walter to

1:02:31.280 --> 1:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>read back in twenty nineteen.

1:02:33.480 --> 1:02:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, And also his medical reports back during his administration

1:02:38.840 --> 1:02:41.920
<v Speaker 2>was done by some doctor who said he weighed like

1:02:42.000 --> 1:02:44.160
<v Speaker 2>fifty pounds less than he actually does. I mean that

1:02:44.280 --> 1:02:46.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing, although I think he might be on

1:02:46.160 --> 1:02:48.840
<v Speaker 2>a GLP one right now, but some reports then is

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:50.120
<v Speaker 2>that I mean.

1:02:50.160 --> 1:02:52.320
<v Speaker 4>I wrote a story in the fall of twenty twenty three.

1:02:52.200 --> 1:02:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Because I was on the politician age beat and like,

1:02:55.400 --> 1:02:57.880
<v Speaker 3>we know nothing. I mean, Donald Trump is the oldest

1:02:57.880 --> 1:03:01.800
<v Speaker 3>president ever inaugurated, older than Joe Biden was on Joe

1:03:01.840 --> 1:03:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Biden's day one, and we know nothing about his health.

1:03:05.200 --> 1:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>By the way, this is another argument for the people

1:03:06.960 --> 1:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>who are like, well, why aren't you covering Trump? Why

1:03:08.520 --> 1:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't covering Trump? Like everything that Biden did sets a

1:03:12.760 --> 1:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>precedent for future presidents to hide whatever they want to

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>hide and just say you didn't say anything to Joe

1:03:20.240 --> 1:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Biden about this, you know. Jonathan Ryner. Doctor Reiner thinks

1:03:25.080 --> 1:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that the White House physician should have to submit his

1:03:27.560 --> 1:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>report under penalty of perjury. That's not the requirement now,

1:03:31.480 --> 1:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean honestly, right now, like a doctor could write

1:03:35.160 --> 1:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>he is great and just hand the paper in and like,

1:03:37.560 --> 1:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no requirement for this.

1:03:38.960 --> 1:03:44.040
<v Speaker 2>So interesting given how much transparency there seems to be

1:03:44.240 --> 1:03:48.840
<v Speaker 2>compared to past administrations. I remember doing a piece for

1:03:49.000 --> 1:03:51.920
<v Speaker 2>CNN back in the day, like in nineteen eighty. Believe

1:03:51.920 --> 1:03:55.400
<v Speaker 2>it or not, the Skyning physician named Ken Chris Bell,

1:03:55.520 --> 1:03:57.560
<v Speaker 2>who was at the University of Virginia where I went

1:03:57.560 --> 1:04:00.720
<v Speaker 2>to school, did a whole book on presidential health and

1:04:00.840 --> 1:04:04.720
<v Speaker 2>how it was covered up. Obviously the FDR wheelchair, but

1:04:04.840 --> 1:04:08.120
<v Speaker 2>the JFK and Addison's disease and the kind of steroids

1:04:08.120 --> 1:04:10.520
<v Speaker 2>he was taking. We know that Woodrow Wilson was being

1:04:10.560 --> 1:04:14.320
<v Speaker 2>propped up and basically his wife Edith was running the country.

1:04:14.360 --> 1:04:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you would think by now there would be

1:04:17.960 --> 1:04:22.480
<v Speaker 2>much more transparency about this, but still there's so much

1:04:22.520 --> 1:04:23.720
<v Speaker 2>that can be hidden.

1:04:23.440 --> 1:04:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Right well, and that era, you know, in the eighties, nineties,

1:04:27.240 --> 1:04:30.560
<v Speaker 3>early two thousands, we had more information about presidential health.

1:04:30.480 --> 1:04:31.680
<v Speaker 4>Than probably ever before.

1:04:32.120 --> 1:04:35.240
<v Speaker 3>But to your point, you've seen a huge treat We

1:04:35.360 --> 1:04:37.360
<v Speaker 3>know less and less and less and less.

1:04:37.640 --> 1:04:40.360
<v Speaker 2>It seems like you saw with Reagan and his Alzheimer's

1:04:40.440 --> 1:04:44.080
<v Speaker 2>disease for example, right, But it's just surprising to me.

1:04:44.640 --> 1:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy, and I mean one of the reasons is

1:04:47.440 --> 1:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>because everybody wants it. The people who make the laws

1:04:49.960 --> 1:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>are partisans, and they want those laws to apply to

1:04:52.840 --> 1:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the other guy. They don't want it to apply to them.

1:04:55.320 --> 1:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, right now, somebody could pass a law requiring

1:04:58.280 --> 1:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>more forthrightness and transparency on health, it would go nowhere.

1:05:01.880 --> 1:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, just like the efforts to band insider

1:05:04.040 --> 1:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>trading by members of Congress, it would go nowhere. But

1:05:06.160 --> 1:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>even if it went somewhere, the only way you could

1:05:08.080 --> 1:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>get that passed, if it is if it was for

1:05:11.480 --> 1:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a one president from now. You could never have it

1:05:14.400 --> 1:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>passed to apply to Donald Trump, you know what I mean,

1:05:17.560 --> 1:05:20.439
<v Speaker 1>just like in the world of Washington. That's how it is. Oh,

1:05:20.720 --> 1:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>this law applies to me. No, no, no, we'll do it

1:05:22.200 --> 1:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>for the next person. We'll do it for the next person.

1:05:24.080 --> 1:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But even then it won't pass.

1:05:25.560 --> 1:05:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, And then I wonder to how you both reconcile

1:05:28.920 --> 1:05:33.200
<v Speaker 2>the fact that Democrats introduced resolutions in legislation pushing Trump

1:05:33.240 --> 1:05:37.120
<v Speaker 2>to undergo a psychiatric evaluation in the first term. We

1:05:37.160 --> 1:05:41.280
<v Speaker 2>have to, But those same Democrats were conspicuously silent. Yes,

1:05:41.360 --> 1:05:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I quotes because it is from your book about Biden

1:05:44.480 --> 1:05:46.880
<v Speaker 2>not taking a cognitive exam.

1:05:47.120 --> 1:05:49.800
<v Speaker 3>I feeled Democrats the ones that have to reconcile that,

1:05:49.600 --> 1:05:52.480
<v Speaker 3>not us. I mean, I think the obvious answer, and

1:05:52.520 --> 1:05:55.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe they'll have a different answer. I think the obvious

1:05:55.040 --> 1:05:56.360
<v Speaker 3>answer is just partisanship.

1:05:56.760 --> 1:05:56.920
<v Speaker 4>Right.

1:05:57.000 --> 1:06:01.160
<v Speaker 3>They introduced those bills because they want to hurt Donald Trump,

1:06:02.000 --> 1:06:07.640
<v Speaker 3>and if they had sincere fears about presidential health, they

1:06:07.640 --> 1:06:10.840
<v Speaker 3>would have reintroduced them during the Biden pretancy, but they didn't.

1:06:11.240 --> 1:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It's so odd. But I mean, this is something that

1:06:13.480 --> 1:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody in this room probably feels. It's just

1:06:16.480 --> 1:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the oddness of partisanship, like because I just I've you know,

1:06:20.280 --> 1:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>even when I was in a party, like when I

1:06:22.360 --> 1:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>was a kid, Like, it's not something I am now

1:06:25.280 --> 1:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm independent, and I just don't even understand it. It's

1:06:28.480 --> 1:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>just you. In order to be a partisan, you have

1:06:31.160 --> 1:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to be intellectually dishonest. You just have to be, like,

1:06:33.800 --> 1:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no other way to do it, it seems. And

1:06:36.440 --> 1:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea that somebody would talk about Donald Trump's fitness

1:06:42.160 --> 1:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and not say anything about Joe Biden's and vice versa,

1:06:46.600 --> 1:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>seems just strange to me. There should be one set

1:06:50.320 --> 1:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of rules and everybody should follow them, and we should

1:06:52.280 --> 1:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>know everything about the health of any president.

1:07:02.720 --> 1:07:04.800
<v Speaker 2>If you want to get smarter every morning with a

1:07:04.840 --> 1:07:08.120
<v Speaker 2>breakdown of the news and fascinating takes on health and

1:07:08.160 --> 1:07:11.520
<v Speaker 2>wellness and pop culture, sign up for our daily newsletter

1:07:11.600 --> 1:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Wake Up Call by going to Katiecuric dot com. I

1:07:23.840 --> 1:07:26.680
<v Speaker 2>did want to ask you quickly about Robert Herr. You

1:07:26.760 --> 1:07:30.360
<v Speaker 2>mentioned David Axelroder, you know, being called a prick by

1:07:30.440 --> 1:07:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden. You mentioned everybody who had the whole democratic

1:07:35.800 --> 1:07:38.840
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure come down on them, and the White House when

1:07:38.880 --> 1:07:43.400
<v Speaker 2>they said even suggested that he was not completely there.

1:07:43.960 --> 1:07:47.480
<v Speaker 2>And Special Counsel Robert her in twenty twenty three, as

1:07:47.520 --> 1:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>you all write about, was appointed to investigate Joe Biden's

1:07:50.520 --> 1:07:55.120
<v Speaker 2>handling of classified documents. He found no grounds for criminal charges,

1:07:55.200 --> 1:07:58.920
<v Speaker 2>but his report included the damning conclusion that Biden was,

1:07:59.040 --> 1:08:03.320
<v Speaker 2>in hers word, a sympathetic, well meaning elderly man with

1:08:03.440 --> 1:08:08.960
<v Speaker 2>a poor memory. That just sent biden Land into a

1:08:09.120 --> 1:08:10.960
<v Speaker 2>complete panic, didn't it.

1:08:11.760 --> 1:08:14.120
<v Speaker 3>I think even people inside the White House think that

1:08:14.120 --> 1:08:18.559
<v Speaker 3>that was because they intuitively knew it was true, like

1:08:18.640 --> 1:08:20.920
<v Speaker 3>they would make a political argument, this is like it's

1:08:20.920 --> 1:08:26.320
<v Speaker 3>obviously obviously it's biggest political liability. But I think their

1:08:26.840 --> 1:08:33.280
<v Speaker 3>reaction to it suggested an extra defensiveness that came from

1:08:33.880 --> 1:08:36.320
<v Speaker 3>they knew. As someone put it to me from the

1:08:36.360 --> 1:08:38.200
<v Speaker 3>White House, he said the thing.

1:08:39.120 --> 1:08:40.479
<v Speaker 2>We were all he said the thing.

1:08:40.600 --> 1:08:43.320
<v Speaker 3>He said the thing, and everyone was not allowed to

1:08:43.360 --> 1:08:48.519
<v Speaker 3>say the thing, and he said it, and that was

1:08:48.560 --> 1:08:53.719
<v Speaker 3>not allowed in that world. And I think as a result,

1:08:53.800 --> 1:08:56.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is the point when I think, if

1:08:56.240 --> 1:08:59.200
<v Speaker 3>you want to give them sort of grace for being

1:09:00.200 --> 1:09:02.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, he has a few bend moments to be

1:09:02.640 --> 1:09:03.559
<v Speaker 3>sole great president.

1:09:03.800 --> 1:09:04.640
<v Speaker 4>You know, innocence.

1:09:04.880 --> 1:09:07.400
<v Speaker 3>This is the moment when you have your own Justice

1:09:07.439 --> 1:09:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Department come in and say come on. And their response

1:09:12.920 --> 1:09:14.360
<v Speaker 3>was to try to ruin him.

1:09:14.160 --> 1:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Not just her. They painted Robert her as a you know,

1:09:18.520 --> 1:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>partisan hack, which he was not. But they went after

1:09:22.439 --> 1:09:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Merrick Garland. They leaked to again to Politico that Garland

1:09:27.439 --> 1:09:31.599
<v Speaker 1>would not be invited back after Biden's reelection. They basically

1:09:31.680 --> 1:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>fired him and date to come and Garland. By the

1:09:36.200 --> 1:09:40.519
<v Speaker 1>end of the Biden presidency comes to the conclusion that

1:09:40.560 --> 1:09:43.439
<v Speaker 1>even though he came on board to be an independent

1:09:43.479 --> 1:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>attorney general with fear of favor for no one and

1:09:48.160 --> 1:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>tried to do that job by appointing special counsel's independent

1:09:51.400 --> 1:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>councils to investigate Trump and Hunter and the President himself,

1:09:55.400 --> 1:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that Biden didn't actually want that, he actually wanted protection

1:09:59.439 --> 1:10:03.639
<v Speaker 1>and Robert her we should not like it took him

1:10:03.720 --> 1:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>months to find a job. The word got out, do

1:10:07.040 --> 1:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>not hire Robert Herr and law firms and you know,

1:10:11.680 --> 1:10:15.839
<v Speaker 1>people looking for a corporate council. They got the hint.

1:10:15.960 --> 1:10:18.639
<v Speaker 2>Kind of sounds Trump downright Trump esque.

1:10:18.800 --> 1:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>One percent. Yeah, although Trump obviously does it at a

1:10:21.800 --> 1:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>much grander scale because everything with him is bigger. But yeah,

1:10:25.360 --> 1:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent. The Robert Hurr who's he now has

1:10:29.520 --> 1:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>a job, but he is, you know, like even if

1:10:32.560 --> 1:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you disagree with what he did, and he basically concluded

1:10:36.080 --> 1:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>that Biden broke the law, but he was unprosecutable because

1:10:38.720 --> 1:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he seemed behind the scenes in that interview like a

1:10:44.439 --> 1:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>very adult old man, except he put it much nicer.

1:10:47.560 --> 1:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>And if you read the transcript of that interview, it's shocking.

1:10:50.840 --> 1:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>It is interviewing a It's like interviewing some guy at

1:10:55.920 --> 1:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the bus station. It's just a guy who just is

1:10:58.160 --> 1:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>talking and talking and talking. At one point, Robert Hurst

1:11:02.880 --> 1:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>is he's trying to find out when this classified information

1:11:05.240 --> 1:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>was shared with people who didn't have access to it,

1:11:07.960 --> 1:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have had access to it, and when Biden was

1:11:10.120 --> 1:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>no longer in office, this is in twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen.

1:11:13.720 --> 1:11:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Biden is unable to understand when that is He says

1:11:17.560 --> 1:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>something like you have to understand during this period, Bo

1:11:20.200 --> 1:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is either deployed or dying. That wasn't true. Bo was

1:11:24.040 --> 1:11:25.639
<v Speaker 1>deployed I think in like two thousand and seven, two

1:11:25.640 --> 1:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, something like that, and Bo died in

1:11:28.240 --> 1:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen. Obviously no one thinks that Joe Biden, you

1:11:33.920 --> 1:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>know that that's not an incredibly important date to him.

1:11:36.880 --> 1:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But to not know the twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen was

1:11:41.600 --> 1:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>not when Bo died, that's very concerning. And when it

1:11:46.960 --> 1:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>came out in the Her report, Biden portrayed it. And

1:11:50.000 --> 1:11:52.519
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this is ignorance or lying, as

1:11:52.560 --> 1:11:57.839
<v Speaker 1>if Robert hurt had brought up Bo Bo's death, he hadn't,

1:11:58.120 --> 1:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>he'd asked about this year twenty seventeen, two an eighteen.

1:12:00.960 --> 1:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>It's really shocking. So Robert Hurr had this window into

1:12:06.320 --> 1:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>what Joe Biden is like behind closed doors in a

1:12:08.360 --> 1:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>way that nobody had gotten in years except for like

1:12:12.640 --> 1:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>his inner circle, and he was shocked at what he saw,

1:12:15.360 --> 1:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and they tried to destroy him for it.

1:12:17.439 --> 1:12:20.519
<v Speaker 2>Did you interview Robert Hurr during this time? Did you try?

1:12:20.720 --> 1:12:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Was he?

1:12:21.240 --> 1:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh? At the time, he wouldn't talk to anybody. At

1:12:23.240 --> 1:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the time, Robert her wouldn't talk and in fact, he

1:12:25.000 --> 1:12:28.599
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even rebutt it when Joe Biden said that in

1:12:28.640 --> 1:12:32.479
<v Speaker 1>February twenty twenty four. He wouldn't even allow anybody at

1:12:32.479 --> 1:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department to say, that's not what happened. Robert

1:12:36.360 --> 1:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>Hurr did not bring up bo dying because that's just

1:12:38.600 --> 1:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>not what the DOJ does. And so he kind of

1:12:42.040 --> 1:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>had to just sit there in self imposed misery, watching

1:12:46.200 --> 1:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>his name be dragged through the mud, and people were

1:12:47.840 --> 1:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>mad at him. People in his life were mad at him.

1:12:50.360 --> 1:12:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Why would you bring that up? That's so horrible. I

1:12:52.520 --> 1:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>know a gold star mom, very conservative Republican, furious at

1:12:56.760 --> 1:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Robert Hurr. Why would he bring that up? He didn't, didn't.

1:13:00.720 --> 1:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>But this is what this is what most white houses do.

1:13:03.320 --> 1:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>This is certainly what the Biden Whitehouse does.

1:13:04.840 --> 1:13:08.479
<v Speaker 2>A shame he couldn't defend himself and set the record straight.

1:13:08.680 --> 1:13:11.880
<v Speaker 2>But now this book is Let me ask you about

1:13:11.920 --> 1:13:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the not so great debate for Joe Biden. Anyway, Jake,

1:13:15.200 --> 1:13:18.840
<v Speaker 2>you're the moderator along with your colleague Dana Bash. You're

1:13:18.840 --> 1:13:21.840
<v Speaker 2>getting ready. I'm sure you're nervous. That's very stressful. I've

1:13:21.880 --> 1:13:23.840
<v Speaker 2>never moderated a debate.

1:13:23.760 --> 1:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Huge oversun by the commission.

1:13:26.240 --> 1:13:30.240
<v Speaker 2>But I can only imagine, like, so, you're ready to go.

1:13:31.400 --> 1:13:34.840
<v Speaker 2>What was your reaction and when did you know? I

1:13:35.160 --> 1:13:37.719
<v Speaker 2>watch it with a group of a very interesting group

1:13:37.760 --> 1:13:39.639
<v Speaker 2>of people, by the way, which I'll tell you later.

1:13:40.640 --> 1:13:43.680
<v Speaker 2>What was your reaction when you or when did you

1:13:43.760 --> 1:13:47.800
<v Speaker 2>realize that, oh my god, this is a disaster.

1:13:48.320 --> 1:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>The first that really there were two. The whole debate

1:13:52.920 --> 1:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>was horrible for him, and I don't think it's hyperbole

1:13:55.080 --> 1:13:58.559
<v Speaker 1>to say it's the worst presidential debate performance ever by anyone.

1:13:59.320 --> 1:14:04.839
<v Speaker 1>In that first block, he starts out shaky but fine,

1:14:05.439 --> 1:14:07.919
<v Speaker 1>and then he has that answer where he just completely

1:14:07.960 --> 1:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>loses his train of thought. He can't come up with

1:14:09.880 --> 1:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>words for things, and he says, we finally beat medicare

1:14:13.840 --> 1:14:16.559
<v Speaker 1>I think he meant we finally beat COVID. I think

1:14:16.600 --> 1:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what he was saying, but who knows. And I said,

1:14:19.720 --> 1:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you, mister President, because as time was up, we

1:14:22.400 --> 1:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>had these iPads so we could communicate with the control room.

1:14:25.600 --> 1:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And I wrote, holy smokes, I just because I didn't

1:14:29.080 --> 1:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>know who was going to be back there reading it,

1:14:30.360 --> 1:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I would have said something else. You and I have

1:14:32.760 --> 1:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>similar predilections for salty language, so but I couldn't believe it.

1:14:38.520 --> 1:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't. I I knew that this was going to

1:14:46.040 --> 1:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>be a much bigger story than a bad debate. This was,

1:14:50.000 --> 1:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>this was everything that the Republicans had been saying about him.

1:14:53.720 --> 1:14:55.160
<v Speaker 2>And Dana passed you a note.

1:14:55.200 --> 1:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Dana passed me a note saying he just lost the

1:14:56.960 --> 1:15:00.439
<v Speaker 1>He just lost the election. Yeah.

1:15:00.600 --> 1:15:03.960
<v Speaker 2>But what was even weirder, Jake, was his reaction to

1:15:04.040 --> 1:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>his performance afterwards.

1:15:06.280 --> 1:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>He didn't I don't think he had any idea.

1:15:08.400 --> 1:15:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Right tell me about that. He came up to you guys, said, hi.

1:15:12.840 --> 1:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Jill Biden. So Donald Trump just kind of storms off,

1:15:15.280 --> 1:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I have to say, considering how historically

1:15:20.240 --> 1:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>awful Biden was, Donald Trump actually was very restrained on

1:15:25.120 --> 1:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that topic. Not on Biden himself after the fact, you mean, well, no,

1:15:29.160 --> 1:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>during the debate. He wasn't restrained during the debate, but

1:15:31.320 --> 1:15:35.479
<v Speaker 1>on the topic of this man. Like you could imagine Joe,

1:15:35.760 --> 1:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you could imagine Donald Trump saying, can you believe that

1:15:38.439 --> 1:15:41.519
<v Speaker 1>this guy is running the country? He can't even he

1:15:41.560 --> 1:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>can't even get out of sense.

1:15:43.120 --> 1:15:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I think you're right about that. During the debate.

1:15:45.200 --> 1:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>During the debate, the only thing he said was I'm

1:15:47.720 --> 1:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>not sure what he just said in that answer, And

1:15:50.160 --> 1:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that he knows either. That's it. That's

1:15:53.080 --> 1:15:54.519
<v Speaker 1>the only thing he said. I'm not saying it was

1:15:54.520 --> 1:15:58.519
<v Speaker 1>a restrained performance. But on that topic. So Donald Trump

1:15:58.640 --> 1:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>leaves Joe Biden and Jill comes up, helped him down

1:16:03.000 --> 1:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>from it, says to him, and well, she says, they

1:16:06.960 --> 1:16:08.519
<v Speaker 1>just come over and makes make small talk.

1:16:08.560 --> 1:16:10.840
<v Speaker 2>But first she says to him, you did a great

1:16:10.960 --> 1:16:13.599
<v Speaker 2>job show. You answered all of their questions.

1:16:13.760 --> 1:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>She says, that's later, that's later that that's later that

1:16:16.760 --> 1:16:20.479
<v Speaker 1>night they go to a rally. After the debate, Jill

1:16:20.520 --> 1:16:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and Joe go to a rally and she, I think,

1:16:23.640 --> 1:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect regretted it, but she says, you did a

1:16:28.280 --> 1:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>great job, Joe. You answered every question like he was

1:16:32.360 --> 1:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in third grade. I mean, it was so infanalizing.

1:16:36.320 --> 1:16:38.360
<v Speaker 2>But this was later that. It was later that it

1:16:38.400 --> 1:16:40.719
<v Speaker 2>was talk about what he said to you and Dana.

1:16:40.960 --> 1:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>He comes over and he says something along the lines

1:16:43.320 --> 1:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of he's just kind of like trying to get us

1:16:46.320 --> 1:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to comment about how many lies Trump told and I, no,

1:16:50.680 --> 1:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't talk about it. I guess we'll go see.

1:16:53.280 --> 1:16:54.519
<v Speaker 2>Was this was this on air?

1:16:55.320 --> 1:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think so. Yeah, I don't think so.

1:16:58.320 --> 1:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>And if it was, it wasn't Mike, and if it was,

1:17:01.320 --> 1:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>CNN didn't give it to me because I asked them.

1:17:03.080 --> 1:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I said, I'd love to know exactly what he said.

1:17:05.160 --> 1:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>But and then by from memory, I didn't know what

1:17:08.240 --> 1:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to say. It was just so colossally horrible, and the

1:17:11.120 --> 1:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>way that Joe Biden had to help him down from

1:17:13.120 --> 1:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the one foot or not even one step stage because

1:17:18.240 --> 1:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>there was like some weird lighting and it might be

1:17:20.240 --> 1:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>disorienting for a eighty one year old man. I didn't

1:17:23.640 --> 1:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>know what to say. I was wearing Phillies cufflinks. It

1:17:25.800 --> 1:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>was a middle of baseball season, and Joe is from

1:17:28.360 --> 1:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, outside Philly, so I showed him, you know,

1:17:32.040 --> 1:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>one of these awkward moments. I'm just like, I got

1:17:33.840 --> 1:17:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Philly cufflinks.

1:17:34.640 --> 1:17:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're a cousband other than that, missus Lincoln.

1:17:38.400 --> 1:17:40.519
<v Speaker 1>Your husband, you know, just shat the bed in front

1:17:40.520 --> 1:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of the whole world. Did you like my Phillies cuflinks?

1:17:42.280 --> 1:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know what to say. I didn't say the

1:17:44.240 --> 1:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>shit the bed stuff, but it was just it was

1:17:46.200 --> 1:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And then they wandered off, but.

1:17:49.320 --> 1:17:50.559
<v Speaker 4>They didn't seem to know how.

1:17:50.600 --> 1:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>They didn't seem to have any idea or if or

1:17:53.320 --> 1:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>they're just very practiced politicians and they knew not to

1:17:55.720 --> 1:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>reveal it. But I kind of believe the former.

1:17:58.320 --> 1:18:02.720
<v Speaker 2>And even his inner circle initially or ever, did not

1:18:03.240 --> 1:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>say that it was a disaster, right. I mean, they

1:18:06.800 --> 1:18:09.640
<v Speaker 2>said he had a cold, right, And I think he

1:18:09.720 --> 1:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>told you he had a cold to Jake according to

1:18:12.280 --> 1:18:13.320
<v Speaker 2>your book, and he.

1:18:13.320 --> 1:18:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Said, sorry, sorry about my voice, I have a cold.

1:18:15.800 --> 1:18:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Right, right. But they didn't seem to kind of level

1:18:20.400 --> 1:18:22.920
<v Speaker 2>with him after that. They were still spinning the polls

1:18:22.960 --> 1:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>and acting like he was still in the in the game.

1:18:26.680 --> 1:18:31.320
<v Speaker 3>They're very dismissive of all of the and they felt

1:18:31.320 --> 1:18:33.720
<v Speaker 3>that it was a complete overreaction, and I think part

1:18:33.720 --> 1:18:39.160
<v Speaker 3>of that, honestly, is revealing that the person they saw

1:18:39.200 --> 1:18:42.559
<v Speaker 3>on the debate stage was not that different than the

1:18:42.600 --> 1:18:46.920
<v Speaker 3>person they often saw behind the scenes. And you know,

1:18:47.320 --> 1:18:49.240
<v Speaker 3>there's been some discussion of like why we use the

1:18:49.240 --> 1:18:51.280
<v Speaker 3>word cover up, Well, it wasn't a cover up, then

1:18:51.320 --> 1:18:53.519
<v Speaker 3>why was it so shocking to so many people? And

1:18:53.560 --> 1:18:57.479
<v Speaker 3>it's because like that in a circle was and I

1:18:57.520 --> 1:19:00.840
<v Speaker 3>don't even know how conscious it was versus is just

1:19:00.920 --> 1:19:05.080
<v Speaker 3>they were like protecting their guy, but they were shielding

1:19:05.160 --> 1:19:10.240
<v Speaker 3>him from that part of Biden being the world seeing

1:19:10.840 --> 1:19:11.160
<v Speaker 3>seeing that.

1:19:11.439 --> 1:19:14.040
<v Speaker 2>How long was it before he dropped out between the

1:19:14.080 --> 1:19:17.120
<v Speaker 2>debate and when he finally announced he wasn't running, It.

1:19:17.080 --> 1:19:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Was a little over three weeks. It was June twenty

1:19:18.680 --> 1:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>seventh of July twenty first, a little over three weeks.

1:19:21.160 --> 1:19:24.080
<v Speaker 2>What did your reporting tell you about how Kamala Harris

1:19:24.120 --> 1:19:25.200
<v Speaker 2>walked that tight rope.

1:19:25.400 --> 1:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>She kept her head down. She kept her head down.

1:19:29.240 --> 1:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>She did not want anyone to think that she was

1:19:33.360 --> 1:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in any way trying to push him out. She was very,

1:19:36.439 --> 1:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>very mindful of that. And in fact, when there were

1:19:40.400 --> 1:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>democratic you know, when there was an effort to shore

1:19:42.720 --> 1:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>up support among Democratic senators and they and the White

1:19:46.120 --> 1:19:50.599
<v Speaker 1>House asked her to call some Democratic senators, the ones

1:19:50.640 --> 1:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that she did not have a good relationship with or

1:19:52.640 --> 1:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a strong relationship with. She declined because she didn't want

1:19:56.560 --> 1:20:00.400
<v Speaker 1>anybody to think, hey, guess who it is. You know

1:20:00.400 --> 1:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that she was in any way campaigning for it. We

1:20:03.840 --> 1:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>use the term in the book that she was loyal

1:20:06.120 --> 1:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to a fault, and I think we mean it literally.

1:20:08.920 --> 1:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>She was so loyal to him that she was part

1:20:13.200 --> 1:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of this problem.

1:20:14.360 --> 1:20:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, it also cost her dearly when she said on

1:20:17.840 --> 1:20:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the view that I wouldn't do anything differently at a

1:20:21.240 --> 1:20:24.439
<v Speaker 2>time when people were looking for change. That wasn't an

1:20:24.520 --> 1:20:26.560
<v Speaker 2>answer that served her well.

1:20:26.600 --> 1:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I think actually that yes, one hundred percent, and that

1:20:29.240 --> 1:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>was probably her worst moment as a presidential candidate, and

1:20:32.960 --> 1:20:35.360
<v Speaker 1>by the way, not a horrible run, given she only

1:20:35.360 --> 1:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>had a one hundred and seven days, right.

1:20:37.040 --> 1:20:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think she did a lot of things

1:20:38.920 --> 1:20:39.880
<v Speaker 2>really well West.

1:20:39.920 --> 1:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>She probably saved three or four Democratic Senate seats, probably

1:20:44.080 --> 1:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>ten or twenty House seats. She brought things back to

1:20:47.760 --> 1:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, losing but within respectability, although she did lose

1:20:51.880 --> 1:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>every battleground state. But I actually think, and this is

1:20:54.479 --> 1:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>just my personal point of view, I actually think the

1:20:56.720 --> 1:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>worst answer she gave to any question was at the

1:20:59.800 --> 1:21:02.640
<v Speaker 1>very end of the campaign, she didn an interview with

1:21:02.720 --> 1:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Halle Jackson of NBC News, and Hallie was pressing her

1:21:06.960 --> 1:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>on like, basically, weren't you part of the cover up?

1:21:09.439 --> 1:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, do you regret it telling, you know.

1:21:12.200 --> 1:21:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Part of the cover up of Joe Biden?

1:21:14.240 --> 1:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, do you regret testifying on behalf of him? And

1:21:19.600 --> 1:21:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Vice President Harris said it was a bad debate, That's

1:21:22.680 --> 1:21:24.479
<v Speaker 1>what she said. It was a bad debate. If it

1:21:24.560 --> 1:21:27.519
<v Speaker 1>was just a bad debate. With all due respect, Vice

1:21:27.560 --> 1:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>President Harris, you wouldn't have been the nominee. Like people

1:21:32.360 --> 1:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>have bad debates, this was not that. I mean, it

1:21:34.840 --> 1:21:37.360
<v Speaker 1>was horrible, but this was a bad debate, was not

1:21:37.400 --> 1:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the problem.

1:21:38.360 --> 1:21:42.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm cureous how you feel about this assertion, this belief

1:21:42.120 --> 1:21:45.040
<v Speaker 2>that Joe Biden still holds onto that he could have won.

1:21:45.840 --> 1:21:49.760
<v Speaker 2>He said recently, yes, I could have won in essence paraphrasing,

1:21:49.920 --> 1:21:53.479
<v Speaker 2>and he said he still got seven million fewer votes

1:21:53.520 --> 1:21:56.640
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty. A lot of people didn't show up

1:21:56.720 --> 1:21:59.719
<v Speaker 2>number one, number two. They're very close in those toss

1:21:59.760 --> 1:22:01.599
<v Speaker 2>ups dates. It wasn't a slam dunk.

1:22:02.120 --> 1:22:07.120
<v Speaker 3>So what I mean, I think Joe Biden moll probably

1:22:08.320 --> 1:22:11.680
<v Speaker 3>to the end of his life, will believe that. And

1:22:11.720 --> 1:22:14.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that's part of sort of his resiliency and

1:22:14.280 --> 1:22:18.920
<v Speaker 3>belief in himself. And I also think acknowledging otherwise would

1:22:19.000 --> 1:22:24.040
<v Speaker 3>be too big of a thing to tell yourself.

1:22:24.320 --> 1:22:27.479
<v Speaker 2>It's something you call what Biden. There's a phrase you

1:22:27.600 --> 1:22:28.360
<v Speaker 2>use in the book.

1:22:28.800 --> 1:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>We refer to the bidens, which is just the stuff

1:22:33.360 --> 1:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>at all. That's the stuff that you and I saw

1:22:36.800 --> 1:22:39.439
<v Speaker 1>when we covered him, like in the nineties and the

1:22:39.479 --> 1:22:44.599
<v Speaker 1>aughts and stuff, just like long winded always made gaffes,

1:22:45.600 --> 1:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>told a lot of FIBs, like all that stuff. That

1:22:48.200 --> 1:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>made it difficult, by the way, for his staff to

1:22:50.720 --> 1:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>see when that was actually symptomatic of something else aging,

1:22:55.280 --> 1:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>if not something else more diagnosable. But yeah, that was

1:23:00.320 --> 1:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that was a real issue. One other thing on the

1:23:02.280 --> 1:23:07.559
<v Speaker 1>on the polling, his pollsters, his outside pollsters, Jeffrey Pollock,

1:23:07.600 --> 1:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Garon, Molly Murphy, never met with him, never talked

1:23:11.080 --> 1:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to him, wanted to never talk to him.

1:23:15.200 --> 1:23:17.400
<v Speaker 2>And they fake polls.

1:23:17.479 --> 1:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>No, they were giving real polls to the campaign. And

1:23:19.600 --> 1:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>then Mike Donaldin, who started his career as a polster

1:23:23.479 --> 1:23:25.679
<v Speaker 1>and ended up being a guy who went by his gut,

1:23:25.960 --> 1:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>not data, would interpret them for President Biden. And this

1:23:30.160 --> 1:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>was one of the things that when we talk about

1:23:33.240 --> 1:23:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Obama and Pelosi and Schumer and Hackeen, Jefferies wanting to

1:23:37.520 --> 1:23:39.880
<v Speaker 1>get through to Joe Biden what's going on out there,

1:23:40.280 --> 1:23:43.599
<v Speaker 1>they are constantly frustrated by the fact that Mike Donaldin

1:23:44.360 --> 1:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is in their view, not being straight with the president.

1:23:47.439 --> 1:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>And to this day they say, oh, you know, it's

1:23:48.720 --> 1:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>only a couple of points. There's only you know, no,

1:23:52.360 --> 1:23:55.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're pollsters. And at the end, finally when

1:23:55.520 --> 1:23:59.519
<v Speaker 1>Schumer has the conversation with President Biden and Rehoboth and

1:23:59.560 --> 1:24:02.479
<v Speaker 1>he says, you're polsters think you have a five percent chance.

1:24:03.200 --> 1:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And I talked to one of the pollsters after I

1:24:06.280 --> 1:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>found that out. It was reported by the New York

1:24:07.920 --> 1:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Times first, but it's also in this book, and one

1:24:10.800 --> 1:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of the posters said to me, it's probably more like

1:24:13.080 --> 1:24:16.479
<v Speaker 1>a one percent chance. I mean, like his numbers were awful,

1:24:16.600 --> 1:24:19.479
<v Speaker 1>they were getting worse, and there were two reasons they

1:24:19.479 --> 1:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>were bad to begin with, inflation and concerns about his age.

1:24:23.560 --> 1:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And he had just put the age issue. There was

1:24:27.040 --> 1:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>no improving it. Everybody saw the debate. Everybody knows what

1:24:31.400 --> 1:24:34.519
<v Speaker 1>that is. People might not understand tariff policy, but as

1:24:34.520 --> 1:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you noted, we all have parents, we all have grandparents,

1:24:37.880 --> 1:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we all are aging ourselves. We know what that is.

1:24:41.560 --> 1:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Everybody and so many people in the book, member of

1:24:44.680 --> 1:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Congress after member of Congress would see Joe Biden behind

1:24:48.000 --> 1:24:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the scenes and say, telling us privately after the fact,

1:24:53.320 --> 1:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>he reminded of me of my dad, who died of

1:24:55.960 --> 1:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Parkinson's And as my husband often tells me, when I

1:24:59.240 --> 1:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>complained about my age.

1:25:01.120 --> 1:25:04.000
<v Speaker 2>You're never going to be any younger, you know. I mean,

1:25:04.160 --> 1:25:06.479
<v Speaker 2>it's it's not reversible, right.

1:25:06.439 --> 1:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, And there was still one hundred and seven days

1:25:08.160 --> 1:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>left and another debate. It wasn't going to get better.

1:25:11.360 --> 1:25:14.679
<v Speaker 2>Fully understanding this falls into the category of kulda would

1:25:14.720 --> 1:25:18.320
<v Speaker 2>have should have? What might have happened if Joe Biden

1:25:18.400 --> 1:25:21.280
<v Speaker 2>had stepped down or announced he was only going to

1:25:21.320 --> 1:25:23.680
<v Speaker 2>be a one term president at a certain point in

1:25:23.760 --> 1:25:29.280
<v Speaker 2>time that the primary, some kind of primary process took place.

1:25:30.439 --> 1:25:32.880
<v Speaker 2>What do you think we would have seen in the

1:25:32.920 --> 1:25:36.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four election campaign and election.

1:25:36.360 --> 1:25:38.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think you would have seen a ton of

1:25:38.520 --> 1:25:42.559
<v Speaker 3>people get in yeah, Pee Putaja. I mean I also

1:25:42.600 --> 1:25:46.080
<v Speaker 3>say that increasingly Democrats are actually acknowledging Hey, we would

1:25:46.080 --> 1:25:48.080
<v Speaker 3>have been better off. Amy Klobuchar said it to meet

1:25:48.080 --> 1:25:50.599
<v Speaker 3>the press law Sunday, Pee Pudajad said it, and a

1:25:50.600 --> 1:25:54.840
<v Speaker 3>ball places Iowa this week. Primelogia Paul has also said this.

1:25:55.360 --> 1:25:57.880
<v Speaker 3>You would have had a very robust primary. I mean,

1:25:58.000 --> 1:26:01.599
<v Speaker 3>so on the Biden people. You it would have been

1:26:01.640 --> 1:26:05.679
<v Speaker 3>divisive and the party would have been divided. I think

1:26:05.720 --> 1:26:08.680
<v Speaker 3>there is a little bit of overlearning the lessons from

1:26:08.720 --> 1:26:13.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty sixteen, where the divisive Hillary Bernie primary they feel,

1:26:14.320 --> 1:26:16.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, cost her the election. But you know, and

1:26:16.520 --> 1:26:18.519
<v Speaker 3>Jacob's mentioned this before, you know, one of the most

1:26:18.560 --> 1:26:20.960
<v Speaker 3>divisive primaries ever was two thousand and eight with Hillary

1:26:20.960 --> 1:26:24.680
<v Speaker 3>and Obama, and it actually ended up making Obama a

1:26:24.680 --> 1:26:28.639
<v Speaker 3>better candidate and it helped the party. So I think

1:26:28.800 --> 1:26:31.000
<v Speaker 3>there are a lot of people in the party. I

1:26:31.040 --> 1:26:32.160
<v Speaker 3>know there are all of people in the party that

1:26:32.280 --> 1:26:35.240
<v Speaker 3>believe it would have even Kamala Harris, who if you

1:26:35.240 --> 1:26:37.880
<v Speaker 3>look at the Electoral College margin two hundred and fifteen

1:26:37.920 --> 1:26:39.360
<v Speaker 3>thousand votes something like that.

1:26:39.520 --> 1:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Like she would have been a better candidate if she won.

1:26:41.960 --> 1:26:44.639
<v Speaker 3>You if she had gone through that primary process, if

1:26:44.640 --> 1:26:46.080
<v Speaker 3>she if she won to if.

1:26:45.960 --> 1:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>She spent her vice presidency, she wasn't doing the reps,

1:26:48.320 --> 1:26:50.479
<v Speaker 1>she wasn't doing interviews, she wasn't out.

1:26:50.600 --> 1:26:54.479
<v Speaker 2>I think because he wasn't. She didn't want to overshadow him.

1:26:54.840 --> 1:26:55.639
<v Speaker 2>They didn't want him.

1:26:56.320 --> 1:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a ton of reasons. It's not meant as an

1:26:58.800 --> 1:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>accusatory statement, but she was she wasn't ready. I mean,

1:27:03.120 --> 1:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the theory of the case from a guy like David

1:27:04.680 --> 1:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Pluffu's quoted extensively in our book, you Obama's two thousand

1:27:07.160 --> 1:27:09.599
<v Speaker 1>and eight campaign manager and worked on the Harris campaign.

1:27:09.640 --> 1:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>At the very end, was a robust primary system would

1:27:12.840 --> 1:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>have produced a Democrat that could have beaten Donald Trump.

1:27:15.160 --> 1:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Poll suggested that Trump was beatable.

1:27:17.640 --> 1:27:20.120
<v Speaker 2>It would have put the Democratic Party, in my view,

1:27:20.200 --> 1:27:23.440
<v Speaker 2>in better stead too, because it would have given exposure

1:27:24.080 --> 1:27:29.400
<v Speaker 2>to their bench. Right, people would have seen these future

1:27:29.439 --> 1:27:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Democratic leaders and they would have become more well known,

1:27:33.360 --> 1:27:37.320
<v Speaker 2>perhaps impressed some voters, and they just didn't have an opportunity.

1:27:37.400 --> 1:27:41.479
<v Speaker 2>So now people are like, who who for twenty twenty eight? Right,

1:27:41.560 --> 1:27:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that some names might have surfaced and some

1:27:45.120 --> 1:27:46.080
<v Speaker 2>real possibilities.

1:27:46.040 --> 1:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>So if the Democrats actually let a primary system happen,

1:27:50.040 --> 1:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, they really haven't had a

1:27:52.280 --> 1:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>competitive primary since Barack Obama ran in two thousand and eight,

1:27:56.360 --> 1:28:00.719
<v Speaker 1>which produced a stronger Barack Obama and a win campaign.

1:28:01.000 --> 1:28:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twelve, obviously he was the incumbent. In twenty sixteen,

1:28:03.760 --> 1:28:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the party leaned on the scales for Hillary and was

1:28:06.479 --> 1:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>unfair to Bernie. Twenty twenty, the party came in and

1:28:11.080 --> 1:28:14.519
<v Speaker 1>made Joe Biden the nominee because they were so scared

1:28:14.560 --> 1:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of Bernie winning, and then twenty twenty four, we had

1:28:17.080 --> 1:28:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the fiasco that we write about. So they haven't really

1:28:20.000 --> 1:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>had a competitive democratic party process, primary process where they've

1:28:23.800 --> 1:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>actually let the voters make up their minds since two

1:28:27.040 --> 1:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight. And I mean, it's one of the

1:28:29.360 --> 1:28:32.519
<v Speaker 1>reasons why I think some of the arguments about Donald

1:28:32.520 --> 1:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump being undemocratic or anti democratic and January sixth and

1:28:35.640 --> 1:28:38.559
<v Speaker 1>all that perfectly legitimate arguments. I'm not disputing them, but

1:28:38.720 --> 1:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's one of the reasons why a lot

1:28:40.080 --> 1:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of voters don't find them particularly compelling because they've seen

1:28:44.240 --> 1:28:48.639
<v Speaker 1>what Democrats did to Bernie in sixteen and twenty and

1:28:49.120 --> 1:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>what they did with Biden in twenty twenty four. It's

1:28:52.320 --> 1:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not exactly you know, small deed democracy.

1:28:58.160 --> 1:29:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Final question, how will Joe Biden be remembered?

1:29:03.560 --> 1:29:08.200
<v Speaker 3>I think I think is part of the problem with

1:29:08.400 --> 1:29:12.400
<v Speaker 3>that question, or I guess sort of honestly, it sort

1:29:12.400 --> 1:29:14.880
<v Speaker 3>of pains me to say, because the thing is, he

1:29:15.080 --> 1:29:19.439
<v Speaker 3>was the one that framed his presidency as a success

1:29:19.520 --> 1:29:21.680
<v Speaker 3>or failure based on whether or not Donald Trump came

1:29:21.720 --> 1:29:28.360
<v Speaker 3>back and he failed, and even people very close to

1:29:28.439 --> 1:29:33.960
<v Speaker 3>him see his presidency now, as you know, basically just

1:29:34.000 --> 1:29:37.600
<v Speaker 3>a presidency in between two Trump terums. I think that

1:29:37.600 --> 1:29:39.120
<v Speaker 3>doesn't mean that a lot of things he did, a

1:29:39.160 --> 1:29:41.920
<v Speaker 3>lot of people in administration he did, won't be remembered fondly,

1:29:42.680 --> 1:29:45.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, especially as like things get built and.

1:29:46.680 --> 1:29:48.759
<v Speaker 2>So much of it is being undone.

1:29:49.479 --> 1:29:55.320
<v Speaker 3>That's true too, And because Donald Trump won and you know, honestly,

1:29:55.600 --> 1:29:57.519
<v Speaker 3>it's that's why we sort of frame it as a

1:29:57.520 --> 1:30:01.640
<v Speaker 3>tragic story because I think his greatest virtue his resiliency

1:30:01.680 --> 1:30:03.880
<v Speaker 3>and not giving up, and at the end it became

1:30:03.880 --> 1:30:04.559
<v Speaker 3>a tragic flaw.

1:30:06.240 --> 1:30:08.639
<v Speaker 1>It's tough to say from the perspective of six months

1:30:08.640 --> 1:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>after the election what history will record. I will say,

1:30:12.840 --> 1:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the what we remember of presidencies

1:30:16.640 --> 1:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in the past, I mean, what are like the three

1:30:19.040 --> 1:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>data points we know about Woodrow Wilson. One of them

1:30:21.920 --> 1:30:25.479
<v Speaker 1>is that he had a stroke and his wife kept

1:30:25.520 --> 1:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it from the country.

1:30:26.360 --> 1:30:30.040
<v Speaker 2>And the League of Nations. I'm resegregating the comfrom right.

1:30:30.520 --> 1:30:33.519
<v Speaker 1>It was a horrible racist and the League of Nations

1:30:33.520 --> 1:30:35.479
<v Speaker 1>and World War One. Yes, there are other things, but

1:30:35.520 --> 1:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the Maybe, like if you say there

1:30:37.240 --> 1:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>are five points for each president, and that's a lot,

1:30:39.520 --> 1:30:41.839
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I don't think a lot of Americans

1:30:41.880 --> 1:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>could tell me much about Calvin Coolidge or Warren G. Harding,

1:30:45.200 --> 1:30:49.439
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, I just think it's part of his legacy.

1:30:49.960 --> 1:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And it was unprecedented, dramatic, hideous, ugly, tragic, heartbreaking. Stephanopolis

1:30:58.880 --> 1:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>called it after he interviewed Joe Biden heartbreaking. That's, you know,

1:31:03.160 --> 1:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>just to put some pathos on it. The humanity we

1:31:05.800 --> 1:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>all age father times undefeated, and here we had it

1:31:09.920 --> 1:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>happen to this guy in front of all of us,

1:31:13.040 --> 1:31:16.639
<v Speaker 1>in enraging. I mean, I don't think that this gets

1:31:17.160 --> 1:31:19.519
<v Speaker 1>separated from his legacy. It is possible that some of

1:31:19.520 --> 1:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>his legislative achievements are what he fought for when it

1:31:21.640 --> 1:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>came to NATO also are part of it. But there's

1:31:24.240 --> 1:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>no erasing this, however much they want to try.

1:31:28.240 --> 1:31:31.280
<v Speaker 2>And this may put a stain on his legacy, I think,

1:31:31.400 --> 1:31:37.040
<v Speaker 2>and unquestionably, Alex Thompson and Jake Tapper so fun talking

1:31:37.080 --> 1:31:41.040
<v Speaker 2>to you all, I mean, obviously an incredibly serious topic

1:31:41.120 --> 1:31:43.320
<v Speaker 2>and an important book. Thank you both so much.

1:31:43.360 --> 1:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Kay, so good to see you.

1:31:47.040 --> 1:31:50.040
<v Speaker 2>So how do you all feel about Jake and Alex's

1:31:50.080 --> 1:31:54.519
<v Speaker 2>book Original Sin and covering the issues presented in this book.

1:31:55.160 --> 1:31:57.920
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to hear from you. Head to my YouTube

1:31:58.000 --> 1:32:01.120
<v Speaker 2>channel where you can watch the interview and leave a comment.

1:32:01.680 --> 1:32:07.360
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to know what you think. Thanks for listening everyone.

1:32:07.600 --> 1:32:10.200
<v Speaker 2>If you have a question for me, a subject you

1:32:10.240 --> 1:32:12.479
<v Speaker 2>want us to cover, or you want to share your

1:32:12.520 --> 1:32:16.280
<v Speaker 2>thoughts about how you navigate this crazy world, reach out

1:32:16.640 --> 1:32:19.280
<v Speaker 2>send me a DM on Instagram. I would love to

1:32:19.320 --> 1:32:23.200
<v Speaker 2>hear from you. Next Question is a production of iHeartMedia

1:32:23.240 --> 1:32:27.599
<v Speaker 2>and Katiekuric Media. The executive producers are Me, Katie Kuric,

1:32:27.720 --> 1:32:32.160
<v Speaker 2>and Courtney Ltz. Our supervising producer is Ryan Martz, and

1:32:32.240 --> 1:32:37.360
<v Speaker 2>our producers are Adriana Fazzio and Meredith Barnes. Julian Weller

1:32:37.479 --> 1:32:42.040
<v Speaker 2>composed our theme music. For more information about today's episode,

1:32:42.280 --> 1:32:44.679
<v Speaker 2>or to sign up for my newsletter, wake Up Call,

1:32:45.120 --> 1:32:48.040
<v Speaker 2>go to the description in the podcast app, or visit

1:32:48.120 --> 1:32:51.320
<v Speaker 2>us at Katiecuric dot com. You can also find me

1:32:51.360 --> 1:32:55.080
<v Speaker 2>on Instagram and all my social media channels. For more

1:32:55.160 --> 1:33:00.519
<v Speaker 2>podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or

1:33:00.520 --> 1:33:05.599
<v Speaker 2>wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Hi everyone, it's

1:33:05.680 --> 1:33:08.559
<v Speaker 2>Katie Couric. You know I'm always on the go between

1:33:08.640 --> 1:33:12.679
<v Speaker 2>running my media company, hosting my podcast and of course

1:33:12.760 --> 1:33:15.679
<v Speaker 2>covering the news. And I know that to keep doing

1:33:15.680 --> 1:33:18.160
<v Speaker 2>what I love, I need to start caring for what

1:33:18.320 --> 1:33:22.280
<v Speaker 2>gets me there, my feet. That's why I decided to

1:33:22.280 --> 1:33:26.519
<v Speaker 2>try the Good feet stores personalized arch support system. I

1:33:26.600 --> 1:33:29.799
<v Speaker 2>met with a Good Feet arch support specialist and after

1:33:29.840 --> 1:33:32.880
<v Speaker 2>a personalized fitting, I left the store with my three

1:33:32.960 --> 1:33:37.960
<v Speaker 2>step system designed to improve comfort, balance and support. My feet.

1:33:38.120 --> 1:33:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Means and back are thanking me already. Visit goodfeet dot

1:33:42.240 --> 1:33:45.639
<v Speaker 2>com to learn more, find the nearest store, or book

1:33:45.680 --> 1:33:47.920
<v Speaker 2>your own free personalized fitting.