WEBVTT - SBF's Arrest and the FTX Hearing

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hide of Blomberg's World headquarters in New York

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and Imed Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg technology

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>coming up old fashioned embezzlement, positioned to fail. Any regulation

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>would have helped. They're just some of the CEO John

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Ray the third and the words he had to say

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of f t X. Understand Bankminfried. We dig into the

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>testimony and what's to come of it. And the fd

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>X fallout is creating headaches at other exchanges, mainly Binance,

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>which has seen nearly four billion dollars in outflows in

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>the past week. And Bloomberg has learned Apple's potential solution

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to anti competitive concerns over its app store. But first,

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to that huge story of the day

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>after ft x is swift collapse sent shock waves across

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>crypto markets. Of course, the House Financial Services commit he

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>was out to get some answers from the senior f

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>t X executives, a task that's been made are now

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>more complicated by the fact that will He is arrested.

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Sa bakmafreed himself in the Bahamas on Monday. Williams Chris

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>so much as with us on the latest. Just walk

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>us through, Chris, what happens now from illegal perspective for

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Sam Magminfried. Yeah, well, as we can see on the screen,

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>things are breaking right now that he's uh denied bail

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Bahamas and it's gonna be in jail if

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe the report I saw said tebrutary eight. So

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that pushes things down the road from the immediate future

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to then and uh, you know he's apparently going to

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>fight extradition, which could take a while, could take months,

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>could take years. Some people say, we've had people poor

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>who have bought extraditions successfully or stolen the Bahamas and

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>had not um. So it's a real question as to

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>how that will proceed before he even gets here to

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>face the charges that are facing him, which are pretty substantial. Chris,

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>I've sat alongside you covering financial crime in the courtroom,

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>preparing and anticipation of being in the courtroom. It's never straightforward.

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>The burden will have to force the prosecution. Of course.

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>What is it that they'll have to demonstrate and prove

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the action Sam Bankman free took

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>or did not take, Well, they're going to happen to

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>show that he used. You know, either he's charged with

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>wire fraud, UM, securities fraud, commodities fraud, and conspiracies to

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>commit those as well, So they're gonna have to show

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that he used basically that he lied to investors or

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>lied to customers by misrepresenting the state of the company's

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>finances or omitting material facts about the company's finances. And

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>when we say material, we mean things that would matter

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to a reasonable investor when they when they invest, if

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that would matter to them in their decision to invest

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>with him or to give them money. Um, And that

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>would be the burden that they would have to show

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>on each of those accounts. The jury to convict Bloomberg's

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>christ almost there on the legal and court speat thank you. Meanwhile,

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>f t X is new chief executive and the man

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>handling its restructuring, John Ray the third did take the

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>stand on Capitol Hill where he called the former ft

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>X team as quote, grossly inexperienced and unsophisticated. Take a listen,

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>not sophisticated at all. Sophisticated perhaps in the way, uh

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they were able to sort of hide it from people,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>uh frankly, right in front of their eyes. But this

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't This isn't uh, you know, sophisticated whatsoever. This is

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>just plain old embezzlement. Bloomberg Shnali Bassak on the ground

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in Washington following it blow by blow, What did we learn?

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>F t x c O. John Ray really talking about

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>how this is like a paperless bankruptcy and that he

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't trust a lot of the paper trail he sees. Meanwhile,

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>on the lawmaker side, you have recognition by some such

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>as Congressman at french Hill who says that the losses

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>here could really dwarf what you saw even with Bernie

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>made off so one of the biggest bankruptcies here in

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>American history. There's also this recognition of whether there could

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>have been anything done to prevent something like this via regulation,

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>via better rules of the law of land when it

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>comes to what's happening in the United States when it

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>comes to digital assets. But at the end of the day,

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you did have John Ray also saying this could have

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>happened anywhere. Remember you had charges civil and criminal here

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 1>of fraud, and also the SEC saying that the commingling

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of funds here were happening as he was misleading investors

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.799
<v Speaker 1>about certain facts about f t X, and Alameda talked

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to us through Shannali, really what the answer is for

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>people who have lost money here? Was there any sort

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of explanation for those who have been so emotionally and

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>but also financially involved in this as to where the

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>buck will potentially flow for us or for international users.

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a few things here. You did have John Ray

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>say that it's impossible to recoup everything, but you also

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>had him say that in the United States it might

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit easier than other places given how

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the firm structured. But I would also say that remember

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the sec complaint, for example, they

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about how the funds were used and where the

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>funds were used, real estate purchases, political contributions, venture capital.

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Remember we've already had the FTX executives say the venture

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>capital in particular are assets, and how they treat that

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in the bankruptcy when they try to make customers whole

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>again will be interesting because they're going to have to

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>track all these assets down at the end of the day,

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and will they get full dollar for them at the end,

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and are they even going to be able to find

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>all the assets? Meanwhile, I just want to go to

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>your expertise, HETIONALI in the contagion effect. You've been looking

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot at the other exchanges that edged on a

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>light on some of the crypto related names that have

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>been sunk by this. But there has been a lot

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of reporting and focus on Binance, for example, on Twitter

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and on other areas of the media. Is that something

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>that you think Washington is paying attention to at the moment.

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they're pretty tied up with f t X

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, So that's a great question if I

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>asked anything about whether it's finance or stable coin industries

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>or anything else. Really, the focus really here is on

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>f t X right now because people have lost so

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>much money and there is a lot of anger. But

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to the point that you're making their finance is a

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>largely international exchange. Of course, there's also finance US. But

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the issue you were talking about earlier in the show

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>was net outflows to the tune of about four billion

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars in a week. I thought Nansen's analysis of this

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. Kind of not to fret this is the

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>small percentage of total assets, but it does goes to

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>show the cost to mur fears around holding money in

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 1>an exchange, especially as the industry gets more concentrated. Plus

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that issue with stable coin withdrawals, to keep an eye

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>on as the industry faces pressure. What happens to the

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>stable coin industry. Whenever you have a congressional committee hearing

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>like this, Nali, Yes, you get the testimony from those

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>called as witnesses. We also kind of get this broad

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>range of opinion from those committee members that pose questions.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Do we get any sense of what the committee members

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>want to happen next? What happens next based on what

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>was discussed in that room? Well, one thing actually and

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>no shocker here, but when there's frustration in the committee

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>often it's backward looking, and so there were a lot

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of questions about what had happened, how does it happened?

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>But there was also a fair bit of frustration that

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>he was arrested yesterday before he was able to testify

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>here today under oath to give Americans more clarity on

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>what had happened here, I would say also, if you

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>want that clarity, go to the indictment from the Southern

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>District of New York, go to the SEC complaint and

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the CFTC complained. There's a lot of detail in there,

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>but there was certainly a lot of frustration here we're

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>not hearing from Sam BigMan freed himself under oath, which

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we know he had said he didn't have all the

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>details because he didn't have all the data. Shanali Bassek

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>just fantastic day of reporting in of course the White

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>House or indeed in Washington or generally. We thank her

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>so much, and let's just talk a little bit for

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a moment about what's been happening. The update that, of

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>course Sam Backminfried has been denied bail by a judge

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Bahamas in order to return to jail. We

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>understand in the island country. Now what's interesting here is

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the judge is also setting the extradition hearing for bank

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Win freed for February the eighth, and learn the arraignment

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday. Has Laways said that he would fight plans,

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, to send him back to the United States

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to face charges. I mean, while coming up the future

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of the cybersecurity industry and as we head towards three,

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>what that really looks like. We're going to get you

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:00.319
<v Speaker 1>the perfect insight an exclusive conversation. Palo Alto Neck Works

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Nikesha Aura US next a Bloomberg. We've got

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk cyber right now because it's been an increasingly

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>important focus for companies, for governments, and of course this

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>year we're going to talk about cyber crime as it persists.

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Plo Alto Network CEO Nikesha Aura Choice US from its

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Global Cybersecurity Conference in Las Vegas, bringing together more than

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity professionals to discuss just that the increasing nature and

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>all encompassing global nature of cyber crime. Nikesh, But what

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>about cyber spending? We want to understand right now when

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you're getting up on your fireside chats, when you're thinking

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>about innovation in the space, as you have been with

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the course with Glogle Cloud, are people still willing to

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>spend as much as they used to in this this

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>environment of economic downturn. Well, Caroline, first of all, thank

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>you for having me as we kick off our IGNITE

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>conference in Las Vegas. I know there's a lot of

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation around the macro environment and what is going on

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>with potential budgets and cyberspending and I T spending to

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>be honest in the future, and whilst we are seeing

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>some degree of caution from the customers out there. I

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think the demand is going away because there's a

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of historical debt that needs to be paid. Because

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>we've built infrastructure over the last thirty years which needs

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to be replaced. Because everyone's relying on technology and that

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.599
<v Speaker 1>requires a lot of our customers to upgrade their capabilities

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to get more and more up to speed with the

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>current techniques in the market. And as you know, the

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>bad actors aren't waiting in an economic downturn. They're attacking

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>with fugusto they are. And therefore, what of the space,

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the competition in the space, the people, the customers do

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>they turn to in this moment? Is it market shap

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that's been growing for you? And how have you been

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>winning that? If so? Well, Caroline, four and a half

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago we were a single product company. In the

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>last four and a half years we have built a

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>portfolio where we lead in thirteen categories of cybersecurity. This

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:01.719
<v Speaker 1>is a few which hasn't been done before by any

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity companies. So, you know, the silver lining in this

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 1>macroeconomic environment is that customers are looking to reduce their

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>total cost of ownership and increase their security posture. Security

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>outcome as you'd like to call it, and that makes

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>us a perfect partner for them because we have spent

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the time in the last four or five years trying

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to put our platform together and that's helping us because

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, people are coming to us in this consolidation

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>seat of driven market the cash. It's been a busy

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>week for Caroline and I'm we're only two days in.

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>We called Monday Merging Monday because of just the relentless

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.239
<v Speaker 1>news for an M and A. You're in ignite two

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of your friends and peers and industry colleagues. Historically, I

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>look at your M and A track record, semin a

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>an option for you guys right now. Well, you know

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>we've bought seventeen companies so far since I've been here

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>for four and a half years. So yes, you know

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>we have appetite for M and A as you can

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>probably tell. But we really focus done expanding our product

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>capability and product portfolio, and we've done M A slightly

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>differently than traditionally an enterprise. We've actually looked for number

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>one or number two in our in a particular category.

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>We made sure that the founders have come to work

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bolt stayed with us. We made made sure they

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>run our business. In fact, you know, I was noticed

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>noting the statistics this morning. We have fourteen thousand employees.

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Eighty percent of those people are new to Poulto in

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the last four years. So we have made sure that

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>this transition that we've undergone through M and A and

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>through organic development has been sort of balanced with increasing

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in our own capabilities. So we think we've paid off

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>all the cybersecurity technical debt we've had to pay to

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>build this into a large platform company for the future.

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't I didn't hear enough. I didn't hear no. Yes.

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Well I didn't hear yes either. Fair enough. Caroline made

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a really good point earlier when we were talking before

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the show that when it comes to cyber security, cyber

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 1>crime is not moderating, even if the spend of your

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>customers is. What are the drivers behind corporates who think, right,

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I better now protect myself and invest in this area.

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>What are the key events from this year that has

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>pushed executives to get their checkbook out? Well I did

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>last year. In two we had twenty confirmed randsomwhere victims,

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>which means companies had to deal with an environment where

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>their technology did not help them. They got breached, their

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>systems were shut down, they had business interruption, and they

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>either had to negotiate their way out of a situation

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>or had to pay rand somewhere to get out of it,

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to get to you know, get back to business. Now

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that leaves boundarily of a scar on you. You're gonna

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sit down with your I T team and their security

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>teams like this should never happen again. So the market

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>just in Mint Mint customers who are not paying attention

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 1>to cybersecurity, and what's happening is, you know, the whole pandemic,

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the whole rework from home, the whole fact that you

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>have you know, online was the only way to get

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>business done because your stores were closed. Has put a

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>tremendous focus on making sure that your technology infrastructure is

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>working at the time that requires it to be uninterruptable,

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It requires it to have business continuity, and their cyber

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>becomes your biggest risk if something happens to your tech infrastructure.

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Because you do a global cyber survey, and what caught

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>my eye was not only just how everyone has experienced

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it was reported experience of cybersecurity incident, but What really

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>interested me was the talent issue, and you talk about

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a cyber skills shortage, and that basically most respondents is

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that having to tend to automated ways of tackling

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity because of talent shortage. How are you looking to

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>tackle that talent shortage in this market? So, Caroline, like

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you already gave the answer and what you said, I

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think we have a talent shortage. I think we

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>have a you know, sort of a perpetration of too

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>many vendors, too much integration, which is done by our

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>customers who in some cases don't have all the skills

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>needed because they're running a two thousand, five thousand, ten

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand people organization, and they should be busy doing their business,

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>not worrying about protecting their infrastructure by stitching cybersecurity solutions.

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>That job should be our job, that should be the

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>industry's job. And that's kind of what we've been working

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>on phil last four and a half years. Four and

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a half years ago, we went out and said, listen,

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a data problem, this is an AI problem.

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>It was funny I was remarking earlier that I played

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>with GPT three and chat GPT over the weekend, and

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it is giving you a little window into what AI

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is capable of. How natural language processing should be able

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to answer you a question without requiring humans to get

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>involved and looking at screens and trying to figure out

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>what the problem is. So I think this is a

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>data problem. I think this is an AI problem. We

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>need more data and AI professionals, not really cybersecurity professionals.

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>We can understand fifty different vendors in the infrastructure and

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>stitch it one at a time for each customer. So

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>this is an automation problem. This is an AI problem.

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>This can be solved, but our customers have to step

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>up and embrace automation and AI because if they don't,

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have more ransom of our victims next year

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>than we had last year. We had a chat GBT

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>ease there on a hands carry How familiar with that?

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Palo Alto Network CEO Nikesha are a really good to

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>catch up, Caroline. Not grateful to have you on the show.

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Twitter's Trust and Safety Council. It's no

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>more a group of independent experts. It was created in

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to help tackle child sexual exploitation, hate speech, harassment other

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>problems on the platform, but it's now been disbanded and

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a letter was sent to the team saying, as Twitter

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>moves into a new phase, we are reevaluating how best

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to bring external insights into our product and policy development work.

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Several members recently quit the group over concerns about the

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>company's ability to police the platform for harmful contented Yeah,

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that's right, Kara and Apples making some changes of its own,

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>preparing to allow alternative app stores on its iPhones and

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>iPads as part of a sweeping overhaul to comply with

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>strict European Union requirements coming in bloom Bus. Mark Goerman

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>broke that story and joins us. Now, Mark, what have

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you learned in your reporting about the changes that Apple

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is working on internally? Thank you both for having me. Yeah,

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>have you explained it well. Basically, Apple has a major

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>project in the works across its software and services organizations

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to really revamp the underpinnings of iOS and iPad os,

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>some of its other operating systems to meet these very

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>stringent and very broad requirements coming into place from the

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>European Union. Now, as part of these requirements, they're really

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>going to start making the iPhone a little bit more

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.959
<v Speaker 1>like Android. Right. I'm sure some people aren't gonna like, uh,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, to hear that comparison. But there's the reality.

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna see some sideloading, which means installing apps from

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>third party app stores, from different websites, from other sources

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet. You're going to see them begin to

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>slightly open up the NFC processor on the phone, which

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is the chip that allows you to do mobile pay

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>with Apple pay, so it's Apple to pay payments for

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the first time, may be able to come to third

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>party apps like your bank or Venmo or PayPal. You're

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>also going to see a change to the browsing engine.

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So there's third party web browsers available on the iPhone,

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>whether that's Firefox or whether that's Chrome. But what most

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>people don't know is that those applications still use the

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 1>underlying mechanics, the underlying engine of an Apple Safari web browser.

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>There's also some work being done to open up the

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Fine My network. Do you remember Tile that Square competitors

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.479
<v Speaker 1>to the air tag. They've complained for months about not

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>being able to have the same iPhone based pairing functionality

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>as the air tag. So Apple is going to try

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to bridge that gap as well. That's interesting, of course,

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>because you bring up a competitor basically that Apple wouldam

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>built something pretty similar to all of this is about competition.

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>We've are gonna gotten thirty seconds left. But will this

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>ultimately satisfied you think, because you're saying it's like Android,

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>but Google is also they think it's too powerful. As

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>long as Apple hits all the requirements that the European

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Union is outlined with the Digital Markets Act for I'm

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>not really sure what else people or the government can

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>complain about. Out the downside for Apple if they don't comply.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>We're talking ten to of annual global revenue as fine

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>switch for Apple as of last year. That's eighty billion dollars.

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Quite the chunk of change. Mark German Money talks always.

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>We thank you so much. Is always great to have

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>him on with a scoot. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hyde in New York with Ed Ludlow in

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, and you are always a busy man across

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>our screens, but also by writing scoop after scoop. Just

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>tell us about the SpaceX fundraising one. Yes, so Bloomberg

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 1>has learned that Elon must SpaceX wants to sell insider

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>shares at a price that would raise the company's valuation

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to about a hundred and fifty forty billion dollars. According

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>to sources, this makes SpaceX the most valuable private company

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in the US. It's up from a seven billion dollar

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>valuation in July. That's according to pitchbook data. You know,

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>this is a company that's dominated ting right the market

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>for commercial space launch. They have Starlink, which is their

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>satellite based internet and you know, in the past, Musk

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>has said that Starlink could be spun off in a

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>listing right once cash flows more predictable. I'm really interesting

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>your take on this story. You know, it's a tender offer.

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't know yet for certain if they'll do a

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>primary as well. And I know, you know, you know

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>this bending on for every seller, there's a buyer, and

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>buyer there's a seller. But what what gets me is

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>that there's clearly an appetite from investors to get involved

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in SpaceX, and when it's led by well, ostensibly one

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk. I know that he of course has very

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>powerful CEOs and operational chief's female at that. But I'm

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>interested in why on the one side, you're talking earlier

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>about Tessa shares have been under pressure. Worry about the distraction,

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>but then the privately held business people answer worried. Yeah.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a very hard one to answer. Gwin

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>shot well, as you alluded to, you know runs day

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.959
<v Speaker 1>to day SpaceX. But Elon Musk is still involved, you know,

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>in his pay testimony the other day, he's said that

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that's still a key area of focus for him. So

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a question that overhangs both companies. But the private

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>entity SpaceX at least seems more immune to this key

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 1>man risk element that tests the shares appear to be

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>under yeah for now, well, still going to the moon,

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it would seem in terms of overall valuation of that business.

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And let's talk about valuations and businesses private and whether

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the exit strategies are still there. We want to talk

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>about fundraise, we want to want to talk about deal sentiment.

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>We've got great local focus for that here in New York.

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Cameron and Sary's with us board partner at Greycroft is

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>also the former head of M and A at Pinterest.

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>So basically, Cameron, you can talk about everything that we

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the moment because it's a hot

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 1>week for M and A and also clearly for valuations,

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>but all certain businesses just talk to us. You're very

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>focused on flin texts, in particular to some consumer focused businesses.

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>I know that the likes of billion under your focus.

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>But talk to us about what the landscape feels like

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>right now for these companies. Well, it's been a slow

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>market for certainly for I pos F, M and A

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and for fundraising all the above right uh, and it's

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>been down significantly. But I think in these last few

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks of the year, certainly on the fundraising front, you know,

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing more activity. I'm seeing more companies trying to

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>close deals before the end of the year. And then

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>on the M and A front, you saw a very

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>large deal announced yesterdayan text space where Coupa Software is

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be bought by Toma Bravo off the public

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>markets for about eight billion dollars. So and that comes

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in the heels of Avolara, another software company is bought

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>by um vis To Equity for about the same price

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollars about a month or two ago. So

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna see more and more these deals

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>where private equity buyers see great valuations and and values

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>really on the public market for some of these great

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>companies that have um earnings but cash flow and that

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the price that it's really been depressed in

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the last year, and that's we've throwed the needle for

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit of whether there's any themes. Then

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.239
<v Speaker 1>you say, if they basically caught earnings, basically if they

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are a profitable business, so what do most of the

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>companies in your portfolio more generally have that right now

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>or more changes needed from within before they can go

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>out and fundraise. Well, I think in the venture space obviously,

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about early stage companies, the majority of

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>them do not have a out of EBA D or profit.

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>They're they're focused on growth to maybe growing for a year,

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>but they're still burning cash on the public markets. However,

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a number of great companies that went public

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of years, particularly sas Space, um

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>software companies that are still public but the valuations have

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>come down significantly. UM you still have you know, Zora, Smartsheet, Docuside, dropbox, Box, um, HubSpot.

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>These are all terrific companies, and I'm you know, I'm

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>willing to bet that the folks at this done too,

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Moravo and elsewhere, probably the salesforce, probably Adobe. They're shopping

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>their pencils and look at these valuations and thinking, you know,

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>when is the right time to make an offer for

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>one of these businesses because those companies do have strong clients,

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>good growth, good margins and cash. Cameraon Monday was I mean,

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it was Merge of Monday. It was madness. I don't

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>know where you were or what you were doing, but

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>as those headlines kept coming, seventy billion dollars worth of

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>deals Sunday night through Monday evening, what was your reaction

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>to that? The timing, the volume, that the velocity at

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 1>which those M and A deals are announced. Yeah, I mean,

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it ties back to the as we've talked about,

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>which is you have a lot of strategics as well

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>as private equally firms of massive cash talg piles. You

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>have attractive valuations in both the private and the public markets,

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and you have end of the year right, so it's

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that time where people want to get things on their

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>books and try to get deals announced before folksy for

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the holidays, so uh, you know, we're seeing that, you know,

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>even on the venture side, where people are trying to

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>really get deals done and fundraising completed before uh, you know,

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>we hit the Christmas and years holidays. What happens next

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is the big question. You know, there are a number

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of private companies out there across subsectors. There are names

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that are associated with going public in the near term,

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>long term. You know, I'm essentially asking you for your

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>outlook and where you see this market going into. Right,

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll look in in one we had something like Nino

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>I p o S and they raised about a hundred

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>forty six billion dollars in proceeds. This year, we've had

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>roughly half of that. I think is is the ballpark metrics.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>So it's been down significantly, and even the companies that

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>felt i P already I think have pulled back and

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>are waiting. Um the two largest on the private side

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in the tech space, I think or Space Sex with

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys just mentioned, and then probably Stripe, the large

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>payments company, which you know, many folks expect, you know,

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it is going to go public in the next you know,

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>who knows, six twelve months, maybe eighteen months. I think

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>those are the two big kind of grand daddies that

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone's waiting for in the tech space to go public,

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and then their number of companies kind of behind that

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that are smaller um. But I think those are the

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>ones that I really looked to to be bell Weathers

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>for when when the market's kind of back open. You've

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>got so much experience in house but also externally in

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>VC and early stage. I'm interested in your perspective at

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the moment in the lead the lamb of regulation because

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>you are exposed to, say, by now pay data companies,

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>credit keeping one of them. The focus on fintech right

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>now very very much in the crypto space, but more generally,

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's going to be a head wind

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 1>or tail wind some of the businesses you're in Well,

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the nice things about fintech historically

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>leaving crypto side, because crypto has famously been largely unregulated,

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but most of the fintech businesses that were involved in

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that I'm involved with. If it's a payments company, you

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>have to have money transfer licenses. If you're a lending company,

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to be a regular lender. If you're an

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.880
<v Speaker 1>insurance like you've gotta be licensed. So all of these

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>businesses that by and large in the fintech space, whether

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it's payments, insurance, lending, are regulated. Uh, and you have

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to go state by state and these are complicated processes.

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>You have to get bank licenses. But because if you

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>do that, it makes it harder for someone to replicate

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>your company. It also takes several years to get started.

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Typically you can spend from you know, two to three

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>years just getting from zero to your first loan or

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>your first payment. But it adds a level, you know,

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously of sophistication of the business and oversight. So I

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>think that you know, in the fintech space, by and large,

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you do have a quite a bit regulation already built

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in and with your expertise, your M and a hat

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>on as well. I mean, your perfect guests really to

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>for the whole show because you're also was an early investor,

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe in most Palo Alto networks right a long time,

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like well, we just have the CEO then cashase terrific. Yeah,

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:57.199
<v Speaker 1>and Nikosh is a big m and a guy. You know,

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>he's done what was it seven deals he said since

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>he started. I'm interested in your respective M and A

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>and regulation because look, you look at the deal with Activision,

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Blizzard and Microsoft. People don't like these sorts of deals.

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>How much do you think companies were big hefty pockets.

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Are they gonna be able to make purchases they want

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to do? Well? You've seen buying large and I see

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the Google Mandian deal. But but Google and Facebook and

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the big tech giants Apple, which is famously not very

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 1>inquisitive anyway, they've been very quiet on the M and

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.360
<v Speaker 1>A front. They really have not wanted to do much

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>because I think most of the deals do get scrutinized.

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 1>You know Facebook about Giffe and that deal is getting

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>unwotot because of the European regulation. And you see the

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Adobe Figma deal, which is one of the larger deals

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in tech, twenty billion dollars, that's being scrutinized now potentially.

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>So the large tech buyers are hesitant I think to

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>make big splashy deals happen because they fear it is

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be subjects regulation. Now. The one exception is Amazon

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>which bought Whole Foods and MGM, and you know the

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>one medical and all these answorry businesses that but you

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>know what The key point is those are not e

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>commerce companies, right, so they're staying clear of buying things

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>in their core wheelhouse because I think they feel these

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>other businesses will have less of a chance of getting

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>scrutinized from a FC perspective. Cameron, I just want to

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>go back to your your kind of career and your

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:10.679
<v Speaker 1>experience in deal making former head and of M and

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>A pintrest now at great scale. You mentioned about some

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>of the deals that might hit barriers, some of the

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>deals that might not get done, deals that have got

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>done in the past. If you're sitting around the table

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>right now with your bankers, with two CEOs that want

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to get a deal done, what do you imagine the

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>frustrations are, or at least the I guess, the anxiety

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that if you proceed with with a deal then you

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>know it might not happen anyway, certainly, And I mean

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you're seeing on these types of deals now

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot more safe cards being built in um s

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>grows and people asking for you know, breakup fees and

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>kids the deal doesn't go through UM you know. I

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>think one of the deals that was announced did not

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>have a no shop so that the company is still

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>allowed to look for other buyers and they might have

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>been cooper um. So I think these are unusual provisions

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that you to pebably don't see. But I think in

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>this market where there is uncertainty, where buyers might try

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to back out, I mean, obviously Elon must try to

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>back out of Twitter before the deal closed, uh, you know,

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty significantly, um, And so I think that's the reality

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of the current market. And I think in the boardroom

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that the venture investors and the others are making sure

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that these safe cards are put in and try to

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>prevent um these deals from falling apart, or to at

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>least have backup options and insurance policies. All right, Cameron,

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and sorry a slip of the tongue there. I think

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I said that you worked at gray Scale, which is

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of course not true. You're a board partner at gray

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Croft and a former head of m and A at Pinterest,

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>which I got right. And we're grateful to have you on.

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Thank you. Now coming up, how will the

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>ft X implosion jump start crypto regulation? We have the

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>perfect guest for the conversation, the Blockchain Association's Kristin Smith.

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But before we got to break let's take a look

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>at how bitcoin has performed since Sam Bankman Free's arrest.

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Is not the most since FTX filed for bankruptcy. Some

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>near term performance, but around just shy of the eighteen

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand u s thought us to taken. This is blatan dyk.

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>The ft X groups collapse, the implosion of f t

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>X fair system from absolute concentration of control in the

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>ends of a small group of grossly inexperienced, nonsophisticated individuals.

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Appears to have all the hallmarks of En Run and

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Bertie Maynoff blended together named Sam Bankman Freed. This is

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.959
<v Speaker 1>the antithesis of anything that is permitted in regulated markets.

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Failed to implement virtually any of the systems or controls

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that are necessary for a company and trusted with other

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>people's money, year assets. Justice seems to be you know,

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in process, which I think is welcome by those in

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the in the crypto industry. It's more more information comes

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to a lot. I suspect there is a good chance

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>they'll be more people under the microsy go Sure. This

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't you know, sophisticated whatsoever. This is just plain old embezzlement. Busy,

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>busy today, in the U. S. District Attorney Damian Williams,

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, calling the ft X scandal one of the

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest financial frauds in American history. But from all the

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>fallout of the ft X downfall, will regulators actually get

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a grip on crypto to make it fairer, more reliable,

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>so this won't happen again. For more on the regulatory outlook,

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>we turned to christ And Smith, the executive director of

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the Blockchain Association, which assists in key policy solutions among regulators, lawmakers,

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>public for the digital assets space in particular. You're, of

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>course there are said sort of talking some would say

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>lobbying on behalf of your members ever labs BH, digital

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>bit dear, not f t X, not f t X,

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank goodness. We actually had tremendous differences on strategy with

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>ft X, and so they were never part of the

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Blockchain Association, And so if there's a silver learning in

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>all of this, it's that we don't have to be

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>competing with them for strategy in Washington anymore. Okay, So

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about strategy, talk about out out of the ashes,

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the roses that will grow that many will hope is

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is an easier playing field. More clear playing field, a

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>more transparent playing field. Is that likely because we asked

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>our audience, we had a Twitter poll, We asked and

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>whether they're confident or not as to whether crypto regulation

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>will meet the mark at this moment, and as we

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>can bring up like say, don't hold your breath, people

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>are on the fence. Yeah, well listen. I think there

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>was a really healthy discussion going on in Washington prior

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to the collapse of xd X on what we need

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to do to move forward with crypto regulation. I think

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>there's two key areas. One dealing with fiat or dollar

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>back stable coins and what those regulatory parameters should look like.

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I also think we were starting to have a healthy

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:46.479
<v Speaker 1>conversation around what crypto exchange, you know, the spot markets,

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>were consumers buy and sell crypto, what the appropriate regulation

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>for that should look like. Those are two very clear gaps.

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the challenge we have now with this FTX

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>situation is the conversation has moved from a small group

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of policymakers who had really taken the time to understand

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this space, to a much broader audience within Congress who

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>wants to get involved and do something. So I think

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>this is going to slow the legislative process down. But

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to end the legislative process.

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there are tens of millions of American consumers

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>who own crypto. Crypto networks are providing incredibly valuable services

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that are going to be the future of a new internet,

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a future of new financial infrastructure. This is innovation that

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>we cannot undo and we want to be competitive with

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>here in the US, and the regulation. Getting that regulation

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>right is key to doing that. Kristen, it's good to see.

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're well. The mission statement of the Blockchain

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Association is to advance the future of crypto in the

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>United States. Has what's happened with FTX, what we've learned

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>about Sam bank Man Freed impacted or jeopardize that mission? Well, listen,

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's certainly a setback. I mean we've had today,

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we heard about the incredible shortcomings at at f t

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>X International UH and its related companies. UM, We've seen

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the charges in the indictments that have come down today.

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is really serious stuff. But this is

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>incredibly abnormal behavior compared to how most people in the

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>crypto community operate. Most people are here because they want

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to empower people because they value transparency. Uh. This is

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a technology, Uh you know that that can empower good

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>for the world. And I think it's going to be

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>incumbent upon us in the crypto industry to pick up

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the pieces that Sam has left with the mess that

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>he has made um and I think it will take

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>some time, but I'm optimistic that we will be able

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>to move beyond this and return to having positive discussions

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 1>around policy. But more importantly, the builders in this space

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 1>are continuing to create and they're they're bringing forward ideas

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think ultimately it will become incredibly obvious to

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>everyday people that crypto is a force for good and

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's here to stay. As you mentioned, Kristen sam Bankmin

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>freed charged with eight criminal counts, including conspiracy and wire fraud.

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>What was interesting to me is during the testimony of

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the current FCS CEO, you know, he kind of laid

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>bare some of the shortcomings of the humans behind f

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>t X and Alameda, lack of financial controls, lack of experience.

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>My question to you is, what did we learn about

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the structural issues in this industry? What are

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the concrete things that need to be fixed with the

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>crypto industry and also the underlying technologies that support it. Yeah. Well,

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I think my takeaway from listening to the hearing today

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>was that this is not a structural problem within the

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>broader crypto industry. This was a structural problem with f

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>t X. They didn't have internal controls, they weren't following

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>local laws, they weren't meeting their own in terms of service,

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have any record keeping. UM. I mean, this

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>company was a mess. It was it was in some

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>ways barely a company. And I think that if you

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 1>look at the way companies in the US that are

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 1>regulated by state money transmitter licenses, who are registered with

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network as money services businesses, uh,

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>these companies are doing the right things and have taken

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the steps as required under law in order to protect consumers. Um.

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>We've also seen companies take further steps and do things

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>like proof of reserves, where they're able to show that

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>all all customer assets are being held and segregated and

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>accounted for. And so I think that this is something

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that policymakers are going to be grappling with as we

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>head into three. I do think that they're going to

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 1>have additional hearings with the start of the new Congress

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>starting in January, and we're going to see a lot

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of legislative proposals in both the House and the Senate

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that take in attempt to tackle different pieces of this.

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:04.359
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's a lot of work to do,

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of discussion that's going on, but this is

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>an important space and one that we need to make

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>sure a lot of maakers get reaped. Blockchain Association Executive

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Director Christin Smith, thank you very much, thanks for having

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>coming up. Why the leaderboard of Bloomberg's Billionaire index shifted.

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg going viral today. There's a new lineup

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of the world's richest people on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Elon Mask, once worth as much as three and forty

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, was dethroned as the world's richest person today.

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Bernard oh No, the founder of LVMH, took the title

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:48.439
<v Speaker 1>instead for now a mask of force. He has lost

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>more than a hundred billion dollars just this year and

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it's now worth well only a hundred and sixty seven billion.

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>His drop as the world's richest came as Tesla's market

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>value fell below five hundred billion for the first time

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:03.280
<v Speaker 1>November twenty And of course this is amid concerns about

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the slowing demand for electronic vehicles and Elon Musk's focus

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 1>running Twitter and ed we kind of come full loop here.

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about the increasing overall valuation of SpaceX no

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:16.919
<v Speaker 1>distraction there, but the issue with Tesla, and of course

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that is behind in non Musk's wealth. Yeah, this is

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the first time Musk has dropped from the number one

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>spot or since he's been number two since September of

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>last year, and there's this micro focus on his wealth.

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But we use that Tesla proxy as a proxy for

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of the confidence in him. But it is interesting

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that the valuation of SpaceX can continues to go up

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>because his fate and their fates are kind of a

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 1>weakly tied at least that's what it says in the

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>regulatory filings exactly. And I mean, it's still it's interesting

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that we've got basically a focus on luxury and a

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 1>focus on technology are the still the names that dominate

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of wealth and wealth building. They are still

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>dominated by white males, largely at the top of the

0:38:58.040 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>billionaires in next and we hope that that will change

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>some way over in the focus on inclusion. But it

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is notable just how far the wealth has fallen just

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>still told what was, it's basically half from where it

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 1>used to be. For Elon Usk, Yeah, there's one thing

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you and I Carrow's stocks go up, and stocks go down,

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and they go back up again. And I wouldn't be

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>surprised to see you on us wealth climb a little

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>bit more exactly. For now, he's number two that does

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it with this addition of Bloembang technology. Do not forget

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to check out our podcast