WEBVTT - Ian Anderson

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, Welcome, Welcome back to Bob west Said's podcasts. My

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>guest into two legendary one of the time, the one

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and only and Anderson of Jeff Wild Tom Ian so

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>glad to have you on the podcast Big Fear. Well,

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just a pleasure to be here. And thank goodness,

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>there is only one of me, the one and only.

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Imagine imagine that there were two of me. I mean,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>people will be recoiling in horror at that screeching flute

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>permeating every fabric of their being. It would be even

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>worse than it already is. I frankly, have always discovered

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that the audiences are seduced during a live performance into

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking I quite like the flute, But in reality it's

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a horrible, horrible noise, and it's okay for a few minutes,

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>but for two hours, goodness me, I'm surprised they actually

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>remain in the in the venue. I have my cats

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>like the flute. My dogs run a mile, my wife

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>runs a mile, and and and she's an elderly lady.

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know James Galway, he says that he has

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>played with you. He's a big flutist. Well you know,

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>he's um he's a big flattist, but he's a he's

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a damned liar. We've we never played together. We were

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>supposed to play together in a concert somewhere in the USA,

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and he was he was performing at the same place

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the night after we were on and so we met

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>up and I sent him some music. We're gonna was

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna come up on stage and we're going to play together.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I'd like to think I like to

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>think he would have done it if it wasn't for

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he was a bit exhausted and jet

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>lagged and and probably a bit overwhelmed with the idea

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of being on a stage with noisy people, and it

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was out of his comfort zone. So I think, frankly

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.639
<v Speaker 1>he chickened out. But we we've always talked about doing

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>something together, and on the one and only occasion when

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>we could have done um, he he checking out. He

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>just didn't show up for sound checks. So it was

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit embarrassing. But anyway, I mean, I'm in touch

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>with James from time to time, elderly gentleman and in

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the twilight years, just just a little bit ahead of me,

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 1>but not too much. But one of his proteges. Andrea Grimanelli,

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>who James was was a tutor to m he he

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and I have played together many times, and in fact

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>we played played together in the Vatican Christmas concert just

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>before Christmas, played with with Andrea Grimanelli. And he's a

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>brilliant soloist, classical flute player and very nice and gentlemanly

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>guy who who's a huge as a huge relationship, great

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>fan of James Goldway, and we we we often chat

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 1>about it and our mutual experience. But that's classical music.

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>That's not what I do. I am just the I

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>am just the class cloud who sits at the back

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and makes rude noises. Well, without being too self deprecating,

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>how do you read your flute playing? Well, the thing

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, I began as a guitar player,

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 1>not as a flute player. So I was as a teenager,

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, struggling to try and learn to play a

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>few notes of essentially what we're blues improvisation. And then

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>when I was some nineteen maybe eighteen or nineteen, I

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>heard Eric Clapton. It just joined John Male's Blues Breakers,

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and that famous album cover where it Clapton is reading

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a children's comic called The Beano. And when I heard

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Eric Clapton, I thought, oh, this is um. This is

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>an object lesson in in um finding something else to

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>play as a musical instrument. So I said about finding

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>an alternative, and I traded in my trustee Fender strat

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>for a you know, it was probably worth today. I

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>mean the sixties strap that belonged to Lemmy, Lemmy of Motorhead.

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It was the previous owner when he was a rhythm

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>guitarist and Reverend Black and the Rocking Vicars rock band.

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>How did you get the strap from Lemmy? Well, I

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:21.119
<v Speaker 1>he was broke, so he had to sell it and

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I took on the the debt, if you like. And

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>so I I got this this instrument, played it for

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a year so and and then traded it in for

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:35.239
<v Speaker 1>a thirty dollar flute. It was a basic student model

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>flute and seemed because that guitar today probably you know,

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>being a real genuine vintage sixties strap to a Japanese

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>collector would probably worth a thirty grand, forty grand maybe

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>if you add in the fact that it used to

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>belong to me, and before that it belonged to Lemmy.

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't seem like a very good deal, you know,

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to part with that and then take on a thirty

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>dollar flute by way of exchange. But I think it's

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the best business investments I could possibly

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>have made as it turned down. But of all the instruments,

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the keyboards, the sacks, the drums, why the flute, Well,

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>there was no sensible reason whatsoever. I went went to

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>trade in my guitar and I looked around on the

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>walls of the music store and the sun. It had

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>been raining. It was a dreary day, I remember, in

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in a place called Litham in Lancashire in the north

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of England, and suddenly the sun came out and shone

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>through the window of the music store and glistened on

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>the on something that was hanging on the wall, which

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>was a flute, and it just beckoned. It just said

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>by me. And I had no idea how to play

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a flute. It just seemed like a nice, shiny, well engineered,

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>rather attractive object. And I have a soft spot for

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>things that are a good engineering in a well designed,

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>well developed and I just thought this looked like it

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>was a sort of musical Swiss watch. Really, so I said,

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll have that with no idea how to play it,

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>and I worked walked out with the flute, which for

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>the next few months I couldn't get a note out of.

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>And somebody finally told me it's like blowing across the

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>top of a Coca cola bottle, you know, you blow

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>at the right angle, it makes a makes a musical note.

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>And that finally dawned on me as I got the flute,

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I think in August of nine seven, and somewhere in

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>mid December I actually managed to get a note out

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>of this flute. It was a note of G, and

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>then I found a note of E, and then A

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and B, and then I had the blue scale. So

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>by the beginning of January, when Jethro actually became Jethrotel,

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 1>I was able to play not only just to play

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of flute, but to play improvised blue

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>solos because I just translated what I thought I knew

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>from guitar playing into into the flute well, even though

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know the proper fingering, and I was just

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, making loud noises to try and equal the

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>impact of the electric guitar in the band. But it worked.

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Out pretty well. I think I I think I probably

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>buy February March, people were beginning to talk about Jeth

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Hotel not just as another blues band, but a blues

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>band with a guy who played the flute standing on

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>one leg, which seemed to catch on in a way

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>with the media and as a as a kind of

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>an image as a logo. From that day onwards. We

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:52.239
<v Speaker 1>were a little different to Savoy Brown and Chicken Shack

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and Fleetwood mac And and the other blues bands of

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that era that also played at the famous Marquee Club

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in London. Okay, all over the web it says that

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>your daughter picked up the flute and then you ultimately

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>learned you were using the long wrong fingering and how

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to re learn it. Is that apocryphal or is that

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a real story. That's a real story. She she asked

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>me when she was at school. I guess she was

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>about eight years old or something, and said, oh, we

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we we've got to learn to play a musical instrument,

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of is just something that you've got

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that I could borrow too to play. And I said, well,

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've got drum kids, I've got saxophones, I've

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 1>got a whole bunch of stuff, but you know, maybe

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the flute is the easiest one. And so I gave

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>her a flute, one of my old stage flutes, and

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I made sure that it kind of played okay, and

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>she took it to school, and she came back and

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>had some little book, you know, how to Play the Flute,

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 1>Chapter one, and it was it was a musical notation,

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>which means nothing to me. But she was playing through

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a few notes and I ventured to say, look, actually,

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing this note and you do it like this,

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and she and she looked at where my fingers were

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>on the instrument, said was that that's not what it

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>says in the book, Daddy, That's not what you're supposed

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to put your little finger on the right hand. So

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I said, rubbish, But of course she was right. It

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>was I'd been all that time. That's just somewhere around

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>about nineteen eighty nine or something. I've been doing it

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>wrongly for all that time. And it was a bit embarrassing.

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>But I then actually went off to to Bombay Mumbai,

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>although it was still Bombay at that time, and it

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>was the day after the India bombings, and Mumbai and

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I arrived to do a preordained press conference before we

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>knew about the terrorist attack. So I was about the

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>only foreigner in town. Everybody had fled and so I

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>had the entire press and media of of of Mumbai

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>came to my press conference because they had nothing else

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to do. There's nobody else to talk to, and as

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a result, we we we chatted about various things, and

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>when I was back in my hotel room, oddly there

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>was a fax machine because my hotel was right next

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to the one that got blown up, and there's a

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>fax machine in my room. And I thought, I'll I'll

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>phone one of the music stores in London and see

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>if they can fax over to me a flute fingering

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>chart to show me all the fingering positions for the

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>different notes, which they did, and I looked with horror

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>at the end. Resultant thought, that is going to be,

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, very very difficult for me to relearn at

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>this point in my life, in almost twenty years after

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I first played the flute, and to begin with, I

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 1>was so daunted by it. I thought, oh no, I'll

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>just stick with what I've got, But it kept luring

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>me back in with the idea that I should try

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and do it properly. And so it took me about

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>six months really to incorporate the correct fingering into my

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>performances on stage, because of course I got set in

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>my ways and took a while to make the adjustment.

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But it was worthwhile because they then gave me the

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the scope to play at a more controllable different volume

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>levels and and and somewhat more in tune than I

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>had been, so it worked out pretty well. And then

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I moved from playing closed whole flutes where all the

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>keys are covered, which is kind of easy for beginners,

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>playing open, open whole flutes, which allow you to kind

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of slur notes and bend notes a little bit like

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 1>playing a blues guitar. And I made all that transition

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>really in nine nine, I guess, and and I never

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>looked back except to wonder why on earth I hadn't

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>learned to play it properly in the first place. Okay,

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned you gave your daughter a road flute from

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the stage. What would be the difference between a road

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>flute and a flute you keep at home and using

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the studio monetary value? Basically, because you know, when you're

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>traveling around the world, and you're apart from the fact

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're your flutes are going to be subject to

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of wear and tear, it's also that

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you know you have to leave them in hotel rooms,

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and or if you decide you don't want to leave

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in a hotel room, you've got to put it around

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>your neck and go up into the depths of some

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>darkened Eastern European town, taking your life and your flute

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in your hands, in order to try and find a

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>good takeaway curry or you know, or an empty restaurant

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 1>to eat in and and and get mugged along the way.

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's a little nerve racking. So I've never

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>traveled with flutes of any huge value. I always tend

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to I mean, they're kind of intermediate flutes, but frankly

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>not worth mugging me for. If you're gonna mug me,

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>take my watch, leave the flute. That's my advice. Now,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>with most musical equipment and sports equipment, people who at

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the elite level, there's a difference, like a pair of

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>skis or a guitar. This is my favorite. Do you

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>have a favorite flute where they all pretty much sound

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the same? Well, going back to James Galway, it's an

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting you know, he did a survey. I mean he

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>had lots and lots of flutes. I mean I know

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>because I've seen them. You've showed me the the cover

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that contains all of his flutes, and I mean there

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>must have been twenty different flutes in there. And he

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>he did a sort of test to try and play

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>them all one after the other, playing exactly the same

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>piece of quite complex classical music. And I think he

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>amply demonstrated that there was so little difference in the

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 1>tonal quality of all of these flutes, you know, arranging

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>from basically an advanced student model flute to you know,

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>eighteen carrot gold flute that was probably costing, and there

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>was a little difference in it. And I actually replicated

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same thing just a few weeks ago, when

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I knowing that I was starting work on a new

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>album with a lot of flute involved in it, that

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I did the same thing. I played a few flutes

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>one after the other on the same audio file and

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>listen to them back, and you know, you could detect

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a tiny little difference, but it was much less than

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it appeared to me when I play the flute, you

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>know you because you reson It resonates in your skull

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>as well as the sound of the instrument from the

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>ambushure whole and the sound that comes out of the

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>open tone hurls of the flute. It sounds more different

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to you, but to a high quality microphone sitting you know,

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty centimeters roughly one ft for you guys away from

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>your your flute. It's all my undetectable the difference. And

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in fact, I was recording something for somebody else. It

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>was doing performing a guest thing for some other artists,

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and I used I used two different flutes to to

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to play so that the flute part that was my

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>contribution to his record. And when it came to it,

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I realized there was absolutely no difference detectable between when

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been playing one flute as opposed to you know,

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds later I switched to using the other flute.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you really couldn't tell? So I don't think there's

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>any great difference when it comes to what you take

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>on the road to play and what you might play

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>because you just like the feel of it or that

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>very subtle nuance that makes one flute different to another.

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think the same thing obtains really for guitars,

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>which is why I've been utterly amazed and and perhaps

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a little irreverent in my response to people like my

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>pile Joe Bonna Messa, who I remember going backstage and

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing it about twenty guitars backstage to play a concert

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>at Hammersmith Odeon in London, and I said, what the

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>hell are all these guitarist for Joe? I mean, what's

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it about. I mean, you just need one, you know,

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you sound great? Well, why do you need all these guitars? Well,

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. I might decided to play a different

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>one that night, or in the song I want to

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>play that one, or whatever. And and I found it.

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It was quite amusing, you know. But I had to

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>take the mickey out of him because he was like

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>many guitarists. You know, it's a mark of how how

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>great your statue is in the firmament of guitar players,

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>as to how many guitars you take on tour, and

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>how many guitar roads you have to employ to change

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the strings and tune them up for you, which is

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the antithesis of life in Jeth Hotel guitar players take

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>one guitar and they change their own strings, and they

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>tune them up by themselves, and nobody is allowed to

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>touch them because your precious instrument. The last thing you

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>want to do is give it to some roadie to

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>handle and smear his bodily juices over the strings when

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>he's probably not watched his hands when he's been to

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the toilet. So nobody touches my flute, nobody touches my guitar,

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And the rest of the guys in the band are

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same, you know, we we are. Our instruments

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>are the tools of our trade. I say, you know,

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>if you if you were a cop and you had

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a you know, nine millimeter glocks glock strapped to your

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>your your your your your, your waist, and you know,

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>would you allow somebody else to clean it, to load it,

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to check it and make sure it was ready to

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>roll when it's a matter of life and death potentially

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that that thing is going to work for you if

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you should need it. And I think it's the same

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>thing with musical instruments. You you should take on the

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>responsibility of looking after them yourself, because it is life

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and death out there. If you pick it up and

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't it's out a tune, or it string breaks

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>or something. It's um, you are going to die a

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>horrible death on stage in front of thousands of people

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and looked like a complete turkey. Okay, So how does

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Ian Ianerson know Joe Bonamassa. I mean, I know Joe

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and he's very open, friendly guy. But you have a

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>reputation as being somewhat outside. But in reality, do you

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>know and connect with a lot of musicians or was

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>there a unique story with Bonna Massa? What's your relationship

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>with other musicians? Well, I I do connect in the

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>sense of there are a number of people that I've

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>met and I've known some of whom I played with,

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's probably less than twenty in fifty something years.

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I know Joe because our agent um said as a

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>suggestion for an opening act, and I was just young

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>kid who's um a bit of a whiz kid making

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>a name for himself, and you know, could he come

0:18:54.680 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and do some shows with Jethro Hotel and an added apprehensively, uh,

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and he actually plays one of your songs during his set.

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a bit of a Jet Hotel fan. So I said, yeah, well, okay,

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think I must have checked out some something

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>on long before YouTube, but it probably found something to

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>listen to. And he seemed he reminded me a little

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of Rory Gallagher in the early days, because he

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>was that kind of a shouty singer rather than a

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>melodic singer, full of energy, full of youthful vigor. Great

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 1>description of Rory Gallagher, Yeah and well, and and of

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the young Joe Bonamassa. But you know, he did some

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>shows with us, and he was such a nice, gentlemanly, quiet,

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>really easy going guy. And you know, a couple of

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>guys in this band they were they were okay, and

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>so it was an easy and easy, you know, a

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>good mix in terms of somebody to work with for

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>a few days on tour, and over the years, I

0:19:54.720 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>suppose we just kept in touch. But the mature um

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe Bonna Massa is someone who I think has evolved

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>beyond the shouty blues. Now he's a much better singer

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and a much better guitar player. He has the melodic

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and the restraint that perhaps you would associate it with

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>with the Eric Clapton um. To begin with, he sounded

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was just a little bit too How

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>many notes can you cram into a bar and sounds?

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>You know? Um, But if you're an opening out, you've

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>got to do that. You've got, you know, thirty five

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>minutes to struct your stuff and make a name for yourself.

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>You you've really got to turn on the turn on

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the taps. But you know, once you've become a headline act,

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>you can afford to demonstrate a little taste and restraint

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and try and try and make every note count, and

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>make the gap between the notes count, because that's the

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that Eric Clapton always had, you know, he knew

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>the value of the space between the notes. It's like

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>dramatic clouds in the sky, but you see between the

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>clouds a little touch of infinite blue, and it's the

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>space between the clouds, just as the space between the

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>notes and the guitar. So that give it its shape,

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>its form. It's drama, it's dynamic range. And I think

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>that's something Joe's and and and once he grew up

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, that's what he learned to do. Me,

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, I'm still stuck in the old days.

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 1>I just crammed as many notes as I can in Okay.

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>You happen to drop curries in there earlier of all

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the big Jethro Tolfi and I was catching up on

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you make sure I didn't forget anything, and it said

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you're a big Indian food expert. Now in America, I

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.479
<v Speaker 1>remember the Ramones talking about vindaloo. I didn't even know

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>what it was. There are a lot of Indian restaurants

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.239
<v Speaker 1>in America today, but nothing like the curry shops in

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the UK. So give us a primer on Indian food.

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>People who are un knowledgeable, what should they know about

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Indian food? Well, what they shouldn't know about it is

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that I mean apart from the connection obviously the primary

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>connection between Britain as a as a as a nation

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>who strutted its stuff across the globe and swept people

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>into its um, it's orbit and made such a huge difference,

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>some of it bad, some of it good. We inherited

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Indian food going back into the eight hundreds when the

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>very first Indian restaurant opened up in London and it

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>really made its mark. After partition in India seven the

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>year of my birth, when the Hindus and Muslims were

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>split up when Pakistan was split up into Pakistan as

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>we know it today and Bangladesh which was which was

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 1>was East Pakistan back then, and so many Indians and

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>bangladesh he's and Pakistani's fled the country during the very

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>unpleasant times after the partition and they came, many of

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>them to the UK and set up Pakistani restaurants, Bangladeshi

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>restaurants and Indian restaurants. And this was really throughout the

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>fifties and sixties. So when I grew up at the

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>age when I was beginning to play music and travel

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:29.719
<v Speaker 1>outside my hometown, then Indian food became. It became what

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you you you you aspired to as a good night

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>out if you were whether it was on your way

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>back from some some gigs somewhere in the north of

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>England and there was some late night Indian restaurant open.

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that you made a bee line for it,

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 1>because we all had a taste for spicy food Chinese.

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I suppose it was the first thing that we knew

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>about in terms of more exotic cuisine, but Indian that

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>nailed it for most of us. So I guess it

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>would be very hard to find many British music then

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and now who A didn't like Indian food and b

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>hadn't been to art school, So that those two things

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>somehow seemed to define what is about British musicians that

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe marks us out from the rest of Europe and

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>most of the USA. You know, we're all nuts about

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a good king prawne Vinderloo and we all we all

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>went to art college to study the creative side of

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of life that then translated into music. So if someone

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to an Indian restaurant, tell them hot at order,

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Well that that happens to me from time to time

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that somebody says, well I'm not sure what I should

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>what I should eat, So it's just you just asked

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>them a few simple questions. Well do you like do

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>you like food that has a wet source or do

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you like something that is dry and not not not

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.479
<v Speaker 1>not wet. Do you like something that is kind of

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 1>spicy like that a lot of spicy flavor is not

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>necessarily hot, but just the spices. Or do you like

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>something that is relatively bland? And do you like something

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that is spicy as in hot or do you want

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>something that's really mild? And and you eat meat, do

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you eat chicken, Do you eat fish, do you eat shellfish,

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>do you eat beef? To eat lamb? Or do you

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>are you vegetarian? And with a benefit of that, you

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>can perhaps direct somebody to something that hopefully is going

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to be along the lines that that that might satisfy them.

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And for people who are perhaps not really sure that

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I would recommend something, I mean, assuming you eat chicken,

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say, go for a chicken corner. It's a mild, creamy,

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>yogurt based sauce with the chicken boned pieces of chickens.

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 1>There's no bone in there. You know that that might satisfy.

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you want something that's you know, if you

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>want to just jump in at the deep end and

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you go for the King Prawn Vindaloo, and if you're

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>completely nuts, go for the King Prawn foul which is

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the legendary hottest of curries. And these days, of course

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>they're made with the benefit of chili peppers that have

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>been refined and hybridized in Arizona and New Mexico. So

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>these days it could be but jell Okia or the

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>or the or the the or the or the Reaper

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the hottest chili peppers on planet Earth.

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I know because I've grown those and you know, one

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>goes an awfully long way in terms of spicing up

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>your your supper. Okay, you mentioned Indy, you mentioned Britain.

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask what is your take unclapped in

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>It is the anti vax the answer? And what is

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 1>your stance on Brexit? Well, I'm afraid to say that

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>people like Van Morrison and Eric Clapton just a name two,

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in the attitude towards COVID, its effects and the vaccine. Um, well,

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I am ashamed of what they what they say, it really, really,

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 1>frankly makes me very angry because it's a you would

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>think you would think that they would be bright enough

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>to know better. And there are people who genuinely have

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a reason not to have the vaccine. But if you're

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a responsible citizen of planet Earth, and I think you

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>should take the chance and have your double vaccine or

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>your triple vaccine. And I mean I've actually had five

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>holes in my arm in the last twelve months, three

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>to do with COVID, one for pneumonia and one for

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>an annual flu vaccine. And I hate needles, I mean

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely hate needles. Drives me nuts. And but at

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, three of those five are

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>about are about protecting, helping to protect people around me,

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 1>my family, my friends, or complete strangers. I think it

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a civic duty, frankly, to bite

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the bullet, be vaccinated, and much less chance that you

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>could be the person who inadvertently infects somebody else, who

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>may be vulnerable, who may end up in hospital sadly

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>may die even with O macron, which is not the

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>pussycat quite that we were hoping for, but it's better

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>than nothing, and we have to accept that. Even though

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>infection rates in my country have now seemingly in the

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>last week turned the corner and started to go down,

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're almost half of what they were two

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, but our death rates, which lag behind the hospitalizations,

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>which lag behind infection rates, you know, are still going up,

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and at the at a rate quite as high as

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the worst of two thousand and twenty one, but still worrying.

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And in your country, you know, you're you are as

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of yesterday, pretty close to the highest daily infection rate

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that's been recorded, and O macron is still going up

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and death rates are still going up. It's um you

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>know we're not out of this yet. And I'm afraid

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Eric Clapton and others send an irresponsible message in my

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>view to two people. They just simply fall into that

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that kind of fake news and and conspiracy theory stuff

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that that does seem to appeal to so many people,

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's it isn't really without foundation. And when I've read,

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>because I go online and I look at what some

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of these people say, and I looked to see where

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>they got it from, and it is it's neither science,

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>common sense or common decency in my view to take

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>an anti vax state a status in your in the

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>way that you influence others. But that's just me. I'm

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a low abiding citizen. I'm a nice guy, and I

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely don't want to catch COVID about possibly avoid it

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>because I'm in that vulnerable category with underlying health conditions.

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I'm taking a little bit of extra

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>care and I'd like to think other people would do

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the same thing on my you know, for for my sake.

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.959
<v Speaker 1>And what about Brexit. Brexit is well, I remember when

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I I woke up to Brexit. I was in Poland

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to do a concert and I woke up in the morning,

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>around six seven in the morning and to hear the

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the early results of the Brexit Pole and was pretty

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>horrified to find out that it was in favor of Brexit.

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I think that the EU needed a

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>sharp shock to wake it up to the fact that

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>as an institution, the EU was I mean, it was

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a post war thing, you know, it was about bringing

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the European countries together so they wouldn't murder each other

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in battle. And then it developed into an economic union,

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>which is fair enough. And then it became the EU,

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>which was okay, but then it became increasingly caught up

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:22.719
<v Speaker 1>with trying to homogenize the whole, the whole fabric of

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Europe into accepting the same set of laws, same set

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of taxation standards, and a whole lot of things that

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I felt were removing the national culture and pride and

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>individual nation's sense of who they were, including in the UK.

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think the EU needed a bit of a

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>sharp shop to wake it up. But at the end

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of the day, I was I was disappointed that we

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>had not been able to find and accommodate some kind

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of a rational way to remain broadly within Europe while

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>having more of our own laws, in our immigration policies,

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in our own hands, rather than as part of a

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>European directive. Unfortunately, it resulted in us leaving the EU,

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm rather sad about that. I've been paying my

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>my German reunification tax since whatever it was nineteen eighty nine, when,

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the reunification

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of Germany as a as a performer going there to work,

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>part of the withholding taxes that we would pay were

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that small part that went towards the cost of reunifying Germany,

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>which is basically building roads and infrastructure and housing and

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the whole shooting match of what had been the Eastern

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Germany ground into the into the dirt by the communist

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>regime as an offshoot of of the USSR. But you know,

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I am sorry that we've left the EU.

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm a European, I'm I'm a I'm a Britain first,

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but I feel very strongly a European. It's where I've

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>spent much of my life and I hope, in what

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>remains of it I get to spend some more time

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. So yeah, I'm sorry to have left but

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to. In a way, I'm kind of

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>glad we didn't stay on the terms that we were on.

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I just felt there was prospects to tough it out

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a little more and get more of what we wanted

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>while still remaining part of Europe. Not a problem that

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys have. It's you, But you do have the

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>problem of NATO, and you do have the problem of

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>an angry Mr Putin who's hell bent on trying to rebuild,

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, from the ashes of the USSR, trying to

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>rebuild a broader empire than the one that he lords

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>over at the moment. I have a photograph, we can

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>find this online, a photograph of of when I went

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to play in St. Petersburg, I think in or ninety

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>one and met the mayor of St. Petersburg at the

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:14.240
<v Speaker 1>time and his assistant kind of rather odd, weird looking

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>little man who was looking daggers at me. In this photograph.

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>It turned out to be the KGB Major Putin. Although

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>he was the chief economic advisor to the Mayor of St. Petersburg,

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 1>he was actually a major in the KGB at the

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 1>same time. And Putin is just the look on his

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>face as I'm you know, smooching with his boss is priceless.

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And when I was well, it was brought to my

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>attention many many years later that there was a photograph

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of us in the same frame. But you can see

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>something about putin that and look in his eyes. It's

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>he's a frightening guy. I actually have a huge admiration

0:34:55.560 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 1>for him as a international statesman and politician. But he's

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>a very scary man, and I can you know, like

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody else, we know what he's trying to do. But

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>as someone who's supposed to be in Ukraine in um

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in the middle in the one at the end of

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the first week of April UM, it's one of those

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>slightly nerve wracking prospects that will Ukraine still be Ukraine

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>by the time I get there, Will I which would

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be another gig in Russia? Well, I'm gonna be in

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Russia for that matter, and whenever it is sometime not

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>too far off to do some concerts there that have

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>been rescheduled three times already, like most of our concerts

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>since early two and twenty, we're on our third or

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>fourth rescheduling of dates that people bought tickets for in

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the middle of two thousand and nineteen and we've not

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>showed up for work yet. I mean's so embarrassing. Just

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>staying on the politics one more time. A couple of

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:58.280
<v Speaker 1>days ago, the lead piece in the New York Times

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 1>our ed page was about the UK sliding into authoritarianism

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Boris Johnson passing all these laws about being arrested if

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you protest, etcetera. Do you think there's a possibility we

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly have this issue in the US and needles sat

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Putin is an authoritarian or is that overblown? But I

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 1>think it's a bit overblown. We are pretty much a

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>liberal society and media. You know, we have a couple

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>of right wing newspapers, but they're not anything like as

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>far to the writers say fox Um. And at the

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 1>same time, you know, whilst our liberal side of things

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little more, a little bit more to the

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>left than than CNN, we're still generally speaking, I think

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 1>we're relatively tolerant country. And you know, once in a

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>while you've got to try and get to grips with

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 1>what is increasingly what is referred to here as wokeasm.

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a those who have adopted really an

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>ultra liberal position because they are partly following trends and

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>not wanting to appear hostile or out of touch and

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 1>so on. But you know, there's got to be some

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 1>common sense in all of it. And you know, some

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of it I go along with, and some of it

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 1>i've you know, I feel a little awkward about. But

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, you know, we are pretty much a liberal country,

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 1>and the most extreme of our right wing media and

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>those within the Conservative Party are still puttycats compared to

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans of the USA, not all of them, but

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:43.839
<v Speaker 1>most of them. And you know, one of my great

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:50.359
<v Speaker 1>chums was and absolutely died in the whole idealistic Republican

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and and he was someone you could have a spirited

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to argument or discussion with. But he was a true

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Southern gentleman and loved by all Democrats and Republicans alike,

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 1>particularly during his stint not only with with Fox, but

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:15.720
<v Speaker 1>as the as the press secretary for for President Bush,

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>actually two President Bushes. He was he was the scriptwriter

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>for Dad and then it was the press secretary for

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>for Junior, and and I was in his office one

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.919
<v Speaker 1>day in the White House and he um, he said,

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>dropping names, but we were we were there just as

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, unexceptional guests to watch a press conference, and

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>went back to Tony Snow's office. Tony Snow's the name

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of the man. And and we got back to his

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>office after the press briefing and the phone rang, and

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it was Barbara Starr from CNN, and I could read

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>his body language and the tone of his voice. He

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>was being so polite and nice to her. And she

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:58.879
<v Speaker 1>was trying to get the scoop, trying to pin him

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>down on all that you know rubbish, you just said,

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, covering up for Bush. But you know, what's

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the real story here, what's the real And and he

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>was so nice and poline. He said, Barbara, you know,

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.439
<v Speaker 1>if I if I could give you anything more, you'd

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>be the first person I would call. It's it's really

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>nice to hear from you. And but you've got the

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got the impression he was somebody that was it

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:23.240
<v Speaker 1>was really appreciated as a as a person of honor

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>and discretion and a gentlemanly way of doing things. And

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>he had a very easy relationship with the media left

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and right alike. And I remember before Tony died finally

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 1>tragically after repeated illness, with with colon cancer. He I

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 1>did say to him, Toney, would you ever, you know,

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 1>would you consider a political career, you know, shift away

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>from being a backroom boy to actually, you know, running

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>for serious office. Um? And he was sort of bashful

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. No, No, my wife wouldn't really want me

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 1>to do that, and blah blah blah blah blah. But

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I've always thought that Tony, Tony would have been the

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Republican president for the USA that the USA really needed. Um.

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Sadly he was never around to do that. That his

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 1>last gig wasn't for Fox. His last gig he was appointed.

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 1>He took on the job with CNN to be their

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Republican reporting the upcoming election where Obama won. And that

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>was Tony's that the last appointment he had at that point.

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess he knew he wasn't going to make it.

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And sadly he was never able to take on that

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>appointment because he became very seriously and died before before

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that happened. But it was an interesting, an interesting twist

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, Tony was so appreciated and revered that

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>he would be taken on by CNN to be the

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the voice of the Republican Party within CNN whenever they

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>were talking out and analyzing the the events leading up

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to the election. So I, you know, I missed Tony.

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 1>He was a good guy and he would have been

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a good precedent. And he was a flute player. And

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that's how I got to know because his his whole

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>passion was playing the flute. He and I argued. I

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 1>said that he was the model for the the anchorman

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>flute playing sequence, the jazz flute bit, and he claimed

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that no, he couldn't. Possibly it must be me. In reality,

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 1>it was probably both of us. But I would never

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>classify myself as a jazz flutist and an anchor man.

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he was a media person, he was a

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was a and so was Tony. So

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I always had my bet that it was modeled on Tony,

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>But who knows. We'd have to ask the writers and

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the and the the actor. You know, where did he

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 1>get that idea for him? Okay, let's go back and

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:01.240
<v Speaker 1>set the scene in the sixties in US, there's certainly

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.879
<v Speaker 1>always been music, but generally speaking, the early sixties were

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:07.720
<v Speaker 1>very vapid, and then at the beginning of the sixty

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:11.760
<v Speaker 1>four the Beatles arrived. What was going on in the UK?

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, we hear about the blues records being imported

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.320
<v Speaker 1>by soldiers. We hear the scene in Liverpool, the Beatles

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 1>play at the Cavern Club. You know, as I say,

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in the US, people saw the Beatles on it solivan,

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>They picked up electric guitars. What was your experience of

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the scene. Well, I had already picked up an electric guitar,

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I think at the time, possibly when the Beatles came along.

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 1>That's another one of my questions. What motivated you? Yeah,

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't really that I was a Beatles fan.

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean I remember when they first appeared with a

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>song called Loved Me Do, and I think what appealed

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to me about it was the harmonica that kind of

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 1>set me off in the track of playing harmonica. But

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were okay, but they were a pop

0:42:55.400 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>group and I had already at that point discovered as

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 1>and blues, and I was not really enamored too much

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of of the early Beatles. Although they were catchy songs,

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you could see the expertise and the energy and the

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the ghost youthful the thing that they put across that

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that allowed a generation of people to to feel passionate

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>about being young and expressing themselves. But for me, that that,

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the UK at that time, you know,

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>was a curious mixture of different sorts of music, and

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the pop music of the day was still for the

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>most part it had been emulating Elvis Presley and other

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 1>derivative imitations of other US acts, So it hadn't really

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 1>we hadn't really home grown very much. That was anything

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to feel good about until until the Beatles came along,

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and and and and In America you had to endure

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Herman's Hermits and the Dave Clark five um as, the

0:43:55.600 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>imports from the UK, which people loved sure enough. But

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>when the Beatles arrived in town, it was a whole,

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:08.759
<v Speaker 1>a whole new ball game. And then it seemed a

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 1>quite quick movement towards something where the Beatles we saw

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:16.920
<v Speaker 1>them mature and developers musicians. And then the big landmark

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>thing that made a difference to me and I'm sure

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 1>many of my peers in the UK, was the advent

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:27.719
<v Speaker 1>of what became not progressive rock but progressive pop. It

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 1>was Sergeant Pepper in the summer of sixty seven, and

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>within a couple of months of that there was the

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Pink Floyd was Piper at the Gates of Dawn, and

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:39.799
<v Speaker 1>these two albums they were like a signpost. It was.

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>It was like walking down a walking down a path

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the woods and suddenly coming across

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a fork in the road and a signpost they're saying,

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:54.239
<v Speaker 1>you know this way, And it was a huge motivator,

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, to hear what you could do with pop

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>music on the one hand and what you could do

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:02.919
<v Speaker 1>with psychedelic rock on the other. So it was quite

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 1>important to me, not as the actual musical style or

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the or the elements of the of the music, or

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the personalities of people playing. It was just that motivation

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that you could actually take it into your own hands

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and write and record and put music out. There wasn't

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>mainstream pop music. Of course, the Beatles had George Martin,

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 1>without whom I'm sure they couldn't have made that record,

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and Pink Floyd had Said Barrett, without whom the lyrics

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and the essence of those songs wouldn't really mentor busting amount,

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>but they were. They were real signposts and landmarks in

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 1>my early days as a teenager. So yeah, it was

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely a step forward from the the imitative rock and

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:51.919
<v Speaker 1>roll of Britain's music scene in the from the late

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>fifties through to the mid sixties, which was frankly a

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:58.760
<v Speaker 1>little embarrassing. You were just copying people singing with American

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 1>accents and wearing the clothes and pretending to be um,

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the American artists that they revered and whose

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:18.280
<v Speaker 1>careers they aspired to. Okay, so you're an art school.

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Is that a holding place? Where do you envision being

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:24.399
<v Speaker 1>an artist or a designer? And how do you pick

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 1>up the guitar and how does that become your direction

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in life? Well, I had a guitar at the age

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of I think eleven. I persuaded my first of all

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I had had I think when I was eight or

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 1>nine years old, I got an Elvis Presley ukulele. That

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 1>was my birthday present or Christmas present. Boats not online,

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but you know, a mail order thing. And and I

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 1>remember the black and white add for this ukulele, and

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it was a picture of Elvis playing what looked like

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a full sized guitar, and it was. It cost twenty

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:00.880
<v Speaker 1>two and sixpence, which you know, in those days was

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>probably a couple of dollars, and naively, I thought, wow,

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's the real deal. And what what arrived

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in the post was this thing that was, you know,

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen inches long and fragile piece of plastic with nylon strings.

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't stay in tune, and I mean it was

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 1>really quite horrible, but you could actually play a few

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 1>chords and and and some simple tunes. And I went

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on from there to get a beating up old Spanish

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:34.920
<v Speaker 1>guitar to which I attached steel strings, which of course

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>meant that the action lifted up off the fret board

0:47:38.040 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to the point where you had bleeding fingers and the

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>attempt to play C major and and it was. It

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:51.279
<v Speaker 1>was pretty out of tune, but I managed to begin with,

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>along with a couple of school chumps, to make some

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>vaguely musical noises in the style of what was called skiffle.

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Skiffle in the UK and the in the fifties was

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of homegrown music form. It was a precursor to punk.

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:07.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, you didn't have to be able to play

0:48:07.239 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a musical instrument, you just kind of did it. And

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:13.239
<v Speaker 1>you don't have drum kits. You had a washboard, you know,

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the sort of corrugated metal thing that used for scrubbing

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 1>clothes on. And a t chest bass which was literally

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:23.839
<v Speaker 1>a wooden t chest that he was packed in. And

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you had a pole, you know, like a like a

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>broom pole, and a piece of string that was stretched

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:33.799
<v Speaker 1>between the two and you have bum bum boom by

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 1>pulling the pole tighter or loosening it off. And so

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that was skiffle, and it was homemade, very simple music

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that was essentially derived from bluegrass and blue grass in

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 1>his turn, of course, derived from folk music from the UK,

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 1>from Scotland, Ireland, England, and from from Northwest Europe. So

0:48:55.400 --> 0:48:57.799
<v Speaker 1>it had turned around and come back to the UK

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:03.239
<v Speaker 1>is as a music form that we could all pick

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 1>up on. You know. There was some energetic and fun

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 1>songs from the few artists who were able to record

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and perform, but blue bluegrass in the form of skiffle

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:16.399
<v Speaker 1>was something that I think probably was the starting point

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:19.359
<v Speaker 1>for many of the musicians of my my era. I mean,

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I've not really talked to any of them, so I

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know most of them, but I would be surprised

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:27.280
<v Speaker 1>if they hadn't also followed the same the same tracks

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 1>as I did. As a teenager, you know, through through

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:33.800
<v Speaker 1>those early music forms, and I think what we didn't

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 1>like was the cheesy, show busy, imitative British pop music,

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 1>which was based on the American stuff that you know,

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:44.719
<v Speaker 1>we we all preferred the real dealing. We're going to

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:47.320
<v Speaker 1>do American music, then let's let's let's do Muddy Water,

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's do Harling Wolf, Let's do even Chuck Berry or

0:49:52.160 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>or Bo Diddley, you know, which was obviously that the

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:58.759
<v Speaker 1>pop side of the blues. But those of us who

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:02.040
<v Speaker 1>grew up with us and jazz as teenagers, you know,

0:50:02.080 --> 0:50:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I think we we set our sights on something a

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:07.719
<v Speaker 1>little more esoteric until it dawned on us that we

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:11.720
<v Speaker 1>were middle class white boys. We weren't black. We didn't

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:14.799
<v Speaker 1>have the experience, the background, the culture. We were just

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 1>still copying something that really wasn't ours. Which is why I,

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:24.240
<v Speaker 1>after a few months of being in a blues band,

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was anxious to try and write my

0:50:25.760 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 1>own songs and step away from the accusation potentially of

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>just ripping off black American folk music, which I revered

0:50:36.680 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and to this day still do. I would hate to

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:43.839
<v Speaker 1>be thought of as just a copyist. So you make

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this transition, how do you end up going down south

0:50:47.520 --> 0:50:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to London and becoming professional? What is your goal? And

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:56.319
<v Speaker 1>you were really starving, so what was that like and

0:50:56.440 --> 0:50:59.000
<v Speaker 1>how did you keep yourself on track with the dreams

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:01.920
<v Speaker 1>supposed to giving up? When I grew up, I mean

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I was born in Scotland, but I moved to the

0:51:04.080 --> 0:51:06.280
<v Speaker 1>age of twelve, I think, to the north of England,

0:51:06.320 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to a town called Blackpool, a seaside town I've often

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:12.920
<v Speaker 1>likened to either the worst of New Jersey. You know,

0:51:12.960 --> 0:51:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a it's you know, it's a it's

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a town where people go to have a good time,

0:51:19.160 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's pretty desolate in winter. And um, the boardwalk

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in in a in Atlantic city or in New Jersey,

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's reminiscent of the promenade in Blackpool. People strut

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:34.399
<v Speaker 1>up and down and ever. In the summer it's nice,

0:51:34.440 --> 0:51:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, eating ice cream and eating burghers or doing

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:40.280
<v Speaker 1>what you do, same sort of thing. But you couldn't

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:43.520
<v Speaker 1>really think about being a full time musician in Blackpool

0:51:43.520 --> 0:51:46.759
<v Speaker 1>because the only opportunities really were to be essentially a

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 1>cover band, or or to be something really very show

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:55.759
<v Speaker 1>busy and do you know some sort of very conspicuously

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>pop music, but everybody knew that if you wanted to

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:01.560
<v Speaker 1>if you wanting to make it, you know, sure you

0:52:01.600 --> 0:52:05.160
<v Speaker 1>could go to Manchester or the or Liverpool and playing

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:10.239
<v Speaker 1>some clubs that were perhaps more the the the up

0:52:10.280 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and coming places. But long term, everybody the gout feeling

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:17.399
<v Speaker 1>was you've gotta go. You gotta go to London. That's

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 1>where you make it. That's where the music industry has

0:52:20.040 --> 0:52:23.880
<v Speaker 1>really centered, the record companies, the biggest clubs and venues

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and so on. So around sixty seven I decided that,

0:52:28.760 --> 0:52:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I should bite the bullet and leave home

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and try for the London opportunity should it, should it exist,

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know I had a plan B and a

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:42.880
<v Speaker 1>plan to see you know, it wasn't like I was,

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, burning my boats and so it was. It

0:52:48.640 --> 0:52:52.440
<v Speaker 1>was a dangerous move, but it worked out in the

0:52:52.480 --> 0:52:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sense of having a couple of months of abject poverty

0:52:57.440 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and literally going hungry and going very very cold, because

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven and in the UK was one of the

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:07.960
<v Speaker 1>coldest winters on record. But you know, it picked up

0:53:08.000 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 1>again January February. Got to get at the Marquee Club

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:14.279
<v Speaker 1>and things moved on. From there and my days of

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 1>eating recycled off cuts of meat and bits of past

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:25.799
<v Speaker 1>their cell by date vegetables and cooking them up. And

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:29.000
<v Speaker 1>then you didn't want to waste anything, so you would

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:32.000
<v Speaker 1>cook it up and then and then you'd add something

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 1>else to it next day, and something else. That the

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:35.879
<v Speaker 1>part just stayed on the stove and you just kept

0:53:35.880 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of adding to it, and so everything stewed in

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:44.440
<v Speaker 1>its own juices. But it kept me, kept me going

0:53:44.480 --> 0:53:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of weeks of the bad period of time.

0:53:48.239 --> 0:53:50.279
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, we've got a few gigs. I

0:53:50.320 --> 0:53:55.279
<v Speaker 1>had enough money to go and buy you know, take

0:53:55.320 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 1>away Chinese or something that was unbelievably I mean, absolutely

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:03.880
<v Speaker 1>lutally just the most amazing experience was to go in

0:54:03.880 --> 0:54:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese takeaway and order some egg fried rice and

0:54:08.400 --> 0:54:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and some sweet and style pork and you know, some

0:54:12.680 --> 0:54:15.720
<v Speaker 1>noodles and whatever, and take it back to your lonely

0:54:15.760 --> 0:54:19.560
<v Speaker 1>little bedsit room, and and it would still be warm enough,

0:54:19.600 --> 0:54:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, you put your hands on it

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to try and warm your hands up first of all

0:54:23.680 --> 0:54:26.640
<v Speaker 1>before you ate it. It was that that was just

0:54:26.680 --> 0:54:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the most amazing, wonderful experience of being independent, being on

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:33.920
<v Speaker 1>your own, away from your parents, and I spent most

0:54:33.920 --> 0:54:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of my time alone because I didn't really have any friends,

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:39.920
<v Speaker 1>know anybody down there, apart from the guys in the band.

0:54:39.920 --> 0:54:43.799
<v Speaker 1>But there they lived in actually in nearby town, so

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we didn't see each other unless we had a gig

0:54:45.640 --> 0:54:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to go to. So I spent a lot of time alone.

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:50.279
<v Speaker 1>It was quite useful because I learned to play a

0:54:50.320 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit of flute and I started to write some music,

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and I read several of Jack carro Act's works, which

0:54:57.200 --> 0:55:04.479
<v Speaker 1>were an interesting, um parallel to my own rather desolate life.

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember reading Desolate Angels as a time when I

0:55:08.040 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was particularly cold and miserable and alone, and in a

0:55:11.640 --> 0:55:16.840
<v Speaker 1>way it was somebody sharing that experience of a stark,

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:22.200
<v Speaker 1>rather bleak situation that that gave me a little bit

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:26.319
<v Speaker 1>feeling that I wasn't alone in the world. Um so

0:55:26.360 --> 0:55:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I yes, I I you know, it all worked out

0:55:28.200 --> 0:55:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and I can't complain. I only went hungry for two weeks,

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Okay, So ultimately band puts out the album

0:55:36.160 --> 0:55:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this was Was it always you were band? Or was

0:55:40.680 --> 0:55:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it more of equal voice, equal membership? Well, I guess

0:55:45.680 --> 0:55:50.400
<v Speaker 1>right at the beginning, Um, you might have thought it

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:53.880
<v Speaker 1>was for guys who had an equal stake in things,

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're equal voices. But in reality, Mick

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Abraham's the guitar player and I were you know, more

0:56:04.000 --> 0:56:06.840
<v Speaker 1>dynamic musical forces. And we needed Mick because he was

0:56:06.880 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a you know, virtue as a guitar player and a

0:56:10.920 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and a shouter, a blue shouter. You know, he'd like

0:56:14.680 --> 0:56:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to give it a lot of energy, and you know,

0:56:17.600 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>he had a lot going for him as a blues

0:56:21.120 --> 0:56:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and rock performer, and he was vital to the band

0:56:25.640 --> 0:56:28.800
<v Speaker 1>um But I was the odd bawl who brought something

0:56:28.800 --> 0:56:31.720
<v Speaker 1>else to the party that was not mainstream in terms

0:56:31.719 --> 0:56:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of blues or an approach, and he and I always

0:56:37.280 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 1>had an uneasy relationship. I think he was uncomfortable with

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:48.200
<v Speaker 1>me because of my musical aspirations didn't stop with you know,

0:56:48.560 --> 0:56:53.200
<v Speaker 1>imitative blues, and the other guys tended after a while

0:56:53.320 --> 0:56:56.879
<v Speaker 1>to come more towards me than Mike. It was very

0:56:56.880 --> 0:56:59.960
<v Speaker 1>set in his ways and a bit of a mercurial

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:04.120
<v Speaker 1>character from time to time. But when we really fell

0:57:04.160 --> 0:57:08.399
<v Speaker 1>out with Mick towards the end of of we were

0:57:10.040 --> 0:57:12.839
<v Speaker 1>already getting a little bit established in the UK, and

0:57:13.080 --> 0:57:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it was at a time when it was make or break,

0:57:17.280 --> 0:57:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, would either build upon that early small success

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and find a new guitar player or you know, go

0:57:26.280 --> 0:57:30.600
<v Speaker 1>back home to mummy, as were the options. Okay, so

0:57:31.120 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 1>how did it end with Mick? And is fat Man

0:57:34.680 --> 0:57:37.760
<v Speaker 1>on stand up about Mick? Well, it's not really about Mick.

0:57:37.840 --> 0:57:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It was just the only time we have a traveled

0:57:41.360 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 1>abroad because Mick wouldn't get on an airplane, but we

0:57:43.480 --> 0:57:48.880
<v Speaker 1>could get a ferry to Denmark and we went to

0:57:48.960 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>play in two clubs on the ferry from the east

0:57:52.720 --> 0:57:56.720
<v Speaker 1>coast of England. And on the way back to the

0:57:56.760 --> 0:57:59.440
<v Speaker 1>ferry to get the ferry home, we went past we

0:57:59.440 --> 0:58:00.800
<v Speaker 1>had a little bit of time in how we went

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:05.720
<v Speaker 1>past a porn shop m in es Buerg, and I know,

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:07.920
<v Speaker 1>just in the porn shop there was a mandolin hanging

0:58:07.960 --> 0:58:10.600
<v Speaker 1>there and I went in and you know, with my

0:58:10.800 --> 0:58:13.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever I learned for doing the club dates, I bought

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a mandolin. Had no idea how to play or tune

0:58:16.680 --> 0:58:19.800
<v Speaker 1>up or anything. And on the way back, because it's

0:58:19.880 --> 0:58:21.640
<v Speaker 1>quite a long ferry journey, so we were it was

0:58:21.640 --> 0:58:23.600
<v Speaker 1>an overnight thing and Mick and I were sharing a

0:58:23.680 --> 0:58:27.440
<v Speaker 1>cabin and I really annoyed him by tuning up and

0:58:27.480 --> 0:58:30.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to play this mandolin, and he was just getting

0:58:30.680 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 1>really really testy about the fact I was keeping him awake.

0:58:33.920 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 1>And but you know, a little bit of a tune

0:58:35.400 --> 0:58:37.720
<v Speaker 1>coming on other what this is good? I like this.

0:58:38.600 --> 0:58:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And and we used to tease Mick, who was pink cherubic,

0:58:45.520 --> 0:58:47.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of slightly chubby. He wasn't fat, you know, he

0:58:47.840 --> 0:58:50.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a beast. He was just a little just a

0:58:50.400 --> 0:58:52.919
<v Speaker 1>little chubby in a healthy chubby kind of a way,

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:55.080
<v Speaker 1>whereas the rest of us were sort of rake thin,

0:58:55.920 --> 0:58:59.400
<v Speaker 1>basically because his mom cooked for him. And when we

0:58:59.400 --> 0:59:02.840
<v Speaker 1>were start think, but I used to tease me about being,

0:59:03.240 --> 0:59:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, not fat, but you know, being a little chubby.

0:59:05.960 --> 0:59:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And so I wrote this song I Don't want to

0:59:08.800 --> 0:59:12.480
<v Speaker 1>be a fat man. And it wasn't really about him.

0:59:12.600 --> 0:59:16.800
<v Speaker 1>It was just, yeah, just a little notion really, And

0:59:16.800 --> 0:59:19.880
<v Speaker 1>but he was convinced I was. It was a sort

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of bitter attack on his corporeal presence, and and and

0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:29.880
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't too happy about it. But it wasn't really

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:33.160
<v Speaker 1>about me. I mean, I never write songs that are

0:59:33.160 --> 0:59:37.080
<v Speaker 1>about real people because I would never betray a relationship

0:59:37.160 --> 0:59:42.320
<v Speaker 1>by by making it so, you know, so intrusive into

0:59:42.400 --> 0:59:46.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody's life. But there is an amalgam of personalities and

0:59:46.160 --> 0:59:50.080
<v Speaker 1>people that's an as an observer. Since I'm that kind

0:59:50.120 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of a writer, I might draw together a few different

0:59:53.000 --> 0:59:56.520
<v Speaker 1>people and that becomes a character in a song. But

0:59:56.560 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it's never about a particular individual. I was certainly never

0:59:59.520 --> 1:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>name name hims or you know, take an individual as

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a model for a song. I would just hate to

1:00:05.920 --> 1:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>embarrass somebody or betray something that is private between us

1:00:10.280 --> 1:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>as a relationship, whether it's a couple of guys or

1:00:14.360 --> 1:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>men and a woman, or you know, it's for me,

1:00:17.280 --> 1:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's all, you know, pretty private stuff. So have

1:00:21.920 --> 1:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you ever listened to a blood Wind Pig record? And

1:00:25.200 --> 1:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I know he's had his health issues, but what's your

1:00:27.160 --> 1:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>relationship of any with Mick today? Well, Mick went on

1:00:30.320 --> 1:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to do blood Wind Pig and got a lot of

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>help from us and our managers and record company, and

1:00:37.040 --> 1:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloodwind Pig were on tour with Gester Hotel a couple

1:00:40.520 --> 1:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of points along the way and and after Blood Wind Pig,

1:00:44.400 --> 1:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean just sort of mixed band. But they threw

1:00:46.440 --> 1:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>him out of his own band in the end because

1:00:49.360 --> 1:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they just he was a tricky chap, you know,

1:00:52.320 --> 1:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to to work with. I mean, very nice man, you know,

1:00:55.680 --> 1:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>he's had absolutely bighearted, nice guy, but just so insecure

1:01:01.720 --> 1:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and bundle of nerves and twitchy and it always um

1:01:06.640 --> 1:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's just kind of awkward to be around, so

1:01:09.360 --> 1:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>desperate to be liked. It was, it was overbearing. But

1:01:14.360 --> 1:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>after Blood Wind Pig, Mick went on, you know, through

1:01:17.960 --> 1:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a various musical and unmusical activities, and when he started

1:01:25.040 --> 1:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>working again, you know, I played with him a few

1:01:27.520 --> 1:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>times and we did some songs for one of his

1:01:32.720 --> 1:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>solo albums and so on, and once in a while

1:01:37.280 --> 1:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>we've spoken. Mike unfortunately these days having stuff with very

1:01:41.440 --> 1:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>serious little health, it's not really you know, he's not

1:01:45.920 --> 1:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>really able to have conversations on the phone or whatever.

1:01:51.560 --> 1:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think changed emails a few times.

1:01:55.760 --> 1:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But but Mick's you know, you know, he's not well.

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And I always been a little sad that he's not

1:02:05.640 --> 1:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>able to do anything anymore at all musically. But my

1:02:09.280 --> 1:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>son was actively engaged in doing a sort of tribute

1:02:14.040 --> 1:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>charity concert in London for make and which I was

1:02:18.880 --> 1:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't I couldn't go to I wasn't. I was

1:02:21.400 --> 1:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>away somewhere else, but it was nice to think that

1:02:24.520 --> 1:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>my son James was one of the organizers of a

1:02:27.520 --> 1:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>fundraiser for Mick to recognize his his role in those

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>years of being part of the British music scene. And

1:02:36.160 --> 1:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Mick has a lot of parles, a lot of friends

1:02:37.880 --> 1:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>who were stand by him, and you know he was

1:02:42.080 --> 1:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in his day, he was one of those guitar players.

1:02:45.600 --> 1:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not so obviously on the level of the Eric

1:02:51.280 --> 1:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Clapton or Peter Green or Jimmy Page or any of

1:02:54.240 --> 1:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>those guys, but he was, you know, he was a

1:02:57.280 --> 1:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>revered blues and rock guitarist and until his little health

1:03:03.000 --> 1:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>took over, you know, he was still doing pretty well. Okay,

1:03:06.040 --> 1:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>let's go to stand Up. This is obviously a different

1:03:09.240 --> 1:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>era and Needles say, it's not streaming, it's vinyl. The

1:03:12.600 --> 1:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>white album would come out, which was actually a response

1:03:15.880 --> 1:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>to overdone packages. But in sixty nine you put out

1:03:20.000 --> 1:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>stand Up and it literally stands up when you open

1:03:23.280 --> 1:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the cover. Whose idea was that, well, I have to that.

1:03:26.880 --> 1:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Then all the credit goes to Terry Ellis, our manager,

1:03:29.520 --> 1:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>because the the first album cover this was that was

1:03:35.000 --> 1:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that was my idea and Terry, bless him, went along

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>with it. I mean, Warner Brothers and Ireland I think

1:03:42.400 --> 1:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>hated it because he can't possibly do this is a

1:03:45.200 --> 1:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>picture of a bunch of old guys with a lot

1:03:47.240 --> 1:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of dogs around them, and then the name of the

1:03:49.120 --> 1:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>band isn't even on the front cover. You know, you

1:03:51.320 --> 1:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. But but Terry kind of, you know,

1:03:55.080 --> 1:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>he stood by us, and that was what I wanted

1:03:58.600 --> 1:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it to be like, and so he went along with it,

1:04:00.680 --> 1:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think it got people's attention because who who

1:04:03.520 --> 1:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>would bring out an album cover and the name of

1:04:05.520 --> 1:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the band isn't even on the on the front of

1:04:07.480 --> 1:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the cover. It was on the back. But nonetheless it

1:04:10.920 --> 1:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>was it was my my, my one. And then stand up.

1:04:15.320 --> 1:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Terry had come up with a with an artist in

1:04:18.520 --> 1:04:23.959
<v Speaker 1>the USA who did specialized in in wood cuts, and

1:04:24.320 --> 1:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what Terry saw this, but it was,

1:04:26.120 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, very graphic. And as having been to our school,

1:04:28.880 --> 1:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I did some would cut some things at school, so

1:04:30.960 --> 1:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I was quite quite um, you know, quite happy to

1:04:36.000 --> 1:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>go along with that. And and Terry came up with

1:04:38.640 --> 1:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea of a gate fall cover that you would

1:04:40.560 --> 1:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>open up and there would be this sort of pop

1:04:42.280 --> 1:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>up thing of the band, and you know what, was it? Okay, fine,

1:04:47.880 --> 1:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>well if you can make that work, let's let's let's

1:04:50.080 --> 1:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>do it. And that indeed was the was the was

1:04:54.440 --> 1:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the album cover, which you know was quite in its way,

1:04:57.640 --> 1:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>quite iconic, and the fact that the album then did

1:05:01.160 --> 1:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>go on to do very well in the UK. In fact,

1:05:03.080 --> 1:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we were on our second US tour. Um. I remember

1:05:07.200 --> 1:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>being in Loose Midtown in Manhattan in the breakfast room,

1:05:14.320 --> 1:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>having breakfast with the guys, and in walked Joe Cocker

1:05:18.840 --> 1:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and came over to our tables. That our congratulations. So

1:05:21.720 --> 1:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>why what's happened? He said? Your album just went to

1:05:23.840 --> 1:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>number one in the UK charts? So can I can

1:05:27.560 --> 1:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I have kind of you're gonna eat all of that bacon?

1:05:29.560 --> 1:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Can I have a bit? So the the you know,

1:05:34.280 --> 1:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the the good news was we were away from the

1:05:37.120 --> 1:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>UK and could do nothing about it, but we had

1:05:38.920 --> 1:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a number one album in England and that was when

1:05:42.360 --> 1:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Terry said, Wow, you know we've got to We've got

1:05:44.520 --> 1:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to capitalize on this. We need something to keep the sea,

1:05:47.600 --> 1:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>put it to keep the pot boiling while we were

1:05:50.120 --> 1:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the UK on a long tour. So can

1:05:52.360 --> 1:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you can you write a hit single that we can

1:05:55.520 --> 1:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>release in the UK while we're away, and to humor him,

1:05:59.760 --> 1:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I say, yeah, sure, no problem, just give me a

1:06:02.480 --> 1:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of hours. And by then I think we we've

1:06:05.480 --> 1:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>gone to Boston, and so we checked into a holiday

1:06:08.320 --> 1:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in the hotel alongside a band called Pentangle who were

1:06:12.720 --> 1:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>also checking it at the same time, and and I said, Okay, Terry,

1:06:17.120 --> 1:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>give me a couple of hours. I'll meet you in

1:06:18.640 --> 1:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the lobby and I'll write a hit single while I'm upstairs.

1:06:22.960 --> 1:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I was just I was just fooling around, you know,

1:06:25.520 --> 1:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I was just just just winding him up. But I

1:06:28.360 --> 1:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>went back down to the lobby and he said, have

1:06:29.640 --> 1:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you written it? If you got it? And I said, well,

1:06:31.360 --> 1:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of, maybe, I don't know. He said, right, well,

1:06:33.200 --> 1:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>i'll book you into a studio in New York next

1:06:35.000 --> 1:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>week and we'll go and record it. So I had

1:06:37.920 --> 1:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to come up with, you know, something slightly more refined

1:06:42.000 --> 1:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>from that basic idea, and we went in and recorded

1:06:44.360 --> 1:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the backing track to Living in the Past and in

1:06:47.560 --> 1:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a studio in m I think it was actually in

1:06:52.040 --> 1:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, which across the river, and and then we

1:06:57.760 --> 1:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>went then to the West Coast. I remember then I

1:07:00.200 --> 1:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>did the flute and vocal over dubs in the studio

1:07:02.880 --> 1:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and in uh I think it was in San Francisco,

1:07:07.800 --> 1:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and we did the mix and sent it back to

1:07:09.840 --> 1:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the UK and it was it was released and amazingly

1:07:13.480 --> 1:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>got to number three in the UK Singles charts. So

1:07:15.920 --> 1:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact I had written its single, but it was

1:07:18.640 --> 1:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>one of those silly things. I was just bluffing, just

1:07:21.680 --> 1:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>fooling around. But the fact that it was in five

1:07:24.080 --> 1:07:27.479
<v Speaker 1>four time signature it really wasn't a mainstream pop song

1:07:28.280 --> 1:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>was quite gratifying because until that point there's only ever

1:07:32.120 --> 1:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>been one other top ten hit in five four times signature,

1:07:35.200 --> 1:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>which was was Dave brew Becks Take five. And so

1:07:40.600 --> 1:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of a nice, nice feeling that you'd

1:07:44.840 --> 1:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you brought something relatively new to the world of you know,

1:07:52.720 --> 1:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the pop music charts and music TV because it was

1:07:56.960 --> 1:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>on top of the pop sore famous um uh weekly

1:08:01.240 --> 1:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>television show that did the latest pop music stuff. So

1:08:06.360 --> 1:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that's how that worked out, and the stand up did

1:08:08.920 --> 1:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>did pretty well and and in its own right, it

1:08:13.400 --> 1:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>paved the way for what came next. Okay, but staying

1:08:16.920 --> 1:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>with the second album for a minute, my favorite song

1:08:19.040 --> 1:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you have such an incredible memory. I look into the

1:08:22.240 --> 1:08:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Sun come about. I'd rather think it was something I'm

1:08:26.560 --> 1:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>not sure where it was on a guitar or where

1:08:27.960 --> 1:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the fiddling around with the Hammond organ. It was in

1:08:30.040 --> 1:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the studio that I've got this really simple little line

1:08:33.760 --> 1:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and it was just meant to be a song about optimism,

1:08:38.560 --> 1:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>um optimism and perhaps in the face of some adversity.

1:08:43.280 --> 1:08:48.479
<v Speaker 1>It was a very simple, you know, cheerful, quietly upbeat

1:08:48.560 --> 1:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>song that didn't strike me as it was, you know,

1:08:53.439 --> 1:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>so important to the album as a whole, compared to

1:08:55.640 --> 1:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>songs like a New Day Yesterday for example, which I

1:08:58.360 --> 1:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>knew it was a power, a full song, and the

1:09:01.200 --> 1:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>worlds like for a Thousand Mothers and things that were

1:09:04.560 --> 1:09:08.519
<v Speaker 1>a bit more animated, and we're look into the sums

1:09:08.560 --> 1:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, gentle placid piece. There are two or

1:09:11.880 --> 1:09:17.879
<v Speaker 1>three like that on it that were gentle um reasons

1:09:17.880 --> 1:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for waiting I think was another one that was a

1:09:19.880 --> 1:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>similar sort of a feel. So yeah, it was just

1:09:23.680 --> 1:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>just trying to bring something in the way of dynamic

1:09:27.200 --> 1:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>range into the broad context of rock music, so it

1:09:30.400 --> 1:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't all have to be crash, bang wallop with drums

1:09:33.400 --> 1:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and bass pounding away on everything you could, you could,

1:09:36.760 --> 1:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you could do things that are a little bit more

1:09:40.040 --> 1:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>varied and musically a little den less dense, and you know,

1:09:46.120 --> 1:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>had different dynamics. And perhaps in the case of a

1:09:50.400 --> 1:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>song like that, it was giving me the opportunity to

1:09:53.960 --> 1:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>not have to pretend to be a rock singer, which

1:09:55.920 --> 1:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I've never felt terribly able to do. Um, So I

1:10:03.320 --> 1:10:05.759
<v Speaker 1>could just sing it in a relatively quiet, easy voice,

1:10:05.840 --> 1:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and it was nice to do something relaxed. Okay, so

1:10:18.479 --> 1:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the next album, let's talk about it from an outside perspective.

1:10:22.960 --> 1:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Many critics felt that the first album was best, needless

1:10:27.040 --> 1:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to say, that was a sound, a different sound. Second

1:10:30.160 --> 1:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>album great reviews. Now for people who are younger today,

1:10:34.680 --> 1:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>they will need not even understand the power of the

1:10:36.880 --> 1:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>rock press. But that meant something back then. Third album

1:10:41.640 --> 1:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>commercial breakthrough. But from the perspective of those paying attention,

1:10:47.640 --> 1:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it seemed a little bit more obvious, less cerebral, less internal,

1:10:53.400 --> 1:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and more on the surface. And of course you had

1:10:56.120 --> 1:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to cry you a song, which was a legendary riff song.

1:10:59.360 --> 1:11:03.559
<v Speaker 1>So just to what degree was this premeditated or those

1:11:03.600 --> 1:11:05.479
<v Speaker 1>on the outside are making this all up and you

1:11:05.560 --> 1:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>just cut a record? Well, it was very much a

1:11:10.200 --> 1:11:13.439
<v Speaker 1>reflection of being on tour in America in sixty nine

1:11:13.840 --> 1:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>when we'd you know, we we we were just just

1:11:18.400 --> 1:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>making our presence felt. You know. We played in few

1:11:20.800 --> 1:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>clubs and we've been an opening act on a few

1:11:22.800 --> 1:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>theater shows. Um. But with the benefit album, it was written,

1:11:29.479 --> 1:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>most of it was written when I got back to

1:11:30.920 --> 1:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the UK, but it did reflect on that what was

1:11:34.080 --> 1:11:38.759
<v Speaker 1>a sometimes a rather dark experience of being in the USA.

1:11:38.880 --> 1:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly we were either headlining and modest venues on our own,

1:11:42.760 --> 1:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but we were traveling a lot and spending a lot

1:11:45.160 --> 1:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of time away from home, and and I I think

1:11:49.240 --> 1:11:53.519
<v Speaker 1>it's it's much of it is. It's rather darker in

1:11:53.680 --> 1:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>musical terms, not in a negative way, but it just

1:11:57.640 --> 1:12:00.479
<v Speaker 1>it just reflects the perhaps some of the ice elations,

1:12:00.560 --> 1:12:05.679
<v Speaker 1>some of the cultural confusion that comes out of visiting

1:12:05.680 --> 1:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>another country and then finding that after the first initial

1:12:11.240 --> 1:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>getting to know it, suddenly you begin to realize that

1:12:15.320 --> 1:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't really necessarily fit in and just feel a

1:12:18.640 --> 1:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>little I felt out of place increasingly in in in

1:12:23.360 --> 1:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in American culture. Glenn are bass player. You know, he

1:12:26.240 --> 1:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>loved America. He love he just loved everything about it.

1:12:28.479 --> 1:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>He was a party guy. You know, he just had

1:12:30.080 --> 1:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>made lots of friends and went out at night and

1:12:32.920 --> 1:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you know he had a great time. But Martin Barr

1:12:36.439 --> 1:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and Clive and myself, you know, we were kind of loaners.

1:12:40.000 --> 1:12:41.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, we just go back to the hotel room,

1:12:41.520 --> 1:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>read a book, watchum. Dick Cavert was here around there.

1:12:47.680 --> 1:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>But it was that it was that sort of era,

1:12:49.280 --> 1:12:51.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, where you just you picked up on American culture,

1:12:51.560 --> 1:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>but you you did it in a slightly more vicarious way.

1:12:55.120 --> 1:12:57.519
<v Speaker 1>You know, you saw it from as an observer and

1:12:58.120 --> 1:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>picked up things from television and media and the newspapers

1:13:02.280 --> 1:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and Smiley's a New York delicate testament that did the biggest,

1:13:08.120 --> 1:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the biggest Um, chicken liver sandwich is known to mankind

1:13:16.000 --> 1:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and child strawberry malted milkshakes. A guy with Martin Barren,

1:13:21.880 --> 1:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>who are starving Hungary, we managed to scrap between us

1:13:25.400 --> 1:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>a few dollars together, and we we bought. We bought

1:13:28.720 --> 1:13:34.639
<v Speaker 1>these enormous wedges of chicken liver sandwich and salad dressing

1:13:34.680 --> 1:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and lettuce and tomato and all the trimmings, and and

1:13:39.160 --> 1:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>then these huge pots of strawberry malted milkshake. Went back

1:13:43.400 --> 1:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to our horrible hotel and ate ourselves into a stupor

1:13:50.320 --> 1:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>having gorged on entirely unhealthy food. But those are the

1:13:56.360 --> 1:13:59.599
<v Speaker 1>sort of the amusing moments and what was otherwise quite

1:13:59.600 --> 1:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>often a other a bit depressing in a way for

1:14:03.280 --> 1:14:05.599
<v Speaker 1>those of us who were missing being at home. You know,

1:14:05.680 --> 1:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't suddenly we were getting noticed and we were

1:14:08.560 --> 1:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>not famous, but you know, people knew who we were,

1:14:11.280 --> 1:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>but we made us he feel even more sort of displaced,

1:14:14.840 --> 1:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think some of that came out in the album.

1:14:17.400 --> 1:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, an important part of it was I

1:14:19.439 --> 1:14:22.719
<v Speaker 1>remember being in in the USA at the time when

1:14:23.280 --> 1:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>when Buzz and Neil walked on the Moon and and

1:14:28.240 --> 1:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Collins, who didn't and was in charge of the

1:14:31.600 --> 1:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the command module. You know, I decided that was worthy

1:14:33.960 --> 1:14:36.519
<v Speaker 1>of a song was to write about Michael Collins being

1:14:36.800 --> 1:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the guy who didn't get to go to the moon

1:14:39.680 --> 1:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>or step onto the moon, and the awful position that

1:14:42.880 --> 1:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>he would have been in. And I'm sure it was

1:14:46.080 --> 1:14:49.439
<v Speaker 1>well planned for, and the eventuality that Neil and Buzz

1:14:49.520 --> 1:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>either landing didn't made it back or crashed in the

1:14:53.120 --> 1:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>first place, and Michael Collins had to return home to

1:14:56.800 --> 1:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Earth alone. He would have been the most vilified and

1:14:59.200 --> 1:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>hated person on the planet. And but that was his gig,

1:15:03.000 --> 1:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that was the job, that's what he signed up for,

1:15:04.880 --> 1:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and I always felt it was rather a touching experience. Oddly,

1:15:09.920 --> 1:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>my son in law played Michael Collins in a in

1:15:13.280 --> 1:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a movie about the moon landing many years later. Not

1:15:18.400 --> 1:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a fame, not not a highly successful movie, but he

1:15:20.960 --> 1:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>did play Michael Collins. Was a curious um. We had

1:15:24.000 --> 1:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to do all of his research about Michael Collins and

1:15:26.160 --> 1:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>everything to do with that. That that that journey, but

1:15:32.080 --> 1:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that that was one of the moments I do remember

1:15:34.280 --> 1:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>being an America and feeling really sort of enraptured with

1:15:39.280 --> 1:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole the whole thing about America and Space Race.

1:15:43.120 --> 1:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>It was. It was a you got really caught up in.

1:15:46.120 --> 1:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>It was very exciting being there at that time and

1:15:50.200 --> 1:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>at the same at the same time turning down the

1:15:52.240 --> 1:15:54.719
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to go and play at Woodstock, which was pretty

1:15:54.800 --> 1:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>much around the same time of the year, along with

1:15:58.160 --> 1:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Led Zeppelin, who also decided not to take up the

1:16:01.360 --> 1:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>invitation to go to Woodstock. And what was the thinking there,

1:16:04.880 --> 1:16:06.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they're thinking was, but I would

1:16:06.720 --> 1:16:09.599
<v Speaker 1>imagine Peter Grant might have had the same view as

1:16:09.640 --> 1:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I do, which was we didn't want to get tarnished

1:16:12.560 --> 1:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>with the brush of the dying embers of the hippie

1:16:14.920 --> 1:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>era and you know, sort of a naked drug taking

1:16:19.240 --> 1:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>massid throng of people who were you know, falling over

1:16:23.720 --> 1:16:27.559
<v Speaker 1>themselves to um love the music of ten years after,

1:16:27.600 --> 1:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>who were forever stuck with that Woodstock appearance for the

1:16:31.360 --> 1:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>rest of their lives to this day. Um, it's what

1:16:34.880 --> 1:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>people remember ten years after four. Leo Lyons, the bass player,

1:16:38.800 --> 1:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>when I met him a few years ago on some

1:16:41.080 --> 1:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>festival that we were playing at, and and he just

1:16:44.840 --> 1:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>come off stage and I said, oh, what, what what? What?

1:16:46.680 --> 1:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>What did you play tonight? Lee? Or what's the set

1:16:49.040 --> 1:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>list taped to the side of his guitar And I

1:16:51.160 --> 1:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>leaned over to look at it, and he said, oh,

1:16:52.680 --> 1:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just the usual set list. And I said that

1:16:57.120 --> 1:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't the set list just for tonight. He said, no,

1:17:00.000 --> 1:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that's been taped to my guitar since nine nine we

1:17:02.600 --> 1:17:05.599
<v Speaker 1>played at Woodstock, So you have no regrets for not

1:17:05.640 --> 1:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>playing No, No, I think we're way too early for us.

1:17:08.160 --> 1:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>We were we were we were not yet fully formed,

1:17:11.120 --> 1:17:14.559
<v Speaker 1>and we were just you know, we needed time, We

1:17:14.640 --> 1:17:20.120
<v Speaker 1>needed time to develop and become a little more mature musically,

1:17:20.160 --> 1:17:23.519
<v Speaker 1>and it would have been awful if we If we'd

1:17:23.520 --> 1:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>gone on, we probably would have done really well. You know,

1:17:25.439 --> 1:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>people were like, wow, is that band even better than

1:17:27.720 --> 1:17:30.519
<v Speaker 1>ten years after? But it was too early for us.

1:17:30.680 --> 1:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I came for the who they were on,

1:17:34.479 --> 1:17:37.360
<v Speaker 1>but they were already established. They knew what they were doing,

1:17:37.439 --> 1:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that who were the who they were, They had a repertoire,

1:17:40.120 --> 1:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>they had an identity. But Jethro Tell was just an

1:17:43.160 --> 1:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>embryonic finding our way sort of a bunch of young

1:17:46.760 --> 1:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>guys who weren't sure what they were going to do. Um.

1:17:50.360 --> 1:17:52.479
<v Speaker 1>So it would have been way too early to achieve

1:17:52.520 --> 1:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>any kind of mass exposure and any sudden success. It

1:17:56.960 --> 1:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>was much better just to step step back into the

1:17:59.320 --> 1:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>shadows and meet up with the Zepps and be their

1:18:03.880 --> 1:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>opening act for a few more shows. That was better

1:18:06.960 --> 1:18:11.519
<v Speaker 1>learning process for me than confronting a bunch of naked

1:18:12.120 --> 1:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>um hippies. So you talk about being somewhat of a

1:18:17.680 --> 1:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>loner being in the hotel room, reading this is an

1:18:21.160 --> 1:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>error when backstage in rock life was really exotic. So

1:18:25.960 --> 1:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to drugs and groupies. That was not

1:18:28.960 --> 1:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>your experience personally. You just were who you were, and

1:18:32.840 --> 1:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you took it on the road. Well. As I was

1:18:35.160 --> 1:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit terrified about drugs. I mean, it's not

1:18:37.960 --> 1:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not a sort of moral position. It's just that

1:18:40.280 --> 1:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>I saw so many people, you know, clearly not doing

1:18:44.680 --> 1:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>themselves any favors as a result of taking drugs, and

1:18:48.880 --> 1:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's, um, it scared me. You know, Frank

1:18:52.560 --> 1:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Laddis didn't really want to take that risk. I was.

1:18:56.280 --> 1:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I smoked a lot of cigarettes back in those days,

1:18:58.760 --> 1:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>so I assumed that my tendency to have an addictive

1:19:03.080 --> 1:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>personality was such that if I ended up, you know,

1:19:06.840 --> 1:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>smoking marijuana, I'd probably be doing it most of the

1:19:10.640 --> 1:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>hours of the day. Wouldn't be something I would just

1:19:13.120 --> 1:19:15.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, do once or twice a week, it would

1:19:15.479 --> 1:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>be I would I was terrified it would it would

1:19:17.920 --> 1:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>take hold of me as a cigarette smoking did. And

1:19:21.240 --> 1:19:24.479
<v Speaker 1>so I never did any of that, and which got

1:19:24.520 --> 1:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>me the reputation being a party pooper, because you know,

1:19:27.360 --> 1:19:30.719
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't go to you know, let Zeppelin's rhoadies

1:19:30.760 --> 1:19:32.799
<v Speaker 1>decided to put on a party and we got invited

1:19:32.840 --> 1:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't show up, you know, everybody thought, oh,

1:19:34.880 --> 1:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, he's he's a snob, he's you know,

1:19:39.080 --> 1:19:42.360
<v Speaker 1>he's some arrogant doesn't want to join in and be

1:19:42.600 --> 1:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the boys. But I was afraid to be

1:19:45.120 --> 1:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the boys. And I I was uncomfortable with

1:19:49.439 --> 1:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the you know, with the sex, drugs and rock and

1:19:53.479 --> 1:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>roll bit. I mean, the rock and roll bit was

1:19:55.160 --> 1:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of okay, you know, it was it was a living,

1:19:58.880 --> 1:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>but the sex and the drug it's were a bit terrifying,

1:20:01.320 --> 1:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, because even then we knew that. But you know,

1:20:04.400 --> 1:20:07.439
<v Speaker 1>there were some pretty nasty strains of gonorrhea going around,

1:20:07.479 --> 1:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and girls were quite frightening to me, you know, because

1:20:11.240 --> 1:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>they were they were very um forward in their behavior

1:20:16.520 --> 1:20:26.400
<v Speaker 1>into quiet withdrawn um English boys who perhaps were you know,

1:20:26.840 --> 1:20:28.479
<v Speaker 1>not not used to these sort of things. You know,

1:20:28.479 --> 1:20:31.559
<v Speaker 1>they're very forward and confident nature of a lot of

1:20:31.600 --> 1:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>American young females. They you know, they were quite frightening really.

1:20:38.120 --> 1:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So I didn't really go in that direction. It wasn't

1:20:42.000 --> 1:20:45.559
<v Speaker 1>something that's um yeah, you know, I'm sure I had

1:20:45.560 --> 1:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a a few relationships, short term and otherwise with with

1:20:49.880 --> 1:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>with girls when I was in my twenties, but it

1:20:51.960 --> 1:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't the big thing for me. I was never

1:20:54.840 --> 1:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>lured into that kind of party behavior and the the

1:20:58.160 --> 1:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>one night stands and the you know, the whole rock

1:21:02.160 --> 1:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and roll excess things. It seemed everybody else was doing it,

1:21:08.080 --> 1:21:10.360
<v Speaker 1>So I suppose that was a good reason for me

1:21:10.400 --> 1:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>not to do it. I just I prefer to try

1:21:13.000 --> 1:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, be different, do my own thing. So

1:21:17.840 --> 1:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I read a lot of books, and I watched a

1:21:20.280 --> 1:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of late night talk shows, and I read the newspapers,

1:21:24.920 --> 1:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and I tried to use the time in a constructive

1:21:27.680 --> 1:21:31.479
<v Speaker 1>way rather than not be able to remember the next

1:21:31.520 --> 1:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>morning what I'd done the night before, which is something

1:21:33.920 --> 1:21:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that's just befallen many bass players in just Hotel, they

1:21:37.400 --> 1:21:39.599
<v Speaker 1>all seemed to be the party guys. The bass players,

1:21:39.640 --> 1:21:42.599
<v Speaker 1>they they all seem to be the ones who wanted

1:21:42.600 --> 1:21:45.439
<v Speaker 1>to go and have a good time. And I know,

1:21:45.560 --> 1:21:48.799
<v Speaker 1>and at least one case, his idea of a really, really,

1:21:48.840 --> 1:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>really good time was when he couldn't remember anything that

1:21:51.320 --> 1:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>happened from the end of the show until coming to

1:21:53.800 --> 1:21:56.479
<v Speaker 1>sound check the next day. It was just just a

1:21:56.520 --> 1:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>complete blank in his mind. Um so he could he

1:22:00.439 --> 1:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>measured having a good time by the fact that he

1:22:02.240 --> 1:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>couldn't remember it, which to me seems utterly ridiculous that

1:22:05.360 --> 1:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>why have a good time and then you can't remember it?

1:22:07.840 --> 1:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I want to save them my good times

1:22:09.680 --> 1:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and recall them for years to come, not have them

1:22:12.800 --> 1:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>fade into some deep abyss of of what did I

1:22:18.960 --> 1:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>do last night? And you know why have I now?

1:22:22.479 --> 1:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>You know these nasty scars or cuts on my face

1:22:26.040 --> 1:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>or my heir or my arms because I got in

1:22:27.800 --> 1:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the fight off, you fell down a fire escape, or

1:22:32.720 --> 1:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>on one occasion, somebody who should be nameless trying to

1:22:35.439 --> 1:22:41.640
<v Speaker 1>flush himself down a toilet. True story, I personally rescued him.

1:22:41.680 --> 1:22:44.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was going to going nowhere, obviously, but

1:22:43.640 --> 1:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>he was in the toilet bowl, yanking on the chain,

1:22:47.920 --> 1:22:52.479
<v Speaker 1>try and determined to end it all. So I drank

1:22:52.600 --> 1:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>him out. And is it an airport? And I got

1:22:57.040 --> 1:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>him on the plane soaking wet. But no, we weren't.

1:23:03.040 --> 1:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>We weren't no names to be mentioned. In fact, forget

1:23:06.000 --> 1:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that I even said any of that. I just made

1:23:08.920 --> 1:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it up. It's not a true story. Who came up

1:23:11.760 --> 1:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>with and how did you create the riff for to

1:23:14.000 --> 1:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>cry of a song? Well, I have to credit the

1:23:18.080 --> 1:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>people who worked in that kind of Vein. I mean,

1:23:21.160 --> 1:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Eric Clapton and Cream had already come and gone by

1:23:24.000 --> 1:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>then in the sense of Cream being a not a

1:23:26.800 --> 1:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>direct influence, but they were the the obvious precursors to

1:23:30.479 --> 1:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Led Zeppelin and Jeth Retell arriving on American shores. Cream

1:23:36.880 --> 1:23:39.519
<v Speaker 1>did you know, after the after Homer's Home Is Dave

1:23:39.600 --> 1:23:43.519
<v Speaker 1>Clark five, the Beatles, then the Cream were the next

1:23:43.520 --> 1:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>big thing. They just stampeded across the country being this amazing,

1:23:48.720 --> 1:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>doing it on their own terms, not not not not

1:23:54.080 --> 1:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in any way fitting into any mold. And that's why

1:23:56.439 --> 1:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>America loved Cream because they quite clearly really did care

1:24:00.520 --> 1:24:02.479
<v Speaker 1>whether you like them or not. They were going to

1:24:02.600 --> 1:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>do what they did when they got on the stage,

1:24:04.439 --> 1:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and if you didn't like it fair enough, if you

1:24:07.080 --> 1:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>did like it, then you know, thanks will take the

1:24:09.439 --> 1:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>money and run. So Cream were the first example of

1:24:12.680 --> 1:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that kind of hit and run band who really didn't

1:24:15.360 --> 1:24:17.719
<v Speaker 1>care whether you like them or not. And when Zeppelin

1:24:17.800 --> 1:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>came in, it was just the same. They gave that

1:24:20.000 --> 1:24:23.400
<v Speaker 1>impression they were there doing this for them. It was

1:24:23.560 --> 1:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>very hedonistic, very self serving, and they really didn't care

1:24:27.240 --> 1:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>whether you like them or not. And I probably picked

1:24:30.040 --> 1:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>up on a bit of that. I think in the

1:24:31.439 --> 1:24:34.719
<v Speaker 1>early days of jethro Tell and you know, it seemed

1:24:34.760 --> 1:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to be what Americans generally speaking, seemed to seem to

1:24:40.120 --> 1:24:45.719
<v Speaker 1>really be drawn towards people who didn't try to appeal,

1:24:45.880 --> 1:24:49.559
<v Speaker 1>they didn't try too hard to be liked. They sort

1:24:49.600 --> 1:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of recognized the genuine and the honest nature of bands

1:24:54.120 --> 1:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>who just came and did their thing, whereas there there

1:24:57.720 --> 1:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>were others who desperately wanted to be successful in the

1:25:00.880 --> 1:25:03.479
<v Speaker 1>USA because that was the big prize, was to be

1:25:03.560 --> 1:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a hit in the USA, and they conspicuously tried too hard,

1:25:08.160 --> 1:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and the American audiences seemed to see through that and

1:25:11.800 --> 1:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>reject them as some as wanting it too badly. Um,

1:25:17.080 --> 1:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>so I guess they came across across maybe as being

1:25:21.000 --> 1:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, not genuine again mentioning no names, but we

1:25:25.000 --> 1:25:26.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we had a few bands who period

1:25:26.680 --> 1:25:28.599
<v Speaker 1>with us, who tried too hard and didn't do well

1:25:28.640 --> 1:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>at all. Um, but we didn't really care that much.

1:25:33.120 --> 1:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So the next step is actually, sorry, I'm mentioning. Yeah,

1:25:36.160 --> 1:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you asked me about to cry, And so it was

1:25:37.840 --> 1:25:40.519
<v Speaker 1>really it was a kind of a post cream. Eric Clapton,

1:25:40.560 --> 1:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>who in a band called Blind Faith and then and

1:25:43.240 --> 1:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they Eat had a couple of good riffs in that,

1:25:45.160 --> 1:25:49.519
<v Speaker 1>and I guess I took that as a not hopefully

1:25:49.560 --> 1:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>not to copy it, but just just to take as

1:25:51.439 --> 1:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>an example something that was a repetitive riff. And and

1:25:55.360 --> 1:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to cry your song was was very much in the

1:25:57.400 --> 1:26:01.120
<v Speaker 1>style of Eric Clapton at the time of Blind Faith.

1:26:02.160 --> 1:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>There's a song I can't remember what it's called, Dad

1:26:04.479 --> 1:26:09.519
<v Speaker 1>da da da da da da da da duh. Yeah, well,

1:26:09.560 --> 1:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>it's it's that kind of a thing, you know, it's

1:26:11.520 --> 1:26:15.759
<v Speaker 1>the monophonic guitar riff on the lowest strings. And Martin

1:26:15.760 --> 1:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>would sometimes lend me his electric guitar so I could

1:26:18.240 --> 1:26:21.519
<v Speaker 1>write songs and and you know, come up with that

1:26:21.680 --> 1:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. So the next step is aqualon you

1:26:25.360 --> 1:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>create it. Do you have any idea how big it

1:26:29.000 --> 1:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>will be? Sometimes, you know, people say I was totally

1:26:31.920 --> 1:26:33.519
<v Speaker 1>close to other people say, as soon as it sits,

1:26:33.600 --> 1:26:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the market's gonna go Guard Gangewin suddenly Jeff Road tall

1:26:37.720 --> 1:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>as big as they were before Everywhere headline arenas did

1:26:41.960 --> 1:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you anticipate that well. On the last day of mixing

1:26:47.200 --> 1:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the album, um, which had been a bit of a

1:26:50.479 --> 1:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>tortious experience because it was a brand new studio that

1:26:52.880 --> 1:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Island Records had just built conversion from an old church

1:26:57.080 --> 1:27:00.799
<v Speaker 1>and in London, and there are a lot of technical problems,

1:27:00.840 --> 1:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>teething problems with the studio that Zeppelin were in. The

1:27:04.360 --> 1:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in the same studio where they were in the crypt

1:27:06.360 --> 1:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of the of the church, which was a much more

1:27:07.960 --> 1:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>compact and nicer sounding room to work in. We were

1:27:11.680 --> 1:27:13.479
<v Speaker 1>in the main body of the church. It was just

1:27:13.680 --> 1:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>echoing and horrible and cold and strange atmosphere and technically

1:27:19.920 --> 1:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of problems. So it wasn't you know, I

1:27:21.720 --> 1:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really sure what we had. I mean songs, you know,

1:27:24.880 --> 1:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I felt fairly confident about most of the songs, but

1:27:27.240 --> 1:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>sonically in terms of the end result, I was, you know,

1:27:30.680 --> 1:27:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a little worried about it. And John Evans, the keyboard player,

1:27:35.720 --> 1:27:38.519
<v Speaker 1>and I we went we've been working all night and

1:27:38.520 --> 1:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we went out to in the early hours of the

1:27:41.240 --> 1:27:45.559
<v Speaker 1>morning to some little cafe that served taxi drivers and

1:27:46.120 --> 1:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>off duty policeman and things with a hot breakfast at

1:27:49.600 --> 1:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>four o'clock in the morning or something. So we sat

1:27:52.280 --> 1:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in this place and I remember sitting there, we were

1:27:54.760 --> 1:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>eating some breakfast and dead tired, just you know, we're

1:27:57.680 --> 1:27:59.559
<v Speaker 1>going to go straight to bed, home to bed after that.

1:27:59.640 --> 1:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And I said to John, what do you think, you know, what,

1:28:04.080 --> 1:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you think we've got here? Is it? Is

1:28:05.720 --> 1:28:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it going to work? And he looked at me as

1:28:07.400 --> 1:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I said, no, I don't know either.

1:28:10.800 --> 1:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I remember that definite feeling of being

1:28:14.720 --> 1:28:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a little nervous that it was either going to be

1:28:17.479 --> 1:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the end or it could be the

1:28:20.360 --> 1:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the next sort of step up the ladder.

1:28:24.560 --> 1:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And I really had no idea. And we delivered the

1:28:27.600 --> 1:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>record of the record company, and you know, it was

1:28:30.280 --> 1:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Julie pressed and put out and some media response, but

1:28:35.080 --> 1:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't huge. You know, I have to say, there

1:28:36.880 --> 1:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a out of the box. It didn't set everybody

1:28:41.040 --> 1:28:44.559
<v Speaker 1>on fire, you know, it was it was okay, it

1:28:44.800 --> 1:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>is so pretty well. And some of the music on

1:28:48.720 --> 1:28:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the album, I suppose Aqualung song My God for example,

1:28:53.920 --> 1:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that they were and Locomotive Breath. In Europe particularly, they

1:28:59.320 --> 1:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>made an impact acts um, partly because the subject matter

1:29:03.439 --> 1:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and partly because of the music. But it was doing okay,

1:29:09.800 --> 1:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but nowhere near what it became over the next two

1:29:13.840 --> 1:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>or three years when it gradually with us performing more

1:29:17.040 --> 1:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>shows and different parts of the world and bringing out

1:29:19.120 --> 1:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>new albums aqual and continued to sell at at a

1:29:22.479 --> 1:29:27.559
<v Speaker 1>very steady and generous pace. And um, and I suppose

1:29:27.800 --> 1:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>more than anything else, became the the archetypal jethro Tyle record,

1:29:33.240 --> 1:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>not only of the seventies but of all time, and

1:29:35.960 --> 1:29:39.559
<v Speaker 1>in many ways because it was a mixture of rock music,

1:29:39.880 --> 1:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of gentle acoustic music, of quirky, you know, fun music,

1:29:46.080 --> 1:29:52.639
<v Speaker 1>and strange, really very insular and gentle moments that were

1:29:52.760 --> 1:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of singer songwriters stuff. It was a mixture of

1:29:56.320 --> 1:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>music in terms of dynamic range and musical style, and

1:29:59.439 --> 1:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that, um, you know, that was part of

1:30:02.280 --> 1:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>what gave it an identity. That's people probably didn't like

1:30:08.080 --> 1:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>every song on the album, but the doubtless there were

1:30:10.360 --> 1:30:13.479
<v Speaker 1>people who really loved the acoustic songs and weren't that

1:30:13.680 --> 1:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>struck with the loud rock ones and vice versa. But

1:30:17.439 --> 1:30:20.959
<v Speaker 1>there was something in there perhaps for a broad spectrum

1:30:21.000 --> 1:30:27.559
<v Speaker 1>of listeners. And it's certainly kind of broke open all

1:30:27.560 --> 1:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of the European territories for us because we hadn't we

1:30:30.479 --> 1:30:33.519
<v Speaker 1>spent too much time playing in the USA and the UK,

1:30:33.680 --> 1:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and it was really with Aqua Lung that we were

1:30:36.120 --> 1:30:39.439
<v Speaker 1>then playing frequently, giving equal time to all the European

1:30:39.439 --> 1:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>countries where we could perform, and that it really took

1:30:42.080 --> 1:30:45.559
<v Speaker 1>off broadly in Europe as well, in Spain and Italy

1:30:45.600 --> 1:30:48.639
<v Speaker 1>and France and Germany, and so we were we were

1:30:48.680 --> 1:30:52.719
<v Speaker 1>becoming quite international really at that point in terms of

1:30:53.320 --> 1:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>not being the biggest band on planet Earth, but being

1:30:56.400 --> 1:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the you know, one of the

1:31:00.360 --> 1:31:04.559
<v Speaker 1>the lesser but sort of well known and appreciated groups

1:31:04.600 --> 1:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that were not mainstream in terms of the rock music

1:31:08.439 --> 1:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that was the most successful and popular. So we were

1:31:11.320 --> 1:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>doing doing okay. So the next albums thick as a brick.

1:31:21.840 --> 1:31:25.799
<v Speaker 1>To what degree was that premeditated I'm talking about music

1:31:26.160 --> 1:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>one long piece? And to what degree was it just

1:31:28.960 --> 1:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of a lark, let's just do something different. Well,

1:31:31.040 --> 1:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it was both of those things. It was predicated really

1:31:34.280 --> 1:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that Aqualung had a few songs that

1:31:39.840 --> 1:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe kind of tied together a little bit um and

1:31:45.240 --> 1:31:47.479
<v Speaker 1>and then the packaging and the album cover and the

1:31:47.520 --> 1:31:50.479
<v Speaker 1>way that the album was sequenced on side one and

1:31:50.520 --> 1:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>side two along with the liner notes. I tried to

1:31:53.840 --> 1:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>bring a bunch of rather disparate songs and music styles,

1:31:57.200 --> 1:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>try and bring them together a bit with the with

1:31:59.360 --> 1:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>them with artwork and packaging, which would sort of draw

1:32:03.040 --> 1:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>things together a bit, even if they didn't deserve it.

1:32:09.120 --> 1:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think that gave people the impression this was

1:32:10.920 --> 1:32:14.439
<v Speaker 1>a concept album, which it really wasn't. And ill from

1:32:14.439 --> 1:32:16.519
<v Speaker 1>the word go, I said, this is not a concept album.

1:32:16.560 --> 1:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a bunch of songs, you know, but music critics

1:32:20.080 --> 1:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and writers were determined to perpetuate this idea that it

1:32:24.680 --> 1:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>was a concept album. So naturally I came to start

1:32:30.439 --> 1:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>work on another album and thought, right, well, they thought

1:32:33.360 --> 1:32:35.519
<v Speaker 1>that was a concept album, Let's give them the mother

1:32:35.560 --> 1:32:39.519
<v Speaker 1>of all concept albums and go completely over the top

1:32:39.560 --> 1:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in a you know, in a very exaggerated way. And

1:32:43.880 --> 1:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I just thought of this kind of parody really of

1:32:48.000 --> 1:32:52.479
<v Speaker 1>concept albums, prog rock, you know, pretending it being written

1:32:52.479 --> 1:32:58.719
<v Speaker 1>by an eight year old boy, and and and writing

1:32:58.720 --> 1:33:03.519
<v Speaker 1>an album through the through the eyes of childhood, but

1:33:03.560 --> 1:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a childhood distorted by the post war years of growing

1:33:07.400 --> 1:33:11.719
<v Speaker 1>up with a lot of prejudices and views that came

1:33:11.760 --> 1:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>down to a young generation of people from that postwar

1:33:15.840 --> 1:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>derision of our of our opponents, and you know, we

1:33:21.960 --> 1:33:25.679
<v Speaker 1>we talked about Jerry as the un We talked about

1:33:25.720 --> 1:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the Japs. You know, we we were we were taught

1:33:28.880 --> 1:33:34.559
<v Speaker 1>to be really rather unpleasant and rather right wing, nasty

1:33:34.560 --> 1:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>little children, and we didn't turn out that way. But

1:33:37.800 --> 1:33:39.519
<v Speaker 1>you know that that was what came down, that that

1:33:39.600 --> 1:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>was the sort of general tenor of children's comics and literature.

1:33:44.840 --> 1:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, we it was reinforcing a lot of stereotypes

1:33:47.600 --> 1:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that I think we could have done with that. But

1:33:49.080 --> 1:33:52.479
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, it was mostly a bit of fun.

1:33:52.520 --> 1:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think most of us just recognized that, well, okay,

1:33:55.200 --> 1:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, our parents went to war and did all this,

1:33:58.520 --> 1:34:00.679
<v Speaker 1>that that's the way it's that's the way we're being

1:34:00.680 --> 1:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>handed down that message. But I couldn't help but feel

1:34:04.320 --> 1:34:06.599
<v Speaker 1>that as a child growing up, that you know, you've

1:34:06.640 --> 1:34:08.720
<v Speaker 1>got to try to make sense of a difficult world.

1:34:08.720 --> 1:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>You've got to try and make sense of the things

1:34:10.280 --> 1:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that are stereotypical, that are prejudice, that are um perhaps

1:34:16.600 --> 1:34:22.479
<v Speaker 1>adult ideas that are increasingly becoming irrelevant as as time

1:34:22.520 --> 1:34:25.720
<v Speaker 1>goes on. And so I wanted to try and see

1:34:25.800 --> 1:34:28.559
<v Speaker 1>through the eyes of a child making sense of a

1:34:28.600 --> 1:34:31.599
<v Speaker 1>difficult adult world and that's really what the album was about.

1:34:31.640 --> 1:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it may seem like, well, it is

1:34:34.120 --> 1:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, a spoof for parody, a lighthearted

1:34:36.840 --> 1:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>bit of fun, but it also has a quite a

1:34:39.160 --> 1:34:44.479
<v Speaker 1>serious message lying underlying the whole thing. And I would write,

1:34:45.880 --> 1:34:48.240
<v Speaker 1>um the album in you know that I'd do the

1:34:48.280 --> 1:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>next three minutes in the morning when I woke up,

1:34:52.000 --> 1:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, quite early. Usually I start working around eight

1:34:54.200 --> 1:34:55.720
<v Speaker 1>or nine in the morning and write the next three

1:34:55.800 --> 1:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>or four minutes of music. And then after lunch I

1:34:58.120 --> 1:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>would go and meet the guys rehearsal room in the

1:35:00.360 --> 1:35:04.840
<v Speaker 1>south of London, in the Rolling Stones rehearsal Room, and

1:35:05.520 --> 1:35:07.599
<v Speaker 1>and then we would add we'd learned what I wrote

1:35:07.600 --> 1:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that morning and added to what I've done the day before.

1:35:10.360 --> 1:35:12.479
<v Speaker 1>And so we built up the album over a period

1:35:12.520 --> 1:35:15.439
<v Speaker 1>about ten days of rehearsal so that we could play

1:35:15.479 --> 1:35:17.439
<v Speaker 1>it all the way through. And then we went into

1:35:18.120 --> 1:35:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the recording studio and we played it all the way

1:35:21.320 --> 1:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>through and took another ten days to record the album,

1:35:24.080 --> 1:35:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and then actually a bit longer to do the album

1:35:27.360 --> 1:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>cover because it was quite involved and you know, it

1:35:31.680 --> 1:35:35.360
<v Speaker 1>took quite a bit of time putting it all together

1:35:35.439 --> 1:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and shooting all the photographs and doing everything. Actually took

1:35:37.920 --> 1:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>longer to do the album cover than it did to

1:35:40.000 --> 1:35:42.679
<v Speaker 1>record the record, but it was worth it again because

1:35:42.680 --> 1:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>it was one of those zany ideas. I mean, Terry

1:35:45.040 --> 1:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>our manager, he really didn't like the album covered. Nobody did.

1:35:48.400 --> 1:35:51.879
<v Speaker 1>They thought this was just insane, you know, sixteen page

1:35:51.920 --> 1:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>newspaper is an album cover and even but he, you know,

1:35:55.680 --> 1:35:57.479
<v Speaker 1>he kind of went along with it, as he did

1:35:57.520 --> 1:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>with them the first album, and it um, it was

1:36:02.760 --> 1:36:06.320
<v Speaker 1>part and parcel of what made that album, you know,

1:36:06.720 --> 1:36:09.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of stand out from the crowd, And poor old

1:36:09.400 --> 1:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>John Lennon had embarked upon an album which was released

1:36:13.080 --> 1:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>shortly afterwards and was already in the works at the

1:36:16.000 --> 1:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>time when Things as the Brick was released and actually

1:36:18.120 --> 1:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>went to number one in the American charts, and and

1:36:21.080 --> 1:36:24.320
<v Speaker 1>John Lennon's album, which featured the front cover front page

1:36:24.320 --> 1:36:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Times, was released shortly afterwards, and

1:36:28.080 --> 1:36:30.679
<v Speaker 1>of course he and his record company must have seen,

1:36:31.439 --> 1:36:33.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, this idea has already been done and out

1:36:33.720 --> 1:36:36.840
<v Speaker 1>there and is bigger and better in the sixteen phays newspaper.

1:36:36.880 --> 1:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>But you can't pull it, you know, he did that

1:36:38.640 --> 1:36:41.919
<v Speaker 1>they had already printed, however, million copies of John Lennon's

1:36:41.960 --> 1:36:45.519
<v Speaker 1>album and the artwork and everything, So it must have

1:36:45.560 --> 1:36:47.479
<v Speaker 1>been quite galling in a way. You know, when you

1:36:47.439 --> 1:36:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you've got an idea, you think, wow, this is good,

1:36:50.200 --> 1:36:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and then somebody's actually beaten you to it and and

1:36:53.680 --> 1:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>quietly sneaked something out there, and now you're you're the

1:36:57.160 --> 1:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you're the imitators and the late most to an idea

1:37:01.040 --> 1:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that I think it was very important to the album.

1:37:03.560 --> 1:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>It was one of the worst John Lennon albums anyway,

1:37:05.840 --> 1:37:07.800
<v Speaker 1>sometime in New York City, So don't worry about it.

1:37:07.880 --> 1:37:11.320
<v Speaker 1>But let's talk about that album cover. I asked about

1:37:11.360 --> 1:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the standing up on stand up we have because of

1:37:14.720 --> 1:37:20.240
<v Speaker 1>brick rock history is littered with acts bitching about their

1:37:20.360 --> 1:37:23.479
<v Speaker 1>label saying they wouldn't let me do it, or they

1:37:23.600 --> 1:37:26.280
<v Speaker 1>let me do it, and I had to eat the price.

1:37:26.800 --> 1:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>You had a very unique situation and that your managers

1:37:31.240 --> 1:37:36.240
<v Speaker 1>were the record company. Now in America, they were distributed

1:37:36.280 --> 1:37:39.720
<v Speaker 1>by other labels, Warner Brothers Center. By the end of

1:37:39.800 --> 1:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the by time you at the eighties, they have their

1:37:43.240 --> 1:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>own freestanding company. So a number of questions, what did

1:37:49.280 --> 1:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Terry Ella's do, What did Chris Wright do? And I

1:37:52.960 --> 1:37:56.800
<v Speaker 1>always felt that Chrysalis was built on the back of

1:37:56.920 --> 1:38:01.840
<v Speaker 1>jeth Row Tall, So I wonder did they acknowledge that

1:38:01.920 --> 1:38:04.240
<v Speaker 1>financially they give you a piece of the company because

1:38:04.680 --> 1:38:07.559
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, Jethro Top was the only successful act.

1:38:07.920 --> 1:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So how did it work with you and your managers?

1:38:09.960 --> 1:38:15.519
<v Speaker 1>And the money Molley began when nobody wanted to record

1:38:15.600 --> 1:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Jet Hotel back in and Terry's I believe his father's

1:38:21.000 --> 1:38:25.639
<v Speaker 1>bank manager loaned some money and so Terry and Chris

1:38:25.680 --> 1:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>took the chance and we made the records with borrowed money.

1:38:31.200 --> 1:38:33.439
<v Speaker 1>We had no record company, no deal, and then they

1:38:33.439 --> 1:38:36.439
<v Speaker 1>hawked around the tapes to try and find a deal,

1:38:36.479 --> 1:38:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and eventually Chris BLACKWELLO Island Records took it on and

1:38:40.920 --> 1:38:44.280
<v Speaker 1>um and it was released through Ireland, the first album.

1:38:44.479 --> 1:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And and then Terry and Chris had a you know,

1:38:51.200 --> 1:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they're a little older than I was, but they were

1:38:53.240 --> 1:38:55.559
<v Speaker 1>learning on their feet, you know, they were learning the job,

1:38:55.680 --> 1:39:00.599
<v Speaker 1>learning about the music industry, and so they ankered after

1:39:00.680 --> 1:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>not just being agents or managers, but the idea of

1:39:04.400 --> 1:39:07.320
<v Speaker 1>having a record company. And and so crystalis Records was

1:39:07.400 --> 1:39:10.360
<v Speaker 1>born as a label. They were able to renegotiate their

1:39:10.360 --> 1:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>deal with Island Records in the UK and with Warder

1:39:13.920 --> 1:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Warners in the USA, actually with the Reprise label who

1:39:19.000 --> 1:39:22.479
<v Speaker 1>then they got their label copy, but it was still

1:39:23.400 --> 1:39:26.479
<v Speaker 1>marketed and distributed by a major record company in the

1:39:26.720 --> 1:39:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in most most parts of the world, but it was

1:39:30.280 --> 1:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it looked like a Crystalist record, and Jethro Tell was

1:39:32.960 --> 1:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the first act to be signed to Crystalists. But it

1:39:37.000 --> 1:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>would be a little bit too generous to say, um, Crystalists,

1:39:42.960 --> 1:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it was founded on the back of Jets Hotel or

1:39:45.240 --> 1:39:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a bunch of other acts at that point.

1:39:47.360 --> 1:39:50.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, we were all important to Crystalist records and

1:39:51.400 --> 1:39:54.280
<v Speaker 1>who else who else in the sixties early seventies on

1:39:54.400 --> 1:39:57.519
<v Speaker 1>Chrystmas had anywhere near the level of success of Jeff

1:39:57.640 --> 1:40:00.439
<v Speaker 1>roll Well ten years after did pretty well to begin with,

1:40:00.600 --> 1:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and then procol Harum for example, came along that they

1:40:03.680 --> 1:40:05.800
<v Speaker 1>were quite meaningful, and then a whole bunch of other

1:40:05.840 --> 1:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>acts um that that passed through the Crystalist ranks over

1:40:10.200 --> 1:40:12.519
<v Speaker 1>the next few years. But you know, sure Jester Hotel

1:40:12.640 --> 1:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>was important, but i'm you know, I would Christened and

1:40:17.600 --> 1:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Terry are both generously said that Obviously Jesstel was very

1:40:22.720 --> 1:40:24.439
<v Speaker 1>important to them at the time, but you know, we

1:40:24.439 --> 1:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>weren't the only We weren't the only thing. I think

1:40:27.000 --> 1:40:29.840
<v Speaker 1>they would have made it without Jethro Hotel. It's just

1:40:29.920 --> 1:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that we that the process was speeded up a little

1:40:34.040 --> 1:40:37.720
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that we were successful enough that Terry

1:40:37.760 --> 1:40:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and Chris could renegotiate the deals. And when they renegotiated

1:40:41.240 --> 1:40:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the deals for higher royalties and different deal structures, they

1:40:44.880 --> 1:40:48.240
<v Speaker 1>passed the benefits of that on to us. You know,

1:40:48.360 --> 1:40:50.760
<v Speaker 1>we we they they volunteered to say, hey, you know,

1:40:50.840 --> 1:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys, you should get a bigger royalty now, because

1:40:53.000 --> 1:40:55.760
<v Speaker 1>we're getting a bigger royalty, and so they were generously

1:40:56.360 --> 1:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>took that initiative. And I mean Terry and I were

1:40:59.320 --> 1:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>always I didn't have so much to do with with

1:41:02.000 --> 1:41:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Chris because he was really more looking after ten years

1:41:04.360 --> 1:41:08.479
<v Speaker 1>after in procol. But Terry was, you know, the one

1:41:08.520 --> 1:41:11.519
<v Speaker 1>focused on our careers, and he and I were always

1:41:11.560 --> 1:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>butting heads and disagreeing on a whole lot of stuff.

1:41:14.479 --> 1:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes, you know, he won the argument, sometimes I

1:41:18.080 --> 1:41:21.280
<v Speaker 1>won the argument. And I think think as a brick

1:41:21.320 --> 1:41:24.599
<v Speaker 1>album cover as an example of you know, me winning

1:41:24.640 --> 1:41:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the argument. I really think this is what we should do. Terry,

1:41:27.240 --> 1:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to work. Other times. You know, Terry,

1:41:30.439 --> 1:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you know he was he was the one who was

1:41:33.040 --> 1:41:35.920
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the benefit album cover and I wasn't really

1:41:36.000 --> 1:41:38.639
<v Speaker 1>keen on it at all. But you know, okay, Terry,

1:41:39.200 --> 1:41:41.320
<v Speaker 1>if you think this is right, let's do this. And

1:41:41.360 --> 1:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that was part of the relationship is that

1:41:44.200 --> 1:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>both of us had our very strong opinions, but we

1:41:47.360 --> 1:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>were not not averse to having a discussion, however spirited

1:41:53.520 --> 1:41:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes loud it might be. But you know, we

1:41:57.840 --> 1:42:01.679
<v Speaker 1>we both knew we could picturelate and say okay, let's

1:42:01.680 --> 1:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>do it your way. And I think that was the

1:42:03.880 --> 1:42:07.479
<v Speaker 1>strength of that relationship that we were both learning as

1:42:07.520 --> 1:42:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we went along. I was learning about the technical issues

1:42:10.320 --> 1:42:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of production and making records. He was learning about the

1:42:13.320 --> 1:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>business side of not just managing the band, but you know,

1:42:16.920 --> 1:42:19.800
<v Speaker 1>developing a record company. So you know, we got we

1:42:19.800 --> 1:42:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we got absolute can't blanche to do whatever we wanted

1:42:24.160 --> 1:42:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in musical terms, and that those who were involved in

1:42:29.400 --> 1:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the marketing and distribution, like Warners or or Ireland or

1:42:33.000 --> 1:42:35.600
<v Speaker 1>then BMG in the US, in in Europe, you know,

1:42:35.680 --> 1:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>they were just they were there to do a job,

1:42:38.080 --> 1:42:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't really have any creative saying what we

1:42:40.240 --> 1:42:42.800
<v Speaker 1>were doing. I think Warners might have tried to do

1:42:42.840 --> 1:42:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that in the early days, but they soon accepted that,

1:42:46.360 --> 1:42:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were selling records and even if they

1:42:48.240 --> 1:42:51.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't quite get it in terms of why they were selling,

1:42:52.080 --> 1:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>they they went along with it. And and we we

1:42:56.240 --> 1:43:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we never had any any kind of um real uh,

1:43:04.240 --> 1:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>contentious input from record companies. You know, you quite often

1:43:07.120 --> 1:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>they had no idea what they were getting to Let

1:43:09.320 --> 1:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>deliver the master tapes. That was it. And you know,

1:43:12.800 --> 1:43:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Crystal has trusted me to do that, and I trusted

1:43:15.920 --> 1:43:18.200
<v Speaker 1>them to once they've got the master tapes, and I

1:43:18.280 --> 1:43:19.920
<v Speaker 1>trusted them to get on with it and do the

1:43:19.920 --> 1:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>best job they could in terms of the the commercial

1:43:23.120 --> 1:43:25.559
<v Speaker 1>application of that. That that's the bit they were supposed

1:43:25.560 --> 1:43:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to be good at. Its exactly the same to this day.

1:43:28.000 --> 1:43:30.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I hand over the master tapes, and when

1:43:30.840 --> 1:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it comes to marketing and promotion, I'm a pussycat. I'm

1:43:34.479 --> 1:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>paying somebody else, you know, effectively to to use their expertise,

1:43:38.240 --> 1:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>their knowledge and there and the weight of their the

1:43:44.920 --> 1:43:49.479
<v Speaker 1>their authority. In the case of inside out of boutique

1:43:49.520 --> 1:43:53.360
<v Speaker 1>label and owned by Sony Records that we have distributed

1:43:53.400 --> 1:44:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and marketing by Sony effectively, which is an ideal, an

1:44:00.120 --> 1:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>ideal blend of being with a major, But at the

1:44:02.160 --> 1:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>same time, at the front end we're with a sort

1:44:04.000 --> 1:44:06.759
<v Speaker 1>of boutique label, which is very much like how Chrysalis

1:44:06.840 --> 1:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>were in the first two or three years. So um,

1:44:10.479 --> 1:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, things come perhaps full circle in that regard.

1:44:14.800 --> 1:44:18.320
<v Speaker 1>But let's talk about the money needles. Say Chrysalis was

1:44:18.360 --> 1:44:22.760
<v Speaker 1>sold to E M I early nineties, h E M

1:44:22.880 --> 1:44:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I was ultimately sold again broken up at this late date.

1:44:29.479 --> 1:44:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you still get royalties for those jeth World Toll

1:44:32.479 --> 1:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>records in two Did you own the publishing or was

1:44:37.200 --> 1:44:40.439
<v Speaker 1>the publishing split with Chrysalis, And what's the status of

1:44:40.560 --> 1:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that today. Well, the royalty rate that we were on

1:44:44.920 --> 1:44:46.760
<v Speaker 1>right at the beginning was a very small one. Is

1:44:46.800 --> 1:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>better than the Beatles got when they started, but it

1:44:49.040 --> 1:44:52.840
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty small piece of the action. Um, and

1:44:53.000 --> 1:44:58.559
<v Speaker 1>then it was redressed considerably around the time of Thick

1:44:58.600 --> 1:45:00.840
<v Speaker 1>as a Brick where we started, and quite quite a

1:45:00.920 --> 1:45:03.439
<v Speaker 1>meaningful royalty rate at that point. And I was also

1:45:03.520 --> 1:45:05.680
<v Speaker 1>getting paid as a producer because I was the guy

1:45:05.840 --> 1:45:08.519
<v Speaker 1>writing the music and producing the records. I was a

1:45:08.600 --> 1:45:11.439
<v Speaker 1>man in the studio taking on the mantle of all

1:45:11.479 --> 1:45:14.599
<v Speaker 1>of that. By seventy four, I was running the business

1:45:14.720 --> 1:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of jet Rotele financially, so I was paying all the

1:45:17.760 --> 1:45:21.479
<v Speaker 1>bills and running it is you know, from a commercial stand.

1:45:21.560 --> 1:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But what my company was UM. So we were getting

1:45:26.000 --> 1:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good royalty rate at that point, UM, and

1:45:29.040 --> 1:45:31.320
<v Speaker 1>by I don't know, by the end of the seventies,

1:45:31.400 --> 1:45:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we were on what was probably the you know, the

1:45:34.000 --> 1:45:36.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of highest level of royalty artist royalty rate that

1:45:36.520 --> 1:45:41.240
<v Speaker 1>anybody was getting paid. And Chris and Terry were always

1:45:41.640 --> 1:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, making sure that we were being rewarded in

1:45:44.120 --> 1:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the same way as the highest paid artists of the day.

1:45:47.120 --> 1:45:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So our contracts were being renewed and renegotiated and we

1:45:51.200 --> 1:45:53.400
<v Speaker 1>were getting better deals. But you know, it was never

1:45:53.479 --> 1:45:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a subject of no one was being held hostage or anything.

1:45:56.400 --> 1:45:58.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, It was just that I think it was

1:45:59.000 --> 1:46:01.560
<v Speaker 1>recognized that you you were all there to share the

1:46:01.640 --> 1:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>benefits together, and so you try and be fair about it. UM.

1:46:05.880 --> 1:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>But the publishing side of it, you know, originally was

1:46:08.479 --> 1:46:13.280
<v Speaker 1>published you know, it's Chrystalis Publishing. And then along the way,

1:46:13.360 --> 1:46:18.519
<v Speaker 1>Crystalis UM went into the publishing side with BMG, So

1:46:18.600 --> 1:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it was Christmas BMG and then um, and then it

1:46:22.000 --> 1:46:24.479
<v Speaker 1>became just BMG, which is just to day. And I'm

1:46:25.120 --> 1:46:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm still published by BMG at the same rate as

1:46:28.760 --> 1:46:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it was when I was published by in the latter

1:46:31.000 --> 1:46:35.479
<v Speaker 1>days of crystalis so um, you know, without without without

1:46:35.520 --> 1:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>going into the percentage terms, it's about as high as

1:46:37.640 --> 1:46:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you can get. That comes to me, and they get

1:46:40.000 --> 1:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the sort of you know what I suppose is for

1:46:43.360 --> 1:46:47.599
<v Speaker 1>probably fairly standard in the business for people of our statue. Um.

1:46:48.080 --> 1:46:50.040
<v Speaker 1>So yes, I mean I owned the publishing and I

1:46:50.880 --> 1:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that was in the days of Terry and Chris. You know,

1:46:53.760 --> 1:46:55.840
<v Speaker 1>they said, well you should own your own publishing. It's

1:46:55.880 --> 1:46:58.479
<v Speaker 1>that you're writing all these songs. And you know, if

1:46:58.520 --> 1:47:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we if we make our cutters as the licensed publishers,

1:47:02.920 --> 1:47:05.160
<v Speaker 1>then that's good. So that's the way that it worked.

1:47:05.240 --> 1:47:08.679
<v Speaker 1>And so I continue to license our products and renew

1:47:08.760 --> 1:47:12.200
<v Speaker 1>those licenses with BMGH. I've got a long standing relationship

1:47:12.280 --> 1:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>with it goes back forty years or something. So it's

1:47:17.200 --> 1:47:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the way that that one works. And in this day

1:47:20.320 --> 1:47:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and age, you know, I know, I mean long gone

1:47:23.240 --> 1:47:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of the days when I used to employ lawyers to

1:47:25.280 --> 1:47:27.800
<v Speaker 1>negotiate record contracts. You know, we've figured that one out

1:47:27.840 --> 1:47:31.679
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago. So quite happy to feel confident

1:47:31.720 --> 1:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in negotiating a record contract these days and for some

1:47:34.720 --> 1:47:37.240
<v Speaker 1>years in the past. And and so I I know

1:47:37.400 --> 1:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>how all that works. I know what the deal points

1:47:40.200 --> 1:47:42.559
<v Speaker 1>and the structures and all the small print are all about.

1:47:42.720 --> 1:47:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, at the royalty rate that we get

1:47:45.400 --> 1:47:49.880
<v Speaker 1>today is um. You know, it's the it's it's it's

1:47:50.000 --> 1:47:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of top rate you would get. Um. I

1:47:54.000 --> 1:47:56.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think. I don't. I don't believe anybody gets more

1:47:57.840 --> 1:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>than we get. What they might get is bigger. Advanced

1:48:00.080 --> 1:48:03.320
<v Speaker 1>is But I'm not an advanced guy. I just say, look,

1:48:03.400 --> 1:48:05.719
<v Speaker 1>keep your money. You know, when we sold the record,

1:48:05.920 --> 1:48:08.720
<v Speaker 1>then you can pay me. But record companies and their

1:48:08.800 --> 1:48:10.920
<v Speaker 1>cash flows and all the rest of it, they sometimes

1:48:10.960 --> 1:48:12.960
<v Speaker 1>insist us to promoters or we want to pay you

1:48:13.080 --> 1:48:17.040
<v Speaker 1>some in advance. And so yeah, you know, I don't

1:48:17.080 --> 1:48:19.439
<v Speaker 1>mind having an advance, but I'm more comfortable and getting

1:48:19.439 --> 1:48:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a high royalty and a notional advance just as an

1:48:23.040 --> 1:48:25.639
<v Speaker 1>act of good faith to make sure that having laid

1:48:25.680 --> 1:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>out some money, a record company going to make the

1:48:27.960 --> 1:48:31.640
<v Speaker 1>effort to try and sell product in order to recoup

1:48:31.680 --> 1:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>their advance. But I'm always, always much prefer to have

1:48:35.200 --> 1:48:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a big royalty small advance. And if record companies want

1:48:40.200 --> 1:48:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to pay me a bigger advance, well that that's fine,

1:48:42.000 --> 1:48:44.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's not what I'm shooting for at all. I

1:48:44.280 --> 1:48:45.760
<v Speaker 1>just want to I just want a good royalty rate.

1:48:45.800 --> 1:48:48.200
<v Speaker 1>We're all we're all in the business of risk together.

1:48:48.880 --> 1:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me that you know, the back end

1:48:51.280 --> 1:48:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is the important thing. If you've done well, then that's

1:48:54.200 --> 1:48:56.960
<v Speaker 1>when you can afford to be generous. If you're a

1:48:57.840 --> 1:48:59.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're a record company, you can afford

1:48:59.479 --> 1:49:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay your ours generously once we've sold the records.

1:49:02.520 --> 1:49:05.720
<v Speaker 1>If you don't sell them, everybody's a loser. And that

1:49:05.800 --> 1:49:07.439
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be the business I want to be

1:49:07.560 --> 1:49:10.639
<v Speaker 1>in for sure. Would you ever sell your publishing, which

1:49:10.760 --> 1:49:12.479
<v Speaker 1>is something that's happening with a lot of acts of

1:49:12.560 --> 1:49:15.799
<v Speaker 1>your vintage at this point, Well that that that process

1:49:15.920 --> 1:49:18.240
<v Speaker 1>came back. I came up many, many, many years ago

1:49:18.360 --> 1:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as the idea of cashing in on your publishing and

1:49:22.040 --> 1:49:24.479
<v Speaker 1>taking a lump sum or taking a lump sum, you know,

1:49:24.600 --> 1:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>selling it for a period of time and then getting

1:49:27.000 --> 1:49:28.479
<v Speaker 1>it back. I mean, all of that's been going off

1:49:28.600 --> 1:49:31.000
<v Speaker 1>years and years and years, and frankly it's not something

1:49:31.160 --> 1:49:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think I looked at it, you know,

1:49:32.840 --> 1:49:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I've had a couple of offers to do that, but

1:49:34.560 --> 1:49:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not something that it's very hard to value because

1:49:37.840 --> 1:49:42.080
<v Speaker 1>especially with a swing towards digital UM technology and digital

1:49:42.760 --> 1:49:45.640
<v Speaker 1>UM ways of getting music, you know, when it when

1:49:45.680 --> 1:49:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it's you're dealing in the world of streaming and hardly

1:49:50.000 --> 1:49:52.800
<v Speaker 1>any paid downloads these days. It's mostly streaming and of

1:49:52.880 --> 1:49:56.800
<v Speaker 1>course physical products. That it's quite difficult really to put

1:49:56.880 --> 1:50:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a value on the on the residual life of of

1:50:00.560 --> 1:50:06.320
<v Speaker 1>copyright UM in publishing terms as fairly generous, you know,

1:50:06.479 --> 1:50:08.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy five years after the death of the composer, but

1:50:08.960 --> 1:50:13.519
<v Speaker 1>in up until a few years ago UM in the UK,

1:50:14.040 --> 1:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the life of copyright was was really rather minimal. It

1:50:17.120 --> 1:50:20.240
<v Speaker 1>was it was fifty years UM and then it went.

1:50:20.640 --> 1:50:24.559
<v Speaker 1>And so we were facing the time when many acts

1:50:24.640 --> 1:50:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of the sixties were going to fall out of copyright,

1:50:28.840 --> 1:50:31.719
<v Speaker 1>some of them famous people like the Beatles, but hundreds

1:50:31.760 --> 1:50:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and hundreds and hundreds of artists who maybe only ever

1:50:34.240 --> 1:50:37.600
<v Speaker 1>had one hit or some marginal record sales suddenly that

1:50:37.920 --> 1:50:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that that little royalty that they were depending on every

1:50:41.080 --> 1:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>year to pay for the heating bill or to you know,

1:50:44.040 --> 1:50:46.720
<v Speaker 1>put food on the table was going to disappear. And

1:50:47.479 --> 1:50:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I was one of those people, you know, making a

1:50:51.760 --> 1:50:55.680
<v Speaker 1>strong play with the UK government for extending life of

1:50:55.760 --> 1:51:01.360
<v Speaker 1>copyright for um in recorded product and the Prime Minister

1:51:01.479 --> 1:51:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of the day who I went to meet with and

1:51:03.720 --> 1:51:05.599
<v Speaker 1>tried to persuade him and did some back of an

1:51:05.680 --> 1:51:08.639
<v Speaker 1>envelope calculations to point out the value to the exchequer

1:51:08.760 --> 1:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of keeping copyright going and what this meant in terms

1:51:11.479 --> 1:51:16.919
<v Speaker 1>of gathering tax um. Just it was taking a political

1:51:17.040 --> 1:51:21.360
<v Speaker 1>view that copyright was something old fashioned and should be

1:51:21.439 --> 1:51:26.200
<v Speaker 1>free for everybody, blah blah blah. But luckily through the EU,

1:51:26.360 --> 1:51:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in fact it was reversed and we did in fact

1:51:29.040 --> 1:51:32.400
<v Speaker 1>get an extension to the life of copyright more or

1:51:32.479 --> 1:51:35.320
<v Speaker 1>less in parallel with how it already was in the USA.

1:51:36.520 --> 1:51:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's become a little more generous. And it

1:51:38.400 --> 1:51:40.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that's a little more value in copyright than

1:51:40.880 --> 1:51:43.400
<v Speaker 1>there was perhaps twenty years ago in the UK. I

1:51:43.439 --> 1:51:45.800
<v Speaker 1>mean it would be valued a little higher, you know,

1:51:46.080 --> 1:51:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the residual rights of of copyright, and I don't think,

1:51:51.360 --> 1:51:55.200
<v Speaker 1>personally speaking, I would ever be seduced into selling copyright,

1:51:55.280 --> 1:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think I would rather I would rather be

1:51:57.720 --> 1:52:04.240
<v Speaker 1>passing it on to my family, um initially and continuing

1:52:04.320 --> 1:52:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to you know, pay tax on that revenue, which is

1:52:09.120 --> 1:52:13.240
<v Speaker 1>um is to me, I'd rather be at the focus,

1:52:13.360 --> 1:52:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the center of it, rather than is somebody else's asset

1:52:18.160 --> 1:52:22.839
<v Speaker 1>to fool around with and offset against other corporate losses

1:52:23.000 --> 1:52:24.559
<v Speaker 1>or do whatever they might do with it. I mean,

1:52:24.640 --> 1:52:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I just really would rather I and my successors entitled

1:52:28.880 --> 1:52:32.519
<v Speaker 1>or hands on about it. I mean, Luckily, I have

1:52:32.600 --> 1:52:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a son who's grown up with me in the music industry,

1:52:35.360 --> 1:52:39.559
<v Speaker 1>and so he's you know, he's he understands all this stuff,

1:52:39.600 --> 1:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and Will is already taking a an increasingly leading role

1:52:44.160 --> 1:52:50.559
<v Speaker 1>in managing the assets of of both my personal musical

1:52:50.600 --> 1:52:54.000
<v Speaker 1>income and the corporate musical income, and he one day,

1:52:54.400 --> 1:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>not too far from now, will be it will all

1:52:57.160 --> 1:52:59.960
<v Speaker 1>be on his shoulders. He may decide, hey, I've had enough,

1:53:00.240 --> 1:53:02.519
<v Speaker 1>I want to sell it. When that's that's his decision,

1:53:02.600 --> 1:53:08.400
<v Speaker 1>not mine. Ultimately, release Crest of the nave In becomes

1:53:08.600 --> 1:53:12.479
<v Speaker 1>mega successful. But also the inside story is the album

1:53:13.000 --> 1:53:16.360
<v Speaker 1>was focused group in terms of what singles. So did

1:53:16.439 --> 1:53:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that would be a commercial comeback into what

1:53:19.240 --> 1:53:23.639
<v Speaker 1>degree was the focused story true and did it affect

1:53:23.720 --> 1:53:27.840
<v Speaker 1>anything on the record. Well, I I may be wrong

1:53:27.920 --> 1:53:29.759
<v Speaker 1>in this, but I do think it was my idea

1:53:29.840 --> 1:53:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that we did that because I wasn't really sure that

1:53:31.760 --> 1:53:35.840
<v Speaker 1>there has been a huge change in not so much

1:53:35.880 --> 1:53:38.320
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, but certainly in the USA. That's big swing

1:53:38.680 --> 1:53:40.519
<v Speaker 1>away from what used to be called a O R

1:53:40.680 --> 1:53:47.240
<v Speaker 1>radio too very tightly regimented and researched playlists UM, and

1:53:47.600 --> 1:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the swing away from that a our album product to

1:53:52.479 --> 1:53:57.720
<v Speaker 1>alternative rock and contemporary pop and rock, and stations like UM,

1:53:58.680 --> 1:54:01.400
<v Speaker 1>like KLOS or double any W suddenly that they were

1:54:01.439 --> 1:54:04.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to get hip and do the new thing, and

1:54:05.080 --> 1:54:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and they changed their format, their playlists and everything, and

1:54:07.680 --> 1:54:11.080
<v Speaker 1>jet rteal just wasn't getting radio but sorry, playtime anymore

1:54:11.240 --> 1:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in the in the way that we had during the seventies.

1:54:13.920 --> 1:54:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think what happened was that the audiences that

1:54:18.640 --> 1:54:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the demographic that the American radio was increasingly playing to

1:54:22.320 --> 1:54:26.320
<v Speaker 1>prove to be fickle. They didn't actually spend the money

1:54:26.520 --> 1:54:29.479
<v Speaker 1>on the products that were being advertised on American radio

1:54:29.520 --> 1:54:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in the way that's been before, and so gradually it

1:54:33.560 --> 1:54:38.680
<v Speaker 1>swung back again to to not a complete reversion, but

1:54:38.840 --> 1:54:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to something that then became known as classic rock. And

1:54:43.120 --> 1:54:45.040
<v Speaker 1>many of those stations then went back to playing the

1:54:45.160 --> 1:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of music that they played before. And I assume

1:54:49.920 --> 1:54:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they replenished their coffers because the slightly older demographic was

1:54:54.960 --> 1:54:58.440
<v Speaker 1>was supporting the advertising that brought them their revenue. And

1:54:59.800 --> 1:55:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it we we began just to sort of get a

1:55:01.920 --> 1:55:04.000
<v Speaker 1>sniff of that, I suppose in the latter part of

1:55:04.080 --> 1:55:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the eighties, and I suggested that we should play the

1:55:07.360 --> 1:55:10.040
<v Speaker 1>record initially, not to the media, not to the press,

1:55:10.680 --> 1:55:13.280
<v Speaker 1>because chances are we've got a rough ride and people

1:55:13.360 --> 1:55:16.000
<v Speaker 1>would not be approving. I said, why don't we play

1:55:16.000 --> 1:55:18.160
<v Speaker 1>it to the fans, you know, and get a body

1:55:18.240 --> 1:55:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of thought and opinion, and we can, you know, maybe

1:55:21.720 --> 1:55:25.960
<v Speaker 1>choose the lead tracks we put to radio as a

1:55:26.040 --> 1:55:28.480
<v Speaker 1>result of what we think jeth rot Health fans want.

1:55:29.320 --> 1:55:32.080
<v Speaker 1>And and we did that to a degree, I mean,

1:55:32.120 --> 1:55:34.800
<v Speaker 1>not not in a hugely detailed, massive survey, but you know,

1:55:34.880 --> 1:55:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to a small focus group kind of thing. And it

1:55:39.200 --> 1:55:42.600
<v Speaker 1>got the record company interested. That was the most important thing.

1:55:42.760 --> 1:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it energized the record company a little bit because

1:55:46.160 --> 1:55:48.320
<v Speaker 1>they were getting direct feedback from the fans who were

1:55:48.360 --> 1:55:51.000
<v Speaker 1>going to buy this record or not. And I think

1:55:51.040 --> 1:55:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what what got them to sit up and take

1:55:53.080 --> 1:55:58.560
<v Speaker 1>notice of Crest of Benave and and the New York

1:55:58.640 --> 1:56:02.200
<v Speaker 1>office of Crystalists were suddenly making a lot more effort

1:56:02.240 --> 1:56:05.600
<v Speaker 1>than they perhaps had been to sell products and and

1:56:05.720 --> 1:56:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to and to promote it in a way that was

1:56:07.840 --> 1:56:11.480
<v Speaker 1>much more hands on and active. And the promo guy

1:56:11.480 --> 1:56:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in New York was was, you know, really um you know,

1:56:17.680 --> 1:56:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you really took it on as a personal crusade to

1:56:19.680 --> 1:56:22.400
<v Speaker 1>try and get your hotel noticed. And we got some

1:56:22.680 --> 1:56:27.840
<v Speaker 1>MTV play, and generally speaking, we um, we were. We

1:56:28.000 --> 1:56:32.400
<v Speaker 1>were not exactly back in favor, but we were getting

1:56:32.480 --> 1:56:36.480
<v Speaker 1>noticed again. And and the record company then nominated us

1:56:36.560 --> 1:56:40.600
<v Speaker 1>for a Grammy and a new Grammy category and the

1:56:40.680 --> 1:56:42.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of all that story, of course you know or

1:56:42.880 --> 1:56:47.280
<v Speaker 1>too well, but it was just the beginning of um

1:56:48.080 --> 1:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of It wasn't exactly a comeback. It was just sort

1:56:51.520 --> 1:56:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of in a way, well you said, refocusing jet hotel

1:56:54.560 --> 1:56:57.240
<v Speaker 1>with a with a with a demographic that that kind

1:56:57.280 --> 1:57:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of knew us already, and it was just remind people

1:57:00.400 --> 1:57:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we were still around, and you know very much that

1:57:02.880 --> 1:57:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that is not that is not just due to me

1:57:05.840 --> 1:57:08.000
<v Speaker 1>or the record, but it was the efforts of crystalists,

1:57:08.000 --> 1:57:11.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the USA, and particularly of Kevin Sutter, the

1:57:11.320 --> 1:57:13.640
<v Speaker 1>promo guy in New York. He was, you know, he

1:57:13.680 --> 1:57:16.000
<v Speaker 1>should take the credit for a lot of the success

1:57:16.040 --> 1:57:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of that album. Well, he's always told me the story.

1:57:18.680 --> 1:57:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Good to have it confirmed by you. Now somewhere around

1:57:23.600 --> 1:57:28.720
<v Speaker 1>thick as a bricks, certainly passion play, the media turns

1:57:28.800 --> 1:57:33.880
<v Speaker 1>against Jeff row Tall. Did you sense this? And I

1:57:33.960 --> 1:57:38.200
<v Speaker 1>would say, generally speaking, jeth Row Toll doesn't get any respect,

1:57:38.920 --> 1:57:42.600
<v Speaker 1>although I believe it deserves so much. And then some people,

1:57:43.160 --> 1:57:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, put it in the progressive camp. It's not

1:57:45.440 --> 1:57:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in the progressive camp in my particular world. How do

1:57:48.920 --> 1:57:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you view all that? And I think that any band,

1:57:51.800 --> 1:57:55.560
<v Speaker 1>any artists, will there will be a love affair with

1:57:55.840 --> 1:58:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the critics and and the public alike for a mile,

1:58:00.920 --> 1:58:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that last year three or four records, and

1:58:03.120 --> 1:58:07.960
<v Speaker 1>then something used coming along, and maybe, and understandably, particularly

1:58:09.320 --> 1:58:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you know music journalists who have been perhaps flattered by

1:58:13.600 --> 1:58:16.720
<v Speaker 1>record companies and managers and invited to concerts and given

1:58:16.800 --> 1:58:19.120
<v Speaker 1>free tickets and all the rest of it. Suddenly they

1:58:19.200 --> 1:58:22.520
<v Speaker 1>begin to feel, you know, they're in the pocket potentially

1:58:22.600 --> 1:58:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that people will see them as being a soft touch.

1:58:25.240 --> 1:58:28.080
<v Speaker 1>They're always going to write good reviews and and necessarily

1:58:28.120 --> 1:58:31.600
<v Speaker 1>they're going to say, no, well, this time we're going

1:58:31.680 --> 1:58:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to buck against the system. We we we don't think

1:58:34.520 --> 1:58:36.520
<v Speaker 1>this does deserve a good review. We're going to give

1:58:36.520 --> 1:58:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it a stinker, you know, and and show that we're

1:58:40.320 --> 1:58:43.600
<v Speaker 1>independent minds and independent writers. And I think to a

1:58:43.720 --> 1:58:46.720
<v Speaker 1>degree that's what happens, and certainly happened with Jester Tell

1:58:46.760 --> 1:58:50.120
<v Speaker 1>around the time of a Passion play, most notably in

1:58:50.200 --> 1:58:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the UK press, but also in the USA too and

1:58:53.840 --> 1:58:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in Australia. I remember, we've got some really really bad reviews,

1:58:57.720 --> 1:59:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and I can understand why, and to some extent I

1:59:01.480 --> 1:59:03.520
<v Speaker 1>having known some of those journalists. I mean, I I

1:59:04.960 --> 1:59:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I had to say, look, hey, I think

1:59:07.240 --> 1:59:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you got this about right. You know, it wasn't it

1:59:09.080 --> 1:59:11.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that great. Had a lot of criticism could be

1:59:11.760 --> 1:59:14.680
<v Speaker 1>leveled at a Passion play, and some of it quite justifiably,

1:59:15.520 --> 1:59:18.400
<v Speaker 1>but of course it hurt at the time, but it

1:59:18.560 --> 1:59:22.920
<v Speaker 1>was greatly exaggerated, you know, especially with the ridiculous press story.

1:59:23.040 --> 1:59:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Jethro Hotel quit because of a horrible front page, bad

1:59:27.080 --> 1:59:30.680
<v Speaker 1>review and Melody Maker. We didn't quit. The first thing

1:59:30.760 --> 1:59:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I heard of it was when I walked down Oxford

1:59:32.520 --> 1:59:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Street in London and saw the copies of Melody Maker

1:59:35.800 --> 1:59:38.440
<v Speaker 1>on the news stand with this headline thing, and I what.

1:59:39.280 --> 1:59:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I bought one to read it, and I was absolutely insensed.

1:59:42.600 --> 1:59:44.240
<v Speaker 1>How what where did they get this from? So I

1:59:44.760 --> 1:59:47.960
<v Speaker 1>went to the nearest phone box and called my manager,

1:59:48.120 --> 1:59:50.600
<v Speaker 1>called Terry Ellis that Crystalists, said what the hell is this?

1:59:50.720 --> 1:59:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Who who put this out? He said, ah, well, sorry,

1:59:54.240 --> 1:59:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I forgot to mention it to you, But I thought

1:59:56.040 --> 1:59:57.760
<v Speaker 1>this was a good idea. We've got another front page

1:59:57.800 --> 2:00:01.320
<v Speaker 1>headline and Melody Maker. I mean one of the times

2:00:01.360 --> 2:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>when Terry and I definitely butted heads and did not

2:00:04.000 --> 2:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>agree on on the way forward. But it made us.

2:00:07.800 --> 2:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought it just looked really rather petulant and stupid,

2:00:10.280 --> 2:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and it took a while to come back from that.

2:00:13.240 --> 2:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>But I actually took Ray Coleman, the editor of Melody Maker,

2:00:16.400 --> 2:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to tars. Ray, you knew this wasn't right, you knew

2:00:20.320 --> 2:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you were being fed a line. You just you just

2:00:22.240 --> 2:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>went along with it because you were prepared to take

2:00:25.720 --> 2:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it at face value because it was a big story

2:00:28.280 --> 2:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you could use on the front page. You know, you

2:00:30.000 --> 2:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>could have just picked up the phone to me and said,

2:00:33.000 --> 2:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>is this right. I was a bit bit upset with

2:00:36.720 --> 2:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Ray and I mean, of course we did things together

2:00:40.200 --> 2:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in the future, and he was a lovely chat but

2:00:42.160 --> 2:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was convenient for him to believe what

2:00:44.480 --> 2:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>he was being told, and it was. It was definitely

2:00:48.520 --> 2:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>not not It was a total piece of manufactured front

2:00:54.920 --> 2:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>page grabbing hysteria and I think actually rather silly thing

2:01:00.600 --> 2:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to do. And what about the Prague Moniker. Well, I

2:01:04.600 --> 2:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>was always very pleased to be in the realms of

2:01:09.440 --> 2:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>progressive rock in people's estimation, because that that term first

2:01:12.880 --> 2:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>came about as far as I'm aware, in the UK

2:01:16.600 --> 2:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>music press in nine and I first saw the term

2:01:19.880 --> 2:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>progressive rock applied to a few bands, including Jeff Hotel,

2:01:25.440 --> 2:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, wow, that's interesting. I quite like that.

2:01:27.640 --> 2:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I quite like the idea being progressive rock. That's that

2:01:31.080 --> 2:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>seems to me what I do, and and so that

2:01:35.560 --> 2:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>was fine. But then of course they got shortened to

2:01:38.400 --> 2:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Prague rock and then just Prague and by the time

2:01:42.040 --> 2:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the early punks came along, Prague was a derisory term.

2:01:45.640 --> 2:01:51.959
<v Speaker 1>Meant to meant to describe people who were um basically

2:01:52.920 --> 2:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with showing off the instrumental prowess, and who were

2:01:57.400 --> 2:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>arrogant and old fashioned and and generally speaking, you know,

2:02:03.040 --> 2:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>up their own artists, to put it mildly, and and

2:02:07.480 --> 2:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think probably bands like Yes and Genesis and Emerson

2:02:10.200 --> 2:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Lake and Palm we do have to bear some responsibility

2:02:13.520 --> 2:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for that. Great musicians and great artists as they were,

2:02:16.600 --> 2:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>but Jethro Tell was a bit more rough and ready,

2:02:18.640 --> 2:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, a bit more, you know, but there was

2:02:21.880 --> 2:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a rougher edge to what we did, partly because we

2:02:24.160 --> 2:02:27.839
<v Speaker 1>weren't as good as they were in terms of musical ability,

2:02:27.960 --> 2:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>but also there was an edge to some of the music,

2:02:30.440 --> 2:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the lyrics. So um, I guess, um, I

2:02:34.600 --> 2:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>guess that's why some of the bands from the punk

2:02:38.560 --> 2:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>era secretly were actually Jethro Hotel fans, like Johnny Rotten

2:02:42.280 --> 2:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>from the Sex Pistols, huge huge fan of Aqualung and

2:02:45.560 --> 2:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>then you know some of the other folks. Remember being

2:02:48.560 --> 2:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>approached by Joey Ramone at a Swiss festival. It was

2:02:52.360 --> 2:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>just all over and we wanted autographs because his mom

2:02:54.480 --> 2:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>was a huge fan and and and the guitar player

2:02:59.480 --> 2:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>from the Had Hot Chili Peppers, or or the Guys

2:03:03.080 --> 2:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Stranglers or Sting, and a whole bunch of

2:03:06.640 --> 2:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>people who were part of that early punk thing. Who

2:03:09.240 --> 2:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>was secret jethro Hotel fans um. I mean, I know

2:03:13.480 --> 2:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>this because this firsthand experience. You know, they've actually said so,

2:03:16.440 --> 2:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure they weren't just being nice to me.

2:03:18.480 --> 2:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Well perhaps they were, but it's it's just kind of

2:03:22.040 --> 2:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>nice to know that that you did actually make an

2:03:24.040 --> 2:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>impact on that next generation of musicians, even though they

2:03:27.640 --> 2:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>couldn't possibly admit publicly to liking Genesis or jeth Hotel

2:03:31.160 --> 2:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it might be, but secretly they did. We

2:03:33.680 --> 2:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>were part of their learning process, part of their background,

2:03:36.840 --> 2:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>their points of reference musically, and even though what they

2:03:40.000 --> 2:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>do was musically very different, it was still informed in

2:03:43.320 --> 2:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>some way by the music that had gone before. And

2:03:46.080 --> 2:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Johnny Rotten saw in the song Aqualung and

2:03:49.520 --> 2:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>saw in the album cover of that he saw a

2:03:51.760 --> 2:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>persona a character that was angry and yet sensitive and fearful,

2:03:58.400 --> 2:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the way was depicted on the Aqualong album cover.

2:04:01.840 --> 2:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>And then that's Johnny Rotten. That's that's how he appeared

2:04:04.360 --> 2:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>when he first appeared on TV. That's going a hunched

2:04:06.560 --> 2:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>guy with sort of the same kind of pose and

2:04:09.040 --> 2:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and and he's a mixture of aggression and anger and

2:04:11.880 --> 2:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>yet fear and vulnerability. I think he captured that in

2:04:15.800 --> 2:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in his stage persona. Um, maybe I'm being a little

2:04:20.280 --> 2:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>fanciful in that, but he certainly told me he was

2:04:22.680 --> 2:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a huge fan of that track. He also hit Wore

2:04:25.680 --> 2:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the Long Coat. Okay. Many Jethroad Toll albums have been

2:04:29.520 --> 2:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>remixed by Stephen Wilson, generally speaking on against remixing, but

2:04:35.640 --> 2:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>he has a unique way of doing it without putting

2:04:38.200 --> 2:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>down the other people who have attempted the same thing

2:04:40.320 --> 2:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>with the Beatles and other acts. He seems just a

2:04:43.800 --> 2:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>scrape away that his Tritus the Steel Wool, and it

2:04:47.400 --> 2:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds exactly like the original but better. So how did

2:04:51.360 --> 2:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you get involved with him remixing your records? How do

2:04:54.800 --> 2:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you feel about all that? He told me that you

2:04:58.640 --> 2:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to fix some mistake from the past, and he said, no,

2:05:01.960 --> 2:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>this is for fans, and this is how the fans

2:05:04.720 --> 2:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>remember it, so you can he tell me the experience there? Yeah,

2:05:08.320 --> 2:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that that that is. That is how Stephen feels about it,

2:05:10.600 --> 2:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and I, you know, I told him to remix that

2:05:13.280 --> 2:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>coolong and five point once around sound and put the

2:05:16.360 --> 2:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>saxophone in another room. I said, just leave out the saxophone,

2:05:21.360 --> 2:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>which he said, now we can't do that. We've gotta

2:05:23.880 --> 2:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we've got to keep everything there and the way it was,

2:05:25.720 --> 2:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>but we'll just make it a little more transparent because

2:05:28.800 --> 2:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it was too dense that album. It's just too much

2:05:30.960 --> 2:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>going on all the time. But you know, the whole

2:05:33.120 --> 2:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>point about when I was asked by the record company,

2:05:35.680 --> 2:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, about doing remixes, and I somewhere, I think

2:05:38.920 --> 2:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd heard that Steven Wilson had remixed that classic first

2:05:44.640 --> 2:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>King Crimson album. So and having believe that that Robert

2:05:50.960 --> 2:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Fripp was quite a kind of a control freak, hands

2:05:53.280 --> 2:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>on guy, I thought, well, if he lets Stephen Wilson

2:05:55.360 --> 2:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>remixes the big album, then you know he must be

2:05:59.680 --> 2:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>all right it. So I've suggested Steven Wilson to the

2:06:02.400 --> 2:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>record company I think at that point still Warners, and

2:06:07.600 --> 2:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that Coolong they wanted to do. And so

2:06:09.280 --> 2:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I said, we'll send him a couple of tracks and

2:06:11.040 --> 2:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>see how he gets on. And he and I communicated,

2:06:14.760 --> 2:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and and so Stephen sent me a couple of you know,

2:06:19.000 --> 2:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>rough mixes having got the digital masters, you know, because

2:06:22.680 --> 2:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously was transferred from the track analog tape to twenty

2:06:28.480 --> 2:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>four bit audio, and then in that process you can

2:06:31.400 --> 2:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>then tackle it in a different way. You can clean

2:06:34.840 --> 2:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>up all the tracks. You can get rid of those

2:06:36.480 --> 2:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>little clicks and hisses and hums, you can you can

2:06:40.280 --> 2:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>delete the extraneous noise between lines of vocal or verse

2:06:46.640 --> 2:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and choruses. You can have absolute digital silence, and so

2:06:51.680 --> 2:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>suddenly the music is much more transparent, you know, you

2:06:54.400 --> 2:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have all that sort of general kind of analog

2:06:58.920 --> 2:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>mulchi kind of back grounds. Suddenly it's it's you can

2:07:01.560 --> 2:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>see through the clouds, you know, it's it's it's daylight.

2:07:04.880 --> 2:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what Stephen has always done well,

2:07:09.000 --> 2:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that he cleans everything up and then he he analyzes

2:07:13.240 --> 2:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the way the original mixes were done and sets out

2:07:17.440 --> 2:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>not to replicate it, but to generally speaking, have the

2:07:21.080 --> 2:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>same stereo field in terms of positioning instruments and gives

2:07:27.680 --> 2:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>them the same dynamic um kind of place. But you know,

2:07:32.960 --> 2:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>he fine tunes everything to a degree that I think

2:07:35.520 --> 2:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>makes the music ultimately it is clearer punchier, more transparent,

2:07:41.640 --> 2:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and in some ways, you know, here's a bit of

2:07:45.920 --> 2:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a trade off because you're dealing with analog tapes that

2:07:48.000 --> 2:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>are fifty years old and they can only probably they

2:07:53.440 --> 2:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>get baked in an oven, so that glues the oxide

2:07:55.800 --> 2:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>onto the backing for one more pass, which is your

2:07:59.440 --> 2:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>one and only chance really to to lift off that

2:08:03.400 --> 2:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>audience transfer it to the digital domain. But you know,

2:08:08.680 --> 2:08:10.879
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the tape has lost a little bit of quality

2:08:10.960 --> 2:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it's at very often the high end seems to suffer,

2:08:13.600 --> 2:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly with certain tape batches that came. I think the

2:08:17.400 --> 2:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>A album suffered very badly from loss of oxide, and

2:08:20.840 --> 2:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it was quite a tough one to try and recapture

2:08:23.320 --> 2:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the high end on that album. But to an extent,

2:08:27.680 --> 2:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you it's a bit of a trade off there.

2:08:29.440 --> 2:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>But by and large the balance lies in favor of

2:08:32.560 --> 2:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>being able to clean things up, tidy things up, give

2:08:34.840 --> 2:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it a bit more punch, a bit more transparency, and

2:08:37.640 --> 2:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and not radically change the balance of instruments or the

2:08:41.880 --> 2:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>or the stereo fields positioning of instruments. But then, of course,

2:08:45.960 --> 2:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the remixing process isn't just recreating a stereo mix.

2:08:49.560 --> 2:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's five point one surround, and and in

2:08:54.160 --> 2:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that regard I'm more than happy to hand over the

2:08:56.560 --> 2:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>reins because I do not have a five point one

2:08:58.640 --> 2:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>surround system. I'd actual you don't own a record player.

2:09:01.680 --> 2:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I used to have a CD player, but Apple stopped

2:09:03.840 --> 2:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>putting CD players in the desktop computer, so I don't

2:09:06.640 --> 2:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>even have one of those anymore. So I'm being used

2:09:09.360 --> 2:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to listening for twenty odd years now. I mean, I

2:09:13.120 --> 2:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>only listen to music as digital audio files. But then

2:09:16.200 --> 2:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, I'm listening to twenty four bit

2:09:18.680 --> 2:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>digital audio files, which are great quality. Um that's the

2:09:23.600 --> 2:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>medium in which I work as a writer, as a producer,

2:09:27.360 --> 2:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>as a recording engineer, and when I'm recording for other

2:09:31.360 --> 2:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>people as a guest. You know, I'm always used to

2:09:34.160 --> 2:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>hearing and hearing good quality music, but I don't. I

2:09:37.960 --> 2:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>don't as a music listener. I'm not really a music

2:09:41.840 --> 2:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>fan or a geek. You know, the idea of the

2:09:45.480 --> 2:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Japanese tea ceremony of music listening by you know, gently

2:09:49.160 --> 2:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>blowing the dust off your vinyl record and setting it

2:09:51.680 --> 2:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>all up and putting it on the turntable and gently

2:09:54.400 --> 2:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>dropping the needle on in the right place. So you

2:09:56.320 --> 2:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>don't damage anything or make horrible noises, and then sitting

2:09:59.000 --> 2:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>back and listening to an entire album. It's a great

2:10:02.000 --> 2:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>thing to do, but it's it is, it's slowing everything down.

2:10:05.360 --> 2:10:08.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just stepping back. And that's why I say the

2:10:08.440 --> 2:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Japanese tea ceremonies are very formal and and stayed way

2:10:13.680 --> 2:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of listening to music. And perhaps that's the way people

2:10:16.280 --> 2:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>did it in the sixties and seventies and they're doing

2:10:18.840 --> 2:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it again today, and good luck to them. But frankly speaking,

2:10:22.560 --> 2:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I if I have a record player, I don't know

2:10:25.680 --> 2:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>where it is. I know I did have one or

2:10:27.560 --> 2:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>two because I don't remember selling them, but um, you know,

2:10:31.680 --> 2:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the sort of thing I just don't really feel

2:10:33.400 --> 2:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>inclined to to acquire, um technical stuff, you know, gadgets

2:10:41.480 --> 2:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and things. I've surrounded by these for all of my

2:10:45.160 --> 2:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>life and I still am today surrounded by gadgets. But

2:10:49.400 --> 2:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm an acoustic guy. I like to pick up and

2:10:51.880 --> 2:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>play acoustic instruments and you know, and have a good microphone,

2:10:56.320 --> 2:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and yes, I use all the technology when it comes

2:10:59.160 --> 2:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to recording and mixt thing, but it's not stuff that

2:11:01.720 --> 2:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy. It's just tools of the trade. You know,

2:11:05.240 --> 2:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just a means to an end, whereas I can

2:11:07.760 --> 2:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>get quite attached to a good microphone or get attached

2:11:10.800 --> 2:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to a nice musical instrument, but the rest of the

2:11:13.520 --> 2:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>ganger tree means little to me. It's um here today,

2:11:16.800 --> 2:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>gone tomorrow. It's it's it's all. It's all as good

2:11:21.120 --> 2:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>as the next update you know to your software. Okay,

2:11:25.200 --> 2:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>stay with software. That's a very modern viewpoint which a

2:11:29.200 --> 2:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of older artists do not embrace, and they bitch

2:11:32.880 --> 2:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>about today's system. What do we know? No matter who

2:11:35.680 --> 2:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you are, it's different from the pre internet era. Very

2:11:39.600 --> 2:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>hard to reach people. Okay, maybe the usual suspects will

2:11:44.320 --> 2:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>come to see you live, but to get your new

2:11:47.320 --> 2:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>music into the hands of the public, to have radio

2:11:51.480 --> 2:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and other exposure outlets play it, it's difficult for absolutely

2:11:56.240 --> 2:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody new and classic acts. So you have a new

2:12:01.720 --> 2:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>album coming out imminently, what was the motivation to do it?

2:12:07.920 --> 2:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Also knowing that it's harder than ever for people to

2:12:10.400 --> 2:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>hear it. Many people don't record at all. Who are

2:12:12.720 --> 2:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>your vintage and how did it suddenly become Jethro Toll

2:12:16.200 --> 2:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>again as opposed to Ianni Anderson, Well, i've I mean,

2:12:20.480 --> 2:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>people have found up saying, oh, it's the first new

2:12:22.040 --> 2:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>jethro Tel album in twenty years, but it's not. It's

2:12:24.400 --> 2:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>actually nineteen. And secondly, there's been quite a few record

2:12:28.600 --> 2:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>releases in that period of time, you know. In two

2:12:30.480 --> 2:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eleven, I started work on a new project

2:12:32.840 --> 2:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>which turned out to be as thick as a Break too,

2:12:35.160 --> 2:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>although I released it under my own name at that point.

2:12:37.680 --> 2:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And and then two years later there was Homoerraticus, again

2:12:41.800 --> 2:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>released under my own name, but in retrospect probably that

2:12:45.000 --> 2:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>should have been released as a jet Hotel album because

2:12:47.280 --> 2:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it was the same bunch of guys who are on

2:12:49.600 --> 2:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the Zelo Gene and have been playing with me for

2:12:53.120 --> 2:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>an average of about fifteen years, the longest lineup of

2:12:56.960 --> 2:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>jeth Hotel ever. And and then of course the String

2:13:01.960 --> 2:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Quartets album, which once again got to number one in

2:13:06.000 --> 2:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the Billboard charts of some obscure category classical crossover or

2:13:09.840 --> 2:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever it's called. And it you know, I've not been

2:13:13.840 --> 2:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I've not been asleep on my feet, you know. I've

2:13:15.600 --> 2:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>been busy working at things and obviously doing a huge

2:13:19.000 --> 2:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>amount of tours. But the time came in during two

2:13:25.640 --> 2:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>sixteen I decide I should I should make a new

2:13:27.800 --> 2:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>record again of two years after the previous one, And

2:13:30.800 --> 2:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of two thousand seventeen, I cracked on

2:13:34.160 --> 2:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>with the job of a new album, which I decided

2:13:36.880 --> 2:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>would be a Jet Hotel album. And decided I would

2:13:40.240 --> 2:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>write a bunch of of songs that each one would

2:13:44.760 --> 2:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>be about a different strong human emotion. That was the

2:13:47.480 --> 2:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>simple underlying theme. So I wrote down a list of

2:13:51.600 --> 2:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>words to describe human emotions, extreme human emotions, just one

2:13:57.280 --> 2:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>word for each each one, and I wrote and words

2:14:00.520 --> 2:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>like hate, vengeance, retribution, jealousy, anger, greed, and then some

2:14:05.760 --> 2:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>nice stuff like fraternal love, spiritual love, erotic love, compassion, companionship, loyalty.

2:14:14.640 --> 2:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>And I looked at my list of words which would

2:14:17.120 --> 2:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>hopefully become songs, and I thought, Wow, these are all

2:14:20.280 --> 2:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>words I remember reading in the Holy Bible. And so

2:14:23.680 --> 2:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in a whimsical moment of fancy, I did an Internet

2:14:27.840 --> 2:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>search for examples of those words coming up in the Bible,

2:14:31.360 --> 2:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and and perused that with you know, a mixture of

2:14:36.280 --> 2:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>amusement and some intellectual curiosity. Because I'm not a Bible

2:14:40.000 --> 2:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>scholar and I am. I copied and pasted some examples

2:14:44.440 --> 2:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of those just as references when it came to write songs,

2:14:47.480 --> 2:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and the songs for the most part of songs about

2:14:49.280 --> 2:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the real world and the present day. But I allude

2:14:52.360 --> 2:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>two elements of the biblical stories here and there, and

2:14:56.000 --> 2:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of songs more obviously than others. But that's

2:14:59.440 --> 2:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the that's the that's the background to the record. And

2:15:03.120 --> 2:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it began in early two thousand and seventeen and I

2:15:06.480 --> 2:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>we recorded seven tracks, four of which were complete by

2:15:10.200 --> 2:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of that that that year, and the rest

2:15:12.880 --> 2:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I kept telling myself, well, get on to finish the

2:15:15.240 --> 2:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>rest of it, but we were on tour so much

2:15:17.000 --> 2:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eighteen and two thousand and nineteen,

2:15:19.920 --> 2:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and I kept putting it off, and then suddenly the

2:15:22.800 --> 2:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>pandemic was honest, and another another period of more than

2:15:27.760 --> 2:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a year went by when we couldn't get together and work.

2:15:30.520 --> 2:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>We were in lockdown, not allowed to be in each

2:15:32.320 --> 2:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>other's company, and I understided I would do the last

2:15:36.560 --> 2:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>five songs which I had written back in two thousand

2:15:38.760 --> 2:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen. They were all complete lyrically and musically, and

2:15:42.040 --> 2:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I just went back and relearned them and recorded them

2:15:46.480 --> 2:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>at home as acoustic tracks, and which in a way

2:15:50.080 --> 2:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it was probably a good thing because it gave the

2:15:53.000 --> 2:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>album rather like aqualung. It gave it a little bit

2:15:55.200 --> 2:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>more variety in terms of dynamics and musical style. So

2:16:00.480 --> 2:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it was finally completed in and mixed and mastered in

2:16:05.200 --> 2:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>June of this year, and the album art was stunned,

2:16:08.400 --> 2:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and I went in search of a record company who

2:16:11.080 --> 2:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>might be brave enough to take it on. And you know,

2:16:14.120 --> 2:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we listened to the overtures of about six different record

2:16:17.640 --> 2:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>companies and two in particular who we went into much

2:16:21.240 --> 2:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>more depth with in terms of looking at the detail

2:16:25.720 --> 2:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of potential deals. And I made my decision. But unfortunately,

2:16:32.440 --> 2:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the the reality of today's world as we meant, meant

2:16:36.440 --> 2:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we would have to wait for some time in order

2:16:38.600 --> 2:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to get vinyl pressed, because it's the waiting time to

2:16:42.320 --> 2:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>get with vinyl pressed from scratches somewhere. Some people will

2:16:45.720 --> 2:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>say eight nine months, other people saying more than a year.

2:16:49.520 --> 2:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the queue to be in if you want to

2:16:51.680 --> 2:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>get your new record pressed as a vinyl product. But

2:16:55.560 --> 2:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I've already um jumped the gun a bit by by

2:17:01.560 --> 2:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>scheduling a release in the end of March two twenty

2:17:04.600 --> 2:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>three for the next album, So we're already in the

2:17:07.120 --> 2:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>queue for having that one pressed in time. But it's

2:17:12.120 --> 2:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>been frustrating, to say the least, having to wait from

2:17:15.360 --> 2:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>May June when I've sort of done the work, and

2:17:17.520 --> 2:17:20.279
<v Speaker 1>then thinking it's not going to be out until January.

2:17:20.959 --> 2:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>It seems like another another long period of sitting on

2:17:25.240 --> 2:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>my hands and then having to be re energized to

2:17:28.240 --> 2:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>do all the press and promo, to try and um

2:17:32.200 --> 2:17:36.199
<v Speaker 1>make its presence felt amongst that small but argent body

2:17:36.280 --> 2:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of fans and perhaps introduced it to who people who

2:17:39.080 --> 2:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>have perhaps not too aware of Jeter Hotel, but might

2:17:41.720 --> 2:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>hear about it in what remains of the music media.

2:17:46.680 --> 2:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>You're heavily active. If you talk about being on the

2:17:49.080 --> 2:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>road so much that you can't finish the record, you

2:17:51.720 --> 2:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about scheduling a record in what is the motivation? Now?

2:17:56.760 --> 2:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of acts they literally have to

2:17:58.760 --> 2:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>work to pay the bills. You've had much more success

2:18:02.200 --> 2:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>than many of those people. You're a smart guy. You

2:18:05.120 --> 2:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>own your own publishing. To what degree is money motivation?

2:18:09.520 --> 2:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Some people they do the live gig because they just

2:18:12.080 --> 2:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>cannot get that response anywhere else in life. That feedback

2:18:15.840 --> 2:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>from the audience. So what keeps you still working on

2:18:19.600 --> 2:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the road and still making new records. Well, part of

2:18:23.080 --> 2:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it is just that that kind of creative urge that

2:18:27.280 --> 2:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you seem to have been born with and as a child,

2:18:30.879 --> 2:18:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can remember doing things. I was always

2:18:32.640 --> 2:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>happy in my own company, playing alone, writing, reading, drawing,

2:18:36.640 --> 2:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and I mean that thing. I've always felt that creative urge.

2:18:40.760 --> 2:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>And I don't feel the need to be with other

2:18:42.840 --> 2:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>people necessarily to you know, for socializing, as I have

2:18:47.840 --> 2:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>too much had too much older brothers, but I grew

2:18:51.440 --> 2:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>up because they had left home. I was grew up

2:18:53.879 --> 2:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>more or less as an only child, and I wasn't

2:18:56.480 --> 2:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly sociable at school, so I had plenty times to

2:19:00.000 --> 2:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>try and develop that sort of creative side of my personality.

2:19:04.800 --> 2:19:08.039
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that never goes away. It's always

2:19:08.080 --> 2:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>becomes a little quietly burning thing in the back of

2:19:12.160 --> 2:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>your mind whatever else you're doing. And when it comes

2:19:14.360 --> 2:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to making a new record, you're also I could say

2:19:17.360 --> 2:19:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you we I am driven by another consideration, which is

2:19:21.480 --> 2:19:26.199
<v Speaker 1>that time is running out. You know, the the sands

2:19:26.280 --> 2:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of time are trickling through there in a very evident

2:19:29.440 --> 2:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and seemingly ever increasing way. And I was bigger. If

2:19:32.040 --> 2:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't do this now, it just could be too late.

2:19:34.959 --> 2:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>That applies to touring as well as making records. So

2:19:38.800 --> 2:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I just want to crack on and do things that

2:19:40.400 --> 2:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I haven't done yet. And as long as I feel

2:19:42.400 --> 2:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that the that the creative juicies are flowing and the

2:19:46.959 --> 2:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>end result isn't too embarrassing, that I'm going to carry

2:19:49.360 --> 2:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>on doing it. And that's very evident in live touring

2:19:52.640 --> 2:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>because of course the pandemic, the eighteen months that we

2:19:55.920 --> 2:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>went through with not a single concert um that was

2:19:59.800 --> 2:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a of a heavy toll, particularly for the band. Guys.

2:20:02.400 --> 2:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to work, you know, I've got investments

2:20:05.120 --> 2:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and money stashed. I'm you know, I'm fine. I don't

2:20:08.160 --> 2:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>need to work again. But they do. And so my

2:20:11.160 --> 2:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>band and crew, you know, they had a real tough

2:20:14.920 --> 2:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months, was still having a tough time now because

2:20:17.520 --> 2:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>although we did twenty shows in the latter part of

2:20:20.520 --> 2:20:24.360
<v Speaker 1>last year, and no we're near enough to recoup their

2:20:25.040 --> 2:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>lots of earnings in the in the previous year and

2:20:27.400 --> 2:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a half. So you know, we we are. We're all

2:20:30.240 --> 2:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I think a little obsessed by having to crack on

2:20:32.080 --> 2:20:34.039
<v Speaker 1>with it and make up for lost time, and particularly

2:20:34.080 --> 2:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>older people like me, older artists. Um, if some some

2:20:40.480 --> 2:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of us may have made the time may have come

2:20:42.080 --> 2:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and gone, it's too late, you know, the narrow window

2:20:44.879 --> 2:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>opportunity unfortunately closed before some artists could re energize themselves

2:20:51.400 --> 2:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and get back on the road. Is the time has

2:20:53.280 --> 2:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>gone by for some people. But for those of us

2:20:55.520 --> 2:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>who are in reasonable health and mentally um equipped to

2:21:01.280 --> 2:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>take on the you know, the stress and the mental

2:21:06.879 --> 2:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>reality of what touring and performing us about. Then, you know,

2:21:10.520 --> 2:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we're all struck by the the inevitability. If

2:21:14.000 --> 2:21:18.039
<v Speaker 1>we don't do it now, there might not be another chance.

2:21:18.879 --> 2:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>A year or two or five years from now, it

2:21:21.680 --> 2:21:26.119
<v Speaker 1>could be over. So I think that's a profound driving force.

2:21:26.280 --> 2:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>However desperate it sounds. There is a degree of desperation

2:21:29.800 --> 2:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>about it, but there's nothing wrong with that. You know.

2:21:32.480 --> 2:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Some people are just desperate to have a good time

2:21:34.360 --> 2:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and go and party with their friends down at the nightclub.

2:21:36.840 --> 2:21:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And I'm desperate to get on the road and do

2:21:38.480 --> 2:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>some concerts and and carry on with the record that

2:21:41.600 --> 2:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I began twelve days ago. It's twelve diggers, yeah, thirteen

2:21:47.879 --> 2:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>days ago. On the January, the Onet as I've done

2:21:51.200 --> 2:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>with the last three or four records. January the first

2:21:53.360 --> 2:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>nine AM, I told everybody that's when I'm starting the

2:21:56.080 --> 2:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>new project, and I did, and so I'm I'm now

2:22:02.400 --> 2:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>thirteen days into that, almost two weeks, slightly hampered by

2:22:07.600 --> 2:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I've been spending many hours a day

2:22:09.640 --> 2:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>doing press and promo, but even today I managed to

2:22:12.440 --> 2:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>slip a couple of hours in working up some refinements

2:22:17.040 --> 2:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>on a couple of song ideas, and I am you know,

2:22:20.400 --> 2:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm now in a position where I can be pretty

2:22:23.520 --> 2:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>confident by the end of this month, I'm going to

2:22:25.720 --> 2:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>be making some demos to send to the guys, to

2:22:28.360 --> 2:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the band, in the band, and hopefully in the the

2:22:31.520 --> 2:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>periods that we have ahead of us, when although I

2:22:36.320 --> 2:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>hope we're on the road doing concert tours, we may

2:22:38.560 --> 2:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>end up still ending up rescheduling yet again, and so

2:22:41.720 --> 2:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we may have time to start recording earlier than I

2:22:45.200 --> 2:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>might have otherwise. But you know where, there's another record

2:22:48.600 --> 2:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in there for sure, and I know what it's called.

2:22:52.360 --> 2:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I have twelve pieces of music. I've written the first

2:22:55.360 --> 2:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>draft of all the lyrics, and no, I'm not going

2:22:58.360 --> 2:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell anybody you or even my family or anybody.

2:23:01.959 --> 2:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to breathe a word about what what

2:23:04.120 --> 2:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the record is and what it's about. And it's it's

2:23:07.040 --> 2:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>too precarious, you know, because I always reserve the right

2:23:09.400 --> 2:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to change my mind, you know, scrap it if necessary,

2:23:12.600 --> 2:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and start again. But you know, it's to me, it's

2:23:15.040 --> 2:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>like bad luck to tell people too much about what

2:23:17.600 --> 2:23:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you're doing. I couldn't agree more soon as I tell people,

2:23:20.800 --> 2:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly I can't do it now. You've also had

2:23:23.840 --> 2:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>adventures in salmon farming. How did that come about and

2:23:27.600 --> 2:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>how extensive was that? Well, I've been a musician for

2:23:30.760 --> 2:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of my life and I thought I

2:23:33.320 --> 2:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>did okay but doing that. But a little part of me,

2:23:37.400 --> 2:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I suppose it's um, you know, there's it's just that

2:23:41.640 --> 2:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just that feeling maybe that you you can turn

2:23:44.480 --> 2:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>your hand to something else, and you don't want to

2:23:46.600 --> 2:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>be too one dimensional in your in your life. So

2:23:49.720 --> 2:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought, there's probably a couple of other things that

2:23:51.760 --> 2:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in doing, and maybe I should give them

2:23:54.120 --> 2:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a go. And I we we we got involved in

2:23:56.959 --> 2:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>farming back in the late seventies, but that was you know,

2:24:02.320 --> 2:24:05.959
<v Speaker 1>sheep and cattle and wheat and barley and oilseed, rape

2:24:06.000 --> 2:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and stuff a bit bit bit bit ordinary, but I

2:24:11.000 --> 2:24:13.959
<v Speaker 1>was bitten by the bug of aquaculture. I read about

2:24:14.000 --> 2:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>it actually in an airline magazine. I read an article

2:24:17.920 --> 2:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>about fish farm in this growing new industry, and I

2:24:21.160 --> 2:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>got quite interested in that idea. And I spent about

2:24:23.840 --> 2:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a year trying to find um some potential um sites

2:24:31.120 --> 2:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>for marine aquo culture, which I was able to do

2:24:33.680 --> 2:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and got it. Literally put notched a toe, but the

2:24:37.440 --> 2:24:40.039
<v Speaker 1>whole of a both feet into the into the water

2:24:41.000 --> 2:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to get going on that, and it was an interesting

2:24:43.879 --> 2:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>parallel career for twenty years to come, and during which

2:24:47.560 --> 2:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>period of time we my companies. You know, we're one

2:24:52.520 --> 2:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of the major producers of smoked salmon, but unlike all

2:24:55.360 --> 2:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the other companies, I was producing the broodstock, the egg,

2:25:00.440 --> 2:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the hatchery, the fresh water part of salmon growth, the

2:25:03.640 --> 2:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>marine on growing of the fish, harvesting, processing, primary processing,

2:25:09.360 --> 2:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and then and then finally the secondary processing and for

2:25:13.680 --> 2:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the most part smoked salmon which was going to some

2:25:16.160 --> 2:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of the premier outlets in the UK and elsewhere in Europe.

2:25:19.640 --> 2:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And so we weren't the biggest company, but we were

2:25:22.200 --> 2:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the only company doing the whole thing you know, from

2:25:25.360 --> 2:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>brood stock and eggs right the way through to the

2:25:27.280 --> 2:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>finished product on the supermarket shells. And so there was

2:25:32.480 --> 2:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>quite a quite a an interesting time learning about a

2:25:36.640 --> 2:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>whole new kind of form of business and a mixture

2:25:41.200 --> 2:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of business and science and biology. But of course it

2:25:47.120 --> 2:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>had a an unfortunate consequence in terms of its impact

2:25:53.440 --> 2:25:56.360
<v Speaker 1>upon the marine environment, the sourcing of feed for salmon

2:25:57.240 --> 2:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and and inevitably the use of of chemicals to to

2:26:03.080 --> 2:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>protect the fish from an antibiotics to present the fish

2:26:06.560 --> 2:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>from disease. And and we were very much in the

2:26:10.240 --> 2:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>spearhead spearheading of of trying to find the way to

2:26:13.840 --> 2:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>do that and not be impactful on the environment and

2:26:17.240 --> 2:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>not be overly reliant on on the artificial side of

2:26:21.680 --> 2:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>intensive farming. So we were, you know, we we were

2:26:24.640 --> 2:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>quite active. I mean, I was quite engaged with people

2:26:26.560 --> 2:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>like green Peace and Friends of the Earth, trying to

2:26:29.080 --> 2:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, show them what it was we were doing,

2:26:30.680 --> 2:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and trying and explain that this wasn't you know, it

2:26:33.320 --> 2:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a perfect industry. But we weren't as bad as

2:26:35.720 --> 2:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we were being made out to be in some quarters.

2:26:38.760 --> 2:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>But in the end, the inevitability caught up with me

2:26:41.120 --> 2:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in the in the new millennium, I decided that I

2:26:45.120 --> 2:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>really there were a couple of things that I was

2:26:47.560 --> 2:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>finding uncomfortable about intensive aquaculture, and I decided it was

2:26:53.200 --> 2:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>time to call it a day. So I sold off

2:26:55.840 --> 2:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>various arms of the business to different companies and turned

2:27:00.879 --> 2:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>my back on aquaculture forever. But you know, twenty years

2:27:04.400 --> 2:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of I wouldn't say enjoyment, And somebody was a bit

2:27:08.800 --> 2:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>scary because it was you know, I was I was

2:27:10.879 --> 2:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the investor, the sole shareholder. I was taking all the

2:27:14.200 --> 2:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>risks and something was very, very risky to do UM.

2:27:17.800 --> 2:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we nearly came a cropper a couple

2:27:20.200 --> 2:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of times, but I managed to keep my shirt on

2:27:24.480 --> 2:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and and I was able to get out of it

2:27:27.280 --> 2:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>without any losses, which is all I ever really wanted

2:27:30.120 --> 2:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to do. I mean, all that any profits we ever made,

2:27:32.680 --> 2:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I just turned it back into the company, and we've

2:27:34.720 --> 2:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>tried to use that for growth in the company rather

2:27:37.040 --> 2:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>than rather than I didn't need the income personally, so

2:27:40.080 --> 2:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it was just something to UM to do for the

2:27:43.800 --> 2:27:46.119
<v Speaker 1>sake of doing it and for the four hundred people

2:27:46.200 --> 2:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that were employed on our fish farms and and processing plants.

2:27:51.040 --> 2:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, been there, done that, won't be going there

2:27:53.200 --> 2:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>again anytime soon. I went back to being a full

2:27:55.480 --> 2:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>time musician because I part from anything else, you know,

2:27:58.720 --> 2:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I felt I was being torn into two different directions

2:28:02.520 --> 2:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>all the time. With my available number of hours of

2:28:06.600 --> 2:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>waking energy, I thought I just should get on being

2:28:10.120 --> 2:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a musician again. That's where I started and where I

2:28:12.080 --> 2:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>should finish. So I will look back on my years

2:28:17.320 --> 2:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in aquaculture with a degree of fondness and some achievement.

2:28:21.920 --> 2:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's not, you know, it's not something I think

2:28:24.800 --> 2:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I miss if I if I ever, if I ever

2:28:27.560 --> 2:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>thought about carrying on with it, it would have been

2:28:29.360 --> 2:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>in shellfish farming, which is really very very almost zero impact.

2:28:33.959 --> 2:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Um I'm you know, I would have been a muscle farmer,

2:28:36.480 --> 2:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps an oyster farmer, scallop farmer, but um, anything that

2:28:42.000 --> 2:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>involves intensive feeding and intensive husbandry where you're putting a

2:28:48.280 --> 2:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of live animals into a small space and then

2:28:50.400 --> 2:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>having to bash them over the head or put toxic

2:28:53.879 --> 2:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>carbon monoxide into a bath to kill them. And yeah,

2:28:57.800 --> 2:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not I'm not a veg I am

2:29:00.600 --> 2:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>mostly vegetarian, and I am one of those people who

2:29:05.000 --> 2:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>find it more increasingly difficult to justify eating something that

2:29:09.600 --> 2:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>had a face on it, which is why I can

2:29:12.360 --> 2:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>carry on. I think I could have carried on being

2:29:14.600 --> 2:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a muscle farmer, because hard as you, hard as you

2:29:17.320 --> 2:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>may try, you don't see a pair of eyes or

2:29:20.560 --> 2:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>any anguish facing you. A lobster, on the other hand,

2:29:24.879 --> 2:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you do, and a squid or an octopus you certainly do.

2:29:28.200 --> 2:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And so some stuff I just wouldn't want to do anymore.

2:29:32.560 --> 2:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I personally killed thousands of fish, and at the time,

2:29:38.760 --> 2:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you got on and did it because I

2:29:40.920 --> 2:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>was working on the farm, you know, here and there

2:29:43.360 --> 2:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in a part time capacity. And I I look back

2:29:48.280 --> 2:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>on the what would be seen as a rather callous

2:29:52.800 --> 2:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>attitude in in in just and just dispatching all these

2:29:58.520 --> 2:30:03.119
<v Speaker 1>these beautiful creatures and turning them into what was then

2:30:03.440 --> 2:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>still a relatively luxury food. I couldn't have carried on

2:30:09.600 --> 2:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>doing that. Sound a bit of a softie. I'm I'm

2:30:12.440 --> 2:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a pussycat, partly because I like pussycats, and partly because

2:30:15.520 --> 2:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I I actually really don't like being involved in harming

2:30:21.640 --> 2:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>living creatures. That goes against my principles and my my

2:30:26.600 --> 2:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>spiritual beliefs. But it's not to say that I never

2:30:29.640 --> 2:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>eat meat or never eat fish, but I do it

2:30:34.000 --> 2:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>very sparingly and try to um. You know, I mean

2:30:39.800 --> 2:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>eating meat is you know, I would have a difficulty

2:30:43.600 --> 2:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>arguing for it. But it if it's if it's been

2:30:49.200 --> 2:30:55.119
<v Speaker 1>extensively reared, not intensively, and it's been organically reared, um,

2:30:56.200 --> 2:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's had a good a good bit of time

2:30:59.720 --> 2:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>just sitting out there in the fields and chewing on

2:31:03.560 --> 2:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>grass and filling the sun on its back and and

2:31:07.520 --> 2:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the wind and it's hair or its fleece or whatever

2:31:11.320 --> 2:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it might be. Then I'm it's marginally easier to argue

2:31:16.760 --> 2:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>for it than something that's grown up on concrete and

2:31:20.520 --> 2:31:25.119
<v Speaker 1>and never actually never actually stepped out into the open air. UM.

2:31:25.360 --> 2:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I have a problem with eating chicken

2:31:28.760 --> 2:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>because so often, of course it's battery real chicken. And

2:31:31.840 --> 2:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I know from from experience as to what that looks like.

2:31:35.520 --> 2:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Because we've occasionally taken in some some chickens that have

2:31:39.959 --> 2:31:44.879
<v Speaker 1>been unwanted by intensive chicken farms, and we've brought them

2:31:45.120 --> 2:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>home to to rear and have another life at home

2:31:48.840 --> 2:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>with us and miractus. They all started laying again and

2:31:52.840 --> 2:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and and living on for another couple of years of

2:31:56.080 --> 2:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a happy life being being able to go out and

2:31:59.440 --> 2:32:02.199
<v Speaker 1>in when it eastern and wander around a big space

2:32:02.920 --> 2:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>suitably fenced against the the invading foxes and dogs and

2:32:09.120 --> 2:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>cats that might otherwise do them hard. But you know

2:32:11.520 --> 2:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that I'm I'm a bit of a softy when it

2:32:13.720 --> 2:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to animals, and um, I don't feel embarrassed to

2:32:18.080 --> 2:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>say that. Not the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

2:32:21.520 --> 2:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>You have your opinion. For those who were fans of

2:32:24.280 --> 2:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>rock of Jeff Row Tall, they can't understand it. There

2:32:28.320 --> 2:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>are dozens of acts that should not be in the

2:32:32.240 --> 2:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. If Jeff row Toll

2:32:34.080 --> 2:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>is not in it, what is your viewpoint of that? Well,

2:32:37.440 --> 2:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I appreciate that people who are the

2:32:39.560 --> 2:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>best will in the world, you know, would be campaigning

2:32:41.840 --> 2:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>or arguing for Jeter Hotel being inducted into the Rock

2:32:45.879 --> 2:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and Roll Hall of Fame. But first of all, when

2:32:51.000 --> 2:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame opened in Cleveland,

2:32:53.240 --> 2:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I was one of the first people to, having been asked,

2:32:56.240 --> 2:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I donated some memorabilia to the Rock and Roll Hall

2:33:00.000 --> 2:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of Fame. So we were in there right from the right.

2:33:02.200 --> 2:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>From the get go. Jet Hotel was present in the

2:33:04.560 --> 2:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. But if we mean

2:33:07.160 --> 2:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>being inducted into the rock and Roll Hall of Fame,

2:33:09.640 --> 2:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a different matter. And I've always felt that the

2:33:12.360 --> 2:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>American Rock and Roll Hall of Fame is that peculiarly

2:33:14.959 --> 2:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>American institution to celebrate American music and its influence perhaps

2:33:20.240 --> 2:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere in some cases, but it's about musical Americana past, present,

2:33:26.680 --> 2:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully in the future. And I don't believe that

2:33:29.040 --> 2:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Jester Hotel really qualifies in regard to that, compared to

2:33:33.320 --> 2:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>many other artists. So I think it would be a

2:33:35.400 --> 2:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of an anomaly for Jester Hotel to be in

2:33:38.920 --> 2:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>inducted into the American Rock and Hall rock and Roll

2:33:41.280 --> 2:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame. Equally, there are some other bands who

2:33:43.840 --> 2:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>have been I also don't think really belonging there for

2:33:46.480 --> 2:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>similar reasons. But you know, there are there are many, many,

2:33:50.320 --> 2:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>many American acts who do deserve because they may not

2:33:52.920 --> 2:33:57.959
<v Speaker 1>be very famous or necessarily have left so much behind them,

2:33:58.040 --> 2:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>but they are still influential, unimportant, and I don't think

2:34:01.560 --> 2:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been given the recognition that perhaps they they deserve

2:34:07.480 --> 2:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>as part of that big, an evolving story of American music.

2:34:13.320 --> 2:34:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, That's how I feel about it. But

2:34:15.520 --> 2:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>we could go into the sort of mechanics of it,

2:34:17.920 --> 2:34:22.879
<v Speaker 1>which is that I think the board that make these decisions.

2:34:23.040 --> 2:34:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if it still does, but it certainly

2:34:24.760 --> 2:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>did have a guy Jan Whenner, who was the editor

2:34:30.120 --> 2:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of Rolling Stone, who had a particular dislike of jeth Hotel.

2:34:33.240 --> 2:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And I've heard from a number of sources that you know,

2:34:35.600 --> 2:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>he absolutely would you hate jeth Hotel and wouldn't dream

2:34:39.760 --> 2:34:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of of of us being in there. And that's fine,

2:34:45.440 --> 2:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm for different reasons, I kind of agree

2:34:48.080 --> 2:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>with him. You know, I don't know the man at all,

2:34:50.120 --> 2:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>never met him, but you know, he's entitled to his opinion,

2:34:52.959 --> 2:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and that may be one of the reasons that that

2:34:57.680 --> 2:35:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it's never been broke. But it would be difficult for

2:35:01.200 --> 2:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>me right now if somebody said, oh, guess what them,

2:35:04.440 --> 2:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we want to induct you into the Rock

2:35:06.040 --> 2:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and Roll Hall of Fame? Are you were you available

2:35:09.120 --> 2:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>two months next Tuesday to come to l A and

2:35:11.800 --> 2:35:13.360
<v Speaker 1>be to be there? And I'm afraid I would have

2:35:13.400 --> 2:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to say I'm sorry, I'm not. I'm supposed to be

2:35:16.200 --> 2:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be uh supposed to be playing in Santiago

2:35:20.760 --> 2:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>de Compostella in Spain that day, or I actually got

2:35:23.959 --> 2:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to be in Moscow to do a show, um, or

2:35:27.440 --> 2:35:30.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm just washing my hair, but the chances are

2:35:31.000 --> 2:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I would not be inclined, just as I didn't want to,

2:35:33.440 --> 2:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>even as the record company wanted to pay for the

2:35:35.680 --> 2:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>tickets for to fly us over to l A for

2:35:38.160 --> 2:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the Grammy ceremony, which they would convincedly wouldn't win, so

2:35:41.480 --> 2:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>there's no point in wasting their money. But even if

2:35:43.520 --> 2:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they had, I wouldn't really have wanted to go. I

2:35:46.640 --> 2:35:48.800
<v Speaker 1>just don't really like long hold travel for the sake

2:35:48.840 --> 2:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of it. I can I can be pressed, pushed, nudged

2:35:53.280 --> 2:35:56.760
<v Speaker 1>onto an airplane if if I'm actually going to work

2:35:56.840 --> 2:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's the band and the crew and we're all

2:35:58.400 --> 2:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to earn a living. They are, But so just

2:36:02.000 --> 2:36:04.800
<v Speaker 1>for the fun and games of some awards ceremony or something,

2:36:05.280 --> 2:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>my heart's not in it. I don't think I would

2:36:07.000 --> 2:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>want to go, and it would then be seen as

2:36:08.800 --> 2:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>very rude. If I had to turn around and say,

2:36:10.640 --> 2:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I don't want to come. I don't

2:36:11.959 --> 2:36:14.320
<v Speaker 1>want to do that. People were just thinking I was.

2:36:14.480 --> 2:36:16.720
<v Speaker 1>It was sour grapes. I was just saying it because

2:36:16.760 --> 2:36:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I was miffed. I was peeved that we've not been

2:36:21.560 --> 2:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>previously asked. So I'm in a bit of a no

2:36:23.640 --> 2:36:28.760
<v Speaker 1>win situation there. But in telling you this, since you

2:36:28.879 --> 2:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>were listened to by a lot of people in the

2:36:31.440 --> 2:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in the media and in the music business, it will

2:36:34.480 --> 2:36:37.880
<v Speaker 1>hopefully serve as a warning to anybody in the both

2:36:37.920 --> 2:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in the Grammy system and in the the Rock and

2:36:41.320 --> 2:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Roll Hall of Fame. There's no point in asking him

2:36:43.040 --> 2:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>because he's made it pretty clear he's not going to come. Well,

2:36:46.680 --> 2:36:48.360
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of acts who have finally been

2:36:48.440 --> 2:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>inducted who didn't come, and uh, most notably Todd Rongwan

2:36:53.240 --> 2:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in this last year. But without going down that path,

2:36:56.200 --> 2:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I must admit that I was anxious about doing this.

2:36:59.480 --> 2:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I only met you once, not that you would ever remember.

2:37:02.080 --> 2:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the show was at the Kodak and it

2:37:04.400 --> 2:37:07.119
<v Speaker 1>was after the show. I'm sophisticated enough to know it's

2:37:07.240 --> 2:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>very hard to come down, but you have a reputation

2:37:10.920 --> 2:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>as being somewhat difficult. So I am stunned that you're

2:37:16.600 --> 2:37:20.720
<v Speaker 1>such a rack and tour and you're so loquacious. Now

2:37:20.920 --> 2:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to me, I could talk to you till the end

2:37:22.720 --> 2:37:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of time. I've given you more time than I've given

2:37:24.800 --> 2:37:29.400
<v Speaker 1>anybody else. But you also say you're a loner. So

2:37:30.120 --> 2:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is it that you don't suffer fools and there are

2:37:32.680 --> 2:37:36.760
<v Speaker 1>certain people you'll talk to, or is it really you're

2:37:36.800 --> 2:37:40.320
<v Speaker 1>talking to me but you'd rather be alone. Well, you know,

2:37:41.840 --> 2:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>part of it, you know, brutally it is. It's part

2:37:44.520 --> 2:37:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of the job. You know, you've you've got to overcome

2:37:47.520 --> 2:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that desire for a seclusion. You get on with it.

2:37:52.120 --> 2:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, you just have to get on with doing it.

2:37:53.680 --> 2:37:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you're gonna do it, do it graciously, do

2:37:55.959 --> 2:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it nicely, smile on the face, cracking joe and trying

2:37:59.200 --> 2:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to try to make in it, trying to be genuine,

2:38:01.200 --> 2:38:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know. So that's what I do. If I have

2:38:02.840 --> 2:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to do meet and greets after a show, I grown,

2:38:05.160 --> 2:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, it's one of checking my schedule. I'm

2:38:08.640 --> 2:38:11.360
<v Speaker 1>meeting greet and I've got to do these things. It's

2:38:11.440 --> 2:38:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Bob left Set guy. I've heard of him, yeah, And

2:38:14.200 --> 2:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>by fact that I mean I do remember meeting And

2:38:16.000 --> 2:38:18.199
<v Speaker 1>my wife actually said to me today, said I remember

2:38:18.240 --> 2:38:21.960
<v Speaker 1>meeting him backstage after a show. But you know, I'm

2:38:22.040 --> 2:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm usually you won't find that many people who said

2:38:26.320 --> 2:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I was shirlish or unfriendly or whatever. If if I

2:38:30.640 --> 2:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>say I'm going to say hello to somebody and meet somebody,

2:38:32.720 --> 2:38:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I I do my best, you know, but but of course, privately,

2:38:37.200 --> 2:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably just rather be, you know, I'd rather be

2:38:40.280 --> 2:38:43.320
<v Speaker 1>heading back to the hotel and watching David Letterman, or

2:38:43.760 --> 2:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>or you know, getting to bed and going to sleep.

2:38:46.600 --> 2:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm just not naturally a gregarious and chumby guy.

2:38:50.080 --> 2:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm going to do it, I'm going to

2:38:52.200 --> 2:38:55.640
<v Speaker 1>try and do it properly. Because I've met a couple

2:38:55.680 --> 2:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of people who've been churlish and unfriendly and and it's

2:38:59.120 --> 2:39:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a huge just appointment when you when you actually do

2:39:02.120 --> 2:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>get the impression that someone just is prepared to be

2:39:07.200 --> 2:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>really rude to you and cut you off just because

2:39:10.800 --> 2:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they're not in the mood. And and so I I

2:39:14.240 --> 2:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>am aware of how that comes across, because I feel

2:39:16.640 --> 2:39:19.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty badly towards off top of my head, two or

2:39:19.840 --> 2:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>three famous people that I actually said, oh, hi, really

2:39:23.280 --> 2:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>nice to meet you, Ian Anderson from jether Hotel, and

2:39:25.520 --> 2:39:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they just turned their back on me and walked away.

2:39:27.240 --> 2:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And what what did I do? What did that what

2:39:31.640 --> 2:39:35.039
<v Speaker 1>did I do to upset you? Van mentioned mentioning their names,

2:39:35.560 --> 2:39:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and so it's a it's you know, I'm I'm aware

2:39:38.879 --> 2:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of how much it kind of hurts if you if

2:39:40.920 --> 2:39:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you're a fan of somebody and then they and they

2:39:44.520 --> 2:39:48.800
<v Speaker 1>treat you in a off hand or a dismissive way,

2:39:49.000 --> 2:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is quite hurtful. So I would hope there aren't too

2:39:52.640 --> 2:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>many people who would have that tale to tell about me,

2:39:55.520 --> 2:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of people who will say, I know,

2:39:57.000 --> 2:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't like to meet people and like to

2:39:58.600 --> 2:40:02.240
<v Speaker 1>say hello. He looks say they're probably right, but I wouldn't.

2:40:02.480 --> 2:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I would hope they wouldn't. They won't be talking about

2:40:04.680 --> 2:40:08.280
<v Speaker 1>personal experience as much as anecdotal stuff that goes around.

2:40:08.400 --> 2:40:10.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I'm a pretty friendly guy to most

2:40:10.879 --> 2:40:13.840
<v Speaker 1>people when i'm you know, when I when I have

2:40:14.000 --> 2:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to do it, when I'm confronted it was somebody stops

2:40:16.720 --> 2:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>me in the street. It's a fan, you know. And

2:40:19.280 --> 2:40:22.280
<v Speaker 1>most of the time I'm gonna say, hi, really nice

2:40:22.280 --> 2:40:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to meet you, thank you, thanks for you know, buying

2:40:26.240 --> 2:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a record or do whatever. But if they then produce,

2:40:29.080 --> 2:40:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty albums from a from a bag that

2:40:32.320 --> 2:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, we're going to end up on eBay that

2:40:33.959 --> 2:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably going to lose my tolerance fairly quickly. And

2:40:37.040 --> 2:40:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in these COVID times, and I've had the experience of

2:40:39.280 --> 2:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this during the last few months. Is it's really not

2:40:42.120 --> 2:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a great time to be grabbing hold of me and

2:40:45.879 --> 2:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to get me to sign things or hug me

2:40:48.160 --> 2:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>while you're doing a selfie. You know, we're in the

2:40:51.160 --> 2:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>middle of a pandemic right now, and I do not

2:40:54.680 --> 2:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>want to be the one who puts my band and

2:40:56.240 --> 2:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>crew out of work by getting COVID when I could

2:40:58.560 --> 2:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>avoid it. So, um, you know, I'm probably a little

2:41:02.000 --> 2:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>more inclined to be avoiding people right at the moment,

2:41:07.600 --> 2:41:09.119
<v Speaker 1>and that may go on for some months to come.

2:41:09.320 --> 2:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So I've tried to say two people, please, you know,

2:41:12.879 --> 2:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>from a distance, I will thank you and give you

2:41:16.000 --> 2:41:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a smile and you won't see it because I'm wearing

2:41:17.840 --> 2:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a mask, but I'm smiling at you. Trust me. But

2:41:20.879 --> 2:41:22.920
<v Speaker 1>let's just leave it at there. That's just not trying

2:41:23.000 --> 2:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to be too pressing about it. But what about your

2:41:26.760 --> 2:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>personal life? How social are you and your personal life?

2:41:30.040 --> 2:41:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Is there anybody you email with every day or talk

2:41:32.879 --> 2:41:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to every day? Do you go to dinner parties or

2:41:35.440 --> 2:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you really more of a home body loaner. Well, I

2:41:38.760 --> 2:41:41.280
<v Speaker 1>have a family and my my my daughter's family, and

2:41:41.320 --> 2:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>my son's family live you know, pretty close by, you know,

2:41:44.920 --> 2:41:47.720
<v Speaker 1>quarter of an hour, half an hour, so we see

2:41:47.760 --> 2:41:49.920
<v Speaker 1>them probably two or three times a week. My son

2:41:50.000 --> 2:41:52.199
<v Speaker 1>in law comes almost every day to take the dogs

2:41:52.240 --> 2:41:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for a walk. Since he's he's out of work even

2:41:55.640 --> 2:42:00.040
<v Speaker 1>more than I am. Being a thespian and pandemic and

2:42:00.200 --> 2:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>other things have meant it's been very difficult for him

2:42:02.520 --> 2:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to do the things that he's should have been during

2:42:05.640 --> 2:42:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years. But um, yeah, you know,

2:42:08.760 --> 2:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we we were pretty close as a family and I

2:42:12.280 --> 2:42:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we have a few friends, most of them long standing friends,

2:42:18.240 --> 2:42:22.360
<v Speaker 1>not not in the music industry, but um but you know,

2:42:22.440 --> 2:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean I exchanged emails recently with who who was it?

2:42:26.480 --> 2:42:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Um Uh. Mark Armond from Soft Cell is a big buddy.

2:42:31.959 --> 2:42:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Unlikely because of the age difference in the musical style difference,

2:42:37.560 --> 2:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>but but he's become a big friend in the last

2:42:40.000 --> 2:42:42.720
<v Speaker 1>few years and we do consciers together. He's a guest

2:42:42.760 --> 2:42:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of mine on our cathedral shows every year when we

2:42:45.959 --> 2:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>do fundraises for churches and cathedrals and Tony Iomi, who

2:42:49.680 --> 2:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>sent me an email at Christmas and I must get

2:42:52.600 --> 2:42:55.640
<v Speaker 1>together and have lunch. And you say these things, but

2:42:55.920 --> 2:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, in reality, another year goes by, another two

2:42:59.040 --> 2:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>years go by, and you've sort of forgotten to do it.

2:43:01.640 --> 2:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>But I guess again, you know, if you're getting older,

2:43:04.440 --> 2:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, well, if I don't have lunch with Tony,

2:43:07.760 --> 2:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>one of us is going to pop off sometime soon.

2:43:09.720 --> 2:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's not like we're lifelong friends, but

2:43:13.280 --> 2:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we've known each other since nine a little bit, you know,

2:43:17.280 --> 2:43:19.959
<v Speaker 1>and he's one of those people that you know, he's

2:43:19.959 --> 2:43:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a good guy. And you know other people I suppose,

2:43:24.600 --> 2:43:30.840
<v Speaker 1>um um that I don't really communicate with that that much,

2:43:30.959 --> 2:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>but there are a few people who are not necessarily musicians,

2:43:34.200 --> 2:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know, politicians or sports people or journalists and

2:43:37.640 --> 2:43:40.760
<v Speaker 1>people that I particularly at Christmas. You know, emails and

2:43:41.600 --> 2:43:45.119
<v Speaker 1>best wishes fly back and forth for a few days

2:43:45.240 --> 2:43:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of Christmas and New Year. Um. But it's um, you know,

2:43:50.400 --> 2:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just in balance. Really, I suppose probably true

2:43:53.720 --> 2:43:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to say I have less less less of a a

2:43:56.840 --> 2:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>gregarious social life on a personal level than your average person.

2:44:00.520 --> 2:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's not entirely absent um. It does, it does,

2:44:06.520 --> 2:44:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it does get tempered, however, by the fact that at

2:44:08.920 --> 2:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this particular point in time, getting together for a boozy

2:44:12.760 --> 2:44:16.320
<v Speaker 1>lunch is probably not a good idea, since we and

2:44:16.720 --> 2:44:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in your country were in the throes of the O

2:44:19.200 --> 2:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>macron dynamic surge. And although there are some signs at

2:44:23.760 --> 2:44:27.280
<v Speaker 1>least where I live that things are tapering off. I mean,

2:44:27.280 --> 2:44:30.680
<v Speaker 1>our infection rate would appear to have gone down to

2:44:31.560 --> 2:44:34.440
<v Speaker 1>just over half during the last two weeks, which from

2:44:34.600 --> 2:44:38.680
<v Speaker 1>very high levels, but it does appear to be seriously

2:44:38.760 --> 2:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>on the turn, and hopefully hospitalizations and deaths will soon follow,

2:44:42.760 --> 2:44:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and maybe in you know, a week or two, you'll

2:44:44.840 --> 2:44:47.120
<v Speaker 1>see the same thing at least in some US states

2:44:47.800 --> 2:44:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that it is beginning to drop, and there are signs

2:44:50.480 --> 2:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of that already in Europe. Europe in the US seemed

2:44:53.920 --> 2:44:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to have been about three or four weeks behind the

2:44:55.680 --> 2:45:01.879
<v Speaker 1>UK all the way through this um and apart from Italy,

2:45:01.959 --> 2:45:04.720
<v Speaker 1>which started off very badly, but we all caught up

2:45:04.760 --> 2:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>with that pretty quickly. But since then Britain has tended

2:45:07.520 --> 2:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the most infected countries with the

2:45:10.640 --> 2:45:15.080
<v Speaker 1>highest impact on on our lives, and the rest have

2:45:15.240 --> 2:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>been you know, three four or five six weeks behind

2:45:18.600 --> 2:45:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and so and then some European countries are even further

2:45:22.720 --> 2:45:25.280
<v Speaker 1>behind and O Macron has not even really got there yet.

2:45:25.360 --> 2:45:29.199
<v Speaker 1>So and their countries with you know, maybe twenty thcent

2:45:29.360 --> 2:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>vaccination rates, Boy, are they going to be in big trouble.

2:45:33.560 --> 2:45:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think in America, I've spoke to

2:45:36.720 --> 2:45:39.240
<v Speaker 1>sending email from my American agents a few days ago

2:45:39.400 --> 2:45:42.800
<v Speaker 1>suggesting some periods of times have come back, and there

2:45:42.840 --> 2:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>are a few shows in the USA in two thousand

2:45:44.680 --> 2:45:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and twenty three, and I'd be reasonably confident that that

2:45:47.080 --> 2:45:51.440
<v Speaker 1>can happen. As I'm hopeful, if not entirely confident, that

2:45:52.000 --> 2:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>most of the shows in two thousand and twenty two

2:45:55.640 --> 2:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll go ahead, albeit some of them will have been rescheduled. Um.

2:46:01.360 --> 2:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I'm trying to be optimistic about all

2:46:04.480 --> 2:46:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of this, But at the same time, I've got to

2:46:05.760 --> 2:46:13.120
<v Speaker 1>be realistic and be prepared to to go um begging

2:46:13.200 --> 2:46:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the airlines for a refund on the tickets you bought

2:46:15.680 --> 2:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that you know can't use. Actually managed just two days

2:46:20.080 --> 2:46:22.560
<v Speaker 1>ago I finally got a refund from the very last

2:46:22.840 --> 2:46:25.320
<v Speaker 1>flights that I had not been refund if I finally

2:46:25.400 --> 2:46:29.400
<v Speaker 1>came through and they were from May two thousand and twenty.

2:46:30.120 --> 2:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I finally got the refunds two days ago. They actually

2:46:34.040 --> 2:46:36.840
<v Speaker 1>paid up brilliant, you know, so there is some honor

2:46:36.920 --> 2:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>even amongst thieves. I wouldn't go that far. Yeah, I

2:46:40.240 --> 2:46:43.520
<v Speaker 1>had a flight like just after COVID began. I was

2:46:43.600 --> 2:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>stunned when they gave me my money back, which was

2:46:45.600 --> 2:46:48.840
<v Speaker 1>over a year. In any event, Ian, this has been wonderful.

2:46:49.400 --> 2:46:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Listen to the tracks that were already outside city Sisters.

2:46:53.000 --> 2:46:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I really like I look forward to seeing you live again.

2:46:56.400 --> 2:46:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure even more you look forward to being on

2:46:59.040 --> 2:47:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the road. Thanks so much for taking the time. A

2:47:01.560 --> 2:47:03.400
<v Speaker 1>great pleasure. Nice too, Nice to see you and talk

2:47:03.440 --> 2:47:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to you, and great to see you're still as active

2:47:07.000 --> 2:47:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's much a voice to be listened to amongst

2:47:12.120 --> 2:47:15.840
<v Speaker 1>fans and the industry alike. So you keep at it

2:47:15.920 --> 2:47:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and become filled with the same desperation as I am

2:47:19.959 --> 2:47:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's not time to quit. Yes, and there's more

2:47:21.840 --> 2:47:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to do. No, no, no, no. I'm not quite as

2:47:23.800 --> 2:47:26.680
<v Speaker 1>old as you, but I'm feeling it and I'm not retired.

2:47:26.720 --> 2:47:28.800
<v Speaker 1>You know. This is my one and only so in

2:47:28.840 --> 2:47:31.880
<v Speaker 1>any event, thanks so much until next time. This is

2:47:32.000 --> 2:47:32.879
<v Speaker 1>bad WEPST