WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week - June 23, 2023

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week.

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean may not have an overall recession. We're having

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 2>a rolling recession. To Kanye roll looks pretty strongly is

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to jobs.

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 3>The financial story is that shape are worth.

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Three major regional bank failures send shockwaves through the banking system.

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>We're all trying to figure out what to make of

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>generative AI.

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Through the eyes of the most influential voices.

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Welcome down, Doctor Paul Krugman, Ryan Moynahan, a Bank of America,

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 2>deebro Lair of the Paulson Institute, Len Hubbard of the

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Columbia Business.

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 3>School, Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 4>The Law of unintended consequences for the Fed, for Biden,

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 4>and for India. This is Wall Street Week. I'm Romain

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 4>Bosting in for David Weston this week, The geopolitical wins

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 4>blowing in India's favor. A conversation with Rockefeller International Chairman

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 4>Rasher Sharma on the Rendramodi's economic ambition.

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 5>You'd have to be a very big contradiant to take

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 5>a bit against India.

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 4>Plus The Business of Sports with Boston Celtics co founder

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 4>ce Felauca on the high stakes deal making in basketball

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 4>and soccer.

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 6>A lot of these valuations have been drown up by

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 6>the fact that certainly basketball and soccer are global game.

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 4>At HPE, CEO Antonio n on the rush to strike.

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 7>While the AI iron is high.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 8>AI will be a huge boost of revenue growth.

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 4>It was a compressed trading week in US markets, markets

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 4>that for a second week in a row, orbited around

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.199
<v Speaker 4>one J. Powell, the FED Chair, making a semi annual

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 4>pilgrimage to Congress, two days of questioning before the House

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 4>and the Senate on the outlook for interest rates.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 9>It only makes common sense to move at a careful pace.

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 9>We don't want to do more than we have to,

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 9>but overwhelmingly people in the committee do think that there's

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 9>more rate hikes coming.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 4>Lawmakers also press Powell to explain how the FED will

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 4>strengthen the supervision and regulation of our banks.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 9>We need to update our thinking around liquidity regulation, which

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.559
<v Speaker 9>was based on a certain speed of bank runs, which

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 9>now looks to be outdated. Really, the liquidity regulation was

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 9>just not It was not appropriate.

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 4>The rise of interest rates and the regional bank fauled

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 4>out have already had considerable consequence for the housing market,

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 4>the number of homes for sale in the US dropping

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 4>to a record low, homeowners opting to stay put since

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 4>moving would mean giving up a cheaper mortgage.

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 10>Those that have that three percent four percent mortgage are

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 10>going to be very reluctant.

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 8>To give up that interest rate.

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>They have equity in their home. They have equity in

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:30.399
<v Speaker 1>their mortgage.

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 7>Then there are the consequences of high inflation.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 4>Central bankers around the globe this week making clear that

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:36.559
<v Speaker 4>the battle.

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 7>Decurb price pressures far from over. Fresh rate heights from Switzerland, Norway, Turkey,

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 7>and the UK.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 4>The Bank of England unexpectedly boosting its benchmark rate by

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 4>a half percentage point, a day after core inflation unexpectedly

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 4>surge to a thirty one year high.

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 11>Well, today's figures strengthen the case for the government to

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 11>stick to its gums. No matter what the pressure from left,

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 11>right or center, we wouldn't be pushed off course.

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, the consequence of a single word. The week started

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 4>with US Secretary of State Anthony Blincoln making progress on

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 4>thawing relations with China, but by the end of the

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 4>week that progress was undone. An unscripted comment from President

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 4>Biden at a campaign event, preferring to Jijian PINGUS quote

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 4>a dictator.

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 12>We had an incident that caused some confusion, it might say,

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 12>But the Secretary of Blincoln had a great trip to China.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 12>I expect to be meeting with President she sometime on

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 12>a near term. And I don't think it's had any

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 12>real consequence and.

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 4>The consequence for poor US China relations. It's looking to

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 4>be advantageous for India Prime Minister voting in his first

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 4>official state visit to the US, making the case for

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 4>corporate CEOs and government officials to view India as a

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 4>partner in technology and a counterbalance to China in the pond.

0:03:52.640 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 7>Few YUS that have been many advances in AI E

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 7>at the same time that help been.

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 13>Even more momentous development in another AIA.

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 7>I made it long and India.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, back on Wall Street, global stocks notching their worst

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 4>week since March, the SMP and the Nasdaq down more

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 4>than a percent on the week, the socks six hundred,

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 4>Europe sliding three and the World beating NK in Japan

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 4>ending a run of ten straight week of gains. The

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 4>money flowing out of equities did find its way into

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 4>the perceived safety of government bonds, and that did push

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 4>yields lower, deepening the inversion of the treasury yield curve,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 4>and that in turn prompted a flight into the dollar

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 4>and a flight out of commodities. It was a somewhat

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 4>confusing and chaotic week four financial markets. Financial markets that

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 4>have been on an unexpected rally this year in defiance

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 4>of mixed economic data and Hawker's central bank actions.

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 7>Investors now left.

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 4>To decide what's worse, the fear of missing out or

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 4>fear of the next shoe to drop. Joining us now

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 4>for our roundtable is Chris Alman, the chief investment officer

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 4>over at Calsters, and Sarah Ketter are the co founder

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 4>over at Causeway Capital. And Sarah, this is a question

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 4>that I think is going to be debated for weeks,

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 4>if not months to come here. Looking at this rally

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 4>that we've had so far this year, do you think

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 4>that whatever tail winds caused that rally will persist into

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 4>the second half.

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Of the year.

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.119
<v Speaker 14>Probably not, And for some of the reasons that you've

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 14>opened the show with today, the economic situation is likely

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 14>to slow, certainly overseas. Europe's already slowing. UK has a

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 14>terrible inflation problem, is doing its best to contain it.

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 14>And as for the US, I mean even more inverted

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 14>yield curve plus the fastest FED funds rate rise up

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 14>to five percentage points that we've seen. I don't know

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 14>how long. What's going on in credit and tightening a

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 14>credit and there are numerous reasons why the stock market

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 14>in the US and oversees may have gotten ahead of themselves.

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 14>It doesn't mean to say there aren't stocks to own,

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 14>just the broad indices might have a bit of a

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 14>setback ahead.

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 4>The KBW Bank index is falling more than five percent

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 4>this week amid what Wells Fargo analyst Mike Mayo said

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 4>is a combination of a bank crisis discount, a recession discount,

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 4>and a regulatory discount. The results of the stress tests

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 4>are set to be released next week and could provide

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 4>some insight into the potential for higher capital requirements for

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 4>the biggest lenders out there, and insight of course, and

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 4>to the feed through into bank lending and economic activity. Sarah,

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 4>there's sort of two components here when we talk about

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 4>the banks, and I guess what we want out of

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 4>the banks, right, there's that extension of credit, I guess,

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 4>to the economy, to folks that need to borrow. There's

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 4>also the issue of capital returns to shareholders.

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 14>Yes, and the conflict at present in the US. US banks,

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 14>certainly the regional level, are under quite a bit of

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 14>pressure and as long as rates remain high, they have

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 14>a series problem both their assets and their liabilities, flight

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 14>of liabilities and markdown and assets. So what are they

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 14>going to do? I think they just just embrace against time.

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 15>For them, they've got to hold it all together.

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 14>You think they're somewhat unsavory place to be investing at present.

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 14>In contrast, European banks over capitalized in general and returning

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 14>capitalist shareholders through dividends and share buybacks. That's you know,

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 14>it's interesting to see the turn of the tables. After

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 14>all those years of European banks being under performers versus

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 14>the US, it has all changed.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 4>Chris, I am here is when we talk about economic conditions,

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 4>or at least we try to read the tea leads

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 4>of what those economic conditions might be. We do know

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 4>that well having credit, basically banks lending money to consumers

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 4>and to businesses is a big part of the grease

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 4>for our economy here and their concerns that that grease

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 4>just isn't there, at least not into the level that

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 4>we want it to be.

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 16>Well remain I think the banks have really slowed down

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 16>their corporate lending in their direct line programs as a

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 16>result of the regulations that came in two thousand and eight,

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 16>but I did definitely being more conservative. The regional banks.

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 10>Hold a lot of real estate debt in office real

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.239
<v Speaker 10>estate debt, and you guys have talked a lot today

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 10>about how the real estate market is due for write

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 10>downs and declines in value. That's going to put pressure

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 10>on their balance sheets, as in some cases the owners

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 10>throw the keys at them.

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 7>So I'm worried.

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 10>You know, there's still a lot of private credit that

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 10>has now come in from institutional investors into the market

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 10>that can fill that financing gap. Those rates of return

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 10>look pretty attractive now that there really are yields and

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 10>fixed income. That said, I think the regional banks are

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 10>going to continue to feel pressure just because their natural

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 10>market is certainly compressed. They've got better interest rates to

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 10>help them, but it's going to be tough.

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 4>That natural market is compressed right now. Chris So and

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned commercial real estate. That's obviously a big focus

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 4>as well. But then even j Powell, when he was

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 4>on Capitol Hill this week, was asked about the need

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 4>for additional or I should say, higher capital requirements, and

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 4>he pretty much, at least in the way that Jay

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Powell speaks, affirm that.

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 7>He did.

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 10>Romaine and I think that you know, they would like

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 10>to see stronger, safer banks. We took a lot of

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 10>time to look deep into Silicon Valley Bank and understand

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 10>that exposure first reserve bank.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:29.359
<v Speaker 16>They really were outliers.

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 10>When you look at the inflows and outflows to banks,

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 10>their capital structure, the regional banks, there are some that

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 10>are weak and some that are strong.

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 16>The money center banks really are in very good shape

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 16>in the.

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 4>US, say Sarah, you're probably a little bit more of

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 4>an active manager than what Chris would be.

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 7>I am curious.

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 4>Does what happen with the banking crisis, the regional banking

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 4>crisis back in March and the potential sort of specter

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 4>of additional regulation, does that change your broader investment thesis overall?

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 15>No, it doesn't. That we're value managers.

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 14>It causeway in our fundamental portfolios, international and global and

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 14>We're no matter where we are in the economic cycle,

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 14>whether we're in a slowing phase or an expansion, We're

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 14>looking for companies engaged in operational restructuring, so something has

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 14>gone wrong with their earnings and then new management or

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 14>the reformed management is there to fix it and reaccelerate.

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 14>And those companies exist all over the world.

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 4>This is a great conversation. Sarah Ketterer over at Causeway Capital,

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 4>and there on the other side of your screen, Chris

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Ailman over at Cawsters. Two big and really smart people

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 4>here to talk about the week that was and maybe

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 4>the weeks to come up ahead. Coming up, norendromodes high

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 4>fline ambitions and a fresh opportunity to sell the world.

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 4>On India's economic future, Rockefeller internationals Rashier Sharma says there's

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 4>still a long way to go.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 5>India's China shouldn't be or wait, China was about twenty

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 5>years ago or so.

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 7>That's next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg.

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Radio.

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 4>India is now the world's fifth largest economy and it

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 4>is big plans to step out of China's shadow Prime

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 4>Minister Narendra Modi addressing Congress in.

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 7>His first official state visit here to the US.

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Laying out an economic model for expanding India's manufacturing nohow

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 4>welcoming foreign capital and solidifying his government as a premier

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 4>partner for the US and his technology companies.

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 13>India willive be the our largest economics soon.

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 4>The World Bank estimates that India's GDP will expand by

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 4>six point three percent in twenty twenty three, outpacing China's

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 4>five point six percent forecastid growth. That's drawing a lot

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 4>of attention and a lot of money from foreign investors,

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 4>a rotation to India, particularly among those worried that China's

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 4>economic recovery is sputtering and in need of a fiscal boost.

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 11>I think the Chinese have a very difficult set of

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 11>challenges ahead of them.

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 17>They're very serious financial overhangs.

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 4>It's not just India's economic road that is giving China

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 4>a run for its money. India has taken away China's

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 4>title as the most populous country in the world. That's

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 4>according to estimates by the UN's World Population Dashboard.

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 18>Projections indicate that the size of the Chinese population could

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 18>drop below one billion before the end of the century.

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 18>In India, by contrast, the population is expected to continue

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 18>growing for several decades.

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 4>Its younger population gives it an edge attracting multinational companies

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 4>from Goldman Sachs to Rolls Royce to Rakuten make in India.

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 7>The world's back office.

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Recent economic data highlighted a rapid service sector expansion that

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 4>can be attributed to the soul called global capability centers.

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 4>These gccs now count for more than one percent of

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 4>India's GDP.

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 18>You have to think about the labor productivity issues in

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 18>the country because it's already a services dominated economy in

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 18>terms of the share of GDP.

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Apple is doing its part in heating up competition between

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 4>India and China. Apple's biggest supplier of Fox Con It's

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 4>set to start manufacturing iPhones in India by next year

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 4>as Apple diversifies away from China.

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 18>We've had considerable success and tailments in the smartphone segment,

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 18>and we have been great interest from the likes of

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 18>Apple and Samsung and expanding and growing here.

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 7>Investors appear to be all on board.

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Rupee denominated bonds are on track for the longest streak

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 4>a monthly buying by overseas funds in almost four years.

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 7>The local currency is offering the.

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 4>Second best carrier returns in Asia this year, and equities

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 4>have loured almost ten billion dollars in net foreign inflows

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 4>this quarter, helping India's three point four trillion dollars stock

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 4>market reclaim its spot as the world's fifth largest.

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 6>See the great thing about India is that with one

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 6>point four billion, you could go into the penny industry.

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 7>There's a market domestic.

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 4>As it positions itself as a leader on the global stage,

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 4>India faces challenges at home with the withering scrutiny of

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 4>a Donni Group after a report from Hindenberg Research alleged

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 4>accounting fraud and stock manipulation.

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 15>These things don't happen every so often.

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 16>They're kind of rare, and our views that we need

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 16>to bet a little bit bigger when you do get

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 16>these outsize opportunities.

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 4>India's modern nations free must also confront some significant shortcomings,

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 4>the country's deadliest rail accident in nearly three decades raising

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 4>questions about outdated infrastructure.

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 17>It is a huge headpack find you.

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 14>They see federal elections with just a couple of months ago.

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>There they will be Nikiya.

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 6>For more.

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 4>We welcome Rashier Sharma, the chair of Rockefeller International. Rashier,

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 4>great to have you here on the program. You know

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 4>emerging markets better than anyone, and I'm sure you also

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 4>know that for years, decades, really investors have really been

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 4>interested in the promise of India. There is a focus

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 4>right now, if you will, on that country, on its

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 4>economy and on its cap markets that seems much different

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 4>than what that focus had been in the past.

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 7>What's changed?

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think that this focus you're seeing on the

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 5>back of Prime Minister Moody's visit here has a lot

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 5>to do with.

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 17>Geography and size.

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 5>The fact that there is such disenchantment with China and

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 5>India's the only country of that kind of size, and

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 5>now also its economic size has become and made it

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 5>so relevant.

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 4>Are there lessons though, that Mody can take from Xijenping

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 4>and his move to globalize the Chinese economy and avoid

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 4>some of the maybe the missteps that Jijienping made.

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think it's quite clear, which is that as

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 5>far as China is concerned, that if you look at

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 5>China's development path, it was a fantastic development path. It's

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 5>only in the last few years that it's got derailed.

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 5>And it's got derailed because they took on too much debt.

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 5>It's got derailed because the state there has decided to

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 5>become much more interventionist flex its muscle, and because China

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 5>is in a way also been retreating from the world

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 5>and turning more inward.

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 17>So what Mode needs to sort.

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 5>Of realize today is that India is where China should be,

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 5>or where China was about twenty years ago or so.

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 17>It should still be a country that's opening up.

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 5>It should still be a country that is backing its

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 5>private sector.

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 4>We were speaking a little bit earlier this week about

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 4>the unemployment rate in China, specifically among the youth, something over.

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Twenty one percent.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 4>India isn't that far behind, I think, depending on what

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 4>numbers are used, somewhere around seventeen eighteen percent here. So

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 4>that's something that has to be addressed. But it's also

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 4>those same demographics that I think attracts a lot of investors,

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 4>the idea that they have a younger population relative to China,

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 4>younger working age population, as you're saying, relative to China.

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 5>This is a country that has consistently disappointed the optimists

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 5>in the pessimists. So the last few years it has

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 5>clearly disappointed the pessimists because it's done much better than

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 5>what the worst forecasts were. Now, I think that we

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 5>just have to be careful that India doesn't follow its

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 5>past pattern and disappoint the optimists as well. So I

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 5>think that this is about expectations, about controlling that, about

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 5>letting the numbers come through, because if you look at

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 5>India today, the amount of foreign investment that India attracts

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 5>is still quite small as a share of its economy.

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 5>Look at numbers you know, such as foreign direct investment,

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 5>the amount that comes into India as is like around

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 5>one percent of GDP. Now, when China was booming and

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 5>really sort of growing at a nineteen percent clip, it

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 5>was attracting foreign investment or foreign direct investment in particular

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 5>of close to four percent of GDP. Even today, other

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 5>emerging markets are attracting foreign investment of around two two

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 5>and a half percent of GDP. So we need those

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 5>numbers now to come through after this incredible amount of

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 5>expectations and also outperformance that we have seen.

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 4>In order to do that, do they need to sort of,

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 4>I guess broad and what's available to invest in. One

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 4>criticism that I've heard from foreign investors is that the

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 4>Indian economy, at least in terms of what can be

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 4>invested in, and they're primarily talking about public markets, is

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 4>way narrower than what you're going to find in China

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 4>any other emerging markets. You even see that in a

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.719
<v Speaker 4>market capitalization three trillion dollars stock market compared to mainland

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 4>China stock market which is like twelve or thirteen trillion.

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but that I think the stock market in India

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 5>has done very well because you know, the Indian economy

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 5>members also about three trillions.

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 17>So but if you.

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Notice that where the growth is so the list being

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 4>in the publicly listed company. Yes, the criticism is that

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the companies and industries they want to

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 4>invest in aren't public yet, so they either feel like

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 4>they have to find a direct way into those companies

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 4>or they have to sit on the sidelines until there's

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 4>a listening.

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Well for foreign investors and their track record are big

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 5>private investments in India is quite mixed. So I think

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 5>that the public markets in India have done very well.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 5>If you look at the breadth of companies in India

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 5>and the diversity of the stock market that's one of

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 5>the best I know of any country in the world.

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 5>There are so many sectors represented out there, from manufacturing

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 5>to healthcare to commodities. It's all their technology, like obviously

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 5>is known. If you look at other emerging markets, they

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:10.719
<v Speaker 5>tend to be very concentrated. You know, Brazil has one

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 5>or two sectors which are make up the market, or

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 5>even China got so sort of taken up by tech.

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 17>As far as the good performing markets concerned.

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 5>So I don't think that's an issue as far as

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 5>India's concern. What's an issue today is just the fact

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 5>that the valuations are very high, which is reflective of

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 5>the fact that expectations are very high out of India,

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 5>and those is what those need to come through.

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 5>We need to see the numbers come through. And you

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 5>can never have an attitude that where else will the

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 5>money go, It's got to come to India. I think

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 5>that that attitude can be problematic. So we're all sort

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 5>of you know, I think that today you'll have to

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 5>be a very big contrariant to take a bet against

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 5>India because the fundamentals do look pretty good as far

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 5>as India's concerned, but also the fact that expectations and

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 5>the hype around India is something which is quite unprecedented.

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 4>All right, that's a great place to Endre Rashier really

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 4>appreciate you taking time for us.

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 7>Thanks Rushir Sharmerck.

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Where's a chair of Rockefeller International and long career Morgan

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Sanley and now of course the founder over at Breakout Capital.

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, AI gets another champion. Hewlett Packard Enterprise CEO

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 4>Antonio Nerry on how HPE fits into the competition.

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 8>AI would be competitive too, but we always start from

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 8>the customer point of view.

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 4>That's next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 4>Wall Street Week. I'm Romaine Boss again for David Weston.

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 4>This week, HPE pushed deeper into the AI fray an

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 4>announcement of a cloud service designed to handle the large

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 4>computing power needed to support generative artificial intelligence. I had

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 4>a chance to sit down with Antonio Nry, the CEO,

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 4>about HPE's long transition away from hardware to the cloud

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 4>and now to AI.

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 8>The announcement we made yesterday and AI completes our vision

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 8>and the execution of the strategy we have been through

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 8>over the last four to five years, which green Lake

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 8>is our cloud platform where we offer edge services, hybrid

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 8>cloud services, and now we're going to offer AI services,

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 8>so in many ways complete entire portfolio. Because in twenty

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 8>eighteen I stated that the enterprise of the future will

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 8>be edge centric, cloud enabled, and data driven, and obviously

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 8>AI is an accelerate of the data driven strategy. And

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 8>we made available an amazing set of services yesterday, with

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 8>the leading service being THEAI Cloud, meaning a public offer

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 8>so customers can come and privately to train their AI

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 8>models in the most sustainable infrastructure.

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 7>Well, let's talk about shareholder value.

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 4>What are we looking at in terms of the addition

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 4>to growth, whether it's profitability or revenue.

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 8>AI will be a huge boost of and your growth,

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 8>and we talked about this in the Q two earnings

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 8>where we specifically call out in ninety days, just in

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 8>Q two we booked an incremental eight hundred million dollars

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 8>just for this type of AI world loads. Since then,

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 8>our pipeline has grown out to over three billion dollars.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 8>And so this is what you see the momental macell

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 8>rated and the reason why they're coming to us is

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 8>because they know we have the capabilities, but also we

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 8>have the trust. Trust is everything when it comes down

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 8>to AI, and to build trust, you need to have

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 8>model completion, and to have model completion, need to have

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 8>this capability. So we expect this business to continue to

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 8>grow and write profitable growth for.

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 4>Our sholders well as you seek to get a little

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 4>bit more traction on this, particularly when it comes to

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 4>revenue growth. Is that going to be enough Antonio to

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 4>make up for some of the lack that we've been

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 4>seeing in the compute segment.

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 8>Now, listen, last year the compute business grew double digits

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 8>and we drove an amazing profitability.

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 7>And we know compute things to be cyclical.

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 8>You know, there are period of times where your modernize

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 8>and you add compute capacity depending on where you want

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 8>to host the worloads, and there periods that will go

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 8>through digestive. But remember Green Lake, and that's an accelerator

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 8>of our compute demand because ultimately that compute demand stays

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 8>there for a longer period of time with hybrid prosmologen

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 8>and honestly higher attached rates. So that's why we are

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 8>growing the edge, we are growing the hybrid cloud, and

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 8>now we're going to grow. The AI together with the

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 8>data and computer will continue to be a very important

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 8>aspect of portfolio, but over time the portfolio mix is

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 8>going to go to those line of businesses just mentioned.

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 7>That was HPE CEO Antonio Neri.

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 4>AI is attracting the tension across sectors, bringing from education

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 4>to healthcare. But while the use of the nascent technology

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 4>might vary, the concerns are similar. Some even characterize AI

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 4>as an existential threat. I sat down with Neurologic CEO

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Janna Eggers a little bit earlier to ask her about

0:23:59.119 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 4>where AI is at.

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 13>In most people's opinion, you know, they think of AI

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 13>as when is it going to be like the human

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:08.959
<v Speaker 13>I think we're very, very far from that.

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 15>But where we are, which is exciting.

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 14>Is we're at a point where AI can really augment.

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 15>Humans and help us out.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 13>And you're seeing them with chat, GPT and some of

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 13>the excitements that people have around the things that it's

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 13>able to do for them as far as generating ideas

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.679
<v Speaker 13>maybe for a vacation or for a new marketing campaign,

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 13>that it's coming up with different ways than they were thinking.

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 4>I well, speaking with the CEO of Hewlett Packard Enterprise.

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 4>They just had a big splash you roll out this

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 4>week of some new AI tools that they're integrating really

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 4>into their larger cloud and enterprise software products. Here, you

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 4>advise a lot of companies. You deal with a lot

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 4>of companies that are looking to build out into this space.

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 4>Is there sort of a scale up factor here that

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 4>you think is viable, particularly when it comes to software

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 4>and a lot of cloud services.

0:24:55.440 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 13>Well, I typically actually advise company is to scale back

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 13>rather than scale out. You know, most companies aren't going

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 13>to use something like chat GPT for their business unless

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 13>it's uh and HPE has an offering there, unless it's

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 13>really focused on their business. So they're training models not

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 13>to be the whole web of information, but to be

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 13>their corporate information. And I do think that's really important,

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 13>and so I wouldn't you know, obviously their use cases

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 13>will scale out, but I think the data self scales back,

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 13>even though again things like chat GPT give us those

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 13>ideas of what could be done.

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, we have to talk a little bit here about

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 4>some of the risk, or at least the perceived risk

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 4>of this uh uh. This week, Bloomberg Technology held a

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 4>big AI summit. They had to sit down with the

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 4>open ai co founder and there was a little bit

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 4>of a pushback here to some of the I guess

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 4>worst case scenarios that have been positive about what AI

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 4>ends up being for us, for human being.

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 13>So I'm I'm again excited that consumers are able to

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 13>use it because they start seeing more of what's wrong

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 13>with it, and because of that, I think they'll learn

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 13>a bit more about AI and.

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 15>Start questioning, which I think is terrific.

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 13>I think, you know some of those fears. I'm more

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 13>worried about AI hype than I am actually worried about

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 13>AI itself.

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 15>So people start believing that it's something that it's not.

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 15>That's what worries me.

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 13>And so I'm I am more excited where people can

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 13>use it, understand that there's some.

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 15>Hype around it, and then they can.

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 14>Start questioning it more and.

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:47.679
<v Speaker 13>Demanding more, demanding things like transparency and explainability, so that

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.239
<v Speaker 13>we know what data's used, how it's used, and what

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 13>data was actually led to this suggestion or this information,

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 13>and whether it.

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 15>Was created or not.

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 13>I mean, you've see some examples of GPT making up

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 13>and people call it hallucinating.

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 15>Citations.

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 13>So if I know that that actually didn't come from

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.239
<v Speaker 13>a real site. I should be able to see that,

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 13>So chat GPT should tell me that as an example.

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, that gets to this whole idea of just how

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 4>reliable the use of this can be. Also, it raises

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 4>a lot of questions about bias. You know, the idea

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 4>that the chat GPT or whatever other generative AI products

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 4>are using. The output is only be as good or

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 4>as qualitative as the inputs, right, And I'd.

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 13>Even say if you have you may have some really

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:39.959
<v Speaker 13>good data, but the question is is it good for

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 13>that use case?

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 15>So people understanding I always talk about AIS really three parts.

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.919
<v Speaker 13>First part is the data, second part is the algorithm,

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 13>and the third part is the objective.

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 15>So making sure that those are.

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 13>All aligned and that this is good data for that

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 13>use case and of the right size.

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 15>Again, you may not need the whole internet of information.

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 13>You may just need your corporate information to actually give

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 13>you better answers than what the whole Internet would give.

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 15>And then back to my point.

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 13>About transparency and explainability. Being able to understand which data

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 13>from which data set or which aggregation of data sets

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 13>really drove that answer is actually quite important now and

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 13>becoming more important.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 4>As we go down this path, and this does appear

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 4>to be kind of the future in some form or another.

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 4>There's been a lot of discussions about the data itself,

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 4>the ownership of that data. We know, at least with

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 4>some of these consumer products, if you're just scraping in

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 4>the web, the question is do you have a right

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 4>to use something that someone else produced without their permission

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 4>and more importantly, without compensation. How do you sort of

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 4>reconcile that given the large data needs that are required

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 4>for this.

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I am actually very much in the protect and

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 13>protect people's copyrights and really respect their data. This is

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 13>why when I talk about corporation and you know them

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 13>going with their own data. When our customers come to

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 13>us and say, hey, can you also help us find data,

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 13>I always push back and say, let's start with your

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 13>data first.

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 15>Maybe we'll need that eventually, but let's start with your

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 15>data first.

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 13>Because most corporations have plenty of data, they don't need

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 13>to go outside of their of their you know.

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.719
<v Speaker 15>Corporate walls to do well with data. So that that

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 15>to me, the amount of data is.

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 7>A red herring that was narrow logic.

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 4>CEO Janna Eggers more coverage coming up here on Wall

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 4>Street Week on Bloomberg, including a look at turning around

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:37.479
<v Speaker 4>a company and winning the NBA Finals. Believe it or not,

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 4>they actually have a lot in common. A conversation coming

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 4>up with Seve Palayuker, the co owner of the Boston

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 4>Celtics and of course, former co chair over at Bain Capital.

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:48.719
<v Speaker 4>He's going to tell us how he applies his private

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 4>equity background to basketball.

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 7>That's coming up next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg.

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm here right now with Stephen Palayuka, of course, the

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 4>former co chairman of Bine Capital and co owner of

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 4>the Boston Celtics. We've been talking a lot about the

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 4>business of sports here, Steven. Probably no business has grown

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 4>as much, at least not here in the US as

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 4>a National Basketball Association. The current television broadcast rights set

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 4>to expire sometime in mid twenty twenty five. I know

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 4>negotiations have already begun, at least with current partners, but

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of speculation right now about how much

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 4>the NBA will broaden its reach in terms of the

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 4>TV rights and the TV partners it has.

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, We're very optimistic. Viewership has never been higher.

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 6>It's been a fantastic season, great competitive balance and wonderful playoffs.

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So singers looking up for the NBA.

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 6>It's a global game and we continue to build the

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 6>business in Africa overseas, and so really exciting times ahead in.

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Order to sort of reach a lot of the new

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 4>folks as well as even the current crop of fans

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 4>that you have in the league. Here is some concern

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 4>here that over the last few years, if you wanted

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 4>to watch an NBA game, there were really only a

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 4>couple of places that you can do it. You know

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 4>that how we watch TV, how we consume media has

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 4>changed a lot, even over the last five years. When

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 4>you anticipate what a new contract, a new broadcast contract

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 4>looks like, do you think it's going to be a

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:22.479
<v Speaker 4>much wider number of companies involved than what we currently have.

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 6>Yes, that's been the trend, trend in the NFL, the

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 6>trend in all sports, so more people can see more games. Fundamentally,

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 6>a lot of these valuations have been driven up by

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 6>the fact that certainly basketball and soccer are global games,

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 6>and with the streaming capability and ability to reach millions

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 6>and millions of customers. We used to measure the fan

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.959
<v Speaker 6>base in millions, and now it's tens of millions, hundreds of millions,

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 6>and even billions as far as football goes.

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 4>As we see evaluation for the popular sports, the soccers

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 4>of the world, the nbas of the world, we've also

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 4>seen investors now start to look at I guess what

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 4>can be considered second tier sports, where you're talking about

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 4>something like lac or even something as what was once

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 4>obscure like pickleball, at least as a professional sport. Have

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 4>you taken any interest in that sort of tier of

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 4>sports leagues.

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 6>Yes, PAGs Group Sports our family office, we've looked at

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 6>several opportunities, and again, I think sports is compelling programming

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 6>and there's going to be a trickle down.

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Effect into all these other leagues.

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 6>So people will start have the capability of watching lacrosse

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 6>or watching pickleball because it's compelling programming.

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're going to see growth in those

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>ancillary sports.

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 4>I am curious about your career in private equity. I

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 4>know you've stepped away from your main role at Bain

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Capital earlier this year. There are I think personally some

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 4>parallels to the growth that we've seen in the private

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 4>equity space over the last couple of decades and the

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 4>growth that we've seen in the interest and valuations in

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 4>sports franchises over that same period of time. Is there

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 4>a material difference in how you approach what you did

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 4>at Bain and the companies that you involved with the

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 4>Bane and what you're doing now in the world of sports.

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 6>It's actually very similar. There are similar dynamics in sports.

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 6>You need to have a great operation, you want to

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 6>build a championship team, you have to have fantastic management

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 6>like we have at the Celtics.

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So there are a lot of parallels.

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 6>The great news is there is a tailwind in the

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 6>growth and private equity.

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It's been a missing over in the past.

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 6>Maybe forty years ago, private equity was known for taking

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 6>out costs. Today the industry is competitive and really focused

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 6>on building businesses, and they want to build growth businesses.

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's very similar in that aspect. People want to

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>buy and invest in companies.

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 6>That can grow, and sports is a very growing property

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 6>throughout the world.

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 7>All right.

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 4>See Well, one of the reasons why we wanted to

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 4>talk to you specifically on this week is because the

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 4>National Basketball Association Draft was held Thursday here in New

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 4>York City. There was a lot of discussion about who

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 4>would be picked first. I don't think the discussion really

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 4>veered too far away from I guess the man that

0:33:58.360 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 4>everyone thinks is going to be the future of this

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 4>when Bamania, I think, is what they're calling it right now?

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 7>What do you make of him?

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 4>And more importantly, I think what he can mean for

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:08.240
<v Speaker 4>the league and what it can mean for new viewership.

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, the league has been fortunate in that, you know,

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 6>I've been following it for forty years now, and we

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 6>had the Larry Magic, you know, Michael Jordan Age, and

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 6>now there are more stars than ever in the league.

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 6>So if you look down the list, there are thirty

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 6>forty what i'd call transcendent players. And when Bymania, you

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 6>know is going to be amazing.

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 1>He's one of.

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 6>The most skilled big men we've ever seen. He can

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.399
<v Speaker 6>do it all, not unlike Lebron when he came in.

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 7>All right, Steve, really appreciate you taking time for us.

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 4>Steven Peluca there he is, of course, the former co

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 4>chairman of Bane Capitol, co owner of the Boston Celtics.

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 7>That does it.

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 4>For this episode of Wall Street Week, I'm Romaine Bostik,

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg,