WEBVTT - Jay Inslee On Why Trump’s INCOMPETENCE Will Hurt Americans

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, welcome to the first full week of May. Here's

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing you need to know about this week.

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Sunday is Mother's Day, sons and husband's Sunday is Mother's Day.

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>You know what that means. You still got time to

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>do all the delivery type things when you're hearing this podcast.

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a public service message for myself, my son,

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and all the husbands and sons out there who can't

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>wait till Saturday or Friday night to try to pull

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>this off. For the mothers, the grandmother's, Hi mom, and

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>all the other special moms of all sorts in your life.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So keep that in mind. I look forward to President

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump going on truth social and wishing all the mothers,

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>even the losers, loser mothers, and the hater mothers, happy

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Mother's Day. I'm sure that will be coming coming quite soon.

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But I thought, if I can do anything for you

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>as a public service, it is that it is Actually

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>took a bit of a quick weekend respite. So what

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>did that really mean. It meant I got to navigate

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Newark Airport. And if you followed my x feed at all,

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>you will know this. In the entire Northeast corridor, here

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is the bottom line, all of the tri state leaders

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>need to get together. This is a mess. The train

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>situation is a mess. The Newark situation is a mess.

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>This is as big of a travel corridor as there is.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>This is what makes people either trust government or not

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>trust government. Get this stuff right and they're amazed and impressed.

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Get this stuff wrong, and this is what sort of

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>can leave a mark. And let's just say, look, there

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>has definitely been I think the Northeast Corridor has a

0:01:55.960 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>few disadvantages. Politically, it is considered a bluer area. It

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is made getting sometimes Republican support for various transportation projects

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that would be helpful in the Northeast corridor not necessarily

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>helpful in other parts of the country. It is tough

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to get bipartisan support for this sometime. But look, this

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>is an important economic engine. The Northeast Corridor is the

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>gateway to this country when people come in. So it

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is something everybody and of course it's really important when

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>it affects me, right, because that's what that's why we've

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>all started podcasts in order to get our own grievances

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>out of the way. So what grinds my gears is

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that I semits. But the point is it is a

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>reminder of how government leaves an impression on the average person.

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>You may not be paying attention to politics, but you

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>pay attention when you can't get from point A to

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>point B. And this is the type of stuff. When

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>people are paying attention to government not working, it means

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you have somehow interrupted their lives. Right. There's sort of

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>two types of voters, those that pay attention and those

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:10.559
<v Speaker 1>that tune in on election day. And if you're disrupting

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>those that tune in on election day, they're the ones

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 1>that can turn election days into blue waves or red waves,

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>depending on who is in power. And that brings me

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. As much as I'd like to wax

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>eloquently about the Alcatraz decision, I will just say one

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>thing about Alcatraz and the movie business. This idea of

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>tifying all movies that come from overseas note when they

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>came out. I don't think Donald Trump thought as Meet

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the Press interview went very well. I think two things

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>really stayed sticky and I think will stick to him

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>from that interview. In particular, asked about following the Constitution,

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, even though he actually takes an oath

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of office that says he promised he's going to defend

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and protect the Constitution. He said, I don't know to

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that when it came to following the Constitution. And then

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>he continues to double down in this idea that he's

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>going to play mister Scrooge and well, you know, two

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars is enough. Well what about the person that can't

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>even afford the two dollars? What about that family? And

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>what's he going to say to them? It is an

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>unusual and watching sort of former Republicans who do not

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 1>like the idea of government deciding how many of anything

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you can have, you can you know, sort of this idea,

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 1>this is this is what communism is about. Let's limit

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the resources. You will hold back, you will decide, you know,

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>hoard and and you know, you get two pieces, two

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>loaves of bread for this family of six, but a

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>family of four gets one loaf of bread because that's

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the rules from central from the central government. It is

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>a really weird place for President Trump to be going,

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and it only I think invites more problems for the

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Republicans as a whole in general. And again it continues

0:04:55.680 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>this uncomfortable ideological realignment that's taking place inside what we're

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>supposed to call our conservative party. But we've been going

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>through this. What is a conservative right? I always, you know,

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the first word matters here conserve, which is less government,

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>you conserve the amount of And in some ways, sure,

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to whack government with the sort of the

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.799
<v Speaker 1>chainsaw and doge, but he also wants to use weaponize

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>government when it suits him. He wants to strengthen government

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>when it suits him. Decide who gets a doll and

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't get a doll, Decide when there's a military

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>parade for his birthday, and things like that. So what

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I would point out is I think it is not

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>an accident that by Sunday evening he needed a couple

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of shiny metal object type of stories, and Alcatraz is

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>one of those shiny metal object stories as well as

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>somehow attacking Hollywood that would feed his base. And at

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the same time, perhaps you know, do his little Jedi

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>mind trick on the news cycle. Pay no attention to

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>what I said about the Constitution, pay no attention to

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>what I said about about restricting the amount of toys

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that come for Christmas. Instead, look over here, look over there,

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the rock. So for me, I look at

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the Alcatraz float and the and the movie business as

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>simply distraction items. And this is what he's quite good at, right,

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>this is what makes him. He's so wired for a

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>short attention span world. He has sort of built. I

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>always said this, He's been built this way his whole life.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Our media environment just caught up to his short attention span.

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And now he is what his mainstream fits right into

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Trump's mindset. So he sort of the moment the moment

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 1>grew to him. He didn't meet the moment the moment

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>met him, and here we are. So that's the way

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I sort of compartmentalize those two. And look, this isn't

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>easy the decision. How do you cover an now Alcatraze.

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a ridiculous story. It's too small. Anything on an

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>island is a big you know, going to cost a

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. This is you know, I have no

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>doubt in his head. He's just excited by the idea

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of America's worst criminals being, you know, just a few

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.679
<v Speaker 1>miles off the coast of San Francisco, his favorite city,

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>wink wink. But I thought I would focus before my

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>guests on this episode's gonna be Jay Insley. In fact,

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of days, I'm gonna have governors from

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the Ay. I've got Jay Insley coming up,

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>got John Kasick coming up to sort of two guys

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that have run for president, two guys that have were successful,

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>won a three term governor, won a two term governor.

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You know there was it wasn't when I first started

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>covering politics, Washington State was a swing state. It has

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>moved sharply. A lot of the coast have moved sharply.

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Back to nineteen ninety two, California was a swing state,

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>was considered a swing state. But what Jay Insley did

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>three terms in a row, I believe Washington State right

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>now has the longest streak of one part rule for

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>governor going He had certainly had a very consequential twelve years.

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Ran for president on a single issue, climate change. It's

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>an interesting conversation and he certainly has his belief on

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the role that the Democratic Party and government ought to

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.559
<v Speaker 1>play in this issue of climate change. And he certainly

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>has some strong feelings about Donald Trump. I won't tease

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the John Kasik interview. That'll be coming up later in

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the week. But because I have a couple of governors

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>who are very camp you know, sort of political guys,

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought this would be a good time to sort

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of take the temperature of campaign twenty twenty six, if

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you will. As you know, the last time we chatted,

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.719
<v Speaker 1>I threw in a couple of other Democrats that had

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>a very strong first hundred days, in particular Abigail Spaanbergert,

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>who is now the clear favorite to be the next

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>governor of Virginia. And there's a variety of reasons for that.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>One is I think she ideologically fits. She's in the

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>much closer to the center, which is I think in

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>these light blue and light red states is where the

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have to be if they are going to have

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a chance to successfully win statewide. Number one and number two,

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>government workers are just really ticked off at this administration.

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Whenever government workers are fired up to vote, that's usually

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>bad news for Republicans in the state of Virginia, and

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so that was obviously one of the reasons there. Look

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>right now in campaign twenty twenty six, the biggest news

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>over the last ninety six hours was another recruiting failure

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Republicans when it came to some key Senate races,

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>specifically what's going on in Georgia where the governor there,

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Brian Kemp, passed on a bid to take on incumbent

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Senator John Ossa. And I think Kemp's decision when

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 1>you couple it with the decision of now former governor

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sununu in New Hampshire deciding an open seat, not

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>even having to challenge the sitting incumbent. This would be

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>an open seat race for him, he'd likely be the

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>front runner right away, but he decided not to. And

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's a couple of reasons. One is,

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is something that I've experienced over the years.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Any of the senators that used to be governors, the

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>path from governor to senator. You talk to any former

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>governor who's serving in the Senate and you ask them

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>which job they like better. None of them hesitate. They

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact now they hate the Senate. The way the

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Senate works, it's dysfunctional. It's not bipartisan anymore. It's still

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>more bipartisan in the House, but it's less bipartisan than

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it ever was. It's hard to get stuff done because

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the party leadership runs the Senate. Now, committee chairs don't

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>have the power they used to have. The Senate is

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a terrible is a terrible place to be compared to

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>what it was just twenty years ago, thirty years ago.

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>It is not the same place. It is not a

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>deliberative body. They don't deliberate squat anymore. Yes, you might

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>occasionally get an interesting day long filibuster, it's about the

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>only time you see any deliberation. If there is any,

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't see real debate. That would be kind of nice.

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>There was a time that actually happened in the Senate,

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>even in my lifetime. But this isn't This isn't the

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>way it is. So it is not surprising to me

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>if Brian Kemp calls up any former Senators that he

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>knows or current senators that he knows, what do you

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>think of the place, they are going to tell them

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it stinks. Ask the current list of governors will complain

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>about the place. Mark Warner missus being governor, John Hickenlooper

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>missus being governor, Mike Bround's missus being governor. So and

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>none of those guys will tell you that the Senate

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.319
<v Speaker 1>is a better job than that. So I don't want

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to sit here and just simply say these are a

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of Republican governors who assess the political landscape and

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad year to run. Even if it were

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a good year to run, the Senate doesn't feel like

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a great place to be. But

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the second thing that I is going on, here's the

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>political landscape. I mean, if you're you know, it's pretty

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>If recent history is any guide, twenty twenty six is

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be advantage de rats. The question is how

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>big of an advantage is it a small advantage? You know,

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the way it was in the in some races sort

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of in twenty twenty two, it was sort of a

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>mixed bag with a slight advantage of the Republicans. They

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>always had a little more wind at the back. That's

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>why they won the won the House, but they couldn't

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>pull off the Senate, mostly due to bad nominees sort

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of trumpet trumpet candidates that were just too trumpy when

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump wasn't on the ballot. And that's the other thing.

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>With Trump not on the ballot, we've seen a couple

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of midterms when that happens, Republican performance goes down, Democratic

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>performance seems to grow, So you have to assess the

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>situation that way, So you know it is it is

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden if you're a Republican challenger, but

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to behave like the incumbent because it's really

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>an election about the party and the White House. So

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I understand why it's not appealing to quote unquote be

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a challenger but have to behave or get treated by

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the by the electorate as an incumbent. And that's what

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>both Chris Nuknew and Brian him would be walking into there. Now, look,

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the Senate map is not great. Not only do they

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>have to win four seats in order to take the Senate,

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>they have to defend four open seats plus the Georgia

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Senate seat with John ast Off, which is going to

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>be noisy feat. So you're essentially looking at five races.

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>The four opens Michigan, New Hampshire, Minnesota, and Illinois. And look,

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>do I think Illinois is going to be that competitive

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day. Probably not, But it's

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 1>an open seat and it's going to be a really

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>crowded Democratic primary, and what if the Democrats nominate somebody

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>too far to the left that gives an opening to somebody,

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>It's unlikely, considering that MAGA seems to be the more

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>dominant force in Republican primaries. Rarely does do moderate Republicans

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>get through. I guess Glenn Younkins sort of kind of

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>was at least less MAGA E than most, which is

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>why he was able to, I think, perform, you know,

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>pull off the upset that he did in Virginia governor

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty twenty one. So you look at that,

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's a tough An area. And then you look

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>at the Republican seats in theory that are in the

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>competitive states. Right you have Maine and North Carolina are

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>really the only two Republican health seats that jump out

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>at you. And so then the question is what are

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the ones that can put into play? Well, this is

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>where I think if you're the Democrats, I don't think

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a plausible path yet to the majority. But here's

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the thing it has The path for the Democrats has

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>gotten better than it was one hundred days ago. Right, Yes,

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>they've got these open seat problems, but they don't have

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>major challengers, good challengers and Republican candidates. I think they

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't get the best candidate they could have gotten in

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Michigan Senate. I think John James would have been better

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>than Mike Rodgers. There. They're not getting their strongest candidate.

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>In New Hampshire, They're not getting their strongest candidate in Georgia.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>It is Minnesota is just a mess of a situation

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Republican Party there. And then I, you know,

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>do I are there some modern Republicans you know, on

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a previous on Earth too? Adam Kinsinger is running for

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the US Senate in Illinois and would have a boxer's

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>chance in a off year like this. But Adam Kinsinger's

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>no Republican anymore. And I think we all know that

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that ship has sailed a long time ago. You know,

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I could have seen a Darren Lehood put that race

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in play again in a non trumpy atmosphere, but I

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine it. So you have that situation. Then you

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>have these primary challengers to sitting Republican incumbents in Louisiana,

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in Texas and North Carolina. Well, I do think Texas

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>can get put into play if Ken Paxton knocks off

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Cornan in the primary. I don't think Cornyn is beatable

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>in a general election at all by any Democrat. I

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of Democrats could be Ken Paxton. I

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>think he's that polarizing and I think he becomes that

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>problematic for the Republicans if he gets there. And I

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know how corn beats him, I really don't, but

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. And I'll tell you this, Cornyn will not

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>be out and he'll not be outworked. And I think,

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and in some ways having he personally clearly doesn't like

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Ken Paxton has no respect for his character, I imagine he's motivated.

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>You throw the fact that there are two appointed senators

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>having to seek election on their own for the first time,

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>one in Florida in the Rubio seat. Ashley Moody is

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be sitting in that one. And then of

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>course you have the Ohio situation, which is a special

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>where we have John Houston filling that seat. And I'll

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>tell you it's Ohio. You know, if shared Brown runs again,

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that puts potentially that seat in place. So again, what's

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the path look like? They got to somehow win get

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>North carolinagain. They're going to need a governor to act

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a former governor who want to run on the Democratic side,

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Roy Cooper, so they have to win North Carolina, they'd

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>have to go win Maine. The governor there, Janet Mills,

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>is pondering that race against Susan Collins. I'm one of

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>those folks who thinks, you know, if you follow sort

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of New England Republican politics closely, there was a time

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>when and the Chafees were impossible to beat in Rhode

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Island until finally a mid term happened in twenty oh

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>six and Sheldon white House knocked off a Chafee and

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the last time a Republican held a Senate seat

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>in Rhode Island. I have a feeling that could be

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>what happens to Susan Collins. She's still probably the only

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Republican that can hold that seat, but eventually her party

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>ID may be the reason she loses. And I'll tell

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>you this, if Paula Page being on the ballot just

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in one House race, I think that's actually a net

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>negative for the Republican ticket. He's polarizing, He will bring

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>out the wrong type of voter if you're a Republican.

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I think this really hurts Susan Collins. With PAULA Page

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>sitting there and frankly, I'm I'm not one hundred percent.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:44.479
<v Speaker 1>If you told me by the end of the summer

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>she's announced that she's not going to run again, it

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't completely blow me away. I still think it's a

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>little early in the calendar and that's still possible. So again,

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I got to find my math here, right. So they

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>need four seats. They have to win North Carolina, win Maine,

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 1>hold all their vulnerable seats, seats I told you about,

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm actually pretty confident, barring in debacle here, they

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 1>could do that. That's now more realistic than ever, especially

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>when they've had Sonunu and Kemp pass. So then you're

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>looking like, where do they find two more seats? Maybe

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>there's Texas. I'm skeptical on Florida, and I'm somewhat skeptical

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>about Ohio. I always say somewhat. I think if the

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>ticket is Ramaswami at the top for governor, I think

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>he's pretty polarizing and I think he's he's more like

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Vance and he'll underperform an average Republican. Does he underperform

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 1>enough to bring down the ticket and to give a

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>shared Brown a shot? Maybe maybe we'll see, And I also,

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>But here's another sort of counter counterfactual there in Ohio.

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Shared Brown may be quite supportive of some of these

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>tariffs of Trump and can he message can Hess? Can

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>he somehow walk that line in Ohio? I don't know.

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So the thing that I would watch out for is,

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I do think if Democrats want a path, they need

0:18:57.960 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>one more. They need to put at least one or

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>two more Senate seats in play. I'm going to give

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you four states where I think they're going to attempt

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>to try to put two of these foreign play. Mississippi, Iowa, Nebraska,

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and Kansas. The farm states. I've talked to you about

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>this before. Between the tariffs and the AID funding cut off,

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>farmers have been hit hard. Nebraska, Kansas, and Iowa are

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>going to pay a price for the Trump economy that's

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>steeper than most other states. Does that harm incumbents there?

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'll throw one other thing at you. There's been

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting speculation that if win Donald Trump finally gives up

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>on Pete hag Set and the smart money in DC

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is when, not if He's going to do it on

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 1>his timeline, not on the media's timeline. But we saw

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it already with Mike Waltz. The backup candidates probably Jony

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Ernst more than Tom Cotton. I know Cotton wants it.

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>I think Laura Lumer has Cotton, has got Cotton in

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>her crosshairs, and I think Cotton becomes an on starter

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>for some of MAGA world. That's not the case with

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Joony Ernst, who sort of tries to find her way

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit closer, you know, a little more MAGA adjacent,

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I think than Cotton is. And I think the there's

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>always a I think MAGA would love to be able

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to say a Republican woman was the first woman head

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Pentagon. So the point is, then, all of

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, you have appointment. Why is this speculation up

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and running? Will Zach Nunn, who is a Republican member

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>of Congress in the third district in Iowa. It is

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the swingiest of districts, it is. Frankly, he's probably the

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>most vulnerable Republican in Iowa if he runs for reelection.

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Decided not to run for the open governor's race in

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that state, which a lot of people thought he would

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>jump into that and didn't say right away he's running

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>for reelection. So look, there's a lot of chatter here

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>about Ernest Pentagon. Maybe she's not running it. Who knows,

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:00.239
<v Speaker 1>is none holding out for that. It's just something keep

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>an eye on. Look, it's not that long ago that

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Iowa elected Democrats statewide, but you know, but in the

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump era, it's been a lot tougher for them. But again,

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.239
<v Speaker 1>without Trump on the ballot, these are places. So as

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you can see here, I'm trying to create the best

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>possible path here I can come up with their Democrats,

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're still probably a seat or too short, and

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that's why we're not there yet. But if they get

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>competitive candidates in Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Mississippi, if they can

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>put two of those four realistically in play, then all

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, the path is there still a long shot.

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>You're still looking at the you know, it's about I

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>think the Indiana Pacers have a better shot at winning

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 1>the NBA title than the Democrats do of winning the Senate.

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think the Indiana Pacers have a boxer's chance

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to win the NBA title. So it's not out of

0:21:56.000 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the realm, and it is slowly building. And you got

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to remember what this political environment is about. This is

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>about Donald Trump these days and the House. Meanwhile, our

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>friends at Down Ballot, I love this the Down Ballot.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>If you don't subscribe to it, you should. It's a

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>great newsletter. They have a great podcast. These are folks

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that they are. They live and breathe data, They live

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and brief politics. Yes they come from stage left, but

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>their reporting and data is just facts only. They did

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the presidential vote by house district. They had the first

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>list of that out before anybody else. And what's fascinating

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>here is that you had one hundred and sixteen. Let

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>me get this right, make sure I have this right

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>here in my numbers. I went through and basically it's races.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's what it was, one hundred and sixteen congressional districts

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>where the presidentill vote was fifty five or lower. There

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>were seventy nine additional districts where the number was between

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty six and fifty nine. Why do I point that out?

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>So out of foreigner in thirty five, right out of

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 1>foreigner in thirty five congressional districts less than two hundred,

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Less than two hundred had a presidential vote of fifty

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>nine percent or less for either of the presidential candidate.

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>That is the most generous definition of competitive you can

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>come up with. So you have just under two hundred

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>districts that are at least going to be decided by

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty by less than twenty points, the spread between DNR

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>will be by less than twenty points. There are more

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Democratic seats than Republican seats on this list. Now there's

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a reason for that. Democrats really the Democrat you know,

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris really underperformed in the Blue states, and that

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>underperformance trickled down a lot of Democratic incumbents won by

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>their lowest vote margins that they've won in a long

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>time in places like Illinois, New Jersey, California. And so

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>while on paper it looks competitive, in theory, it's not

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>going to be as competitive because Donald Trump is going

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to be on the ballot. But here's all you need

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to know. There are forty two Republican districts where Donald

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump got less than fifty five percent of the vote.

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>If you assume there's a three to four point bump

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>when Trump's on the ballot for Republicans in general, that

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>just shows you how easily that if there is a

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>dem way. First of all, the ceiling is going to

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>be no more than thirty to thirty five seats, Max,

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's being generous. But the path is there,

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>and the path that winning the House for the Democrats

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 1>is quite clear. It's quite easy, and in fact, not

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>winning the House would be catastrophic for the party at

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this point, barring some unforeseen event that rallies the troops.

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's my early picture there. It's been a good

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>first hundred days for the Blue team when it comes

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to preparing for twenty twenty six, even though they've had

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>more retirements, the lack of good recruiting on the Publican

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>side and the intra party fights that are already developing

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Republican Senate side, I think, do put do

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.959
<v Speaker 1>suddenly give the Democrats a glimmer of hope that they

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>can somehow put the Senate in plane in twenty twenty six.

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Still a long shot, but it's like Indiana Pacers winning

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the title long shot, all right. So with that, it's

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a nice long open for you political junkies out there.

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoyed this one. I will try to

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>do this every couple of weeks where we just go

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 1>deep into my brain when it comes to comes to

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 1>the Senate and gub and House races. But with that

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>staking a break, Governor j Insley on the other side,

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you've only been retired now, I don't know. I guess

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>it's one hundred days. So right, what do we about

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>at one hundred and fifteen days? How does it feel?

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, the last one hundred days of the Trump administration,

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 2>it actually feels like a thousand days. So I feel

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 2>like I've had a thousand days under my shirt.

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Listen, but you must miss a lot of it. I mean,

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you did it for three terms. Correct me if I'm wrong.

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was three terms and then seventeen years in

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Congress and foreign state legislatures. So I had three good

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 2>decades of public service. But I must, I must push

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 2>back against Shusan and retired. I really do not want

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 2>to retire. I'm still in the game. I'm working with

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Climate Power to let people know about the science of climate.

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm working on some gun safety issue with the Alliance

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 2>for Gun Responsibility. I'm trying to stir the masses. I

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 2>just had a piece in the Guardian I printed saying

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 2>we got to wake up and smell the roses to

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 2>push back. So I really feel the same degree of

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 2>lust for the fight.

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let me let me put it another way. Then,

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:55.959
<v Speaker 1>do you feel in some ways being in office can

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>can constrain you. I'm not saying you were constrained in

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>what you said. You've got things you have to do.

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you're a governor, there's stuff you have.

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>There's the have to dos and the want to dos,

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes you don't. You can't do. The want to

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>do is because of the have to dos. You know.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was a bit of a rebel as governor.

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 2>I kind of did what I wanted to do because

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 2>it was in the interest in Washingtonians. So I really

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 2>did not feel constrained. And I think, actually, to some

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 2>degree that was a little bit of the strength that

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 2>I brought to the table, because I was willing to

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 2>push boundaries and you know, on issues like health care

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 2>and climate change and a more progressive tax system. And

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 2>we had a lot of positive change in twelve years

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 2>because I didn't approach the job as feeling constrained. I

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 2>always felt it was my job to raise the state's

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 2>ambitions and not be constrained by forces of the status

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 2>quo or economic power. And so no, I'm mind constrained now.

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 2>I was fairly unconstrained then, and some people were not

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 2>happy with that by the way you call it.

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, I will say this consequent whatever you You know,

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to make everybody happy, you're probably going

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to make nobody happy. Right, There is this fine line.

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I do believe in incrementalism personally, I do believe in

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>building coalitions from the from the middle out. But there

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 1>is something to be said. If you're trying to placate everybody,

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you're actually not going to make any progress. There is

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you've got to You've got to be willing. Look,

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going over here and these people are going to

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>be unhappy, but that's so be it.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.959
<v Speaker 2>Well. I do think executives have a couple of different approaches.

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Some say, look, I'm just going to try to bank

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 2>as much political capital as I can and not ruffle

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 2>the waters as little as I can, and that's my

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 2>route to popularity. That was not my route. I always

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 2>felt that I wanted to push the envelope a positive change,

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 2>And when you mentioned incrementalism, I think it is interesting.

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 2>I think we did reach the right we did reach

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 2>the right pace of that. As evidence, we had three

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 2>of my major advances were challenged at the ballot box

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 2>last November with and with a referendum to repeal them.

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Best climate change policies in the country are capital gains

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 2>tax and our first in the nation long term care plan,

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 2>which you were very proud of. Were actually the first

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 2>state that have long term care plan for people. We

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 2>know the silver tsunami is coming, and there was an

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 2>effort by the forces of reaction to repeal all of those,

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 2>and we won those going away, like sixty thirty eight,

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 2>how much healthier?

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm want to pause there a minute, because

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I actually think that can make government in some ways

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:39.719
<v Speaker 1>more trustworthy and healthier. Meaning, look, you did something that

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>some you know that that at first may have looked

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>like it was a fifty five to forty five decision, right,

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>getting the voters to affirm something the legislature the governor

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>did usually strengthens that law into sticking, right, Like you know,

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a reason why in Washington, this Washington

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the other Washington you always want a little bipartisanship for

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>big bills because you don't want to you know, you

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to give whiplash, you don't want to be

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>unbringing it every four years. In some ways, is it

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>better that you were challenged and that you wanted the

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>ballot box rather than never being challenged at all? With

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>those loss.

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Certainly it is if you win. Sure, So if you win,

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 2>then it is much better. No, these were resounding victories,

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, like our Climate Commitment Act has raised several

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars, it restrains carbon and we won sixty two

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 2>to thirty eight. That was you know, that's a big margin.

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it puts anything over sixty these days is huge.

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 2>That's a big landslide. And so that made sure there

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 2>were no attacks in the legislature that lash question. Even

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.959
<v Speaker 2>though there were fiscal strains on the state, there were

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 2>no attacks to siphon that money off or degrade the

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 2>revenue associated with it. Same with our long term care plans,

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 2>same with our capital gains tax. So yes, it did

0:30:55.920 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 2>solidify them, and you know it was I guess out

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 2>is you're right, you have to pick a pace of change. Fortunately,

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I think we picked the right pace. We're with in

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 2>tune with the hearts of Washington State, and I hope

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:11.959
<v Speaker 2>other states will follow us.

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, you couldn't I want to go to that. You

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>had a constituency that wanted this change. I mean, in

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>some ways, you couldn't have forced this change if you

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>had a constituency that was going to fight you.

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Of course not no, that's of course not. But you know,

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 2>people sometimes will not get involved in the charge unless

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 2>there is a bugle blown. And we blew the bugle

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 2>said here's a way to identify these issues. And I

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 2>think what we found if you look at the history

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 2>of last since I've been alive, these things are so

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 2>incredibly contentious until the day after they're resolved and people

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 2>start to see the benefits. So our Climate Commitment Act,

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, it was very contentious when we passed it

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 2>in twenty nineteen twenty.

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Tell me how it works. To explain people how works.

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what it does. It stands up a provision

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 2>that will help meet our carbon reduction goals. We have

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 2>a goal of one hundred percent clean electricity that's in law,

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 2>and this creates a mechanism to assure that we reduce

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>carbon both in our utility grid and in our transportation

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 2>and in our industrial sector. So what it does is

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 2>it sets an absolute cap, an absolute limit on pollution

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 2>of these toxic materials in the state of Washington, and

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 2>it forces the polluting industries to purchase a credit against

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 2>that total amount, and we only sell enough credits to

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 2>go to that total amount, So they have to pay

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 2>to pollute. The first principle of it, the polluters have

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 2>to pay for their pollution. And that's a very important

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 2>concept because you know, when you go to the garbage dump,

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 2>you got to pay you fifteen bucks, twenty bucks to

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 2>dump your garbage for.

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>The right to do that. Yeah, well right to do

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of communities you've got to pay people to

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>just pick up your trash exactly.

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, for too long though, we've allowed polluting industries to

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 2>treat the atmosphere like a big garbage dump for free.

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Well guess what if it's for free, guess what people do?

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 2>They dump their garbage and our only atmosphere that is

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 2>now putting a blanket of carbon dioxide around the earth.

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 2>So let me take that money goes back to citizens.

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>What how do you prevent so you know, you have

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a power grid surge and all of this, you know,

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's always these are the fears that get

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.959
<v Speaker 1>thrown at people about these policies that if you put

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this cap on carbon either one of two things going

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to happen. The cost of energy is going to go

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>up because there's a limited amount of potential supply, or

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>there just won't be enough when there's a surge, whether

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a heat wave or a cold wave or something

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>like this. Explain to me the provisions that I'm sure

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>are in this bill that you have that sort of

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>deal with sort of outsized events that that could cause

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>surges and cost or surges and power use.

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, the best answer to those concerns is experience, and

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 2>our experience has been wholly positive in that regard. We

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 2>are building clean energy jobs like crazy in Washington State.

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I've permitted the probably the biggest wind turbine farm in

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the Western United States. I've permitted quite a number of

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:15.240
<v Speaker 2>solar farms we're building. We have two of the most

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 2>advanced battery companies in the world today. Where are you

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 2>on nukes?

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, it depends on the climate change activists you

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to when it comes to nukes.

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, just talk about which nukes we're talking about, because

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 2>it's an important distinction. All nukes are not created equal.

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Number one, I'm very excited about fusion energy. As you know,

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 2>fusion energy is not fission energy. It has essentially no

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 2>nuclear waste. It just used water. It's a limited supply

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 2>and one of the first fifty megawatt plants in the

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 2>world may start construction Washington State if things go well

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 2>next year. Now that's not a guarantee technology. There's still

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 2>a lot of work to be done on that. But

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 2>they're actually starting potentially construction next year. That is an

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 2>amazing achievement. If fusion pays off, pays off, that's like

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 2>the Holy grand Is. A lot of people have skepticism

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 2>about it, but I'll tell you there's some really good

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 2>investors who are investing in this, and I'm glad we're

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 2>moving forward on small modular reactors. The question is can

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 2>they be built to reduce the amount the risk of

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:23.800
<v Speaker 2>any problem at at at a reasonable price. That's a

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 2>question that remains to be seen. We did have a

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.759
<v Speaker 2>proposal here. It fell apart just because of cost, not

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 2>because it's nothing on it, but just the supply chain.

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 1>You can sort of prove safety and prove that there's

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>if you can improve.

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Safety, if there's a and if we if if we

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 2>actually find a waste disposal side of the nation, which

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 2>we do not I yet so there's three things that

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 2>stand in the way of what we call SMRs from

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 2>moving forward. But I think we should be open to

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 2>these potentials of anything that's that's non carbon omitting. But

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 2>coming back to your central question, Look, the best argument

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 2>is success and that's what we're experiencing here with the

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 2>clean energy economy. And that's been so maddening about Trump

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 2>because he's trying to kill all of this economic growth

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 2>for low cost energy. That's the other thing that I

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 2>want to point out. This energy is the least expensive

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 2>in ninety percent of America now solar and wind and

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 2>advanced battery storage are less expensive than coal. But he

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.959
<v Speaker 2>wants to get rid of the less expensive and that's

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 2>why we've had some utility bills go up since he's

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:32.280
<v Speaker 2>been president.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why people are against more options, like

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>why do we do want fewer options? And this is

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>something where this has been a head scratcher for me.

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought of conservative government, at least when I grew up,

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>as having less involvement in picking winners and losers. And

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a case where the government's coming in and saying, no,

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to impact the market. We're going to warp

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>the market, if you will, in favor of one part

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 1>of the industry over another. And of course that's been

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:03.959
<v Speaker 1>the mind boggling thing to me, and I'm sure you've

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>probably thought about this too, which is, where are the

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>small government people? Where are the free marketeers, you know,

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 1>just sort of let let let the market decide on

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 1>these things. And they're not there, and I'm I'm wondering

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>where that constituency has gone.

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:24.479
<v Speaker 2>Well. I have two theories about why Donald Trump wants

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 2>to kill clean energy jobs, you know, because he says

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 2>the wind term has caused cancer. We know they just

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:32.360
<v Speaker 2>caused jobs. One, when he was four years old, he

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 2>was frightened by wind, a wind turbine that was going

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 2>around and he sees so now he's got a phobia.

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Or Two he just didn't like him because they're taller

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 2>than he is. He's the only two thing that explains

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 2>his phobia of the cleanest, cheapest, cheapest, I want capital

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 2>ch cheapest electricity in America. And it also cuts against

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 2>his sort of vision of the dominant America. You know,

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 2>dominance is his number one verb. He worships the gods

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 2>of dominance, so he wants energy dominance. Well, if you

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 2>want to be energy dominant, why are you killing domestic

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 2>sources of energy? This is homegrown, all American energy, red, white,

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 2>and blue spinning wind turbines and solar panels in advanced electricity. Uh,

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 2>this is all American. So this cuts against virtually everything

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 2>he told citizens he wanted to do when he ran

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 2>for office. Hey, he said he wanted to reduce inflation.

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 2>These actions by him of killing these clean energy industries

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:32.320
<v Speaker 2>is increasing inflation. Number two, he said he wanted to

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 2>be American, to be dominant. Well, he's actually shooting us

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:37.839
<v Speaker 2>in the foot and giving these markets to China. And

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:42.280
<v Speaker 2>that's not a winning message. So he's you know, I wouldn't.

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 2>You've asked to be judged against a rational position. I've

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:46.280
<v Speaker 2>given up.

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 1>My uh at my meetings with might meet the press staff. Remember,

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>logic has been banned or banning logic because lot if

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you if you look at this administration or you look

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 1>at his governance through a lot, there is none. I mean,

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the only the only through line is his quote unquote gut.

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>But let me that gets me to to another point

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and that you wrote in the Guardian in your op ed,

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>because it I've had this question the question you opened

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>your op ed with I've had with I've had from

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a friend of mine that lives overseas, and he's essentially,

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>why aren't people in the streets that's been like the

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>probably of the non political people just sort of these

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 1>are not super highly charged, but people that live overseas

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that pay attention obviously pay more attention than than the

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>average global citizen. And my explanation is exhaustion. I say,

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, the best explanation I have is is there

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 1>are some people who think, well, we tried that the

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 1>first time and he came back. Now I would argue, well,

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's why he didn't win a second term, and

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that's why all those things. But that is my best explanation. Exhaustion.

0:39:58.800 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>What's your explanation?

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.760
<v Speaker 2>A couple of things. Number One, we are the victim

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 2>of two hundred years plus of successful democracy except for

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the Civil War in America. So we've been a victim

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 2>of being lucky never to experience what the continent of

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Europe or South America or Asia has experienced.

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 1>So we don't imagine there there are some people that

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>believe our democracy is only about sixty years old, that

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't really until the Civil Rights Tech that everybody

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>got to participate.

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 2>You that's a good argument, and I will I will

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:36.479
<v Speaker 2>not argue the point.

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 1>No I may, I hear you.

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but at least during those sixty years, we just can't.

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 2>This is the failure of imagination. It's very difficult even

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 2>today to wrap your heads around a guy. You know,

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 2>I grew up in the fifties and you know, say,

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 2>doing the Pledge of Allegiance every day and worshiping the president,

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 2>being united during the Cuban missile crisis, and you know,

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 2>I grew up with that all American conatitude. And to

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:06.720
<v Speaker 2>think to have to imagine an American president facially ignoring

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 2>the US Supreme Court, it takes the powers of imagination

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 2>because we've never experienced that in the United States. Hungary

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 2>has experienced it, Germany has experienced it, Argentina has experienced

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 2>We never have. So I think part of it is

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 2>we don't we have to imagine this because we've never experienced.

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 2>But I do believe there's some exhaustion. But I'll tell you,

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 2>people are waking up. So I spoke to twenty thousand

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 2>people on a Sunday day in Seattle. A couple of

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 2>weekends ago. On my street corner up here in Bambridge Island.

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Every day there's two dozen people standing out there and

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 2>they're not in the New York Times or on your show,

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 2>but they're just out there. People are waking up. I

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 2>wrote this piece in the Guardian you refer to about

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 2>a month ago, and there has been some marginal waking

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 2>up that's happening. So I'm very pleased by that because

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 2>people are starting to feel the ramifications, because he is

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 2>capable of totally ripping apart every law, on every constitutional

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 2>privilege if we don't get out there. So I'm glad.

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad that we are, and everybody's got a stake

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 2>in this. You know, there's gonna be report released tomorrow

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 2>a couple of days after this, by Climate Power. I

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:12.800
<v Speaker 2>work with a group called.

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 1>So just letting people know we're taping on Tuesday, April

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty ninth, because I always like the time stamp. So

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on April thirtieth.

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 2>Report, it's going to talk about the incredible tens of

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 2>thousands of jobs loss that we've already lost because of

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 2>his tackle on clean energy. I guess what I'm saying

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 2>is the assault on democracy has real term ramifications for

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 2>your economic conditions of your family. It's not just kind

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:45.800
<v Speaker 2>of Ivory Tower constitutional law. It means you're going to

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:48.760
<v Speaker 2>pay more for utility, your kid's gonna lose their jobs,

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 2>and your prices are going to go off. Those are

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the real term ramifications of losing democracy, not just pointy

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 2>headed things for constitutional lawyers at the law schools.

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny you put it those terms. I

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>have a friend of mine who is an Ivory Tower guy,

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>teaches it UMass Amherst has been paranoid about America becoming

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 1>hungry right until Liberation Day. And he goes, you know,

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 1>he goes, I'm now finally feeling better. And I said,

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:20.440
<v Speaker 1>why is that you must not have any money invested

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market. He goes, no, no, no, because

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:24.799
<v Speaker 1>it's not that he goes, because I know how we

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>stop authoritarianism in this country make people poor again. Like

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that the economy if he if he's mismanaging

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>the economy, he's not going to be able to get

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:37.800
<v Speaker 1>away with everything else. I mean, that's sort of a

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a dark way of trying to find optimism. But do

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:44.359
<v Speaker 1>you do you concur with that conclusion that that once

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>people feel the economic impact, then suddenly they'll start, you know,

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 1>putting all this together.

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going to answer that question with this caveat.

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 2>I want to make sure you don't report that I

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 2>am favoring a recession.

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, no, I I and that's that it's the worst

0:43:59.239 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 1>part of this right now.

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 2>But that's the worst partner. I mean, I hate.

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Feeling you sit there. Look, I hope he's right. I

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 1>hope he can bring manufacturing and they'd be great to

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:11.399
<v Speaker 1>see all these jobs and oh yes, but I don't

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 1>know if he understands how civilizations work, like this tube

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:18.360
<v Speaker 1>paste is out of the tube. Globalization, I mean, this

0:44:18.400 --> 0:44:20.759
<v Speaker 1>has been the greatest eighty year run in the in

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:23.759
<v Speaker 1>the in the in human history, more people brought out

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of poverty around the globe. I mean, I sit here

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, you're never putting this back. The small

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:33.800
<v Speaker 1>business owner in Nigeria who can export to the United

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:36.359
<v Speaker 1>States or the EU and make money is never going

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to say, oh, I guess now I got to go

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 1>to economic nationalism and sell people here. That isn't how

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to work.

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:45.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, an an answer to your question, if you look

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 2>at his you know absolutely creatoring approval numbers. The substantial

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 2>part of that is because people do know that terrorists

0:44:53.400 --> 0:44:56.239
<v Speaker 2>are going to increase their costs and within about five

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 2>to six weeks, I mean, they can't get stuff because

0:44:58.560 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the shelves are going to be missing a lot of

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 2>stuff they've had. We already have twenty to thirty percent

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:04.800
<v Speaker 2>reduction ships coming into Seattle Harbor.

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>For me, you're one of the what sized port are you, guys?

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're one of the biggest.

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're maybe second on the Puget soun. I mean

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 2>we've already experienced twenty to thirty percent reduction already even

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 2>before the terrorists kick in. So Americans know they're going

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 2>to get hurt big time by this. He's totally failed

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:26.400
<v Speaker 2>trying to tell them otherwise. And yes, that does weaken

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 2>his ability to tear up the US Constitution. There's no

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 2>question about it. It's not the preferred way to keep

0:45:32.719 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 2>our constitution intact. The preferred way is for people who

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 2>get out on the street in peaceful protests, and college

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 2>presidents saying I'm not going to deal with you, and

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 2>law firms saying I'll see you court and school district

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 2>administrators teaching their kids on this subject. That's what's going

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 2>to ultimately restrain restrain this situation.

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny you bring up those three entities,

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and I would throw in the heads of traditional media

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>companies who have not stood by the associated when it

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 1>was a latent First Amendment violation, right, and everybody is

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 1>using the same excuse. Well, you know it's not going

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to mean anything. And you know the guy Paul Weiss said,

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:15.839
<v Speaker 1>people were trying to poach our clients. You know, you

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:18.439
<v Speaker 1>do have universities going, well, have you looked at them?

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't look at us? It's this weird. It's like, now

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>we all, I frankly have a better understanding of how

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 1>things happened in Berlin and Munich in the thirties. Right,

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:32.439
<v Speaker 1>it was fear and survival kick in, and sometimes people

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>get selfish, right, and it's like I've got to survive

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and my surviv if I have to sacrifice you to survive,

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:40.319
<v Speaker 1>at least I stay in the room and maybe I

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>can fix it later. I mean, that's a that's I

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like what we're watching, at least in the legal community,

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the media community, in the university community.

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 2>So this is a movie that has been played quite

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 2>a number of places around the world before. How this

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 2>movie turns out, we don't know yet, but it's a

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:03.880
<v Speaker 2>movie that will turn out very badly if individual organizations

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 2>and individual people decide to feed the crocodile. Here's what

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean. Winston Churchill, as fascism was raising in Germany,

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 2>and everybody's saying, well, he's okay, you know, we'll go

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:16.000
<v Speaker 2>along with this guy with a mustache for a while.

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 2>His name I won't mention, And Churchill said, you know,

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 2>it's a really bad strategy to feed a crocodile in

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 2>the hopes that he will eat you last. And I

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 2>think that just defines why these decisions have been so

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 2>damaging to democracy and ultimately to these institutions, because I'll

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 2>tell you what, Blackmailer's extortionists never get done with the

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 2>first bite. They come back. You've already seen him coming

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 2>back and want more from Columbia and these law for him.

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 2>You're already seeing him coming back for that, and so

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 2>surrender is not an option here if we want to

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:55.959
<v Speaker 2>keep a democracy. And I think these you were starting again,

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:57.839
<v Speaker 2>You're starting to see this tide turn a little bit.

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 2>You're starting to see people waking up in these c streets,

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 2>c suites. Now, if I may in the media, I

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't saw George Clooney's play that Good Luck about edwar Armurrell,

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 2>a proud Washington State University graduate by the way, who

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 2>is such a great friend of demogracy. Yeah, and the

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 2>whole play was about management of the media at that time,

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 2>CBS trying to lean on Edgar Murrell to lighten up

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:28.319
<v Speaker 2>on his attacks on Joseph McCarthy. That day, same day,

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 2>in the same studio, the executive producer of sixty Minutes

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:34.839
<v Speaker 2>had it quick because management was leaning on him, because

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Trump was leaning on him. And I'm going, like, this

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 2>play is when we're living this play, it's a real thing.

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:42.799
<v Speaker 2>It's not just on the stage. We're living it at

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 2>this moment. Well, yes, we hope the voices in the

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:49.400
<v Speaker 2>media can do the same thing. We know some have

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 2>capitulated and some are standing up. But if there's ever

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:56.360
<v Speaker 2>a moment to stand up, you know, and I've appealed.

0:48:57.040 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I've tried to make this on a very personal basis.

0:48:59.160 --> 0:49:02.840
<v Speaker 2>So I've called my agents of the University of Washington

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 2>to talk to him about this subject, and they've expressed

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:08.239
<v Speaker 2>some of the same concerns you have research dollars, he's

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 2>going to attack us, blah blah blah. And what I've

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:13.440
<v Speaker 2>tried to say is that look, imagine you're the region

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 2>of the University of Heidelberg in May nineteen thirty three

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:21.719
<v Speaker 2>and you're told by the new chancellor that you won't

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:24.279
<v Speaker 2>you can no longer admit Jewish students, or he's going

0:49:24.320 --> 0:49:27.359
<v Speaker 2>to cut your research budget in half. And I've asked

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 2>these reagents, what would you do? You're being tested and

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 2>you get to decide what you really believe in. And

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I've tried to appeal people on a personal level with

0:49:37.719 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 2>that type of issue because I do believe that's the

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 2>same scenario. I really do, because we have seen this happens.

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Anating hypothetical question to ask.

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 2>It's an important one because I can recognize the fear

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 2>that people have. I get it, it's rational, it's human.

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 2>But things your treasure. Sometimes you've just got to stand

0:49:57.200 --> 0:50:01.080
<v Speaker 2>up for. And you know us my seat voting for

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:04.759
<v Speaker 2>an assault weapon band, so you know I know what

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 2>it means to sacrifice.

0:50:07.760 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, well, you know I want to actually because you

0:50:10.640 --> 0:50:13.239
<v Speaker 1>know that's correct me. If I'm wrong, did you do

0:50:13.320 --> 0:50:16.760
<v Speaker 1>your NAFTA vote that year too, did you vote, Yeah,

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and you voted.

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 2>For it, correct, Yes, I was a favorite NAFTA.

0:50:19.840 --> 0:50:21.879
<v Speaker 1>That's right, because you were part of it. And this

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is what I want to get at trade, because this

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is the uncomfortable truth about open markets and free trade.

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Our country is so big and diverse that there are

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 1>regions that are saw immediate wins, and there are regions

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that saw immediate losses, and we can talk about what

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we could have done better to help in different regions.

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:43.920
<v Speaker 1>But when I think about the trade situation and the

0:50:43.960 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 1>issue with tariffs, and you know, the Sun Belt has

0:50:48.600 --> 0:50:52.880
<v Speaker 1>become a financial juggernaut, right and a manufacturing juggernaut, and

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that's due to arguably these open trade deals that have

0:50:57.480 --> 0:51:00.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed foreign manufacturers to build plants in the United States

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. So when I think about the

0:51:02.960 --> 0:51:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party's debate about sort of how to win back

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 1>working class voters, and certainly the issues in Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin, Iowa,

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm bringing up some former swing states and as well

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:19.280
<v Speaker 1>as potential swing state you know where they lost. Washington gained,

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Nevada gained, Texas gained, Arizona gained, right, the Sunbelt gain

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 1>how do you have that conversation with the American public. Right,

0:51:28.800 --> 0:51:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it was a net positive, NAFTA was a net positive,

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 1>but there were people that lost.

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:39.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, first off, this is I'm glad we have this discussion,

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:42.319
<v Speaker 2>but it needs to be nuanced because there's no black

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 2>or white.

0:51:42.719 --> 0:51:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's why you have to do it on a podcast.

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I hate to say this. I couldn't do

0:51:46.480 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this in our eight minute interviews and meet the press, governor, right,

0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, because you can't have this and this is

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the beauty of this format. But it's also the I

0:51:53.520 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 1>think why our political debate is such garbage.

0:51:57.080 --> 0:51:59.959
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well, the first thing I would say is, look,

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:03.000
<v Speaker 2>there's all kinds of arguments on this tariff, how it

0:52:03.040 --> 0:52:05.480
<v Speaker 2>should be, etc. And you can fashion all kinds argue

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:08.319
<v Speaker 2>about every single tariff. But the thing you should not

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:11.719
<v Speaker 2>have is a president who is grossly incompetent, who has

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:15.400
<v Speaker 2>created so much uncertainty that he has even unintentionally started

0:52:15.440 --> 0:52:18.480
<v Speaker 2>trade wars that has now resulted. You want to talk

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:22.399
<v Speaker 2>about manufacturing, a lot of these manufacturing companies are not

0:52:22.440 --> 0:52:24.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to do their job at all

0:52:25.280 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 2>because they're not going to be able to get the

0:52:26.719 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 2>rare earth they need from China, and the magnets of today,

0:52:31.000 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 2>the ninety percent of the rare earth comes from China

0:52:33.040 --> 0:52:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that's getting shut off. That's a consequence of these tariffs.

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:39.319
<v Speaker 2>So when you have a grossly incompetent person who wants

0:52:39.360 --> 0:52:43.200
<v Speaker 2>to cause chaos and nobody knows what his real plan is,

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:47.320
<v Speaker 2>and he has caused the damage to the image of

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:50.279
<v Speaker 2>the United States because he's been a buffoon. You know,

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:52.440
<v Speaker 2>he says, I'm going to do one hundred and forty

0:52:52.440 --> 0:52:55.600
<v Speaker 2>five percent tariff on China. He says, they're going to

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 2>back down, they're talking to me, They're going to surrender

0:52:57.800 --> 0:53:00.720
<v Speaker 2>the next day. Gee says, forget it. But I'm not even.

0:53:00.520 --> 0:53:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Taking your phone, Governor. I mean, he's handled his leverage.

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Whatever leverage the United States did have, he handed it

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 1>away to everybody. So, I mean the guy in India,

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:12.799
<v Speaker 1>India sitting there going, oh, how badly do you need

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:13.399
<v Speaker 1>a trade deal?

0:53:13.960 --> 0:53:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump? Oh you need to trail that bad He

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:22.640
<v Speaker 3>has been both chaotic, uncertain. He has squandered our national

0:53:22.680 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 3>treasure of credibility because he's folded. He folded on this.

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:29.839
<v Speaker 3>But now Trada won't let them even fold. They won't

0:53:29.880 --> 0:53:30.279
<v Speaker 3>take his.

0:53:30.320 --> 0:53:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Phone calls, right, they won't.

0:53:32.640 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 2>He can't even fold.

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:35.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to cash out there, Donnie.

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:39.439
<v Speaker 2>So I would love to think eventually China will show

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:42.759
<v Speaker 2>a little mercy to him and eventually work something out.

0:53:43.560 --> 0:53:45.680
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I mean, I guess the first thing I

0:53:45.680 --> 0:53:48.399
<v Speaker 2>ask you about trade is the way he's going about

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 2>it is so injuriously.

0:53:50.239 --> 0:53:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Get that, but balance out. Look, you were in Iowa,

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you campaigned to Iowa. You know, all those towns used

0:53:56.560 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to be may Tag, used to be this, used to

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:02.280
<v Speaker 1>be that. You know, my dad's sister lived in Monroe, Michigan.

0:54:02.360 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Used to be lazy Boy, used to be Monroe shock absorbers, right, right,

0:54:07.320 --> 0:54:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But Washington State's benefited quite a bit from increased exports

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:13.920
<v Speaker 1>around the world, right, So you know, Look, part of

0:54:13.960 --> 0:54:16.080
<v Speaker 1>me thinks people should have just moved out of the

0:54:16.080 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Midwest more and we should probably have more domestic migration.

0:54:19.560 --> 0:54:22.839
<v Speaker 1>But but set that aside. There's still a you know,

0:54:23.000 --> 0:54:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that constituency wants one thing, and that's how you win

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:26.320
<v Speaker 1>presidential elections.

0:54:26.360 --> 0:54:29.160
<v Speaker 2>So how do you want I'll tell you what my

0:54:29.280 --> 0:54:33.319
<v Speaker 2>general thinking. I think generally tariffs are not productive for

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:36.960
<v Speaker 2>economic growth on either side of a border. They restrict

0:54:37.040 --> 0:54:40.320
<v Speaker 2>people's ability to do business with one another. That's basically

0:54:40.320 --> 0:54:44.839
<v Speaker 2>what the what they do. Generally speaking, I think economies

0:54:44.880 --> 0:54:47.600
<v Speaker 2>grow when people can do what they do best. And

0:54:47.680 --> 0:54:50.920
<v Speaker 2>if they group bananas and you know, and in Panama

0:54:50.920 --> 0:54:53.399
<v Speaker 2>and we can't and we should be willing to buy

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:56.239
<v Speaker 2>bananas even though we have a trade deficit with them,

0:54:56.680 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 2>and to make us pay more for bananas or restrict

0:54:59.600 --> 0:55:02.920
<v Speaker 2>the ability of our ability to get bananas general doesn't

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:04.920
<v Speaker 2>make a lot of sense. So I'm in general, I

0:55:04.920 --> 0:55:09.200
<v Speaker 2>don't think tariffs make a lot of sense, except they

0:55:09.239 --> 0:55:12.759
<v Speaker 2>are useful obviously for national security purposes, so you can

0:55:12.800 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 2>protect your national security assets. They are useful if you

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:23.480
<v Speaker 2>are being abused, for instance, with issues of intellectual property,

0:55:23.760 --> 0:55:26.320
<v Speaker 2>and there has been some abuse of our intellectual property,

0:55:26.719 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 2>so as a mechanism to force compliance within national standards,

0:55:31.160 --> 0:55:34.440
<v Speaker 2>there's some reason in that regard and when we do

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:36.680
<v Speaker 2>do them. And if I was going to criticize NAFTA

0:55:36.760 --> 0:55:40.239
<v Speaker 2>for a moment, I think the pace of change when

0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 2>you are having new technologies coming on, as with these

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:47.839
<v Speaker 2>huge new technological advances, we should pay more attention to

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:51.160
<v Speaker 2>the pace of change. And the pace of change was

0:55:51.680 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 2>more disruptive than anyone would watch.

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:55.480
<v Speaker 1>How could you have slowed down? I mean, change is

0:55:55.520 --> 0:55:57.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to you know. This is the problem with trying

0:55:57.560 --> 0:56:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to control a free market, right, that you can't always

0:56:00.280 --> 0:56:01.880
<v Speaker 1>control your hockey stick moment.

0:56:02.080 --> 0:56:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, you know, if you're going to run the tape backwards.

0:56:06.800 --> 0:56:09.520
<v Speaker 2>I would have slowed down the rate of opening up

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.040
<v Speaker 2>some of these markets that happened in NAFTA because it

0:56:12.120 --> 0:56:14.719
<v Speaker 2>was just so disruptive to a lot of states in

0:56:14.719 --> 0:56:18.920
<v Speaker 2>the Midwest. So that would help, and to some degree

0:56:18.960 --> 0:56:22.200
<v Speaker 2>that did improve in subsequent trade negotiations at subsequent presidents

0:56:23.160 --> 0:56:27.040
<v Speaker 2>negotiated and now being ripped up. But the one thing

0:56:27.080 --> 0:56:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I tell you, I'm for sure nance there's no nuance

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:32.600
<v Speaker 2>on this. The way this guy's going is creatoring the

0:56:32.680 --> 0:56:37.040
<v Speaker 2>US economy. And it's interesting to me how even though

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:40.279
<v Speaker 2>tariffs and not everybody gonna get a major economics right.

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:42.560
<v Speaker 2>So I got around for SATAN for four years and

0:56:42.680 --> 0:56:45.520
<v Speaker 2>argue this issue with professors one way or another. Not

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 2>everybody had that privilege. Yet Americans have a deep understanding

0:56:50.080 --> 0:56:52.880
<v Speaker 2>that this guy's going to cost him more money for

0:56:53.040 --> 0:56:58.040
<v Speaker 2>everything they buy, practically bluting utility bills because he's refusing

0:56:58.080 --> 0:57:00.640
<v Speaker 2>to let us have access to good, clean so learn

0:57:00.719 --> 0:57:03.680
<v Speaker 2>win energy. So Americans get this and it you know,

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:06.360
<v Speaker 2>it's principal reason as numbers or are just creating.

0:57:08.040 --> 0:57:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Let me talk about climate change. You made it the

0:57:10.239 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 1>centerpiece of your presidential campaign. In some ways, you were

0:57:14.040 --> 0:57:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the only one that really grounded your campaign in a

0:57:16.560 --> 0:57:20.440
<v Speaker 1>substantive issue. And maybe that was given the moment we

0:57:20.440 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 1>were living in with Trump and all that stuff that

0:57:23.120 --> 0:57:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in some ways I found it noble, But maybe you

0:57:25.440 --> 0:57:28.600
<v Speaker 1>were swimming upstream. And yet I would argue it probably

0:57:28.640 --> 0:57:31.240
<v Speaker 1>gave you even more momentum to do some things in

0:57:31.280 --> 0:57:35.640
<v Speaker 1>your state. But what did you learn from trying to

0:57:35.800 --> 0:57:39.680
<v Speaker 1>from trying to create an urgency around this issue that

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:42.040
<v Speaker 1>government should be involved in the solution. What did you

0:57:42.120 --> 0:57:45.480
<v Speaker 1>learn in your conversations with voters that says, you know,

0:57:45.640 --> 0:57:47.680
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about these issues, talking about them this

0:57:47.720 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 1>way not that way? Or what advice would you give

0:57:50.400 --> 0:57:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to other politicians who want to get voters to understand

0:57:54.960 --> 0:57:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the urgency better on their terms, not necessarily on my

0:57:58.640 --> 0:58:01.520
<v Speaker 1>terms or your terms, but on on their terms. What

0:58:01.520 --> 0:58:03.120
<v Speaker 1>what have you found to be most effective?

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:07.360
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going to tell you a story. It doesn't

0:58:07.440 --> 0:58:09.880
<v Speaker 2>really match the script. I'm going to tell you a

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:14.360
<v Speaker 2>story because it's your Paul. You appreciate campaign stories, right.

0:58:16.200 --> 0:58:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Story, and I love a good campaign story.

0:58:17.720 --> 0:58:19.560
<v Speaker 2>You're pulling it. So I'll tell you part of my

0:58:19.640 --> 0:58:22.160
<v Speaker 2>learning experience. So I went to Hamburg, Iowa. It is

0:58:22.200 --> 0:58:24.120
<v Speaker 2>my very first event, and we were going to focus

0:58:24.160 --> 0:58:25.440
<v Speaker 2>on climate change because there's been a.

0:58:26.640 --> 0:58:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Right first event, you're like, first event.

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 2>In Iowa, and because there's been a horrendous flood swept

0:58:32.720 --> 0:58:36.960
<v Speaker 2>through town that it was a magnificently choreographed event. We

0:58:37.040 --> 0:58:39.480
<v Speaker 2>had a guy who actually was out Gore's advisor, whose

0:58:39.560 --> 0:58:43.320
<v Speaker 2>mother's house was destroyed in the flood. We could go

0:58:43.400 --> 0:58:46.040
<v Speaker 2>through and we had you know, eight or nine cameras

0:58:46.080 --> 0:58:48.120
<v Speaker 2>and the whole radio and everybody was there. It was

0:58:48.560 --> 0:58:51.400
<v Speaker 2>a wonderful event. We could see where the water had

0:58:51.440 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 2>come up halfway up the windowsills. There were all these

0:58:55.680 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 2>silos that had collapsed in the flood. So all this

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:01.040
<v Speaker 2>week we're just laying out all over the ground. I mean,

0:59:01.040 --> 0:59:05.000
<v Speaker 2>it was it was a very good graphic illustration and

0:59:05.120 --> 0:59:07.520
<v Speaker 2>these and that place had never seen a flood before.

0:59:07.520 --> 0:59:09.080
<v Speaker 2>It had been there for one hundred and fifty years,

0:59:09.120 --> 0:59:11.360
<v Speaker 2>and that tout had never seen a flood before, so

0:59:11.440 --> 0:59:15.920
<v Speaker 2>this was a perfect example of climate cause disasters that

0:59:15.960 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 2>we are now are experiencing. And the thing was going well.

0:59:19.720 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I talked to a lot of people there. They all

0:59:21.400 --> 0:59:24.560
<v Speaker 2>thought that we should do something about climate change, and

0:59:25.120 --> 0:59:26.840
<v Speaker 2>it was really a great visit. And as I was

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:29.000
<v Speaker 2>going to get in the car, my young staff for

0:59:29.160 --> 0:59:32.400
<v Speaker 2>who I didn't know very well, says, you got to

0:59:32.440 --> 0:59:34.600
<v Speaker 2>come over here, guv, you got to meet Henry over

0:59:34.640 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 2>here at the auto body shop. And I go, no, no,

0:59:36.680 --> 0:59:38.080
<v Speaker 2>we're done. We got to here. He said, no, you

0:59:38.120 --> 0:59:40.200
<v Speaker 2>have to come see Henry. Everybody knows Henry in town.

0:59:40.240 --> 0:59:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I said, no, no, we're done. He says, look, you got

0:59:42.240 --> 0:59:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to come. I said, okay. So we walk across town.

0:59:44.760 --> 0:59:47.720
<v Speaker 2>We go on to Henry's shop, auto body shop, and

0:59:47.760 --> 0:59:53.480
<v Speaker 2>there's NRA posters and Dixie flags and I said, no,

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:56.000
<v Speaker 2>this is not a place. I wanted to be.

0:59:56.120 --> 0:59:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Sure I'm at the right spot for a Caucass stower. Huh,

0:59:59.080 --> 1:00:00.000
<v Speaker 1>new caucas Captain.

1:00:00.440 --> 1:00:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Nice to meet you, Henry, but we have to be going.

1:00:03.480 --> 1:00:05.920
<v Speaker 2>And the press noticed that I was a little reticent

1:00:05.960 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 2>to talk to him. So the press came to him

1:00:08.400 --> 1:00:10.560
<v Speaker 2>and said, Henry, what do you think of this climate

1:00:10.640 --> 1:00:13.240
<v Speaker 2>change that the governors talk about. He says, Oh, that's

1:00:13.280 --> 1:00:16.040
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of malarkey. That flood was just because the

1:00:16.080 --> 1:00:19.880
<v Speaker 2>core of engineers found it up. And the first lesson

1:00:19.920 --> 1:00:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I learned is this is a tough business that we're in.

1:00:24.600 --> 1:00:27.280
<v Speaker 2>So that's a little campaign story. So here's what I've

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:32.600
<v Speaker 2>learned is that that you have to talk to people

1:00:32.640 --> 1:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>about this issue where they live. You can't lecture people obviously,

1:00:38.160 --> 1:00:39.840
<v Speaker 2>you need to talk to them about where they live.

1:00:39.920 --> 1:00:42.440
<v Speaker 2>You need to find out what they care about, what

1:00:42.480 --> 1:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>do you care about, what's important to you and your family,

1:00:44.800 --> 1:00:47.880
<v Speaker 2>And that's the first part of any discussion. And then

1:00:47.960 --> 1:00:50.400
<v Speaker 2>once you find that out, to talk to them about

1:00:50.520 --> 1:00:54.280
<v Speaker 2>possibly they might be interested in this question. If it's

1:00:54.600 --> 1:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>a job for their kid coming out of college, we

1:00:56.960 --> 1:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>got good ways to say, hey, here's a good reason

1:01:00.040 --> 1:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>your child may have a good career. If it's your

1:01:05.040 --> 1:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>crop that you're trying to sell, well, we sure hope

1:01:08.320 --> 1:01:10.560
<v Speaker 2>that your crop isn't one of those silos that is

1:01:10.640 --> 1:01:14.160
<v Speaker 2>being washed away. If you have a child with asthma,

1:01:14.320 --> 1:01:16.760
<v Speaker 2>you say, you know, you know it's making your child.

1:01:16.960 --> 1:01:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Because we have an epidemic of asthma right now. So

1:01:19.600 --> 1:01:21.760
<v Speaker 2>the first thing I've learned is to just meet people

1:01:21.800 --> 1:01:24.920
<v Speaker 2>where they are and talk to them about their personal

1:01:26.040 --> 1:01:31.560
<v Speaker 2>ambitions and fears, and that's the way to move forward. Well,

1:01:31.640 --> 1:01:35.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll mentioned weather thing though, Okay, Americans still don't understand

1:01:36.080 --> 1:01:39.720
<v Speaker 2>this phenomena. Only one out of five Americans know there's

1:01:39.720 --> 1:01:43.480
<v Speaker 2>a scientific consensus about this, that we're wrapping the Earth

1:01:43.520 --> 1:01:46.600
<v Speaker 2>in a blanket of carbon dioxide, and that there is

1:01:46.680 --> 1:01:50.439
<v Speaker 2>a scientific consensus about this. So there's still a lot

1:01:50.480 --> 1:01:54.240
<v Speaker 2>of basic information that we need to share with Americans.

1:01:54.240 --> 1:01:56.200
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the reasons I like the Climate Power

1:01:56.240 --> 1:02:00.080
<v Speaker 2>Accountability Group holding Trump accountable so we can share of

1:02:00.120 --> 1:02:01.640
<v Speaker 2>this scientific information with people.

1:02:04.120 --> 1:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I've wondered about that I'd

1:02:06.520 --> 1:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>like to see more politicians lean into, particularly locally, is

1:02:09.880 --> 1:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the adaptation issue, right which is, no matter what happens,

1:02:14.440 --> 1:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>rather than debate whose fault it is, we all have

1:02:17.120 --> 1:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to live with this new environment. We all have to

1:02:19.280 --> 1:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>survive and hopefully thrive in it. Have you found if

1:02:22.600 --> 1:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you start with sort of hey, are you are? Are

1:02:26.440 --> 1:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you tired of the high cost of insurance for your

1:02:32.000 --> 1:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>home because you live this close to a body of water, Well,

1:02:35.880 --> 1:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>here's why it costs more to live this close to

1:02:37.920 --> 1:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a body of water. I mean it, And this is

1:02:41.680 --> 1:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>why maybe we need to build a barrier or maybe

1:02:43.680 --> 1:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>we need to do this. Is is that a better

1:02:48.280 --> 1:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>way in with some people?

1:02:49.560 --> 1:02:49.760
<v Speaker 2>You know?

1:02:49.800 --> 1:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like my daughter did a she's a marine science major.

1:02:52.840 --> 1:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>She did an internship in Scambia County, which is in

1:02:56.000 --> 1:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the Panandle, Florida. It's a pretty conservative area, and they

1:02:58.880 --> 1:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>told them never to use the frame climate change. Talk

1:03:01.680 --> 1:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>about fishing, talk about conservation, talk about making sure you

1:03:07.320 --> 1:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>have plenty of good places to fish. Why do people

1:03:09.720 --> 1:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>move to Florida, you know, for the outdoors figuring out

1:03:14.400 --> 1:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>how to speak essentially native languages no matter where you

1:03:17.840 --> 1:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>are in the country.

1:03:18.960 --> 1:03:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well that kind of comes back to what I

1:03:20.840 --> 1:03:23.320
<v Speaker 2>was saying, is you talk about the specific things in

1:03:23.360 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 2>people's lives, including fish. We've had all the kilp disappeared.

1:03:28.800 --> 1:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I live on Bamberg, John Washington. All the boat kelp

1:03:31.320 --> 1:03:33.880
<v Speaker 2>have disappeared. We used to be ringed with boat kelp

1:03:34.120 --> 1:03:37.760
<v Speaker 2>these forests, and that's what the salmon depend on. So

1:03:37.920 --> 1:03:39.760
<v Speaker 2>if you like to go fishing, it's a big deal.

1:03:39.840 --> 1:03:43.400
<v Speaker 2>So yes to that part of your question. But I haven't.

1:03:43.480 --> 1:03:46.120
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, the insurance thing is so profound,

1:03:46.160 --> 1:03:47.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you can't. You're not going to be able

1:03:47.520 --> 1:03:48.200
<v Speaker 2>to get insurance.

1:03:48.200 --> 1:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>And the insurance industry is going to force force government's

1:03:51.320 --> 1:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>hand here, rightment.

1:03:53.000 --> 1:03:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Governments choice. Government's going to have to step into the

1:03:56.440 --> 1:03:58.840
<v Speaker 2>role of the insurance industry. It's going to be extremely costly.

1:03:58.880 --> 1:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Your favorage. This is a you know, a nice place

1:04:02.200 --> 1:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to live where you are. I'm going to guess that

1:04:04.720 --> 1:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the insurance is higher than any property tax you pay.

1:04:08.600 --> 1:04:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I can't tell you for sure that's true, but whatever

1:04:11.200 --> 1:04:13.439
<v Speaker 2>it is, it's going to go up because we've had

1:04:13.560 --> 1:04:16.720
<v Speaker 2>fires even in the western you know, we're the Evergreen State,

1:04:16.800 --> 1:04:19.000
<v Speaker 2>have little rain here, but we're having fires on the

1:04:19.040 --> 1:04:22.680
<v Speaker 2>western side of Washington State. Now I've had two whole

1:04:22.720 --> 1:04:25.880
<v Speaker 2>towns burned down. Of course Trump denied this emergency relief

1:04:25.920 --> 1:04:30.680
<v Speaker 2>from that. But coming back from your central question, I

1:04:30.720 --> 1:04:32.720
<v Speaker 2>agree that you want to talk to people. If they're

1:04:32.760 --> 1:04:36.200
<v Speaker 2>fishermen or fisher you talk about fish. If there's asthma

1:04:36.240 --> 1:04:38.880
<v Speaker 2>in their family, you talk about asthma. You talk about

1:04:38.920 --> 1:04:42.040
<v Speaker 2>those issues, not the global crisis. Right, It's not the

1:04:42.080 --> 1:04:46.240
<v Speaker 2>planet this problem, it's your life. I haven't found though

1:04:46.320 --> 1:04:49.480
<v Speaker 2>that that. You know, on occasion, you'll get a Republican

1:04:49.600 --> 1:04:52.960
<v Speaker 2>say yes, I'm willing to finance a new dyke right

1:04:53.080 --> 1:04:56.200
<v Speaker 2>to protect the town. You're getting some of that, but

1:04:56.240 --> 1:04:59.200
<v Speaker 2>that is not translated to them saying and by the way,

1:04:59.240 --> 1:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>I want to do something about fossil fuels destroying and

1:05:02.400 --> 1:05:05.000
<v Speaker 2>causing this problem in the first place. It's been so

1:05:05.160 --> 1:05:08.400
<v Speaker 2>disappointing that we have not been able to find Republicans

1:05:08.400 --> 1:05:10.000
<v Speaker 2>in office to be able to help us on this.

1:05:10.080 --> 1:05:13.120
<v Speaker 2>And I keep hoping that's going to change, but it

1:05:13.240 --> 1:05:15.520
<v Speaker 2>is not. The only Republicans really helping us the ones

1:05:15.560 --> 1:05:19.680
<v Speaker 2>that are out of office. So right now we've got

1:05:19.720 --> 1:05:20.320
<v Speaker 2>to replace them.

1:05:20.320 --> 1:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, look what Lisa Murkowski said, there is a culture

1:05:22.680 --> 1:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of fear among Republicans that speaking out. I mean, retribution

1:05:27.000 --> 1:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is real.

1:05:28.280 --> 1:05:31.280
<v Speaker 2>You could sense that in her tone of voice.

1:05:31.320 --> 1:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean the people that got the people that got that.

1:05:34.000 --> 1:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Laura Lumer went into his office. It was like anybody

1:05:36.680 --> 1:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>who had any who had worked with Mike Pompey or

1:05:40.440 --> 1:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Tom Cotton were essentially escorted out of the Pentagon. Just

1:05:44.440 --> 1:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>what do they worked for? I mean, that's right out

1:05:46.400 --> 1:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of I mean, come up with your hypothetical from Europe

1:05:51.280 --> 1:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen thirties. That's right there, we're just doing

1:05:54.040 --> 1:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a purge. You're associated with my political enemies. Get out

1:05:57.600 --> 1:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of here.

1:05:58.240 --> 1:06:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I agree that there's pressure for potential primaries for

1:06:01.800 --> 1:06:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Republican office holders. There's no question about this. But why

1:06:05.680 --> 1:06:07.200
<v Speaker 2>the hell are you in office if you're not going

1:06:07.280 --> 1:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>to do some basic things. You know, probably thirty four

1:06:10.600 --> 1:06:14.160
<v Speaker 2>percent of the Republicans in Congress, no climate change is

1:06:14.880 --> 1:06:19.040
<v Speaker 2>potentially devastating to us. They know that, they don't publicly

1:06:19.080 --> 1:06:22.040
<v Speaker 2>express it. They know it, but they won't lift a

1:06:22.120 --> 1:06:24.640
<v Speaker 2>damn finger to help us out because they're afraid of that.

1:06:24.760 --> 1:06:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going like, you don't deserve to be in office,

1:06:27.240 --> 1:06:30.000
<v Speaker 2>and we're going to retire you from private life.

1:06:30.120 --> 1:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, this dawned on me. Actually, you did lose,

1:06:34.120 --> 1:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if losing made you a better representative

1:06:38.720 --> 1:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>later and a better governor later because you were willing

1:06:41.840 --> 1:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you almost the fear of losing, well, you'd already experienced it.

1:06:45.320 --> 1:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>So what's the fear?

1:06:46.960 --> 1:06:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Like?

1:06:47.560 --> 1:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>How much do you think that gave you more confidence

1:06:51.040 --> 1:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in staking out a little more aggressive positions governing.

1:06:55.400 --> 1:06:57.400
<v Speaker 2>It's a really interesting question. I should think about that

1:06:57.440 --> 1:06:59.440
<v Speaker 2>before I answer it, because it's a hell of a

1:06:59.480 --> 1:07:02.880
<v Speaker 2>thing to lose. It's painful losing car in DC, and

1:07:03.520 --> 1:07:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I'd staked everything I had to get elected and I

1:07:06.080 --> 1:07:10.600
<v Speaker 2>wanted to upset. You know, It's very painful. But I

1:07:10.800 --> 1:07:12.040
<v Speaker 2>would just tell you the one thing I can tell

1:07:12.040 --> 1:07:14.280
<v Speaker 2>you for sure. I have never regretted my vote for

1:07:14.320 --> 1:07:17.320
<v Speaker 2>the assault weapon bill for one second, even though I

1:07:17.360 --> 1:07:20.560
<v Speaker 2>lost something that was very dear to me, because I

1:07:21.240 --> 1:07:25.120
<v Speaker 2>just believe that public service is such a blessing that

1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:27.960
<v Speaker 2>you have. It's bestowed on you by so many thousands

1:07:27.960 --> 1:07:32.520
<v Speaker 2>of people. To not follow your convictions and the real

1:07:32.560 --> 1:07:37.240
<v Speaker 2>best interests. Just you're abusing this great gift that is

1:07:37.280 --> 1:07:41.560
<v Speaker 2>given to you. And when these Republicans know climate change,

1:07:41.880 --> 1:07:44.440
<v Speaker 2>because these are smart people, right, you're dentists or doctor,

1:07:44.480 --> 1:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>they know this is eatness alive. They understand chemistry, they

1:07:47.480 --> 1:07:50.600
<v Speaker 2>understand physics. But when you refuse to do that because

1:07:50.640 --> 1:07:54.160
<v Speaker 2>you're afraid of Donald Trump, you're abusing your office. This

1:07:54.320 --> 1:07:56.320
<v Speaker 2>is a great gift that has been given to you.

1:07:56.920 --> 1:08:00.320
<v Speaker 2>And so I feel very strongly about this. As you

1:08:00.360 --> 1:08:04.080
<v Speaker 2>can tell, when people are afraid of their own damn skins,

1:08:04.280 --> 1:08:07.200
<v Speaker 2>it won't stand up for their constituents. There's too much

1:08:07.240 --> 1:08:08.920
<v Speaker 2>of that going on. And I will just tell you,

1:08:08.960 --> 1:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>even though I lost, I never regret of it because

1:08:12.440 --> 1:08:16.160
<v Speaker 2>I felt so passionately about my obligation of my constituents.

1:08:16.720 --> 1:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>No, it's just something that I've just sort of done

1:08:18.439 --> 1:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on me. Think it here because you you did go

1:08:22.080 --> 1:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>places frankly that I think other statewide governors would have.

1:08:25.120 --> 1:08:25.559
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

1:08:25.960 --> 1:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Let me get my second term. Maybe I'll try it

1:08:27.840 --> 1:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to my second term. Maybe I'll try to like I.

1:08:30.240 --> 1:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>You know you and I know plenty of those politicians

1:08:32.880 --> 1:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you know on both sides of the aisle where there.

1:08:35.560 --> 1:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>You're right, it's the accumulation. But there's something about losing

1:08:39.800 --> 1:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and then winning again that's gotta It's like bungee jumping

1:08:44.160 --> 1:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the first time or skydiving the first time. If you

1:08:46.400 --> 1:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't die, you're not afraid of it.

1:08:48.439 --> 1:08:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, maybe that's it. And I appreciate you trying to

1:08:51.240 --> 1:08:54.400
<v Speaker 2>think that. I'm you know, it was like mildly courageous,

1:08:54.439 --> 1:08:57.479
<v Speaker 2>But I actually would think it's a different thing. Maybe

1:08:57.520 --> 1:08:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I have more confidence in my citizens than some of

1:08:59.840 --> 1:09:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the politicians. I just have more confidence that people will

1:09:03.840 --> 1:09:06.800
<v Speaker 2>be able to understand the science of climate change, and

1:09:06.840 --> 1:09:10.679
<v Speaker 2>they'd be willing to do modest things to improve the situation.

1:09:10.800 --> 1:09:12.800
<v Speaker 2>That's why we passed this Climate I could havement Act.

1:09:13.160 --> 1:09:17.760
<v Speaker 2>And it turns out my confidence and citizens was fulfilled

1:09:17.800 --> 1:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>because we won sixty two to thirty eight. So I

1:09:20.040 --> 1:09:22.920
<v Speaker 2>think part of it is that that I'm willing to

1:09:23.000 --> 1:09:28.320
<v Speaker 2>ask for more change because I trust people that they'll

1:09:28.360 --> 1:09:31.000
<v Speaker 2>be able to figure it out, take some work that

1:09:31.120 --> 1:09:31.439
<v Speaker 2>they get.

1:09:31.640 --> 1:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, let me let you everybody wants a debate

1:09:34.080 --> 1:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>about what the Democratic Party should be doing right now?

1:09:36.200 --> 1:09:39.519
<v Speaker 1>Way in for me, what would you? What would you be?

1:09:40.960 --> 1:09:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Would you be looking for new leadership? Are you looking

1:09:43.600 --> 1:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>for new leadership? Are you looking for the current leadership

1:09:47.200 --> 1:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to step up? What's your preference?

1:09:50.000 --> 1:09:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, my working rule is everything everywhere, all the time.

1:09:56.479 --> 1:09:57.240
<v Speaker 2>That's number one.

1:09:57.880 --> 1:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>And the leaders side for a movie.

1:09:59.760 --> 1:10:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it could be the leadership we need right now.

1:10:02.960 --> 1:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>We actually are finding and that's common ordinary citizens who

1:10:06.960 --> 1:10:10.920
<v Speaker 2>are standing up, sometimes on a street corner, sometimes marching

1:10:10.960 --> 1:10:15.120
<v Speaker 2>on a sidewalk, sometimes emailing the congress person, sometimes talking

1:10:15.120 --> 1:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>to their cranky uncle at dinner time. We have that

1:10:18.160 --> 1:10:21.479
<v Speaker 2>leadership and it's a rising right now, big time. And

1:10:21.520 --> 1:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>so I'm pleased about the leadership. We're happy, which isn't

1:10:25.000 --> 1:10:28.200
<v Speaker 2>necessary to have some sort of flag bearer because we're

1:10:28.200 --> 1:10:31.599
<v Speaker 2>not going to have one for a year nominae.

1:10:31.760 --> 1:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's just true both party.

1:10:33.760 --> 1:10:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Everybody says, well, where is your leadership? I said, the

1:10:35.880 --> 1:10:38.720
<v Speaker 2>leadership isn't our people, and they're standing up on their

1:10:38.800 --> 1:10:41.160
<v Speaker 2>hind legs. And we have that. We have that leadership

1:10:41.520 --> 1:10:44.400
<v Speaker 2>that we really need, and we got a great, deep bench.

1:10:44.439 --> 1:10:46.280
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna have a great nominee. We got a lot

1:10:46.320 --> 1:10:49.040
<v Speaker 2>of people with a lot of talent. I love here

1:10:49.080 --> 1:10:52.000
<v Speaker 2>and JB. Prisker the other day saying, you know we're

1:10:52.040 --> 1:10:54.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna we're gonna go after him on the soapbox and

1:10:54.680 --> 1:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>beat him at the ballot box. I loved Core with

1:10:58.840 --> 1:11:01.320
<v Speaker 2>what he did. I love Jen Mills standing up at

1:11:01.360 --> 1:11:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the White House to this bully. So we got we

1:11:04.479 --> 1:11:06.360
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of voices. I'm confident we're gonna have

1:11:06.360 --> 1:11:07.960
<v Speaker 2>a good nominee because there's a lot of talent.

1:11:08.960 --> 1:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>What did you learn from Canada? I find it because

1:11:12.880 --> 1:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>here's something I've I took. I don't want to overlearn,

1:11:16.000 --> 1:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>but I'm intrigued about Mark Carney is kind of a technocrat, right.

1:11:20.320 --> 1:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is a central banker. You know, he

1:11:22.720 --> 1:11:25.559
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be somebody even six months ago you would have

1:11:25.920 --> 1:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>designed in a lab to say this is the next

1:11:28.720 --> 1:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. And you know,

1:11:31.200 --> 1:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>especially we see this picture of Trudeau, who was just

1:11:34.080 --> 1:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a very charismatic figure. Certainly he had got polarizing at

1:11:37.040 --> 1:11:40.519
<v Speaker 1>the end and unpopular. And you know, I'm I'm one

1:11:40.520 --> 1:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of those people who believes that we the American voter

1:11:45.320 --> 1:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>usually picks a new president based on you know, that

1:11:49.120 --> 1:11:52.639
<v Speaker 1>has the characteristic that the last president didn't have, whatever

1:11:52.720 --> 1:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that is, you know, and from Obama to Trump, right

1:11:55.360 --> 1:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that I would always say, it's a little bit of

1:11:56.800 --> 1:11:59.639
<v Speaker 1>the showmanship. Right. They thought Obama was almost too nuanced.

1:11:59.640 --> 1:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>They want it, they wanted everything's black and white and

1:12:02.720 --> 1:12:06.759
<v Speaker 1>binary and a little bit of that. Obama was different

1:12:06.800 --> 1:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>from Bush. Bush was sort of black and white, good

1:12:09.200 --> 1:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and evil. He was mister Gray, right. But Bush was

1:12:12.320 --> 1:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a you know, he had a distinction with Clinton having

1:12:15.400 --> 1:12:17.519
<v Speaker 1>to do with the personal character issues and people didn't

1:12:17.600 --> 1:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>like that, right, So hw Bush couldn't feel your pain,

1:12:22.000 --> 1:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton could. My point is is that we do

1:12:25.080 --> 1:12:28.479
<v Speaker 1>seem to do that. So what do you imagine is

1:12:28.520 --> 1:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the characteristic this country is going to want to have

1:12:30.840 --> 1:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>post Trump? What's the big one? Is it empathy? Is

1:12:35.120 --> 1:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it technocratic expertise? What do you imagine three years from

1:12:41.200 --> 1:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>now that that sort of forget issues. What's that characteristic

1:12:45.439 --> 1:12:47.799
<v Speaker 1>that hey, we need this kind of president this time.

1:12:48.400 --> 1:12:50.200
<v Speaker 2>First of all, I got a comment on Canada. This

1:12:50.320 --> 1:12:55.960
<v Speaker 2>wasn't about Trudeau. It's all about Trump, right, one hundred days.

1:12:56.000 --> 1:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Look, I have to say I've never seen somebody you

1:12:58.320 --> 1:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>can't say he's not had an impactful under days. No

1:13:01.160 --> 1:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>even to ownership of this economy politically, it's just stupid.

1:13:04.640 --> 1:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>He could have been blaming Biden for this economy for

1:13:06.840 --> 1:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>another six months, to be totally cynical about it. But

1:13:09.800 --> 1:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>he said no, no, no, I'm going to make it

1:13:11.960 --> 1:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>my economy.

1:13:13.160 --> 1:13:16.719
<v Speaker 2>But you, David Brooks David Brooks were on a piece

1:13:16.760 --> 1:13:19.240
<v Speaker 2>and said, well, you know, Trump has been brilliant in

1:13:19.240 --> 1:13:22.599
<v Speaker 2>one way, and he's extremely energetic and active. And I'm

1:13:22.640 --> 1:13:25.840
<v Speaker 2>going like, yeah, Charles Mansen was a brilliant, homicidal man

1:13:26.120 --> 1:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>maniac dude, David, But that's the way.

1:13:28.560 --> 1:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>But I'm on a boat, you know what I don't

1:13:30.360 --> 1:13:33.439
<v Speaker 1>like on a boat. But it's extremely active because I'm

1:13:33.479 --> 1:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>probably yacking over the side.

1:13:35.400 --> 1:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, anyway, I wasn't happy about David's article in that regard. Uh,

1:13:40.120 --> 1:13:42.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's interesting. I really haven't given a huge

1:13:42.240 --> 1:13:46.800
<v Speaker 2>amount of thought to that ideal candidate issue. I'm just

1:13:46.840 --> 1:13:49.719
<v Speaker 2>going to share with you. I'm just really optimistic about

1:13:50.080 --> 1:13:52.719
<v Speaker 2>where my party is right now. I know that sounds

1:13:52.800 --> 1:13:53.760
<v Speaker 2>totally there.

1:13:53.840 --> 1:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say that a lot of

1:13:55.280 --> 1:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you're You're actually in the minority, I

1:13:58.120 --> 1:13:59.479
<v Speaker 1>think at your party.

1:14:00.240 --> 1:14:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm optimistic. Number one, I know a lot of these

1:14:02.720 --> 1:14:04.560
<v Speaker 2>people that are going to be in the mix for

1:14:04.720 --> 1:14:07.840
<v Speaker 2>our next candidate, and I related some of them, and

1:14:07.880 --> 1:14:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I've debated them, I've worked with them as governors. Got

1:14:10.880 --> 1:14:13.360
<v Speaker 2>I just there's a lot of talent there. So I'm

1:14:13.360 --> 1:14:15.559
<v Speaker 2>really confident we're going to find the right candidate for

1:14:15.600 --> 1:14:18.479
<v Speaker 2>whatever reason. And Number two, I do believe that our

1:14:18.479 --> 1:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four experience were largely one offs that will

1:14:22.800 --> 1:14:27.400
<v Speaker 2>not be replicated. Inflation which we got hit with every

1:14:27.439 --> 1:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>country in the world and blamed for a president of

1:14:31.880 --> 1:14:35.720
<v Speaker 2>extreme age, an eventual candidate only at eighty nine days

1:14:35.800 --> 1:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>to campaign, an immigration crisis that was not handled as

1:14:40.760 --> 1:14:42.880
<v Speaker 2>well as it could have been. That's on us to

1:14:42.920 --> 1:14:45.760
<v Speaker 2>some degree. Those were all one offs that I don't

1:14:45.760 --> 1:14:48.559
<v Speaker 2>believe we're going to be replicated. So what happened in

1:14:48.600 --> 1:14:51.200
<v Speaker 2>a narrow win in twenty twenty four, I don't believe,

1:14:51.200 --> 1:14:52.960
<v Speaker 2>well any reason I believe is going to happen in

1:14:53.000 --> 1:14:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the next go round. So I'm optimistic. I'm optimistic about

1:14:56.080 --> 1:14:59.680
<v Speaker 2>the twenty twenty six cycle. I think there is a

1:15:00.840 --> 1:15:03.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of sarcastic on occasion, but I gave you

1:15:03.520 --> 1:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>some advice to my Republican colleagues in the House. Don't

1:15:07.320 --> 1:15:11.599
<v Speaker 2>sign any long term leases, fellas, ladies, because there's fifty

1:15:11.680 --> 1:15:14.639
<v Speaker 2>or sixty of you that are on in great, great

1:15:14.760 --> 1:15:18.000
<v Speaker 2>danger right now. And I saw where change elections can

1:15:18.040 --> 1:15:22.080
<v Speaker 2>be in nineteen ninety four. I've seen it, and there's

1:15:22.160 --> 1:15:24.679
<v Speaker 2>every reason to believe that's what we're going to experience again.

1:15:24.720 --> 1:15:27.040
<v Speaker 2>And something changes, because I kind of tell you the

1:15:28.320 --> 1:15:32.640
<v Speaker 2>anger that's out there right now is so deep, so profound,

1:15:33.200 --> 1:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>and for so many different reasons that how they're going

1:15:37.000 --> 1:15:38.320
<v Speaker 2>to pull out of this nosedive.

1:15:38.439 --> 1:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you know, before I let you go,

1:15:41.280 --> 1:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm obsessed with fine. I think there's some structural updating.

1:15:44.920 --> 1:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, in the same way we had an infrastructure

1:15:46.760 --> 1:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>build because we needed to update roads and bridges. I

1:15:50.040 --> 1:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>do think we have to update the democracy to meet

1:15:52.280 --> 1:15:53.759
<v Speaker 1>the needs of the twenty first century.

1:15:54.120 --> 1:15:55.719
<v Speaker 2>Paul Brother Right.

1:15:55.960 --> 1:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things that I'm I just did

1:15:57.760 --> 1:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a Ted talk on this. I'm obsessed with this. You

1:15:59.640 --> 1:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>served to Congress. I'm curious what you think. I kind

1:16:02.120 --> 1:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of think we need to uncap the House. I think

1:16:03.840 --> 1:16:07.519
<v Speaker 1>the House there's too much distance between the House and

1:16:07.560 --> 1:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the people. At eight hundred thousand per congressional district, do

1:16:10.800 --> 1:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that that would that the fourteenth largest city

1:16:13.760 --> 1:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in America is Austin, and it doesn't even have a

1:16:15.840 --> 1:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>population of eight hundred thousand. I don't think we should

1:16:18.360 --> 1:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have four hundred and thirty five major cities as congressional districts,

1:16:22.280 --> 1:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>which is essentially what we've done. But I've had plenty

1:16:26.160 --> 1:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of people say to me, Yeah, but why do I

1:16:27.880 --> 1:16:31.439
<v Speaker 1>want twice as many members of Congress running around Washington?

1:16:31.439 --> 1:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Why do I want to have that? Now? I think

1:16:33.360 --> 1:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it would bring democracy a bit more local have people

1:16:36.320 --> 1:16:38.439
<v Speaker 1>would be a little bit more connected. They might actually

1:16:38.439 --> 1:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>know their member of Congress or know somebody who knows them.

1:16:43.520 --> 1:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's one thing. That's one thing I'm at.

1:16:45.800 --> 1:16:47.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'd like to get rid of partisan primaries.

1:16:47.880 --> 1:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I like what you guys do in Washington State. I

1:16:49.880 --> 1:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>like with California. There's different ways to do it. I

1:16:51.920 --> 1:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's a very I think you have more people

1:16:53.920 --> 1:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>participating in primaries because of the way you guys do it.

1:16:57.120 --> 1:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>What are some structural changes you'd like to see.

1:17:00.240 --> 1:17:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's an interesting one. I'm so pleased that you

1:17:02.800 --> 1:17:06.519
<v Speaker 2>want more members of Congress. That is a minority position.

1:17:06.680 --> 1:17:07.080
<v Speaker 2>You love it.

1:17:07.120 --> 1:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I know as a speech, I know it is, but

1:17:09.200 --> 1:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I really believe it. I mean, it is what the

1:17:11.400 --> 1:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>founders intended. They wanted. They wanted a House of Representatives

1:17:15.560 --> 1:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that was nurses, that was labor day laborers. They weren't

1:17:19.200 --> 1:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>interested in it being now it's a club, it's a

1:17:22.640 --> 1:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>country club. You need ten million dollars in cash to

1:17:25.040 --> 1:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>get there, you know, either access to it or have

1:17:27.439 --> 1:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it on your own. That's that's not the people's house.

1:17:30.600 --> 1:17:32.880
<v Speaker 2>I think there's good reason to think that would be

1:17:32.920 --> 1:17:35.280
<v Speaker 2>an improvement of the House Represents. But I believe there's

1:17:35.280 --> 1:17:37.719
<v Speaker 2>free or four things ahead of it in mine that are.

1:17:37.640 --> 1:17:39.479
<v Speaker 1>By the way. It would fix the electoral college too,

1:17:39.479 --> 1:17:42.479
<v Speaker 1>without constitutional amendment. I mean that is one of my

1:17:42.720 --> 1:17:44.519
<v Speaker 1>that is one of my benefits of this is that

1:17:44.720 --> 1:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you would actually make it. It would make the electoral college.

1:17:48.600 --> 1:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>It would take Wyoming's advantage on voting for president and

1:17:52.880 --> 1:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>would cut it by two thirds. For what it's worth, I.

1:17:58.800 --> 1:18:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Guess there is a percentage changed in that. So that's

1:18:01.240 --> 1:18:04.160
<v Speaker 2>helpful six times to two and a half times. I

1:18:04.400 --> 1:18:05.640
<v Speaker 2>like to get I'd like to get rid of the

1:18:05.640 --> 1:18:08.360
<v Speaker 2>electoral college. I think that their point, obviously, if we

1:18:08.360 --> 1:18:11.400
<v Speaker 2>could ever achieved that. I think Jerry Mannering is just

1:18:11.479 --> 1:18:14.479
<v Speaker 2>such a moral blot on us and it has been

1:18:14.760 --> 1:18:17.680
<v Speaker 2>such a such worse than when I started in politics.

1:18:17.680 --> 1:18:20.720
<v Speaker 2>That Jerry Mannering has been so much more acute because

1:18:20.760 --> 1:18:23.120
<v Speaker 2>of algorithms and computers have now allowed it to be

1:18:23.200 --> 1:18:24.439
<v Speaker 2>diced and sliced like.

1:18:24.439 --> 1:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Any too easy to find your voter, too easy.

1:18:27.520 --> 1:18:29.920
<v Speaker 2>To find out. Now we're picking up there's only you know,

1:18:31.040 --> 1:18:34.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty seats that are even contested in the United States,

1:18:34.400 --> 1:18:36.720
<v Speaker 2>except in a big year like this, okay, which I

1:18:36.760 --> 1:18:37.519
<v Speaker 2>believe where you might.

1:18:37.400 --> 1:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Can open it up the aperture a little bit.

1:18:38.960 --> 1:18:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Ye twenty twenty six. I think those are the two

1:18:42.080 --> 1:18:47.479
<v Speaker 2>biggest things. The the what you're I'm trying to think

1:18:47.520 --> 1:18:50.559
<v Speaker 2>what you've proposed, I don't think is would solve the

1:18:51.400 --> 1:18:53.960
<v Speaker 2>one of the biggest problems as a structural problem, and

1:18:54.000 --> 1:18:58.040
<v Speaker 2>I think you've talked about this before, is the self

1:18:58.120 --> 1:19:03.639
<v Speaker 2>segregation of the constituent into polarized communities. So now there

1:19:03.680 --> 1:19:07.599
<v Speaker 2>are half as many zip codes in America that have

1:19:07.760 --> 1:19:10.080
<v Speaker 2>a fifty to fifty or purple split as there were

1:19:10.080 --> 1:19:13.920
<v Speaker 2>when I started politics, half as many. So there's been

1:19:13.960 --> 1:19:17.240
<v Speaker 2>a structural demographic shift that has made this business of

1:19:17.280 --> 1:19:21.960
<v Speaker 2>democracy much more difficult because the people geographically are so segregated.

1:19:22.000 --> 1:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, they've self sorted, you know, it's self sorted. In fact,

1:19:24.680 --> 1:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm always hesitant to say you got to get rid

1:19:26.320 --> 1:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of jerrymandering. I'm like, hang on, we might need a

1:19:28.200 --> 1:19:31.400
<v Speaker 1>jerrymander competitive districts like that.

1:19:30.439 --> 1:19:33.880
<v Speaker 2>You know that I can I can testify to you

1:19:33.920 --> 1:19:37.360
<v Speaker 2>that it makes the business of consensus building so much

1:19:37.400 --> 1:19:40.080
<v Speaker 2>more difficult. And if we can find it, I don't

1:19:40.080 --> 1:19:42.559
<v Speaker 2>know what you can do about that, but that has

1:19:42.640 --> 1:19:45.120
<v Speaker 2>been a real problem. Then we have the threats to voting,

1:19:45.840 --> 1:19:49.679
<v Speaker 2>and Trump and the Republicans do want to restrict the vote,

1:19:50.080 --> 1:19:52.760
<v Speaker 2>and they're taking so many actions to reduce and make

1:19:52.800 --> 1:19:55.840
<v Speaker 2>it much more difficult to vote. There's something like nine

1:19:55.960 --> 1:20:00.599
<v Speaker 2>million voters who don't have access. They're citizens, but they

1:20:00.600 --> 1:20:03.720
<v Speaker 2>don't have access to the first piece of paper that

1:20:03.760 --> 1:20:07.200
<v Speaker 2>they need, even though everybody knows they're citizens. So that's

1:20:07.240 --> 1:20:09.760
<v Speaker 2>a threat as well to make it much more difficult.

1:20:10.080 --> 1:20:12.879
<v Speaker 2>And the fact that we have people standing in lines

1:20:13.120 --> 1:20:17.240
<v Speaker 2>for hours to vote is insane. So we have all

1:20:17.240 --> 1:20:19.439
<v Speaker 2>mail voting here. You do it from your kitchen table.

1:20:19.520 --> 1:20:22.120
<v Speaker 2>You got two weeks to do it, and we got

1:20:22.120 --> 1:20:25.680
<v Speaker 2>a high voter participation. I see these people stand in

1:20:25.800 --> 1:20:28.920
<v Speaker 2>line in the South and there's one hundred and five

1:20:28.920 --> 1:20:31.320
<v Speaker 2>degrees and they made it illegal to give them water.

1:20:31.960 --> 1:20:35.559
<v Speaker 2>That's how much Republicans hate people when they vote. Okay,

1:20:35.680 --> 1:20:39.120
<v Speaker 2>this is a threat, and going to all mail voter

1:20:40.000 --> 1:20:42.799
<v Speaker 2>really makes sense, not to big people suffer to vote.

1:20:43.000 --> 1:20:44.680
<v Speaker 2>I think there's things we can do. You might have

1:20:44.680 --> 1:20:46.720
<v Speaker 2>two day voting periods, for instance, if you don't have

1:20:46.760 --> 1:20:48.680
<v Speaker 2>no mail voting. So there's a lot of things we

1:20:48.720 --> 1:20:52.280
<v Speaker 2>can do to make it easier to have access, but

1:20:52.360 --> 1:20:54.559
<v Speaker 2>we need some work. But the first is they have

1:20:55.160 --> 1:20:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the first the first is to expect the president to

1:21:00.080 --> 1:21:03.759
<v Speaker 2>follow the damn law. That's the first thing that we need.

1:21:03.880 --> 1:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, we got It's a mighty fine constitution.

1:21:05.880 --> 1:21:06.000
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:21:06.120 --> 1:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I sit here, I look at that thing, and it's like,

1:21:08.120 --> 1:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>we the founders had a lot of a lot of problems.

1:21:11.280 --> 1:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>We know this, but boy, it was a pretty good blueprint.

1:21:14.040 --> 1:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>All we have to do is follow it.

1:21:16.120 --> 1:21:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And you know the thing that this experiment democracy,

1:21:21.080 --> 1:21:23.479
<v Speaker 2>it is a blessing and it is unique. It's a miracle.

1:21:23.520 --> 1:21:26.680
<v Speaker 2>They pulled it off back in the eighteenth century, and

1:21:26.760 --> 1:21:31.960
<v Speaker 2>here we are at risk in relatively you know, prosperous

1:21:32.000 --> 1:21:36.200
<v Speaker 2>times and relatively peaceful times. To think of abandoning this

1:21:36.360 --> 1:21:41.559
<v Speaker 2>because of one narcissistic social path is disturbing. That's why

1:21:41.880 --> 1:21:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I hope anybody who listening to the show will find

1:21:44.280 --> 1:21:47.000
<v Speaker 2>a way to express themselves in.

1:21:46.960 --> 1:21:50.479
<v Speaker 1>This self sorted I think the only problem I fear

1:21:50.560 --> 1:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, the people listening to us already

1:21:53.400 --> 1:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>are aware. It's like, how do we inform those that

1:21:57.479 --> 1:21:58.559
<v Speaker 1>are busy lives, you know?

1:21:58.600 --> 1:22:03.120
<v Speaker 2>And well, for another him, I'm very serious. When I

1:22:03.160 --> 1:22:05.960
<v Speaker 2>talk to people, I encourage him to talk to their

1:22:06.040 --> 1:22:10.519
<v Speaker 2>family first. Really, I'm very serious. About that, and we

1:22:10.600 --> 1:22:12.880
<v Speaker 2>need to talk to each other about these things. You

1:22:12.920 --> 1:22:16.080
<v Speaker 2>don't have to be a senator to influence this debate.

1:22:16.280 --> 1:22:18.559
<v Speaker 2>You can just do it in your own family. Great man,

1:22:19.320 --> 1:22:22.800
<v Speaker 2>So that's where I encourage people to start. Then run

1:22:22.840 --> 1:22:23.360
<v Speaker 2>for senator.

1:22:23.760 --> 1:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll go to Jay Insley's house and have

1:22:25.640 --> 1:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a raucous Thanksgiving. Come on over, hey, it's great to

1:22:30.320 --> 1:22:31.479
<v Speaker 1>talk with you. Great to catch up, sir.

1:22:31.920 --> 1:22:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for caring about democracy.

1:22:33.600 --> 1:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Keep talking, all right, and let's get those SuperSonics back

1:22:36.479 --> 1:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in Seattle.

1:22:37.240 --> 1:22:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm working on it.

1:22:38.439 --> 1:22:39.519
<v Speaker 1>I know it's got to happen.

1:22:39.560 --> 1:22:43.280
<v Speaker 2>It got it, It does. Okay, be lucky.

1:22:43.680 --> 1:22:53.599
<v Speaker 1>You got it. Well. I hope you enjoyed that interview

1:22:54.200 --> 1:22:58.559
<v Speaker 1>with Jay Insley. Something tells me, did you get the

1:22:58.560 --> 1:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>impression he's still going to run for I did. I

1:23:01.360 --> 1:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know what that's. Something is, who knows. Maybe there's

1:23:04.200 --> 1:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a senate race in his future. Maybe he's ready to

1:23:06.400 --> 1:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>be a cabinet secretary. If there's another administration that leans

1:23:10.320 --> 1:23:13.519
<v Speaker 1>to the left, we shall see. But he didn't strike

1:23:13.600 --> 1:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>me as somebody that was that was retired, as you

1:23:17.320 --> 1:23:19.559
<v Speaker 1>could tell in that conversation. All right, let me get

1:23:19.560 --> 1:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>through a few ask Chucks.

1:23:20.960 --> 1:23:21.679
<v Speaker 2>Ask Chuck.

1:23:24.960 --> 1:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, first one, I'm curious to get your take

1:23:26.960 --> 1:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this one. Let me read the name here comes from

1:23:29.240 --> 1:23:34.439
<v Speaker 1>a fellow, Todd Todd Corning, Todd Jay of Corning, New York, Corning,

1:23:35.320 --> 1:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the home of corningwhere all that stuff. Here's his question.

1:23:38.200 --> 1:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious to get your take on the impact that

1:23:40.280 --> 1:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>registered independence play in our current political divide. As a

1:23:42.800 --> 1:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>left of center pragmatist or incrementalists, take your pick. I

1:23:46.680 --> 1:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>switched from D to an I as a protest against

1:23:48.840 --> 1:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>what I saw as a left word lurch within the

1:23:50.240 --> 1:23:52.559
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party. By the way, I think you're not alone.

1:23:52.840 --> 1:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the increase of the last four years and

1:23:55.040 --> 1:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the independent numbers come almost exclusively from stage left. The

1:23:59.080 --> 1:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>first in the first Trump term, it most exclusively came

1:24:02.160 --> 1:24:04.439
<v Speaker 1>from stage why. But here's what he asked Lately, I'm

1:24:04.439 --> 1:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>wondering if this was a mistake. I suspect that many

1:24:07.479 --> 1:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>newly minted independents that switch parties for similar reasons, and

1:24:10.120 --> 1:24:12.599
<v Speaker 1>that in states with close primaries, such as my home

1:24:12.640 --> 1:24:14.479
<v Speaker 1>state of New York, switching parties has only made it

1:24:14.520 --> 1:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>more likely than an ideologically extreme candidate becomes the nominee.

1:24:18.040 --> 1:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Ding Ding ding Ding. I'm wondering what you think of

1:24:20.680 --> 1:24:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the best way forward would be both for me as

1:24:22.520 --> 1:24:24.559
<v Speaker 1>a voter and our nation as a whole when it

1:24:24.560 --> 1:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>comes to nominating more moderate candidates who could better bridge

1:24:27.080 --> 1:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>our political chasm. By the way, love what you're doing

1:24:29.680 --> 1:24:31.719
<v Speaker 1>and I never miss an episode Keep it up. PS.

1:24:31.760 --> 1:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Todd makes a better last name than a

1:24:33.920 --> 1:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>first name, appreciated as somebody who has lived with two

1:24:36.760 --> 1:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>first names. Of course, we used to joke at NBC

1:24:39.240 --> 1:24:41.599
<v Speaker 1>that we were the home of the two first name

1:24:42.760 --> 1:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of the two first name personalities Chris Matthews, Brian Williams,

1:24:46.200 --> 1:24:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Todd, David Gregory. Right, a bunch of us had

1:24:50.080 --> 1:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>first and last names that could be interchangeable. Look, this

1:24:55.120 --> 1:24:58.799
<v Speaker 1>is I think. I think partisan primaries are a virus

1:24:58.960 --> 1:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>in the country. I think partisan primaries are why we

1:25:01.760 --> 1:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>have too much polarization in Congress. Essentially, the average Democratic

1:25:07.960 --> 1:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>voter is much closer to the center than the average

1:25:10.680 --> 1:25:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Democratic elected official, and the average Republican voter is much

1:25:13.680 --> 1:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>closer to the center than the average Republican elected official.

1:25:16.320 --> 1:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Why is that? Because our primary system essentially tries to

1:25:21.000 --> 1:25:25.559
<v Speaker 1>keep you Todd Jay from actually voting. They don't want

1:25:25.600 --> 1:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you voting, They want you independence voting right, they want

1:25:28.280 --> 1:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>hard partisans voting only. I think it's a huge problem.

1:25:31.439 --> 1:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm I think one of the bigger changes we need

1:25:33.680 --> 1:25:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to make is to open the voting to all. We

1:25:36.720 --> 1:25:41.360
<v Speaker 1>need to have I'd like to have more predictable times

1:25:41.400 --> 1:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>when primaries are held. Look, state should be able to

1:25:45.400 --> 1:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>hold when they want to hold them. But maybe we

1:25:47.000 --> 1:25:50.559
<v Speaker 1>create sort of quarterly national primary days where if you're

1:25:50.560 --> 1:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>going to hold a primary in April, you're going to

1:25:52.200 --> 1:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>do it in this second Tuesday. If you're going to

1:25:53.600 --> 1:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>hold a primary in May, you'll do it in this

1:25:55.160 --> 1:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>second Tuesday of May. You know, some sort of predictability

1:26:00.080 --> 1:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of schedules so people remember when they's voting, they're not shocked.

1:26:03.320 --> 1:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've had such a mess over the last

1:26:05.320 --> 1:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>four years in New York State. You know, the year

1:26:08.040 --> 1:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>AOC won her primary, it was the first time that

1:26:12.000 --> 1:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>they had ever held they separated the state primaries from

1:26:14.760 --> 1:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the congressional primaries. There were actually two different primary days

1:26:18.080 --> 1:26:22.719
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eighteen, and so she won in a much

1:26:22.880 --> 1:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>much lower turnout situation. In fact, I don't know if

1:26:27.439 --> 1:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>she wins that primary. If AOC's ever in Congress had

1:26:31.800 --> 1:26:35.719
<v Speaker 1>New York held its primaries normally combined, where the state

1:26:35.840 --> 1:26:39.599
<v Speaker 1>offices and the federal offices shared the same primary date.

1:26:39.880 --> 1:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>For some ludicrous reason that cycle, they did not. And

1:26:43.920 --> 1:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you know it's I always say, butterfly effects of history, right,

1:26:47.840 --> 1:26:50.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the most you know, dynamic and

1:26:50.640 --> 1:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting and most consequential new members of the Democratic Party,

1:26:55.800 --> 1:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>one arguably thanks to a fluky decision to split the

1:27:00.120 --> 1:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>calendar in some weird way that New York did to

1:27:03.120 --> 1:27:06.639
<v Speaker 1>create the primary system that they created. So, look, you're

1:27:06.640 --> 1:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>not wrong. I think that the more people that vote

1:27:09.120 --> 1:27:12.679
<v Speaker 1>in primaries, the less ideological winners you will have, because

1:27:12.680 --> 1:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>most people are not ideologues. Most people are where you are.

1:27:16.200 --> 1:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>You may have a preference of left versus right. You

1:27:19.320 --> 1:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>may consider yourself more of a social liberal or a

1:27:21.960 --> 1:27:24.479
<v Speaker 1>fiscal conservative, however you want to look at it, But

1:27:24.520 --> 1:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you're somewhere between the thirty yard lines. There are not

1:27:27.280 --> 1:27:29.759
<v Speaker 1>many people between the zero and the thirty on the left,

1:27:29.880 --> 1:27:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and ditto on the right. So you know, I do

1:27:33.920 --> 1:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>think we need to get rid of partisan primaries. I

1:27:36.200 --> 1:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>think that is just a massive decision. And yes, I'm

1:27:39.320 --> 1:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a strategic voter, I'm lucky. In the state of Virginia,

1:27:42.680 --> 1:27:45.559
<v Speaker 1>there are no there is no party registration, and I

1:27:45.600 --> 1:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>get you know, I can't if both parties are holding

1:27:48.040 --> 1:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a primary for the same election, I have to pick

1:27:49.840 --> 1:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a side. But for the next election, I can pick

1:27:52.439 --> 1:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the other side. You don't ever have to. So I

1:27:54.680 --> 1:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>always vote in the most competitive primary, hard stop right.

1:27:57.760 --> 1:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>I want my vote to count, I want my vote

1:27:59.439 --> 1:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to matter, and so I vote in primaries left and right,

1:28:04.280 --> 1:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>depending on what's the competitive primary in a given cycle,

1:28:07.479 --> 1:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in a given year. So it's a I feel lucky

1:28:12.000 --> 1:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that way. I would hate. I think New York State

1:28:14.400 --> 1:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is the most undemocratic state, especially for supposed blue state.

1:28:20.360 --> 1:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>The ridiculous rules that still take place, the petition signatures

1:28:25.439 --> 1:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that are necessary to get on the ballot, it is.

1:28:28.320 --> 1:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>It is a bit arcane the way New York does

1:28:30.960 --> 1:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>holds its elections in general. So look, you're not wrong

1:28:34.840 --> 1:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>on that, but it's a system I think that that

1:28:37.160 --> 1:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>needs needs to be changed. And and I understand, and

1:28:43.720 --> 1:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you're not wrong in how you're thinking that.

1:28:46.560 --> 1:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>If you want to say, it's like, for instance, living

1:28:49.000 --> 1:28:53.519
<v Speaker 1>in the district, if you live in Washington, DC, whether

1:28:53.520 --> 1:28:55.719
<v Speaker 1>you're a Democrat or not. You almost have no choice.

1:28:55.760 --> 1:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>But the register is a Democrat if you want to

1:28:57.280 --> 1:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>have any say of who's going to hold office. That's

1:29:00.080 --> 1:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>true in Idaho. If you're a Republican, there's no use

1:29:02.360 --> 1:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>registering as a Democrat because all the primaries are going

1:29:05.080 --> 1:29:08.519
<v Speaker 1>to basically decide in the Republican primary. So I think

1:29:08.560 --> 1:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to I do think sometimes as a voter

1:29:11.960 --> 1:29:15.479
<v Speaker 1>you have to be strategic in your voter registration. Second

1:29:15.560 --> 1:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>question here, as an Arlingtonian, thank you for the local

1:29:17.840 --> 1:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>political shout out here. What do you think will be

1:29:19.840 --> 1:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Governor jenkins legacy? He made such a splash when he

1:29:22.360 --> 1:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>was elected, but it's seeing he hasn't accomplished much in Richmond.

1:29:25.000 --> 1:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>His failure to bring a major sports franchise to Virginia

1:29:27.120 --> 1:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>exemplified his lack of understanding of local politics. Also, what

1:29:30.200 --> 1:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is having the commanders moved back into DC mean for

1:29:32.160 --> 1:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the city? Do you think Mayor Bowser and the DC

1:29:34.400 --> 1:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>City Council can pull it off? Go? Ohs Douglas. So

1:29:39.200 --> 1:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he's a sneaky Marylander, you know, Douglas? Are you one

1:29:42.080 --> 1:29:44.719
<v Speaker 1>of those guys that still tries to say oh's during

1:29:44.760 --> 1:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the Star Spangled banner, you know, that was that was

1:29:47.800 --> 1:29:51.679
<v Speaker 1>a big When I first moved to DC, the only

1:29:51.680 --> 1:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>baseball team in the area was the Orioles. This was

1:29:53.960 --> 1:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties, and I remember the first time I

1:29:56.080 --> 1:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>heard that. You do the national anthem ins oh the Home,

1:30:00.400 --> 1:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and whenever you hear the oh the Home and then

1:30:02.320 --> 1:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it's Oh's, there would always be this big o's, just

1:30:04.400 --> 1:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>like in Atlanta. You know, at the Home of the Brave,

1:30:06.200 --> 1:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you're braves, you know, they get all excited. Well, the

1:30:09.680 --> 1:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>best thing that has happened about the downfall of the

1:30:11.920 --> 1:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>o's over the last twenty years and the rise of

1:30:15.160 --> 1:30:19.479
<v Speaker 1>the Nationals in general, and sort of the dcification, the

1:30:19.560 --> 1:30:23.519
<v Speaker 1>DMV really becoming its own identity. I go to DC

1:30:23.640 --> 1:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>sporting events now and I rarely hear somebody saying oh

1:30:26.800 --> 1:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>during the Star Spangle banner. Anyway, just thought i'd get

1:30:28.800 --> 1:30:31.839
<v Speaker 1>that rant out of the way. Look, I think Youngkin's

1:30:31.920 --> 1:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>legacy was winning. Was winning, right, That's that's the legacy

1:30:37.479 --> 1:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that he was able to show that Virginia still is

1:30:41.600 --> 1:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a competitive state. If you're not a Maga Republican, but

1:30:46.720 --> 1:30:49.479
<v Speaker 1>you're right. I think his his big goals, he's not

1:30:49.479 --> 1:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>been able to achieve it's some of it is you

1:30:52.880 --> 1:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>could say it's his fault. Some of it is the

1:30:54.920 --> 1:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>fault of the national atmosphere. I think he'd probably govern

1:30:58.880 --> 1:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit more centrist if he didn't also have one

1:31:02.200 --> 1:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>eye on running for president someday and still wants to

1:31:04.720 --> 1:31:08.479
<v Speaker 1>be sort of Maga adjacent. He certainly was flirting with

1:31:08.600 --> 1:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>being Trump's running mate, so I think he kept a

1:31:12.040 --> 1:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a conservative. You know, it's funny. The

1:31:14.640 --> 1:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>last Republican governor before him was Bob McDonald, But Mob

1:31:18.360 --> 1:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>McDonald wanted to be the running mate and acting more

1:31:20.920 --> 1:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>moderate was the way to do that, and I think

1:31:23.360 --> 1:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and he got well, he got a big transportation deal done,

1:31:26.280 --> 1:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>something that hadn't been done in a couple of decades.

1:31:28.640 --> 1:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>That was a big deal, So he had a legacy. Obviously,

1:31:31.120 --> 1:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>he ended up getting sort of a taint on him,

1:31:33.280 --> 1:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>having to do with some personal graft issues with some

1:31:37.520 --> 1:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>donors in the use of the governor's mansion. But he

1:31:43.520 --> 1:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>did he did get something big done, but he was

1:31:47.040 --> 1:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of incentivized to move to the middle a little bit.

1:31:49.960 --> 1:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>He ran more as a conservative and ended up governing

1:31:52.120 --> 1:31:54.439
<v Speaker 1>as a middle Younkin ran more as a moderate and

1:31:54.560 --> 1:31:56.519
<v Speaker 1>he ended up drifting a little bit more to the

1:31:56.560 --> 1:31:58.479
<v Speaker 1>right because I think he's still hoping to have a

1:31:58.479 --> 1:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>future in the Republican Party. So I think his decision

1:32:03.200 --> 1:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to keep one eye on running for president someday in

1:32:05.720 --> 1:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's Republican Party has probably constrained him from I think,

1:32:11.920 --> 1:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>having a bigger legacy as a governor here. But hey,

1:32:15.439 --> 1:32:18.559
<v Speaker 1>guess what, the election ain't over yet. I mean, his

1:32:18.760 --> 1:32:22.479
<v Speaker 1>term isn't over yet. He still got one, arguably one

1:32:22.479 --> 1:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>more year to do that, all right, But thank you Douglas,

1:32:26.439 --> 1:32:29.559
<v Speaker 1>and I'm rooting for the O's. But if I were you,

1:32:29.640 --> 1:32:32.599
<v Speaker 1>are you mad at Rubinstein? My buddy Jason Lockham Forth,

1:32:32.600 --> 1:32:35.439
<v Speaker 1>a man guy, is on fire when it comes to

1:32:35.479 --> 1:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>his anger at how the O's have not spent money

1:32:38.880 --> 1:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>on free agents and unpitching. But I digress. Last question

1:32:42.840 --> 1:32:46.599
<v Speaker 1>I will take for now is from Jack Vista. Jack

1:32:46.640 --> 1:32:49.639
<v Speaker 1>a from Vista, California, and he writes, Hey, Chuck, despite

1:32:49.680 --> 1:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>not being a Catholic, I'm always fascinated by the conclave

1:32:52.280 --> 1:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you and me both brother. Over the years, I've enjoyed

1:32:54.880 --> 1:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>your interviews with George Wigele. Whenever some big news out

1:32:57.760 --> 1:32:59.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Vatican came and was wondering if you might

1:32:59.560 --> 1:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>have him on All Things Pope politics interview, whether it's

1:33:03.160 --> 1:33:06.479
<v Speaker 1>before or after the White Smoke, I'd devour it. Jack.

1:33:06.760 --> 1:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I am ashamed to admit that I hadn't thought about

1:33:10.360 --> 1:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Wigel until you wrote. So. I want to give you

1:33:12.960 --> 1:33:15.479
<v Speaker 1>all the credit in the world. George, if you're listening,

1:33:15.479 --> 1:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>we're coming at booking. I'd love to have you. He's right,

1:33:19.120 --> 1:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>George has got a unique understanding of the politics of

1:33:23.000 --> 1:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the College of Cardinals. And let me just say here, Yes,

1:33:27.880 --> 1:33:31.679
<v Speaker 1>I saw the movie Conclave, and I thought the ending

1:33:31.720 --> 1:33:33.839
<v Speaker 1>was stupid, and I'll just leave it at that. I'm sorry.

1:33:34.439 --> 1:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I was so that movie was eighty percent awesome, and

1:33:41.680 --> 1:33:47.639
<v Speaker 1>you know I did. I get what they were trying

1:33:47.680 --> 1:33:49.919
<v Speaker 1>to do, and they thought it was an interesting twist.

1:33:50.640 --> 1:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>It just left a weird taste in my mouth. I

1:33:53.200 --> 1:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to put it. I don't want to

1:33:56.240 --> 1:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>be a spoiler. I know a lot of people are

1:33:57.800 --> 1:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>watching it, but it was so good and it captured

1:34:01.520 --> 1:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>what I look I still this is my dream is

1:34:04.800 --> 1:34:08.639
<v Speaker 1>to be, you know, to watch this happen, to watch

1:34:08.720 --> 1:34:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the politics of the College of Cardinals. I've always envisioned

1:34:11.280 --> 1:34:14.479
<v Speaker 1>it like the Iowa caucuses, where there's people like, we'll

1:34:14.479 --> 1:34:16.519
<v Speaker 1>go in certain groups and then they have these little

1:34:16.520 --> 1:34:19.720
<v Speaker 1>conversations and then they vote again. And here's this So

1:34:19.800 --> 1:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I in my head, I've treated it sort of like

1:34:22.040 --> 1:34:26.599
<v Speaker 1>the Vatican caucuses, you know, if you will. But here's

1:34:26.600 --> 1:34:28.559
<v Speaker 1>something that I've learned from all of all of the

1:34:28.600 --> 1:34:31.720
<v Speaker 1>experts I've spoken with over the years since I got

1:34:31.720 --> 1:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to cover two conclaves as a professional journalist, is that

1:34:38.479 --> 1:34:41.720
<v Speaker 1>nobody knows anything. This is one of those things that

1:34:42.240 --> 1:34:46.519
<v Speaker 1>the conclave works its will, and you know it is

1:34:47.560 --> 1:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, these are these are things that I feel like,

1:34:49.800 --> 1:34:52.280
<v Speaker 1>forty years from now, we'll learn about what happened in

1:34:52.320 --> 1:34:55.720
<v Speaker 1>this conclave that is about to begin any day now.

1:34:55.800 --> 1:34:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So I look forward to Wigel. I'm sorry for those

1:34:59.320 --> 1:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of you that love the movie Conclave that I that

1:35:01.760 --> 1:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving it my you know, it's a two and

1:35:07.439 --> 1:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a half stars for me because I love the concept,

1:35:09.840 --> 1:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>loved eighty percent of it. Thought the twist was worthless,

1:35:13.840 --> 1:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't need it, wasn't necessary, could have done it one

1:35:16.439 --> 1:35:20.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred other different ways. But the twist really sort of

1:35:20.320 --> 1:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is like what really We're going there, and it's like Anyway, again,

1:35:26.160 --> 1:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to be respectful of not being a spoiler

1:35:28.400 --> 1:35:33.679
<v Speaker 1>on this, but let's just say I was bummed because

1:35:33.720 --> 1:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought it's like having this incredible flight and then

1:35:37.240 --> 1:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you just sort of land without wheels and you just

1:35:40.160 --> 1:35:42.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of crash land. And that felt like a movie

1:35:42.320 --> 1:35:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that crash landed for me. All Right, I'm gonna take

1:35:46.320 --> 1:35:48.240
<v Speaker 1>at least a twenty four hour break the next time

1:35:48.280 --> 1:35:52.879
<v Speaker 1>we update this pod. I hope you will have devoured

1:35:52.880 --> 1:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this episode and I'll have another one right behind it

1:35:55.680 --> 1:35:58.519
<v Speaker 1>ready for you to listen to. I was always like,

1:35:58.600 --> 1:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe, We appreciate it. Tell your friends, subscribe everywhere.

1:36:02.160 --> 1:36:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe on Apple, Spotify podcasts, subscribe to YouTube channel. And

1:36:06.520 --> 1:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>coming soon, we'll have a couple of other announcements coming,

1:36:11.160 --> 1:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>including a couple of other places where you'll be able

1:36:14.720 --> 1:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to find content by yours truly with that until we

1:36:19.920 --> 1:36:20.519
<v Speaker 1>upload a down