Speaker 1: Good morning, peepsend and welcome to ok F Daily with
Speaker 1: Meet your Girl Daniel Moody, recording from the Home Bunker, Folks.
Speaker 2: In today's conversation, we sit.
Speaker 1: Down with our friend, our in house doctor, doctor Jonathan Metzel,
Speaker 1: and we talk about a range of things that are
Speaker 1: happening right now as it pertains to our democracy and
Speaker 1: the erosion that is taking place, the crumbling that is happening.
Speaker 1: But as I turn on the microphone today, George Clooney
Speaker 1: has decided that after putting together a fourteen million dollar
Speaker 1: fundraiser for Joe Biden, that he thinks that the smartest
Speaker 1: thing to do is to come out and to say
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden should step aside, that he considers him
Speaker 1: a friend, and he's a good president and was a
Speaker 1: good vice president, but that it's time for him to
Speaker 1: step aside. And what I've wanted to elevate in this
Speaker 1: Joe Biden in step aside conversation is one the massagin
Speaker 1: award that is taking place with the absolute just dismissal
Speaker 1: of Kamala Harris, who is the Vice President of the
Speaker 1: United States, and the fact that it is overwhelmingly rich,
Speaker 1: white powerful men that are coming out calling for Biden
Speaker 1: to resign to be replaced with a white man, as
Speaker 1: if we don't already have a succession plan in place
Speaker 1: in this country if something happens to the President of
Speaker 1: the United States. What I recognize about this is that
Speaker 1: these people who are coming out, overwhelmingly white men, who
Speaker 1: are coming out and calling for Biden to step aside,
Speaker 1: have nothing at risk. Their lives are not going to
Speaker 1: be the ones that are upended because of a Trump regime.
Speaker 1: They are not going to have to live under threat.
Speaker 1: They are going to have the finances and the skin
Speaker 1: tone to be able to fully and George Clin can
Speaker 1: raise his kids on Lake fucking Como and the other
Speaker 1: political punditry, white wealthy male class, they'll be fine, and
Speaker 1: they'll probably just get lock and step with Donald Trump
Speaker 1: in order to save their own asses. But it is
Speaker 1: the rest of us, who are part of marginalized communities
Speaker 1: who are the ones that are going to be in danger.
Speaker 1: And so I'm not willing to fucking gamble with changing
Speaker 1: a horse four months into the election. What I am
Speaker 1: willing to do is something that John Stewart brought up
Speaker 1: on The Daily Show, which is we need to bring
Speaker 1: in everybody, the governors, you know, the House representatives, the senators,
Speaker 1: the medio personalities and what have you, and get on
Speaker 1: the same page about creating a multiracial, multi generational coalition
Speaker 1: in order to fight back against fashion and Donald fucking
Speaker 1: Trump and MAGA and Project twenty twenty five. That's what
Speaker 1: our time should be used for, is to do what
Speaker 1: it is that people in France did who came from
Speaker 1: different ideological makeup, but they recognize the threat at hand
Speaker 1: that Marie Le Penn and our far right party we're
Speaker 1: going to have on France, and they did what needed
Speaker 1: to be done, and then they can figure out how
Speaker 1: to fucking govern. But we need to focus on how
Speaker 1: to fucking win. And that's the problem that Democrats find
Speaker 1: themselves in right now, is that they would rather spin
Speaker 1: their wheels and have a bunch of wealthy, white powerful
Speaker 1: men talk about overlooking the Vice President of the United
Speaker 1: States and bolstering her up and go ahead and look
Speaker 1: for another white man.
Speaker 2: Folks.
Speaker 1: We are not going to win that way, and I
Speaker 1: don't understand why people can't get it through their heads.
Speaker 1: Coming up next, my conversation with our friend, our in
Speaker 1: house doctor, doctor Jonathan Metzel. Folks, you know that whenever
Speaker 1: we have the opportunity to chat with our in house doctor,
Speaker 1: doctor Jonathan Metzil, we are always thrilled and pleased. And Jonathan,
Speaker 1: you are getting ready to take a big trip. You
Speaker 1: are headed to Israel in a few days.
Speaker 3: Well, actually I'm leaving right before we speak today. I'm
Speaker 3: leaving this afternoon.
Speaker 1: Oh you're leaving this afternoon.
Speaker 2: Oh my god.
Speaker 3: Okay, if our faithful viewers could see my apartment right now,
Speaker 3: they would send they would send help. But now I'm
Speaker 3: going to I'm going to England. First. I'm giving a
Speaker 3: talk if anybody's out there in London on Sunday, I'm
Speaker 3: speaking at the Sigmund Freud Museum in London on Sunday
Speaker 3: about guns in America and elections, which is a pretty
Speaker 3: interesting topic in the UK right now. And then I've
Speaker 3: been doing work with Physicians for Human Rights Israel Power
Speaker 3: STEGN for fifteen years and we've actually talked about it
Speaker 3: on here and I don't know, this was a year
Speaker 3: where I really have It's an intense time, right but
Speaker 3: they asked me to come back and this, you know,
Speaker 3: I want to be somebody who comes back when things
Speaker 3: are hard, not just when you know when they're easy.
Speaker 3: And so it's an incredible organization and a lot of
Speaker 3: my Israeli colleagues are processing in the streets against everything
Speaker 3: that's happening for a very very long time. And so
Speaker 3: I'm going to go there for a week. I said,
Speaker 3: what do you want me to talk about? And these
Speaker 3: are Israeli doctors basically, and Palestinian doctors and Bedouin doctors,
Speaker 3: and they said, we want to learn more about structural racism.
Speaker 3: So I'm going to Israel to lecture about structural racism,
Speaker 3: which is something they feel like they really want to
Speaker 3: know more about. And so it's just funny that, like
Speaker 3: when you were not in a place like you see
Speaker 3: it's one thing or the other thing, which it is
Speaker 3: in a lot of ways, but also people are there
Speaker 3: living their lives and still trying to do work that
Speaker 3: is equitable and just across around the world. Then, you know,
Speaker 3: so I'm interested to see what I find. And I
Speaker 3: think the other interesting thing about this trip is that
Speaker 3: I'm going to interview a lot of people because Israel
Speaker 3: is not that different from the United States. I mean,
Speaker 3: obviously all the other stuff aside, but in terms of
Speaker 3: just the electorate, you know, they're probably forty five percent
Speaker 3: of people are roughly liberal and fifty percent or conservative,
Speaker 3: many more obviously very very religious Orthodox Jewish people there
Speaker 3: a particular constituency. But I'm going to interview people about
Speaker 3: what they were thinking in the lead up to when
Speaker 3: Nittan Yaho got elected, because it just seems to be
Speaker 3: like there were a lot of similar forces at play
Speaker 3: as there are here. But if I can, I hope
Speaker 3: to write a piece just about put everything aside if
Speaker 3: you can, which is obviously hard for a lot of people,
Speaker 3: but just the question of like an electorate that feels
Speaker 3: like this election is just another election, or our candidate
Speaker 3: that Candaidate on the left was somebody nobody's really all
Speaker 3: excited about, but the implications the day after one really
Speaker 3: changed life and death for people forever in a way.
Speaker 2: You know, I think it's one a couple of things
Speaker 2: when you talk to them about structural racism, And obviously
Speaker 2: structural racism looks different depending on the country that you're in,
Speaker 2: depending on what ethnic racial groups, cultures you know you're discussing,
Speaker 2: and so what does the framing around that look like
Speaker 2: given your lens in the United States, but also how
Speaker 2: to I guess share that perspective with understanding the differences
Speaker 2: that persist in Israel and Palestine are really about culture
Speaker 2: and religion versus in the United States they are about
Speaker 2: you know, race.
Speaker 3: So I've been learning and lecturing in the Middle East
Speaker 3: about this for I think almost fifteen or twenty years now.
Speaker 3: I go back every two years, and and that was
Speaker 3: a learning experience for me. I mean, when we did
Speaker 3: a lot of outreach in the West Bank, but also
Speaker 3: in a lot of Druze villages in parts of Israel
Speaker 3: and parts of Israel, so there are a lot of
Speaker 3: I mean that's actually wor Alb's in some Bedouin areas
Speaker 3: also on next Tuesday, And so the race categories are
Speaker 3: just totally different in a way in a lot of
Speaker 3: ways you know people here, which kind of drives you crazy.
Speaker 3: You spent a lot of time in the Middle East.
Speaker 3: Everybody thinks it's like white Europeans and and they're all
Speaker 3: came in and that kind of thing. But as people
Speaker 3: I think now realize, like fifty five percent of israelis
Speaker 3: probably more with you know, intermixing and stuff come from.
Speaker 3: Yeahmen in Ethiopia and Iran and Egypt. So just Jewish Israelis,
Speaker 3: a lot of them would not identify as white because
Speaker 3: ethnically they're actually closer to I mean their grandparents escaped
Speaker 3: Egypt or or you know, Syria had a huge Jewish community.
Speaker 3: So there's a lot of just the categories here of
Speaker 3: like dying of whiteness versus black politics. And it doesn't
Speaker 3: mean anything there. I mean it does because they are
Speaker 3: really interested in how to fix it. Now that being said,
Speaker 3: a lot of work that I've done there two things.
Speaker 3: One is they want to know about equity and social
Speaker 3: justice work because there were terrible things that were done
Speaker 3: to for example, Yemeni women who came over, who their
Speaker 3: babies were taken, and you know, all these kind of
Speaker 3: things happening like in the forties and fifties. I mean, actually,
Speaker 3: I encourage people that they're interested in this at all
Speaker 3: to go on the Physicians for Human Rights Israel site.
Speaker 3: It's they've been anti occupation forever and you know a
Speaker 3: lot of politics that are really inflected by the US.
Speaker 3: But this is a long way of saying, at least
Speaker 3: there I'm going to be talking about structural competency, because
Speaker 3: I think that's the framework that adapts, which is like,
Speaker 3: how can we build equity frameworks for health care delivery
Speaker 3: and things like that, which is kind of what we
Speaker 3: were doing when we were doing a lot of Israeli
Speaker 3: Palestinian collaboration. That was the framework we were using. Also,
Speaker 3: we were in the West Bank a batch. Obviously that's
Speaker 3: going to be a lot more difficult now. But I'm
Speaker 3: curious to see what people what people say.
Speaker 1: I've said this before, I think to you, but I
Speaker 1: definitely have wrote about it. When I went to Israel
Speaker 1: and Paleston in twenty fifteen that as like a black
Speaker 1: queer woman traveling there, I was it was almost startling
Speaker 1: to me, like because I couldn't see the differences between
Speaker 1: people on their face, like like like it was just
Speaker 1: so shocking. I'm just like, how do you know who
Speaker 1: to hate? Because it like a like and I say
Speaker 1: that like jokingly, you know, but like honestly, because obviously
Speaker 1: in America things are literally very black and white, right,
Speaker 1: Like you know, I am a black person, and so
Speaker 1: you know the history right that has me in this space.
Speaker 1: And so when I was looking at Israelis and I'm
Speaker 1: looking at Palestinians, and I'm like, you all look alike
Speaker 1: like cousins, you know, like family cousins.
Speaker 2: Like I don't understand it.
Speaker 1: And so just like again with this idea of teaching
Speaker 1: about structural racism, their race, like their discrimination is based
Speaker 1: in religion, right, it's based in religion, and who has
Speaker 1: a right to the land of their people, et cetera.
Speaker 1: And so to me, it was just like it was
Speaker 1: very wild to be and you know, to be in
Speaker 1: a place. But I you know, similarly around the world
Speaker 1: in places where there are unrest because of different tribal groups,
Speaker 1: different religious groups and what have you, You're just like, how
Speaker 1: how do you even know to like to hate this person?
Speaker 1: It just doesn't make sense.
Speaker 3: And you know, the other interesting thing is that there
Speaker 3: are over a million Israeli Palestinians and so who are
Speaker 3: Palestinian Israeli citizens. And there are entire cities like in
Speaker 3: the North where they're like all the government everything is
Speaker 3: like totally mixed or has been like their model cities
Speaker 3: where all the shit hasn't played out. No, I mean,
Speaker 3: the thing is, well, first of all, these crisis moments
Speaker 3: are incredibly good at getting us to hate each other.
Speaker 3: So there's just a whole tribalizing. I mean it's also
Speaker 3: based in real things for sure, but it's also for me.
Speaker 3: You elect a government like Trump, or you elect a
Speaker 3: government like Nintaanyahu, elect governments who like all these governments,
Speaker 3: they were like, you're in this tribe, and if you
Speaker 3: go there the tribe, you're you're it's treason and we're
Speaker 3: going to make you pay a price and all these
Speaker 3: kind of things. And so I think that's part of it.
Speaker 3: Now in Israel, I don't want to get it too
Speaker 3: much of a free pass. I mean in the forties,
Speaker 3: like the Europeans who came fleeing Germany felt like they
Speaker 3: were like high culture, doing the Viennese waltz and speaking
Speaker 3: High German and stuff like that, and they then look
Speaker 3: down in their nose that, you know, people who are
Speaker 3: coming from Yemen who were not educated and all these
Speaker 3: kind of things. So there are racial divides, is kind
Speaker 3: of the so called Ashkenazi's Farti divide and kind of
Speaker 3: Spanish Jews versus Eupeene juice. But the thing is that
Speaker 3: was kind of in the fifties and as generations all
Speaker 3: grew up together, largely, I mean, it's a socioeconomic divide
Speaker 3: for in some places, but not you know, but it
Speaker 3: breaks down every generation because people are all hooking up
Speaker 3: and so so I think that's I think that's part
Speaker 3: of it. But then again there are these historical narratives,
Speaker 3: obviously racial narratives, and then there's just like a lot
Speaker 3: of death and killing in terms of the governments and
Speaker 3: all these kind of things. I don't know, But for me,
Speaker 3: I don't know, it's just I just for every place, like,
Speaker 3: why are we electing the worst people?
Speaker 1: Well, I want to ask you this, you know, as
Speaker 1: you get ready to leave and to go overseas today,
Speaker 1: we just saw the results as you mentioned in the UK,
Speaker 1: we saw the results in France, where the people in
Speaker 1: both of those countries have beat back, have voted back
Speaker 1: against far right authoritarianism. And so looking at that, as
Speaker 1: you pay attention to geopolitical situations and elections and what
Speaker 1: have you, what have you gleaned from those two elections.
Speaker 1: As the people are still in Israel calling for the
Speaker 1: resignation of Netanyahu, which will not happen, or calling for
Speaker 1: a new election, I don't know if that will happen.
Speaker 1: As we get closer and closer to our own election here.
Speaker 3: Well, I think three main things. First, I'm getting two
Speaker 3: talks in the UK, and then I'm giving three kind
Speaker 3: of talks. But a lot of community have reached stuff
Speaker 3: in like they are categories of people in Israel who
Speaker 3: don't fit into a lot of this. So I'm doing
Speaker 3: some stuff as I was saying with Drews and bedouin
Speaker 3: communities also in Israel. You know, I'm going to ask
Speaker 3: everybody where I go. I'm going to have a slide
Speaker 3: on my talk, what message do you have for the
Speaker 3: United States? What have you learned from your experience? They
Speaker 3: want to tell people in the United States who are
Speaker 3: facing our own big election. I'm really curious what people
Speaker 3: say and like, what have you learned?
Speaker 2: That very interesting?
Speaker 3: So I'm going to if I can do some research,
Speaker 3: I'm just going to say, email me if you want to.
Speaker 3: I'm going to be asking that question a lot. What
Speaker 3: what have you learned my sets, especially from France, because
Speaker 3: you know, the pen is really terrifying, but the pen
Speaker 3: is like Project twenty twenty five. People like these are
Speaker 3: people who have been in the opposition forever, but they've
Speaker 3: also always been whackos, and now the idea is that
Speaker 3: they're going to take over and control everybody's life, and
Speaker 3: the power goes their head. Hint. I think the thing
Speaker 3: with France is that people got together and they fought
Speaker 3: it back by making compromise. Like there are a lot
Speaker 3: of people in France who were running for political office
Speaker 3: who then made all these deals and said, look, I
Speaker 3: know I'm more senior than you, but I just think
Speaker 3: the election itself is so important. It's not about me,
Speaker 3: It's about the election. Hint, hint. And so the party
Speaker 3: really got unified and they made it really transparent and
Speaker 3: they were like, we're all on the same team, and
Speaker 3: here's what we're getting behind. And it's not the older people,
Speaker 3: because younger people have different sensibility, sense of the economy,
Speaker 3: like in a way being linked to the elites. Who
Speaker 3: poor Joe Biden. They're coming down on him so hard now,
Speaker 3: but the elites, you know. So I just think they
Speaker 3: made a lot of really important strategic choices.
Speaker 1: Yes, they made a coalition a force to go against
Speaker 1: the far right. Like I mean to me, that is
Speaker 1: how politics is supposed to work, where one the people
Speaker 1: recognize the existential threat and then those leaders that are
Speaker 1: in power say this is how we're going to rally,
Speaker 1: and you know, instead of being fractured, recognize that if
Speaker 1: La Penn were to get in, this would undo who
Speaker 1: France like. Who France is and has been for decades
Speaker 1: upon decades of democracy.
Speaker 3: And roughly the same in UK is different, but a
Speaker 3: kind of process happened that ultimately. But do you know, man,
Speaker 3: I mean, I've hinted about this on this show for
Speaker 3: two years, but this stuff with Biden just really infuriates me.
Speaker 3: I mean, I want us to do whatever's going to work.
Speaker 3: And I realize that I think you're still thinking he
Speaker 3: should stay in, right because he has all the money
Speaker 3: and stuff like that.
Speaker 1: No, it's not even like I don't think that he
Speaker 1: should stay in because he has the money. I say
Speaker 1: that he stays in because we have four months. And
Speaker 1: I don't think that people understand the amount of work
Speaker 1: and like seating that needs to happen in order to
Speaker 1: interer it even like and first of all, the whole
Speaker 1: conversation that is happening about floating other names outside of
Speaker 1: the Vice President of the United States is already like
Speaker 1: missage in Noir and like bullshit. So I won't entertain
Speaker 1: any of that. But on its face, the whole conversation
Speaker 1: is based in racism and sexism. She's the vice president
Speaker 1: of the United States. If something were to happen to
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, guess who becomes president. And so I think
Speaker 1: that for me, he stays in because we have four
Speaker 1: fucking months you wanted Joe Biden removed. That conversation should
Speaker 1: have happened in twenty twenty, not four months before the
Speaker 1: fucking election. So I don't care if he is weekend
Speaker 1: at Bernie's. I don't care if he's in a fucking
Speaker 1: hospice bed. Like people need to understand and rally around
Speaker 1: that because we don't have the time for there to
Speaker 1: be a quote unquote new person coming in.
Speaker 3: It's it's sad because like our system is so inept,
Speaker 3: like oh yeah, I mean like in the Europe, you know,
Speaker 3: the whole election is seven weeks start to finish out,
Speaker 3: and so you'd think ideally, but I just I know
Speaker 3: so many people who like, if Biden's a candidate, they're
Speaker 3: not going to vote, you know, I just I so
Speaker 3: many people, and it's just so I'm really torn because
Speaker 3: wood rallying around Kamala hairs and then there's so many
Speaker 3: good people you could pair with her that I think
Speaker 3: we just get people excited again. And I'm just personally
Speaker 3: mad because I feel lied to by a lot of
Speaker 3: this Biden stuff. It feels a little bit cover up
Speaker 3: fish to me, which people have been telling me for
Speaker 3: you years, like, oh, they're covering up all this medical stuff.
Speaker 3: And I was like, oh, I don't give crap, Like
Speaker 3: I don't know, but it does seem like something about
Speaker 3: that debate, man, it just feels like, yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean, look, the debate was terrible. It should have
Speaker 1: never happened. If his team was at all concerned with
Speaker 1: what his performance was going to be, they should have
Speaker 1: pulled it. They should have pulled it and said that
Speaker 1: he had COVID and like, unlike Donald Trump, we're not
Speaker 1: going to put other people at risk, and that's what
Speaker 1: you do. And that would have been its own narrative
Speaker 1: and media cycle.
Speaker 2: But the fact that there has.
Speaker 1: Been, to me a coordinated effort by all media outlets
Speaker 1: to call for the resignation of Joe Biden. And yet
Speaker 1: when Donald Trump received his guilty verdict, there was no
Speaker 1: calling for him to drop out of the race. There
Speaker 1: was no calling for like the fact that a convicted
Speaker 1: criminal should not be the president of the United States,
Speaker 1: and how dangerous this is and what a precedent it's setting.
Speaker 1: There wasn't like an I for one am sick of it.
Speaker 1: And so also Donald Trump doesn't exhibit that he is
Speaker 1: quote unquote all there either, right, but again there is
Speaker 1: still no there's no coordination around trying to protect our democracy,
Speaker 1: but there is absolute coordination on trying to take down
Speaker 1: Joe Biden.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean, for me, I've thought a lot about this.
Speaker 3: I agree with everything you just said a lot, but
Speaker 3: I would also say I don't care about whether or
Speaker 3: not Trump is competent. I think Trump is incompetent, but
Speaker 3: it doesn't matter to me really, because for me, the
Speaker 3: question isn't comparent Biden and Trump. It's what it's the
Speaker 3: narratives Democrats will tell themselves to get the coalition together,
Speaker 3: so Trump could be job of the Hut for all
Speaker 3: I care. Media is in a lot of ways already,
Speaker 3: but this story I do feel about Biden's competency and
Speaker 3: whether he'll take a meeting now after six pm and
Speaker 3: all these kind of things like it that's important for
Speaker 3: Democrats independent of the coverage that Trump gets. I just
Speaker 3: I think there's something about like what narrative do we
Speaker 3: have to tell ourselves as Democrats to get back to
Speaker 3: building because honestly, Trump voters aren't going to vote for
Speaker 3: our side, but our coalition. If we hold together, you know,
Speaker 3: we win. But I don't know. I just it's just
Speaker 3: there's so many missteps here. It's just it's I mean,
Speaker 3: obviously we're going to mobilize around whoever the candidate is.
Speaker 3: I personally think, given everything, that's if they can pull
Speaker 3: it off. I personally think a Harris somebody ticket would
Speaker 3: be more exciting for people in a four month period
Speaker 3: if they could mobilize the same networks and resources. I
Speaker 3: don't know if that's possible. And I do think some
Speaker 3: of these questions about could you do the job? I
Speaker 3: think are valid questions right now. Now. It's infuriating that
Speaker 3: these have been held from us for a long time
Speaker 3: and everything matters about who wins the election. But I
Speaker 3: don't know enough about this. I'd be curious to note
Speaker 3: could we pull off like a Kamala Harris, And I
Speaker 3: mean I love Andy Basheer as you know ticket or
Speaker 3: something like that. You know, So I just want to
Speaker 3: do where it takes to win.
Speaker 1: Everyone needs to be focused on. What I want to
Speaker 1: see is the same loyalty and circling of the wagons
Speaker 1: that Republicans can do for a convicted felon, for us
Speaker 1: to do for Joe Biden for the next four months.
Speaker 1: We need to get to inauguration day. We need to
Speaker 1: get we need to win the election and get to
Speaker 1: inauguration day. I don't care about what happens after that,
Speaker 1: and I don't understand why that can't just happen like that.
Speaker 1: The focus can't be on the existential threat that we're
Speaker 1: in and just move in that direction for the next
Speaker 1: four months. What happens after that, I don't care.
Speaker 3: It's just really it's like the viewership of NMSNBC versus
Speaker 3: the viewership of Fox News. Can you convince enough people
Speaker 3: who don't already agree with what you just said, which
Speaker 3: is me and you and all our friends who saw
Speaker 3: Biden at that debate. Can you convince enough people who
Speaker 3: are like swings it's really going to better swing state
Speaker 3: undecided voters. That's really, you know, whatever a narrative convinces them,
Speaker 3: I will go with that. The meetings are all happening
Speaker 3: today as actually as we are talking about this right now,
Speaker 3: so I'm curious to see. So the question will be
Speaker 3: like how much damage did that? It wasn't just the debate.
Speaker 3: It was the debate that kind of opened a flood
Speaker 3: of frustration that people have been feeling gas lit. I think,
Speaker 3: how much damage did that do to swing state voters?
Speaker 3: And that'll be the poll and that I think that'll
Speaker 3: be what happens. But I don't know. I just I
Speaker 3: don't need Jill Biden yelling at me right now.
Speaker 2: Fair point.
Speaker 1: Well we will leave it there today, my friend. I
Speaker 1: wish you safe, safe travels, keep in touch with us
Speaker 1: while you are away, because I'm interested to know what
Speaker 1: insight folks have for the United States and what their
Speaker 1: thoughts are around their own issues of structural racism.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, I've here. I actual, to be honest,
Speaker 3: it was like take your breath away moment. I'm like,
Speaker 3: do you want me to come talk about peace negotiations
Speaker 3: or war something? And like the actually we want to
Speaker 3: learn how we can be more racially equitdople. I don't know,
Speaker 3: there was something about it. This was like the last
Speaker 3: answer I thought. I'm like, oh, I'll come, you know,
Speaker 3: I'll come and we'll see and again this group is
Speaker 3: mixed in ways that are just it's you know, you
Speaker 3: can't get a sense of what it's like from here
Speaker 3: in that regard. You know, they're so anyway excited to
Speaker 3: go and come back and talk to everybody about amazing.
Speaker 1: That is it for me today, dear friends on Woke
Speaker 1: a f as always power to the people and to
Speaker 1: all the people. Power, get woke and stay woke as fuck.