WEBVTT - Surveillance: Vaccines With Germany's Scholz

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast Hometown Keene. Along with

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Ferrill and Lisa Brownwitz Jailey, we bring you insight

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>from the best and economics, finance, investment and international relations,

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Fine Bloomberg Surveillance and Apple podcast SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. The story in

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Europe much more complex. It's been a tough few months

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to roll out this vaccine, and now Germany has outlined

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>some plans to gradually reopen the economy. I'm pleased to

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>say that still with us is our colleague, Bloomberg's Mat Miller,

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm very happy to say the German finance minister

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.599
<v Speaker 1>joins us. Now all have Scholtz, Minister, fantastic to catch

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>up with you, sir. I just want to start with

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine strategy in Europe, which you've reportedly called, and

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>forgive me for my language, sir, a real pile of crap.

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>It's that a fair characterization of how you see things

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and how you've seen things play out in Europe over

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the last several months. I think there was a problem

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in ordering enough vaccines in the last year, but now

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>anyone is working very hard to work that we will

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>have enough vaccines to bring it to the people, and

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>this is what is organized in all the countries, also

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in Germany. What went wrong, Minister, it's just the one sentence.

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I already said. There could should have been more. There

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>should have been more activity to organize more vaccines, and

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>especially if you understand that most of the important developments

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.559
<v Speaker 1>for modern vaccines have been made in Europe, and two

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of the three big companies that develop new vaccines Moderna

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and que Vac and BioNTech are from Germany. So this

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is a good basis for doing the right things. But

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in the end, I think we are now on the

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>wreck right track, and anyone is working very hard in

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>all the countries, and we are now fascinating the people,

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and we are organizing that this will happen as fast

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>as possible, and there will be in a short time

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>millions of people that got the ability to have their vaccine.

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Minister Shultz, considering that those companies are German, why didn't

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the government act to get them first, those vaccines out

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to the German people right away. I think it is

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>absolutely clear that this is something that should be organized

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>in Europe together and it's also clear that this is

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>something that should be part of an international collaboration which

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is working necessarily for saving the world. And as you know,

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we are already working very hard on international and global

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>initiatives supporting those countries who have not the means to

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.119
<v Speaker 1>to organize the vaccines for themselves, because if we want

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>to fight so successfully against the pandemy, it will be

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>necessary that we give the chance to all the people

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>on the globe. Coming back to Europe, coming back to Germany,

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we will make it well. You're responsible for

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the damage done now by extended lockdowns to

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the German economy. Our reporter Berge yain and found that

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the government is considering as much as fifty billion euros

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in additional debt spending and supplemental debt spending in order

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the deeper damage from the extended lockdown.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Can you confirm that we will do extra activities. Yes,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>this is true and we are able to do so.

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>As you know, we were in Europe the first to

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>fight against the pandemic with fiscal means. In the last year,

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we developed the first a very strong recovery program, and

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>we managed the political activity that made it possible that

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole European Union is answering together to this crisis.

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>The effect on the German economy is obvious. We are

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>having a very good situation at the labor market and

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it is much better than anyone expected the last year.

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>We have a very good situation in the economy, and

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>if you compare the development of the German economy to

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:30.239
<v Speaker 1>other countries in the world, you see we are between

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the best fighting against the economic consequences of the crisis.

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Can I just push a little bit harder to get

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 1>a figure here in terms of the additional spending that's necessary,

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Mr Minister, is fifty billion euros in additional spending necessary?

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Or somewhere in that ball ballpark. Your colleagues from Germany

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>asked the same question to me, and I always gave

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>them the same answer. You will see, I didn't expect

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a new answer. Just follow up on. The election is

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>coming up later this year. You're running against Chancellor Mercle's party.

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>You have to find some kind of daylight between her

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and yourself on the pandemic? Where is the daylight? What

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>would you have done differently that wasn't done? Fighting against

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic? Is a common task of the whole government,

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 1>and I think we have to be very hard and

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>fighting against the health crisis which is linked to the pandemic,

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and save the the and save the people, and this

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>is what we do. And so I think it is

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>not a good idea to do campaigns on this question.

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>But obviously I think we need something which is a

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>plan for coming out of this situation. And this is

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>why I urged anyone to be very very concrete on

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the question of testing and on the question of fascinating

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the people. And I was also very strict in the

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.119
<v Speaker 1>question we discus. Asked in the beginning that there should

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>have been more activity in Europe about producing and buying

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the scenes and people are seking very hard. This will

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>be a single issue election this year. There is no

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>other discussion in the global economy. Right now, you're saying

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>there's no difference between yourself and the c DU on

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the biggest issue of the last several decades in the

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>global economy. There is no difference in how you would

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>handle this crisis, on how you would reopen this economy.

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:38.359
<v Speaker 1>There is no day like whatsoever. There are differences that

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>are discussed, but to be very clear, it is a

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>common task and I am very much urging anyone not

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to do party politics and the question which is responsible,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in the question which is important for the life of

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>our people. This is something no one would accept. And

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>there is something which is different to other countries. Noble

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>doubted that there is really a problem with the pandemic

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Corona virus, and no one doubted that it

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>was necessary to fight against it. So there is a

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>consensus on this question also, not not just within the

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>parties of the government, but also with the most of

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the opposition parties. And so this consensus is helpful for

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>doing the right things now and being a very honest politician.

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I think doing your task is the first thing if

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you're running for ruling the country. And this is the

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>task we have now. And yes, we are the one

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>fighting for the idea that this must be done, saving

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the economy, working on social cohesion, looking at the people

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>who are suffering most and supporting them, and fighting against

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the health prices. And this is what we have to do.

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>They are honorable goal. Sir. Let me finish with this one,

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>because there's a big problem in Europe developing on acceptance

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:04.239
<v Speaker 1>of the vaccine. Have you had the vaccines. I haven't

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>been vaccined because there has been uh an agreement on

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>who will be the first and who will be the last,

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and the leading politicians are not in the first role.

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>But any one of us said and I do the

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>same that when we are at the stage where we

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>will be fascinated, have the chance to get the vest scene,

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>we will take it. And I will take the one

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>which is offered to me, and I will not choose

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the different ones, because there are a lot

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of very successful the scenes on the Marketisa, thanks for

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>time today. We appreciate an important conversation on some really

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>difficult issues. So thank you for your understanding. The German

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>finance minister, there all have shelves right now, John, this

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>is a joy, joy joy. The answer is we only

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 1>have David Blanchelow of Dartmouth and after Cardiff football wins

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>turn in a row. They haven't lost in ten games,

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>which is absolutely extraordinary. So Professor blanch Blanche Flowers people

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>have allowed him to come on air. He is definitive

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>on the job economy, from the wage curve of decades

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>ago to not working, where have all the good jobs gone?

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Danny Blanche Flower to the right and the left owns

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a high ground. He joins us now from Dartmouth College, Hanover,

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire. Danny, you have a chapter in Not Working

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>where you say where is the wage growth or the

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>lack of it? With the government induced inflation, we're going

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to see, well that give us a legitimate wage growth

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>in the good feeling from it? Well in a while.

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the big reality was the wage growth was very weak.

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>The Fed really didn't interpret it correctly, didn't have an

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>explanation for it. A big story going for it will

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>be what happens to wage growth. But we have a

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>puzzle right now because during the doing two thousand twenty

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and coming in to two one, wage growth has jumped.

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>It's jumped to about seven or eight percent, but not

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>credible because that's because the dropping of the lower end

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of the labor market to be like so it's just

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a batting average effect. So watching wages is going to

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>be really important. Measuring it's going to be very hard,

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>but in some sense that I think, yeah, you're right

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>you said a minute ago, look at g d P.

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think the big deal will be look at

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>wage growth, look at what happens um and see if

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 1>it sustains itself in a way that it that it hasn't.

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And and then the major reason in a sense for

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that is the people at the lower end have got

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>to be lifted. They've been impacted hard by the pandemic.

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>They didn't see really strong wage growth in the last

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>decade or so. So I think wages, they're really central

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>toward this. Within wages being central to it, it is

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>about jump start in the economy. What is the character

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>of six or seven percent g d P. What kind

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of economy will that be? Well, it'll be it'll be

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good economy. I mean, we have we have

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to put all of this in context, Jenny. Is it

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>an economy for the elites the bottom line? That's exactly

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the concern. I mean, the K shaped recovery, strong recovery

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>for some, no recovery for others. And I think that's

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>really the concern. I mean. The great thing in a

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>sense of that Biden and stuff is he's focused on it.

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>He has two really strong appointees in Treasury and at

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the Council, Janet Yelling and cc Rousse, who said in

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the in their nomination speeches, this is what we're going

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to focus on. But the reality of that is it's

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>really hard. It's really hard to bring everybody along together.

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>And look at look at the stock market. We've looked,

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that that's doing pretty well. Wall streets doing fine,

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>You've been talking about it. But the issue in some

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>sets around the world is what happens to main street?

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>And because main street has not done that well, this is,

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 1>in a sense of the explanation of populism. It's the

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>explormation in the US of a of a push to

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>Trump is an explanation in the UK pushed to Brexit.

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is central to what happens in this recovery.

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you bring everybody along in the UK? Does the

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>British Prime Minister? Is he able to do things for

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the fifty constituencies that used to be labor that went

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to him to vote for Brexit. You've got to deliver

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and the question is are you going to be able to?

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the question is what is power going to

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>say about those people who are who are at the

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 1>lower who've been furloughed and potentially their firms won't what

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>won't kick started again? Danny, There's a lot there. Let's

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>unpack a little bit of it this idea of you know,

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>people come on this show and they say that the

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>markets outperformed and did really well even though main Street

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>lagged behind for a long time. Now we're entering a

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>new paradigm where main Street can perhaps do better and

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the and markets may perhaps underperform a bit. Are you

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>saying that's hogwash, that that's not true and that's not

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the trajectory that we're on. Well, I mean, I see that.

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>The central part of what we're seeing is that the

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Fed is going to do in the bank of eing them.

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>They're going to do quantitative easing. They're going to keep

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>doing that. That's going to push our asset prices. The

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>question then is how does that quantitative easing, How does

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>that help people at the lower end. The answer is

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>relatively so, it doesn't. So the focus on the Biden

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 1>package is actually about jobs, helping people at the lower end,

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and restoring employment to those who are furlowed, those who

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>have been taking these unemployment betters. I should just go back.

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So when the unemployment rate rises, we have never as

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>of last April, we have met to we have never

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>seen wage growth rise dramatically. So why is that the

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>bottom ten percent or so of the wage distribution dropped out.

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>They're not working, they're furloughed. And the question is if

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>are the firms that are furloughed actually going to reopen?

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>And if they're not, we're in really big trouble. The

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>government's going to have to do something about that, um

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and we know that we've never seen anything quite like that.

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>The reality is that this is a big problem. I

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:08.959
<v Speaker 1>gotta jump in, sir, and we've gotta go back to

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>your time in the Bank of England. You're at the

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England at that really crucial time oh six

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.719
<v Speaker 1>o nine, right before the crisis, coming out of the

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>crisis as well, when you sat there with Governor King,

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>did you tell him you don't like the idea of

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>QUI because you thought this would happen. Was it anticipated

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>at the time when this grand experiment really got going.

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not. I mean, I think the reality was that

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>this central banks were basically unprepared, unprepared for having to

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>do this. But I think the biggest thing, John was

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that two things. Nobody really had a clue about the

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>transmission mechanism and how it was going to work. And

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>nobody had a clue how about this thing would ever end?

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And of course it hasn't ended and it continues. So

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is no. I mean that's the

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>other part of it is think of the debate going

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>on at the Bank of England. The committee is now

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>arguing in public about whether they think they should go

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to negative rates. I mean I remember being told then

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that half a percent was the lower bound. You couldn't

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>go lower than a half. So the answer is this

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is this is an unheard of territory John. You know

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we will see, um what what what assets? Will they

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to buy? What will the Bank of England do?

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Will the US go to negative rates? I mean, I

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>think pals made all the right noises, but the question

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is do they have any ability really to impact them?

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And does a hundred billion of QUEI today are its

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>effects the same as it was in two thousand monements?

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>How do we have a proper conversation about this? Because

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I know from sources that when you were at the

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England, Governor King told you guys not to

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>go out there and say quie won't work. Once you

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>decided to do it, that was it. You all had

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to get on the same page. You don't have to

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>tell me right now on the record whether that was

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>true or not, because I know from talking to people

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it happened. So Danny, when are we going to have

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a proper conversation about whether this works or not and

0:15:57.720 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>not be dictated by just a couple of people who

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>have made some big decisions. Oh, I think the answer

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>was a thing. Eventually, by around November two thousand and eight,

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it was clear that you couldn't cut rates enough and

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that you had You know, you can't cut the price

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that cut the price of money, so you raise the quantity.

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's go back to your earlier question. I

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>mean the answer is it's unclear what QUI has done.

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think what you just asked me, what

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>has QUI done? But it has to be in combination

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>with zero or zero or someplaces negative rates, and so

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the attempts to work out what it's done are difficult.

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I take the view actually is that if

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>we haven't done it, unemployment rates would have been That's

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the Blancie line. So I think certainly in two thousand

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>eight nine it worked, probably diminishing return set in, but

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it certainly seems to me to have had positive effects

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>on stock markets. Why else is the stock market rising

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>because there's this buyer of assets that's out there. So

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, um, and we're I'm looking back.

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Basically we had no idea what to buy, to think,

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>do you buy ten years fifteen five? So the Bank

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of England bought pretty pretty long stuff that didn't mature

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. Um. So it's not just what it q do,

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>but what should you buy? What are its impact? What

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know? What duration stuff do you buy? So all

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>of that's still in the air, and the answer is

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>that when you're floundering, you have to do everything. So

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I think and Powell has been cautious, and I I don't

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think sensible, more sensible and cautious than people at the

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Bank of eng and how they instid inflation is going

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to take off based on no evidence. So I think

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you know the story out of the Fed looking back

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>saying they've got it. They got got two eighteen rong,

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>which I said on your program, I think every month

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>for three and a half years. So so I'm hopeful,

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>but these are tough time, Danny. Good to see you,

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>always good to catch up. Downmouth Carlige, Professor of Economics,

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>let's get this back on track, Chrisma Rank your Belly

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Funds co Chief investment of Chris. We're not going to

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>do London Derbys and all of that stuff. Let's talk

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>about the markets. Do I position for better growth? Do

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I position for higher inflation? And what's the difference between

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the two? Yeah, I think your position for both. Listen,

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Goldilocks died probably a year ago. UM. The era of

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>low inflation and low rates UH and good growth is

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>probably over, and you know were it might be likely

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to see much higher inflation going forward. The question is

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>how much why are we getting inflation? Is a good inflation?

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Meaning is it because everybody wants to go on vacation

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in August? Or is it because OPEC is squeezing us?

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 1>And is it structural? Um? And you know, those are

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>all questions we think about. UM. The market obviously is

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it's very focused on the interplay between rates and inflation,

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and that has fed the rotation into value stacks, which

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>has started, you know, six months ago and has benefited

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>people like us. Chris. We have a conversation with the

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.959
<v Speaker 1>leadership of x on today here at Bloomberg. Give us

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>your update on hydro carbon's Gabelle is is ancient for

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a love of industrial companies where Mario was ween your thoughts,

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm big oil. Yeah, so listen. One of the one

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of the big themes coming out of this earning season

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>has been E s G Environmental social governance. Everybody's talking

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>about it, everybody's gonna write about it in their annual

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.719
<v Speaker 1>report um. And the irony, of course is that over

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the last several months it's been these big dirty companies

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>like Excellent who who have done much better. Again, longer term,

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how that plays out. We actually just launched

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 1>a sustainability fund, our first sustainability fund called Love Our

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Planet and People. It's our first ETF, and you know,

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we we think there's a bright future for companies who

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>are trying to uh go green, and particularly big industrial

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>companies that are trying to pivot to green. And you've

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>seen that with GM and data and air products and

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extent Excen, who's interestingly focused on carbon

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>capture and sequestration as opposed to some of the other

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>things that the other in gradets are focused on. Chris,

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to something that you said,

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Goldilocks died a year ago. And this speaks to the

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not too hot, not too cold, not to the

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>very character Well, I mean, honestly, see how it could

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>get pretty morbid. I am curious though, going forward what

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that means. Who loses? Because in everything is perfect kind

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of world with nothing is too hot and too cold,

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>everything can kind of rise. At the same time, who

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>suffers when Goldilocks dies? Yeah, well, I think you're seeing

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it in what's happening with the nastac. You know, this

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>is a perfect environment for the big growth companies, um,

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>big internet companies in particular that I don't have to

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>show profits in the near term um and whose profits

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in the future are being discounted at very low rates

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>but by the market. So I think there's going to

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>be more of an impetus to to be profitable, to

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>have rational economic models, and that you know, should favor

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the traditional incumbent companies, which now include probably many of

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the thing which are you know, enormously profitable and have

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>very strong market positions. Much a bit of child and

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>shooting into this show this morning. See the founder of

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the bomber. That's great. What is this you accidentally put

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg? It's gonna Nurst the children because they're in tears, Like, so,

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>what is this Chris las guess serious on So honestly,

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>this is something that people have been talking about. Yes, look,

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to talk about Goldilocks. But at the

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>same time, not too hot, not too cold is a question?

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Is at dead? I mean you'd say these are some

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of the key questions and investing all of that good stuff, Chris,

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>active management. Now do you think you've got a stronger

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>argument for that this year? I think we do. Um.

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm reminded we're talking about commodities. The cure

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>for high prices is more high prices in the case

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of passive the cure for passive in the eyes of

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>active managers is more passive. Um. You know, we've seen

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, mindless flows driving the market over the last

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 1>ten years or more. Uh. And to the extent that

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>we can do price discovery and add alpha that benefits us,

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I think now is the time to do it, because

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the playing field is changed Goldilocks. If Goldilocks is in

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>fact dead, that everybody's gonna go up. We're in the

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>three or four accounting statements. Is the alpha general water

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>or is it even dies? It distinctions of cash flow.

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 1>What's the line that matters to the Gabelle shop. It's

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly the cashalist statement. You know, cash is king. It

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>always has been. Um, it's not about a revenue multiple.

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And so that's why we're looking. Chris always got to say,

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Sir christmin Rank, give out a fund Colley, Chief Investment Officer,

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you. What we've tried to do now, pushing on

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>a year and evermore, is the medicine of this pandemic.

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Giving us original leadership in February of last year was

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Peter Hotez. He's dean of the National School of Tropical

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Medicine at the Baylor College of Medicine. He has been ubiquitous.

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest, you know, it's almost like Dr Fauci. Peter,

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you have been everywhere giving us wisdom on the vaccine.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Have you spoken to the governor of your Texas I've not.

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I've not had the opportunity to speak with the governor

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>or his staff. Of course, I'd always welcome that opportunity,

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and I have in the past, but not not over

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this latest issue. If well, over the latest issue, it's important.

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing anecdotally of people just literally trying to leave

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the state. They're so furious about this. And yes there's

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 1>people in support of the governor. What would be your

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>counsel to the governor right now of the differential equations

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of more vaccinations, better vaccinations, better statistics against his political philosophy. Well,

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>there are two reasons not to dial back masks and

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>social distancing at this point. One is we've got this

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>terrible United Kingdom variant as some people call it. I

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>call it the B one one seven variant that first

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a rose out of southern England in September, and now

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>the data showing it's much more aggressive in terms of

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>its ability to be transmitted. And also now the UK government,

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>although the second part is not being peer reviewed, if

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the UK government's put it up on their website, looks

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>pretty compelled that the death rates higher. So this is

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a bad actor and it's racing through the country at

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a high rate, really really bad. In Florida right now,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe ten of the isolates virus isolates are this B

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>one one seven variant from the UK. And so that's

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>so we can even know the number of cass been

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>going down pretty steadily, it's not plateaued. And now many

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of us think that's going to start going back up

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a fourth wave. That's issue one. And then second, Um,

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, vaccines are not here yet. Um. Now that's

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>been disappointing. Operation Warp speed promised vaccines upon emergency use

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>authorization for the J and J vaccine that's not delivering. Um,

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>they will come. The President two days ago committed to

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>having every American wants to be vaccinated. Can't be vaccinated

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>by late spring, early summer. So that's good news. So

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>hold off, you know, don't don't dial back the masks

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and social distancing right now. This is the very worst

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>time to do it. Dr Hotez, This may be premature,

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>but looking forward, based on where we are in the

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>inoculation schedule as well as a technology that's been discovered

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>through this process, are we closer to the next pandemic

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>or further away? Well, I think we're we're closer to

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>vaccinating our way out of this current one. And and

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I say that because there's some exciting news that came

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>out of Israel last week published in the New England

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Journal of Medicine. We've known that that that two doses

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Visor vaccine and likely the Madarina vaccine as well,

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 1>can uh can stop symptomatic illness and keep you out

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of the hospital or the intensive care unit. Reduction, But

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the data from Israel shows a reduction also an asymptomatic transmission,

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>meaning people who become PCR positive. So that's a game changer.

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>It means that you can enough people get vaccinated, and

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.239
<v Speaker 1>if the other vaccines have a similar performance, which I

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>think they will, it means that we can halt transmission,

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and that means that we can vaccinate our way out

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of this epidemic. In the United States. It means uh,

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 1>get I don't know that things will go completely back

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to normal, but I would have a much more optimistic outlook,

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe even mass coming off later in the summer fall.

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>So a lot to look forward to it now. It's

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>not the time to screw it up by relaxing measures.

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>You don't want people losing their lives before all the

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>good things to come. And I guess that Dr Hotels

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to the next pandemic, the post covid era,

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 1>We're still dealing with the different coronavirus is that could

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.239
<v Speaker 1>be out there, and frankly, based on some estimates, it's

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of amazing. We haven't had a pandemic like this

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 1>until now. Do we feel prepared to deal with it

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in a better way than we deal dealt with this one,

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>which by many accounts really could have been handled a

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 1>lot better. Yeah, you know, with one of the things

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that I always point out that things have gotten better

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>with each pandemic, we do learn something. After Stars in

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>two thousand three, we put an International Health Regulations i

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>h R two thousand five after H one and one

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the Global Health Security Agenda, and stepped up influenza surveillance.

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>After after Ebola and Zeke at Davos, to successive Davos meetings,

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation SEPPI was launched. So

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>each time we do learn something, we make incremental advances.

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>This one, I think we'll have more far reaching effects

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>because of how it's devastated that the economy globally and

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>how it's become a global security issue. Dr Hotez, As

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's always a kink in the smooth curves.

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 1>If you take the wonderful smooth curve of the vaccinations

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>success of people like you, it's a curve down through

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the years, where is the kink for you, or we

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>can say all clear. Is it it fifty years old?

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Is it forty eight years old? Do you have in

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>your head forty two years old? Where is that tipping

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>point as we moved to young adults, Well, and there's

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>no Well, it's it's really a gradual, uh, gradual, gradual slope. Um.

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, one of the things we've learned also

0:27:56.480 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is that even younger individuals of comorbid conditions can get

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty serious illness. You know. The thing that worries me

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the most, quite quite honestly, is I think the US

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is other than the spring, which is going to be rough.

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the US is going to manage its way.

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll probably see a third immunization with the Fiser and

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Madarina vaccine, maybe tailored to the variants, maybe a second

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>dose of the Johnson and Johnson vaccine. Don't be surprised

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>if you see that happening. The thing I'm worried about

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 1>is other parts of the world. Africa is scaring me

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 1>right now because you have that's what's called the South

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>African variant to be one three five one. Now it's

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>accelerating into Malawi and Mozambique and into Tanzania, and we

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot to offer. Those two mRNA vaccines

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>are still pretty fussy in their ability to scale up

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>production in the freezer chain requirements. I don't think they're

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>going to have a big role in helping Africa. The

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>astra Zenica vaccine is a good vaccine for the UK variant,

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it's not working against the South African variant.

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>The murk is out, so when you know, go down

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the list. We don't have a lot to offer the

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>freaking continent. We're trying to scale up aggressively our recombinant

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>protein vaccine, but I'm really worried about the destabilization of

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Africa right now. I told that you have touched on

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the issue I think, and we appreciate your time and

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>let's continue the conversation in the ways to come. Dontor

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Peter hot that's that Dan of the National School of

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Tropical Medicine Bailor College of Medicine. This is the Bloomberg

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays from

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern. I'm Bloomberg Radio and on

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Television each day from six to nine am for

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud,

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on the terminal. I'm

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg.