WEBVTT - What Is AI Slop Doing to Us?

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Science Stuff, a production of iHeartRadio. I'm

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>horehit Champ, and today we're talking about artificial intelligence, or AI,

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and specifically images and videos made by AI, which some

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>people call AI slop, and how it affects us, our brains,

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>our society, and our sense of reality. We're going to

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>be talking to an AI expert about this, a neuroscientist,

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and somebody who's looked into the dangers of AI generated

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>pictures of cute, fuzzy animals. Yeah, you think they're perfectly safe,

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>but they're not. So ask chat GPT to clear your schedule,

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>claude your way to our show and mid journey with

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>us as we answer the question what is AI slop

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>doing to us? Enjoy? Hey? Everyone, So you've probably noticed

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that AI is everywhere, and you've probably seen and heard

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>images and videos made by AI programs in your social

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>media feed, online, and even on TV, sometimes without knowing

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it was made by AI. And this trend has exploded

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in just the last few years. So I was curious

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to know two things. First, what happened a few years

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>ago that led to this sudden explosion of AI content

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and apps and services. Do we suddenly discover a magical

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>algorithm or alien artifact that suddenly gives machines this much power.

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And second, I wanted to know what effect all this

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>fake AI made content has on our brains and how

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>we see the world. So we'll answer both questions, and

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll start with the first. What happened a few years

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>ago that started this recent explosion in AI? And is

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>there a limit to it? To answer these questions, I

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>reached out to this guy I met at lunch the

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>other day, who I'm pretty sure is human. Well, thank

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you doctor Tam for joining us.

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you JORGEV for having me. So my name is

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 2>doctor ed Tam. I am a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford University.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>A lot of my work concerns the uncertainty around AI

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 2>and what are the limitations of AI and how we

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 2>can potentially overcome those.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And how can I make sure you're real and not

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>an AI.

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, we've met in person, so you know that.

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I met someone who looks like you a role I know,

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>although it was over at lunch.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 2>So yes, a robot that can eat and joke and drink.

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, doctor ed Tam is going to tell me what

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>happened a few years ago that made AI swimmingly explode

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in what it's able to do. But to do that,

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>we have to go back to where it all started,

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>which is when scientists had the idea for AI in

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the first place.

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 2>It goes back to like the last century at least.

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 3>So the idea is that the human brain is composed

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 3>of cells that are called neurons, and these neurons connect

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 3>with each other and these different productivity patterns in the

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 3>brain gives us the rich functionality of the human brain.

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 3>So back in the nineteen hundred, scientists we're thinking, can

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 3>we somehow mimic the biological human neural network with a computer,

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 3>And so there are some early models that kind of

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 3>try to tries to do this. One of the earliest

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 3>and famous one is called the perceptron, and it's just

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 3>this kind of like three layer no network with some

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 3>nonlinear function and coded. So that was kind of like

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 3>the first model, but it was already kind of like

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 3>a mini breakthrough.

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a transformer like the toys.

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh yes, yes, megatron.

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why they call it the perceptron.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So, starting in the nineteen forties, scientists and engineers had

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>an idea of how the human brain worked. It was

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a humongous network of neurons connected to each other, and

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>so the scientists and engineers wondered if we could make

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>an artificial brain. So they programmed on a computer how

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a neuron reacts. It takes signals from other neurons, weighs

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>each input depending on some numbers or parameters, and then

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>if it all adds up to a certain amount, it

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>fires off a single signal to other neurons. And at

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>first these networks with layers of neurons were pretty simple,

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but amazingly they could easily recognize patterns, meaning like recognize

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers or images kind.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Of that's exactly right, like telling apart of human digits,

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 3>can you tell a part a cat from a dog.

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 3>There are all these image benchmark data sets that people

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 3>work on, and then it turns out when you stack

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 3>them on top of each other, it can encode really

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 3>really rich patterns.

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So things progress somewhat slowly. Over the next few decades,

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>people started to make bigger and bigger networks of these

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>artificial neurons. Instead of a few neurons, it started to

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>become dozens, and then hundreds, and then thousands of these

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>neurons and dozens of these layers, and it was pretty powerful.

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>You could give the machine a whole bunch of images

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of dogs and they could learn to recognize dogs. You

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>could give it a whole bunch of human fingerprints or faces,

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and they could recognize fingerprints and faces.

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 3>So that was maybe in like the twenty tens or

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 3>something like that. When you go on Facebook, you know how,

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 3>if you post a picture on Facebook, it actually tags

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 3>your face and it tags the faces of your friends,

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 3>and I remember that being like magic.

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 2>I was like, wow, like it recognizes me.

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 3>And that's the type of AI back then ten years

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 3>ago that can do that.

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So ten years ago, AIS were really good at recognizing things,

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>but that's kind of all they could do. They couldn't

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 1>make anything up or talk to you or write anything

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for you. They were smart, but they were passive. But

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.040
<v Speaker 1>then in twenty seventeen, some engineers at Google discovered a

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>special way to make these networks of neurons that changed everything.

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And it kind of started when they said, you know what,

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should stop trying to copy the human brain.

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 3>So at the very beginning, people try to come up

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 3>with very simple computer models, like the perceptron that tries

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 3>to mimic the human brain, and then gradually this neural

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 3>network or deep learning morphed into something completely different that

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 3>is no longer trying to mimic the human brain.

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can imagine that if the History of the

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Human Race was a movie, this might be the part

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>of the movie that foreshadows that it's not gonna end. Well,

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>what the engineers at Google had invented was something called

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 1>the transformer. In this case, it's not related to the

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>robot toys.

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 2>It is not related to the robot toys at all.

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I guess I've been in the AI.

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 3>World for so long that transformers used to me in

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 3>the movie and me Tron and all that souff now

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 3>means something completely different to me.

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>They reprogrammed your brain.

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>They reprogrammed my brain. Yeah, okay.

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>What this transformer way of connecting neural networks that the

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Google engineers invented in twenty seventeen does is that it

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>uses an old ticnique from language translation called attention. And

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>basically what it means is that when an AI is learning, say,

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a piece of text from a book, it doesn't just

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>learn what each word means. It learns the context of

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the word. For each word, it sort of learns what

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>word it usually has after it and before it, and

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it also learns what word it usually has two words

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>after it and two words before it, and so on

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and so on. Let's here's an example. So like the

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>word sit from sitting, usually it comes a few words

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>before chair or sofa.

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Right right right, So I sit on a sofa. I

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 3>sit on a sofa is very logical, very sensible. The

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 3>key work that is important in terms of me understanding

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 3>what sofa means is the I in the sentence. So

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 3>it's not a dog sitting on the sofa, it's not

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 3>cat sitting on the sofa, it's I that is sitting

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 3>on the sofa. And so the attention mechanism allows you

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 3>to kind of learn that type of correlation. And there

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 3>are technical details about position encodings, but the main thing

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 3>is just you want to learn the meaning of a

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>word in the context of the words that surround it.

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>This sort of simple and kind of common sense sounding

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>trick is basically what revolutionized AI. You can apply it

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to text, images, music videos, and it's what makes chat GPT, Gemini, Grock,

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>mid Journey, Claude, Nano, Banana, Copilot and all those AI

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>agents out there work. And that's because using this transformer

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>architecture and paying attention to the context of the data

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>clout AIS to teach themselves.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it's called self supervised learning.

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh that sounds scary.

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah. So traditional machine learning or AI systems, they

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 2>rely on supervised learning, which means that a human has

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 2>to tell you what is right or what is wrong. Now,

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 2>while that's great, it's not very scalable because a human

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 2>can only tell you what's right or wrong for a

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 2>thousand things or two thousand things or whatnot. You can't

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 2>scale it to a billion things. Whereas with this self

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 2>supervised paradigm, you don't need human supervision. You just need

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 2>some large purposes of unstructured data, and then the machine

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 2>teaches itself just by predicting what the next token is

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 2>and seeing whether that matches reality in terms of the

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 2>real data.

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>What doctor Tam saying is that this new type of

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>AI could teach itself by predicting what the next word

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>or part of an image should be according to its

0:09:55.559 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>context and then checking with the real thing. And do

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>ability of AIS to learn contexts and teach themselves, combined

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 1>with big companies putting billions of dollars into huge computer

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>farms meant that you could suddenly have ais teach themselves

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the entire Internet.

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 3>So the idea is that very surprising things happen when

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 3>you scale something to really really make sizes. They perform

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 3>way way better in terms of producing realistic samples and texts.

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 3>So there is some type of phase transition in terms

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 3>of how intelligent or how realistic the samples that it

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 3>generates will look like something.

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Click. It suddenly activated some potential in these systems that

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>experts were not expecting. Right. So t wecap ais were

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.719
<v Speaker 1>originally meant to copy the human brain, and they were

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>really good at just recognizing things patterns, faces, numbers. But

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>then some engineers at Google decided, you know what, let's

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>forget the human brain and just push this through the limit.

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>And what they came up with created ais they could

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>understand context, and more importantly, they could teach themselves. And

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>once that happened, they scaled up, gubbled up the Internet

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and made a leap that's making a lot of people,

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>uh concerned right now. So when we come back, we're

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about how these new ais can affect

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>your brain, and how they could even make endangered species

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of animals go to think, don't go anywhere, We'll be

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>right back. Hey, welcome back. We're talking about AI slop

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>or AI made images and videos that are swamping the

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Internet right now, and what effect it's having on us

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>so far. Talking about what happened in twenty seventeen that

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>suddenly made these AI systems be able to talk to

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you and make the kind of realistic images everyone sees

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in their social media feeds. Now we're gonna talk about

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the effect it's having on our brains. Is it possible

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for AI generated content to rewire how we think? To

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 1>tell us about that, I reached out to my friend,

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>neuroscientist Dwayne Godwin, a professor at Wake Forest University and

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the co author of the book Out of Your Mind,

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>which he co wrote with me. Doctor Godwin recently wrote

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>an article about this topic online, so I thought he

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>was the perfect person to give us the neural perspective

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>on this topic. Here's my conversation with doctor Dwayne Godwin. Hey, Dwayne,

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>how are you?

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm doing well? Orgey, how are you?

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm good? Now? Just to make sure this is the

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>real you, right, I'm not talking to an AI version

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of you.

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 4>No, I AMZ I'm the real deal man.

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 1>And is there an intelligence artificial or is organic?

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 4>It's augmented by caffeine.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Augmented intelligence? There you go. Well, I wonder if there's

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a way for people to know if this conversation is

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>generated by one of those you know, chat GBT things

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that mix podcasts.

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, if we were really sneaky, we might have

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 4>generated an AI podcast of the two of us going

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 4>back and forth and then tested our audience in their

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 4>ability to tell the difference. But we're not that sneaky.

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, this is.

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 4>The real thing.

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get into it. I guess the first

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>question I had was how good are we at telling

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is something is AI generated?

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 4>We're not very good. People tend to overestimate their AI radar.

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 4>A lot of obvious tells, like you know, extra fingers,

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 4>robotic phrasing, those are getting all smoothed out. And we're

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 4>looking at these things often on very tiny screens, and

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 4>so what's plausible quickly becomes good enough or believable wow,

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 4>And the result of that is there's kind of a

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 4>confidence gap. We feel very certain that we can tell

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 4>fake stuff when we see it, but often we're not

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 4>doing much better than chance.

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Are there any studies that kind of tell us how

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>good we are at spotting fake ais?

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there have been studies that have been done. There

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 4>was a study where people are essentially two groups. They're

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 4>presented with both real images and AI generated images, and

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 4>it turns out that they're about fifty percent you know,

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 4>it's like fifty to fifty that they can tell the difference.

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Basically, they can't tell the difference.

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so they're really about at the level of chance.

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Yikes. Okay, and this was probably done a few couple

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, right.

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's right, And so things are only better now.

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 4>So you can imagine that right now, with the quality

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 4>of generative AI, that this is even going to be

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 4>more true.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, we all like to think we're good at spotting

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>fake images or videos. I mean, we've all seen bad

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>computer graphic effects movies, so we think we know what

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>fake looks like. But actually the sign says that we

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>are not much better than guessing randomly if something is

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>fake or not. And according to doctor Godwin, there are

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>three reasons our brains are kind of helpless against this

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>onslaught of fake content coming at us on a daily basis.

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>The first reason is that your brain sort of wants

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to believe things are real. I guess, as a neuroscientists

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and as a psychologist, why do you think our brains

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>are so easy to fool?

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, a couple of reasons. You know, our brains are

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 4>built for speed and survival and not for fact checking.

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Right, And I guess that means out in the wild,

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>if you think you see a bear or a tiger

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>coming at you, your brain is not going to have

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted like fact check that there really is a tiger

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>coming at you. You want your brain to just react

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to the idea that maybe there's a tiger coming at you.

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that's sedaptive. You're going to go with bear if

0:15:57.720 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 4>it looks anything.

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Good. Because I guess we don't have all information all

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the time, so our brains are sort of have trained to, like,

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>do as much as you can with as little information

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>as possible.

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's a concept in psychology called heuristics, which is

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 4>basically making decisions on the basis of very limited information,

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 4>and our brains are doing that constantly, so you know,

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 4>we have to make those very quick decisions, so we

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 4>can pass our genes onto the next generation.

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I see, and so you can exploit that. I guess

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>because we see something that sort of looks real, your

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>mind will basically make the conclusion that it is real.

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it will create the story that it is real.

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 4>You know, what is the purpose of our brains. Our

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 4>brains are prediction machines, and so we've learned certain facts

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 4>about the world, about how things normally go. So if

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 4>you're in the woods and you encounter something it seems

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 4>like a bear, your brain already knows that that's probably

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 4>not a great thing, and so you're going to extrapolate

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 4>that story and you're going to want to avoid that

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 4>bear as much as possible, right.

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess we kind of had a natural mechanism against that,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>which was this idea of the Uncanny Valley.

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm familiar with the Uncanny Valley. It's that sort

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 4>of eerie feeling that you get when you see something

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 4>that's trying to be real but it's not real. It

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 4>makes me uncomfortable because I know that it's not supposed

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 4>to look like that exactly.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So, like we did have a brain mechanism to

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>defense against fake things. Right, But it seems like AI

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>today has basically blown past that defense, like it's now

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>past the uncanny valley.

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it has jumped across the uncanny valley for sure.

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>In other words, our brain has a built in BS

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.479
<v Speaker 1>meter called the uncanny valley. But now AI content is

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so good it's blown past that last line of defense

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>or your brain. Okay. The second reason our brains are

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>easy to fool by AI generated content is that it's

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>not built to withstand the constant stream of it we

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>get every day. The second thing you said was repetition.

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's right. So your resistance is being reduced in

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 4>two ways. So first is just the repetition of seeing

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 4>the same thing over and over.

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Meaning like, if I'm scrolling through these online feeds and

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>most of what I see has that sort of feeling

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.959
<v Speaker 1>of an AI generated thing, then my brain is just

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna normalize it. Is that kind of what you're saying, Like,

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it's yeah, it is.

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 4>There's another more insidious part of that, which is, let's

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 4>use the you know, the cute animal AI generated cute

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 4>animal videos you'll see in the comments underneath those people

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 4>reacting to it as if it's real, and so part

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 4>of that is, Hey, everybody else thinks it's real, and

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 4>I'm a person too, shouldn't I be thinking that this

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 4>is real? And so there's this sort of desire on

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 4>the part of people to reach a consensus with your group,

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 4>and so if you start identifying with that group, then

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 4>your brain might be bent toward making a decision that, hey,

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 4>maybe this is real, even if you might have had

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 4>initial doubts. Yeah, maybe you start to fall into line.

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Like we all like to think we're independent thinkers and

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 1>critical thinkers, but part of our brain is sort of

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>wired to kind of basically follow the mob.

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, a little bit of mob mentality. Yeah, we like

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 4>to think of ourselves as logical beings, but the reality

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 4>is we're all challenged by biases, and those biases can

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 4>be very adaptive in the case of things like heuristics.

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>And then the third reason our brains are easy targets

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>for AI slob is that a lot of that SLOB

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is made to play with our emotions. And then you

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>said the third one was that we tend to believe

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>things that kind of affect our emotions.

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that's probably one of the most insidious things, is

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 4>that things that ring our emotional bell tend to make

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:56.479
<v Speaker 4>it through without the kind of critical thought processing that

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 4>we would normally apply to something that's just factual or techation.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 4>So think about politics. Politics is very polarizing. So if

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 4>you see something in your social media feed and it

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 4>confirms what your emotions tell you should be true based

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 4>on your political leanings, then that we'll get through the

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 4>normal cognitive criticism that you would apply to that information.

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Yikes, Like, we let our emotions get in the way

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 1>of our critical thinking, so our brains are ill equipped

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to deal with all this AI slot because it tends

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to believe what it sees. We're inundated with this content

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's all meant to trigger our emotions and things

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>doctor Godwin says are just getting worse.

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 4>They're getting worse because it's getting better. There's a lot

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 4>of money being put into making these things basically indistinguishable

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 4>from reality, and we were already suffering under the idea

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 4>that we could possibly tell the difference, but it's becoming

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 4>a parent that we cannot, and it's going to be

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 4>even harder.

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>It kind of seems like it's also getting worse because

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems like people are more willing to post fake

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>AI generated things, like just the other day, the White

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>House official account posted some AI altered image of some

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>activist protester, and they were totally unapologetic about it.

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the tools are more readily available, and your ability

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 4>to manipulate those tools doesn't even require that you have

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 4>any sort of computer science degree.

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's just an app on your phone.

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. This stuff is scalable too, So it's not just

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 4>that a person can go in and do like a

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 4>one off. A single person could generate a lot of

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 4>this content and get it out there, and even use

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 4>AI to generate bots that would distribute that content for you.

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 4>So it's only going to get worse, I think.

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's not looking so good for us organic and

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>they naturally made squishy intelligences out here. But according to

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>doctor Godwin, there are some things you can do to

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>protect your neurons. What can we do to protect our

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>brains from the defect of this AI slut?

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's hard. I wish I had an easy answer,

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 4>because what I've told you so far it's pretty hopeless. Right,

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 4>it sounds hopeless.

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I should look it up and chat GBT.

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 4>But I think there are things that we can do,

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 4>and part of it is just slowing down. The thing

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 4>we can't do is there's no way we're going to

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:39.239
<v Speaker 4>become a forensic AI detector. So what we have to

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 4>do is really add some friction, build some simple verification habits,

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 4>and try to shrink our exposure to this fire hose

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 4>of bad stuff. I think a good rule is if

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 4>it hits you emotionally in the first two seconds, then

0:22:56.040 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 4>just pause and then just ask the question, Okay, made this,

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 4>where did it come from? And can I confirm that

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 4>this is real? Somewhere boring and reputable.

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I see, look for sources that you can trust, and

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe shift your consumption from the wild west of social

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>media to some of these sources that you trust more

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and that are known to give you objective truth.

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 4>That's right. So if something seems to perfectly confirm your

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 4>own biases, that's the time to tell yourself, you know,

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 4>I need to dig a little deeper before I accept this.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I see, check other websites, maybe even the ones that

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>you don't agree with.

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 4>That's right. Part of it is if it's real, then

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 4>it should exist somewhere other than your social media feed.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 4>And I think the other part of this is there

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 4>is an algorithm that is trying to cater information to you.

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 4>It's called a social media feed for a reason, because

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 4>it's being fed to you.

0:23:56.080 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, I see, ye realize that it's a feed.

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 4>So you have a choice. In x dot com, for example,

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 4>it'll have a curated feed, and then it'll have a

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 4>feed of people that you follow, and I always turn

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 4>off the curated feed and only go for the accounts

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.719
<v Speaker 4>that I have actually chosen to follow.

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well that's a good one. Well, hopefully people will listen.

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But here's the twist, ending, Dwayne, this was AI generated. Yes, No,

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we're just kidding. No, we actually had this conversation. How

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>can we prove it? Dwayne, say something that an AI

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>would never say?

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 4>What an AI would never say? Never listen to an AI?

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, let me come back. We're going to talk

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>about another way in which AI slob is affecting us,

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>one that is kind of unexpected. That is through the

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>insidious use of pictures of cute animals. You think they're harmless,

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>but actually they could lead to a lot of death

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and destruction. So stay with us. We'll be right back.

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. I am not an AI or am I

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the effects AI slop or AI generated

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>content has on us. And so far we learn how

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 1>AI slop works and why it's so easy for our

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>brains to believe it's real. Now we're going to explore

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>how we can affect our actions by focusing on one

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>specific example, which is pictures and videos of cute animals.

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>You've probably seen this in your social media feed. Some

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>cute little hummingbirds taking shelter inside a flower, or a

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>cute kitten plucking gummy bears off a gummy bear tree,

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>or a cow scratching itself with the room. Actually one

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of those is real, but the fact that you don't

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>know which of them it is is kind of the

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>whole problem, and, according to the next person I talked to,

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>can kind of be a serious problem with potentially dire consequences.

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Ketterina Zimmer is a science journalist who writes about biology

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and the environment, and she recently published an article about

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>aislop in Atmos magazine. Well, thank you, Katrina for joining us.

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 5>Thanks so much for having me.

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, how can I be sure that you're real and

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 1>not AI generated?

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 5>That's a good question. I guess you'll have to trust

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 5>me on this.

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 2>One.

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, Well, you've written a lot about the impact

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of AI and AI generated images on us, but from

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a different angle, So tell us about the article that

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you wrote.

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 6>Yes, the story began sometime last year when I started

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 6>seeing this wave of AI generated images of animals on Instagram,

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 6>which is my poison and of social media use.

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 5>And so for context, I'm a big animal lover and.

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 6>I write journalistic articles about nature and wildlife for living,

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 6>So my algorithms know that and they show me a

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 6>lot of animal content.

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 5>But these AI generated images started to.

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 6>Worry me a bit because they were usually very captivating,

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 6>often very beautiful images, but they're not real and I

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 6>guess I could only tell that they were AI generated

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 6>because they were depicting animals doing things that they usually don't,

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 6>or moving not quite the way you'd expect, or sometimes

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 6>they had this like glossy photoshop sheen to them that's

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 6>characteristic of some AI imagery.

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 5>And what alarmed me.

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 6>Was that a lot of people, judging by the comments

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 6>sections on some of these posts, didn't seem to know

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 6>that they were a fake because they look so realistic.

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Wow, what would they say? So?

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 6>One example is an I generated video of a pair

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 6>of hummingbirds sheltering from the rain inside a rose. I

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 6>asked an ornithologist about this. Hummingbirds do not do that,

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 6>and people are still commenting things like oh, how cute lovebirds,

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 6>how adorable, and it's got three point one million likes.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Wow, So millions of people were believing that these were

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>real hummingbirds.

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, And as a truth abiding journalist, I felt it

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 6>was important to call this out for what it is,

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 6>misinformation and also explore what impact does it have when

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 6>you have millions of people believing this kind of imagery

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 6>is real? How could this affect our perceptions of nature?

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Amazing? What are some other examples of PI generated images

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of animals you've seen out there?

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so there are different genres of this kind of imagery.

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 5>So birds in beautiful settings.

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 6>I've seen a lot of videos showing animals like bears

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 6>or sometimes seals being rescued from the ocean. They're also

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 6>AI concoctions of animals that don't exist, like there are

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 6>some like tadpole type creatures with big googly eyes that

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 6>I saw going viral as well. And there are also

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 6>a lot of videos showing like eagles or lions attacking

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 6>children or dogs, that kind of thing.

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think people make these images and videos?

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think there's a lot of motivations that feed

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 6>into this. The most obvious one is just wanting more likes, clicks, followers,

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 6>which is of course like the currency of status for

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 6>social media.

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>People just want to get popular on social media.

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 6>I think so in some cases, they're also financial incentives,

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 6>so social media platforms like TikTok will actually pay creators

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 6>for videos that go viral. I had a conversation with

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 6>one cre who makes AI generated videos, and he had

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 6>a motivation that really surprised me. For him, part of

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 6>the fun is deliberately testing whether people can recognize these

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 6>as fake. So he'll often make his videos to look

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 6>like they were shot from an iPhone, like there is

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 6>one showing a giraffe walking through a mall in Dubai.

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Now you wrote a little bit about why we're vulnerable

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to these images, like why are we prone to believe

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>these fake animals?

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think a lot of the spoils down to

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 6>our growing lack of knowledge about animals among many societies today.

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 6>So a lot of us are living in cities, We're

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 6>being less exposed in nature. I think we're losing touch

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 6>on a large scale, and I mean a lot of us,

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 6>including me, I should say, struggle to identify species of

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 6>plants and animals around us. There is one study of

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 6>students at Oxford University that showed that half of them

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 6>couldn't five British bird species. If I recall correctly, those

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 6>were actually biology students.

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 5>And I think we're.

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 6>Especially susceptible to biology related misinformation in particular because, I mean,

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 6>scientists are always discovering new species and new behaviors. Just

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 6>the other week, there's that story about Veronica, this Austrian

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 6>cow who used a broom to scratch herself that was

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 6>not AI generated because that information came from reputable news outlets.

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>For a second, I thought you were mentioning something that

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>was not real.

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 5>No, No, I'm pretty sure that was real.

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>This was a cow that grabbed a broom and scratched

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>itself with it.

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, she had figured out to use a broom to

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 6>scratch herself in particular ways, and I think it was

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 6>described as the first case of tool use in cows

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 6>by scientists.

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Bonus points. Do you if you correctly guessed the cows

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>scratching itself with a broom is the real image and

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>not AI generated. It's true, look it up on a

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>real new site. Okay, now let's get to how these

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>AI made images can affect us. And then in the

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>article you wrote about how this can affect how we

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>relate to animals, what did you learn.

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so a lot of these impacts are just unfolding

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 6>at the moment, so we don't have concrete data on this.

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 6>But the experts I spoke to had a few concerns.

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 6>One of them is that as we see more images

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 6>of a certain animal, that can make us more likely

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 6>to believe that that animal is in fact more abundant

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 6>in the real world. So there's some interesting research showing

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 6>that seeing images of endangered lions or giraffes can cause

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 6>us to overestimate their abundance in the wild. And I

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 6>don't know the exact numbers, but I think there's only

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 6>like a little over one hundred and ten thousand wild

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 6>giraffes in the world, and only a little more than

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 6>twenty thousand lions. But a lot of people don't know

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.239
<v Speaker 6>that because we see these animals all the time in

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:13.959
<v Speaker 6>travel commercials or children's toys cartoons, and so some of

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 6>the AI generated videos of birds that I've seen featured

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 6>birds of paradise, many of which are threatened by habitat loss.

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 6>So I think seeing these images a lot can cause

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 6>us to believe they're actually quite abundant and make us

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 6>blind to the conservation crisis these creatures are in.

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I see.

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's one way, hey, I slap can change our

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>view of animals. It can distort how abundant or how

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>safe from extinction they are. It can also distort our

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>view of how safe or dangerous so animals are.

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 6>And there are some other concerns and more related to

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 6>specific kinds of videos. So one expert mentioned that seeing

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 6>human like depictions of animals like polar bears could lead

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 6>us to believe that they're cute, fluffy, and approachable creatures,

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 6>and that kind of information could lead people to seek

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 6>out encounters with those animals in the wild. There actually

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 6>are cases of people in the US going out to

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:27.280
<v Speaker 6>try and pet mountain lions and bears and unfortunately ending

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 6>they end up getting moulled.

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you trying to tell me that polar bears don't

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>really drink Coca cola and wear scars?

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 5>I'm afraid not. Sorry to bust that myth.

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Say she didn't go up to a polar bear with

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>us pop drink.

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.919
<v Speaker 5>Definitely not. You should never approach a polar bear.

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Yes, fake images can make some animals seem safer than

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they really are, and you can also have the opposite effect.

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>You can make some animals seem more dangerous than they

0:34:57.640 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>really are.

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 6>There are a lot of videos showing animals like eagles

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 6>or lions attacking humans or dots, which could make people

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 6>more likely to support the culling of those animals or

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 6>less likely to support their conservation.

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Kindarina says. Another big genre of AI generated images or

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>videos are those of exotic or endangered animals walking around

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in people's houses.

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 6>Seeing a lot of AI generated imagery also features exotic

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 6>animals being.

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 5>Kept as pets, such as Kappi virus.

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 6>Seeing that kind of imagery could make people more likely

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.439
<v Speaker 6>to want to have them as pets and potentially even

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 6>fuel the capture of these animals in the wild.

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>But one of the worst consequences of all this AI slob,

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Katerina argues, is that it makes us doubt what's actually real.

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 6>I want to add the big impact that worries me

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 6>personally is that as people begin to cotton on that

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 6>a lot of this imagery isn't real, they might start

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 6>to dismiss wildlife imagery altogether. So you could have photographers

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 6>spending years trying to get a significant image of a

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 6>bird doing something interesting, only to have people on social

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 6>media say, oh, that's fake news. I'm not going to

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 6>care about that. And the same thing could happen with

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 6>scientists who discover new species or new behaviors. And I

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 6>think that's really what worries me the most is that

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 6>it could further alienate us from the natural.

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>World because we don't know what to believe anymore, and

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>so therefore we will tend to not care about.

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 5>It, right exactly.

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, And I think that's really sad because this is

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 6>a time when species really need our attention. So twenty

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 6>eight percent of plant and animal species that have been

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 6>studied are in some way threatened with extinction, so basically

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 6>a third. And to me, I think that's the saddest

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 6>thing about this is that not only are we not

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:15.280
<v Speaker 6>paying attention to these real threats that animals are facing,

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 6>but that we're instead looking at these fake images of

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 6>them on our phones that don't reflect reality. It's like

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 6>the world's on fire and we're looking at these hummingbirds

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 6>and roses and going, oh, how cute. That's wonderful, and

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 6>there are actually some hummingbird species that are in need

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 6>of conservation attention.

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Meaning that it's sort of detaching, is further from reality,

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and the reality could be kind of bad out there. Yeah, exactly,

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 1>like the world's on fire and people are looking at

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the pictures of the fire and going, oh, that's ais.

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, exactly, all right.

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, hopefully that gives you a pretty sense of why

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>these AI generated images are so powerful all of a sudden,

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>why our brain is so easily fooled by them, and

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>how even pictures and videos of cute animals can impact

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>our sense of reality. Some of you might be wondering, well,

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 1>what can we do about this, and the answer is

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>not that complicated. According to our experts. You should a

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>not believe everything you see on the Internet or your

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>social media feed and look for reliable and reputable sources. B.

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 1>You should keep pushing companies to do a better job

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of labeling AI generated content, and c lobby your elected

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:42.240
<v Speaker 1>officials to put in place more rules and regulations around

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. But most definitely you should listen to this

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast every week. Wait did I say that or did

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>AI say that? Either way, if you're hearing this and

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>you're human, thanks for joining us. See you next time

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you've been listening to Science Stuff. The production of iHeartRadio

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>written and produced by me or hych Ham, credited by

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Rose Seguda, executive producer Jerry Rowland, and audio engineer and

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:17.320
<v Speaker 1>mixer Kasey Pegram and you can follow me on social media.

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Just search for PhD Comics and the name of your

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite platform. Be sure to subscribe to Science Stuff on

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts,

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and please tell your friends we'll be back next Wednesday

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>with another episode.