WEBVTT - Guest Host: Lisa Boothe Commands 'The Freedom Hut'

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, American ring,

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>You're a great American Again the Buck Sexton Show begins,

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Remember the Sexton. No, I really can't stay. Maybe it's

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>cold outside. I've got to go away. Maybe it's cold outside.

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>This evening has been hoping that you drop very nice.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll hold your hands. They're just like my mother will

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>start too worryful. What's your father? Will be pacing the

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>flow to the fireplace. So really i'd better skirt, please,

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>don't well, maybe just a half a drink. Baby it's

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>bad out this So I love that song. And this

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is Lisa Booth with the Buck Sexton Show. I'm filling

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in for him tonight. Obviously I don't sound like him,

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>which is probably a good thing because that would be weird.

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>But all right, So I am really fired up about

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>this right now. So we've got radio stations in Cleveland

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and San Francisco that have banned this beautiful song, Baby

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>It's Cold Outside, a Christmas classic goes back to nineteen

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>forty four. They have banned this song and one of

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the hosts of the radio one of the radio stations

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.839
<v Speaker 1>that banned it, Glenn Anderson, had this to say. He said,

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the world we live in is extra sensitive now. People

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>get easily offended. But in a world where me too

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>has finally given woman the voice they deserve, this song

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>has no place. But isn't that kind of the problem.

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>One that the world has gotten that sensitive that a

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>song from nineteen forty four somehow a problem. But also

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>they need to movement and how far it's gone that

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the lyrics of the song somehow imply you know something nefarious.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And what really drives me insane is I really think

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it sort of puts the viewpoint of the left in perspective.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>One from the censorship standpoint, they don't like something, they

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>shut it down. But two that somehow women are victims.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>And you look at the words of this song. And

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the woman in the song decides to stay. So who

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.119
<v Speaker 1>cares if she's asked three four times to stay? It's

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>her choice. She has agency. If she wanted to leave,

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>she could have left. She decided to stay. She decided

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to have another drink. And according to the song, it

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>was cold outside, wouldn't you want to stay? Inside and

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>have another drink, particularly if you're hanging out with someone

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>you like and someone you're having fun with. So how

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous is it to imply somehow, because she's asked a

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of times, that you know, she can't make their

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>own decision, and to stay that she's a victim. It

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>paints her as weak and that drives me insane as

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a woman. But it really is the same approach that

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the Left applies to a lot of things, even for

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the equal pay argument from the left. Essentially, what they're

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>implying is that women need a government mandate or government

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>intervention to get paid more, And how ridiculous that. And

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>even if you look at studies, they don't even break

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that down. Most often the breakdown and pay comes from

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>decisions that a woman makes, either time in office or

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>choosing less lucrative careers. But it just really irks me

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that the left beliefs somehow that a woman can't do

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it on their own and that they need a government intervention.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And another aspect of this that I find, you know,

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>really just scary and terrifying is sort of for the

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>relationships between men and women. There was also this Princeton

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>A capella group that decided to pull the plug on

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the Kiss the Girl from Little Mermaid. Everyone knows that song.

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to sing it because I have a

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>terrible voice. Nobody wants to hear that. But people at

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the university said that they raised concerns over misogyny and

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that it was dismissive of consent. How ridiculous, somehow a

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>song just about kissing a girl is going to trigger people.

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how insane have we gotten? And where has

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>this led us? As well? The Daily Wire recently reported

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>about women and men in relationships having to enter some

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of dating consent agreement and shooting videos regarding consent

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>because men are so terrified about getting caught up in

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>this too movement. And it really concerns me because you

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>look at what the over correctness or the overcorrection we've

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>seen in society about the meed too, and it actually

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>negatively impacts women. You know. Bloomberg interviewed around thirty senior

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>executives on Wall Street and they actually found that men

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>are walking on eggshells because they're so terrified of getting

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>caught up in they need too movement that they don't

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>even want to be around women. And I found this

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting because Karen Olinsky, a president of the Financial Women's

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Association and a senior vice president at Wells Fargo, said

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the falling. She said that women are grasping for ideas

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and how to deal with it because it's affecting their

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>careers and it's a real loss. So essentially what has

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>happened is because of the me too movement and this

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>overcorrected overcorrection and the societ that we've seen, women are

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>actually worse off and men are terrified to be a

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>round woman. And can you blame them? I mean, you

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>look at what happened to Supreme Court Justice Brett Cavanaugh

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and the railroading of him over baseless allegations from people

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>like Christine Ford, where we've seen numerous inconsistencies with her stories.

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>We saw lies about flying, lies about the second exited house.

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can you blame men for being terrified of

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>living in this society? I remember a while back, there's

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a woman named Emily Lindon, I believe it's her name

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>from teen Vogue, and she said that it doesn't at

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>all concern her if innocent men's lose their jobs over

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>false accusations because it's more important to bring down the patriarchy.

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how terrifying is that that it's okay for

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>an innocent man to get caught up in something that

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do, just to prove a bigger point. That's

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>where we're at, people, And nook no further than what

0:05:56.160 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Senator Mazie Horno also said during the Supreme Court confirmation

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>of Brett Cavanaugh. She said that men should just shut up.

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So men listening, that's what you should do. That's what

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>people on the left, that's what some of these women believe,

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Mazie Rano being one of them, just shut up. And

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Senator Jill Brand also further approved this point. Just this week,

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>she tweeted out that the future is a female, to

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>which Donald Trump Junior rightfully responded. He said, should I

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>tell my boys, ages nine, seven and six that there

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>was no future for them? So, you guys, this is

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the kind of society that we're living in right now.

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, it may just be a banning

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of the song is the way the left views this,

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>But I view it as so much bigger. And these

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>are issues we're facing as a society. The over sensitivity,

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the censorship of the left, and also what the over

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>correction of the me too movement has brought. And we

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>really saw that come to a fruition with the Supreme

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh hearing. And we're going to see

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot more of this. So people, if you were

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>living in these states or in these cities where these

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>radio stations are banning baby it's cold outside, you call

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>them and you tell them that you want them to

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:08.799
<v Speaker 1>play it. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. Lisa

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Booth filling him for him tonight. You might know me

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>from Fox News. I'm on outnumbers sometimes I do a

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>bunch of stuff over there. I've also written some columns

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>for The Hill and for the Washington Examinar, and spent

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>some time on Capitol Hill in campaigns as well. We've

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>got an awesome show for you tonight. We've got National

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Review Andrew McCarthy. We're gonna talk to him about the

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Mueller probe. We're going to talk to Stephen Yates about

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>China and trade. Jesse Kelly, who thinks that Alexandria Acasio

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Cortes should not be underestimated. You're gonna want to stay

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>tuned for that. And we're also going to talk immigration

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>with Center for Immigration Studies Andrew Arthur and also Fares R. J. Hammond.

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>So you're gonna want to stick around for that. It's

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be an awesome show. But first I wanted

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to get your take, you know, on what I had

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>said earlier on in the show about the Me Too

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>movement and the band on the baby It's Cold Outside song.

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So why don't you call in if you're If you're around,

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>we'd love to hear your thoughts. Phone numbers eight four four,

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred buck So tune in, would love to hear

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>what you have to say. And also another person who

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear what they have to say is

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>producer Mike. Mike, how did I do there with that?

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>What did you make of my opening statement there? I

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>thought it was outstanding. When you said you came in,

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you said you wanted to talk about that, I was like, yeah,

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm like that's pretty good because like on the surface,

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I when this debate was going on, it's found it

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>utterly ridiculous. I was just like, here's the left losing

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>their minds again. But like like when you get into

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it and which just happened with Judge Cavanaugh and the

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>environment we live in. It's serious. You know, it's from

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a guy's point of view, like it's not like it

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>used to be. And you have to be cautious about dating.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And when you can take a seventy four year old

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>song and make that out of it, I think it's

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous but scary. Well, and that's what's And look, I'm

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a I'm all for like the Harvey Weinstein's going down,

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know people like that, you know, who are

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>doing terrible things. But you know, I'm not okay with,

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the baseless allegations thirty six years later that

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>are unproven, no corroborating witnesses, no corroborating evidence, and trying

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to bring someone down off of a beer a mirror allegation.

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>That's why it really concerns me because I have three brothers,

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, so I look at this both from

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a female perspective but also someone who has been raised

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in a family with guys, and you know, it's kind

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of terrifying. And I was telling you about the study

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that I found really interesting. And so I'm a senior

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>fellow for this group called Independent Woman's Voice, and her

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>sister's organization is the Independent Woman's Foundation, and so they

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>flagged this study that I found super interesting. All right,

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and so the study's done by Valentine Bolotney. I'm sorry, Valentine,

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I probably butchered your name, so I apologize for that

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>also Natalie Emmanuel. And so essentially what they did is

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>they looked at several years of data with the Massachusetts

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Bay Transportation Authority BUST and train operations, and what they

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>found is that even in a unionized environment, where tasks

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>are similar, allery wages our identical, and tenure dictates promotion,

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that female workers still earned eighty nine cents on the

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>male worker dollar. And the reason they found was because

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of the choices that women make, for instance, and what

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they found that men take forty eight percent fewer unpaid

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>hours off work, eighty nine percent more overtime hours annually,

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and also sign up for seven percent more scheduled overtime,

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>and they take twice as much last minute unscheduled over time.

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>And I found that interesting because even in this really

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>level playing field that you have, you still have women

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>earning less. What that tells me is perhaps there's one

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>on the left that are showing up at these rallies

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>with the pink cats. Maybe they should spend more time

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>not at these rallies and wearing these pink cats, but

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe showing up at work. Yeah, putting in a little

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>bit more time, or making different career decisions in the

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>career fields that they're choosing. I don't know if you

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily have to respond to the I don't want

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to gain in trouble, but yeah, I'm in trouble every

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>day here. But it's all good. But what do you

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>make of that study? I mean, is it as interesting

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>as I find it? Or am I just a nerd here? No?

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>I think if you carried about two of those things

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>could be true at the same time you're on now,

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm good. Yeah, I found it very interesting. And once again,

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I can't believe this actually studies about

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>this now, But it's why it's out there. I think it's,

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, worth paying attention to and worth you know,

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Has anyone called them talk to us yet? Yeah,

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:14.719
<v Speaker 1>we actually have some We have Mark onm Mississippi on

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the line, so he wants to talk about a little

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>bit and we're gonna put them through right now for you. Hey, Mark, Hey,

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>are you doing I'm doing well, how are you doing tonight?

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Good listen, I just wanted to put some infot on

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>when this started. I'm fifty eight year old white male.

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been at a chemical plant for thirty years. And

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.599
<v Speaker 1>the brainwashing classes as I call them, starting back in

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the nineties, and they kept changing the program and starting

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>out and expect respect, matter of respect, women for this,

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>women for that. And we have women that work and

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they actually are making the same amount of money, but

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>just the things that have changed over the years. And

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>they have a network for everybody but the white male.

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>They have the LGDDCT whatever. All the letters are Hispanic Network,

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the Black Network, Women's Network. And years ago my colleague

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>tried to start a Christian network and we're told that

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you just can't be forming hate groups. Wow. But the women,

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I heard you talking about some of them

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 1>not making money at other places. I'm sure that might,

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 1>but they are here and they're you know, same as

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>this men. There's some men that are can't carry their

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>weight either. But when you get out there and you're

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about valves and forty eight inch plate frenches and

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, you know, they give, they get it,

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>but they just change it around when they work around them.

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing against women or anything. We got plenty of them.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>They're good workers and can you know, do better than

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>some men. Well, the point I was making is that

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>there's this you know, well, the point I was making

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is that there's a study that essentially, in you know,

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>very level equal playing field, that essentially what happened is

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that the choices of the women there dick heated the

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>outcome of the pay. So that was the point I

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>was making, is that, you know, it's a lot of

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>times it comes down to choice. And again back to

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>my point earlier agency and the fact that women aren't victims.

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>We make our own decisions and we you know, we

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>make our own determination in life. So that was kind

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of more broadly about the point I was making. But

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>do you find in the work environment has your interaction

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>with women changed or are you worried with you know,

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of the me too movement and that interaction with

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the you know, women at your organization. I mean, I've

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>been married to the same lady for thirty one years,

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>so I try to avoid I do like to I

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>guess they call it a pension method. I don't show

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>up with anybody alone or working together or anything. It's

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>always more than just me and another woman doing a

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>job or something. You know, And that's saying terrible, but

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's just the way I mean. I gave

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>an example. We had a man that was become the

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>supervisor area. He brought again it really wasn't one of

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the good workers, and he brought her behind closed door

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. It wasn't two months after that he went

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>back to his tools because he was told under no

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>circumstances or you go one on one behind closed door.

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. He was just trying to give her a

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>performance review and tell her what she was doing on

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>but that was just a big insult. Yeah, well, it

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you're ruined, ruined a good person. Well, it

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you're a smart man. And as they say,

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>happy wife, happy life. Right yeah, all right, well you

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>have a great night. I appreciate you calling in. All right,

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go to Nick now and queens who wants

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this as well. Okay, hey Nick, Hey Lisa,

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>are you I'm doing well? How's it going? Good? Excellent

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>job so far? Oh I appreciate that. That's better than

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the alternative, right yeah, right, And I'm the one I

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>always tweet you pictures of when you're on TV. Oh awesome,

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. I let's try your pictures of my

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>niece every once in a a long. Oh yeah, I've got

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I've got a niece as well. Um, she's a little

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>CUTI pie. So that's a really fun thing to have.

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Um and so what so what were your thoughts then

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>on you know what I had said, uh, sort of

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>regarding the banning of baby it's cold outside and sort

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of more broadly, this overcorrection in society regarding the me

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>too movement? You know, what are your thoughts on that?

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's ridiculous and I think you actually probably

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>said it on TV that think of the other songs

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that are on the radio and the rap songs and

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>all these other songs that are on the radio. But

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>those are fine. But you know, in old time Christmas

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>song is not right. And that's that's just you know that,

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that's just really really the PC police are just it's

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it's out of control. And you know, I my kind

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of theory is I'm going to do whatever I want

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and I don't care what other people think. Well, and

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like, if I want to listen to Christmas music.

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna listen to Christmas music. Same here, which is

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>why we started the show with baby It's Cold Outside

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>because I love that song. But they're coming for a

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>little Mermaid kiss the girls a problem. They're also coming

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>for it off, so Rudolph needs to be aware as well.

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But Nick, I appreciate your time, thanks so much for

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>calling in, and we appreciate you sharing your thoughts. Right,

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we have one more call. Time for one

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>more call. Let's do it, yeah, Alan Ohio, Alan, Hey, Allen, Hi,

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>how's it going? Okay? Um? A lot of snow and

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>sloppy weather here in the Buckeye State. Ah, well, you

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>know that's what I h Oh Sorry, go ahead, But

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I had a couple comments about this song, and it

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>shows a lot of ignorance on the left side because

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I work with traumatized women, and I think I'm a counselor, okay,

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think this whole um protest that they have

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>against this song minimizes what it's really like for a

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>woman who's been truly traumatized. That song in that movie

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>does not begin to um parallel in any way what

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>happens to women who are physically restrained, blocked from leaving,

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>and I think that it trivializes the whole issue. The

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>second observation I just wanted to make real quickly is

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>that I think it's sexist because if the roles were reversed,

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't even be having this conversation. If it was

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the woman asking the man to stay, we wouldn't be

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>having this conversation. So I think the whole fact that

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>they point out a problem here shows that they have

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a sexist, sexist viewpoint. Well, you know that's actually that's

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a great point you make, because you're right. I mean, look,

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>if this song was about a woman saying that to

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a man, they'd be like, oh, look at her. She's

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>so strong, she's so empowered, she makes her own decisions.

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But exactly back to you know, your point what I

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>was saying earlier, It's like the fact, just because he's

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>asked her a couple of different times, somehow she can't

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>make her own decisions. I mean, in the end of

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the song, she chose to stay. She wanted to have

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>another drink, So I mean, you know, goes back to

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, that point about agency and ability for a

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:15.719
<v Speaker 1>woman to make her own decisions, but you're right. If

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the roles were reversed, the dynamics of the conversation would

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be completely interesting. Thank you so much for Alan. You

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>made some really interesting points tonight, so we really appreciate

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>your time. All right again, Lisa booth Phillion for the

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>buck Sexton Show. You know me from Fox News, I

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.479
<v Speaker 1>think in some other places, So stay with us. Welcome

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>back to the buck Sexton Show. We've got Andrew McCarthy

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>from the National Review and also a Fox News contributor,

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and I've had the honor of being on the Fox

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>News is Outnumbered couch with him. Andy, You're such a

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>smart guy, so I am so glad to have you

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>on the show tonight. And just you know so much

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>about the Mueller investigation, everything that's going on, so I'm

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>just so thankful that we've got you to break it

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:57.959
<v Speaker 1>down for us. So, you know, Andy, first of all,

0:18:57.960 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to start off Judge Napolitan, I want of

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>her co workers from Fox made some news yesterday. He

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 1>said that he believed that Don Junior will be indicted.

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that statement? Do you believe him? Well,

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any evidence to that at the moment. Lisa,

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that we have a better indication that there

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>was some kind of a criminal investigation going on. I don't,

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't really, I don't know what the Politano was

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>referring to. I know that people are looking carefully at

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>his testimony in the in the Senate, but so far,

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the only intriguing thing there is that he

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>says that he did not speak to then candidate now

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump about the Russia meeting at the Trump

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Tower in June of twenty sixteen. The only two people

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I think who know that one way or the other

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>are Don Junior, the President, and from what I understand,

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that the Mueller has been putting

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>pressure on Paul Manafort where they've had a flowing out

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>after Manafort was trying to cooperate with the investigation, Mueller's

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>evidently been putting pressure on him about whether the President

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>knew about the Trump Tower meeting him, whether Don Junior

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>had told him. I don't know what other evidence, you know,

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>what other transaction they'd be looking at, but I don't

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.959
<v Speaker 1>to what. At least the way I understand the investigation

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>right now, I don't think they have evidence to charge

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>him well, and I wanted to ask you that because

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I read your column the other day, and the case

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>you made is that Mueller is not or he's building report,

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>he's not building sort of a criminal case. And so

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>if you can for our listeners if they haven't read

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>your column, which they should, and I advise everyone to

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>go and read it, but can you just sort of

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>summarize that for us and why you believe that he's

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>building report and not a case. Yeah, sure, Well, no

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor builds a case, Lisa, the way that Muller is

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>going about it. So what you want to have when

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you're building a criminal case is a cooperator who's an accomplice,

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>who is involved in what you say is the main scheme.

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And then what you do is you bring that cooperator

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>into court to plead guilty and you have him alocute

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to the full extent of the conspiracy. So you say, yes,

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>there was a Yes, there was a conspiratorial arrangement. I

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>was involved in it. You know, these other three people

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>were involved in it. Here's what they did, here's what

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I did. And that's how you go about it. The

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>last thing you would do as a prosecutor trying to

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>build to the crescendo of a big case would be

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>to plead all of your possible, big important witnesses to

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>charges of lying to investigators. It would mean that the

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>one enduring thing that a jury would come away with

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>after watching your case is that they can't believe a

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>thing any of your this is say, which is not

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the way that you that you go about it. So

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Mueller's problem, and this has been the problem

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I tried to identify when he was appointed without the

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>basis of a you know, without any factual grounding for

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>a criminal investigation. From that day forward, there has never

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>been a time when it seemed that Mueller had evidence

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of anything criminal in the way of a scheme between

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the Trump people and the Kremlin. And I've always thought, Lisa,

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's the reason they refer to it as collusion,

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>because collusion is a weasel word, and uh, you know,

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it just means concerted activity. You and I are colluding

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>by having this conversation, doesn't mean we're doing anything wrong, right,

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>What what prosecutors care about is conspiracy, which is a

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>criminal agreement to violate a law, a criminal law, And

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>he's never had that. So I think that you know,

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>every There are a lot of people who who don't

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like Trump who look at all these pleas and they think,

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, very hopefully from their perspective, that Mueller is

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>piece by piece, mesodically rolling up people to get, you know,

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>to go up the chain, as they say, and finally

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>get to Trump. But that only works when you're getting

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>them to plead guilty to the thing that they did

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>with Trump. And if they're all pleading guilty to making

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>false statements to investigators long and after the cell called

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>collusion scheme, then you don't really have a collusion case. Well,

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>so then you know, my question to you then is,

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's the point of the Mueller investigation? Then

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>if if they're you know, really, isn't this criminal activity?

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, why even have the Muller investigation of the

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning with like to begin him? What is he doing?

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>What is the point of this investigation? That's always been

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a great question, and it's you know, one of the

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>reasons I try to point out that, you know, there

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is this distinction between criminal investigations and counterintelligence investigations. What

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Mueller was handed was a counterintelligence investigation that's importantly different

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>from a criminal investigation. In the latter. In criminal cases,

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>what you're trying to do is build evidence so that

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that somebody that

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you've identified as a suspect has violated a law. The

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>point of a counter intelligence investigation is not to enforce

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the law. In fact, most the vast majority of counterintelligence

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>investigations don't have anything to do with criminal prosecution. The

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>point of a counterintelligence investigation is to collect information about

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>foreign powers that may threaten American interests. So, for example,

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>in the Russia counterintelligence investigation, the thing that you're looking

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>at is Russia. You know to the extent that it

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>poses a threat to our election system and anything else

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that way, it may pose a threat too. And the

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>reason it's really bad to give a prosecutor a counterintelligence

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>investigation is twofold. First, in the Justice Department, counterintelligence investigations

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>don't get a prosecutor because it's not lawyer work. It's

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>agent work. It's analytical work. There's nothing about having a

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>law degree that makes you an expert intelligence analysis. So

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the only time the lawyers get involved in the Justice

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Department in counterintelligence is if the analysts need them to

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>get for example, a warrant under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Act to surveil somebody. So then the prosecutorial it's not

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>even they not even usually prosecutors, they're just government lawyers

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Justice Department. They will go to the fies

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.479
<v Speaker 1>the court and try to get a warrant for the agents,

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but they don't get involved in the collection or analysis

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of the evidence. So why you would put a prosecutor

0:25:55.640 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in charge of an important counterintelligence investigation is beyond me.

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>But the second reason it's really bad, Lisa, is what

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you want with prosecutors is for them to be assigned

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to something that already is suspected to be a crime.

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 1>When you assigned the prosecutor. In other words, what we

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>do in this country is a crime gets committed and

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>then we assign a prosecutor. We don't assign a prosecutor

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and tell them, see what you can do to go

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>off and find a crime. So that's not the way

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 1>it works. So my being overly am I overly simplifying

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>this and saying that you know, it seems like Muller

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>is in search of a crime instead of investigating a

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>crime that's already happened. Yes, I think that with respect

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to President Trump. That has always been true. And one

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that's another of the reasons I guess

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I should say that's that's a really bad way to

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>go about it in terms of counter intelligence. Is you know,

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>if I assign you, Lisa as a prosecutor to go

0:26:56.040 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>investigate the robbery of the First National Bank, we all

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.199
<v Speaker 1>know that there was a robbery, and we know that

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>there's like three or four elements of bank robbery that

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a prosecutor has to prove beyond the reasonable doubt. So

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the transaction has understandable limits and parameters, and you either

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>you can either prove it or you can't after doing

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>an adequate investigation. By contrast, a counterintelligence investigation, as we've

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>just said, is just an information gathering exercise, and the

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.239
<v Speaker 1>guys who gather information will always tell you they can

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>never get enough, right. So unlike a normal criminal investigation,

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have any finite you know, there's no sensible

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>beginning an end to it, and it can just be

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>an unguided missile or a phishing expedition with no natural

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>beginning or end, and it would be one It would

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.679
<v Speaker 1>be one thing if you did something like that in

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>a normal prosecutor's office where all the resources of the

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>office can't be poured into one case. You know, every

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>every case has to compete with every other case for resources.

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 1>But you know, when you're when you're a special cancel situation,

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like you're you assigned a prosecutor to one target.

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And then if you turn around and say, and by

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, we're putting any limits on you. You're assigned

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to this person and you scorch the earth as much

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 1>as you think you need to to try to find

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a crime. That's not really the American way of doing investigations. Yeah,

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty terrifying stuff there. And look, i'd be eve

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>remiss to not ask you about the Mueller sentencing report

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>on Michael Flynn. It came out on Tuesday night. What

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are your takeaways from it? And also is the media

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>missing anything big about it that hasn't really been reported. Oh? Yeah,

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a lot in there. I mean,

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I know everybody says because there's so much redaction, you

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>can't really tell what Muller has and there's there's something

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to be said for that. But I think it's interesting. Um,

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me that it confirms something that that

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been arguing all along, which is that you know,

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you asked me a second ago, what is Muller doing here?

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I think a big priority that Mueller has is to

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>justify the very controversial decision made by the Obama administration

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to conduct an investigation of the opposition party's presidential campaign

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the presidency of Trump. And you know, I think that's

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>what they were obviously going about doing that. If you

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the Flynn memo, what it seems to indicate

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is that they've brought on to exactly what the theory

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that the Justice Department had in the Obama days before

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Muller was assigned. So you'll learn that, you know, there

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>was a Logan Act investigation of Flynn during the Trump transition. Well,

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Logan Act is not a good basis

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to conduct a criminal investigation. It's this two century old

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>provision that never has been prosecuted successfully in the Justice Department.

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And when when Flynn was in the Trump transition, his

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>job was to deal with counterparts from other countries. So

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think that's a proper basis to

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>be conducting an investigation. And yet, you know, Muller seems

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to adopt that. So I think a big part of

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>what he's trying to do here is even if they

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>don't find any sitable criminal offenses, by they are going

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to they are ultimately going to say that there was

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>plenty of basis for the FBI in the Justice Department

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to be suspicious. So why aren't more people reporting that then?

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Because you mean, you look at that, there really doesn't

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>seem to be a basis for the FBI ever interview

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>interviewing Flynn in the first place. He didn't do anything

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>wrong with talking to Kissley acc about sanctions. He was

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>part of the incoming administration. That has happened before. So

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>why why aren't more people talking about that? I think

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>because the media buy enlarges anti Trump, and they liked

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the investigation. And you know, ultimately Congress is not limited, Lisa,

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to criminal violations. High crimes and misdemeanors don't have to

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>be indictable criminal offenses, so it's always possible that Muller

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>could turn up something that might be impeachable, even if

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it can't be used to indict Trump. So they liked

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the investigation. All right, Andy, well, thank you so much

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>for joining us tonight. I knew you would be an

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>awesome guest. So so thankful for you joining us this

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>evening and making sense of everything for us. Thanks so much,

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>least always a pleasure to be with you. Thank you.

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Hope to see you soon. All right, YEA, have a

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>great night. Muller's not involved in a investigation. Mueller has

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a Trump destruction project. He brought on a team, all

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of them dedicated to destroying Trump. They've done everything they

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>could to destroy Trump. Part of that technique is you

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>throw the kitchen sink. You basically threatened somebody and say

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to bankrupt you, I'm going to put your

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>son in jail. I'm going to charge you with so

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>many different crimes you'll never get out from undred. Now,

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>would you like to talk? And we have the full

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>power of the federal government against you, it's pretty tough

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>not to try to find a way to get him

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>off your back. But it has nothing to do with

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the truth, it has nothing to do with justice. Historians

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>someday will comment that this was one of the most

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary efforts to undo the will of the American people

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>buy an established bureaucracy and its establishment friends that we've

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>seen in all of American history. Okay, so that was

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Newt Gingrich. And we've also talked to Addie McCarthy just

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in the last break, and again I urge you to

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>go read his column it's called Robert Mueller's Plan, because

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I really, you know, I've got a lot of concerns

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>about this. And to his point, if Robert Mueller is

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>building a report, not a case, then what is the

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>point of the Mueller investigation to begin with? If there's

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>not criminal activity that he's already that he was looking

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>at from the inception of this investigation, what is the

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>point of his investigation? And it's also it's not just

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>new Gingridge, it's not just Annie McCarthy that have raised

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>questions and kind of rung the alarm on this. There's

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>also this column in USA Today not too long ago

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>by Michael Muccasey, who is a former Attorney General who

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>served under George W. Bush, who raised the point that

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the Special Counsel investigation just should have never started from

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, that there wasn't a justification for the investigation.

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And now here we are. Taxpayers have been on the hook,

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and what have we gotten from it? Where is the collusion?

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Where is the crimes in relation to conspiracy that Annie

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy was talking about earlier. Yet but yet here we are.

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to you about Express VPN. Every

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>time you go online or you use public WiFi, you're

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>actually putting information and danger and all it takes is

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a one time, one time, and a hacker could have

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>enough information on you distill your identity by infiltrating your

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Internet traffic. Hackers could open bank accounts in your name,

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>access your emails, and destroy your credit for years. That's

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>why I decided to take my privacy back by using

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Express VPN. Express VPN has easy to use apps that

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>runs seamlessly in the background of my computer, phone, and tablet.

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Turning on Express VPN protection only takes one click. Express

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>vpn Secure anonymizes your Internet browsing by encrypting your data

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and hiding your public IP address. Protecting yourself with Express

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>VPN costs less than seven dollars a month. Express VPN

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is rated the number one VPN service by tech Radar,

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and it comes with a thirty day money back guarantee.

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you ever use public wi fi and you

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>want to keep hackers in spies from seeing your data,

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Express VPN is the solution. And if you don't want

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to hand over your online history to your internet provider

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>or data resellers, express VPN is the answer. So protect

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>your online activity today and find out how you can

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>get three months free at express vpn dot com slash buck.

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>That's Express vpn dot com slash buck for three month

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.959
<v Speaker 1>free and a one year with a one year package.

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Visit express vpn dot com slash buck to learn more.

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Hoard two of the Buck Sexton Show. Lisa

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Booth in for him tonight. I've got Steven Yates on

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the line. He is a former national security advisor to

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>former President Dick Cheney Vice President Dick Cheney. And see when.

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad you're here because I really want to

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.439
<v Speaker 1>talk to you about what's going on right now with

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:50.479
<v Speaker 1>China and trade. The Chinese Minister of Our Commerce said

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday at that the meeting in G twenty at

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the G twenty summit was very successful and that the

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>two countries are over the next ninety day is going

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to seek to try to formulate a more specifcific deal.

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So where are we right now with China on trade

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and also what happens in the next ninety days, in

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>your opinion, at least, I think we're kind of running

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in two tracks at once right now. I think everyone

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>has come to the awareness that Donald Trump is a

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:20.240
<v Speaker 1>different kind of president, and he's taking an unconventional approach

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to negotiating with China, and this is a major issue

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.959
<v Speaker 1>for his presidency but also for him personally. He's talked

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>about it for decades, trying to rebalance what he sees

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>as I think accurately the raw deal Americans have had

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 1>in doing business in China. And the second track is

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 1>managing the politics of the near term and going into

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>next year. Financial markets were getting skittish about FED moves potentially,

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 1>and the kind of dark horizon of a trade war

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>with China seemed to be rattling a few cages. I

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think that Donald Trump is going to go wobbly

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and negotiations with the Chinese, but we definitely have a

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of back and forth in the history of US

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 1>China relations, and certainly, going back the better part of

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty years of my working on China related issues, I've

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>never heard of anyone putting a ninety day horizon out

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>there with China and expecting real measurable results. So if

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we get something in those ninety days, that's unprecedented. But

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the president is pushing in the right direction

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to try to give the Chinese goal posts, and then

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>if they fail to meet them, well, then he goes

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>back to hitting them with the hammer of the tariffs,

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>which he said he is famously the tariff president. So

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think you'd mentioned his unconventional approach. I mean,

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's working, the tariffs against China and

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of this tougher approach. Is it working well? It

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly worked. Up to the G twenty meeting. The Chinese

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>were feeling pressure. I think the leadership was feeling pressure

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>political and economic. There's a kind of an open question

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>among those of us who try to watch these things

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 1>really closely about whether the Chinese feel like they got

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a ninety days breathing space or whether they kind of

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>had this personal heart to heart at the leader level. Now,

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I am a deeply skeptical person when it comes to

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>having a heart to heart with the head of a

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>communist party of any country, And much as the Communist

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Party of China have a heart and so I don't

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>really believe in personal chemistry and negotiating with China, But

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the President believes in playing that in his negotiations. So

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the combo of trying to build some rapport, pressing them

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>with tariffs and the threat of future of things coming

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 1>back probably is the right thing. But frankly, the Chinese

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>only understand power and pressure, and that's what they'll respond to. Friendliness.

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>He'll just eat up for lunch and come back and

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>say can I have another serving? And so I think

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the President is going to have to be prepared to

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>be tough through twenty nineteen and onward. But if we

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>get net progress along the way, I'm happy with that.

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Just don't backtrack. So you're thinking this is the long

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>road ahead, then this is going to take a while. Absolutely,

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 1>that's my zoo. I mean, I'd love to be proven wrong.

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd be happy to see the president get a breakthrough

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and recalibrate the US China trade relationship. But we have been,

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, on a fantasy for the last fifty years

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:18.439
<v Speaker 1>about giving economic benefits to China and favorable dealings with China,

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>letting it get away with things we don't let any

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:23.800
<v Speaker 1>other country get away with on the expectation they become

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.839
<v Speaker 1>more modern, more like us, less of a problem. And

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think President Trump accurately read that a majority of

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Americans don't buy that anymore. And guess what, the statistics

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and the reality of doing business in the world doesn't

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.400
<v Speaker 1>back it up anymore. And so we've got the theft

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:43.959
<v Speaker 1>of intellectual property, imbalanced trade, and a lot of non

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>tariff barriers, which is a technical way of saying unfair

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 1>trade practice is beyond taxes that the Chinese have gotten

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>away with, and we this is just desperate need of

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>a rebalance. So I support the direction. I'm just not

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>optimistic it will be a near term harvest. And you

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 1>had mentioned the intellectual property theft that of course was

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 1>part of the justification of tariffs on China and this

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>tough stance that the Trump administration is taking. Of course,

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they did a seven month investigation into China and found

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a loss economically of about fifty billion dollars to Corporate

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>America and corporate earnings. Can you just break down for

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the listeners just the impact of the intellectual property theft,

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>what China is up to, and why it's so important

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to know about this and to call China out on it. Well,

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.800
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost, I think the scale is much larger,

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and so we're probably really looking in the ballpark of

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:40.479
<v Speaker 1>like six hundred billion dollars worth of intellectual property being

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 1>stolen from American interests over recent years. And that's not

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:46.919
<v Speaker 1>like going back thirty years, it's just going back into

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 1>recent years. And so what happens is companies try to

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>go into the ever large China market thinking they'll get

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>market share, increased sales, have an export platform, and the

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Chinese will add on fe these forced technology transfer, have

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>their people trained up to basically spy on you and

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 1>copy what you do, and after a certain amount of time,

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>they become incredibly competitive under a national brand to do

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you do, and the government there will favor

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the national brands over foreigners, and sooner or later you

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 1>find yourself squeezed out of the market you thought was

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>enormous and key to your long term growth. So there's

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>been over the last twenty five to thirty years, there's

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 1>been a number of big companies and some small entrepreneurs

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that have literally had their lunch eaten by the Chinese

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 1>this way, over and over and over. The first few

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>times people can say, oh, this is just working the

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>kinks out, and there's some winners and some losers. But

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a long term pattern now where entire companies

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>get engulfed, major technologies get overtaken, and some of these

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:52.840
<v Speaker 1>technologies are critical to our vital infrastructure, like five G

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 1>technology and cellular communications and lots of semiconductor parts in

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>everything that's in the technology that we live our lives,

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>relying upon for security, but also everyday commerce and just

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>getting around town. This is now a vital part of

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>our economy, and the Chinese have really taken a huge

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:18.320
<v Speaker 1>stake in it, and now it's difficult to do something

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to push back. So President Trump's got obviously a lot

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of criticism regarding his approach on trade, a little bit

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:28.320
<v Speaker 1>less on China, you know, more on you know, regarding

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:33.720
<v Speaker 1>surrounding NAFTA in Mexico and Canada. But staying on trade,

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 1>do you think, I mean, what other approach does President

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Trump have then to try to if he's trying to

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>extract concessions from China, if he's trying to get them

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to lay off the intellectual property threft theft outside of tariffs,

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, what other options are available to President Trump

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:51.319
<v Speaker 1>and trying to kind of lay the hammer down on China. Well,

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 1>some of what he's done broadly on trade, while not

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 1>directly targeting China, I think has had an impact on

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>negotiations with China and the reality to deal with them.

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Number one, the successor agreement to NaSTA had Canada and

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Mexico agree to conditions that Chinese can't go make a

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>favorable agreement with one or the other of them and

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:18.800
<v Speaker 1>sneak their way in their goods or services into the

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:22.399
<v Speaker 1>United States and bypass our own laws, in our own

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>restrictions for security or other conditions, and so eliminating a

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>NaSTA loophole that gave Chinese an unfair advantage by way

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of NaSTA had an impact on their economic strategy. Also

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 1>recalibrating the trade relationship and our alliance structure with Europe.

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>At first, everyone said the sky is going to fall,

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 1>this is going to wreck the world. But what it

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>turned out was not only could these things be done

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 1>that people said were impossible, but an increasing number of

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>our alliances openly in many cases but even more so privately,

0:43:55.680 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>are saying we two want a rebalancing of China's behavior

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 1>on security, on unfair trade practices. The feeling of intellectual

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 1>property affects a lot of interest around the world. So

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of quiet cheerleaders behind the administration's approach

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to try to tackle these issues with China. And frankly,

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 1>there's no precedent. No leader in the world, not just

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States, has really tried to pressure the Chinese

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to reverse this trend to date, and so any progress

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Trump gets is the first in the world. How much

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:31.240
<v Speaker 1>pressure is China feeling right now? I read a CNBC

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 1>article saying that China's growth could be slowed about point

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>six percent I think next year regarding are due to

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs. You know, how much pressure economically is China

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:45.319
<v Speaker 1>facing right now? Much more than statistics would let us know.

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Number One, there's a longstanding issue of how accurate are

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Chinese statistics, given that they are done by organizations controlled

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>by officers of the Communist Party of China. And the

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>other part of it is, for the United States, it's

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>an infinitesimal fraction of our GDP is tied to trade

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 1>with China, and for China it's getting up into the

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>single digits, which sounds small to a lot of people,

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>but that is like a hundred times more impactful on

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:19.360
<v Speaker 1>their GDP their trade with US than our trade with

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 1>them is for the US GDP. So, in a very

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>real way, there's economic pressure that is disproportionately on China

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that it is on the United States. Now, the industries

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 1>in the US that are affected farmers primarily, but not

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:35.839
<v Speaker 1>limited to them, they have real pain, They had some uncertainty,

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think the administration and Congress have tried to

0:45:38.520 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>address it. But we should be under no mistake, and

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:44.759
<v Speaker 1>I hope the President's team is under no mistake. The

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 1>pressure is much more on China, and the time to

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:50.279
<v Speaker 1>get your advantage is now. Will they're under pressure, don't

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:52.719
<v Speaker 1>get them up for air and hope that they'll be

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:54.839
<v Speaker 1>nice to you after this pressure has been put on them.

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about, you know, kind of same question

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 1>regarding at the United States. How much pressure is the

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 1>United States economy in effect with China and the retalitary

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 1>tariffs that they've put on us, And if this is

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the long haul, how much damage or how much pain

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>are Americans going to feel? Well, certainly there are some

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 1>sectors that have put all their eggs in the China basket.

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I think soybeans is one of those that comes to mind,

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:27.280
<v Speaker 1>but hey, and some other commodities that affect agricultural state disproportionately,

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be long term impact. Now. Part of

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the Buenos Aires G twenty agreement was that the Chinese

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:38.839
<v Speaker 1>are committed to increase purchases of those kinds of commodities,

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and so we'll see whether that helps mitigate the longer

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:47.800
<v Speaker 1>term uncertainty about this. But there's two kinds of pressure

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that are going to come to play. One is economic

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 1>and the other is political. The political press pressure is

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 1>frankly a bit more mixed. The President's approach is more

0:46:56.760 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Main Street than Wall Street, and frankly, there are elements

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 1>of the new Democrat majority in the Congress that has

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a history of being more sympathetic to the trade policy

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of the president has been pushing than his own majority

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in recent years has and so the politics of this

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>are definitely mixed. The Wall Street versus Main Street part

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of this, I think is the most important part of

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:20.920
<v Speaker 1>going into twenty twenty. And that Electoral College coalition that

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump wrote to victory in twenty sixteen, that is

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a belt of manufacturing that wants to see a rejuvenation

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of work here and sees China as an unfair player,

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that that's going to remain solidly

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>behind him. So there's the economic pressure, and I think

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street will keep and that's going to be hard

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:39.839
<v Speaker 1>for the administration, but I think Main Street is going

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:44.799
<v Speaker 1>to mostly be supportive of this direction continuing. So let's

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about the politics a little bit. You know, you

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously mentioned the incoming Democrat House. How much does that

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 1>impact is that dynamics also with the Republican led state

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>majority one and looking at the renegotiated NAFTA deal essentially

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and then to potentially any sort of deal with China. Well,

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Democrat majority is going to be

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:13.360
<v Speaker 1>very skeptical of deals with China, and the Republican majority

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>probably balance would be inclined towards a more mainstream or

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 1>conventional approach to trade and dealing with China on balance,

0:48:23.239 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 1>But the combo of an administration engaged in these kind

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of negotiations of their party and then needing to try

0:48:29.640 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 1>to meet common ground. I mean, trade legislation has to

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 1>come out of the House because usually it's dealing with taxes, revenue, tariffs,

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 1>things like that, And so there's going to have to

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 1>be piped bipartisan work to get something actually inked, But

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the politics of it actually favor the President

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and getting coalition in the House. If that happens, I

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 1>think the Senate would be hard pressed try to stand away. Although,

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 1>as you've witnessed as well as anyone, the Senate is

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:01.799
<v Speaker 1>the body in which any one person can stand up

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 1>at grandstand frankly, at any moment and bring things to

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a halt. And so that's just something we live with

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 1>on every issue going forward. Right, all right, Stephen, thank

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us, and I really appreciate

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 1>your insight on this. Have a great one. Thanks. Would

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you be willing to support some degree of wall funding

0:49:21.400 --> 0:49:24.800
<v Speaker 1>if you got a permanent bona fide solution on back No,

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that would approve one point three at least a million

0:49:28.760 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for the border fence, correct and not necessarily because that's

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:34.640
<v Speaker 1>what it was last year. So if you just extend

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that again, wouldn't that cause a problem. I mean, it

0:49:37.640 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 1>depends on how you spending money. It's border security as

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 1>about order security, but within that there was money for

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the fence as well. Well, you're trying to better fence,

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:49.840
<v Speaker 1>You're not trying to be a wall. Now, speaking for myself,

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:57.200
<v Speaker 1>consider the wall immoral, ineffective, expensive, and President said he

0:49:57.239 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 1>promised it. He also promised Mexico would pay for it.

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:02.839
<v Speaker 1>So even if they did, Smarl still and then they're

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:08.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to pay for us. Soon to be Speaker Pelosi,

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>which I really hate saying that. That is just really

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>depressing that she's going to be the incoming Speaker of

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the House. Democrats obviously took control of the House, and

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:19.799
<v Speaker 1>this is what President Trump is going to be met with. Well,

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Democrats aren't going to support the wall. Nancy Pelosi doesn't

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 1>want to play ball. There are going to continue standing

0:50:26.680 --> 0:50:29.759
<v Speaker 1>in the way of President Trump and his efforts to

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:32.399
<v Speaker 1>try to build a wall on the southern border. And look,

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the only reason why he wants the walls, he wants

0:50:34.600 --> 0:50:37.799
<v Speaker 1>it to serve as a deterrent from illegal activity at

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:41.319
<v Speaker 1>the southern border. And we're seeing right now why that

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:45.759
<v Speaker 1>is needed. When we saw most recently a thousand migrants

0:50:45.760 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in this caravan illegally trying to rush the southern border,

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and of course they were met by customs and Border

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:56.279
<v Speaker 1>patrol agents with tear gas because they were trying to

0:50:56.440 --> 0:51:00.239
<v Speaker 1>illegally cross into the United States and break the law.

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is we're going to continue to see

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 1>these caravans of migrants coming and trying to exploit or

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:09.520
<v Speaker 1>laws if we don't change things. If one we don't

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:13.280
<v Speaker 1>increase border security, in two, if we don't change laws

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 1>in relation to immigration, particularly looking at things like asylum laws. Look,

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the reality is that these Central Americans coming over to

0:51:20.719 --> 0:51:23.960
<v Speaker 1>seek asylum in the United States, eighty nine percent are

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:26.759
<v Speaker 1>going to pass that initial tests. Only nine percent are

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 1>actually going to be granted asylum in immigration court. Think

0:51:30.200 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 1>about those numbers. Almost ninety percent will pass the first test.

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 1>That's how easy that initial interview is, that initial threshold,

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that initial bar to that they're trying to pass is

0:51:40.680 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and only nine percent will actually be granted an immigration court.

0:51:44.000 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 1>That is troubling. If that doesn't tell you that our

0:51:46.280 --> 0:51:48.239
<v Speaker 1>laws need to be changed, I don't know what does.

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 1>And also another thing that really irks me is the

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>hypocrisy of the left when it comes to President Trump's

0:51:53.640 --> 0:51:55.759
<v Speaker 1>calls for a border role. If you remember back in

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:59.399
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six, Democrats like Diane find Stein Ron

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:03.880
<v Speaker 1>why even Obama, Biden, and Clinton all voted in favor

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of a border fence in two thousand and six. Yet

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:10.840
<v Speaker 1>those same people, You've got Hillary Clinton basically, you know,

0:52:10.880 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>she made fun of President Drop in his desire for

0:52:13.239 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a wall. You had Democrats at the time saying, like

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Senator Diane Feinstein saying that they are solidly behind border security.

0:52:21.160 --> 0:52:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Well where are they now? But you know what, I'm

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 1>going to talk to Center for Immigration Studies are Arthur

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>about all of this asylum, what is happening at the

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:31.400
<v Speaker 1>southern border with this caravan. He's going to break it

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:34.680
<v Speaker 1>all down for us. He's Center for Immigration Studies. We're

0:52:34.719 --> 0:52:36.400
<v Speaker 1>going to talk to him about the asylum. We're going

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk to him him about the wall, and we're

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:40.800
<v Speaker 1>also going to talk to him about this other really

0:52:40.840 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting story that's going on right now, this Honduras woman

0:52:43.800 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 1>who crossed over into the southern border, jump the wall

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a baby in the United States. We're also

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:51.600
<v Speaker 1>going to talk to him about birthright citizenship and if

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it needs to end, you're gonna want to stay tuned.

0:52:53.440 --> 0:52:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not kidding you. It's going to be a great interview.

0:52:56.640 --> 0:52:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Buck Sexton's Show. Lisa Booth filling

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 1>in for him. We've got Art Arthur of Center for

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Immigration Studies. He is a resident fellow for both law

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and policy. We're going to talk to him about what

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:10.279
<v Speaker 1>the latest with the caravan and what's going on at

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the southern border. Art, how are you, I'll do great.

0:53:13.120 --> 0:53:14.799
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing today? I'm doing well, all right,

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:16.759
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted to get your take. So there's some

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:21.040
<v Speaker 1>headlines today regarding adoran woman who scaled the border wall

0:53:21.080 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to have a child in the United States. So it's

0:53:23.040 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of ignited this debate which we've already seen, really

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:30.120
<v Speaker 1>regarding birthrights citizenship. President Trump talked about it during the campaign.

0:53:30.239 --> 0:53:32.759
<v Speaker 1>He sort of recently talked about it as well. So

0:53:32.840 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, what does this tell us about the problems

0:53:35.080 --> 0:53:39.839
<v Speaker 1>with birthrights citizenship From your vantage point, well, birthrights citizenship

0:53:40.040 --> 0:53:42.880
<v Speaker 1>at least has become a magnet that draws individuals to

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States in order to give birth. And you

0:53:46.520 --> 0:53:49.280
<v Speaker 1>look at this specific example and quite frankly, it points

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:53.200
<v Speaker 1>out everything that's wrong with it. One, the woman had

0:53:53.239 --> 0:53:55.520
<v Speaker 1>an incentive the United States. I think that she referred

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:57.759
<v Speaker 1>to it as your big reward for making it to

0:53:57.800 --> 0:54:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the United States is giving birth to a child in

0:54:01.160 --> 0:54:04.520
<v Speaker 1>this country too. She was eight months pregnant at the

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:09.320
<v Speaker 1>time that she actually gave birth, she took a perilous

0:54:09.400 --> 0:54:14.760
<v Speaker 1>journey to the United States and again entered illegally, putting

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:17.040
<v Speaker 1>not only her life but the life of her unborn

0:54:17.160 --> 0:54:22.920
<v Speaker 1>child in danger. So the fact is that, you know,

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a prime example of everything that is wrong

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:28.240
<v Speaker 1>with birthright citizenship. It encourages people to enter the United

0:54:28.280 --> 0:54:30.799
<v Speaker 1>States illegally, to undertake the arduous journey to come to

0:54:30.840 --> 0:54:35.360
<v Speaker 1>this country, and then it gives people an incentive to

0:54:35.480 --> 0:54:39.160
<v Speaker 1>enter the United States have United States children equities that

0:54:39.800 --> 0:54:42.279
<v Speaker 1>will make it probably next to impossible to remove her

0:54:42.320 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 1>from the United States at the end of the day.

0:54:44.400 --> 0:54:47.360
<v Speaker 1>So when President Trump was talking about ending birthright citizenship,

0:54:47.440 --> 0:54:49.040
<v Speaker 1>he got a lot of flaks. Some were saying that

0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take a constitutional amendment. Where are you

0:54:52.440 --> 0:54:55.279
<v Speaker 1>on that debate, and what legally would it take to

0:54:55.400 --> 0:55:01.480
<v Speaker 1>end birthright citizenship. Well, the leading case on this issue

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:04.319
<v Speaker 1>is a case called Wang kim Arc, which is more

0:55:04.360 --> 0:55:08.400
<v Speaker 1>than one hundred and I think twenty years old, interpreting

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 1>the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, and Wan kim Ark

0:55:11.360 --> 0:55:15.560
<v Speaker 1>involved an individual whose parents were actually permanent residents of

0:55:15.640 --> 0:55:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States and Wan kim Arc was born in

0:55:18.200 --> 0:55:21.640
<v Speaker 1>this country, and his argument was that he was a

0:55:21.640 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>citizen under the fourteenth Amendment. And so even if you

0:55:26.160 --> 0:55:29.800
<v Speaker 1>accepted face value, you know, Wan kim mark the idea

0:55:29.880 --> 0:55:34.759
<v Speaker 1>that a child born of permanent residents is automatically a

0:55:34.840 --> 0:55:38.040
<v Speaker 1>citizen of the United States. There's still the question of

0:55:38.080 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 1>whether or not individuals who are not who were born

0:55:43.040 --> 0:55:49.359
<v Speaker 1>to individuals who were here illegally, not under the jurisdiction

0:55:49.400 --> 0:55:52.799
<v Speaker 1>of the United States and fourteenth Amendment, would be citizens.

0:55:52.960 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly, I think that there is an argument to

0:55:55.000 --> 0:55:58.320
<v Speaker 1>be made. In addition, there was a very strong descent

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in wan kim Arc that said that the case was

0:56:00.560 --> 0:56:05.400
<v Speaker 1>decided wrongly. Was decided very much according to British common

0:56:05.480 --> 0:56:11.280
<v Speaker 1>law and the idea of sovereignty and allegiance, many ideas

0:56:11.280 --> 0:56:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that were rejected at the founding of this republic. So one,

0:56:16.719 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that won key mark is quite as

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:21.200
<v Speaker 1>broad as people say it is. And two I think

0:56:21.239 --> 0:56:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it was wrongly decided. But the fact is that there

0:56:24.040 --> 0:56:26.440
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been a case that's challenged it in the intervening

0:56:27.280 --> 0:56:30.600
<v Speaker 1>more than a century. I believe it was Senator Lindsay

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Graham who said that he was going to introduce legislation

0:56:33.600 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to end birthright citizenship. Do you know where Congress is

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>on this issue right now, and do you know what

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the latest is with what Senator Lindsay Graham said. I

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:45.680
<v Speaker 1>do not. I have not seen a bill that would

0:56:45.680 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 1>actually end birthright citizenship. I think the Wall Act, which

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:52.719
<v Speaker 1>was introduced by a variety of senators, actually does have

0:56:53.640 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Speaker 1>some legislation that does that, and Senator Graham maybe one

0:56:56.440 --> 0:57:00.319
<v Speaker 1>of the maybe one of the senators that's involved in

0:57:00.360 --> 0:57:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that Act. But again, I believe that this is something

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that could be done by congressional enactment. It's going to

0:57:05.719 --> 0:57:07.319
<v Speaker 1>have to go to the Supreme Court. But I think

0:57:07.320 --> 0:57:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that this particular Supreme Court would probably look at, you know,

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that case on the principles on which it was based,

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and would you know, in accordance with h you know,

0:57:19.000 --> 0:57:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the founding documents of this country, and I think that

0:57:21.360 --> 0:57:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of original is sitting on the

0:57:22.920 --> 0:57:27.240
<v Speaker 1>court right now, would probably disagree with the decision in

0:57:27.320 --> 0:57:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Wan Kim Mark. And I think that it would that

0:57:29.280 --> 0:57:33.640
<v Speaker 1>if the Congress were to pass legislation that would change

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:37.760
<v Speaker 1>birthright citizenship, that it would probably survive Congressional Review. The

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 1>only problem is that the clock is running out. I

0:57:39.560 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>really don't expect Speaker Pelosi to be introducing any legislation

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to that effect um in one hundred and sixteenth Congress.

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:49.440
<v Speaker 1>So quite frankly, the door is closing quickly for a

0:57:49.520 --> 0:57:53.920
<v Speaker 1>change to be made. So the woman from Honduras, who

0:57:54.120 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, scale the fense to to have the baby,

0:57:56.160 --> 0:57:58.040
<v Speaker 1>she said that her and her family are looking for

0:57:58.160 --> 0:58:01.680
<v Speaker 1>family reunification and clumb this Ohio. They've got some family there.

0:58:01.960 --> 0:58:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't kind of speak to the and they're

0:58:04.400 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 1>seeking asylum just for the listeners at home, does this

0:58:06.880 --> 0:58:09.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of speak to what's wrong with our asylum system

0:58:09.720 --> 0:58:11.120
<v Speaker 1>right now? In the sense that you know, all the

0:58:11.600 --> 0:58:14.200
<v Speaker 1>most of the media, mainstream media, they say, look, these

0:58:14.240 --> 0:58:16.920
<v Speaker 1>people are coming over. You know, they're fleeing the conditions

0:58:16.920 --> 0:58:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in Central America. But isn't there also this other large

0:58:20.880 --> 0:58:23.760
<v Speaker 1>component about it, where it's it's family reunification that they're

0:58:23.760 --> 0:58:28.760
<v Speaker 1>seeking here in the United States, and it's also economic opportunities. Absolutely,

0:58:28.880 --> 0:58:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's important to note that, you know, the fact

0:58:32.320 --> 0:58:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is we have a higher standard of living than almost

0:58:34.400 --> 0:58:37.840
<v Speaker 1>every country in the world. The vast majority of individuals

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe is given the opportunity to live in the

0:58:40.320 --> 0:58:45.360
<v Speaker 1>United States. In fact, would plus because we've had temporary

0:58:45.480 --> 0:58:49.240
<v Speaker 1>protected status, perhaps one of the biggest misnomers in immigration law,

0:58:49.600 --> 0:58:54.120
<v Speaker 1>from Honduras and from El Salvador for more than fifteen years.

0:58:54.200 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 1>We have a large population of people from those countries

0:58:57.160 --> 0:58:59.919
<v Speaker 1>living in the United States. And that's a drawing fact

0:59:00.280 --> 0:59:02.840
<v Speaker 1>for individuals who are from those countries. They want to

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:05.400
<v Speaker 1>reunify with their family members, they want to have better

0:59:05.400 --> 0:59:07.760
<v Speaker 1>schools for their kids, they want to have better hospitals

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:09.880
<v Speaker 1>for themselves and their children, they want to have more

0:59:09.920 --> 0:59:14.040
<v Speaker 1>economic opportunities. Again, that's perfectly understandable. The problem is it's

0:59:14.080 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 1>just not legal. The credible fear standard, which is the

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:22.760
<v Speaker 1>screening standard that's used by customs and Border Protection are

0:59:23.280 --> 0:59:26.200
<v Speaker 1>used by US citizenship and immigration services at the border

0:59:26.200 --> 0:59:29.160
<v Speaker 1>for people who enter illegally is very low. It's deliberately low,

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and for the better part of nine years, only about

0:59:34.240 --> 0:59:36.840
<v Speaker 1>five thousand people claimed credible fear and guide into the

0:59:36.920 --> 0:59:38.800
<v Speaker 1>United States. But work out around that, if you did

0:59:38.840 --> 0:59:41.960
<v Speaker 1>claim credible fear that you had about an eighty to

0:59:42.240 --> 0:59:46.160
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent chance of being allowed into the United States.

0:59:46.160 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And then being released. In fact, that's what happened to Missernandez,

0:59:50.040 --> 0:59:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the mother of the child. She and her family were

0:59:52.600 --> 0:59:57.840
<v Speaker 1>released on Sunday. And let me just give you a

0:59:57.960 --> 1:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that puts this into relief. If you were detained,

1:00:02.800 --> 1:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>your case will be finished in about forty days. If

1:00:05.360 --> 1:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not detained, your case will take an average of

1:00:07.840 --> 1:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>eight years. So probably Misser Nandez and her husband and

1:00:13.040 --> 1:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>her now two children and however many more children she

1:00:15.760 --> 1:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>will have, will probably be in the United States indefinitely

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>if she ever leaves. So what percentage of those individuals,

1:00:21.800 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking more at the eight year mark, do

1:00:25.240 --> 1:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>they end up showing up an immigration court or where

1:00:28.200 --> 1:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>do they go? The vast majority of the asylum claims

1:00:31.760 --> 1:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>get denied. A significant number of them failed to file

1:00:36.600 --> 1:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>asylum applications at all, and then a larger percentage of

1:00:40.480 --> 1:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>them either fail to show up for court or failed

1:00:43.400 --> 1:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to appear for their asylum hearing. So only about fifty

1:00:47.160 --> 1:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>three percent of them ever file an asylum application, and

1:00:49.920 --> 1:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the denial rate for those cases is higher than seventy

1:00:55.240 --> 1:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>percent at the end of the day. So I mean,

1:00:58.120 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>do you get the sense then, obviously based on you know,

1:01:01.120 --> 1:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the things you just said, that these people

1:01:03.840 --> 1:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that are coming here from Central America that they have

1:01:06.320 --> 1:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>an understanding of how to game the system absolutely, and again,

1:01:11.800 --> 1:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, this seems to be a fact that is

1:01:14.440 --> 1:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>lost on the press. They know that if they come

1:01:16.720 --> 1:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>with children, that they're going to get released after twenty

1:01:19.400 --> 1:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>days under the Flores Settlement Agreement. They know that if

1:01:22.560 --> 1:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>they claim credible fear, the odds are they're going to

1:01:24.880 --> 1:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>be allowed into the United States even if they don't

1:01:27.160 --> 1:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have an asylum claim. They know that if they're children,

1:01:32.640 --> 1:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>if they show up, that they're going to be released

1:01:34.720 --> 1:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>over to HHS with them two days. So these are

1:01:38.880 --> 1:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>all things that we want to dissuade people from doing.

1:01:41.120 --> 1:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>About ten percent of all women who make the perilous

1:01:43.960 --> 1:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>journey from Central America to Mexico or sexually assaulted. About

1:01:47.760 --> 1:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of all of the individuals who make that

1:01:52.880 --> 1:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>journey are assaulted in one way or another, and that's

1:01:55.400 --> 1:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>according to Doctors Without Borders. That's not a statistic from

1:01:58.400 --> 1:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States government. So, you know, it's an amazingly

1:02:03.120 --> 1:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>perilous journey that we want to encourage people not to undertake. Plus,

1:02:06.440 --> 1:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we want to have respect for our own laws.

1:02:08.600 --> 1:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>But the fact is that when people in Honduras, Guatemala

1:02:13.040 --> 1:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'll Salvador see people like Misernadas get into the

1:02:16.720 --> 1:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>United States, give birth and get released, it just encourages

1:02:20.120 --> 1:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>more people to come. So can I because the approach

1:02:23.160 --> 1:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of the mainstream media is a fact that you know,

1:02:26.280 --> 1:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>they're concerned about the humanitarian aspect of what's going on

1:02:29.760 --> 1:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in Central America, and you know, these individuals, these migrants,

1:02:33.640 --> 1:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know some illegal immigrants that are trying to

1:02:35.400 --> 1:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>cross the border illegally coming over to the United States.

1:02:38.480 --> 1:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Why then do we never hear about the aspect that

1:02:41.560 --> 1:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned, about the dangerous journey and what happens

1:02:45.120 --> 1:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>along the way. Why is that never discussed? And if

1:02:47.920 --> 1:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the media is so concerned about the humanitarian conditions, why

1:02:51.800 --> 1:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>don't they talk about that? Well, you know, it's it's

1:02:54.920 --> 1:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>funny because under President Obama, when he was faced with

1:02:58.520 --> 1:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a similar situation in two thou fourteen, both NPR and

1:03:02.400 --> 1:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>National Geographic if you can imagine, spoke about the dangers,

1:03:06.480 --> 1:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and I've written about the articles that they wrote. Then

1:03:09.880 --> 1:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in fact, they talked about a specific pharmacy in all

1:03:12.240 --> 1:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>tars to Nora, where women would go to get birth

1:03:15.760 --> 1:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>control because of the high likelihood that they would be

1:03:18.040 --> 1:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>raped on the journey to the United States. And yet

1:03:22.280 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, that part of the story gets lost.

1:03:25.920 --> 1:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Now all we see is the crying little girl next

1:03:27.920 --> 1:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to the border patrol agent and the pink sweater. Now

1:03:30.560 --> 1:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>all we see is the mother dragging the two children,

1:03:33.280 --> 1:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>one without shoes, one wearing a diaper, away from the

1:03:36.240 --> 1:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>tear gas canister. And I think that a lot of

1:03:39.480 --> 1:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that has to do with the way that the media

1:03:40.920 --> 1:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>feels about the president. Any stick is a good stick

1:03:44.040 --> 1:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to beat Donald Trump with. I think they believe and

1:03:47.160 --> 1:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>they figure that hard tugging pictures of small children, babies

1:03:53.600 --> 1:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>born in the United States are effective tools to use

1:03:57.120 --> 1:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>against Donald Trump. And that's why I think we see

1:03:59.800 --> 1:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>this and why we don't hear about how lawful that

1:04:02.120 --> 1:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>journey is. ICE has attempted to put out statistics about this,

1:04:05.960 --> 1:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but by and large, nobody ever writes about them. And

1:04:09.320 --> 1:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the governments of those three countries encouraged their nationals not

1:04:12.640 --> 1:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to leave, but they leave anyway. Well, So one thing

1:04:15.040 --> 1:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I found interesting about the imagery that you're talking about.

1:04:18.400 --> 1:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>When there was you know, I think about a thousand,

1:04:20.720 --> 1:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>this might be two weekends ago, now where you know,

1:04:23.960 --> 1:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you had the almost a thousand immigrants trying to rush

1:04:28.640 --> 1:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the southern border, and that was the image that you

1:04:30.560 --> 1:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>talked about in The Washington Post reported about why everyone

1:04:33.720 --> 1:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>was so focused on that picture, and they did it

1:04:35.760 --> 1:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>because they thought it contradicted the narrative it came from

1:04:38.720 --> 1:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the White House. But one thing that I found interesting

1:04:40.840 --> 1:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>about it is that the children didn't have shoes in

1:04:43.200 --> 1:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the photo. But it's my understanding that at these shelters

1:04:46.280 --> 1:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico where they came from, that they do have

1:04:49.320 --> 1:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>shoes and clothing available. Is that correct? That's correct, And

1:04:53.120 --> 1:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the fact is that you know, this was a family

1:04:56.840 --> 1:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that had made the journey. I believe they were from Honduras,

1:04:59.000 --> 1:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and I believe again there was father in Louisiana for

1:05:03.640 --> 1:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the two children. So and they were attempting to breach

1:05:10.000 --> 1:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a rusty border fence that had accordion wire on the

1:05:14.720 --> 1:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>other side. I really am not one hundred percent sure

1:05:17.080 --> 1:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>what that woman was thinking about putting children into that situation.

1:05:21.200 --> 1:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm a parent, I had children that I had a

1:05:24.120 --> 1:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>child at age once upon a time, and if I

1:05:26.640 --> 1:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>were to attempt to rush toward police officers with Ryan

1:05:30.680 --> 1:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>gear on and a rusty fence and accordion wire. I'd

1:05:33.920 --> 1:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>probably be arrested for child endangerment. I certainly wouldn't end

1:05:37.880 --> 1:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>up with my picture splashed all over the Washington Post.

1:05:41.480 --> 1:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Well and also not yeah, not to mention the fact

1:05:44.040 --> 1:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>what they were doing was illegal in trying to cross

1:05:46.800 --> 1:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the border illegally. But I'm glad that you had mentioned

1:05:48.920 --> 1:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that because I do think that the way the media

1:05:50.800 --> 1:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>paints this just sort of tells everyone everything they need

1:05:54.200 --> 1:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to know about where the mainstream is coming. Mainstream media

1:05:57.200 --> 1:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is coming from it just in their buys about the

1:05:58.720 --> 1:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration and immigration at large. But or we've got

1:06:01.400 --> 1:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to get going. But thank you so much for joining

1:06:03.400 --> 1:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>us tonight. I really appreciate your insight on this very

1:06:05.680 --> 1:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>hopeful Thank you for have a great night. Or you've

1:06:10.240 --> 1:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>got Lisa Booth filling in for Buck sex Sin tonight

1:06:12.680 --> 1:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to the Buck Sexton Show. Thanks so much

1:06:15.320 --> 1:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>for staying with us. So I want to play this

1:06:17.560 --> 1:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>clip for you about President Trump talking about Elizabeth Warren

1:06:22.440 --> 1:06:23.959
<v Speaker 1>and then we're gonna talk about it. Take a listen.

1:06:24.320 --> 1:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna cover polka hotas. Who is thank of it?

1:06:31.960 --> 1:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank of it? She of the great tribal heritage. What

1:06:36.360 --> 1:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>tribe is it? Let me think about that. One meantimes

1:06:40.480 --> 1:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>she's based her life on being a minority polka hotas.

1:06:45.200 --> 1:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>They always want me to apologize for saying it, and

1:06:48.600 --> 1:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I hereby, Oh no, I want to apologize. I'll use

1:06:52.120 --> 1:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>tonight polka hots. I apologize to you. I apologize to you.

1:06:57.280 --> 1:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I apologize to the fake polka hunt this. I won't

1:07:01.520 --> 1:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a vote. Now it's causing her problems. You know that

1:07:06.640 --> 1:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>name is called because now even the liberals are saying,

1:07:09.200 --> 1:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>take a test, take a test. You know the I

1:07:13.160 --> 1:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you, I shouldn't tell you because I like not

1:07:15.680 --> 1:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to give away secrets. But this one, let's say I'm

1:07:18.200 --> 1:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>debating pocahunt this right, I promise you all do this.

1:07:22.600 --> 1:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I will take you know those little kids, they saw

1:07:24.440 --> 1:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>them television for two dollars, learn your heritage. Guy says

1:07:29.240 --> 1:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I was born in Scotland. It turns out he was

1:07:31.200 --> 1:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>born in Puerto Rico. And that's okay, it's good. You know.

1:07:35.840 --> 1:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Guy says I was born in Germany. Well he wasn't

1:07:38.120 --> 1:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>born in Germany. He was born someplace. So I'm gonna

1:07:40.400 --> 1:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>get one of those little kids and in the middle

1:07:43.080 --> 1:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of the debate when she proclaims that she's of Indian

1:07:47.440 --> 1:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>heritage because her mother said she has high cheek boats

1:07:53.840 --> 1:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that's her only evidence that her mother said she had

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>high cheek book. We will take that little kid and say,

1:07:59.640 --> 1:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>but we have to do it gently, because when the

1:08:03.200 --> 1:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>meat two generations, you have to be very gentle. And

1:08:08.360 --> 1:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we will very gently take that kid and we will

1:08:11.760 --> 1:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>slowly toss it, hoping it doesn't hit her and injure

1:08:15.600 --> 1:08:19.559
<v Speaker 1>her arm, even though it only ways probably two ounces,

1:08:21.080 --> 1:08:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and we will say, I will give you a million

1:08:23.680 --> 1:08:27.559
<v Speaker 1>dollars to your favorite charity, paid for it by chump

1:08:28.360 --> 1:08:30.639
<v Speaker 1>if you take the test and it shows you're an Indian.

1:08:30.840 --> 1:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I mean, come on, that's hilarious. I don't

1:08:35.120 --> 1:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>care if you like President Trump or not, but you

1:08:37.000 --> 1:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>can't not laugh at that. It's pretty funny. Well, turns

1:08:40.200 --> 1:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>out to remember that response in President Trump making fun

1:08:43.040 --> 1:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of Elizabeth Warren calling her pokehonas prompted her not too

1:08:46.760 --> 1:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>long ago to take a DNA test. You know, this

1:08:49.280 --> 1:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>was her moment to prove to everyone that she hasn't

1:08:52.240 --> 1:08:54.519
<v Speaker 1>been lying of her about her heritage. She hasn't been

1:08:54.520 --> 1:08:57.799
<v Speaker 1>taking advantage of structural or structural advantages in her career

1:08:57.840 --> 1:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>as a result. But turned out whole release ended up

1:09:01.280 --> 1:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>being a massive joke, and what we found out was

1:09:04.280 --> 1:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that Elizabeth Warren is actually probably less Native American than

1:09:07.760 --> 1:09:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the average US white person. So she did this whole

1:09:10.720 --> 1:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>rollout is a five minute video. You know, she really

1:09:13.840 --> 1:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>thought that this was just going to clear her name,

1:09:16.720 --> 1:09:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and instead it ended up hurting her. And so today

1:09:19.840 --> 1:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>word around the street from New York Times is that

1:09:21.920 --> 1:09:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren. They have the article titled Elizabeth Warren stands

1:09:25.680 --> 1:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>by a DNA test, but around her worries about and

1:09:28.479 --> 1:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>so essentially word on the street is these Democrat operatives

1:09:31.439 --> 1:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>are really worried that Elizabeth Warren potentially had ended her

1:09:34.400 --> 1:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>own career be our presidential ambitions before they even got started.

1:09:38.200 --> 1:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>You know what I even remembered when this happened. My

1:09:40.960 --> 1:09:44.599
<v Speaker 1>first thought was she's done because she just embarrassed herself

1:09:45.000 --> 1:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>so bad by doing this rollout and actually inevitably ended

1:09:48.880 --> 1:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>up hurting her more than helping her own case. And

1:09:51.120 --> 1:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it's also kind of hilarious what President Trump is able

1:09:53.920 --> 1:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to push Democrats into doing end up stepping in their

1:09:57.320 --> 1:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>own way, hurting themselves and potentially limited herself from the

1:10:00.680 --> 1:10:03.519
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty field. So I found that interesting. I wanted

1:10:03.520 --> 1:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to share it with you. Welcome back to the Buck

1:10:06.920 --> 1:10:09.519
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show. Lisa Booth in for him. We've got Jesse

1:10:09.720 --> 1:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Kelly on the line, and he is the host of

1:10:12.360 --> 1:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>ninety ninety point fifty KPRC radio station. Jesse, So, you

1:10:19.080 --> 1:10:23.799
<v Speaker 1>recently made some headlines inadvertently and not intentionally when Twitter

1:10:23.920 --> 1:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>banned you. Did you ever find out why Twitter banned you?

1:10:28.520 --> 1:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, the headlines or headlines be getting quote permanently

1:10:34.520 --> 1:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>banned from Twitter. And now my name was training nationwide

1:10:38.320 --> 1:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>no matter what, I'll take it now, I don't, I don't,

1:10:41.920 --> 1:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I don't know. I don't care. I mean,

1:10:43.720 --> 1:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I really do not care. I didn't care that much

1:10:45.920 --> 1:10:49.439
<v Speaker 1>to begin with. It's social media to run by leftists,

1:10:49.479 --> 1:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's just something we all have to watch out

1:10:51.080 --> 1:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>for on the right. Right, all right, Well, let's get into,

1:10:53.400 --> 1:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, some more stuffs into this stuff. So I

1:10:55.000 --> 1:10:58.599
<v Speaker 1>really enjoyed your column in The Federalists, and it's why

1:10:58.640 --> 1:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the right should start taking Alexandria Cossio Kurtz seriously. And

1:11:03.120 --> 1:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I find it interesting because I am one of those people.

1:11:05.240 --> 1:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you hear are some of the things she says.

1:11:06.960 --> 1:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>You see some of the things she tweeted out. I

1:11:08.439 --> 1:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>mean she honestly thought that she signed law or legislation

1:11:12.560 --> 1:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>into law, which is obviously not the job of Congress.

1:11:15.720 --> 1:11:17.639
<v Speaker 1>So it's really easy to kind of see these things.

1:11:17.680 --> 1:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's some of the things she says and just automatically

1:11:20.040 --> 1:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>dismiss her. But you say we should not, why because

1:11:24.439 --> 1:11:27.479
<v Speaker 1>it actually makes her more endearing Because elections are not

1:11:27.560 --> 1:11:30.519
<v Speaker 1>about It's not about you, Lisa, it's not about me.

1:11:30.560 --> 1:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not about the political pundits who who pay attention,

1:11:33.960 --> 1:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>or even people who maybe don't have a platform, but

1:11:36.200 --> 1:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>people who pay attention. Those people know how they're going

1:11:38.920 --> 1:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to vote. I guarantee you the next guy, we know

1:11:42.400 --> 1:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>how we're voting in the next election. Elections are about

1:11:45.120 --> 1:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>the common man. They always have been. The guy who votes,

1:11:48.560 --> 1:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but he kind of pays attention, he kind of doesn't.

1:11:51.479 --> 1:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And in this day and age, in the social media age,

1:11:54.000 --> 1:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it's all about charm and appeal and it's a big

1:11:57.760 --> 1:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>reason why Trump is president. And yeah, makes the idiotic

1:12:01.200 --> 1:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>guests and I'm not defending them. Obviously, the things she says, or,

1:12:04.240 --> 1:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>don't I get that. But what the right does is

1:12:06.960 --> 1:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>we pile on Or and pile on Or and pile

1:12:09.160 --> 1:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>on Or. We attack her as an idiot, and what

1:12:11.720 --> 1:12:13.599
<v Speaker 1>we do is we make her a martyr to her

1:12:13.640 --> 1:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>supporters and also the common man thinks, well, I didn't

1:12:17.240 --> 1:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>know that either, Bob. I guarantee many people say, oh,

1:12:20.320 --> 1:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought they did sign it into law. Well, where

1:12:22.080 --> 1:12:23.599
<v Speaker 1>I ever't want to make in front of her, stop

1:12:23.640 --> 1:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>being such a chair. Plus, I mean, she's pretty. That matters.

1:12:27.320 --> 1:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>She's she's charismatic, she's good with the camera. She has

1:12:31.560 --> 1:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>more appeal than people think. How do you think her

1:12:33.880 --> 1:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>policies play in the public. Obviously she's talking about you know,

1:12:38.240 --> 1:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>single player healthcare systems, these things with huge price tags.

1:12:41.720 --> 1:12:43.519
<v Speaker 1>But do you think that matters to the average voter.

1:12:44.560 --> 1:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I think some it does, some it doesn't. But I

1:12:47.120 --> 1:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think socialism, especially if you look at like the

1:12:49.720 --> 1:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders versus Donald Trump hypothetical numbers from twenty sixteen,

1:12:54.520 --> 1:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Sanders crush Trump by double digits, and almost all of them. Yes,

1:12:58.880 --> 1:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>things are going okay now, but I don't think socialism

1:13:02.280 --> 1:13:05.479
<v Speaker 1>as a whole. Is that unappealing to the American public

1:13:05.560 --> 1:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>not nearly unappealing as it should be. Socialism is That's

1:13:09.080 --> 1:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>why I wrote the article Socialism is frightening. It's killed

1:13:12.439 --> 1:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>more people than Nazism or racism, Radiism's combined. It's a

1:13:17.000 --> 1:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>frightening thing in America is not as far from it

1:13:19.880 --> 1:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>as those of us on the right would like to believe. Well,

1:13:22.760 --> 1:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and so what's the best way for conservatives to fight that?

1:13:25.840 --> 1:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you look at some of these polling and

1:13:27.880 --> 1:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you know the way younger Americans view socialism, and it's

1:13:30.320 --> 1:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty terrifying. So you know what's the best way then

1:13:33.320 --> 1:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for Republicans to push back on that? For conservatives to

1:13:35.800 --> 1:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>push back. That's not necessarily going after younger Americans. Younger

1:13:41.000 --> 1:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Americans as far as voters don't, they don't matter. Everybody

1:13:44.560 --> 1:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>talks about younger people are always socialists, they're always democrats.

1:13:48.360 --> 1:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It's that old Winston Churchill line. If you're under thirty

1:13:51.000 --> 1:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and not a liberal, you have no heart. If you're

1:13:52.760 --> 1:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>over thirty and not a conservative, you have no brain.

1:13:55.200 --> 1:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>They'll come around as soon as they start bringing paychecks in.

1:13:58.280 --> 1:14:01.799
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to a candidate like Cortez, attack

1:14:01.920 --> 1:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the ideas, that's fine. Break down the mask. That's fine,

1:14:05.560 --> 1:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>but constantly braging her with this your a moron, She's

1:14:10.000 --> 1:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>an idiot, she's so stupid. What that does is it

1:14:12.800 --> 1:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>personalizes it for people who maybe lukewarm supporters of hers. Well,

1:14:17.240 --> 1:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, I kind of liked her, and now

1:14:18.920 --> 1:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you're calling her an idiot. Now you're kind of calling

1:14:21.280 --> 1:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>me an idiot. It's the same thing the left has

1:14:23.360 --> 1:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>done with Trump. All of the criticisms of Trump are

1:14:26.160 --> 1:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>so personal. Trump's supporters take them personally, they take them

1:14:30.040 --> 1:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>on themselves, and so it's made him even more powerful.

1:14:33.760 --> 1:14:35.479
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point. I mean, do you think that

1:14:35.720 --> 1:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>conservatives do a good enough job in sort of articulating

1:14:39.479 --> 1:14:43.799
<v Speaker 1>why her policy suck? No, But then again, it's harder

1:14:43.840 --> 1:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to do that in this social media world. I mean

1:14:46.360 --> 1:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>it is a Twitter world, Facebook, Instagram, and people don't

1:14:49.920 --> 1:14:52.679
<v Speaker 1>like to accept that. But those things are extremely powerful now,

1:14:53.040 --> 1:14:55.919
<v Speaker 1>and so it's snarky, it's one hundred and forty characters,

1:14:55.960 --> 1:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's get it in and get it out, and it

1:14:58.640 --> 1:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>very rarely do you have some was a tension span

1:15:01.240 --> 1:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>long enough to break down why it stinks? And that's

1:15:04.280 --> 1:15:06.519
<v Speaker 1>something we do need to get better at home. Well,

1:15:06.560 --> 1:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and so you mentioned in your column you've spoken about

1:15:09.040 --> 1:15:12.439
<v Speaker 1>this as well of that. You know, relatability is so important. Now.

1:15:12.520 --> 1:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>We saw that be an issue with Hillary Clinton. I

1:15:14.600 --> 1:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>remember even David axel Rod was pointing out the fact that,

1:15:18.360 --> 1:15:20.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, she people couldn't relate to her, the fact

1:15:20.520 --> 1:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that everything came out of her mouth through a political

1:15:22.760 --> 1:15:24.479
<v Speaker 1>lens that you know, it was part of the reason

1:15:24.560 --> 1:15:26.839
<v Speaker 1>that hurt her. So, you know, taking that into account

1:15:26.840 --> 1:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and a looking ahead at twenty twenty, what do you

1:15:28.880 --> 1:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>see from the left in terms of what the Democrat

1:15:30.920 --> 1:15:33.759
<v Speaker 1>primary field's going to look like? It's gonna be beato.

1:15:34.280 --> 1:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I would I said he was running against I told everybody,

1:15:39.160 --> 1:15:41.479
<v Speaker 1>I said, he's not even running for senate here in Texas.

1:15:41.600 --> 1:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>He's running for president. He always has been running for president.

1:15:44.560 --> 1:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>You don't take those hard left positions in Texas that

1:15:48.040 --> 1:15:50.719
<v Speaker 1>expect to win. But he did set himself up nationally.

1:15:50.840 --> 1:15:53.759
<v Speaker 1>He has charisma, he has a national name idea now

1:15:54.040 --> 1:15:56.479
<v Speaker 1>and I'm tony he's going to boat race the entire

1:15:56.520 --> 1:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Democratic field. Besides maybe Harry. I mean, you think he's

1:16:01.280 --> 1:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>just gonna you know what was he on the skateboard

1:16:03.760 --> 1:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>across the presidential debate stage. And that's my point, Les,

1:16:09.400 --> 1:16:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Like you saw that, and I saw that, and I

1:16:11.640 --> 1:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>rugged my eyes about rolled into the back of land.

1:16:14.120 --> 1:16:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Now what is this idiocy? But we have to remember

1:16:17.600 --> 1:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>we did that a lot to Barack Obama when he

1:16:19.760 --> 1:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>was running, too, and the things he would do in

1:16:21.320 --> 1:16:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the way people fell in love with it. People loved

1:16:23.600 --> 1:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that stupid skateboard thing. They love the little dumb things

1:16:27.080 --> 1:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Beto does. So we can't dismiss it because we think

1:16:30.000 --> 1:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it's stupid. The left loves him and the guy hands

1:16:33.439 --> 1:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it's whatever it is, and it doesn't pay to deny it.

1:16:36.720 --> 1:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump had it and the left denied it. Obama had it,

1:16:39.160 --> 1:16:41.599
<v Speaker 1>the right denied it. There's always a guy, there's always

1:16:41.600 --> 1:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a superstar out there. We like to roll our eyes

1:16:44.160 --> 1:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>at and call an idiot or call all these other things.

1:16:47.360 --> 1:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>But I'm telling you the guy has something. And I

1:16:49.960 --> 1:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>think Trump still beats him, but you watch him come

1:16:52.240 --> 1:16:54.559
<v Speaker 1>back and win in twenty twenty four. But see, you

1:16:54.600 --> 1:16:56.799
<v Speaker 1>think he can make his way through a crowded primary

1:16:56.840 --> 1:16:58.599
<v Speaker 1>hill dank. So I think you know what we're looking

1:16:58.640 --> 1:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>at right now is nix eatingly. I mean, there's been

1:17:01.240 --> 1:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple contenders in recent days saying that you know

1:17:04.800 --> 1:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to run, but right now it looks

1:17:06.720 --> 1:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's still going to be a pretty big primary field.

1:17:08.800 --> 1:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so you think he's able to break through

1:17:10.880 --> 1:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the with the Kamal Harris's and the Corey Bookers of

1:17:13.800 --> 1:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the world, Well, Booker, There's no way Booker is going

1:17:17.160 --> 1:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to do it. He just doesn't have what it takes.

1:17:19.160 --> 1:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Harris would be the only one I would say that

1:17:21.720 --> 1:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>would compete with Beto because she has the looks, she's

1:17:25.520 --> 1:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>really good, she speaks really well. Obviously former district attorney,

1:17:29.200 --> 1:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>so she knows what she's talking about him. I don't

1:17:31.320 --> 1:17:33.679
<v Speaker 1>agree with any of her policies, but I think Beto

1:17:33.800 --> 1:17:35.519
<v Speaker 1>crushes them all. I mean, yes, it will be a

1:17:35.520 --> 1:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>crowded field, but you see who there rolling out. It's

1:17:38.240 --> 1:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a crowded field of a bunch of old, boring white people.

1:17:41.160 --> 1:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Those are not people who are going to energize the

1:17:43.840 --> 1:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Democratic base. It's just not well. Jesse, thanks so much

1:17:47.000 --> 1:17:49.479
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. We will be looking ahead in the

1:17:50.040 --> 1:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>coming months here to see if he ends up throwing

1:17:52.439 --> 1:17:54.719
<v Speaker 1>his hat in the ring. I'll talk to you seeing

1:17:55.040 --> 1:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, Jesse, have a good one. Thanks Omaha. Steaks

1:18:01.160 --> 1:18:05.599
<v Speaker 1>is America's original butcher since nineteen seventeen. Order with complete

1:18:05.640 --> 1:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>confidence right now. Omaha Steakes is giving an amazing limited

1:18:09.240 --> 1:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>time offer to Bucks listeners. When you go to Omaha

1:18:12.280 --> 1:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Steaks dot com and enter code Buck into the search bar,

1:18:15.840 --> 1:18:18.519
<v Speaker 1>you will get seventy four percent off Omaha Steaks Family

1:18:18.520 --> 1:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Gift Package originally one ninety five, now only forty nine

1:18:22.400 --> 1:18:25.519
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine. Order now and you'll get four hand cut

1:18:25.560 --> 1:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>aged to tenderness tops or loin steaks, two Savory Premium

1:18:29.880 --> 1:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>pork chops, two chicken fried steaks, four Omaha Steakburgers, four

1:18:34.280 --> 1:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>snappy Huelbasa sausages, all beef meatballs, four perfectly brown potatoes

1:18:40.400 --> 1:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>au grop ten, four made from scratch caramel apple tartlets,

1:18:44.800 --> 1:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>plus get four more burgers for free. Omaha Steakes is

1:18:48.000 --> 1:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a fifth generation family owned company with over one hundred

1:18:51.240 --> 1:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>years of experience delivering perfectly aged beef cut beef hand

1:18:54.960 --> 1:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>cut by master Butcher's in Omaha. Again. This is a

1:18:58.320 --> 1:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>limited time package for only four nine. When you go

1:19:01.880 --> 1:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to Omaha Steaks dot com, type Buck in the search

1:19:05.000 --> 1:19:07.120
<v Speaker 1>bar and add the Family Gift Package to your car.

1:19:07.520 --> 1:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't wait. This offer ends soon. Go to Omaha Steaks

1:19:11.280 --> 1:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com type Buck in the search bar to send

1:19:14.080 --> 1:19:18.519
<v Speaker 1>the Omaha Stakes family package. Today, Welcome back to the

1:19:18.520 --> 1:19:21.519
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show. Lisa Booth in for him tonight. I

1:19:21.560 --> 1:19:24.759
<v Speaker 1>want to play you this interview that Buck did yesterday

1:19:24.800 --> 1:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>with Greg Jarrett, the author of the Russia hoax. And

1:19:27.360 --> 1:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially what Greg is saying it runs contradictory to what

1:19:31.280 --> 1:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the mainstream media is saying about the

1:19:34.000 --> 1:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Flynn's Michael Flynn's cooperation with Muller, that it actually is

1:19:38.400 --> 1:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>good for President Trump, because a lot of people are

1:19:40.880 --> 1:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that, you know, Trump has done this is really

1:19:43.080 --> 1:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>bad for the president. So why don't you take a

1:19:45.160 --> 1:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>listen to the interview? What do you make of this

1:19:50.400 --> 1:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>latest series of events this week? Is it? Let's start

1:19:54.439 --> 1:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Flynn no jail time but substantial cooperation. What

1:19:58.439 --> 1:20:01.599
<v Speaker 1>do you see in those documents? What's it all telling you? Well,

1:20:01.640 --> 1:20:05.799
<v Speaker 1>the word cooperation is one of those wonderfully fungible terms.

1:20:06.800 --> 1:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Cooperation can simply mean he agreed to talk to us

1:20:10.840 --> 1:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>immediately and try to be as forthcoming as he possibly could.

1:20:14.200 --> 1:20:18.559
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean that he actually was able to provide

1:20:18.640 --> 1:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>anything that is incriminating whatsoever towards Donald Trump in this

1:20:23.880 --> 1:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>so called collusion investigation. Collusions also, you know this amorphous

1:20:31.600 --> 1:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>crime that doesn't really exist in the criminal codes. Is

1:20:34.640 --> 1:20:39.559
<v Speaker 1>it some sort of conspiracy coordination with Russians. Well, this

1:20:39.800 --> 1:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>memo reveals none of that, and in fact just the opposite.

1:20:45.200 --> 1:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>The memo itself makes no mention of collusion. The addendum,

1:20:49.200 --> 1:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>which is roughly five pages long, is heavily redacted, but

1:20:56.439 --> 1:20:59.559
<v Speaker 1>you can tell from how it's laid out and set

1:20:59.640 --> 1:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>up two things that Flynn offered assistance on two subjects. First,

1:21:06.720 --> 1:21:11.559
<v Speaker 1>he contributed something that's unidentified in a criminal case not

1:21:11.640 --> 1:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>handled by the Special Council, So that tells us it's

1:21:14.800 --> 1:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>not directly collusion related because it's handled not by Muller. Second,

1:21:20.920 --> 1:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Flynn seems to have answered questions about the Trump transition

1:21:24.880 --> 1:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>teams conversations with foreign governments, including Russia. But that can't

1:21:32.040 --> 1:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>be collusion either to win the election, because the election

1:21:36.120 --> 1:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>was already over. So it's a bit of a mystery

1:21:39.400 --> 1:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>as to what is contained in the redactions. But I

1:21:42.720 --> 1:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's evident to me and others that there's not

1:21:45.840 --> 1:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>much evidence of collusion being provided by Flynn and what

1:21:50.400 --> 1:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>do you take from the lack of any I mean,

1:21:53.200 --> 1:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we've had a few people already go down for the

1:21:56.240 --> 1:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>process crimes of lying during the course of an investigation

1:22:00.439 --> 1:22:04.679
<v Speaker 1>about no actual criminal conduct, right, Papadopoulos, Alexander Zuan. There's

1:22:04.720 --> 1:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>been a few of them. Papadappolis got two weeks. Flynn

1:22:07.800 --> 1:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's gonna get nothing. Do you do you

1:22:10.880 --> 1:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>gauge that more as a function of Mueller thinking that

1:22:14.920 --> 1:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the cooperation was just so exceptional, or is that also

1:22:18.560 --> 1:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Mueller maybe not wanting to kick the hornet's nest even more?

1:22:22.000 --> 1:22:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Because I think people realized that the FBI did Flynn

1:22:25.760 --> 1:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>dirty on this one. I mean, this was this was

1:22:28.479 --> 1:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a setup. I mean, there was a classify the week

1:22:31.280 --> 1:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and then the claim of the Logan Act to get

1:22:34.240 --> 1:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing going. I mean, this is as as

1:22:36.800 --> 1:22:39.360
<v Speaker 1>much a coordinated political hit as anything I can think of.

1:22:40.840 --> 1:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Flynn should never have been prosecuted by Robert Muller and

1:22:44.640 --> 1:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>his assembled team of partisans. Why Because the FBI agents

1:22:50.240 --> 1:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>who interviewed Flynn concluded that he was telling the truth.

1:22:55.000 --> 1:22:58.759
<v Speaker 1>That was confirmed by both James Comey and his debuty

1:22:58.800 --> 1:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Andrew McCabe when they were interviewed by congressional investigators. The

1:23:04.400 --> 1:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>truth is, had Robert Muller been forced to prove his

1:23:07.360 --> 1:23:10.479
<v Speaker 1>case against Flynn and Chord, he would have lost. He

1:23:10.640 --> 1:23:14.559
<v Speaker 1>probably would have lost the case against Popadopoulis as well.

1:23:14.560 --> 1:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Why because the law requires that a false statement be

1:23:18.840 --> 1:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>made willfully and knowingly. That's a very difficult thing to prove.

1:23:26.800 --> 1:23:31.360
<v Speaker 1>If somebody's recollection of a conversation happens to be different

1:23:31.439 --> 1:23:35.519
<v Speaker 1>than a transcript of the conversation, or different than how

1:23:35.560 --> 1:23:39.479
<v Speaker 1>the FBI or Muller interprets it, that's not a crime.

1:23:40.720 --> 1:23:46.439
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Muller applied enormous pressure on Flynn to

1:23:46.600 --> 1:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>admit to lying, when in fact Flynn never lied, and

1:23:51.120 --> 1:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in fact, Flynn became broke trying to pay his legal fees.

1:23:55.760 --> 1:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And what was really unconscionable is that Muller threatened to prosecute,

1:24:01.240 --> 1:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>based on no evidence, Flynn's own son. So Flynn finally

1:24:06.240 --> 1:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>surrendered under the intense emotional strain in monetary pressures, which

1:24:10.920 --> 1:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is really a shame. It's wrong, it's unconscionable for Mueller

1:24:15.680 --> 1:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>to behave that way. Now, the Cohen PLA also got

1:24:21.479 --> 1:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>some attention this week. What what what can you tell

1:24:24.000 --> 1:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>us about how you how you read that and what

1:24:27.160 --> 1:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>comes next? Well, Michael Cohen is a prodigious liar and

1:24:32.720 --> 1:24:39.479
<v Speaker 1>a tax cheat, and he played guilty because he wants

1:24:39.600 --> 1:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>leniency in his sentencing treatment. You know, this is the

1:24:44.880 --> 1:24:48.839
<v Speaker 1>trouble when the government, Robert Mueller in this case, decides

1:24:48.880 --> 1:24:52.959
<v Speaker 1>to get in bed with a known liar and criminal.

1:24:54.200 --> 1:24:58.439
<v Speaker 1>For all we know, Michael Cohen is lying about his lies.

1:25:00.080 --> 1:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So we I mean he is not a credible witness.

1:25:03.600 --> 1:25:07.759
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, because Muller is going ahead with sentencing,

1:25:07.800 --> 1:25:10.599
<v Speaker 1>it means he will never call Cohen as a witness

1:25:10.640 --> 1:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in anything. So you know, Cohen, in my judgment, is

1:25:14.479 --> 1:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>also a total zero when it comes to collusion. You know,

1:25:19.920 --> 1:25:25.599
<v Speaker 1>he can talk about payments which are perfectly legal under

1:25:25.640 --> 1:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Campaign Election Act, to women who said they

1:25:30.280 --> 1:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>had affairs with Donald Trump, not a crime. What do

1:25:35.120 --> 1:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you think about And by the way, everyone, we're speaking

1:25:37.439 --> 1:25:40.679
<v Speaker 1>to Greg Jarrett, author of the Russia hoax, the illicit

1:25:40.760 --> 1:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>schemes to clear Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump. Judge Napolitano,

1:25:46.560 --> 1:25:49.839
<v Speaker 1>your colleague, overt Fox said earlier today, quote, I expect

1:25:49.920 --> 1:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump Junior to be indicted. Do you agree with

1:25:53.840 --> 1:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that assessment. Disagree. Well, given Mueller's behavior of criminalizing conduct

1:26:03.240 --> 1:26:09.559
<v Speaker 1>that is not remotely criminal, that's altogether a possibility. You know, again,

1:26:09.720 --> 1:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Flenn's a perfect example. He didn't lie, he didn't commit

1:26:13.160 --> 1:26:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a crime, but Mueller prosecuted him. Nevertheless, So as I

1:26:18.960 --> 1:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I spent an entire chapter in my book

1:26:21.040 --> 1:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>The Russia Hoax explaining how the Trump Tower meeting violates

1:26:25.880 --> 1:26:28.719
<v Speaker 1>no law. You know, it's not a crime to talk

1:26:28.760 --> 1:26:32.439
<v Speaker 1>to a Russian lawyer or any Russian for that matter.

1:26:33.760 --> 1:26:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Take a look at the Federal Election Commission website. Foreign

1:26:37.560 --> 1:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>nationals may participate in American campaigns as long as they

1:26:42.000 --> 1:26:46.559
<v Speaker 1>don't receive money or donate money. So to have a

1:26:46.600 --> 1:26:49.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation with a Russian lawyer who purportedly is going to

1:26:49.720 --> 1:26:55.120
<v Speaker 1>give you information about Hillary Clinton, you know, that's that's

1:26:55.160 --> 1:26:58.559
<v Speaker 1>just not a crime. So we'll wait and see what

1:26:58.640 --> 1:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Muller does. But know he is the kind of unprincipled,

1:27:01.920 --> 1:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>unscrupulous character, Mueller who would try to weaponize and criminalize

1:27:09.560 --> 1:27:13.799
<v Speaker 1>that which is not truly under the law of crime.

1:27:15.160 --> 1:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that this is winding down? And if so,

1:27:19.280 --> 1:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>could he tell us why? Because I've been hearing that

1:27:22.120 --> 1:27:25.599
<v Speaker 1>for quite a while, and obviously it has not been

1:27:25.600 --> 1:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>true for quite a while, because this thing still drags on.

1:27:30.600 --> 1:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to be in you know, springtime, still

1:27:33.439 --> 1:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about whether Mueller's got the goods? It's altogether possible. Sure,

1:27:39.760 --> 1:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>These independent counsels and special counsel investigations tend to drag

1:27:46.400 --> 1:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>on well beyond their merits. We certainly saw that in Whitewater,

1:27:53.880 --> 1:27:57.360
<v Speaker 1>which went on for the better part of four years

1:27:57.960 --> 1:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and then ended up, you know, acute the President Bill

1:28:02.240 --> 1:28:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Clinton then of something that had nothing whatsoever to do

1:28:06.840 --> 1:28:11.679
<v Speaker 1>with the original mandate. So there's no telling when Muller

1:28:11.680 --> 1:28:14.559
<v Speaker 1>and his team of partisans will end this thing. They

1:28:14.560 --> 1:28:17.880
<v Speaker 1>should have ended it long ago. There's not a whiff

1:28:17.960 --> 1:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of evidence that Trump ever had some conspiracy or coordination

1:28:22.320 --> 1:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>or collusion with Russia to win the election. None zero,

1:28:27.120 --> 1:28:29.559
<v Speaker 1>And it should have ended there. And in point of fact,

1:28:29.720 --> 1:28:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Muller should never have been appointed because under the federal regulation,

1:28:35.520 --> 1:28:38.519
<v Speaker 1>she can only appoint a special counsel if there's some

1:28:39.160 --> 1:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>evidence of a crime first. And Lisa Page, who was

1:28:44.240 --> 1:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the top FBI lawyer on the Russia investigation, testified two

1:28:48.840 --> 1:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>months ago that during entire time the FBI had the case.

1:28:53.680 --> 1:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>They never found any evidence of collusion. So this has

1:28:58.960 --> 1:29:02.879
<v Speaker 1>been with Robert Muller, an investigation in search of a crime,

1:29:03.560 --> 1:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>which were verses. Ambassaardizes the legal process and turns the

1:29:08.080 --> 1:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>federal regulations on their head. And that was Greg Jared,

1:29:12.080 --> 1:29:14.519
<v Speaker 1>author of the Russia hoax with Buck. Coming up next

1:29:14.640 --> 1:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is R. J. Homman of Fair. He's going to talk

1:29:17.040 --> 1:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to us about the upcoming spending fight on Capitol Hills.

1:29:19.800 --> 1:29:23.559
<v Speaker 1>As stay tuned, Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show,

1:29:23.800 --> 1:29:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Booth. Here, we've got RJ. Hamman on the line

1:29:26.720 --> 1:29:29.759
<v Speaker 1>from the Federation for American Immigration Reform. He's the government

1:29:29.760 --> 1:29:32.479
<v Speaker 1>relations director. J I really wanted to get in to

1:29:32.840 --> 1:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>with you about, you know, this upcoming spending fight that

1:29:35.960 --> 1:29:38.479
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see on Capitol Hill. President Trump of

1:29:38.520 --> 1:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>course is demanding and pushing to get funding for the

1:29:42.320 --> 1:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>border wall. Where do you see you know you're covering

1:29:44.960 --> 1:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>all this and paying attention to it. Where is this

1:29:47.280 --> 1:29:50.599
<v Speaker 1>fight heading and what do you foresee happening? Yeah, Li's

1:29:50.800 --> 1:29:53.679
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having beyond obviously the border wall, President Trump's

1:29:53.720 --> 1:29:56.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, key campaign promise. I mean, it's his signature issue.

1:29:56.560 --> 1:29:59.599
<v Speaker 1>That's what everybody was screaming for on the campaign trail,

1:29:59.680 --> 1:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>but you know, on this, on that front, he's been

1:30:01.920 --> 1:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>largely stymied all year. I mean, every single funding fight

1:30:05.439 --> 1:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we've had, you know, congressional leadership has convinced him, Oh,

1:30:09.280 --> 1:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll do it next time, We'll do it next time. Well,

1:30:11.920 --> 1:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>now it's now or never. I mean, you have Speaker

1:30:14.200 --> 1:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi coming in in January. She's not going to give

1:30:17.000 --> 1:30:19.479
<v Speaker 1>you any border wall funding for the next two years.

1:30:19.680 --> 1:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So right now it's now or never. Obviously, with the

1:30:23.120 --> 1:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>tragic death of former President George HW. Bush kind of

1:30:26.800 --> 1:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>threw a wrinkle in some of these negotiations. As many

1:30:30.439 --> 1:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of your listeners may remember, the spending bill, the dhs

1:30:33.880 --> 1:30:37.559
<v Speaker 1>CR was supposed to run out tomorrow, December seventh. So

1:30:37.640 --> 1:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>what they did today, and I want everybody understand because

1:30:41.240 --> 1:30:44.479
<v Speaker 1>this isn't as swampy as it gets. So what they did.

1:30:44.640 --> 1:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>What they did is they did a two week continuing

1:30:47.000 --> 1:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>resolution to push the shutdown deadline from December seventh to

1:30:51.000 --> 1:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>December twenty first, right up before Christmas. And Lisa, you've

1:30:54.840 --> 1:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>seen this before. I've been up in Washington and see this.

1:30:57.040 --> 1:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>The closer you get to Christmas, Conservatives always get screwed.

1:31:00.280 --> 1:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>So this, you know, the bad news is that it

1:31:02.080 --> 1:31:04.799
<v Speaker 1>effectively puts a pressure on a lot of these members

1:31:04.840 --> 1:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to cave and accept what leadership offers them just to

1:31:08.040 --> 1:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>get home for Christmas. And you know, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell,

1:31:11.439 --> 1:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Kevin McCarthy, I mean, they're not really true supporters of

1:31:15.560 --> 1:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's immigration platform, even though they let on like

1:31:18.479 --> 1:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>they are in the border wall. So you know, when

1:31:21.080 --> 1:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you want to pass something that you know your base

1:31:23.080 --> 1:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to hate and and you don't want a

1:31:24.920 --> 1:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>bunch of angry phone calls or get thrown out in

1:31:27.040 --> 1:31:29.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty and then schedule to vote right up against

1:31:29.520 --> 1:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Christmas while everyone's distracted. So you know, it looks like

1:31:32.840 --> 1:31:34.839
<v Speaker 1>that that they just want to kind of tell President

1:31:34.920 --> 1:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump that, hey, we can't get those votes. We need

1:31:37.240 --> 1:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to pass a one year extension of Department Homeland Security

1:31:40.960 --> 1:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>funding into next year. But you know, again, right now,

1:31:44.720 --> 1:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look good. It's now or never. That's why,

1:31:47.000 --> 1:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, organization is urging you know, our members in

1:31:49.920 --> 1:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the general public to make your voice heard. Call your

1:31:52.320 --> 1:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress and say you do support the President

1:31:55.160 --> 1:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump's a key campaign promise you support border security because

1:31:59.000 --> 1:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of Congress all they care about right now, it looks

1:32:00.840 --> 1:32:02.679
<v Speaker 1>like he's getting home for Christmas, even though they didn't

1:32:02.720 --> 1:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>accomplish what they were set there to do. Well. I

1:32:05.080 --> 1:32:08.479
<v Speaker 1>know this all two from working on Cathitol Hill and

1:32:08.840 --> 1:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Arch I wanted to, you know, how much leverage do

1:32:10.720 --> 1:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you think President Trump is going to use here? I mean,

1:32:12.680 --> 1:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>because we saw with the brief shutdown that you know

1:32:16.040 --> 1:32:20.599
<v Speaker 1>what President Trump dubbed the Schumer shutdown over DACA. I mean,

1:32:20.640 --> 1:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think he'll do that again? I mean, do

1:32:22.120 --> 1:32:24.479
<v Speaker 1>you think President Trump is not going to play those games?

1:32:24.560 --> 1:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, do you think he'll hunkered down? And how

1:32:26.320 --> 1:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>much leverage does he really have here? I mean, I

1:32:28.040 --> 1:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>know he can veto it, you know, you know as

1:32:30.080 --> 1:32:32.599
<v Speaker 1>well as I do. Again, it's I think both parties,

1:32:32.760 --> 1:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think this fear is generally correct. Is everybody's

1:32:35.160 --> 1:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>afraid of being blamed for a shutdown. I mean, it backfired,

1:32:39.120 --> 1:32:43.679
<v Speaker 1>It's backfired on Republicans before, It's certainly backfired on Schumer

1:32:43.880 --> 1:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>when he did that over DACA. And I think there's

1:32:45.760 --> 1:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>always a fear again. I mean, this is why you know,

1:32:48.960 --> 1:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we think President Trump should use his leverage and tried.

1:32:51.400 --> 1:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>If he wanted to shut down the government, he should

1:32:53.400 --> 1:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>have done this back in March, you know, or a

1:32:55.840 --> 1:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>lot or a lot farther away than right at the

1:32:57.680 --> 1:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>game against the line here. But again, no, Trump does

1:33:00.760 --> 1:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>have leverage. He can veto this thing. But again, when

1:33:04.280 --> 1:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you take out again at the damage and how long

1:33:07.400 --> 1:33:10.439
<v Speaker 1>a shutdown would be, you know, Democrats could essentially run

1:33:10.439 --> 1:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>out the clock, say President Trump's vetos whatever they give

1:33:13.880 --> 1:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>him on the twenty first, they can just hang tight

1:33:16.160 --> 1:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of weeks until they get in power

1:33:18.200 --> 1:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and then send him something else, rather than you know,

1:33:21.120 --> 1:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>if they've tried to pass something he didn't like, they

1:33:23.160 --> 1:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>vetoed it. You know around this week, Democrats would maybe

1:33:26.120 --> 1:33:28.479
<v Speaker 1>have to come to the table and not risk being

1:33:28.520 --> 1:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>blamed for a one month shutdown. But again, you know,

1:33:30.760 --> 1:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>President Trump said, we remember back in September when he

1:33:33.880 --> 1:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>got a terrible spending bill, he says, I'm not going

1:33:36.160 --> 1:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to sign a bill like this ever. Again, he said

1:33:39.240 --> 1:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that repeatedly, and I mean we're hoping he you know,

1:33:41.840 --> 1:33:44.479
<v Speaker 1>he puts his boots in the ground and and sticks

1:33:44.520 --> 1:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to what is his key campaign promise again, like I said,

1:33:47.760 --> 1:33:50.559
<v Speaker 1>it is now or never Nancy Pelosi will not give

1:33:50.680 --> 1:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>him any border wall funding. In fact, you know, a

1:33:53.840 --> 1:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Democrat appropriators, they're going to be trying to claw away

1:33:57.400 --> 1:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>money from border security and essential law enforcement functions as

1:34:01.240 --> 1:34:04.479
<v Speaker 1>long as they pertain to immigration. You're talking cutting ICE funding,

1:34:04.680 --> 1:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>cutting CBP funding. They're not just gonna not give him

1:34:07.840 --> 1:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>what he wants. They're gonna take away from our border

1:34:11.080 --> 1:34:15.280
<v Speaker 1>security and interior enforcement apparatus. So I mean, he's in

1:34:15.360 --> 1:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>fantasyland again if he thinks that he can listen to

1:34:18.160 --> 1:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the establishment Republicans on Capitol Hill and oh, we'll get

1:34:20.960 --> 1:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it next time. There is no next time. Wells. One

1:34:23.200 --> 1:34:25.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that always gets me is we've seen like a

1:34:25.920 --> 1:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand people try to rush the southern border illegally break

1:34:29.080 --> 1:34:31.320
<v Speaker 1>their way into the United States. You saw them do

1:34:31.400 --> 1:34:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the same on their journey to the United States and

1:34:34.400 --> 1:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>breaking into what was it, Mexico or I'm getting the

1:34:38.120 --> 1:34:41.280
<v Speaker 1>right doing that as well. And then we're saying recently

1:34:41.320 --> 1:34:44.439
<v Speaker 1>two of people basically throwing their children over the Southern

1:34:44.479 --> 1:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>wall to get into the United States. So just lawlessness,

1:34:47.439 --> 1:34:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and to me, it kind of makes the case for

1:34:49.800 --> 1:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>what President Trump has been saying of increased border security

1:34:53.160 --> 1:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>and also all right, No, absolutely. I mean a wall

1:34:57.120 --> 1:34:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is a wall is just one of the many things

1:34:59.600 --> 1:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>again that we need to do. And and you know,

1:35:02.000 --> 1:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>people act like, you know, President Trump was exploiting the

1:35:04.680 --> 1:35:09.360
<v Speaker 1>caravan and all those visions as you know, a manufactured crisis,

1:35:09.439 --> 1:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>if you will. And I think it was actually manufactured

1:35:12.560 --> 1:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>by a lot of these open borders groups and everything

1:35:15.040 --> 1:35:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that they know that we're having, you know, and immigration stalemate,

1:35:18.840 --> 1:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and they know how you know, toxic this is in

1:35:20.720 --> 1:35:23.479
<v Speaker 1>our country, and they're looking to exploit the division and

1:35:23.840 --> 1:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>make almost a standoff, if you will. But again, the

1:35:26.920 --> 1:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>border wall can't stop the caravan, and I think that's

1:35:29.760 --> 1:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>something that you know, I wish President Trump would understand

1:35:32.600 --> 1:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more, you know, if he really wanted

1:35:35.240 --> 1:35:37.479
<v Speaker 1>to stop this problem. I mean, it's of course, it's

1:35:37.520 --> 1:35:40.280
<v Speaker 1>all well and good to want that five billion dollars

1:35:40.400 --> 1:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>or even more for some border infrastructure walls work. We

1:35:43.960 --> 1:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>need to repair things down there on the border. A

1:35:46.040 --> 1:35:50.599
<v Speaker 1>lot of the fences needs repairs. I totally understand that

1:35:50.680 --> 1:35:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we support that. But President Trump has to call for

1:35:54.520 --> 1:35:57.360
<v Speaker 1>closing our asylum loopholes. I mean, this is what is

1:35:57.439 --> 1:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>driving people up here from Central America. These coyotes down

1:36:01.439 --> 1:36:03.320
<v Speaker 1>there that bring them up here. They know how to

1:36:03.400 --> 1:36:06.240
<v Speaker 1>exploit our loss. They know what to say in their

1:36:06.240 --> 1:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>credible fear interviews to get released into the interior of

1:36:09.160 --> 1:36:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the country. They know that if they bring a child

1:36:12.160 --> 1:36:14.639
<v Speaker 1>that they will get released because they can't be detained

1:36:14.640 --> 1:36:17.479
<v Speaker 1>for more than twenty days. These laws are the ultimate

1:36:17.560 --> 1:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>pull factors. And we could have a wall from sea

1:36:20.120 --> 1:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to Shining Sea and they'll it'll still happen because these

1:36:24.040 --> 1:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>people will just walk right up to a port of

1:36:26.240 --> 1:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>entry or rush a port of entry and claim asylum

1:36:29.439 --> 1:36:31.439
<v Speaker 1>and get released into interior of the country. It is

1:36:31.479 --> 1:36:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the new form of illegal immigration. It's not like the

1:36:34.800 --> 1:36:37.479
<v Speaker 1>early two thousands when you had young, working age Mexican

1:36:37.560 --> 1:36:40.839
<v Speaker 1>mails streaming over the border and just running into the country.

1:36:41.000 --> 1:36:44.519
<v Speaker 1>They turn themselves in immediately, and a wall certainly will

1:36:44.520 --> 1:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>not stop this well. And I mean we saw that

1:36:47.120 --> 1:36:50.280
<v Speaker 1>with the end of the zero tolerance policy with President Trump.

1:36:50.320 --> 1:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>There is an eighty percent increase of families coming over

1:36:53.520 --> 1:36:56.639
<v Speaker 1>to the United States after that policy ended, So clearly

1:36:56.880 --> 1:36:59.479
<v Speaker 1>people are figuring out how to game the system. So

1:36:59.560 --> 1:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to you about you'd mentioned the

1:37:01.000 --> 1:37:03.760
<v Speaker 1>loopholes that need to be closed. Can you what are

1:37:03.760 --> 1:37:06.760
<v Speaker 1>those loopholes and what needs to be done about it? Yeah,

1:37:06.840 --> 1:37:09.839
<v Speaker 1>we look at about you know, three main things. So,

1:37:09.840 --> 1:37:12.439
<v Speaker 1>so first you got to tighten the credible fear standard

1:37:12.479 --> 1:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>for asylum applicants. So credible fear credible fear interview is

1:37:16.360 --> 1:37:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the first thing you do when you make an asylum

1:37:18.680 --> 1:37:21.559
<v Speaker 1>claim to see if it's it's valid. And the Obama

1:37:21.560 --> 1:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>administration really liberalize the meaning and it's created a situation

1:37:25.479 --> 1:37:28.240
<v Speaker 1>where everyone thinks that they can get it. And what

1:37:28.280 --> 1:37:31.639
<v Speaker 1>they need to do is impose penalties on migrants who

1:37:31.680 --> 1:37:35.320
<v Speaker 1>make these frivolous claims. Really tighten the standard of these interviews,

1:37:35.560 --> 1:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>because right now, I think it's over ninety percent path

1:37:38.040 --> 1:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that initial interview and many of them eventually get their

1:37:41.120 --> 1:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>asylum claims denied. But but as you know, it takes

1:37:45.439 --> 1:37:47.760
<v Speaker 1>well over a year, sometimes two years to get your

1:37:47.760 --> 1:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>asylum claim adjudicated because the backlog is so great. So

1:37:51.200 --> 1:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>what these people want to do is they really don't

1:37:53.120 --> 1:37:55.240
<v Speaker 1>want to see their asylum claim all the way through.

1:37:55.680 --> 1:37:58.240
<v Speaker 1>They know that if they get past this initial credible

1:37:58.280 --> 1:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>fear interview that they'll get really into the country and

1:38:00.880 --> 1:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>they can just go disappear into the population. The second

1:38:04.000 --> 1:38:06.479
<v Speaker 1>thing we need to do is address the Flores Settlement agreement.

1:38:06.479 --> 1:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a court settlement, and that's what tricked up when

1:38:09.240 --> 1:38:12.880
<v Speaker 1>President Trump was trying to That's what interfered with President

1:38:12.920 --> 1:38:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump's deer or tolerance policy was the Floras Settlement. Correct

1:38:16.320 --> 1:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Florist settlement says that if your family units can't be

1:38:19.040 --> 1:38:21.960
<v Speaker 1>detained or children can't be detained either for more than

1:38:22.000 --> 1:38:24.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty days, and then they have to be released. And

1:38:24.360 --> 1:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and if what we need to do is extend family

1:38:27.439 --> 1:38:30.839
<v Speaker 1>detention and increased detention space so that will have adequate

1:38:30.880 --> 1:38:33.479
<v Speaker 1>holding facilities so we don't have to release these people.

1:38:33.520 --> 1:38:36.439
<v Speaker 1>And and President Trump when he did the zero tolerance thing,

1:38:36.680 --> 1:38:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is he really exposed truly what the open borders left

1:38:40.320 --> 1:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>really wants to do. You know. He says, all right,

1:38:42.920 --> 1:38:45.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, so we could either separate families. They oh, no,

1:38:45.280 --> 1:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that. And he goes, all right, well,

1:38:47.280 --> 1:38:49.559
<v Speaker 1>let's hold the families together, and they say, no, you

1:38:49.600 --> 1:38:51.679
<v Speaker 1>can't do that either. So then what do you want

1:38:52.000 --> 1:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that's just for them to be released in the interior

1:38:54.040 --> 1:38:57.439
<v Speaker 1>of the country. If we exactly exactly, if we really

1:38:57.439 --> 1:38:59.519
<v Speaker 1>want to stop this again, we have to ensure that

1:38:59.600 --> 1:39:02.439
<v Speaker 1>these can be held together in detention. And I think

1:39:02.520 --> 1:39:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the third thing is amending one of our trafficking laws,

1:39:05.800 --> 1:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>which is the TVPRA, the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act.

1:39:10.040 --> 1:39:12.639
<v Speaker 1>And that's a law. It's a well intentioned law designed

1:39:12.640 --> 1:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to protect miners from sex traffickers, but now it's just

1:39:16.479 --> 1:39:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it's basically a foothold to get into the US. And

1:39:19.040 --> 1:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we believe there a variety of changes that can be

1:39:21.080 --> 1:39:24.439
<v Speaker 1>made that would close this loophole that's being exploited while

1:39:24.600 --> 1:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>still protecting these children who may be at risk. And

1:39:28.160 --> 1:39:30.720
<v Speaker 1>then I think more broadly, you know, you secure the

1:39:30.760 --> 1:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>border with more resources and staffing, you dry up the

1:39:33.439 --> 1:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>jobs magnet by implementing mandatory, you verify, you know, you send,

1:39:37.479 --> 1:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you send the message no more funny business. I mean,

1:39:40.160 --> 1:39:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we're serious about enforcing our laws. And Congress hasn't done

1:39:43.920 --> 1:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that yet. You know, President Trump has tried time and

1:39:46.000 --> 1:39:48.719
<v Speaker 1>again to do what he can through his executive authority,

1:39:48.800 --> 1:39:51.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of the opposite of what President Obama did. And

1:39:51.280 --> 1:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the ACLU or other open borders groups seem

1:39:54.080 --> 1:39:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to be able to find an activist judge anywhere, you know,

1:39:57.400 --> 1:40:00.519
<v Speaker 1>and likely under the Ninth Circuit to stop President Trump,

1:40:00.560 --> 1:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>even though he has legitimate authority most of the time

1:40:04.600 --> 1:40:08.720
<v Speaker 1>delegated to him by Congress. UM. And you know, or

1:40:08.800 --> 1:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>j I wanted to talk to you about, you know,

1:40:12.040 --> 1:40:15.559
<v Speaker 1>how much has word essentially gotten out to these Central

1:40:15.640 --> 1:40:19.840
<v Speaker 1>American migrants about how easy or laws are to games.

1:40:20.000 --> 1:40:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I know you had mentioned the fact that, you know,

1:40:21.920 --> 1:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine percent of these indigual individuals are going to

1:40:25.040 --> 1:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>pass that first interview with immigration authorities. And my understand

1:40:28.160 --> 1:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>he's only nine percent who actually show up an immigration

1:40:31.200 --> 1:40:34.360
<v Speaker 1>court will be granted asylum. So how much is word

1:40:34.439 --> 1:40:37.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially gotten out about how easy it is to come

1:40:37.840 --> 1:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>here and at least pass that first initial or interview. Oh,

1:40:41.880 --> 1:40:44.559
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's widely known. I mean even go back.

1:40:44.720 --> 1:40:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So I remember back when President Trump, you know, diddaca. UM,

1:40:48.800 --> 1:40:52.639
<v Speaker 1>he had to dispatch Joe Biden down to Central America

1:40:52.720 --> 1:40:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to tell the governments down there, hey, and to let

1:40:56.800 --> 1:40:58.880
<v Speaker 1>your people know that just because we're doing this DACA

1:40:58.960 --> 1:41:01.240
<v Speaker 1>thing doesn't mean that you're gonna be able to come.

1:41:01.280 --> 1:41:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've seen we've seen this time and again

1:41:03.720 --> 1:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>every time either Congress discusses or extends an immigration benefit.

1:41:08.920 --> 1:41:11.519
<v Speaker 1>Or even you know, our laws get widely known how

1:41:11.560 --> 1:41:14.599
<v Speaker 1>they can be abused. These people down their irrational people,

1:41:14.640 --> 1:41:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they take note, they know what their family members have done,

1:41:17.800 --> 1:41:20.640
<v Speaker 1>they know what works. And a lot of these coyotes

1:41:20.680 --> 1:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>down there. You know, there was actually a Washington Post

1:41:23.080 --> 1:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>article several weeks several of the reporters went down to

1:41:27.040 --> 1:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Guatemala and we're actually talking to people down there. Coyotes

1:41:30.080 --> 1:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>were encouraging people to go with a child that a

1:41:33.960 --> 1:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>child is basically known as a get out of jail

1:41:36.439 --> 1:41:39.519
<v Speaker 1>free card. I mean that is that's a humanitarian crisis.

1:41:39.600 --> 1:41:43.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're our laws are encouraging people to bring

1:41:43.640 --> 1:41:46.320
<v Speaker 1>their children and sometimes not even their own children, and

1:41:46.439 --> 1:41:49.360
<v Speaker 1>encourages kidnapping. You know, as somebody in Guatemala could go

1:41:49.439 --> 1:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>kidnap a child knowing that you know, hey, that child

1:41:52.160 --> 1:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>might get out of jail free card and a ticket

1:41:54.960 --> 1:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to work in the United States. That creates a crisis

1:41:57.160 --> 1:42:00.360
<v Speaker 1>down there. This journey up up to the United States

1:42:00.360 --> 1:42:03.599
<v Speaker 1>from Central America, it's terrible. I mean, you have children

1:42:03.640 --> 1:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that are raped, that they're subjected to violence. You know,

1:42:07.800 --> 1:42:11.240
<v Speaker 1>gangs are recruiting. I mean, it's a real crisis, and

1:42:11.880 --> 1:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>our laws are exacerbating the problem. You know, it's not

1:42:15.360 --> 1:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>You're not being in humane, you're not acting without heart

1:42:18.200 --> 1:42:20.719
<v Speaker 1>when you want to shore them up again. These people

1:42:20.800 --> 1:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>need to make the changes in their own countries to

1:42:23.080 --> 1:42:25.720
<v Speaker 1>better the conditions down there, rather than coming up in

1:42:25.760 --> 1:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the treacherous journey to the United States and disregarding our laws. Well,

1:42:29.680 --> 1:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and to that point, DHS put out a statistic. I

1:42:31.960 --> 1:42:33.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's over the past two years there's been one

1:42:33.920 --> 1:42:36.599
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ten percent increase in malls bringing a child

1:42:36.640 --> 1:42:39.679
<v Speaker 1>trying to enter into the southern border. So completely making

1:42:39.800 --> 1:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>your point, J, We're out of time, but I really

1:42:42.080 --> 1:42:46.360
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you joining us tonight. RJ. Haman of Fair all right,

1:42:46.360 --> 1:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks Lisa, thank you so much. Welcome back to the

1:42:49.960 --> 1:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show. Lisa Booth. I really appreciate you guys

1:42:53.120 --> 1:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>for sticking with me to night. This is actually my

1:42:54.720 --> 1:42:57.120
<v Speaker 1>first time a solo hosting radio, So thank you to

1:42:57.160 --> 1:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Buck for getting sick and allowing me this opportunity to

1:43:00.040 --> 1:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>fill in for him. Really, he's a friend of mine,

1:43:02.200 --> 1:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>so I really appreciate him believing in me and not

1:43:05.240 --> 1:43:07.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking I was going to screw it up. So a

1:43:07.320 --> 1:43:09.799
<v Speaker 1>great friend there. And I've also I've got a producer,

1:43:09.960 --> 1:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike with me right now, because I heard that he

1:43:12.240 --> 1:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>actually takes issue with where I went to college. So Mike,

1:43:17.280 --> 1:43:20.320
<v Speaker 1>what gives? I don't take issue. I I mean, that's

1:43:20.360 --> 1:43:22.559
<v Speaker 1>the way. That's why I tell you where you went school. Yeah,

1:43:22.560 --> 1:43:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I went to the University of Tennessee, which is a

1:43:24.080 --> 1:43:28.519
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal school. Phenomenal yeah, yeah, big Orange. Right. Well, I'm

1:43:28.520 --> 1:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a Philadelphia boy, so I don't really have place to

1:43:31.200 --> 1:43:33.240
<v Speaker 1>speak on the South. But well, then what's your beef

1:43:33.240 --> 1:43:35.200
<v Speaker 1>with me? What I could deal? I have relatives who

1:43:35.200 --> 1:43:37.400
<v Speaker 1>went to the University of Alabama. Well, I mean, it's

1:43:37.439 --> 1:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>not like you guys have anything to be upset with

1:43:39.120 --> 1:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. Alabama has been, you know, amazing, Yeah, kicking

1:43:42.080 --> 1:43:44.439
<v Speaker 1>butt with football. We just have problems with schools that

1:43:44.600 --> 1:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>really stink at football. You know, that's so right, and

1:43:47.760 --> 1:43:49.519
<v Speaker 1>right now that a season not going so good. You know,

1:43:49.880 --> 1:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>actually I want to talk to you about that, and

1:43:52.160 --> 1:43:53.639
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is wrong with your program? Well,

1:43:53.680 --> 1:43:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it's really tough, is I can't really rebut that because

1:43:56.240 --> 1:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I went to school when Philip former, Philip

1:43:59.080 --> 1:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Fumer ever, Philip former, and then also when Lane Kiffin

1:44:03.600 --> 1:44:06.360
<v Speaker 1>screwed US over Yes, things just went downhill. And I'll

1:44:06.360 --> 1:44:07.880
<v Speaker 1>tell you this. I think it's so funny because I

1:44:07.880 --> 1:44:10.080
<v Speaker 1>remember there was a guy that put up our guy

1:44:10.160 --> 1:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>or gal who I don't know if who who was

1:44:11.640 --> 1:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>behind it, put up a billboard on one of the

1:44:14.120 --> 1:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>major highways and it read that Lane Kiffin was as

1:44:18.240 --> 1:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>faithful as Tiger one. That's really funny. I never saw

1:44:21.920 --> 1:44:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that well, and that just goes to show you how

1:44:23.960 --> 1:44:27.679
<v Speaker 1>much people love their football in Knoxville, Tennessee, that someone

1:44:27.840 --> 1:44:30.639
<v Speaker 1>would pay their own money to I mean the billboards.

1:44:31.760 --> 1:44:34.240
<v Speaker 1>He was well, I mean it's true because Lane Kiffin was,

1:44:34.560 --> 1:44:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, not a faithful you know, he's a terrible coach,

1:44:37.560 --> 1:44:41.280
<v Speaker 1>screwed us over M and so well that's actually that's

1:44:41.280 --> 1:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>true too. But so I found that to be hilarious

1:44:43.240 --> 1:44:46.240
<v Speaker 1>because someone literally spent their own money to send a

1:44:46.280 --> 1:44:49.519
<v Speaker 1>message and an important message. It was, yeah, an important message.

1:44:49.560 --> 1:44:52.559
<v Speaker 1>What is it about the South? It out and like

1:44:52.760 --> 1:44:55.040
<v Speaker 1>because the Alabama fans are the same. SEC is great,

1:44:55.200 --> 1:44:57.640
<v Speaker 1>SEC country is awesome. They loved their football and they

1:44:57.680 --> 1:44:59.800
<v Speaker 1>take it so seriously. I understand there's no NFL teams

1:44:59.800 --> 1:45:01.439
<v Speaker 1>down there, But what's in the water down there that

1:45:01.520 --> 1:45:04.160
<v Speaker 1>like gives them like they're they're crazier than like Giants

1:45:04.160 --> 1:45:06.280
<v Speaker 1>fans and Eagles fans like they're nuts. They have you

1:45:06.320 --> 1:45:08.880
<v Speaker 1>been to games? Like? Have you gone to an SEC game? Oh? Yeah,

1:45:09.360 --> 1:45:11.559
<v Speaker 1>Well it's so much fun. Yeah, I mean that was

1:45:11.640 --> 1:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the highlight of going to ther University of Tennessee. It's

1:45:14.200 --> 1:45:16.160
<v Speaker 1>so much fun going to the football games. You get

1:45:16.160 --> 1:45:18.519
<v Speaker 1>to hang out with friends. It brings the school together,

1:45:18.600 --> 1:45:21.120
<v Speaker 1>or brings the community together. It's just a lot of fun.

1:45:21.200 --> 1:45:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Not even too you know, my girlfriends and I in college.

1:45:23.960 --> 1:45:26.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, we go to games at the different universities.

1:45:26.240 --> 1:45:29.040
<v Speaker 1>We go to Old Mess, we go to Georgia, and

1:45:29.080 --> 1:45:30.519
<v Speaker 1>you get got to check out some of the other

1:45:30.600 --> 1:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>universities as well, which was a lot of fun. Although

1:45:33.439 --> 1:45:37.439
<v Speaker 1>toma um you know what? Yes, actually, well no, I

1:45:37.439 --> 1:45:41.280
<v Speaker 1>don't remember it ready. Have you ever had a yellowhammer?

1:45:41.640 --> 1:45:44.160
<v Speaker 1>You know what that is? Actually I did. I did

1:45:44.240 --> 1:45:47.280
<v Speaker 1>go to the University of Alabama. That's cracked. Yeah, it's

1:45:47.280 --> 1:45:50.160
<v Speaker 1>been a while since I graduated, although hopefully nobody knew

1:45:50.200 --> 1:45:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that because I still look young, maybe you'll be okay

1:45:55.320 --> 1:45:58.240
<v Speaker 1>at least that's just what I'm gonna tell myself. Still,

1:45:58.520 --> 1:45:59.920
<v Speaker 1>if I still go out and get card at a

1:46:00.160 --> 1:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>good night so it makes feel better about yourself definitely.

1:46:03.200 --> 1:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's it's beautiful down there. Like I love

1:46:05.080 --> 1:46:06.560
<v Speaker 1>going the BAM. I've never been to Tennessee, so I

1:46:06.840 --> 1:46:09.479
<v Speaker 1>can't speak too hard on it. It's beautiful. We've got

1:46:09.479 --> 1:46:11.599
<v Speaker 1>in you've got Vall Navy on the water too, which

1:46:11.640 --> 1:46:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of fun. Be game the games. But

1:46:13.400 --> 1:46:15.639
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much everyone. I really appreciate you guys for

1:46:15.760 --> 1:46:17.960
<v Speaker 1>joining me tonight, and thank you Buck for letting me

1:46:18.240 --> 1:46:19.880
<v Speaker 1>fill in for you. Have a great night, everyone,