WEBVTT - MNF Recap, Down Goes Purdy & Tear It Down or Turn It Around

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first. Like you know to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the big game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in What Driving Nick Write Episode one eighty six.

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Fresh off an interesting, if not all that well played

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Monday night football game after a very intriguing Week six

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL were seemingly no quarterbacks except for Trevor,

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Laura and Jared Goff played well, We will discuss all

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 2>of that. Demonse will be joining as shortly. He for

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 2>his first time since moving to Los Angeles, is dealing

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 2>with the devastation of Los Angeles traffic, but we'll give

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 2>him a pass. We'll see him shortly. Here is what

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 2>missed the cut for today's show. Trevor Lawrence Day to

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 2>day with a knee injury. They play on Thursday night.

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 2>That is a story to monitor for Thursday. Justin Field's

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 2>doubtful with a thumb injury. They're gonna be playing a

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 2>guy from Shepherd College. Potentially that's a disaster for a

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 2>team that's already had a bunch and Kansiony defeats Denver

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 2>for Chexnoes yet the one thousandth straight time. But where

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 2>we're going to start today is with Monday Night Football.

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 2>The producers tell me that I said the Cowboys were

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 2>going to roll the Chargers. They obviously did not roll

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers. They did, however, beat the Chargers. They also

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 2>said that I had mentioned that looked sensational and I

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 2>took a shot at Herbert. The question I'm being asked

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 2>is have people been too harsh on Dak and not

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 2>harsh enough on Herbert. So let's start with the Herbert

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 2>part and then we will circle around to Dak And

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 2>also what frustrated me about last night's Cowboys game. So

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Justin Herbert came into the NFL top ten pick pressed

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 2>into service in the game where the Chargers team doctor

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 2>stabbed Tyrod Taylor trying to ge him a painkilling injection

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 2>week two of his rookie season against my beloved Chiefs

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 2>in a game, the defending champion Chiefs, no Less, in

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 2>a game he did not think he was gonna have

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 2>to play and threw for three hundred yards, one touchdown,

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 2>one pick, a ninety four passer rating, and they lost.

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>But he was down right terrifying, And in that moment,

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 2>I said, Oh, Jesus, this guy that the Chargers, a

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 2>divisional opponent, got a great one and he's going to

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 2>be a pain in the ass for years to come.

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>And that is still kind of true. But where I'm

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 2>at with Herbert is that it is not that he

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 2>is the problem with the Chargers. As I said to

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Demanse a few weeks ago when we discussed him, It's

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 2>not that he's the problem. It's that he is paid

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 2>to be the solution, and you have some concern on that.

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>It is. Is Justin Herbert a good quarterback, no question.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Is Justin Herbert a very good quarterback? I think so.

0:03:53.960 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 2>But has Justin Herbert improved in any significant fashion since

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 2>his rookie year. No. Justin Herbert's rookie year three to

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 2>one touchdown interception ratio, A ninety eight passer rating yards

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 2>per attempt of seven point six. So again three to

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 2>one touchdown interception ratio, ninety eight passer rating yards per

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 2>attempt seven point six. Justin Herbert for his career a

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 2>three to one touchdown interception ratio a ninety seven passer

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 2>rating seven point two yards per attempt seven point I'm

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 2>sorry he was seven point three as a rookie seven

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 2>point two. Now, it's not like those are really good numbers,

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 2>and they're the numbers of a really good quarterback. But

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 2>when you put up those numbers as a rookie, we

0:04:56.000 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 2>expect you to consistently improve. That just hasn't happened. And Edwarder,

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.919
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know this stat So credit to Heaedwarder for

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 2>tweeting it out an hour or so ago. Let me

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 2>the let me find it real quick. I just had it.

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Stefan Gilmour's clinching I in Tino. Justin Herbert through his

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 2>thirteenth career interception in the fourth quarter of a one

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 2>score game tonight. That's five more so he has thirteen.

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 2>No other quarterback has more than eight since he came

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 2>into the league. Now, Herbert plays a lot of one

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 2>score games, there's been more opportunities for that. I understand that.

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 2>But there are a lot of different thresholds of do

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I have a good quarterback? Do I have a very

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 2>good quarterback? Do I have a great quarterback? Do I

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe have the best quarterback? And one of them is

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the indefinable situation Herbert was in last night, and it's

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 2>the feeling that you have if you're rooting four or

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 2>against that team, which is got the ball two twenty

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 2>left down three own twenty five yard line. I had

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 2>a bet on the Cowboys. I was rooting for the Cowboys.

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't worried. That's a problem. And no Charger fan

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 2>out there can argue. When he got the ball there

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 2>you were like, well, definitely getting three, might get seven.

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 2>You were actually watching saying, USh, this probably isn't gonna

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 2>end great. And that doesn't mean he's bad. He obviously

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 2>is not bad. But he came into the league and

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 2>A or a B plus and right now he's an

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 2>AUS or a B plus. That's a problem now to

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys. The good Dak Prescott was sensational last night,

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 2>adverse circumstances, his coach seemingly working against him. Michael Gallup. Now,

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>where Dak I thought made a mistake was targeting Gallup

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 2>so often. But Gallup couldn't catch anything and made plays

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 2>with his legs, which he must do more of. That's

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 2>an important part of his game. He's gotta do more

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 2>of it. Made plays out of structure, made high level throws,

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 2>completed some big time third, medium's, third and longs, and

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 2>was excellent last night the Cowboys, and I tried to

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 2>caution everyone of just anointing the Niners in the Eagles

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 2>like oh Man, Cowboys lucky if they make the playoffs.

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Now game back, game back of both of those teams. Now,

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 2>the Niners obviously have the tiebreaker with Dallas, but Dallas

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 2>gets Philly twice, and while Philly has the toughest eight

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 2>game stretch in the league coming up, Dallas has a

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 2>buye then their home for the Rams, then one of

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 2>those Eagles games, then the Giants, the Panthers, the Commanders

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 2>before their schedule gets far tougher with Seahawks, Eagles, Bills, Dolphins, Lions,

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 2>and then finish the year against the Commanders. So do

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 2>not be surprised in the least if we leave Thanksgiving

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Day with the Cowboys in first place in the NFC East.

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Don't be surprised by that. In fact, that's what I

0:08:54.840 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 2>think is gonna happen. And so there is there that

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 2>is the good for the Cowboys. Here is the not

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 2>good for the Cowboys. What we saw from Mike McCarthy

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 2>at halftime of the game, or right before halftime of

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 2>the game is just absolutely unforgivable. And by the way, guys,

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, I think a MIC's opening there, so

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm hearing a lot of background noise. If you guys

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 2>can kill that for the moment, I don't know if

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the audience is hearing it as well, but yeah, so

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 2>if you guys can fix that, that'd be great. Uh.

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 2>The the so, what happened at halftime of the game,

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 2>right before halftime was and I know this term can

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 2>be overused, but was coaching malpractice. Guys. What I'm hearing it,

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 2>just so you guys know, is Demanse's Mike. If you

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 2>guys can kill that for the moment, that would be great.

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 2>What happened last night is coaching malpractice and it can't happen.

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 2>And so I'll give you the play by play of it,

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 2>but it is a stinging indictment of McCarthy's faith in

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Dak and McCarthy's situational awareness. The Dallas Cowboys had two

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 2>timeouts and completed a short pass to Michael Gallup on

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the sideline for eleven yards to get the ball to

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 2>the chargers thirty seven yard line. Gallup was ruled that

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 2>his forward progress was stopped in bounds. Okay, So McCarthy

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 2>had a choice there to call timeout or not. He,

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, didn't realize the clock was running, and

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 2>then once he realized it, decided, screw it, I'll hold

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>onto the timeout. So they run a play they again,

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 2>they have at the thirty seven with fifty seconds left,

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 2>five zero, and they don't get their next playoff till

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 2>there's twenty seven seconds left. On that play, there is

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 2>a penalty. The next play there's another penalty, and all

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, we're in this situation fourteen seconds left.

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Dallas has both timeouts, they have the ball at the seventeen.

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>The clock has been mismanaged to this point, but it's

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 2>just kind of run of the mill mismanagement, being a

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>little too protective of your timeouts. Okay. Dak then throws

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 2>over the middle with eight seconds left. There are the

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 2>play ins with eight seconds left, they're at the fourteen.

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 2>They have two timeouts. This is the key piece of it,

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 2>and Mike McCarthy doesn't use it until there's three seconds left.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Instead of trusting your decade long veteran franchise quarterback to

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 2>take a shot to the end zone, he lets it

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 2>go down to three seconds and kicks the field goal.

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 2>You can't do that. The margins are too thin. And

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 2>it is such an indictment of what McCarthy thinks of Dak.

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 2>But the problem is, Mike McCarthy, you guys ain't winning

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 2>a damn thing if you don't trust Dak Prescott flatly.

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>And so I thought the end of the half was unforgivable.

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 2>And it for a guy who picked the Cowboys to

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 2>go to the Super Bowl. It made me while last

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 2>night's game, the defense looked excellent, Dak looked great. The

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 2>coaching was so abysmal it concerned me massively. So there's

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 2>our Monday night football reaction. Demonse, got here, little la

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 2>traffic issues. Demonse, how are you doing this morning? No listen.

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 2>I told the guys, you've been doing the show for

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:24.839
<v Speaker 2>eighteen months. This is the first time the traffic got you,

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not gonna hold it against you. They had

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 2>a whole photoshop ready to kill you on it. I

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 2>can see right now you're very upset with yourself. I'm

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>not worried about it. The next the reason, I was

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna wait till the B block to bring you in,

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 2>but you got here just in time to talk about

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 2>your new guy, the guy that Daniel Jones was replaced

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 2>by in brock Purty. So why don't you go right ahead?

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so brock Prity finally lost his first game. He

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 3>threw his first pick, but he didn't have his key weapons.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that any quarterback would have struggled without their

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 3>key weapons in situation like that, best defense in football,

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 3>the whole nine. So he's not Patrick Mahomes, obviously. Is

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 3>there anybody else besides Patrick Mahomes on a on an

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 3>NFL team that you'd be comfortable having as your quarterback?

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course there's there's there's, of course there are.

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather have Mahomes than anyone, but the guys, we

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 2>gotta we gotta be fair here, we I mean, I

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 2>see the producers wrote, yes, perty isn't the MVP. Congrats

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 2>on winning an argument no one was actually making. That's

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 2>both this is the this is what is just maddening.

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 2>It was being made on TV shows everywhere, everywhere. He

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 2>was fourth in the Vegas odds. But and this is

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 2>where I get to just kind of be a jerk

0:14:56.080 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 2>and say, yeah, this is one of those those eventually

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 2>right takes I told you about, because everyone now is

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 2>grading Purdy on a curve that is tacitly admitting they

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 2>agree with me about his skill level. Oh, no one

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 2>can move the ball on the Browns defense, Lamar Jackson.

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Did you know why? Because he's awesome? And I had

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 2>to listen for a month that I was a hater

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 2>for not admitting party was awesome. What more do you

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 2>want to see from Brock Purdy? I was asked, and

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 2>I said, well, a couple things. One is, I'd like

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 2>to see how he looks in a situation where he

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have the Avengers around him as skill position guys,

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 2>and all of a sudden he loses Christian McCaffrey and

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 2>he's terrible. He's not mediocre, he's not okay, he's terrible.

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I asked to see that didn't pass that test. Hold

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 2>On the other the other other question. The other thing

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 2>I said I wanted to see was let's see them

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 2>in a tight second half and see how he does.

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 2>And the answer was a fifteen passer rating and fifty

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 2>yards in the second half. And everyone's like, oh, Nick,

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 2>you're being too harsh. I I'm only being too harsh

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 2>if everyone is now with me that he should be

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 2>graded on the young We're not sure how good he is,

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 2>give him time to grow curve. But I that's where

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I've been putting him, And folks said, I'm being mean.

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 2>So now people want to be able to argue that

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 2>he is unquestionably a top ten quarterback and arguably the

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 2>most valuable player in the league, and then also be

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>able to argue you can't hold the fact that he

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 2>got out played by PJ Walker against him. Pick a lane,

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Pick a lane. Folks like that, that's the the and

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 2>let's the Browns defense is awesome. But what's also true

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 2>is this. They've played five quarterbacks this year. The first

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 2>game was against Joe Burrow on one leg. Now, they

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 2>were great and Burrow was terrible. But I think we

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 2>also then saw over the next few weeks that Burrow

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 2>was gonna look really bad. Against most teams. The second

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 2>game was against Ryan Tannehill, who stinks every week. They

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 2>played Kenny Pickett, who had a decidedly mediocre game, not great,

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 2>not awful, which is exactly who Kenny Pickett is. They

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 2>played Lamar Jackson, who was awesome, which is exactly who

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Lamar Jackson is. And they played Brock Purty and he

0:17:55.600 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 2>was terrible. And so take from it what you want, guys. Uh,

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 2>but we saw for the first time a team not

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 2>have to worry about Christian McCaffrey, A team dare Brock

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Party to beat him. And he could have thrown four

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 2>interceptions in that game. He just could have. And anyone

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 2>who is being honest will admit the Niners' biggest question mark,

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the Niners' weakest link, and the thing that makes if

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 2>you're a big Niners fan you the most afraid is

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>that Brock Party doesn't have it. That is just a

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 2>fair reading of the season. Now, DEMONSA, you tried to

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 2>jump in, but I was fired up, so I wouldn't

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 2>I stopped you, So go ahead.

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I guess the last couple of minutes of that

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 3>game was probably the biggest spot up until his NFL

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 3>career yet he did get them in the field goal

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 3>range without his two biggest weapons.

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 4>There was a hands to win the game. Was it

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 4>a forty three yarder?

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I think forty one yarder? All right, so let's talk

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 2>about that. The first play of that drive, he throws

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 2>the ball right to the Browns and he drops it,

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 2>and people are like, oh, nick, nick, that's not fair.

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna count dropped interceptions against him. Well, folks now

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 2>want to give him credit for missed field goals, right.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 2>He can't play it both ways. You can't be like,

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 2>if the guy makes the field goal, he's a hero. Fine.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 2>If Newsom catches the ball thrown to him, he's he

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 2>in that exact spot. First play of the drive, throws

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 2>a pick, And yes, I did want to see Brock

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 2>Purdy in that moment, and after trying to throw the

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 2>game away, he moved them down the field. That is true.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 2>What is also true, and this is where people would

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 2>have gotten angry with me, But at least I am

0:19:55.880 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 2>consistent if that guy makes that field goal, you know what.

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 2>My feelings on Brock Perdy's game are twelve for twenty seven,

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and twenty five yards, one pick and a

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 2>ball that just slipped right out of his tiny hands.

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 2>You know what my feelings are on his performance that game,

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 2>that field goal made or missed. He was bad because

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 2>he was That's why the fallacy of the quarterback wins stuff.

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 2>But this is the double standard that I just I

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 2>can't get over with some of my colleagues in the media.

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 2>When objectively speaking, Purdy would have a mediocre game, particularly

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 2>last year, where McCaffrey would be unbelievable and carry them

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 2>and they would win. Folks would say, got nick quarterbacks

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 2>jobs to win the game. His job is to win

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 2>the game. You're gonna criticize him, and now he's awful

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 2>and they lose, and you know what, those same people

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 2>are saying, what more do you want him to do?

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, be better in the first fifty nine

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 2>minutes so the game doesn't come down to your rookie

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 2>kicker outdoors in Cleveland in the rain making a kick

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 2>to beat p J. Walker. Is that too much? No,

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 2>it's not too much.

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 4>Situation.

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 2>So just now, what'd you say?

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Situation sounds super similar to some other team that didn't

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 3>have one other team and lost to a lesser team,

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs. Do you what do you mean that team,

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs the first game of the year they lost

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the Lions. Well, I will say the lines are looking

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 3>pretty good, looking pretty good.

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 4>They did use that game. They're supposed to be like this.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 4>You put them up here in Holmes Mountain. They got

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 4>that one guy the top of the mountain. See.

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 2>But this is where people, this is and I don't

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 2>know if you're being serious or just trying to get

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 2>a rise out of me. I'm not sure. This is

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 2>where people make fools of themselves. We want to what

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 2>are we comparing right now? We're comparing Patrick Mahomes to

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Brock Party. If people are trying to argue I give

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Mahomes more benefited out than Brock Party, yeah, of

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 2>course yes I do. And there's a reason for it.

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Are people trying to argue that the Chiefs looked as

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 2>as out of sorts against the Lions as the Niners

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.959
<v Speaker 2>did against the Browns. I don't think that's what the

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 2>tape shows. I don't think that's the case.

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>This is this is.

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:37.479
<v Speaker 3>Any quarterback would struggle without their two main I guess

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes only had Kelsey that was missing. But you'd argue,

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 3>yet some other things missing. Anybody would struggle at quarterback

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 3>without two of their main weapons.

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, no, not MVPs. Not great quarterbacks, Yes they are not.

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>They are not necessarily putting up three hundred yards. But

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 2>the reason you get discussed as the most valuable player

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 2>of the NFL is because your team can function without

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 2>other guys. It's because you are clearly the most valuable

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 2>player on your own team. These are this is what

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about. This is the again, where do we

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 2>want to discuss brock perty Do we want to hold

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 2>him to the standard we hold Geno Smith to? I'm

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 2>okay with that. Do we want to hold him to

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 2>the standard we hold Derek Carr to? I'm okay with that,

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 2>And that is a compliment to him. Those are veteran,

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 2>established quarterbacks. The hold on honest question. Do you think

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 2>the San Francisco forty nine ers would be worse with

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Derek Carr? Do you think they'd be worse with Geno Smith?

0:23:58.440 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Definitely not Joe Smith?

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 2>No, So, so, hold on, are are we are? We

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 2>have elevated this guy? That's been the discussion all last week.

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 2>It was is he the MVP of the league? That

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 2>was the discussion. And yet and yes, of course it

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 2>is maddening because I had this same argument with people

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 2>in a different form about Jimmy Garoppolo and and now

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 2>folks want to have it again with Brock Purty, and

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 2>so I'm I'm just asking, how did Kirk demonse Kirk

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Cousins elite good, average, below average, awful. Pick a category

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 2>you'd put him in. I know where I.

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Think average and kind of breaks out into elite every

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 3>once in a while.

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 2>I YEA, well, yeah, I said elite good average. So

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 2>it's like in the in between good and average, in

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 2>between good an average. Right, Okay, Kirk Cousins this week

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't have Justin Jefferson and you could tell he missed him,

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, didn't even throw for two hundred yards. Found

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 2>a way to be functional. Now they're to be fair,

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 2>they're playing the Bears defense versus the Browns defense, right,

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 2>So that's a massive, massive difference. I totally recognize that.

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 2>But the idea if you have to have the league's

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 2>best running back, the league's best left tackle, the second

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 2>best tight end, and a top three wide receiver duo

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 2>in the league in order along with the second best

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 2>play caller in order to be functional, you're not a

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 2>difference maker at the quarterback position. Here's not. And I

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 2>asked to see something. He was given an opportunity to

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 2>make me look like a fool, and instead he got

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 2>out played by PJ. Walker. So I just I don't

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 2>The jury is still out. But I was reading articles

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 2>and this is where and this is the other wildly

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 2>frustrating thing. Folks then say, these arguments are made, and

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 2>then people say, no, it's a straw man. It's not

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 2>a goddamn straw man. Mike Sando, I think it was,

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 2>wrote an article in The Athletic talking to NFL executives

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 2>about is Brock Purdy the next Joe Montana the next

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Tom Brady or and that's not even the problem part

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 2>it was or is he just the next deck acting

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 2>The conversation had been set exactly right, exactly right, that

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 2>his ceiling is two of the greatest ever and his

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 2>floor is, oh, he's just going to be a guy

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 2>who makes hundreds of millions of multiple playoff appearances, multiple

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 2>twelve thirteen win seasons, and as a long time starter,

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 2>that's not his floor. Flatly, Matt Shaub might be his floor.

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:18.719
<v Speaker 2>That and that might like the the that's the conversation

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 2>we were having. And my I have not moved the goalposts.

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 2>And and this is the last thing I'll say. The

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.719
<v Speaker 2>whole idea of Nick even You've got to admit you

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 2>would have never thought the Niners would be this good

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 2>with Brock perty Guys, I picked the Niners to go

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 2>to the Super Bowl last year with a quarterback who

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 2>had thrown forty career passes as their starter in Trey

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Lance forty if that maybe is forty or fifty career passes.

0:27:56.520 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I and that was before they added Christian mc caffrey. Okay,

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I am a strong believer in that roster. I also

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 2>let me ask one other question, because this this just

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 2>irritates me right now this moment. How many are you

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 2>I'll ask you this, Demanse, right now this moment. Do

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 2>you think the Niners are the favorites to win the

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl?

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 3>The favorites, favorites to win the Super Bowl? Yeah, I'd say, yeah,

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 3>just about to go Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't.

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 4>I think I think it is, though.

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, they literally are. But it's the I mean,

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 2>they are the Vegas favorites right now Okay, but you're

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 2>but it seems like from your reaction, you're it's.

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 4>Exactly.

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 2>It could be the Chiefs, could be the Eagles, and

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 2>then there's the Lions lurking or whatever. Okay, let's play

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 2>a game. Replace brock Purty with Spin the Wheel Lamar Jackson.

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Are the Niners the far and away favorites, head and

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 2>shoulders better than everyone? Okay, Let's replace him with Trevor

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Are they the massive favorites? Let's replace him with Jared Goff.

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Are they the massive favorites? Let's replace him Dak Prescott, yep,

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Hurts yep, of course, Josh Allen, of course. Patrick Mahomes,

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 2>here's a better one. Replace brock Purty with C. J. Stroud.

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Are the Niners in a better or worse position than

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 2>they're in right now? Better position, of course, which is

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 2>why us talking about him like he's the NFL's MVP

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 2>is maddening. Let's move on next. Replace him, Matt Stafford.

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 2>They might not lose a game, go ahead.

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Said, the Eagles are coming off of an embarrassing loss

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 3>to the Jets. I don't know how embarrassing it is, honestly, but.

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 2>I agree bouncing back.

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Bouncing back won't be easy either, as they hosted Dolphins

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday night. With how Philia has looked the past

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 3>few games, should we be hammering Dolphins plus two and

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 3>a half?

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:13.959
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm not in a position to give gambling

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 2>advice right now. I have to recalibrate all of that.

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think that was an embarrassing loss to

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the Jets. Here's what I do think, Demonse. I do

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 2>think that Nick Sirianni should have gotten way more criticism. Listen,

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Jalen played a bad game, and Jalen's pick at the

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 2>end was terrible, no denying it. But here is what

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 2>is also true. The New York Jets were out of timeouts.

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 2>It was at the two minute warning. It was third

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 2>and nine, and the Eagles were up by two points,

0:30:55.160 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 2>fourteen to twelve. It's not as if the Jets had

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 2>moved the ball up and down the field any of that.

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Zach Wilson's still the quarterback and on third and nine,

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 2>right around midfield with no timeout remaining for the Jets.

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 2>If you run, and if you're Sirianni, you know Hurtz

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have it today. He's already thrown two picks. If

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 2>you run the football, maybe you pick it up, probably

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 2>you don't. If you pick up eight yards, you're gonna

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 2>run your stupid little brotherly shove play and you're gonna win.

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 2>The game's gonna be over. But let's just say you

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 2>run and you get zero yards. What's the situation. There's

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 2>then a minute fifteen left and you're punting from midfield

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 2>and you are saying, we have the best pass rush

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL, the best d line in the NFL,

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Zach Wilson, you need to go sixty five yards with

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 2>no timeouts and a minute five left to beat us,

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 2>and instead you gave the game away. Now Jalen shouldn't

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 2>have made that throw, but it is Sirianni's job to

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 2>protect his team. And if you have a pass rush

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 2>the way you do and you are playing Zach Wilson

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 2>and you have the opportunity to run the ball again,

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 2>the no timeouts thing is critical. You are leaving the

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Jets about sixty five seconds to go the length not

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the length of the field, but to go two thirds

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 2>of the field to get into field goal range with

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 2>no timeouts, and instead you throw it and you lose.

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 2>So I think The Eagles are fine ish. I don't

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 2>think they're a dominant team. I didn't think they were

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 2>dominant when they were five and zero. I also think Demontay,

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 2>have you looked at their next eight games? It's yeah,

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna read it to you real quick. Home for

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins at the Commanders, who again a divisional game

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 2>on the road. They did beat them last year, but

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 2>that's not that tough. You should win that game. So

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 2>home for the Dolphins at the Commanders. Then home for

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Dallas at the Chiefs, Home for the Bills, Home for

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the Niners at Dallas at Seattle. That's the next day.

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 2>That is that. That is a you are thrilled if

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 2>you go four and four stretch, if you go five

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 2>and three, you feel unbelievable. And so it's not that

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm overly worried about Philly, but they are they That

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 2>was a game they gave away. All Right, what are

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 2>the follow ups here? I had a tweet about the

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 2>brotherly show they want me to do?

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 4>You did have a tweet? I think we're going to

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 4>show it for those on YouTube? Was the time?

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Go ahead, yeah, here it is. This is what

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:11.720
<v Speaker 2>I wrote. I can't quite explain it. But not only

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 2>have the Eagles hacked the quarterback sneak, turning an eighty

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 2>percent successful play into a ninety eight percent successful play,

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 2>They've also tricked the rest of the league into turning

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 2>an eighty percent successful play into a forty percent successful

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 2>play by failing and imitating them. So this is what

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 2>is wild about what the Eagles have done. The quarterback

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 2>sneak four years was one of the most reliable plays

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 2>in the league. If you need a yard or less,

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 2>you'd run the quarterback sneak and cross teams four out

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 2>of five times. It would work cross teams across years.

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 2>The only team that really had it way way better

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 2>was the Patriots with Brady he was like ninety Okay,

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles turned that four out of five play into

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 2>a ninety five out of one hundred play with the

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 2>brotherly Shop. The rest of the league must recognize, we

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 2>can't do it. We don't have Jason Kelsey at center,

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 2>we don't have Jalen Hurts at quarterback, we don't practice

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 2>it enough, and now the rest of the league has

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 2>turned there. If you just did the old quarterback sneak,

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:33.439
<v Speaker 2>you'd be fine most of the time. Instead, they're trying

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.760
<v Speaker 2>to do this other thing, and I watched four teams

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:41.720
<v Speaker 2>fail at it this weekend. Four teams stop it. Stop

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 2>trying to do something you can't do rest of the league.

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:48.439
<v Speaker 2>Now folks are asking, have asked me, does this make

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.280
<v Speaker 2>me change my opinion on whether or not the NFL

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 2>is going to outlaw it?

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 2>My argument on the NFL outlawing it is purely an

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 2>esthetic one. I think it is too ugly of a play.

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 2>I know Philly fans get mad when I say that,

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I think and I but now maybe it's a They

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 2>don't have the outlaw it because it solves itself if

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Jason Kelsey retires and if Jalen hurts at some point,

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 2>says guys, I, I, you know, enough of a major

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:27.399
<v Speaker 2>part of our offense being twenty guys hitting me from

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 2>different sides. I, you know, I think I'm over that

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:33.840
<v Speaker 2>piece of it. But it is clear that it is

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 2>unique to Philadelphia right now, and it has had downstream

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 2>effects hurting the rest of the league trying to imitate them.

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, next, last one?

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 4>All Right?

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 3>The Bills have only had seven points going into the

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.240
<v Speaker 3>final five minutes of the last two weeks. They needed

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 3>the rest to bail them out, just to beat the

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Giants with Tara Taylor. But there's still four and two

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 3>when they get to go a place face the New

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 3>England Patriots. Why are the Buffalo Bills trying their asses off?

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 3>But the Chiefs are just practicing when this type of

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 3>stuff happens.

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So again, so a couple things. One is, as

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 2>soon as the Chiefs lose one of these practices that

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 2>I've talked about, people will be able to crow. But

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.240
<v Speaker 2>not only have they not lost, they have not trailed

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 2>for one second in the second half in any game

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 2>since Week one. They have not been in jeopardy of

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 2>losing any of these games. That's first of all. Second

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 2>of all, the Bills only having seven points at the

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 2>five minute marking back to back weeks is concerning flatly.

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 2>And the Bills also don't have games to give away.

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 2>They easily could have lost to the Giants. Now, I'm

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 2>not gonna win about the refereeing. They were whining about.

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Refereeing is just so tired. What people are going to

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 2>realize is it's not that they're oh my god, the

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 2>refs always bail out the Chiefs. What they're going to

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 2>realize is every single standalone, nationally televised game that is

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 2>close is going to have a play at the end.

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 2>People can bitch about wait for it this morning, get

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter later today, and you know what, people are

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 2>going to all of a sudden be realizing, Holy crap,

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 2>did Micah Parsons rough Justin Herbert on that damn near

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:40.879
<v Speaker 2>game clinching sack? What demanse? Did you see it? Yeah? Yeah,

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 2>the And so the reason people think the Chiefs are

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 2>benefiting disproportionately is because the Chiefs are on national TV

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:56.760
<v Speaker 2>every single week, and they win every team that wins

0:38:56.760 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 2>a nationally televised close game. If the way you want

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:03.760
<v Speaker 2>to consume pro football is find a way to discuss

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 2>the refs, you're gonna be able to find a play.

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 2>I would argue what the Bills did at the end

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:12.320
<v Speaker 2>of that game was actually super smart because they recognize

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 2>there's a little hack to end of game officiating. They

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 2>almost ever call the exact same penalty twice two times

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 2>in a row. So once you get called for pass

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 2>interference on the final play of the game, you know

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 2>what you should do on the untimedown pass interfere Because

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 2>refs don't want to call the same penalty two times

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 2>in a row to end a game. They just don't.

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 2>And so I got no problem what the Bills did

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 2>where I now what I will say is and I

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 2>tweeted this as well, and this is another one of

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 2>those things that I just know I'm right on. So

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't care. I like sometimes I send out these

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 2>tweets and I'm like, oh my god, like I'm gonna

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 2>get ratio. People are gonna, you know, say I'm a

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 2>hater or whatever it is. But I know I'm right.

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 2>So that Josh Allen touchdown pass was one of the

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 2>single most impressive throws anyone has made all year, and

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 2>a terrible decision. And why I don't trust the Bills.

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 2>So Demonse's laughing, and I understand people are like, Nick,

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 2>what are you talking about? Here's what I'm talking about.

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 2>It is second and six, there are four minutes left.

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 2>You are playing the New York Giants, who prior to

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 2>this game had not led in a game all year,

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 2>had not led for a single play all year. Prior

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 2>to this game. They're playing their backup quarterback, and they

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 2>hadn't scored a touchdown in a month, had not scored

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown a month, you're down two points, you're in

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:59.919
<v Speaker 2>the red zone. It is second and six. The own

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 2>only thing you can't do is throw a pick. A

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 2>field goal wins you the game. Now, Josh made a

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 2>throw that I don't even know Mahomes can make. Getting

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 2>that velocity on that ball, hitting that tight of a window,

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:27.839
<v Speaker 2>it was unbelievable. But that is absolutely the reason they

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 2>are He is such a hard player to trust. You

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:35.240
<v Speaker 2>can be wowed by him, but it's hard to trust

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 2>him because that was a bad decision. It worked out,

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:42.839
<v Speaker 2>and it's one of the best plays I've most impressive

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 2>plays I've ever seen. It also could have cost them

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 2>a game they had no business losing. And so if

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 2>you're going to and this is the nuance to it,

0:41:57.040 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 2>if you're going to take those types of risk, have

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 2>that type of boom bust quarterback, then I need you

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 2>to not for back to back weeks, have seven points

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 2>at the five minute mark of the fourth quarter. If

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 2>the whole idea behind your team is yeah, we're gonna

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 2>make some mistakes, but man, the upside's so great, then

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 2>you need to not be sitting on seven as the

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 2>game hits the three hour mark. In back to back weeks.

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:36.839
<v Speaker 2>That's not unfair, Bruce said to me the other day. Well, yeah,

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's the modern day Brett Farv. Brett Farv

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 2>by this point of his career had won multiple MVPs

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 2>and been to multiple Super Bowls and won a championship.

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:52.239
<v Speaker 2>Not quite the modern day Brett Farv. Like, Yes, the

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 2>modern day Brett Farv minus the championships, the Super Bowl appearances,

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:02.439
<v Speaker 2>and the league MVPs. So I the and as far

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 2>as why are the Chiefs allowed to practice and other

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 2>teams aren't because they're the defending champions. Because in the

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 2>last five years, the Bill's best year was worse than

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs worst year. Okay, in the last since Mahomes

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:31.759
<v Speaker 2>has been there. Take the chief single worst season losing

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 2>in overtime in the conference championship game. Take the Bill's

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:42.839
<v Speaker 2>best season getting blown out in the conference championship game

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:47.959
<v Speaker 2>by Kansas City. Yes, I hold the teams to different standards. Yes,

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 2>a team that has lost once in the last eleven

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 2>months and it was by one point without their second

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 2>and third best player that team, I am going to

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 2>give more of a benefit of the doubt too. I

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 2>am you can call me crazy. I say that is

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the most logical thing ever. And so and also, by

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the way, here's the other margin of error factor the

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs if they win Sunday. And I'm worried about Sunday

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 2>because the Chargers play the Chiefs tough that they never

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:28.280
<v Speaker 2>beat the Chiefs, but they play them in three point

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 2>games every single year, and at some point the Chargers

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:34.879
<v Speaker 2>win those will win one of those games. But if

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:40.760
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs win on Sunday, they will have essentially locked

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 2>up the division. By mid October, they'll be six and one.

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 2>The Chargers will be two and four, having already lost,

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of the head to heads, and the

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Raiders are in second place at three and three, and

0:44:57.719 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Garoppolo is going to the hospital. Old Luggiddon's back

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 2>looked at. So the Bills, on the other hand, if

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:11.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, needed to escape against Tyrod Taylor to not

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:17.840
<v Speaker 2>fall behind the Jets in the standings. These two things

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 2>are not the same. Take a quick break, come back,

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 2>what's right.

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.319
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:45:30.360 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Anthony Robliss, who defined every expectation

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling Champion and Unstoppable, a new

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:40.320
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 5>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 5>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 5>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:54.840
<v Speaker 5>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, welcome back in What's Right with Nick? Right,

0:45:58.400 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 2>that was a forty five minute blocks, So we'll try

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 2>to go fast here, and then I forgot to tell

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:07.319
<v Speaker 2>you guys, we can get to your chat questions in

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:09.879
<v Speaker 2>the C blocks. You guys can drop those questions here

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 2>in a moment, but Demans, let's get right to it

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 2>before we get to our game. Tear it down or

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:17.239
<v Speaker 2>turn it around. There's one more topic you guys want

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 2>to ask me about.

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so this weekend, your golden boy Kleb Williams had

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the worst game of his college career. Meanwhile, Wimby's looking

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:29.400
<v Speaker 3>very solid in preseason. You've been super heavy on Caleb Williams.

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 3>But if telling them that, have been warning everybody about

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 3>jumping on the Wimby boat. Are you sure that you

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 3>jumped on the wrong generational talent or are you worried

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 3>that you jumped on the wrong.

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 2>No, so listen, if people were talking about Wimby the

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 2>way I'm talking about Caleb, I'd be fine with it.

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:56.320
<v Speaker 2>I've said, now, it's a little tough in the NFL

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 2>because we break it down by position, not by like

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:05.279
<v Speaker 2>overall players in the league. But when I've said that

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Caleb is one of the five most valuable football players

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:15.359
<v Speaker 2>in the world right now moving forward, if you said, hey,

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Jannis Jokic, who else would you rather have for the

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 2>next decade than Wimby, I'd listen to that. That's not

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 2>the conversation that's been had around Victor Winbinyama. The conversation

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 2>has been that by year three, this was what Woje

0:47:34.560 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 2>said on the night of the draft lottery, by year three,

0:47:37.680 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 2>he will be head and shoulders, no pun intended, the

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:46.239
<v Speaker 2>best player in the league, the best offensive player and

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the best defensive player, something only a handful of guys

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:55.279
<v Speaker 2>have ever been at any point in their careers, the

0:47:55.320 --> 0:48:00.040
<v Speaker 2>best offensive and defensive player in the entire sport. That

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the X Men. That's where what was said about Wimby

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 2>was if he does not end up as one of

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the ten greatest football basketball players ever ever, he's a disappointment.

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 2>What I've said about Caleb is I'd rather have him

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:25.720
<v Speaker 2>than Justin Herbert. These are not the same things. Now,

0:48:25.920 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 2>what I will tell you is about both these guys.

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 2>One is I don't know what Wimby is going to

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:37.800
<v Speaker 2>look like in real games on offense in the beginning,

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 2>but on defense, he absolutely is going to be an

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 2>a defender immediately. And what we're seeing on the hesitation

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 2>people have on even putting shots up in his vicinity

0:48:58.760 --> 0:49:03.720
<v Speaker 2>is true, unbelievable, and so I'm excited to watch it. Listen,

0:49:04.000 --> 0:49:07.040
<v Speaker 2>once the games count, somebody is going to try to

0:49:07.080 --> 0:49:10.240
<v Speaker 2>just go through him. Somebody is gonna see if, okay,

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:13.120
<v Speaker 2>how much does the wingspan matter? If I push you

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:15.759
<v Speaker 2>under the basket, And I want to see how he

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:20.320
<v Speaker 2>reacts to it. But Wimby's preseason could not be going

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:24.280
<v Speaker 2>better as far as Caleb goes. Find me the college

0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 2>player that never has a single bad game. I mean,

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 2>give me a break. The amount of oh, Nick, what

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:32.919
<v Speaker 2>do you think about Caleb Williams Now the exact same

0:49:32.960 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 2>thing I thought about him before Notre Dame. Listen, guys,

0:49:35.680 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry that because Caleb Williams has set the standard

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:46.800
<v Speaker 2>so incredibly high that seeing him play a bad game

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:52.880
<v Speaker 2>feels it generates an allergic reaction. I'm sorry that going

0:49:52.960 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 2>into the Notre Dame game, this guy had, let me

0:49:56.960 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 2>get it exactly right, eighty five ive touchdowns to ten picks.

0:50:02.960 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 2>We had seen him play thirty two games he had

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 2>ten picks, and then in the Notre Dame game he

0:50:08.000 --> 0:50:10.120
<v Speaker 2>was bad. He had three picks and the Notre Dame

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 2>kicked his ass. People are like, uh, what are you

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:15.839
<v Speaker 2>ready to say about him? Now? What am I ready

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 2>to say about the guy who, on the season has

0:50:19.640 --> 0:50:25.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine touchdowns four interceptions and is now even with

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:29.880
<v Speaker 2>the Notre Dame game, just having the third best season

0:50:29.920 --> 0:50:32.920
<v Speaker 2>by a passer rating perspective in the history of college football.

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I think he's still pretty phenomenal. So no, I'm not

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:40.719
<v Speaker 2>worried at all about Caleb. I have been impressed by

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Wimby all right, next, all.

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:45.839
<v Speaker 3>Right and bringing back an whole game today and tear

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:48.000
<v Speaker 3>it down and turn it around. I'll give you a

0:50:48.040 --> 0:50:49.880
<v Speaker 3>team and you will say whether they should tear it

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 3>down before the trade deadline, or if they should make

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 3>a move for a late season turnaround. First off, we've

0:50:55.680 --> 0:50:58.759
<v Speaker 3>got the Jets. The jets amazing defense has them in

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the playoff conversation, and Rodgers was even seen throwing past

0:51:02.160 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 3>his pregame Sunday, I know you have doubts, but are

0:51:05.120 --> 0:51:06.120
<v Speaker 3>you really betting.

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 4>Against the sky Er and Rogers? Should the Jets tear

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:10.360
<v Speaker 4>it down or turn it around?

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Well? Yeah, I mean I don't think they should tear

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:14.239
<v Speaker 2>it down. I think they should try to, you know,

0:51:14.280 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 2>make a playoff push. Obviously, Aaron, Aaron, This idea that

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Rodgers is gonna play this year is one of

0:51:19.480 --> 0:51:21.319
<v Speaker 2>the most ludicrous things I've ever heard in my life.

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 2>I like it, though flatly not gonna happen. You like it?

0:51:25.320 --> 0:51:25.759
<v Speaker 2>How come?

0:51:26.080 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 4>I like?

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:27.120
<v Speaker 5>I do?

0:51:27.200 --> 0:51:29.760
<v Speaker 4>Think? Uh, I don't.

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:32.360
<v Speaker 3>I think he is giving hope to his teammates and

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 3>like kind of keeping them in the game. I think

0:51:34.080 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 3>he's doing it. I think he's doing it for his team.

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:44.839
<v Speaker 3>He's no, okay fair. I think that, like, his team

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:47.080
<v Speaker 3>was obviously really let down when that happened, and I

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 3>feel like he was also let down. He probably felt

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:51.160
<v Speaker 3>like he let the team down. I think that he's

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:53.799
<v Speaker 3>trying to keep them in the picture and keep spirits up,

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:55.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, keep the morale up in the locker room.

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 2>You know what. That is an incredibly generous reading of it.

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:04.160
<v Speaker 2>You might be correct. I think he wants the attention. Personally,

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 2>I think he wants the attention, and I think there

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:09.040
<v Speaker 2>is no chance he is back this year. But we'll

0:52:09.040 --> 0:52:11.200
<v Speaker 2>see how it plays out. But in the meantime, that

0:52:11.320 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Jet where I will admit I was wrong is the

0:52:16.239 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Jets defense is better than I thought it was gonna

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 2>be good, very good. It's been great. Garrett Wilson I

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:28.879
<v Speaker 2>thought was, you know, like the tenth, eleventh, twelfth best

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:32.240
<v Speaker 2>receiver in football. He's been better than that. Breeze Hall's

0:52:32.280 --> 0:52:34.720
<v Speaker 2>been excellent. The offensive line is a problem, and obviously

0:52:34.840 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Zach Wilson's a problem, but credit to the Jets in

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:42.399
<v Speaker 2>that regard. And what's unbelievable to Monsey is had they

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:47.319
<v Speaker 2>just not lost to the damn Patriots, they'd really be

0:52:47.400 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 2>cooking right now, and the Patriots might be the worst

0:52:50.080 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 2>team in the whole AFC all right now.

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 3>A crazy take like is saying that the Jets would

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 3>be undefeated if they had Aaron Rodgers. Is that like

0:52:57.560 --> 0:53:01.160
<v Speaker 3>a is that a horrible take? I mean they've had one,

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 3>They've had one game that wasn't close, and I think

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 3>it was against the Cowboys.

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:08.759
<v Speaker 2>The Cowboys. Yeah, I don't think they'd have beaten the

0:53:09.520 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 2>here's the thing about the about the about them being undefeated.

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:18.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they'd have beaten the Chiefs the Cowboys.

0:53:19.560 --> 0:53:21.839
<v Speaker 2>But but here's the thing. I know you're saying, like, oh,

0:53:21.840 --> 0:53:26.760
<v Speaker 2>that's ridiculous if they had Aaron Rodgers in that specific game,

0:53:27.600 --> 0:53:31.479
<v Speaker 2>Zach Wilson like put up Aaron Rodgers type numbers. It's

0:53:31.520 --> 0:53:35.800
<v Speaker 2>not like they played the Chiefs close with terrible quarterback play.

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Does that make sense? Like the Patriots game? They you

0:53:39.680 --> 0:53:42.720
<v Speaker 2>know they they definitely beat the Patriots with Aaron Rodgers.

0:53:42.760 --> 0:53:47.000
<v Speaker 2>The Patriots, it was a five point game. Go ahead.

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, would you say he's worth three points in general?

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 2>In general? Yes, but I guess two points. One is

0:53:57.840 --> 0:54:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I ain't the Chiefs got up seven team nothing and

0:54:01.880 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 2>winning cruise control mode because they're playing Zach Wilson and

0:54:05.160 --> 0:54:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the Jets. And secondarily, Zach in that game completed seventy

0:54:09.440 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 2>five percent of his passes at two hundred and fifty

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:13.040
<v Speaker 2>yards at a one to five rating, two touchdowns, snow

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 2>picks like Aaron I don't think would have done in

0:54:16.719 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 2>that specific game far better. So I don't know about undefeated.

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:23.279
<v Speaker 2>The Cowboys game, they got blown out, but they also

0:54:23.320 --> 0:54:26.600
<v Speaker 2>got blown out because of how bad the quarterback play was,

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 2>like a kind of ball started rolling downhill. I do

0:54:30.239 --> 0:54:34.160
<v Speaker 2>think this, and Sala tried to walk it back this morning.

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:40.480
<v Speaker 2>But if you actually think you're a playoff contender, talking

0:54:40.760 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 2>on Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes probably a bad idea

0:54:44.680 --> 0:54:47.160
<v Speaker 2>because he said, we've played great quarterbacks and we've.

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 4>Been embarrassed him right, all right, So.

0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's let's talk about that for a second. You definitely

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:57.360
<v Speaker 2>have to play the Bills again this year, and you hope,

0:54:57.400 --> 0:55:01.880
<v Speaker 2>against hope to have the opportuno to play the Chiefs

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:07.480
<v Speaker 2>again this year. Maybe don't say you embarrassed those quarterbacks. Patrick,

0:55:09.200 --> 0:55:09.880
<v Speaker 2>he's not scared.

0:55:10.480 --> 0:55:12.440
<v Speaker 4>Maybe don't say it. I don't say what he wants.

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, tell that to the folks who were screaming

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 2>about Borrowhead Invitational, about the Boroughhead, about Burrowhead Stadium. I mean,

0:55:20.200 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 2>that's that's fine, all right.

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Next, Oh, we got Patriots, Come on, and you're seriously

0:55:26.320 --> 0:55:30.240
<v Speaker 3>coming counting out the best coach of all time, the Jets.

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:33.719
<v Speaker 3>If the Jets can resurrect Zach Wilson, can Belichick resurrect

0:55:33.719 --> 0:55:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Mac Jones?

0:55:34.800 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 2>Should they tear it down? You got to tear it down.

0:55:38.200 --> 0:55:40.719
<v Speaker 2>Here's a question I asked on the TV show yesterday.

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:44.480
<v Speaker 2>If the Patriots released every single player on their offense,

0:55:44.800 --> 0:55:47.440
<v Speaker 2>just cut them all, would any one of them start

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 2>start for another team? I don't know, maybe like Trent

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Brown for a team of the bad offensive line, Romandre

0:55:54.960 --> 0:55:57.799
<v Speaker 2>Stevenson for a few teams they have no talent.

0:55:58.200 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 4>They even tear it down if you don't have any Jesus.

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:02.960
<v Speaker 2>No, you got it? I mean yeah, I mean you

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:05.759
<v Speaker 2>can hope to get Caleb you can. You just got

0:56:05.760 --> 0:56:08.480
<v Speaker 2>to tear it all down. And this is going to

0:56:08.520 --> 0:56:13.000
<v Speaker 2>be an ignominious end for Belichick. Car so fast next, Yeah,

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:13.440
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing.

0:56:13.600 --> 0:56:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Vikings Kirk Cousins said he wouldn't wave his no trade clause,

0:56:17.200 --> 0:56:20.360
<v Speaker 3>But do we really believe that with no justin Jefferson,

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:21.560
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's time to rebuild.

0:56:21.640 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Should the Vikings tear it down and turn it around?

0:56:24.840 --> 0:56:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I absolutely believe it that he wouldn't wave his

0:56:29.719 --> 0:56:32.240
<v Speaker 2>no trade clause. He's trying to get another Giant payday

0:56:32.320 --> 0:56:35.279
<v Speaker 2>and going to another team in a new system doesn't

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:38.200
<v Speaker 2>help him with that. He's comfortable in Minnesota, he likes

0:56:38.239 --> 0:56:41.879
<v Speaker 2>it there. It's indoors. They but they should tear it down.

0:56:41.960 --> 0:56:44.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean they've got to start over. You build around

0:56:44.400 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 2>justin Jefferson and not much else. That's what you do

0:56:46.560 --> 0:56:48.120
<v Speaker 2>there next. I like Addison too.

0:56:50.080 --> 0:56:52.680
<v Speaker 3>You've been teasing that Russell Wilson's time has already done,

0:56:53.080 --> 0:56:55.840
<v Speaker 3>even if the Broncos are dragging their feet. But Denver

0:56:55.960 --> 0:56:57.680
<v Speaker 3>has a lot of pieces they could trade now for

0:56:57.719 --> 0:57:00.719
<v Speaker 3>a kickstart to rebuild. Should the Bronco tear it down

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 3>or turn it around?

0:57:02.320 --> 0:57:05.400
<v Speaker 2>No, they obviously have to tear it down, and I

0:57:05.400 --> 0:57:08.440
<v Speaker 2>mean they also have a chance at Caleb if not

0:57:08.520 --> 0:57:11.319
<v Speaker 2>another quarterback. They're gonna tear it down. They're gonna cut

0:57:11.360 --> 0:57:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Russell Wilson this offseason, and I think he's gonna get

0:57:14.560 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 2>benched after the Chiefs game. They have two more games

0:57:17.400 --> 0:57:19.320
<v Speaker 2>then they have a bye week. The Chiefs game is

0:57:19.360 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 2>the second one, the one leading into the bye week.

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I think they're gonna bench him there. Put your questions

0:57:23.560 --> 0:57:25.760
<v Speaker 2>in the chat now and we'll answer him. Next quick

0:57:25.760 --> 0:57:33.320
<v Speaker 2>break right back, what's right? All right, we'll go through

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:35.800
<v Speaker 2>a few quick questions. By the way, a programming note today,

0:57:35.800 --> 0:57:38.959
<v Speaker 2>today the TV show is only thirty minutes long two

0:57:39.000 --> 0:57:43.960
<v Speaker 2>to two thirty because we have live programming on FS one.

0:57:44.280 --> 0:57:46.360
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back to our regular schedule tomorrow. But that

0:57:46.440 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 2>means we got jam back TV show because it's Tuesday,

0:57:49.160 --> 0:57:53.840
<v Speaker 2>which means it's Mahomes Mountain Day. And spoiler alert, Caleb

0:57:54.000 --> 0:57:56.280
<v Speaker 2>tripped on the mountain but did not fall off the mountain.

0:57:56.320 --> 0:57:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not that crazy, all right, demanse, what are some

0:57:58.760 --> 0:58:00.800
<v Speaker 2>of the questions that we have from the audience.

0:58:01.600 --> 0:58:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Joshua Harbin said, people are actually forgetting their party still

0:58:04.600 --> 0:58:07.640
<v Speaker 3>had Kittle and Ayuk San Francisco fans are so funny.

0:58:08.320 --> 0:58:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, I mean, listen, he was down his two

0:58:10.640 --> 0:58:13.160
<v Speaker 2>best weapons, so all he had left was a one

0:58:13.240 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 2>really good receiver and the second best tight end in football.

0:58:16.320 --> 0:58:18.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's just an impossible situation.

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Next, Mohammed musa question. If NBA players started shooting granny

0:58:23.000 --> 0:58:25.480
<v Speaker 3>style free throws at ninety percent, would Nick won it

0:58:25.600 --> 0:58:27.080
<v Speaker 3>banned for esthetic reasons?

0:58:27.280 --> 0:58:27.920
<v Speaker 4>Great question?

0:58:28.120 --> 0:58:31.360
<v Speaker 2>No, they yeah, it's a fine question. But we never

0:58:31.400 --> 0:58:33.439
<v Speaker 2>have to worry about that because guys have too much

0:58:33.520 --> 0:58:36.440
<v Speaker 2>pride to try to gain the system like that. Like

0:58:36.480 --> 0:58:38.800
<v Speaker 2>give me a break. You're like, oh, yeah, that's what

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:40.480
<v Speaker 2>they should do. No, it's not what they should do.

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:44.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the entertainment business, and there is a professional

0:58:44.640 --> 0:58:48.760
<v Speaker 2>pride in doing things the way they're supposed to be done.

0:58:49.120 --> 0:58:50.960
<v Speaker 2>So I know people give me a hard time about that.

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:53.479
<v Speaker 2>The entire goal is to win kind of.

0:58:54.080 --> 0:58:57.160
<v Speaker 4>But it's also history with the touch plus thing.

0:58:58.360 --> 0:59:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, and the more team that fail on it, the

0:59:01.600 --> 0:59:05.240
<v Speaker 2>more respect Philly gets for it. That it's not like

0:59:05.320 --> 0:59:07.600
<v Speaker 2>that that it is they have gained the system in

0:59:07.600 --> 0:59:11.080
<v Speaker 2>a way that is unique to their personnel, which is

0:59:11.120 --> 0:59:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I think more impressive than otherwise.

0:59:13.000 --> 0:59:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Next toush Bush is like a button on your back.

0:59:16.920 --> 0:59:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Clark Nebras or nebres Is Nick. Is Ion still a

0:59:21.440 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 3>top young player or has the hype sailed?

0:59:26.400 --> 0:59:29.080
<v Speaker 2>No, he's still a top young player in theory, and

0:59:29.120 --> 0:59:32.560
<v Speaker 2>when he's played he's been unbelievable. But you have to

0:59:32.600 --> 0:59:35.200
<v Speaker 2>be worried about him on court and off court. So

0:59:35.360 --> 0:59:40.000
<v Speaker 2>like there is the I wouldn't sell my Zion stock,

0:59:40.040 --> 0:59:41.600
<v Speaker 2>but I wouldn't be buying more.

0:59:41.360 --> 0:59:41.960
<v Speaker 4>Of it, all right.

0:59:42.080 --> 0:59:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Next Ember, Lindo Garzan asks, should the Jaguars sit Trevor

0:59:46.840 --> 0:59:47.560
<v Speaker 3>this Thursday?

0:59:48.760 --> 0:59:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I'd probably not. You got to see how

0:59:50.800 --> 0:59:53.720
<v Speaker 2>his knee feels. You gotta be careful with him, but

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:56.120
<v Speaker 2>you also got to win games all of a sudden

0:59:56.160 --> 1:00:00.560
<v Speaker 2>with the with the Texans being a legit frisk team,

1:00:00.960 --> 1:00:04.640
<v Speaker 2>you can't give games away, and so you try to

1:00:04.680 --> 1:00:08.320
<v Speaker 2>protect Trevor. But if he can go, he goes. All right,

1:00:08.440 --> 1:00:10.360
<v Speaker 2>ask CF Candy's question and then we'll.

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we see Nick. Do you think Caleb goes back

1:00:12.880 --> 1:00:15.400
<v Speaker 3>to us? See if the Bears have the first round pick.

1:00:16.200 --> 1:00:19.160
<v Speaker 2>The first No, this is such a ridiculous idea. First

1:00:19.160 --> 1:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>of all, guess what, guys, Every team ever that gets

1:00:22.320 --> 1:00:24.840
<v Speaker 2>the first overall pick stinks. There's not a lot of

1:00:24.840 --> 1:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>instances like, oh, going to this great franchise with the

1:00:29.120 --> 1:00:32.680
<v Speaker 2>first overall pick. No, you're not. Second of all, the

1:00:32.720 --> 1:00:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Bears have their pick and the Panthers pick. So if

1:00:36.320 --> 1:00:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Caleb goes to Chicago, it's an incredible It's a division.

1:00:40.600 --> 1:00:44.480
<v Speaker 2>The Packers are in rebuild, the Vikings are in rebuild.

1:00:44.840 --> 1:00:48.120
<v Speaker 2>You also probably can draft Marvin Harrison junior and they're

1:00:48.120 --> 1:00:50.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna hire it an awesome I said it a month ago.

1:00:51.480 --> 1:00:54.959
<v Speaker 2>Draft Caleb at one, Marvin Harrison Junior at two or three,

1:00:55.360 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>and then hire Ben Johnson from Detroit and get rolling

1:00:58.440 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Demont's great work. Today, everybody, I'm on with Colin in

1:01:02.080 --> 1:01:04.439
<v Speaker 2>ninety minutes. I'm then doing the TV show at two.

1:01:04.760 --> 1:01:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm then on Ethan Sherwood Strauss's podcast later today. I'll

1:01:08.480 --> 1:01:11.080
<v Speaker 2>see you guys for all that stuff. Have a wonderful day.

1:01:11.120 --> 1:01:13.680
<v Speaker 2>See you guys on TV today at two o'clock for

1:01:13.720 --> 1:01:14.520
<v Speaker 2>first things First,