WEBVTT - Job Gains Are A Mirage Until Stimulus Runs Out: LaSalle CEO

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Kind a Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. I do you want to

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>point out some other statistics as well? The overall employment

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>rate does not show the racial disparities. So the black

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate, for example, was fifteen point four percent, and

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>within that men's unemployment in the black community sixteen point

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>four percent, so much much worse than the overall unemployment

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>rate at eleven point one percent. Let's bring in somebody

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>who tries to place people in jobs where they are needed.

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Tom Gimball is founder and CEO of LaSalle Network staffing

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and Recruiting agency and it's been going since so it's

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>seen several business cycles. Tom, thanks for joining. What are

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.639
<v Speaker 1>you seeing the last month or two who's calling you

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to find them workers? Well? That's the interesting thing is

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>business is okay. It's not terrible. It's definitely not pre

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>COVID levels, but there's not consistency across verticals and per

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've had my business for almost twenty five years,

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and through two thousand one and the two thousand and

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>eight two thousand nine recovery, UM, you'd see verticals that

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>we're doing well, and now it just happens to be

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>company by company depending on how they're staffed and what

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>their client mixes. And it's really not an a vertical

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>industry per se. So what we're seeing across the board, though,

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is I t continues and I'm not talking tech companies.

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>It could be a manufacturing company, but they're hiring technology

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>talent continues to be the leader in the in the

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>fields that are hiring Thomas. So as you look at

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>some of this data gain a couple of months here,

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you've had some uh pretty strong data. Is that is

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the labor environment tries to recover here? Is this is

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>simply Corporate America kind of bringing back some furloughed workers

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>or is this any type of new hiring growth growth hiring?

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I would characterize it. What are you seeing? It's definitely

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>not growth hiring. It is absolutely dependent on p PP

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>money and companies having government backed UH finances in order

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to bring people back, and I think that's what we're

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing is the intersection right now. People say, why is

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the stock market up when there's forty million not thirty

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>five million people unemployed, And the answer is because we

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't had a true intersection of suffering from an economic basis.

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Even people that haven't been called back, they're getting six

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars a week unemployment from the federal government on top

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of their state unemployment. So they're at forty five to

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars a year, and well, maybe not hold of

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>where they were. They're definitely not begging for peanuts in

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the parking lot to be able to eat. They can

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>pay their bills, and so you get these situations of

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>what we're looking at. Um. Well, the numbers are are mirage.

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit of smoke and mirrors until we

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>get the September October numbers. Everything else is is really

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>smoking mirrors because of the government funding. So Tom tell

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 1>us about the data you collect on people that tell

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you they are looking for jobs, actively seeking jobs. I

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 1>presume you know you've got roles and roles of people

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>previous customers and continuing customers. Well, the interesting thing is

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is when you have so many service workers, hospitality waiters, waitresses,

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>hotel employees, so on and so forth. It's really where

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the lines share was. Then in the flip side in

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>corporate America, you saw a lot of excess salespeople. So

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>what companies were doing through a growth market from two

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand ten to uh, you know, really February of this year,

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is they're hiring an anticipation of business picking up and

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>continuing to grow. So companies were hiring more people than

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>they needed for today, but to be ready for next month,

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>next quarter, next year, and get them trained and acclimated.

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Those are the people that are now on the street.

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>They got let go because the business wasn't there yet.

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>And so the hard part is trying to find out

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that there's very few companies that say we're gonna do

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a downsizing, line up our best people and let's get

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>rid of them first, right. That doesn't happen for the

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>most part um And and so we've got a lot

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of people that are just confused over where they where.

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>They let go because they made too much money and

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>companies needed to take a hit, which is true. There's

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a few people like that. I've actually hired some of

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>them myself, but but secondarily, there's a lot of people

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that maybe weren't even qualified for the jobs. And at

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>three point five percent unemployment, you get a lot of

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>companies taking chances to hire people. At eleven percent or

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>fourteen percent unemployment, companies don't take chances. They only hire

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>proven commodities. So, Tom, we're starting to see, you know,

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in some key states California, Texas, Florida, you know, big

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>labor states, kind of seeing some of the virus go

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the other way. Uh, you know, states and cities beginning

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to kind of close down once again. Are we going

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to see that in the numbers over the next couple

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of months. Are you thinking to what extent? Yeah, I

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to see that quite a bit because

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it's coinciding with the p PP money wearing off. And

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>even though they extended it from ten weeks to twenty

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>four weeks, the majority of companies that took the money

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it expired, they used it at the way they were

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>supposed to and it's expiring at the expired at the

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>end of June. And so now what you're having is

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>an intersection of companies, uh don't have money to pay

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>their people from the government. They're not going to have

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>an influx of business due to quarantine, and business is

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>being shut down by their state governments. And at the

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>same time they're going to have no choice for survival

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>but to lay people off. So I think you're really

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>at an interesting intersection between the COVID health crisis and

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a false sense of economic security from the government money

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>starting to run out. It'll be a real interesting third quarter.

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>What about your own business? How do you work at

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a time like this when companies have such a choice

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>if they are even able to hire that they can

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>really just probably put out a help wantedsign literally on

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>their windows of their properties. Do you also suffer and

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>how are you managing? I appreciate you asked, So it's

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a real interesting dynamic. We we've got about two a

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>little under two hundred and fifty employees on staff, and

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we haven't laid off a soul at the Sound Network.

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So what we've done is is Number One, we've always

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>managed the company in a fiscally conservative way to be

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:18.239
<v Speaker 1>ready for situations like this. Number Two, companies are hiring,

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>You've just got to find the pockets and and that's

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the biggest challenge. And what I've seen more than anything

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>else in our company is we've always been a culture

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>first company. And when you have happy people that are

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>appreciative of the where they work, they're going to execute

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.799
<v Speaker 1>the mission in a lot more efficient way than other folks.

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And so we've been able to pick up business. And

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we've moved internal recruiters, so we've moved more people to

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>our I T practice. We've moved them off call centers,

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.799
<v Speaker 1>which is slowed down because of the proximity of workers

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in a in a closed in environment. Our supply chain

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in our HR practice or human resources practice is picked up,

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and we've moved recruiters into that space. And so you've

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>really got to do what I call chasing the gap.

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>You've got to find where uh the gap and opportunities.

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But to your question, um about companies being able to

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>run an AD and getting people, that's exactly why they

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>need us, because there's too many people applying to a job.

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>With forty million unemployed people, you run an AD, you're

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna get hundreds, if not thousands, of people who aren't

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>qualified for it and you can never get through that

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>batch on your own. Tom, what is your sense kind

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of going forward of uh, maybe how the workforce may change. Um,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.679
<v Speaker 1>in this country, we've had more and more people working

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>from home. We've probably had a lot of companies recognizing that,

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>g we can do this. Do you think there's gonna

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>be material changes and maybe how companies staff themselves and

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and maybe where they elect to have their workers. You know,

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a couple of different hypotheses on this

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that I have, but you know, first and foremost, I

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>look at the situation and it's going to be driven

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>by company profits. And if companies are going remote with

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>workers from home and they're doing well and making money,

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll stay with it. And when they don't and the

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>times change, you'll see it reverse no matter what the

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>situation is, because if you're not making money, that is

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the definition of why you're you're in business. UM, So

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that that will truly dictate it. Secondarily, though, on the

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>aspect of work from home, UM, what you're you're gonna

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>see is if people can work from anywhere, you're going

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to hire people that are the least expensive. It's like

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>off shoring. People didn't off shore to to India or

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the Philippines or or what have you because they thought

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the work was better. They thought it was cheaper and

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it was acceptable. And so what you're gonna have in

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the same situation is if you can hire a developer,

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>if everybody's gonna work from home, why would you pay

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody two hundred thousand dollars in San Francisco and you

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>can pay a hundred and ten thousand dollars in Montana.

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>And that will affect the real estate markets, the rental

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>real estate markets, the homeownership in in major metropolitan cities,

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and will be a huge ripple effect. I don't think

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>work from home. I think two years from now you're

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>going to see office back to levels that they were

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 1>pre COVID TOM. When you wake out race and your data,

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>do you notice anything, Well, it's there. There's a there's

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of difference between in race from college degree

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and non college degree and where people are working. And

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.839
<v Speaker 1>you have major metropolitan areas that that obviously have a

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>higher minority standpoint versus more rural areas, and I think

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>those continue to be issues but that that every company

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to face. Um the biggest challenge is how

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>do we get more minorities into colleges to have college

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>degrees to compete against what's been traditionally a white labor force,

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's where we spend a lot of our time

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>with either historically black colleges and universities and state colleges

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that tend to have a higher minority concentration. Hey, Tom,

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>just quickly, what do you make of this um the

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>issue about the uh H one B visa issue. How

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>much of is that going to be a problem for

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>U S recruiters. It's a it's a big issue when

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you're when you're looking at at tech talent and bringing

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>people in and not just traditional like software developers and

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>bearing stereotypical like that, but but engineering as well, and

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the STEM type position science, technology, engineering,

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and math. There's been a lot of those roles that

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>have been H one B visa type situations and and

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>there's really two fold. Number one is having that talent

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>available and number two, um is the message that it

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>sends of diversity and people wanting to come here and

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and work. Now, on the flip side of it, if

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that talent is not going to be allowed in the country,

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>companies are just gonna off shore the business anyways. And

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the majority of big technology companies they have facilities, offices

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>or strategic alliances with companies and other countries, and so

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>then we're gonna lose the people uh from being here,

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're actually gonna lose the payroll taxes into the

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>system because we're just gonna be paying an offshore company

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to do it for us. I think it's a real

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>detriment uh politics aside. I think it's a real detriment

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>to the economy and to getting the best talent in

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the world to want to be in America. Tom, thank

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you so much for your insights today. Always just fascinating

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>getting insights from somebody who really, you know, is at

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the cold face of the labor market and those who

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>are looking for work. And obviously we're seeing millions and

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>millions looking for work right now. Tom Gimbal joining us

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>their founder and CEO of LaSalle Network. It's based in Chicago.

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>It's been stuffing and recruiting since and really there are

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>some messages in what Tom was saying their pole, you know,

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>most obviously that this is just not going to end

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. There's so many people to be placed. Yeah,

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. Plus you've got the again those big states, California, Texas, Florida,

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>some others, Arizona, it's going to be, you know, a

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>real issue to try to deal with those numbers which

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>are sure to go the other way here as some

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of those states kind of pulled back on the reopening.

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So we are talking about this morning's jobs report. It

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>was eagerly anticipated the number perhaps better than estimates, but

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we should mention that estimates ranged from half a million

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to nine millions, so there was really a huge, huge

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>disparity in what economists thought was going to be the

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>case in this data. Let's bring in an economist now,

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Danielle di Martino Booth. She is CEO and Director of

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence at quill In Intelligence. She's also also Bloomberg opinion

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 1>columnist and also author of fed Up, an insider's take

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>on why the Federal Reserve is bad for America. Danielle,

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining. Explain to us what's good about this data.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Larry Codlow says, it's about the furloughs coming down and

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that's going to continue. What else is good about this data? Well,

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you know money. The thing is because of the misclassification error.

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people in my world have

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>started to follow the Department of Labor data that come

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 1>out on on a weekly basis, it's much time where

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>if you will, and it's not prone to the same

0:12:56.400 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>seasonal adjustment. So if you look at that day against

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the backdrop of a hundred and sixty four point six

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 1>million in the US labor force, you see the all in,

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>including the pandemic unemployment Assistance program, you have thirty one

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>point five million Americans right now collecting unemployment insurance in

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the state state and insurance programs or the

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Cares Act extended benefits programs as well. So that is

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a record high number, and that is what I follow

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the most closely because it's a hard number and it's

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not prone to seasonal adjustments. It's simply the number

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of Americans collecting unemployment insurance as of the same week

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>as the survey week that we saw for the non

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 1>farm payroll data this morning. So, Daniel, you're based in

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas you of a grounds eye view of kind

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening in that state. Give us a sense

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 1>of kind of where you think a state as big

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and as diverse as Texas, how is it dealing with

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the resurgence and cases there and kind of how do

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you think that's going to impact employment numbers going forward

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>as we think about not just Texas, but Florida and

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Californian Arizona and California has just shut down nineteen counties

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. Uh So, the way I look at this

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is is traffic patterns, it's open table reservations, it's Google

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>trends in terms of individuals looking for unemployment insurance benefits,

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen them pick up for the last few weeks.

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>There are very few paying attention to initial unemployment claims,

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but they are definitely moving in the wrong direction. They've

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>missed the consensus for three weeks in a row, meaning

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>they've come in higher. And that is what we're seeing

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>here in Dallas and in other places that are slowing down.

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Restaurants are closing back up, bars have obviously closed again,

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's much more reticence on the part of a

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people to go out and spend and that

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is filtering through to the number of people applying for

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the first time for unemployment insurance exactly. We just literally

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes ago had Nationale Tennessee revert back to

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>phase two from phase three. So it's happening incrementally around

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the country. Done, what are re employment benefits and bonuses, well,

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>re employment benefits and bonuses are uh A their theoretical

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and some of the things that we've heard thrown out

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>would be potentially a four thousand dollar credit to travel

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>around the country um and go see America. It would

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>come back to you with your taxes. Basically, what they're

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is incentivize Americans to come back into

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the workforce, many of whom are making more money today,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>making six hundred dollars extra a week that is set

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to expire on July thirty one. I truly believe that

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are dead set on extending that six hundred

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars because of the effect that it would have. And

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>we as we see one state after another lift rental

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>moratorium um uh and the national moratorium by the way,

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on stead really assisted uh Renters lifts on July. So

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got two different cliffs, if you will, for people

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>who have been relied on stimulus to tie them over. So, Danielle,

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense not given we've got a couple

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>more data points here on the labor front. How do

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you think this US economy is going to uh? You know,

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>presumably we're gonna get this brutal UH second quarter g

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>d P print. But how do you expect the remainder

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of the year into two thousand and twenty one to

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>develop from an economic activity perspective. Well, so I'll be

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>much more comfortable when I start to see the number

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of people collecting pandemic uneployment assistant claims begin to go down.

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>We've had one point eight million added to that in

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the data that we have. Last week it was one

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>point six million, So these are new entrants. UH Looking

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>for Cares Act released this Pandemic Unmployment systince last through

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, by the way, December thirty one.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'll be happier when I start to see the

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>number of Americans collecting unemployment decrease, because that means that

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get more velocity and edibility to generate

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>growth the on the mathematical bounce that we know that

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see in the third quarter, even as

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>as Goldman Taxes estimated we've closed down the economy a

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>few days ago. That preceded, as Vonnie just said, Nashville

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and Miami and nineteen counties in California, you're gonna need

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a truly reopen economy. The President would be best served

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 1>to mandate masks, which would get a lot of a

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>lot more people out and purchasing spending, generating economic activity. Danielle.

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>We also had Larry Caudlow a little earlier talking about

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>helping the restaurant industry, the tourism industry, and the entertainment industry.

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>You talked about capital gains, moves, investment right offs. How

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>do you see that all happening? Will you need a

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>mixture of everything from from what I just mentioned to

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>those reemployment benefits and bonuses to a continuation of p PP.

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. I think it's a combination of

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>many things. I worry that the relief for the restaurant

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>industry is going to come too late because of a

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>recent YELP survey that found had already made the decision

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>to close restaurants in America a third of retailers in America.

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>These are small businesses. So if they're going to do

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>something to try and rescue the restaurant industry as so

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>much of the country recloses, it's something they need to

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>do very very quickly. Daniel D. Martino Bouth, thank you

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us as always. Danielle As a

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>CEO and Director of Intelligence at Quill Intelligence, also a

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>former advisor at the Dallas Federal Reserve, and also a

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg opinion columnists and that's not enough. She's also the

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>author of the book entitled Fed Up and Insiders Take

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on why the Federal Reserve is bad for America the market, Vannie,

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of giving back some of those games.

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>We were up about four change on the DAW, now

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>up about one seventy five. So I think people are

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>recognizing that while the jobs data was certainly a strong,

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>strong number, better than expected, it's a you know, backwards

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>looking number, and maybe going forward the numbers may not

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>be as good going forward well. And of course, as

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we get you know, local updates throughout the morning from

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>various parts of the country, you started sort of worrying

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>about coronavirus again, right, and and the surge in some

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>areas not even a resurgence, but you know, a first

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>surge in many areas which were causing which is causing

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>areas to shot down again. Yeah, exactly right. And as

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier on Nashville, Tennessee, kind of rolling back

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>from a phase three opening back to a phase two

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>so as they get more cautious. This is Bloomberg Markets

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>with Paul Sweeney and Bunny Quinn on Bloomberg Radio. Well,

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the narrative of the COVID nineteen pandemic really over the

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>last week to ten days to two weeks perhaps has

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>been the surge in cases in key populous states such

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>as California, Texas, Florida, Arizona, states that had generally been

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>lightly touched by this virus in the early stages. To

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of kind of where we are, where

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we're headed. We are so fortunate to have Laurence sour

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>with that she's assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine at the

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>John's Hopkins UH School of Medicine. And I might note

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that the Bloomberg School of Public Health is supported by

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Michael Bloomberg, founder Bloomberg ELP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. In this

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>radio station and TV station, Lauren, thank you so much

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. Some really grim numbers coming out

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of some key populous Sun belt states. What's your take. Yeah,

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that what we're seeing is the impact of

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>reopening too soon essentially, um, and I don't think it's

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>unreasonable dr pat to the other day on UM some

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of his testimony so that he expected that we could

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>possibly see a hundred thousand cases here in the US

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and UM per day. And and I think I think

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we're headed there. You know, we had a fifty pieces

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>day yesterday. And UM, I think the impact of these reopening,

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>this new mixing and the wanting so desperately to go

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>back to normal is showing its space. The reopenings that

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>need to be you know, moved back, need to be

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>so down how they contribute to do new spread? Lauren,

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we we're still looking at the date on that,

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>but I do think we are seeing new spread because

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of those reopening, particularly in places like bars and restaurants

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and indoor spaces where there is crowding. Um. You know,

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>there was this rush to get back to normal, and

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we're not in a place where we can be back

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to normal. And I think this Jon, we sort of

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>realize that, and you know, remove the political politicization of

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, social distancing and wearing masks and things like that,

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and just look at them as really public health measures.

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>The better off will be. So Lauren, there is a

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>playbook on how to bend the curve, which is a

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>term we spoke about a lot early uh in this pandemic.

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Delaware, Pennsylvania, some states who

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>really had some success and are continuing to see some

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>pretty good numbers. There's no reason why this can't be

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>applied to other parts of the country, is there. Yeah.

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. I mean, I think, um, you know,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of lessons to learn from places

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.959
<v Speaker 1>like New York. Massachusetts is doing really well, UM, and

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they've been pretty restrictive on what they're allowing

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>with reopening, and they also have a lot of community

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>buy in around masking and social distancing, and so learning

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>lessons from the states that have gotten it right um,

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and even some of the states that have had to

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>backtrack and say we thought we were ready and we're not.

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's critical. One of the challenges is, you

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>know that we have to change our approach if we

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>learn new We may have to change our approach if

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we learn new information, and communicating that to the public

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>UM is really important. So the message are getting today

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>might be slightly different than the message you're getting tomorrow

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 1>because we've learned these new things. Yea, where do you

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>go for a new information that you trust to move

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>on the conversation and the research on coronavirus law and

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>other specific places and and is it a day by

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>day thing or it can we really only find new

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>information and amount a month by month basis. Yeah, I

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>think it is a day by day thing. There's a

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of science happening really really quickly, and we have

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a little careful with the science that's coming out.

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's been an uptick in the use of

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>pre prints, which essentially is is research is being published

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>before it's been peer reviewed, and so how we use

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>that information to make operational decisions has to be you know,

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>a little better understood. UM. I am partial to the

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins resources. I think we're doing UM. I maybe a

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>little biased, but I think we're doing a lot of

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>really good work UM. And you know, there's a lot

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>of really good resources on the Hopkins site. And and

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>I think UM information UH outbreak dot info UM is

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a is a website by scripts that I really like

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that UM is calling UM research together and it's been

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>really valuable. It's updated regularly, and it's really useful. So

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of sites out there. It's just a

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>matter of you know, parsing through it. Sometimes it feels

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>like information overload, and I think part of that is

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>because this is so new and were we are adapting

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>our approach based on new information, that it feels like

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>there's this overflows him soul well profession. When I think

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of Johns Hopkins, I think of two things, lacrosse and

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>world class kind of science medical, uh, you know, knowledge.

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 1>And that's why we're so fortunate to have folks like

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>you and the other folks at that Johns Hopkins talking

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>with us. We appreciate that. One question, is this whole

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>mask you mentioned, kind of the mask wearing thing. It's

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of a second nature for us here in this

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the country, but I know in a lot

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of parts of the country it's really not. Does that

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>require some type of federal mandate if you will to

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>wear masks in public? How do you think you play that?

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeahs mnate, it would be one option. I think it's

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>UM those can be challenging to enforce. I think we

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>also have to respect the state police powers that give

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the state the um authority to in um enact public

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>health measures and health care measures. UM I think the

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing, honestly is the messaging and the communication around it.

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.239
<v Speaker 1>We're in a bit of a trust vacuum when it

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to UM, you know, public health authority and leadership,

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>UM and messaging, and we have to find a way

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to make the masking or the pace coverings or even

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the physical distancing not about the politics behind it and

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>who's supporting what, but about the fact that masks keep

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 1>people safe, the evidence of telling us that my mask

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>is keeping you safe, your mask is keeping me safe UM,

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and together we can protect our most vulnerable communities and

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>try to get back to some some of the normality. Lauren,

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>our conversations with you are literally are highlights for the day.

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So thank you very much for making yourself always available

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>even with everything that's going on. Lauren Sower is a

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>system Professor of Emergency in Medicine JOHNS Hopkins School of Medicine,

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and I should say she has a Public Health Preparedness

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Masters and Homeland Security Management as well, so she really

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>knows what she's talking about. And that out break dot

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>info once again, that website potentially another source of information

0:25:56.640 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>for us. All well, we have an up market, say

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>off the highs certainly, but certainly uh, you know, up

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>about one percent on the SDP and the Dallas. Greg

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>was just reporting on the back of those better than

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>expected jobs numbers to get a sense of kind of

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>how we should be thinking about equity investing here today

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and what is a very very uncertain market, very very

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>uncertain virus uh update where we already got some states

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that are doing well, some states that aren't doing well.

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Barry Ridholts, Bloomberg opinion columnists and host of Masters in

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Business on Bloomberg Radio, was also the founder and chairman

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and chief exact investment officer of Ridholt's Wealth Management. Barry,

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. First, I just

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>want to start off and kind of how you're thinking

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>about the markets here. We had a better and expected

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>jobs number. We've had some talk from Larry Cudlow about

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>more fiscal stimulus, UM, we've heard from Chairman Pal over

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the last several days. Kind of what's your view right here?

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So the jobs numbers are looking backwards telling us about

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>June and and so far in this insane COVID economic era,

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>every one of those reports have a giant as risk

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>on it. We won't find out what the true numbers

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>look like for months and months and months, they're they're

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>not only going to be revised, but they keep changing categories.

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'd rather see a positive number than a negative number.

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, take good or bad, take those numbers

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>with a grain of salt. Looking forward UM. Originally there

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit of pushback on the idea of

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a stimulus. It wouldn't surprise me if we see maybe

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollar direct to employee bypassing the company sort

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of stimulus, maybe some sort of I can't believe I'm

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna say this again. I feel like Charlie Brown trying

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to kick the football from Lucy. But maybe we'll get

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>a infrastructure plan and some sort of stimulus. I've been

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>wishfully thinking about that every year for I think since

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>my bar Mitzvah and and and you know, the market

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>clearly is thinking in terms of looking past into UM.

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of variables, and it does not

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>look like we're doing a fantastic job managing reopening. And

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>if this gets much worse, I think you're going to

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>see the economy start UM reflected in some of the data.

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>So Barry the President earlier on was talking about a

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>bit of a comeback in Q three, certainly before the election.

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we all know that that's very likely, except

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for the fact that there is only one direction that

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy can go from here, and that's in an

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>improving direction. Does that mean that markets at records now

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>continue to move higher when we actually see improving data.

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to challenge your thesis, and there is always

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>two ways the market can go. We have come way

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>off the loads of March April May. We're doing so

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>much better than we were. If this entire reopening process

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and and and the number of infections continues to spiral

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>out of hand, I don't think it's a high probability,

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's a real possibility that that we head back

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>towards those economic clothes if we don't get this virus underhand.

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Now I only think that's a fifteen possibility. I don't

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's the most likely outcome. I I'm more concerned

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>about just slipping a little bit and bouncing along kind

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of where we were this month last month, still a

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>huge improvement from March and April, but not anywhere near

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>where we should be. And a lot of this is

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.959
<v Speaker 1>going to be dependent on how well we manage uh

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the lockdown here in New York, where the numbers have

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>gotten so much better. I've spoken to a lot of

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>colleagues and neighbors and other people we work with in

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the city, and I'm s arise at how few people

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:06.959
<v Speaker 1>are planning on going back into their offices before January one.

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>We just saw a Broadway get locked down for the

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year. That's but I suppose just development

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>just I know I'm taking Paul's question here, but I

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>guess that's my point, Bari, because if the market isn't

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>selling off on some of this, then will it ever

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>sell off? I mean, what will be the thing that

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>gives the market permission to sell off or does it? Well,

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>what does the market have to do with the economy.

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I I know that's a glib answer, but when you

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>look at the data over history, the at least along

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>shorter periods of time, obviously, when we see a collapse

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in economic activity, the market has a tendency to follow that,

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and when the economy begins to recover, the market tends

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to presently see that in advance. But that said, um,

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, back in April I wrote a column April one.

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>People thought it was an April fool's joke on maybe

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the OVID nineteen is not a financial or economic events.

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's a meteor from out of space, and it's not.

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't derailed the bull market, and we're just gonna

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>keep going where we are going as soon as we

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>have a little more clarity on a treatment and a vaccine. Um.

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Think back to seven yet, a huge move off of

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the eighty two lows, and the market got she lacked,

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>not just that one day, but about a thirty plus

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>percent correction, and once the market shook that off, it

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>kept on going higher and higher until the ultimate peak

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand. This coronavirus crisis, lockdown and market crashing

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>recovery could end up being very parallel to seven. So yeah,

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>markets ultimately will respond to profits and and future expectations

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of growth. But but maybe we're looking at this from

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the wrong perspective, and and maybe this isn't the run

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of the mill recessions that we typically see the last

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>six to twelve months. The market drops and then we

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>start all over. Maybe this isn't a reset. Okay, Barry,

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>just real quickly, I want to go to your recent

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>column because the headline was fantastic, the robots will handle

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>your finances now thirty seconds. What do you mean there?

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So run Carson runs the Carson Wealth Group about twelve

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half billion dollars and he's a big believer

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that AI and data is going to take us to

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a very different place. Not so much what what he

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>describes as the robo advisors, the algorithmic trading and betterment,

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>well from those sort of things, but an entire new

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>approach to UM human computer interaction. You know, once we

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>pass the touring test, once the computer is indistinguishable from

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a human when you're interacting over a phone or an internet,

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>do you really need a high paid advisor. I think

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>wealthy people want to deal with a human and this

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is a solution to UM smaller portfolio issues. Carson Ron

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Carson thinks that eventually it will be robots and humans

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>working together. It will be fascinating to see what happens

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Yes, maybe, if maybe you need a

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>human that acts like a robot or a robot that

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>acts like a human. I'm not sure which would be better. Barry,

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It's always fun to chat with You have a wonderful

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>fourth of July weekend. That's very Riddle's opinion columns here

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg, founder of Adults Wealth Management, and of course

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the host of Masters in Business, the podcast which is

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>now in its teen season and it is well well

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>worth having to listen to some fantastic Masters in business

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>out there. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever a podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Bonny Quinn and All Sweeney I'm on

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio. H