WEBVTT - Why Eurodollars Might Be Ground Zero for De-Globalization

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Old Thoughts podcast.

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy all the Way and I'm Joe Wish. So, Joe,

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>you like to talk about money, right? I love talking

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>about money. I think where money comes from, its origin,

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, or even just what it is is

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>one of those topics that I can never get enough of.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So what is that we're going to talk about today? Yeah,

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>we are, um, but we're going to talk about a

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>type of money that doesn't normally get a lot of

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>attention outside certain aspects of the financial community. We're going

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about euro dollars. So euro dollars, you

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>know what I have to say, Like, this is one

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of those topics that I know, I'm supposed to know

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot more about than I do. I kind of

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>vaguely at this idea that people use futures and euro

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars to bet on what they think the FED is

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>going to do. But then beyond that, like what and

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess that, And I kind of have this sense

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that their dollars held outside of banks that aren't in

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the US. But honestly, I know very I know embarrassingly

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>little about them and how they actually work and what

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:25.559
<v Speaker 1>their point is, well, you're being very modest as usual.

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Actually this I'm really not like that. Just I just

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>told you the extent to which I know, like I

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>don't even really get how it works, Like I don't

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>even get how you can hold a dollar at a

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>bank outside the US, Like in the first place. That's

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a very strange concept to me, because I have this

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>conception of like how banks hold money, and I don't

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>really understand how that can happen outside the US. So

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole day is very mysterious to me, and I'm

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>glad we're finally doing an episode that will hopefully clear

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it up. And sometimes I'm modest, but this time I'm not. Okay, Well,

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>mysterious is actually the key word here, So I just

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to boil it down really simply before we start. Euro

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar based really refers to US dollar denominated deposits that

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>are at foreign banks, and by foreign I mean non

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>US or foreign branches of US banks. So that's the

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>simplest explanation. But of course there there is a lot

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of sort of mystery and controversy swirling around these. Lots

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 1>of people think this is a sort of form of

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>like shadow bank liquidity that's floating around in the system

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>outside of the federal reserves control. People talked about it

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot during the financial crisis, and we are seeing

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>some people talking about it again with the recent market

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>sell off, and one of those people is our guest

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for today. Before we get into this, can I just say, uh,

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>did anyone do you think anyone else like me first

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>when they thought when they heard the word euro dollars,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>just thought that was what the euro was. That like,

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the euro was short for euro dollars. Oh, Joe, I'm

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>sure for years when I heard euro dollar, I just

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>assumed that the euro was just the nickname for yar

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>own dollars. I know that's not the case right now,

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>but just to really emphasize how ignorant I am on

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this topic, that really is what I thought for years

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>until I realized there's something else. Now, You're absolutely right,

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>lots of people think you're a dollar is just the

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>exchange rate. So for the avoidance of doubt, we are

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to be talking about the euro dollar cross

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>exchange rate. That that's not what this is about. This

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>is about something much more interesting, about a specific type

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of money that's actually quite important to the way the

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>financial system works. So without further ado, let's bring on

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>our guest. It is Jeffrey Snyder. He is head of

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Global Research at al Hambra. Jeffrey, thank you so much

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, good morning, Thanks for having me, Joe

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and Tracy. So, given Joe's lack of expertise in this

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>particular topic, maybe we should start really really slow with

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Sorry Joe, that's very patronizing. Please, no, no, no, please,

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but let's start slow. What exactly is a euro dollar? Well,

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, it's a common misperception, and I

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>think you guys explained it pretty well. I mean, lots

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of people to hear the term euro doll and they

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>think obviously euro because that kind of term and that

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of terminology isn't common in usage, and most people

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>they've never heard of a euro dollar before anyway, so

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not uncommon for this to be a very confusing topic.

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, the term euro in front of a

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar simply means, as you both pointed out, that these

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>are dollars offshore somewhere, and it could be anywhere around

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the world. That could be, you know, a bank in

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cayman Islands, it could be a bank in Europe,

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>as the original term was used. That's where the term

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>came from. And in fact, it's not just dollars that

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>are offshore. There's an entire currency ecosystem that exists, um

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>including something that's called in euro euro. They're offshore euros

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in this euro euro market. That makes it even more

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>strange and complex and I guess interesting at some place

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>as So. One of the things that I do understand

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to some extent about banking is that it's not like

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>there's this fixed pool of money out there that gets

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>shifted around. That banks are essentially creators of money, is

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>one way to think about it. In banks issue loans,

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and those loans turned into deposits, and then the deposits

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>are held at banks and then new money is created.

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So explain what's really happening. You mentioned a bank in

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cayman Islands. A customer holds euro dollars there. What

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>is where did these dollars come from? How do they

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>create them? What is the mechanics in which they come

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>into being? Well, yeah, and that's another thing. You know,

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>The term euro dollars anachronistic. Originally it referred to actual

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars on deposit in the bank somewhere. When we talk

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>about a dollar deposit, people think, probably quite correctly, that

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>there are stacks of cash in a bank vault in

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cayman Islands, right. They think that's a dollar deposit, right,

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>because that's traditionally what you're told in school. That's what

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>people refer to and in convention. But that's not actually

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>what it is. It's eurodollars. In the beginning used to

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>be you know, stacks of cash and a vault somewhere,

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>but over time they have becomeing and they have evolved

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>into simply bank liability. Some bank offshore somewhere has a

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar denominating liability. However it came about, um doesn't really matter.

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Once they obtain dollars in any format, they can then

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>multiply them in various different other forms of bank liabilities.

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's essentially an inter bank international system where it's

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>denominated primarily in dollars, and it's always and it's uh

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it's operated offshore or outside the United States. So the

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>way in which these dollars come to existence is simply

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>one bank somewhere says I want to do something, and

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>another bank on the other side says, I want to

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>do something. They get together, they exchange liabilities and assets,

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>and that's how it's done. As long as the bank

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>on the one side has balance sheet capacity to quote

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>unquote lend these euro dollars to the other bank, it

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>can both banks except the transaction and it takes place.

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's no actual physical money, there's no actual physical currency.

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>There no no actual physical anything in the system. It's

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>simply led your money. It's just one bank on a

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>computer screen has a number. The bank on the other

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>side has a computer screen. Those two numbers match. Therefore

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>money has been created and the transaction takes place. So

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to money being created, and Jeff, I

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>think you just mentioned um multiplying at that point, can

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you give us a specific example, like, let's say I'm

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like a rich Arab shake or something

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that was Milton Friedman's famous example. And I have a

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>million US dollars and I wanted to deposit it in

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a non US bank. What happens to that million dollars

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and how much extra money or liquidity would be generated

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>given that the foreign bank will still have some sort

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of reserve requirement. Well, you know, in Milton Friedman's example

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>back in the in the late nineteen sixties early nineteen seventies,

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>there were reserve requirements and those were applicable. But still,

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the way which it happened, there's a

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>whole variety of ways in which these dollars become eurodollars.

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>In a lot of cases, is not just a you know,

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a foreigner who decides he has a dollar balance domestically

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and wants to put them in

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>London because they can obtain a better interest rate. That's

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the the ways in which the euro

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar market first evolved was to take advantage of interest

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>rate differentials offshore versus on shore. But once those dollar

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>liabilities came into existence, that opened up the whole range

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of possibilities in terms of this multiplier effect where um,

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you mentioned earlier in the introduction, where euro

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars apply not just to foreign banks holding dollars, but

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>also US domestic banks and their foreign subsidiaries, and so

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>there were you know, over time, they're evolved away for

0:08:56.200 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>domestic US banks to transfer dollar liabilities to their foreign subsidiaries,

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>often operating out of London. Again, the term euro dollar

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>meaning Europe, and so there's any number of ways for

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>these dollar liabilities to be created domestic and then get

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>transferred overseas. And it's easy just to transfer back and

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>forth from the from the domestic US bank to its

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>foreign subsidiary. And once those liabilities were created outside the

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>United States, once they're transferred to their foreign subsidy on

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the euro dollar market, they can then be multiplied in

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>any number of ways and any number of kinds of transactions.

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And over time, the way in which that has happened,

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a way in which that has been banks have been

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>able to do that is it's not just quantitative expansion,

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it's qualitative expansions any number any for any number of

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>different exotic liabilities that can be created once those dollars

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>are offshore. Now that there's a huge robust market for

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>these dollars offshore, the sky's the limit, essentially, And that's

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>what's been over the last three or four decades. The

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>eurodollar market has grown exponentially, or it had up until

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven, simply because it was, you know,

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>offshore system. So does that mean that euro dollars are

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>basically an extra source of liquidity in the financial system? Like?

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Is that how banks end up using them. That's how

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 1>it started. The intent here was, you know, how do

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we solve the you know, Triffin's paradox. What was left

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>over from Breton woods and Bretton woods in the goal

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>exchange system was constraining on global trade and globalization, and

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the rising demand for trade globally meant we need some

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>form of international money to intermediate between different systems trying

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to do merchandise trade. What the euro dollar did on

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>what Milton Freeman showed in nineteen sixty nine, was that

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we could multiply dollars outside the United States that would

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not affect the domestic money supply, thereby solving Triffin's paradox.

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And over time that's exactly what happened in the nineteen

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>sixties and early nineteen seventies is the euro dollar took

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>over the liquidity adjustment functions of a global reserve currency.

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>And so originally the intent was how do we finance globalization,

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>how do we finance the growing need for global trade.

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>But over time, especially in the late eighties in the

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>early ninety nineties, it started to get into other forms

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of financialization and in different functions, and so it became

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>instead of just a strictly global trade, currency system, intermediation,

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. It became an entire financial ecosystem

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>whereby you know, you go back to two thousand and eight,

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>why we're German banks being nationalized over a US housing bubble. Well,

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the reason is because they were financing those US dollar

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>assets on the eurodollar markets, and so it became something

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>very different over time, and it kind of really towards

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 1>the end got really out of control. But this is

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting, and this is something that I hadn't really

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>put together before in my understanding. When we talk about

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the dollar as the reserve currency, and it's by far

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the most stable medium of exchange, and someone in Turkey

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>might want to trade with someone in China, but neither

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of them want the other countries currency per se. This

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the role that the eurodollar market can

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>play and essentially this common third currency for parties all

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 1>around the world that can then be exchanged via any

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>two banks. Right, And that's you know, there's a lot

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of misconception about what when we talk about a global

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>reserve currency, what does that actually mean? And Joe, you

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>just described it perfectly. A lot of people think, you know,

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>reserve currencies you know oil gets priced in dollars. Well,

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that's part of it. That's a benefit of having a

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>global reserve currency. But there is a function, there's a

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a mechanical need for a reserve currency to perform

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the role. Just as you said, how do we get

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>different systems that want to trade with each other because trade,

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>free trade is definitely a good thing. How do we

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.559
<v Speaker 1>get those to be able to do that without having

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody around the world have to hold everybody else's currencies

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>or be able to process payments and somebody else's currency.

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, it was historically the British pound

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>performed that role originally, and then the Breton Wood system

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>added the US dollar to the role of global reserve.

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But that created again Triffids paradox, where the fixed the

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>dollar supply was fixed by gold, and therefore it was

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the best way to allow this intermediation to

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>happen under a rapidly globalizing system. And so the euro

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>dollar arose at the right time and in the right

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>place and then the right way to be able to

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>take over that role so that globalization and global trade

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>could be unhampered by a constricted supply. Because Essentially, that's

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>what we talked about before. Because it's an offshore currency system,

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's a bank ledger system, it's interbank system, there

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>really isn't as a lot of restrictions on it placed

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>on it that constraints the flexibility the liquidity that is

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is necessary to perform these roles. Right. So one of

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the I mean, I don't know if you would call

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 1>it a criticism, but one of the things that people

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>point out about your dollars is it's something that the

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve doesn't necessarily have a lot of control over

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>um in the same way that they might be able

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to affect the banking system and other kinds of liquidity

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>by raising interest rates, are changing reserve requirements. Can you

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>explain how exactly that comes about. Well, I would argue

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>they have no control and they have actually no very

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>little influence at all in the eurodollar market, which is

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>why two thousand and eight happened. Um, the Federal Reserve

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>did a whole bunch of stuff in two thousand eight,

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>nothing worked. The reason is because it was a eurodollar panic,

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>not a dollar panic. And that's you know, we talk

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>about the eurodollar in the term itself being anachronistic. What

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we really mean is that it's a bank centered system.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a credit based monetary system. Therefore, what matters and

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>what's that what's at the center of the system are

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>these global banks that are creating and trading all of

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>these dollar denominated liabilities, and so the Federal Reserve has

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>very little input into that system. Most of them mostly

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it had been just psychological, the idea of a greenspan

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>put but it's starting in two thousand seven, banks began

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to realize that the Federal Reserve was really powerless. And this,

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, it was one of the earliest criticisms

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of the euro dollar system. We go back into the

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies and eighties, some of the officials and some

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of the economists that actually studied the Euro dollar system

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>kept warning, you know, we have this international supply of

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars outside the United States, out of the reach of

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>any central bank anywhere, and so that could be a

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>problem because there's, first of all, it's nonreservable, so there

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't really reserves there. And second of all, there's no

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>way to create them because there's no central bank operating

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in any of these places. Because it's offshore from everywhere

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and so um and one. In one sense, it was

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>good because it performed the roles that were required for

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>globalization and global trade. But in another sense, there was

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing to restrain it. There was nothing to make sure

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it was a robust system that could withstand even some

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of the UH some of the things we saw, especially

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>with the housing bubble and the massive credit growth in

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the in the last decade. I think this is a

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>really key point to helping people understand the system. So

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to drill down further, like if I have

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of money at a US bank, like say

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>City Group or JP Morgan, and people perceive that to

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>be pretty safe because even in the worst situation, City

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Group or JP Morgan could pledge collateral to the FED

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and get liquidity and get dollars, and you know, my

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>deposits is going to be pretty good. If I have

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars and UH deposits with some non US

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>bank that doesn't have that same relationship with the Federal

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Reserve in a panic, there's no easy way for them

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:46.239
<v Speaker 1>to get a stable supply of dollars to meet that liability.

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And of course I guess this is why the FED

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>had to engage in dollars swap lines with other central

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>banks around the world during the crisis, so that those

0:16:56.240 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>regional central banks could then supply dollar liquidity to their

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>banks or attempt to supply attempt. Yeah, and you know

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the misunderstood aspects of the crisis

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>was where, what, what why do we need all of

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>these dollar swaps. And at one point it was, you know,

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>six billion, the massive amount of dollars that the FED

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>was trying to put out there into the market. But

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't. It wasn't the right kind of liquidity. It

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.199
<v Speaker 1>was you know, bureaucratic, it was rigid, it wasn't it

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a good enough replacement for malfunctioning euro dollar system.

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>But your point being is exactly right. I mean, we

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>have this international money system, and again, because it's largely

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>an inter bank system, the issue isn't so much for

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 1>a US based a positive who has money out in

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars outside. It's really what happens to a bank in

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the Caymans that says it has a dollar liability and

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>has been trading off dollar liabilities when all of a

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sudden funding those kinds of of of transactions becomes difficult

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>because the market starts to break down. Who do you

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>turn to. Well, if normally you turn to any number

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of banks operating in the market, and all of a sudden,

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 1>all of them are very kiddish and nervous and don't

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>offer you any good terms to fund your liability structure.

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>You have no recourse to anything. And so that's why,

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, two thousand and eight was mostly a bank

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 1>panic among banks. It was an inter bank panic more

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>than it was you know, something like the nineteen thirties

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>where you saw people lined up trying to convert to

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>cash outside of you know, the local country bank anywhere

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. It was an inter bank panic

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>because this monetary system is itself an international inter bank

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 1>money system. Okay, so in two thousand eight you have

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>basically an interbank funding crunch that manifests itself in the

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>euro dollar market as well as some other markets uh

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>repo I guess being the one other famous example. The

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Fed comes in provides extra dollar liquidity and um that

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>solves the problem at least for a little while. Can

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>we fast forward to today, Jeff, because you have some

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:58.479
<v Speaker 1>interesting um theories that you've been writing down on your

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>blog talking about how the recent market sell off might

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>have its origins in a sort of similar collateral crunch

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>that's taking place in the eurodollar market. Yeah, well, we

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>look at the euro dollar system. You know, there's because

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been somewhat of a mystery for so long and

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>because officially, you know, it doesn't exist. Central banks do

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>not admit that there's this offshore money market because how

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>could they, because there's a whole lot of information about it.

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a lot of good statistics, but you know,

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen anecdotally, what we've seen in prices, and

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen in the statistics we do have is

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that the system broke down on August nine, two thousand

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and seven, and then it never It was never restored,

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>it never got back to operations. So there's been for

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:44.959
<v Speaker 1>the last eleven years ongoing intermittent euro dollar squeeze, as

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I call it, where we have these episodes. This would

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>be the fourth one if if that's exactly what's taking

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>place right now. There's these episodes where the system goes

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>from you know, partial recovery back to nervousness, and then

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>then the system contracts and we get into these globe

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>downturns um financial markets go back into turmoil, and then

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.719
<v Speaker 1>it'll it'll get to a point where it can go

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>into a reflation period where things seem to be getting

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>better and things loosen up a little bit, and then

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, it will turn back into another downturn.

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And again, we've seen this three times before, and I

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>think we're seeing it again for a fourth time. And

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the reason is because the system has never been able

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to go back to before August ninth, two thousand seven

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and operate in the way that it did before. And

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason is because people realize that the risks involved here.

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Whereas you know, before two thousand and eight, two thousand

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 1>and seven, the belief was common that there was no

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 1>risk that you could just grow and expand and take

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>on any form of liability, any form of assets that

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to do, and as long as you were growing,

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>everything would be fine. And it come along two thousand

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>seventy two, they finally the system finally realized and began

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to doubt itself. Hey, there's a whole lot of risk here,

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and we're not being compensated for that risk. And so

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>banks have been pulling back from their money dealing activities

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>in these Euro dollar spaces for eleven years, but they

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>don't do it all at once. They do it again

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in these intermittent episodes, and I think that's what we're

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now, all right? What is the data that

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>you look at to assert that a we've never really

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>gotten back to the pre crisis sort of behavior of

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this market. And then when you talk about this is

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the third or fourth of these episodic um stresses within

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the euro dollar market, what are you looking at or

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>what are you seeing specifically that tells you that that's

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the key thing to understand about these markets?

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Sellofs well, there's uh. Some of the data is just

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>priced data. For example, you look at the repo rate

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>general collateral U S Treasury repo rate. In a system

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that worked before August nine, two seven, the repo rate

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>should be less than the unsecured you know, federal funds

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>LIBE or whatever it be, because you know a collateralized

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>transaction is less risk. But what we've seen since a

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>special the end of two thousand eight in the Institution

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>observed the report rate is no longer tied to the

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>unsecured rate. There's a breakdown and hierarchy. In other words,

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>there should be a repro rate negative spread to something

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>like federal funds. But there are these very specific periods

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>where the report rate will just go crazy, and in

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in this case and in each of the four cases

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>UH subsequent cases, the report rate will go way above

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>federal funds, which makes no sense. I mean, a hierarchical

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>structure of predictable money market function, we should see the

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>repo rate be less than federal funds. But yet in

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>these very specific periods where we see all this financial

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>distraction and we see global economic concerns, UM, the report

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>rate will be well above federal funds. And that happened

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year. UH. The repot rate got to be

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 1>almost fifty basis points above and maybe even more fifty.

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going off a memory here, but it got to

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>be a substantial amount more than the reverse repot floor

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that the Fed sets for UM. It's money market corridor.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's one way to look at it. There are others.

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Just the exchange value of the dollar. For example, you know,

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>in the middle two thousand's, up until two thousan dollar

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>was falling consistent with rising eurodollar supply on these markets

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>since then, the dollar has been rising and people trying

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>to figure out why, how could that be um and

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>what it is is it's simply this this eurodollars squeeze.

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>When there are periods where euro dollars are hard to

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>come by, that the value of the dollar goes up

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>because these people on the other side of these transactions,

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 1>banks and foreign locations who are short synthetically these U

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>S dollars because it's of their internet interbank liabilities. When

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it becomes difficult for them to fund in U S

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars as they have to do, the price of the

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar goes up. So it's almost like a short squeeze.

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of actual data, physical debt and I

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>want to say physical data, but actual concrete data. We

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>can use things like the Treasury departments take data. Most

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>people think of tick as you know, how much are

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>foreigners buying and selling US treasuries and in a given month,

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>But there's a whole bunch of other data that the

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Department collects, including the cross border US dollar activities

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of US banks. What you see there again is the

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Up until two thousand and seven, you have

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a parabolic rise in these cross border dollar transactions, and

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>since then you have these intermittent periods of ups and downs.

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Were over the last eleven years that the cross border

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar activities between US banks and foreign banks has stagnated,

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>It stopped. There's no more growth in that kind of

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>business anymore. And you can see it justin if you

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>follow the balance sheets of the total asset structure of

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>of these global banks. You know, look at JP Morgan.

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan's balance sheet was growing exponentially until two thousand

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and eight. Now it's it's essentially flat over the last decade.

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Banks don't grow anymore. So, Jeff, if you're right, if

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>if we are seeing another bout of stress in the

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>euro dollar market and it is manifesting itself in a

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>stronger dollar as people look for alternatives to euro dollars,

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>how does that or how do you think that's going

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to play out in the market. So we get the

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar strengthening, and presumably that might cause tighter financial conditions,

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>which maybe means that we see some risk assets sell off.

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Or does the sell off necessarily come through the fact

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that liquidity in the form of euro dollars is evaporating.

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little bit of both. I mean,

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and there's also sentiment to consider too, because we have

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to think about this in economic terms. What's established all

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>these ups and downs is that the global economy, especially

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>global trade because then the euro dollar and it's hard

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to be about intermediate global trade. If there's

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a problem in the euro dollar market, there's a problem

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in the global trade system and therefore the global economy.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>And therefore, you know, a sentiment turns on the lack

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity in the economic risk of all of these

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>things too, So you have you have a bunch of

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>different feedback if X that all feed into the same direction,

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>which is rising nervousness and eventually fear, which which permeates

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>into you know, all sorts of liquidation events. You think

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 1>about China. Recently, Chinese stocks have been liquidated since they're

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>reopened from a golden week that has its its its

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.959
<v Speaker 1>origination in this dollar problem. U S stocks are probably

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 1>more about sentiment than actual liquidity. But still, you know,

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>it all feeds back into the same thing, and over time,

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>if it goes far enough and it continues in this direction,

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it becomes self reinforcing. Like we saw in two thousand fifteen,

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, or two thousand eleven and two thousand and twelves,

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>where the economy starts to fall off or roll over,

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>which feeds into more uncertainty and fear in these dollar system,

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>which causes the dollar system constrain even more, which causes

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy to get even even more precarious, and so

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>on and so on. Is there a plus side in

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we have these episodic stresses, that we're

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 1>not building up to something big and catastrophic like we

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>saw in two thousand seven and two thousand and eight,

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 1>and instead we just sort of have these, you know,

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>many many blow ups, but that sort of relieve pressure

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>from the system overall. Well, I would argue this is

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:16.719
<v Speaker 1>actually the worst case. I'd rather have a crash at

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this point. Really, I know that's counterintuitive in a way,

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the global economy has never recovered from

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight, and time as a big factor in that,

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and so the cost of the system malfunctioning the way

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it has, in my opinion, aren't strictly economic anymore. We

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:34.959
<v Speaker 1>took we suffered the economic consequence. As you look at

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>places like Italy, for example, the Italian economy is slow,

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>is smaller today than it was in two thousand and

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it has never recovered. The European economy has never recovered.

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:46.920
<v Speaker 1>The U S economy has never recovered. I know people

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>are talking about how it's booming right now, but the

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>US fell off trend ten years ago and it's getting

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>further and further behind that trend. And so to me,

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>these periodic episodes are the reason that the economy hasn't recovered,

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and therefore they're taking us further or further away from

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a stable position. I think that's why you've seen the

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>rise of populism, the rise of distrust in establishment, or

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.360
<v Speaker 1>wherever you want to call it. It's because economic opportunity

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>has largely disappeared because of the malfunctioning the international reserve currency.

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.360
<v Speaker 1>So how do we fix that? And I don't think

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you could fix it, but I just keep doing allowing

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>it to go the way it is. We need to

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>get to a stable currency system so we can get

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to stable an actual real economic growth again. And the

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 1>way you do that is to get people to to

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to this euro dollar system that doesn't work. So, okay,

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't work. What should be done? In your view

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>if this sort of basic system of international finance is

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>inherently flawed. You mean, how do we replace the euro

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>dollar problem with something that isn't so susceptible to Yeah,

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>like it ultimately, like the problem with the gold standard

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>was sort of manifest saw in two thousand and eight

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that there's the euro dollar wasn't a perfect solution either

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in your view, is there a solution to this dilemma?

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Or will we always be stuck with the problem that

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>if we want to stable global trading currency, there's going

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to be the challenge that the supply of it will

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>inherently be limited. Well, yeah, and I think you're right, Joe,

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the pendulum has swung too far in

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the other direction. You know, the goal exchange system under

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Breton Woods was too constraining. The euro dollar system was

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>way in the other direction. It was far too free

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and unconstrained. So the answer may be somewhere in the middle.

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>But how do you actually design a system that replicates

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the good features of the euro dollar system, which there

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>are many. Uh, it's not perfect and it got way

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>too far in the wrong direction, but there are some

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>good elements the euro dollar system, including the ability to

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>flexibly supply money to where it's demanded, So how do

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>we get how do we keep those characteristics but also

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>put some kind of constraints on it so that doesn't

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>get out of hand again. And that's that's It's a

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>incredibly complex question, especially when you get into the really

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>into the shadow spaces of what actually takes place in

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of interbank transactions internationally, because they are incredibly

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>complex and exotic and they don't lend themselves to easy analysis.

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>So this might not be surprised. Sounds like, sounds like

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a whole separate episode. Yeah, maybe, all right, Well, um,

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll have to leave it there in that case.

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Snyder, head of Global Research at al Hambra. Jeff

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>also has uh something called the euro Dollar University if

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to check that out and actually get more

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>than just a half hour primer on euro dollars. So

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that's on YouTube as well as the macro Voices podcast. Jeff,

0:30:48.080 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much, Thanks Jeff, Thank you, Joe, Thanks Tracy,

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>so Joe, I'm so glad we finally got to devote

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>an entire episode to the euro dollar, and I thought

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that was a really great primer as well as a

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>really interesting theory about what might be driving the recent

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>market sell off. Yeah, I mean, I definitely would disagree

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.479
<v Speaker 1>on this sort of big picture that we haven't had

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a global recovery and so forth. But it's certainly true

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that the recovery has been disappointing around the world since

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the crisis, and looking at the financial roots of that

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>may be one important aspect. But that aside, I do

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>think this idea of the mechanics of money creation, and

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't is really important, and I hadn't really thought

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>before about the inherent challenge of what it means when

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone wants to trade in a stable currency, but not

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone has the same equal access to that currency, and

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>so the opportunityy or you know what, the euro dollar

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the problem that the euro dollar market solved, but also

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the inherent risks of that. Yeah, and also Jeff's point

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>about how euro dollars have essentially grown in tandem with

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>globalization was really interesting. And you know, I wonder about

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the link between what we've currently been saying in terms

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of trade tensions and the recent eurodollar stress, like that

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:26.959
<v Speaker 1>seems like a natural connection to potentially make right. And

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I do think this is going to be one of

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the biggest stories. And we've talked about it for a

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>long time, but just sort of like deglobalization as a whole,

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and we talk about it a lot from the trade

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>perspective all the time. We don't talk about it as

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>much from the financial system perspective. But it feels like

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>we have a financial system very much designed for an

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>ear of expanding globalization and an economic system and political

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>system where the gears seem to be turning the other way.

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're absolutely right that it's going to

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>be really interesting to see the interplayer. Right. No one

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>ever thinks about the euro dollar as ground zero for

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>de globalization. People think about you know, apple supply chains

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like, right, right, exactly right, all right, Well,

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>this has been another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast.

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway. You can also follow Jeff Snyder. He is

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>at Jeff Snyder Underscore. A I P and a shout

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>out as well to one of our listeners at goub

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Mint Cheese for suggesting Jeff in the first place. And

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the Stalwarts, and you should follow our producer to for

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for Foreheads on Twitter. He's at foreheads t as well

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>as the bloomberg head of podcast, Francesco Leavy at Francesca Today.

0:33:48.800 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening year to