Speaker 1: Going up next our final news roundup and Information Overload hour.
Speaker 2: All right, News Roundup and Information over old hour this Friday.
Speaker 2: It is eight hundred and nine four one Sean. You
Speaker 2: want to be a part of the program, your calls
Speaker 2: coming up, final half hour of the program today. Big
Speaker 2: win US Supreme Court today. Again, there's been now multiple wins.
Speaker 2: We've been chronicling all of them, and this one dealing
Speaker 2: with the Trump administration and their request for stay of
Speaker 2: a lower court's orders blocking enforcement of his birthright Citizenship
Speaker 2: executive order. Remember the President wanted to end birthright citizenship.
Speaker 2: Pretty amazing. We're going to play all of the president's
Speaker 2: comments in full also coming up for the next half hour,
Speaker 2: but I want you to just listen to a little
Speaker 2: bit of what he had to say earlier today.
Speaker 3: I was elected on a historic mandate. But in recent
Speaker 3: months we've seen a handful of radical left judges effectively
Speaker 3: try to overrule the rightful powers of the president to
Speaker 3: stop the American people from getting the policies that they
Speaker 3: voted for.
Speaker 4: In record numbers.
Speaker 3: It was a grave threat to democracy, frankly, and instead
Speaker 3: of merely ruling on the immediate cases before them, these
Speaker 3: judges have attempted to dictate the law for the entire nation.
Speaker 3: In practice, this meant that if any one of the
Speaker 3: nearly seven hundred federal judges disagreed with the policy of
Speaker 3: the duly elected president of the United States, he or
Speaker 3: she could block that policy from going into effect or
Speaker 3: at least delay it for many years tied.
Speaker 4: Up in the court system. This was a colossal abuse.
Speaker 3: Of power which never occurred in American history prior to
Speaker 3: recent decades. And we've been hit with more nationwide injunctions
Speaker 3: than were issued in the entire twentieth century.
Speaker 2: I mean, it really is remarkable, and I think the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court got this right. Most conservatives see what's happening,
Speaker 2: what the Democratic Party could never accomplish at the ballot
Speaker 2: box electorally, what they can't accomplish legislatively, they run to
Speaker 2: and go judge shopping to activist justices. And and by
Speaker 2: the way, eighty percent of the judges they go to
Speaker 2: are appointed by Democrats on purpose, it's not an accident.
Speaker 2: And then it slows down the president's agenda, and he
Speaker 2: is duly elected by the people to implement that agenda.
Speaker 2: Senator Danes of Montana is thrilled with the Court ruling
Speaker 2: today and agrees that universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable
Speaker 2: authority that Congress has given to the federal courts and
Speaker 2: allowing a single activist judge to dictate policy for the
Speaker 2: entire nation needed to stop. And I applaud today's Supreme
Speaker 2: Court ruling to limit nationwide injunctions. Senator Danes of Montana.
Speaker 2: By the way, there are many days I'm not having
Speaker 2: the best day, and I'm thinking what would life be
Speaker 2: like on a ranch out in Montana. Not that the
Speaker 2: people of Montana want any more people from any other
Speaker 2: state coming to their state and frankly maybe bringing their
Speaker 2: dumb policies with them. In my case, I agree with
Speaker 2: the people of Montana.
Speaker 5: Well, Sean, we always welcome conservative refugees. We just don't
Speaker 5: want to have liberal missionaries joining us in Montana.
Speaker 2: I mean, I swear it's like, you know, if you
Speaker 2: got to move out of California, New York, New Jersey, Okay, fine,
Speaker 2: you can move if you're going to come to my
Speaker 2: free state of Florido, which I do love, or you're
Speaker 2: going to go to Texas, so the Carolinas or Tennessee.
Speaker 6: Just you can. They'll welcome you with open arms.
Speaker 2: Don't bring your dumb, idiotic policies that destroyed your state
Speaker 2: with you and then destroy the new state you're going.
Speaker 5: To, Sean, we welcome those who want to join us.
Speaker 5: So we hope folks it might have changed this stay
Speaker 5: out of the way. So we're on the same page there, Sean.
Speaker 5: But look, this was a huge win for the American people.
Speaker 5: Is where it starts. I was a huge one for
Speaker 5: President Trump. This is a huge win for the American people.
Speaker 5: You said it so well. It's about the equality here
Speaker 5: of powers and just proportionality of powers where the left
Speaker 5: can go shop some rogue judge somewhere in America and
Speaker 5: stop a significant ruling or order coming from the President
Speaker 5: of the United States who is trying to protect the
Speaker 5: country as commander in chief. So this is a wonderful win.
Speaker 5: And you know what also says to me, Sehn, we're
Speaker 5: reaping the benefits and the fruit of an election that
Speaker 5: happened back in twenty fourteen when we flipped the Senate.
Speaker 5: That's the year I got elected to the Senate. I
Speaker 5: was the first Republican in one hundred years. We picked
Speaker 5: up nine seats that night, and that was during Barack
Speaker 5: Obama's last midi term election, and it set in motion
Speaker 5: after the tragic passing of Scalia, where we put three
Speaker 5: conservative Trump judges on the bench and we're seeing the
Speaker 5: consequences of really elections that began back in fourteen. Just
Speaker 5: to reminder how important Senate races are on America because
Speaker 5: you reap the fruit or you reap the curse of
Speaker 5: what happens in the courts sometimes for a generation.
Speaker 2: What do you make of the other Supreme Court decisions
Speaker 2: that have come down. I mean, it really has been
Speaker 2: a little bit of a whirlwin as it is at
Speaker 2: the end of every Supreme Court session. And you know
Speaker 2: they now and one swoop have ruled on a lot
Speaker 2: of issues. This one about about birthright citizenship, but also
Speaker 2: about a whole variety of issues.
Speaker 6: What's your take.
Speaker 5: Well, there's another one that strikes to the heart of
Speaker 5: the Danes family as parents of four and now grandparents
Speaker 5: of seven, Seawan and that's that six to three decision
Speaker 5: we've got that says parents can opt their children out
Speaker 5: of LGBTQ transgender lessons in the public schools. This is
Speaker 5: a win. It's a win for parental rights to win
Speaker 5: for religious liberty. Frankly, it's crazy this is even a debate.
Speaker 5: But why are we teaching this gender radical ideo in
Speaker 5: great school, even down to preschool anyway. But I'll tell
Speaker 5: you Alito nailed it when he wrote for the majority.
Speaker 5: I'm going to quote what he wrote in the majority.
Speaker 5: He said, a government burdens the religious exercise of parents
Speaker 5: when it requires them to submit their children to instruction.
Speaker 5: Him that poses a very real threat of undermining the
Speaker 5: religious beliefs and practices from the parents that they wish
Speaker 5: to instill. Alito nail it, as he always does. Another
Speaker 5: great win for this court that was set in motion
Speaker 5: because of Republican Senate and the leadership of President Trump.
Speaker 6: What did you make about the South Carolina decision?
Speaker 5: Well, another huge win. I mean, think about talking about
Speaker 5: protecting the rights of the states and a federalism win
Speaker 5: where South Carolina says, hey, we're not going to allow
Speaker 5: Medicaid funds federal dollars to be used to pay to
Speaker 5: plan parenthood for elective abortions.
Speaker 6: Why why do we give planned parenthood a penny?
Speaker 5: Anyway, We're working on defunding them right now as we speak. Sean,
Speaker 5: we'd love to get that piece included the Reconciliation Bill,
Speaker 5: and I don't even like to use the word planned parented.
Speaker 5: That sounds way too kind of planned parented. This is
Speaker 5: called elective abortions on demand. That's what we're stopping. There
Speaker 5: should not be taxpayer dollars allowed to prop that industry up.
Speaker 6: You know, the party has become radicalized.
Speaker 2: Maybe it's just culminated this week with mom Donnie winning
Speaker 2: the Democratic nomination for New York City mayor. But the
Speaker 2: Democratic Party of old I don't remember as a party
Speaker 2: that would champion the rights of men to play women's sports.
Speaker 2: It just seems that they're doubling down on radicalism, and
Speaker 2: I don't think it's going to help them long term.
Speaker 2: I think that the Republican Party has emerged as the
Speaker 2: party of working men and women, and they are the
Speaker 2: party of woke coastal elites, and I think they're just
Speaker 2: out of touch with the country.
Speaker 5: It's exactly right, Sean, and we're seeing there in state
Speaker 5: like Montana. Seohn. I grew up in a family of Democrats.
Speaker 5: These were the old Labor Union FDR farmers from Scandinavia.
Speaker 5: Sometimes in my family mix in Bontana. But here's what's happened.
Speaker 5: It's the classic example of where they didn't leave the
Speaker 5: Democratic Party is the Democrats left them. They moved so
Speaker 5: far left. And what's happening is with the remaining moderates
Speaker 5: that no longer existed Democrats, they've all left to what
Speaker 5: is left is the radical radical side of the left.
Speaker 5: So it is doubling down on their ideology. And after
Speaker 5: their demise is we go forward to with elections. They
Speaker 5: don't have a plan going forward and the double down
Speaker 5: on their far left police as we've seen evidence what
Speaker 5: happened in New York this past week.
Speaker 2: Seventy nine Democrats this week wanted to impeach Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: which is remarkable. They didn't care when Barack Obama, Joe Biden,
Speaker 2: Bill Clinton, or any past president used force. They wouldn't
Speaker 2: stand at the joint session the Lake and Riley's family
Speaker 2: murdered by an unvetted Biden Harris illegal or the family
Speaker 2: of Joscelyn Nungary murdered by Harris Biden illegal. And to me,
Speaker 2: it's if you can stand for parents that lost their children,
Speaker 2: you have lost your souls.
Speaker 5: Look, Sean, they've lost their soul on multiple fronts. But
Speaker 5: let's just take what happened last Saturday, when President Trump
Speaker 5: made the absolutely right decision, a bold, decisive action to
Speaker 5: take out the nuclear capabilities of Iran. History will look
Speaker 5: so fondly on what President Trump did. And to think
Speaker 5: the left, what are they doing? They're trying to plant
Speaker 5: false intelligence the New York Times to undermine what was
Speaker 5: absolutely a stellar execution by the US military. The Israelis
Speaker 5: have done to protect their lands and their democracy through
Speaker 5: their preemptive strikes on Iran. And they had one part
Speaker 5: of that whole plan that they needed our help, and
Speaker 5: that was a heavy lift of V twos to drop
Speaker 5: the thirty thousand pounds bo that would draft precisely on
Speaker 5: the right way. They scored one hundred on the test. Sean,
Speaker 5: we should be cheering for these brave patriots in the
Speaker 5: left instead once impeach President Trump. That sums it up
Speaker 5: for me. And it just shows you how much they
Speaker 5: truly have lost their mind and how they're losing their
Speaker 5: losing support for the American people.
Speaker 2: They really are, all right, quick break right back more
Speaker 2: with Montana Senator Steve Daines's with us, then your calls
Speaker 2: coming up eight hundred and nine to four one Sean,
Speaker 2: all right, we continue with Montana Senator Steve Daines's with us.
Speaker 2: Let's talk about the One Big Beautiful Bill. Had a
Speaker 2: little bit of a setback in the last two days,
Speaker 2: and that is the Senate Parliamentarian trying to do her
Speaker 2: level best to take out a lot of the Republicans'
Speaker 2: plans here. Now, one of the problems is is you're
Speaker 2: looking at an unelected bureaucrat and somebody that was appointed
Speaker 2: by Harry Reid and somebody that has shown themselves to
Speaker 2: be pretty left leaning. And now my understanding is having
Speaker 2: spoken with a number of other Senators and your colleagues,
Speaker 2: is that it basically is a matter of shifting and
Speaker 2: changing the language, and most of what Republicans want we'll
Speaker 2: still get in that bill.
Speaker 6: Are you confident of that?
Speaker 5: Yeah? You know, literally, Sean, before I came on in
Speaker 5: the air to speak with you, I was going back
Speaker 5: and forth with Ted Cruz my colleagues as we are
Speaker 5: making final adjustments because you have a chance to go
Speaker 5: back and clarify language on these arguments before the Parliamentarian. Look,
Speaker 5: we strongly disagree with many of the rules she has made,
Speaker 5: but she also has given us the ability to correct
Speaker 5: some of the bill language to give us a chance
Speaker 5: to actually get it done. And so that's exactly what's
Speaker 5: going on right now, and I think I'm going to
Speaker 5: be able to establish much of what we've been fighting for,
Speaker 5: not all of it. You win, somebody lose someone. Let
Speaker 5: me just say this, Sean, when the Democrats tried their
Speaker 5: craziness and their reconciliation bills with inflation reduction acts and others,
Speaker 5: they try to radically changed immigration policies in this country
Speaker 5: in terms of pathway to citizenship for illegals, and the
Speaker 5: parliamentarian stopped it. So this thing does cut both ways.
Speaker 5: She did rule against the Democrats when they tried some
Speaker 5: of this. She's given us the ability to make some
Speaker 5: modifications for welcome them as we speak. I don't like
Speaker 5: a lot of these rulings, but you've got to keep
Speaker 5: fighting right now. Times of the essence to get this
Speaker 5: bill done on the present desk by for July.
Speaker 2: Oh well, looking at for example, she's trying to take
Speaker 2: up the provisions the Medicaid provided provisions including changes to
Speaker 2: federal funding for states and the share of healthcare provider taxes.
Speaker 2: My understanding is it just has to apply to all
Speaker 2: states and that will be resolved. They were not eligible
Speaker 2: for approval via the simple majority. Other provisions that were
Speaker 2: acts include eliminating some Medicaid eligibility for non citizens meaning
Speaker 2: illegal immigrants, adults and children, and lowered the federal Medical
Speaker 2: Assistant percentage of funding percentages for states that allow non
Speaker 2: citizens to get healthcare coverage from ninety to eighty percent.
Speaker 2: Another section that didn't pust pass Muster was blocking federal
Speaker 2: funding for Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Chip program
Speaker 2: to provide gender transition medical care. You know, as Tommy
Speaker 2: Turberville said, the woke Centate parliamentarian who appointed was appointed
Speaker 2: by Harry Reid and advised al Gore. Struck down a
Speaker 2: provision banning illegal immigrants from stealing Medicaid from American citizens
Speaker 2: is a perfect example of why Americans hate the swamp.
Speaker 2: What's your take on his comments.
Speaker 5: I don't disagree, but I'll say this, the reason we're
Speaker 5: in this position to get major wins on tax and
Speaker 5: spending policy is because we're using the reconciliation process. It
Speaker 5: has these parameters called the bird wrapped around it. To
Speaker 5: get policy outcomes, you typically need sixty votes, not fifty one,
Speaker 5: so as long as it meets the threshold of being
Speaker 5: a spending or tax type impacted provision and not primarily
Speaker 5: a policy outcome, that makes it compliant with Birds. Now, Sean,
Speaker 5: I went to engineering school, not law school, So I'll
Speaker 5: let my lawyers sort out some of these arguments. And yes,
Speaker 5: I don't like a lot of the ruins has come down,
Speaker 5: but she's giving us such a chance to come back
Speaker 5: and make a counter argument. I think we're going to
Speaker 5: save several of these important revenue and tax outcome issues
Speaker 5: that will also have policy implications. But the policy argument
Speaker 5: can't be the primary driver has to be taxes in spending.
Speaker 5: And that's the Bird rule, and that's why sometimes it
Speaker 5: cuts both ways.
Speaker 6: All right, we appreciate your time.
Speaker 2: Steve Dan's great state, beautiful state that it is, Montana.
Speaker 2: Thank you, sir. We appreciate your time. Eight hundred nine
Speaker 2: four one sewn. As we continue, also, President Trump weighing
Speaker 2: in on the Supreme Court decision a big win on
Speaker 2: birthright citizenship. We'll play his comments on the other side.
Speaker 2: All right, let's go to Pambondi, President Trump and Todd
Speaker 2: Blanche and the Supreme Court decision today. The issue overall
Speaker 2: issue is birthright citizenship, but more specifically the interference of
Speaker 2: lower courts that would prevent a president from doing his job.
Speaker 4: Well, this was a big one, wasn't it.
Speaker 3: This was a big decision, an amazing decision, one that
Speaker 3: we're very happy about this morning. The Supreme Court has
Speaker 3: delivered a monumental victory for the Constitution, the separation of powers,
Speaker 3: and the rule of law.
Speaker 4: It's striking down.
Speaker 3: The excessive use of nationwide injunctions to interfere with the
Speaker 3: normal functioning of the executive branch. The Supreme Court has
Speaker 3: stopped the presidency itself.
Speaker 4: That's what they've done.
Speaker 3: And really it's been an amazing period of time this
Speaker 3: last hour. There are people elated all over the country.
Speaker 3: I've seen such happiness and spirit. Sometimes you don't see that,
Speaker 3: but this case is very important. I was elected on
Speaker 3: a historic mandate. But in recent months we've seen a
Speaker 3: handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the
Speaker 3: rightful powers of the president to stop the American people
Speaker 3: from getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers.
Speaker 3: It was a grave threat to democracy. Frankly, and instead
Speaker 3: of merely ruling on the immediate cases before them. These
Speaker 3: judges have attempted to dictate the law for the entire nation.
Speaker 3: In practice, this meant that if any one of the
Speaker 3: nearly seven hundred federal judges disagreed with the policy of
Speaker 3: the duly elected President of the United States, he or
Speaker 3: she could block that policy from going into effect or
Speaker 3: at least allay it for many years tied up in
Speaker 3: the court system. This was a colossal abuse of power
Speaker 3: ever occurred in American history prior to recent decades, and
Speaker 3: we've been hit with more nationwide injunctions than were issued
Speaker 3: in the entire twentieth century together. Think of it more
Speaker 3: than the entire twentieth century. Me I'm grateful to the
Speaker 3: Supreme Court for stepping in and solving this very, very
Speaker 3: big and complex problem, and they've made it very simple.
Speaker 4: I want to thank Justice Barrett.
Speaker 3: Who wrote the opinion brilliantly, as well as Chief Justice
Speaker 3: Roberts and Justice as Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas.
Speaker 4: Great people. Thanks for this decision.
Speaker 3: And thanks to this decision, we can now promptly file
Speaker 3: to proceed with numerous policies that have been wrongly enjoined
Speaker 3: on a nationwide basis and some of the cases we're
Speaker 3: talking about would be ending birthright citizenship, which now comes
Speaker 3: to the fore that was meant for the babies of slaves.
Speaker 3: It wasn't meant for people trying to scan the system
Speaker 3: had come into the country on a vacation. This was,
Speaker 3: in fact, it was the same date, the exact same date,
Speaker 3: the end of the Civil War.
Speaker 4: It was meant for the babies of slaves. And it's
Speaker 4: so clean and so obvious.
Speaker 3: But this lets us go there and finally win that
Speaker 3: case because hundreds of thousands of people are pouring into
Speaker 3: our country under birthright citizenship, and it wasn't meant for
Speaker 3: that reason.
Speaker 4: It was meant for the babies of slaves.
Speaker 3: So thanks to this decision, we can now properly file
Speaker 3: to proceed with these numerous policies and those that have
Speaker 3: been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis, including birthright citizenship,
Speaker 3: ending sanctuary city funding, suspending refugee resettlement, freezing unnecessary funding,
Speaker 3: stopping federal taxpayers from paying for transgender surgeries, and numerous
Speaker 3: other priorities of the American people. We have so many
Speaker 3: of them. I have a whole list.
Speaker 4: I'm not going to bore you and I'm going to
Speaker 4: have Pam get up.
Speaker 3: And say a few words, but there's really as you
Speaker 3: could talk as long long as he wants, because this
Speaker 3: is a very important decision. This is a decision that
Speaker 3: covers a tremendous amount of territory. But I want to
Speaker 3: just thank again the Supreme Court for this ruling. It's
Speaker 3: a giant. It's a giant, and they should be very
Speaker 3: proud and our country should be very proud of the
Speaker 3: Supreme Court today. And with that, i'd like you to
Speaker 3: listen to the words of Pam Bondi. She's an incredible
Speaker 3: Attorney General. We're very proud of her. And as you know,
Speaker 3: Todd Blanche is with us, and we have so many
Speaker 3: others that worked on this case and other cases, and
Speaker 3: I think they're doing a great job.
Speaker 4: Please say a few words.
Speaker 7: Thank you, President Trump. Thanks for fighting for all Americans.
Speaker 7: Americans are finally getting.
Speaker 8: What they voted for.
Speaker 7: No longer will we have rogue judges striking down President
Speaker 7: Trump's policies across the entire nation.
Speaker 8: No longer today.
Speaker 7: In the six to three opinion, Justice Barrett correctly holds
Speaker 7: that the District Court lacks authority to enter nationwide or
Speaker 7: universal injunctions. These lawless injunctions gave relief to everyone in
Speaker 7: the world. Instead of the parties before the court, as
Speaker 7: the Supreme Court held today, they turned district courts into
Speaker 7: the imperial judiciary. Active liberal justices. Judges have used these
Speaker 7: injunctions to block virtually all of President Trump's policies. To
Speaker 7: put this in perspective, there are ninety four federal judicial districts.
Speaker 7: Five of those districts throughout this country held thirty five
Speaker 7: of the nationwide injunctions. Think about that, ninety four districts
Speaker 7: and thirty five out of the forty opinions with nationwide
Speaker 7: injunctions came from five liberal districts in this country.
Speaker 8: No longer, No longer.
Speaker 7: These injunctions have blocked our our policies from tariffs to
Speaker 7: military readiness, to immigration, to foreign affairs, fraud abuse, and
Speaker 7: many other issues. The judges have tried to seize the
Speaker 7: executive branch's power and.
Speaker 8: They cannot do that no longer, no longer. And on immigration.
Speaker 7: On a side note, today marks two thousand, seven hundred
Speaker 7: and eleven arrest on these terrorists and these gangs. Total
Speaker 7: arrest today with HSI investigations and thank you Stephen Miller.
Speaker 8: Thank you to Homeland Security.
Speaker 7: Thank you to everyone working hand in hand with the
Speaker 7: FBI on all of these transnational gangs. TDA has been
Speaker 7: a huge terror to our country, as well as MS
Speaker 7: thirteen as well as Sinaloa cartels.
Speaker 8: No longer, No longer.
Speaker 7: These injunctions have allowed district court judges to be emperors.
Speaker 7: They vetoed all of President Trump's power and they cannot
Speaker 7: do that. This has been a by artisan problem that
Speaker 7: has lasted five presidential terms, five different presidents, and it
Speaker 7: has ended today. We will continue to fight for President
Speaker 7: Trump's policies. I want to thank the Office of White
Speaker 7: House Counsel Dave Warrington.
Speaker 8: You and your staff have been incredible.
Speaker 7: Are Solicitor General's Office John Sowers, Sarah Harris, and Todd
Speaker 7: Blanch and AML Bovie. Todd's going to say a few
Speaker 7: words because we've had another major ruling today on transgender
Speaker 7: books and some other great wins that we've had. But
Speaker 7: no longer will they have this power in our country.
Speaker 7: It is the President's authority, under his executive branch to
Speaker 7: do everything to fight for the American people, and he
Speaker 7: will continue.
Speaker 8: To do that. That's why he was overwhelmingly elected. Thank you,
Speaker 8: Thank you.
Speaker 4: Today's a great day for the rule of law.
Speaker 1: It's a great day for the Justice Department, and it's
Speaker 1: one that's been a long time coming and one that
Speaker 1: every American should have been waiting for with bated breath.
Speaker 4: And so I echo what.
Speaker 1: The President said and attorneys around BONDI that the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court did a great thing today, not only for this administration,
Speaker 1: before every American in this country. If not for the
Speaker 1: injunction's case, we would be here talking about another great
Speaker 1: decision that came down today, the Trans Books case, which
Speaker 1: restores parents' rights to decide their child's education. Seems like
Speaker 1: a basic idea, but it took the Supreme Court to
Speaker 1: set the record state and we thank them for that.
Speaker 1: And now that ruling allows parents to opt out of
Speaker 1: dangerous trans ideology and make the decisions for their children
Speaker 1: that they believe is correct. And so we thank the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court for that. There's been multiple decisions over the
Speaker 1: past several weeks that just show why this injunction while
Speaker 1: this nationwide injunction ban had to happen.
Speaker 6: For example, what I mean by that is.
Speaker 1: Local district court judges issuing decisions that are clearly contrary
Speaker 1: to law just because they don't like the policy of
Speaker 1: President Trump, and when it gets to the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: has to correct it. But that takes time. The Attorney
Speaker 1: General thanked our lawyers, and I'll do it again. Our
Speaker 1: lawyers are working twenty four hours a day, seven days
Speaker 1: a week to fight these injunctions and to emergency appeals,
Speaker 1: emergency states, going back to discourt judge asking them to
Speaker 1: change their view. And so their hard work is really
Speaker 1: paying off today. But over the past few weeks, we
Speaker 1: had a stay of an order that prevented DHS from
Speaker 1: moving aliens to a third country. We had a stay
Speaker 1: of an order that stopped the Department of Defense from
Speaker 1: implementing military Readius, the EO that President Trump signed. We
Speaker 1: had another stay of an order forcing reinstatement of fired
Speaker 1: Executive Branch employees, entirely within the president and Article two
Speaker 1: his right to do.
Speaker 4: We had to stay.
Speaker 1: As you all know of numerous Doze cases. And again,
Speaker 1: every one of those stays requires a tremendous amount of
Speaker 1: work and effort by the lawyers and parties involved.
Speaker 4: And they should be doing other work.
Speaker 1: They should be doing the work that the president and
Speaker 1: this administration demands and has a.
Speaker 8: Right to a and not.
Speaker 1: Fighting these these local judges who don't don't make decisions
Speaker 1: based on the law. They make decisions because they just
Speaker 1: simply don't agree with the administration's decision about policy. And
Speaker 1: that's and that's wrong. Thank you.
Speaker 3: Any questions, Yes, for FAM go ahead.
Speaker 8: For sure. Thank you.
Speaker 4: Mandatory General.
Speaker 8: So, as you know, the Supreme Court did not rule
Speaker 8: on the underlying.
Speaker 7: Constitutionality of the President's Birthright Citizenship Order.
Speaker 8: So what is the plan now?
Speaker 7: Are you going to try to implement the EO just
Speaker 7: in states where there isn't a legal challenge. Yeah, so
Speaker 7: birthright citizenship will be decided in October in the next
Speaker 7: session by the Supreme Court, unless it comes down in
Speaker 7: the next few minutes.
Speaker 8: I guess it could come down.
Speaker 7: There's still I think they're still deliberating right now on
Speaker 7: some cases. As you heard, we just got transgender books,
Speaker 7: which is a huge win, but most likely that will
Speaker 7: be decided in October in the next session. However, it
Speaker 7: indirectly impacts us because, as you correctly pointed out, if
Speaker 7: there's a birthright citizenship case in Oregon, it will only
Speaker 7: affect the plaintiff.
Speaker 8: In Oregon, not the entire country. So yes, it's.
Speaker 7: Indirectly, but that's pending litigation and we're waiting on that
Speaker 7: in the next term.
Speaker 1: And how concerned are you that the Supreme Court will
Speaker 1: come back and determine that the executive order is unconsciable.
Speaker 7: We're very confident in the Supreme Court, but again it's
Speaker 7: pending litigation and that will directly be determined in October.
Speaker 7: But it indirectly impacts every case in this country, and
Speaker 7: we're thrilled with their decision today.
Speaker 4: Peter Madam, Journey General, thank you for being here to
Speaker 4: take our questions. A couple of questions to the both
Speaker 4: of you.
Speaker 1: The EO goes had a thirty day race period before
Speaker 1: it goes into effect. Is there any thought about trying
Speaker 1: to make it effective immediately within that period of time.
Speaker 7: We're going to follow the law, We're going to make
Speaker 7: those decisions, and we're going to do what's right in
Speaker 7: the bounds.
Speaker 2: Of the law.
Speaker 1: And then the DOJ didn't ask the justices to rule
Speaker 1: on the merits of the birthright Citizenship band just for
Speaker 1: explanation purposes, Why sure.
Speaker 7: Because that's going to come down in October. In the
Speaker 7: this was huge because it's indirectly impacted today. As I said,
Speaker 7: it's now it's case by case. Let me reiterate of
Speaker 7: the thirty five of the forty nationwide injunctions filed against
Speaker 7: this president against his executive authority as President of the
Speaker 7: United States, thirty five of them came from Maryland, d C. Massachusetts, California,
Speaker 7: and Washington. And that's crazy, these five districts. So yes,
Speaker 7: it indirectly impacts us. It will be a separate decision
Speaker 7: in October.
Speaker 6: All right.
Speaker 2: That was President Trump and the Attorney General Pam Bondi
Speaker 2: and Todd Blande from earlier today.