1 00:00:13,160 --> 00:00:16,680 Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up, a weekly markets podcast. 2 00:00:16,880 --> 00:00:19,160 Speaker 1: My name is Mike Reagan and I'm a senior editor 3 00:00:19,280 --> 00:00:22,480 Speaker 1: at Bloomberg. This week on the show, has all this 4 00:00:22,640 --> 00:00:25,759 Speaker 1: rotation made you see sick? Yet? Earlier this year was 5 00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:28,680 Speaker 1: the massive rotation out of big tech and other growth 6 00:00:28,720 --> 00:00:32,960 Speaker 1: stocks and into more cyclical and value oriented stocks. But 7 00:00:33,159 --> 00:00:36,120 Speaker 1: a whip of hawkishness from the Federal Reserve has caused 8 00:00:36,120 --> 00:00:38,200 Speaker 1: everyone to sort of jumped back to the other side 9 00:00:38,200 --> 00:00:41,160 Speaker 1: of the boat again and growth is outperforming once again, 10 00:00:41,200 --> 00:00:43,479 Speaker 1: at least for now. Now some people are saying the 11 00:00:43,479 --> 00:00:45,560 Speaker 1: market is falling for a head fake from the Fed. 12 00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:47,880 Speaker 1: But we want to get into it with the head 13 00:00:48,080 --> 00:00:53,040 Speaker 1: strategist at a major pioneering quantitative fund manager. But first 14 00:00:53,200 --> 00:00:55,400 Speaker 1: I want to bring in our co host. And sorry 15 00:00:55,440 --> 00:00:57,600 Speaker 1: to all the Charlie Pellet fans out there, but no 16 00:00:57,760 --> 00:01:00,160 Speaker 1: Charlie Pellet intro this this week. And that's because as 17 00:01:00,200 --> 00:01:02,520 Speaker 1: this co host is, there's no mystery about her. She's 18 00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:05,640 Speaker 1: been on the show before and gotten to Charlie Pellet treatment. 19 00:01:05,640 --> 00:01:07,959 Speaker 1: Her name is vill Donna hi Rich. She is a 20 00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:11,600 Speaker 1: cross asset reporter at Bloomberg. Vill Donna, what do you 21 00:01:11,600 --> 00:01:14,600 Speaker 1: have to say for yourself, well, I wouldn't be opposed 22 00:01:14,600 --> 00:01:17,600 Speaker 1: if we had another Charlie Pellet treatment. Here you are. 23 00:01:17,640 --> 00:01:21,400 Speaker 1: You're disappointed, aren't you? Everyone loves the Charlie Charlie. All right, 24 00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:24,440 Speaker 1: I'm sorry. I apologize next time, but I will put 25 00:01:24,440 --> 00:01:27,000 Speaker 1: out Vill Donna, as many of you know, is what 26 00:01:27,040 --> 00:01:30,959 Speaker 1: I consider the chief crazy things correspondent for what goes up. 27 00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:33,640 Speaker 1: Many of the crazy things I've brought to the show 28 00:01:33,680 --> 00:01:36,360 Speaker 1: have been courtesy of Bill Donna. You're actually very sane 29 00:01:36,400 --> 00:01:39,120 Speaker 1: and level headed for someone who is such an expert 30 00:01:39,160 --> 00:01:42,119 Speaker 1: in crazy things. Though, I gotta say they're just really 31 00:01:42,120 --> 00:01:44,600 Speaker 1: interesting to read. And I have what I think is 32 00:01:44,640 --> 00:01:47,080 Speaker 1: a pretty good one you know today. Okay, good, I 33 00:01:47,120 --> 00:01:48,680 Speaker 1: got a good one. So hopefully we don't have the 34 00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:50,960 Speaker 1: same one that that would be awkward, and by all means, 35 00:01:50,960 --> 00:01:53,200 Speaker 1: if you see something crazy, a reminder that we have 36 00:01:53,280 --> 00:01:56,000 Speaker 1: a podcast hotline that's just sitting here waiting for you 37 00:01:56,040 --> 00:01:58,200 Speaker 1: to leave us a voicemail. Vil Donna, our our old 38 00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:01,320 Speaker 1: friends Sarah promised she would call the hotline and leave 39 00:02:01,400 --> 00:02:05,080 Speaker 1: us some crazy things. But um alas so far, I'm 40 00:02:05,080 --> 00:02:08,080 Speaker 1: like a kid on Christmas checking the voicemail and I'm 41 00:02:08,120 --> 00:02:11,000 Speaker 1: nothing in my stocking. But I'm thinking maybe she's just 42 00:02:11,120 --> 00:02:13,919 Speaker 1: forgotten the numbers, so I'll give the number. It's uh 43 00:02:14,040 --> 00:02:17,280 Speaker 1: six four or six three two four three four nine. 44 00:02:17,320 --> 00:02:19,280 Speaker 1: Oh so, please don't give us a call, leave us 45 00:02:19,280 --> 00:02:21,160 Speaker 1: a voicemail and maybe we'll play it on the show. 46 00:02:21,560 --> 00:02:23,560 Speaker 1: But let's get to that. Guest, as I said, he 47 00:02:23,680 --> 00:02:28,200 Speaker 1: is the head of investment strategists at a big fund manager, 48 00:02:28,840 --> 00:02:31,560 Speaker 1: uh that manages about six d and thirty seven billion 49 00:02:31,560 --> 00:02:36,200 Speaker 1: dollars in assets. His name is West Krill, head strategist 50 00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:40,920 Speaker 1: at Dimensional Fund Advisors. West, Welcome to the show, excited 51 00:02:40,960 --> 00:02:44,680 Speaker 1: to be here, Thanks for having me today. Absolutely absolutely, West, 52 00:02:44,760 --> 00:02:46,880 Speaker 1: I've got good news. I'm gonna start off with what 53 00:02:46,919 --> 00:02:49,520 Speaker 1: we call in the industry, a softball question for you, 54 00:02:49,800 --> 00:02:52,440 Speaker 1: uh so, so that's my gift to you today. But 55 00:02:52,440 --> 00:02:55,160 Speaker 1: I'm just want to talk a little bit from your 56 00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:59,600 Speaker 1: perspective about the approach Dimensional takes to investing. Now. Obviously, 57 00:02:59,639 --> 00:03:02,239 Speaker 1: Dement sal as I said in the intro, considered a 58 00:03:02,360 --> 00:03:05,600 Speaker 1: very pioneering firm that was sort of one of the 59 00:03:05,600 --> 00:03:08,120 Speaker 1: first to be at the intersection of kind of the 60 00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:13,760 Speaker 1: academic thinking about markets and actually managing money using those 61 00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:16,720 Speaker 1: types of approaches. In the real world. For example, the 62 00:03:16,760 --> 00:03:21,000 Speaker 1: founders studied under Eugene Fama and Kenneth's French Um. But 63 00:03:21,040 --> 00:03:23,520 Speaker 1: I'm curious just for you to explain to us what 64 00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:27,639 Speaker 1: is dimensionals approach to investing. Yeah, of course, So you know, 65 00:03:27,680 --> 00:03:30,680 Speaker 1: we're founded in nineteen eighty one and we've always been 66 00:03:30,720 --> 00:03:34,400 Speaker 1: built on implementing the great ideas in finance, and to 67 00:03:34,480 --> 00:03:36,400 Speaker 1: your point, you know, a lot of that is cultivating 68 00:03:36,720 --> 00:03:39,280 Speaker 1: these deep connections with some of the luminaries in the 69 00:03:39,320 --> 00:03:43,280 Speaker 1: academic world Fama and French, like you mentioned, Robert Merton, 70 00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:46,960 Speaker 1: Robert Novi, Mars. So that's been really instrumental in the 71 00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:49,480 Speaker 1: way that we've built our firm. And then a central 72 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:52,600 Speaker 1: tenant to our investment philosophy is our deep seated belief 73 00:03:52,960 --> 00:03:55,280 Speaker 1: in markets. So what that means is when we go 74 00:03:55,400 --> 00:03:59,560 Speaker 1: to UH seek to outperform markets, we do so not 75 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:02,280 Speaker 1: by trying to outguess market prices and figure out where 76 00:04:02,320 --> 00:04:06,279 Speaker 1: they've gone wrong, but by emphasizing certain groups of securities 77 00:04:06,480 --> 00:04:10,520 Speaker 1: with higher expected returns based on research, very rigorous research 78 00:04:10,720 --> 00:04:13,600 Speaker 1: from the academic community. And of course you know, we 79 00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:16,320 Speaker 1: have a fanatical emphasis on the role of implementation. We 80 00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:19,680 Speaker 1: feel that's a really critical level of expertise to have 81 00:04:19,800 --> 00:04:22,440 Speaker 1: when you're trying to translate these ideas from the academic 82 00:04:22,480 --> 00:04:26,960 Speaker 1: world into real world value add investments for our clients. 83 00:04:28,440 --> 00:04:30,520 Speaker 1: I know you guys recently converted a bunch of your 84 00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:33,039 Speaker 1: mutual funds into e t s and it was a 85 00:04:33,120 --> 00:04:35,599 Speaker 1: really big deal in the world of ets, and I'd 86 00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:38,200 Speaker 1: love to chat about that in a second, but maybe 87 00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:40,279 Speaker 1: you can tell us a little bit about what types 88 00:04:40,279 --> 00:04:44,880 Speaker 1: of things your clients and people who've been having conversations 89 00:04:44,920 --> 00:04:47,520 Speaker 1: with recently have been asking you about them what's been 90 00:04:47,839 --> 00:04:51,520 Speaker 1: on their minds? And I asked, because I'm thinking of 91 00:04:51,560 --> 00:04:54,760 Speaker 1: all of the fund manager surveys and all these different 92 00:04:54,800 --> 00:04:57,400 Speaker 1: surveys that we tend to see from from week to week, 93 00:04:57,880 --> 00:05:00,839 Speaker 1: where some of the topics recently, I feel like have 94 00:05:01,080 --> 00:05:04,400 Speaker 1: been changing. Where the virus used to be at the 95 00:05:04,440 --> 00:05:07,240 Speaker 1: top of of mind for a lot of people and 96 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:09,919 Speaker 1: it's sort of fallen off and now it's more fed 97 00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:13,760 Speaker 1: and questions around inflation, yes, certainly, I mean those come 98 00:05:13,839 --> 00:05:17,880 Speaker 1: up in conversations. I would say the foremost conversation topic 99 00:05:17,960 --> 00:05:19,960 Speaker 1: for us, and this has been the case really for years, 100 00:05:20,240 --> 00:05:24,040 Speaker 1: is the performance of small cat value versus large cap growth, 101 00:05:24,080 --> 00:05:26,080 Speaker 1: And you know, it's been interesting as you've sort of 102 00:05:26,080 --> 00:05:28,679 Speaker 1: seen a cee saw in terms of the sentiment behind 103 00:05:28,680 --> 00:05:30,880 Speaker 1: those questions. For a while, it was, you know, small 104 00:05:30,920 --> 00:05:33,760 Speaker 1: cap value underperforming large growth concerns around that, and then 105 00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:36,000 Speaker 1: when you had small cat value coming roaring back and 106 00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:38,080 Speaker 1: people would start to ask how much longer can this last? 107 00:05:38,120 --> 00:05:40,160 Speaker 1: And then you know, now you see that at least 108 00:05:40,160 --> 00:05:43,280 Speaker 1: in this past quarter as small value has been underperforming 109 00:05:43,360 --> 00:05:46,799 Speaker 1: large growth again. So you know, I think it reinforces 110 00:05:47,240 --> 00:05:49,920 Speaker 1: a couple of different billion points for investors investors to 111 00:05:50,000 --> 00:05:53,200 Speaker 1: keep in mind. The first is just the uncertainty around 112 00:05:53,200 --> 00:05:56,640 Speaker 1: these premiums. So you know, the premise behind the small 113 00:05:56,680 --> 00:05:59,159 Speaker 1: cat value stocks having higher expectory turns in the market 114 00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:01,800 Speaker 1: is a very simple one. It's the idea that you're 115 00:06:01,839 --> 00:06:04,480 Speaker 1: paying less for a stream of future cash flows, and 116 00:06:04,520 --> 00:06:07,640 Speaker 1: that's a very evergreen concept. But we also know that 117 00:06:07,640 --> 00:06:11,520 Speaker 1: stock returns are volatile, and these premiums can be negative 118 00:06:11,800 --> 00:06:14,359 Speaker 1: for sustained periods of time, but they can also show 119 00:06:14,440 --> 00:06:18,080 Speaker 1: up in really large magnitudes really quickly. The return difference 120 00:06:18,120 --> 00:06:20,480 Speaker 1: between small value and large growth in the US as 121 00:06:20,520 --> 00:06:23,680 Speaker 1: of March thirty one over the trailing six month period 122 00:06:24,279 --> 00:06:26,960 Speaker 1: was sixty two percentage points. That's one of the largest 123 00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:29,320 Speaker 1: return deltas over such a short period of time ever. 124 00:06:29,760 --> 00:06:32,240 Speaker 1: But it's not uncommon for these premiums to show up 125 00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:35,920 Speaker 1: in a hurry, and this has obvious implications for investors. 126 00:06:35,960 --> 00:06:38,159 Speaker 1: It means that you need to be disciplined in terms 127 00:06:38,200 --> 00:06:40,720 Speaker 1: of your approach to capturing these and it also means 128 00:06:40,760 --> 00:06:44,480 Speaker 1: from an investment management standpoint, we need to be continuously 129 00:06:44,600 --> 00:06:47,919 Speaker 1: pursuing these groups of stocks and a very accurate way, 130 00:06:48,160 --> 00:06:50,480 Speaker 1: so that our investors know what they can expect from 131 00:06:50,520 --> 00:06:53,599 Speaker 1: our investment approach, you know. So I want to talk 132 00:06:53,720 --> 00:06:57,400 Speaker 1: about that what Vildana mentioned, the conversion of of some 133 00:06:57,440 --> 00:06:59,640 Speaker 1: of your funds into et apps. I mean, you're still 134 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:03,280 Speaker 1: cominently a mutual fund manager, but you've you know, began 135 00:07:03,400 --> 00:07:06,240 Speaker 1: the process of converting some into e t f s, 136 00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:09,000 Speaker 1: And to me, I wonder, you know, in the bigger 137 00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:12,960 Speaker 1: scheme of things, that seems to me like perhaps part 138 00:07:12,960 --> 00:07:15,840 Speaker 1: of the natural evolution of quant investing. You know, I 139 00:07:15,880 --> 00:07:18,840 Speaker 1: think back to one when you were founded, but I 140 00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:22,200 Speaker 1: can't imagine the man hours and the labor required to 141 00:07:22,240 --> 00:07:25,400 Speaker 1: do just a simple regression study. Say, going back you know, 142 00:07:25,440 --> 00:07:27,960 Speaker 1: a few decades. It must have been, you know, and 143 00:07:28,200 --> 00:07:32,640 Speaker 1: an army of of people with visors and calculators. There's 144 00:07:32,680 --> 00:07:36,160 Speaker 1: all Texas instrument calculators. However, it was done. But is 145 00:07:36,200 --> 00:07:38,960 Speaker 1: that part of it? Just that you know, uh, the 146 00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:43,320 Speaker 1: computing power and the brain power on Wall Street is 147 00:07:43,400 --> 00:07:47,960 Speaker 1: kind of caught up with the quant uh sort of strategies, 148 00:07:48,040 --> 00:07:50,640 Speaker 1: and you know, it's now a lot you're able to 149 00:07:50,640 --> 00:07:52,320 Speaker 1: do it a lot cheaper, able to put it in 150 00:07:52,320 --> 00:07:55,520 Speaker 1: an ETF rapper, and and do it at a much 151 00:07:55,640 --> 00:07:59,160 Speaker 1: less cost basis than than you would say, years ago 152 00:07:59,640 --> 00:08:02,000 Speaker 1: in the equal fund space. Is does that sound right? 153 00:08:02,080 --> 00:08:05,480 Speaker 1: Is it? Is it kind of part of that evolution? Well, 154 00:08:05,520 --> 00:08:07,000 Speaker 1: I think that, you know, the E t F conversion 155 00:08:07,080 --> 00:08:10,320 Speaker 1: was was a very exciting thing for us because that conversion, 156 00:08:10,360 --> 00:08:13,120 Speaker 1: that type of event had not happened at that scale before. 157 00:08:13,640 --> 00:08:16,960 Speaker 1: And those particular strategies that were converted are managed with 158 00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:20,400 Speaker 1: an eye towards minimizing the tax impact for investors, and 159 00:08:20,440 --> 00:08:22,880 Speaker 1: the et F rapper gives you another tool in the toolkit, 160 00:08:23,400 --> 00:08:26,440 Speaker 1: uh to mitigate or to increase the tax efficiency of 161 00:08:26,480 --> 00:08:29,040 Speaker 1: those strategies. And so that was a very important thing 162 00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:31,200 Speaker 1: for us. But we like to say we're wrapper agnostic. 163 00:08:31,240 --> 00:08:33,040 Speaker 1: You know, we believe both the mutual fund and et 164 00:08:33,160 --> 00:08:35,560 Speaker 1: f rappers those type of vehicles do have a place 165 00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:39,080 Speaker 1: depending on an investor's objectives. But I think one of 166 00:08:39,080 --> 00:08:41,240 Speaker 1: the things you're kind of hinting at with this what 167 00:08:41,360 --> 00:08:43,920 Speaker 1: i'll call the rise and systematic investing. You know, that's 168 00:08:43,960 --> 00:08:47,520 Speaker 1: something that we have noticed, even going back further again 169 00:08:47,559 --> 00:08:49,960 Speaker 1: to your point. You know, you mentioned how the ability 170 00:08:50,040 --> 00:08:55,199 Speaker 1: to identify factors within the investment data, uh is a 171 00:08:55,240 --> 00:08:56,520 Speaker 1: lot easier now that it used to be. You know, 172 00:08:56,520 --> 00:08:59,600 Speaker 1: We're used to have computers the size of entire rooms 173 00:08:59,640 --> 00:09:02,000 Speaker 1: like the and I'm sitting in that you needed to 174 00:09:02,040 --> 00:09:04,959 Speaker 1: run regressions to identify these kind of parameters. Uh. Yeah, 175 00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:06,400 Speaker 1: Now it's much timplt. You could probably do it on 176 00:09:06,400 --> 00:09:09,400 Speaker 1: a smartphone. At this point. There is actually an academic 177 00:09:09,440 --> 00:09:11,720 Speaker 1: by the name of Campbell Harvey who keeps track of 178 00:09:11,760 --> 00:09:13,720 Speaker 1: all of the factors that have been identified in the 179 00:09:13,720 --> 00:09:16,760 Speaker 1: academic literature, and last time I checked, it was up 180 00:09:16,760 --> 00:09:20,200 Speaker 1: over five hundred. Uh And in fact, another academic named 181 00:09:20,240 --> 00:09:24,400 Speaker 1: John Cochrane refers to this as the factors zoo Um. Now, 182 00:09:25,160 --> 00:09:27,240 Speaker 1: this is not to say that there's that many, maybe 183 00:09:27,320 --> 00:09:30,920 Speaker 1: hundreds of different distinct sources of expected returns. A lot 184 00:09:30,960 --> 00:09:33,480 Speaker 1: of these are probably variations of the same economic concept 185 00:09:34,160 --> 00:09:36,880 Speaker 1: that are repackaged, but I think it does bring the 186 00:09:36,920 --> 00:09:40,600 Speaker 1: conversation back to the importance of implementation. It's one thing 187 00:09:40,679 --> 00:09:43,840 Speaker 1: to identify a group of securities that, based on historical 188 00:09:43,920 --> 00:09:47,040 Speaker 1: data while outperform in a simulation. Bringing that to a 189 00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:51,000 Speaker 1: real world investment solution where you deliver the outperformance net 190 00:09:51,040 --> 00:09:54,080 Speaker 1: of implementation costs is a different story altogether. And I'll 191 00:09:54,080 --> 00:09:56,520 Speaker 1: give you one really simple example. The Russell two thousand, 192 00:09:56,600 --> 00:09:59,200 Speaker 1: a small cap index we know from the research as 193 00:09:59,200 --> 00:10:03,319 Speaker 1: small cap secure. These have higher expected returns than large caps. Well, 194 00:10:03,360 --> 00:10:06,599 Speaker 1: the small cap Russell two thousand index has historically underperformed 195 00:10:06,640 --> 00:10:09,640 Speaker 1: the Russell one thousand index going back to seventy nine. 196 00:10:10,040 --> 00:10:12,960 Speaker 1: So that's one example. We're just identifying a group of 197 00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:16,240 Speaker 1: stocks you expect to have higher returns. Doesn't always pan 198 00:10:16,280 --> 00:10:19,160 Speaker 1: out an investment vehicle. You really need this level of 199 00:10:19,200 --> 00:10:23,480 Speaker 1: expertise and the research, design, management, and last but not least, 200 00:10:23,520 --> 00:10:26,440 Speaker 1: trading of a strategy to capture these sources of higher 201 00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:38,280 Speaker 1: expector returns for investors. I want to ask you and 202 00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:42,080 Speaker 1: Mike and I were chatting about this right before our conversation. 203 00:10:42,160 --> 00:10:44,560 Speaker 1: But when it comes to some of those factors, does 204 00:10:44,600 --> 00:10:47,439 Speaker 1: it feel like all of the good ones have already 205 00:10:47,440 --> 00:10:50,920 Speaker 1: been sort of discovered and exploited and repackages, you say, 206 00:10:51,080 --> 00:10:54,640 Speaker 1: or is there something else out there that you you're 207 00:10:54,679 --> 00:10:58,080 Speaker 1: finding really exciting? I think that's certainly a challenge, you know, 208 00:10:58,160 --> 00:11:00,679 Speaker 1: especially let's say you're a finance student these days compared 209 00:11:00,720 --> 00:11:02,800 Speaker 1: to one thirty years ago, to find something that hasn't 210 00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:07,320 Speaker 1: already been discovered. There's certainly the incentive to try and 211 00:11:07,360 --> 00:11:10,520 Speaker 1: look for something that's new. Um, But I think that, 212 00:11:10,640 --> 00:11:12,840 Speaker 1: you know, just because some of these core kind of 213 00:11:12,880 --> 00:11:16,760 Speaker 1: acid allocation determining building blocks like size, value or profitability, 214 00:11:17,280 --> 00:11:20,160 Speaker 1: you know, even if you can't add on to those necessarily, 215 00:11:20,280 --> 00:11:22,120 Speaker 1: there's a lot of other inputs into a strategy that 216 00:11:22,160 --> 00:11:23,880 Speaker 1: need to be taken into account. And that's where you know, 217 00:11:23,920 --> 00:11:26,400 Speaker 1: some of the really exciting research has been done, uh, 218 00:11:26,440 --> 00:11:28,360 Speaker 1: you know, internally with our research team, where we look 219 00:11:28,400 --> 00:11:31,080 Speaker 1: at things like this, where you find shorter term drivers 220 00:11:31,080 --> 00:11:33,640 Speaker 1: of expected returns that are really tradeoffs that you have 221 00:11:33,760 --> 00:11:37,439 Speaker 1: to balance against things like size, value or profitability. You know, 222 00:11:37,520 --> 00:11:40,760 Speaker 1: if you think about a value strategy, how to stocks 223 00:11:40,880 --> 00:11:43,840 Speaker 1: often become value stocks while it's following a period of 224 00:11:43,880 --> 00:11:47,040 Speaker 1: relative underperformance versus their peers. What do we know from 225 00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:50,280 Speaker 1: the phenomenon of momentum within the cross section of stocks. Well, 226 00:11:50,280 --> 00:11:54,040 Speaker 1: stocks that have had relatively poor returns uh in previous 227 00:11:54,080 --> 00:11:57,800 Speaker 1: periods tend to continue to have relatively poor returns in 228 00:11:57,840 --> 00:12:01,199 Speaker 1: the short run. And so addition, all sources of information 229 00:12:01,240 --> 00:12:04,000 Speaker 1: about expector returns like that are really crucial to Again, 230 00:12:04,080 --> 00:12:07,479 Speaker 1: even for these well established factors like size, value, and profitability, 231 00:12:07,840 --> 00:12:10,080 Speaker 1: making sure that we capture our fair share of those 232 00:12:10,440 --> 00:12:14,319 Speaker 1: still a very important part of implementation. Uh, what's I'm 233 00:12:14,320 --> 00:12:16,440 Speaker 1: great glad you brought up Cam Harvey. We've had him 234 00:12:16,480 --> 00:12:19,280 Speaker 1: on the show a few times. Not in a while, though, 235 00:12:19,280 --> 00:12:21,920 Speaker 1: But listeners, if you wanna hear more of the thoughts 236 00:12:21,920 --> 00:12:23,920 Speaker 1: of Camp, scroll back on the on the phone a 237 00:12:23,920 --> 00:12:26,319 Speaker 1: few a year or two and we had a couple 238 00:12:26,360 --> 00:12:28,520 Speaker 1: of good episodes with Cam. I getting back on. But 239 00:12:28,600 --> 00:12:31,280 Speaker 1: wes I wanna talk about what I What I mentioned 240 00:12:31,320 --> 00:12:34,199 Speaker 1: at the top of the show is basically what appears 241 00:12:34,240 --> 00:12:36,920 Speaker 1: to be kind of a reversal in the rotation back 242 00:12:36,960 --> 00:12:41,480 Speaker 1: to growth and tech leadership. Now, Uh, maybe the thinking 243 00:12:41,600 --> 00:12:43,120 Speaker 1: is the FED took a little bit of the wind 244 00:12:43,160 --> 00:12:45,480 Speaker 1: out of the sales of the reflation trade that was 245 00:12:45,840 --> 00:12:49,160 Speaker 1: boosting Uh, you know, the banks, the energy companies, the 246 00:12:49,440 --> 00:12:52,400 Speaker 1: real cyclical and value sectors of the market. How are 247 00:12:52,440 --> 00:12:55,040 Speaker 1: you thinking about that? Is uh, you know, and Bildad 248 00:12:55,080 --> 00:12:57,160 Speaker 1: has written about this and some others that a lot 249 00:12:57,160 --> 00:12:59,960 Speaker 1: of people think this is kind of a wrong react 250 00:13:00,120 --> 00:13:03,240 Speaker 1: and from the market to rotate this aggressively back into growth, 251 00:13:03,280 --> 00:13:06,000 Speaker 1: that there's still some jewice left to be squeezed out 252 00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:08,840 Speaker 1: of the value and cyclical trade. How are you thinking 253 00:13:08,840 --> 00:13:11,880 Speaker 1: about it? Well, we can start with first principles when 254 00:13:11,880 --> 00:13:14,200 Speaker 1: it comes to why we would believe any value premium 255 00:13:14,280 --> 00:13:17,439 Speaker 1: or size premium or profitability premium in the first place. 256 00:13:17,520 --> 00:13:19,960 Speaker 1: And it's based on the fact that there are differences 257 00:13:19,960 --> 00:13:22,480 Speaker 1: and discount rates across stocks. Right, Investors are going to 258 00:13:22,600 --> 00:13:26,719 Speaker 1: require different rates of return to hold different stocks. Just 259 00:13:26,800 --> 00:13:28,800 Speaker 1: like if you had a whole population of people went 260 00:13:28,840 --> 00:13:30,600 Speaker 1: to the bank for alone, they're likely to get different 261 00:13:30,600 --> 00:13:33,680 Speaker 1: interest rates from the bank, and so it's similar that 262 00:13:33,760 --> 00:13:36,360 Speaker 1: we would expect something like that to be true for 263 00:13:37,000 --> 00:13:40,480 Speaker 1: first stock discount rates, size, value, and profitability are just 264 00:13:40,520 --> 00:13:44,000 Speaker 1: based on using price combined with fundamentals to identify these 265 00:13:44,040 --> 00:13:47,680 Speaker 1: differences and expect to returns, which means that every single day, 266 00:13:47,760 --> 00:13:50,560 Speaker 1: based on the information known to market participants, there's some 267 00:13:50,559 --> 00:13:54,240 Speaker 1: stocks with higher expected returns than others. And that's what 268 00:13:54,280 --> 00:13:56,959 Speaker 1: we're talking about with these expected premiums, such as the 269 00:13:57,040 --> 00:13:59,839 Speaker 1: value premium. So we expect this premium every day, and 270 00:13:59,840 --> 00:14:03,640 Speaker 1: I know from the data that these premiums can be volatile. 271 00:14:03,640 --> 00:14:05,760 Speaker 1: If you just look on a rolling you know, one 272 00:14:05,840 --> 00:14:09,720 Speaker 1: year basis about of twelve month periods going back to 273 00:14:09,760 --> 00:14:13,959 Speaker 1: the nineteen twenties, and the US growth is outperformed value, 274 00:14:14,160 --> 00:14:16,160 Speaker 1: and I think that really hints at this notion of 275 00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:21,080 Speaker 1: the difference between realized returns and expector returns. So many 276 00:14:21,080 --> 00:14:24,520 Speaker 1: people had attributed the strong performance of growth stocks versus 277 00:14:24,600 --> 00:14:27,480 Speaker 1: value and you know, kind of that decade leading up 278 00:14:27,480 --> 00:14:29,680 Speaker 1: to the big turnaround for value recently, and they kind 279 00:14:29,680 --> 00:14:32,120 Speaker 1: of laid that at the feet of the FED. But 280 00:14:32,200 --> 00:14:34,720 Speaker 1: when you look at the performance of those growth stocks 281 00:14:34,760 --> 00:14:37,640 Speaker 1: over that period where they were churning out twenty per 282 00:14:37,760 --> 00:14:39,880 Speaker 1: year in terms of returns, you have to ask yourself 283 00:14:39,880 --> 00:14:43,000 Speaker 1: as an investor, do I believe the expected return for 284 00:14:43,040 --> 00:14:47,080 Speaker 1: this asset classes that seems awfully high and I think 285 00:14:47,080 --> 00:14:48,720 Speaker 1: we would look at that and say a good portion 286 00:14:48,800 --> 00:14:52,840 Speaker 1: of that was an unexpected component of the return that 287 00:14:52,920 --> 00:14:55,480 Speaker 1: might have been based on great success for some of 288 00:14:55,480 --> 00:14:57,960 Speaker 1: these companies, that could have been unexpected to a certain extent. 289 00:14:58,560 --> 00:15:00,440 Speaker 1: Certainly when you look at their valuation as they were 290 00:15:00,480 --> 00:15:03,920 Speaker 1: creeping up, they were still are very very high. Um. So, 291 00:15:03,960 --> 00:15:07,360 Speaker 1: when I think about is the question of is there 292 00:15:07,360 --> 00:15:10,840 Speaker 1: any juice left exqueeze from this limon? My question would be, well, 293 00:15:10,880 --> 00:15:13,240 Speaker 1: what's changed about your expectation for the value premium? As 294 00:15:13,320 --> 00:15:15,800 Speaker 1: long as you believe that low prices associated with higher 295 00:15:15,800 --> 00:15:19,240 Speaker 1: expector returns, there's plenty of juice left to squeeze because 296 00:15:19,240 --> 00:15:22,200 Speaker 1: we still expect a value premium every single day, you 297 00:15:22,200 --> 00:15:24,920 Speaker 1: know us. I'm curious how your approach fits in with 298 00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:26,720 Speaker 1: the year like this, Uh, you know, and I know, 299 00:15:26,840 --> 00:15:31,120 Speaker 1: being anchored in sort of the academic approach of investing 300 00:15:31,160 --> 00:15:36,280 Speaker 1: and very much anchored to the efficient market hypothesis at dimensional. 301 00:15:36,960 --> 00:15:39,480 Speaker 1: Then boy, we enter a year like one, right, and 302 00:15:39,520 --> 00:15:42,239 Speaker 1: we've got all of a sudden, all the discount brokerages 303 00:15:42,360 --> 00:15:45,120 Speaker 1: just completely get rid of commissions. You've got all these 304 00:15:45,160 --> 00:15:48,280 Speaker 1: people stuck at home. Uh, they can't go out. They 305 00:15:48,280 --> 00:15:50,760 Speaker 1: can't bet on sports. You know, they've got a lot 306 00:15:50,760 --> 00:15:53,640 Speaker 1: of spare cash, whether it be because of that or 307 00:15:53,680 --> 00:15:57,880 Speaker 1: because of the stimulus from the government and whatnot. And 308 00:15:57,920 --> 00:16:00,840 Speaker 1: we have this phenomenon like the at its stocks just 309 00:16:00,960 --> 00:16:04,120 Speaker 1: going going absolutely nuts. And it's hard to for me 310 00:16:04,160 --> 00:16:06,520 Speaker 1: to sort of wrap my head around how a student 311 00:16:06,520 --> 00:16:09,480 Speaker 1: of sort of efficient market theory can can kind of 312 00:16:09,760 --> 00:16:13,880 Speaker 1: operate in that environment. I mean, Um, does it change 313 00:16:13,880 --> 00:16:16,800 Speaker 1: your approach at all to see this type of behavior? 314 00:16:17,600 --> 00:16:20,880 Speaker 1: And half jokingly, I asque is there perhaps a Reddit 315 00:16:20,960 --> 00:16:23,000 Speaker 1: factor that can be exploited? You know, is there a 316 00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:26,560 Speaker 1: Wall Street bets factor that you could somehow quantify and 317 00:16:26,560 --> 00:16:28,960 Speaker 1: and try to play with and and feel free to 318 00:16:28,960 --> 00:16:30,800 Speaker 1: tell me I'm crazy for thinking that. I've I've heard 319 00:16:30,800 --> 00:16:33,200 Speaker 1: it before, but I'm just curious how you think about 320 00:16:33,240 --> 00:16:37,040 Speaker 1: a year like this, Um, with that academic background, that 321 00:16:37,120 --> 00:16:42,160 Speaker 1: efficient markets theory background, Uh, with the market that's a 322 00:16:42,160 --> 00:16:45,040 Speaker 1: lot of times just being driven by day traders, you know, 323 00:16:45,480 --> 00:16:48,160 Speaker 1: place some trades based on what they read on Reddit 324 00:16:48,200 --> 00:16:49,720 Speaker 1: and what they think the crowd, where they think the 325 00:16:49,720 --> 00:16:52,240 Speaker 1: crowd is going to go next. Well, I think it 326 00:16:52,320 --> 00:16:55,760 Speaker 1: reinforces the need for flexibility within your investment approach and 327 00:16:55,840 --> 00:16:58,880 Speaker 1: having a daily process. So you know, when we look 328 00:16:58,880 --> 00:17:01,400 Speaker 1: at the price change for a visual securities, I mean 329 00:17:01,400 --> 00:17:03,520 Speaker 1: we know it can happen because of maybe a change 330 00:17:03,520 --> 00:17:05,720 Speaker 1: in the expectation for the future for the cash flows 331 00:17:05,720 --> 00:17:07,720 Speaker 1: of the firm. It could reflect a change in the 332 00:17:07,760 --> 00:17:11,200 Speaker 1: discount rate that's assigned to those expected future cash flows. 333 00:17:11,320 --> 00:17:14,520 Speaker 1: Very difficult, if not impossible, to disentangle those two effects. 334 00:17:14,560 --> 00:17:17,200 Speaker 1: But what we do know is that when price is higher, 335 00:17:17,720 --> 00:17:20,639 Speaker 1: expect to returns are lower. So where that's relevant is 336 00:17:20,680 --> 00:17:23,040 Speaker 1: if you have a strategy, like say one that's focused 337 00:17:23,040 --> 00:17:24,960 Speaker 1: on small cat value stocks. Well, if you have a 338 00:17:25,000 --> 00:17:27,520 Speaker 1: company like one of the ones you're mentioning that started 339 00:17:27,520 --> 00:17:29,320 Speaker 1: off a small cat value and all of a sudden 340 00:17:29,359 --> 00:17:31,960 Speaker 1: it's prices now making it one of the largest two 341 00:17:32,000 --> 00:17:34,199 Speaker 1: or three companies in the US, well, then at that 342 00:17:34,240 --> 00:17:36,720 Speaker 1: point it's not really fitting the definition of higher expected 343 00:17:36,760 --> 00:17:39,960 Speaker 1: returns in accordance with a small cat value portfolio. So 344 00:17:40,000 --> 00:17:42,439 Speaker 1: if I have a daily process, then I can make 345 00:17:42,480 --> 00:17:44,800 Speaker 1: the determination to sell that out of the portfolio at 346 00:17:44,840 --> 00:17:47,960 Speaker 1: that time. It's funny when you look at, uh, you know, 347 00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:50,000 Speaker 1: some of the index approaches. You can use the Rustle 348 00:17:50,040 --> 00:17:52,679 Speaker 1: two thousand value as an example, where as of May 349 00:17:52,760 --> 00:17:56,280 Speaker 1: thirty one, you've got game Stop and AMC still within 350 00:17:56,320 --> 00:17:58,480 Speaker 1: the index, and at that time they were accounting for 351 00:17:58,520 --> 00:18:02,200 Speaker 1: about one and a half percentage point of the index. Uh. 352 00:18:02,240 --> 00:18:03,919 Speaker 1: And you know, you might even think of that is 353 00:18:04,080 --> 00:18:06,679 Speaker 1: a almost a Yao Ming like outlier, like if you 354 00:18:06,720 --> 00:18:09,639 Speaker 1: had Yamming visiting a kindergarten class in the size of screpancy. 355 00:18:09,800 --> 00:18:11,239 Speaker 1: Kind of the picture you would get if you think 356 00:18:11,280 --> 00:18:14,439 Speaker 1: about those two companies in a small value index. But 357 00:18:14,520 --> 00:18:17,159 Speaker 1: they weren't alone. In fact, you had about fifteen percent 358 00:18:17,240 --> 00:18:19,919 Speaker 1: of the Russell two thousand values holdings were actually in 359 00:18:19,960 --> 00:18:23,159 Speaker 1: the top one thousand largest in the US, which is 360 00:18:23,200 --> 00:18:26,240 Speaker 1: obviously the domain of the Russell and thousand indusicries. So 361 00:18:26,640 --> 00:18:28,800 Speaker 1: you know, again that's kind of a function of the 362 00:18:28,840 --> 00:18:31,879 Speaker 1: way that indusseries do their rebalancing in the case of 363 00:18:31,880 --> 00:18:33,840 Speaker 1: the Russell in disease once per year. We believe in 364 00:18:33,920 --> 00:18:37,080 Speaker 1: having a daily process that we can reflect changes in 365 00:18:37,160 --> 00:18:42,080 Speaker 1: market prices throughout the year and rebalance our portfolios incrementally, 366 00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:43,960 Speaker 1: and you need flexibility to do that. You have to 367 00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:48,280 Speaker 1: flex flexibility across names through time and individual names, so 368 00:18:48,359 --> 00:18:50,640 Speaker 1: you're not beholding the one individual trade. In that way, 369 00:18:50,640 --> 00:18:53,680 Speaker 1: you can dynamically react to the way prices changed to 370 00:18:53,840 --> 00:18:57,320 Speaker 1: continuously pursue higher expector returns and manage risk at the 371 00:18:57,359 --> 00:19:00,600 Speaker 1: same time. I gotta say, I would to see Yao 372 00:19:00,720 --> 00:19:03,800 Speaker 1: Ming visited kindergarten class. I'd I'd pay, I'd pay cover 373 00:19:03,920 --> 00:19:09,399 Speaker 1: charts for that, Dott, I'm sure you would. Most of 374 00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:15,560 Speaker 1: my sports jokes go over my head. Sorry about that. 375 00:19:15,720 --> 00:19:17,720 Speaker 1: But but to go back to what Mike was saying 376 00:19:17,720 --> 00:19:22,240 Speaker 1: about this year, Um, you know, returns have been really great. 377 00:19:22,760 --> 00:19:24,600 Speaker 1: I think we were checking the numbers just this morning. 378 00:19:24,600 --> 00:19:26,680 Speaker 1: It's been the second best first half of the year 379 00:19:26,760 --> 00:19:29,159 Speaker 1: in about two decades or so. And then at the 380 00:19:29,200 --> 00:19:34,120 Speaker 1: same time you have all these naysayer's warning about bubble 381 00:19:34,560 --> 00:19:37,920 Speaker 1: and pockets, bubbles and pockets of the markets that are 382 00:19:38,119 --> 00:19:41,119 Speaker 1: sort of bubblicious, if I can use that word. But 383 00:19:41,400 --> 00:19:44,880 Speaker 1: is that thanks is that a prevalent sense right now 384 00:19:45,320 --> 00:19:48,840 Speaker 1: or is it just uh something that you here all 385 00:19:48,840 --> 00:19:51,960 Speaker 1: the time anyway, or is there sort of this sense 386 00:19:52,080 --> 00:19:55,119 Speaker 1: of paranoia that's just a bit more prevalent just because 387 00:19:55,600 --> 00:20:00,840 Speaker 1: the market has been doing so well for the last year. Well, 388 00:20:00,880 --> 00:20:03,720 Speaker 1: the danger with using the expectation or the fear of 389 00:20:03,760 --> 00:20:08,360 Speaker 1: a bubble to influential asset allocation decisions is the possibility 390 00:20:08,359 --> 00:20:11,120 Speaker 1: that you might be wrong in the enormous opportunity costs 391 00:20:11,359 --> 00:20:13,760 Speaker 1: for doing so. And again, you know, I keep on. 392 00:20:13,840 --> 00:20:16,119 Speaker 1: I think twenty was a great example of all the 393 00:20:16,160 --> 00:20:18,480 Speaker 1: case studies that you can use where if you look 394 00:20:18,480 --> 00:20:22,400 Speaker 1: at the flows that we're going into money market funds 395 00:20:22,800 --> 00:20:25,760 Speaker 1: in Q one of I mean, it was close to 396 00:20:25,800 --> 00:20:29,200 Speaker 1: seven billion of dollars presumably going out of equities into 397 00:20:29,280 --> 00:20:32,240 Speaker 1: money market funds, and then what happens subsequent to the 398 00:20:32,280 --> 00:20:33,800 Speaker 1: end of Q one that year, Will you had any 399 00:20:33,840 --> 00:20:37,560 Speaker 1: enormous tear We had equities globally, you know, delivering thirty 400 00:20:37,600 --> 00:20:40,960 Speaker 1: some percentage points worth of return over the next two quarters. 401 00:20:41,000 --> 00:20:44,200 Speaker 1: So that's what's potentially on the table if you let 402 00:20:44,280 --> 00:20:47,520 Speaker 1: expectations of when maybe these premiums are gonna show up 403 00:20:47,520 --> 00:20:49,200 Speaker 1: in the future influence what you're gonna do. We don't 404 00:20:49,240 --> 00:20:51,399 Speaker 1: know when these premiums we're going to show up. That's 405 00:20:51,480 --> 00:20:53,800 Speaker 1: kind of the nature of you know, not just the 406 00:20:53,800 --> 00:20:57,320 Speaker 1: equity premium, but size, value and profitability, you know, the 407 00:20:57,400 --> 00:20:59,200 Speaker 1: value premium. Again, we keep one back to this one 408 00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:01,400 Speaker 1: because it's been in the news so much lately one 409 00:21:01,440 --> 00:21:04,040 Speaker 1: out of twenty months in the US historically. So this 410 00:21:04,040 --> 00:21:08,480 Speaker 1: is data going back to value stocks outperform growth stocks 411 00:21:08,480 --> 00:21:12,280 Speaker 1: by seven and a half percent inch points. That's fifteen 412 00:21:12,320 --> 00:21:16,360 Speaker 1: times what their unconditional average was. Uh So, I think 413 00:21:16,400 --> 00:21:19,320 Speaker 1: that just this notion that things can turn very quickly 414 00:21:19,760 --> 00:21:22,120 Speaker 1: unless you know what the news that's going to influence 415 00:21:22,160 --> 00:21:25,119 Speaker 1: expectations in the future is going to be. Then the 416 00:21:25,160 --> 00:21:27,960 Speaker 1: most tried and true method of capturing your fair share 417 00:21:28,080 --> 00:21:30,720 Speaker 1: of the market return and of these premiums is that 418 00:21:30,760 --> 00:21:34,160 Speaker 1: stay consistently invested so when they do show up, you're 419 00:21:34,200 --> 00:21:36,320 Speaker 1: there to capture them. At the same time, we do 420 00:21:36,400 --> 00:21:39,719 Speaker 1: have this wrong cohort that's been consistently buying, which is 421 00:21:39,920 --> 00:21:42,320 Speaker 1: which has been the retail investor. I read a note 422 00:21:42,320 --> 00:21:45,359 Speaker 1: earlier this week that said last Friday was a record 423 00:21:45,440 --> 00:21:49,879 Speaker 1: day for retail traders buying equities. I'm wondering how you 424 00:21:49,880 --> 00:21:52,680 Speaker 1: guys are thinking about the retail investor and their involvement 425 00:21:52,720 --> 00:21:56,800 Speaker 1: in the market, and how much of your conversion from 426 00:21:56,800 --> 00:21:59,919 Speaker 1: of your mutual funds into e t s is aimed 427 00:22:00,080 --> 00:22:04,360 Speaker 1: at attracting retail money potentially. Yeah, one of the benefits 428 00:22:04,359 --> 00:22:07,720 Speaker 1: for us having different investment solutions in different rappers, whether 429 00:22:07,760 --> 00:22:11,879 Speaker 1: it's open and mutual funds, ETF, separately managed accounts. We 430 00:22:11,960 --> 00:22:14,760 Speaker 1: want our clients to have lots of different ways to 431 00:22:15,000 --> 00:22:18,520 Speaker 1: use dimensionals investment solutions within the way they're building an 432 00:22:18,520 --> 00:22:22,160 Speaker 1: asset allegation for their clients and you know, so we 433 00:22:22,200 --> 00:22:23,600 Speaker 1: want at the end of the day to have all 434 00:22:23,640 --> 00:22:25,280 Speaker 1: those choices on the table for them. But we still 435 00:22:25,400 --> 00:22:28,680 Speaker 1: very much believe in the idea of having these financial intermediaries. 436 00:22:28,680 --> 00:22:30,800 Speaker 1: And again, some of the lessons we've been talking about 437 00:22:31,160 --> 00:22:33,880 Speaker 1: of the opportunity costs from deviating at the market at 438 00:22:33,920 --> 00:22:38,560 Speaker 1: the wrong time or not being consistently exposed to these 439 00:22:38,560 --> 00:22:41,920 Speaker 1: premiums can be greatly mitigated by you know, for example, 440 00:22:42,119 --> 00:22:46,040 Speaker 1: an an investor having an advisor who helps helps them 441 00:22:46,040 --> 00:22:49,000 Speaker 1: stay consistent with their investment approach. And we feel like 442 00:22:49,040 --> 00:22:52,200 Speaker 1: it's a very big benefit for investors. And then all 443 00:22:52,200 --> 00:22:54,240 Speaker 1: of our investment solutions are really tailored so that they 444 00:22:54,240 --> 00:22:56,280 Speaker 1: can make the best decisions of how to peace these 445 00:22:56,320 --> 00:23:16,439 Speaker 1: things together consistent with the goals of their you know, 446 00:23:16,480 --> 00:23:20,200 Speaker 1: West says, regular listeners will know, Um, I think I'm 447 00:23:20,359 --> 00:23:23,560 Speaker 1: contractually obligated to discuss inflation on the on the show, 448 00:23:24,080 --> 00:23:26,919 Speaker 1: perhaps legally obligated. I think they passed a law somewhere 449 00:23:26,920 --> 00:23:31,160 Speaker 1: all podcast hosts must discuss inflation. But I mean, obviously 450 00:23:31,200 --> 00:23:34,280 Speaker 1: the big wild card, the big variable everyone's top of 451 00:23:34,320 --> 00:23:37,520 Speaker 1: mind this year. Will it be transitory or not? How 452 00:23:37,520 --> 00:23:41,639 Speaker 1: long does transitory really mean? How are you thinking about 453 00:23:41,640 --> 00:23:44,800 Speaker 1: inflation and and is it affecting the way you're thinking 454 00:23:44,800 --> 00:23:47,280 Speaker 1: about portfolios? You know, break it down to us about 455 00:23:47,520 --> 00:23:50,359 Speaker 1: you know, you're you're sort of thirty view of inflation 456 00:23:50,359 --> 00:23:53,560 Speaker 1: and what to do about it? Yeah? Absolutely, I mean 457 00:23:53,640 --> 00:23:55,399 Speaker 1: depending on you talk to, you get lots of differing 458 00:23:55,480 --> 00:23:58,680 Speaker 1: viewpoints in terms of their expectations for inflation. So it's 459 00:23:58,680 --> 00:24:01,479 Speaker 1: helpful for us to just look what is the market 460 00:24:01,520 --> 00:24:05,000 Speaker 1: in aggregate telling us about inflation expectations, And you know, 461 00:24:05,000 --> 00:24:07,399 Speaker 1: we can see that from some indicators. For example, you 462 00:24:07,440 --> 00:24:09,600 Speaker 1: can need to break even inflation, or the difference in 463 00:24:09,680 --> 00:24:13,560 Speaker 1: yields between nominal and inflation protected treasuries at the same maturity. 464 00:24:14,040 --> 00:24:17,480 Speaker 1: You can use the you know, the forward inflation expectations, 465 00:24:17,560 --> 00:24:19,919 Speaker 1: something like the five year five years. So if I 466 00:24:19,960 --> 00:24:22,840 Speaker 1: look at the five year break even inflation rate right now, 467 00:24:23,000 --> 00:24:24,679 Speaker 1: or at least as of a few weeks ago, it 468 00:24:24,800 --> 00:24:27,760 Speaker 1: was hovering around right around two point four percent. The 469 00:24:27,880 --> 00:24:30,199 Speaker 1: five year five year forward inflation, which is telling you 470 00:24:30,200 --> 00:24:33,080 Speaker 1: something about inflation expectations for the five year period after 471 00:24:33,760 --> 00:24:36,440 Speaker 1: the next five years, so basically covering ten four years here, 472 00:24:36,760 --> 00:24:39,560 Speaker 1: that number was around two point one percent. Both of 473 00:24:39,600 --> 00:24:43,320 Speaker 1: those numbers are pretty well on line with historical trends, 474 00:24:43,359 --> 00:24:45,560 Speaker 1: So looking at those indicators, it doesn't seem that the 475 00:24:45,600 --> 00:24:50,960 Speaker 1: market in aggregate is expecting particularly high inflation. And expecting 476 00:24:51,040 --> 00:24:54,120 Speaker 1: inflation is incorporating into security prices, whether you're buying you know, 477 00:24:54,240 --> 00:24:58,400 Speaker 1: stocks or bonds or anything that's in nominal terms, you're 478 00:24:58,400 --> 00:25:03,080 Speaker 1: getting compensation for expect and inflation. Now, some investors might 479 00:25:03,080 --> 00:25:06,360 Speaker 1: be particularly sensitive to inflation, and that means they might 480 00:25:06,359 --> 00:25:09,760 Speaker 1: be concerned with unexpected inflation. So, for example, if consumer 481 00:25:09,800 --> 00:25:14,280 Speaker 1: prices rise more than the broad market is expecting, then 482 00:25:14,760 --> 00:25:17,080 Speaker 1: they might want to seek additional protection for that. And 483 00:25:17,119 --> 00:25:20,240 Speaker 1: there are options, and it's sort of like the COVID vaccines, 484 00:25:20,280 --> 00:25:22,200 Speaker 1: where you have different ways to reach the same level 485 00:25:22,240 --> 00:25:27,720 Speaker 1: of inoculation. You can use treasury inflation protected securities which 486 00:25:27,800 --> 00:25:32,240 Speaker 1: will hedge on expected inflation. There's a consideration there, which 487 00:25:32,320 --> 00:25:34,280 Speaker 1: is that the yields on those are very very low. 488 00:25:34,359 --> 00:25:37,520 Speaker 1: The real interest rates for US treasuries are negative across 489 00:25:37,520 --> 00:25:40,920 Speaker 1: the board, across all maturities. Um. Then there's also the 490 00:25:41,000 --> 00:25:45,760 Speaker 1: possibility of having a fixed income solution which combines inflation 491 00:25:45,880 --> 00:25:49,760 Speaker 1: swap overlays, so you're getting you're gonna get paid real inflator, 492 00:25:49,800 --> 00:25:53,280 Speaker 1: actual inflation, and then it's overlaid. On corporate bond strategies, 493 00:25:53,320 --> 00:25:56,720 Speaker 1: we can expand your opportunities set two different levels of 494 00:25:56,720 --> 00:25:59,320 Speaker 1: credit and different currencies as well, so there are options 495 00:25:59,320 --> 00:26:03,200 Speaker 1: for investors who do have concerns about unexpected inflation. But 496 00:26:03,240 --> 00:26:06,600 Speaker 1: I think getting to this notion that expected inflation, which 497 00:26:06,640 --> 00:26:08,480 Speaker 1: is whatever the market believes is going to come to pass, 498 00:26:09,240 --> 00:26:12,800 Speaker 1: is being compensated in current security prices. And let's face it, 499 00:26:12,880 --> 00:26:15,120 Speaker 1: the market, when they're producing prices like this, they were 500 00:26:15,240 --> 00:26:17,320 Speaker 1: very difficult to out guests. We might all have our 501 00:26:17,359 --> 00:26:20,679 Speaker 1: opinions on what's gonna happen in the future, but looking 502 00:26:20,680 --> 00:26:24,520 Speaker 1: at the data around active fund managers outguessing market prices 503 00:26:24,680 --> 00:26:28,639 Speaker 1: is very difficult for most folks, you know, West. Before 504 00:26:28,680 --> 00:26:31,520 Speaker 1: we get to the crazy things, I just want to 505 00:26:31,560 --> 00:26:34,560 Speaker 1: get your your sort of current of the moment thoughts 506 00:26:34,640 --> 00:26:37,680 Speaker 1: on on asset allocation. If I can, And let's start, 507 00:26:37,960 --> 00:26:40,520 Speaker 1: you know, with the hypothetical sixty forty. Now, obviously there's 508 00:26:40,560 --> 00:26:43,359 Speaker 1: been a lot of debate recently of whether sixty is 509 00:26:43,400 --> 00:26:47,800 Speaker 1: dead or you know, what should go into that bucket? Um, 510 00:26:47,840 --> 00:26:50,440 Speaker 1: you know, should he be seventy thirty or whatever, whatever 511 00:26:50,480 --> 00:26:52,440 Speaker 1: the case may be. There's there's kind of a lot 512 00:26:52,520 --> 00:26:55,639 Speaker 1: of diversity of opinion on the whole notion of a 513 00:26:55,640 --> 00:26:58,840 Speaker 1: diverse what a diversified portfolio should should look like right now? 514 00:26:58,880 --> 00:27:02,640 Speaker 1: So I'm just kinda cure swear you stand on that idea. Um, 515 00:27:03,119 --> 00:27:06,240 Speaker 1: you know, are you a sixty forty type of guy? Uh? 516 00:27:06,280 --> 00:27:08,159 Speaker 1: And if so, what you know, what exactly are you 517 00:27:08,160 --> 00:27:10,720 Speaker 1: putting in your sixty? What are you putting in your forty? 518 00:27:10,760 --> 00:27:12,040 Speaker 1: You know a lot of people saying you've got to 519 00:27:12,040 --> 00:27:13,679 Speaker 1: take a little more risk in the forty, get some 520 00:27:13,720 --> 00:27:16,600 Speaker 1: credit in there, some corporate credit, maybe some em debt, 521 00:27:16,640 --> 00:27:18,879 Speaker 1: that sort of thing. How are you thinking about it all? 522 00:27:19,640 --> 00:27:23,120 Speaker 1: And how much bigcoin is part of that? We're dose 523 00:27:23,200 --> 00:27:26,080 Speaker 1: coin for that matter. Well, I'll start with what the 524 00:27:26,080 --> 00:27:29,200 Speaker 1: theory tells us, and it tells us that your asset allocation, 525 00:27:29,320 --> 00:27:32,000 Speaker 1: especially that split between equities and fixed income, is going 526 00:27:32,040 --> 00:27:35,040 Speaker 1: to be a function of really the relative amount of 527 00:27:35,359 --> 00:27:38,879 Speaker 1: actual invested capital you have versus your human capital. So 528 00:27:38,920 --> 00:27:41,000 Speaker 1: when you first start out working, where most of your 529 00:27:41,000 --> 00:27:43,680 Speaker 1: assets on your quote unquote balance sheet, if you want 530 00:27:43,680 --> 00:27:45,919 Speaker 1: to call it, that is your human capital, your ability 531 00:27:45,920 --> 00:27:48,399 Speaker 1: to continue to work to save more money and contribute 532 00:27:48,440 --> 00:27:51,359 Speaker 1: to your savings in the future. And as you transition 533 00:27:51,400 --> 00:27:53,760 Speaker 1: through your working life, when you get closer to retirement, 534 00:27:54,119 --> 00:27:57,640 Speaker 1: obviously you've exhausted more of your human capital, probably don't 535 00:27:57,640 --> 00:27:59,960 Speaker 1: want to work forever, but hopefully you've been able to 536 00:28:00,000 --> 00:28:03,359 Speaker 1: accumulate more in terms of invested assets. So when you 537 00:28:03,400 --> 00:28:06,119 Speaker 1: think about the riskiness of each one of those components, 538 00:28:06,400 --> 00:28:09,000 Speaker 1: your human capital is a much more stable and lower 539 00:28:09,119 --> 00:28:13,160 Speaker 1: risk component than your investment capital. So when you're when 540 00:28:13,200 --> 00:28:15,479 Speaker 1: you're young, when you're starting off in your working career, 541 00:28:15,920 --> 00:28:17,800 Speaker 1: that means that most of your balance sheet is in 542 00:28:18,160 --> 00:28:20,800 Speaker 1: quote unquote lower risk assets. You might take more risk 543 00:28:20,840 --> 00:28:23,679 Speaker 1: in terms of your invested assets, so that's why you 544 00:28:23,760 --> 00:28:27,439 Speaker 1: might see a higher allocation equities when you're at a 545 00:28:27,560 --> 00:28:31,120 Speaker 1: younger investment age. Obviously, as you proceed through your investment lifetime, 546 00:28:31,440 --> 00:28:34,560 Speaker 1: you start to transition or de risk your financial assets 547 00:28:34,560 --> 00:28:37,919 Speaker 1: and you start to transition into more fixed income heavy allocation. 548 00:28:38,440 --> 00:28:40,880 Speaker 1: So you know, that's something that I think is probably 549 00:28:40,880 --> 00:28:43,120 Speaker 1: a good starting point when you're thinking about how much 550 00:28:43,320 --> 00:28:45,200 Speaker 1: you know you how much do you want to continue 551 00:28:45,200 --> 00:28:47,440 Speaker 1: to work, how much, how on target you are in 552 00:28:47,520 --> 00:28:48,880 Speaker 1: terms of what you've been able to say for your 553 00:28:48,880 --> 00:28:51,720 Speaker 1: financial goals, and you can make your equity fixed determination 554 00:28:51,760 --> 00:28:55,320 Speaker 1: from there. Now, within each one of those sleeves, I 555 00:28:55,360 --> 00:28:56,960 Speaker 1: start with the notion that you want it to be 556 00:28:57,000 --> 00:29:01,160 Speaker 1: as diversified as possible. So when within the equity sleeve, 557 00:29:01,280 --> 00:29:04,360 Speaker 1: maybe have a global allocation and two equities, does that 558 00:29:04,400 --> 00:29:07,040 Speaker 1: mean you're gonna hold just an exact fac simile of 559 00:29:07,040 --> 00:29:09,280 Speaker 1: the global market portfolio? Maybe not. You might have reasons 560 00:29:09,280 --> 00:29:13,000 Speaker 1: to deviate. US based investors tend to have a home 561 00:29:13,040 --> 00:29:15,560 Speaker 1: bias towards US stocks, you might have an overweight there. 562 00:29:15,920 --> 00:29:18,480 Speaker 1: But I think broad diverse vacation is a very important 563 00:29:18,520 --> 00:29:22,360 Speaker 1: component within the fixed income Some of that depends on 564 00:29:22,440 --> 00:29:25,400 Speaker 1: what your ultimate goals are, and let's say your goals 565 00:29:25,400 --> 00:29:30,040 Speaker 1: are to support consumption within retirement. That kind of sets 566 00:29:30,120 --> 00:29:32,160 Speaker 1: up almost like a liability, Like if you were to 567 00:29:32,160 --> 00:29:35,280 Speaker 1: think of a same insurance company that has cash flow 568 00:29:35,400 --> 00:29:38,400 Speaker 1: needs at certain periods of time, those are liabilities that 569 00:29:38,400 --> 00:29:40,600 Speaker 1: they're going to try and hedge with their fixed income. 570 00:29:40,920 --> 00:29:43,800 Speaker 1: And this is where maybe a liability driven investment approach 571 00:29:43,880 --> 00:29:46,360 Speaker 1: might work. Where you have fixed income that has a 572 00:29:46,480 --> 00:29:51,440 Speaker 1: duration that's taylor or connected to whatever the liabilities are. Uh, 573 00:29:51,440 --> 00:29:54,480 Speaker 1: those cash flow needs you have in retirement, they have 574 00:29:54,480 --> 00:29:57,120 Speaker 1: a duration associated with them and it changes through time. 575 00:29:57,640 --> 00:30:00,320 Speaker 1: So by having a dynamic allocation, you're fixing. Um, that's 576 00:30:00,400 --> 00:30:03,040 Speaker 1: one example of how you would taylor that fixed income 577 00:30:03,120 --> 00:30:07,239 Speaker 1: sleeve to whatever your needs are. Well, don I'm just 578 00:30:07,240 --> 00:30:10,200 Speaker 1: glad West when he started talking about people getting further 579 00:30:10,240 --> 00:30:13,560 Speaker 1: along into the workforce and closer to the retirement age 580 00:30:13,600 --> 00:30:18,440 Speaker 1: that he didn't point right at me. I'm glad about that. Well, Well, 581 00:30:18,480 --> 00:30:22,080 Speaker 1: listeners can't see, but he did. Actually everybody knows he 582 00:30:22,120 --> 00:30:25,360 Speaker 1: did point at Mike fair enough, fair enough as he should, 583 00:30:25,400 --> 00:30:29,000 Speaker 1: as he should stand clearer of the craziest things we 584 00:30:29,040 --> 00:30:33,720 Speaker 1: saw in markets this week? Well, West, great conversation. I 585 00:30:33,720 --> 00:30:36,480 Speaker 1: think that is our segue to the crazy things that 586 00:30:36,680 --> 00:30:38,600 Speaker 1: I know you brought a good one for us. I'm 587 00:30:38,640 --> 00:30:40,880 Speaker 1: gonna save yours for last. But West, how about you? 588 00:30:41,040 --> 00:30:44,320 Speaker 1: Have you seen anything crazy in markets in the last week? Yeah, 589 00:30:44,320 --> 00:30:46,360 Speaker 1: there was one that kind of caught my attention, and 590 00:30:46,480 --> 00:30:49,600 Speaker 1: it happened right when there was a press conference for 591 00:30:49,720 --> 00:30:53,440 Speaker 1: the Portugal soccer team, during which Christian Ano Ronaldo came 592 00:30:53,520 --> 00:30:55,959 Speaker 1: up to the stage and as part of their promotional 593 00:30:56,040 --> 00:30:58,520 Speaker 1: period for Coca Cola, there were, of course, to Coca 594 00:30:58,520 --> 00:31:01,520 Speaker 1: Cola bottles sitting right next to his microphone, and of 595 00:31:01,560 --> 00:31:04,120 Speaker 1: course his reaction was to remove those from the table 596 00:31:04,440 --> 00:31:07,000 Speaker 1: and hold up a bottle of water, I guess, encouraging 597 00:31:07,000 --> 00:31:10,040 Speaker 1: people to drink water. What was notable about this was 598 00:31:10,120 --> 00:31:13,400 Speaker 1: that that day Coca Cola stock went down about four 599 00:31:13,440 --> 00:31:17,040 Speaker 1: billion dollars, so, uh, you know, whether it's caused and effect, 600 00:31:17,040 --> 00:31:19,400 Speaker 1: whether it's just a coincidence. Kind of interesting because Coca 601 00:31:19,400 --> 00:31:23,360 Speaker 1: Cola actually owns some water distribution companies, so you know, 602 00:31:23,400 --> 00:31:26,160 Speaker 1: they should be able to benefit from a widespread surge 603 00:31:26,200 --> 00:31:29,640 Speaker 1: and water consumption. But that was certainly one that was notable. 604 00:31:30,320 --> 00:31:33,440 Speaker 1: That was that's a great one. That's a perfect crazy thing. 605 00:31:33,480 --> 00:31:36,360 Speaker 1: And I you know, interestingly, you would think the margins 606 00:31:36,400 --> 00:31:38,600 Speaker 1: on water are probably a lot higher for Coke anyway, 607 00:31:38,760 --> 00:31:41,040 Speaker 1: I guess maybe it wasn't the De Saunty brand or 608 00:31:41,080 --> 00:31:45,040 Speaker 1: whatever Cokes brand is that, but that's that's a good one. 609 00:31:45,160 --> 00:31:47,240 Speaker 1: That's a pretty good one. And then another guy pushed 610 00:31:47,240 --> 00:31:49,800 Speaker 1: aside the Heineken I think too, they he didn't want 611 00:31:49,840 --> 00:31:53,520 Speaker 1: to be associated with Heineken, so little uh, a little 612 00:31:54,120 --> 00:31:56,520 Speaker 1: activism in the in the soccer world. And then they 613 00:31:56,560 --> 00:31:58,760 Speaker 1: I think they were all told stop doing this, just 614 00:31:58,840 --> 00:32:04,440 Speaker 1: leave the cokes and for the sponsor. That's right, that's right, 615 00:32:04,680 --> 00:32:06,320 Speaker 1: all right, that's a good one. And I'm mine is 616 00:32:06,480 --> 00:32:09,320 Speaker 1: very food oriented too. And you may argue with me 617 00:32:09,400 --> 00:32:12,800 Speaker 1: that this is not exactly a market story, but I 618 00:32:12,840 --> 00:32:15,680 Speaker 1: will push back on that because my crazy thing is 619 00:32:15,720 --> 00:32:19,720 Speaker 1: about the avocado market uh Albana. And to prove it's 620 00:32:19,720 --> 00:32:22,320 Speaker 1: a ballad topic, there is a ticker on the Bloomberg 621 00:32:22,360 --> 00:32:25,040 Speaker 1: for avocado prices out of Mexico, so you know you 622 00:32:25,040 --> 00:32:27,200 Speaker 1: can you can run a regression on it. The seasonality 623 00:32:27,200 --> 00:32:28,520 Speaker 1: on it is interesting. I don't know if you want 624 00:32:28,560 --> 00:32:31,080 Speaker 1: to get into the avocado trade West, but I encourage 625 00:32:31,080 --> 00:32:33,640 Speaker 1: you check it out. But this is a really good 626 00:32:33,640 --> 00:32:35,920 Speaker 1: story from the Wall Street Journal, one of their a 627 00:32:36,040 --> 00:32:39,040 Speaker 1: head stories on page one, and it's about the fact 628 00:32:39,080 --> 00:32:43,800 Speaker 1: that avocados have gotten so pricey that there are these 629 00:32:43,960 --> 00:32:47,640 Speaker 1: organized gangs going in and trying to to basically rob 630 00:32:47,680 --> 00:32:50,959 Speaker 1: avocado farms and what the farmers are doing to prevent it. 631 00:32:50,960 --> 00:32:54,680 Speaker 1: They talk about one farmer in South Africa. He's got 632 00:32:54,760 --> 00:33:02,600 Speaker 1: motion activated infrared cameras around the hundred seventy acre farm. Um, 633 00:33:02,680 --> 00:33:06,480 Speaker 1: he's also got on stand by a rapid response team 634 00:33:06,520 --> 00:33:11,160 Speaker 1: that's led by a next military guy, complete with tracker dogs, 635 00:33:11,480 --> 00:33:13,840 Speaker 1: and they try to you know, immediately react to the 636 00:33:13,840 --> 00:33:17,680 Speaker 1: avocado thiefs as they come in. Um. One of my 637 00:33:17,720 --> 00:33:20,959 Speaker 1: favorite things in Mexico. The drug cartels are actually fighting 638 00:33:20,960 --> 00:33:24,120 Speaker 1: over the avocado crop now because the prices prices have 639 00:33:24,240 --> 00:33:27,479 Speaker 1: got so far. But they say, you know, these just 640 00:33:27,560 --> 00:33:32,520 Speaker 1: aren't sort of smash and grab guys that they basically 641 00:33:32,600 --> 00:33:35,760 Speaker 1: planned this to a t. And the general describes it 642 00:33:35,840 --> 00:33:41,440 Speaker 1: as large career grapht raids on farms where they can 643 00:33:41,640 --> 00:33:45,720 Speaker 1: basically steal about a ton of avocados in a very 644 00:33:45,720 --> 00:33:48,320 Speaker 1: short time I think like a couple hours, and then 645 00:33:48,840 --> 00:33:51,080 Speaker 1: they take it, they launder it onto the black avocado 646 00:33:51,160 --> 00:33:54,880 Speaker 1: market and uh and make a fortunate it so fascinating stuff. 647 00:33:54,880 --> 00:33:57,560 Speaker 1: I know. Our colleague Tracy Alloway loves to chart the 648 00:33:57,600 --> 00:34:01,920 Speaker 1: correlation of avocado prices with bitcoin, so uh, another reason 649 00:34:01,920 --> 00:34:04,520 Speaker 1: why this is I think a good candidate for our 650 00:34:04,520 --> 00:34:07,200 Speaker 1: crazy things. Well, Dona, I don't know if you'll if 651 00:34:07,200 --> 00:34:11,200 Speaker 1: you'll allow me this uh, this rare commodity trade to 652 00:34:11,280 --> 00:34:14,239 Speaker 1: be a crazy thing. I'll allow it. And I'll even 653 00:34:14,239 --> 00:34:16,279 Speaker 1: allow you to name it. You can name it the 654 00:34:16,520 --> 00:34:22,000 Speaker 1: guacamole cartel. I'm open. I'm open to other names, other suggestions. 655 00:34:22,080 --> 00:34:26,640 Speaker 1: Guack cartel. I like that, all right, not bad? All right? 656 00:34:26,800 --> 00:34:30,040 Speaker 1: What do you have first, Fildanna. Mine is not food related, 657 00:34:30,120 --> 00:34:33,759 Speaker 1: but I'm leaving the planet for for mine. Uh, and 658 00:34:33,880 --> 00:34:37,360 Speaker 1: it's I read this story about Procter and Gamble saying 659 00:34:37,520 --> 00:34:40,680 Speaker 1: that they've signed an agreement with NASA to test laundry 660 00:34:40,719 --> 00:34:44,880 Speaker 1: solutions in the International Space Station, which I thought was 661 00:34:45,160 --> 00:34:48,600 Speaker 1: really interesting because there are no washing machines in space, 662 00:34:48,719 --> 00:34:53,080 Speaker 1: so basically what happens astronauts just wear the same clothes 663 00:34:53,160 --> 00:34:57,080 Speaker 1: over and over until they're like totally disgusting. And so 664 00:34:57,200 --> 00:34:59,759 Speaker 1: this is a way for them to try to make 665 00:35:00,000 --> 00:35:05,480 Speaker 1: continuous space living actually a possibility, I suppose. So there. 666 00:35:05,560 --> 00:35:09,280 Speaker 1: I guess they're not sure how Proctu and Gamble detergent 667 00:35:09,400 --> 00:35:13,640 Speaker 1: behaves in space. Well, you can't, you can't. You can't 668 00:35:13,680 --> 00:35:17,120 Speaker 1: wash clothes in space, and so they're trying to figure 669 00:35:17,160 --> 00:35:20,200 Speaker 1: out a way to actually make that happen. Huh, that's 670 00:35:20,200 --> 00:35:22,120 Speaker 1: a good one. I'm i gonna say, if they can 671 00:35:22,120 --> 00:35:29,200 Speaker 1: make dry shampoo, maybe they can make dry detergent. That's right, right, right, Again, 672 00:35:29,239 --> 00:35:30,880 Speaker 1: there's not a lot of dirt in space either, I 673 00:35:30,880 --> 00:35:34,560 Speaker 1: imagine those uh International Space Station is a pretty sterile environment, 674 00:35:34,600 --> 00:35:39,399 Speaker 1: so how much no, because astronauts have to exercise two 675 00:35:39,400 --> 00:35:42,799 Speaker 1: hours a day. Oh gotcha, gotcha? So there you can 676 00:35:42,800 --> 00:35:45,839 Speaker 1: get pretty gross. So they've got pit stains on their 677 00:35:45,920 --> 00:35:48,440 Speaker 1: their space suits and stuff. I guess wow. All right, 678 00:35:48,480 --> 00:35:50,799 Speaker 1: well that seems like I'm glad to hear that. I'm 679 00:35:50,960 --> 00:35:54,240 Speaker 1: you know, if this whole space tourism thing kicks off further, 680 00:35:54,520 --> 00:35:57,839 Speaker 1: that's that's gonna that's gonna come in handy. I don't know, West, 681 00:35:57,840 --> 00:35:59,359 Speaker 1: I don't know how you trade that one is there. 682 00:35:59,600 --> 00:36:02,719 Speaker 1: I don't know what the end market is for for 683 00:36:02,920 --> 00:36:06,040 Speaker 1: detergent in space. Still wrapping my my head around the 684 00:36:06,040 --> 00:36:10,880 Speaker 1: expectations there. All right, what the check back on that? 685 00:36:10,920 --> 00:36:12,480 Speaker 1: We'll see how they did on that experiment. That's a 686 00:36:12,480 --> 00:36:13,839 Speaker 1: good one, Bill Dona. I don't know if the share 687 00:36:13,840 --> 00:36:16,319 Speaker 1: price moved or not, but no, but it was just 688 00:36:16,360 --> 00:36:19,439 Speaker 1: a fun read. Yeah. Well, hopefully you know you won't 689 00:36:19,440 --> 00:36:21,479 Speaker 1: see so match you're not in a press conference. Push 690 00:36:21,520 --> 00:36:26,640 Speaker 1: the tide pods away from him anyway, that would be 691 00:36:26,960 --> 00:36:28,400 Speaker 1: that would make the share person, that would make it 692 00:36:28,400 --> 00:36:33,080 Speaker 1: share absolutely anyway, vel Data, Hirich uh West Krill. So 693 00:36:33,160 --> 00:36:34,600 Speaker 1: happy to have you on the show. Really enjoyed the 694 00:36:34,600 --> 00:36:37,200 Speaker 1: conversation and hopefully we can do it again sometime. Yeah, 695 00:36:37,239 --> 00:36:47,719 Speaker 1: thanks for having me. It was great. What Goes Up. 696 00:36:47,719 --> 00:36:49,879 Speaker 1: We'll be back next week. Until then, you can find 697 00:36:49,920 --> 00:36:52,800 Speaker 1: us on the Bloomberg Terminal, website and app where wherever 698 00:36:52,840 --> 00:36:55,239 Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. We'd love it if you took 699 00:36:55,239 --> 00:36:57,320 Speaker 1: the time to rate and review the show on Apple 700 00:36:57,360 --> 00:37:00,480 Speaker 1: Podcasts so more listeners can find us. And you can 701 00:37:00,480 --> 00:37:04,600 Speaker 1: find us on Twitter, follow me at Reaganonymous, Bildonna is 702 00:37:04,719 --> 00:37:08,279 Speaker 1: at Bildonna high Rich. You can also follow Bloomberg Podcasts 703 00:37:08,400 --> 00:37:11,600 Speaker 1: at podcasts. I thank you to Charlie Pellet to Bloomberg 704 00:37:11,680 --> 00:37:14,160 Speaker 1: Radio in the voice of the New York City Subway System. 705 00:37:14,200 --> 00:37:16,800 Speaker 1: What Goes Up is produced by Topor forhez ahead of 706 00:37:16,800 --> 00:37:20,920 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Podcasts is Francesco Levy. Thanks for listening. See you 707 00:37:20,960 --> 00:37:21,359 Speaker 1: next time,