WEBVTT - Ark Invest's Wood Committed to Bitcoin

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.480
<v Speaker 1>We've got a great guest. I want to get right

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to her. Delighted to have back with us to talk

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>about so many of the things that really preoccupied us

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of weeks. Kathy Would is back

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>with us. She's the founder, CEO, and chief investment officer

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of our invest joining us via zoom. Kathy, it is

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>so great to have you here with Tim and myself

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>alive on radio, TV, across all the Bloomberg platforms. How

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>are you doing very well? It's been a very challenging

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>few uh while I should say twenty months, but uh,

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're looking at our portfolios right now and um,

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>we are back to where we were in terms of

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>calling them deep value portfolios if you give us a

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>five year investment time horizon, I mean, we're seeing incredible

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>values for the kinds of growth, kind of growth that

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>our portfolios are going to deliver. You know where I

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>want to go. I gotta talk to you about the

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>crypto space. You Um, you know, it's it's a world

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you know really well. We think about the ft X collapse,

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the bankruptcy proceedings today, the coming undone of Sam Makeman Free.

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>You know you have been buying into some of the

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>different names in the cryptos based coin Base, gray scale

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin trust. Why should investors trust crypto? Why do you

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>trust crypto at this point? Yes, if you look at

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>the block chains, let's let's use UH the Bitcoin blockchain

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>and Ethereum, what you'll find is they have the infrastructure.

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>The technology has not skipped a beat throughout this entire crisis.

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the hash rate, Bitcoin's hash rate is at

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>an all time high, and that is a real indication

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of the security of the network. On Ethereum, we're seeing

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the total value uh staked at twenty four billion, that

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is an all time high. So we think the infrastructure

0:01:55.400 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is working beautifully. UM. As far as coin Base, this

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is an onshore regulated UH company and wanting to help

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>shape regulations. Brian Armstrong, the CEO, and Alicia uh CFO

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>have been leaning in into what's going on right now

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and saying, okay, regulators, we need more clarity in order

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to protect to protect investors, those who wanted to get

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>involved with a certain types of crypto were forced off

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>shore and look at what's happened. So UM, I I

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>think that coin Base is going to come out here

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>looking very very strong. It just lost a very big

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 1>competitor in f t X. Well what is the market

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 1>missing though, because you know, that could be one narrative, Cathy.

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, we haven't exactly seen shares

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of coin based rallies since FTX is collapsed. Do you

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>think to you that represents potentially broader concern about just

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>people's interest in crypto following f x's collapse. No, I

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's more fear. I think uh many people say,

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what we don't know? Uh and uh

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>so what we do is we step back, you know,

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>put a little perspective into the situation here and what

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>do we have. So the entire crypto asset ecosystem is

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>an eight hundred billion dollar ecosystem. Apple is three times

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>larger in terms of market cap. So that's some perspective.

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Many people are saying, well, okay, is this another lehman?

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Could this be uh? You know, could could we see

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the domino effect here? I've just given you one reason

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>why the banking system back in oh eight oh nine

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>trillions and trillions of dollars and it was the global

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>banking system. Right now we have it seems from f

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>d X five to ten billion dollars in creditors. If

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>as uh as f t X has filed bankruptcy, they

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>will be making claims. If you look at Lehman, that

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>was one point to trillion dollars in claims. So again

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>just trying to put perspective, this is fraud. This is

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>made off, made off with sixty four billion dollars in claims.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Again f t X five to ten billion. Now, I

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>know that crypto assets are you know, they attract a

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention. This is um you know, the three

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>revolutions we talk about all the time. You know, a

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>new monetary system in terms of the first global private

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>meaning not government controlled, digital rules based monetary system. That's Bitcoin.

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>A very big idea. Defy is a very big idea.

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And uh, while that has been thrown into question in

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.799
<v Speaker 1>terms of you know, shifting from one exchange to another,

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we've had a lot of shifting around. But I think, uh,

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Defy in terms of taking the middlemen out

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of financial services and and making the ecosystem much more

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>transparent with much less counterparty risk, is going to take off.

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>It will continue to move forward. We believe they think

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we're trying to figure out is

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>how long that we think the industry will be feeling

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the ramifications of f t X. I mean, one thing

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we've learned right with SPF and f t X is

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>what we didn't know. So how long do you think

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>this goes on? Because you obviously have faith in it,

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>You've been buying into it, and you think this is

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a good entry point at this point, whether it's gray Scale,

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 1>whether it's coin base, But um, how long do you

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>think we continue to feel the effect? And do you

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>think there's more contagion to be felt? Um? Well, we

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>always look for the whale, uh in in a situation

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>like this, and if if there was a whale out there,

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it was f t X and and Sam Bankman freed,

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, King of the hill. Uh So I think

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>we found the whale and uh you know, I'm sure

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they are going there's going to be more fallout, but

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we see how big the whale is. And yes, a

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have lost a lot of money around

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the crypto acid ecosystem, uh losing value here. But if

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:22.799
<v Speaker 1>we're right on the underlying technology and the underlying roles

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin and ether ethereum are going to play in

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>this new world. Uh. Then I think we're going to

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>recover pretty quickly. You mentioned that f t X was

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a quote fraud. It's no lehman or no made off.

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>Give us an understanding of what your interactions more like

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>made off. Oh my gosh, so we'll give us. Give

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>us an understanding of what your interactions were with Sam

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Bankman Freed before this followed. And have you spoken to him,

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>because I know you were at Crypto Bahamas along with

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 1>many other people earlier this year, the f t X

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Salt conference. Yes, I had a zoom my team and

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I had a zoom with Sam before that conference. I

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>think they wanted to have us represented at the conference. Uh,

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and so I did. I did give a presentation there

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>or I was on a panel. Um. But other than

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that one phone call just to set up, I have

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>never talked to him. Um. And you know, he by

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of the phone call seemed to be distracted

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>by whatever else he was doing. So that was my

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>one exposure to him. Um. And you know, I think

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the thing that is shocking is how many people were

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>very close to him, and one would have presumed looked

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>at all of the documents and got a sense of

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the books Uh, the fact that so many people were

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>completely fooled um is quite shocking. And you know, I

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think he had this aura around him or something that

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>caused people to to to ask fewer questions than might

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>otherwise have been the case. It's very hard to understand.

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you worry it all about as you buy into

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Gray Scale, Kathy, Um, you know the whole world of

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the Digital Currency Group and Barry Silver's company, I mean

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the various connections that kind of go back to f

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>t X. Are you at all worried about a liquidation

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>or anything. Well, we know that the Gray Scale investment

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>trusts are the most valuable part of that company right

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>now and uh, and they are revery their cash cows,

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 1>their revenue generating. Um. We we do not think we

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to try and hold on to that

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>uh if nothing else, so UM we are. We're looking

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>at a forty one discount of this first relative to

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin today and so we actually think there's a lot

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of upside. Now. One of the things that we know

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that Gray Scale and Michael Son and Cheim a great

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Scale wanted was to convert this this trust into an

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>e t F. I think what's happened with the fallout

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>here might increase the probability that a bitcoin e t

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>F will will be approved. I'm not saying immediately, but um,

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 1>we know that. And even the newest SEC commissioner him

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Lizarraga I think is his name, has come out and

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>said we need more, We need as regulators to focus

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on decentralization and transparency. What is the most decentralized and

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>transparent crypto asset in the world. It is bitcoin, and

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>yet retail investors do not have easy access through a

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 1>liquid asset like uh an e t F which which

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>honestly I don't understand given that they approved a bitcoin

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>futures and so you know, I think it might increase

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the odds we shall see. Well, and some of them

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.559
<v Speaker 1>been wondering whether or not you're playing the arbitrage um

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>with GBTC right now? You know, is it that because

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of the trust deep discount at this point, is that

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the thinking for you to kind of be moving more

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>money into this name, Well, it is one of the

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>few securities we have to own securities in e t

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>f s, so it is one of the few securities

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>we can buy. And yes, it's at a very big discount.

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, so it is more attractive bitcoin um bitcoin

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>if they were to even liquidate it. You know, we've

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>got such a big discount relative to to bitcoin that um. Again,

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't think they're going to this is the most

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>valuable property. I think they're going to hang onto it,

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think over time the discount will close. Don't

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>know if it's because of a conversion to a bitcoin ETF.

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure the regulators will take a very close look

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>at d c G and the Gray Scale Bitcoin Investment Trust.

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>But we do know this is a grant or trust,

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>highly regulated, highly regulated. I mean, we have to do

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>our homework on it. And we know that all of

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin behind g BTC is in cold storage at

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>coin base, and coin base has confirmed this. Uh so uh,

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we feel quite comfortable with it here, Kathy.

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>We've talked coin Base, We've talked g BTC. Are there

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>any other opportunities in crypto that you see right now

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>in the wake of f t XS collapse as prices

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>have been beaten up. Well again for our e t

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>F s we uh we. As you mentioned on coin Base,

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we also owned Square and it is interesting that Jack

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey has chosen the most transparent, most decentralized crypto asset

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to center UH blocks crypto exposure too. And I realize

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to from a developer community point of view,

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>leave them on their their own. But we do think

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin UH, and you can see through the behavior of

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure hasn't skipped a beat, not one beat at

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 1>more secure than it was yesterday, the day before, in

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the day before. So I have a feeling this is

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>going to elevate Bitcoin in the eyes of not only

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the crypto world, but the investment world at large. And

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling it's going to have more running

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>room through the rest of the world. I think this

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is the way that this is blocked go to market UH,

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to get into the rest of the world. And we

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be very successful. So then I'm

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>assuming Kathy that you're going to hold to your bitcoin

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>forecast for what is it, a million per coin by

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that still feels good to you, yes, and you can

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes you need to bow old test. You

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>need to go through crises UH to see UH, to

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>see who the real um to see the survivors first

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of all, but really to test battle test the infrastructure

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and the thesis. And again, we think Bitcoin is coming

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>out of this smelling like a rose because of what

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I have mentioned previously. And I do think that the

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>one thing that will be delayed is um perhaps institutions

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>stepping back and just saying, Okay, do we really understand this?

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh and once they actually do the homework and see

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>what's happened here, I think they might be more comfortable

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>moving into into bitcoin uh and and perhaps ether as

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a first stop, you know, as they'll understand it more.

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Jack Dorsey. I want to switch gears if

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I can, And I was thinking about Twitter and Tesla.

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, there's so many things that are going

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>on in our world right now that I feel like

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>you are the person to comment on. How do you

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>make sense of Elon Musk? So when you know you've

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>talked to you've been investor in Tesla for a long time,

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>are you comfortable with his actions around Twitter of firing

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>people hiring them back? Um, you know the verified check

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about people paying for it and then taking that back.

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel comfortable with this name? And I should

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>put out that right you own private shares of Twitter

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and have talked about wanting to own more yes, Um,

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>yes we do. We we saw we owned Twitter for

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>quite a while and we sold it into the rumors

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that Ellen was going to buy it because we knew

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>there would be a lot of controversy around that. So

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it moved into the sixties. I think it got to

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>seventy and we sold there and have been watching, Um,

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>have been watching from the sidelines. But if you look

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>at that model longer run, it has not delivered on

0:14:55.920 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the promise. And you know, I think opening uh the

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>algorithms which we think he will do, and taking away

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the kind of human driven censorship and uh, and and

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>allowing the transparency of the algorithms that they do put

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>put out there, you know, allowing people to question them.

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be very healthy. If you

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the daily average users, I think the various

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>metrics that you can count daily, they have been going

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>up dramatically. So you know, if you I know a

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who you know, basically decided to quit

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Twitter because they didn't like the kind of censorship and

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>so forth that was going on. So I actually like

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>what he's doing. It seems interestingly enough, though, that a

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of brands don't like what he's doing Kathy, and

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen some prominent companies pull back or at least

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>pause advertising on the plant photo. Of course, I mean

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense if you know, you don't necessarily want

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to support the guy who owns Tesla, if you're making

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, competitive competitive competitive vehicles Tesla, but bigger brands

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that are worried about brand safety. And I'm wondering, you know,

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you're seeing in your Twitter timeline,

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>but I'm seeing ads that are what not relevant to

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>me anymore not relevant to me now and aren't actually

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>ads that are for companies. They're more like ads for

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>influencers these days. It doesn't seem like it's necessarily moving

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of increasing revenue from an advertorial perspective

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>right now. Well, I do think that this is not uh,

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this is not just an advertising vehicle. In fact, this

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is that probably might diminish quite significantly in terms of

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>its important longer run. You'll you'll remember that Ellen started

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>his entrepreneurial pursuits UM in UH with a precursor to PayPal.

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>So he very a very long time ago had this

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>idea of a digital wallet, a super app like what's

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>app um in mind and of course took a big

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>detour into another passion of his. Um. We know he

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>knows a lot about this world. And I think if

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>anyone in the US can do this, I think I

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>think he can. I think he'll surround himself by the

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>right business leaders. He's not going to do this himself.

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>If you look at Tesla, he's not. You know, if

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>you look at many people say, aren't you worried about Tesla, No,

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>we're not. Because of our work on electric vehicles. They are.

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>They are are grabbing a disproportionate share and will continue

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>to do so of a market that we think by

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>will account for eighty five to of all cars sold

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>in in the world. Uh So that's on automatic pilot.

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>He's now working on autonomous, which we think is uh

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to work. In fact, I just have the

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>pleasure of riding in a Cruise car in San Francisco,

0:17:55.680 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>an autonomous car GM uh US wanted to see, wanted

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to check it out, and I have to tell you

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>I love the ride. And uh, I know autonomous is

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>possible because Cruz and WEIMO are doing it, and we

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>think Tesla is going to do it in a much

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>bigger way. So that's Tesla, but onto Twitter, it really

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 1>needed to be shaken up. I think think he can

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>make it be a great business and very profitable. And

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>if so, how I do think about the amount of

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>data that Twitter has UH and it's proprietary data, and

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>think about the combination of that and artificial intelligence. Remember

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>he has AI expertise and experts. I know he brought

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in some of his engineers UH and they are going

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to I think surprise and delight heading for a super

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>app kind of product. And you know, by our estimates

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and you'll find this in our big ideas. I think

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>it was um the vale all you of each customer

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>in a digital wallet UH should be And when I

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>say that the market cap associated UH should be in

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the twenty thousand plus range, because it's not just for

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>financial services, it will ultimately be for for commerce and

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>AI is the glue that's going to pull this all

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 1>together and the data that they have, the data is

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the new oil. You've heard that this is absolutely true

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Twitter. Well, Kathy, I mean the

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 1>currency Twitter as a currency has worked really well for you.

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>You've got one point five million followers on the platform.

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people see what you tweet. We saw

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>eulogies last week being written for Twitter. It didn't end

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>up dying as many people thought it would. But what

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>would happen if Twitter went away? And are you concerned

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>about that? You know it's been and and yes, we

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>speak from experience. This is an extremely productive social network

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for us, is our most productive and uh, you know

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>it truly is the global public town square. You know

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>I can write an open letter to the FED and

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>put it out over Twitter. Now do I think the

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Fed's going to listen to me? No, I don't, but

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that they may listen, That the FED board members may

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>listen to someone who might think that I have something

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to say, which is simply a question. Wait a minute,

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>how can you be unanimous seventy five basis points at

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a time? How can you be unanimous when there is

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>so much conflicting data out there, including an inverted yield curve?

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Now at seventy five basis points, that's crazy. I think

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to look back in history and say, what

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>were they thinking unanimous? Commodity prices are falling. You've got

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>excess inventories all over the place. We're seeing massive discounting.

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna see deflation and then they'll make

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>a move in the opposite direction. But we need, you know,

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>we need a steadier hand than that. So when Kathy

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 1>went to you, because you've argued this and you and

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>you put this out there in terms of FED policy,

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of deflation, when do you think it will come?

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we're seeing it. I think if you look

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>at a lot of commodity prices, not only are they

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>down thirty two some of them from their peaks, they're

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>down on a year over year basis. In fact, oil

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>itself is almost down on a year over year basis.

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Now the big pushbacks on this call we get our

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>wages and rents. We're seeing rent inflation reverse quite suddenly

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and dramatically. So what I think we will look back

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in history and say this inflation shock was the function

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of a supply shock caused by COVID, supply chain problems afterwards,

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and even more problems after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Um,

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>if I can just take one second, I would like

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to give uh an analogy to the late nineteen teens.

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>We were in the middle of the massive, you know,

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>most massive innovation the history of the world had seen. Telephone, electricity,

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and automobile all at the same time. But we had

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>World War One and we had the Spanish flu sound

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>familiar now, That was much worse than what we've gone through.

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>We've gone through nothing like that, But there were massive

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>supply chain problems back then, and inflation peaked at twenty

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>four percent right in June. In June, and by June

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>it was minus fifteen percent. So I think that our

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>eight to ten percent inflation, which is where it was

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>at the peak, is going to turn around and we're

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>going to see some very big surprises on the inflation front.

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know who agrees with us, the bond market.

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Look at the bond market is doing now then three yeah,

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>three sev inverted. That's telling us that the bond market

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is saying recession and or big surprises on the low

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>side of inflation expectations. So and it's probably both. Kathy, unfortunately,

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of minutes left here. One thing we

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>did want to squeeze in um. We've been talking about

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in the newsroom that Alliance Bernstein is getting ready to

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>launch actively managed disrupted disruptor e t F. And from

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>what I understand you pitched them. You know years ago. Um,

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>how does that make you feel? And you know, to

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>see a firm from that you worked at kind of

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>doing a very similar thing or looking to do something similar. Yes, well, um,

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Alliance Bernstein I believe got the first fully active, fully

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>transparent e t F in I think it was early.

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 1>It got the approved in early two thousand thirteen. So

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that's when I put my hand up and said I'll

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>do that. And um uh, there were there was a

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>belief that e t f s were not safe or

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, there were a lot of arguments against it.

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Probably the biggest one was mutual funds, which are much

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>more profitable. I would say the economics there are higher

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>than e t f s. How does it make me feel?

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm the more the merrier. I think this

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is a fantastic rapper for the end consumer. It's fully liquid,

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>unlike mutual funds you have to wait till the end

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>of the day. Transparent, fully transparent, that's what that's what

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>investors want. Uh. It is more tax effective, much more

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 1>tax effective. We're seeing mutual funds that are down thirty

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>percent this year, but they're slapping their investors with thirty

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>uh in capital tax gains uh and then finally, it's

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.199
<v Speaker 1>more cost of active when you because all of the

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what you see is what you get with these fees.

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>There aren't a bunch of hidden fees, so it's a

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>great rapper for the end consumer. I highly recommend it

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're happy that that they that they are seeing

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the light now. All right, Well, good to get you

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to weigh in on that and just so much more, Kathy,

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>we always appreciate your time. Be well, have a great Thanksgiving.

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Kathy would uh CEO, c I O and of course

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.719
<v Speaker 1>founder of our invest joining us there via Zoom