WEBVTT - NBA Player Rankings #23-21: Bam Adebayo, Evan Mobley, Jaylen Brown

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>The volume. All right, Well, good to Hoops Tonight. Here

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 1>at the volume heavy Wednesday, everybody. Hope all of you

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>guys are having a great week so far. Got a

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>jam packshow for you guys today. We're continuing our player rankings.

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>We have three more players we're getting to today, number

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, number twenty two, and number twenty one. You

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>guys are the joke before we get started. Subscribe to

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Hoops Tonight YouTube channels. You don't miss any more of

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>our videos. Follow me on Twitter and underscore jcnlt so

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys don't miss a show announcement. So forget about

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a pocast few where we get your podcast on our

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Hoops Tonight tell us a super helpful if you leave

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a rating and a review on that front. Jackson is

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>doing great work on our social media feeds on Twitter, Instagram,

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and TikTok. Make sure you guys follow us there

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>for more content throughout the year. The last but not least,

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>keep dropping mail bag questions and the YouTube comments. We

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about this after the first video, but our mail

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>bags over the course of the rest of the summer

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to be more geared towards the player.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Your rankings.

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, ask whatever questions you have, and if I see

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting question that's not related to the player rankings,

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into it. But this is all very subjective

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and all very up for debate. As we talked about

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>in our first video, it's very little separating number five

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>from number fourteen on my list and number fifteen all

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the way from the fortieth guy that I considered for

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>this list. There's a lot of room for argument there.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And so if you guys disagree with any of my placement,

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>a guy too high, a got too low, a guy

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>who missed the list who should have made it, a

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>guy who made the list who shouldn't have made it,

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>anything that you disagree with, right mail bag with the colon,

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>drop your kind of like counterpoint, keep it short, keep

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it brief like elevator. Pitch for what you guys disagree with,

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and we'll argue about those in our mail bags throughout

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the summer.

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Now it's gonna be a little tricky.

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>This Friday's mail bag is just going to be reacting

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to our first video because I'm going out of town.

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to Alaska, and I'm going to be gone

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>for like ten days. So the first two Fridays will

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>just have the one mail bag this Friday that reacts

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to the first video. But the rest of the list,

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we have like five additional mail bags that will be

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>recording over the course of the list, where you guys

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>will have plenty of opportunity to argue about what you

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>disagree with, so make sure you guys get those into

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the comments. So, without any further ado, let's talk some basketball.

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Number twenty three Bam out of Baio, a guy who

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>was dropped from where he was last year in the

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>top twenty for me. His season in review, he played

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in seventy eight games, averaged eighteen point one points per game.

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>That was his lowest since twenty twenty nine. Point six

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>rebounds per game, four point three assists per game is

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>highest since twenty twenty one, two point zero stocks per

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>game is one point three steals per game last year

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>was the second highest total of his career. Now his

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>efficiency is where things are going to get pretty interesting,

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and I have a lot of different stuff I want

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to get into with Bam here. So he was just

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>forty nine percent from the field last year. That was

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the lowest mark of his career to this point now.

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Part of it was the increase in his three point volume.

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>People are going to shoot lower percentages on threes. That's

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 1>going to affect your field goal percentage. He had never

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>taken more than one three point attempts per game in

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the first several seasons of his career. Last year was

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the first year that he attempted over one. He attempted

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>almost three threes per game, so that obviously plays a

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>certain role in the drop in his field goal percentage,

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But he also shot poorly on twos. He shot fifty

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>two percent on twos, which is his lowest mark since

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>his rookie season. He's had three straight years from twenty

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty to twenty twenty two in the past where he

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>averaged the same points per game eighteen points per game,

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>but shot fifty seven percent on twos over the course

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of those three seasons, so substantially lower this year than

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>levels he's reached previously in his career. He's flat out

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>regressing as a shot maker inside the arc. He shot

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>below forty percent on floaters and hooks last year, which

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>is brutal for his position at the center position when

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you do so much work rolling out of ball screens,

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>your ability to short range shot make, either beating switches

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>with quick quick hook shots or catching on the roll

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and spinning into a quick hook, or making floaters on

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the role. Those are vitally important parts of shot making

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>at the center position, and he was below forty percent

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>on them last year. He used to just be better

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>at it. He's fifty two percent on floaters and hooks

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty one, fifty five percent on floaters and

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>hooks in twenty twenty two. So, for whatever reason, and

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I really don't have an explanation for it, he just

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been able to recreate what he did in years

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>past and elevate from there to that next level. It

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of came to the surface, if you guys remember

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>as an issue for Bam during the twenty twenty three

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>finals in the series against Denver, he was consistently getting

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>quality short range looks, layups a little bit further away

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>from the rim, short hooks, floaters, little bank shots. He

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>was getting all of these looks and he just wasn't

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>making them against Denver, and he was becoming a problem

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>because they were the kind of shots that were open

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in their offense. Often his touch it's not just on

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>hooks and floaters. Either on layups, it's been an issue.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>He shot just fifty percent last year on layups. That's

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>way below where his peers are at the center position

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>again Bam fifty percent, Anthony Davis sixty percent, Carl Anthony

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Towns fifty eight percent, if he eats the Zubats fifty

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>seven percent, nikolea Jokic sixty seven percent. You guys get

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the point. Compared to his peers, he really struggles on

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>short range shot making layups, hooks, floaters, that sort of thing,

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and that has ended up being an issue for him

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 1>as he's failed to kind of take that next step

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>as an offensive player. There was kind of like this

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>inflection point for Bam in right around that twenty twenty

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>two to twenty twenty three phase when the Heat made

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>those back to back conference finals runs in their NBA

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Finals run, where it kind of felt like he was

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>either going to improve as a finisher and become like

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>one of those legit second tier stars like Anthony Davis,

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>or he was gonna plateau, and instead he's kind of regressed.

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>This is actually crazy, even with the influx of his

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>three point shooting, which is legitimate, like he had never

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>attempted more than one three per game. He attempted almost

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>three three three pointers per game this year, and he

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>made thirty six percent of him, which is very respectable

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>as a three point shooter. But even with that influx

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 1>of like a more efficient shot profile, he posted a

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>true shooting percentage of just fifty six percent last year,

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>which was the lowest mark of his entire career. This

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is a big part of how he slipped out of

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the top twenty for me, despite the fact that Tyrese

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Haliburt and Damian Lillard Jason Tatum have dropped out of

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the list entirely, which should have bolstered him against that.

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>But I dropped him because he's just regressing as an

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>offensive player and it's preventing the Heat from getting to

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:13.119
<v Speaker 1>their ultimate goals in the postseason. The lack of shot

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>making for Bam is especially frustrating because of how amazing

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>he is at everything else, including passing out of the

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>center position. When it comes to that part of offense,

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>being that five out dribble handoff folkrum, going side to side,

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>making reeds at a two million game, being the guy

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that ties everything together for that offense, he's actually great

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>at that there are only four centers in the entire

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>NBA who meet the following criteria at least twenty five

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>minutes per game, so a guy who plays a lot,

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a usage rate of at least twenty percent, so guy

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>who has the ball a lot, and an assistant turnover

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>ratio of at least two to one. There's four guys

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in the entire NBA at the center position that meet

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>those criteria, and the other three guys are not very

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>athletic Demonisibonis, Nicola Vucevich. Those guys are right around two

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to one, and then Yokich, who's better than three to one,

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>who obviously is kind of the anomaly, but those are

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>like skill focused centers who are great playmakers. And then

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it's Bam. Bam is the fourth guy on that list.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Another way to put it is like this, Bam is

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the only truly athletic center in the NBA who can

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>playmake at that elite like at that elite level of

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>efficiency and volume or he's not turning the ball over.

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>He's top five and assists per game among centers. He's

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the only guy who brings that athleticism in that like

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>refined playmaking at that center position in the entire league.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>You combine that with his unbelievable defensive versatility, which we're

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>about to get more into in a minute, and you

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>have a player that had a truly sky high potential,

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>like top tier superstar potential, if he could have just

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>added reliable shot making. That's why I've been so keyed

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in on that piece of his game over the last

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>few years, and it just kind of feels like a

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>missed opportunity. He's regressing when it should be something that

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>he's improving on. But again, he's an excellent playmaker. He's

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>fifth and assists per game among centers overall. We talked

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>about that modern dribble handoff fulkrum in the NBA, like

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>when you have guys that can score and pass out

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of action guards having a big who can flow from

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>side to side, meaning like run that first action. Oh

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work. Quick, make yourself available at the top

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>of the key, catch turn, and go to the other

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>side of the floor dribble handoff while always being able

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to make the reads out of it, like, oh, they're

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>overplaying me. I'm gonna fake the dribble handoff and go

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to the rim or setting the good screens that free

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the guys up passing to guards as they backcut or

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if they get top locked and are forced to backcut.

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>The playmaking that you do out of that. There's all

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff that in terms of decision making and

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.599
<v Speaker 1>playmaking you need from the center position in order to

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>run five out offense in the modern NBA, and offense

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>that the Heat run more than many teams in the NBA.

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>BAM's great at that. And then again the defensive end

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of the floors where Bam really separates himself. Bam didn't

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>have his best defensive season last year. Zero point seven

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>blocks per game were the lowest since his rookie since

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>his rookie year in the NBA. Now context there, he's

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>playing with more two big looks. That's going to put

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>him in some different situations playing alongside Killo where and

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I generally think it was the least motivated he's been

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>as a defender since he came into the league. As

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the Heat were just so far away from achieving their

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 1>postseason goals, he finished outside of the top five and

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Defensive Player of the Year voting for the first time

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>since twenty nineteen.

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Last year.

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I do still believe in Bam as an apex defender

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in this league. I think that he will continue to

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>operate closer to that top five defensive player of the

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>year type of caliber player looking forward in his career,

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I look at last year as more of like an outlier.

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 2>The big differentiator for.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Bam is that he's essentially a hybrid between a traditional

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>rim protecting bit and kind of like a legitimate wing

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of his ability to move his feet on

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the perimeter. He brings the best scheme versatility defensively out

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of any center in the league, aside from maybe Victor Wembanyama.

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the best switching center in the league, Bam.

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>There was a time when I thought it was Anthony Davis,

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and you could argue Ad is still maybe a better

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>defender all around because of how good he is at

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the rim. But Ad put on a bunch of weight

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and hasn't been able to move his feet on the

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>perimeter as well. It hasn't been as good defending switches.

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Bam is legitimately awesome switching out onto the perimeter. One

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of the unique things he does that many other big

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>struggle with. We're gonna talk about this when we get

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to Evan Mobley. But one of the things that like

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Evan Mobley struggles with is when he gets switched onto

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>quicker guards, he gives too much space and those guys

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>get really comfortable with their pull up three point shooting.

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Evan got lit on fire on pull up threes in

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>ISOs this year, kind of prevented him from being as

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>good of an ISO big as as he could have been,

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>as good of a switching big as he could have been. Bam,

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>You'll see him like two feet out outside the three

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>point line picking up pull up shooters way out on

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the perimeter. He's way more active with his hands to

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>disrupt the rhythm and flow of pull up shooters so

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>they can't comfortably settle into pull up jump shots, while

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>also having the speed laterally and the recovery athleticism to

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>deal with quickness getting past him. He's unbelievable defending on switches.

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Even last year and what everyone considers to be a

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 1>down year, he was still amazing on the perimeter and switches. Statistically,

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>there were one hundred and fifty one players in the

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>NBA last year who defended at least fifty ISOs. Bam

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Allouja zero point six to two points per possession in

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>ISO that ranked third on that list, third out of

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty one players. He does this while

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>also being very good in traditional coverages. He gets up

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to the level of screens quickly and at the level

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>coverages and can disrupt pull up shooters. He can contest

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in the mid range. He can protect the rim. He

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously is in his protecting the rim as some of

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the taller, longer centers in the NBA, but he's good

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>enough at it in conjunction with.

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Being one of those truly elite.

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Top tier switching defenders that he makes life very easy

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>for Eric Spolsterras schematically because they can build out any

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>defensive scheme that they want. Bam can do literally anything

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you ask him to do. One of the most versatile

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>defensive foundations in the game. Bam can be a frustrating player,

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and his lack of developing upside has certainly prevented Miami

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>from reaching their ultimate goals, and his regression there is,

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>like like I said, downright frustrating, especially if you're a

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>fan of Bam in the heat. But you can't do

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot better in the modern NBA than a

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>big man who can legitimately anchor any defensive coverage at

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a Defensive Player of the Year level, giving you an

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount of flexibility from opponent to ponent, both in

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the regular season and in the playoffs, while also being

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a legitimately good dribble handoff fokram on offense that can

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of get guys set up in the right spot. Now,

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 1>his lack of touch, especially around the rim, prevents him

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>from reaching that second tier of superstars in the NBA,

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 1>but his overall value is still enough to put him

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>at twenty three on this year's list. All right, number

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty two Evan Mobley. Nothing says summer like long days,

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>clutch plays, and firing off a few bets on the game,

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>all with DraftKings Sportsbook. As the season heats up, so

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>do the bats and DraftKings Sportsbook hasts you covered with

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>live betting, home run props, odds, boosts, and more. Whether

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you're chasing dingers or jumping in mid game, there's always

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>action to be had. Never bet on baseball before.

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 2>It's easy.

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Pick a guy to go yard, hammer some live odds

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>mid game, or just ride your squad and hope for

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the best. Those spreadsheets just vibes and Dingers. My favorite

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>guys to watch are always Aaron Judge and show Heyo Time,

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're betting home run props. Here's something special

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>for first timers. New DraftKings customers bet five and get

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets instantly. Download

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the DraftKings sportsbook app and use code hoops. That's h oops.

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>That's code hoops for new customers to get one hundred

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and fifty dollars in bonus bets instantly when you bet

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>just five bucks only on DraftKings.

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 2>The Crown is yours.

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Gambling problem called wind one hundred gambler in New York

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>call eight seven seven eight hope and why, or text

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>hope and Why to four six seven three sixty nine.

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>In Connecticut, help was available for problem gambling Call eight

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Boothill Casino and Resort in Kansas twenty one plus. Age

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and eligibility varies by jurisdiction. Void in Ontario. New customers

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>only bonus bets expire one hundred and sixty eight hours

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>after issuance. For additional terms and responsible gaming resources see

0:15:51.840 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>dkang dot co slash audio. Last season in review for

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Evan played seventy one games. Very award heavy season for Evan.

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>He won Defensive Player of the Year. He was First

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Team All Defense, second Team All NBA, made the All

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Star Game, and was tenth in MVP voting. It's a

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>hell of a breakout season for the young star. His

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>averages he averaged nineteen points, nine rebounds, and three assists

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>two point five stocks per game. His efficiency used fifty

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>six percent from the field, sixty two percent on twos.

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have amazing touch on short twos, like forty

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>percent on floaters and hooks fifty three percent on layups.

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Those marks are only slightly ahead of where bam Adebayo was,

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>but he had one hundred and ninety four dunks last year.

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Bam only had one hundred and forty. Now, some of

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that is that Evan Mobley played with better ball handlers,

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>but some of it is also that Evan Mobley is

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a better vertical spacer and that was something that allowed

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>him to be way more efficient on twos than bam

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Adebio was last year. He also shot thirty seven percent

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>from three on three point two attempts per game last

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>year in the regular season, more than double the attempts

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of any previous season in his career, and he shot

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>well in the postseason. He shot forty five percent from

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>three in the postseason on four attempts per game, so

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the jump shot feels real. He's legitimately a substantially better

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>jump shooter than bam Ade Bio. He was sixty percent

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in effective field goal percentage and a career high sixty

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>three percent in true shooting, seven percentage points ahead of

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>where bam Adebayo was last year. Evan Mobley, in my opinion,

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>has become flatly a better offensive player than bam was

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>or is. The perimeter jump shot is more reliable. He's

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>added some of the ability to run action. I do

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>think bam is a better like five out dribble handoff fulkrum,

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>but Evan Mobley has closed the gap in terms of

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>offensive initiation with some of his ability to run offense,

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to run inverted action, and his superior jump shooting and

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>his vertical spacing, like we talked about earlier, it made

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Evan Mobley a very dynamic roleman. Evan Mobley scored one

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 1>point one seven points per roleman possession last year compared

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to just zero point nine seven for bam Ata Bio,

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>so twenty points better per one hundred roll man possessions.

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 1>And again, some of that is the gap in ball handling,

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>but most of it is just that Mobley has become

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:25.479
<v Speaker 1>a better offensive player. Evan Mobley shot thirty eight percent

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>on pick and pop three's last year. Bam shot twenty

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>three percent on pick and pop three, So three is

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>when he was slipping out of ball screens. Those are

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>generally wide open regardless of who the ball handler is.

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So like that, again, there is an obvious ball handling

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.239
<v Speaker 1>gap between those two teams, but I think there's an

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>obvious gap in offensive refinement between Evan Mobley and Bamadabayo

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. Here's some play type data for Evan Mobley.

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>He's a hyper efficient play finisher. One point one to

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>seven points per roleman possession. That's sixty six percentiles of

0:18:57.800 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty far above average.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 2>One point five.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Five to nine points possession on cuts that's in the

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 1>ninety second percentile. That's that awesome vertical spacing and his

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>good hands around the basket, very good in transition, very

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>good in offensive rebound situations.

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 2>In action.

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>If you go back two years to twenty twenty four,

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Evan Mobley ran just one hundred and fifty three pick

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and rolls, ISOs and post ups including passes. Last year

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that skyrocketed up to three hundred and thirty nine, more

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>than double Now. The efficiency was only okay, zero point

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>nine to one points possession including passes on all three

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>play types combined. Again not excellent, but it was his

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>first season as like a high volume creator, and that's

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 1>really not bad. He was specifically successful in inverted ball

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>screen situations, meaning when he was handling the ball in

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>either Donovan Mitchell or Darius Garland or one of the

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>shooters like Sam Merrill or Max Strew's would come up

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>screen for him and then slip out to the three

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>point line. It kind of created some very simple reads

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.959
<v Speaker 1>for him, like if the guards screened and the guard's

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>man didn't help, he would just turn the corner and

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>go downhill and he'd either get all the way to

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.479
<v Speaker 1>the rim or he'd make a kick if someone stepped

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>over to help. It was a pretty simple set of reads.

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>If the guard lingered in a hedge, then the shooter

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 1>would slip out free and he would just pitch it

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>back to the shooter as he got to the three

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 1>point line. It was a very simple kind of order

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of operations for Evan Mobley that allowed him to be

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>effective and one of the hardest actions to guard in

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the NBA. That kind of like ghost screen action with

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a bigger ball handler involved. When he passed out of

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>inverted ball screens. The Calves got one point zero six

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>points per possession last year, which is very good. I

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>also thought Mobley played well in the playoffs. His jump

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>shot was going in at a higher clip than the

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>regular season. He was making his hook shot, his shot

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>creation was successful. He ran fifteen of those inverted ball

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>screens in the playoffs and got nineteen points. That's great.

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a great number. He ran fourteen post ups in

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>ISOs for thirteen points, which is not amazing, but it's

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>above his regular season efficiency. I thought the Caves held

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>up well on the offensive glass in that series, where

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>in us past that was something that Evan Mobley and

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Jared Allen both had struggled with. I thought last year

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>was just a monumental step forward in Evan Mobley's development

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>as a basketball player.

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>On the defensive end, I actually think Evan Mobley is

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a tiny bit overrated. I would not have given him

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Defensive Player of the Year last year. I do believe

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that Evan Mobley is a very very good defender, but

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>for instance, I do think that bam Adebayo is a

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>better defensive player than Evan Mobley. I do not view

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Evan Mobley in the conversation for best defenders in basketball. Again,

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a big part of it is he wasn't very good

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>on switches. In that list of one hundred and fifty

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>one players who defended at least fifty ISOs that Bam

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>was third place on, Evan Mobley ranked sixty sixth on

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 1>that list. He allowed twenty seven more points per one

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred ISOs than bam Adebio did. And his weakness, again,

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we talked about it a little bit earlier when we

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Bam. Bam was picking up pull up

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>shooters outside the three point line and stunting at the ball,

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>which allowed him to prevent himself from allowing easy pull

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>up jump shots over the top. Evan was consistently back

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>on his heels further back behind the three point line,

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and so he contained the ball well. Excuse me, he

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 1>contained the ball well, but he gave up a lot

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of easy pull up three point shots on his heels

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in those ISO situations. He does have a good amount

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of scheme versatility. It's worth mentioning. He does a lot

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of work and two big looks as like a low

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>man on the back line. He can do a decent

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>job in switches. Again, he's not bad at it. He's

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>just not nearly as good as some of the other

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>bigs in the league because of him being kind of

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>passive and on his heels, and he does protect the

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>rim reasonably well. Evan Mobley getting the Defensive Player of

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the Year award again, I disagreed with that. I thought

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>that had more to do with the Cavs just winning

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>a shit ton of games and being kind of like

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>an award geared around team success. I do still believe

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Evan Mobley is an excellent defender overall, even if I

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily believe he was deserving of the accolades that

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>he got last year on the defensive end. The best

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>way for me to explain how I landed with Bam

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>at twenty three and Evan Mobley at twenty two is

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to say that I believe Evan Mobley is the better

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive player, and I believe Bam is the better defensive player.

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But I believe the gap between how good Evan Mobley

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is on offense and how good BAM is on offense

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 1>is bigger than the gap between how good BAM is

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>on defense and Evan Mobley is on defense.

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I think that gap is smaller, and no matter.

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>What, it's a really impressive step forward for Evan Mobley

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in his development. The next step it's going to be

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>improving as a switch defender and continuing to improve overall

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>as an offensive initiator and as a three point shooter.

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>All of this lands Evan at twenty two in this

0:23:56.160 --> 0:24:04.479
<v Speaker 1>year's rankings. All Right, number twenty one. Number twenty one

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in this year's player rankings is Jalen Brown. Last season

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>interview for Jalen, he played sixty three games. That was

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>his lowis in twenty twenty one. He was dealing with

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the knee issue throughout the year, which is going to

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>be a big part of the way we framed things

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>for Jalen Brown. In this particular segment, he averaged twenty

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>two points per game. That was his lowis in twenty

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty six rebounds four point five assists, which was by

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>far a career high from him. The increase in assists

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>mainly stemmed from Jalen becoming a much more willing passer

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>out of his one on one situations, specifically ISO's and

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>post ups. For example, in the twenty twenty four season,

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>when he passed out of iso or passed out of

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>post ups, he generated just zero point ninety five points

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>per possession. In the twenty twenty five season, he passed

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>out of ISOs and post ups about a time and

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a half as frequently, so he did it a lot

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>more and he generated one point three zero points per

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>possession when he passed out of those situations. The specific

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>improvement that I noticed the most on tape was him

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>passing out of the post. He did a lot better

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>job this year when he would get in the post

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of just kind of probing until that second defender would

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>come in, making the appropriate kickout passes on time on

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>target to shooters. The Celtics did shoot super well on

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>his post kickouts this year, but there was also a

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>market improvement in the quality of the threes that he

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 1>was generating, and I tend to think those things are associated.

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So obviously a little bit of shooting luck, but a

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of shot quality as well. He generated thirty two

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>made threes out of post ups for his teammates in

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>just sixty three games this year. Last year, in seventy games,

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>he generated just twenty. That increase in overall playmaking ability

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>from Jalen made up for some of what was a

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty down year for Jalen Brown as a shooter. But

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into some of the specific reasons why,

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's very fascinating. First of all, let's just get

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>through the numbers. He was forty six percent from the field.

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the lowest since his rookie year. He was fifty

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>three percent on twos, lowest since his second year in

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the league, thirty two percent from three, lowest since his

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>rookie year. Fifty two percent in effective field goal percentage.

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me the thirty two percent from three that was

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the lowest of his entire career. Fifty two percent in

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>effective field goal percentage, lowest since his rookie year. Fifty

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>six percent in true shooting percentage, lowest since twenty nineteen.

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 1>So why did efficiency dip the way that it did

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>this year. I think it mostly had to do with

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>his knee. There's this thing that I talk about a

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>lot in this show called energy transfer. It's a concept

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 1>for jump shooting in general, shot making in basketball, essentially,

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 1>like if you make a move to get to anywhere

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 1>on the floor, or even if you're just in a

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>catch and shoot situation, at the end of that sequence,

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:01.199
<v Speaker 1>you are transferring energy from your feet up through your knees,

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>up through your hips, up through your shoulder, elbow, four arm,

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>all the way through the wrist on the snap of

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the snap of the jump shot right. And if you

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>get less power, then you usually get out of one

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>part of that system. The entire calibration of it gets

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>thrown off. I thought it was evidenced by a couple

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of key areas in his shooting efficiency. Take a look

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>at this. His jump shooting was down mostly across the board,

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>like overall one point zero four points per shot on

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>jump shots in twenty twenty four, zero point nine to

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>two points per shot in twenty twenty five, so twelve

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.360
<v Speaker 1>points per one hundred jump shots. Worse overall on jump

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>shots off the dribble zero point eighty five points per

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>shot last year. The year before one point zero zero

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:52.959
<v Speaker 1>points per shot, so fifteen points per one hundred off

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the dribble jump shots, worse contested catch and shoots twenty

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty four one point zero four, twenty two twenty five

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>zero point nine to eight six per one hundred worse, right,

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>But in wide open catch and shoot shooting he was

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>actually up year over year. He was one point one four,

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, one point one point eight, and twenty

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. Now, before we dig into why that's interesting,

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:20.880
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about his rim finishing two. In twenty twenty four,

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:23.880
<v Speaker 1>he got to the rim seven point three times per

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>game and shot sixty two percent there. According to Synergy

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, just six point seven attempts per game

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and just sixty percent at the rim, So a little

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>bit worse in both volume and efficiency. So what does

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it tell us that Jalen has improved as a playmaker

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and improved as a wide open catch and shoot guy

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>year over year, but that he struggled on contested jump

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>shots off the dribble jump shots and his rim volume

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in efficiency both dropped year over year. It sounds to

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>me like the game continues to slow down for him

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and his skill set is continuing to refine, but that

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>he was obviously dealing with the struggle to get lift

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and separation, which is going to make a lot of

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>sense for a guy who's dealing with the issues. What

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>are the shots that are going to require extra oomph

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in your lower body in that energy transfer, contested catch

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and shoot, jump shots, shooting off the dribble and out

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of footwork and getting to and finishing at the rim,

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>That's where he saw the drop off. Now, it's at

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>least worth mentioning that he's about to turn twenty nine

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>years old and he has a ton of miles on

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>his body relative to most NBA players his age. For perspective,

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>he's played forty five hundred playoff minutes. Lebron James has

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>played twelve thousand. So the way to look at it

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>is Jalen Brown already at just age twenty eight, has

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>played thirty eight percent of the playoff off minutes that

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Lebron James has played, and he's well into his forties now.

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So Jalen's dip in athleticism and the associated struggles, as

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>well as the reality of his age and the amount

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of mileage on his body that's a big part of

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>how he slipped a little bit down the list For

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>me this year, I'll be curious to see if he's

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>able to overcome that knee issue and get back to

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent next year, or if it's something that

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>lingers and that can become a problem as things continue

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>throughout his career. Next year will be our first opportunity

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to see Jalen Brown in a truly featured primary shot

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>creator role. Last year, Jalen's volume was sizable, especially in

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>one on one situations. He ran over five hundred pick

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and roles and excuse me, over five hundred post ups

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and ISOs, but his overall shot creation volume is still

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>low relative to his peers at the top of the league.

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>He was good, though, one point zero one points per

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>possession and pick and roll including including passes on four

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty three reps.

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 2>That's slightly above average.

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>One point per ISO including passes on pretty high volume

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and two reps that was the thirteenth most

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in the entire NBA efficiency efficiency for that, once again

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>slightly above average. He was one point two eight points

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>per possession in post ups including passes, which is excellent.

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>That ranked number one. Jalen Brown was number one out

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of the eighteen players to run at least two hundred

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>post ups last year. Now, again, some of that is

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>influenced by the fact that the Celtics shot super well

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>on his kickouts. I think they shot like sixty percent

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>on his kickout threes out of post ups. But it's

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>worth mentioning again, when I looked at the film, the

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>kickouts were happening more frequently and he was generating better

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>shots than he did in previous years. So some of

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it was shooting variants, some of it was also the

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>quality of shots he was generating. I expect Jalen Brown

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to continue to thrive at volume in ISO and post

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>up situations. They tend to present the simplest reads in

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a four out one in system. So, for instance, if

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you're on a cleared side post up for Jalen Brown,

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>very easy reads for him. If you put him on

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the left block and he's got the ball in his

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>right hand, you double from the top. It's an easy

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>kick out up to the wing for a three point shot.

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>You double off the opposite wing. He can rifle that

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>pass to the opposite wing. I've seen him make that

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>specific pass. Many times they could get a little tougher

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>when they load up and make the weak side corner available,

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but Jalen will is typically pretty good at getting deeper

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>into the paint making the kickouts. They're easier reads ISO,

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>same sort of thing, cleared side ISO exact same reads

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we just covered wing ISOs in four out one in.

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty simple. If the defender's funneling you towards the

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>baseline and you drive. If you drive and they don't

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>help off the strong side corner, you're gonna face help

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>off of the weak side corner if they rotate down

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the reads to the wing. If they don't the reads

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to the corner, it's a pretty simple set of reads

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>out of an ISO. If you do get to the middle,

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>if they pinch down from the nail, you pinch up

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to you pitch it out to the wing. If they

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>stay glued to the wing and you get past that guy,

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>they're probably gonna help off the corner.

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 2>You make the kick to the corner.

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like those one on one situations present that I

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>think Jalen Brown can handle really well.

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 2>So increasing his volume.

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Because he's the primary guy, he's just gonna get into

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a better rhythm, and it'll make him even better at

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>making those basic reads. I think he's gonna be fine

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in ISO and post up situations.

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not Jalen Brown has a truly great season

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>leading the Celtics will come down to his work and

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>pick and roll. That is not a skill set that

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>comes naturally to Jalen Brown. When he has to read

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of moving parts, navigating a defender behind him and

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in front of him, looking off defenders some of the

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>more complex help and recover situations that you see in

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>pick and roll, tougher angles, tougher passing reads, that's where

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it can get tough for him. I do think it's

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a coverage he's gonna see quite a lot this year too,

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>especially since he'll be surrounded by less talent. Teams will

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>switch less against the Celtics, there will be more loaded

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>up pick and roll traditional coverages. My guess is that

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Brown struggle here. I think we'll see a pretty

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>high turnover rate from him this year. I think his

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>efficiency in pick and roll per per possession including passes

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.280
<v Speaker 1>will flirt with a point and maybe dip below a point.

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>But if he can prove me wrong here. He does

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>have the potential to have a special offensive season, especially

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>if he can get his knee back to one hundred percent.

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>But my guess is it's going to be really nice

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in ice in post up situations about that, he'll struggle

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 1>in pick and roll, and then overall it'll be kind

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of a mixed bag from him this year. On defense,

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I have a tremendous amount of respect for Jalen Brown.

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's just one of the absolute apex perimeter

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>defenders in the league when he really locks in there,

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the top tier. He's just such an amazing

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 1>weapon to have on a roster. He even brings the

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>switch ability that gave Boston the championship ceiling they had

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in the past. We talk so much about Jason Tatum

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and his ability to guard centers and how that made

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>things work because they could switch. Well, that only works

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that the guy that's guarding the guard can also switch

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>on to center, which Jalen Brown could effectively do. Obviously,

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this year will be different, and that you probably have

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>way too much offensive responsibility to be that apex defender

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:12.720
<v Speaker 1>while also doing everything he needs to do on offense.

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's still an important part of his skill set

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 1>that we have to factor in when we're considering a

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>list like this. Jalen Brown's dropped a bit on this

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>list as his body has started to let him down

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a bit in the playoffs, especially, he shot very poorly

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>on long jump shots, very poorly at the rim. He

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.320
<v Speaker 1>was just fifty five percent at the RAM in the postseason.

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>But again, as an Apex perimeter defender and a bona

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>fide secondary shot creator in this league, I think he's

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>firmly entrenched in the top twenty five. I have him

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>at spot number twenty one this year. All Right, guys,

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 1>This's all I have for today is always to sincerely

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you guys for supporting and supporting the show. Remember

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to get your mailbag questions in. It won't be for

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of fridays that we get to this particular

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>episode in our mail bags, just because I'm going out

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 1>of town to Alaska. But I do plan on going

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>through all the videos and finding all of the arguments

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>for our mailbags. So if you disagree with any of

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the rankings in any way, shape or form, give a

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>quick elevator pitch and the YouTube comments with as a

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>mailbag question, and we'll get to them in our mail

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>bags throughout the remainder of the list. Again, as always,

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you guys for supporting me and supporting the show.

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:16.399
<v Speaker 2>Now I'll see you guys next time.