WEBVTT - Why OpenAI Is A Terrible Business

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>A media Hello, and welcome to Better Offline. I'm your

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>host ed zich Tron. What as ever, please check the

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>episode notes for links to the things that I'm talking

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>about now. Frequent listeners know that I'm immensely skeptical of

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>generative AI, both as a technology but also as a business.

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It's expensive, it's unreliable, it doesn't actually do that much,

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and the real world use cases range from kind of

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>helpful to unhelpful to not really useful in any way,

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>shape or form, and definitely not useful enough to justify

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions of dollars in spending. And I know

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody is gonna email and say, but ed, my mate's

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>granny's uncle's dog uses chat GBT to brainstorm or something

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>else equally flimsy. And I really need you to put

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>all of this in context. Open AI loses five billion

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year, and basically every big tech company is

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>blown past their emissions targets, with few signs that they'll

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>ever bother to try and meet them again, all in

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>pursuit of the piddliest or most convoluted use cases in history.

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a goddamn fast and that's why generative AI is

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>such a regular topic on this show. I feel like

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry is experiencing a kind of collective madness,

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a delusion that's seeing companies like Microsoft and Google, but

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>both their companies and our planet on a technology that

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>continually fails to deliver on well anything I want to

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>say here, And I actually wrote down this supposedly massive potential,

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>but what was the potential? Ever? Can anyone actually tell

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>me what this was meant to do? Other than agi? Anyway,

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Eventually I see this all falling apart, and I think

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a clamorous event when everything does

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>actually unravel. I return so often to Generative AI because

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I truly fear the damage that this confrontation will cause,

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm concerned about the damage that's happening right now.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>If I'm honest, And while my tone's off in acerbic

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think you'd have it an any other way,

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't really take much joy in watching these things burn. Sure,

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I admit it's pretty funny thinking about satching a Delea

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>getting fired or sunded up a shy getting fired, or

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>both of them looking stupid, But it's not the same

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>thing Miglee's kind of tempered. When I stop and think

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>about what all of this means or will mean, I

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>should say, for the companies trying to get funding right now,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>or for the companies that will try and raise money

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>after the bubble bursts, and for the tech workers that

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>will get laid off, either because Microsoft and Google want

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to put more money into data centers and GPUs, or

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>because their generative AI bets have gone tits up and

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>they need to save money some other way. And so

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I hope you'll forgive me for a somewhat more somber

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>tone to this episode. I want to again make a

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>clear headed analysis of where we are today and where

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going. And the reason I'm retreading this

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>path is because over the last month or so, we've

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>seen some really really alarming signs about the accelerating crisis

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in generative AI, whispers that the party will soon come

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to a halt. Now, you may remember a few episodes

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>back that I started talking about pale horses of the

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>AI apocalypse, signs that things were falling apart, like layoffs

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>at AI companies, price increases or decreases, internal discord at

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>these big AI companies, speciously impressive yet kind of flimsy

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>product announcements and so on and so forth. Since then,

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of been proven right several times. Multiple pale

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>horses have emerged. There was a big, stupid magic trick

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 1>to impress investors in the form of open aised rush

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>launch of its one and that model, by the way,

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was code named Strawberry. Rumored pricing increases which hat GBT

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Now they're looking at forty four dollars

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a month by twenty thirty, and they're looking at potentially

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>thousands for models in the future, and then layoffs at

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Scale AI, which is one of the biggest players in

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>AI training data, if not the biggest. And these are

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>all signs that things are beginning to fall apart. And

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important to explain how precarious things are

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>right now despite all of the money stashing around, and

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>how dangerous the power of magical thinking really is. I

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>want to express my concerns about the fragility of this

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>movement and the obsessiveness and directionless that brought us here,

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and I want us all to kind of do better now.

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't mean you the listener, but if you remember the

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>media that's written something vague about AI and you've kind

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of carried water for Sam Mortman. It is time to stop.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>It was already time to stop some time Aguary, I

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>should just be clear, but now really is the time

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to stop. But this week's a two parter, and I'll

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>be explaining things well in two parts. Obviously. First of all,

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about open ai, the most recent

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>funding round, and how bad their business is and exactly

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>how worried you should be about them now. The second

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 1>part is going to be about something I'm calling the

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>subprime AI crisis, where I see a growing bubble of

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>companies integrating generative AI at prices well heavily subsidized by

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>big tech and heavily discounted by companies like open ai

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and Anthropic. Should either of these companies get desperate or

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, actually want to make more money than

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 1>they spend, they're inevitably going to have to raise the

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>prices to match their actual costs, which will likely make

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the existence of many AI startups completely untenable. You know,

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like when the teaser interest rates on subprime

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>mortgages that expired during the Financial crisis, and people suddenly

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>started losing their houses. In any case, these are going

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to be meaningful, yeah, kind of brutal episodes, in part

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>because while it's enjoyable to watch big tech burn or

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>get embarrassed, there's a real human cost, like I said,

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and the damage to our environment is already being done

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and might not even stop when Generative AI does. And

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>whether Microsoft and Google and the other big generative AI

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>backers slowly wind down their positions or cannibalize their companies

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep open AI and Anthropic alive, I'm convinced that

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the end result is still going to be the same.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I fear tens of thousands of people will lose their

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>jobs and much of the tech industry will suffer as

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>they realize that the only thing that can grow forever

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is a cancer. I'm going to paint you oblique picture

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>not just for the big AI players, but for tech

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>more widely, and for the people to work at these companies,

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and tell you why I think the conclusion to this

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>sordid saga, as brutal and damaging as it will be,

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is coming sooner than you think. Let's begin, as have

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>explained in agonizing detail in the past in my newsletter

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Open AI will have to continue to raise more money

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.679
<v Speaker 1>than any startup has ever raised in history, in perpetuity

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>just to survive. They're going to burn five billion dollars

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this year, and yes, that's after they make their revenue

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>and costs are only set to increase over the next

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>few years they develop bigger models. Their business as it

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>stands is completely untenable, and I'm going to explain why

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in a bit. Nevertheless, that's why open Ai, the ostensible

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit that may soon become a for profit who bloody

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>knows at this point, raise the funding round at evaluation

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of one hundred and fifty seven billion dollars, bringing in

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.799
<v Speaker 1>a reported six point six billion dollars in cash, along

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>with opening a four billion dollar revolving credit line from

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>banks like JP morgan See and a bunch of others

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that should know better after the acquisition of Twitter. Investors

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in the funding ground included Josh Kushner's Thrive Capital in

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Video and of course Microsoft, who were somehow undeterred by

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the abrupt exiffs open ai cto mirror Marati days before

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the round closed. Also joining the frame was soft Bank,

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese investment company with a drag record of making

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the worst bets in history, and they dumped

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>five hundred million dollars into open Ai, and that alone

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>should start getting people a little worried. You see, soft

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Bank's founder, Masayoshi Son is what we in the business

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>call the dumbass. I realized this is a very broad

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>brush to paint somebody with. But let me explain. Soft

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Bank's vision fund dumped sixteen billion dollars into we Work,

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>which by the end of last year, by the way,

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>was worth forty four million dollars, and nearly a billion

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars into wire Card, which turned out to be an

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>elaborate fraud. With its leadership. Are the facing criminal charges

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>or becoming fugitives from justice in Russia. Soft Bank has

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>become effective synonymous with burning cash on terrible bets and

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>lost over thirty two billion dollars in the last three years.

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>The problem that open Ai faces is that they need

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>an absolute shit ton of money, and generally the only

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>companies that need that much are the ones that may

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>not have a sustainable business model. Open Ai demanded a

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>minimum investment of two hundred and fifty million dollars from investors,

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and while regular American vcs might have that much, and

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>indeed had in the case of Costler and Kochume Management,

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>there aren't enough of them to fill out a six

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>point six billion dollar funding round. And because open Ai

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>needed that much, not wanted needed, their only real choices

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>were to go to Masayoshi Son, who's a man who

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>put tons of money into stupid things and believes he

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>was put on this earth to make digital superintelligence and

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I have a link to that. By the way. It's insane,

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>all I mean. There's also another choice, you know, the

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>far dodgier investors in the Middle East m mg X,

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>one hundred billion dollar investment fund backed by the United

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Arab Emirates to invest primarily in AI and semiconductor companies.

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This should also be a big warning sign that things

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>are going poorly, because absolutely nobody raises from the UAE

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 1>of the SuDS because they want to. They're the place

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you go if you need a lot of money and

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not confident anybody else is going to give it

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to you. Other aspects of this deal are also a

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>bit worrying, one of them being that one of the

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 1>founding partners of MGX is the Sovereign Wealth Fund of

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Abu Dhabi, which brought in around five hundred million dollars

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 1>into Anthropic in twenty twenty three. Kind of a conflict

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of interest. Do you think any of these people actually

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>goddamn care though they're all working to the same rot economy.

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Nonsense fucking Anyway, as I mentioned previously, open Ai now

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>has access to that four billion dollars in debt from

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>banks in that revolving credit facility too, and that's also

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>not brilliant for a company that just burns cash. I

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the interest rate on it is, but

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine it's great. Generally, revolving credit lines are

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>worse interest rates, So that's great, I guess. But open

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>ai is desperate. Fundraising comes down to one one thing,

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>one really obvious thing. They need so much money. They

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>needed like ten billion dollars here, and they kind of

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>got it in this wonky way. But they need that

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>money to survive because, like I said, they lost five

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>billion in twenty twenty four, and that figure is likely

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>to increase as more complex models demand more compute and

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>more training. Data and Anthropic CEO Dario ama Day predicted

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that future models may cost as much as one hundred

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars to train and open ai. By the way,

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>they may have just raised the biggest round in history.

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>They're going to have to raise another round again soon.

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>And I'll explain why. While open ai succeeded here, it

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>was only after a fairly arduous process where they'd already

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>tried to raise a hundred billion dollar valuation earlier in

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the year, and that specifically turned off investors because of

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the huge price tag. And there's this, by the way,

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to quote the information, there's a growing concern over the

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>overvaluation of generative AI companies. Oh you fucking think do

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you think that there's a concern here? Well, after this podcast,

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be really, really concerned. I guarantee anyway

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to get the round done, open ai committed to converting

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>itself from a nonprofit to a for profit entity. Failure

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to do so within two years will see their funding

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>converted into debt, which by the way, will be the

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>kiss of death for a company that only ever loses money.

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>The deal, per Reuter's, also includes provisions that would allow

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>investors to adjust the valuation or claw back their investment

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>should the transition from nonprofit to for profit fail. And

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is worrying because I don't think there's

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>any historical precedence of a company, a nonprofit at least,

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that had this much money then converted. And what complicates

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that as well is converting a business of this scale

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>from a nonprofit to a for profit. Well, it involves

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>transferring assets, and because any assets previously donated to the

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>public benefit, as Alexander Reed, partner at Baker Holsteller, is

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>quote as saying The Wall Street Journal cannot be converted

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>into a private benefit without compensating the public for the loss.

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 1>Every asset, which includes things like patterns and other intellectual property,

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>would have to be paid for. Well, it's hard to

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>say for certain, it's likely this deal and the process

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 1>of untangling open ai from its nonprofit beginnings is really

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 1>only going to add to open AI's cash problem. And

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not like that was a good problem to deal

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>with in the beginning. And now I will do a

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>thorough review and analysis of open ai because I want

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you to see exactly how stupid things have become in

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry and how ridiculous all of this writing

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>this boiled my blood, by the way, because when you

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>see how lossy this company is, when you really ingest

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>how bad open ai is and how stupid it is

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that we've let this happen, and we meaning the tech industry.

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>You then will think on your own lives and be like, wow,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you think I could pay my rent like late, or

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>like ask a company to pay my rent because my

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>job involves me just burning piles of cash. No, you

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be able to lose money for a business. You

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and I we have to operate normally, not sam Oltman,

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>though sam Oltman doesn't have to be normal. Sam Altman,

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>like all of the gilded assholes of the tech industry,

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is allowed to live in this fantasy land based on

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>marketing high Now, before we go into it, though, I'd

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 1>like to enjoy one of the following lovingly crafted advertisements

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that in no way seem out of place from anything

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. And we're back, So to put it bluntly,

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>open ai is an absolute dog of a company. On

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>September twenty seventh, The New York Times reported that open

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>ai would lose five billion dollars in twenty twenty four,

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a number which the Information had estimated back in July,

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and the open Ai expected to raise the price of

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT plus its premium product to twenty two dollars

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a month by the end of twenty twenty four and

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>are remarkable forty four dollars a month by twenty thirty. Interestingly,

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and worryingly, the Times also confirmed another hypothesis of mine

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that and I quote fundraising material also signaled that open

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>ai would need to continue to raise money over the

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>next year because its expenses grew in tandem with the

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>number of people using its products. In simpler terms, open

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>ai may have raised six point five or six point

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>six billion in funding literally a week ago, but they

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>need to raise more, probably the same amount or more

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say, within the next six months. And

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>The Times also reports that open ai is making internal

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>revenue estimates I would describe as this is a technical term,

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fucking ridiculous. Open aiy's monthly revenue hit three hundred

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in August, and the company expects to make

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>three point seven billion dollars this year. The company will,

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>as mentioned, loose five billion dollars anyway, and I'm going

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to keep minding you of that. Yeah. Open ai says

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that it expects to make eleven point six billion dollars

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five and an astonishing one hundred billion

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars by twenty twenty nine, a statement that is so

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>egregious that I'm surprised it's not some kind of financial

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>crime to say it. For some context, by the way,

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft makes about two hundred and fifty billion dollars a year,

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Google about three hundred billion dollars a year, and Apple

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>about four hundred billion dollars a year. So yeah, I

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>guess by twenty thirty that's how big open ai. Well

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you've well, you fucking talk. It drives me insane. And also,

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, all of those companies make more money

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>than they spend. Open ai, on the other hand, spends

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>two dollars and thirty five cents to make one dollar.

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>If you remember one thing from this podcast, it's that

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>every dollar they make they have to spend two dollars

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and thirty five cents to get. It drives me insane. People,

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to live in these conditions. How do

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I do this? How do I get to burn money?

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>What the no? Seriously, open ai loses money on every

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>single transaction, every single time that somebody uses chet, GPT

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>or plus or connects one of their models, and while

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it might make money selling premium subscriptions, I severely doubt

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>those subscriptions are turning a profit and they I really

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>do think losing money even on their power users. And

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>as I'll get into the next episode, I believe there's

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>also a SUBPRIMEI crisis brewing because open ai is API

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>services which let people integrate their models into products, are

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>currently priced to attract customers in scale, and increasing these

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>prices to match the actual cost will likely make this

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>product unsustainable for many businesses currently relying on these discount

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of rates, and that's if they have any usage. But

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll also get to that later. Now, if you anything

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>like me, you have somebody who's told you that open

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>ai is a growth business and that it will just

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>turn the knob to make it self profitable, much like

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Web Services, which is Amazon's cloud computing product, did

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Now, I just want to be clear. If

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you're listening and you think that you're just wrong, you're

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>just completely wrong. You live in a fancyland. Wake the

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>fuck up. I'm sick and tired of hearing this crap.

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Open ai is nothing like Amazon Web Services. First of all,

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>open ai owns none of its infrastructure as everything everything

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 1>is run on Microsoft's as Your Cloud. Secondly, Microsoft, also

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>as part of an open ai funding around from twenty nineteen,

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>has full access to all of open AI's pre agi research,

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>which is all of it, by the way, and full

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>license to sell and integrate all of their technology. They

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>have complete free reign over open aiy's intellectual property. Thirdly,

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Web Services did not immediately start with a deficit

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>so great that it required raising more money than's ever

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>been raised in the history of tech. Where still open

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>AI's technology doesn't get cheaper as it scales. In fact,

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it does the opposite. This is not like other businesses.

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.719
<v Speaker 1>You want to compare this to stop saying this to people.

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous. And I know why people say this, and

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I am ranting, and you just have to forgive me.

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I know that people don't want to believe that this

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>much money can be wrong. It can be. It is

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>currently being wrong. You are watching and listening to it

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>being wrong. This is not like Google Cloud. It is

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>not like the early days of the Internet. It is

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>not like Amazon Web Services. It's nothing like them at all.

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>There is no historical example like this, not even Uber

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Uber at least had a business model. In the worst

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>year of its life, Uber lost I think six point

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars or something like that. So about one

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>point six billion dollars in open ai lost in twenty

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. Right, you want to know what year that was?

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty the year when people couldn't go outside, and

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>there are many years after they probably should have stayed indoors. Two,

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>But that's a different podcast. The point I'm making is,

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>if you've got a comfortable little thing in your soul

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that's saying this is just like things I've seen before,

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>they'll turn it around. They absolutely And now I'm going

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>to break down exactly how untenable open ai is with

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a few statements for starters. Open ai is trying to

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>hit eleven point six billion dollars of revenue by the

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>end of twenty twenty five, and to do that it

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>will have to triple its revenue and its current cost

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of revenue, so two thirty five to make a dollar,

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>open ai will spend twenty seven billion dollars to hit

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>eleven point six billion dollars, even if open ai somehow

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>harves their costs, and by the way, in the next

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>year they're going to be building a brand new model,

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>which will cost them an absolute shit ton of money.

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>They will still lose two billion dollars in twenty twenty

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>five to hit these revenues. However, I must be clear,

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>these costs are going up. They need this company to

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>grow by three hundred percent and the only way they're

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>going to do that is by making a new model.

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And the only thing that's really growing at this company

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>is they're free users, and those free users lose the

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>money every single time they use it. And even if

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>they added a two dollars price increase to chat GPT

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>plus and a similar price on their business plans like

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>teams and enterprise, these things aren't really going to significantly

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>move the needle without also adding a bunch of growth

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>on top. An open Aiy's latest GPT four model it

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>cost them one hundred million dollars to train, and more

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>complex models like the Orian one they're allegedly coming up

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>with and I imagine oh one which will get to

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>next episode, well, they're going to cost them an absolute

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>shit ter more to build. And also, by the way,

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the information estimated back in July the open AI's training

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>costs would be about three billion dollars in twenty twenty four.

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>The costs are not coming down. People. Now here's another problem.

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Buzzy tech companies need exciting things to get investors in,

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 1>customers jazzed and opening eye. Well, they haven't really had

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>anything exciting or truly important since the launch of GPT

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>three point five, and even their latest reasoning model, like

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>I said, I'll get to it next episode, it's not

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>been particularly impressive. That model, by the way, is much

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>more expensive to run and uses something called chain of

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>thought reasoning, which I'll get into. But nevertheless, it takes

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>more power to run because they're doing way more calculations

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't even have a use case when they

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>announced it. What is going on with this company? But

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>putting that aside, open AI's products are also becoming increasingly commoditized,

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>with Google, Meta, Amazon, and even Microsoft building their own

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>large language models and other models to compete. Where still

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>these models are using effectively identical training data, which they're

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>also running out of, which makes their outputs and by extension,

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the technology itself kind of similar. But most worrying of all,

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm really going to drum on this one later.

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Open AI's cloud business, So the one where they connect

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>their models to other businesses and then the businesses sell

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>products to customers using those models technology. It's small, It's

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>really small. It's small to the point that it suggests

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a fundamental weakness in the generative AI industry. It's

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>extremely worrying that the biggest player in the game, oh

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>only makes a billion dollars less than thirty percent of

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>its revenue from selling access to its supposedly innovative technology.

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:13.199
<v Speaker 1>And fundamentally, I can't really find any compelling evidence that

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>suggests that open ai is going to be able to

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>sustain this growth. In fact, I really can't find any

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>historical comparison for this company. And I also feel like

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>open AI's growth is already stumbling. But if you don't

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>want to stumble through life bereft of joy or growth

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>or happiness, I really recommend you buy one of the

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>following things. And if you can't buy it, download it.

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>If you can't download it, go into a shop and

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>demand that they start stocking it. And if they'll just

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>give it to you, demand that you can give them money.

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Listen to the advertisers. All right, we're back, So for

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the next part of this episode, I'm going to begin

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to exactly how open ai makes money, which is going

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to require me to lay out its various businesses and products,

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to have a lot of numbers. Trust me,

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it's worth it, because this shit is insane. So, according

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to the New York Times, open ai expects chat GPT

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to make about two point seven billion dollars in revenue

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four, with an additional billion dollars in

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>revenue coming from other businesses using open AI's technology. Roughly

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 1>seventy three percent, or two point seven billion dollars of

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>open AI's revenue comes from selling premium versions of chat

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>jupt called plus Teams and Enterprise. Chat Jupt Plus is

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>marketed to individuals for twenty bucks a month, offering faster

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>response times, priority, access to new features, and capability is

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>not found in the free product, like image generation, which

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>you can get in so many different other places. Importantly,

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>open ai can use anything you'd do as training data

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>unless you explicitly opt out. Open Ai also sells access

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to a team's product, which costs twenty five dollars a

0:23:57.560 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>user a month if pay annually, so three hundred bucks

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a year per user and thirty dollars a user a month.

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>If paid monthly from this point on, your date is

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>excluded from that used to train open AI's models. By deform.

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Open ai sells enterprise subscriptions that include an expanded context

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>window for longer prompts, meaning you can give more detailed instructions,

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>admin controls, and enhance support an ongoing account management. It

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't clear how much this costs, but I found a

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Reddit thread from a year ago that suggests it's about

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty dollars a user a month, with a minimum of

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty seats on an annual contract. I

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>also believe open ai offers discounts for customers who buy

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in bulk very standard software as a service business model.

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>A further billion dollars, or twenty seven percent of open

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>AI's revenue comes from open ai licensing its models and

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>services via its API. One thing you notice when you

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>look at this price page is that there's this huge

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>variety of models and APIs available, and that there's massive

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:55.360
<v Speaker 1>amounts of variation in pricing too. I look into these

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in depth in my newsletter, which by the way, is

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>called open ai is a bad business and it's worth

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>reading if you want to know, if not, just for

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the pricing in its various services is

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>also super messy, but you don't need to know that

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. Open Ai also makes about two hundred million

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a year selling access to its models through its Microsoft

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 1>according to Bloomberg, where open Ai takes a twenty percent

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>cut of all revenue, and by the way, that's not

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on top of the billion. This means that open ai

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:23.959
<v Speaker 1>only makes about eight hundred million dollars a year by

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>selling access to its API. That two hundred million is

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>on top I want to add, how worrying this is

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>both open Ai and the larger generative AI market. If

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>open Ai, the most prominent name in all of generative ai,

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is only making a billion dollars a year from selling

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the shovels for the gold rush, what does that say

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>about the growth trajectory for this company all the actual

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>usage of generative AI products. That's the question for later

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in the show. The first let's talk dollars. So as

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it stands, open Ai makes the majority, like I said,

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>more than seventy percent of its revenue from selling access

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to premium versions of chat GPT. A few weeks ago,

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the Information Report that chat gpt plus had more than

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>ten million paying subscribers, and that it had one million

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>more than we're paying for higher priced plans for business teams.

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>As I've laid out previously, this means that open ai

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is making about two hundred dollars million dollars a month

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>from consumer subscribers. But business teams is a very vague.

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>It isn't obvious what it means. It could mean the

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 1>team plan, it could mean the enterprise plan, and you

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>may think, well ed, couldn't you be horribly wrong? Couldn't

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it be that they're actually ripping' they they got a

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>million enterprise subscribers. Wouldn't that be good? Wrong? Oh? The

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>New York Times has my back here. Based on their reporting,

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we can actually get a little more specific. Chat gpt

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>plus is ten million customers, making open Ai around two

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>point four billion dollars a year. As ten million users

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>spending about twenty bucks a month, which equates two hundred million,

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>might apply by twelve two point four billion dollars. Dad

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I swear I was listening in Mathson Times. This means,

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that business users make up about three

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars a year in revenue. Of twenty five

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a month, which isn't really great. While ten

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 1>million paying customers might seem like a lot. Chat GPT

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is effectively to generative AI what Google is to search.

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Ten million people paying for this kind of table stakes,

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that this company can triple that number

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in a year is absolutely ridiculous. Open ai has been

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>covered by effectively every media outlet in the world. It's

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in almost every single conversation about AI, even when

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not about generative AAI, and has the backing and

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>marketing push of Microsoft and pretty much the entirety of

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley. Chat GPT has over two hundred million weekly users,

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and The New York Times reports that open ai has

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and I quote, three hundred and fifty million people using

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>their services each month as of joom though it's unclear

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>if that includes those using the API. I would guess

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that's chat GPT users collectively. This means that open ai,

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the most popular company in the industry, in the most

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>prevalent industry in the industry, talked about to everyone and everywhere,

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>can only convert about three percent of its free users

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>into paying customers. Now, by the way, Eager listeners may go, well,

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>three twenty percent conversion, that's not bad, right, right, wrong. Generally,

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>free products don't cost this much to run. Chat GPT

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>itself is extremely expensive. Whether it's free or whether it's premium,

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it's the same thing. So yeah, those three hundred and

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty million people, they're more of like a parasite than anything.

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>The ninety seven percent who won't give them the credit card.

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not great. And I think that lack of conversion

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>might be because chat GPT and chat GPT Plus are

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>really similar products. Chat GPT Plus that you use the

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>product more often and have access to numer models, but

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no obvious new thing you can do. As a result,

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't really upsell to plus unless you found someone

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>who's already worked out the use case for themselves. And

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>open Ai remains piss poor at actually marketing this product,

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>mostly because of the limitations of what a large language

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>model can do. As a result, most people diddling with

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>chat GBT will get what they need to out the

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>free version. I'd also argue that those willing to pay

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>for a Plus subscription are more likely to use the

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>platform way way more than free users, and because every

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>prompt on chat, GBT loses the company money. It's reasonable

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to believe that paying users would be far more of

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a burden on the system. While there's a chance to

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>open an eye, could have a chunk of users that

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't particularly active. One cannot run a business based on

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>selling stuff you hope that people won't use. And no, no,

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing like a gym or insurance. Stop it. When

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I wrote the newsletter and I said that, I got

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>so many people who thought they were the cleverest people

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>at all school. Oh, it's like a gym. It's like, sure,

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not the same. Stop it. You're not clever. No

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>one's impressed, And I should be clear. There's also a

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>reason why enterprise customers are generally more desirable than private individuals.

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>As with any other consumer centric subscription product, regular customers

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>are far more likely to cut their spending when they

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like they're getting value from the product, or

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>when the household budget demands it, or there's economic problems.

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Just look at Netflix. They were the biggest name while

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>they still are the biggest name in streaming, and they

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>lost a million customers in twenty twenty two because of

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the cost of living crisis. These are real things that

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>will happen to open ai if they're not already happening.

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Chat GPT plus is likely for many people, kind of

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a lifestyle product, and the problem is that when people

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>lose their jobs, or inflation hikes happen, or cheaper things

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>come along that do much the same thing, these products

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>are the first to get slashed from the budget. And

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that's before any arbitrary or silly or desperate price increase

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>is done by a company that isn't the good business. Honestly,

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of remarkable that open ai found ten million

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>people to actually pay for chat gpt, But how do

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you grow that to twenty million or forty million people.

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I think they need like thirty million by the end

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty five. How does that happen? Very worrying anyway.

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>At present, open ai makes about two hundred and twenty

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>five million dollars a month. That's two point seven billion

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a year. By selling these premium subscriptions. To hit eleven

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>point six billion dollars in twenty twenty five, open ai

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>would have to increase revenue from chat GPT customers by

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and ten percent. If we consider and forgive me.

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do some maths at you. The current

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>ratio of plus subscriptions, the teams and enterprise subscriptions that

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight point eight nine percent is GPT plus versus

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the business ones at eleven point eleven percent. Open Ai

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>would need to find eighteen point two nine million paying users,

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's at the new price point of twenty two

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>bucks a month, while also retaining every single one of

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the current subscribers to Chat GPT plus, who would also

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>need to renew at the same price point to hit

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>seven point four billion dollars or about six hundred and

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sixteen million dollars a month. It would also have to

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>make an additional nine hundred and thirty three million dollars

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in revenue from its business or enterprice clients, which again

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>would require open Ai to more than triple their users

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and retain the current ones to triple these users. To

0:31:56.880 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>actually do this, Chat GPT has to meaningfully change, It

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>has to do so soon, or disclose multiple meaningful, powerful

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>use cases that are so impressive that eighteen million new

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>people agreed to give them twenty two dollars a month.

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>That's an incredible, and I would say insane goal and

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>one that I do not think this company is capable

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of achieving. It would require making chat GPT something far

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>more compelling than it already is, in ways that I

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>can't even imagine. Just as the company lost multiple members

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of its senior leadership team, it doesn't look good. There

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a meaningful change. Now. I know I've

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>already given you a lot of worrying things about open

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>aiye about their very top heavy, subscription driven business, Why

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it isn't going to grow, why they need to grow

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it to grow faster than any one's ever grown, why

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they need to stop losing so much money. But there's

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>something else to be worried about. There's something even flimsier

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>about this business, and it's actually something that's disastrous. It's disastrous.

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm serious. It is simply disastrous. How little of open

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>AI's revenue comes from providing other companies that means to

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>integrate generative AI into their systems. It is astonishingly bad.

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I cannot be clear enough here. Before I wrote this script,

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>before I wrote the newsletter that led to it, I believed,

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>in my heart of hearts that how OpenAI made their

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>money was from providing access to their models. That makes sense, right,

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>because this company's talked about everywhere. Their technology is meant

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to be innovative. Everyone's meant to use it, right, that

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Surely most of their money would come from

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>people getting in on the revolution and then integrating the

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>revolution into their products, and then people using the revolutionary thing. Right. Wrong.

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>First of all, if open ai only makes a billion

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year selling API access and thus let you

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>integrate the models into your products, it suggests that even

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the biggest company in generative ai cannot find enough customers

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to make its business viable. Secondly, it's yes, there's a

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>remarkably small amount of demand for GENERATIVEAI integrations. Or consider

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>another way that the companies connecting to open ai aren't

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>really making it very much money at all. If the

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>GENERATIVEAI revolution were really here, surely open ai, the household

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.240
<v Speaker 1>name in large language models, would be rolling in cash

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>from their ABI business, not leaving it at less than

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.919
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent of their and your revenue. This isn't the case.

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>It's so strange. So at the twenty twenty four open

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Ai Dev Day event, it's developer conference, which took place

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in October, first, the company said that over three million

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>developers are building apps using open AI's infrastructure. That works

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>out to about three hundred and thirty three dollars a developer,

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's far less money than other companies which make

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>money by providing a service through their API actually make. Twilio,

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a company that makes its money sending SMS, messages and

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>push notifications for companies, over the past quarter, made about

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars in revenue. That's what OpenAI made from

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.760
<v Speaker 1>renting out its models and APIs over the past year.

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Twilio also made roughly four billion dollars over the last

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>four quarters, which is more than open AI's projected revenue

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for the entirety of twenty twenty four. As I mentioned before,

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 1>open ai makes two hundred million dollars of its one

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar revenue from Microsoft reselling its models a twenty

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 1>percent cut. That suggests that Microsoft two is making about

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars from open aised models. So in the

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>event that open ai and Microsoft are making about a

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in annualized revenue by providing access to open

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>AI's models. Again, these are estimates based on current growth trajectories.

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>It suggests that there's only two billion dollars in annual

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>revenue coming from both of these companies combined, and that's

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>without wait is open ai making less money from open

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>AI's models than Microsoft is. Oh my god, this business

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is a stinker. And this also suggests that generative AI

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>as a technology doesn't have a product market fit. According

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>to a survey by Andrews and Hory It's a VC

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the year and I quote, the twenty twenty

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>three market share of closed source models was estimated at

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 1>eighty to ninety percent, with the majority of that share

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>going to open ai and open source ones would include

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:15.240
<v Speaker 1>things like metas Lama model, which is kind of open source.

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:19.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a whole other thing anyway. Another survey from IoT

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Analytics published late last year suggested that the number might

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 1>look a little different, with thirty nine percent of the

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>market share going to open Ai and thirty percent going

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to Microsoft. Assuming that the latter numbers are true or

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>even close to true, this suggests that the generative AI

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>market is really small. If open Ai, which dominates with

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd wager about thirty percent of the market, is only

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>making a billion dollars a year from selling access to

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:45.760
<v Speaker 1>its models at this stage. In this massive hype bubble.

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>There might not even be ten billion dollars of annual

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>revenue from companies integrating generative AI into their products. That's tiny,

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and this should be where all the money is. If

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is the future of everything, why is the

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>revenue stream so painfully weak. Open ai is making so

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>little selling access to their models, and it suggests that

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>despite this hype cycle, there either is an interest in

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>integrating these products from developers, or when these integrations are

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 1>actually in there, consumers aren't really into them or using them. Remember,

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:19.880
<v Speaker 1>these products are charged on usage, and so it's possible

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>for generative AI to be integrated into a service but

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>not actually drive much revenue for open Ai as a

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 1>result of users not really caring. While chat gpt as

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>brand recognition, companies integrating open AI's models into their products

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are far more indicative of the long term health of

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.359
<v Speaker 1>both the company and the industry itself. Because if open

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>ai can't convince people to integrate and use this shit,

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>do you think others are succeeding? I mean, think about it.

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Where have you seen some weird chatbot up here in

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 1>your life? Where have you seen an LM poked into

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>something you use? Have you been like, oh good, I

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>can't wait, or have you just kind of tried to

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>ignore it. Maybe you've interfaced with it. It sucks. There

0:37:56.960 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>are some decent products, like there are email clients that

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>summarize emails Microsoft teams Apparently people really like the summarization.

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>But we are meant to be describing the future here.

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 1>We're meant to be describing something exciting and sexy. Not huh.

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>This summarized the meeting for me interesting. But looking at

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 1>these numbers, it's hard to imagine how open ai will

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>more than triple revenue in the next fifteen months to

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>hit eleven point six billion dollars in sales. Furthermore, at

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 1>its current burn ray, open ai is currently spending, like

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 1>I said, two dollars and thirty five cents to make

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a buck, meaning that eleven point six billion dollars in

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:33.760
<v Speaker 1>revenue could cost as much as twenty seven billion dollars

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to actually make. And as I previously mentioned, what costs

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>could foreseeably come down, All signs point to them increasing.

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>GPT four costs one hundred million dollars to train, and

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>more complex future models will cost hundreds of millions or

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>billions to train, as I mentioned the Information said that

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>training costs were would look like three billion dollars in

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, and I think it's fair to assume

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that the new models are just as costly, if not

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>more so. Ye there's something deliciously ironic about all of

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this that, despite a clear lack of user interest in

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 1>generative AI, open Ahi's global marketing push has succeeded in

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>making lots of people intrigued enough to try a completely

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:14.479
<v Speaker 1>free service that only loses the money. While it's usually

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 1>great news that a product has three hundred or more

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:20.800
<v Speaker 1>million free users, every book time somebody uses a service

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>like chet GPT, it loses the company money. And in

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the case of chet GPT, good lord, they must be

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 1>losing so much. The Information estimated in July the open

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Ai will spend around four billion dollars in server costs

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:35.879
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four to run chat GPT and host

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>other companies running their services using GPT in its other models,

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>effectively meaning that every dollar of revenue is immediately eaten

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 1>by the costs of acquiring it, and that's before your

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>factor in more than fifteen hundred people, as many as

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>seventeen hundred people now work at open Ai, which is

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>another one point five billion dollars or more in costs,

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>and other costs, by the way, are on top of that,

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 1>they've got real estate taxes, stock grunts. This is all

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>very bad and while open ay could potentially reduce costs,

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>they've shown no proof that they can. And they tried once,

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>well at least one got out, the so called iraqis

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 1>model from last year that they tried to show that

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>was meant to be more efficient if failed to launch.

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.399
<v Speaker 1>That's not a good sign, is it. But there's one

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>more problem. There's still more problems, and this one, well,

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 1>this one was caused by their fundraising. You see, they

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:29.839
<v Speaker 1>just raised six point five six point six billion dollars

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in capital one hundred and fifty seven billion dollar valuation.

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>This means that all future rounds have to be at

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 1>that valuation or higher. A lower valuation, which is called

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the down round, would make current investors quite pissy and

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 1>send a very loud signal to the market that the

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>company is having trouble because nobody thinks they're worth what

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 1>they used to be, which in turn would overwhelmingly suggest

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>open AI's only way to survive is to raise its

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>next valuation at a two hundred billion dollar valuation and

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 1>require yet another giant raise. I would say at least

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:05.439
<v Speaker 1>ten billion. For context, the biggest IPO valuation in US

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>corporate history was Alababa, which debuted on the NASC with

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a market cap of nearly one hundred and seventy billion dollars.

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:14.240
<v Speaker 1>That figure is more than double the runner up Facebook,

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>which had a value of eighty one billion dollars. And

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 1>I want to give you some history on that one too.

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's initial OPO was really bad because people were concerned

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>about mobile users and not monetizing them. Well, they won

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that one, but the market's pulverized Facebook for that. Do

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you think that they're going to be Oh yeah, so

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>your company loses five or more billion dollars a year

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and you have no path of the profitability. Yes, put

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you up on a Nasdaq sounds perfect. Fuck that. No,

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to do that. How is this company

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>going to do? How is this company going to IPO?

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>And yet there's more problems too. I don't know how

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>openay is meant to convert itself from its weird nonprofit

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>structure into a for profit company. I don't know if

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it's possible, it won't be easy. And what's crazier is

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and there's so many little things like this in this

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 1>story where you're like, people are going to look back

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>on this and think, Wow, we were goddamn stupid. At

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>least I hope they did. But open ai has two

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>years from close to convert from a nonprofit to a

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>for profit or their funding will convert into debt. I

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's six to nine percent interest. Hey, this isn't good. Also,

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>at some point open ai is going to have to

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 1>work out a way to go public, like I said,

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise, why did people invest? Why did people bother?

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>They could do future secondary sales, And at some point,

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>if that's all they're going to be able to do

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in secondary sales referring to selling private stock to another individual, well,

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean at that point it's a Ponzi scheme. You're

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>just pulling in money to hand out money to other people. Eventually,

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>it's not good these This company has no past to profitability.

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have one. And regardless of what happens with

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:54.760
<v Speaker 1>everything I'm mentioning, they still need to raise more funds.

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Chat GPT's free version is an actual poison on open

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>AI's system. It's a marketing channel that burns billions of

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:04.399
<v Speaker 1>dollars to introduce people to a product that only ten

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 1>million people will actually pay for. And open AI's future

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>depends largely on its ability to continue convincing people to

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:14.319
<v Speaker 1>use it. So how does this continue? How does open

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 1>ai survive? I don't think it can. Open ai is

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 1>a disaster in the making, and behind it, it's a nastier,

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:25.360
<v Speaker 1>shittier disaster, a lack of fundamental strength in the generative

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 1>AI market writ Large. If open ai can only make

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars as the leader in this market, and

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:34.840
<v Speaker 1>really only eight hundred million because the other two hundred

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 1>million comes from Microsoft, it suggests that there's not really

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>developer or user interest in generative AI products writ Large.

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps it's the hallucination problem, where it authoritatively states something

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:48.759
<v Speaker 1>that isn't true. Well, maybe it's just that generative AI

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>isn't something that produces interesting interactions with a user. While

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that somebody could work out a really

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:58.920
<v Speaker 1>cool product, it's time to ask why Amazon, Google, Meta,

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 1>open Ai, Apple and Microsoft have failed to make one

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:07.760
<v Speaker 1>one in the last two years? Where is it? Where's

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the killer app? And no, it's not early days. Shut up.

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 1>More money than anything has ever raised has gone into

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>these companies. More attention has gone into these companies than

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:23.920
<v Speaker 1>any other hyperscalar movement ever, even the metaverse. Where's the product? Man?

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Where is it? And while this bubble can continue coasting

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for a little while longer, nothing about the open ai

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>story looks good. This company's lost. They're bleeding money with

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>every single interaction with the customer, and they're flogging serve

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>software that's the best kind of useful and worst actively

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:45.359
<v Speaker 1>harmful to the environment. Unless something significantly changes, like a

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 1>massive scientific breakthrough in energy or compute efficiency, I just

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:52.240
<v Speaker 1>don't see how open ai makes it two more years.

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And worse still, if my hypothesis about the wider market

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is true, there might just not be a viable business

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in make and selling large language models. While Meta and

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:04.760
<v Speaker 1>open Ai might be able to claim hundreds of millions

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of users on these services, I don't see any evidence

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that these people will make them any money, and in fact,

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I only see evidence they'll lose it. And if I'm right,

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 1>we're watching vcs in companies like Microsoft burn tens of

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars to power the next generation of products

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and nobody really gives a shit about And in the

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:26.720
<v Speaker 1>next episode, I'm going to go into the much bigger problem,

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the subprime AI crisis, where everyone building on these platforms

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:33.319
<v Speaker 1>is inevitably going to get rug pulled when Open AI

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and Anthropic and other companies raise their prices, because if

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 1>they don't raise their prices, how are they going to

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to afford to keep going. I don't bloody no,

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 1>but we'll get into it next episode. Thank you for

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer of the

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Better Offline theme song is Matosowski. You can check out

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 1>more of his music and audio projects Matttersolski dot com,

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>M A T T O s O W s Ki

0:46:05.640 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You can email me at easy at Better

0:46:08.560 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 1>offline dot com or visit Better Offline dot com to

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:13.880
<v Speaker 1>find more podcast links and of course my newsletter. I

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>also really recommend you go to chat dot Where's youreaed

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 1>dot at to visit the discord, and go to our

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:22.359
<v Speaker 1>slash Better Offline to check out our reddit. Thank you

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:23.360
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening.

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Better Offline is a production of Cool Zone Media. For

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 2>more from Cool Zone Media, visit our website cool zonemedia

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 2>dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.