WEBVTT - Deception In The Details:  Sarah Westwood Talks to A&G

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I will say this before we get to our reporter.

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I did see Larry Summers on CNN this morning, and

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>he was he's a democratic economist, but he was more

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>than willing to call out all those other bills as inflationary.

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>He was warning the White House this is gonna make

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>inflation worse. He says, this is going to help with inflation.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So right, well, and there was the big Chip bill

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>as well. To discuss this. Uh my gosh, what a day.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Westwood, investigative reporter for the Washington Examiner, joins us, Sarah, welcome,

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>how are you. I'm great, thanks for having me. I

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>can only assume that somebody but Joe manson a yacht.

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that how he changed his mind or would we

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>have any idea how that came about. It's completely unclear

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>how it came about. The win of it is certainly

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly earlier than yesterday afternoon. I mean, I think

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Republicans were really burned by the timing of his announcement

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that he was going to back this deal, because, if

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you remember, Mitch McConnell said, we are not going to

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>offer support for the semi conductor bill, the chips bill

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that you guys mentioned unless you guys, you know, agree

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>not to move forward on a reconciliation build. Does all

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this stuff fund climate change? You know that the Democrats

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>have been wanting. And he held up that bill until

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>he was pretty sure that build back better or some

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>version of it was dead. Then he lent his support

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to it, and just a few hours later, Mansion and

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Chumor come out and say they have a reconciliation deal.

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>So I think Republicans feel really burned right now by

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that bait and switch. And it's why House Republicans are saying, well,

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you may have tricked us in the Senate, but we're

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to support it in the House. And they

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>are whipping against the Chips bill. Now, Wow, even though

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans like the Chips bill, they're just using it

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>as a bargaining chip. If you'll pardon the use of

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the word chips too many times, Um, if you'll excuse me,

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm enjoying some pringles. Well that is kind of from

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>from a Yeah, that's interesting from a drama standpoint, because

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw the headlines middle of the day that before

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the we're on the I'm on the we're broadcasting the

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>show is centered on the West coast. So it was

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the day for me that the whole

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>new bill back better paired down thing was dead. I

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>saw the headlines that that was dead, and then all

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, just like Tony Dow the other day,

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>was not dead. Briefly, Um, you were following that story.

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So so some Shenanigans are lying or is it? How

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>upset are the Republicans about this? Republicans are pretty upset.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they definitely feel like there was deception involved

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in in the way the details of the new Democratic

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Reconciliation Bill came out. And it's almost certainly was the

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>case that Mansion and Schumer didn't magically arrive at this

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>conclusion hours after the Chips bill passed. It's clear this

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>deal probably came together in the days or even weeks

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>before Chips advanced out of the Senate and then it

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>was announced. Also not clear what part of this bill

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>would be, you know, anti inflationary. I mean, it's subsidies

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>for green energy, it's subsidies for solar panels and electric cars,

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it's tax increases on businesses. So it's not clear where

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are really getting this idea that it's going to

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>fight inflation, and it's really bad timing for them to float,

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, more than three fifty billion dollars worth of

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>government spending at the same time that we're getting these

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>GDP numbers. That suggests to all sentient economists that the

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>economy is now in a recession on top of the

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>inflation that we're experiencing. So can you we've skipped to

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the politics, and the politics are are really interesting actually

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>this time. But what is in this gigantic fourty three

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar bill just the quick drive by while the

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>part that Democrats seem most excited about is a lot

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of the climate change um UH measures that are in

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this bill obviously, like I mentioned, their subsidies for electric vehicles,

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>for solar panel production, for transitioning more towards clean energy.

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>There's some new UH carbon emission regulations. I can just

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>jump in and make These are my words, not yours.

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I just I get the feeling, you know. My My

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>first thought when I hear those words is that's gonna

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>be a bunch of crap, a whole bunch of useless crap,

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>A whole bunch of money is gonna get spent. It's

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>not gonna help the environment in any way people are

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna get rich. We're not gonna use less fossil field.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>But back to you, Sarah, Celinda, right, Celenda is what

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind. Right, That's often been the case is

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that it's been a boondoggle for technology that has not

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>yet succeeded on the free market, that is not ready

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>for mass production and doesn't impact climate change in any

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>meaningful way. So you have the climate piece of it.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats are really excited about. There's an increase in

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the corporate minimum tax. That will actually be an interesting

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>component because UH Senator Kirsten Cinema out West has repeatedly

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>said she does not support raising taxes on businesses in

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>any form, and her opposition to tax increases has been

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>part of what prevented Democrats from moving forward on a

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>bill like this before. Even though Mansion, you know, has

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>opposed a whole host of other things, she's been standing

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>against corporate tax increases. It will be interesting to see

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>if she's gonna shift her stance now because she doesn't

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be the one in the hot seat like

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Mansion has been. You also have some UH pharmaceutical company

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>reforms that allows Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices with

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the pharmaceutical companies, the government things that will help lower

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>prescription drug prices for senior So it's sort of a

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>grab bag of some of the stuff that Democrats wanted

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and build back better. It's nowhere near as ambitious, but

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it does in a lot of areas dump money into

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>the economy at a time when it's already overheated, and

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that's obviously going to be the line that Republicans use

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>against it. Yeah, I just saw one item that it

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>was I think it was sixty billion dollars given to

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>disadvantaged neighborhoods who have been disproportionately affected by climate change

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, which having grown up in Chicago

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>with the corrupt, corrupt money handout system they have there,

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I know, a slush fund. When I see just just unbelievable,

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>just unbelievable that the UM. When I hear the biggest

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>investment in climate change fighting ever, I just I want

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to hold onto my wallet. Maybe I'm too cynical, but

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I doubt it. So now, because this is a budget

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>reconciliation bill, the filibuster does not factor incorrect, and it

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>will probably pass the House. So don't need any Republicans. Correct,

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>no Republicans will be needed. But the interesting thing is

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they are going to need all fifty Democrats, so they

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>can use Senator Vice President Kamala Harris as a tiebreaker.

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>But one issue for Democrats right now in terms of

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the timing is that, uh, their members keep getting COVID.

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I believe Senator Dick Durbin is the latest

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to be out for at least two weeks because of COVID,

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So we can't pably be there. The Senate, unlike the House,

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>does not have proxy voting, so everybody has to physically

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 1>be there, so their plans keep getting pushed back and

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>push back and push back because members are out with COVID,

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and so even though all the details of the bill

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>seem to have been hammered out, they might not be

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>able to get it done before August recess, which pushes

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>this into September because of the COVID outbreak that Washington's experiencing.

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sarah, I'm gonna ask you to not listen

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to the next few sentences. This is private to Jack.

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>The Republicans have to send people into the Capitol to cough.

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>That's that's stupid that they're still holding onto the you

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta be there to vote. That's that's a vestige of

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the eight hundred. But whatever, that's a different topic. Um uh.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Westwood, investigative reporter of the Washington Examiners on the line,

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and do you want to touch on the giant chips? See,

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I suppose we should before we run out of time.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>So what's the big deal on the on the chip bill?

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Why is this big? Well, chip bill would offer subsidies

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to UH semiconductor manufacturing here in the US to sort

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of full sort the US of competitiveness against China, who's

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>also a big manufacturer of semi conductor. And these are

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>chips that are using basically all kinds of technology that

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we use. So it's important bills. But there were also

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>deficit concerns, inflationary concerns, because anytime you're talking about a

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>subsidy or a hand out to an industry, you're talking

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>about the government dumping money into an economy that's already

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, struggling too many dollars, chasing too a few goods.

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And the politics of the chips build were also sort

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of surrounded in controversy, I think because of Paul Pelosi,

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi's husband, making some pretty lucrative trades in the

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor industry on the stock market. So there was a

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of sort of scandal involved in this bill. And regardless,

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to have a hard time getting

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>through the House if all the Republicans are going to

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>vote against it. But you know, if if if Nancy

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi can get keep all of her Democrats in line

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to support it, then you know there's a good chance

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that that it does become law. And Republicans are going

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to be really unhappy about that. So the Republicans, all

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans are against the chip bill. Also, well, leadership

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is whipping against it, which means leadership has sent out

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>memos to all the hundreds of GOP members and said

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the official position of the conference is that we would

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>like you to vote against this. Now, they don't do

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>this for every bill. Sometimes they don't whip against things.

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>They let members vote their conscience, as they say, but

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>this is an instant when conscience, yeah, saying we would

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 1>like you to vote against the spill. That doesn't mean

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone will tow the line, but most well, But is

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that as a leverage against the build back better Light

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>or is that because they actually are against the chip bill.

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the former, you know, I think there

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>was a good chance this was honest way to passage

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>beforehand it had by partisan support. Okay, so I did

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>have Republicans, right, I just want to make sure I

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>understand that. So it had Republican support outside of the

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 1>whole using its leverage, all right, Yeah, that was pretty

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>solid bipartisan support. I mean, it was not uncontroversial. But

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Westwood of the Examiner on the line in the

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>few seconds we have left, Sarah, could you give us

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the brief list of government programs that have been cut

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to help pay for the giant new one? So I'm

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>glad we only have a few seconds. So that's the

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. You are. You are. You are really

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>good at your job, and most people aren't. I'm not

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 1>most people are not good at the jobs. You are

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>really good at your job. Yeah, it's always a pleasure.

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Thanks at Million, You're terrific. Thanks bye bye, farm Strong

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and Jetty