WEBVTT - Another Regional Bank Plunges; Fed Opens Door to Pause

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>From the Bloomberg interactor Burger Studios. This is Bloomberg day

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Break for Thursday May fourth.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Coming up today, pack West is the latest regional bank

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 2>to plunge. Is that consider strategic options.

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Big names on Wall Street say that FED deserves a

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>blame for the current crisis.

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Jay Powell raises rates again, but leaves the door open

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 2>for a pause.

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>And Apple prepares to record earnings.

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 3>This afternoon, the Manhattan DA rules the death of a

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 3>subway rider who dined by a show called a homicide,

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.919
<v Speaker 3>whilst the suspected gunman in a deadly Atlantis shooting has

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 3>been caught. I'm John Tucker, bore ahead, I'm John Stash.

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Aaron sports a walk off win for the Yankees, the

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Mets got swept.

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 2>The Devil's lost Game one at Carolina.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 5>That's all straight Ahead on Bloomberg day Break, The business

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 5>news you need to starn your day in just one

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 5>fifteen minute podcast each morning on Apple, Spotify, The Bloomberg

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 5>Business Appen everywhere you get your podcasts.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Good morning, I'm Nathan Hager.

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Karen Moscow. Here are the stories we're following today.

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 2>We begin this morning with continued turmoil in the banking industry.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 2>The regional lender PacWest Bank Corp. Has been weighing a

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 2>range of strategic options, including a sale. We get the

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 2>details from Bloomberg's Doug Prisner.

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 6>Yes, Packwest is open to a sale, although the company

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 6>hasn't started a formal auction process. We're also told the

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 6>Beverly Hills Bank is considering a breakup or a capital raise.

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:28.119
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 6>An outright sale has been hindered because there aren't many

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 6>potential buyers interested in the entire bank. Packwest compromises a

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 6>community lender called Pacific Western Bank, as well as some

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 6>commercial and consumer lending businesses. Also, a buyer would have

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 6>to potentially book a big loss on marking down some

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 6>of those loans in New York. I'm Doug Prisoner, Bloomberg.

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak, All right, Doug, thanks well. Shares of pack West

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>originally fell sixty percent on the news, but just after

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>midnight on the East Coast, the regional bank confirmed its

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in talks with several potential investors and said to posits

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>have increased since March. Checking shares a pack West right now,

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>they are down almost thirty seven percent in early trading.

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 2>And reaction is pouring into this latest chapter in the

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 2>banking crisis, Karen Pershing squares Bill Ackman says the US

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 2>regional banking system is at risk. He goes on to

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 2>say regulator failures to update and expand the insurance regime

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 2>has quote hammered more nails in the coffin.

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>And Nathan, the Federal Reserve deserves some of blame for

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the banking crisis. That's the view from former New York

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>FED president and current Bloomberg opinion columnist Bill Dudley.

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 8>I think the FED broadly missed the fact that this

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 8>interest rate risk that they had created by being very

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 8>late to tighten monitary policy, that they created by flooding

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 8>the bank with deposits by doing quantitative easing, that they created,

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 8>part of the stress on the banking system that rose

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 8>when they had to tighten bi monetary policy by five

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 8>percent in a little over a year.

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And former New York FED President Bill Dudley made the

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>comments just after the Fed's latest rate decisions. Stay tuned

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for more of his inner with a Bloomberg coming up shortly.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Fed schir Jay Powell also addressed the banking termoil during

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 2>his news conference yesterday. Karen, that was before the latest

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 2>news on Packwest. Palell says issues in the banking sector

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>are not systemic.

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 9>Conditions in that sector have broadly improved since early March,

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 9>and the US banking system is sound and resilient. We

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 9>will continue to monitor conditions in the sector. We're committed

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 9>to learning the right lessons from this episode and will

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 9>work to prevent events like these from happening again.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 10>Well.

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>As far as monetary policy, powellan company did raise rates

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>for a tenth straight time, but open the door to

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a June pause for rate hikes. We got this reaction

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>from former Atlanta Fed president Dennis Lockhart.

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 11>The focus is on inflation. They're trying very hard to

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 11>separate financial stability concerns system banking system concerns from monetary policy.

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 11>We'll see if conditions forced them to begin to combine

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 11>financial stability concerns with monetary policy decisions.

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Former Atlanta Fed President Dennis locker Heart says overall, he

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>thinks j. Powell is taking a long term hawkish position

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>on policy.

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Interest rates are also in focus overseas, Karen, the European

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Central Bank is poised to slow the pace of interest

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 2>rate increases later this morning. It's after its preferred measure

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 2>of inflation eased for the first time in ten months.

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Officials at the Central Bank are expected to raise the

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 2>deposit rate by a quarter point to three point two

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 2>five percent.

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Staying in Europe here, Nathan Shares of Schaller at more

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>than two percent first quarter profit, beating estimates. In the

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>oil giants said it will repurchase a further four billion

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>dollars of shares. That's the same buyback size as in

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the prior quarter.

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 2>And back here in the US, careen the earnings continued

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 2>to roll in as well, with Apple leading the way.

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Today we get a preview from Bloomberg's Tom Busby.

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 12>Despite expectations of continued solid sales of iPhones, watches, MacBooks,

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 12>and other gadgets, Wall Street is bracing for what could

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 12>be a second year over year sales decline in a

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 12>row as consumers here in the US and all around

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 12>the world pull back a bit on their spending. But

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 12>Apple also expected to boost its dividends and increase its

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 12>share buyback program, which it did by ninety billion dollars

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 12>just a year ago. For the second quarter, look for

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 12>revenue of just under seventy two billion dollars forty nine

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 12>billion of that from iPhone sales and consensus calls for

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 12>innings per share of a dollar forty three. Tom buzzby

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 12>Bloomberg Daybreak. All right, Tom, thanks well.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Turning to politics, We're just days away from a key

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.359
<v Speaker 1>meeting on the debt ceiling, and now economists at the

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>White House are issuing a new warning. The Council of

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Economic Advisor says a short default on the debt would

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>cost a half million jobs and knock six tens of

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a percent off GDP. If it lasted a full quarter,

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>GDP would fall more than six percent and the unemployment

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>rate would go up five percent. Democratic Congressman Henry Kuahar

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is pushing for a clean debt ceiling increase.

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 13>We cannot have a default because that's going to cost

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 13>the US and we saw that at twenty eleven. We

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 13>did it at the very end, and what happened the

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 13>US credit was downgraded and that caused a lot of

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 13>more money where we're paying out billions of dollars on

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 13>interest because of the downgrade.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>And Congressman Henry Quayar of Texas spoke with our Washington

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>correspondent Joe Matthew on Bloomberg's sound on Catch the show

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at one pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or listen

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Tim now to take a look at some of the

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 2>other stories making news in New York and around the world.

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 2>For that, we're joined by Bloomberg's John Tucker. Good Morning, John,

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and Nathan.

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 3>The New York Medical Examiners world The death of a

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 3>thirty year old subway rid a homicide. The NYPD says

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 3>the man had been shouting at people aboard a train

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 3>on Monday, then fellow writers tackled him and won a

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 3>US marine put him at a choke hold that lasted

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 3>until his body went limp. The medical examiners. His thirty

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 3>year old Jordan Neely, died from compression of the neck.

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 3>Neeling is known to some New Yorkers as a Michael

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Jackson impersonator in Times Square. Mayor Adams was ansd on

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 3>CNN about the investigation.

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 14>Well, now it's still ongoing, and really our hearts go

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 14>out to the family and this terrible incident, and the

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 14>disc attorney, as you stated, the Medical Examiner's office just

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 14>bruth the case and now it's in the hands of

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 14>investigators that determine exactly what happened. There's so many unknowns

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 14>at this time.

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 3>For now, the Manhattan DA has not charged anyone. Police

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 3>in Atlanta say they caught the suspected gunman who shot

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 3>and killed one woman and wounded four others at a

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 3>medical center. The mother of the alleged suspect, twenty four

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 3>year old m Patterson, says he was upset or a

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 3>medical mix up and wanted a drug to deal with

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 3>anxiety and depression. Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens.

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 15>It's the guns that we're talking about. We live in

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 15>a state and in a nation where people have easy

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 15>and wide access to firearms that are used to kill

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 15>other fellow Americans. We need immediate action that meets the

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 15>urgency of this crisis.

0:07:55.560 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Mayor Dickens says a citizen's tip Lanta Patterson's arrest. People

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 3>are dead, including a seven year old girl, after a

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 3>shooting in Newark, New Jersey, last night. Two others were

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 3>wounded in what polease say is a domestic dispute, and

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 3>a home on Johnson Avenue. The SATs back to gunman

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.679
<v Speaker 3>was also killed. A judge dismissed Donald Trump's one hundred

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 3>million dollar lawsuit against the New York Times and its

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 3>reporters over a twenty eighteen expose on his taxes. The

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 3>New York State Supreme Court judge also ordered the former

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 3>president to pay the news outlets attorney's fees. Prosecutors is

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:31.679
<v Speaker 3>said to be nearing a decision on whether to charge

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 3>President Biden's son Hunter with tax violations. The Washington Post

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 3>says that's according to people familiar with the matter. Global

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 3>News twenty four hours a day, powervine more than twenty

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 3>seven hundred journalist and analysts, you know, over one hundred

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 3>and twenty countries. I'm John Tucker. This is Bloomberg, Nathan.

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, John. Time now for Bloomberg Sports Update. For that,

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 2>we bring in John Stanshower.

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 4>All right, Nathan.

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>It was a long day.

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a good one for the Mets in Detroit

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 4>at day night double ahead of the Tigers won the

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 4>openers six to five, scoring twice in the eighth na

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 4>A Bada Montevino. Detroit catcher Eric Pass had five hits

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 4>and then he hit two home runs in the nightcap,

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 4>won by the Tigers eight to one. Max Schurzer, back

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 4>from his suspension, gave up six runs and eight hits.

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 4>This afternoon, Justin Verlander makes his Mets debut. Yankees are

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 4>off before starting a weekend series at Tampa Bay. The

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 4>raised just one again. They are twenty five and six,

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 4>sixteen and two at home, the eight and a half

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 4>games ahead of the Yankees, who did rally to win

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 4>a second straight over Cleveland at the Stadium. The Yanks

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 4>trailed two nothing, got home runs in the fifteen from

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Willie Calhoun and new Yank outfielder Jake Bowers. Calhoun drove

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 4>in the tiny run bottom of the ninth inning, and then

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 4>the Yanks won four to three on the Jose Travino

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 4>hit in the tenth. Before the game, Yankee GM Brian

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 4>Cashman said the reason his team is in last place injury.

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 16>Were banged up so bad right now. If it was

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 16>a short seat and we'd be taken out. But we

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 16>have time to make up ground and we're gonna compete

0:09:58.080 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 16>with who we have here, and we look forward to

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 16>getting who we need back, you know what, a later date.

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 4>Thanks ok Toad Aaron Judge back next week. Stanley Cup

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 4>flaff Carolina an easy game one win over the Devils

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 4>in Raleigh five to one. That's the same score of

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 4>the games one and two losses by the Devils against

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 4>the Rangers, and of course they came back and won

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 4>that series. Vegas beat Edmonton sixty four. The Oilers Leon

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 4>Dreizeido scored all four in defeat. NBA Boston blew out

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Philadelphia by thirty four. That series tied at one. The

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Jets have signed veteran whiteout Randall Cobb, a longtime teammate

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 4>of Aaron Rodgers in Green Bay.

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 2>John Stash Edwin. Bloomberg Sports.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 17>Live from coast to coast, from New York to San Francisco,

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 17>Boston to Washington, d C. Nationwide on SIRIUSXAM, the Bloomberg

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 17>Business app, and Bloomberg dot Com.

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break. Good morning. I'm Nathan Hager.

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's continue the conversation now on the latest rate hikes

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 2>from the Federal Reserve and the continued turmoil in the

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 2>regional banking sector. If we've learned one thing over the

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 2>past years monitary tightening cycle, it is that there are

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 2>no guarantees. There was no guarantee that the Fed would

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 2>raise interest rates as fast as it did, and it's

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 2>not guaranteed they're now going to pause Fed chaired jer

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Own pal signal the Central Bank could stop hikes after

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 2>yesterday's quarter point increase, but that the Central Bank will

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>remain data dependent and at the same time, the Feds

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 2>not just following the data, it's also closely watching continued

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 2>turmoil in the regional banking sector. Bill Dudley, ran the

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 2>New York Fed, is currently a Bloomberg opinion columnist. He

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 2>says the Central Bank should keep an eye on how

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 2>this turmoil unfolds, but he thinks it's also time to

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 2>own up to the way interest rate increases may have

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 2>fueled the crisis. Bill Dudley discussed that along with Jpalll's

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 2>news conference yesterday with Bloomberg's Tom Kean, Lisa Abramowitz, and

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Ferrell. Let's bring you that discussion now.

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 18>If they pause, is it asymmetric or symmetric? Does a

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 18>pause mean rate cuts to come or they can say

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 18>we're going to pause and we can go either way.

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think they can pause and then continue to

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 8>tighten again if the data turns out to support that.

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.199
<v Speaker 8>But obviously when they do pause, they're making a pretty

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 8>strong statement that they've gotten enough information that they're confident

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 8>that policy is sufficiently restrictive to use German policy terms

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 8>to bring inflation down to two percent over time. So

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 8>a pause is going to be a pretty significant event

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 8>from the Fed. Now. Obviously contact matters that we're in

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 8>the middle of a debt limit ceiling fight at the

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 8>time of the June FMC met.

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 19>You might take a pause for.

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 8>Other reasons, but I would say a pause will be

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 8>pretty important event. What the Fed was trying to do

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 8>today was say, look, we don't know if we're going

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 8>to pause or not at this point. The message, I

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 8>think in the statement and in the Prescombe was pretty clear.

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 8>We think we're getting close to a level that's sufficient restrictive.

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 8>We're not absolutely certain data's going to tell that we

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 8>have to do a little bit more. We're clearly not

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 8>going to cut yet. So I think the pushback that

0:12:58.200 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 8>the Fed is making is really to the markets price

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 8>seeing rate cuts. The FED thinks that the process of

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 8>getting inflation done to two percent is going to take some.

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 19>Time, a lot longer than what the market thinks.

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 18>What is a cumulative effect of where we are right now?

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 18>Give in how you nailed the need for higher rates

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 18>to fight inflation.

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 8>Well, we're certainly in the vicinity of what's sufficient. I

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 8>think in my mind whether they have to do another

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 8>you know, increase or two it's hard to say at

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 8>this point.

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 19>You know, we've come a long way in the last year.

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 8>As puppet cheer Paul said in his press covers, you

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 8>go five hundred basis point five percent increase in short

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 8>term rates.

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 19>That's a lot in a year.

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 8>And we're also starting to see some of the effects

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 8>of that on the on the banking system, so that

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 8>the FED has a whole nother source of restraint, which

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 8>is a credit conditions are going to tighten because some

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 8>banks are going to pull off. Now the hard part is,

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 8>he said in his press covers, it's very hard to

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 8>access how important that a channel is going to be.

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 8>My own personal view is it's going to be fairly weak,

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 8>because the problems that these banks face were not that

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 8>they went out and made bad loans. The problem that

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 8>these banks spaces they went out and took a lot

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 8>of interest rate risks.

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 7>Bill, were you satisfied with the explanations or the answers

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 7>to the questions about the supervisory of some of these

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 7>banking institutions that have failed, Well, I.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 8>Don't think the FED is, you know, taking the full

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 8>responsibility for being pretty slow on this process. I mean,

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 8>if you go back and look at the November Financial

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 8>Stability port, which I did this morning, there's there's basically

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 8>no mention of any kind of you know, interest rate

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 8>risk mismatch, any prime kind of potential liquidity problem in

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 8>the bank. So it wasn't just a question of the

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 8>supervision not being more aggressive with Silicon Valley Bank.

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 19>I think the FED basically missed the risk.

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 8>Here that the posits could flow out very very quickly

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 8>because of the marked and market losses on some of

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 8>these banks balance sheets.

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 7>Do you think, then, Bill, they're still missing it, that

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 7>they don't appreciate the full extent of it, based on,

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 7>for example, the preliminary look that they got to the

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 7>Senior Loan Officer opinion survey, which seemed to indicate just

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 7>an ongoing trend of what they had, are then underappreciating

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 7>a new pressure in the market.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 8>I think that his answer on the Senior Loan Officers

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 8>servey was that it's moving in the same direction that

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 8>it was upward and the tightening of credit conditions, but

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 8>not in a way that would suggest that the problems

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 8>of the banking system since mid March have led to

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 8>a significant further tightening of credit conditions. So I think

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 8>he's basically saying there's not really any new information in

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 8>the senior loan officers survey.

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 19>That was my sense of his response to that question.

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.359
<v Speaker 18>Doctor Dudley, what you just said is extraordinary. You said, basically,

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 18>the FED missed the ramifications of new digital technology the

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 18>speed with which we can move deposits out A delicate question,

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 18>if I may, Bill, and that is basically they want

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 18>Mary Daly's head. There's no other way to put it nicely.

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 18>You've had experience being a president of a FED. Do

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 18>you go after the president of any given regional FRED

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 18>when there's a major blow up like this? Or is

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 18>it much more down the food chain looking at the

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 18>process of supervision and regulation, I think it's.

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 20>A much broader issue about supervisors finding finding problems with

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 20>banks and then not forcing the banks to remedy those

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 20>problems in a timely way. The second issue here was

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 20>I think the FED broadly missed the fact that that

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 20>that this interest rate risks that they had created by

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 20>being very late to tighten monitary policy that they created

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 20>by flooding the bank with deposits by doing quantitative easing

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 20>that they created part of the stress and the banking

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 20>system that rose when they had to tighten.

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 8>Monetary policy by five percent in a little over a year.

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 8>So the Federal Reserve has some culpability here, both in

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 8>terms of the monitary policy policy policies that they pursued

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 8>over the last few years, and also on the supervisory.

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 21>Sid's certainly culpability. They're not really looking to go out

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 21>and acknowledge in a major way, that's for sure, based

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 21>on some of the statements we've heard.

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 19>They have to a degree.

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I thought I thought the dead report from

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 8>Michael Barr that came out last week was what did.

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 19>Acknowledge that there was a lot of improvement on the

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 19>supervisory side that that needed to be made.

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 8>But I don't think the Fed has acknowledged the fact

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 8>that the monitary policy regime that they followed, which was

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 8>to be purposefully late and tightening monitary policy meant you

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 8>were encouraging banks to take on more interest rate risk,

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 8>and then those banks.

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 19>Got caught and the Federal Reserve heavy ring raised by

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 19>five hundred.

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 8>Basic points, you know, I mean, at the end of

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 8>the day, what they're trying to do is assess what

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 8>is sufficiently restrictive in order to get inflation back down

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 8>to two percent. Before the banking system problems, they thought

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 8>sufficiently restricted was higher than what we are today, And

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 8>in fact, Paul was talking about potentially even doing a

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 8>fifty base ap point Radhi cup not too long ago.

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 8>And then the banking problems hit, and so that caused

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 8>the BED to lower their estimate of what sufficiently restricted is.

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 8>So the data will inform them about what's sufficiently restrictive is.

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 8>If the data is really strong, they'll revive up their

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 8>notion of what's sufficiently restrictively.

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 21>Well, Bill, are they going to put more weight on

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 21>financial sector data or are they going to put more

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 21>weight on the data coming from traditional indicators.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 8>Think they're going to put a lot of weight on

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 8>what they're seeing in terms of the labor market, wages

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 8>and inflation. You know, that's really where they haven't made

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 8>much progress yet. They're also going to probably take some

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 8>signal by what's having in the housing sector, because if

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 8>you look at the single family housing sector, it looks

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 8>like it's actually stabilizing. So the policy restraint that's already

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 8>been put in place. Looks like it's the effects of

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 8>that on housing are starting to feed.

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 21>But just a final question from us all this is

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 21>something my the Key's brought up over the last week

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 21>in my conversations with him, whether this would be a

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 21>nod to June two thousand and six. You obviously have

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 21>a deep understanding of the history of the Federal Reserve.

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 21>Back in June O six, they wrote in the statement,

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 21>the extent and timing of any additional firming that maybe

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 21>needed to address these risks will depend on the evolution

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 21>of the outlook and et cetera, et cetera, inflation and

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 21>economic growth implied by incoming information. Now, Bill, do you

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 21>think it's a deliberate nod to JUNEO O six when

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 21>essentially that decision ended up being a pause.

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 18>No.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 19>I don't think they know yet.

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 8>I think Pow being true is very honest when he

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.479
<v Speaker 8>said that we haven't made any decision about whether we're

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 8>going to pause it. I think they think that the

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 8>probability is highed that they're going to pad, but they

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 8>haven't actually got there yet.

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 2>That was former New York Fed President and current Bloomberg

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 2>opinion columnist Bill Dudley speaking with Bloomberg Surveillance following yesterday's

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 2>FED decision. If you missed any part of that conversation,

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 2>you'll be able to hear the full interview on today's

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Daybreak podcast. Download the show every weekday morning wherever

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts. This morning, we continue to watch

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 2>banking stress play out in the pre market, with shares

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 2>of PacWest now down about thirty eight percent. That regional

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 2>bank has confirmed Bloomberg News reporting that it is exploring

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 2>strategic options, including a possible sale. Assurances that the bank

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 2>has not seen unusual deposit outflows. Don't seem to be

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 2>offering assurances to investors this morning. So let's bring in

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Herman Chan to get more analysis on this been analyzing

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 2>the regional banking turmoil throughout. Herman is a senior analyst

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 2>for US regional bank at Bloomberg Intelligence. Herman, Good morning.

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 2>What is prompting paquest to explore strategic options? What is

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 2>going on with this bank?

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 19>Sure?

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 22>So, Packwest is an institution in California. Much like SVB

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 22>and First Republic, it does have some exposure to the

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 22>tech companies, the startups, and the venture capital community. Much

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 22>like SVB, but to a lesser extent, so it's not

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 22>the entirety of its business like SVB, but as a

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 22>subset and that part of the business that suffers some

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 22>deposit outflows in the first quarter. The bank did mention

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 22>in March that it was looking at strategic alternatives, but

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 22>refrain from doing so given the market uncertainty. I think

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 22>that this is just another revisit of that notion that

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 22>it's looking to either sell itself or or sell certain

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 22>sets to shore if it's balance sheet, is.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 2>That where this is going to go? Are we going

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 2>to see assets going to other institutions here? Could there

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 2>be other shoes to drop in the regional banking sector,

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 2>particularly out west.

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, you look at.

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 10>What's happening and the market.

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 22>It has this mentality of shooting first and asking questions

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 22>later after uh the failures of really large regional banks

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 22>and strong institutions.

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 10>Before this whole banking turmoil.

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 22>SVB, First Republic and Signature also had some operations on

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 22>the west coastern California. It's it's unfortunate, but the playbook

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 22>for for shorts and the market terminal has been evident

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 22>and and it.

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 10>Is working out well.

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 22>So the market's just going down the list of potentially

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 22>weaker banks, and peck West is firmly in that picture.

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 2>It seems like this list is being gone down in

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 2>pretty rapid fashion here. When we see these kinds of

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 2>shaky situations for these banks happening almost day by day

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 2>here at this point, does that raise the risk that

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 2>we are seeing something systemic playing out here?

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 22>You know what, when the whole SVB situation was playing out,

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 22>I was thinking this was more a idiosyncratic issue because

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 22>SBB managed.

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 10>They're balancing a bit differently.

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 22>They had much more deposit inflow during the pandemic period

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 22>versus other regional banks because of who they cater to,

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 22>the strength of the startup market and the activity there.

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 22>They invested at the height of the pandemic when interest

0:22:53.760 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 22>rates were zero into security mortgage backed securities, treasuries, et cetera.

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 22>And as interest rates rose those securities went down in value,

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 22>they had much more exposure to that dynamic. What's happening

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 22>now is that adiosyncratic nature initially has seemed to have

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 22>evolved to hit other banks that didn't have necessarily the

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 22>same amount of risk that SBB did. So it seems

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 22>like we need a more holistic solution from Washington, perhaps

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 22>to do something to really stem the nature because if

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 22>we've already seen the domino effect of three banks bail

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 22>and a few banks now teetering, so there needs to

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 22>be some sort of response, it seems, from government.

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 10>Authorities to really address the situation as a whole.

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, we have gotten something of a response from the

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>FDIC of you know, calling for further cap increase in

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the cap of insurance for some of these deposits. Here

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 2>what more can be done to provide some further confidence

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 2>in the regional banking sector. What could it look like?

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 10>What could it look like? I think it could look

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 10>like a few different areas.

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 22>I think the FDIC have sort of paved the way

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 22>with their report of changing deposit insurance, putting some options

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 22>on the table in terms of increasing the insurance on

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 22>business deposits, perhaps even a blanket insurance guarantee.

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 10>Across all deposits. Maybe that's something that needs to be

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 10>acted upon more forcefully and more quickly. Maybe government can

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 10>do something in terms of guaranteeing deposits for a period

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 10>of time to calm the markets. So that's something perhaps

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 10>that's on the table, and something that we're looking forward

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 10>to hear more about.

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 2>So our last thirty seconds here, what about the assurances

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 2>we heard from Chairman Powell that the First Republic takeover

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 2>can put a floor on all this. Are there further

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 2>shoes to drop potentially?

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 22>I appreciate those comments, but I think that markets has

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 22>their mind made up that the market turmoil hasn't really

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 22>has it really quelled at this point. So it seems

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 22>like based on first quarter reporting that the deposit outflow

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 22>that happened with First Republic was much stronger and First

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 22>Republic was an outlier with.

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 10>The pop down. We didn't see that across the other band.

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 23>This is Bloomberg day Break Today, your morning brief on

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 23>the stories making news from Wall Street to Washington and beyond.

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Look for us on your podcast feed at six am

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Eastern each morning, on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts.

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 23>You can also listen live each morning starting at five

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 23>am Wall Street time on Bloomberg eleven three to zero

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 23>in New York, Bloomberg ninety nine one in Washington, Bloomberg

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 23>one oh sixty one in Boston, and Bloomberg ninety sixty

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 23>in San Francisco.

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Our flagship New York station is also available on your

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa devices. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty plus.

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 23>Listen coast to coast on the Bloomberg Business app, serious

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 23>XM Channel one nineteen, the iHeartRadio app, and on Bloomberg

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 23>dot Com.

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nathan Hager and.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Karen Moscow. Join us again tomorrow morning for all

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the news you need to start your day right here

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Daybreak