Speaker 1: All right, showing us.
Speaker 2: Now, we have a lot of important issues in terms
Speaker 2: of the legalization weaponization issue that are in the news today,
Speaker 2: but I got to get reaction. David shown is with
Speaker 2: US former counselor to President Trump's civil liberties attorney, Greg Jarrett,
Speaker 2: Fox News legal analyst New York Times bestselling author, Greg,
Speaker 2: when I did live in New York had an office
Speaker 2: right next to mine, like me, he left to an
Speaker 2: undisclosed location. Reaction, Greg Jarrett, I mean, I think you
Speaker 2: lived in New York City for how long?
Speaker 3: Oh goodness, I both lived and worked in New York
Speaker 3: for thirty years, and you know, fight, I could see
Speaker 3: what was happening, and you know, like you, I left without.
Speaker 1: Looking back, without looking back.
Speaker 2: But people ask me all the time, well don't you
Speaker 2: miss I might know I miss some of my friends,
Speaker 2: but they all want to come down and see me
Speaker 2: in the Free State of Florida.
Speaker 4: David, your reaction, it's it's finished. I mean, in my view,
Speaker 4: the history that we've known of the city has finished.
Speaker 4: The fact that this guy was even in the running
Speaker 4: indicated that I think used to be a landlord in
Speaker 4: New York very glad not to be and as you know,
Speaker 4: I'm sure there are signs already up in Florida. Uh
Speaker 4: pre and post mandami prices on rough dates.
Speaker 1: Oh no, it's it's absolutely hilarious.
Speaker 2: And now, with all that said, I want to be
Speaker 2: very clear, as I said in the last hour, I
Speaker 2: feel sorry for my friends that are there, their heartbroken,
Speaker 2: and I don't want to I don't want to rub
Speaker 2: it in, but it's something that they have to face
Speaker 2: as a reality. This this is who they're living next to,
Speaker 2: people that have bought into all of this.
Speaker 1: Let me let me move on a little bit.
Speaker 2: The FBI launched the preliminary investigation into the burn Bag
Speaker 2: saga in July. If we go back there. According to
Speaker 2: an open electronic communication made public by the DJ and
Speaker 2: their filings in Federal court, uh this this filing began
Speaker 2: on Monday. We're getting new information every day as part
Speaker 2: of the Komi prosecution. Now, the Bureau said. The classified
Speaker 2: information stashed away in a room at the FBI headquarters
Speaker 2: related to Operation Crossfire Hurricane, launched three days after Donald
Speaker 2: Trump announced he was running for twenty twenty four, made
Speaker 2: public and DOJ filings in federal Court and the Bureau
Speaker 2: saying that the classified information stashed away. I think they
Speaker 2: thought they got rid of it all. And with this
Speaker 2: new avalanche of evidence, Greg Jarrett, let me start with
Speaker 2: you and this court filing by Lindsay Halligan in Virginia,
Speaker 2: it seems extraordinarily damning to me.
Speaker 3: Oh it is. I mean, it is a tsunami of
Speaker 3: new and incriminating evidence against Kmie that couldn't should lead
Speaker 3: to I think additional criminal charges against him of lyne
Speaker 3: and obstruction, that is, the destruction of evidence, concealing evidence
Speaker 3: from Congress, damning evidence against him. Notes that show Komy
Speaker 3: did indeed authorize and direct his friend and FBI special
Speaker 3: government employee Daniel Richmond to leak to the media, which Comey,
Speaker 3: of course later denied in testimony before Congress. That's the
Speaker 3: heart of the indictment against him. So this is highly
Speaker 3: corroborating evidence of Commy's fault statements. It's in the hands
Speaker 3: of the prosecutors. After one particular leak, Comy wrote, well done,
Speaker 3: my friend, who knew this would be so fun? And
Speaker 3: the other evidence is also equally damning. You know, while
Speaker 3: he was criticizing Hillary Clinton for breaking the law jeopardizing
Speaker 3: national security using her private email as Secretary of State
Speaker 3: against what Komy himself was using a private email account
Speaker 3: to conduct official FBI matters. So brazen and so stupid
Speaker 3: by comy, but classic comy. You know the message. You know,
Speaker 3: he bragged he'd soon be working for President elect Clunton
Speaker 3: and she'd be grateful that he helped her. I mean
Speaker 3: that really tells the whole story, doesn't it.
Speaker 1: It really does.
Speaker 2: David Sholon, let's get your take on this, because I
Speaker 2: think this is pretty damning, and in the beginning I
Speaker 2: thought this may be a very difficult case to prove.
Speaker 2: I don't particularly love the jurisdiction in Virginia where it's
Speaker 2: taken place, and that somewhat frustrated me. And I think
Speaker 2: this is rather the low hanging fruit for Komi in
Speaker 2: terms of what the criticisms I have against him. Using
Speaker 2: the dirty Russian disinformation dossier is the basis of four
Speaker 2: PAISA warrance three of which he personally signed even after
Speaker 2: it was debunked, and he had a legal obligation to
Speaker 2: go back to the PISA Court and say the information
Speaker 2: presented to that court was false, not accurate, and give
Speaker 2: the judge in that case an opportunity to lift that warrant.
Speaker 4: Yeah, there's no question about that that there's no question
Speaker 4: the court's rules required him to go back and make
Speaker 4: the corrections. They never did. But I'll tell you this
Speaker 4: about the recent filing. To me, you know all of
Speaker 4: this abuse that Lindsay Halligan got about, She's not an
Speaker 4: experienced prosecutor, insurance defense lawyer. I think she's shown brilliant
Speaker 4: here and great public responsibility by this filing. Listen, all
Speaker 4: we saw was former Justice Department officials, former big shots,
Speaker 4: filing briefs and support of Coma and vindictive prosecution. Selective prosecution.
Speaker 4: Didn't do anything wrong. It was brilliant to expose exactly
Speaker 4: what it is that she must have seen in this
Speaker 4: case and in deciding to bring the indictment. I think
Speaker 4: she's talented, hardworking, never had the meeting her, but I
Speaker 4: think this was the right move. And I think this
Speaker 4: is the reason I say it's responsible, is let the
Speaker 4: public know exactly what she was looking at. When you
Speaker 4: see all of these people using their former offices for
Speaker 4: credibility to say there's nothing against Combie, he did nothing wrong.
Speaker 4: These these emails and texts and other communications Daniel Richmond
Speaker 4: are very damning and I'll tell you this. I think
Speaker 4: there's a real issue about a conflict for his lawyers,
Speaker 4: Patrick Fitzgerald. According to the filing here, memorandum between meetings
Speaker 4: between Kobe and President Trump were leaped specifically to Patrick
Speaker 4: Fitzgerald at the time. He's a part of this. He
Speaker 4: may well be a witness in the case.
Speaker 2: Oh you think Patrick Fitzgerald might tell me more about that?
Speaker 4: Could be well.
Speaker 2: Patrick Fitzgerald, by the way, if you don't remember, he
Speaker 2: was the special prosecutor, counsel whatever he was at the time,
Speaker 2: and he's the one that went after Scooter Libby was
Speaker 2: going after Carl Rover at the time. Scooter Libby was
Speaker 2: the chief of staff for then Vice President Dick Cheney
Speaker 2: who just passed away, and.
Speaker 1: They went after him hard. But George W.
Speaker 2: Bush, he may I believe he commuted the sentence, but
Speaker 2: I got the pardon came from Donald J.
Speaker 1: Trump. Interestingly enough.
Speaker 4: Yeah, So what the papers that were filed provide on
Speaker 4: page nine is that on May ninth of that year,
Speaker 4: after he was fired, Comy sent copies of four to
Speaker 4: seven memorandum he had drafted, purportedly summarizing one on ones
Speaker 4: with the President elect and the President to one of
Speaker 4: his attorneys, Patrick Fitzgerald, and so these memos are at
Speaker 4: the heart of the case, among other things so on.
Speaker 4: But again, you know, now we're getting a full picture
Speaker 4: of this. So all we on the instream media was, Oh,
Speaker 4: it's only because Trump is angry at him and so on.
Speaker 4: There's real substance here, and it was appropriate for Lindsay
Speaker 4: Halligan to expose this stuff now for the public consumption
Speaker 4: because it's a matter of great public interest.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Greg, what do you think?
Speaker 3: Yeah? I agree. And there's another aspect to this. In
Speaker 3: Comy's handwritten notes dated September twenty sixth, twenty sixteen, Comy
Speaker 3: confirms that he learned that Hillary Clinton invented this phony
Speaker 3: Russian narrative to Smeir Trump and Comey's notes.
Speaker 2: Actually, and by the way, that datea is important, Greg,
Speaker 2: forgive me for interrupting. That date is important because that's
Speaker 2: long before the first FUZA warrant was filed, and the
Speaker 2: bulk of the information was the dirty Russian disinformation dossier.
Speaker 3: That's right. There were meetings at the White House with
Speaker 3: Comey and Brennan and Obama and Biden in which Brennan
Speaker 3: alerted that, you know, we have evidence that Hillary Clinton
Speaker 3: invented this phony scandal to help herself get elected to
Speaker 3: smear Trump. And Comey's note state and I'm quoting here
Speaker 3: HRC plan to tie Trump to Russia. That speaks for herself.
Speaker 3: And of course, when Comey testified before Congress, he feigned
Speaker 3: acute amnesia and said, she wiz, that doesn't ring any bells.
Speaker 3: I have no recollection of any of that. Well, that's
Speaker 3: something that you would never forget. So Commy was lying,
Speaker 3: and his own notes put a lie to his congressional testimony,
Speaker 3: which constitutes yet another crime. And you know, Comy's incriminating notes,
Speaker 3: other important documents were stuffed in burnbags in a secret
Speaker 3: room in the FBI to be destroyed. What is that
Speaker 3: Under the law, It's called obstruction of justice and obstruction
Speaker 3: of Congress.
Speaker 2: Yeah, very much. So, you know a lot of people
Speaker 2: ask me all the time. You know, Hannity, you've spent
Speaker 2: all these years, You've you've you've you've you've shown us
Speaker 2: the truth. We've learned about the dossier, We've learned about
Speaker 2: buis abuse, we've learned about the dual justice system, we've
Speaker 2: learned about weaponization we have the declassification from Tulsa Gabbard,
Speaker 2: you know, And when do people become you know, get
Speaker 2: held accountable. And that's a hard question to answer. Good
Speaker 2: and I understand people's frustration. What did you all think
Speaker 2: of John Brennan when he was confronted. I can play
Speaker 2: it for you. Uh, let's play the tape.
Speaker 1: And you misrepresented that.
Speaker 4: We never say it was the subsupation. It was influence operations,
Speaker 4: which is what they do.
Speaker 1: The difference between influences. No, you don't know that, you don't.
Speaker 2: I mean, he's cursing, he's screaming, confronted really for the
Speaker 2: first time over the Hunter Biden laptop and signing on
Speaker 2: to this you know document, you know, apparently circulated by
Speaker 2: winking Tony blinking David shown. Uh wow, if somebody starts
Speaker 2: poking me in the chest with their finger, they got
Speaker 2: a problem, especially.
Speaker 4: You given your background and training. But anyway, No, it's
Speaker 4: inconceivable this guy ever held the position that he did.
Speaker 4: And Gregg's point cannot be underestimated. The fact that people
Speaker 4: at this level knew that Hillary Clinton had a scheme,
Speaker 4: a false s team clearly to affect the election is
Speaker 4: absolutely astonishing. You know, Sean, I've said this many times before.
Speaker 4: If it were not for you and your show, I
Speaker 4: don't believe much of this stuff ever would have been exposed.
Speaker 4: But you state on it. You ask the question about accountability.
Speaker 4: Some people might say to some degree, the last election
Speaker 4: was some accountability, but I think now you're starting to
Speaker 4: see real accountability. And you know, when President Trump speaks
Speaker 4: about these people being criminals and so on, they say, oh, gee,
Speaker 4: this is vindictive prosecution. It can be that he's angry
Speaker 4: about crimes that were committed against the country and that
Speaker 4: they ought to be prosecuted. That doesn't make it an
Speaker 4: illegal vindictive prosecution. So look, this stuff is huge now,
Speaker 4: and I think we've only scratched the surface on accountability
Speaker 4: last forward.
Speaker 3: Greg Jarrett, Yeah, I agree wholeheartedly. And you know, as
Speaker 3: to John Brennan, you know, I mean, he's always had
Speaker 3: the reputation of a bad temper and meaner and a
Speaker 3: junkyard dog. And we know what the fifty one former
Speaker 3: tell people did. They crafted a phony letter to protect Hunter.
Speaker 3: Biden in turn allowed Joe Biden, in a debate with
Speaker 3: President Trump in twenty twenty, to cite them and their
Speaker 3: lives that the laptop was rushing disinformation. The FBI had
Speaker 3: already confirmed its authenticity. It has since been verified by
Speaker 3: anybody and everybody in the mainstream media and elsewhere. So
Speaker 3: you know, Brennan was part of the big lie, and
Speaker 3: that big lie succeeded because I think it was pivotal
Speaker 3: in helping, you know, Joe Biden win the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think so too.
Speaker 2: Let me ask you from a legal standpoint, both of you,
Speaker 2: real quick, I have about fifteen seconds for each of you.
Speaker 2: If somebody starts poking you in your chest like that,
Speaker 2: do you have a right to stop them and defend yourself?
Speaker 3: Yes, yeah, you know if you're if you feel a
Speaker 3: threatened imminently with serious bodily harm or any kind of harm,
Speaker 3: you have the law n tells you to defend yourself. Now,
Speaker 3: I think your instincts are correct. Step back first, that's
Speaker 3: always the smart move. But if it persists, yeah, you
Speaker 3: would have every right to punch the guy in the nose,
Speaker 3: and he deserves.
Speaker 5: It, all right.
Speaker 2: I appreciate both of you. Amazing times. We're living in
Speaker 2: eight hundred and nine point one.
Speaker 1: Sean.
Speaker 2: If you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 6: Alerting you to all the ways the government wants to
Speaker 6: put into your life.
Speaker 2: This is a Sean Hannity show. You know, we have
Speaker 2: a national anthem. I think some states does. Some states
Speaker 2: have their own state anthems. I guess they probably do, right,
Speaker 2: but we just don't really pay that much attention to them.
Speaker 2: I'm assuming they do, Linda, Do they?
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 7: I know there's college anthems.
Speaker 2: By the way, how did your prediction work out that
Speaker 2: I told you was never going to come true yesterday?
Speaker 2: I'm just asking, considering the amount of how did your
Speaker 2: prediction come out?
Speaker 7: It's terrible. I'm crying non stop. It's heartbreaking.
Speaker 8: You've got a radical Islamic mayor in New York City
Speaker 8: twenty years after the Twin Tower attacks. I'm like, great,
Speaker 8: it's going great, Yeah, good day, Okay.
Speaker 1: But you were saying there's no way he's going to win.
Speaker 1: That's the problem.
Speaker 7: I was from the bottom of my heart, from the
Speaker 7: bottom of my heart.
Speaker 1: You didn't want to believe it.
Speaker 7: You were in no no, no, no, no no no no.
Speaker 2: No no, yes yes yes, because you were on this program
Speaker 2: telling me Curtis was going to win.
Speaker 1: And I'm like, no, I was not in denial. All
Speaker 1: I was. I would like a lot of odd people.
Speaker 7: I was in full faith. I believed he would win.
Speaker 2: I didn't see the Look, the bottom line is the
Speaker 2: total between Cuomo and and and Curtis. Mam Donnie still won.
Speaker 2: So you know this, this last minute panic push to
Speaker 2: get Curtis out and people wanting to blame Curtis. No,
Speaker 2: I blame Cuomo. Cuomo should have taken the initiative. You
Speaker 2: had the best idea, to your credit, and he didn't
Speaker 2: do it. But maybe they needed Well, I got.
Speaker 7: To be honest with you. It wasn't Cuomo. It wasn't
Speaker 7: Cuomo that should have done it, because Cuomo should have
Speaker 7: never ran. He didn't win.
Speaker 8: He ran as an independent because he could have believed
Speaker 8: he didn't win. And you know, Charlie Hurt made a
Speaker 8: really good point. Ethan and I were talking about this earlier.
Speaker 8: Everybody's like freaking out, like, oh my god, he won,
Speaker 8: he won. He actually didn't do that great. You know,
Speaker 8: if you look at the Blasio and you look at Adams,
Speaker 8: they won by sixty and sixty five percent. This guy
Speaker 8: only won by the bear margin of fifty percent. Like
Speaker 8: it's not as bad as everything.
Speaker 1: That analysis, I'm sorry, I agree.
Speaker 2: Why is that analysis because none of them had a
Speaker 2: a well, a high profile name like Cuomo against them,
Speaker 2: which is a prominent political name in New York. And
Speaker 2: you cannot deny that that is a massive difference in
Speaker 2: terms of the voting texture and scenario under which Mamdani
Speaker 2: was running.
Speaker 7: I disagree with you.
Speaker 2: When you got people coming in, you disagreed with me
Speaker 2: that you thought Curtis was going to win, and you were.
Speaker 7: I did, and I have my own beliefs as to
Speaker 7: why he did it. We won't go there right now.
Speaker 2: I don't want to hear it because you aren't real
Speaker 2: It's no point in hearing your analysis of this. But
Speaker 2: I do have an idea for New York. They need
Speaker 2: a state anthem. What do you think of this one?
Speaker 9: All right?
Speaker 2: That's the national anthem of the former Soviet in Russia.
Speaker 7: That is a Rocky four song. All right, let's not
Speaker 7: get exsted, come on.
Speaker 2: All right, Or we can go to the national anthem
Speaker 2: of Cuba. Maybe New York City can adopt this one.
Speaker 2: And they've even got a third option, and that is
Speaker 2: the national cartoon.
Speaker 7: I don't know, Oh that was.
Speaker 2: We should have people vote on what the what the
Speaker 2: state anthem of New York City should be. Let's see
Speaker 2: Etha Washington State Shawn Hannedy show Etha, how are you
Speaker 2: glad you called?
Speaker 9: Hi? Sean? Hey listen, Uh my my my all my
Speaker 9: can are from and my dad was born in bay Ridge, Brooklyn.
Speaker 9: Bottom line is that mom, Donnie, your new communist who's.
Speaker 1: In wealth is not my new communist.
Speaker 9: I know, Thank god you move at any rate. Bottom
Speaker 9: line is this is that he wants to raise wages
Speaker 9: to like thirty dollars per hour.
Speaker 1: Okay, bottom line a thirty dollars.
Speaker 2: He wants a thirty dollars minimum wage twice what it.
Speaker 9: Is now, yes, exactly, okay. So the thing is that
Speaker 9: Trump can only do so much in regards to fixing
Speaker 9: the economy because when base wages all around the country,
Speaker 9: including the state of Washington and now New York, when
Speaker 9: they're higher, that means that prices are higher. When you
Speaker 9: go to a taco bell that the minimum wage is
Speaker 9: seventeen dollars per hour, that's going to raise the inflation.
Speaker 9: So Trump can only do so much much to fix
Speaker 9: the wages. Increase of wages increases product prices and I
Speaker 9: don't know how. I don't know how President Trump will
Speaker 9: I love an a door. I don't know how he's
Speaker 9: going to fix that. And not to disparage people, Okay, yeah, great,
Speaker 9: higher wages terrific, But then the products that they're making
Speaker 9: are going to be higher.
Speaker 2: Uh, Listen, there's only so much people are going to
Speaker 2: be willing to pay for a cheeseburger. I like cheeseburgers,
Speaker 2: but I can't eat them very often. Occasionally I have one,
Speaker 2: you know, in a lettuce wrap with onions and you know,
Speaker 2: a little bit of ketchup, and I'm happy, you know,
Speaker 2: especially if it's an In and Out Burger or a
Speaker 2: Crown Burger.
Speaker 9: You know.
Speaker 2: Oh, I like a lot of burgers, but I just
Speaker 2: don't eat them very much because I like to make
Speaker 2: my own healthy food. Of just I'm crazy about it.
Speaker 2: But you know, it's at some point you're going to
Speaker 2: see a loss of jobs. You're going to see a
Speaker 2: loss of business, and you're going to see businesses shut
Speaker 2: down because the margins in the food industry are so minuscule.
Speaker 2: You know, most restaurants don't make their money on the
Speaker 2: food that you're buying. They make it on the booze
Speaker 2: that you're drinking or the wine that you're drinking, just
Speaker 2: in case you didn't know. And I know for my
Speaker 2: many years working in the restaurant business. I mean, you
Speaker 2: can make some money, but there's a lot of waste involved.
Speaker 2: You buy fish, okay, you only had you know, two
Speaker 2: maybe three days you can use that fish, then boom,
Speaker 2: it's going out the window. It's going to be a
Speaker 2: special on Tuesday night, thrown out on Wednesday morning.
Speaker 1: So it's very very hard. Just you know, it's so sad.
Speaker 2: And the people that will be impacted by that are
Speaker 2: going to be young people that take those jobs and
Speaker 2: older people that are retired but like to work. You're
Speaker 2: going to lose those jobs and they probably can use
Speaker 2: the money in many cases. Anyway, ETHA, thank you appreciate it. Beth,
Speaker 2: God bless Texas. Glad you called. How are you hi?
Speaker 9: Thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 10: It's in order to talk to you. My question is
Speaker 10: how is Mendanni even allowed to run? And if you're
Speaker 10: in Congress and you're saying that you're a socialist, how
Speaker 10: in this country, with our constitution are you allowed to
Speaker 10: stay in office? I don't understand, Well.
Speaker 2: You can have any views you want, and if the
Speaker 2: people decide to elect you, I mean, then that's that's
Speaker 2: the way the system works. I mean, we do believe
Speaker 2: in freedom, and you have the freedom to be dumb,
Speaker 2: ignorant and stupid and New York, New York is gonna
Speaker 2: be dumb, ignorant and stupid and vote for this guy,
Speaker 2: and it will end in the predictable way that socialism, Marxism, statism,
Speaker 2: you know, always ends unfulfilled promises and more poverty in
Speaker 2: the end than less, and a loss of freedoms as
Speaker 2: the government takes over every aspect of your life in
Speaker 2: the name of false security.
Speaker 1: That's how it's going to end.
Speaker 2: And whether or not a state like New York wakes up,
Speaker 2: I don't know, you know, I do feel badly. I mean,
Speaker 2: I'm kind of joking around a little bit. I mean,
Speaker 2: what do you want me to do? You want me
Speaker 2: to come on the air like liberal Democrats and Rosie
Speaker 2: Oh you.
Speaker 1: Moving to Ireland again?
Speaker 2: They got any more? I'm not doing that. I've there's
Speaker 2: been plenty of times in the course of my life
Speaker 2: and career when elections don't go my way and you
Speaker 2: just stay in the fight and and you try to,
Speaker 2: you know, stop mitigate the damage that bad politicians with
Speaker 2: bad ideas and bad values are going to instill on you.
Speaker 2: That's my advice to the people that have to stay
Speaker 2: in New York. Now, I can tell you that there
Speaker 2: is going to be a massive exit plan out of
Speaker 2: New York.
Speaker 1: You know, I mentioned an article earlier.
Speaker 2: Today, I mean a whole big article today about you know,
Speaker 2: how real estate and Florida is going to go through
Speaker 2: the roof. I would have preferred, even though it's my
Speaker 2: free state of Florida. Here's the headline, New York City
Speaker 2: election drives one hundred plus million dollars. Florida real estate
Speaker 2: surge is nervous New Yorkers flee. Now there's going to
Speaker 2: be a Mom Donnie real estate effect, and that's gonna
Speaker 2: it's gonna benefit places like Look the god bless Bruce Plakman.
Speaker 2: Nassau County ended up fine last night. They did great.
Speaker 2: Bruce Plakeman's done a great job. Nassau County's read Suffet County.
Speaker 1: Same thing. But for the ret for New.
Speaker 2: York City, the Five boroughs, you're going to get the
Speaker 2: government you deserve. And I feel bad for you, but
Speaker 2: it is what it is. Thank you, Beth, appreciate it.
Speaker 2: Eight nine, Shawn is a number. All right, quick break
Speaker 2: right back to our busy phones told for you. It's
Speaker 2: eight hundred ninety four one, Shawn. If you want to
Speaker 2: be a part of the program, as we continue.
Speaker 6: The final hour of the Sean Hannity Show is up next.
Speaker 6: Hang on for Sean's conservative solutions.
Speaker 2: Back to our busy phones. Eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean.
Speaker 2: If you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 2: Wes and Tennessee, Wes, You're on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 5: Hi, Hey, good afternoon, Sean. So I wanted to talk
Speaker 5: about why I think socialism and communism principles actually have
Speaker 5: any traction. To begin with, I had the blessing slash
Speaker 5: misfortune of growing up in the nineties. You know, when
Speaker 5: parents told you, well, you can be anything you want
Speaker 5: and you'll succeed. You can do anything you want and
Speaker 5: you'll succeed. Go to college, you'll succeed. I was fortunate
Speaker 5: that I had my grandfather who was the voice of reason.
Speaker 5: I remember being a small kid listening to Hannity and
Speaker 5: Holmes and here I am, you know, thirty years later,
Speaker 5: almost and essentially people grew up with this mentality that
Speaker 5: just because you're an American, you didn't have to face adversity.
Speaker 5: Things didn't have to be difficult. But I tell my
Speaker 5: kids that adversity builds character, it builds resiliency. And people
Speaker 5: go out in the world and they face adversity for
Speaker 5: the first time and they're like, well, I should be successful.
Speaker 5: So they expect the system to make them successful in
Speaker 5: that regard. Does that make sense?
Speaker 1: Listen, let me tell you something. There's nobody in this life.
Speaker 2: I don't care if you grow up rich, you grow
Speaker 2: up poor, you grow up middle class, you grow up
Speaker 2: somewhere in between. Is nobody in life that escapes the
Speaker 2: ups and downs, the trials, the tribulations that life presents
Speaker 2: all of us. It is a It just doesn't happen
Speaker 2: that way. It's not designed to work that way. And
Speaker 2: what we you know, if we if we stand back
Speaker 2: and we I put a religious perspective on it, and
Speaker 2: I think that is God's plan to strengthen us. As
Speaker 2: a matter of fact, the Bible says God will test
Speaker 2: us and strengthen us and fortify us and make and
Speaker 2: and basically it's all designed for us. To come to
Speaker 2: a recognition and realization that we're nothing without Him, and
Speaker 2: by calling out to him, you know, therein lives human salvation.
Speaker 2: You know, there's a misperception I believe of Christianity, and
Speaker 2: you know the left and ignorant people you know, will say,
Speaker 2: you know, Christians are self righteous and pompus and pious,
Speaker 2: et cetera. Actually it's a it's the complete opposite. If
Speaker 2: if you if to be a Christian, to me is
Speaker 2: have a desire in your heart to want to be better,
Speaker 2: with the recognition that you're not good, with a recognition
Speaker 2: that you have failed, with the recognition that you want help,
Speaker 2: with a recognition that you you want to connect with
Speaker 2: that which puts you on this earth, your God, your creator,
Speaker 2: endowed by our Creator, and by reaching inward and upward,
Speaker 2: that you are calling out to God for salvation. The
Speaker 2: word repentance is to change one's heart, and you know
Speaker 2: to do that you seek forgiveness. You seek, you know,
Speaker 2: his blessing and support to live care free in your
Speaker 2: life and find the purpose for which you have created. Anyway,
Speaker 2: I appreciate the call, my friend, thank you. Eight hundred
Speaker 2: and ninety four one Sean. If you want to be
Speaker 2: a part of the program.