Speaker 1: Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
Speaker 2: All right, news round up and information overload. Our toll
Speaker 2: free our number is eight hundred and nine point one Sean.
Speaker 2: If you want to be a part of the program. Well,
Speaker 2: the left wing Democrats they can't help themselves. I guess
Speaker 2: they really can, but they choose not to. But they
Speaker 2: are who they are, and I don't think they're going
Speaker 2: to change too much. And anyway, the issue of trans
Speaker 2: athletes or men playing women's sports, they are now the
Speaker 2: champions of And if you remember, President Trump got into
Speaker 2: a little bit of a confrontation with the with the
Speaker 2: governor of Maine, Governor Mills, over this issue. And here's
Speaker 2: how that went down.
Speaker 3: Is the main here the governor of Man.
Speaker 4: Are you not going to comply with it? Well, we
Speaker 4: are the federal law. Well you better do it. You
Speaker 4: better do it because you're not going to get any
Speaker 4: federal funding at all if you don't. And by the way,
Speaker 4: your population, even though it's a liberal orthough I did
Speaker 4: very well there. Your population doesn't want men playing in
Speaker 4: women's sports. So you better comply because otherwise you're not
Speaker 4: getting any federal funding.
Speaker 3: Every state. Good, I'll see you, and could I look
Speaker 3: forward to that that should be a really easy one
Speaker 3: and enjoy your life after governor, because I don't think
Speaker 3: you'll be an elected politics ouch.
Speaker 2: And then of course Galvin Newsom talks to Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 2: I'm not for men playing women's sports. But we've got
Speaker 2: the tape, and here's what he had said at the time.
Speaker 5: Turns out in twenty fourteen, here's before I was governor.
Speaker 5: There was a law established that established the legal principles
Speaker 5: that allow the allowed trans athletes and women's sports. But
Speaker 5: the issue of fairness is completely It is an issue
Speaker 5: of fairness, and I think Democrats have last thank you
Speaker 5: for what you did on civil rights for students in
Speaker 5: our schools, transgender rights in this state.
Speaker 2: Oh, of course, you know, Gaveners flips and flops and
Speaker 2: flails because he wants to live at sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue.
Speaker 2: Now you might remember the case. A Laurel Libby, state
Speaker 2: legislator from Maine won her case, by the way, and
Speaker 2: her role of main politics for the help of the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court ruling in her favor. But she's still struggling
Speaker 2: to do her job for her constituents because some people
Speaker 2: in Maine's legislature do not want to hear from her,
Speaker 2: and she's also had plenty to say about why the
Speaker 2: Democrats cannot connect with today's generation. But anyway, we appreciate
Speaker 2: you being with us, Laurel Libby. Thank you, And you
Speaker 2: know you decided to stand up and protect girls sports
Speaker 2: and you are ostracized, and I guess remain ostracized. And
Speaker 2: you reminded your state what title mine was all about
Speaker 2: in the first place, and they were responded by rejecting
Speaker 2: your right to voice your opinion. I mean, this is
Speaker 2: this is the modern day left today.
Speaker 6: That is the modern day left. Thankfully, the Supreme Court
Speaker 6: has ruled that the justaure has to count my vote
Speaker 6: now while the case is pending, and so I am
Speaker 6: still not able to speak in the main House, but
Speaker 6: I am allowed to vote on behalf of my constituents
Speaker 6: at this point, I mean.
Speaker 2: I just can't believe what is the rationale for not
Speaker 2: letting you speak?
Speaker 6: Well, I was centered three months ago and their rationale
Speaker 6: was that I shared a picture of a minor. Now,
Speaker 6: of course, this was a picture that had been shared
Speaker 6: publicly already, and if I had shared the post in
Speaker 6: celebration of a biological male winning a state championship in
Speaker 6: the female category, then that post would have been celebrated
Speaker 6: as well. But the fact is that it highlighted a
Speaker 6: policy that's not popular with manors, and so in political retaliation,
Speaker 6: I was censured and my ability to vote and speak
Speaker 6: on the floor on behalf of my constituents was taken.
Speaker 2: So we have two issues that have come out today.
Speaker 2: Abe Hernandez, a male high school athlete identifying as a female,
Speaker 2: continues to make waves in the track field world. Hernande
Speaker 2: is the name you may be familiar with. Took first
Speaker 2: place in both the long jump and triple jump at
Speaker 2: the California Interscholastic Federation Southern Section Master's Meet over the weekend,
Speaker 2: and by doing so, Hernandez qualified for both events for
Speaker 2: next weekend state championships. And anyways, this individuals I guess
Speaker 2: a junior, and those latest accomplishments could be enough to
Speaker 2: start Nettingham College scholarship offers in women's track and field,
Speaker 2: made possible by the fact that the biological male recently
Speaker 2: amended his birth certificate to reflect his change to the
Speaker 2: poultry sum of twenty three dollars and anyway, an organization
Speaker 2: also that works to protect fairness, safety, and equal opportunity
Speaker 2: for women in girls' sports, issuing various officials in the
Speaker 2: state of Minnesota for allowing poise to compete against girls
Speaker 2: in sporting events there, and the Alliance Defending Freedom Female
Speaker 2: Athletes United you know names the Attorney General Keith Ellison
Speaker 2: and others. And the official policy of Minnesota High State
Speaker 2: High School League, which governs high school athletics in the state,
Speaker 2: is to allow students to compete based on their stated
Speaker 2: gender identity without regards to sex. So this obviously is
Speaker 2: still continuing and Democrats continue to champion it. What's your
Speaker 2: reaction to that.
Speaker 6: Yes, absolutely, completely unfair and discriminates against our young women
Speaker 6: who have worked so hard for years trying to excel
Speaker 6: in their different fields and to have a biological male
Speaker 6: boy swoop in and take their place, because that's exactly
Speaker 6: what is happening. They're being pushed aside so that a
Speaker 6: boy can can swoop in and take their podiums, take
Speaker 6: their medals, take their scholarships. It is completely unfair and
Speaker 6: we've heard that from Gavin Newsom. Unfortunately he's not backed
Speaker 6: that up with any action in support of women and girls.
Speaker 6: But that's we need to see state by state, And
Speaker 6: thankfully we are seeing individual school districts step up, whether
Speaker 6: we're talking about Maine or Washington or other states and
Speaker 6: declare that they're going to go by Title nine rather
Speaker 6: than allowing this woke policy to persist. But folks need
Speaker 6: to stand up and say no more.
Speaker 2: Well, I appreciate your winning the Supreme Court. The idea
Speaker 2: that you cannot speak on behalf of your constituents and
Speaker 2: they're silencing you is beyond troubling to me? Is it
Speaker 2: not anybody in that chamber that you work in and
Speaker 2: main willing to stand up for you and stand with
Speaker 2: you and support your right to speak?
Speaker 6: You know, I wish that there were. I just got
Speaker 6: my right to speak back last Thursday, and just today
Speaker 6: him having the right to vote on specific bills challenged
Speaker 6: by even my own party when Republicans wouldn't support a
Speaker 6: roll call on a bill that I requested today. So
Speaker 6: now ongoing challenges from both the left and the right
Speaker 6: in the main House.
Speaker 2: Chamber, And what is the reaction among your constituents in
Speaker 2: this case?
Speaker 6: Now, my constituents are thankful as the am I that
Speaker 6: I am able to vote on their behalf. It's been
Speaker 6: a long three months they have not had representation. They've
Speaker 6: been completely disenfranchised by the Democrat majority issuing this censure
Speaker 6: and declaring that I couldn't speak or vote on their behalf.
Speaker 6: But they're also eager for me to have my voice
Speaker 6: back and to be able to speak on their behalf.
Speaker 6: In our case is pending on June fifth, we'll have
Speaker 6: a hearing before the First Circuit Court of Appeals, and
Speaker 6: I'm hopeful that they'll uphold the Constitution in my constituents'
Speaker 6: right to representation and my right to the First Amendment
Speaker 6: right to free speech, and that this will be struck
Speaker 6: down well.
Speaker 2: This is also unprecedented in as much as you have
Speaker 2: all four active federal judges in Maine, all four of
Speaker 2: them recuse themselves from hearing your lawsuit against the main
Speaker 2: House speaker. Why did they accuse themselves.
Speaker 6: The mother of the biological mail the boy that won
Speaker 6: the state championship here in Maine that I posted about.
Speaker 6: That young man's mother apparently works for the court, and
Speaker 6: so the judges recused themselves because of that close relationship
Speaker 6: with that employee. And my case was moved to Rhode
Speaker 6: Island where it was heard, and then when we lost there,
Speaker 6: we've moved again to the First Circuit Court of Appeals
Speaker 6: and are looking forward to having our day in court
Speaker 6: on June fifth.
Speaker 2: It really is unbelievable. What did you make of this
Speaker 2: news that came out over the weekend, some what, twenty
Speaker 2: million dollars a plan to study the syntax of young
Speaker 2: men to win their votes over. I mean, what was
Speaker 2: your reaction to that? I mean it made me laugh.
Speaker 2: I mean I chuckled to myself with the idea that
Speaker 2: somehow Tim Walls was chosen as the as the white
Speaker 2: guy to you know, be able to talk pro talk
Speaker 2: with people is laughable to me. But I mean, that's
Speaker 2: that's what happened. But Democrats wrote, you know, twenty million
Speaker 2: dollars plot to win over young male voters doesn't sound
Speaker 2: very authentic to me.
Speaker 6: No, it certainly does not sound very authentic. And if
Speaker 6: you're in a position where you have to buy the
Speaker 6: next generations vote, you may want to consider that perhaps
Speaker 6: the policies that you're advocating for economic to social policies
Speaker 6: and everything in between, perhaps you should reconsider what you
Speaker 6: stand for. If the next generation is saying we don't
Speaker 6: want that rather than trying to buy their vote.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the plan was called SAM, which is short for
Speaker 2: Speaking with American Men, a strategic plan and promised investment
Speaker 2: to study the syntax, language, and content that gains attention
Speaker 2: and and virality in these spaces. And the plan recommends
Speaker 2: buying advertisements and video games and noted above all, we
Speaker 2: must shift from a moralizing tone. I mean, old, let
Speaker 2: me hi, bro, how are you? What's going on? Dude?
Speaker 2: What's up?
Speaker 7: Man?
Speaker 2: How are you? What's happening with you? I mean, we
Speaker 2: have to have a lesson in how to be a person.
Speaker 6: You know, a I can go a long way, but
Speaker 6: I don't think it can help shift the failed Democrat
Speaker 6: policies to win over the next generation, and certainly not
Speaker 6: the folks who are playing video games by bringing in
Speaker 6: any kind of fake you know, they're looking for authenticity.
Speaker 6: The next generation is looking for authenticity and they can
Speaker 6: tell authenticity from not and that's what's shifting folks away
Speaker 6: from the Democrat party. Buying advertisements in video games is
Speaker 6: not going to get them anywhere.
Speaker 2: I don't think so.
Speaker 8: Well.
Speaker 2: We appreciate your fight. Sorry, you have to live through this,
Speaker 2: and I am very grateful to hear that your constituents
Speaker 2: support you, because we need more people like you that
Speaker 2: are willing to get in the fight and engage in
Speaker 2: the fight even though you're treated so unfairly. And I
Speaker 2: hope the courts rightly reverse this travesty, this constitutional travesty
Speaker 2: in this case. And we appreciate you coming on and
Speaker 2: we wish you the best.
Speaker 1: Of look, thank you so much.
Speaker 7: All right, Laurel.
Speaker 2: Libby eight hundred and nine to four one, Shawn is
Speaker 2: a number if you want to be a part of
Speaker 2: the program. We have somebody call themselves coach from the
Speaker 2: great state of Texas. God bless Texas. What's up, coach?
Speaker 2: How are you you a coach? Yes, sir, what do
Speaker 2: you coach? What do you coach?
Speaker 1: Well? I coached It's a little bit of football, basketball.
Speaker 1: I coached both my daughters in sports. I played sports forever.
Speaker 1: I'm luckily I'm retired now because if I was in
Speaker 1: the school district right now, I would be risking my
Speaker 1: career because I'm first of all, I'm pissed off number one.
Speaker 1: And you have to question last segment, how much is enough?
Speaker 1: I don't know if that was rhetorical, but I haven't
Speaker 1: answer how much is enough. I might do three things
Speaker 1: that are gonna have to happen to kill This has
Speaker 1: nothing to do with legislation or funding one they needed.
Speaker 1: Somebody has to step up and out absurd, be absurd,
Speaker 1: bringing Mike Tyson in women's box and bring me Labron
Speaker 1: James and basketball, give me a mail tennis player and girl,
Speaker 1: and that will end it. That's one way. Number two. Sadly,
Speaker 1: somebody's probably gonna have to die, and I hope it
Speaker 1: doesn't go that way, but we're getting closer.
Speaker 2: And close, God, I hope not. I mean, you have
Speaker 2: the one volleyball player that was pretty severely injured, and
Speaker 2: it's just about physicality. And I think Caitlyn Jeni said
Speaker 2: it best when she said, I don't care what your
Speaker 2: hormone levels are when you're eighteen, nineteen twenty, what were
Speaker 2: your hormone levels at puberty? And then you have this
Speaker 2: whole concept of puberty blockers. Then you have another concept
Speaker 2: where where where kids can literally get this type of
Speaker 2: treatment without parental consent, which is a major problem for
Speaker 2: me because as a parent, you're not a potted plant,
Speaker 2: and I believe in parental rights. Well, I mean, it's
Speaker 2: a multifaceted.
Speaker 1: Issue, but it's not to me. It's not about the biology.
Speaker 1: If you look at any game or any sport that's
Speaker 1: ever been played or ever will be played, it's got
Speaker 1: to be fun. It's got to be fair. There's got
Speaker 1: to be free of danger. Of three, yes, is what
Speaker 1: I call it. So the the man playing in the
Speaker 1: women's sport, let's just call it what it is. It
Speaker 1: removes all three. It's no fun, it's no fair, and
Speaker 1: now we're in danger. It's gonna take a serious injury
Speaker 1: or death sadly to make this stop.
Speaker 2: I hope it doesn't come to that, coach, I really do.
Speaker 2: I'd hate to see that happen. And it's preventable and
Speaker 2: it's just. But what is amazing to me is, in
Speaker 2: spite of public opinion so strongly against this, the Democrats
Speaker 2: are clinging to this as their issue, just like they
Speaker 2: cling to, you know, defending the rights of illegals over
Speaker 2: the safety of an Americans, like they cling to the
Speaker 2: notion that it is a constitutional crisis to cut out waste,
Speaker 2: fraud and abuse in government spending. It's like they could
Speaker 2: They wouldn't even stand for mothers that lost their children.
Speaker 2: This is a party that has really really gone astray
Speaker 2: and they've lost, you know, any moral compass or moral
Speaker 2: clarity or common sense in their lives. Maybe it's a
Speaker 2: good thing if you don't want them to win, but
Speaker 2: you know what, they're not going to give up fighting.
Speaker 2: They're not They're going to try and take your stove,
Speaker 2: take your air conditioner, take your refrigerator, you know, put
Speaker 2: a car in your driveway that you don't want, and
Speaker 2: not give you freedom, and then and promise a cradle
Speaker 2: to grave, womb to tomb society that will never materialize. Anyway,
Speaker 2: my friend, eight hundred nine four one Shawn is our number.
Speaker 2: If you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 2: All right, quick break right back. We'll get to your calls.
Speaker 2: Eight hundred ninety four one Shawn as we continue today. Anyway,
Speaker 2: eight hundred and nine four one Shawn, if you want
Speaker 2: to be a part of the program. I mean, it
Speaker 2: is clear the left is not going to change. I
Speaker 2: mentioned earlier. They want to want you to climate proof
Speaker 2: your Memorial Day and electric grills are a climate friendly
Speaker 2: option of fossil is nothing cleaner burning than natural gas,
Speaker 2: nothing cleaner. It makes zero sense. They don't care. But
Speaker 2: that's them, that's the left today. You know, Mike Rose
Speaker 2: said something that was very, very interesting and I like
Speaker 2: him a lot. He did the Dirty Job series. He
Speaker 2: also is on my favorite show, Deadliest Catch. I love
Speaker 2: that show, just loved that show. You know, I donated
Speaker 2: the money. He never he still has never sent me
Speaker 2: my poster autographed by the captains of that show. Can
Speaker 2: you believe that? What's up with Mike? Anyway? He's highlighting
Speaker 2: how there is a lack of consequences that could be
Speaker 2: leading to a declining work ethic and with all the
Speaker 2: new high paying career jobs that will be coming online
Speaker 2: in the next four years, there's going to be a
Speaker 2: great need for people that have a good work ethic. Anyway,
Speaker 2: so he went on to point out that a lot
Speaker 2: of these younger kids, and you know, they grew up
Speaker 2: in a world without deadlines and consequences, and that it's
Speaker 2: fueling a potential crisis. And over the last few years,
Speaker 2: many people are questioning the work ethic of former members
Speaker 2: of gen Z. Those are people born between ninety seven
Speaker 2: and twenty twelve and have expressed concern over how this
Speaker 2: impacts young people entering the workforce. And anyway, he went
Speaker 2: on to explain he was on with Martha McCallum on
Speaker 2: Fox that one of the overriding factors contributing to the
Speaker 2: decline in work ethic in younger generations is they face
Speaker 2: more lenient deadlines and less consequences, and he said that
Speaker 2: expectations and standards of workers can become fungible quickly. He's
Speaker 2: not wrong. I've noticed this in my own life. You know,
Speaker 2: if you live your life on a high wire with
Speaker 2: the safety net fifteen feet below you all the time,
Speaker 2: there's no consequence for falling, and on to explain that
Speaker 2: the work ethic is gone. I can tell you one
Speaker 2: of the best things that ever happened in my life
Speaker 2: is I worked, and I work from you know, the
Speaker 2: at age eight with a with a you know, doing
Speaker 2: paper routes, age twelve, working Friday, Saturday, Sunday night, washing
Speaker 2: dishes and a busy restaurant. And it's like we've got
Speaker 2: to now go. But we got to get our kids back,
Speaker 2: and we got to teach them a work ethic. And
Speaker 2: it's like schools today, they just pass you, whether you're
Speaker 2: qualified to pass or not. Pretty unbelievable. Anyway, eight hundred
Speaker 2: and nine one, Shawn is our number. You want to
Speaker 2: be a part of the program. Let's say, how to
Speaker 2: Randy and Washington State. Randy, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 6: Hey?
Speaker 7: I wonder to talk about that great, big, beautiful bill.
Speaker 1: I don't understand.
Speaker 7: If we have the House and a swim majority in
Speaker 7: the Senate, why are we even listening to these Democrats?
Speaker 7: They obviously just want to spend their money needlessly and waitefully.
Speaker 7: And if we have the majority, why don't we just
Speaker 7: write it down bill the way it's supposed to be written,
Speaker 7: cutting out all the pork, and fight it out in
Speaker 7: the Senate. And honestly, we don't even really have the
Speaker 7: Senate because we don't have enough votes to pass the bill.
Speaker 2: We do through the reconciliation process. And frankly, you can
Speaker 2: thank the chairman of the Budget Committee in this case
Speaker 2: that happens to be Lindsey Graham. Now Ron Johnson, Ram
Speaker 2: Paul and some others are saying they don't think the
Speaker 2: cuts go far enough. I'm fine with them adding more
Speaker 2: cuts to it, I really am. I have no problem
Speaker 2: with that at all. The Trump tarrifs, by the way,
Speaker 2: have foreign car company scrambling to open factories. In New York,
Speaker 2: consumer confidence jumped by double digits in May. That number
Speaker 2: just came out. The stock marker went through the roof today.
Speaker 2: And you know, but I'll give you an example. And
Speaker 2: you know, doctor Oz was on this program last week
Speaker 2: that we're all footing the bill fourteen billion dollars, you know,
Speaker 2: from Medicaid fraud while eligible patients struggle for care. There's
Speaker 2: one point four million people that are illegal that are
Speaker 2: getting Medicaid benefits. Now, there was a New York Post
Speaker 2: article today and you're right, Yes, Republicans need to cut
Speaker 2: federal spending and soaring Medicaid outlays because it's headed towards insolvency,
Speaker 2: you know. And you could see that the outlays have
Speaker 2: skyrocketed these last twenty years, and the Fed spend one
Speaker 2: hundred and sixty billion in fiscal year twenty three and
Speaker 2: over three and a half times as much state level spending. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: that rose from one hundred and eight to two hundred
Speaker 2: and eighty billion dollars. But what's basically gone on is
Speaker 2: Democrats steadily pushing towards universal health care coverage at taxpayer,
Speaker 2: taxpayer expense. By doing it this way. In the process,
Speaker 2: Medicaid's grown from covering the poor and covering the near
Speaker 2: poor and even the not really poor at all. In
Speaker 2: the process, sas displacing private insurance more than it's actually
Speaker 2: expanding the share of the population that is covered. Any
Speaker 2: illegal immigrants as well as legal ones who aren't supposed
Speaker 2: to become, you know, beyond the public dole or on
Speaker 2: the public dole, and they're all benefiting from this. That's
Speaker 2: not how this was designed. That's why it's headed towards insolvency,
Speaker 2: just like Social Security is headed towards insolvency, and it's
Speaker 2: a big problem. If the Senate can improve it and
Speaker 2: make it more conservative and cut back more money, I'm
Speaker 2: all in favor of it, and I think probably Republican
Speaker 2: House members will support that too. The way this is
Speaker 2: going to work is the House passed it by you know,
Speaker 2: a slim margin, and the Senate will pass their version
Speaker 2: of it, working with the Senate parliamentarian to make sure
Speaker 2: it meets the criteria for reconciliation, and then they'll go
Speaker 2: into conference between the two houses. They'll come up with
Speaker 2: a compromise bill. Hopefully it cut more because I think
Speaker 2: the more the better. I think it's better for the economy.
Speaker 2: We can't keep robbing from our kids. And then they'll
Speaker 2: vote again in the House, so again in the Senate,
Speaker 2: and then hopefully the President signs the bill. As of now,
Speaker 2: I don't see problems. I think that eventually will get there.
Speaker 2: But I think it's a heavy lift, and I think
Speaker 2: the more that they cut the better.
Speaker 7: Well, and I don't agree with them, you know, like
Speaker 7: putting Social Security on the chopping block.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm sixty eight.
Speaker 7: I don't make enough on my Social Security to even
Speaker 7: qualify to rent an apartment. And that's a you know,
Speaker 7: cheap apartment. You have to have three times amount of
Speaker 7: monthly income to qualify to rent an apartment. And I
Speaker 7: paid my dues and I'm still paying. I'm back to
Speaker 7: work and I'm paying every paycheck into Social Security and
Speaker 7: I already paid. I don't think that's just anyway. I
Speaker 7: know there's a lot of injustice, and I know Trump's
Speaker 7: doing a fantastic job. I'm really impressed, and I hope
Speaker 7: that they addressed the Social Security issue because every year
Speaker 7: these politicians vote themselves are raised. Well, we in social
Speaker 7: Security ought to get the same percentage of a race.
Speaker 7: We don't we get two point five percent. Woo. That
Speaker 7: doesn't even keep up with the times. So anyway, that's
Speaker 7: all I had to say, Sean, thanks for taking my call.
Speaker 2: You bet, Randy, appreciate it. Man, Glad you called Jimmy
Speaker 2: New York Next Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 9: Hi, I was just calling about the blatant hypocrisy and
Speaker 9: the lack of ethics that has become the Democratic Party.
Speaker 9: The fact that they went out of the way to
Speaker 9: throw everything and the kitchens think at Trump to try
Speaker 9: to get them tossed, and they created the twenty fifth
Speaker 9: Amendment just to go after his mental and cognitive abilities.
Speaker 9: Yet the mainstream media and the party had such a
Speaker 9: concerted effort that I'm playing key parts and covering up
Speaker 9: Biden's diminishing ability. Now they're trying to spin around that
Speaker 9: they're pointing out Jake Tapper putting out his book. They
Speaker 9: have no shame. They're trying to take the part of
Speaker 9: pointing out this, and now they're pointing out the importance
Speaker 9: of going after Trump's declining ability again, like people aren't
Speaker 9: picking up on their games. They're playing with their classic
Speaker 9: deflection tactics.
Speaker 2: Listen. It was, as we pointed out on this radio
Speaker 2: show and on TV, we were pointing out as cognitive
Speaker 2: decline in Frank over the summer and fall of twenty nineteen,
Speaker 2: and it was obvious to us then he was not
Speaker 2: the same guy that he was as vice president, not
Speaker 2: the same guy he was as president. So the idea
Speaker 2: that they didn't know just holds no water with me.
Speaker 2: We were showing the American people in real time. Somebody
Speaker 2: on one of these networks said they weren't showing it,
Speaker 2: they weren't highlighting it, they weren't focusing on it. They
Speaker 2: were covering it up, and they didn't make it a
Speaker 2: big issue. Had they done so, Joe Biden probably would
Speaker 2: have been removed with the twenty fifth Amendment. And the
Speaker 2: people around him that were responsible for this, what did
Speaker 2: they know? When did they know it? That needs to
Speaker 2: be a full fledged investigation because that is a real
Speaker 2: constitutional crisis if you don't know, if the president doesn't
Speaker 2: have control of his faculties. Anyway, appreciate the call, Jimmy,
Speaker 2: Glad you're with us. Dave Illinois. Next Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 8: Hi, Hello, an honor to speak to you, mister Hannity
Speaker 8: an honor.
Speaker 2: The honor is all mine, Sorr, glad you checked it.
Speaker 2: What's going on.
Speaker 8: Well living here in the fine communist state of Illinois.
Speaker 8: But anyway, I was diagnosed. I got my diagnosis the
Speaker 8: exact same day that our former president did on prostate cancer.
Speaker 8: I'm sixty two years old, had been monitoring it for
Speaker 8: for five years, saw a spike, we did an MRI.
Speaker 8: MRI led to a biopsy. Biopsy led to the diagnosis.
Speaker 8: It is not that hard to, you know, be diagnosed
Speaker 8: with prostate cancer again, if they're doing just a simple
Speaker 8: blood test, literally a ten minute test two times a year,
Speaker 8: pointed them to where I've been diagnosed with.
Speaker 7: Prostate cancer.
Speaker 2: Now do I like to now a what what stage
Speaker 2: just cancer do you have? Do you know?
Speaker 8: Well, the on the Gleason scale, I've gotten real smart
Speaker 8: on this. I'm a seven.
Speaker 2: It's a pretty high score. That's not that's not that,
Speaker 2: that's not something you can ignore.
Speaker 8: No, No, they said, you know, I could probably go
Speaker 8: this summer without dealing with it. I could probably push
Speaker 8: it up to a year without really going after it.
Speaker 8: But no more than that. And it's like, no, I'm
Speaker 8: I'm gonnae on top of this. So I have a
Speaker 8: twenty three treatment radiation followed by they will insert radioactive
Speaker 8: seeds into me, and the week after fourth of July,
Speaker 8: I'm done.
Speaker 2: Let me tell you something. I know Rudy Giuliani who
Speaker 2: was public about it. Ali North, he was public about it.
Speaker 2: They used the radiological seeds like you were using, and
Speaker 2: they had great results. I know people that used other
Speaker 2: treatments that have had great results. I applaud you for
Speaker 2: jumping on it early, not waiting that year, because you
Speaker 2: run the risk. The longer you wait, the greater of
Speaker 2: the odds it can spread beyond the prostate. But most
Speaker 2: people don't know. Most men will die with prostate cancer,
Speaker 2: but not from prostate cancer. And it's very very common.
Speaker 2: Yours got, you know, aggressive fast, but you stayed on
Speaker 2: top of it. And I'm going to tell you how
Speaker 2: this is likely going to end for you. I'd say
Speaker 2: the very very high You're going to be fine and
Speaker 2: you're not going to die of prostate cancer. And the
Speaker 2: fact that he didn't have a simple PSA test that
Speaker 2: you rightly point out a blood test is unconscionable to me.
Speaker 2: It's unfathomable to me. And having been around President Trump
Speaker 2: and been with him in the Middle East. I saw
Speaker 2: upfront and close and personal, the close proximity. At all times.
Speaker 2: Doctors are with the president. Anytime you see a presidential
Speaker 2: motor cave, there is an emergency vehicle with medical doctors
Speaker 2: prepared to do surgery on the president at the ready.
Speaker 2: It's with him at all times. He has access to
Speaker 2: a doctor twenty four to seven and as it should
Speaker 2: be for any president, Democrat or Republican. Anyway, I'm glad
Speaker 2: you're going to be through this by the fourth of July.
Speaker 2: I think that's awesome. You're being proactive. I could not
Speaker 2: encourage any more to do so, and I think you
Speaker 2: made the right call. I really do well.
Speaker 8: I think that every guy needs to have a check
Speaker 8: because again, it is not a huge ordeal.
Speaker 2: God bless you in your treatment. Keep us up to speed.
Speaker 2: Let us know you're okay, right well do thanks sir?
Speaker 2: Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn, you want to be
Speaker 2: a part of the program. All right, that's gonna wrap
Speaker 2: things up for today. Hannity Tonight, nine Eastern on the
Speaker 2: Fox News Channel, Caroline Levitt Wrihine's previous Joe Conshaw on
Speaker 2: a corrupt media, Senator Mark Wayne Mullen, Alan Dershwoodz, Greg Jarrett,
Speaker 2: and also we will check in with Clay Travis. Say
Speaker 2: you DVR tonight Hannity nine Eastern on Fox. We'll see
Speaker 2: you tonight back here tomorrow. Thank you for making this
Speaker 2: show possible.