WEBVTT - Surveillance: A Fed Minutes Preview With Vincent Reinhart

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Joining Us.

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Vincent Reinhart Standish Melon economist and investment strategist. Good morning

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to you, Vince. Is that how you see this plank

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>out a short term win? Good more and Jonathan uh So, Look,

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that we have to accept that the government's

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be shut down for a while, that it

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>was pretty clearly a distinct standoff we saw yesterday, and

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that the Federal Reserve is on the sidelines for a bit.

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>The minutes will be an interesting this afternoon, though. What

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>are you looking for from the minutes? To South Benoon.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>One thing you gotta remember is that the minutes are

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be an accurate depiction of what was discussed

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>at the f MC meeting, But a lot of stuff

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is discussed at the FMC meeting. The transcript runs something

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>like a d and twenty pages, and they just still

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>look down to eleven or twelve pages in those minutes. Um. Therefore,

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>there's some selectivity in the week or two after the

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>meeting to nudge the boat in a in a better direction.

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Chair Pal came off a little tone death in the

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in the press conference. They'll try to fix it in

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the minute. So you'll seem more responsive to financial conditions.

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>You'll see him more worried about the world and emphasizing

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the range of views on appropriate monetary policy be a

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>bigger tent. In an interview in The Wall Street Journal today,

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Jim Blad saying we're bordering on coming too far on

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.559
<v Speaker 1>rates and possibly tipping the economy into recession. If rights

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on left did vince, what do you think of that?

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>The idea that we're one right hunk away from a

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>policy mistake at a federal reserve. So the first thing

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say is I believe in market economies. I

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're so fragile that if you get a

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>quarter point wrong one way or the other, you are

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>headed to the abyss. Uh. And so I hope that

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>you know the world works better than that. Second, remember

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that president Board has had of you consistently over the

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>over the last five years or so. Uh that uh,

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not possible to predict where rates are going, and

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>so your best estimate of where the neutral rate is

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is where it is right now. And so he could

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>have repeated the concern uh he expressed in the in

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the journal, uh, this morning, just about any time over

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the last several years. So I'm not sure that's news,

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Vince Reynard. In the minutes, there's these key words some

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>several several members several of this, John, it's like you

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and me, some several, Vince Reynard. How is several different

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>with Chairman Powell versus several with yelling bernankey in back

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to your time with Chairman Greenspan. I mean, is there

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>an active discussion that Chairman Powell listens to or is

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>he alone as Greenspan was alone. So I would say

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the first thing the minutes drafters, and remember I signed

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the minutes for six or seven years. Uh tried he

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>used to quill John. It was with a quill can,

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>candle light and a quill um. Uh, try to be

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>consistent across time. And so I probably everybody still has

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that dog eared cheat sheet on parchment paper. I would

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>say that gives the translation of some and several and

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple and a few, So I don't think that

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not a part of the minute. Question is how

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>consultative is chair Pal relative to other of his predecessors.

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>My bed is is pretty consultative. He comes from a background, uh,

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, from a bush bush triggery from the private sector,

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>some think tank um, in which you get along by

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>by by getting along. And he uh often said hey,

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an economist. That means he listens to economists.

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So I would suspect that, um, he does talk a lot.

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the concern you should have is he talks

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot to people who are just like him. That

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>he had a material influence admiring the last eight bank presidents.

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>The board appointments are relatively you know, uh similar to his,

0:04:56.320 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to his they're basically rebuilding the bush triggery um, and

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>so there's a question how much diversity of opinion there

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>is that the you know, in FMC discussions, that's always

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a risk. Well, then being able to listen to the

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>committee is important. Being able to present all the committee

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>things coherently and consistently is something altogether different, and I

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>see a chairman that's really struggling to do that. We

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>seem to have flip from one view to another in

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the emphasis every time he speaks seems to change. Do

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you think the chairman's struggling in the early part of

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 1>his tenure events? So, I think the chairman's uh issue

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and he is that he has an ambition to explain

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy as as clearly as possible. His audience is

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>not Bloomberg or the Wall Street Journal, It's the readership

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>of USA today. And the problem is when you try

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to simplify the message to a few key points, you're

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>going to leave some stuff out, and global financial markets

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>will very quickly remind you what you left out. And

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>so I don't uh. So, I think there is an

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>issue of how much financial market experience there is at

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the top of the house across you know, when you

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>think about the leadership of the said and I think

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>there's also a sincere desire to keep it simple. But

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>keeping it simple may mean you kept it too simple.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 1>How important is January thirty? I mean it's changed, I

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>know in six, eight weeks, etcetera. But Vince, right now

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we're in ten twelve days away from January thirty. Whatever

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the math is, it's most more than that fifteen days

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But but it's right now, how important is

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>this January meeting become? So it's important in a couple

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of ways. One is it's how will we handle a

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>press conference? Uh, the now that he's will be doing

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>eight of them a year. But I think it's also

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>important in that they have changed change their communications strategy.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to be responsible for commun indicating the

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 1>entire path of interest rates, because that then the headlines

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>are the FED tightened and intense to tighten more. They

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to say the data drove them

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates this meeting. They don't want the responsibility

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of a long term commitment, but they also don't want

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to comprise markets. So the question is do they lean

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>into tightening in March or do they signal that they

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>are pausing. That's the big question for January. This has

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>been a wonderful Vincent Reynard, thank you so much for

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the briefing with standard Melon of course for years even

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>decades with a FED serving as head of research for

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Alan Greenspan as well. It was an original and

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>historic moment for the nation. The President spoke last night,

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>let's listen the border wall, when very quickly pay for itself.

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>The cost of illegal drugs exceeds five billion dollars a year,

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>vastly more than the five point seven billion dollars we

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>have requested from Congress. The wall will also be paid

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for indirectly by the great new trade deal we have

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>made with Mexico. The President the United States, and of

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>course Speaker Pelosi and Senate Leader Schumer speaking after the

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>President last night. He is a Democrat from Texas, but

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that barely describes his visceral understanding of the border. There

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is no one I know in America more linked to

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Laredo and the border east and west. And Henry Quire

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of the twenty district in UH, Texas, and of course

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat and conservative Democrat, I might point out from Texas.

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Mr Quaier, I am thrilled that you're with us today.

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>What does President Trump get most wrong about what the

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>people on the border want. Well, first of all, he

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>makes it sound like it's a crisis and a very

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>difficult place to live. If you look at the latest

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>FBI stats, UH, and I've looked at him for years,

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the same thing. When you look at murder rates,

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>crime rate, violent rape assaults and all that the border

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>crime rate is lower than the national crime rate. In fact,

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>if you look at Laredo, my hometown on the border,

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that murder rate UH is about two or three times

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>lower than Washington, d C. So when the President leaves

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow to the border, the most dangerous thing he's gonna

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>see is when he leaves Washington to go to the

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>border again. You have a visceral understanding with this, with

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the history of your parents, with the history of a

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Laredo and folks, Laredo isn't Murdy Robin's song. Just for

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to get it straight, Laredo is a huge depot for

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>trade in America. Now, it's completely different than the stereotype.

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have funding and this is axios. Mike Allen

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>just reporting moments ago oh MB is talking to Pentagon

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>about a military refunding of this project. How would you

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>respond to having the Pentagon come down and do this

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure project for your Laredo. You know it's wrong, And

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I said on both the subcommittees are appropriations for homeland

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and defense. There are two different things. We're talking about

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a law enforcement issue at the border, not a military issue.

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>And the President needs to understand this. If you wanted

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to stop drugs, and the latest d A report will

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you that most drugs that come into the United

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>States will come through ports of entry uh. Cars, drugs

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>uh and And he just doesn't understand that a wall

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>is not going to stop the drugs coming in the

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>way he thinks it is. So he's got to have

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 1>a better understanding the way the border works. And require

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.359
<v Speaker 1>you're you're on the edge of the Blue Dog coalition,

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 1>you're a conservative Democrat. There's a lot of Republicans out there,

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we saw this at the election, who have moved away

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>from the certitude of the president of belief in the president.

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 1>How lonely is this president within his Republican party. How

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>many Republicans are over with the Blue Dog coalition. You know,

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. That's a very good point. When you talk

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of the Republicans on on a private matter,

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll tell you that they understand that the President is

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 1>not correct on this issue, but many of the times

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>they have to stick with them because the party. But

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them understand that the wall is a

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth century solution to a twenty one century problem. He

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>thinks that the only way you're gonna secure the border

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is by having a wall, and that's wrong as China

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 1>at you know, look at the Berlin Wall, look at

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the Germans and the French are in the World War One.

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we just gotta look at technology and personnel

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and other ways of securing the border. Right, So so

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that Congressman, what you're calling for is more practical border security.

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Do we have any idea of how much that would cost?

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>What kind of training are you talking about? Well, you know,

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>first of all, let's look at border patrol. Uh where?

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Now two thousand border patrols short from the higher lights

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that we used to half two thousand border patrol. So

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>what does the administration do? They put a two million

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar contract to hire border patrol to show them how

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to hire border patrol. In fact, they just hired with

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>fourteen point eight million dollars. They hired two new border patrol.

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Now maybe one of them is Captain America. I don't know,

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>but if you're gonna spend that much money, you better

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>get something good for for that money. So we gotta

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>hire border patrol. We gotta give them the equipment. The

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>military has a lot of technology that works very well.

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the tech companies out there have the

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>latest technology that works very well. But again, we can't

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>play defense on the one yard line called the US

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Mexico border, where we spent over eighteen billion dollars. We

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>got to expand that work with Mexico with Central America.

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>A couple of years ago, if I can say this briefly,

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we added fourteen million dollars to help Mexico secure the

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>border with Guatemala. Did you know with that amount of

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>money they were able to stop over two d and

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand people a year, people that would have come

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to our borders. We gotta be smart on how we

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>secure the border. Congressman, how what kind of changes would

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you also make to the American detention system? Well, you know,

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>again the detention. You know, one of the things I've

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>done is I make sure that there's transparency, make sure

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know we if somebody ends up in the detention,

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that we treat them with dignity and respect. But again,

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, it's important to know that detention is

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a deterrence. We can and not have catch and release.

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And I know that some of my Democrat party don't

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>like detentions, but again, you gotta have some detention beds,

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>because if somebody comes in, you gotta be able to

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>hold them and then send them back. I want to

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>stretch from Laredo up to the sixteenth District and help

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>pass so and Congresswoman Escobar's district as well. That's the

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>span in the reach. That's the emotion that the President

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>talks about. Speak to liberal Democrats about their belief on

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 1>the wall. What the liberal Democrats get wrong, the cushion

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Democrats of California, even the President up on Fifth Avenue

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in New York, what do they get wrong about a

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>liberal approach to our immigration and border activity. Well, you know, again,

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>so without due respect. I think the extreme right and

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>the extreme left don't understand the way the border works

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>without due respect. Some people want open borders. I don't

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>believe in open borders. I want to have a law

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and order at the border. And we have that. Like

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, our our areas are very safe. That we

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have problems, of course we do, but it's safer than

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>many other places. But the bottom line is, uh, you know,

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got to have some sort of deterrence. You cannot

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>just open up the border to anybody coming in. And

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna have a wall too, And I say

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that to to to certain people a wall if you

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I've asked this question to all the border patrol chiefs

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>since Bush, Obama, and Trump, and I've asked them how

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>much time there's a border wall by you quote this

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>is from from all of them, a few minutes or

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a few seconds. So we're gonna spend billions of dollars

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to uh to spend on a wall? Or do I

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>spend a hundred dollars and buy you a ladder that

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>can jump people over that uh, that fence. One final question,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I know Dr Quaire that the only reason you got

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>elected is your affiliation with the University of Texas and

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>what Texas A and m as well, folks, that is

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>just in Texas. You don't do that, and Mr Quaire

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>did as well. What is it signal to Texas that

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple computer is gonna drop another x thousands of bodies

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>into austin Texas? What does that signal about Texas capitalism?

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, let me tell you Texas some years ago

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>was was creating about one third of all the private

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>jobs in the country. One third. We were just growing,

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>so we got trade is important to our area. Uh,

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>energy is very important to oiline gas is very important

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to our area. But now the tech. If you go

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to Austin and I used to work there at Secretary

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of State and as a State rep. I've seen Austin

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>now become a hub for technology for new startups and

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>so that that means a lot. They just got to

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>work on the transportation because it's got a little congested

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in Austin. Congressman, thank you so much. Enquire the twenty

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>eight district in Texas, thank you for joining us. Thanks

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>so much. With us is the right person to speak

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to on the changes of Mr Trump's Republican Party, and

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he is John Braybender, working with Mr Santorum among others.

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Mr Brabender has been in recovery from the lousy Steelers

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>season that we've just seen, and we're thrilled that he

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>could join us today as well. John. When I look

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Republican Party, it has to be a party

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of change. There's a lot of talk about Democrats, the

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>new liberalism of the Democratic Party. With this crisis right now,

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>what do you perceive is the change in Republicans as

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>they greet two thousand nineteen. Well, look, first of all,

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>we're we're saying the President and the Republican Party are synonymous,

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not sure that on this particular shoe they are.

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody agrees with border security, everybody agrees with

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>the importance of getting something done. The real question comes,

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>do you do it at the expense of closing down

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the government? And you know, one thing that I've learned

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>over time is that generally the White House owns problems,

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>whether they created them or not. And so what what

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I really believe is that last night turned out to

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>be a non event because there was no major announcement. Uh.

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you know, the only thing I think we

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>learned were two things. What is that President Trump is

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>much more comfortable in front of twenty thousand people out

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>an auditorium trying to free wheel it. And I think

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we also learned what Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer will

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>look if they were ever side by side at a

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>wax museum. Beyond that, I don't think every you were

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>left they're saying where where do we go? But it's

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>an easier message for the Democrats. The presidents saying we

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>need border security borders really means a wall, and I'm

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>not opening until we did it. I mean, you know,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>but you've always had a more sophisticated message about GOP politics,

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and some people think it's a Whig Party forty going

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>into oblivion. What is a gentleman from Kentucky need to

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>do to regain a voice for non Trumpian Republicans. Well,

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's a that's a really good point, because what

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe this president was elected on was a lot

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of disenfranchised Americans who had very little loyalty the either

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>party that felt both sides and let them left them

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>alone on the economic battlefield, and that it chronically took

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire to give them a loud enough megaphone to

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>say I'm gonna go there, fight for you, give you

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a voice and change things. In fact, I think you

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>know more than you know. Everybody cheered the wall when

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump keep these speeches. What I think was missed

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>was what people were really cheering even louder for, was

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>heven saying I was going to drain the swamp. And

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that where the party has gotten off here

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit is uh number one, we're poor on messaging.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Number two, it is more of this shake up Washington

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and make it for real people again. That is going

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to get the president reelected. And honestly, I'm not sure

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that they go to bed at night worrying as much

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>about the wall as they do about their next next

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>paycheck and fuming over the fact that Washington politicians, in

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Washington insiders seem to have a lot of benefits and

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>privileges that they don't enjoy. So Joel Nice, talk about

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the classic grid luck we have right now. Typically it's

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>tension elsewhere the breaks the grid luck. What it's the

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>ten shouldn't come from? Is it the lines of the airport,

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Is it the employees that don't receive that paychecks? Where

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>does it come from? But well, what it really comes

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>from is who's gonna win in the poll data that's

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>going to influence the next election. If one side or

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the other side feels that somebody else has all of

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>a sudden gaining an advantage, they're gonna move on this.

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's be honest. This is a public relations

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and pr problem. It is it is not a policy problem.

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>And and so you know, you have two sides who

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>are trying to figure out how they can make the

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>other side own this, which appears to be losing. John,

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna run out of time, but we would love

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>to get you back on again with us, and of

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>course with Kevin so early down a FM in Washington,

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>John Brave Under, thank you so much, just way way

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>too short a time. Today we'll have Mr brave under

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>on away uh on again of course with brave Undercott

0:20:52.520 --> 0:21:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Cox in Washington. This is a joy. We'd like to

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>see her every ninety days. We don't. Betsy is just happy.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>We have an adult in the room of Morgan Stanley

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and every everybody on the cell side is their own style.

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Ms Graci style is to do pristine work on the banks,

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 1>involving a lot of analysis, math in numbers and the

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>mathiness of Betsy Grazi or Morgan Stanley with your team.

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>What's the Mathew number that sticks out right now for

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the banks loan loan or what's the math thing that

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>matters right now? The math thing that matters for the

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>stocks is that they are pricing in recession level valuations

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>even though radio you have to keep talking, okay, so

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>even okay, even though we've got fundamentals that are flashing positive.

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's so, what's your level is strong by

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>what's your level of conviction right now in the major banks,

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:15.719
<v Speaker 1>we'll overweight the group, and our top picks are State Street,

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America and JP Morgan. So usually going into

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>arning season, we've had some guidance on traving revenue from

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the big CEO, somebody's big banks. They got it this

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>one way, then got us in another in the spice

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of a couple of weeks. So I have no idea

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>what to expect this quota. What are we getting? That's

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>why you read our stuff? So, um, why did that happen? Right?

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Because we had a conference it was second week in December.

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Message was somewhere you know, trading revenues are going to

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>be flat to plus, you know, maybe mid single digits.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And then towards the end of the month you heard

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>from I think it was b of a right, Brian

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Wayne hen CEO coming out and saying, hey, you know

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a little bit lower, it's gonna be

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>sub zero. You know it's going to be negative. And

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>does that surprise any of us really? Because we had

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>such a market pullback, especially with bonds breads widening a

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>lot the last couple of weeks in December. You guys

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>know that, right, I mean we would paying attention, Yeah, attention.

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So you've got if you've got exposure to high yield,

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>if you've got exposure to leverage, finance revenues are probably

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>coming in lower capital markets. Is going to be difficult.

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>What are the positive signs, what are the green lights

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to say buy bank stocks that come from this? And Okay,

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>so part of what you know we're doing here is

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>we've got a four queue that's in the rear view

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>mirror and it's stock analysts. We want to look forward.

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So the rear view mirror is showing that it was

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a tough quarter. Four Q is a tough quarter because

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you had so much market this location, I mean, was

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the last time we had a quarter with SMP down.

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>It's been a while, right, So looking forward, we've got

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>loan growth flashing positive, the hight fed data right comes

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>out weekly see and I long growth five percent up

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>here on your good morning everyone for Global Wall Street,

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Betsy Gray sick with us with Morgan Stanley, your colleague,

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 1>and cry Magdalena Slosa does deuts your bad right correct?

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>And they got a bonus issue And in all that,

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>how are the bonuses going to be for American Global

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street? Are they gonna do a Deutsche Bank. Are

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>they gonna be okay? Are they going to be light?

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Are they gonna be a lot of bodies moving around?

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not running comp at these companies, but

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>what I can tell you is in our models, UM,

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we do have comp ratios coming down slightly, okay, year

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>on here, but that's but that's been happening one to

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 1>three q right, so you've had uh comp ratios coming down,

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>But that's and it's it's really reflecting management discipline here

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to continue to drive towards target r o s. You know,

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in the US, the companies that I cover obviously, you know,

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>be of JP City, we've got we've got three quarters

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>of you know, one to three q U eighteen very strong,

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>four q weaker. But you know, compools we're expecting UM

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to trending line with with with what we

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 1>saw the first three quarters of the year. Do they

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>within camp and discipline, do they take apart divisions or

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>sell divisions off or stop doing things in divisions or

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>is it going to be labor rationalizations twenty at a

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 1>time here, ten at a time here, which which expense

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>discipline model? Are they going to use? Okay, So can

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I like frame this a little bit You're what you're

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>basically saying, frame means say it better than I just

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>did basically what she's about today. Well, oh you agree, right,

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to use that line so many times over

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of weeks. Can I just frame this

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better? Can you frame it a little

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>bit better? For us? Well? What you what you're really

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>asking is was the market dislocation so tough in December

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that managements are going to have to do something different

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>from having been expecting to run their business the first

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the year, and in in the US in

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>my group, you know, I don't I believe the answer.

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.239
<v Speaker 1>There's know, I think you're gonna have tweaking. You're not

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>going to have you know, wholesale change. So let's talk

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>about the capital return programs. I'm going to catch up

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>with an analyst from Oppenheimer who says the following, we

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>haven't changed our dollar buy back assumptions, but with the

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>recent price declines, we expect banks to be able to

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>retire around six percent of their shares in How significant

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of these capital return programs going to be? The buyback programs?

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So from a stock perspective. You want to think about

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>where they're going to be increasing versus stabilizing. Right, and uh,

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>there's many banks that have been doing four or five

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>percent you know, buy backs for a couple of years now.

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>We do have a couple of companies where we're expecting

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>buybacks to increase, and that's you know, um Wells Fargo

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, State Street right. State Street had to had

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>to stop their buy back program for the last two

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>quarters of the year due to the c r D acquisition.

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>So there's a couple of places where we think they're

0:26:56.160 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>going to see acceleration. But that's that doesn't surprise me.

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And and and Betsy Jargon. What does tech spend mean?

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>You're hugely optimistic view on JP Morgan. They're gonna open

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>forned branches, fifty new markets. I just want an a

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>t M up where I live. I mean, you know,

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>from from name the bank. I don't care. But but

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>what does the phrase text spend mean? Okay, um, text bend.

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>It basically means okay, Well, here's what I want to say.

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>You've got spending on tech plant, equipment, computers and software.

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>You've got tex spend on people who are actually writing

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the code. You've got tex spend on, um, folks that

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are designing what your next ten years is going to

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>look like. Right, so you asked the question away, Um,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good way because there's plenty of people

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>who say, look, my tex spend is different from yours

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 1>because I'm only taking hardware and software and you're taking

0:27:55.640 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in all the strategy folks too. The important message about

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>out text Spend, in my opinion, is that this is

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a business that will continue to migrate towards UH speed.

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Right now. We've seen this in plenty of markets already

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that the banks are involved in equity trading, for example,

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>but the need to have a super efficient plant took

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 1>communicate with your conce How did the little guys compete

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>with this? How do the shared platform? Shared platform? I

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>mean this is you know there are third parties that

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you can amortize your costs over by sharing the platform

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>with others. Did I frame that? Okay? John did a

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>decent chop. I think it's got to decide whether I

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>honestly do and if we haven't want a third anchor,

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I would push Betsy. Could that person? I think? I think,

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think I could have a lot of

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>fun with you every morning you think so, Betsy, Thank you,

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>m Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.479
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio