WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2020 NFL MegaPod Week 1 Preview

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Check it down Man, Now Down Man. September ten, it's

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>being in the Big Podcast Week one of the National

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Football League season. It's Gill Alexander is our I'm gonna

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 1>call our tenth season on the megapod very pumped. Thank

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you to everybody who has listened throughout the years. Uh,

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>for everybody who asked for it. On Thursdays on Twitter,

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we love you back this year. The staples of the show.

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Yen's there from Pittsburgh, one of the stars of Showtimes

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>docuseries Action Back in the Day. It's Todd wishing of

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a spelt, Todd wishing of how many pounds have you lost? Toddy, Well,

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm down to two nine. If you know, during the

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Action show I was three. So that's uh, if you're

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>doing the math at home, that's about seventy six pounds. Anyways,

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of pounds. Seventy six pounds from the

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>talk and since since I was in Vegas another forty one.

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>We're also a flying start everybody, and of course Mike

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Palm ladies and gentleman Derek Stephen's conciliary, uh, the vice

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>president of operations over there at Circus Sports, Mikey, thank

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you for doing this. I'm so excited to be back

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>on with Todd. I missed him as uh you know,

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>was the Census year, and like all of his people,

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>he had a return home for the Census, So I'm

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to seeing him. Not even sure, I don't

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>even know what kind of like did that was. I

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't even really get it, so Mike, maybe you'll explain

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.199
<v Speaker 1>it to me later. That's just a governmental joke from Mike,

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing more a rotating guests, and we always have a

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>rotating guest. He is always in the leadoff spot, a

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>tradition unlike any other passed. We want him to give

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the year anymore former Super Contest champion over there when

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it was called the Hilton, so that gives you some

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of when in history, something like that, part of

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the San Susi team when he wanted at the time

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the finest record in Super Contest history as well. It's

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Brady Hand and how you doing, Brady. I'm doing great.

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Good to be back on the megapode now, Mike. Here's

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>what happened before the show. Mikey joked that if Brady's

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on the show, is gonna last double the like that

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it normally does. So now Brady's only speaking in phrases.

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>He's like, thank you's so happy to be here. You

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 1>want to get on with it, Mike, get you down.

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you talked too much. And you know, Mike,

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>he just loves to like get a get a like

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a meme going about somebody that's totally not true. And

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you know how it is, those big casino executives, they

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>just care about themselves. We know, Brady, how many people

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>were in the Super Contest in two thousand and eleven

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>when you won it? Five hundred and seventeen. And what's

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting about that number? That was a record high at

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>the time, and ever since then it really just increased exponentially.

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the next year there was about seven fifty,

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and then they got to about eleven hundred. And you know,

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>nowadays we're into the neighborhood of the three thousands. Not

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this year, but yeah, five hundred and seventeen, and that

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>was a record high. Brady, you're you're a modest Is

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it fair to say that it was your idea to

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>have Super Contest weekend? Thereafter? It was? Yes, After the

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>victory by San Susie, I got on the phone with

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Jake Hornegay and I said, Hey, let's let's throw a

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>golf tournament. Let's have a big to do to get

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody fired up about football and have everybody come to

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>your hotel for the weekend. And I think it was

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>just a few weeks ago that we completed our ninth

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Super Contest weekend, so that has stuck. And now Mikey's

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>involved too. They have their own contest weekend, so it's

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>great stuff. Did you use the phrase to do when

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you asked about this with Jake Cornigant? Is that actually

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>came up? I did, specifically, Yes, Mikey. Mikey. What Brady

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is referring to, obviously, is that Circus Sports h entered

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the contest game last year and too much fanfare. You

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>are doing it again this year. You are doing it

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>with a survivor contest as well. Can you explain to

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the people's I don't know why I just talked like

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Bill Cosgy, but can you explain to the people's what

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the overlay may or may not be in both of

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>those as we approach Saturday week one deadline, because you've

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>got a huge sprint here at the end of entries,

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't you a real a real last minute rush. I

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>mean you asked the P. T. Barnum question about three

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago when we were at about three hundred entries.

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>How much of this overlay is real? And how much

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>is P T. Barnum? In the last fifteen days, we've

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>done almost two thousand as we speak. The circle million

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>to which this year Derek guaranteed three million instead of

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>one point five million and needs three thousand entries to

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>break even for us? Is that two thousand, four hundred

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and fifty six, And I mean there's an outside shot

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we get to three thousand. We did three hundred and

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty on Tuesday, and we did four hundred and thirty

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>entries yesterday and we're at almost so you're gonna get

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>it for sure. Then now we're not not for sure.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Remember the proxies starting really tomorrow and Saturday have to

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>start p and picks in so it's hard for them

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to get up a lot of appointments. The late rush,

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>if it is one, will be mostly locals, people living

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>in Nevada. So what's the what's the what's the drop

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>dead hour? Like exact hour, the bewitching hour is two

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 1>pm on Saturday, Todd and then you have to have

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>your picks in by three now the survivor. We introduced

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>it to Last Man Standing. I'm sure many of your

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>loyal megapod listeners are familiar with dad. You pick a team,

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>no point spread, you can only use them once during

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the year, and who's ever left at the end wins

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a million. Derek guaranteed a million, so we actually surpassed it,

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're at a thousand, forty seven right now, so

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe we get to twelve hundred, twelve fifty in that

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>for a pot of one point three million. We added

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the rink goal that if anybody all, Todd, I want

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you to treat this like this is the McLaughlin group

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>talk when you are called upon. Well, I haven't gotten

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>any eartime in months, so it's my time, baby, It's

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>my time. Let him tell his story. Todd is saying,

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>with metaphysical certainty, will get to three thousand. There's some

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Laughlin reference for you, eleanor cliff anyhow maybe we can

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>get the thirteen hundred. It's winner take all, Todd if

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>anybody goes perfect. And we added the three Thanksgiving Day

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>games as its own week, so you gotta say one

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of those six teams in case you get there. If

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>anybody goes eighteen and oh, or multiple people go eighteen

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and old, Derek will add a million dollars on top

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>of the pot. So one guy goes eighteen and al,

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>he's looking at like two point two million right now.

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So even if it ended in week fourteen and there

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>was one player left, he's still gotta put picks in

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the way to see even get the

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>million dollar bonus. By the way, typically do survivor people

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>go the entire season to win or do they usually

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>win before the season ends? You know in stations they

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>have a hundred thousand people in it. You know they're twenty.

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll have about a thousand. I would be surprised if

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>if somebody made it eighteen and oh, I predicted it

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>would be around fifteen or sixteenth week, would we'd be

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>down to one? But we'll see. It's interesting, it's a

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>different year, uh, And it'd be may may be tough

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to get through the first few weeks when we haven't

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>seen anybody play. I asked Mikey a few weeks ago

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>how much of this is real and how much of

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this is P. T. Barnum, which is my way of saying, damn,

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>how much of this is you and Derek bullshit? I

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted told question for me. I apologize three weeks later,

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I thought a worthwhile question. Nonetheless, all right, boys,

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>here's how it goes. We have the format that we've

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>had for years. Let's move the Thursday night game up

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to the front. We don't have to elaborate on it

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>if we have no particular conviction on either the side

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>or the total. But it is the Chiefs and the Texans.

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>It is nine and a half in favor of the

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs in a quote unquote home game. Right, it is

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a home game, but it's obviously the year of COVID,

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>so things aren't exactly the same as they used to be. Uh.

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>The total is at fifty four. Mikey, let's start with you,

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>or actually, let's start with our guest, because that's the

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>only polite thing to do. Brady, anything tonight Thursday Night football.

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I actually did play the Texans, and uh, you know,

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this is not a handicapping element that I think you

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>want to base your play on, but I do think

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>there is a little bit of a revenge angle here, uh,

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and specifically playoff revenge because we remember the Texans got

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>out to a twenty four to nothing lead, and again

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that is not the basis of the handicap here. But

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I still believe that they have not forgotten that and

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>do want to make amends for that. I also think

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the general public likes to bet against Bill O'Brien and

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs conversely or are a big public darling. So

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I think this point spread is skewed a little bit. Um.

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I do think Houston has a chance to win the game. Um,

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>but I'll go with the points here plus nine and

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a half and I'll say Kansas City by six. One

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of the more memorable playoff games in recent history. As

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Brady said, the Texans went out to nothing lead. Kansas

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>City eventually wanted fifty one to thirty one, but they

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>came back from the to nothing deficit, as I recall,

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>with eight straight drives in which they scored, seven of

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>which were touchdowns, one field goal. Just an amazing turn

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of events. One of the great playoffs is that, Brady

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is actual. Is that one of your three picks, Brady,

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Because as the stenographer, I have to get this down correctly. No,

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it is not one of my official best bets. For

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, but I do officially have the Texans in pocket. Todd,

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's ask you a question. Could you let the last

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:20.719
<v Speaker 1>three words of my last sentence finished before you do that?

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Or you just need to knock out those last three words? Two? Five?

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>All right? I appreciate that, Mikey or Todd anything on

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>this game tonight. Anything. I can't believe Todd Hadson spoken.

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, you're the secretary, You're not the

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>straphyll he called me. I did, I did all fair.

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Maybe I should doutgrade him if that's a

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I have an official play on this Okay. One of

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>my three picks is tonight, and uh it's only because

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm really struggling to come up with three plays. But

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go over fifty four tonight this game. I

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>think this Houston offense, you're down grading yourself. It's actually

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty three or fifty three and a half. This is

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the first time ever four in the open. If you

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>were listening, he previewed the game as fifty four. Well,

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Gil got it wrong. Well, let me see, maybe I

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>did get it wrong because I didn't have the totals up,

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's very possible ladies and gentlemen, that the number

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of the consensus number is my screens that coming up.

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, fifty three and a half. Actually, hold on,

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>hold everything, fifty three. It is fifty three. Pardon whole point, Mikey,

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Wait a minute, you said fifty three and a half.

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>You were trying to still chine me out of a half.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna go over three or fifty three and

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a half. I saved you a point. I'm gonna go

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>over fifty three. I think this Texans offense is loaded

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and and and here's the other reason. There's no crowd

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>noise that arrowhead to mess with them on third and long. Okay,

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this will be an interesting factor for bookmakers when they're

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>trying to set these totals. The defense is not gonna

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>benefit the home team from loud noise and snap counts,

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>not only the false starts, but your offensive line not

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>firing off the ball all at the same time, I

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>think this is the shootout. I'm with I'm with Brady.

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this number is greatly exaggerated. And if you

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>could have gotten ten on this game, good for you.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>But official play todd over over fifty three from Mike

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Palm Todd anything from you right now, I'm not making

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>any official play on this game. I really don't have

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a feel for it. Although I leaned towards the Texans.

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, nine and a half points is a lot

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of points, and and it's not like the Chiefs now.

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Granted in the playoffs, they did have that blowout, but

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs didn't blow people out every single week last week,

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>if you remember, there were a lot of close games

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and and nine and a half points against the good team,

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>there's too many. Now, I'm not making it a pick

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>or anything, but you know I would lean with Brady

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>on this one. No pick from me in game opportunity.

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 1>I think if I leaned anything, i'd lean with Mikey.

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>But no pick for me on this. Let us begin

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>with the official best bets. Brady, we start with you.

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>What is pick number umber one, sir? I'm going to

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>begin with the Los Angeles Rams. And I actually made

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>this bet back in May uh Rams plus three against

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, And much of this was based off of

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>my feeling gil on what the public perception of these

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>two teams is. And I think in week one, UH,

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 1>starting your point of handicap with public perception is kind

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of a good starting point. You can dive into the personnel,

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the injuries and and all that type of thing. Obviously,

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't have preseason two assess this year, but I

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>think public perception is a good starting point in Week one.

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>And with the Cowboys, you know new head coach, a

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>perceived upgrade from Jason Garrett, the shiny new draft pick

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in Ceedee Lamb, and how much talent this team has

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>had for years, brutally under underachieving last season, and it

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>just seems like people are giddy about America's team and

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>are already crowning them super Bowl champion. Conversely, I think

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the public perception is extremely low on the Los Angeles Rams,

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and I also think it's very interesting that all summer

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>long this line was pretty much frozen at three, even

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>though it seems the public judgment of these two teams

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 1>already exist. And now just finally here on opening night,

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>we're we're starting to see some two and a half

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>pop up, So maybe some Rams money finally coming in. Um.

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the Cowboys will be good for sure, but

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the Rams will be much better than the

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:28.839
<v Speaker 1>general consensus is. I also think Sean mcveigh's offense is

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to use misdirection and really take

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>advantage of what is a pretty weak Dallas Cowboy linebacking corps.

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the running backs that they have

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles to replace Todd Gurley, the draft pick

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>cam Acres, Malcolm Brown, Darryl Henderson. Cam Acres is really

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a stud and a lot of people would have known

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>more about him if Florida State was any good last year.

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think those three guys will allow Jared Goff

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to have play action pass opportunities, and we all, I

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>think could agree whether you like Jared Goff or not.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>When he's able to do play action pass, uh, that's

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>when he's at his best. I think this game has

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a potential for a lot of points, but I think

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are kind of a sleeping dog here with

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody so high on Dallas and down on on the Rams.

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Also a couple of big losses in the lineup at

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the line of scrimmage for Dallas. I don't think this

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>necessarily affects the point spread, but could affect the game.

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>That's offensive tackle Ao Collins out for Dallas. Gerald McCoy

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of course will be out on defense, so I think

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the Rams could win this thing out right. I did

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>not bet the money line, but I will see if

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I can win the game with the points. All right,

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Rams plus three extra juice, give us some extra juice there,

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Toddy plus three minus once when he consensus on the Rams.

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>That is the Sunday Night game of the week. By

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, Drew DINSI, who does such great work. Whale

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>caper art Twitter, who was on a numbers game on

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>visa with me earlier this week, he also loves the Rams.

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll hope to get him on the Megapod at some

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>point this year. By the way, in contrast to the

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Texans and the Chiefs, where the Chiefs obviously beat the

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Texans and they come back we just talked about on

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>their way to winning the Super Bowl last year, Cowboys

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Rams two of the most disappointing teams last

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>year in the NFL we were called Cowboys, ended up

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>going eight and eight out of the playoffs, a game

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>behind the Eagles in the NFC East and the Rams.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>After getting to the Super Bowl the previous year and

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>losing to the Patriots, they finished nine and seven on

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the outside looking in third place behind the Niners and

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks in the NFC West Todd number one from you.

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Well you all know that. Um. Even though some people

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think I'm that bright, I did uh have a

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of very juicy stuff last year in the National

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Football League and have forgotten more about gambling than some

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>people will ever know. I won't talk about who those

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>people maybe, but I will just say this. I was

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>dead right on the damn Tampa Bay Buccaneers going over

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>every damn week of the NFL season, except the funds

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that I held off. Didn't bet them over. Against Houston Texans,

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it didn't go over, and then all the rest of them,

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I just kept going over because we they couldn't play defense,

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and they had a great offensive football team. Plus Jamis

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Winston pitched in with a bunch of pick sixes, and

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it was just beautiful. It was like Gonzaga over, baby

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Buccaneers over. And I'm gonna go with even

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>though I've got background noise from bar Canada, I'm gonna

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>go with the over. Why in the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans States game? And here's why. I've got Tom

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Terrific Brady at the offensive helm. That's gotta be as

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>good as Jamis Winston. We're gonna be able to score

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points. I haven't. I don't believe that

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Buccaneers have upgraded the defensive end of

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball until I see it with my own eyes

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and guess who they're going against. Yeah, that's right, They're

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>going against Drew Brees, he of the Well. Maybe not

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the smartest things to say in a racial pandemic situation.

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Let the true Brees. Let New Orleans Saints. I'll see

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>over because I think there's gonna be points all over

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>this football field. The consensus is forty seven and a

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>half for forty eight, Gil, tell me what I get.

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm going over those numbers, baby, you get forty seven

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half, sir, over forty seven and a half

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Tampa Bay New Orleans game. That's an afternoon game,

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>one of three afternoon games on Sunday week one. How

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>many early games I hate when they do this. There

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>are a grand total of nine early games in three

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>afternoon games that we have a Sunday night and remember

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a Monday night doubleheader coming up as well. Mikey, was

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that pick that you gave earlier? Was that your number

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>one best bet on the over of the Houston k

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>C game. Why don't give us your number one best bet?

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>It was actually my number two best bet? And what

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>is a racial pandemic? My number one number one? You

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know what a racial pandemic is? No one knows.

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>It's the Tennessee Titans on Monday night, the second Gil

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 1>didn't give his first pick. You can't go to the

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>second pick already. Well, I was trying here, Todd. Okay, fine,

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. My number one pick happens to be.

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready for this? The Tennessee Titans. So because

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Mikey in order? Okay, but Mikey already gave a pick.

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So I was just asking if that it was his

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>number one pick. Do you understand how it was his

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>number two pick? You asked me to hold you in

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in Okay, Okay, you helped me in contempt, So okay,

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll follow the guy who apparently is more than just

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the secretary. He also can all this in contempt. I'm

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on Tennessee. And then Mikey, you can chime in with

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>your number two pick to start things out. How about

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that or your number one pick on this? Also? You

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>know your number two. No, you're number one, but here's

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>my number one as well. This is both Mikey and

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 1>my number one pick. We're on Tennessee. I'm on Tennessee

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>because of the following. If you listen to a numbers game.

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I said it on the megapod to last year,

0:18:58.119 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but all last year, and I think I did this

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>with Utah a number of times. No one loves Drew

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Lock more than Drew Lock. When he made good plays,

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>that dude was the happiest guy in the world. He

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>just thought he was a world killer. But if you

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>go back and look at his run late last year,

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Drew Lock beat up on really bad past defenses in

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>his four victories, really bad bottom quarter bottom third actually yeah,

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 1>no bottom quarter checked that past defenses in the National

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Football League, and so competition matters. H Adam Chernoff, who

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>was on Visa and the Show be Former and Follow

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the Money with Mitch Moss and PAULI Howard, he absually

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>added to that as well, where he said not only

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>that he was also helped Drew Lock was by yards

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>after catch, primarily by his receivers, in a way that

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>most quarterbacks were not. And if you look deep into

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>his pressure stats. How does he perform under pressure? Not

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>good at all, almost bottom of the barrel in the

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>National Football League. So here he is now the beginning

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>of his sophomore season. There's a von Miller problem that

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>just happened in Denver, brutal loss for of the Denver Broncos.

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee was a two point dog, two and a half

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>point dog at one point, they're a two point favorite.

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Guess what. I still like him as long as it's

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>not three Tennessee Titans, who, on the other hand, to me,

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>are criminally underrated, even after their great playoff run, having

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>beaten the Patriots and the Ravens last year. So for me,

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it's Tennessee. Mikey, Yeah, I agree with you. I was

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>listening to the president of the Todd Wishing of Fan Club,

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lombardi, talking about They're not gonna play Drew Lock

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in September the way they played Drew Lock in December

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>last year in those meaningless games. Uh, there's too much

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>public perception of this great Drew Lock. I agree with you, Gil,

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>it's much different. He's gonna have to go up up

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>against a much more well coached defense than he faced

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year last year, and yeah,

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>von Miller is a factor in this. For me, I

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>thought this was a cheap price. Personally, I make the

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Titans about a four point favorite in this game. So

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that's my number one. Best Okay, that's my number one

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>as well, Brady, let's get your number two since we

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>already had Mikey's number two. My second play is on

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Falcons and as high as plus two and

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a half. Now I got them at plus two over

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle Seahawks, and I think he can begin with

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>public perception again here too. People remember Atlanta starting the

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>season last year at one and seven, dan Quinn was

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>going to be fired. They tend to forget that this

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>team finished the year six and two with wins over

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco the Saints. Uh, they won their last four

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in a row. I also think public perception on Todd

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Gurley is low, but I think the change of scenery

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>will be very good for him. It seems like this

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>guy's been around forever, but people forget he's only twenty

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>six years old, and you add to had to add

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>him to this offense that I think is extremely powerful

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>from a passing standpoint and a potentially elite running back.

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this can be a really well bound, balanced,

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>formidable attack for Atlanta. And on the other side of

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the coin here, I think the public look public looks

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>at Seattle only laying a pointer two and it looks

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 1>like low hanging fruit and gil. You know, Seattle has

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>notoriously struggled against the spread on the road. Atlanta, by

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the way, very good at home eleven and one straight

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>up against the spread in home openers under Matt Ryan. UM.

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Seattle is still questionable on the offensive line.

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>They don't have a great pass rush. We know they

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>did not signed Clowney. Dan Quinn, of course, spent a

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>long time in Seattle under Pete Carroll as the defensive coordinator.

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>He knows what this team is going to try to do. Uh.

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Falcons also last four meetings against Seattle are undefeated against

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the spread. UM. I think it's possible that the wrong

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>team is favored here. Now you know there's not a

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>huge difference between Seattle minus two and Atlanta minus one. UM,

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think this game should probably be picked them

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>at worse. UM. I like Atlanta at home catching a

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of points. Seattle on the road, I think is

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a fade situation in the in the opening game of

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the season. I'll take Atlanta here. A matter of fact, Todd,

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>give him plus two and a half. That seems to

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 1>be the consensus right now. So Atlanta plus two and

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a half. That game for me is gonna come up later,

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>but in a totally different context later on the show,

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>as we progress through all of our questions. It's one

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>thing to have a global pandemic. It's one thing to

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>have racial protests. Is an entirely different thing to have

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a racial pandemic. Ladies, and gentleman Todd wished of on

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the board with his first ridiculous comment, what do you

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>got number two? Todd? Well, here's the thing about me.

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I like to be entertaining as well as informative. Some

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>people are informative like you, Gil. Some people are entertaining,

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like Mike. I try to bring the two together. Now, Yeah,

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you're the total baggage. My second pick. You know what

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I have to say. I gotta go with Brady on

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 1>this one. I like the Atlanta Falcons too. And here's why.

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>If you remember the Atlanta Falcons, they do have a quarterback,

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and they Maddie Ice, and of course I've poined the

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>phrase Gilly Ice for mental fortitude lacking that that Maddie

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Ice has as well. But if you noticed last year,

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>late in the season, Maddie Ice got his crap together

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Atlanta Falcons played a lot better football late

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in the season. I believe there was a game against

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Seattle where Matt shab was the quarterback and they kept

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>it close and played them real tight. I think plus

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. Seattle's, to me is the kind

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of team. They can look amazing, they can look you know,

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're very up and down. You know, Russell

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Wilson gets three touchdowns behind and then it comes flying

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>back and and wins the game out of nowhere. I

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>could totally see this thing like a six game. I'm

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>getting two and a half points Atlanta at home. You know,

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta played really poorly coming out of the gate last year.

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>They've got to have that in the back of their mind,

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking we gotta get off the schnite early in the season.

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>You've got to play hard right off the get go.

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Give me Atlanta Falcons with Brady Rustling two and a half.

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>That game's got Planko written all over it for me.

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Plinko plus two and a half. I get two and

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a half points in plink Plinko might go against you, man,

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that ship might end up in a slot you don't like. Um,

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, just my opinion. Uh. My number two picks,

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>since we already have Mikey's is the over in the

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Houston Kansas City game tonight. My number two pick as

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.439
<v Speaker 1>we fight through the the just absolute din at the

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>d in downtown Las Vegas, where it must be teaming

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>with contests signer ruppers better than Mike's heavy breathing from

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 1>last year. Um, alright, My number two pick is the

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins. Hit it Todd, mymid Dolphins, mymiph number one. Alright,

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that's enough. I'm on the Dolphins plus the six and

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a half against the New England Patriots. Uh new era

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 1>obviously in New England, not just because Tom Brady has

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>gone and Cam Newton is in behind center, but because

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they are team opt out, so many opt outs over

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>five less than ten. I want to count seven or

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.479
<v Speaker 1>eight tone goal, but that includes Patrick Chung, It includes

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Donta Hi Tower. In fact, uh, they are without their

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>starting linebacking crew from last year, not just because of

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>opt outs, but also because of transactional things, and so

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the conventional wisdom seems to be, well, it's still Bill Belichick,

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it's still the New England Patriots. They're gonna give six

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half points to the Miami Dolphins. I simply

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:25.959
<v Speaker 1>do not get this. Ryan Fitzpatrick is the best quarterback

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>in the a f C East period, and I am

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>all about the Dolphins. I have a Dolphins bet for

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>them to win the a f C East at eleven

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>to one. I have a bet on them with the

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>season win total over. I think this is a criminally

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>underrated football team. You're giving me six and a half

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a team that, remember, beat the Patriots in Week seventeen

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>last year, when the Patriots did have Tom Brady and

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:54.719
<v Speaker 1>did desperately need to win that football game, completely ruined

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>their playoff run by uh killing their seating. Give me

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins plus six and half, Thank you very much,

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Brady number three. Okay, number three, I'm gonna go to

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the a f C East as well, and I'm going

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to take the New York Jets, also getting six and

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a half and uh for the third time in a row.

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm also going to start with public perception here and

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>you know who is in love with the Jets this

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 1>year besides their fans, and even those fans are perennial

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>downers doubters. Um. Meanwhile, everybody loves the Bills, and including myself.

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>But I do think Buffalo has a really good chance

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to go deep in the playoffs. That doesn't mean game one.

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Week one, I'm going to lay a touchdown with them

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>against a division opponent, and we know, especially the first

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>three weeks in the NFL season, the division underdogs are

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a strong play. Um. I go back to the fact

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that revenge is not a strong handicapping angle, and I

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>don't put put much stock into it. But we go

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>back to the opening game last year, and it was

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a pretty tough pill to swallow, I imagine for the Jets.

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>They were up sixteen to nothing on the Bills. C. J.

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Mosley gets hurt late in the game, Bills come back

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to win seventeen to sixteen. I gotta believe that the

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Jets have not forgotten that, and their season just immediately

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>went downhill. Sam Donald got Mono and the entire campaign

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 1>was shot. So they kind of get a second chance

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 1>here to start off their season with a good start

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh. I love the running back trio of Levian Bell,

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Frank Gore, and Michael p Ryan. UH love the draft

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>pick of Denzel Mims Mickey Beckton. I think both of

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>these teams are improved. But when the Jets were healthy

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>last season, which was completely few and far between, I

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're nearly as bad as most of their

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>season appeared or played out. Um So, in my mind,

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>these teams are much closer than a six and a

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>half point spread. I would say this ought to be

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>more like the standard field goal spread and not jump

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>all the way to a touchdown. I'll take New York

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and the points New York Jets six and a half.

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Give the man six and a half against the Buffalo Bills,

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Todd number two, number three, your third pick. I'm kind

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of torn. I sort of like the idea of betting

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>against Mike Mularkey led Dallas Cowboys team. That's one place

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I might want to go, or the over in that

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins game. You know what, because we've already had We've

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>already had a pick on that Cowboys game. I'm I'm

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna pass the Cowboys game, although I do I am

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>with Brady on that l A. Rams team. I think

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys are a joke as always. Um, let me

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>go with Miami Dolphins, New England Patriots over the forty two?

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you have? Gil? Forty two? Let's say here,

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>hold on, hold onto, yes, sir, okay, I'm gonna go

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>over the forty two in the Miami Dolphins Pats game.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And here's why. With the Miami Dolphins, I get Ryan

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick almost a Hall of Fame spread quarterback. I mean,

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the guy covers the spread like Tom Brady wins Super Bowls.

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>But he they obviously were able to move the football

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>last year against New England. I think they'll be able

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to move the football against decimated out Patriots team. I

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>think Miami can get you some points in this game.

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And the New England Patriots. You know Tom Brady, I mean,

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know Bill Belichick is sitting there thinking,

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>my new toy. Now, Cameron Newton. I don't know if

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys have ever heard of this guy, but he

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>played for Auburn, and I believe that, you know, Belichick

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is gonna gonna coach him up with some kind of

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, for years and years and years he had

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Brady Clydesdale running quarterback slower than even me to

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>get to the pizza. This guy was slow. Now he's

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>got Cameron Newton, who's got to be a lot healthier,

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's got to be thinking I can run all

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>kinds of fun stuff. And who knows what he and

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Josh McDaniels have cooked up. I think they can move

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to football against the Miami Dolphins. And it's only forty two.

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Give me the over. Let's go points. Let's go points

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.719
<v Speaker 1>over forty two. Mikey final pick, Todd, what do you

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>have on a number for Bears, Lions, side and total? Gil?

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I have forty two and a half as the total,

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and I have it uh three juiced heavily to the underdog.

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you have? Gil? The three is juiced

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>heavily to the underdog. But I have forty three as

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the official consensus. We'll go with forty three and plus

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>three minus. Yep, I'm gonna play that game. Gil is

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>my final pick. Over the forty three, Over the forty three.

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a This is a bad Bears team, all right.

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't get helped out by Mitchell Trabinski. The good

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>thing for Mitchell Trabinsky is that Matt Patricia will play

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>very very vanilla defenses. Mitchell Drabinsky will be able to

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>move the ball down the field with a short passing game.

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's not accurate at all when he goes

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>deep down the field, but he does have some legs

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to him, and they'll have the ability to throw underneath

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in this game. I like the Lions, but I think

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that the Bears can put up seventeen as well, and

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna go over forty three here. And also

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a note, something that's equally as good this year is

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have to listen to my heavy breathing.

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that since Todd is at his mother's house, he

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>had to put clothes on. That's right. For those who

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Mikey and I get to actually do this

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on video with Todd, so we are regaled by his

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>beautiful spelt body, thankfully, though still cloaked and clothes. My

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>last pick is not gonna have any really deep dive analysis. Uh.

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland is the third pick. I'll take the points against

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore as long as this is over a touchdown. I'm

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>getting seven and a half here. I will take the

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns the thinking just simply being that the subtraction

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of Freddie Kitchens is going to be a huge boon

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Cleveland Browns. Matty Humans who worked for the

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Veggas heads and Information Newey has a great nick name

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>for Freddy Kitchens, Larry the Cable Guy, which I think

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is a great, uh great sort of image of what

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Freddie Kitchens brought to that ball club, which is not

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>much and was perhaps a detriment to the team. I

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>also think with the continuity of Baker Mayfield and his

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>teammates on offense, I think that this team will be matured.

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I hope Baker Mayfield is actually more matured heading into

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a new season. Sometimes I think he was a little

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>about himself. I just think that this is a lot

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of points. But give me the seven and a half.

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>If Baltimore beats me, you know, thirty four to nothing,

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>lesson learned. But I'll take my chances. In an NFL

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>where I think, with no off season and no preseason

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>games a little less contact than normally, it's a lot

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of points to give in any game, especially against the

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>team as talented at least on papers the Cleveland brown

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So Cleveland plus seven and a half is my final

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>pick teasers of the week. Now, if you recalled last

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>year's megapod, I was spectacularly bad in six point teasers.

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>To Team six point teasers, Mikey, what do you recall

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>my record being I exaggerated, but for a long time

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you were stuck on two wins. I think you were

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like one at one point before a flurry that got

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>me to about five and eleven or whatever it was

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>at the end. Um, all right, Brady to team six

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>point teaser. Because obviously a lot of people like to

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>do teasers. I still think teasers, if done properly, are

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the best bets in the National Football League,

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>if not the best, if you do them Stanford Wong Wise,

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that didn't work out last year, though, because all of

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>mine were Brady, what's your teaser the week? Yeah? No,

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you're right, Gil. In fact, a member of my San

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Susy team who has an extensive casino background told me

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 1>one time, and this is back in the day when teasers,

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:26.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're minus one ten, maybe even at minus one. Uh.

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>He felt a two team six point teaser is the

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:32.760
<v Speaker 1>very best bet you can make in the NFL. UM,

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And you guys know, I like the Falcons with the

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>point spread of two. That's also a very advantageous number

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>for a six point teaser, taking it up to eight

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 1>or in this case eightan a half. So so that's

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the first leg of my two team teaser here. The

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>second leg is the forty Niners down to one and

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl loser angle here is a factor for sure,

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think that applies more so to this team

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>covering the full seven points in the game. Uh, and

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:02.399
<v Speaker 1>also a gener role uh, you know, account of their

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>success in a follow up season to losing the Super Bowl,

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily just winning this game. And I do think

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners are a far better team than Arizona

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals. They grabbed everybody's attention this offseason acquiring DeAndre

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins all of a sudden, they were, you know, a

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>challenger for the division. UM. I think this team still

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>has holes on the offensive line, their defensive spotty at best,

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the secondary is getting older. I do think they're going

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>to be a fun team to watch, and I think

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 1>they'll be involved in some shootouts and this could be

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>one on Sunday. But I'm not ready to put them

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>up and over San Francisco Seattle and Los Angeles in

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the division. And I know Arizona dis is a division

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>dog here and and the Niners, you know, tend to

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>struggle with mobile quarterbacks. But I think San Francisco has

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>an excellent running game and the receiving corps I think

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is better than people think. People like to note the

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>loss of Emmanuel Sanders, but they forget the draft choice

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of Brandon Aiyuk out of Arizona State, who I think

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>can be a real weapon. You've got Mostart Coleman and

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a finally healthy Jerick McKinnon, which is a sick Kyle

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>shanahan type backfield. I think Javin kin Law is going

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to be an awesome player on the defensive line. And again,

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you know thirteen and three last year, a loss on

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. I think in general San Francisco is

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a fade for me this season. I

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>would go under their season win total um. But to

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>win this game over Arizona, who I think is a

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit overhyped this year. To win this game by

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>two points, I think that's a good teaser play. Okay,

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Brady with the Falcons Niners two teams six point teaser

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>by the way, for those who wondered what I was

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>saying before Stanford wrong teaser. Stanford Wong is pseudonym for

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>an author that wrote great gambling books in the past.

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 1>But the most positive e V teaser legs are short

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>home of favorites that you get to tease through the

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>three and the seven, short home dogs that you get

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to tease through the three and the seven, and home

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>teams of us above a seven point spread where you

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 1>can tease it back down through the seven and the three.

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Now that's in a normal year with no more normal

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>home field advantage. This is obviously a quirky year or

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>home field advantage, if it's anything at all, is still

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to be determined, but that is historically what quality Stanford

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Wong teaser legs are. I will buck that momentarily and

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>not use one of those. But um Brady's only right

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:26.839
<v Speaker 1>yours yours does apply in both cases, although although San

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Francisco gets you through the three really technically so yeah,

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:32.399
<v Speaker 1>not a perfect stand for the wall in the leg,

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 1>but almost perfect. Todd, what's yours? Okay, I'm gonna go.

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Also with the Atlanta Falcons, I like the Atlanta Falcons.

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about why I like the Atlanta Falcons. Brady's

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:44.959
<v Speaker 1>talked about why he likes the Atlanta Falcons. We're gonna

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>get eight and a half points. I'll take it in

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta plus the eight and a half. For the second

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the teaser, I'm gonna take the New England Patriots. Um.

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I just think that the Paths have that thing in

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the back of their heads. They lost to this Miami

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins team in a big game late season. Um. Like

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I said before, I think Belichick's got new uh toy

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and his candy store with um with the Camp Newton.

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think the Pats come out here and and

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>all I've got to do is win the game. I'm

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:22.399
<v Speaker 1>on my half. Give me the Pats the second team

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in my two team team, all right, Atlanta in New

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>England for Toddy Mikey, Did Todd know that we were

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>doing this show today? Why is there so much folk

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>angst about what his picks are gonna be? Didn't he

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>make them before we went on air? You a party

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's two thousand eleven and use both of them.

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm allowed to have angst, Mike, Okay, you're allowed to

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>have the first week my turn, I didn't interrupt you

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.720
<v Speaker 1>when you talk. I'm gonna party like it's two thousand

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot. You can't take the under in the first year, Mike,

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't take the under in the first period in

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 1>these picks. Sorry, Lady Cannon's top two picks. The Rams,

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>let's teach ab update and a half and the Falcons.

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's tease them up to eight and a half. And

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Todd's already talked about why Brady liked them, so I

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>don't need to talk about Atlanta and who was the

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>other team, Mikey, I'm sorry, and the Rams Atlanta and

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the Rams, oh, the Brady Cannon special um dare I

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 1>make it all four of us who are taking the

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Falcons on these teasers? You know what that means? Yeah? Well, yeah,

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, it is so Atlanta teasing through the

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>three and the seven two about eight and a half

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta plus eight and a half on one side of

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the teaser. My other side is actually not a textbook

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>leg I'm taking the Indianapolis Colts and teasing them down

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 1>through the seven and the three against the Jacksonville Jaguars.

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I think this could be a historically bad football team.

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 1>They're obviously tanking for Trevor. All the are the Jacksonville Jaguars,

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:50.879
<v Speaker 1>and if the Colts just can't beat them, all I'm

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>asking them to do is beat them. For goodness sakes,

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I deserve to be owing one on the teaser. So

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's Indianapolis in Atlanta as my teaser of the week

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>minus half, okay, because I see the Colts everywhere as eight?

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 1>So are you sure? Give me minus one? Give me

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 1>minus one, give me minus two? Yes, I'm sorry, give

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>me minus two. Okay, I'm not holding you in contempt,

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>but I am still warning, okay, still warning everybody. Minus too.

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. I don't know what I was thinking. Right there,

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>idyls minus too again. As long as it's under the three,

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that's my play, alright. I like Mikey's even though I

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 1>don't like Mikey as a person. Do you like his

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.399
<v Speaker 1>pick with the Rams update? Now? All right? You didn't

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>like mine? Is that what you're telling me? I'm just

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that I wanted to say something nice about Mike

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>because you know he's just he's a bad person and

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you can want to help him out of and you

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>interrupted him five times first he was stenographer. Now is

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the judge, let's get as amazing. All right, last thing

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>before the final two questions, Survivor pick of the week. Now,

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>if any of us are still alive and Survivor late

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in the season, you are allowed not to give your pick.

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>But here week one, why not Brady if you were

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in a Survivor. By the way, are you in circus Survivor? Brady? Yes,

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that. That is really just not my ty key.

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>As far as the style of NFL gambling, I'm not

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a Survivor guy. I've played a few times. I've come close,

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>but I am not in Mike's contest. All right, what

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:19.439
<v Speaker 1>would it be if you were in Survivor? What would

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it be? Well, I have to preface this by saying

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I have not mapped out the entire sixteen seventeen week season.

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>What have you? Um So I'm not necessarily being strategic

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>about who I'm going to pick this week. But I

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 1>think the forty Niners are a good team to win

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>this week. Um you know, I expressed my feelings there

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and my teaser play. Not sure if they'll cover the seven,

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>but I think they win the game. That would be

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>my uh my Survivor play this week. Mikey, just clarify

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>for everybody the rules of Circus Survivor. You are allowed

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to use the same team more than once, yes or no?

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>And is it against the spread or is it straight up?

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Straight up? And you can only use the team one okay,

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and you have to use the Thanksgiving Day that's a

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>week onto itself. So there's eighteen weeks all right, straight up.

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Cannot use a team more than once. I knew this,

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I just wanted to clarify. Okay, who

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>do you have, Mikey. I'm using the Colts against the

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>tanking Jaguires this week. That's exactly who I'm using Colts,

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 1>at least in one of my two entries. I'm taking

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the Colts because I wouldn't mind having them fall by

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the wayside in terms of being able not to use

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:28.919
<v Speaker 1>them again. That is, so I'm taking the Colts. Todd. Now, Mike,

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of course is going to give me a hard time

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 1>for not being prepared. But nobody told me we were

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 1>doing Survivor this year until the beginning of this phone call.

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So I like Brady, who is being intelligent and telling

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>us that you have to map out the season so

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 1>you see who you're gonna need later. That's the only

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>way to really play survivor correctly. But since you and

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Mikey didn't realize that, that's fine, No we did. We're

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>just for god, I know you did. I'm just giving

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>you a little dig. Calm down, Relax, relax, Okay. I'm

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 1>going to take a team that comes by the name

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Pittsburgh Steelers. That's right, the Stellars are back

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 1>with Danny Roethlisburger at the quarterback position. We're going into

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:17.800
<v Speaker 1>play Danny Dimes and yeah, I think Ben Roethlisburger sands

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the beard, gets it done, and who probably is gonna

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:23.839
<v Speaker 1>need them later nobody. I'll take the steel and they

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>will let me have him. On M S G Plus Mikey,

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>do you believe that it's amazing? I got serious? Yeah. Oh,

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, I'm gonna be unentertaining for now

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>on I'm gonna go back to Todd. That was a

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>very quick way of turning things against you. All of

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:50.439
<v Speaker 1>a sudden. Look out the tables turned alur final two,

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>final two questions he can dish he can't receive uh

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:58.920
<v Speaker 1>final two questions of all the big favorites on the board,

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>which is the most likely in your opinion to lose outright?

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise known as what's the team that's gonna jack up

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>your your money line favorite parlay? If that's how you

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>choose to play the NFL, Brady, who's the big favorite

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that you are least likely to trust? And let let

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 1>me define who these are? The Kansas City Chiefs nine

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorites against Houston tonight. Let's go

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 1>with the six and a half because there's not enough

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to choose from. If I don't Buffalo six and a

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 1>half over the Jets, New England six and a half

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:29.840
<v Speaker 1>over the Dolphins, Baltimore seven and a half over Cleveland,

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and San Francisco seven point favorites against Arizona. Did I

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:38.279
<v Speaker 1>skip the Colts Colts by eight over Jacksonville. Pardon me, Well,

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna like hearing this, but that would be

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 1>my choice. The Indianapolis Colts. Um. I think they have

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of talent and really all over the field.

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 1>I actually picked this team to win the division, but

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 1>so much of their talent is brand new, including their

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 1>most important piece, Philip Rivers at quarterback. So you guys know,

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>training campus been basically a glorified zoom meeting. You have

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>no preseason reps, and now all of a sudden, this

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 1>team is supposed to just immediately gel and fire on

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>all cylinders in game one, week one. I I also

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:16.960
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in the tank theory on Jacksonville. I think

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we saw that with the Miami Dolphins last year and

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it didn't really come to fruition. Um. What the Jacksonville

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars have that the Colts don't is continuity. And you

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 1>touched on this a little bit earlier, Gil, this is

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>basically the same team, same coaching staff, a couple of

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 1>minor upgrades via the draft. Uh in Jacksonville. And also

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 1>this Colts team, they are built for playing in the

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Dome with speed, and now they go to hot, sticky Florida.

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be eighty eight degrees humidity on grass. I

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 1>also think that COVID travel is different from traditional travel

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for road teams. This year, you've got a division game,

0:45:56.600 --> 0:46:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Division home dog. I think the Jags actually have a show. Okay, yeah,

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean we are Mikey and I are relying on

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers to survive in our survivor to in our

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>survivor pool with that pick, Todd, biggest favorite, most likely

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>news out right in your opinion, I'm gonna go with

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the Colts too. If you're going to go and talk

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>about big faves, it could theoretically go down. I believe

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the Colts lost in Week sixteen to the Jacks last

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>year to put them under the total of their season

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>win total. I mean, who was the Colts? Like? What's

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:33.880
<v Speaker 1>so special about the Colts? I don't think there's anything

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.840
<v Speaker 1>special about him in Philip Rivers is certainly not somebody

0:46:36.840 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 1>who I think is a Hall of Fame quarterback. Mikey

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:42.239
<v Speaker 1>right that down, Mikey, Well, you know, the Colts have

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a to answer your question. Colts have a pretty spectacular

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>offensive line in Jacksonville has lost players since then. News.

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 1>That's why their favorite. Todd wishnev I only have outgoing,

0:46:57.280 --> 0:47:01.759
<v Speaker 1>but incoming. I cannot take incoming again. This is gonna

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>be the new thing. Todd can't take anything blah blah

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:09.879
<v Speaker 1>black Mike, But Todd, what about the Houston oilers? How

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>good were those oilers? You? Warren Moon could spin it.

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Warren Moon could spin it all right, I'm gonna

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:21.280
<v Speaker 1>take the Patriots as the favorite that could get upset.

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's so many guys that have left that program.

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>We really don't know what we're getting. I like Fitzpatrick,

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they were able to beat this team last year. I

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 1>give the Dolphins a shot to win this game. Yeah,

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 1>and as you know, I'm already on the Dolphins. Patriots

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 1>would be my selection as well, for all the reasons stated.

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 1>We just don't know. They don't have players, Like how

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>good do you people think Belichick is? I mean, you

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>cannot overcome not having the players on the field. Stop

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it already, as I now cut to a shot of

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 1>me Sunday night, just shaking my head in dismay. If

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots question, uh, last question, if we were playing

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:59.279
<v Speaker 1>a bizarro game, pick Gil, what's your pick on the

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 1>big favorite could move? Oh? My god? Did he was? He?

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Was he here New England? You you and Mike you

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:08.760
<v Speaker 1>like pets? Yes? I remember I had Miami earlier too,

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 1>as as one of my best bets. Alright, final final question.

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:15.839
<v Speaker 1>If we were in a Bizarro world and we had

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:17.959
<v Speaker 1>to pay it, I had to play a side rather

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in each of it, every one of these games, but

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:22.919
<v Speaker 1>we got one free pass one game that you wanted

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:25.439
<v Speaker 1>no part of on the side, Brady, what would it be? Well,

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you guys, leaning towards Miami versus New England

0:48:29.400 --> 0:48:31.400
<v Speaker 1>with the points. But but I really don't know what

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:34.239
<v Speaker 1>to make of this team yet. And I really don't

0:48:34.239 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 1>know what to make of New England. Uh So I'm

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 1>just gonna wait and see. I do not have a

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:42.399
<v Speaker 1>bet on that game. But the one I really want

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 1>no part of is Tennessee versus Denver on Monday Night.

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And I know you guys really like the Titans, UM,

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is really not about the von Miller thing,

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:53.800
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not really sold on either of these teams.

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Mike Brabel is a great coach, he's improving

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 1>year in and year out. UM. But I thought they

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>caught a little bit of lightning in the bottle last

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:04.840
<v Speaker 1>year with Tannehill and Derrick Henry going nuts the second

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:08.280
<v Speaker 1>half of the season. UM and the Drew lock point. Yeah,

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how good is this guy really? And all

0:49:10.880 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, you know they're, you know, a contender

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for the division because he beat up on week competition

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the last four games. So I am not high on

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 1>either of these teams. And I don't know who's going

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to show up if it's going to be a good

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:25.920
<v Speaker 1>or bad version on Monday night, so I'll stay a

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:28.600
<v Speaker 1>long ways away. I'm glad you're the first guest this year, Brady,

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 1>because you do see things a lot differently than I

0:49:31.640 --> 0:49:34.640
<v Speaker 1>know I do heading into week one and we'll see, uh,

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:37.400
<v Speaker 1>who's uh on it most of the time, or who's

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>been completely wrong, or maybe it'll just split down the middle.

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So I really appreciate the perspective Todd gave. You want

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:45.400
<v Speaker 1>no part of I want no part of the Cincinnati

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Bengals against the Los Angeles Chargers. What in the world

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is that? Who knows what you're getting with Cincinnati? Los

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Angeles has lost their Philip Rivers. I have no idea

0:49:56.880 --> 0:49:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is ekel are going to get stopped at the half

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 1>yard line forty two times? An instant replace started me

0:50:02.000 --> 0:50:04.560
<v Speaker 1>from winning up that. Who knows what's gonna happen? I

0:50:04.600 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to I was. I was on the right

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 1>side of that, meaning the winning side, let's not call

0:50:10.560 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it the right side. I was on the winning side

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:13.319
<v Speaker 1>of that. I was standing at the caso. That was

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the cheating side. But I do believe there was the

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:19.239
<v Speaker 1>cheating side, and I said, I said to Uh, I

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:20.920
<v Speaker 1>can't remember who I was with, but I said to him,

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I was like, don't if I ever tell you, I

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:25.040
<v Speaker 1>don't get the you know, nothing good ever happens to me,

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>remind me of this moment. By the way, I'm more,

0:50:28.040 --> 0:50:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised that more people anecdotally right, I don't have

0:50:31.960 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the evidence on this, but I'm surprised that more people,

0:50:34.160 --> 0:50:37.239
<v Speaker 1>just in in people I've talked to aren't on the

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Chargers like there does not There does not seem to

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 1>be any Chargers love against a rookie quarterback playing his

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:48.200
<v Speaker 1>first game in the National Football League very interesting to me. Uh,

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:51.399
<v Speaker 1>mikey game you want no part of at How bad

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of the scheduling by the NFL that that's one of

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the three late games? Just awful? Anyhow, I want no

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:01.799
<v Speaker 1>part of this Saints this game, just because I need

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to see this this Bucks team. I'm not necessarily sold

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:07.840
<v Speaker 1>on the hype. Is Tom Brady better than Jamis? I

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean he looked pretty bad the last

0:51:11.160 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 1>two months of the season. Uh last year, um playing

0:51:14.680 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in the system that he's known for so long. Yeah,

0:51:16.680 --> 0:51:20.239
<v Speaker 1>he'll have a lot more weapons, but his father time

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:21.919
<v Speaker 1>going to catch up them. So I'm gonna take await

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and see approach on the bucks, probably for a few

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:26.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks and certainly this week. That's as good a choice

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>as any. I ended up on Seattle Atlanta. I know

0:51:29.120 --> 0:51:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I haven't landed my teaser, but to me, that is

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the most plinko ish game out there, um, meaning it

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:38.120
<v Speaker 1>could fall anywhere on the number. Seattle Atlanta would be

0:51:38.160 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 1>my pick, but I would give Tampa Bay, New Orleans

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:42.719
<v Speaker 1>honorable mentioned as well. I agree with Mike too that

0:51:42.719 --> 0:51:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that one is really hard to figure out. Yeah, that's

0:51:45.400 --> 0:51:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a tough one. Absolutely New Orleans favored by three. And

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to switch? Can I switch my teaser from

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta plus eight and a half two and Pats minus

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 1>pointing a half two rams plus eight and a half

0:51:56.600 --> 0:51:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta plus eight half because I like the rams also,

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 1>so can I switch of my pat side of my

0:52:01.320 --> 0:52:04.840
<v Speaker 1>one of my Okay, isn't that what you had? Mikey? Also?

0:52:05.440 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 1>That is what Mike. Yeah, you're glad to glad do

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:13.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want, Todd wish Knev, whatever you want. I

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:16.200
<v Speaker 1>see your strategy, Todd, You're just gonna copy me on

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the teasers and tie for first because we know Gil

0:52:19.160 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>has no job. Apparently you guys have never seen primetime

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 1>action on MSG plus, where I can't miss thinking about

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:29.560
<v Speaker 1>moving to New York. Yeah, there you go. For Todd Wish,

0:52:29.600 --> 0:52:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Deev and Mike Palm Staples on the show each and

0:52:32.280 --> 0:52:34.920
<v Speaker 1>every weeker on the Megapod. And to Brady Cannon kind

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:37.000
<v Speaker 1>enough to join us for the first week each and

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:41.040
<v Speaker 1>every year former Super Contest Champion. Thank you, gentlemen, appreciate it.

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:45.400
<v Speaker 1>It's Gill Alexander can't believe football is here. Very pumped.

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy good luck with all your bets stuff. Thanks for

0:52:48.040 --> 0:53:00.160
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Megapod M