WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance: Mary Barra's Buyback Plan

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene, along

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Abramowitz. Join us each day

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for insight from the best an economics, geopolitics, finance and investment.

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe to Bloomberg Surveillance on demand on Apple, Spotify and

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>anywhere you get your podcasts, and always on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business app. John Ferrell

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>with Mary Burrow, I.

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Want to go through some of the numbers for our audience.

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Divid end up thirty three percent, biggest ever buyback plan

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 2>ten billion dollars, forty billion dollar name yesterday. Just some

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 2>context perspective there that is massive inquiring minds. Mary will

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 2>want to know why have you decided to deliver a

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 2>ten billion dollar buy back shortly after you've signed a

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 2>labor contract that adds nine point three billion to expenses

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 2>over its term.

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, as we looked at what was happening from a

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 3>labor perspective, we had built and really the labor environment

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 3>going into our negotiations, we had put conservative estimates into

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 3>our plan. So although it was a little higher than

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 3>what we expected, we believe that we have and our

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 3>guidance for next year, we've already said that we'll be

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 3>able to offset that completely with the plan that we

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 3>already had of a two billion dollar cost out perspective.

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 3>So we did the right thing to recognize our manufacturing

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 3>team members who have done a great job and continue

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 3>to build vehicles safely with high quality. And we also

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 3>thought that we've got to look and make sure that

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 3>we're balanced across all of our stakeholders, and our owners

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 3>are very important. So we think this was a very

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 3>balanced response when we look at what was done from

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 3>a labor perspective and what we're doing as part of

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 3>our capital allocation framework for our owners.

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's get into that. So shareholders are super happy.

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 2>The name is up by almost eleven percent so far

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 2>this morning. I wonder if you aw Wiz Mary, they

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 2>didn't get the forty percent they wanted. They got twenty

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 2>five plus cost of living adjustments and other things as well.

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Is the old things of this morning not something that

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 2>concerns you.

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 3>When I look at it, I think it's balanced. Again,

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 3>we have very well compensated and you know, when you

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 3>look at the suite of benefits that our represented team

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 3>members have it's a very very appropriate package and frankly

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 3>leading from an industry perspective broader than just the auto industry.

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 3>So I think we did the right thing to recognize

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 3>and reward the hard work of our manufacturing team members

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 3>across the board. But also one of the things our

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing team members very much value is job security. And

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.239
<v Speaker 3>to have job security, you have to have a strong

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 3>company and you have to look at all of your stakeholders.

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 3>So what we did from a share buyback perspective for

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 3>our owners is I think a very balanced response.

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 2>As you know, this move this morning not just about

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the capital return program, also about cost cuts. We know

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 2>you're looking to fully offset that labor contract the additional

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 2>costs from it. Have you identified where you will cut

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 2>where you need to cut?

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, a lot of this was already underway. At the

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 3>beginning of this year calendar year twenty twenty three, we

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 3>announced it too, billion dollar cost reduction structural cost reduction

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 3>between twenty three and the end of twenty four.

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:06.679
<v Speaker 4>That's well underway.

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 3>As I said, we also comprehended that we would have

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 3>increases in our labor cost as we looked at what

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 3>the environment was and also wanting to reward our manufacturing employees.

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 3>So you know there's work going across many aspects of

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 3>the business and including making our products more efficient while

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 3>still having the features, the functionality and beautiful designs that

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 3>our customers want. So there's been a concentrated effort at

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 3>the company to lower our fixed costs while enabling wonderful

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 3>products and rewarding the team that is helping us deliver them.

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Clearly, these are additional costs. Are they forcing a change

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 2>in execution or a change in strategy?

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Definitely not a change in strategy. Our strategy is clear.

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 3>It's really based on four pillars of executing our strong

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 3>internal combustion engine program vehicles, and we see we're performing

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 3>very well in the market and we see that we're

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 3>below the average incentives. I think that speaks to the

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 3>strength of our internal combustion engine products. From an EVY perspective,

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 3>we have confidence in the portfolio we have. We're a

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 3>bit disappointed this year that we were constrained by the

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 3>automation to build modules. So this is not something that

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 3>is fundamentally an issue with Altium. It was more manufacturing

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 3>automation issue that we're working and we'll be out of

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 3>it by middle of next year and making improvement every

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 3>quarter from that perspective.

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Also software and this year.

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.119
<v Speaker 3>Earlier this year, Mike Abbott joined our team who brings

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 3>tremendous software expertise and he's built a very strong team

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 3>that we'll share more about when we get to our

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 3>investor day in March of next year. And then autonomy

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 3>and when you look at autonomous vehicles and the importance

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 3>of this technology and the talent that we have at Cruise.

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 3>We are doing an independent review from an incident perspective

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 3>but also overall from a safety perspective, and that will

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 3>guide our path forward there. But we have a very

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 3>capable team there. So the four pillars of our strategy

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 3>have not changed at all. What has changed is our tactics,

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.799
<v Speaker 3>and our tactics are changing because of the world is changing.

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 3>We never thought that the EV adoption would necessarily be

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 3>a straight line. We've seen this in other markets, we're

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 3>seeing it now in the US. But I think the

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 3>thing that everybody has to remember, if the growth is slowing,

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 3>it is still growing. And we think as we get

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 3>more of the EV products we have this year into next,

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 3>we think we're going to see is strong adoption for

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 3>our products, and as the charging infrastructure continues to be

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 3>more robust, we think that's going to drive adoption as

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 3>well as having affordable evs. And that's where when you

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 3>look at the Chevrolet Equinox as well as the Blazer

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 3>and the Bolt that's coming, we're going to be having

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 3>products in that range of affordable vehicles.

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 4>That is going to be very important from EV adoption.

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Two things to unpack there. One is robot taxis. The

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 2>other is EV. So let's deal with robot taxis. First,

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 2>your counting expenses on crews substantially, just how committed are

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 2>you there? I remember only a number of years ago

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 2>we were talking about bringing in fifty billion in revenue

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.359
<v Speaker 2>by twenty thirty, and I get it. Married We'll understand

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 2>that new tech is tough to develop, its to deploy.

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I think we're seeing that across a range of issues.

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 2>But when do you know if it's the right time

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 2>just to walk away from this well, I.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Think the first of all, when you look at the

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 3>progress that the Cruise team has made over the eight

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 3>last eight years when General Motors acquired crews, I think

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 3>it's substantial and we've already demonstrated that the cruise vehicle

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 3>can perform at a level that's safer than a human driver.

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's not forget over forty thousand people on average lose

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 3>their lives in traffic accidents in the US alone, and

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 3>ninety percent of them are caused by human error. What

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 3>we have learned with this incident is it's got to

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 3>be significantly better than a human driver to drive adoption,

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 3>and we have to do a much better job of

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 3>working with the regulators. That's something that GM has a

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 3>long reputation of working and being transparent with regulators at

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 3>the local, state, and federal level. So I think as

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 3>we do that and get the results of the independent

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 3>review we're doing, that will guide us on our path forward.

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 4>From an AV perspective.

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm always interested in how we know when we're wrong

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 2>an exit size I think everyone has to go through,

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 2>including myself married. But on this topic of EV's the

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 2>slow down, what's behind it and why aren't we just

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 2>learning that American consumers just don't want these cars?

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't think it's that American consumers just don't

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 3>want these cars. I think there still is limited availability

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 3>when you look at the choice that customers had today,

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 3>from an internal combustion vehicle perspective, I think a lot

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 3>of the evs that are out.

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Right now are more expensive.

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 3>You've got to look at where the sweet spot of

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 3>the market is, and when you really want to win

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 3>an EV's you've got to make sure that you are

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 3>meeting the customer who only owns one vehicle. That's the

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 3>bulk of people who buy vehicles today, new vehicles. They

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 3>only own one vehicle or if they have two in

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 3>their family. They're needed every day to earning their livelihoods.

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 3>So we've got to get affordable. There's got to be

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 3>a robust charging infrastructure. So again, the growth hasn't gone

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 3>in reverse. It's slowing. I think we never expected. We

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 3>thought it would be have some bumps along the way.

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what we're.

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Seeing right now.

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 3>But I think when we have evs that are affordable,

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 3>when people realize how much fun they are to drive

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 3>and the performance and they're not giving anything up, and

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 3>then that all important charging infrastructure, I think you know

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 3>we're going to see them start to grow at a

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 3>more rapid break again. And that's something that we'll continue

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 3>to watch. And that's why we've changed some of our

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 3>tactics to be responsive to where the customer is.

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 2>You've been super generous with your time. Marriage. Just want

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 2>to fit in one further question. Right now, you're a

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 2>forty three billion dollar name. It's a big move this

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 2>morning by ten percent. The forward multiple we're talking about

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 2>four times expected earnings a little more than that after

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>today's move. The stock has been dead money for the

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 2>best part of a decade. You've been doing this a

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 2>long time. I know you're super close with investors. What

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 2>is it that you think is in this plan, this

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 2>strategy that you have and a strategy that you've suggested

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 2>this morning hasn't changed that's going to turn this around.

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think demonstrating our commitment to all of our

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 3>stakeholders and the I think when you look at a

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 3>ten billion dollar accelerated buyback program, it should signal because

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 3>it means we have confidence in the cash generation ability

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 3>of this company. We have confidence in our strategy across

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 3>the four pillars that I covered. Yes, we had some

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 3>challenges that this year with our ultim based evs that

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 3>I think gabe investors some concern, But we're demonstrating the

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.359
<v Speaker 3>confidence that we and the board have that we're executing

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the strategy, and we're going to see growth, strong cash

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 3>flow and strong margins.

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 4>That's what we're going to deliver.

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>That's captured in today's move nine percent. Mary, appreciate your

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 2>time ready tell you thanks for catching up with us,

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Mary Parda of GM too.

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Wiseman joins us right now. Global Efects interest rate strategist

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>much more than that at Macquarie, with lots and lots

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of experience on this. I love the first sentence of

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>your note. Don't believe the hype You've been skeptical. Are

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you combining and dovetailing in with your low rate call

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a true slowdown in the economy?

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 5>Yes? Absolutely. I think the narrative these days from Wall

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 5>Street that I've seen in the last few weeks is

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 5>that the reason the ten year field has been coming

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 5>down is because we're in a disinflationary phase here in

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 5>the economy, and there's going to be more disinflation to

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 5>come in the US. I agree with that we are

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 5>going to see disinflation in the US. It's going to

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 5>come in rants, it's going to come in those eras

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 5>of the CPI that are linked to consumer discretionary spending.

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 5>But let's Also keep in mind one of the reasons

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 5>we're going to see this disinflation is because the consumer

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.599
<v Speaker 5>is slowing. And there you have the don't believe the

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 5>hype story, right, I don't believe the story is about

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 5>record breaking Black Thursdays, by Friday sales and Cyber Monday sales.

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 5>I think what I think these sales were on the

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 5>back of heavy discounting. If you look at what some

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 5>of these corporate execs had said prior to the start

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 5>of the holiday spending season, they talked about having to

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.199
<v Speaker 5>cut prices. We'll all Marty even talked about deflation. So

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 5>this is this is about disinflation. But let's keep in

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 5>mind where this this inflation is going to come from.

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 5>It's going to come from a weakening and pricing power

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 5>at the consumer product and services level. It's going to

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 5>be driven by slow down in agurate demand in the US.

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Also about how they're pank for this stuff Binapailita. You

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 2>look at some of the numbers just booming. What do

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 2>you take away from that?

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 5>So my takeaway is from a macroeconomic perspective, what it

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 5>does is it shifts spending to the early part of

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 5>the season because normally you would have to save up

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 5>a few more shekels as you approach your deadline on

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 5>December twenty fifth to get those purchases done with by now,

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 5>pay later. You don't need to do that, so it

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 5>allows you to spend earlier, especially if you don't have

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 5>access to revolving credit or credit cards. So I think

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 5>that's another reason why we might have seen the so

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 5>called record breaking days on last Friday and Monday. But again,

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 5>if that's if it's the case that spending was only

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 5>pulled forward, it doesn't mean that in aggregate for the

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 5>whole of the season we're going to get that much

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 5>that much hype.

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 6>So far, people have viewed weaker US data as a positive.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 6>It's both been for a bond rally and a stock rally,

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 6>And you're saying that we could see that bond rally

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 6>continue quite significantly going forward. Will there be a diversion

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 6>so in terms of risk asseesis or have to be

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 6>to fuel a bond rally that goes much deeper than

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 6>where we are now.

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, to let the bond rally extend to say where

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 5>the ten yure yield gets the three percent, I do

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 5>think it has to be associated with a sell off

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 5>at risk assets. I don't think you know, to get

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 5>that kind of forceful move early in the bond market,

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 5>you need to have some sort of dislocation in risk ASTs,

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 5>some sort of drop in stocks, but over time, not necessarily.

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 5>I think we can see a situation where, if this

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 5>inflation continues slowly, you get the bond deal going down

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 5>to where it was, let's say in the spring. Three

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 5>and a half percent is not inconceivable without a stock

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 5>market drop as long as it happens slowly and steadily.

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But well, corporations adapt. If I go back to bear Stearns,

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>where you're held court, you had an entire security analysis

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>team looking at these slowdowns, I don't buy the gloom.

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And the corporations, like General Motors, will adapt.

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.599
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure what they're going to adapt to. Technological

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 5>progress and changes. They can adapt to. Government policies that

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 5>spur more investment in electric vehicles and clean energy technologies

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 5>they can adapt to. But what do you do when

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 5>you have excess inventory as the auto dealers do?

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 7>Now?

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 5>What do you do when the banks and the finance

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 5>companies are cutting off credit to auto buyers?

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 8>What do you do?

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 5>Then you're not in control of that situation. You're in

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 5>control of what's happening on your factory floor, You're in

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 5>control of promotions, and maybe the way you adapt is

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 5>by cutting prices. Let's face it, that's a way of

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 5>adapting to to hold on to market share in the

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 5>face of excess inventories, in the face of consumers slowing

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 5>their demand. So yeah, they can adapt, but it's not

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 5>necessarily in a way that is going to make their

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 5>stock prices shoot up.

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 2>You've identified a series of places in this economy where

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 2>we could see lower prices retail, Walmart, talked about the

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 2>auto makers, We're talking about GM, maybe lower prices, going

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 2>to see that come through the pipeline soon. What's the

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 2>biggest threat that still lingers for you? The biggest threat

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 2>to that view that this disinflation continue through next year.

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 5>It's supply shocks. I think the lesson of twenty twenty

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 5>twenty two and early twenty twenty three was that we

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 5>cannot control what happens in the rest of the world,

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.599
<v Speaker 5>especially as it pertains to the supply of oil, the

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 5>supply of natural gas. So from my perspective, if we

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 5>get another shock in that market, and by the way,

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't have to be because of a war, although

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 5>in the past two years that has been the case.

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 5>It could be simply that OPEC plus decides to curtail

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 5>supply and we get a brand going back up to

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 5>the low nineties as a result of that. Again, it's

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 5>a question of how much they curtail supply by, but

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 5>that's the biggest risk right now. The good news is

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 5>that gasoline prices in the US have been falling for

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 5>six weeks straight, I think, and steadily. I think that's

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 5>going to show up in the CPI by the time

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 5>we rolled around to seeing the November numbers and the

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 5>December numbers. But the real reason that the CPI is

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 5>going to still see disinflation is because rents rents in

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 5>the new tenant market and the new lease market are

0:14:57.960 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 5>coming down. That's going to put a lot of pressu

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 5>ultimately on the yellows as measures of rents of primary residences.

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 5>We're going to get that disinflation over the next few months.

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>This is exactly what nil Data of Renaisance Macro is

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 2>talking about tom the disinflation that's in the pipeline for

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 2>rents for used cars, which is why based on what

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Walla said yesterday, it's not that much of an if

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 2>for the likes of Terry, for the likes of Nil Duta,

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 2>which is why they think you're going to get this

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 2>conversation early next year about which you said interest rates.

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's no question there's a school of thought out

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>there that this is not if. It's just simply when

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in the path to it. But I would dovetail it

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>back to the labor economy, which we've barely touched on today,

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and we've got claims coming up here Thursday. And then

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the late jobs report for November. I believe

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it's December eighth. But the basic idea here, John is

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>when does a labor economy finally go? If you get

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a labor economy to go, you get there instantly.

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Claims two O nine, keep going back to two nine

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 2>claims to eighty one economy in so many different ways

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 2>over the last eighteen months or so. Terry, it's going

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 2>to see it, Terry wi there at Macquarie.

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Longer going far away. There was KKR nineteen seventy six

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>with history made in a style and a method. At

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>KKR it was original. Shanale Basset gets an update from

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>their co CEO Shanale, Good morning, Thank you, Tom.

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 9>I'm standing by with the co CEO of KKR, Scott

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 9>not All, and it is a really big day for

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 9>KKR because they are doing this. They're buying the rest

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 9>of Global Atlantic, a big insurance company that they don't

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 9>already own. That is an all cash, two point seven

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 9>billion dollar deal. But you're also creating a new unit

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 9>at KKR that houses a core private equity business. If

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 9>you had to give the market one way to understand

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 9>what you're trying to do over there, what is it?

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 10>First of all, Shanali, great to be with you, Thanks

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 10>for having me. Really, what we're trying to do today

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 10>is lay out the big three growth engines we have

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 10>as a firm. So you're right, we are buying the

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 10>minority stake in Global Atlantic we don't already own. We

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 10>already owned sixty three percent of the companies, so we're

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 10>buying the other thirty seven percent. Global Atlantic has been

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 10>a great partnership for us. This is a transaction we

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 10>did in twenty twenty one. The company is more than

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 10>doubled since we announced the original deal in July of

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty and it's been highly recurring a lot of

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 10>growth earnings for KKR, so that's part one. We are

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 10>also modifying our compensation ratios so our asset management business

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 10>continues to scale.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 8>Our run rate management fees have doubled over the last

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 8>three years.

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 10>So the second thing we're doing is reducing the compensation

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 10>ratioon fees, making an offsetting increase on kerry, and that

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 10>will allow us to create more fee related earnings for

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 10>our shareholder.

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 9>You're changing the way you pay people.

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 10>In effect, not the aggregate amount of compensation, but we're

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 10>providing more of the fee related earnings to our shareholders,

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 10>a little bit more carry to our people.

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 8>The net of that is about.

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 10>Neutral, but it will mean more of few related earnings overall.

0:17:58.240 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 10>And then the third thing we're doing to your point,

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 10>and this is relatively new for us, is we're creating

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 10>a new segment for the firm.

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 8>So we've historically reported.

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 10>As asset management and insurance. We are adding a new

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 10>segment called Strategic Holdings. And what we will include in

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 10>there are the dividends that we're receiving and will begin

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 10>to receive in greater magnitude from our core private equity portfolio,

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 10>which is a portfolio of great diversified recession resistant companies

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 10>that we've been building up over the last several years.

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 9>KKR, Apollo, Brookfield, they're all buying insurance companies. All of

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 9>you are diversifying in pretty meaningful ways if you think

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 9>about it. It's made private equity, by the dollars, by

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 9>the assets under management, a smaller part of all of

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 9>your businesses. What does this mean for the future of

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 9>private equity?

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 10>Private equity is still a growth business for us. We

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 10>expect to continue to grow that part of KKR for

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 10>a long time, both with respect to the flagship strategies,

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 10>but also we've created a number of different growth strategies.

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 10>The core private equity business is part of private equity

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 10>that's now a thirty billion dollar franchise for us.

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 8>So this isn't about an ore. This is about an

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 8>and we see an ability to grow PE and.

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 10>All the other parts of KKR, and we've diversified meaningfully

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 10>over the course of the last ten to fifteen years.

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 8>We're just continuing our way down that path.

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 9>Now, what does Global Atlantic exactly do. It seems like

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 9>what it's really doing is giving you a whole balance

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 9>sheet to be using to compete on you've mentioned capital

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 9>markets is one place there's been a lot of competition

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 9>from your industry to the banks. How does this help

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 9>you now compete in a bigger way?

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 10>Sure, Global Atlantic, as you know, it's largely issued annuities

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.239
<v Speaker 10>to individuals, and so if you think about what we

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 10>do at KKRE, we work for pensioners, retirement retirees all

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 10>around the world now family offices and individual investors as well.

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 10>Global Atlantic distributes its products to that same kind of

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 10>an audience. So historically we've worked for tens of millions

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 10>of retirees. We still do, but now they're just in

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 10>the form of policyholders. And that's our mission at KKR

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 10>is to actually do a great job for all those

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 10>people that we work for.

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 8>We're not confused about who our bosses are.

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 10>And so to the second part of your question on

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 10>capital markets, what Global Atlantic allows us to do is

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 10>create more synergy.

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 8>We didn't necessarily see all this three.

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 10>Years ago when we started our way down this path,

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 10>but we think there's even more we can do to

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 10>unlock value between the two companies, and capital markets is

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 10>just one of those examples.

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 9>Capital markets means you might be appearing on more and

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 9>more deals lending a balance sheet to provide capital for

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 9>big buyouts and other leverage loan deals.

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:27.479
<v Speaker 8>That's right, and we're already in that business.

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 10>So the way that we built our capital markets business

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 10>is by partnering with a Street, So we'll be alongside

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 10>of the traditional banks and investment banks as we built

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 10>that business. But what Global Atlantic brings us is an

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 10>ability to expand the vision for that franchise. So there's

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 10>more to do across asset based finance. As an example, more,

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 10>when Global Atlantic does their large institutional block transactions, we

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 10>can put some of the Global Atlantic balance sheet.

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 8>GA has its own.

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 10>Sidecard third party capital funds called IVY, so some can

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 10>go into those third party funds, and then we can

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 10>syndicate the excess through our capital markets forranchise as well.

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 10>Just like we do private equity and infrastructure transactions, it

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 10>applies to insurance deals as well.

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 9>Something interesting about these deals is that you already have

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 9>told investors this morning that this will add twenty percent

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 9>to total operating earnings. You're boosting your targets into twenty

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 9>twenty six for few related earnings.

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 4>What are the real financial impacts?

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 9>What can stockholders feel for KKR over the next two

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 9>three years, well, I.

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 10>Think what they'll be able to see is we are

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 10>going to grow all three of our recurring forms of

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 10>earnings in a much more meaningful way going forward, So

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 10>a few related earnings will be higher. We continue to

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 10>see a lot of organic growth in our businesses. Just

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 10>by changing our compensation ratios, you get accretion on few

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:39.719
<v Speaker 10>related earnings, and we think by virtue of what we're

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 10>renouncing today, we can do even more. With the Global

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.959
<v Speaker 10>Atlantic where we invest that portfolio, it's already gone from

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 10>seventy two billion of AUM when we announced the transaction

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 10>to one hundred and fifty eight billion over the last

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 10>few years.

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 8>We think we can do even more together. But they'll

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 8>also see.

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.360
<v Speaker 10>More insurance operating earnings, which we believe are highly recurring

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 10>and fast growing. And then we'll have this third element,

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 10>which will be the core private equity dividends showing up

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 10>in the strategic holding segment. If you put those three

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 10>things together, we think that'll be seventy percent or more

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 10>of our overall pre tax income is those three forms

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 10>of recurring earnings, and we're going to introduce them a

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 10>new metric around that called operating earnings and we'll talk

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 10>about that later today with our shareholders.

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 4>Scott, we do have to leave it there.

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 9>Thank you for joining us on a big day over

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 9>at KKR. Tom shout on the.

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Basic Thank you so much with a gentleman from KKR

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>in the future of what they do, joining us now, Lawyer.

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm chief US economist at FS Investments. On an eight

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>point nine percent nominal GDP America, Laurie, what's so great

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>about your economics is you've got it from the litmus

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>paper of the FX market. How alone is the United

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>States with an eight point nine percent nominal GDP. When

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Rishie Sonak is telling Francy Qua he's worried about.

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 11>Austerity, I think we are still the growth continued to

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 11>just surprise to the upside, and to me, it's remarkable

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 11>the inconsistency between talking about rake cuts to you know,

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 11>this idea that we're going to need rake cuts in

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 11>the near term to support the economy, or the short

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 11>term idea that we've seen the labor market slow. And

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 11>really we do feel like we're an economy and the

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 11>data would show that we're an economy firing on all cylinders. Government,

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 11>business bending, consumption the only keys that's not really adding

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 11>to it as residential construction. I would say that we

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 11>are the standalone leader on growth.

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And what's so important here, Lisa, A nominal GDP topline,

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that's real GDP posts inflation is there's an assumption here

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>by the Bill Ackmans of the world economists and not

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to plunge down to what six percent,

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>five percent? Even that's a boom economy.

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 6>And when you say it, they're talking the inflation component.

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 6>And Laura, that's what I want you to weigh in on.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 6>How much does it matter if we see a slow

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 6>down do we need to slow down if we continue

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 6>to see the pace of disinflation that we've seen so

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 6>far this year.

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 11>I think there's two pieces to that argument. To me,

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 11>the real and one place from probably off consensus is

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 11>I am really reticent to think that we are going

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 11>to get this magical slow down in inflation back to

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 11>that two percent lane that we have had. On the

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 11>good side, we have a lot of indications that just

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 11>from some slower demand and from some of these resolutions

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 11>and inventory that we're going to see lower goods prices.

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 11>But I think we are really ignoring the big elephant

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 11>in the room, which is services. We still have a

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 11>hot labor market by my measure, we still have wage

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 11>pressure that is way higher than prior to the pandemic,

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 11>and the resting heart rate of inflation is still well

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 11>above two percent. And on the services side really is

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 11>the problem here.

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 4>So I think we need to.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 11>Be careful about being very complacent about inflation coming down,

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 11>and that really feeds into this non recessionary rate decline

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 11>Goldilocks complacency that has taken hold of equity markets at

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 11>this moment.

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 6>In some ways, the Fed's wall are really kind of

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 6>fed into that yesterday, which is a reason why maybe

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 6>he gave Steams some of these market movements. He said,

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 6>there is just no reason to say you would keep

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 6>rates really high and inflation is back at target, how

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.719
<v Speaker 6>high is the threshold then to cut rates. If we

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 6>do see the disinflation in the pipeline significant, it might

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 6>not be long lasting because of some of these other issues,

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 6>but we do see year over year comps come in

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 6>with autoprice disinflation or outright deflation with rents coming in,

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 6>with the fact that goods, as Walmart said, just prices

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 6>are actually going down outright.

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 11>I think the FED is good at looking around the

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 11>corner on especially this rent issue.

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 4>There's no doubt that rent.

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 11>Is a very lagging indicator, but it's sticky for a reason.

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 11>And all of the short term indicators that you know,

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 11>six months ago were really pointing to rents coming down

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 11>fast have now reversed. And I think something that's very

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 11>important to me is the fact that rents are far

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 11>below the cost that it is to buy a home

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 11>per square foot. You are costing you a lot less

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 11>to rent, and landlords are rational. They're going to see this,

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 11>and they are going to over the next several quarters,

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 11>you know, push rents higher again. So it's something that

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 11>you just can't ignore in the core, even if you

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 11>get the headline hitting two percent. I get nervous when

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 11>the FED tries to micro manage the inflation process.

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Laura, and this with your overarching philosophy of summing all

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this together, are we beyond the pandemic? It sure doesn't

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like it to me. It feels like the stimulus

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is still pop and popping, popping. But from where you sit,

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>are we beyond COVID Not?

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 11>In the data, Tom, I think we're seeing this trampoline

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 11>effect and the Q three GDP numbers are great example

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 11>of that, and we had a big inventory, you know,

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 11>push higher. We could very well get that. Still detracting

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 11>from the fourth quarter, you're still getting some of these

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 11>big swings in factors that are disguising what's going on

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 11>underneath with demand which is still really red hot. So

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 11>this is a big to me, you know, piece that

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 11>we're looking at. For twenty twenty four, we start to

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 11>see some move away from reliance on savings towards income.

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:30.679
<v Speaker 11>I think the irony is it could be a period

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 11>of lower growth next year, but actually better sentiment about

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 11>household economics as you see income finally catch up to

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 11>the prior year and a half of inflation.

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm gonna pinion down it. Give me some twenty

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty four lower outlook numbers, real GDP.

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 8>What do you think?

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 11>Real GDP one point four and I think the tenure

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 11>stays pretty high. I'm putting it at four percent for

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 11>twenty twenty four.

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are Lisa, these are huge slow down numbers.

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And then the question comes over immediately, what does non

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>farm payrolls do? David Kelly, a JP Morgan would say

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 1>goes negative.

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 6>Well and This is really the ultimate question, Laura, do

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 6>we get that kind of slow growth but high yield

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 6>along with a full, fully employed America, along with job

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 6>creation that continue to chugle all.

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 11>I think that we look at the recessions that we've

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 11>had in the two thousands, twy tens, even the nineteen nineties,

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 11>we saw very little. If you look at nineteen ninety

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 11>two thousand recessions, we saw very little drop and output,

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 11>but a massive decline in labor in this I think

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 11>upcoming year we're going to see a slower economy, but

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 11>I think that companies continue to view labor as a

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 11>scarce resource. I think the true Goldilocks is not going

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 11>to be defined by output. It's going to be defined

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 11>by the labor market, and we are going to see

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 11>the I think the unemployment rates stay quite low.

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 12>Lar.

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. We FS investment slower rhyme this morning there

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>were a one point four percent called slower economy year.

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Howard Marks, chairman of oak Tree Capital Management, and I

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>must point out author of not one, two, but three

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>important books on investing of What to Do and just

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>as importantly Howard What Not to Do. Howard on Charlie

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Munger getting the odds on your side. How did Charlie

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Munger get the odds on his side?

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 12>He started off with a brilliant mind and a brilliant partner.

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 12>He intensively studied the financials, thinking about the long term.

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 12>He never tried to guess what a company or a

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 12>stock would do in the short term. And he held

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 12>for many years. You know, he was a great practitioner.

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 12>Sit on your hands, and he did it flawlessly in.

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>The modern day, in the modern media, I remember reading

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>those annual reports. How are years ago there was no

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>financial media, there was no blogging internet. The short termism

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we're living it now. What is the lesson of Charlie

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Munger's long termism?

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 12>Well, if you want to hit the long ball, you

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 12>have to be very patient, and you know, when the

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 12>stock moves up the first twenty percent, you can't start

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 12>taking profits. Charlie and Warren have held things for decades.

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 12>And the other thing is they were and Charlie always

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 12>talked about this, you have very few moonshots. Charlie said

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 12>within the last year that most of his wealth came

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 12>from four decisions. And so you know what would have

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 12>happened if he would have started trimming those four decisions

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 12>early he certainly would not have accomplished what he did,

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 12>and I think Warren would the same thing. Maybe the

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 12>number four would be a little different with Warren, but

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 12>you know, you know, Warren's famous for having said, put

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 12>all your eggs in one basket. And I watched the

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 12>basket really closely, and I think that it wasn't one basket.

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 12>But the idea of concentration and patience coupled with good

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 12>decisions makes for a great success. You know, a concentration

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 12>and patience don't accomplish anything if you can't make above

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 12>average investment decisions.

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 7>But putting it all together is the formula for success.

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 6>Howard, you wrote in some of your thoughts about Charlie

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 6>Mungerth that he had very definite opinions, in particular regarding

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 6>the investment management industry. He viewed the industry with considerable skepticism,

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 6>and while a member of it, I found myself in

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 6>agreement with him more often than not. What exactly are

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 6>you talking about in particular?

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 12>You know, I think both Charlie and Warren felt that

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 12>our industry, relatively few members of it made substantial contributions

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 12>to their clients wealth. Many more members that were well paid.

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 12>He was always one who questions incentives. He says, you

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 12>give me incentive, an incentive, I'll tell you the behavior.

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 12>And and I think that, you know, I think that

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 12>Warren and Charlie, if you're their operation, they, in fact

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 12>Warren's ed and quotes, not a partnership, not a corporation

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 12>of partnership. And they considered there there the people they

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 12>manage money for.

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 7>Their shareholders to be their partners.

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 12>And they considered themselves to be working for their partners

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 12>and not themselves, and their own wealth and success was

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 12>a byproduct of working of doing great work for the partners.

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 12>So you know, I like to put my sameself in

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.959
<v Speaker 12>the same boat. Those sentiments appeal to me greatly, and

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 12>I've tried to follow that.

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 6>How difficult has it been to sort of to adapt

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 6>the strategy to different eras When you had conversations with

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 6>Charlie Munger, there are questions around tech and how that

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 6>changed the investment thesis. How did they think about the

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 6>changing concept of what a wonderful company looked like and

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 6>what fair value was.

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 7>You know, you, on the one hand, you have to

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 7>evolve with the times.

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 12>On the other hand, you know they never went a

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 12>full bore into the tech sector. You know, their famous

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 12>are having made a lot of money with Apple, but

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:44.479
<v Speaker 12>you know, most tech the way they said it, they

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 12>put it on the too hard pile. And if you

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 12>have if you understand that your success will come from

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 12>a small number of holdings, that means you don't need twenty.

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 7>Thirty thirtyfty sixty. You don't need to exploit all the sceptors.

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 7>You just have to find a few great ones.

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 12>Of course, on the other hand, you know Tom said

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 12>that we're you know, we're in a new era with

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 12>all the communications we have. Part of what that means

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 12>is that the world is a more interconnected, intelligent place.

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 12>You know, back fifty years ago we used to be

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 12>able to exploit things nobody else knew. Today there's very

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 12>little information that doesn't make its waste speedily around the world.

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Howard to help us with one final question here to

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>the management the future management of Berkshire Hathaway. They have

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a from COVID buildup of cash a four hundred and

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:42.479
<v Speaker 1>twelve billion out to half a trillion dollars five hundred

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and twenty five trillion. You and everybody else out there

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is living with explosive money market fund growth. You know

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the story in that forward here for Berkshire, Hathaway, what's

0:34:55.200 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the best use of there in our mounds of cash?

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 12>You know, the people who run Berkshire today and will

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:12.479
<v Speaker 12>run it tomorrow understand the limitations of size. All things

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 12>being equal, size makes it harder to outperform. They have

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 12>the best probability of outperforming of any company their size,

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 12>but their size will matter. And you know one of

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 12>my professors at University of Chicago. I asked him afterwards,

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 12>how would you manage a big fund? He'd say, I

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 12>would index the cord and manage the hell out of

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 12>the periphery. And I would imagine that at their size,

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 12>they'll have to move in the direction of something like that,

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 12>although they will not give up on outperformance.

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Howard Marx, thank you with oak Tree Capital Management. In

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>remembrance of Charlie.

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 6>I'm so pleased that we get to speak with Tipenstein,

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 6>co founder and co chair of Carlisle Group, host of

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 6>Peer to Peer Conversations on Bloomberg Television, because David is

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 6>somebody who talks with all the executives across Wall Street,

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 6>Main Street and beyond to understand how they're dealing with

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 6>some of these transformative technologies of the moment, and David,

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 6>I want to start there kind of where the similarities

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 6>are in how some of these executives are thinking about

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 6>the developments and artificial intelligence in a generative AI.

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 13>Well, everybody wants to be an expert on AI and

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.879
<v Speaker 13>figure out how it's going to affect their company positively

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 13>or negatively, but honestly, nobody really knows for sure yet

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 13>how it will work. We're really inning one of artificial

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 13>intelligence in terms of how major companies are going to

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 13>use it or have it used against them. So everybody's

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 13>trying to hire artificial experts or get people into their

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 13>firm who can help them assess whether artificial intelligence is

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 13>going to be useful to them or helpful to them,

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 13>And nobody really knows yet, So I can't say anybody

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 13>is certain how it's going to impact their business yet.

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 1>David, mister Zevino stealed Marsh mcclennan and others, and then

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Nannie goes to AIG where different than other executives, he

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>has to deal with disaster. What did you learn about

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>how he handles the unexpected?

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.879
<v Speaker 13>Well, insurance is about dealing with the unexpected, really, and

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 13>so AIG became the largest insurance company in the world

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 13>for many, many years, and as a result of that,

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 13>it had enormous tentacles throughout the entire financial complex. It

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 13>clearly extended itself too much, didn't anticipate problems that arose,

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 13>particularly in the mortgage area, and as a result had

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:40.399
<v Speaker 13>to be bailed out by the US government to tune

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 13>of about one hundred and eighty billion dollars. Now that

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 13>money's been paid back with interest. But AIG is no

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 13>longer the biggest insurance company in the world, and it

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 13>doesn't have quite the tentacles around the world that it

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 13>once did, but still a very profitable company.

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>David and Newsmaker yesterday. This is what Rubinstein does. He's

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>steering the thunder from journalist David Rubinstein with Bill Ackman

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and the track that this nation will take. What

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>did you learn from mister Rackman, David Rwinstein.

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 13>Well, Bill is a very impressive person who obviously is outspoken,

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 13>has been outspoken on many issues over many years. Recently

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 13>has become quite visible in what he's been saying about Harvard.

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 13>But he said in the interview which will air not

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 13>too long from now that he's made a new bet.

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 13>He's made a number of macro bets that have turned

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 13>out to be extremely positive. One of them, he made

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.439
<v Speaker 13>it over one hundred times his money on a bet

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 13>that he made a number of years ago in the

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 13>time of COVID. Now he's made a bet that interest

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 13>rates will be cut sooner by the Fed than is

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.399
<v Speaker 13>otherwise expected. And if that bet is successful, I guess

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 13>he'll make a fair amount of money. But that's the

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 13>big issue that many people are grappling with. Will the

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 13>Fed decide and it needs to lower interest rates before

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 13>the political season starts, let's say, in the summer or

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 13>the fall of next year.

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Dave, excuse me, go ahead, Lisa, please my fault.

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 6>David, is it surprising to you that a big hedge

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 6>fund is focused on making big bets on treasuries right now?

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 13>Well, many hedge funds people are doing that. Honestly, he

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 13>has not done the so called treasury trade that others

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 13>have done, where he's buying treasuries and shorting treasury futures.

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 13>He hasn't done that. This is basically a bet that

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.760
<v Speaker 13>the Fed will succumb to some pressure to lower interest

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 13>rates before too long. Now, the conventional wisdom in Wall

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:25.879
<v Speaker 13>Street is that the Fed will lower interest rates at

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 13>some point during their first or second quarter, more likely

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 13>the second quarter. I think his bet is it'll probably

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 13>do it sooner than the conventional wisdom. And I have

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.280
<v Speaker 13>said publicly before, and I still think it's the case

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 13>that the Fed will get in trouble if it lowers

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 13>interest rates around the political season, because the Republicans will say, well,

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 13>you're helping Joe Biden by lowering interest rates if you

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 13>do so over the summer or in the early fall.

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 13>So the Fed is going to lower interest rates, probably

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 13>to avoid political criticism. It don't have to do it

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 13>sooner than later.

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>David, you mentioned mister Ackman in Harvard in the Horror

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Eastern Mediterrane. I want to go to your

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Duke University where they have a bridge. Folks. There's an

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>old bridge called the Free Expression Bridge. And to make

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a long story short, they had to paint over a

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 1>pro Palestinian tone as well. David, I want you to

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 1>talk to the great and good right now about how

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>those of means and success should deal with their shock

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>at our American universities.

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 13>Well, the American university system is still the envy of

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 13>the world, and our private universities are really the places

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 13>that people from all over the world want to attend.

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 13>There's been a shock that many people didn't realize how

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 13>strong the anti Israel feeling has been in some campuses,

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 13>and the result of that has been outraged by some alums.

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 13>Some universities have handled this better than other universities. I

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 13>am the chairman of the board of the University of Chicago,

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:51.840
<v Speaker 13>and we have a tradition of not issuing statements on

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 13>political matters or outside matters, and we have an issue

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 13>one in this case. But in many cases other universities

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 13>have not had that policy, and they've got in trouble

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 13>for issuing statements that don't please one side or the other.

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 13>It's a difficult way to walk his fine line, and

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 13>I don't know that anybody has figured it out properly

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 13>or correctly.

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>David All glorious day for Bloomberg Surveillance with Doug cass

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and Howard Marks with us and membrance of Charlie Munger.

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Give us your thoughts on the hugely successful experiment that

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>was Berkshire Hathaway.

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 13>For those who don't know. Charlie Munger was from Warren

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 13>Buffett's hometown of Omaha. He moved to Los Angeles and

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 13>later reconnected with Warren Buffett, who hadn't really known before,

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 13>but he had worked for Warren Buffet's grandfather at one

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 13>point in a store. Charlie Munger was had outspoken, very

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 13>very smart, a lawyer who transitioned from being a lawyer

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:48.839
<v Speaker 13>to being an investor, and his track record early on

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 13>was actually better than Warren Buffett's in some respects. They

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 13>teamed up became an incredible team of people who were

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 13>mostly known to the public through their annual meetings where

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 13>Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger would answer questions for six

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 13>hours on end. And Charlie Munger was quite well known

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 13>for his I would say, dismissive ideas of some other

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:13.839
<v Speaker 13>people's thoughts about investing. He was a very fundamentalist kind

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 13>of investor and he transformed Warren Buffett. Warren Buffett was

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:21.879
<v Speaker 13>taught to buy things very cheap, and buy things cheap

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 13>you can always make money. It was Charlie Munger's view

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 13>that you should buy good companies. Maybe you pay a

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:29.879
<v Speaker 13>reasonable price for it, but buying good companies is better

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:32.479
<v Speaker 13>than buying cheap companies which may not be that good.

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 13>And Warren Buffett gives a lot of credit credit to

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 13>Charlie Munger for having transformed his views on the investment world.

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>David, thank you for joining us today with us remember,

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and so Charlie Munger and of course with your excellence.

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Look for a conversation with Peter Zefino. Peer to peer

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>conversations hugely anticipated in the next ten days. A conversation

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>with Bill Eckman that move I would suggest move Markets.

0:42:56.360 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast on Apple, Spotify and

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live every weekday

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:08.319
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Easter. I'm Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>can watch us live on Bloomberg Television and always I'm

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal. Thanks for listening. I'm Tom Keen, and

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg