WEBVTT - Coronavirus Is Dominating The U.S. Due To Failure To Control It

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, A, market pros, and

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news. Kind the

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts, and on Bloomberg dot com. Well. In a

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>video released shortly after his return to the White House

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>from Walter Reet Hospital, President Trump sought the play down

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the peril of the virus that has killed more than

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>two hundred ten thousand Americans since Let's take a listen.

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>Don't let it dominate, don't let it take over your lives.

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Don't let that happen. We're the greatest country in the world.

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>We're going back, We're going back to work. We're gonna

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>be out front as your leader. I had to do that.

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I knew there's danger to it, but I had to

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>do it. I stood out front. I lead. That was

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>President Trump speaking in a video. Let's get some color

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>on some of those points there. We can do that

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>with dr amish Abalgia senior scholar, Ineffectiousness East physician, the

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security at the Bloomberg School

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.639
<v Speaker 1>of Public Health. We should note that the JOHNS Hopkins

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg School of Public Health is supported by Michael R. Bloomberg,

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>founder of Bloomberg LP, Bloomberg Philanthropies. And this radio and

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>TV operation. Dr Dodger, thanks so much for joining us.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>What were your thoughts as to President President Trump and

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>his comments since leaving the hospital that don't let it

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 1>dominate you. He even made it in a tweet today

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>comparing it to the flu. What are your thoughts there?

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I think these are kind of misguided statements. And the

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>fact is coronavirus is dominating us, and it's dominating us

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>because we've failed to control it and we haven't still

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>no ability to test, trace and isolate, and until we do,

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the virus is going to dominate us, whether or not

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>we want to or not. And this isn't something to

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>compare it to influenza. This is at least six times

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>more fatal than influenza, and influenza isn't a worldwide calamity

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and disruption the way COVID nineteen is. So I think

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this is the President getting back to his standard down

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>laying misinformation and outright lies about the virus that he

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>himself luckily has survived, dr adlda. Should everybody get the

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>exact same course of treatment that the President has gotten. No,

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>each person's treatment is individualized based upon what types of

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>symptoms they're having. So if somebody needs oxygen, they usually

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>do get rem desevere in DEXI methods, and that's part

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of the standard of care for individuals who require oxygen.

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>The regeneration antibody treatment that he got on compassionate use,

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>that's not available to the general public in the clinical

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>trials right now, So that isn't something that we give

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to people. We don't know if it works yet. We

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:39.679
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it works even in the President's case.

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>But the steroids and the remdesks of your are our

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>standard of care for oxygen basically oxygen. Docay, I know

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 1>the President is not your patient, but in your opinion,

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>based upon the knowledge that we have publicly available, should

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>he have left the hospital, well, I think I've had

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>patients that do well and they get discharged pretty quickly

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and turn around quickly even when they've been on oxygen,

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So so I do. I do think it's something that

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at. Is he on a good trajectory,

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>have his symptoms improved? Is he no longer requiring supple

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>metal oxygen? And then the other question is where are

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you sending him to? Are you sending him to somewhere

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 1>that faith where he has support in case he gets

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>into trouble again. And obviously the White House is not

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the same thing as sending him to an apartment somewhere

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 1>where there's nobody to help him walk up four flights

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of stairs. So the White House has a sophisticated medical

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>unit which can give supplemental oxygen, which can give intravenous drugs.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>They have around the clock doctors and nurses and other

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>medical professionals there. So he really isn't going home in

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the sense that you and I might be going home.

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>He's going to basically an advanced almost almost an advanced

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>hospital in many by many standards, apart from putting other

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>people at risk when he takes off the mask indoors

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>at the White House or when he takes a car

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ride with Secret Service agents, albeit in Ppe. Potentially, what

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>about the idea that he is being active on these

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>drugs doesn't mean that he's doing himself some damage If

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>he feel feels good and gets active or is that

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>totally fine? If you feel good, then you know, make

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>use of your body while you can. Well, we want

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>people to re engage with their activities of daily living

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in a measured way. We want to We don't want

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>people to go too fast, too quickly, So I think

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>it's important that his doctors gauge it. And it's very

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 1>hard to do that from a distance because I'm not

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>his position to know exactly how much trouble he has

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.119
<v Speaker 1>doing activities of daily living. But we do want people

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to not be bedridden and not not do anything, because

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that also puts you at risk for complications. So if

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you are able to be active after you've recovered from

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen or even during COVID nineteen, it's important to

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>take a measured amount of activity and titrate that based

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>on your symptoms and how you're doing overall. And that's

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.799
<v Speaker 1>something that his doctors hopefully are helping him to decide.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Dr do we know whether he is still in sexious?

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>The president he he is still infectious. We we know

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>that people are infectious for at least a period of

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>ten days from when symptoms occur, so he is still

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>still contagious to other people, probably or a couple of

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>at least several more days. Doctor, There's probably not much

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you can say about this, but isn't it concerning that

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>cases are just proliberating now throughout the White House and

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of people that were involved in debate prep

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>We're at the Rose Garden, you know, and and and

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>even staff at the White House, and presumably they'll get

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>medical care, but this will put pressure on DC medical resources. Again, Yes,

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.799
<v Speaker 1>this is unacceptable and inexcusable. What's going on this White

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>House super spreader cluster needs to be investigated appropriately, in

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate action taken. This is the biggest super spreading event

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in DC, and it was in the White House,

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in the most protective place on the planet. And I

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>think that this is something that we need to understand

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>what the dynamics are transmission were there. We need to

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>contact race and case investigate to understand how far this

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>will reach. Because these people, although they were on federal

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>property in the DC Public Health Department doesn't have jurisdiction there.

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of them are DC residents and

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the DC Public Health authorities need to contact trace those

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>individuals to make sure that they're not starting to change

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the transmission that are going to land on vulnerable people.

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>We've already had the President hospitalized and we have former

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Governor Christie hospitalized based on these events. So we don't

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>want more people hospitalized because of the failure of the

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>White House to actually take an event that they caused

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and perpetuated. Seriously, do we know whether there is contact

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>facing going on for those people that were at the

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Rose Garden event. What we've heard is that the DC

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Public Health has not had much cooperation from from the

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>White House. We've heard the CDC had a contact tracing team,

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:35.559
<v Speaker 1>but they're not doing it. So this is being handled

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>internally from the White House. So like most things that

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>have happened, are regarding this is probably this is going

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to be characterized by opaqueness and obfuscation, and so I'm

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>not sure how much contact anything is going on. We're

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>hearing that people were not contacted. For example, uh, the

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>governor of of of Ohio said he was not contacted

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that people that the debate had positive

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>people there. So I'm unclear to how robust is contact

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>tracing is going on. And in the president position, Dr

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Commy has been no help in this manner. Uh So

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a great confidence that they will be

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>able to stop these changes of transmissions because they're choosing

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>not to soft this change of transmission. Wow, just let

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that thing in for a second. Dr Amish Adulga, thank

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Really a great pleasure to speak with

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you always. Dr Adulga is senior scholar and infectious disease

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>physician at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. That

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty stunning turn of affairs. We we knew it,

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>but to hear somebody who has treated patients, who has

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>released patients, who you know largely is you know, watching

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>what's going on and assuming the best, to hear this

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is pretty stunning, Paul, It really is. It just flies

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in the face of all the science that we know

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that we know has worked so well, which is you

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>know where your mask keeps six ft apart? Wash your hands.

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>We know that here are the people in the Metro

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and York area no better than anybody, and not to

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>see it followed by our leaders is frustrated. This is

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets with Paul Sweeney and Bonny Quinn on Bloomberg Radio.

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>During these tough times. Do you find yourself looking for

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>images of puppies online? Well, if you do, then you

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely want to listen into our next interview because we're

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>speaking with the CEO of Petco who joined the company

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eighteen after having worked for HP PepsiCo

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>for decades, So a lot of experience in corporate America

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and a little experience with pets. I'm sure let's welcome now.

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Ron Coglan, against CEO of Petco. Ron talked to us

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 1>about the rise and pet adoptions and fostering during the pandemic.

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It seems like it might be a good idea if

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you're ever going to do it, to do it now

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>when you're probably more likely to be at home. Absolutely well,

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>first of all, great thanks for having me. Um. If

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at people at home, people may be looking

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>being a little disconcerted through the pandemic pets for a

0:08:56.040 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>way to have accompaniment and nurturing and seeing growth like

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen in years in pet adoptions, pet fostering

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and new pets and households. Bank America just did a

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>study and thirty seven percent of households and that study

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>reported having a new pet. We have people calling our

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>stores waiting to see when we'll have new reptiles, birds, fish, etcetera.

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's so ron just give us a sense of

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>how your company, Petco has been dealing with the pandemic

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and and maybe some changes you've been forced to make

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and how you're thinking about your business. Yeah. Well, first

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.359
<v Speaker 1>it started with keeping everyone's safe, whether it's our customers

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's our employees. We put a lot of

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>effort into shipping swimming pools of sanitizers, football fields of

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.439
<v Speaker 1>masks um in New York. We shifted our format, closed

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the front of the store. I went to Delhi order

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>format where our team members shopped for you. So we

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>did all that and I was very out and I'm

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>proud that our COVID penetration amongst our team is one

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>third the national average, despite folks interacting with humans all

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>day long. We also stood up curdside pick up. In

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, we added five hundred ship from store locations,

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>so our stores now are mini distribution centers. So a

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of fast work. But what this really solidified for

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.719
<v Speaker 1>us is we have a role to play take care

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of pets and our mission of improving lives and being

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.599
<v Speaker 1>a health and wellness company for pets. Ron, what's the

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>update on I p O plans? Listen, we have more

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>customers coming to us for more reasons, which is good.

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And whenever you have success, people start talking, but we

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>don't comment on any such such things. So Ron talked

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to us about you know, how, how's how's your business been.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing its sales are up. We see the industry

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>sales presumably a pet sales or pet adoptions and pet

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>owners ship is up. Is that translating into your business?

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, we have more customers coming. Um, they

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:11.599
<v Speaker 1>are buying more food, buying more grooming, vaccinations. One of

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that's interesting is people are home all day, right,

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>so they know that Fluffy needed to be groomed. They

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>remember that Rover needed a vaccination. Uh so Um that

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the explosion of pets and people say more time with

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>our pets has been good for us. But one of

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that you know, we take very seriously is

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:34.119
<v Speaker 1>our role. And today we're announcing that we are eliminating

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>shock collars. Um. We codified our mission of being all

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>about improving lives and pets and pet parents, and we

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>just decided that shock collars aren't consistent with that. So

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>we are eliminating shock collars from our stores starting today

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and actually starting a petition to have other retailers do

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>similarly and offering folks um free training class online to

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>replace it. Well, that sounds very reasonable. I'm sure pets,

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.199
<v Speaker 1>even in the training process, will be happy not to

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>be shocked. Seriously. But that said, that just brings up

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the idea of people getting sort of you know, having

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 1>strange tastes, let's put it that way. And I wonder

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>after the launch of Tiger King on Netflix, did you

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>see an increase in requests for sort of strange animals,

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>wild animals, unusual animals. Yeah, our our companion animal business

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is doing very well. Uh in terms of strange animals,

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>will leave that to the to the Tiger King. But

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>are our folks in our stories do a great job?

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>You said reptiles, they're pretty strange to me. Well to come,

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 1>they're strange to others. Their their accompaniments, and we're very

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>proud of the teams that handle those products. Ron, how

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>do you gives a sense of how pet Co competes

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>with some of the big Amazons of the world and

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the big chain department stores, where the pet

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>department is just one department of a overall bigger enterprise.

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 1>How do you traditionally compet against those bigger players. Yeah,

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:03.839
<v Speaker 1>so let me let me start at the top. I

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about our mission of improving lives of pets and

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 1>pet parents. No other company in UM, whether it's the

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>general merchandise like the ones you mentioned, or even in

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the pet space, is dedicated to health and wellness for pets.

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think of us as the CBS or the

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Whole Foods in the pet space, and we think that's

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a unique place. One two. Nobody else has a fully

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>integrated solution from the training, to the grooming, to the

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>veterinary care to UM food that has no artificial flavors

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 1>and colors. Nobody else carries that whole has that whole

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>suite of services for a one stop shop for a

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>pet parent that's looking for health and wellness products for

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>their for their pet. And what we launched last week

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>was vital Care, and that is a membership program for

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a monthly fee. You get that nail trim, you get

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that vaccination, and you get the counts on your food.

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And nobody else can do that because nobody else has

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a fully integrated solution. Briefly wrong because we're out of time,

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>but any COVID nineteam protection products or any inquiries on

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>those things, um in terms of our our stores and

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>our partners, absolutely, you know the pieces about COVID and pets.

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it was one in a million anecdotal. So we

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>have not seen that as any issue that people need

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to worry about. That's good. Ron Coughlin, CEO of pet Co,

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>joining us to talk to us about how the pet

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>industry is doing in the pandemic and pet adoptions uh

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and sales up of four percent. That's kind of the

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>headline for me. We're going to consult Ira Jersey right now,

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>chief US Interest Rate Strategies for Bloomberg Intelligence. All right,

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we had a little bit of a move yesterday sort

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of walk everybody up, but that looks at the bond markets.

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't massive in historic terms, but it was good

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>five basis points for the ten year and you know,

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>another few basis points for the thirty year. But we're

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>back to sort of stagnation again today. Do the bond

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>market price in a less contested election and now we're done. Yeah,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know if it was as much

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as uh, not contested election, but I think the market

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is thinking that there's a higher probability of a Biden

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>victory and and and so what that means is you're

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>going to have, uh if, if Joe Biden wins, more

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>likely a larger fiscal stimulus plan. And that's going to

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>do two things. One it should theoretically be better for

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the economy in general then um then then say a

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>smaller fiscal stimulus that you'd probably get with the split government.

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>And two, and I think this is just as important,

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is um, if you do get that larger fiscal stimulus,

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna need there's gonna be more bonds out there

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>are more supply. So so that's one of the reasons

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>why you saw that steepening of the yield curve. And

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and we we broke some pretty important levels Fannie. So

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so one point five seven on the thirty year bond

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>was h is the high from the post covid Um

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>crisis period. And now that we've broken that, we now

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>target yields that are actually about twenty basis points above

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>where we are now. So so I think that that's

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>like that those are the numbers you have to think

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>about now as we get closer to the election. If

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it looks like Biden wins um, you know, we might

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>creep higher and yield with the yield curves deepening. So

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we pat Chairman Pal speaking to a group of economists today,

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>which sounds just like a hoot. I'm sure, Um, I've

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>been there, yeah. Um. It seems like we hear from

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Pal almost on a weekly basis here, so I'm

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>not expecting much here. But is there anything different here?

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Is this an audience that wants to hear something perhaps different,

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>or has the ability to ask questions where we might

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>get some news out of this. I don't. I think

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that he'll continue to be pretty coy and and basically

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>reiterate what has been said at press conferences. I mean,

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the things now, Paul, is because we have

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>press conferences at every single meeting, it's going to be

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>really difficult for the FED chair in particular to say

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>anything that's significantly different than what he said just you know,

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>just a week ago or two weeks ago at at

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the at the press conference after the last meeting. I

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's so important to listen to the mosaic that's

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>coming out with all the different FED members because you know,

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>having an idea about what each member is thinking about

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>for future policy matters, so you know, what are their

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>own individual tendencies when it comes to how long that

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll let inflation run hot before they want to be hawkish.

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>So obviously some some members of the committee or are

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>going to be more hawkish. O there's more devish and

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and understanding the dynamics between those individual players will what

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>will be key. But but to your point, I don't

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 1>think Powell today is going to say much much that's

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna gonna be new. He will have to give his

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>opinion on this bond market move though, right, I M

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>not just that. But Charlie Opens is out yesterday sort

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of saying two and a half percent. At some point

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>we'll need to know exactly what Powell things beyond two

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, yeah, So so certainly Powell as a member

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>like he'll wind up maybe saying something like, um, you know,

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>my personal opinion, this is not the opinion of the committee,

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is that we should let it run hot until it

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's sustainable and we'll have to hike. But

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but you know that's gonna be you know, kind of um,

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>nondescript enough that it's not going to give us that

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 1>much new information. Um. When it comes to you know,

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the the bond market move, it's still within mostly the

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>ranges that we've seen. So, you know, the tenure yield

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is still well within the ranges that we've seen over

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the last four months. So UM, So I don't I

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think that they'll he'll talk about it. I think

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that maybe he'll couch the steepening of the yield curve

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 1>as a positive sign that the market thinks that the

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>growth and inflation are going to be higher in the future. Um.

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>But um but but you know, other than that talking

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>about it being optimistic and optimistic view, I don't think

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>you can say much more about the bond market move.

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I wrote, what is this reserved actually doing in terms

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>of being in the market buying bonds? How active they've did?

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>What have they been buying? Yeah, so so well, they

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't actually changed very much at all. We put out

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a weekly note every Friday with what they've purchased in

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that week. Um, and the basically they're still just buying

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>every day a little bit and uh, all throughout the curve.

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>They haven't changed that, and most of their purchases are

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>actually in the front end of the curve, so they're

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in low risk, shorter maturity bonds and uh so, so

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's keeping that part of the yield curve

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>very tame and timid. So even though you had a

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent move yesterday and say the tenure in the

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty year, the front ends still didn't move very much.

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Um partially because interest rates are expected to be low

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>for a long period of time, but also in part

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly that because the Fed is buying just about everything

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that it can in uh in that kind of five

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>years and in maturity range. So I what would you

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>anticipate after the election, say we do get that Biden

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>when at the bond markets pricing in do we not

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>see much movement? Then yeah, I think you'll see still

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>see a little bit. I mean, I think the market

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.239
<v Speaker 1>is still going to be a little bit um on

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>edge and not fully pricing a Biden victory unless it's

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely obvious. And I do think that the market is

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit concerned about whether or not there'll be

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>some hiccups, and you know, counting ballots and and uh

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>an account by mail. Uh. So, I do think that

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>once it's there's a declared victor, regardless of who it is.

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the bond market will reprice a

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit um. You know how much that is is

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>always a matter of subjectivity. Um. But I do think

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>that we could reach For example, certainly the yield highs

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that we saw a couple of um um a couple

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of months ago, kind of up near one eight percent

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>on the third year UM. So again like constrained but

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>not um but not a massive move. Hey, I rank

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us IRA Jersey, chief US interest

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. He covers all things for

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the FED, all things in the treasury market. Uh he

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>puts out there only note he has a weekly Lots

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of great stuff in there, all available on the Bloomberg

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 1>terminal by typing b I go. It is time now

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>for as you heard, Bloomberg Opinion. We want to get

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Opinion technology columnists based in Europe alex Web.

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And the reason we want to get to alex Web

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is because with many stories to discuss with him, we

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the Cineworld group closures, which is very,

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>very sad we were talking about this yesterday and other things.

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>We just got worried that a judge is going to

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>hold a hearing on November four is on Commerce Department

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>order banning TikTok. So we can talk about that later

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in the conversation, But first, Alex, you know, obviously it's

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.479
<v Speaker 1>a very sad day when all of the movie theaters

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>goes down. Basically, any hope that these theaters might reopen

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>at some point, yes, I think that that is. We

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know when, but Tenny World has said it's going

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to shut down. It's plus theaters in the UK and

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>the US. Um that isn't a permanent closure, but it

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>does potentially leave forty five thousand people out of work.

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>The kind of note for optimism here is that this

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>straw that broke the camel's back in a sense was

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>was MGM decided to push the release of the new

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Bond film until April. But it is doing just that.

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It's pushing it to April. That means that it hopes

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>clearly that there will be a cinema audience by then,

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 1>and it hasn't decided to push it online. Alex, to

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>me for somebody who's filed this industry for close to

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty years. It's kind of a chicken in the egg

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>issue for me. Are people not going to theaters because

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>there's not enough good content or they not going to

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>theaters because they don't want to be stuffed into a

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>confined space? Uh during a pandemic, what are the companies

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 1>saying are the real reasons for I guess, you know,

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>temporarily closing down these theaters. So the companies are saying

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the lack of the films they have reopened or

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>had reopened screens with quite strict under the quite strict guide,

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and that, for example, exists in the UK where ultimately

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>they're only allowed to feel about thirty of each screen.

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>But they had been saying that, you know, they were

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they were filling that thirty percent and they were hoping

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>then that the release of No Time to Die that's

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the title of a new film, the new bomb film,

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>would reinvigorate a certain to a certain extent, cinema going

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the other sema chains. For example, in the UK we

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>have Odeon still open on weekends a MC in the

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>US as well, so they still think there's an audience.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>There is just a company like Single World in particular,

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>which has significant debt exposure because of not least the

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>acquisition of Regal cinemas in the US. That means it

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>has higher operating costs in the sense that it's got

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>to service its debt. And um, so it's trying to

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>reserve its cash in order to be able to do

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that more effectively. Yes, it's said, according to your column,

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it was burning through as much as sixty million dollars

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of cash a month with screens partially open in September.

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>What are the margins for a screening, Alex? Obviously the

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the movie theaters have to pay the studios and so on,

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>and they do count on things like popcorn sales to

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>help out and obviously that's not happening now either. So

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>how you know, do we have any idea what kind

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of capacity would need to be filled in order for

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a movie theater to be able to operate, you know

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in the green and it is quite hard to get

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the full granularity on that. Probably speaking, their relatively healthy

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in a sense of recession recession proof businesses, you know,

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:37.719
<v Speaker 1>silly world typically reports if its are revenue that is

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of course massively dropped off right now. Um And and

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the way that the kind of breakdown of revenue. The

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>way the revenue is broken down is that maybe is

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 1>actually the ticket sales, and then they have merchandizing and

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>food food sales on top of that. About half and

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>half clearly getting people into the cinemas me just still

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>able to sell um, you know, popcorn and drinks and

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>all those sort of things. A lot of cinemas in

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the US we have seen have been offering discounts getting

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>them into the cinema and the hope they make the

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>money up on some of those other offers offerings. So

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the difficulty right now is cinema studios having to work

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>out whether they can make enough money back from just

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>putting something online, whether by selling it or just selling

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>it to a streamer, or where they need the cinematic

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>release to make up. In the case of No Time

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to Die, there two fifty million dollar budget and that

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>probably excludes the marketing costs. So it seems as though

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the studios think that they do really need to release

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>these things cinematically in theatrically sorry, in order to cover

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>their costs and make the sort of returns that warranted

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that upfront investment. And so that in a sense he's

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>good news for the the cinema industry or cinema operators,

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>because they hope at least that when we're clear of

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the virus, the audiences warturn and the studios will return.

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, Alex. Another problem for the film exhibitors is

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a problem that the studios have been effectively shut down

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for six to seven months. No film or TVs have

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>really been made because everybody has been kind of shut down.

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>So that suggests that even when they do open up,

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>there might be a lack of supply. From that perspective,

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I think interestingly, that's more likely to be a problem

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>for the streamers because, um, you're still getting TV shows

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and films released on the streaming platforms because we're not

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing stuff released in cinemas and theaters that is being

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>pushed back to when the theaters open again. So you're

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>getting a kind of a build up of supply there

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>which will all of a sudden drop hopefully sometime next year. Meanwhile,

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>there is perhaps come the spring next year, because we

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't had much production for the past six eight months, Um,

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be perhaps the dearth of supply for

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the streamers and and the TV networks and and I

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>think that might be more of a concern for them,

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>um than it is for the cinemas themselves, so that

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, would you disagree with that sort of interpretation.

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what some people have been suggesting to me. Yeah,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, you know, it's we'll have to see it.

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>But there really is going to be a lack of

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 1>supply here, I think for everybody, and it's going to

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>take a little bit of a catch up, I guess, um.

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as you're you're pointing out the broadcast

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and cable networks, you know, have really cut back on

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>their scripted programming because there's just not that much there,

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're relying more and more on the on you know,

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of reality TV. So it's a real problem for

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody just in terms of lack of supply there. Alex,

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Can I jump in and ask Alex what he makes

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of this Reuter's report that a judge will at the

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 1>hearing in November four the whether to block the Commerce

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Department order that would effectively ban TikTok in the United States. Alex,

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you got feeling what will happen with TikTok? Can it

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>really be banned? I think it seems unlikely they'll be

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, an out right back on it. Did there's

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the risks. I mean, obviously this is getting into real

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>legal sort of a legal labyrinth here. But then, um,

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to know what on what basis exactly it

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is being banned. The Commons Department is trying to impose

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 1>things upon it, but that doesn't have the legal basis

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to do so, and obtomately that's when the judge that

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>has has died upon it. I'm really I'm sure the

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>risk of retaliate reactions from China for other pieces of

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the US tech economy, it seems quite high. But equally

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a judge isn't necessarily it's not his job to take

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>into account those kind of um diplomatic considerations. So it's

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>very very difficult one to protect. Well, does something else

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>happening that day, right, that's right, a little bit of

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>an election coming up, So alex wellb European technology calmness

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg opinion joining us from London again kind of

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the key issue here. For the film of businesses, not

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of films out there. The films that are

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>out there, they're getting pushed the next year. So If

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you're a uh, you know, you know, a movie house,

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>what do you do. If you're a theater, what do

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you do? You don't have any content people are concerned

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>about coming into your theaters. You close down temporarily. At

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>least that's what we're seeing across the globe. Thanks for

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever a podcast platform

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn.

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio