WEBVTT - Audible Gasps in Chamber, Republicans Dazed After Obamacare Vote: Dennis

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you at the grocery store

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p L Podcast

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. Apparently, our

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>political backdrop is a made for TV and big screen movie.

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Last night did not disappoint. Early morning hours, there was

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a vote on the skinny repeal of Obamacare. It failed

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>with a dramatic thilmbs down from John McCain, who came

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>back up from Arizona despite his new diagnosis of brain

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>cancer to vote down and crush this bill. Here to

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>discuss Zach trac Er, healthcare reporter for Bloomberg News in

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg eleven three oh studio, as well as Stephen

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Center order for Bloomberg News. Who is on Capitol

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Hill and who is at the proceedings last night or

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I should I say today? Early this morning? I'm amazed

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you're still up and uh and conscious at this point, Steve,

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>can you give us a sense of what it was

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>like on the floor in the moments leading up to

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the momentous John McCain thumbs down, as well as just

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:25.199
<v Speaker 1>afterwards as everyone tried to digest what this failure meant. Yeah,

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>so it was a really insane night. Um talked to

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>John McCain several times leading up to him walking into

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>the chamber, and he had told us and other reporters

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>about two hours earlier that he was prepared to vote

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>no if he didn't get at these assurances from the

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>House and he wasn't necessarily satisfied with Paul Ryan's answers,

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted to talk to his governor. And then

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I got him right before he went on the floor,

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and he said, you know, I'll let you know. He

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>told another reporter of the show was about to go

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>on or something or watch the show, and so we

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>sprinted upstairs into the chamber to see what he was

0:01:57.640 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna do. And the first thing he did is walked

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>up to Chuck Schumer. Chuck Schumer something, had a big

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>smile on his face and put his arm around McCain.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And then McCain goes over to John Coryn, the Republican whip,

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>who suddenly is a very agitated, upset turns around because

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the thumbs down to another senator, and I spurnt it

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>out of the chamber because it looked like this thing

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 1>was going to go down and McCain was going to

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>vote no. And over the course of the next hour

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>there was an, you know, just a massive effort to

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>try to get John McCain or Lisa mccowsky to change

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>their minds. And Mike Pence came over and talked to

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>him for about half an hour, talked to him off

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the floor. It looks like there may have been a

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>phone call with the president. Other senators one after another

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>came and tried to talk McCain out of it. In

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, Lisa mccowski and Susan Collins are sort of

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>on each of his shoulders and sort of protecting him,

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>and McCain ultimately stood fast and Lisa mccowski stood fast,

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 1>and Collins voted no for first Denmarkowski and uh McCain's

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of for effect came in and was the third

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>no vote um and there was audible guests inside the chamber,

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 1>especially from the Democratic side, and you know, just a

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>crazy scene that sort of a madhouse in the in

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the Capital afterwards with a Republican the days mad uncertain

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>what to do, and Democrats also because they certainly weren't

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>expecting this. Zach Tracer, I wonder if you could come

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in and tell us what does this mean now for

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Americans who have been using insurance that is available through

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the Affordable Care Act, well, Obamacare, it survived another sort

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of near death experience. UM. It remains to be seen

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what this means. You know, for the next few years,

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we're still going to be relying on, you know, a

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration that's declared this law dead. That's you know,

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump tweeting let it fail, um, you know. So,

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna be relying on those folks too, you know,

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>run open enrollment starts in November to make sure this

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>market works going into UM. So you know, it's still

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of open questions about what the administration will do. UM.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>But for the time being, you know, this this is

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the law of the land. Uh, Steve, I want to

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>get your sense on what's next for the Republicans that

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>already have been some calls for Senate Majority Leader McConnell

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to step down or give over the proceedings to somebody else.

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>With respect to healthcare. But this is a huge blow

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>politically because this is the one thing that they wanted

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to get done. Um, certainly in the first year. Uh,

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, initially, what's the next up there? Yeah, I

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>think that there's really a choice now for the president.

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>You know a Zach was saying, you know, the president

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>has to make a choice now. Does he want to

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe pivot? You know, there's all these talks. Maybe at

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>some point Trump will pivot. Uh, he can do what

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>he did last night and just talk about letting the

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>law the law of al maybe trying to sabotage it

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and try to bring the Democrats to the table with threats.

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's gonna work. Um, there are things

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>you can do with Democrats. Mr McConnell didn't sound particularly

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>interested in and uh, you know, he said that he

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't think there was gonna be a lot of interests

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>among Republicans and bailing out insurance companies, which is sort

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>of might be code for just giving more money to

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the system for things like cost sharing subsidies. But Zach,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring you in here. So if Congress

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>does nothing, what would happen to Obamacare and its current form. Well,

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>the big question that we're watching UM, as Steve pointed out,

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is what happens with these cost sharing subsidies. These need

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to be paid each month. There's a big legal dispute

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>going on over whether there whether it's legal for them

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to be paid UM. And essentially this legal dispute gives

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration UM some ability to decide to stop

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>paying them at any time. So there's this big, big

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>threat hanging over the Affordable Care Act. And if these

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>were pulled UM, insurers have said either that they would

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>pull out of markets, UM, they would raise premium something like.

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is you know, sort of the nuclear

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>option that they do have going forward. Stephen, maybe you

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>could shed a little light on this. This seems to

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>be this desire for in fighting, right there's in fighting

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>with the Republicans in Congress, there's infighting inside the White House,

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>there's infighting when it comes to this healthcare initiative. What

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is cause is that you've been covering this? Do you

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>have a sense of what is deeply responsible for this? Well,

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of different reasons, right, UM for when

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you lose a bill like this. It's not just one reason.

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>There's there's many different reasons said to have the sort

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of this kind of catastrophe. I think one of them

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>has to be the Trump White Houses incomplete chaos. I mean,

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>the there's been basically this complete utter meltdown in the

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>last few days with Scaramucci in his profanity lace tirade

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to the New Yorker about Ryan's previous This is not

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>what you This is not the sign of a well

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>functioning White House trying to pass its number one legislative

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>priority on the Senate floor. But hang on, but Stephen,

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>but is it? But is it the characteristic of, let's say,

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>an administration that wants to do away with the old

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>levers of power and to create the very kind of

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>conditions that you're describing because they don't trust the old

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>way of doing business. I guess though, But I mean,

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a math problem here. The math problem

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is that they have fifty two Republican senators. They don't

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>have sixty, they don't have seventy, they don't have fifty five.

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>They have fifty two, and two of them are Lisa

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Murkowski and Susan Collins, who owe nothing to Donald Trump. Uh.

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Murkowski gets elected with independence and Democrats in Alaska.

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>She you know, she is based. She doesn't face a

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>reelection until two and John McCain has brain Cancer's John McCain.

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>He can do what wants the you know, the one

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.679
<v Speaker 1>punishment was rand Paul preventing him from doing his defense

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>bill today. But you know, I think John McCain ultimately

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is the one person who could probably uh safely kill

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this bill and not really have to worry about some

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>some massive repercussions. And if they were to try to

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>do threats against these senators. There was a clumsy threat

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>against Murkowski. I don't see how that does anything but

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>backfire when you only have a margin of two makes sense,

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know how to do the math for us. Thanks

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>very much, Bloomberg. Stephen Dennis, our congressional reporter. Our thanks

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>also to Zach Tracer, our healthcare reporter. We've got much

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>more coming up. This is Bloomberg. We have been talking

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>about the FDS surprise decision and to cut the amount

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of nicotine and cigarettes to non addictive levels, or that

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the least is the plan. I want to bring an

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Anna Edney. She's our healthcare reporter here at Bloomberg News.

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>And Anna, before we get into the details of this

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and talk a little bit about the response with shares

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of Philip Morris and Ultria plummeting. I want to just ask,

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>do you have any idea what precipitated this announcement by

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the f D A. Well, it's something they have been

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about, um even before the new FDA Commissioner, Scott

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Gottlieb got there. Um Mitzadella, who's ahead of the tobacco

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>center there, He's made references um in the past to

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>wanting to focus more on nicotine, to sort of taking

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a more nicotine centric approach um to how they deal

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>with tobacco products. And so it seems like, you know,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>with with Gottlieb coming in that then maybe that was

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>something that was able to be um hastened and that um,

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, possibly some of some of his ideas um

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of made this a bigger deal than it would

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>have been before. And isn't it also a direct sort

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of an effort on the part of the FDA to

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>encourage what they describe as safer alternatives to cigarettes, such

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>as e cigarettes and vapor products. Definitely, the FDA has

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>been looking into whether there are you know, safer products,

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>so they they have authority through a two thousand nine

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>law to kind of look at UM these reduced risk

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>products is what they call them, and try to maybe

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>get those UM FDA clearance. And so you know, they

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't quite stood behind anything yet and said hey, this

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is better for you UM than a cigarette might be.

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And they haven't really pushed back quite as a policy,

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>but it looks like that could be the way that

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 1>they're moving with this decision. They also talked about targeted

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>relief I believe on the timeline for the f d

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>AH looking at the regular regular regulations and the application submissions, right, yeah,

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that's right, the you know, to to be able to

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>get in their UM these reduced rest products to turn

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in kind of the information they need to UM to

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to get on the market. They pushed that

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>back so that UM and tried to ease some of

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.319
<v Speaker 1>the regulations so that you know, they could support the

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>alternative is basically to smoking, the what they call combustible cigarettes.

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So anna, if they've been if the FDI, f d

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>A has been talking about this for a while, why

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>was there such a dramatic response in the shares of

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Philip Morris and Altria I think it was, you know,

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>something that they have hinted up, but no one really

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.719
<v Speaker 1>knew exactly how they would implement it. Um as far

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 1>as the the nicotine um levels goes as reducing those,

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and we still don't exactly know how they'll implement it.

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>They thinking like this sounds pretty I don't know, sketchy,

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>not sketchy as he likes. I don't know, you know,

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>if this is kosher, but as as far as like,

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of a sketch of a plan. They're

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 1>planning to look at this and maybe address this. So

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of the reason why I sort of have

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>doubts about the response in the market to this. I

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>think you're right that it is a sketchypho plan. And

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that's something that that Commissioner Gottlieb has been doing in

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>many different areas. He's saying, here's where I'm going. He's

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>not waiting until everything is fully ready to go. He's

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of giving people direction on different things, whether it's

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>drugs or medical devices, UM, and here on tobacco. As

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is where this is where he's looking.

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>This is what he would like to do. UM what

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>comes out me and you know, that's a that's a

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>totally different question. UM. You know, I think right now

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>we're probably there probably lobbyists, UM, tobacco lobbyists all across

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Washington gearing up to do a lot of work in

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the next you know, a few months or year, however

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>long this might take to come up with UM and

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>talking to lawmakers. You know, there's a there's a good

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>chance that there are some maybe particularly Republicans, who who

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>don't want to interfere with cigarette products and might seek

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to block this. Well, maybe you could just also talk

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>about the initiatives. I know that Philip Morris, for example, Uh,

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they're the maker of Marlborough. They have their own smokeless cigarette,

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>right the what is it I i q O S Yeah, yeah,

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the you can't say it as nicely as Marlborough ken

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you right now? Um. They So, you know the notes

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I've seen this morning coming in from some of the

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>analysts on Wall Street who cover tobacco companies directly saying

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that that could be a benefit, um, for for Philip Morrison,

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that they might be able to kind of take the

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>lead in this in this market, given the shift that

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 1>FDA is kind of starting to put in place. UM,

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>these the non combustible cigarettes, they are considered more like

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>products that would heat up instead of burn, so they

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of heat slowly at at a much lower rate um.

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, those kind of products could be

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>where they're headed, and it looks like they kind of

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>have the jump on that. I want to thank you

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>very much for being with us a very important topic

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on EDNY explaining what is going on with the Food

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and Drug Administration working to cut the amount of nicotine

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in cigarettes to non addictive levels, the goal preventing thousands

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of tobacco related deaths a year. It was a surprise

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>move and the shares are certainly reacting to it. Looking

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>at the shares of Altria Group, they are down nine

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent. British American tobacco down more than

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>six and a half percent. Uh, this is a story

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously we will continue to follow. Thank you very much.

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Don't you think it is I think it's fascinating, But

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I also don't totally understand the response because everyone, if

0:14:57.480 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows the FDA has been working on something, and

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>then they put out something saying we're working on something,

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and everyone freaks out. I don't totally get it. Well,

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>now it's on paper and they can all freak out

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're selling this thought. David Garrity is our just

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>our guest now. He is the chief executive of g

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>v A Research, and he is also a columnist at Investopedia.

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And David, you're gonna tell us a little bit about

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Amazon earnings or lack thereof, right, certainly, Well, no, with

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>regards Amazon, mean, we're looking at a company here that historically,

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the twenty years that has been public

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and obviously the years before then when it was private,

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>has typically focused very very much on gaining market share

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and has not been shy about spending money in order

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to do that. And now while we're in a situation

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>here where revenues are continuing to outpace analyst expectations, the

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>company hasn't necessarily fully made its turn towards a commitment

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to consistent profit that people were hoping for, in which

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I think has been instrumental in helping to drive the

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>stock price higher over the last twelve the twenty four months.

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, Shara O. V Day, a Bloomberg Gadfly columnist here,

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>had made a really good point, I thought, which is

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>why our shareholders surprised by this. Amazon has said, we

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to spend money on new initiatives, we are

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to try to generate even bigger profits. This

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have come as a surprise, so why did it?

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I think on the margin, what you have to consider

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is that as Amazon has grown and gone into more

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>verticals and has essentially captured the market capitalization associated with

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>those prospective competitors, that the pool, if you will, of

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors investing in Amazon are no longer strictly speaking,

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the technology oriented investors that it was in the past.

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>That now people have begun to look upon Amazon as

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>being a proxy or an eligible substitute for investing in

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the retail sector or investing in the consumer sector. And

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that the expectations associated with those investors

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're investing parameters have obviously favored profits more over time.

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>And so it's these new marginal investors or investors coming

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in on the margin who arguably are the ones that

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Amazon needs to be concerned with, and the ones who

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>are concerned about Amazon's expense growth well, and Amazon plays

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in so many different fields just as you described, and

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I keep thinking of the Amazon effort when it comes

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to your living room, whether it is the Alexa uh

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>speaker that is connected to their vast inventory of stuff

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that you might not need, plus also their entertainment offerings

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>with Amazon Prime Video that competes directly with Apple in

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>many ways. And if you could talk about Apple, because

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be releasing their results on Tuesday, certainly well,

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean Amazon waiting in very, very effectively, but you

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and an Apple arguably seems to have been late in

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of the battle for the living room, if we will,

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>But I would say that you know, in the case

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of looking at Apple, we do have something to look

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>forward to in the fall, which is the introduction of

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the tenure anniversary iPhone um price points. They are seen

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>to be moving north of a thousand dollars, So there

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>may be some questions about affordability from a consumer standpoint,

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>but nevertheless, from an investor's perspective, owning Apple ahead of

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>a product introduction has typically been a good time to

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>own the stock. And if we wanted to look at

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of evaluation of Apple relative it's to its growth rate,

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>say is compared with Amazon, Apple is trading it far

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.719
<v Speaker 1>less of a demanding multiple relative to its expected growth

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>rate based upon earnings estimates held by put out by

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>the Street versus those of Amazon, and so as a

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 1>result of investors wanted to have exposure to tech. You know,

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>from a tactical standpoint, probably not a bad idea to

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>be looking at Apple over Amazon in here, David, I

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>love the war for the living room. It's sort of

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>could connote a lot of things, but this is perhaps

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>not the one that people think of with you know,

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>marital discord, but even you know, I want to talk

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about a point that Liam Dunning of

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg made earlier in the show where he was talking

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>about Exxon and that the issue with the shares falling

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>after the release of their their second quarter earnings really

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>came because their prices were already so elevated their share

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>price um that anything but perfection was going to be

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>such a disappointment. I mean, as Amazon basically in the

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>same boat, and that going forward, unless they're able to

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>deliver the sky in the moon, you're going to see

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>a continued weakness in their shares. Now, I would say that,

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, given the midpoint guidance for operating UH income

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>for Amazon in the third quarter, that number being you know,

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a negative I think one million dollars. So the company

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>arguably saying that they might be in a position just

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to lose money in the third quarter. UM. Investors typically

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>had looked for Amazon for a big finish to the year,

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a big fourth quarter, and so I would say that

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>probably Amazon trades flat to down, but find some support,

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, going into maybe the end of August, beginning

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>of September, when investors start setting themselves up for a

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 1>run into the year end. And the fact is that

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is going to be very well positioned with the

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>recent Amazon Prime Day. Uh, they've sold more Echo Slash

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Alexa powered devices, UM, you know from that standpoint, and

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>they're moving into more categories. So clearly the share of

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>wallet they'll be gaining, arguably is going to be growing.

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And bottom line, we are looking at an economy that

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>probably remains relatively stable going into the second half of

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the year, both domestically, and we're seeing some strength coming

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>in major markets such as Europe overseas. David, just quickly,

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>do you believe that people will be speaking into their

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Alexa devices ordering groceries from whole foot Um. We'll have

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to see if the Trump administration allows that transaction to

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>move forward, but I would certainly expect that, yes, this

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is something likely to happen. Well done, all right, Yeah,

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean honestly, I think that this is uh, this

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 1>is really key. I was reading on the Market's Live

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>blog on Bloomberg how the IT sell off and Amazon's

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>shares has really driven and sell off across emerging markets equities,

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 1>and how this has had huge ripple effects in a

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>variety of markets. So clearly what happens here has a

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>very very big ramification on many other markets. David Garretty,

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. David Garretty as

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of g v A Research and a

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 1>columnist and invest Opedia, and he always provides good insight

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>into the world of fang and technology. Coming up, Politics,

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Policy and Power with Amy Morris and Roz Krasney. Amy,

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I hear that there's some I don't know stuff going

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 1>down in Washington these days. We have ten shows in one.

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna take twenty pounds of news and put it

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in a five pounds show. The Russia sanctions bill could

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>face a presidential veto Russia's reacting to it as well.

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna follow all of that. The Affordable Care Act

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>repeal has collapsed. You may have heard Senate Republicans blocked

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.479
<v Speaker 1>that bill. We're gonna find out where they go from here. Also,

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>we got the second quarter GDP numbers, and it is

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>also Trump's first full economic quarter, so we'll find out

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about how he is doing as well. Well.

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>A lot to listen to ten shows in one Politics,

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Policy and Power with Amy Morris and Roz Krasny. They

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>will jam it all in to that hour, and it

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is an important hour to listen to. I'm Lisa bram

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Woit's along with pim Fox. This is Bloomberg. I'm looking

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>at the x On mobile, which missed estimates for earnings

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>basically because cuts failed to offset output declines. To give

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit more perspective, I want to bring

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in Liam Denning Bloomberg Gadfly columnists who focuses on all

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>things energy and Liam, what was the big takeaway for

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 1>you from these earnings? Well, I think with with x

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>On specifically, the big problem is that although they still

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 1>generate a lot of money, Okay, they missed earnings estimates,

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>but they're still you know, made three point four billion dollars,

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and they are still um for the third quarter in

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a row, covering their UM, their capex, and their dividends

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>from cash flow from operations. The problem is they're just

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>they're just trading it too big of a premium. As

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>far as I can hold on, I say, this is

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>actually really important because what do they have as far

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>as cash flow? Three point four billion dollars that was

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>earning earnings, So that that that they're earnings with three

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>point four billion dollars, I mean, this is a tremendous amount.

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying that basically all of the valuations right

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>now are so elevated that anything but perfection and exceeding

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>expectations will be a downer. Yes, and and particularly an

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>xn's case, because Xxon historically has always traded at a

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>premium compared to the likes of Shell, Chevron, VP, whatever,

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>because they do have this reputation for for excellence and

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>a great track record on on delivering projects and that

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. But I just think that these days, UM,

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>that maybe just a little too backward looking, because this

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>company is challenged on several fronts, and if you look

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>at its free cash flow versus a Shell, which delivered

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>great results yesterday, that the disparity in valuation is quite stark. Well,

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the disparity also in the dividends is also dramatic. Well,

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the disparity in dividends is is actually not too dramatic

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>if you consider that Shell at the moment is having

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to fund um some of its dividends with script is

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>issuing new shares. But I think the biggest problem is

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Shell clearly delivered a lot more free cash flow this

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>past quarter, and on a four quarter basis, it's it's

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 1>really quite a lot. And if you look out ahead,

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>analysts of forecasting Shell to deliver, you know, perhaps almost

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>double the amount of free cash flow that Xon is

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>set to deliver over the next three years, and your

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>x ON trades at much bigger multiples and a much

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>lower dividend yield than Shell. I guess I was also,

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was trying to have you read my mind.

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I apologize. I apologize because I also lumped in with Shell.

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking of Chevron, which also released results, and

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at their dividend and that is significantly

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>greater than than Exxon. And the stocks moving higher today,

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>do you think they're gonna have to sell even more

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>acreage of like in the Permium Basin, in the in

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the A shale gas region. In terms of what Exon well, yeah,

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean that they're going to look at what Chevron

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is doing and go, well, maybe that that Xto acquisition,

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe we need to sell some of the acreage. I

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think so, you see, excellents, problem is really that

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>it made a big bet on Russia. You may remember

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>they signed this this very far reaching agreement. Yeah, the

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>sacle And Islands. This is what Rex Tillers and Secretary

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of State got a metal well circling is actually running fine.

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.719
<v Speaker 1>It's more the agreement that they that they signed with

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Rosneft to to develop Russian shale and Russian Arctic offshore.

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:13.199
<v Speaker 1>And this was going to be the growth driver for

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Xon into the twenties. The problem is sanctions have largely

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>closed off some of that and and so Excellent is

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>actually pivoting closer into the Permian shale, where it's made

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a number of acquisitions. The difficulty it has is that

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the shale business is quite different from Exxon's bread and butter,

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>which is which is big kind of mega projects. Shale

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is very capital intensive. It's much it's much more about

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>repeating your success on a on a lot of smaller

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>projects over and over again. Now there's no there's no

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>doubt that Exon can bring some operational excellence to that

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of business, But whether it can achieve the sort

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of returns on capitol the shareholders have become used to

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of decades, that's that really remains

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to the same. Thank you very much for being with us.

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Liam Denning is our Bloomberg gad Fly columnists. He covers energy,

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>oil and all things related to fossil fuel. Just to

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>be clear, m is not joining us. He is working

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 1>from home where he can put his feet up and

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>stay in his pajamas. So thank you for getting on

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the phone with us. But can you tell my resentment

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a Friday, clearly Okay, Well, and enjoy enjoy the lounge.

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh Liam, I'll just tell you that the ex On

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>mobile shares they are right now, they are down to

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>and a quarter percent. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>pan l podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio