1 00:00:04,760 --> 00:00:08,080 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox. 2 00:00:08,119 --> 00:00:11,200 Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we 3 00:00:11,280 --> 00:00:14,480 Speaker 1: bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for 4 00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:16,560 Speaker 1: you and your money, whether you at the grocery store 5 00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:19,960 Speaker 1: or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p L Podcast 6 00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:29,560 Speaker 1: on iTunes, SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. Apparently, our 7 00:00:29,600 --> 00:00:33,960 Speaker 1: political backdrop is a made for TV and big screen movie. 8 00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:38,120 Speaker 1: Last night did not disappoint. Early morning hours, there was 9 00:00:38,159 --> 00:00:42,720 Speaker 1: a vote on the skinny repeal of Obamacare. It failed 10 00:00:42,720 --> 00:00:46,280 Speaker 1: with a dramatic thilmbs down from John McCain, who came 11 00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:50,400 Speaker 1: back up from Arizona despite his new diagnosis of brain 12 00:00:50,479 --> 00:00:53,920 Speaker 1: cancer to vote down and crush this bill. Here to 13 00:00:53,960 --> 00:00:56,920 Speaker 1: discuss Zach trac Er, healthcare reporter for Bloomberg News in 14 00:00:56,920 --> 00:00:59,000 Speaker 1: our Bloomberg eleven three oh studio, as well as Stephen 15 00:00:59,040 --> 00:01:02,520 Speaker 1: Dennis Center order for Bloomberg News. Who is on Capitol 16 00:01:02,600 --> 00:01:06,000 Speaker 1: Hill and who is at the proceedings last night or 17 00:01:06,040 --> 00:01:08,360 Speaker 1: I should I say today? Early this morning? I'm amazed 18 00:01:08,360 --> 00:01:11,520 Speaker 1: you're still up and uh and conscious at this point, Steve, 19 00:01:11,720 --> 00:01:14,200 Speaker 1: can you give us a sense of what it was 20 00:01:14,319 --> 00:01:17,160 Speaker 1: like on the floor in the moments leading up to 21 00:01:17,240 --> 00:01:20,880 Speaker 1: the momentous John McCain thumbs down, as well as just 22 00:01:21,360 --> 00:01:25,199 Speaker 1: afterwards as everyone tried to digest what this failure meant. Yeah, 23 00:01:25,240 --> 00:01:27,560 Speaker 1: so it was a really insane night. Um talked to 24 00:01:27,640 --> 00:01:30,520 Speaker 1: John McCain several times leading up to him walking into 25 00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:34,039 Speaker 1: the chamber, and he had told us and other reporters 26 00:01:34,080 --> 00:01:36,680 Speaker 1: about two hours earlier that he was prepared to vote 27 00:01:36,680 --> 00:01:39,360 Speaker 1: no if he didn't get at these assurances from the 28 00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:43,400 Speaker 1: House and he wasn't necessarily satisfied with Paul Ryan's answers, 29 00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:46,080 Speaker 1: and he wanted to talk to his governor. And then 30 00:01:46,120 --> 00:01:47,720 Speaker 1: I got him right before he went on the floor, 31 00:01:47,760 --> 00:01:49,480 Speaker 1: and he said, you know, I'll let you know. He 32 00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:51,560 Speaker 1: told another reporter of the show was about to go 33 00:01:51,640 --> 00:01:54,800 Speaker 1: on or something or watch the show, and so we 34 00:01:54,840 --> 00:01:57,640 Speaker 1: sprinted upstairs into the chamber to see what he was 35 00:01:57,640 --> 00:01:59,840 Speaker 1: gonna do. And the first thing he did is walked 36 00:01:59,880 --> 00:02:02,920 Speaker 1: up to Chuck Schumer. Chuck Schumer something, had a big 37 00:02:02,920 --> 00:02:05,200 Speaker 1: smile on his face and put his arm around McCain. 38 00:02:05,960 --> 00:02:09,520 Speaker 1: And then McCain goes over to John Coryn, the Republican whip, 39 00:02:09,720 --> 00:02:12,760 Speaker 1: who suddenly is a very agitated, upset turns around because 40 00:02:12,760 --> 00:02:16,560 Speaker 1: the thumbs down to another senator, and I spurnt it 41 00:02:16,560 --> 00:02:19,200 Speaker 1: out of the chamber because it looked like this thing 42 00:02:19,280 --> 00:02:20,959 Speaker 1: was going to go down and McCain was going to 43 00:02:21,120 --> 00:02:24,760 Speaker 1: vote no. And over the course of the next hour 44 00:02:25,040 --> 00:02:27,560 Speaker 1: there was an, you know, just a massive effort to 45 00:02:27,600 --> 00:02:30,520 Speaker 1: try to get John McCain or Lisa mccowsky to change 46 00:02:30,560 --> 00:02:34,160 Speaker 1: their minds. And Mike Pence came over and talked to 47 00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:36,600 Speaker 1: him for about half an hour, talked to him off 48 00:02:36,600 --> 00:02:38,239 Speaker 1: the floor. It looks like there may have been a 49 00:02:38,280 --> 00:02:42,880 Speaker 1: phone call with the president. Other senators one after another 50 00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:45,560 Speaker 1: came and tried to talk McCain out of it. In 51 00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:48,400 Speaker 1: the meantime, Lisa mccowski and Susan Collins are sort of 52 00:02:48,480 --> 00:02:51,960 Speaker 1: on each of his shoulders and sort of protecting him, 53 00:02:52,080 --> 00:02:57,639 Speaker 1: and McCain ultimately stood fast and Lisa mccowski stood fast, 54 00:02:57,800 --> 00:03:03,239 Speaker 1: and Collins voted no for first Denmarkowski and uh McCain's 55 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:05,440 Speaker 1: sort of for effect came in and was the third 56 00:03:05,520 --> 00:03:09,600 Speaker 1: no vote um and there was audible guests inside the chamber, 57 00:03:10,520 --> 00:03:13,959 Speaker 1: especially from the Democratic side, and you know, just a 58 00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:18,560 Speaker 1: crazy scene that sort of a madhouse in the in 59 00:03:18,600 --> 00:03:22,880 Speaker 1: the Capital afterwards with a Republican the days mad uncertain 60 00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:27,200 Speaker 1: what to do, and Democrats also because they certainly weren't 61 00:03:27,240 --> 00:03:30,480 Speaker 1: expecting this. Zach Tracer, I wonder if you could come 62 00:03:30,480 --> 00:03:32,960 Speaker 1: in and tell us what does this mean now for 63 00:03:33,240 --> 00:03:37,200 Speaker 1: Americans who have been using insurance that is available through 64 00:03:37,200 --> 00:03:41,760 Speaker 1: the Affordable Care Act, well, Obamacare, it survived another sort 65 00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:44,600 Speaker 1: of near death experience. UM. It remains to be seen 66 00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:46,800 Speaker 1: what this means. You know, for the next few years, 67 00:03:47,360 --> 00:03:49,480 Speaker 1: we're still going to be relying on, you know, a 68 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:52,760 Speaker 1: Trump administration that's declared this law dead. That's you know, 69 00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:56,680 Speaker 1: Donald Trump tweeting let it fail, um, you know. So, 70 00:03:56,680 --> 00:03:59,000 Speaker 1: so we're gonna be relying on those folks too, you know, 71 00:03:59,080 --> 00:04:02,160 Speaker 1: run open enrollment starts in November to make sure this 72 00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:05,480 Speaker 1: market works going into UM. So you know, it's still 73 00:04:05,520 --> 00:04:08,960 Speaker 1: a lot of open questions about what the administration will do. UM. 74 00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:10,920 Speaker 1: But for the time being, you know, this this is 75 00:04:10,960 --> 00:04:13,640 Speaker 1: the law of the land. Uh, Steve, I want to 76 00:04:13,680 --> 00:04:17,200 Speaker 1: get your sense on what's next for the Republicans that 77 00:04:17,320 --> 00:04:21,880 Speaker 1: already have been some calls for Senate Majority Leader McConnell 78 00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:27,800 Speaker 1: to step down or give over the proceedings to somebody else. 79 00:04:27,880 --> 00:04:30,400 Speaker 1: With respect to healthcare. But this is a huge blow 80 00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:33,160 Speaker 1: politically because this is the one thing that they wanted 81 00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:36,320 Speaker 1: to get done. Um, certainly in the first year. Uh, 82 00:04:36,560 --> 00:04:40,400 Speaker 1: you know, initially, what's the next up there? Yeah, I 83 00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:43,880 Speaker 1: think that there's really a choice now for the president. 84 00:04:44,320 --> 00:04:46,839 Speaker 1: You know a Zach was saying, you know, the president 85 00:04:46,880 --> 00:04:49,440 Speaker 1: has to make a choice now. Does he want to 86 00:04:50,080 --> 00:04:53,960 Speaker 1: maybe pivot? You know, there's all these talks. Maybe at 87 00:04:53,960 --> 00:04:56,640 Speaker 1: some point Trump will pivot. Uh, he can do what 88 00:04:56,720 --> 00:04:59,120 Speaker 1: he did last night and just talk about letting the 89 00:04:59,200 --> 00:05:01,479 Speaker 1: law the law of al maybe trying to sabotage it 90 00:05:01,520 --> 00:05:04,600 Speaker 1: and try to bring the Democrats to the table with threats. 91 00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:07,680 Speaker 1: I don't think that's gonna work. Um, there are things 92 00:05:07,720 --> 00:05:11,839 Speaker 1: you can do with Democrats. Mr McConnell didn't sound particularly 93 00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:15,599 Speaker 1: interested in and uh, you know, he said that he 94 00:05:15,640 --> 00:05:17,360 Speaker 1: didn't think there was gonna be a lot of interests 95 00:05:17,360 --> 00:05:21,680 Speaker 1: among Republicans and bailing out insurance companies, which is sort 96 00:05:21,720 --> 00:05:24,839 Speaker 1: of might be code for just giving more money to 97 00:05:24,880 --> 00:05:28,040 Speaker 1: the system for things like cost sharing subsidies. But Zach, 98 00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:30,520 Speaker 1: I want to bring you in here. So if Congress 99 00:05:30,560 --> 00:05:36,560 Speaker 1: does nothing, what would happen to Obamacare and its current form. Well, 100 00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:39,279 Speaker 1: the big question that we're watching UM, as Steve pointed out, 101 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:42,480 Speaker 1: is what happens with these cost sharing subsidies. These need 102 00:05:42,520 --> 00:05:45,320 Speaker 1: to be paid each month. There's a big legal dispute 103 00:05:45,360 --> 00:05:48,200 Speaker 1: going on over whether there whether it's legal for them 104 00:05:48,200 --> 00:05:51,880 Speaker 1: to be paid UM. And essentially this legal dispute gives 105 00:05:51,880 --> 00:05:56,039 Speaker 1: the Trump administration UM some ability to decide to stop 106 00:05:56,120 --> 00:05:58,599 Speaker 1: paying them at any time. So there's this big, big 107 00:05:58,640 --> 00:06:01,760 Speaker 1: threat hanging over the Affordable Care Act. And if these 108 00:06:01,760 --> 00:06:04,320 Speaker 1: were pulled UM, insurers have said either that they would 109 00:06:04,360 --> 00:06:07,279 Speaker 1: pull out of markets, UM, they would raise premium something like. 110 00:06:08,040 --> 00:06:10,080 Speaker 1: I mean this is you know, sort of the nuclear 111 00:06:10,080 --> 00:06:14,599 Speaker 1: option that they do have going forward. Stephen, maybe you 112 00:06:14,640 --> 00:06:17,240 Speaker 1: could shed a little light on this. This seems to 113 00:06:17,279 --> 00:06:20,560 Speaker 1: be this desire for in fighting, right there's in fighting 114 00:06:20,560 --> 00:06:24,039 Speaker 1: with the Republicans in Congress, there's infighting inside the White House, 115 00:06:24,080 --> 00:06:28,400 Speaker 1: there's infighting when it comes to this healthcare initiative. What 116 00:06:28,640 --> 00:06:31,480 Speaker 1: is cause is that you've been covering this? Do you 117 00:06:31,720 --> 00:06:36,760 Speaker 1: have a sense of what is deeply responsible for this? Well, 118 00:06:36,800 --> 00:06:40,000 Speaker 1: there's a lot of different reasons, right, UM for when 119 00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:42,680 Speaker 1: you lose a bill like this. It's not just one reason. 120 00:06:42,720 --> 00:06:45,880 Speaker 1: There's there's many different reasons said to have the sort 121 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:48,640 Speaker 1: of this kind of catastrophe. I think one of them 122 00:06:48,680 --> 00:06:52,760 Speaker 1: has to be the Trump White Houses incomplete chaos. I mean, 123 00:06:52,800 --> 00:06:57,039 Speaker 1: the there's been basically this complete utter meltdown in the 124 00:06:57,120 --> 00:07:02,880 Speaker 1: last few days with Scaramucci in his profanity lace tirade 125 00:07:02,920 --> 00:07:05,960 Speaker 1: to the New Yorker about Ryan's previous This is not 126 00:07:06,040 --> 00:07:08,599 Speaker 1: what you This is not the sign of a well 127 00:07:08,640 --> 00:07:12,520 Speaker 1: functioning White House trying to pass its number one legislative 128 00:07:12,520 --> 00:07:15,040 Speaker 1: priority on the Senate floor. But hang on, but Stephen, 129 00:07:15,080 --> 00:07:18,320 Speaker 1: but is it? But is it the characteristic of, let's say, 130 00:07:18,520 --> 00:07:21,840 Speaker 1: an administration that wants to do away with the old 131 00:07:22,000 --> 00:07:25,640 Speaker 1: levers of power and to create the very kind of 132 00:07:25,680 --> 00:07:28,440 Speaker 1: conditions that you're describing because they don't trust the old 133 00:07:28,480 --> 00:07:31,280 Speaker 1: way of doing business. I guess though, But I mean, 134 00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:34,480 Speaker 1: you know, there's a math problem here. The math problem 135 00:07:34,640 --> 00:07:38,160 Speaker 1: is that they have fifty two Republican senators. They don't 136 00:07:38,160 --> 00:07:40,920 Speaker 1: have sixty, they don't have seventy, they don't have fifty five. 137 00:07:41,480 --> 00:07:43,920 Speaker 1: They have fifty two, and two of them are Lisa 138 00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:48,160 Speaker 1: Murkowski and Susan Collins, who owe nothing to Donald Trump. Uh. 139 00:07:48,320 --> 00:07:51,360 Speaker 1: Lisa Murkowski gets elected with independence and Democrats in Alaska. 140 00:07:51,760 --> 00:07:54,080 Speaker 1: She you know, she is based. She doesn't face a 141 00:07:54,120 --> 00:07:59,160 Speaker 1: reelection until two and John McCain has brain Cancer's John McCain. 142 00:07:59,320 --> 00:08:02,320 Speaker 1: He can do what wants the you know, the one 143 00:08:02,360 --> 00:08:06,679 Speaker 1: punishment was rand Paul preventing him from doing his defense 144 00:08:06,680 --> 00:08:10,600 Speaker 1: bill today. But you know, I think John McCain ultimately 145 00:08:10,720 --> 00:08:14,760 Speaker 1: is the one person who could probably uh safely kill 146 00:08:14,880 --> 00:08:17,920 Speaker 1: this bill and not really have to worry about some 147 00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:21,440 Speaker 1: some massive repercussions. And if they were to try to 148 00:08:21,760 --> 00:08:25,280 Speaker 1: do threats against these senators. There was a clumsy threat 149 00:08:25,320 --> 00:08:29,400 Speaker 1: against Murkowski. I don't see how that does anything but 150 00:08:29,520 --> 00:08:32,760 Speaker 1: backfire when you only have a margin of two makes sense, 151 00:08:32,800 --> 00:08:34,360 Speaker 1: you know how to do the math for us. Thanks 152 00:08:34,440 --> 00:08:37,800 Speaker 1: very much, Bloomberg. Stephen Dennis, our congressional reporter. Our thanks 153 00:08:37,840 --> 00:08:41,800 Speaker 1: also to Zach Tracer, our healthcare reporter. We've got much 154 00:08:41,840 --> 00:08:58,120 Speaker 1: more coming up. This is Bloomberg. We have been talking 155 00:08:58,120 --> 00:09:01,720 Speaker 1: about the FDS surprise decision and to cut the amount 156 00:09:01,720 --> 00:09:04,800 Speaker 1: of nicotine and cigarettes to non addictive levels, or that 157 00:09:04,880 --> 00:09:06,880 Speaker 1: the least is the plan. I want to bring an 158 00:09:06,880 --> 00:09:09,920 Speaker 1: Anna Edney. She's our healthcare reporter here at Bloomberg News. 159 00:09:10,040 --> 00:09:12,319 Speaker 1: And Anna, before we get into the details of this 160 00:09:12,400 --> 00:09:14,440 Speaker 1: and talk a little bit about the response with shares 161 00:09:14,800 --> 00:09:18,440 Speaker 1: of Philip Morris and Ultria plummeting. I want to just ask, 162 00:09:18,640 --> 00:09:21,000 Speaker 1: do you have any idea what precipitated this announcement by 163 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:24,920 Speaker 1: the f D A. Well, it's something they have been 164 00:09:25,160 --> 00:09:29,360 Speaker 1: talking about, um even before the new FDA Commissioner, Scott 165 00:09:29,360 --> 00:09:33,200 Speaker 1: Gottlieb got there. Um Mitzadella, who's ahead of the tobacco 166 00:09:33,280 --> 00:09:36,760 Speaker 1: center there, He's made references um in the past to 167 00:09:37,480 --> 00:09:40,960 Speaker 1: wanting to focus more on nicotine, to sort of taking 168 00:09:41,000 --> 00:09:45,120 Speaker 1: a more nicotine centric approach um to how they deal 169 00:09:45,120 --> 00:09:48,560 Speaker 1: with tobacco products. And so it seems like, you know, 170 00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:51,480 Speaker 1: with with Gottlieb coming in that then maybe that was 171 00:09:51,559 --> 00:09:55,360 Speaker 1: something that was able to be um hastened and that um, 172 00:09:55,400 --> 00:09:58,520 Speaker 1: you know, possibly some of some of his ideas um 173 00:09:58,720 --> 00:10:00,520 Speaker 1: kind of made this a bigger deal than it would 174 00:10:00,520 --> 00:10:05,440 Speaker 1: have been before. And isn't it also a direct sort 175 00:10:05,440 --> 00:10:07,040 Speaker 1: of an effort on the part of the FDA to 176 00:10:07,320 --> 00:10:12,200 Speaker 1: encourage what they describe as safer alternatives to cigarettes, such 177 00:10:12,200 --> 00:10:19,480 Speaker 1: as e cigarettes and vapor products. Definitely, the FDA has 178 00:10:19,520 --> 00:10:23,880 Speaker 1: been looking into whether there are you know, safer products, 179 00:10:23,920 --> 00:10:28,400 Speaker 1: so they they have authority through a two thousand nine 180 00:10:28,480 --> 00:10:33,720 Speaker 1: law to kind of look at UM these reduced risk 181 00:10:33,760 --> 00:10:37,200 Speaker 1: products is what they call them, and try to maybe 182 00:10:37,360 --> 00:10:41,360 Speaker 1: get those UM FDA clearance. And so you know, they 183 00:10:41,400 --> 00:10:45,280 Speaker 1: haven't quite stood behind anything yet and said hey, this 184 00:10:45,400 --> 00:10:48,880 Speaker 1: is better for you UM than a cigarette might be. 185 00:10:49,080 --> 00:10:52,160 Speaker 1: And they haven't really pushed back quite as a policy, 186 00:10:52,280 --> 00:10:54,680 Speaker 1: but it looks like that could be the way that 187 00:10:54,720 --> 00:10:58,079 Speaker 1: they're moving with this decision. They also talked about targeted 188 00:10:58,120 --> 00:11:01,559 Speaker 1: relief I believe on the timeline for the f d 189 00:11:01,559 --> 00:11:08,760 Speaker 1: AH looking at the regular regular regulations and the application submissions, right, yeah, 190 00:11:08,800 --> 00:11:11,680 Speaker 1: that's right, the you know, to to be able to 191 00:11:11,679 --> 00:11:15,880 Speaker 1: get in their UM these reduced rest products to turn 192 00:11:15,920 --> 00:11:19,360 Speaker 1: in kind of the information they need to UM to 193 00:11:19,480 --> 00:11:22,280 Speaker 1: be able to get on the market. They pushed that 194 00:11:22,360 --> 00:11:24,920 Speaker 1: back so that UM and tried to ease some of 195 00:11:24,920 --> 00:11:28,319 Speaker 1: the regulations so that you know, they could support the 196 00:11:28,840 --> 00:11:33,120 Speaker 1: alternative is basically to smoking, the what they call combustible cigarettes. 197 00:11:33,520 --> 00:11:35,800 Speaker 1: So anna, if they've been if the FDI, f d 198 00:11:35,960 --> 00:11:38,160 Speaker 1: A has been talking about this for a while, why 199 00:11:38,240 --> 00:11:40,760 Speaker 1: was there such a dramatic response in the shares of 200 00:11:40,800 --> 00:11:44,560 Speaker 1: Philip Morris and Altria I think it was, you know, 201 00:11:44,720 --> 00:11:47,000 Speaker 1: something that they have hinted up, but no one really 202 00:11:47,080 --> 00:11:49,719 Speaker 1: knew exactly how they would implement it. Um as far 203 00:11:49,800 --> 00:11:54,199 Speaker 1: as the the nicotine um levels goes as reducing those, 204 00:11:54,240 --> 00:11:57,120 Speaker 1: and we still don't exactly know how they'll implement it. 205 00:11:56,760 --> 00:12:01,000 Speaker 1: They thinking like this sounds pretty I don't know, sketchy, 206 00:12:01,120 --> 00:12:03,480 Speaker 1: not sketchy as he likes. I don't know, you know, 207 00:12:03,600 --> 00:12:05,640 Speaker 1: if this is kosher, but as as far as like, 208 00:12:05,880 --> 00:12:07,480 Speaker 1: you know, sort of a sketch of a plan. They're 209 00:12:07,480 --> 00:12:09,959 Speaker 1: planning to look at this and maybe address this. So 210 00:12:10,240 --> 00:12:12,560 Speaker 1: it's sort of the reason why I sort of have 211 00:12:12,679 --> 00:12:16,400 Speaker 1: doubts about the response in the market to this. I 212 00:12:16,400 --> 00:12:18,520 Speaker 1: think you're right that it is a sketchypho plan. And 213 00:12:18,760 --> 00:12:22,480 Speaker 1: that's something that that Commissioner Gottlieb has been doing in 214 00:12:22,520 --> 00:12:25,319 Speaker 1: many different areas. He's saying, here's where I'm going. He's 215 00:12:25,360 --> 00:12:29,040 Speaker 1: not waiting until everything is fully ready to go. He's 216 00:12:29,120 --> 00:12:32,679 Speaker 1: kind of giving people direction on different things, whether it's 217 00:12:32,760 --> 00:12:36,400 Speaker 1: drugs or medical devices, UM, and here on tobacco. As 218 00:12:36,559 --> 00:12:38,960 Speaker 1: you know, this is where this is where he's looking. 219 00:12:39,000 --> 00:12:41,680 Speaker 1: This is what he would like to do. UM what 220 00:12:41,880 --> 00:12:44,080 Speaker 1: comes out me and you know, that's a that's a 221 00:12:44,120 --> 00:12:47,640 Speaker 1: totally different question. UM. You know, I think right now 222 00:12:47,679 --> 00:12:52,000 Speaker 1: we're probably there probably lobbyists, UM, tobacco lobbyists all across 223 00:12:52,480 --> 00:12:56,200 Speaker 1: Washington gearing up to do a lot of work in 224 00:12:56,280 --> 00:12:59,400 Speaker 1: the next you know, a few months or year, however 225 00:12:59,520 --> 00:13:01,600 Speaker 1: long this might take to come up with UM and 226 00:13:01,679 --> 00:13:04,720 Speaker 1: talking to lawmakers. You know, there's a there's a good 227 00:13:04,760 --> 00:13:09,120 Speaker 1: chance that there are some maybe particularly Republicans, who who 228 00:13:09,200 --> 00:13:13,720 Speaker 1: don't want to interfere with cigarette products and might seek 229 00:13:13,760 --> 00:13:16,520 Speaker 1: to block this. Well, maybe you could just also talk 230 00:13:16,600 --> 00:13:19,880 Speaker 1: about the initiatives. I know that Philip Morris, for example, Uh, 231 00:13:20,040 --> 00:13:24,560 Speaker 1: they're the maker of Marlborough. They have their own smokeless cigarette, 232 00:13:24,640 --> 00:13:29,960 Speaker 1: right the what is it I i q O S Yeah, yeah, 233 00:13:30,040 --> 00:13:34,080 Speaker 1: the you can't say it as nicely as Marlborough ken 234 00:13:34,160 --> 00:13:38,880 Speaker 1: you right now? Um. They So, you know the notes 235 00:13:39,040 --> 00:13:42,320 Speaker 1: I've seen this morning coming in from some of the 236 00:13:42,360 --> 00:13:46,600 Speaker 1: analysts on Wall Street who cover tobacco companies directly saying 237 00:13:46,640 --> 00:13:50,760 Speaker 1: that that could be a benefit, um, for for Philip Morrison, 238 00:13:50,800 --> 00:13:54,400 Speaker 1: that they might be able to kind of take the 239 00:13:54,520 --> 00:13:57,440 Speaker 1: lead in this in this market, given the shift that 240 00:13:57,600 --> 00:14:00,319 Speaker 1: FDA is kind of starting to put in place. UM, 241 00:14:00,480 --> 00:14:04,160 Speaker 1: these the non combustible cigarettes, they are considered more like 242 00:14:04,600 --> 00:14:07,320 Speaker 1: products that would heat up instead of burn, so they 243 00:14:07,400 --> 00:14:10,840 Speaker 1: kind of heat slowly at at a much lower rate um. 244 00:14:10,920 --> 00:14:13,720 Speaker 1: And so you know, those kind of products could be 245 00:14:14,280 --> 00:14:16,640 Speaker 1: where they're headed, and it looks like they kind of 246 00:14:16,679 --> 00:14:19,120 Speaker 1: have the jump on that. I want to thank you 247 00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:21,760 Speaker 1: very much for being with us a very important topic 248 00:14:22,200 --> 00:14:25,160 Speaker 1: on EDNY explaining what is going on with the Food 249 00:14:25,160 --> 00:14:28,080 Speaker 1: and Drug Administration working to cut the amount of nicotine 250 00:14:28,600 --> 00:14:33,080 Speaker 1: in cigarettes to non addictive levels, the goal preventing thousands 251 00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:36,320 Speaker 1: of tobacco related deaths a year. It was a surprise 252 00:14:36,400 --> 00:14:40,120 Speaker 1: move and the shares are certainly reacting to it. Looking 253 00:14:40,120 --> 00:14:42,520 Speaker 1: at the shares of Altria Group, they are down nine 254 00:14:42,600 --> 00:14:45,840 Speaker 1: and a half percent. British American tobacco down more than 255 00:14:45,920 --> 00:14:49,360 Speaker 1: six and a half percent. Uh, this is a story 256 00:14:49,360 --> 00:14:52,520 Speaker 1: obviously we will continue to follow. Thank you very much. 257 00:14:52,800 --> 00:14:55,000 Speaker 1: Don't you think it is I think it's fascinating, But 258 00:14:55,000 --> 00:14:57,440 Speaker 1: I also don't totally understand the response because everyone, if 259 00:14:57,480 --> 00:14:59,560 Speaker 1: everyone knows the FDA has been working on something, and 260 00:14:59,560 --> 00:15:01,600 Speaker 1: then they put out something saying we're working on something, 261 00:15:01,600 --> 00:15:03,680 Speaker 1: and everyone freaks out. I don't totally get it. Well, 262 00:15:03,720 --> 00:15:05,520 Speaker 1: now it's on paper and they can all freak out 263 00:15:05,560 --> 00:15:22,640 Speaker 1: and they're selling this thought. David Garrity is our just 264 00:15:22,880 --> 00:15:24,800 Speaker 1: our guest now. He is the chief executive of g 265 00:15:24,920 --> 00:15:29,400 Speaker 1: v A Research, and he is also a columnist at Investopedia. 266 00:15:29,960 --> 00:15:32,560 Speaker 1: And David, you're gonna tell us a little bit about 267 00:15:32,600 --> 00:15:37,640 Speaker 1: Amazon earnings or lack thereof, right, certainly, Well, no, with 268 00:15:37,680 --> 00:15:40,720 Speaker 1: regards Amazon, mean, we're looking at a company here that historically, 269 00:15:40,840 --> 00:15:42,520 Speaker 1: you know, over the twenty years that has been public 270 00:15:42,560 --> 00:15:44,680 Speaker 1: and obviously the years before then when it was private, 271 00:15:45,080 --> 00:15:48,080 Speaker 1: has typically focused very very much on gaining market share 272 00:15:48,120 --> 00:15:50,360 Speaker 1: and has not been shy about spending money in order 273 00:15:50,400 --> 00:15:52,680 Speaker 1: to do that. And now while we're in a situation 274 00:15:52,720 --> 00:15:57,120 Speaker 1: here where revenues are continuing to outpace analyst expectations, the 275 00:15:57,200 --> 00:16:01,000 Speaker 1: company hasn't necessarily fully made its turn towards a commitment 276 00:16:01,080 --> 00:16:05,000 Speaker 1: to consistent profit that people were hoping for, in which 277 00:16:05,040 --> 00:16:07,000 Speaker 1: I think has been instrumental in helping to drive the 278 00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:10,080 Speaker 1: stock price higher over the last twelve the twenty four months. 279 00:16:10,600 --> 00:16:13,920 Speaker 1: You know, Shara O. V Day, a Bloomberg Gadfly columnist here, 280 00:16:14,440 --> 00:16:16,240 Speaker 1: had made a really good point, I thought, which is 281 00:16:16,400 --> 00:16:20,520 Speaker 1: why our shareholders surprised by this. Amazon has said, we 282 00:16:20,560 --> 00:16:23,120 Speaker 1: are going to spend money on new initiatives, we are 283 00:16:23,160 --> 00:16:26,360 Speaker 1: not going to try to generate even bigger profits. This 284 00:16:26,440 --> 00:16:29,280 Speaker 1: shouldn't have come as a surprise, so why did it? 285 00:16:29,840 --> 00:16:31,720 Speaker 1: I think on the margin, what you have to consider 286 00:16:31,760 --> 00:16:34,640 Speaker 1: is that as Amazon has grown and gone into more 287 00:16:34,760 --> 00:16:39,520 Speaker 1: verticals and has essentially captured the market capitalization associated with 288 00:16:39,560 --> 00:16:43,560 Speaker 1: those prospective competitors, that the pool, if you will, of 289 00:16:43,600 --> 00:16:47,840 Speaker 1: institutional investors investing in Amazon are no longer strictly speaking, 290 00:16:47,880 --> 00:16:50,960 Speaker 1: the technology oriented investors that it was in the past. 291 00:16:51,080 --> 00:16:54,280 Speaker 1: That now people have begun to look upon Amazon as 292 00:16:54,320 --> 00:16:58,400 Speaker 1: being a proxy or an eligible substitute for investing in 293 00:16:58,400 --> 00:17:01,680 Speaker 1: the retail sector or investing in the consumer sector. And 294 00:17:01,720 --> 00:17:05,400 Speaker 1: I would argue that the expectations associated with those investors 295 00:17:05,440 --> 00:17:10,280 Speaker 1: and they're investing parameters have obviously favored profits more over time. 296 00:17:10,320 --> 00:17:13,879 Speaker 1: And so it's these new marginal investors or investors coming 297 00:17:13,960 --> 00:17:16,760 Speaker 1: in on the margin who arguably are the ones that 298 00:17:16,800 --> 00:17:20,120 Speaker 1: Amazon needs to be concerned with, and the ones who 299 00:17:20,119 --> 00:17:24,359 Speaker 1: are concerned about Amazon's expense growth well, and Amazon plays 300 00:17:24,359 --> 00:17:26,840 Speaker 1: in so many different fields just as you described, and 301 00:17:26,880 --> 00:17:29,680 Speaker 1: I keep thinking of the Amazon effort when it comes 302 00:17:29,720 --> 00:17:32,320 Speaker 1: to your living room, whether it is the Alexa uh 303 00:17:32,480 --> 00:17:35,840 Speaker 1: speaker that is connected to their vast inventory of stuff 304 00:17:35,840 --> 00:17:39,240 Speaker 1: that you might not need, plus also their entertainment offerings 305 00:17:39,240 --> 00:17:43,760 Speaker 1: with Amazon Prime Video that competes directly with Apple in 306 00:17:43,800 --> 00:17:46,040 Speaker 1: many ways. And if you could talk about Apple, because 307 00:17:46,040 --> 00:17:49,119 Speaker 1: they're going to be releasing their results on Tuesday, certainly well, 308 00:17:49,119 --> 00:17:53,600 Speaker 1: I mean Amazon waiting in very, very effectively, but you 309 00:17:53,720 --> 00:17:56,560 Speaker 1: and an Apple arguably seems to have been late in 310 00:17:56,640 --> 00:17:58,960 Speaker 1: terms of the battle for the living room, if we will, 311 00:17:59,320 --> 00:18:00,800 Speaker 1: But I would say that you know, in the case 312 00:18:00,840 --> 00:18:02,960 Speaker 1: of looking at Apple, we do have something to look 313 00:18:03,000 --> 00:18:05,480 Speaker 1: forward to in the fall, which is the introduction of 314 00:18:05,560 --> 00:18:09,440 Speaker 1: the tenure anniversary iPhone um price points. They are seen 315 00:18:09,520 --> 00:18:11,399 Speaker 1: to be moving north of a thousand dollars, So there 316 00:18:11,400 --> 00:18:15,200 Speaker 1: may be some questions about affordability from a consumer standpoint, 317 00:18:15,240 --> 00:18:19,760 Speaker 1: but nevertheless, from an investor's perspective, owning Apple ahead of 318 00:18:19,760 --> 00:18:22,879 Speaker 1: a product introduction has typically been a good time to 319 00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:25,280 Speaker 1: own the stock. And if we wanted to look at 320 00:18:25,359 --> 00:18:28,840 Speaker 1: sort of evaluation of Apple relative it's to its growth rate, 321 00:18:28,920 --> 00:18:32,600 Speaker 1: say is compared with Amazon, Apple is trading it far 322 00:18:32,760 --> 00:18:35,719 Speaker 1: less of a demanding multiple relative to its expected growth 323 00:18:35,800 --> 00:18:39,080 Speaker 1: rate based upon earnings estimates held by put out by 324 00:18:39,119 --> 00:18:41,639 Speaker 1: the Street versus those of Amazon, and so as a 325 00:18:41,680 --> 00:18:44,679 Speaker 1: result of investors wanted to have exposure to tech. You know, 326 00:18:44,800 --> 00:18:47,440 Speaker 1: from a tactical standpoint, probably not a bad idea to 327 00:18:47,480 --> 00:18:50,720 Speaker 1: be looking at Apple over Amazon in here, David, I 328 00:18:50,760 --> 00:18:53,440 Speaker 1: love the war for the living room. It's sort of 329 00:18:53,480 --> 00:18:56,120 Speaker 1: could connote a lot of things, but this is perhaps 330 00:18:56,160 --> 00:18:58,320 Speaker 1: not the one that people think of with you know, 331 00:18:58,400 --> 00:19:00,840 Speaker 1: marital discord, but even you know, I want to talk 332 00:19:00,840 --> 00:19:02,520 Speaker 1: a little bit about a point that Liam Dunning of 333 00:19:02,520 --> 00:19:04,960 Speaker 1: Bloomberg made earlier in the show where he was talking 334 00:19:04,960 --> 00:19:08,639 Speaker 1: about Exxon and that the issue with the shares falling 335 00:19:08,680 --> 00:19:12,280 Speaker 1: after the release of their their second quarter earnings really 336 00:19:12,280 --> 00:19:15,640 Speaker 1: came because their prices were already so elevated their share 337 00:19:15,680 --> 00:19:19,159 Speaker 1: price um that anything but perfection was going to be 338 00:19:19,440 --> 00:19:22,639 Speaker 1: such a disappointment. I mean, as Amazon basically in the 339 00:19:22,680 --> 00:19:25,480 Speaker 1: same boat, and that going forward, unless they're able to 340 00:19:25,520 --> 00:19:28,359 Speaker 1: deliver the sky in the moon, you're going to see 341 00:19:28,600 --> 00:19:31,399 Speaker 1: a continued weakness in their shares. Now, I would say that, 342 00:19:31,480 --> 00:19:36,600 Speaker 1: you know, given the midpoint guidance for operating UH income 343 00:19:36,840 --> 00:19:39,639 Speaker 1: for Amazon in the third quarter, that number being you know, 344 00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:42,560 Speaker 1: a negative I think one million dollars. So the company 345 00:19:42,640 --> 00:19:44,520 Speaker 1: arguably saying that they might be in a position just 346 00:19:44,560 --> 00:19:48,600 Speaker 1: to lose money in the third quarter. UM. Investors typically 347 00:19:48,600 --> 00:19:51,560 Speaker 1: had looked for Amazon for a big finish to the year, 348 00:19:51,680 --> 00:19:54,040 Speaker 1: a big fourth quarter, and so I would say that 349 00:19:54,080 --> 00:19:57,560 Speaker 1: probably Amazon trades flat to down, but find some support, 350 00:19:57,640 --> 00:20:00,000 Speaker 1: you know, going into maybe the end of August, beginning 351 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:03,879 Speaker 1: of September, when investors start setting themselves up for a 352 00:20:03,960 --> 00:20:06,439 Speaker 1: run into the year end. And the fact is that 353 00:20:06,520 --> 00:20:08,960 Speaker 1: Amazon is going to be very well positioned with the 354 00:20:09,000 --> 00:20:13,080 Speaker 1: recent Amazon Prime Day. Uh, they've sold more Echo Slash 355 00:20:13,119 --> 00:20:16,680 Speaker 1: Alexa powered devices, UM, you know from that standpoint, and 356 00:20:16,680 --> 00:20:19,320 Speaker 1: they're moving into more categories. So clearly the share of 357 00:20:19,359 --> 00:20:22,240 Speaker 1: wallet they'll be gaining, arguably is going to be growing. 358 00:20:22,440 --> 00:20:25,520 Speaker 1: And bottom line, we are looking at an economy that 359 00:20:25,600 --> 00:20:28,760 Speaker 1: probably remains relatively stable going into the second half of 360 00:20:28,800 --> 00:20:31,520 Speaker 1: the year, both domestically, and we're seeing some strength coming 361 00:20:31,520 --> 00:20:35,119 Speaker 1: in major markets such as Europe overseas. David, just quickly, 362 00:20:35,400 --> 00:20:38,560 Speaker 1: do you believe that people will be speaking into their 363 00:20:38,640 --> 00:20:44,399 Speaker 1: Alexa devices ordering groceries from whole foot Um. We'll have 364 00:20:44,440 --> 00:20:47,560 Speaker 1: to see if the Trump administration allows that transaction to 365 00:20:47,600 --> 00:20:49,960 Speaker 1: move forward, but I would certainly expect that, yes, this 366 00:20:50,080 --> 00:20:53,320 Speaker 1: is something likely to happen. Well done, all right, Yeah, 367 00:20:53,359 --> 00:20:55,600 Speaker 1: I mean honestly, I think that this is uh, this 368 00:20:55,640 --> 00:20:57,919 Speaker 1: is really key. I was reading on the Market's Live 369 00:20:58,000 --> 00:21:01,399 Speaker 1: blog on Bloomberg how the IT sell off and Amazon's 370 00:21:01,440 --> 00:21:04,840 Speaker 1: shares has really driven and sell off across emerging markets equities, 371 00:21:04,880 --> 00:21:07,159 Speaker 1: and how this has had huge ripple effects in a 372 00:21:07,200 --> 00:21:10,880 Speaker 1: variety of markets. So clearly what happens here has a 373 00:21:11,000 --> 00:21:15,800 Speaker 1: very very big ramification on many other markets. David Garretty, 374 00:21:15,880 --> 00:21:17,800 Speaker 1: thank you so much for joining us. David Garretty as 375 00:21:17,880 --> 00:21:21,240 Speaker 1: chief executive officer of g v A Research and a 376 00:21:21,280 --> 00:21:25,360 Speaker 1: columnist and invest Opedia, and he always provides good insight 377 00:21:25,440 --> 00:21:29,399 Speaker 1: into the world of fang and technology. Coming up, Politics, 378 00:21:29,440 --> 00:21:33,920 Speaker 1: Policy and Power with Amy Morris and Roz Krasney. Amy, 379 00:21:33,960 --> 00:21:37,240 Speaker 1: I hear that there's some I don't know stuff going 380 00:21:37,280 --> 00:21:40,360 Speaker 1: down in Washington these days. We have ten shows in one. 381 00:21:40,600 --> 00:21:42,639 Speaker 1: We're gonna take twenty pounds of news and put it 382 00:21:42,680 --> 00:21:45,760 Speaker 1: in a five pounds show. The Russia sanctions bill could 383 00:21:45,760 --> 00:21:48,800 Speaker 1: face a presidential veto Russia's reacting to it as well. 384 00:21:48,840 --> 00:21:51,080 Speaker 1: We're gonna follow all of that. The Affordable Care Act 385 00:21:51,080 --> 00:21:54,560 Speaker 1: repeal has collapsed. You may have heard Senate Republicans blocked 386 00:21:54,600 --> 00:21:57,479 Speaker 1: that bill. We're gonna find out where they go from here. Also, 387 00:21:57,760 --> 00:22:00,600 Speaker 1: we got the second quarter GDP numbers, and it is 388 00:22:00,640 --> 00:22:03,360 Speaker 1: also Trump's first full economic quarter, so we'll find out 389 00:22:03,359 --> 00:22:05,920 Speaker 1: a little bit more about how he is doing as well. Well. 390 00:22:05,960 --> 00:22:08,480 Speaker 1: A lot to listen to ten shows in one Politics, 391 00:22:08,480 --> 00:22:11,399 Speaker 1: Policy and Power with Amy Morris and Roz Krasny. They 392 00:22:11,400 --> 00:22:13,879 Speaker 1: will jam it all in to that hour, and it 393 00:22:14,000 --> 00:22:16,920 Speaker 1: is an important hour to listen to. I'm Lisa bram 394 00:22:16,920 --> 00:22:33,400 Speaker 1: Woit's along with pim Fox. This is Bloomberg. I'm looking 395 00:22:33,400 --> 00:22:37,520 Speaker 1: at the x On mobile, which missed estimates for earnings 396 00:22:37,760 --> 00:22:41,600 Speaker 1: basically because cuts failed to offset output declines. To give 397 00:22:41,680 --> 00:22:43,800 Speaker 1: us a little bit more perspective, I want to bring 398 00:22:43,840 --> 00:22:47,600 Speaker 1: in Liam Denning Bloomberg Gadfly columnists who focuses on all 399 00:22:47,680 --> 00:22:50,600 Speaker 1: things energy and Liam, what was the big takeaway for 400 00:22:50,640 --> 00:22:54,639 Speaker 1: you from these earnings? Well, I think with with x 401 00:22:54,760 --> 00:22:59,480 Speaker 1: On specifically, the big problem is that although they still 402 00:22:59,520 --> 00:23:03,120 Speaker 1: generate a lot of money, Okay, they missed earnings estimates, 403 00:23:03,119 --> 00:23:06,560 Speaker 1: but they're still you know, made three point four billion dollars, 404 00:23:06,600 --> 00:23:09,760 Speaker 1: and they are still um for the third quarter in 405 00:23:09,760 --> 00:23:14,040 Speaker 1: a row, covering their UM, their capex, and their dividends 406 00:23:14,119 --> 00:23:18,159 Speaker 1: from cash flow from operations. The problem is they're just 407 00:23:18,400 --> 00:23:21,280 Speaker 1: they're just trading it too big of a premium. As 408 00:23:21,320 --> 00:23:23,159 Speaker 1: far as I can hold on, I say, this is 409 00:23:23,160 --> 00:23:25,560 Speaker 1: actually really important because what do they have as far 410 00:23:25,600 --> 00:23:29,520 Speaker 1: as cash flow? Three point four billion dollars that was 411 00:23:29,600 --> 00:23:32,000 Speaker 1: earning earnings, So that that that they're earnings with three 412 00:23:32,040 --> 00:23:34,760 Speaker 1: point four billion dollars, I mean, this is a tremendous amount. 413 00:23:34,960 --> 00:23:38,679 Speaker 1: So you're saying that basically all of the valuations right 414 00:23:38,720 --> 00:23:44,119 Speaker 1: now are so elevated that anything but perfection and exceeding 415 00:23:44,160 --> 00:23:49,520 Speaker 1: expectations will be a downer. Yes, and and particularly an 416 00:23:49,640 --> 00:23:53,840 Speaker 1: xn's case, because Xxon historically has always traded at a 417 00:23:53,920 --> 00:23:59,640 Speaker 1: premium compared to the likes of Shell, Chevron, VP, whatever, 418 00:24:00,080 --> 00:24:04,520 Speaker 1: because they do have this reputation for for excellence and 419 00:24:04,640 --> 00:24:08,359 Speaker 1: a great track record on on delivering projects and that 420 00:24:08,440 --> 00:24:11,960 Speaker 1: sort of thing. But I just think that these days, UM, 421 00:24:12,080 --> 00:24:14,879 Speaker 1: that maybe just a little too backward looking, because this 422 00:24:14,960 --> 00:24:19,080 Speaker 1: company is challenged on several fronts, and if you look 423 00:24:19,119 --> 00:24:21,800 Speaker 1: at its free cash flow versus a Shell, which delivered 424 00:24:21,800 --> 00:24:27,800 Speaker 1: great results yesterday, that the disparity in valuation is quite stark. Well, 425 00:24:27,840 --> 00:24:32,040 Speaker 1: the disparity also in the dividends is also dramatic. Well, 426 00:24:32,119 --> 00:24:37,120 Speaker 1: the disparity in dividends is is actually not too dramatic 427 00:24:37,160 --> 00:24:39,840 Speaker 1: if you consider that Shell at the moment is having 428 00:24:39,880 --> 00:24:43,320 Speaker 1: to fund um some of its dividends with script is 429 00:24:43,640 --> 00:24:47,320 Speaker 1: issuing new shares. But I think the biggest problem is 430 00:24:48,040 --> 00:24:51,560 Speaker 1: Shell clearly delivered a lot more free cash flow this 431 00:24:51,680 --> 00:24:54,800 Speaker 1: past quarter, and on a four quarter basis, it's it's 432 00:24:54,840 --> 00:24:57,400 Speaker 1: really quite a lot. And if you look out ahead, 433 00:24:57,440 --> 00:25:01,800 Speaker 1: analysts of forecasting Shell to deliver, you know, perhaps almost 434 00:25:01,840 --> 00:25:04,240 Speaker 1: double the amount of free cash flow that Xon is 435 00:25:04,240 --> 00:25:06,160 Speaker 1: set to deliver over the next three years, and your 436 00:25:06,320 --> 00:25:09,320 Speaker 1: x ON trades at much bigger multiples and a much 437 00:25:09,359 --> 00:25:12,960 Speaker 1: lower dividend yield than Shell. I guess I was also, 438 00:25:13,240 --> 00:25:15,280 Speaker 1: you know, I was trying to have you read my mind. 439 00:25:15,320 --> 00:25:19,520 Speaker 1: I apologize. I apologize because I also lumped in with Shell. 440 00:25:19,600 --> 00:25:22,480 Speaker 1: I was thinking of Chevron, which also released results, and 441 00:25:22,480 --> 00:25:25,120 Speaker 1: I was looking at their dividend and that is significantly 442 00:25:25,119 --> 00:25:28,080 Speaker 1: greater than than Exxon. And the stocks moving higher today, 443 00:25:28,119 --> 00:25:29,680 Speaker 1: do you think they're gonna have to sell even more 444 00:25:29,760 --> 00:25:33,119 Speaker 1: acreage of like in the Permium Basin, in the in 445 00:25:33,160 --> 00:25:38,280 Speaker 1: the A shale gas region. In terms of what Exon well, yeah, 446 00:25:38,280 --> 00:25:39,800 Speaker 1: I mean that they're going to look at what Chevron 447 00:25:39,880 --> 00:25:43,320 Speaker 1: is doing and go, well, maybe that that Xto acquisition, 448 00:25:43,320 --> 00:25:45,719 Speaker 1: maybe we need to sell some of the acreage. I 449 00:25:45,760 --> 00:25:49,800 Speaker 1: don't think so, you see, excellents, problem is really that 450 00:25:50,000 --> 00:25:53,160 Speaker 1: it made a big bet on Russia. You may remember 451 00:25:53,200 --> 00:25:56,680 Speaker 1: they signed this this very far reaching agreement. Yeah, the 452 00:25:56,680 --> 00:25:59,080 Speaker 1: sacle And Islands. This is what Rex Tillers and Secretary 453 00:25:59,080 --> 00:26:03,040 Speaker 1: of State got a metal well circling is actually running fine. 454 00:26:03,160 --> 00:26:05,719 Speaker 1: It's more the agreement that they that they signed with 455 00:26:05,840 --> 00:26:11,600 Speaker 1: Rosneft to to develop Russian shale and Russian Arctic offshore. 456 00:26:11,600 --> 00:26:13,199 Speaker 1: And this was going to be the growth driver for 457 00:26:13,440 --> 00:26:18,080 Speaker 1: Xon into the twenties. The problem is sanctions have largely 458 00:26:18,320 --> 00:26:21,119 Speaker 1: closed off some of that and and so Excellent is 459 00:26:21,160 --> 00:26:26,280 Speaker 1: actually pivoting closer into the Permian shale, where it's made 460 00:26:26,280 --> 00:26:29,960 Speaker 1: a number of acquisitions. The difficulty it has is that 461 00:26:30,000 --> 00:26:34,000 Speaker 1: the shale business is quite different from Exxon's bread and butter, 462 00:26:34,080 --> 00:26:37,160 Speaker 1: which is which is big kind of mega projects. Shale 463 00:26:37,280 --> 00:26:41,600 Speaker 1: is very capital intensive. It's much it's much more about 464 00:26:41,640 --> 00:26:44,240 Speaker 1: repeating your success on a on a lot of smaller 465 00:26:44,320 --> 00:26:47,600 Speaker 1: projects over and over again. Now there's no there's no 466 00:26:47,640 --> 00:26:51,439 Speaker 1: doubt that Exon can bring some operational excellence to that 467 00:26:51,520 --> 00:26:54,400 Speaker 1: sort of business, But whether it can achieve the sort 468 00:26:54,400 --> 00:26:58,000 Speaker 1: of returns on capitol the shareholders have become used to 469 00:26:58,080 --> 00:27:01,800 Speaker 1: over the past couple of decades, that's that really remains 470 00:27:01,800 --> 00:27:04,600 Speaker 1: to the same. Thank you very much for being with us. 471 00:27:05,000 --> 00:27:08,320 Speaker 1: Liam Denning is our Bloomberg gad Fly columnists. He covers energy, 472 00:27:08,480 --> 00:27:11,600 Speaker 1: oil and all things related to fossil fuel. Just to 473 00:27:11,640 --> 00:27:14,119 Speaker 1: be clear, m is not joining us. He is working 474 00:27:14,119 --> 00:27:16,159 Speaker 1: from home where he can put his feet up and 475 00:27:16,200 --> 00:27:18,760 Speaker 1: stay in his pajamas. So thank you for getting on 476 00:27:18,760 --> 00:27:20,720 Speaker 1: the phone with us. But can you tell my resentment 477 00:27:20,720 --> 00:27:25,640 Speaker 1: it's a Friday, clearly Okay, Well, and enjoy enjoy the lounge. 478 00:27:26,040 --> 00:27:28,600 Speaker 1: Uh Liam, I'll just tell you that the ex On 479 00:27:28,680 --> 00:27:30,680 Speaker 1: mobile shares they are right now, they are down to 480 00:27:31,000 --> 00:27:40,119 Speaker 1: and a quarter percent. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg 481 00:27:40,119 --> 00:27:43,520 Speaker 1: pan l podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews 482 00:27:43,560 --> 00:27:48,760 Speaker 1: at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm 483 00:27:48,760 --> 00:27:51,800 Speaker 1: Pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at pim Fox. 484 00:27:52,119 --> 00:27:54,800 Speaker 1: I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one 485 00:27:55,080 --> 00:27:57,840 Speaker 1: before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on 486 00:27:57,840 --> 00:28:03,080 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio