WEBVTT - The 2024 All-Breakout Team (EP. 768)

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome and everybody to Fantasy Crows. This is the Fantasy

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Podcast has with Joey Paid jopis a Pia. Today

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have some fun. It's time for the All

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Breakout Team for twenty twenty four. The guys we're gonna

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>win you, leagues. The guys are gonna carry you to glory.

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And by glory, well I mean maybe some money, maybe

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>some I don't know, trophies, or perhaps even an incredible belt,

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>which we're gonna be giving away here pretty soon on

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the channel. But before we give away things, I want

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep one thing, and it's the Welsh. I always

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>want to keep you around because it's fun to have

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you around. Welsh breakouts the definition can be all over

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the place. What's your definition of a breakout player?

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.919
<v Speaker 3>Man, I completely agree with what you're saying. Like the

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 3>line between breakouts and sleepers is a very very thin line,

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Like I'm not really sure where it completes. I mean,

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 3>sleepers kind of lives in a world of a player

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 3>that is being so undervalued. Breakouts are a player that

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 3>is ready to take that next step in value, And

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.199
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of how I view them, you know, even

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 3>looking at my own list, I would say for the

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 3>most part, every single player on here is not seen

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 3>in some like elite tier, and sometimes the jumps might

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 3>not even be I don't know, like insanely exponential. But

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 3>to me, it is about the tier change that ends

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 3>up happening. A guy that you know hits two point

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 3>fifty with twenty something homers can jump into being a

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 3>two seventy thirty plus homerun hitter. That changes the tier

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 3>a player. I have a player that was a twenty

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty guy last year, but the average stunk. I think

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 3>this player can improve their batted ball skills this year,

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 3>can improve overall on the batting average and turn that

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty into closer to a thirty thirty with a

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 3>better batting average, and that changes the tier. So these

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 3>are definitely players that are on my watch list, on

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 3>my draft list I want on all my teams, But

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 3>there is no O'Neill Cruise. I did not put him

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 3>on this list just out of like you know, sanity

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 3>for everybody, because I put him on everything. I absolutely

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 3>think he is a breakout, but he is I've actually

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 3>defined him more as a sleeper because his value has

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 3>been so low but I did not put him on

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 3>this list, so you guys can all feel okay, we

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 3>will pick a different shortstop and it is the twenty

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty guy I spoke about.

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Well for more onneal Cruz content, just watch any other

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>video with Welsh that we've recorded. But no, what you

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>did stop, I think everybody appreciates that.

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:33.679
<v Speaker 2>And we're trying to get different names. We're trying to

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 2>throw out some other you guys are gonna hear some names.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>But we're also trying to drive home certain things that

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>we think and when we are on something like last

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>year we were on Corbyn Carrol, we were on Azzi Albi's.

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of things that we were on were right

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and we kept driving into the ground and we did

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it for a reason because we wanted you to be

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in on them as well. But for me, whilst the

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>breakout is a player that's shown you at least the

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>piece you know, they haven't quite you know, put it

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>over a full season, I think these are the guys

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that are ready to show it to you over a

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>full season that can really give you that productivity that

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for. And again, when you're trying to figure

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>out how to approach your drafts. Make sure you go

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>over to Fantasypros dot com because the Draft kid is live.

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>It is free. Of course if your premium get access

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to more. We want you to sink all your leagues

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>here Fantasy Pros because again that's free. Also, when you

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>sink your leagues, no matter how many you have, you

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>have ten leagues, two leagues, it doesn't matter. You can

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>set all your lineups right from the Fantasy Pros app.

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Draft Wizard is up and running. We want

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you to be successful. That's why we're here. We're trying

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to give you the content. We're trying to give you

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the tools so you can go out there and crush

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>all of your drafts, crush all of your leagues, crush

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>all of your trades. And when you do all those things,

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you might just win this a championship belt from Trophy Smack,

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the Ultimate Fantasy Baseball Championship Belt giveaway. To qualify for

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>this glorious belt, all you have to do is subscribe

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Pros MLB YouTube channel and comment below on

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>any video. That's it. That's all you got to do,

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that you not only subscribe but also

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>ring that belt that it goes ding for notifications so

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you know every time a new episode is up, and

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>also so you can claim your prize of this glorious

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Baseball championship belt. Only want trophy, smack.

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Want to touch the shiny want to touch the shiny belt.

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of shiny things, how about this hat that Welsh

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is wearing on the YouTube channel today? What hat is

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>this for? What hat? It's staring me down, It's looking

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>into my soul? What team is this?

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Did you say what the hat? By the way, did

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 3>you say what the hat is this?

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 2>This is there's a little bit here in it.

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>This is the bit is killing on the audio only

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>version of the show. I know.

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, I actually teased this hat that I wasn't sure

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 3>if I would wear it because it might stress people out,

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 3>but I decided today We're going to do it. I'm

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 3>looking into your soul? Who are your brain?

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>The future for breakouts? I think it's the very appropriate we.

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Are This is the lake elsinor storm. I believe this

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 3>is one of their alternative hats. Their logo is like

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 3>a storm with eyes on it, and then they have

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 3>this alternative one where it is just eyes that stare

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 3>at you.

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, this is like the double vision. This is

0:04:57.880 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 2>like a pseudo.

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Doctor Strange third eye, but it's third and fourth thigh

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 3>looking for the breakout.

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>It feels like a Looney Tunes, like a character lurking

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in the dark.

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 2>I could do this funny is going like this.

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>No, no, don't do that. Let's not do that, guys.

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the breakouts. Let's start a catcher. And

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>my guy is somebody we talked about last year and

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw a little bit in twenty twenty three, but

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>not enough, unfortunately, because Logan o'hapi ended up having some

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.559
<v Speaker 1>injuries that derailed him. But he did flash the power.

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>In just fifty one games last year, he had fourteen homers. Yeah,

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 1>the batting average did drag, but we could say that

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of catchers. When we're trying to draft catchers,

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for power most of the time. And those

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>two catcher leagues right now, this guy is currently going

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>as the fourteenth catcher overall ADP of one to ninety six.

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, oh Hopy's one of these guys that you

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>can wait on catcher, even a fifteen team league snag

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this guy. He could probably match the same productivity or

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>close to it that you might get out of a

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Alvarez was going ahead of him, maybe even a

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>Cal Rawley if things really go well for a Hopy.

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>But again, the fourteenth catcher overall, I think he's a

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>steal and I think he's gonna be one of the

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>bright spots for an Angels team that might not have

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of light shining on it. So a Logan

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>o'hapi is that guy for me? Welsh, who's the catcher

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>that made your all breakout team of twenty twenty four?

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, you can have some catchers with good batting average.

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 3>A question is going to be the counting stats and

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>where are they going to go? My favorite catcher this

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 3>is a homer play. I believe this is well.

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Now I have two diamondback homers here.

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Gabriel Moreno is my favorite of the catchers to not

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 3>only just draft because he comes in at an overall

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 3>lower cost.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>He's eleventh.

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 3>As far as the ECR goes on catchers one sixty

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 3>six to EIGHTYP, I'll say he can go even go

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 3>later in the ADP gets pushed up a little bit

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 3>by like two catcher NFBC leagues that throw that up,

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 3>so it's even a little bit later. But Gabby Moreno

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 3>in the playoffs absolutely lit it on fire, multiple home

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 3>runs hitting in that three spot. He's an under twenty

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 3>percent strikeout guy. Hit two eighty four this past year.

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 3>He had an expected batting average it was still over

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 3>two sixty. He improved his hard hit numbers. The thing

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 3>he's got to do is get the ball in the air,

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 3>and that's what we see from a lot of young players,

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 3>and this is a pretty hit or friendly environment.

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be.

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Put in RBI opportunities throughout the year, and this team

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 3>absolutely rallies around him, and the playoffs I think was

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 3>like a really first early sign to realize that they

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>are comfortable as can be with this guy being the

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 3>number three hitter because he's a good contact guy.

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>So can he improve the launch angle?

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes? Will he?

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 3>That's going to be the thing in question. He was

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 3>like a four or five percent launch angle guy based

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 3>on hard hit and barreling. If he can get the

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 3>ball near double digits, he will surpass twenty home runs

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 3>this year. I think the RV I think he is

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 3>going to blow pass all of his projected numbers, and

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 3>that's why I'm so heavily invested.

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Projections in general have him.

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Beating last year's numbers, but there's still I think low

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 3>eleven homers, sixty one RBIs.

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I'll put the check down.

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 3>He is going to beat every single projection from ATC

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 3>or the bat X this year and he is my

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 3>favorite breakout catcher where I think next year we'll be

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 3>looking at him as a top five or six catcher.

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Overall.

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I love him and head to head points leagues too,

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>because the contact rate. Even though he might not hit

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteen home runs, I'll take the hits, I'll take the

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>run score, and I'll take where he's hitting in the

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>batting order. Let's take a quick break in the action

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to tell you about fan Tracks, the most customizable fantasy

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>platform in the industry, offering the greatest fantasy experience for

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>your dynasty, keeper, redraft and best ball leagues. Create or

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>join a Fantasy Baseball commissioner league, invite your friends, and

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>dominate your draft this season. Fan tracks Free MLB League

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Manager is the most customizable, easy to use, and feature

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>rich platform in the industry. If there's anything lacking in

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>your current fantasy league manager, fan tracks likely has it.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Go deep with the Ultimate Keeper and Dynasty leagues, create

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a simple redraft league or even a customizable Best Ball

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>league with up to two thousand teams. And if you're

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>coming from another service, fan Tracks can import any of

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>your current leagues and customize them as needed. Fantasy sports

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sleep, and neither does fans. With seasons running three

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty five days a year, many have already renewed,

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>scheduled their drafts, continued trading of players, draft picks, et cetera.

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason why fantasy players who try fan Tracks

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>make it their permanent home for all their fantasy leagues.

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Sign up for free today and be entered to win

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the fan Tracks Game day experience, where fan Tracks will

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>send you and your league to an MLB game of

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>your choice. Simply go to fantracks dot com slash Fantasy

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Pros and sign up today. That's fantracks dot com slash

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros, fan Tracks, the home of fantasy sports. And

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>now back to the action. Let's go to first base. Welsh,

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>who do you have all right?

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Going out to first base? This is one of my

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 3>absolute favorites. Tristan Cassis with the Boston Red Sox. He

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 3>is the ninth first baseman on the board ninety five overall,

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 3>and Tristan Kassas exemplifies like everything that you're looking out

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 3>of a first basement as far as you like, big

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 3>hard hit metrics, thirteen percent barrel percentage, forty six percent

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 3>hard hit rate. He had expected batting average just about

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 3>within ten batting average points of what he did. High

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 3>launch angle, gets the ball in the air fifteen point

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 3>seven degree and average over ninety one miles per hour

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 3>on his overall hits. So he hits the ball really hard.

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 3>He makes sures he makes sure he barrels. He also

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 3>is putting up a pretty respectable batting average that I

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 3>think has more upside I think for a high walk

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 3>not exceptionally high strikeout guy with these type of batt

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 3>of ball skills, he is going to again I'm picking

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 3>on this again. He's going to surpass what projections have

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 3>him at. They don't have him at thirty. I firmly

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 3>believe he's going to be a thirty home run hitter

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 3>this year. I think he's going to cross the eighty

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 3>run and eighty RBI territory. He's one of my favorite

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 3>third basemen our first baseman, and there are a few

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't really like that are a little bit ahead.

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 3>If you can get him at a corner infielder two,

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm in Tristan Costa is my breakout first baseman.

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, my guy, you can definitely get at corner at

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>first base. It's Josh Nayler of the Cleveland Guardians one

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty two consensus ADP. Again, you can find that Fantasypros

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com. The rank right now is the seventeenth first

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>baseman going off the board. And you know Naylor last

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>year had to deal with injuries. He only played one

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty one games, but he did seventeen homers

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 1>and he drove in ninety seven runs. He's hitting behind

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>Jose Ramirez in that order. He hit three zero eight

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>last year. The X batting average was two ninety three.

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>The K percentage was thirteen point seven. He is a

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>very valuable player, and I think far more valuable than

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the ADP suggests. I remember last year when we had

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Aero conon talking about projections. It was one of his

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite players, and he was one hundred percent right. He

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>really did perform. But I think there's a breakout coming

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>where if this guy can play one hundred and fifty

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>games this year just adding the volume alone. Not only

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>could he drive in one hundred runs easily, but I

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>think you're also looking at a guy that could approach

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty five homers. There might even be a thirty homer

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>season than there two for him if everything breaks right.

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Steamer hasn't projected for a four to eighty slugging percentage.

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>That's what I want to see. But the funny thing

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is you look at all the projections for Naylor. Everything's

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>around one hundred and thirty something games, and I just

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to play more than that this year

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>as long as you know, the injury gods are kind

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to us, and Josh Naylor could be a guy that

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely breaks out. And the Cleveland Guardians need that too.

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>They need somebody else in that order to really stand

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>out besides Ramirez. I think it was a really tough

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>season for them offensively as a whole, as a unit,

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and Naylor could be a guy that could really change

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that dynamic for them if he does develop and take

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that next step. And you could say last year was

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the breakout maybe, but again, I think there's another gear

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in this player and I think the ADP is far

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>too low Welsh. Do you agree? Yep?

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>I love him probably.

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if I didn't love Costas as much as

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 3>I do, he would have probably been number two as

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 3>far as far as like identifying breakout. So, by the way,

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it was last year too, but

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Ariol we talked about Naylor this.

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Year as well.

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, said, this is one of those guys and when

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 3>you can get batting average from players, I actually don't

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 3>even think Costas and Naylor as a combo is the

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 3>worst thing in the world, because you're gonna get a

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 3>bunch of RBI from Naylor.

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 2>I think Costas is going to score more runs than

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 2>you expect.

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I love it, especially if you're hugging batting

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 3>average a little bit more or you're trying to make

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 3>up for it. Naylor is a great piece to put

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 3>in there. He is a home run threat. He makes

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 3>really really good contact, consistent contact, and we saw the

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 3>RBIs kind of fly up last year. We just got

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 3>to make sure that the rest of the pieces around

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 3>him are, you know, in RBI opportunities. But yeah, I

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 3>think Naylor is a fantastic pick here.

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:21.599
<v Speaker 1>Well, look ninety seven last year and one hundred and

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty one games. That's pretty good. I also think, well,

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you're looking at a guy like Naylor,

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it's also a matter you know, not only his health,

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>but also you know, is that player ready to make

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that next step. He's been in the league a little

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>while now, I think you know that comfortability factor starts

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to set in where you see these kids start to blossom.

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell you this, I'll take an a step further.

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 1>If you're a salary cap league, what a great value

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>play he is? Like, you don't want to pay for

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a big first baseman. You know, maybe you get a

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, one hundred season out of Naylor with a

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.719
<v Speaker 1>two ninety or three hundred batting average, I'd be a

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty sweet return on investment. That probably be a lot

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>cheaper than going after the top tier first basement. All right,

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.719
<v Speaker 1>for me at second base at two twenty two and

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>adp second baseman off of the board, it's Edward Julian

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Minnesota Twins. I love this guy. Last year

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>he was the player that popped for me in the spring.

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I was very excited about him last year and he

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>got called up things didn't go well, got sent down,

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>came back and started to show you all the things

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that I was very excited about. And if you go

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>back and look at the minor league track record of

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this player, two hundred and sixty three games in the

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues, right over three seasons, he hit two to

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>eighty five with a four to thirty seven OBP, a

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>four eighty seven slugging, and a nine to twenty four OPS.

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>They moved on from Horey Polanco. They've made room. Julian's

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the guy. Last year, one hundred nine games for the Twins,

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he had sixteen homers, hit two sixty three, but that

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>OBP three point eighty one. I'm telling you this guy

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to be an on base machine. I love

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>him in OBP leagues. I love him in points leagues,

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>which is where I prefer to play, but also Welsh.

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I've compared him statistically. I think he's the next Jose Vedro,

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a player that egans just set it and forget it.

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's gonna be a very valuable thing

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy and for the Minnesota Twins this year. Who's

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>your second base breakout of twenty twenty four?

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I probably would have picked Julian by the way, had

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 2>you not.

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but let's go.

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 3>I do love me some Nolan Gorman, and this might

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 3>be a case of we have to have like the

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 3>breakout may have already happened, you know how you said

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 3>that when Naylor, You're like, well, the breakout may have

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 3>already kind of been there.

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Gorman and may have kind of been there. He did

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 2>hit twenty seven.

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a better version of Gorman, just like

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>there could be a better version of Nailer two.

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 3>That's right, But he also hit twenty seven homers and

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 3>he barely has an ADP inside the top two hundred.

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 3>He's the sixteenth second baseman, so not a starter in

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 3>fifteen team rod O. It's one eighty two according to

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 3>the consensus ADP that you can find over in Fantasy pros.

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 3>And there's still another gear in here, but that gear

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 3>has to be about the batting average. So he hit

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 3>two thirty six this past year, which was a ten

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 3>point jump from the year before, and the strike cups

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 3>have been an issue consistently. His issue has been higher

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 3>in the zone, and that's what they had had him

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 3>go work with driveline the previous year on and that's

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 3>still kind of a you know, a work in progress.

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 3>He's one of the better low zone hitters in all

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 3>of baseball, and the hard hit numbers spoke for itself.

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, forty eight point five percent hard hit rate,

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 3>one of the better ones in baseball, sixteen and a half.

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Barrel rate that's up there.

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 3>One of the best launch angles over twenty degrees twenty

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 3>two point two, and had an average ninety one EV.

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 3>So you go back to kasas these are kind of

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 3>similar numbers, except the hard hit and launch angle even bigger.

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 3>For Gorman, his expected batting average has been two thirty

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 3>nine or two thirty eight for two straight years. The

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 3>difference is his actual batting average is two thirty six.

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 3>If he can improve higher in the zone just a

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 3>little bit, he can start matching what our higher expected

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 3>stats and he will be one of the bigger values

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 3>post one point fifty thirty plus homers in the middle infield.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 3>If you can get a two forty batting average would

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 3>be phenomenal. It'll just be will we get that? Every

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 3>projection system says, so we're well atc two thirty nine,

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I should say, but essentially two forty. But you've got

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 3>right in that range. Give me two forty and give

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 3>me thirty plus homers and Nolan Gorman where he can

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 3>be a big breakout this year.

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Love it all right, Let's get to the third base

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>side there. Who is at the hot corner to break

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>out in twenty twenty four? Welsh?

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, for my third baseman, I'm going off script

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. I'm picking Michael Busch, who and why

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 3>say off script? ADP of four hundred ranked thirty five

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 3>will not actually most likely play that position. And I'm

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 3>throwing out the bigger caveat is Cody Bellinger. Cody Bellinger

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 3>resigning If we had heard that Michael Bush was going

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 3>to be like a primary first baseman. If Bellinger comes

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 3>back and as a primary first baseman, that leaves us

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 3>some questions. If he goes into center field, it opens

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 3>it up. They've also said they have not announced who

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 3>the third basement is going to be. It could be

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 3>morele could be Michael Bush. But the reason I want

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 3>to focus on Michael Busher is he does qualify at

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 3>this position and this team. Given the at bats, He's

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 3>ready to have his breakout season. He's ready to be

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 3>a higher batting average and Nolan Gorman type ATC only

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 3>has ninety one games, but twelve homers, hitting two thirty seven,

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna hit high. He hit three twenty three in

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 3>Triple A this past year, obviously a friendlier ballpark in

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 3>the PCL, but he had an under twenty percent strikeout percentage,

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 3>K percentage eighteen point eight, a high walk percentage, and

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 3>he hit twenty seven homers in Triple A alone. If

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 3>he's given the opportunity in a friendly ballpark in Chicago,

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 3>he will hit over twenty homers. He is absolutely free.

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 3>But the question is is does a playing time get

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 3>decimated by Cody Bellinger. There's probably a lot of players

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 3>we could have picked here. This has been someone I

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 3>have been picking up in drafts. He's now cheaper than

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 3>ever because of Bellinger. But if he does lock down

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 3>that spot, be it at DH, be it at first,

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 3>be it at third, be it at all of it,

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 3>and he gets regular at bats, he's gonna hit over

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 3>two fifty and he's gonna hit over twenty homers. It'll

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 3>be a breakout for Michael Bush.

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Morell's gonna get that first crack at bats.

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>That's just how I feel about it.

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 3>But that's gonna be The thing is where are they?

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Are they comfortable moving players? I think Bellinger might play

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 3>between center and first base. Pete Kraarmstrong is a big

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of key to this as well, if they move

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 3>these pieces around in Michael Busch, Michael Busch just it

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter the position. He needs the regular playing time

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 3>and if that happens, he is going to break out.

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 3>If not, egg on my face, this one will not work,

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 3>all right.

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Noelve, Marte is that guy for me at third base

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>one to eighty five ADP, the nineteen third baseman going

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>off the board. Marte did get a small sample size

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Reds last year, thirty five games, but my

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>goodness was a good three to six team batting average

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>three sixty six OBP of four to fifty six slugging.

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>He's got power, he's got speed. You look at the

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>minor league track record again. He's just turning twenty two

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this year, but the minor league track record is good.

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>A two eighty two slash with three sixty seven, four

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven, eight thirty three ops. These are all the

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>things you're looking for. He's got power, he's got speed.

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>He has got the profile. We've been waiting for this

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>kid a long time. The first time I saw him Welsh,

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, the first time I saw him

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>was in twenty twenty one play and he was in

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle organization still and I it was very impressed

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>by this kid, and I thought, this guy is going

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 1>to certainly skyrocket through. And then obviously the change of

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>scenery there in that big tray with Luis Castillo brought

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>him over to Cincinnati. But Cincinnati, there's a lot of

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>reasons to be excited. It's a young team. There's gonna

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>be growing pains. But I think Marte's skill set, with

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the pop and the speed and the ballpark factor he's

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be playing in I think it's enough for him

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to break out. I think it's enough for him to

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>be the everyday starter at third, and I think it's

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>enough for him to translate not everything that he did

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 1>last year in those thirty five games in the small sample,

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>but enough of it that I think he's going to

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be a huge value with that return on investment. Now,

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to shortstop, I went back and forth

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on this one. I've been really I don't know about

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you but I've been drinking the Michael Garcia kool aid.

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, I had to

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>go with my boy, Junior Caminaro instead. Now he qualifies

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it short, qualifies a third in most of your leagues.

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>But Kamonaro, to me, we just talked about the goods.

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>He's the goods. Hits the ball the opposite field with power,

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>makes great contact. I don't think there's anything left for

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>him to really prove. I know he is to kid,

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I know it's another young player, and it feels like

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking dynasty here, but at the same time, well,

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it's hard not to get excited about this player. Jose

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Cabalio is the only thing standing in his way, and

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think it's enough. I think there's a

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>big giant gap in the middle of that order without

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Wander Franco. And you're looking at a guy last year

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three that combined in single A or

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>should say high he in double A thirty one homers,

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>ninety four RBI hit three twenty four with an nine

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to seventy six ops. There's very little for this kid

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to learn. I think he will get his fifty to

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy five, maybe even one hundred at bats at Triple A.

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's gonna take that long. I think

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>by Memorial Day this kid is up. If not May first,

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>he's up. And I think cam Naro is going to

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>take this league by storm. He's going to be a

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>tremendous player from the jump, and he's a guy that

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to invest in very much. Now you're the

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>prospect guy. Do you think I'm being too excited about

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>kem Naro's twenty twenty four impact?

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean I'll throw out a couple of things.

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 3>He's not gonna play shortstop at all, So I would say, well,

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 3>I just want to point I don't.

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Think he would if they really want to get the

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>bat in there, Like if they really want the log

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>jam him in there, he could.

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 3>The flexibility is yeah, the flexibility is there if if

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 3>he were there and they want because here's the deal, Yeah,

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Yandy or Estoc Pardes, they could be the problem at third.

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 3>But you know, if Praidies moves to DH, they could

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 3>have Yandi at first. Camon Arrow made it like a

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 3>really great defensive play in spring, like he's a good

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 3>defender there. Amedrozario's kind of popping at shortstop. Caman Arroo

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 3>would actually provide them flexibility because he can play corner

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 3>and in that middle.

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>All of that.

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Aside, I agree with that. I don't think this could

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 3>be more than fIF I think by May first, if

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 3>he's not up, I would be absolutely shocked because this

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 3>guy's ready. He's defensively been playing solid. I talked with

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Carson Williams, his prospect teammate, who you know is a

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 3>defensive wizard, and he said, how close him and camon

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Arow are working defensively. His bat is absolutely live. I

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 3>don't technically, I don't pick like prospects for this. I mean,

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 3>if I would, I would have probably done Holiday and

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 3>I would have done cakemon Arrow.

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Because I agree with you, I want to draft him.

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 3>He's a guy that I guess for all intensive purposes

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 3>he's going to break out because he's going to be

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 3>given an off oportunity. And I think he is a

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 3>smoke and steel after two hundred because you get him

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 3>as a.

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Bench of projections, Welsh, I see they have Aranda as

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 1>d H Paritis a third and Diaz at first. Do

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you think I mean again, I I'm looking around and

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that Cameron Aro is a piece that you

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>can't stunt the growth of for any of those guys.

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>As good as Diaz was last year, in Paridis was

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>last year at times too.

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 3>I agree that the Randa thing is interesting because it's

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 3>like that's like that stubborn, like what do we have

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 3>out of this guy?

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 2>You know, do we want? We need to see what

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 2>we like?

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 3>That presses that. But there were Estock Parides trade rumors

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 3>in the offseason. I would still say there's an opportunity.

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 3>If this team is committed to cam and Aro, you

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 3>could see a player like Esock Pradies just get moved

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 3>before camps are, before camp's end, in the season starts.

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 2>But that's why you want to make the bet.

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Jonathan Ronda is enough to hold back

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 3>camon Aro. I don't think, you know, finding the spots

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 3>for Estock Praides is enough to stunt them not bringing

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 3>him up. And the Rays really should consider if if

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 3>they can find a way to make this happen, get

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 3>you have potential extra pit compensation. If he were to

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 3>start from day one, he legitimately could win Rookie of

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 3>the Year and that is more player pool money in

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 3>the draft. So I don't think the team should be dismissive,

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think we should be dismissive because of

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 3>some of the early words. Sometimes got to motivate these guys,

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 3>make them show you that they deserve to be the guy,

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 3>and I think Kemano has been doing that in spring.

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I would keep an eye on lineups towards the end

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of spring too, because if Michael Garcia of the Royals

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>starts hitting, I don't know one, I don't know. They

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>decided to MJ. Melendez is not the leadoff guy or

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever they and they lengthened that lineup a different way.

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>That would also be a guy. And the guy that

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>you're going to talk about, Anthony Volpi, is a player

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen play in person many times here in

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey where he played for the Somerset Patriots, and

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised he didn't hit the ground running last year.

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think, just like you, he is ready to

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 1>do that in twenty twenty four and break out.

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that's what I talked about at the top.

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is we're talking about a guy that

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 3>went twenty twenty and we're like, hey, he's going to

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 3>break out. And it's like, well, how does that happen? Well,

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 3>it's because the guy hit two oh nine.

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Hit two oh nine.

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Last year.

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 3>He had two oh nine while not even having a

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent strikeout rate, which that's kind of wild in general.

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 2>Here's a semi positive not that there's a lot of

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 2>plate appearances to it.

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:13.640
<v Speaker 3>But so far in spring training he has a ten

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 3>percent strikeout rate, so that has been exceptionally low. He's

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 3>hitting over three point fifty. I've seen him in the minors. Now,

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 3>he did this in those early stages of his career,

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 3>but then he kind of he really had like a

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 3>high push advancement. I mean, you know, he's twenty two

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 3>year old making it to the majors. But you know

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 3>he had like a rookie season where he hit two

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 3>fifteen and then he bounced back at three oh two.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, he has found ways to bounce back to

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 3>his batting average. But the problem is he may not

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 3>be more than a.

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Two to fifty guy. What he's not is a two

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 2>oh nine player. He hit two oh nine. This is

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 2>similar to Ellie de la Cruz.

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 3>I want to point out Ellie de la Cruz the

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 3>last you know, whatever, it was I'm trying to mat

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:52.479
<v Speaker 3>I think it was the second half of the season.

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 3>He hit like two oh three and still stole like

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 3>eighteen bases or something like that while hitting two oh three.

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 3>My point is Anthony Volpi hit twenty one homer still

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty four bases while hitting two to oh nine in

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 3>a Yankees lineup. The upside is there. So expected batting

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 3>average was in the two thirties. I think you can

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 3>cut the strikeout percentage. We know he can steal. He

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 3>is a legit thirty thirty option. He gets the ball

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 3>in the air almost ten percent, barrel rate, over forty

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 3>percent hard hit. All of those things we like. It

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 3>is just about pitchment. He hit fastballs pretty well. It's

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 3>about hitting off speed stuff and doing it consistently. And

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 3>he has shown that in the miners before. I think

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 3>he can do it. He can hit two thirty or

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 3>two forty absolute breakout campaign and we're going to be

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 3>figuring out what do we do with this guy that

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 3>hit thirty thirty but has a lower than two to

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 3>fifty batting average. He's gonna teeter between a third and

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 3>like a you know, fifth round pick somewhere in there.

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:49.959
<v Speaker 3>I think Anthony Volpi is going to break out, and

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 3>he did it while kind of stinking in his first year,

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 3>so improvement even better break him out.

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say too. I'd love to see him get

0:26:58.240 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>moved up in the order too, because I think that's

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a p Also, he's hitting an eighth spot right now.

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I know Lemayhews at the top of this order, and

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know he's got to get hot in order to

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>justify and move up. But if he gets moved up,

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna see so much better opportunities in terms of

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>guys having to pitch to him. Because we have Soto

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>and Judge behind you, you got to pitch to Anthony Volpi,

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think that would go a long way to

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>his development. I wish the Yankees would take that leap

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of faith, but it doesn't seem like, at least in

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the year. That's something I want to do.

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 3>One good thing, though, is if he is hitting nine,

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 3>this is one of those like top ten teams where

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 3>you're like, if you can hit nine and you've got

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Judge and Soto kind of right behind you, the run

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 3>opportunities might present themselves in a pretty positive way.

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 2>He's got it, not press. But I mean again, he.

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Is that guy. Though he is a grinder, he's a

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>very hard nosed player, and I think last year he

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>just pressed too hard, you know. I think that was

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a big problem.

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 3>Also a little bit, I forgot to mention a two

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 3>point fifty babbitt. That's that's an incredibly low babbitt. That

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 3>that is an easy book, an identifier of positive aggression

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 3>that has to come up. And that's a lot of

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 3>what plays into the batting average. Coming up two thirty

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 3>seems like very reasonable and that's not super exciting. But

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 3>if we get to two forty two to fifty, Anthony

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Volpi will be a problem.

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree, uh in a good way.

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 2>By the way, for these people on all the good ways.

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the outfielders. Welsh, who did you pick

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>for your all breakout team of twenty four?

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, I've definitely talked about these guys. My two

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 3>big breakouts. Number one Riley Green with the Detroit Tigers,

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 3>who hit two eighty eight and only ninety nine games,

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 3>eleven homer, seven stolen bases.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Last year.

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 3>He improved what did he improve? Launch angle, barrel percentage,

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 3>hard hit percentage, All of those improved really good, hard

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.719
<v Speaker 3>hit forty six percent, double digit barrel Those are kind

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 3>of key metrics that I'm looking for, especially for players

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 3>that have, you know, exceptional skills and how can they

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 3>continue to improve. There you go, he's gonna barrel up

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 3>the ball. He's gonna hit it hard. That's gonna do

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 3>good things for you. His expected batting average was too

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 3>eighty seven. He hit two eighty eight. We know he's

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 3>gonna hit for high batting average. He had an almost

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:06.959
<v Speaker 3>one fifteen max EV. So it all maintains that he

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 3>can hit the ball hard, and he does it on

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 3>a high at batting average, and you know what, that

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 3>usually equates to really great offensive results. The ballpark isn't

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 3>the best, but I do think that Riley Green can

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 3>push twenty five homers this year. I think he can

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 3>steal double digit bases, none of which are projected, but

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 3>projections are all over on games played. If he stays healthy,

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 3>I think he will be a force in that lineup.

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 3>And he is a smoking deal at one sixty three

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 3>and the thirty first outfielder.

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 2>My other one.

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 3>We actually said a little scare the other day. He's

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 3>another one of my favorite late targets. He's going off

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 3>at two hundred and the forty fourth outfielder according to

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 3>the average ECR. It's Jaren Duran who had twenty four

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 3>stolen bases last year. He had a high batting average,

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 3>hitting two ninety five. His expected batting average is almost

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 3>two seventy. Again, those those metrics, we're looking for forty

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:02.719
<v Speaker 3>five percent hard hit rate. That's huge double digit number

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 3>on the launch angle over ten percent.

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>He improved.

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 3>He didn't improve year over year, he improved over his

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 3>rookie rookie year. Barrel percentage is still a little bit

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 3>too low, but his expected numbers are for the most part,

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 3>in line across the board. And here's the big thing.

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I think he's going to steal like crazy this year

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 3>if he stays healthy. What did he have He had

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty four stolen bases in one hundred games. I think

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 3>he's going to push forty this year. He has a

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 3>chance to hit high in the lineup, and those hard

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 3>hit numbers give him a really good baseline. Jaron Durant

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 3>at two hundred is lol. Overall, he is a fourth

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 3>to fifth outfielder on every single team. And you know

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about Nico Horner who hits for a high

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 3>batting average and steals forty bases. Jaron Duran might put

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 3>up Nico Horner's numbers in the outfield and go one

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty spots later. So gim me Jared Duran,

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna breakout.

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a huge difference there, all right, looking on

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to the outfield for me, Jordan Walker, post hype, sleeper,

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>perfect opportunity one twenty four. Overall the thirtieth outfit are

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>going off the board, Jordan Walker. When you look at

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the minor league numbers, I mean they're elite A three

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>ZHO one three eighty three five ten slash and eight

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>ninety two ops. Last year, you know, some ups and downs,

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>got sent down one point two, but over one hundred

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen games he did it. Sixteen homers, hit two

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy six. He held his own. A lot of the

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>problem too, was on the road, where his OPS was

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred points lower on the road as opposed to

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>at home. I'm home cooking. Things were good for him

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>when he went out, not so good away. So he

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>became a guy that he really had to manage a

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit more in terms of Yeah, daily transactions or

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>weekly lineups. He had to really account for the schedule

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>when it came to Walker if you were paying attention

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>on how to utilize him. But I've comped this player

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to Jermaine Die before. To me, that's the kind of

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>hitter he is, and Jermaine Die was a very useful

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>piece for a long time. I think this guy post hype.

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I know last year you are very much a Jordan

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Walker guy. I don't feel like I've heard you talk

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about Jordan Walker once this year, so I want to

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about him. But before I do, the other guy

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that I have is jex Centchurio, who I know you're

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>excited about too. There is another dude where Look, when

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you give a twenty year old kid an enormous extension,

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>he's going to play and he's gonna play every day.

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>He's a good defender. He is the deal when it

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>comes to power, when it comes to speed, when it

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>comes to all of those intangible qualities. We are in

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a embarrassment of riches right now when it comes to

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>this young talent that's being filled through the major leagues,

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's stunning to think that they're getting there at

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one, twenty two years old, and they're making

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>an impact. I think Churio is just that next guy

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to make an impact. It's a good ballpark factor for him.

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>He's got some lineup protection now that Hoskins is there

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>with Yelich, so there's some pieces. Contraras is there too,

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>so they've got some pieces around him. It doesn't have

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to carry the offense. We'll see where he ends up

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>hitting in the batting order. That could have something to

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>do with it too, how far that breakout could be.

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>But again, I know I've got a couple of rookies

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>on this list, but I think these guys are not

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>just your average rookies. I think this is going to

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>be a very special year of rookies. Remember back in

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the day, boys and girls, when you had your tops

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>traded nineteen eighty six and you look. Did all the

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>rookies in that class? I know Welsh doesn't because.

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I put three years old, I don't remember that.

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember it. It was Barry Bonds, and it was

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Will Clark, and it was all these bo Jackson was

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>all these guys. It was a historic rookie class. Barry Bonds,

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Benia, all those guys were in there that to

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>me could be this rookie class in twenty twenty four

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is a special group. Welsh. So Jordan Walker, how come

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>no Jordan Walker noise for no I'm in.

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 2>I know there hasn't been a lot.

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, one of the things I thought was super interesting

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 3>was Mason Wynn confirmed that Jordan Walker had gained twenty

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 3>pounds of muscle in the off season and that those

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 3>are you want that from a guy like that already

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 3>explosive batspeed. I remember he was here and there as

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 3>in a fall league, and my son got to meet

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 3>him and take a picture with him, and he was

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 3>in just pure awe of the size of Jordan Mark

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 3>because you know, I'm a big dude. We were just

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 3>hanging out together. You know how Jordan Walker like looks

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 3>down on me. And for a guy to get even

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 3>bigger with explosive batspeed, I'm all in.

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I am in.

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 3>I guess I haven't really like signaled him as this guy,

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 3>but I'm drafting. I'm trying to draft him where I can.

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 2>I've got him.

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 3>I think inside the top one hundred. Think he might

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 3>have even worked with some drive line this year. I

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 3>think it's fantastic physically, he has all the elements to

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 3>just be a superstar, and I love the idea of

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 3>the added muscle to get the ball in the air

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.280
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more, and he was making really good contact.

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I love him and I love Cheerio.

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 3>I tweeted out that picture from before we went on

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 3>our trip, so like a week and a half ago,

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 3>when I was at Brewers Camp that I thought it

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 3>was interesting that Cheerio was working exclusively with Christian Yelich

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 3>and Garrett Mitchell South Frilic in that same session. The

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 3>entire day was on a backfield working at third base.

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 3>I really think Pat Murphy has made the decision that

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Frillic is gonna be a third base slash super utail guy,

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 3>and they are putting Cheerio in that lineup. That's how

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 3>they have treated him his whole time. The question would

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 3>be did they fall in love with Joey Weimer. I

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 3>don't think so. I think Weimer and Garrett Mitchell can

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of play up platoon, Cheerio can do it, and

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 3>south Frillick kind of comes off there. So I am

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 3>resigned to Cheerio making this roster and that's why I

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 3>ranked him like right inside the top one hundred, and

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 3>that might be even a little bit low. I will say,

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 3>though he struggled kind of most of camp and then

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 3>just had like a big day just the other day

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 3>and improved his batting average to three hundred. But I'm

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 3>with you on both of these players, and I think

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 3>I do think Cheerio is gonna break camp with the team,

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 3>and I think that it isn't a kind of an

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 3>exceptional group of prospects. We might look back when we go,

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 3>holy crap, we had Carter and Langford and Holiday and

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 3>Cam and Era, and we're gonna be blown away by

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 3>the results.

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean just those guys alone, not to mention

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>if any of the other guys that were not, you know,

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the guys in the peripheral of that, you know, prospect

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:41.439
<v Speaker 1>top twenty, they might make him in Heston Kuerstad could

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:43.359
<v Speaker 1>come up and make a big impact with the power

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that he has. I mean, it's just.

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 2>We could still see schemes.

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean it really, I'm telling everybody, twenty twenty four

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 1>might be the year of the rookie. Again. This is

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a special group here. If they can get enough activity

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>at the major league level, let's get to the pitchers here, Welsh, Uh,

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>probably no surprise of the guys. We're going to pick

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>one of them. We have both selected. So let's talk

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>about Michael King, and let's talk about your second selection too.

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no chance, because I saw you put Michael King

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 3>on here. No chance I wasn't not putting them on here.

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>We are.

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 3>We're going hand in hand again into the sunset of

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:18.280
<v Speaker 3>picks because I am I think still currently the highest

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 3>ranker on Fantasy Pros on Michael King two two three

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 3>era as a starter had an over thirty one percent

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.240
<v Speaker 3>k percentage as a starter.

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 2>I love his pitch mix.

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 3>I've kind of found similarities in Pablo Lopez overall. Obviously,

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 3>you know it's used a little bit differently, but I

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.839
<v Speaker 3>love the sinker, sweeper fastball overall mix a change up

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 3>with actually the number one whift pitch. And I'm pretty

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:44.919
<v Speaker 3>optimistic that this team is not going to press down

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 3>on his inning. So, I mean, he was great as

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 3>a starter last year. You're going into a pitcher friendly

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:53.760
<v Speaker 3>ballpark with good runs. You've got superstars, you've got Machado,

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 3>you've got Tatis, you've got a pretty good defensive infield

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:59.240
<v Speaker 3>as well. You know, getting Tatis out of there committing

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 3>to Kim. I like who they are defensively, I think

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Michael King. Let's see Michael King projections I think have

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 3>been like around one hundred and thirty. I think he

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:08.320
<v Speaker 3>can push one hundred and sixty. They're going to depend

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 3>on this guy. And he had two pitches of a

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 3>thirty nine or higher fifth percentage and he was a

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:14.760
<v Speaker 3>phenomenal starter.

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 2>Low walk rate too.

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 3>He lowered his walk rate as a starter, So I

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 3>mean the K minus walk percentage one of the better

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 3>in the league. I think Michael King he is the

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 3>epitome of the player that is ready for a breakout

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 3>because he doesn't fit that mold for a lot of people,

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 3>and he will be put into the starter role and

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:35.720
<v Speaker 3>from a value perspective, one forty eight ADP forty fourth

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 3>starting pitcher. Overall, he's one of my favorites. And I

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 3>know you, you've you and me are on the Michael

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 3>King bandwagon.

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. When I wrote up all the pictures for the

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Black Book this year on Amazon, I gotta tell you, like,

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 1>I just felt like, you know, King was that standout guy.

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>You look at all the numbers when you're looking at

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a trend, line for a pitcher. Everything's going in the

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 1>right direction. Michael King was not some schlub prospect too.

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>He was a big time prospect in the Yankee organization. Again,

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it was it's always hard for these Yankee guys some

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>time to break into the rotation because there's so many

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>expectations that are there. And I think it's always commendable

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:09.839
<v Speaker 1>when you have a guy that goes and just says, Okay,

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 1>well I'm gonna convert into reliever here and help the

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 1>team and be there. And we've seen guys flourish in

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that role and become really good starting pitchers. Again, I've

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 1>brought up a few guys, but Johan Santana is the

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>one for me that always stands out of the last

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:24.439
<v Speaker 1>of that ilk. But that used to be the way

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>guys broke into rotations. They used to be the kind

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of you know, you'd have to do your time in

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the bullpen and then you got your chance to be

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a starting pitcher. And I think Michael King is just

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>locked and loaded, ready to go. He might be the

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>best San Diego Padre pitcher on the board in terms

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of value, Like I don't even know if that's debatable

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Potentially the other guy for you is

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a Homer pick. So let's talk about Brandon Fought.

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Brandon Fotch is too good of a deal. I

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 3>can't get over that. He's a two to eleven on

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 3>ADP the fifty seventh starting pitcher. I think he legit

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.359
<v Speaker 3>can be a top thirty, top thirty five guy.

0:38:57.719 --> 0:38:58.919
<v Speaker 2>Here's an interesting thing.

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 3>From September on, he had an over ten k per

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 3>nine with pending the miney and I'm including the playoffs

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 3>by the way, So September on with the playoffs because

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:09.919
<v Speaker 3>it went to the World Series, he had a two

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:12.839
<v Speaker 3>or under walk per nine to go with that ten

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 3>k per nine. This was when he chanted, when Strom

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 3>had him move on the mound and then he was

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 3>going sinker fastball, sweeper with a little bit of change up.

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 3>But that over ten k per nine with two or

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 3>lower walk per nine. Of qualified pitchers, there were only

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 3>like six pitchers that did that that last season. And

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:31.720
<v Speaker 3>they're all like amazing pitchers. By they're all the name Luis,

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Castillo and Strider. You know, they're all the best names.

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 3>So my idea is, this is a guy that won

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and eighty innings in the minor leagues. The

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 3>year before he found his improvement, he was phenomenal. Era

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 3>was into the low threes. He had over ten k

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 3>per nine September on into the playoffs, the most important time,

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 3>he stopped walking guys.

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 2>He's a home.

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Run problem, but he's going to get all the innings

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 3>he can on a great defensive team with offensive support.

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 3>He is one of their top counted pitchers and he's

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 3>going to probably be in that number four spot. I

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 3>think Brandon Fought is just a crazy, big steal. The

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:06.760
<v Speaker 3>breakout's going to happen, and we're going to be talking

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 3>about him in that same third you know, in that

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.359
<v Speaker 3>thirty range of pictures, he's gonna change multiple tiers up

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:15.399
<v Speaker 3>and we're gonna laugh. I think we're going to laugh

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 3>at him being like almost sixtieth.

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Overall on starting pitchers.

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 3>So I know it's a homer. I had him last

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 3>year and it was kind of egg on my face

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:24.479
<v Speaker 3>for a bit. I'm hopeful that that's going to change,

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:26.839
<v Speaker 3>and I think the changes that they did with him

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 3>September on through the World Series is a proof that

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 3>this guy can be in the upper echelon of fantasy pitchers.

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Now for me. The other guy's Bailey Ober at forty

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>five overall in terms of the pitchers, one fifty six

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>in adp Ober to me, really starting to settle in

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 1>nicely last year, very strong season for Bailey Ober and

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:48.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, you start to look around, he said, Okay,

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the ERI was three forty three, but the XCRI was

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>three six three, so not that far off. I just

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like that Minnesota Twins rotation is loaded. I think

0:40:56.960 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a great thing. Whenever you have young pitchers, they

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>can let him just kind of fly on their own.

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>They don't have to do too much, they don't have

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to worry about being at the top of this rotation.

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Pablo Lopez is that guy already, he has that gig.

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe Ryan gets a lot of publicity, as he should.

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>But Bailey Over is a guy that I think is

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of floating around right now, and I think, just

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:19.479
<v Speaker 1>like Michael King, ironically, they're kind of going back to back.

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>It just feels like a no brainer pick to me

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's upside with the win potential. Last year, one

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty four in things, one hundred and forty

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>six strikeouts, just twenty nine walks. The walk rate is minuscule.

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 1>If you keep the walks down, the hits low, you're

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:34.959
<v Speaker 1>going to have success. The whip was at one point

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 1>oh seven last year, again one forty four in the

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 1>inning soda last year, he could easily get up to

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>one seventy five. That's huge. I think the win potential

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is there for him too. Love the bullpen as well,

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>at the back end of this bullpen for the twins,

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's a lot to like when it

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to Bailey over If he does make thirty starts

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 1>this year, he's going to destroy the return on investment,

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:59.280
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely obliterate it. Love the guy and speaking of

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a bullpen and back ends of closer situations Andres Munos,

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:06.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go back to the well again. Welsh knows.

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I love this guy. Last year I talked about him

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:11.400
<v Speaker 1>so much, and then last year start off with the injuries.

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Eventually things did clear out, Seawald moved on and Munios

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 1>moved in. He is at one twelve overall, the thirteenth

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 1>closer going off the board. But this guy has the

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>fastball velocity. He's got the stuff to become a dominant closer.

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's ready this year with a healthy offseason,

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a healthy spring to really hit the ground running and

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:31.800
<v Speaker 1>become the guy that I thought he was going to

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:34.280
<v Speaker 1>be last year. So just kind of like Jordan Walker

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Andres Munio. Sometimes we're a year early on a guy,

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like I'm a year early on Munios,

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a year early on Walker, but and then on Edward

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 1>Julian too, So I'm buying back into a lot of

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 1>these players. But I think twenty twenty four is gonna

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 1>be the breakout for those guys who's your reliever that

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you're high on, that you think can breakout in twenty

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty four.

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I like that Munyo's one. I was

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 3>huge on him last year. I was worried about Brash

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 3>taking over that job, but then Brash had this injury

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 3>that probably is going to just allow Munya to run

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 3>with it, So I love that. And they got rid

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:04.720
<v Speaker 3>of pre Lander Barrow, who they traded to the White Sox,

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 3>so it's like all the options to take away from

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Munnos are just kind of fading. So that's a great

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 3>one mine kind of simplistic into my bus territory. I

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 3>come to the breakouts and I'm gonna pick Evan Phillips,

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 3>who is the fifteenth closer going or if I'm sorry,

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 3>fourteenth closer going off the board ADP One thirteen, whatever,

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 3>But give me a Dodgers closer.

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Give me a Dodgers closer that they trust.

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 3>We have seen more confidence come out of camp from

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Dave Roberts about Evan Phillips, who, by the way, wasn't

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:34.720
<v Speaker 3>giving up a whole bunch of contact.

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:35.319
<v Speaker 2>He did have.

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, ex wOBA was like top ten percent against

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 3>a strikeout rate right around the thirty was twenty eight

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:42.839
<v Speaker 3>point two k percentage, low walks, He had a really

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 3>low era.

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Expected era was a bit up. But really, I.

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Don't even tell you all that stuff. He's with the Dodgers.

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.840
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna be the guy. If he falters a lot,

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 3>they can go to Bruce Dharr and they do obviously

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:56.760
<v Speaker 3>have some options. But he has been great in spring.

0:43:57.320 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 3>He's got the trust, and you've got the best off

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 3>in baseball behind him, and there's going to be a

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 3>lot lot of opportunities. So I love a closer with

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 3>opportunities that's not inside the top ten. He will break

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 3>into the top ten this year and probably be a

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 3>stupid value. So Evan Phillips is my breakout closer all right.

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Just to run through the rosters for you. For the

0:44:17.600 --> 0:44:21.400
<v Speaker 1>breakout teams, Welsh has Gabriel Moreno, Tristan Cassas, Nolan Gorman,

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Michael Bush, Anthony Volpi love that one, Riley Green, Jaron Durand,

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Michael King, Brandon Fott and Evan Phillips. I've got Logan o'hapi,

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Josh Naylor, Edward Julian Noelvee Marte Junior, Kemenaro, Jordan Walker,

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Curio, Michael King, Bailey Ober and Andre's Munio's. But

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we want to hear from you who are the breakouts

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in your mind in twenty twenty four. Drop your names

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the comments below. Tell us who you're drafting with fervor,

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>with excitement. You just might win yourself a trophy Smack

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Championship belt while you're at it. Don't forget to subscribe

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to the YouTube channel. As Welsh's hat is looking deep

0:44:56.520 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>into my soul right now, very unsettling. Don't get to

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>do that. Ring the bell for notifications, and of course

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>make sure you sink all your leagues over a Fantasy

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:08.799
<v Speaker 1>pros two to use all the draft software and to

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 1>use all of the incredible tools to manage your team.

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 1>To draft your team. The draft Assistant with Sink will

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 1>help you get all the right players on your squad

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt, so you are ready and armed and dangerous,

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>just like Welsh's hat for the twenty twenty four baseball season.

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 1>That'll do it for us, because I'm gonna have nightmares,

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>but the story of the game goes on. For the

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Welsh's hat, I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids.

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Nightmare for you all.