WEBVTT -  The N-Word Debate | Cite Your Source

0:00:00.630 --> 0:00:03.870
<v Speaker 1>Welcome home, NLP fam. This is Angela Rye. You're about

0:00:03.890 --> 0:00:06.330
<v Speaker 1>to hear an episode of Cite Your Source, a show

0:00:06.390 --> 0:00:09.890
<v Speaker 1>produced and presented by Native Lamb Pod. On Cite Your Source,

0:00:09.930 --> 0:00:13.470
<v Speaker 1>we fact-check the headlines and debunk viral news. We say

0:00:13.750 --> 0:00:16.910
<v Speaker 1>we are your two-step verification on all the BS. New

0:00:16.980 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>episodes drop Wednesday at 9 p.m. Eastern on Cite Your

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.940
<v Speaker 1>Source's YouTube channel. If you're listening and wondering what our

0:00:23.980 --> 0:00:26.380
<v Speaker 1>sources are, I encourage you to check out the video

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>where we cite our sources in real time and we

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.220
<v Speaker 1>have our sources in show notes. Thank you. Enjoy the episode.

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.659
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Cite Your Source. I'm your host, Angela Rye.

0:00:36.700 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>We are your two-step verification on all the BS. And

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.019
<v Speaker 1>today we are talking about the N-word. Who can use

0:00:43.100 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it or should anyone at all be using it? Joining

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>me today are Lennard Charlemagne-Lagarde McKelvey, multimedia mogul. Jordan Pierre,

0:00:50.979 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>youth leadership and identity advocate and founder of Voice. Delano Squires,

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.330
<v Speaker 1>director of the DeVos Center for human flourishing at the

0:00:59.450 --> 0:01:04.010
<v Speaker 1>Heritage Foundation, and author of The Vanishing Black Family, Dr.

0:01:04.130 --> 0:01:08.030
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Stordor Pryor, professor of history at Smith College and

0:01:08.170 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>author of Something We Said, Richard Pryor, A Notorious Word,

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.819
<v Speaker 1>and Me, Derek Johnson, president and CEO of the NAACP,

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>and Dr. Michael Eric Dyson, distinguished professor of African American

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.510
<v Speaker 1>and Diaspora Studies at Vanderbilt University. We got through it

0:01:24.590 --> 0:01:29.050
<v Speaker 1>all today. We will be addressing three claims. One, the

0:01:29.150 --> 0:01:33.570
<v Speaker 1>N-word is associated with the most painful aspects of black history. Two,

0:01:33.890 --> 0:01:37.289
<v Speaker 1>the N-word is derived from the Amharic word nagus, which

0:01:37.350 --> 0:01:41.650
<v Speaker 1>means king. Three, it is socially acceptable for white people

0:01:42.110 --> 0:01:45.940
<v Speaker 1>and individuals of other racial backgrounds to say the N-word.

0:01:46.700 --> 0:01:49.620
<v Speaker 1>So I know you all are wondering where and who

0:01:49.700 --> 0:01:50.500
<v Speaker 1>is the fact checker.

0:01:52.300 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Surprise, surprise!

0:01:54.060 --> 0:01:54.780
<v Speaker 3>It is me.

0:01:54.890 --> 0:01:56.470
<v Speaker 1>She is I and I is she. That is right.

0:01:56.930 --> 0:01:59.490
<v Speaker 1>I will be serving as our resident fact checker. So

0:01:59.530 --> 0:02:01.990
<v Speaker 1>if any panelist is on some BS or tells a

0:02:01.990 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>little story, I will hit that buzzer and you'll hear

0:02:05.030 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>this sound. Then they will have to cite their source.

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.060
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be good, y'all. But first, let's

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>get to the N-word.

0:02:12.419 --> 0:02:13.019
<v Speaker 3>Nigga.

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:13.460
<v Speaker 2>Nigga.

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:14.540
<v Speaker 4>Nigga.

0:02:14.660 --> 0:02:15.500
<v Speaker 3>Say it right now.

0:02:31.570 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I got to ask you all this very

0:02:34.500 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>basic question, yes or no. Should folks be using the N-word?

0:02:38.100 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>This is a rapid round. We're going to start with

0:02:39.740 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the person I know will be the rapidest. That's Dr. Dyson.

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:43.420
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So your answer is yes. People should use the N-word. Okay, Derek?

0:02:46.980 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 4>Black people should. Black people should.

0:02:48.970 --> 0:02:49.650
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Derek?

0:02:49.930 --> 0:02:50.290
<v Speaker 3>No one.

0:02:50.810 --> 0:02:51.930
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Liz?

0:02:52.710 --> 0:02:53.310
<v Speaker 2>Complicated.

0:02:53.590 --> 0:02:54.730
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Delano?

0:02:55.010 --> 0:02:56.709
<v Speaker 4>Depends. Okay, Jordan?

0:02:57.130 --> 0:02:57.329
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:02:57.710 --> 0:02:58.609
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Lenard?

0:02:59.310 --> 0:02:59.380
<v Speaker 6>No.

0:02:59.430 --> 0:03:00.710
<v Speaker 7>No. No?

0:03:00.830 --> 0:03:03.330
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you sound like you have the most hesitation. Why no?

0:03:04.030 --> 0:03:06.890
<v Speaker 8>I have no hesitation, but when a sister said complicated,

0:03:07.330 --> 0:03:09.110
<v Speaker 8>I can see where it can be complicated. But I

0:03:09.130 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 8>think that when you know better, you do better. And

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.620
<v Speaker 8>I know for me, whenever I've used it, I've never

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.459
<v Speaker 8>used it as a term of endearment. I use it

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.700
<v Speaker 8>the way white supremacists use it. I be like, them goddamn,

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.860
<v Speaker 8>you know? So I don't see the benefit of it

0:03:21.900 --> 0:03:24.630
<v Speaker 8>in 2026 to still be using it in any way, shape,

0:03:24.690 --> 0:03:24.930
<v Speaker 8>or form.

0:03:25.270 --> 0:03:25.889
<v Speaker 2>For me, personally.

0:03:25.910 --> 0:03:26.870
<v Speaker 3>It just feels a little vibrational.

0:03:27.410 --> 0:03:29.550
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, I think it's complicated. White people should never

0:03:29.650 --> 0:03:31.150
<v Speaker 9>use it. I don't want to ever hear it, and

0:03:31.350 --> 0:03:33.710
<v Speaker 9>I don't say it. But I also know that it's

0:03:33.750 --> 0:03:37.100
<v Speaker 9>in conversation with white supremacy when black people use it,

0:03:37.770 --> 0:03:41.650
<v Speaker 9>and that to remove the word is just removing a

0:03:41.690 --> 0:03:46.900
<v Speaker 9>vocabulary word when the words in conversation with injustice, inequity, inequality,

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.860
<v Speaker 9>those systems have to be removed before the N-word stops

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 9>meaning anything. As long as it means something, it's going

0:03:53.660 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 9>to continue to be used. That's the complication for me.

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:57.060
<v Speaker 1>Delano?

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:57.570
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:03:57.590 --> 0:04:01.100
<v Speaker 10>And I would make a distinction between private use, public

0:04:01.220 --> 0:04:03.580
<v Speaker 10>use and commercial use. And a great deal of the

0:04:03.620 --> 0:04:06.260
<v Speaker 10>conversation around that word, particularly over the last 40 years,

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 10>is about public and commercial use, particularly if you're talking

0:04:09.140 --> 0:04:11.860
<v Speaker 10>about hip hop. But I think it's important to remember

0:04:11.900 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 10>that every all language has context and you have to

0:04:15.620 --> 0:04:19.020
<v Speaker 10>look at the message, the messenger, the motive and the medium.

0:04:19.260 --> 0:04:20.860
<v Speaker 10>And for me, and this is where I would.

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:21.500
<v Speaker 2>Agree with Charlamagne.

0:04:22.070 --> 0:04:23.779
<v Speaker 10>A lot of the time, the motive, even when it's

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 10>coming from our mouths, is not a clean motive. It's

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.380
<v Speaker 10>not a good motive. But language is fluid in the

0:04:29.420 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 10>way that people talk, particularly when in a private setting,

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.740
<v Speaker 10>doesn't necessarily mean that they have ill intent when they.

0:04:35.700 --> 0:04:36.539
<v Speaker 2>Use particular words.

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.740
<v Speaker 10>And that's why there's a difference between reading a word

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 10>and using a word. And I think all the panelists

0:04:42.430 --> 0:04:44.969
<v Speaker 10>would agree that using the word as a slur, regardless

0:04:44.990 --> 0:04:47.430
<v Speaker 10>of whose mouth it comes out of, is off-limits.

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.260
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I say for me, I feel like we shouldn't

0:04:50.300 --> 0:04:51.779
<v Speaker 5>use the N-word. And the reason why I'm saying that,

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 5>because I think of when I think of words, I

0:04:53.140 --> 0:04:54.870
<v Speaker 5>think about the power of language. You said in the

0:04:54.910 --> 0:04:58.650
<v Speaker 5>Bible says the power of death or life relies on

0:04:58.670 --> 0:05:00.930
<v Speaker 5>the tongue. But even outside of that, it's understanding that

0:05:01.250 --> 0:05:03.770
<v Speaker 5>words also have a neurological response. And depending on the

0:05:03.830 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 5>field and work that you're doing, I'm trying to reaffirm

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 5>young black men and who they are. I want you

0:05:07.260 --> 0:05:09.260
<v Speaker 5>to reaffirm me and who we are. Why you don't

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.659
<v Speaker 5>feel comfortable calling me a king? a God as such,

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 5>but you want to reaffirm me in being a nigga.

0:05:13.140 --> 0:05:15.210
<v Speaker 5>And then I got to think of the responses. Words

0:05:15.250 --> 0:05:17.030
<v Speaker 5>have an impact. When I call a young man a king,

0:05:17.070 --> 0:05:19.310
<v Speaker 5>how he start to stand up. And we talk about facts,

0:05:19.330 --> 0:05:21.540
<v Speaker 5>but also feelings matter, right? How you make a young

0:05:21.570 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 5>man feel when you call him a certain word, how

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.460
<v Speaker 5>you reaffirm him in his presence. And then I think

0:05:25.500 --> 0:05:27.660
<v Speaker 5>about like, I studied media. I think about 1915, the

0:05:27.700 --> 0:05:31.340
<v Speaker 5>first depiction of from Hollywood was the nigga through the

0:05:31.380 --> 0:05:33.300
<v Speaker 5>birth of a nation. So now when we see people

0:05:33.339 --> 0:05:34.980
<v Speaker 5>say we lazy or we don't have a certain type

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:36.580
<v Speaker 5>of work ethic, that's because the only depiction you have

0:05:36.620 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 5>of a black man out of America was the nigga.

0:05:38.900 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 5>You know what I mean? But reaffirm me and show

0:05:40.700 --> 0:05:42.170
<v Speaker 5>me the wars that we won. Show me the people

0:05:42.190 --> 0:05:44.589
<v Speaker 5>that did stand on something. Show me Hannibal. Show me

0:05:44.610 --> 0:05:47.029
<v Speaker 5>the contributions we made to society. We ain't just niggas.

0:05:47.350 --> 0:05:48.790
<v Speaker 5>So not think of a nigga, I also think of

0:05:49.170 --> 0:05:51.510
<v Speaker 5>those that's been lost and don't know the sense of self.

0:05:51.550 --> 0:05:52.950
<v Speaker 5>And we say that knowledge of self is not just

0:05:52.970 --> 0:05:55.790
<v Speaker 5>violence prevention, but it also ignites collective liberation when you

0:05:55.830 --> 0:05:57.830
<v Speaker 5>know who I am. So when I speak to young men,

0:05:57.850 --> 0:06:00.830
<v Speaker 5>I understand the power of language, the neurological responses that

0:06:00.850 --> 0:06:03.010
<v Speaker 5>they ignite, but more importantly, how it makes somebody feel.

0:06:03.100 --> 0:06:04.339
<v Speaker 5>So I don't think we should use the word nigga

0:06:04.380 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 5>at all.

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.500
<v Speaker 1>So, Doc, and this is for Dr. Dyson, you are

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the one person on this panel who is like, yes, absolutely,

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:18.290
<v Speaker 1>my nigga. So on that, I'm curious to know, you know,

0:06:18.310 --> 0:06:21.830
<v Speaker 1>when you hear these very visceral, passionate responses about what

0:06:21.890 --> 0:06:25.609
<v Speaker 1>the N-word means to folks who are sitting here, Why

0:06:25.710 --> 0:06:29.370
<v Speaker 1>is your response so different, knowing its treacherous past, knowing

0:06:29.450 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>its history, particularly when used to inflict pain, harm, or

0:06:33.100 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>death upon black folks? Why is your response so different?

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:41.700
<v Speaker 6>Look, listening to everybody here, with the exception of President Johnson,

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 6>I know he shares views with others, I understand all that.

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:51.540
<v Speaker 6>But language is flexible. Language is fluid. It evolves over

0:06:51.580 --> 0:06:56.229
<v Speaker 6>space and time. And I acknowledge all of this at

0:06:56.250 --> 0:06:58.670
<v Speaker 6>the same time when I was reading Dr. Hiram Smith's book,

0:06:58.810 --> 0:07:01.229
<v Speaker 6>What's Up My Nigga, where he talks about the fact

0:07:01.290 --> 0:07:04.860
<v Speaker 6>that very few people were actually kings. Most of us

0:07:04.890 --> 0:07:07.980
<v Speaker 6>were average black people. It's all right, I think, as

0:07:08.020 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 6>Brother Jordan talked about it, to speak about us as

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.900
<v Speaker 6>kings and queens, but the average black person was not that.

0:07:16.500 --> 0:07:20.070
<v Speaker 6>So That's an assertion of a kind of idealized state

0:07:20.090 --> 0:07:22.930
<v Speaker 6>of being as well. The reason, look, I didn't hear

0:07:23.370 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 6>nigga first time from a rapper. I heard it from preachers.

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:27.740
<v Speaker 4>If you read Dr.

0:07:27.780 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 6>Henry Mitchell's book about black preaching, he talks about an

0:07:30.060 --> 0:07:34.140
<v Speaker 6>encounter between Sandy Ray out of Brooklyn and Dr. Frederick

0:07:34.180 --> 0:07:36.580
<v Speaker 6>George Sampson, who happened to be my pastor in Detroit,

0:07:37.140 --> 0:07:39.950
<v Speaker 6>and referring to each other or one to the other

0:07:40.050 --> 0:07:40.670
<v Speaker 6>as my nigga.

0:07:41.430 --> 0:07:42.290
<v Speaker 4>Martin Luther King Jr.

0:07:42.310 --> 0:07:46.690
<v Speaker 6>the night before he died, playfully rebuked Andrew Young, by

0:07:46.750 --> 0:07:50.650
<v Speaker 6>taking a pillow and saying, where you been, little nigger? Now,

0:07:50.670 --> 0:07:52.650
<v Speaker 6>I don't think anybody's going to deny that Martin Luther

0:07:52.670 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 6>King Jr., though he was certainly not perfect, was certainly

0:07:56.070 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 6>the embodiment of the struggle for Black self-determination and a

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 6>positive self-conception as anybody ever in our community. So when

0:08:03.620 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 6>I hear nigger, I hear warmth, I hear beauty, I

0:08:06.660 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 6>hear terror. There's no question the fact that Black people

0:08:10.180 --> 0:08:13.620
<v Speaker 6>sometimes internalize what nigger means, but we know that it

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:17.490
<v Speaker 6>can be quite Problematic and it can also be quite complicated.

0:08:17.810 --> 0:08:20.170
<v Speaker 4>You can use it as a as a greeting. What's up,

0:08:20.190 --> 0:08:20.570
<v Speaker 4>my nigga?

0:08:20.890 --> 0:08:27.020
<v Speaker 6>You can use it as an interrogation nigga Use it

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 6>as celebration my nigga you can use it as a

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:35.500
<v Speaker 6>rebuff nigga so there are multiple ways in which nigga

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.790
<v Speaker 6>operates and we can say just like women use the

0:08:38.809 --> 0:08:42.140
<v Speaker 6>B word and right, among themselves, not with us, or

0:08:42.420 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 6>gay and lesbian people have appropriated that term fag.

0:08:45.910 --> 0:08:48.790
<v Speaker 4>And use it among themselves. As Dr. Hiram Smith again

0:08:48.830 --> 0:08:52.450
<v Speaker 4>points out, this didn't start with hip hop. Black people

0:08:52.620 --> 0:08:54.910
<v Speaker 4>in the 1850s were using nigga.

0:08:55.309 --> 0:08:57.489
<v Speaker 6>And whether you think it's because of the deletion of

0:08:57.530 --> 0:09:00.189
<v Speaker 6>the R that we did in the South or because

0:09:00.250 --> 0:09:03.230
<v Speaker 6>we adopted some kind of British talk, the point is

0:09:03.670 --> 0:09:05.390
<v Speaker 6>nigga is complicated and beautiful.

0:09:05.750 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 4>And what Black people have done with nigga is amazing.

0:09:08.620 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 4>What we have been able to manage a kind of complexity,

0:09:12.500 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 4>a kind of nuance, a kind of rebuke to the world.

0:09:15.700 --> 0:09:16.380
<v Speaker 4>And I don't think.

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.300
<v Speaker 6>that we should stop using it because white people get confused.

0:09:19.340 --> 0:09:21.860
<v Speaker 6>White people are grown. They go to the moon. They

0:09:21.900 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 6>run parts of the world. They are billionaires, but they

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.739
<v Speaker 6>cannot say the word nigga, nigga, please. So I think

0:09:27.780 --> 0:09:29.740
<v Speaker 6>that at the end of the day, we've got to

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 6>assert the legitimacy of this term that has evolved out

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 6>of our culture, where we have sent messages to each

0:09:37.420 --> 0:09:41.580
<v Speaker 6>other and to ourselves about both affirmation and recrimination and

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 6>hurt and pain at the same time.

0:09:43.179 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to go to Dara really quick. Because in 2007,

0:09:46.400 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the NAACP buried the N-word. buried the N-word. There was

0:10:07.300 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a whole casket. There were eulogies. From Julian Bond, y'all,

0:10:11.580 --> 0:10:12.660
<v Speaker 1>to Kwame Kilpatrick.

0:10:12.740 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh, boy.

0:10:13.140 --> 0:10:14.300
<v Speaker 1>There was a for real few.

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:14.540
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.420
<v Speaker 1>But I will ask you, D, what do you think

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:23.610
<v Speaker 1>has happened since that 2007 very, you know, dramatic ceremonial

0:10:23.690 --> 0:10:24.830
<v Speaker 1>burial of the N-word.

0:10:25.230 --> 0:10:29.210
<v Speaker 7>So I'm going to start where Dr. Dyson left off.

0:10:30.170 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 7>As Black folks, we said culture. And people adapt how

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.540
<v Speaker 7>we move, how we sing, what we say. And in

0:10:36.700 --> 0:10:40.740
<v Speaker 7>uses of the word, we're given license to folks outside

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 7>of our community, whether we realize it or not. And

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.540
<v Speaker 7>so when we give that license and then we hear

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.700
<v Speaker 7>it back and we get angry... Should we be getting

0:10:48.860 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 7>angry or should we monitor how we want to be reflected?

0:10:53.020 --> 0:10:54.790
<v Speaker 2>You know, Birth of a Nation was mentioned earlier.

0:10:54.910 --> 0:10:59.310
<v Speaker 7>We got into trying to impact the images of black

0:10:59.390 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 7>folks in 1915. We jumped on Amos and Andy, and

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 7>you cannot find an Amos and Andy episode because of

0:11:07.900 --> 0:11:10.020
<v Speaker 7>illegal settlement, the NAACP.

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>When Richard Pryor went to Africa and came back and

0:11:12.780 --> 0:11:13.870
<v Speaker 2>did his standup, he said.

0:11:13.900 --> 0:11:17.290
<v Speaker 7>You know, we're not that. I will not use that

0:11:17.350 --> 0:11:20.110
<v Speaker 7>word again. This is not about hip hop. This is

0:11:20.170 --> 0:11:23.110
<v Speaker 7>not about how pretty or ugly a word is. This

0:11:23.210 --> 0:11:24.270
<v Speaker 7>is about whether or not we're.

0:11:24.190 --> 0:11:28.100
<v Speaker 2>Gonna give other people a license. to use a word.

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 7>That has been offensive and have political and economic meaning

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 7>as it relates to our well-being.

0:11:34.660 --> 0:11:38.460
<v Speaker 4>But don't you think? Y'all acting like we invented the term.

0:11:38.580 --> 0:11:39.460
<v Speaker 4>White folk invented the term.

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:40.220
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't matter.

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 4>It does matter. It matters a whole lot.

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.350
<v Speaker 6>Because if white folk invented it and now we're saying

0:11:44.590 --> 0:11:45.970
<v Speaker 6>we don't want to give them license to say it,

0:11:45.970 --> 0:11:48.030
<v Speaker 6>they didn't ask us for permission to say nigga.

0:11:48.429 --> 0:11:49.790
<v Speaker 4>They said it themselves.

0:11:50.090 --> 0:11:53.270
<v Speaker 6>What we did was try to engage in a kind

0:11:53.350 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 6>of linguistic negotiation with the terms of our existence. And

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.510
<v Speaker 6>so you can take the word nigger away and they

0:11:59.530 --> 0:12:00.910
<v Speaker 6>can still treat us like a nigger if they call

0:12:00.950 --> 0:12:03.170
<v Speaker 6>us a hamburger or a cookie. The point is, at

0:12:03.190 --> 0:12:06.170
<v Speaker 6>the end of the day, we can't predicate our engagement

0:12:06.490 --> 0:12:10.090
<v Speaker 6>with linguistic or rhetorical forces because of the fact that

0:12:10.130 --> 0:12:13.010
<v Speaker 6>it might upset or it might create the belief in

0:12:13.050 --> 0:12:14.060
<v Speaker 6>white people that they can't say it.

0:12:14.130 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 4>Most white folk know they can't say it. Most white

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:17.140
<v Speaker 4>folk don't say it.

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.380
<v Speaker 6>The reason why you don't see people on television, on radio,

0:12:20.460 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 6>and when they do as white people, they are rebuked.

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.340
<v Speaker 6>They don't do it because there has been a limit established.

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.100
<v Speaker 6>Brother Lenard talks about black privilege. That is a black

0:12:29.140 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 6>privilege that I don't think we should easily surrender. And

0:12:31.700 --> 0:12:33.620
<v Speaker 6>if we do so, if we do it based upon

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 6>white people, that is the most white supremacist thing imagined,

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.420
<v Speaker 6>that now we have to genuflect before the altar of

0:12:39.470 --> 0:12:42.670
<v Speaker 6>their linguistic purity because they are afraid of their ears

0:12:43.030 --> 0:12:45.290
<v Speaker 6>being penetrated by this word that they now feel that

0:12:45.309 --> 0:12:46.189
<v Speaker 6>they have permission to say.

0:12:46.450 --> 0:12:48.850
<v Speaker 4>They ain't asking us for permission. They saying it regardless.

0:12:48.870 --> 0:12:51.330
<v Speaker 2>This ain't a black-white reality, right? If I go to Korea,

0:12:51.390 --> 0:12:53.469
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to see Koreans calling me the N-word.

0:12:53.970 --> 0:12:54.350
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:12:54.370 --> 0:12:56.310
<v Speaker 2>If I go to China, I don't want them wrapping

0:12:56.350 --> 0:12:56.990
<v Speaker 2>the N-word.

0:12:57.350 --> 0:13:01.130
<v Speaker 7>Because we are so domesticated, we don't realize the power

0:13:01.150 --> 0:13:04.100
<v Speaker 7>of our culture and what people pick up and how

0:13:04.140 --> 0:13:04.780
<v Speaker 7>they see us.

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 2>When I'm on the continent of Africa, any of the

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:08.380
<v Speaker 2>54 countries.

0:13:08.900 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 7>They see a black American as being something from a.

0:13:12.980 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Boys' hood.

0:13:14.300 --> 0:13:17.070
<v Speaker 7>We have to change the image by which people see us,

0:13:17.110 --> 0:13:20.710
<v Speaker 7>how they hear us, and what they respond to. When

0:13:20.770 --> 0:13:23.030
<v Speaker 7>I was in Detroit— I went to that better high

0:13:23.050 --> 0:13:25.890
<v Speaker 7>school than you did. Western high school was the most

0:13:25.910 --> 0:13:29.290
<v Speaker 7>diverse high school still is. If we catch one of

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.220
<v Speaker 7>the white boys, Mexican or Puerto Ricans, saying it, they

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 7>getting socked in the mouth. Why should we give people

0:13:35.820 --> 0:13:36.459
<v Speaker 7>a license?

0:13:37.410 --> 0:13:39.630
<v Speaker 4>How are you giving them license, though? How are you

0:13:39.770 --> 0:13:41.270
<v Speaker 4>using it, giving them license?

0:13:41.290 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 7>Because we set standards. We are the culture. People try

0:13:44.220 --> 0:13:46.380
<v Speaker 7>to emulate us all the time.

0:13:46.700 --> 0:13:49.460
<v Speaker 4>But they know not to. But I'm saying most white people.

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:50.220
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying all white people.

0:13:50.260 --> 0:13:50.940
<v Speaker 1>I'm touching you right there.

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 4>Cite your sword.

0:13:51.620 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>You said they know not to.

0:13:53.950 --> 0:13:58.690
<v Speaker 6>I'm saying I'm saying empirically verifiable information and evidence suggests

0:13:58.710 --> 0:14:01.599
<v Speaker 6>to us most white people in our presence in public.

0:14:01.620 --> 0:14:02.620
<v Speaker 4>I'm not brother.

0:14:02.770 --> 0:14:05.500
<v Speaker 6>Squires made a difference between commercial and private and public.

0:14:05.820 --> 0:14:08.900
<v Speaker 6>I'm saying in in public, most white folk are not

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:09.900
<v Speaker 6>saying the word nigger.

0:14:10.420 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 2>In our presence.

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:12.980
<v Speaker 4>That's what I'm saying. I'm in public.

0:14:13.380 --> 0:14:15.239
<v Speaker 6>They can say, I can't control what they do at

0:14:15.260 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 6>the crib. What they do at the crib is what

0:14:17.190 --> 0:14:19.010
<v Speaker 6>they do at the crib. I'm saying there's a public

0:14:19.070 --> 0:14:22.870
<v Speaker 6>censorship that is imposed upon white people to a degree

0:14:22.910 --> 0:14:24.150
<v Speaker 6>that they don't feel.

0:14:25.650 --> 0:14:28.740
<v Speaker 4>Successfully able to do so or feel comfortable. Why do

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 4>we know that?

0:14:29.260 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 6>Because when they do do it, it's news. When they

0:14:31.820 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 6>do do it, it makes sense. Social media go crazy.

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.340
<v Speaker 6>So my point is most white folk know what the

0:14:37.380 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 6>limits are and they ain't operating with the belief that

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:41.250
<v Speaker 6>they have the ability to say it.

0:14:41.550 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to get in here five minutes ago.

0:14:43.210 --> 0:14:43.950
<v Speaker 1>Let me go to Liz.

0:14:43.970 --> 0:14:45.790
<v Speaker 9>I have a different point now, but I just feel like.

0:14:52.570 --> 0:14:54.670
<v Speaker 9>But I just think about all the different ways in

0:14:54.710 --> 0:14:58.170
<v Speaker 9>which we have tried to assert ourselves with like respectability.

0:14:58.780 --> 0:15:01.950
<v Speaker 9>And it does not change the way we are perceived.

0:15:02.010 --> 0:15:04.570
<v Speaker 9>Like back in the early 19th century, there was a

0:15:04.670 --> 0:15:08.870
<v Speaker 9>method that free people in the North used called moral suasion,

0:15:09.270 --> 0:15:10.930
<v Speaker 9>that they were going to try to act and dress

0:15:10.970 --> 0:15:14.340
<v Speaker 9>and behave in public in order to establish their citizenship.

0:15:14.660 --> 0:15:17.300
<v Speaker 9>They were not seen as citizens. It didn't matter what

0:15:17.340 --> 0:15:19.670
<v Speaker 9>they were wearing and what they had on. that this

0:15:19.730 --> 0:15:22.620
<v Speaker 9>white supremacy was larger than them. So I think that

0:15:22.940 --> 0:15:23.210
<v Speaker 9>to me.

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.460
<v Speaker 4>Elizabeth Higginbottom, that's the source she's still.

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:25.940
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:27.250
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:15:27.410 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 2>But I think, too, that there's like a.

0:15:29.860 --> 0:15:31.020
<v Speaker 1>There's a subversion.

0:15:31.060 --> 0:15:35.570
<v Speaker 9>There's a real subversion, satire, and protest when black people

0:15:35.620 --> 0:15:36.670
<v Speaker 9>are using the N-word.

0:15:36.970 --> 0:15:39.369
<v Speaker 2>And I do think, listen, I don't want to use it.

0:15:39.450 --> 0:15:40.190
<v Speaker 1>I've never said it.

0:15:40.750 --> 0:15:43.450
<v Speaker 9>It is dry in my mouth. So I'm talking about

0:15:43.530 --> 0:15:48.420
<v Speaker 9>people like my father, who was Richard Pryor, who stepped

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 9>into that conversation and wanted to give voice to an

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:55.380
<v Speaker 9>authentic black reality. And I just think Thinking that taking

0:15:55.420 --> 0:15:58.330
<v Speaker 9>that word out of black mouths is going to cure

0:15:58.370 --> 0:16:01.710
<v Speaker 9>the problem of white supremacy or white people saying it is,

0:16:02.230 --> 0:16:05.109
<v Speaker 9>they had 400 years, right? They had 400 years to

0:16:05.210 --> 0:16:07.210
<v Speaker 9>squash it and make it go away, and they didn't.

0:16:08.150 --> 0:16:08.850
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, go ahead.

0:16:08.890 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 10>No, I was going to say, the way I would

0:16:11.290 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 10>want to come back in the conversation is to say,

0:16:14.100 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 10>my decision to use or not use or my analysis

0:16:16.540 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 10>of how people use the word does not begin with

0:16:18.700 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 10>white people.

0:16:19.230 --> 0:16:19.490
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:16:19.650 --> 0:16:21.410
<v Speaker 2>I grew up in New York City. I've been living

0:16:21.450 --> 0:16:21.930
<v Speaker 2>in the D.C.

0:16:22.010 --> 0:16:24.830
<v Speaker 10>Area for almost 20 years. I live in a majority

0:16:24.850 --> 0:16:26.990
<v Speaker 10>black county. I don't live my life saying, well, what

0:16:27.010 --> 0:16:29.110
<v Speaker 10>do white people think about this particular thing? For me,

0:16:29.250 --> 0:16:32.110
<v Speaker 10>what's much more important is not what other people call me.

0:16:32.150 --> 0:16:34.380
<v Speaker 10>It's what I answer to. It's what I believe about myself.

0:16:34.670 --> 0:16:36.620
<v Speaker 10>My wife and I are raising our four children. We

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:40.300
<v Speaker 10>don't raise them with specific values and principles because, well,

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 10>when you go outside, a white person is going to

0:16:42.180 --> 0:16:44.060
<v Speaker 10>see you this way. We raise them that way because

0:16:44.100 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 10>we want them to know who they are and whose

0:16:45.580 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 10>they are. They're created in God's image. So for me,

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.390
<v Speaker 10>it's not whether white people use it or don't use it. And,

0:16:51.630 --> 0:16:54.540
<v Speaker 10>you know, to the professor's point, I think, yes, white

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:56.780
<v Speaker 10>people don't use the word in public because there's certain

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 10>social sanctions that go along with that. My question to

0:16:59.820 --> 0:17:02.540
<v Speaker 10>our community always comes back to the same thing. Why

0:17:02.580 --> 0:17:04.730
<v Speaker 10>is it that we always have higher standards for white

0:17:04.770 --> 0:17:05.990
<v Speaker 10>people than we do for ourselves?

0:17:06.050 --> 0:17:06.810
<v Speaker 1>Now, Delano.

0:17:07.410 --> 0:17:10.470
<v Speaker 2>I'll stand on that. Let me quote the professor. Let

0:17:10.510 --> 0:17:11.770
<v Speaker 2>me quote the professor.

0:17:11.970 --> 0:17:13.369
<v Speaker 4>This is empirically true.

0:17:13.410 --> 0:17:13.750
<v Speaker 10>Hold on.

0:17:13.850 --> 0:17:14.090
<v Speaker 4>Hold on.

0:17:14.130 --> 0:17:14.369
<v Speaker 6>Hold on.

0:17:14.410 --> 0:17:14.730
<v Speaker 2>Hold on.

0:17:14.750 --> 0:17:15.290
<v Speaker 3>Hold on.

0:17:15.310 --> 0:17:15.550
<v Speaker 6>Hold on.

0:17:15.570 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 2>Hold on.

0:17:16.130 --> 0:17:16.580
<v Speaker 4>Hold on.

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:16.850
<v Speaker 6>Hold on.

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:17.350
<v Speaker 4>Hold on.

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:17.850
<v Speaker 1>Hold on.

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 4>Hold on.

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no.

0:17:26.260 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>OK, I want to hear your empirical.

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 3>We give white people more grace than we give each other.

0:17:30.180 --> 0:17:34.450
<v Speaker 10>I know that much. When it comes to language, when

0:17:34.470 --> 0:17:36.250
<v Speaker 10>it comes to imagery, there's certain.

0:17:36.270 --> 0:17:36.869
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you something.

0:17:37.050 --> 0:17:39.889
<v Speaker 10>If Eminem ever let the letters N-I-G get to the

0:17:40.030 --> 0:17:42.770
<v Speaker 10>front of his lips, there would be boycotts all across

0:17:42.850 --> 0:17:43.350
<v Speaker 10>urban radio.

0:17:43.369 --> 0:17:44.369
<v Speaker 4>He did as a young person.

0:17:44.550 --> 0:17:45.770
<v Speaker 3>He did, yeah.

0:17:45.850 --> 0:17:47.890
<v Speaker 2>And there's a price to pay. But there are artists

0:17:48.290 --> 0:17:51.790
<v Speaker 2>who talk about GMO... Drill music as a subgenre is

0:17:51.890 --> 0:17:53.300
<v Speaker 2>all GMO. Guns, murder, ops.

0:17:53.619 --> 0:17:53.780
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:17:54.150 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Nobody's getting boycotted.

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.660
<v Speaker 10>The only time black artists get boycotted is if they

0:17:57.700 --> 0:18:01.700
<v Speaker 10>say things against other protected communities. If they make jokes

0:18:01.740 --> 0:18:05.100
<v Speaker 10>about LGBT people, if they say, oh, my money is kosher,

0:18:05.140 --> 0:18:07.290
<v Speaker 10>then they have to apologize and they have to go.

0:18:08.030 --> 0:18:10.409
<v Speaker 2>Sit with a rabbi and do some training.

0:18:10.790 --> 0:18:13.010
<v Speaker 4>But that's easily explainable, right? Because you're not part of

0:18:13.030 --> 0:18:14.690
<v Speaker 4>that community. That's fine.

0:18:15.090 --> 0:18:16.510
<v Speaker 2>I'm not talking about whether it's explainable.

0:18:16.590 --> 0:18:19.540
<v Speaker 10>I'm saying we should keep the standards high for ourselves

0:18:19.630 --> 0:18:23.620
<v Speaker 10>because of ourselves, not in order to appease anybody else

0:18:23.660 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 10>or to explain how anybody else lives.

0:18:25.940 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Who said that, though? I think I'm struggling because I

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>heard you say there was empirical data to support that

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.859
<v Speaker 1>we're harder on ourselves than we are to white people.

0:18:35.310 --> 0:18:36.990
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm saying we have higher standards.

0:18:37.010 --> 0:18:37.450
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:18:37.570 --> 0:18:40.459
<v Speaker 1>What is that source? Like, I don't, number one, I'm

0:18:40.500 --> 0:18:43.060
<v Speaker 1>saying every, actually, let me go to the audience right now.

0:18:43.780 --> 0:18:46.460
<v Speaker 1>How many of you all grew up with, we have

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.379
<v Speaker 1>to be twice as good? Raise your hands. Okay. And

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:51.010
<v Speaker 1>even on the panel, at least, well, two of us,

0:18:51.050 --> 0:18:51.389
<v Speaker 1>three of us.

0:18:51.650 --> 0:18:54.670
<v Speaker 4>Oh, Delano heard that too. Okay.

0:18:54.869 --> 0:18:57.430
<v Speaker 1>And so when we have to be twice as good

0:18:57.450 --> 0:18:58.290
<v Speaker 1>as who?

0:19:00.100 --> 0:19:00.490
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:19:00.630 --> 0:19:02.700
<v Speaker 10>As white people to get half as far. But but

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.300
<v Speaker 10>that's but here here here to make it just hit

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:05.620
<v Speaker 10>a point.

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:06.380
<v Speaker 2>I make it a point.

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:06.659
<v Speaker 3>I make it.

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:06.780
<v Speaker 6>OK.

0:19:07.380 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 10>I'm saying and I'm only going to hip hop because

0:19:09.780 --> 0:19:13.700
<v Speaker 10>hip hop ushered in the widespread commercial use of the word.

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:14.340
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 10>I'm going there because for the better part of the

0:19:17.060 --> 0:19:19.340
<v Speaker 10>last 40 years, I've seen artists.

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm at the site resource on that, too. Did hip hop.

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 1>It was hip-hop.

0:19:23.180 --> 0:19:24.939
<v Speaker 3>Widespread commercial use.

0:19:25.140 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't need blaxploitation films.

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 3>No, not like that.

0:19:28.540 --> 0:19:30.139
<v Speaker 8>They never got as big as hip-hop.

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Not hip-hop. Global phenomenon.

0:19:31.820 --> 0:19:33.180
<v Speaker 1>Widespread commercial use.

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 2>Black Power, Richard Pryor.

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 4>They didn't invent it. They glorified it.

0:19:36.310 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 2>They amplified it.

0:19:37.550 --> 0:19:39.129
<v Speaker 3>Amplification.

0:19:39.150 --> 0:19:39.710
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you that.

0:19:39.790 --> 0:19:40.550
<v Speaker 3>International.

0:19:40.590 --> 0:19:41.810
<v Speaker 1>They exported it around the world.

0:19:41.869 --> 0:19:45.490
<v Speaker 10>I mean, the reason Calvin Butts had a steamroller roll

0:19:45.530 --> 0:19:47.910
<v Speaker 10>over CDs, right, in New York City and see Loris

0:19:47.930 --> 0:19:50.940
<v Speaker 10>Tucker was because of the use of that language. And so, again,

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.379
<v Speaker 10>I'm talking about the commercial use. And the question I'll

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.470
<v Speaker 10>pose to the professor, the good professor is.

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you, if you hear artists saying it, right? Okay,

0:20:01.660 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 2>that's part of their.

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:04.300
<v Speaker 10>But what if you go to a concert and you

0:20:04.420 --> 0:20:06.669
<v Speaker 10>see white people in the audience repeating it?

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:07.180
<v Speaker 11>Yes.

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:08.379
<v Speaker 2>Would you be offended by that?

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:08.980
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 2>That's the part that... That's the.

0:20:10.570 --> 0:20:15.330
<v Speaker 4>Point I was making earlier. Wait a minute. Are you

0:20:15.369 --> 0:20:17.090
<v Speaker 4>telling me that white people are.

0:20:17.710 --> 0:20:22.730
<v Speaker 6>insignificantly unintelligent that they can't determine that you can say this,

0:20:22.869 --> 0:20:24.860
<v Speaker 6>but you can't say this. I can say all this

0:20:24.900 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 6>part until the N word. And if some rapper gives

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:29.140
<v Speaker 6>them permission to say so, this is what I say.

0:20:29.500 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 6>Be careful because rapper X can tell you to do that,

0:20:32.700 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 6>but homeboy B outside this stadium is going to whip

0:20:35.740 --> 0:20:37.770
<v Speaker 6>your ass if you try to repeat that word.

0:20:37.810 --> 0:20:39.730
<v Speaker 4>So I'm saying I don't infantilize white people.

0:20:39.750 --> 0:20:43.390
<v Speaker 7>Why do the gymnastics of it? Because it's not necessary.

0:20:43.410 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you got 50 million words.

0:20:46.700 --> 0:20:48.179
<v Speaker 2>Why is that?

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:49.180
<v Speaker 3>I got 100 million.

0:20:49.619 --> 0:20:54.170
<v Speaker 6>Why is it the National Association for the Advancement of

0:20:54.250 --> 0:20:54.950
<v Speaker 6>Colored People?

0:20:55.390 --> 0:20:57.450
<v Speaker 1>I was going there next. Don't be taking my question.

0:20:57.570 --> 0:20:57.949
<v Speaker 6>No, no, no.

0:20:58.010 --> 0:20:58.550
<v Speaker 4>I'm saying.

0:20:58.890 --> 0:20:59.010
<v Speaker 3>Why?

0:20:59.050 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Because I can tell you why.

0:21:00.010 --> 0:21:02.050
<v Speaker 7>Because when we were created, those around the table, they

0:21:02.070 --> 0:21:04.430
<v Speaker 7>were not considered white, although we may consider them white today.

0:21:04.730 --> 0:21:07.250
<v Speaker 7>White is a social construct. So folks who sat around

0:21:07.270 --> 0:21:10.150
<v Speaker 7>that table was around that table for their own protection.

0:21:10.380 --> 0:21:12.980
<v Speaker 7>If you was Irish, Italian, if you was Jewish, that's

0:21:13.060 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 7>colored in that context in 1909.

0:21:14.770 --> 0:21:14.830
<v Speaker 3>2026.

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:18.740
<v Speaker 2>That's where we are. That's why it was created then.

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 2>You asked why color. That's why.

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.020
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm not asking about then. I understand then.

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 6>I'm saying right now, why is it that the NAACP

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.669
<v Speaker 6>hasn't changed its name? Because you have a brand. You

0:21:27.690 --> 0:21:30.950
<v Speaker 6>have an identification. People understand what color means now. It's

0:21:31.170 --> 0:21:31.750
<v Speaker 6>circled around.

0:21:31.810 --> 0:21:33.810
<v Speaker 2>People love color. But guess what we have done since

0:21:33.850 --> 0:21:34.330
<v Speaker 2>I've been in?

0:21:34.609 --> 0:21:36.629
<v Speaker 7>We market the five letters and not the name that

0:21:36.670 --> 0:21:39.900
<v Speaker 7>go under there because the brand you cannot change. Coca-Cola

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:41.940
<v Speaker 7>was about cocaine getting a drink, but they're not going

0:21:41.980 --> 0:21:43.300
<v Speaker 7>to change their name from Coca-Cola.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 4>You're making my point for me. It's complicated.

0:21:45.300 --> 0:21:45.580
<v Speaker 2>It's nuanced.

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 3>It's complicated.

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 2>No, you didn't say it was cool. She said that.

0:21:47.980 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 2>She said that.

0:21:49.010 --> 0:21:49.930
<v Speaker 4>You didn't say that.

0:21:49.950 --> 0:21:51.630
<v Speaker 2>You can't use it. It's beautiful.

0:21:51.650 --> 0:21:52.050
<v Speaker 3>You're mine.

0:21:52.109 --> 0:21:55.610
<v Speaker 4>One thing I wanted to say, because again, I... Hey,

0:21:55.650 --> 0:21:57.219
<v Speaker 4>because we can't be.

0:21:57.060 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 9>Here all day, friends.

0:22:06.170 --> 0:22:07.510
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate claim one.

0:22:07.990 --> 0:22:08.290
<v Speaker 2>Dr.

0:22:08.310 --> 0:22:10.170
<v Speaker 1>Dyson, it sounds like it's changed from a hard yes

0:22:10.190 --> 0:22:11.020
<v Speaker 1>to a complicated.

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:11.740
<v Speaker 5>Oh, no.

0:22:11.820 --> 0:22:13.739
<v Speaker 1>Oh, no. Nigga.

0:22:14.020 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, no.

0:22:15.580 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm straight nigga. Okay, my nigga.

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:19.580
<v Speaker 1>We going to claim two.

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 6>Right. All right.

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>So before we get into the second claim, which is

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that the N-word is derived from the Amharic word negus,

0:22:26.700 --> 0:22:29.109
<v Speaker 1>which means king. Let's roll this clip.

0:22:30.290 --> 0:22:30.690
<v Speaker 3>Negus.

0:22:31.850 --> 0:22:32.189
<v Speaker 11>Negus.

0:22:32.830 --> 0:22:33.630
<v Speaker 6>Could you use it in a sentence?

0:22:33.650 --> 0:22:33.750
<v Speaker 3>Negus.

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.980
<v Speaker 4>The Negus ruled Ethiopia until the coup of 1974.

0:22:37.980 --> 0:22:46.510
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted to play that in part because our

0:22:46.670 --> 0:22:50.270
<v Speaker 1>EP Geraldine has a lifeline we called earlier. Jaime Asifa

0:22:50.310 --> 0:22:53.130
<v Speaker 1>told us that that was not the pronunciation, the correct

0:22:53.150 --> 0:22:56.730
<v Speaker 1>pronunciation of a king. It's actually Negus, which is king.

0:22:56.840 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And for women, for queen, it's Negus. And so when

0:23:01.060 --> 0:23:02.899
<v Speaker 1>you hear Negus and that T is kind of soft,

0:23:03.460 --> 0:23:05.060
<v Speaker 1>You know, Kendrick said, I'm going to do a little

0:23:05.140 --> 0:23:09.090
<v Speaker 1>artwork here. Pulitzer Prize winning hip hop artist, Kendrick Lamar.

0:23:11.130 --> 0:23:15.129
<v Speaker 1>He is a Pulitzer Prize winning.

0:23:15.190 --> 0:23:15.610
<v Speaker 2>He is.

0:23:15.910 --> 0:23:16.210
<v Speaker 1>Anyway.

0:23:16.230 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 4>But you know that's complicated.

0:23:17.540 --> 0:23:20.619
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm not doing this today. That's another show. And

0:23:20.660 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to fight it out with Kendrick.

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 3>What's up, Drake?

0:23:23.540 --> 0:23:23.940
<v Speaker 5>Oh, Lord.

0:23:26.790 --> 0:23:30.790
<v Speaker 4>Oh, that's a show. That's a show.

0:23:31.250 --> 0:23:32.550
<v Speaker 1>Y'all, this is not versus.

0:23:33.410 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 4>This is not versus.

0:23:34.390 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 6>But in relationship to what you're talking about though, Kendrick says,

0:23:37.180 --> 0:23:38.180
<v Speaker 6>I am not black.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.540
<v Speaker 3>Hey, for the record, Drake can only say Nick. He

0:23:41.580 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 3>can only say half of it.

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.030
<v Speaker 4>Drake said, light skin still a dark nigga.

0:23:46.369 --> 0:23:48.950
<v Speaker 6>Kendrick said, I'm black, don't call me black no more.

0:23:49.150 --> 0:23:49.770
<v Speaker 4>That's your king?

0:23:49.970 --> 0:23:50.770
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm just saying.

0:23:50.790 --> 0:23:53.330
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, back to claim two.

0:23:53.430 --> 0:23:54.290
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:23:54.330 --> 0:23:56.590
<v Speaker 1>We like to talk about things that come up. This is,

0:23:56.619 --> 0:23:59.820
<v Speaker 1>of course, on his record, To Pimp a Butterfly. And

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the record, he cites that we

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:06.899
<v Speaker 1>use Negus as N-E-G-U-S. And it's a way of saying king.

0:24:07.350 --> 0:24:09.210
<v Speaker 1>How many of you all agree with Kendrick on this?

0:24:10.470 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And can you cite your source?

0:24:11.890 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 4>I can say why I disagree with it.

0:24:14.180 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I would love to hear it because I know you

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.459
<v Speaker 1>stay ready. Don't say anything bad about Kendrick.

0:24:17.780 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 4>No, I love Kendrick. Kendrick is a genius.

0:24:20.300 --> 0:24:20.460
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:20.540 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 4>But Dr.

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 6>Hiram Smith, again, goes through this whole kind of etymological derivation.

0:24:25.220 --> 0:24:27.300
<v Speaker 4>And he shows that Negus, why would.

0:24:27.220 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 6>A slave master call his chattel enslaved people kings and queens, right?

0:24:32.790 --> 0:24:35.350
<v Speaker 6>Then he talks about the Amharic and that it had

0:24:35.390 --> 0:24:38.689
<v Speaker 6>no relationship to Central and West Africa versus what was

0:24:38.710 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 6>going on in Ethiopia. So it sounds great because it

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:45.340
<v Speaker 6>makes you feel good. You're calling each other king, but

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.260
<v Speaker 6>that's not where it derives from. Then he goes through

0:24:47.780 --> 0:24:50.899
<v Speaker 6>the Spanish version, the Portuguese version, the French version, the

0:24:50.940 --> 0:24:54.590
<v Speaker 6>Latin version. It is a complicated amalgamation of different, you know,

0:24:54.770 --> 0:24:55.970
<v Speaker 6>etymological derivations.

0:24:55.990 --> 0:24:57.169
<v Speaker 4>So, but that ain't one of them.

0:24:57.530 --> 0:25:00.710
<v Speaker 6>That does not represent what happens when black people are

0:25:00.730 --> 0:25:01.670
<v Speaker 6>doing their thing with niggas.

0:25:01.750 --> 0:25:05.129
<v Speaker 1>Well, you brought up our good friend, Dr. Hiram Smith.

0:25:05.330 --> 0:25:07.540
<v Speaker 1>And this is his book, What's Up, My Nigga? He

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.820
<v Speaker 1>is in the audience with us today. He has done

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a ton of research, including researching more than 2,300 stories

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:18.010
<v Speaker 1>of formerly enslaved people listening to that audio podcast. Talk

0:25:18.030 --> 0:25:21.350
<v Speaker 1>to us about the real origin story, since it's not Amharic,

0:25:21.430 --> 0:25:22.210
<v Speaker 1>the Amharic tradition.

0:25:22.530 --> 0:25:27.970
<v Speaker 11>Thanks for having me. Well, the origins of the term nigger,

0:25:28.260 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 11>hard R, they are complicated. And one of the reasons

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.580
<v Speaker 11>why it's so complicated is because we don't have a

0:25:34.619 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 11>lot of written documentation of the term until you get

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 11>up to about the 18th and 19th centuries. But what

0:25:42.420 --> 0:25:45.540
<v Speaker 11>we do know is that the term originated with Latin,

0:25:46.180 --> 0:25:48.740
<v Speaker 11>the Latin word nigger. Now, a lot of people try

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.340
<v Speaker 11>to pronounce it as Niger, but that is not how

0:25:51.380 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 11>the word was pronounced in Latin.

0:25:52.740 --> 0:25:53.740
<v Speaker 2>The guh was.

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 11>Always hard, and the I was always pronounced as E. Now,

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:03.189
<v Speaker 11>Oxford English Dictionary lists the first attestation of nigger in

0:26:03.369 --> 0:26:08.189
<v Speaker 11>English as 1577 and 1584 by educated men who knew

0:26:08.250 --> 0:26:12.070
<v Speaker 11>how to read and write Latin. But we have to

0:26:12.270 --> 0:26:16.899
<v Speaker 11>take into consideration the transatlantic slave trade. all of the

0:26:17.330 --> 0:26:21.490
<v Speaker 11>colonial powers who were involved in the slave trade had

0:26:21.630 --> 0:26:25.110
<v Speaker 11>some form of the word that they had borrowed from

0:26:25.190 --> 0:26:30.330
<v Speaker 11>Latin that meant black person, and it was related to

0:26:30.369 --> 0:26:33.470
<v Speaker 11>the term nigger in English. So in French, you had negra.

0:26:33.950 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 11>In Spanish, you had negro. In Portuguese, negro, which in

0:26:39.150 --> 0:26:41.780
<v Speaker 11>Spanish and Portuguese, by the way, they weren't borrowed. They

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 11>were passed down through centuries of unbroken communication. You have

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 11>the Dutch neger. And the question is, how do you

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:56.699
<v Speaker 11>adjudicate between all of these different potential contributors? Well, we

0:26:56.780 --> 0:26:59.659
<v Speaker 11>know that in the Caribbean, before these islands in the

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:04.820
<v Speaker 11>Caribbean became permanent colonies, they were passed around and colonial

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:05.940
<v Speaker 11>powers were vying.

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.140
<v Speaker 4>For those places.

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 11>It's possible that all of these terms, negra, neger, Negro, Niger,

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:21.139
<v Speaker 11>have contributed to what we have in the English language today.

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:25.130
<v Speaker 11>We can't really definitively say where the word comes from,

0:27:25.869 --> 0:27:27.830
<v Speaker 11>but it came from one of those sources. One of

0:27:27.869 --> 0:27:29.949
<v Speaker 11>the things that we can definitely say is it did

0:27:30.010 --> 0:27:32.750
<v Speaker 11>not come from Negus. Ethiopia wasn't even part of the

0:27:33.690 --> 0:27:36.100
<v Speaker 11>transatlantic slave trade. You're on the wrong side of the map.

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 11>It's a beautiful, it sounds beautiful.

0:27:38.180 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 4>I wish it were true.

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 11>But it's just not true.

0:27:41.859 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, Kendrick.

0:27:42.940 --> 0:27:45.460
<v Speaker 1>OK, well, that's the only place where Kendrick is losing

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:50.310
<v Speaker 1>in my eyes. I really appreciate that. Thank you so much, Dr. Smith.

0:27:50.890 --> 0:27:53.369
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk for a moment about our power. And I

0:27:53.410 --> 0:27:55.530
<v Speaker 1>think that this is important, an important transition before we

0:27:55.550 --> 0:27:58.430
<v Speaker 1>get to claim three, because there is something I think

0:27:58.450 --> 0:28:01.060
<v Speaker 1>that you all are seeing about us holding on to

0:28:01.100 --> 0:28:06.310
<v Speaker 1>this word culturally in hip hop. At home, playing a

0:28:06.330 --> 0:28:09.410
<v Speaker 1>spades game, I play dominoes, dominoes, whatever it is, there's

0:28:09.430 --> 0:28:12.750
<v Speaker 1>something about it. And in an earlier conversation, Dr. Smith

0:28:12.790 --> 0:28:14.870
<v Speaker 1>and I got to do my podcast about this very thing.

0:28:14.910 --> 0:28:18.790
<v Speaker 1>And I was really wrestling with this idea that we

0:28:18.810 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have much power. This is one thing that belongs

0:28:23.580 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to us that we are refusing to kind of give up. Liz,

0:28:26.940 --> 0:28:29.300
<v Speaker 1>I want to come to you because I think about

0:28:29.780 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>your father. When I was two, my dad had a

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.189
<v Speaker 1>Richard Pryor special on My mom told my dad that

0:28:36.210 --> 0:28:38.450
<v Speaker 1>was not a good idea. I repeated words he said.

0:28:38.730 --> 0:28:41.219
<v Speaker 1>They were curse words, not nigga, but I probably would

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>have said that too if he got there. He did

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>have kind of a pilgrimage back to the continent and

0:28:46.700 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>changed his mind, but originally his use of the word

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:51.100
<v Speaker 1>was still a form of protest.

0:28:51.180 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's right.

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.550
<v Speaker 9>I mean, he decided that he was going to give

0:28:55.630 --> 0:28:59.170
<v Speaker 9>up like the comedy shtick and that he was going

0:28:59.230 --> 0:29:02.020
<v Speaker 9>to embrace where he really came from, which was He

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.610
<v Speaker 9>came from an impoverished part of Peoria, Illinois, and he

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.610
<v Speaker 9>was going to speak the way that his people spoke.

0:29:07.990 --> 0:29:10.890
<v Speaker 9>And that was using the N-word in the house. That

0:29:10.910 --> 0:29:12.830
<v Speaker 9>was talking about sex in a way that maybe people

0:29:12.870 --> 0:29:14.330
<v Speaker 9>didn't in other families.

0:29:14.710 --> 0:29:16.350
<v Speaker 1>That was, you know, all of those things.

0:29:16.550 --> 0:29:20.290
<v Speaker 9>And even talking about racism in the police, you know,

0:29:20.450 --> 0:29:22.810
<v Speaker 9>police brutality, that he was going to do that on

0:29:22.910 --> 0:29:26.590
<v Speaker 9>stage and start cultivating that authentic voice. And part of

0:29:26.630 --> 0:29:28.870
<v Speaker 9>that was using the N-word. Two of his Grammy Award-winning

0:29:28.990 --> 0:29:31.990
<v Speaker 9>albums have the N-word in the titles. But then at

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 9>the end of that decade, he followed many people like

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 9>that Alex Haley pilgrimage back to Africa. He went to Kenya,

0:29:40.660 --> 0:29:43.020
<v Speaker 9>which is East Africa. Most people went to West Africa,

0:29:43.060 --> 0:29:46.140
<v Speaker 9>but he still went. And he said he took stock

0:29:46.180 --> 0:29:49.210
<v Speaker 9>and looked around and said, in this context of Black

0:29:49.230 --> 0:29:52.470
<v Speaker 9>people doing the most menial jobs and Black people running

0:29:52.490 --> 0:29:55.790
<v Speaker 9>the country, does the N-word work here?

0:29:56.150 --> 0:29:56.950
<v Speaker 1>In this context.

0:29:57.060 --> 0:29:59.070
<v Speaker 9>And he said it didn't, that he hadn't thought it,

0:29:59.380 --> 0:30:01.540
<v Speaker 9>that he hadn't said it, and that it wasn't working

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:03.700
<v Speaker 9>for him anymore. And that he said he was never

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:04.860
<v Speaker 9>going to call another black.

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.500
<v Speaker 5>Man the N-word.

0:30:07.620 --> 0:30:09.620
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious to know what else you all might think

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.540
<v Speaker 1>about our source of power. Is this a thing that

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:13.620
<v Speaker 1>we should be leaning up against as one thing we

0:30:13.660 --> 0:30:16.030
<v Speaker 1>can have that other folks can't touch? Or is it.

0:30:16.870 --> 0:30:20.270
<v Speaker 8>I don't understand why using that word would make anybody

0:30:20.290 --> 0:30:21.170
<v Speaker 8>feel powerful.

0:30:21.750 --> 0:30:23.630
<v Speaker 3>You know, like the good brother.

0:30:24.110 --> 0:30:25.970
<v Speaker 8>Doc said something earlier when he was saying that white

0:30:25.990 --> 0:30:26.910
<v Speaker 8>people invented the word.

0:30:26.990 --> 0:30:28.330
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand, you.

0:30:28.270 --> 0:30:31.370
<v Speaker 8>Know, using a word that we know our oppressors were

0:30:31.470 --> 0:30:35.620
<v Speaker 8>using to dehumanize us and then continuing to call our

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 8>own people that. And when I was younger, I read

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 8>a book that I even reference now called From Niggas

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 8>to Gods by a brother named Akeel. And he used

0:30:42.580 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 8>to talk about, you know, the N word being your

0:30:45.020 --> 0:30:47.090
<v Speaker 8>lower nature and how you should never submit your will

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.310
<v Speaker 8>to your lower nature. You should submit your will to

0:30:49.350 --> 0:30:51.370
<v Speaker 8>the God in you, which was your higher nature. So

0:30:51.550 --> 0:30:54.810
<v Speaker 8>the name of the book was literally from N-words to gods.

0:30:54.830 --> 0:30:57.010
<v Speaker 8>And it always made me think like, I don't want

0:30:57.050 --> 0:30:59.490
<v Speaker 8>to be in the N-word mind state. And if the

0:30:59.510 --> 0:31:01.620
<v Speaker 8>white man did invent that word, I want to return

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 8>that word to cinder. I don't have any usage of

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 8>that word, you know, at 48 years old in 2026.

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 8>I don't know why that word makes people feel powerful.

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 8>It doesn't make me feel powerful when I use it.

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:14.770
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, look, point taken.

0:31:15.610 --> 0:31:19.030
<v Speaker 6>But the point is that the word exists in an

0:31:19.170 --> 0:31:22.770
<v Speaker 6>ecosystem of where we have been stigmatized and demonized? Have

0:31:22.790 --> 0:31:25.490
<v Speaker 6>we internalized it without question? The panel has been brilliant

0:31:25.530 --> 0:31:28.630
<v Speaker 6>about that. Have we reproduced the very thing that we

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 6>are arguing against? We have, but that's not all we've done.

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.660
<v Speaker 6>Because when I hear the word nigga, I hear a

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 6>form of collective intimacy.

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 4>I hear my hood in Detroit. I hear my pastor.

0:31:39.860 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 6>I hear the people that were associated with that church

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:44.020
<v Speaker 6>from niggas to gods.

0:31:44.180 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 4>I get that.

0:31:44.780 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 6>But I've been as a Baptist preacher for more than

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:53.460
<v Speaker 6>40 years, I've seen some of the worst pathologies associated

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 6>with Christianity or religion or God that have tried to

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:00.890
<v Speaker 6>sneak in some of the worst beliefs about the human being.

0:32:01.330 --> 0:32:04.690
<v Speaker 6>That nigga pales in comparison, so to speak. So my

0:32:04.750 --> 0:32:07.870
<v Speaker 6>point is that if we have developed this word, some

0:32:07.910 --> 0:32:09.690
<v Speaker 6>of us dig it, some of us don't. Some of

0:32:09.750 --> 0:32:12.490
<v Speaker 6>us understand we think it has power, some of us don't.

0:32:12.870 --> 0:32:15.590
<v Speaker 6>I think it clearly has power because we're having a

0:32:15.630 --> 0:32:17.469
<v Speaker 6>television show about it. We're not having a television show

0:32:17.490 --> 0:32:22.540
<v Speaker 6>about cracker. We're not OFE or what's going on. This

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:27.010
<v Speaker 6>word has a unique register and it does signify a

0:32:27.050 --> 0:32:29.230
<v Speaker 6>certain kind of power. And yes, we have been denied

0:32:29.270 --> 0:32:31.860
<v Speaker 6>a whole bunch of other things. Why would we surrender

0:32:31.910 --> 0:32:35.090
<v Speaker 6>the privilege Right. Martin Luther King Jr.

0:32:35.230 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Using it.

0:32:35.770 --> 0:32:37.970
<v Speaker 6>And if King can use it, I'm saying we can

0:32:38.010 --> 0:32:40.430
<v Speaker 6>have a lot of arguments against it. But I think

0:32:40.470 --> 0:32:43.060
<v Speaker 6>that it shows that there is a complicated and nuanced

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.210
<v Speaker 6>way we can do it now. And by saying this, yes,

0:32:45.780 --> 0:32:49.660
<v Speaker 6>Red Fox, Richard Pryor, the earlier generations got mad at

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:50.820
<v Speaker 6>hip hop because hip hop.

0:32:51.300 --> 0:32:54.500
<v Speaker 4>As Brother Squire said, put it in the commercial realm, right?

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.930
<v Speaker 6>We were playing those records, those were party records, but

0:32:57.970 --> 0:33:01.910
<v Speaker 6>they weren't circulating to the dominant culture. There's no question

0:33:02.210 --> 0:33:04.770
<v Speaker 6>that hip hop has amplified that to the world. And

0:33:04.810 --> 0:33:08.130
<v Speaker 6>there's no question that if black women traveled the world, Mr. Johnson,

0:33:08.650 --> 0:33:10.970
<v Speaker 6>And they get pinched on their behind because somebody saw

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:14.340
<v Speaker 6>a rap video, right? So I'm not arguing with that.

0:33:14.460 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 6>We can't say some of this stuff is out of

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:18.180
<v Speaker 6>control and so on and so forth. But when we

0:33:18.220 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 6>say out of control, you stop using the N-word. You're

0:33:20.420 --> 0:33:23.660
<v Speaker 6>still a sexist. You're still a patriarch. You're still a misogynist.

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:25.950
<v Speaker 6>So my point is, let's deal with the fact that

0:33:25.990 --> 0:33:28.350
<v Speaker 6>the word has come to be what it is. Yes,

0:33:28.430 --> 0:33:30.750
<v Speaker 6>white people invented it. But like gay people take the

0:33:30.790 --> 0:33:33.290
<v Speaker 6>word back, like women take the word back. And they

0:33:33.330 --> 0:33:36.950
<v Speaker 6>don't even mean sometimes physical, I mean, human beings, right?

0:33:36.990 --> 0:33:39.500
<v Speaker 6>When you say we up in this... Or we up

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.140
<v Speaker 6>in this, as Dr. Smith talked about in his book

0:33:42.180 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 6>or in a speech where we talk about that cat,

0:33:45.380 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 6>that nigga did this. So we understand the complicated use

0:33:48.860 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 6>of that term if it has historically been associated with

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:54.390
<v Speaker 6>people on a slave plantation.

0:33:54.270 --> 0:33:56.770
<v Speaker 4>They used that term. We're talking about our ancestors.

0:33:56.890 --> 0:34:00.250
<v Speaker 6>Our ancestors saw virtue and value in a term, and

0:34:00.290 --> 0:34:03.890
<v Speaker 6>they were far closer to being dominated by white supremacy

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 6>than any of us are here today. So I think

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 6>that our own history suggests that there is a power,

0:34:09.580 --> 0:34:12.750
<v Speaker 6>a power of self-definition. a power of self-love, a power

0:34:12.830 --> 0:34:16.009
<v Speaker 6>of irreverence, and a power of making class distinctions that

0:34:16.110 --> 0:34:19.730
<v Speaker 6>sometimes make bourgeois Negroes upset, that make poor black people upset,

0:34:19.969 --> 0:34:22.690
<v Speaker 6>that we have to contend with in a very serious fashion.

0:34:22.750 --> 0:34:24.380
<v Speaker 8>I wonder, do we even still use it as a

0:34:24.390 --> 0:34:27.980
<v Speaker 8>term of endearment in 2026? Yeah.

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:28.819
<v Speaker 2>You know what I hear?

0:34:28.940 --> 0:34:33.580
<v Speaker 8>I hear, fuck nigger, broke nigger, bitch nigger, young nigger.

0:34:33.660 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 4>I saw some YNs.

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.140
<v Speaker 3>At the gas station this weekend. I went to the

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:36.700
<v Speaker 3>other gas station.

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:38.020
<v Speaker 4>Right, and when I went to the office.

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Wait, wait, wait.

0:34:40.850 --> 0:34:42.410
<v Speaker 4>Hold on.

0:34:42.570 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even get to the button. That's the anointing.

0:34:45.140 --> 0:34:49.980
<v Speaker 1>It just hovers. Jordan, before you jump in here. Leonard,

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:51.540
<v Speaker 1>you said you saw what at the gas station?

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 2>Some YNs.

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:53.180
<v Speaker 1>What's a YN?

0:34:53.620 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 2>He just said it.

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:56.540
<v Speaker 4>It stands for young nigga.

0:34:56.660 --> 0:34:58.700
<v Speaker 2>I know. But what he's speaking to, though, is important.

0:34:58.739 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 2>When we think about words, we also think about imagery.

0:35:00.739 --> 0:35:03.029
<v Speaker 5>When I teach young black men, so I think it's

0:35:03.070 --> 0:35:04.770
<v Speaker 5>also a reference point that we could do the scholastic

0:35:04.790 --> 0:35:07.150
<v Speaker 5>conversation and all the studies. But I'm talking about when

0:35:07.170 --> 0:35:09.089
<v Speaker 5>you're speaking to a young man, you ask him, what's

0:35:09.110 --> 0:35:10.729
<v Speaker 5>the difference between a young man and a young nigga?

0:35:11.030 --> 0:35:13.450
<v Speaker 5>He got two images in his head of himself. So

0:35:13.489 --> 0:35:16.290
<v Speaker 5>we're not comparing our enslavement, our oppression to any other

0:35:16.330 --> 0:35:18.770
<v Speaker 5>group because it's much different. To be brought to America,

0:35:18.810 --> 0:35:20.609
<v Speaker 5>stripped of an identity, then now I'm trying to reaffirm

0:35:20.660 --> 0:35:22.259
<v Speaker 5>you on who you are. Language is one of the

0:35:22.300 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 5>first bases of a naming system. We name everything not

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 5>only as a classification, but as an identification. And then

0:35:27.980 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 5>when you take on the word, that's a self-fulfilling prophecy,

0:35:30.460 --> 0:35:32.500
<v Speaker 5>meaning I'm taking ownership of a word that was used

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.029
<v Speaker 5>to not only degrade my ancestors, but to categorize me

0:35:35.050 --> 0:35:38.190
<v Speaker 5>in a particular identification system. So I would never ever

0:35:38.290 --> 0:35:39.910
<v Speaker 5>use the word when I'm teaching young black men. I'm

0:35:39.930 --> 0:35:42.250
<v Speaker 5>not saying saying, yo, what up, my nigga? I'm saying

0:35:42.270 --> 0:35:43.070
<v Speaker 5>you not a nigga.

0:35:43.350 --> 0:35:44.310
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:35:44.450 --> 0:35:46.710
<v Speaker 5>Why do you feel uncomfortable calling me a God? That's

0:35:46.770 --> 0:35:48.950
<v Speaker 5>another question. We talk about 5% of the nation of Islam.

0:35:49.350 --> 0:35:51.370
<v Speaker 5>All these other groups that also made a big contribution

0:35:51.410 --> 0:35:54.150
<v Speaker 5>to the black male existence within America. And the terminology

0:35:54.170 --> 0:35:56.410
<v Speaker 5>language that they use was never going to ever justify

0:35:56.430 --> 0:35:56.819
<v Speaker 5>the use of.

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 2>A colonial term on our people.

0:35:58.420 --> 0:35:59.940
<v Speaker 4>I don't know no other group that do it.

0:36:00.260 --> 0:36:02.660
<v Speaker 5>People will be even, we even refrain from using the term,

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:06.060
<v Speaker 5>the derogatory term to refer to any other ethnic group

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 5>that we know of. Because we know it comes with ramifications,

0:36:08.460 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 5>but yet using nigga seemed like it was supposed to

0:36:10.430 --> 0:36:11.490
<v Speaker 5>be a cultural acceptance.

0:36:11.530 --> 0:36:13.430
<v Speaker 4>Like, nah, you a nigga. No, you not.

0:36:13.530 --> 0:36:15.549
<v Speaker 2>And why is there a resistance to speaking to our

0:36:15.590 --> 0:36:16.250
<v Speaker 2>higher purpose?

0:36:16.590 --> 0:36:18.790
<v Speaker 7>Why is there a resistance to say, you know what,

0:36:19.190 --> 0:36:22.149
<v Speaker 7>we are better than this. And we can glamify the word.

0:36:22.190 --> 0:36:25.140
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you know, the word MF got multiple meanings.

0:36:25.810 --> 0:36:27.770
<v Speaker 7>But we don't have to go and say you're MF

0:36:27.810 --> 0:36:30.489
<v Speaker 7>and you're an MF, you my MF. Why should we

0:36:30.630 --> 0:36:31.630
<v Speaker 7>hold on to something?

0:36:31.650 --> 0:36:32.390
<v Speaker 1>But we definitely do.

0:36:34.610 --> 0:36:36.750
<v Speaker 2>I didn't say we didn't. Don't hit it no more.

0:36:36.810 --> 0:36:39.370
<v Speaker 2>I didn't say we didn't.

0:36:39.750 --> 0:36:43.950
<v Speaker 7>Because at the end of the day, all of us

0:36:44.010 --> 0:36:45.930
<v Speaker 7>up here, we have to set an example. And if

0:36:45.969 --> 0:36:49.339
<v Speaker 7>we want to move forward, young people are looking at us.

0:36:49.380 --> 0:36:50.420
<v Speaker 2>They're listening to us.

0:36:50.860 --> 0:36:53.180
<v Speaker 7>And the three things that really set an example is

0:36:53.219 --> 0:36:55.580
<v Speaker 7>what we say, what we do, and how we show up.

0:36:56.010 --> 0:36:56.230
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:36:56.430 --> 0:36:58.190
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's the most important part here. We

0:36:58.210 --> 0:37:00.950
<v Speaker 7>should be operating to our highest purpose because we don't

0:37:00.969 --> 0:37:03.310
<v Speaker 7>know what five-year-old, seven-year-old, 15-year-old.

0:37:03.630 --> 0:37:07.650
<v Speaker 6>But taking what you're saying, look, some African-Americans have abandoned

0:37:07.790 --> 0:37:11.770
<v Speaker 6>black folks, some some colored people, some black people have.

0:37:11.830 --> 0:37:14.660
<v Speaker 6>But the niggas showed up for those people who are

0:37:14.969 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 6>I'm saying who are poor, dispossessed. So they see in

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 6>that particular figure, they don't see that term as derisive.

0:37:22.460 --> 0:37:26.259
<v Speaker 6>They don't see that term as necessarily derisive. emblematic of

0:37:26.300 --> 0:37:28.919
<v Speaker 6>the antagonism that we've been encouraged to have.

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 4>They see something different. It doesn't have to be in

0:37:31.940 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 4>their head.

0:37:32.980 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 1>And I have a question.

0:37:35.860 --> 0:37:37.540
<v Speaker 5>When you teach, have you ever asked any of the

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:39.820
<v Speaker 5>young black men in your classroom, are you a nigga?

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:41.239
<v Speaker 4>Ask them that. Absolutely.

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:42.170
<v Speaker 3>And what do they say to you?

0:37:42.350 --> 0:37:42.969
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I am.

0:37:43.130 --> 0:37:44.730
<v Speaker 3>And what do they mean by that?

0:37:44.810 --> 0:37:46.750
<v Speaker 4>They mean a lot of different things. They mean that

0:37:46.810 --> 0:37:47.470
<v Speaker 4>I'm a.

0:37:47.510 --> 0:37:48.609
<v Speaker 1>Who is they?

0:37:49.030 --> 0:37:51.330
<v Speaker 4>Michael Eric Dyson class at Vanderbilt University.

0:37:51.390 --> 0:37:51.670
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:58.370
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm citing my damn self. This the nigga I

0:37:58.390 --> 0:38:00.930
<v Speaker 4>know best. And what I'm saying to you is that

0:38:01.090 --> 0:38:02.590
<v Speaker 4>all I'm saying is that I agree.

0:38:02.610 --> 0:38:05.390
<v Speaker 6>I agree with what they're saying in terms of what

0:38:05.469 --> 0:38:07.870
<v Speaker 6>it can mean, but it doesn't have to mean that, right?

0:38:08.190 --> 0:38:11.430
<v Speaker 6>Necessity is one thing. It can mean all that stuff,

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.739
<v Speaker 6>but it can also mean, when you talk about self-identified

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 6>as a determined figure to do well, I keep saying

0:38:17.660 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 6>Martin Luther King Jr.

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:18.980
<v Speaker 4>he ain't the only one.

0:38:19.260 --> 0:38:21.299
<v Speaker 6>I'm saying a lot of other brothers and sisters that

0:38:21.380 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 6>I know who are high-ranking, who are loving themselves, also

0:38:25.090 --> 0:38:27.930
<v Speaker 6>understand the intimacy of that term and don't have to

0:38:27.989 --> 0:38:29.290
<v Speaker 6>be seen as self-hating.

0:38:29.370 --> 0:38:31.649
<v Speaker 2>You know what else they did back then? They cooked

0:38:31.670 --> 0:38:33.149
<v Speaker 2>with lard. Are you cooking with lard?

0:38:33.390 --> 0:38:33.969
<v Speaker 4>Not at all.

0:38:34.190 --> 0:38:36.169
<v Speaker 2>So why can't you drop the word? Because he said

0:38:36.190 --> 0:38:36.330
<v Speaker 2>it then.

0:38:36.370 --> 0:38:38.410
<v Speaker 4>You just told me you kept color for a reason.

0:38:39.110 --> 0:38:41.140
<v Speaker 2>Because he said it then doesn't mean we have to

0:38:41.180 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 2>do it now.

0:38:41.700 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 4>I understand that. We evolve.

0:38:43.700 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Allow him to evolve and allow us to evolve and

0:38:45.900 --> 0:38:46.339
<v Speaker 2>drop the word.

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 6>Dr.

0:38:46.700 --> 0:38:47.779
<v Speaker 4>King is here right now.

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:51.410
<v Speaker 1>Allow me to evolve this conversation because We don't have

0:38:51.450 --> 0:38:54.339
<v Speaker 1>that much time, but I do want to, you can

0:38:54.380 --> 0:38:56.380
<v Speaker 1>respond in your next response.

0:38:56.460 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:00.140
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask a truthful question. Please be honest.

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:02.140
<v Speaker 1>For some of you, I can hit the button because

0:39:02.180 --> 0:39:06.290
<v Speaker 1>I know you very well. The question is, do you

0:39:06.670 --> 0:39:07.750
<v Speaker 1>use the N-word?

0:39:08.130 --> 0:39:09.750
<v Speaker 6>No. Yes. No.

0:39:10.350 --> 0:39:10.770
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes.

0:39:11.430 --> 0:39:12.790
<v Speaker 3>No. It's complicated.

0:39:14.910 --> 0:39:22.259
<v Speaker 1>Eyes ready to light your ass up.

0:39:22.300 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 4>That's because you intimidated him and he knew.

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:28.500
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm trying. I strive not to. You know, I.

0:39:28.540 --> 0:39:30.450
<v Speaker 8>Literally, it was this year that really made me be like, yo,

0:39:30.469 --> 0:39:31.350
<v Speaker 8>I gotta dead this work.

0:39:31.370 --> 0:39:32.550
<v Speaker 1>What happened?

0:39:32.570 --> 0:39:34.110
<v Speaker 3>When the whole Fat Joe situation happened.

0:39:34.150 --> 0:39:34.630
<v Speaker 2>Because.

0:39:35.170 --> 0:39:36.530
<v Speaker 3>Hold on, Lenard.

0:39:36.570 --> 0:39:38.390
<v Speaker 1>For those of you at home that don't know what

0:39:38.430 --> 0:39:40.210
<v Speaker 1>happened with Fat Joe, we're going to go ahead and

0:39:40.230 --> 0:39:40.730
<v Speaker 1>run this clip.

0:39:40.989 --> 0:39:42.989
<v Speaker 4>Because I heard when that was going on, you said, yo,

0:39:43.010 --> 0:39:43.880
<v Speaker 4>Fat Joe ain't black.

0:39:43.930 --> 0:39:47.240
<v Speaker 2>No, I am black. Fat Joe is the blackest.

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.300
<v Speaker 4>Nigga you ever seen in your life.

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:51.060
<v Speaker 2>Go look it up!

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:53.020
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to say the N-word, okay?

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:54.210
<v Speaker 2>I wish I could stop saying it.

0:39:54.340 --> 0:39:56.180
<v Speaker 3>I know better and don't do better, okay?

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:59.259
<v Speaker 8>And I know there is nothing funnier to white supremacists

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:02.660
<v Speaker 8>than to see a bunch of black and brown people arguing.

0:40:02.340 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 3>About who can use the word nigga.

0:40:04.180 --> 0:40:05.700
<v Speaker 2>Do we not realize how silly that looks?

0:40:07.820 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And I wanted to start there. This is actually the

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 1>beginning of our third claim, which is it is socially

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:16.510
<v Speaker 1>acceptable for white people and individuals of other racial backgrounds

0:40:16.570 --> 0:40:21.489
<v Speaker 1>to say the N-word. I want to make sure people

0:40:21.530 --> 0:40:26.010
<v Speaker 1>understand at home, Fat Joe's dad is Afro-Cuban. There's another

0:40:26.050 --> 0:40:29.100
<v Speaker 1>clip we're going to play just a moment after this. But, Lenard, first,

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:30.620
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear your point. What made you change

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>your mind about it this year?

0:40:32.260 --> 0:40:34.140
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, because I've always known better.

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 8>Like, you know, the first book my father ever gave

0:40:35.980 --> 0:40:37.780
<v Speaker 8>me was the autobiography.

0:40:37.110 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Of Malcolm X.

0:40:38.010 --> 0:40:39.750
<v Speaker 8>And then that led me to read, you know, Message

0:40:39.770 --> 0:40:41.549
<v Speaker 8>to the Black Man by the Honorable Elijah Muhammad. Then

0:40:41.590 --> 0:40:44.350
<v Speaker 8>I read from, you know, Niggas to God by Akil.

0:40:44.370 --> 0:40:46.509
<v Speaker 8>So I never wanted to call myself the N-word. That's

0:40:46.530 --> 0:40:49.989
<v Speaker 8>why I call myself... Charlemagne the God. And then, you know,

0:40:50.110 --> 0:40:53.310
<v Speaker 8>just throughout time, just being in the environments that we

0:40:53.330 --> 0:40:55.169
<v Speaker 8>grow up in, you do find yourself using the word.

0:40:55.190 --> 0:40:57.660
<v Speaker 8>But then I found myself realizing I'm not using this

0:40:57.700 --> 0:40:59.910
<v Speaker 8>word as a term of endearment. I'm using it the way,

0:41:00.300 --> 0:41:02.819
<v Speaker 8>you know, the white people use it. And so when

0:41:02.860 --> 0:41:05.739
<v Speaker 8>I heard Fat Joe have that comment, when I heard

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 8>Fat Joe say that, I wasn't even mad at what

0:41:07.260 --> 0:41:09.620
<v Speaker 8>Fat Joe said when I heard the discourse around it.

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:13.959
<v Speaker 8>Nothing made sense to me. There was no justification for

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 8>using the words.

0:41:15.219 --> 0:41:16.509
<v Speaker 3>I was just like, you know what? I'm going to

0:41:16.530 --> 0:41:16.859
<v Speaker 3>let it go.

0:41:17.070 --> 0:41:19.549
<v Speaker 8>Give that back to the white people because I know better.

0:41:19.910 --> 0:41:20.270
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:41:20.469 --> 0:41:22.810
<v Speaker 10>And I think part of it is because we have

0:41:22.850 --> 0:41:25.190
<v Speaker 10>this tension and going back to the good professor when

0:41:25.230 --> 0:41:27.420
<v Speaker 10>I asked him, if you had a concert and you hear,

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:30.100
<v Speaker 10>you know, an artist use the word and you look

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 10>to your left and you see, you know, a white

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.989
<v Speaker 10>concert girl who paid for the ticket. Repeat the word.

0:41:35.330 --> 0:41:36.570
<v Speaker 10>Would you consider that offensive?

0:41:36.590 --> 0:41:37.350
<v Speaker 2>And he said, yes.

0:41:37.390 --> 0:41:39.730
<v Speaker 10>And I think the problem is we assume that a

0:41:39.790 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 10>word can be permanently fixed for one group of people,

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 10>anybody nonwhite, and permanently fluid for a second group of people,

0:41:46.860 --> 0:41:47.500
<v Speaker 10>anybody who's black.

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 2>And that just doesn't make any sense.

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:51.529
<v Speaker 10>To Charlamagne's point, you know, that word is still the

0:41:51.570 --> 0:41:55.430
<v Speaker 10>last word that many thousands of black men hear. Right

0:41:55.469 --> 0:41:58.210
<v Speaker 10>before another black man takes their life in this country,

0:41:58.550 --> 0:42:00.610
<v Speaker 10>in the year of our Lord, 2026.

0:42:00.610 --> 0:42:03.390
<v Speaker 2>But again, to the professor's point, is that the only

0:42:03.430 --> 0:42:05.270
<v Speaker 2>way that black people? Of course not. And I know

0:42:05.290 --> 0:42:07.730
<v Speaker 2>a lot of older black folks and they will use

0:42:07.770 --> 0:42:09.130
<v Speaker 2>the word. But again, it's private.

0:42:09.690 --> 0:42:11.950
<v Speaker 10>So how you communicate privately is different than how you

0:42:11.989 --> 0:42:15.750
<v Speaker 10>communicate publicly. And that's much different than how you communicate commercially.

0:42:15.770 --> 0:42:17.569
<v Speaker 10>And the last thing I'll say is this. We live

0:42:17.610 --> 0:42:19.009
<v Speaker 10>in an era where it's not just black and white.

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 10>There's an Asian kid today who's going to school and

0:42:22.980 --> 0:42:26.779
<v Speaker 10>he's telling his Hispanic friend, oh, what up, man? The

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:28.759
<v Speaker 10>idea that he's saying that because, oh, man, I want

0:42:28.780 --> 0:42:31.620
<v Speaker 10>to lynch this guy clearly doesn't make sense. So the

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:34.819
<v Speaker 10>word is fluid, but it's fluid for everybody. And the

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 10>question to me is not whether it's socially acceptable because

0:42:37.270 --> 0:42:39.990
<v Speaker 10>nobody's asking for permission to use language nowadays.

0:42:40.010 --> 0:42:42.410
<v Speaker 1>Why is it fluid to everybody? So for you, if

0:42:42.450 --> 0:42:45.690
<v Speaker 1>you're at a concert, you know, Jay just did his

0:42:45.710 --> 0:42:49.669
<v Speaker 1>final show in L.A., If he says the N-word quite

0:42:49.690 --> 0:42:52.610
<v Speaker 1>a bit in his performance, you see a white concert

0:42:52.650 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>goer singing along with the N-word, your response is?

0:42:56.340 --> 0:42:56.620
<v Speaker 6>Nothing.

0:42:57.640 --> 0:42:59.540
<v Speaker 2>But again, part of it, I don't live my life

0:42:59.580 --> 0:43:01.439
<v Speaker 2>based on what white people do, think, or say.

0:43:01.500 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, Delano, that's hard for me to understand because you

0:43:03.460 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 1>work at the Heritage Foundation.

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:05.770
<v Speaker 4>Come with it.

0:43:06.070 --> 0:43:06.630
<v Speaker 2>Can I respond?

0:43:06.650 --> 0:43:08.149
<v Speaker 1>You got the mic.

0:43:08.469 --> 0:43:11.830
<v Speaker 10>Oh, so the reason I'm there and the reason that

0:43:11.850 --> 0:43:13.830
<v Speaker 10>I do the work that I do around marriage and

0:43:13.870 --> 0:43:16.609
<v Speaker 10>family structure is is because many of our institutions do

0:43:16.690 --> 0:43:19.150
<v Speaker 10>not do that work. So my presence there is a

0:43:19.230 --> 0:43:20.670
<v Speaker 10>judgment in many respects.

0:43:20.730 --> 0:43:21.190
<v Speaker 1>I got it.

0:43:21.210 --> 0:43:22.430
<v Speaker 3>With all due respect and.

0:43:22.340 --> 0:43:43.870
<v Speaker 10>Humility, Every time the NAACP has a national conference, the

0:43:43.910 --> 0:43:46.430
<v Speaker 10>National Urban League has a national conference, the Joint Center

0:43:46.450 --> 0:43:49.049
<v Speaker 10>for Political and Economic Studies has a national conference, the

0:43:49.070 --> 0:43:50.990
<v Speaker 10>Congressional Black Caucus has a national conference.

0:43:51.430 --> 0:43:53.430
<v Speaker 2>I either go to the agenda, foundation, excuse me.

0:43:54.050 --> 0:43:55.650
<v Speaker 10>I either go to the agenda or I show up

0:43:56.410 --> 0:43:59.010
<v Speaker 10>and I look to see state of the black family,

0:43:59.530 --> 0:44:01.529
<v Speaker 10>decline in black marriage rates, nothing.

0:44:02.090 --> 0:44:05.380
<v Speaker 2>I was at CBC last month, nothing about marriage. Foundation,

0:44:05.420 --> 0:44:08.500
<v Speaker 2>CBC Foundation. So I say that we're all- Have you.

0:44:08.460 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Ever proposed a panel?

0:44:10.340 --> 0:44:10.880
<v Speaker 2>I did, actually.

0:44:11.140 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 4>You did?

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 7>Yes.

0:44:11.820 --> 0:44:12.540
<v Speaker 1>Who did you send it to?

0:44:12.620 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 2>To the president of the CBC Foundation and the vice president.

0:44:15.260 --> 0:44:15.800
<v Speaker 2>I did, actually.

0:44:16.020 --> 0:44:16.859
<v Speaker 1>Did they respond to you?

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 10>No, but I spoke to the vice president. And hopefully

0:44:19.180 --> 0:44:21.690
<v Speaker 10>we'll connect. And I would love to connect with Mr.

0:44:21.730 --> 0:44:22.150
<v Speaker 4>Johnson.

0:44:22.270 --> 0:44:24.529
<v Speaker 1>And let me just say this, because I do want

0:44:24.550 --> 0:44:26.430
<v Speaker 1>to get back to the N-word. And Delano knows he's

0:44:26.469 --> 0:44:27.890
<v Speaker 1>welcome to come back on the show where we deal

0:44:27.930 --> 0:44:28.650
<v Speaker 1>with the family.

0:44:28.770 --> 0:44:29.290
<v Speaker 2>Please do.

0:44:29.310 --> 0:44:31.549
<v Speaker 1>Because I think that we all care about the preservation

0:44:31.710 --> 0:44:33.989
<v Speaker 1>of the family. I think what's tough here is there

0:44:34.030 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>were still some illogical leaps that were made around the

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:42.250
<v Speaker 1>content of those conversations. For example, I was at the NAACP.

0:44:42.270 --> 0:44:44.969
<v Speaker 1>So this is a primary source talking. We held a

0:44:45.210 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>panel and a live podcast where we included conversations around

0:44:50.660 --> 0:44:54.020
<v Speaker 1>Nolan Wells and his family. Nolan Wells' family were centered.

0:44:54.780 --> 0:44:56.890
<v Speaker 1>You see the preservation of a black family unit. A

0:44:56.950 --> 0:45:00.250
<v Speaker 1>very caring family who lost a young man who may

0:45:00.290 --> 0:45:03.290
<v Speaker 1>have been called the N-word upon his death. We don't know.

0:45:04.190 --> 0:45:07.310
<v Speaker 1>And probably was not killed by a black person. So

0:45:07.670 --> 0:45:10.489
<v Speaker 1>there are conversations we have around family, but they are

0:45:11.570 --> 0:45:15.359
<v Speaker 1>intersectional conversations. A term that was coined by the amazing

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:19.270
<v Speaker 1>Kimberly Crenshaw. And intersectionality has a lot to do with

0:45:19.310 --> 0:45:22.259
<v Speaker 1>why you may not see marriage or family on a

0:45:22.300 --> 0:45:24.840
<v Speaker 1>panel by itself, but it's absolutely discussed.

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:27.500
<v Speaker 10>In this country, 70% of black children are born to

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 10>unmarried parents. In New York City, it's 75%. In D.C.,

0:45:30.340 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 10>it's 77%. In Baltimore, it's 83%. In Louisiana, Mississippi, and Arkansas,

0:45:34.540 --> 0:45:36.440
<v Speaker 10>it's 82%.

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:37.660
<v Speaker 2>The idea that we would be.

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:41.880
<v Speaker 10>The centers for disease control look up final birthday.

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not listening to centers of disease control right now.

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:46.879
<v Speaker 4>For a lot of reasons.

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:47.660
<v Speaker 6>Hold on. Hold on.

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:50.700
<v Speaker 2>Because I think I think I think I think you

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:51.379
<v Speaker 2>made a good point.

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:51.580
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:45:51.660 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 10>I'm not talking about whether we discuss issues facing black families.

0:45:56.150 --> 0:45:59.330
<v Speaker 10>I'm talking about the decline of the married two-parent household.

0:45:59.350 --> 0:46:01.750
<v Speaker 10>Let me be very specific with my language. And what

0:46:01.790 --> 0:46:05.390
<v Speaker 10>I'm saying is that marriage and family structure policy is

0:46:05.510 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 10>not a priority on the institutions that claim to represent

0:46:08.620 --> 0:46:09.180
<v Speaker 10>black people.

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:14.460
<v Speaker 2>What is marriage and family structure policy? What does that

0:46:14.500 --> 0:46:14.919
<v Speaker 2>even mean?

0:46:15.340 --> 0:46:18.410
<v Speaker 7>Is it having a job to pay as a fair wage?

0:46:18.969 --> 0:46:22.910
<v Speaker 7>Is it healthcare access? Is it quality education?

0:46:22.930 --> 0:46:24.800
<v Speaker 10>It's having access to your dad on an everyday basis

0:46:24.820 --> 0:46:26.440
<v Speaker 10>because he's married to your mom and he lives with her.

0:46:26.460 --> 0:46:27.239
<v Speaker 4>Well, maybe we.

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:29.060
<v Speaker 1>Should talk about the mass incarceration rates.

0:46:29.140 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no.

0:46:29.860 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 6>Yes, we should.

0:46:30.500 --> 0:46:30.839
<v Speaker 3>You know what?

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:31.570
<v Speaker 1>Let me do this.

0:46:34.950 --> 0:46:43.760
<v Speaker 6>The Reverend Jesse Jackson, God bless his soul, was deeply

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:49.670
<v Speaker 6>involved with speaking about family structure and argued about the

0:46:49.710 --> 0:46:54.150
<v Speaker 6>particular ways in which the families were pulverized and pounded.

0:46:54.620 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 4>By these social structures.

0:46:56.960 --> 0:46:59.299
<v Speaker 6>And he talked about the relationship between, so we don't

0:46:59.340 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 6>do it in a way that some of our white

0:47:02.260 --> 0:47:05.720
<v Speaker 6>conservative brothers and sisters do it to extract it from

0:47:05.780 --> 0:47:10.130
<v Speaker 6>the larger flow of white supremacy, social injustice, and public

0:47:10.170 --> 0:47:12.110
<v Speaker 6>policy that imposed certain.

0:47:11.870 --> 0:47:14.230
<v Speaker 4>Limits upon it. We know that the The Monaghan.

0:47:13.910 --> 0:47:16.589
<v Speaker 6>Report in 1965, if I can cite the source, where

0:47:16.610 --> 0:47:19.370
<v Speaker 6>he talked about a tangled web of pathology. I don't

0:47:19.410 --> 0:47:23.270
<v Speaker 6>think a black mouth replicating a white supremacist logic is

0:47:23.330 --> 0:47:25.010
<v Speaker 6>paying attention to the black family.

0:47:25.340 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 4>And Brother Squires, I'm glad you were there. But the

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 4>Heritage Foundation has done.

0:47:29.060 --> 0:47:33.580
<v Speaker 6>More damage to African-American peoples and the conception of what

0:47:33.620 --> 0:47:36.020
<v Speaker 6>the family is about than a whole bunch of other

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:37.419
<v Speaker 6>things than any niggas that I know.

0:47:37.700 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 4>So what I'm saying is that what.

0:47:39.180 --> 0:47:44.390
<v Speaker 6>We have to do is pay attention— But pay attention

0:47:44.469 --> 0:47:47.009
<v Speaker 6>to the serious ways in which those issues are real,

0:47:47.290 --> 0:47:50.850
<v Speaker 6>but not extracted from other issues that we pay attention to.

0:47:51.110 --> 0:47:53.910
<v Speaker 6>So did the Heritage Foundation have anything to do with

0:47:53.969 --> 0:47:55.910
<v Speaker 6>Trayvon Martin and the way in which he had a

0:47:56.010 --> 0:47:58.879
<v Speaker 6>mother and father who were healthy and alive? Are these

0:47:58.930 --> 0:48:01.740
<v Speaker 6>other black families where they have a mother and father there? No,

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:05.660
<v Speaker 6>because they have a preset ideological formation that judges the

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 6>black family before they try to help it. So at

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 6>the end of the day, I think that what you're

0:48:09.860 --> 0:48:12.259
<v Speaker 6>I'm glad that you were there. But let's let's own

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:15.419
<v Speaker 6>up to the fact that the Heritage Foundation has been

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:18.319
<v Speaker 6>wholly destructive in so many different ways. And I can

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:20.339
<v Speaker 6>cite them sources for the reports that have been done.

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:22.069
<v Speaker 6>But let me get back to the N-word thing here

0:48:22.110 --> 0:48:25.650
<v Speaker 6>in terms of what I think that look, black people

0:48:25.750 --> 0:48:29.489
<v Speaker 6>have a complicated relationship. Yes, to that word. But I'm

0:48:29.590 --> 0:48:32.540
<v Speaker 6>an absolutist when it comes to this. that if you

0:48:32.620 --> 0:48:34.239
<v Speaker 6>are black you can do it and if you ain't

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:36.529
<v Speaker 6>you can't and it ain't that it ain't that hard

0:48:36.890 --> 0:48:38.969
<v Speaker 6>and white folk do a lot of other stuff why

0:48:39.010 --> 0:48:41.830
<v Speaker 6>are we worried about uh if we say it others

0:48:41.870 --> 0:48:44.209
<v Speaker 6>will say it i can guarantee you this if every

0:48:44.270 --> 0:48:46.790
<v Speaker 6>black person in america stops saying the n-word right now

0:48:47.070 --> 0:48:49.759
<v Speaker 6>stop saying today it's not going to stop any of

0:48:49.780 --> 0:48:53.360
<v Speaker 6>the processes that are already in place because the naacp

0:48:53.380 --> 0:48:56.759
<v Speaker 6>buried that word that was resurrected in a second yeah

0:48:56.780 --> 0:48:59.839
<v Speaker 6>right so i'm saying to you right and i use

0:48:59.880 --> 0:49:02.700
<v Speaker 6>that metaphorically as a metonym for a particular.

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:05.580
<v Speaker 1>Place of course we don't know what a metonym.

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:09.989
<v Speaker 6>Is m-e-t-o-n-y-m one thing standing in for the other you

0:49:10.030 --> 0:49:13.190
<v Speaker 6>say where my cash is speaking about your money so

0:49:13.250 --> 0:49:17.130
<v Speaker 6>i'm saying that in that sense that you can't bury

0:49:17.210 --> 0:49:19.469
<v Speaker 6>a word. The belief that you can even bury a

0:49:19.489 --> 0:49:23.880
<v Speaker 6>word given the complicated and nuanced interpretation to which it

0:49:23.950 --> 0:49:27.500
<v Speaker 6>is lent and the black people who have invested serious

0:49:27.560 --> 0:49:30.840
<v Speaker 6>engagement with that word, who are not stereotypes of self-hatred,

0:49:31.060 --> 0:49:34.060
<v Speaker 6>who believe that young boys can be kings and girls

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 6>be queens.

0:49:34.780 --> 0:49:36.840
<v Speaker 4>Who believe that black people can make an advance.

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:40.279
<v Speaker 6>If we are so vulnerable that one word can just

0:49:40.380 --> 0:49:43.830
<v Speaker 6>derail us because we use it, then who's really got

0:49:43.870 --> 0:49:44.330
<v Speaker 6>the power?

0:49:44.570 --> 0:49:46.530
<v Speaker 4>And what are we saying about our own sites?

0:49:46.630 --> 0:49:48.850
<v Speaker 7>It's not about being derailed, right? I don't believe in

0:49:48.870 --> 0:49:50.969
<v Speaker 7>the performative stuff. So that's why I haven't even tried

0:49:50.989 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 7>to defend the barrier to N-word. I am saying, why

0:49:53.820 --> 0:49:56.320
<v Speaker 7>are we not shooting for a higher purpose?

0:49:56.400 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 4>What are we saying?

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:01.720
<v Speaker 2>What we do and how we show up.

0:50:01.850 --> 0:50:04.270
<v Speaker 4>I wrote 28 books. Most of them don't have anything

0:50:04.350 --> 0:50:04.529
<v Speaker 4>in them.

0:50:05.570 --> 0:50:05.870
<v Speaker 6>Most.

0:50:07.890 --> 0:50:08.339
<v Speaker 3>Most.

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:11.839
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I got nigga evidence. Wait a minute. My book

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:14.279
<v Speaker 4>on Tupac has to have nigga. My book about white

0:50:14.300 --> 0:50:14.780
<v Speaker 4>people has.

0:50:14.660 --> 0:50:16.440
<v Speaker 2>To have nigga. I don't need you to justify why

0:50:16.460 --> 0:50:16.980
<v Speaker 2>you got it in there.

0:50:17.080 --> 0:50:18.400
<v Speaker 4>All I'm saying is.

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:22.430
<v Speaker 7>Why are we not trying to project a higher purpose?

0:50:22.770 --> 0:50:23.790
<v Speaker 7>People are watching.

0:50:23.810 --> 0:50:26.770
<v Speaker 4>Who said that? Hit the thing. Who said that's higher?

0:50:26.790 --> 0:50:27.130
<v Speaker 2>Hold on.

0:50:27.190 --> 0:50:27.569
<v Speaker 3>Hold on.

0:50:27.590 --> 0:50:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, guys. Yes, I'll do this. But here's why.

0:50:30.590 --> 0:50:36.010
<v Speaker 1>We're still on claim three. And Claim 3 is about

0:50:36.410 --> 0:50:40.190
<v Speaker 1>people of other races using this word. Okay, let me

0:50:40.210 --> 0:50:43.109
<v Speaker 1>just roll this clip for you because sometimes it might

0:50:43.150 --> 0:50:44.589
<v Speaker 1>be a condition. Let's roll that clip.

0:50:45.630 --> 0:50:47.969
<v Speaker 2>First BAFTA of the night for a vital part of

0:50:48.010 --> 0:50:48.530
<v Speaker 2>movie making.

0:50:51.250 --> 0:50:53.170
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so in response to that clip.

0:50:53.510 --> 0:50:55.890
<v Speaker 2>Here's the problem. It's not only that he said it.

0:50:56.800 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 2>It was on delay. They didn't stop it.

0:50:59.830 --> 0:51:03.150
<v Speaker 7>They allowed it to fester before they reacted to it

0:51:03.570 --> 0:51:05.150
<v Speaker 7>in response to the outrage.

0:51:05.650 --> 0:51:05.890
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:51:06.010 --> 0:51:09.900
<v Speaker 2>So it wasn't just him. We have softened that culture

0:51:09.940 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 2>that is OK.

0:51:11.239 --> 0:51:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:51:12.100 --> 0:51:13.100
<v Speaker 2>That's the problem.

0:51:13.420 --> 0:51:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me I just have a question for you,

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:17.610
<v Speaker 1>for Delroy Lindo and for Michael B.

0:51:17.620 --> 0:51:17.969
<v Speaker 4>Jordan.

0:51:18.250 --> 0:51:21.190
<v Speaker 1>Would your responses have been the same to that? Because

0:51:21.230 --> 0:51:24.750
<v Speaker 1>I don't think mine would have been. When he yells

0:51:25.330 --> 0:51:26.990
<v Speaker 1>it out and they just stand in there like.

0:51:27.370 --> 0:51:28.150
<v Speaker 2>They're probably in shock.

0:51:28.450 --> 0:51:30.290
<v Speaker 1>I would have been in shock, but I would have

0:51:30.310 --> 0:51:30.950
<v Speaker 1>shocked them back.

0:51:31.989 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 6>I wouldn't put the burden on them because they're trying

0:51:34.200 --> 0:51:38.140
<v Speaker 6>to be decent and embodying all of the higher virtues.

0:51:38.000 --> 0:51:39.110
<v Speaker 4>That we want to see.

0:51:39.760 --> 0:51:43.070
<v Speaker 6>Because a nigga would have said, did they crack.

0:51:44.290 --> 0:51:45.090
<v Speaker 4>It?

0:51:45.130 --> 0:51:48.770
<v Speaker 6>But look, a physical symptom of a disease, yes, is

0:51:48.830 --> 0:51:51.089
<v Speaker 6>a category. But here's the question. Why is it that

0:51:51.130 --> 0:51:53.260
<v Speaker 6>you didn't say anything else? Why didn't you say F?

0:51:53.350 --> 0:51:54.250
<v Speaker 6>Why didn't you say B?

0:51:54.489 --> 0:51:56.310
<v Speaker 4>Why didn't you say? So even later.

0:51:56.530 --> 0:52:01.910
<v Speaker 6>Well, I'm just saying that even in the ecosystem of demonization.

0:52:02.290 --> 0:52:04.890
<v Speaker 6>that penetrates even people with those kind of diseases. So

0:52:05.200 --> 0:52:06.940
<v Speaker 6>I just say at the end of the day, again,

0:52:07.360 --> 0:52:09.739
<v Speaker 6>if you black, yes, if you not black, then no.

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 6>And I don't think it's any complicated to say there's

0:52:12.940 --> 0:52:14.779
<v Speaker 6>some stuff, you know, right now, there's some stuff you

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:16.060
<v Speaker 6>will never say, not in public.

0:52:16.400 --> 0:52:18.509
<v Speaker 4>You know it right now, you will never utter it.

0:52:18.830 --> 0:52:23.569
<v Speaker 6>And I'm saying the so-called nigga, that censorship exists for

0:52:23.610 --> 0:52:26.049
<v Speaker 6>a reason and it offers privilege to people who have

0:52:26.090 --> 0:52:28.310
<v Speaker 6>very little else in this world. And we can teach

0:52:28.350 --> 0:52:30.819
<v Speaker 6>them to raise, I got a PhD from Princeton. I'm

0:52:30.860 --> 0:52:33.160
<v Speaker 6>a from the west side of Detroit. I was raised

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:35.799
<v Speaker 6>by people who understood what were about, who taught me

0:52:36.100 --> 0:52:39.580
<v Speaker 6>the difference between as our young brother Jordan was talking

0:52:39.620 --> 0:52:42.940
<v Speaker 6>about and demonizing and hating ourselves. We can do all

0:52:42.980 --> 0:52:45.120
<v Speaker 6>of that. If Martin Luther King can do it, I

0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:47.440
<v Speaker 6>think anybody can do it. And we can say with

0:52:47.660 --> 0:52:50.799
<v Speaker 6>a poise and equanimity, yes, we understand what we should

0:52:50.820 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 6>do and not do. We understand when we should say

0:52:52.660 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 6>it and not say it. And at the end of

0:52:54.100 --> 0:52:56.419
<v Speaker 6>the day, we have the right and privilege to do so.

0:52:56.700 --> 0:53:00.120
<v Speaker 6>And I think that that is not a white supremacist notion,

0:53:00.340 --> 0:53:01.820
<v Speaker 6>that's a black self-determination.

0:53:01.860 --> 0:53:03.500
<v Speaker 1>Let me tell you one thing, Gok is leading on

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this Martin Luther King piece. You know, when white people say,

0:53:06.300 --> 0:53:07.450
<v Speaker 1>I have black friends.

0:53:08.950 --> 0:53:09.989
<v Speaker 4>I have a dream.

0:53:10.010 --> 0:53:12.990
<v Speaker 1>Liz has been trying to get in, let this lovely

0:53:13.090 --> 0:53:15.750
<v Speaker 1>queen reclaim her time. I mean, this is what my

0:53:15.790 --> 0:53:17.210
<v Speaker 1>book is about, is that.

0:53:18.570 --> 0:53:22.120
<v Speaker 9>When they were up there on stage, there's a trauma

0:53:22.180 --> 0:53:24.300
<v Speaker 9>and a shock that happens in that moment. To expect

0:53:24.320 --> 0:53:27.940
<v Speaker 9>somebody to respond in that moment to being dressed up

0:53:27.980 --> 0:53:33.319
<v Speaker 9>to the nines at this highfalutin award ceremony and then

0:53:33.420 --> 0:53:37.180
<v Speaker 9>hear this lowest attack that you could possibly hear.

0:53:37.540 --> 0:53:38.980
<v Speaker 2>How do you respond?

0:53:39.219 --> 0:53:41.480
<v Speaker 9>What I'm trying to write about through this book is

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:47.900
<v Speaker 9>talk about intersectionality. is how the emotional and the history

0:53:48.280 --> 0:53:51.259
<v Speaker 9>and the personal come together. And that's what makes this

0:53:51.300 --> 0:53:54.710
<v Speaker 9>word so deeply complicated is because I could map my

0:53:54.770 --> 0:53:59.010
<v Speaker 9>entire life by the times I was called and confronted

0:53:59.050 --> 0:54:02.529
<v Speaker 9>the N-word unexpectedly and reacted in some ways the same

0:54:02.570 --> 0:54:04.920
<v Speaker 9>way those two did on stage. And that's, I mean,

0:54:04.960 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 9>I think that's what's important is to know that they

0:54:07.620 --> 0:54:09.500
<v Speaker 9>were doing the very best they could in that scene.

0:54:09.560 --> 0:54:11.219
<v Speaker 8>And what Sister Pryor is saying is true because every

0:54:11.260 --> 0:54:15.050
<v Speaker 8>time we hear a white person use the N-word, we

0:54:15.070 --> 0:54:17.730
<v Speaker 8>get triggered because of generational trauma.

0:54:17.870 --> 0:54:19.810
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:54:19.830 --> 0:54:22.180
<v Speaker 1>So that's a good point, too. So speaking of hearing

0:54:22.219 --> 0:54:27.710
<v Speaker 1>white people create a generational trauma response... Let us roll

0:54:27.750 --> 0:54:29.969
<v Speaker 1>this clip where Chris Rock is with the White Kings

0:54:30.010 --> 0:54:30.370
<v Speaker 1>of Comedy.

0:54:30.989 --> 0:54:33.480
<v Speaker 3>He's the blackest white guy I fucking know.

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:36.920
<v Speaker 11>And in all the negative things we think about black people,

0:54:37.219 --> 0:54:38.200
<v Speaker 11>this fucker.

0:54:38.400 --> 0:54:39.240
<v Speaker 4>You're saying I'm a nigger.

0:54:39.580 --> 0:54:45.810
<v Speaker 8>Yes, you are the niggerest fucking white man I have ever.

0:54:48.719 --> 0:54:50.140
<v Speaker 3>The context of this is very important.

0:54:50.260 --> 0:54:51.500
<v Speaker 1>OK, I can't wait to hear this.

0:54:51.620 --> 0:54:55.560
<v Speaker 8>No, because Chris started off by saying black people. But

0:54:55.580 --> 0:54:58.960
<v Speaker 8>then he said, you have all of the negative traits

0:54:59.020 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 8>of black people.

0:54:59.620 --> 0:55:00.739
<v Speaker 3>So then Louis C.K.

0:55:00.930 --> 0:55:04.190
<v Speaker 8>Said the N-word because in his mind, N-word is the

0:55:04.230 --> 0:55:07.790
<v Speaker 8>person with all the negative traits of a black person.

0:55:07.950 --> 0:55:09.649
<v Speaker 1>Well, and also Chris Rock.

0:55:10.560 --> 0:55:13.360
<v Speaker 9>Said that in his own HBO special.

0:55:13.400 --> 0:55:15.100
<v Speaker 3>From Niggas to Black People, one of my favorite comedies.

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:18.360
<v Speaker 4>And he repented. But he did rethink it.

0:55:18.380 --> 0:55:23.219
<v Speaker 7>Think about the comedy writers for, not Jamie Foxx, Kevin Hart.

0:55:24.080 --> 0:55:26.580
<v Speaker 7>And that stand-up and all of the offensive jokes that

0:55:26.620 --> 0:55:28.259
<v Speaker 7>those writers, all white writers.

0:55:28.010 --> 0:55:29.450
<v Speaker 2>Wrote, and people read them.

0:55:29.469 --> 0:55:31.549
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right.

0:55:31.570 --> 0:55:32.350
<v Speaker 2>That's a problem.

0:55:32.450 --> 0:55:35.310
<v Speaker 7>We should like, wait a minute, for them to feel

0:55:35.350 --> 0:55:37.410
<v Speaker 7>like they have license, where's they getting it from?

0:55:37.530 --> 0:55:39.970
<v Speaker 2>They're getting it because we've set a culture that is okay.

0:55:40.830 --> 0:55:48.970
<v Speaker 10>And it's not just Chris Rock and Louis C.K. Going

0:55:49.010 --> 0:55:51.570
<v Speaker 10>back to the clip with Fat Joe. When Fat Joe asserts,

0:55:52.070 --> 0:55:54.860
<v Speaker 10>I'm the blackest N-word you know, he's not doing that

0:55:54.880 --> 0:55:56.739
<v Speaker 10>because he said, you know, I'm the most entrepreneurial. I'm

0:55:56.760 --> 0:56:00.400
<v Speaker 10>the most faithful to my wife. And this is the problem.

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:04.020
<v Speaker 10>Oftentimes when we talk about blackness. It is defined within

0:56:04.060 --> 0:56:06.540
<v Speaker 10>a context of negativity.

0:56:06.860 --> 0:56:07.970
<v Speaker 2>And even the fact... I don't think.

0:56:08.160 --> 0:56:10.270
<v Speaker 1>So first Joe said... Joe didn't just say, I'm the

0:56:10.310 --> 0:56:12.290
<v Speaker 1>blackest nigga you know. He said, I'm black.

0:56:12.630 --> 0:56:12.910
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:56:12.930 --> 0:56:14.650
<v Speaker 1>Then he said, I'm the blackest nigga you know.

0:56:14.670 --> 0:56:14.850
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:56:14.930 --> 0:56:15.570
<v Speaker 2>And let's be clear.

0:56:15.610 --> 0:56:18.009
<v Speaker 1>And he's not actually saying it in a negative connotation.

0:56:18.050 --> 0:56:20.600
<v Speaker 1>He's talking about being down for the culture.

0:56:22.020 --> 0:56:23.759
<v Speaker 10>Part of what Joe Crack is saying is like, look,

0:56:23.820 --> 0:56:26.100
<v Speaker 10>I was running through the Bronx doing what I was doing.

0:56:26.600 --> 0:56:28.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm putting it in its proper context.

0:56:28.520 --> 0:56:32.400
<v Speaker 1>But you can't properly contextualize it when that's not what

0:56:32.420 --> 0:56:33.580
<v Speaker 1>he said.

0:56:33.620 --> 0:56:36.700
<v Speaker 7>Joe's not separate from the culture. He's in the culture.

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:41.140
<v Speaker 7>He's Afro-Latino. We're stretching the Afro.

0:56:41.180 --> 0:56:42.160
<v Speaker 2>No, we're not.

0:56:42.680 --> 0:56:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Not at all. I cite my source because Joe himself

0:56:45.820 --> 0:56:49.320
<v Speaker 1>has said his dad is Afro-Cuban. You got a DNA

0:56:49.340 --> 0:56:50.779
<v Speaker 1>you want to run that we don't know about, though?

0:56:51.239 --> 0:56:52.300
<v Speaker 2>No, you go ahead.

0:56:52.400 --> 0:56:59.930
<v Speaker 7>The domestic violence is not the end of black people.

0:57:00.410 --> 0:57:04.069
<v Speaker 7>The transatlantic slave trade was from the Caribbean all the

0:57:04.110 --> 0:57:04.609
<v Speaker 7>way up.

0:57:05.150 --> 0:57:07.609
<v Speaker 2>Whether it was on, I don't know, Cuba, Hispano. I mean,

0:57:07.989 --> 0:57:08.950
<v Speaker 2>it's all of that.

0:57:09.190 --> 0:57:11.930
<v Speaker 4>Most black folk went to Brazil.

0:57:11.969 --> 0:57:14.310
<v Speaker 7>More blacks down in Africa. So when we get narrow

0:57:14.330 --> 0:57:15.870
<v Speaker 7>and say, well, he's not part of black culture. No,

0:57:15.890 --> 0:57:17.270
<v Speaker 7>he is a part of the black culture.

0:57:17.860 --> 0:57:19.580
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I agree with that. I'm saying if he's black,

0:57:20.000 --> 0:57:21.260
<v Speaker 4>then he's got the right to say it. But let

0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:21.860
<v Speaker 4>me tell you this.

0:57:22.360 --> 0:57:24.380
<v Speaker 6>If he weren't, if he weren't, if he were a

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:26.300
<v Speaker 6>Latino who didn't have that black culture.

0:57:26.720 --> 0:57:27.180
<v Speaker 2>No, bro.

0:57:27.260 --> 0:57:29.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't care how many. Look, did y'all ever see

0:57:30.400 --> 0:57:32.560
<v Speaker 4>the series Curb Your Enthusiasm?

0:57:32.640 --> 0:57:32.900
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:57:32.940 --> 0:57:36.400
<v Speaker 6>Remember when the black guy says to Larry David, are

0:57:36.440 --> 0:57:39.660
<v Speaker 6>you my nigga? What does Larry David say? First of all,

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 6>he know not to say, yeah, I'm your nigga. He says, yeah,

0:57:43.180 --> 0:57:46.950
<v Speaker 6>are you my Caucasian? because he understood that that was

0:57:47.010 --> 0:57:48.930
<v Speaker 6>a limit. And I'm saying, why are we making this

0:57:48.950 --> 0:57:51.590
<v Speaker 6>more complicated than it is? White folk, for the most part,

0:57:52.210 --> 0:57:55.030
<v Speaker 6>in public space, do not say that word because the

0:57:55.110 --> 0:57:59.150
<v Speaker 6>stigma associated with it has revealed Black people's ability to

0:57:59.230 --> 0:58:01.880
<v Speaker 6>take back a word that white folks said and flip

0:58:01.910 --> 0:58:03.890
<v Speaker 6>it around. Now, I get the fact that you say,

0:58:03.930 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 6>why do we spend all that time doing that? We

0:58:05.780 --> 0:58:07.620
<v Speaker 6>should be doing other stuff. We can eat and chew

0:58:07.660 --> 0:58:10.220
<v Speaker 6>gum and spit and do things at the same time.

0:58:10.260 --> 0:58:11.200
<v Speaker 4>It's not either or.

0:58:11.260 --> 0:58:13.540
<v Speaker 6>We can talk about niggas, and we can talk about

0:58:13.560 --> 0:58:18.060
<v Speaker 6>getting PhDs and doctorates and attorneys and entrepreneurs and working

0:58:18.100 --> 0:58:19.420
<v Speaker 6>at the Heritage Foundation.

0:58:19.480 --> 0:58:22.340
<v Speaker 4>Jesus. And being able to do all of that at

0:58:22.380 --> 0:58:22.960
<v Speaker 4>the same time.

0:58:23.000 --> 0:58:27.520
<v Speaker 3>That's the ad hominem attack. Did we really?

0:58:27.600 --> 0:58:29.180
<v Speaker 4>Jesus, the Lord of salvation.

0:58:29.220 --> 0:58:30.919
<v Speaker 3>Did we really take the word back, though?

0:58:31.100 --> 0:58:31.180
<v Speaker 11>No.

0:58:31.220 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:32.700
<v Speaker 8>Because if we took it back, why do we get

0:58:32.760 --> 0:58:34.570
<v Speaker 8>offended when we hear other people say it, even if

0:58:34.590 --> 0:58:35.890
<v Speaker 8>they're using it in its proper context?

0:58:35.950 --> 0:58:36.250
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:58:36.270 --> 0:58:36.590
<v Speaker 2>There you go.

0:58:36.670 --> 0:58:37.330
<v Speaker 4>I can answer that.

0:58:37.370 --> 0:58:39.810
<v Speaker 1>That's not their, it's not their word. So on that.

0:58:39.850 --> 0:58:40.490
<v Speaker 2>Can I say one more thing?

0:58:40.530 --> 0:58:40.910
<v Speaker 4>Yes, sir.

0:58:41.130 --> 0:58:43.690
<v Speaker 8>You know, another thing that happens in that clip, I

0:58:43.710 --> 0:58:46.919
<v Speaker 8>don't like when people use the word nigga and black

0:58:46.960 --> 0:58:49.040
<v Speaker 8>as if they're synonymous with each.

0:58:48.960 --> 0:58:49.340
<v Speaker 3>Other, right?

0:58:49.660 --> 0:58:51.600
<v Speaker 8>Because the thing I used to hate the most, and

0:58:51.640 --> 0:58:53.680
<v Speaker 8>y'all can explain this to me because y'all really, really

0:58:53.700 --> 0:58:55.340
<v Speaker 8>came up in that era. In the 90s when they

0:58:55.360 --> 0:58:57.460
<v Speaker 8>would say Bill Clinton was the first black president.

0:58:57.740 --> 0:58:59.340
<v Speaker 3>Why? Because he got some head and smoked some weed?

0:59:00.100 --> 0:59:01.910
<v Speaker 2>And played saxophone.

0:59:01.930 --> 0:59:03.530
<v Speaker 3>That's the reason they used to say it.

0:59:03.570 --> 0:59:05.110
<v Speaker 6>Toni Morrison is the one who came up for it

0:59:05.130 --> 0:59:07.290
<v Speaker 6>in the New Yorker magazine. She was talking about how

0:59:07.330 --> 0:59:11.200
<v Speaker 6>he was being demonized, how he was being misrepresented. as

0:59:11.360 --> 0:59:14.760
<v Speaker 6>despite all of his achievements, he was still being reduced.

0:59:14.800 --> 0:59:18.260
<v Speaker 3>But demonized for what? Getting ahead.

0:59:18.620 --> 0:59:19.940
<v Speaker 4>And not ahead of him.

0:59:19.980 --> 0:59:23.740
<v Speaker 6>That was simultaneous convergence of incidental facts.

0:59:25.240 --> 0:59:28.110
<v Speaker 4>She was talking about this head, not that one, okay?

0:59:28.410 --> 0:59:29.730
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying.

0:59:29.930 --> 0:59:33.030
<v Speaker 1>I think chronologically, didn't she write that piece before all

0:59:33.050 --> 0:59:35.510
<v Speaker 1>the stuff happened with the Monica Lewinsky?

0:59:35.570 --> 0:59:38.510
<v Speaker 4>I think she was. I don't know.

0:59:38.570 --> 0:59:39.970
<v Speaker 2>We got to get that source.

0:59:40.170 --> 0:59:41.090
<v Speaker 1>I need to cite that source.

0:59:41.130 --> 0:59:42.570
<v Speaker 9>I just want to say this is why the history

0:59:42.590 --> 0:59:45.190
<v Speaker 9>is so important. There's an attack on black history right now.

0:59:45.210 --> 0:59:45.650
<v Speaker 4>It's true.

0:59:46.810 --> 0:59:49.320
<v Speaker 9>And this is why black history needs to be taught

0:59:49.360 --> 0:59:51.820
<v Speaker 9>so that those kids, they can make a choice. You know,

0:59:51.840 --> 0:59:53.400
<v Speaker 9>you're talking about people, they don't even have a choice.

0:59:53.680 --> 0:59:55.840
<v Speaker 9>I don't think you can reclaim if you don't know

0:59:55.880 --> 0:59:58.800
<v Speaker 9>the claim, right? So you have to actually know where

0:59:58.820 --> 1:00:02.930
<v Speaker 9>that history came from, have conversations about where the roots

1:00:02.970 --> 1:00:04.330
<v Speaker 9>of the word, you know.

1:00:04.370 --> 1:00:05.950
<v Speaker 2>Who's using it, why they're using it.

1:00:06.770 --> 1:00:10.970
<v Speaker 9>And bring that into, before people hear the hip hop, 10, 11,

1:00:10.970 --> 1:00:13.710
<v Speaker 9>12 years old, they can actually make a real decision.

1:00:13.750 --> 1:00:16.830
<v Speaker 9>Like I always talk about sex before sex education. You

1:00:16.850 --> 1:00:18.670
<v Speaker 9>think people aren't going to get pregnant if they don't

1:00:18.710 --> 1:00:20.709
<v Speaker 9>talk about sex. You think they're not going to start

1:00:21.210 --> 1:00:23.410
<v Speaker 9>engaging with this word if we don't talk about it,

1:00:23.410 --> 1:00:26.130
<v Speaker 9>but they need to understand the roots of this history.

1:00:26.150 --> 1:00:27.410
<v Speaker 2>And that's what we're- Well, Dr.

1:00:27.510 --> 1:00:29.630
<v Speaker 6>Smith, to your point, Dr. Smith in his book talks

1:00:29.650 --> 1:00:34.320
<v Speaker 6>about the difference between reappropriation and reclamation. Because reappropriation is

1:00:34.360 --> 1:00:37.620
<v Speaker 6>for people who- We're not the intended original source of that.

1:00:37.900 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 6>And difference, we're saying nigga, not nigger. We're acting as

1:00:41.820 --> 1:00:45.070
<v Speaker 6>if we're not making a terminological and etymological derivation that

1:00:45.190 --> 1:00:50.590
<v Speaker 6>signifies the black intent of a particular phrase. Talking about Kendrick,

1:00:50.930 --> 1:00:54.670
<v Speaker 6>when he says, I feel uncomfortable when Drake uses the

1:00:54.730 --> 1:00:55.390
<v Speaker 6>term nigga.

1:00:55.470 --> 1:00:57.130
<v Speaker 4>I feel uncomfortable when you do that. I get that.

1:00:57.370 --> 1:00:58.590
<v Speaker 4>Not too much on Kendrick.

1:00:58.670 --> 1:01:00.070
<v Speaker 1>Oh, wow.

1:01:01.660 --> 1:01:05.610
<v Speaker 6>Cite the source, a biased person who is prejudiced against Drake.

1:01:05.930 --> 1:01:10.150
<v Speaker 6>But when Drake says light skin is still a dark nigga,

1:01:10.490 --> 1:01:14.610
<v Speaker 6>his daddy is from Memphis, his grandmama babysat Aretha Franklin,

1:01:14.630 --> 1:01:18.750
<v Speaker 6>he spent time with black people in Memphis and inculcated

1:01:18.770 --> 1:01:19.330
<v Speaker 6>that culture.

1:01:19.370 --> 1:01:20.990
<v Speaker 4>And all I'm saying at the end of the day.

1:01:21.030 --> 1:01:22.890
<v Speaker 1>And he was on stage with Backstreet Boys at his

1:01:22.910 --> 1:01:23.470
<v Speaker 1>40th birthday.

1:01:23.490 --> 1:01:25.700
<v Speaker 3>But wait a minute.

1:01:26.160 --> 1:01:27.500
<v Speaker 4>And Kendrick defended.

1:01:28.350 --> 1:01:31.350
<v Speaker 6>Iggy Azalea, when black people were trying to say she

1:01:31.390 --> 1:01:34.550
<v Speaker 6>was ripping off the culture. She's literally from a colonizing country,

1:01:34.790 --> 1:01:37.090
<v Speaker 6>but Drake is a colonizer because he's a black man.

1:01:37.150 --> 1:01:40.070
<v Speaker 6>All I'm saying is, we make arbitrary distinctions, and Charlamagne

1:01:40.090 --> 1:01:43.240
<v Speaker 6>is right here. Sometimes black people mean by that word, nigga,

1:01:43.280 --> 1:01:45.980
<v Speaker 6>just what white people mean. Yeah. But sometimes they don't.

1:01:46.260 --> 1:01:49.400
<v Speaker 6>And so it's the complicated convergence of the simultaneity that

1:01:49.440 --> 1:01:50.140
<v Speaker 6>has to be dealt with.

1:01:50.160 --> 1:01:50.939
<v Speaker 3>You know what Doc said?

1:01:51.060 --> 1:01:53.030
<v Speaker 8>You said grandma's somebody, baby's out of River Franklin, somebody

1:01:53.050 --> 1:01:53.840
<v Speaker 8>across the side just saw us.

1:01:53.860 --> 1:01:54.250
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:02:00.140 --> 1:02:04.660
<v Speaker 6>Michael Eric Dyson talking to Drake's daddy, okay?

1:02:05.260 --> 1:02:07.160
<v Speaker 4>And it's also in Complex Magazine.

1:02:07.490 --> 1:02:09.950
<v Speaker 1>Well, I am so grateful to you all today. This

1:02:09.990 --> 1:02:13.250
<v Speaker 1>has been an incredible conversation. Audience, I don't know where

1:02:13.270 --> 1:02:17.170
<v Speaker 1>y'all stand now, but hopefully you have reached a conclusion

1:02:17.250 --> 1:02:19.590
<v Speaker 1>about if you're gonna use the N-word. How many of

1:02:19.640 --> 1:02:25.700
<v Speaker 1>you all use the N-word? Raise your hands. I was just, oh, four, five, sometimes.

1:02:26.050 --> 1:02:28.690
<v Speaker 1>And then has your mind changed? Will you continue to

1:02:28.790 --> 1:02:29.350
<v Speaker 1>use the N-word?

1:02:29.370 --> 1:02:29.430
<v Speaker 3>No.

1:02:29.830 --> 1:02:31.650
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not. No, it hasn't changed?

1:02:32.250 --> 1:02:32.690
<v Speaker 5>No. Okay.

1:02:32.970 --> 1:02:37.750
<v Speaker 1>Please join me in thanking today's incredible panelists, Liz Pryor,

1:02:37.910 --> 1:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Eric Dyson, Leonard McKelvey, Derek Johnson, Jordan Pierre, and

1:02:42.620 --> 1:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Delano Squires. We're so grateful for y'all. So today we

1:02:45.260 --> 1:02:48.300
<v Speaker 1>discussed three claims. One, the N-word is associated with the

1:02:48.340 --> 1:02:52.060
<v Speaker 1>most painful aspects of black history. Yes, that is true.

1:02:52.490 --> 1:02:54.750
<v Speaker 1>The N-word is not only a relic of black trauma,

1:02:54.870 --> 1:02:58.430
<v Speaker 1>but it is still terrorizing some people today. Number two,

1:02:58.470 --> 1:03:01.470
<v Speaker 1>the N-word is derived from the Amharic word nagus, which

1:03:01.530 --> 1:03:04.810
<v Speaker 1>means king, no. This is not true. We love you, Kendrick,

1:03:05.150 --> 1:03:09.330
<v Speaker 1>and appreciate your desire to redefine and reclaim. But historically,

1:03:09.650 --> 1:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the N-word was never intended to describe black people as royalty.

1:03:12.820 --> 1:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>That was especially for you, Doc. Number three, it is

1:03:15.520 --> 1:03:18.780
<v Speaker 1>socially acceptable for white people and individuals of other racial

1:03:18.820 --> 1:03:21.380
<v Speaker 1>backgrounds to say the N-word. Don't even let Chris Rock

1:03:21.400 --> 1:03:24.230
<v Speaker 1>tell you this. No, at least not according to Pew Research,

1:03:24.290 --> 1:03:27.790
<v Speaker 1>and more than 70% of Americans agree that white people

1:03:27.870 --> 1:03:30.530
<v Speaker 1>should never say it. For most of us, it is

1:03:30.570 --> 1:03:33.470
<v Speaker 1>a slur no matter the intent. We are not a monolith, though.

1:03:33.740 --> 1:03:36.660
<v Speaker 1>Our experiences with this word differ, and certainly whether we

1:03:36.740 --> 1:03:39.540
<v Speaker 1>use nigga or the n-word, I will tell y'all I'm

1:03:39.560 --> 1:03:42.340
<v Speaker 1>wrestling with my own hypocrisy on this word. I can

1:03:42.380 --> 1:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>say that one day I pray that it finally rests

1:03:44.940 --> 1:03:48.580
<v Speaker 1>in peace. Remember, knowledge is power, and on Cite Your Source,

1:03:48.620 --> 1:03:50.780
<v Speaker 1>we put that power back into the hands of the people.

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Please subscribe to Cite Your Source on YouTube, engage with

1:03:53.480 --> 1:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>us on social media, and share with somebody. Until next time,

1:03:56.580 --> 1:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Angela Rye. This is Cite Your Source.

1:04:03.700 --> 1:04:04.010
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.