WEBVTT - Teammate Battles

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>advice Leagues dot Com. Here's your host. Welcome to Fantasy

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly, another preseason edition. This is episode five, year

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>number twenty six for Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Giarchi and my coast today are Scott Fish and Matt Harrison. Hello, guys, Hey, hey,

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.959
<v Speaker 1>it's we're only we're less than two weeks away from

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the start of the season, and they're so little news

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>without the preseason games and with limited access to practices

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>walk throughs. Uh. It's it's it's just a different world.

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And I get the feeling we're gonna be so wrong

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>on so many things in week one. You know, I

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>think normally we've got a reasonably good read. On week

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be Frisman Jackson everywhere. That's exactly right. And

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it maybe it's okay to be wrong. Who's the Cowboys read?

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that our listeners think it's okay for

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>us to be wrong. Wrong. I meant they're wrong, not us. Yeah,

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we won't be wrong about anything ever. On this show,

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we go through the news from around the league at

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the outset of all these preseason shows, and this is

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>when we're trying to take little nuggets and gleaning little

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>things from on site reporters and try to figure things

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>out without the preseason games so we can normally use

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to get a better read on things. It is more challenging,

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>but we're up to the task. Beginning with the Panthers,

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt The Panthers held an inter squad scrimmage that's hard

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to say inter squad scrimmage on Tuesday. The only touchdown

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in the game was a Bridgewater fade route into the

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>end zone to slot receiver Christian McCaffrey. Yeah, alright, Christian

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey lined up in the slot on that play. They're

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be lining him up everywhere on the field

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>this year. One point zero one in every draft, it's

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey. It's uh, it's pretty universal right now. Smith,

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>John H. Smith. I respect that do Gardner Minshew things

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>taken off. There are people doing it skyrocket, But here's

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>the thing. If you're doing it in a free league,

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>don't bother tweeting me. It's gutless tweet me the picture,

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the photo of you of your draft room with you

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>taking Gardner Minshew and your hundred dollar entry fee. There

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we go. Now we're talking. I think they're only giving

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>away like two cases of beer for this too, So

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a sweepsticks still right now, they are giving a

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>lifetime a year's supply away if you win your league

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>with it, if you how many how many people? A

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are going to do that. You know

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>they can't. They're gonna be thousands of people that do that.

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>You could rig your free league to make sure you went.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>It's probably just one they probably probably, I'm sure they Anyway,

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the Las Vegas Raiders. Uh, Tyrrelle Williams

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>torn labor. He's gonna try to play through it. But

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I've had one and it can't imagine trying to play

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>through that and catch footballs, especially reaching up to grab football's.

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Um and Nelson l z Jones are supposedly in great

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>shape and in football somehow. That's the real news is

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're still in football. Um, I think Tyroll Williams

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is undraftable, and I think, oh yeah, he's slid down

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to maybe the seventies or eighties in my rankings. Probably, Yeah, really,

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I wasted your time because all three. We can talk

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about that Raiders wide receiver position later.

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>The Packers album was already is surging with big catches

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and practice and is sewn away the number two receiving job.

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>He's being vastly underdrafted right now. His average draft position

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>is one seventy five. And you've got a for sure

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>number two. Yeah, for sure number two. Aaron Rodgers has

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>got some miles loft. Don him. It's it's it seems odd.

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Washington football team at Ben Standig

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Athletics says that Bryce Love is not a

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>lock to make the roster and has been running with

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the second and third team in practice. Man who is

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>on the first team, I think I read that is

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>he's not a lot to be active on game days

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>if they only start three. But either way, Adrian Peterson

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>is splitting reps with Antonio Gibson with the first team

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. Second team leader j D. Mcksucker, j D mcsucking,

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I will be stunned if he ends up being a

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>material part of this offense. He's ahead of Bryce Love

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 1>right now. Well, I've always there starter as the thirty

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>six year old, so you might you might be Adrian

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Peterson's basically he's almost free in league. Nobody's taking him,

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna be one of those guys where you

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>draft him and suddenly you've got a flex player that

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you can start every week. He's gonna get seven touchdowns.

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to Let's go to Buffalo Scott

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.559
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen hoping to run less often, which is something

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>fantasy owners loved. He he's mostly especially after you ran

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>for nine touchdowns last year nine times. There it is there,

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it is the colt head coach Frank Right, there's more

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>singletary battling, a bunch of fumbling issues and uh, Zack, really,

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't say Church is okay? With that interruption? That's

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the lead story. Why would you not have Jack Moss

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>news first alight standing rule for this show going forward

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>if you have good Zack Moss News Smiths or John

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Smith News right to the top of the show, right

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to the open cold said coach. Frank Wright says that

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>tight end will be a really really important dynamics. I

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted you to do your Frank Reich voice again. It

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>sounded so really important dynamic for the team's offense. Yes,

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>apparently he's marble mouse. Jack Doyle is you're likely starter.

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Trey Burton could play the Eric Ebron. Remember Burton Reich

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>we're together in Philadelphia, so they have a little bit

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of shared history there. Let's go to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin returned from missing three straight practices earlier in

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the week, and if you're drafting a kicker, watch out

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>for the Tampa situation. Right now. Elliott Fry and Matt

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Gay are locked in a battle. The winner will be

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>part of a good offense and probably be a really

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>good kicker. But you might not want to draft them yet.

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>You might want to pick them up after it's decided. Yeah,

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay scored the fourth most points in the NFL

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>last year. You know whoever ends up kicking for them,

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's more about opportunity. It's a top

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>five kicker no matter who wins. But we don't know

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna win. Let's go to the Cleveland Brown Scott

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb in concussion protocol, but it's a way un

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>till the season, so he should be fine. He'll be fine.

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs general manager Brett Veach says that Clyde Edwards

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a laire is quote on pace to have a big

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>year to be our primary ball carrier. Hell yeah, baby,

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what I want to hear. Even at this time

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of year when everybody's lying, I don't care because that

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>fits my personal theress and I want information bias. Absolutely,

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the Detroit Lions. Man. The running back

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>situation is a little bit messy right now. DeAndre Swift

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>was held out of practice Tuesday and Thursday, and the

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>reasons were not disclosed. He did practice in a limited

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>fashion on Wednesday, but carry on, Johnson's wearing a knee

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>brace for confidence reasons, and even both Scarborough is limited

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to practice right now. It's a little dicey in that

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>running back room. The New York Jets Scott, multiple Beat reporters,

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and Adam Gates have all said that Frank Gore is

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the best back in camp. But god, let's come to this,

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>but watch out, watch out case traded for his boy,

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Kalin Blage. How about everybody's reporting the Dolphins are going

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to just drop Palin Blage and Adam Gates coast whoa whoa, whoa, whoa.

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I will give you draft picks my beer. What the

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>war the Rams. Last week we talked about Josh Reynolds

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>holding off Van Jefferson, but this is a fluid situation.

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>This week now Van Jefferson is getting so much praise

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and getting run with the first team offense, and from

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>time to time this could be a developing situation. And

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe for the time being, you can't draft either Van

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson or Josh Reynolds. But I still think start of

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the season Josh Reynolds. By the end of the season

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Van Jefferson. Let's go to the Seattle Seahawks. Matt Little

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 1>running back news. Chris Carson returned to camp after resolving

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>some personal matters. But Pete Carroll, Oh, let me do

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>my Pete Carroll impression here. He said that, Hello, Gavna

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Carloside will be a big factor. What I thought that

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>was dead on Scott The Denver Broncos Vick van Jo

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>after a couple of weeks ago saying that Melvin Gordon

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>would be the lead back of the committee. Now he says,

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:04.719
<v Speaker 1>not so shure. I'd like I think we're in a

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>position where we don't have a starter. I think that's

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>closer to correct, to be honest. Uh, let's so, what's next, Oh,

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it's me the Vikings. Ola b C. Johnson looks like

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you're opening day starter, opposite Adam Feeling. When asked about

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jefferson's development, Kirk Cousins migrated the conversation over to

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Ola B. C. Johnson, who he described as having maybe

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>the best training camp of anyone on the team. And

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>now Justin Jefferson has been fine, but b. C. Johnson

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>has been in the system for a year. It's a

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>big advantage this season. I think your opening day, your

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>opening day starter is going to be Ola B. C.

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Johnson at wide receiver for the Vikings. Philadelphia Eagles matt

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>left tackle Andre Dillard suffered a torn biceps during Thursday's practice.

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>He's out for the season. Luckily, they resigned former left

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>tackle Jason Peters to play guard. He's gonna slot over

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to left tackle now, and Isaac see Malu becomes the

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>new left card All right, and to the New England Patriots,

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Scott Nearly everyone involved watching the Patriots practices, says day

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 1>Damian Harris is standing out like a Zach Moss type

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>player at this, let's not get carried away zat Moss.

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>But Davis, he's your He's gonna be your starter, and

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be the Andes Sony Michelle. Yeah, he's put

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in work with Michelle out. I'm glad to hear that.

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>For the Steelers wide receiver, rookie wide receiver Chase Claypool

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>looks fantastic, drawing rave reviews, which could be trouble for

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody when they've got all these other receivers that want

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to get fed the ball. If Claypool ends up making

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>an impact and getting into some some first team wraps,

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>who knows, somebody's gonna be the odd man out. And

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I've talked before I get I get a little bit

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>worried about Maybe we'll talk more about that later. Dallas

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Matt both starting tackles for the Cowboys are dealing

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>with injury. Tyron Smith was limited on Thursday with a

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injury. L Collins has been sitting out after a

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>hard crash beat Reporters expect both to be ready by

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Week one. Scott Tennessee Titans. This one's short Ryan Tannehill.

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 1>The Derrick Henry has been working on his pass catching

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and Tannehill sleazy looks really good and really confident catching it. Now, Yeah,

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean if if Henry is gonna catch, if he adds, yeah,

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.599
<v Speaker 1>if he he catches fifty passes, he's she should be

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the first player taking in the draft. Probably forty is

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>almost every wide receiver has heard Kendrick Borne is basically

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 1>the last man standing there. Um. The team has turned

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to wash outs like Kevin White for depth, but the

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>hope is closer to the first game of the season,

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>they'll start getting some guys back. Kendrick Borne might be

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a sneaky pick up for you could do a Deebo

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Samuel super late because he's he's going got drafted at

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>this stage because of people worried about the Liz Frank right,

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>So you could do Deebo Samuel really late and then

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>last pick your draft Kendrick Borne, and you've got a

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco starting wide receiver. They think Deebo is gonna

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>be ready for week one now they're they say, sprinting

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>hard and practice and there's lots of good signs on debot.

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I hope. So, but you know, these Liz Frank injuries,

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>We've seen this thing go three surgeries deep. So it's

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>just my wife's had one for two years. Yeah, it's

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it is. She doesn't play for the forty Niners right now.

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>She's on the wide receiver death chart somewhere, somebody is Matt.

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Giant. Rookie safety Xavier McKinney underwent

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>surgery on a broken left foot, hopeful to return in

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>late November, and see Kwon Barkley limped off the field

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, didn't finish practice, but has been back practicing

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>later in the week. But he did get a little

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>dinged up in practice. We'll hope he fin I assume

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he's fine. Cincinnati Bengal Scott Joe Mixon has been missing

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>practice due to what Zach Taylor says. He thinks his migraines.

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting in a contract, how you not know? But yeah,

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly the point. He was threatening contract told out

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and he's missing practices. Uh a j Greenback and Joe

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Burrow is looking lights out in two minute drills. Yeah,

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow is going to be legit. I'm confident think

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>he breaks seven. Baker may feel session record. I kind

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of want to bet the over. I think I kind

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of do too. I kind of do too, Ravens J K.

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Dobbins turning heads in almost every practice. He's expecting to

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>have a significant early role. I don't think we're gonna

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>have to wait for him to get a lot of

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of run here. I think he presses mark

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>ingram for time, um really fairly early in the season.

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards is going to be the odd man out

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of this deal, almost certainly at lint of Falcons, Matt, Oh,

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to try another impersonation of offensive coordinator Dirt Cutter.

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>You're ready, yes, hi hole, this is Dirk Cutter. I

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>want Todd Gurwey to get at least fifteen touches per

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>game this year. Is that good? That was a Kermit

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the Frog. That was not No, that was totally Dirk Cutter.

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>That was a Kermit the Frog. I'm pretty sure Dirk

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Cutter says hi ho every time he meets Yeah. Lakwan

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Treadwell also has a bad case of the drops, according

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to the Falcons website, So who does I'm sorry, Lakwan Treadwell. No,

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's gonna make the roster. No, all

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>that's so bold? Oh, No, Scott the Chargers. Mike Williams

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 1>could miss the season open or with the shoulder spring

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and Josh Kelly has been looking really good, my sleeper

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>from two weeks ago. Uh, they now think he has

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the edge for the number two jobs. I think that's

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>going to be the case right now. Mike Williams is

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>hard to draft at all at this stage. Um, and

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I realized he may he may even be ready for

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the opener, but he was already a touchdown dependent guy

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>who's g gives you really hot. Average depth of targets

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>like almost twenty tyrods is like nine. Yeah, that's a

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>bad fit. Yeah, and we're nervous about that for sure.

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's our last. We have two teams left, and they're

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>both Mats. The Cardinals. Kenyan Drake has been held out

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of practice with a foot injury and was seen in

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a walking boot earlier in the week. Oh, Chase Edmonds

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>getting all of the first team loving right now? I

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's I think Chase is gonna get way more

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>work than people. And then how about David Montgomery for

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bears who slipped while carrying the rock and practice.

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>They're calling it a strained groin and saying he's expected

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to be out two to four weeks. That does give

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>him an outside shot of being ready for opening Day. Also,

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Adam Hogue of NBC Sports that it looks like Nick

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Foles is pulling away from Mitch Rubinsky. Yeah. You know

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the thing with David Montgomery and this groin injury, if

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you bring him back, you know, groin injuries and running

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>backs terrible combination and easily something that could end up

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>being a ren aggravation to the injury if you're bringing

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>back too soon. They have virtually no depth at the

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>position because three cones not gonna you know, He's not

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Maybe it might be Cordell Patterson or Spencer Ware,

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>remember Naggie and Spencer Ware, but his together, I know,

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'd rather where on my team. I

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>think at this day, well they could Jackson Jacks want picks.

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's maybe that's what they end up doing here.

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>When we come back this weekend, tons of drafts and auctions.

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>You will get advice from all of us for draft

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and auction day. This is a huge week for them.

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Coming up next Fantasy Football Weekly, Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Paul church In, Scott Fish and Matt Harrison with you.

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a huge weekend for drafts, auctions all this week. Really,

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>we've got only two weeks left to get in your

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>draft and auction, so this is this is a biggie,

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>probably the most popular week. So let's spend a little

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of time just giving draft day advice, whether it's

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a draft or an auction, the kind of advice that

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to do that people should hear as they're

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>heading in to their drafts and they're trying to maximize

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it the most. You know, the two hours you're gonna

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>spend in this draft. You gotta live with these decisions

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>all year long. This is awfully important. Let's make sure

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to get it right. Scott. Let's begin with you. I

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>know that you, like me, prefer the auction or the draft.

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna focus largely on auction related advice. I've got

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a smack, I got a little everything over. What do

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about? First? I was upset you

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>had that nineteen percent question last week on three tough questions. Yeah,

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the question last week was is it a viable auction

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>strategy to not spend more than nine percent of your

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>budget on any one player this particular year? Did you

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>know My first ever article when I entered this industry

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for full time was a full article on auction strategy,

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and my main talking point was never spend over fifteen percent?

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So have you lived by that? I? I have lived

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>by that, except for in bank roll leagues because they're

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a little different, but you know, there are different types,

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>but in all other ones, I've absolutely lived by it.

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Auctions are so fluid that I love the hard cap

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of a in a two dollar auction, when a player

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>gets to thirty dollars, I'm just out. I'm out. And

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this year I wanted to focus on it this year,

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>especially because it's so dang deep. But you don't have

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to spend over thirty on anyone. Let everyone waste their

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>money and is my long hard standing rule. So that's

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>tip one on and you know what, to me, I

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>couldn't live with that every year, but this year in

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the deepest draft I've ever seen, Yeah, having money and

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>at the one hour mark of your auction is a

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>really good spot to be in. It's pretty nice to

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>run the board late an auction, is it ever? It's empowering.

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>It's like the best feeling when everybody's just scrambling and going, oh, please,

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>don't take this guy for two exactly when you can

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>control the board, it's a It is a lot of

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>power you don't ever normally have. It's like if you

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.199
<v Speaker 1>were in a draft and you had every pick in

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the twelfth round of your draft. Yeah, well, to me,

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel like the twelveth round. It feels like

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the seventh round. One thing that that hard limit does

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and if you can stick to it, which you should,

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it keeps you from price price enforcing and gain stuck it. Uh.

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>It also keeps you avoids tilting. You're not gonna tilting. Yeah,

0:18:58.080 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>so it's a good point. It calms you down in

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.479
<v Speaker 1>an and I've seen I've seen people tilt where they

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>get in absolute and the next thing you know, you're

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>way over here there. They're probably doing it with you,

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 1>against you as they're looking at your cheat sheet and

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the action people knowing your strategy will bid thirty one

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>just to fight price yard. I don't care this has

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>happened to me because my cheat sheet is available for

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>free com and so I'm in an auction. People are

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.239
<v Speaker 1>holding my sheet and looking at me and raising my

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>bids because they've got my maximum in front of them.

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>They know what they know exactly what I think. I

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>blame Brian Oak. I think you should he said you've

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>done it to me before. Uh Matt from Draft Advice,

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>So I I kind of went all in on the

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>drafts and I just wanted to kind of go over

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>my Gainesville strategy again. The three five two that's the

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>area code of Gainesville, Florida. That's where it gets the name.

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Chart likes to call it undo the option. And someone

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>just tweeted us while we're talking about under the opposite,

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's catching off undo the opposite if

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>there's ever a year to undo the opposite. This. So

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the strategy dictates that you take running backs with your

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>first three picks, wide receivers with your next five, and

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>then two more running backs in rounds nine and ten.

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>That's the three five two um. So that means you

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>leave the first ten rounds with zero quarterbacks, zero tight ends,

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 1>five running backs, five wide receivers. And why would you

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>do this? The depth of the players at certain positions

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>is so weird this year. There's so many good deep quarterbacks,

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>there's so many good deep tight ends, and the wide

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>receivers and running backs in rounds four through eight. That's

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>what it's all about for me and this so get this.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Here are the running backs available in rounds four through eight.

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson, who I like, David Johnson, Levy on Bell,

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Raheem mostart mark Ingram, James Conner, Devin Singletary, David Montgomery.

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>There's lots of question marks there. But if you look

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>at the wide receivers that go in rounds four through eight,

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and only eleven wide receivers are going in the first

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>three rounds, It's A J. Brown, It's Cooper Cup, Allen Robinson,

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Adam Feeling, d J. Moore, Calvin Ridley, the list goes

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>on and on. It's absolutely insane the value you can

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>get in those middle rounds with wide receivers right now

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and come out with three stud wide receivers. And that's

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>why I want to keep doing the Gainesville the three

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>five tree to um. I think there's a lot of

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>too too with this this this particular year. It's the

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>way it works out, and we're really seeing running backs.

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Running backs are going hard and early, and if they're

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>they're they're tapping out faster than wide receiver. Buy a lot.

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>This particularly well and one more thing quarterback and tight

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>end easy to you can get at tight end in

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>round eleven Hayden Hurst, t J Hockenson, MIKESICKI, John U

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Smith Just stop at John. I got Gardner, Minshew and

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow in the fourth rounds of an IDP draft yesterday. Yeah,

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>well cut in half twelve team what quarterback like you

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>said Roethlisberger, Minshew, Cam Newton, Joe Burrow, Tannehill, Cousins like

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you can get. There's good quarterbacks, um, and I guess

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>my first bullet point on this discussion about what to do.

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Today's your draft day, your auction day. You're listening to

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the show getting prepped up. This is the year to

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>just try something new. Maybe it's what Matt just described,

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's something else. This is the deepest draft I've

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>ever been a part of. There are good players at

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>almost every stage of the draft. There are no bad

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>rounds in this one. You're going to find some of

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you can help you every spot of the draft, or

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>almost at any price point that you want in the auction.

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So everything can work. And I just encourage you to

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>be creative, try something new and different that you've always

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>wanted to try because this is the best year I've

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>ever seen to try something different. Chart is gonna try

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 1>getting running backs in the first period. It's weird. It

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:51.479
<v Speaker 1>is something you've never tried before. Never do that, Uh, Scott,

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>what have you got? Uh? Second auction tip here, Lalo

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is a great job, great one

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for this year. In it's the auction, don't even bid

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>for the a couple of days or in a live

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>auction first twenty or so players don't even bid. Or

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>if you do bid and you don't want to reveal

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing, bid make bids that you know have

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>no chance of winning. Just lay completely low all the

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>excitement at the start of an auction. People are spending

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>tons of money. Save it, okay, but don't be the

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 1>guy that throws out stay Kwon Barkley one dollar. No,

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Scott will throw him out for well, yes, what you

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 1>could do, because he's he's going to go for more

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>than you know. I but I hate I hate the

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>people to do that because it never go Now now,

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Sae Kwon Barkley, that should take thirty seconds to auction

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>off is going to take a minute a half. You know,

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>one person in an auction can fix that. When somebody

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 1>does the Sa kwan for one, you just go yeah,

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.479
<v Speaker 1>but nobody does because everybody's like, I might get him

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for three. Yeah, that never works. Let's be adults, uh correct.

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Go get your guys. It's auction day, it's draft day.

0:23:56.240 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Decide on who who you walk out there a year,

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>there are three or four guys that you really really

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>want on your team. Just go get him, don't. I

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>don't care. I don't care what the ADP says. You know,

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>let's I'll take mad it is. That's actually one of

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>my other bullet points. Austin Neckler is one of the

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>guys you like, I think you should. He should be

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>taken in the first round, ADP says the end of

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the second or the early third. Who cares, It's gonna

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>break your heart if you don't get Austin Neckler. Just

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.719
<v Speaker 1>go take him. Who cares about ADP? Identify your guys

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and go get them. You know Scott's Hays don't spend

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>more than in an auction. I feel like, well, I

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's a viable strategy and it's one you could

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>come away with a good team with. For me, if

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes is a guy you want on your team,

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Go get him or whoever it is, Go get your guys.

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine me the biggest thirty dollars on Kenny

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Golladay And I'm just like dying, man. I just I

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 1>hate it when I leave auctions and I didn't get

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>my guys. Go get your guys, especially in auctions. Yeah,

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the one time when you have a chance, you better, right, Scott,

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>you're focusing on draft day auction decisions. Yes, My My

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>next tip is attacked the middle. And it's not just

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>attacked the middle of the auction, which you absolutely should do.

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Attack the middle of an auction, but also the middle

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of tears. Yes, when the first player of a tear

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>hits the board, they start getting bit up, and generally

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>someone is trying to get their guy in that tier,

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>so they're paying more the last player of a tier.

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Super people get scared, they get super expensive. Attack the

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>middle of the auction and attack the middle of tears.

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some truth to that. I've gone to

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>do it. I've the worst auctions I've ever had have

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>employed this strategy. And here's my tip to you what

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>not to do. Don't go to an auction saying I'm

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>just gonna find value. I'm just gonna find guys I

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>think are under undervalued. The weird thing is value will

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>come to you if you do the auction right. I

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>think so do and you end up not getting your

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>guys again, back to this, You don't get your guys

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're just waiting for value and fishing for value.

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>The next thing you know, you've just got a bunch

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 1>of players that nobody wanted. Zack Moss is up for

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>bid right now in an auction, and Jonna Smith is

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>coming up right after him. I don't I know JOHNA.

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Smith's gonna get thrown out next because I'm gonna nominate

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>him right afterwards. Okay, are you really spending up on

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>those kind of guys that will you break the rule

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to go get guys? You know I wouldn't, not Johnny Smith,

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>But yeah I paid uh in a recent twenty man auction.

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I just paid fourteen for Zach for Zack Moss. You

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>know it's a twenty team auction, but sure, yeah, I

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>alluded to this earlier. Just have a fun team. I

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>think there's to me. I love I love having Patrick

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes on my team and Lamar Jackson on my team,

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>entire Hill on my team. Guys that are athletic specimens

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that when Patrick Mahomes goes back to pass and you

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>see him with that big wind up and the blood

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>starts pumping, anything could happen. You know, this thing, this

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>ball could go sixties seventy yards in the air and

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 1>cradle into the arms of Tyreek Hill. I love having

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>players where any time they touched the ball, something magical

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>could happen. Fun players make for a fun year, even

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>if you don't win the whole thing. Scott, You've got

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>more auction items. Sure, sure, this one's this one's a

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>little short. I called it this one. I am the law.

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>It's it's fun being Yeah, it's fun being judged dread.

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But just be careful not to get exiled to the

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>cursed earth. You don't want to price and force someone.

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>And if people don't know what price enforcing and no

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>auctions is is you're bidding up a player you don't

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>really want. You're just bidding them up to waste money

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>to get money out of other people. Um My, My

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 1>main point on that is, never make a bid that

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you are not okay winning that bid. It's hard. I mean,

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>it's really it's gutsy. It's gutsy. If it's gonna crush

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you that you ended up with that bit just because

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you're bidding somebody up. Don't don't make that bit. We've

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>all been in several auctions before. How many times have

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we been in an auction, made a bit of eighteen

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars a player and then just been absolutely relieved when

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody said nineteen, just like, oh thank god. Absolutely. Uh.

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're doing an online drafter auction and you're not

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the online drafter auction room, you know it's

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a new technology to you, it's a new website. Whatever,

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>go early, get situated. Understand how everything works, how you

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>make a selection, how you build a queue. Do a

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>mock on that site. Yes, go do a mock draft

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>on that site, so you learn the engine because you

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want technology to be an impediment. Well, you're on

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the clock and you're trying to figure out if I

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>should raise an auction bid or your your pick is

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>up in the draft and ESPN and Yahoo, which are

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>probably the two most popular things. ESPN recently changed their

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>auction room about a year ago. So if you haven't

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>played in a little while, it's gonna be a little

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>bit different. You can go do free mocks right on

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>their site at any time time. Yeah. And by the way,

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the technology for those auction rooms, auctioning is hard. It's

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>really hard that Yes, Be and Yahoo have done an

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>amazing job with their auction rooms. They're really really good.

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>They're both good. They just move things sometimes you don't

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>know where they are. Got. Uh. Next tip for auctions, Uh,

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>take notes. And I'm not talking about like in college

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>taking tons of note. It's like that kind of thing

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about. When you wit a player, take note.

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>If someone was bidding hard against you, put a note

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>by that player. This guy really wanted this player. Um.

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Same with if you see someone who gets obviously stuck

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>with a player, you might be able to get him

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>on the cheap. Just a couple of brief notes to

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>take while you're while you're doing an auction, Can I

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>give you I don't want to steal? Well if you

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>if you I'm gonna, I've got an auction. Yeah, well

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I have one more, but you're not gonna. It won't hit.

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Every year I write down all of the auction values

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>for every player. So when s Kwon Barkley goes for

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>forty one. Write down forty one next his name. Then

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the next year I go back and I look so

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that I can see in this group of people. Here

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is how this this group tends to lean. You know,

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they run running backs heavy, and I know that the

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>high end running backs are going to go for forty

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>one because I've got years of I look back for years,

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I go years of data. Here's what this, this is

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>what this up. It is good prep and so I

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>can you really can get a feel for and I'm

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>telling you it largely holds true year after year. People

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>just are who they are. Wow. So it actually ended

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>up kind of stealing my last note. And just if

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you're in a new auction league, every auction is super different.

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So looking at previous years and current auction values as

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.719
<v Speaker 1>a tool is okay, but be prepared for the auction

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to drastically change. Unless you're in the auction with the

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>same group of people, which you know, then you might

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to get a pretty good read of the room.

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Last one, be mentally ready if you're in a draft

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to trade down. You know this is to Matt's point earlier,

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>there's just so much depth and so much value. If

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you could turn your first round pick into a second

0:30:57.840 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and a third, make that deal. If you tune your

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>second rounder to a third and fourth, make that deal.

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>You know you can really accumulate picks. We talked about

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>this in some detail a few shows ago. You really

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>can accumulate a lot of picks and do yourself a

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>favor in a deep draft by trading down. Most people

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>don't do it. We'll never do it. This is a

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>great opportunity for exactly that. Hey, if you want to

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be ready for your draft auction, maybe it's today, maybe

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it's this week. Get my g cheat for free Guillotine

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>leagues dot com. Paul Church and Scott Fish and Matt

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Harrison with you. Back in moments. Welcome back to Fantasy

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Fault Charchi and Scott Fish and Matt Harrison

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>with you. This is a segment we like to call

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>three tough questions. You can play along. I will pepper

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:04.479
<v Speaker 1>my co host, with three. So uncomfortable with this segment

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>right now? Based on what happened the last time the

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.239
<v Speaker 1>three of us were at this table, you should be

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you went over three. If you recall and then you

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>carried over your bad mojo to last week. And I

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>just answered everything that Scott answered, And if you got

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>him all right and I got him all wrong, that

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>can happen. You can play along, see if you can

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>go three and oh we begin with tough question number one.

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Does the plethora of injuries to wide receivers improve your

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>projections for tight and George Kittle a lot, a little,

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>or not at all? Scott, alright, so he was already

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>my tight end one pretty much with a bullet. So

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much more I can add to him.

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're asking if he will break his own single

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>season receiving record of which is best of all time

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>for tight ends at six. Already thought he had a

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>shot at it. If you think he's gonna to break

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>his career high and touchdowns of five, he had three

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>called back last year, I think he was already going

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to do that, so honestly, not at all, because I

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>already had him pegged for just a ridiculous year. Yeah,

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna answer whatever, Scott. No, Deebo was seen

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>sprinting hard, as I mentioned at Wednesday's practice. That's a

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>good thing. It's still possible he's ready for week one.

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Hiuk is week to week with what's called a mild

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>left hamstring strain, so he could be back by week one.

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>The depth at the wide receiver position isn't flashy, but

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:36.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not horrible. Kendrick Borne showed flashes in the red

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>zone last year. Dante Pettis looked like a professional wide

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver in the past, enough so where Chart gave me

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a first round pick for him. Uh Davon Austin, Kevin

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.719
<v Speaker 1>White I have a first round pedigree. I expect one

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of those to get cut. But rookie Joan Jennings was

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a guy that people generally liked going to the draft.

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>He felt the seventh he's on the roster. To the

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>point of it, all is is Htle is gonna eat.

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>We're not worried about that. Having better weapons on the

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>field will help allow him to avoid additional coverage. Though

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>what's good for the offense is good for the offense.

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>So my answer is not at all, not at all. Again,

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the question is does the plethor of injuries the wide

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>receivers improve your projection for tight end George Kittle a lot,

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a little, or not at all. Any correct answer is

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>not at all and you said, things that are good

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>for the offense. Uh, for good for a player in

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the offense are good for the whole offense. Things that

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>are bad for a player in the offense are bad

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>for the whole offense. Kittle is not gonna get better

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>because of this. He's he is a matchup nightmare. He's

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 1>too big for dbs, he's too fast for linebackers. But

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>without competent receivers, they you can put both linebacker and

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>a dB get a double and triple. They can double him.

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Except for Jalen heard, most of these injuries are short term. Um,

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a long season. I just don't think at the

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>end of the day that those injuries are going to

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>change much of anything for George Kittle. Nicely done, you

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>two tough question Number two. Ben Roethlisberger is going off

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the board as quarterback fifteen in round twelve. Is the

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>public drafting him too late, too early or just right?

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Matt Oh, I got one right and I get to

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>go first now? Yeah, back baby, Uh, you have honors,

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:19.320
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. In two thousand eighteen, the last season

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Big Ben played in, he was the second best fantasy

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in the league behind Patrick Mahomes. He had over

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>yards that season thirty four touchdowns. It was more yardage

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>than Mahomes. By the way, Now, he did have Antonio

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Brown that season, but the depth of Juju, Dionte Washington

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and Claypool plus Ebron Advance a tight end is pretty good.

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy owners are replaying last year, though, and he didn't

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>really play last year if you might remember. Correct, they're

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 1>saying he has zip on the ball and looks like

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:53.280
<v Speaker 1>his old self and practice. Plus I don't fully trust

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>James Conner or the running backs to be monsters this year.

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think Roethlisberger has top five quarterback upside, and

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:01.439
<v Speaker 1>if you can get him in the twelfth, that means

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>we're drafting him too late. Okay, Scott, Okay. So getting

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback like him in the twelfth is fine because

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm always against taking quarterbacks in the single digit usually,

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>always usually against taking quarterbacks in the single digit rounds. Anyway,

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I think there's legit concern for his elbow and what

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a full sixteen games would look like on that elbow,

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it looks great great in practice right now.

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>But obviously he has ten top ten upside, but he

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't run either, and there's that risk there. By the way, Matt,

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:34.839
<v Speaker 1>you just said you think we're drafting him too late

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>at QBFT yet my shock Fantasy Com cheat sheet here

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>says Ben Roethlisberger QB. Well the order is correct. Okay, okay,

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you need other people to draft other quarterbacks? Checks out,

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>God Scott always trying to bust my behind. None of

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:06.879
<v Speaker 1>that in this room has. My answer is, it's just right.

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>It's just right. It's fine. Roethlisberger is going too late.

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>There's there's all this receiving talent around him. You've got

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>four capable wide receivers, you have two capable tight ends,

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you have pass catching backs. He's got the excellent offensive line.

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football focuses number five ranked pass blocking offensive line

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>from last year. I believe you calling Judith Schuster capable

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is your biggest compliment. It probably this year he's capable.

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 1>And Matt alluded to this, Uh we forget one. He's

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>one season removed from being Fantasy Football's third highest scoring quarterback.

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>He could regress a ton and still be way outperformed

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 1>different way I'll perform the twelfth round. So he is

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>going too late. Tough question number three, Terry McLaurin and

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>A J. Brown were both robbed of the Rookie of

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the Year award last season, which these second year receivers

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 1>will post the bigger fantasy point improvement in year number two. Scott,

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, what's going on here? He tricked me with

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that one? Yeah, I thought I had honors? What the heck? Man? Whatever?

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I am going with F one.

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:19.399
<v Speaker 1>McLaren Uh, it's mostly due to their staffis. By the way,

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that's a way better nickname than Scary Terry. Scary Terry

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 1>is a basketball player's nickname. Well, and he's also a

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 1>morty name too, Like F one is way way cooler.

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>How not just mclaude. I knew, I love, I love

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>both these guys. But but really the truth is F

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>one had a hundred less yards and and a touchdown

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.399
<v Speaker 1>less last year. He had nine nineteen yards and seven

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and fifty eight receptions. I think I think he

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>improves that by you know, a hundred two hundred yards

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of extra touchdowns. A J. Brown already had

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>over a thousand yards and eight touchdowns. I don't know

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 1>how much how much more he's gonna jump up from

0:38:56.760 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that so the bigger improvement I'm going to with f one. Okay,

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean A J. Brown did all that but on

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 1>only eight four targets and fifty two catches. So it's

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 1>gotta be a J. Brown who can who can go

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>through the roof. But much like they should have been

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>co Rookies of the Year last year, it's possible that

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 1>they could be the co most improved players this year.

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:20.799
<v Speaker 1>I like them both a lot um. They don't know.

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing we're not saying anything bad. You don't call

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>him soft questions chart. So my answer is a J. Brown,

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 1>And the reason is the offense. The quarterback is better

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in Tennessee. The running backs are better in Tennessee, the

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, the tight ends, probably the better second wide receiver.

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Everything about Tennessee's offense is significantly better than Washington's. So

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that's why a J. Brown's got a better shot of

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>massive improvement. Yeah, you you took most of my talking points.

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 1>It is a J. Brown, even though he starts from

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>a higher position. As a baseline, McLaurin was roughly wide

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver twenty five depending on scoring system last year and J.

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Brown was roughly wide receiver eighteen. But you hit on

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 1>so many of the key things. A J. Brown's got

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the advantage of stability of quarterback, stability of overall offense,

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>the better running game to keep heat off, the better

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:11.720
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, and the better ownership situation, which, by the way,

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 1>is a tangible intangible I mean, there really is a

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:20.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of chaos that has to be happening right now

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 1>inside the Washington front office, and that stuff if it

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 1>affects everybody, it really does. By the way, I was

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 1>going to take A J. Brown, but mad and I

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to be the same la pedaling. No, it's uh.

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>We saw we saw inconsistency last year from mclauren just

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>because of not that not that his I think any

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.439
<v Speaker 1>part of it's his fault. It's just all these things

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that surround and that offense. It's going to be because

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>he had a nine yard game, McLaren had an eleven

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>yard game. Tia to thirty nine yard games. These are

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>all scoreless games. Those are bad games that give you

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 1>l's and in a guillotine league, those are bad games

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that get get your head chopped. Have to be really

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>careful with with McClaren that way. And yes, A J.

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Brown starts from a higher point, so it's harder for

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 1>him to make improvement. But he's got wide receiver one

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in him. He does a J Brown does, and he can't.

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Dwayne Haskins can't power to be all the time. I

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think it might matter. The offensive lines bad. I

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I just think that offense just is not

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to produce enough to make Terry McLaurin

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near wide receiver number one. You underestimate Alex Smith.

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>We have a couple of bonus minutes. I'm gonna give

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you a bonus question. Christian McCaffrey is going off the

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 1>board number one. Leagues, let's talk about whether or not

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it should be this overwhelming, because I don't think that's

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the case. There are a lot of things working against

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Christie McCaffrey this particular year. We have a whole new

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>offense that he's got to that has to be acclimated to.

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>We have an offensive line in Carolina. Well, we think

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be good, but we don't know. We we

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>have a whole new we have a whole We have

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>an offensive line that is straight up garbage, that is

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a bad offensive line. We have a quarterback that is

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 1>not going to threaten downfield at all. Now you can

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, Will Allen last year and go,

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what, what good was he either? But Teddy's

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>not built that way. Um and just regression, I mean,

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>just what he did last year was so off, so

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 1>far outside of the ordinary, that it seems unlikely to

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>happen again. And there are a lot more. There are

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of weapons there. Ian Thomas is legit good.

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Anderson is there now, Yes, not to mention sel

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 1>t J. Moore, right, So you know, there are a

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:41.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of other options there. We don't know for sure

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that this new coaching staff is going to treat Christian

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey the same way the last one did, which really

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:50.359
<v Speaker 1>deferred to him on like everything. Fantasy football players did

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 1>catch a touchdown from the practice, yes, and so I

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>got some stuff on this. So Matt Rule. His offenses

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>at Baylor ran the ball of the time. Joe Brady

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>was one of the most past happy coordinators uh in

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the in the in college. Last year at l s

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>u UM, the team average thirty eight passing attempts per

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>gards lay a little bit, but the Panthers passed on

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 1>six of plays last season that was the fourth highest

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in the league. And you have a quarterback who can't

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>throw very far. So it's a team that passed a

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>lot last year, an offensive coordinator who passed a ton

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the year before, and a head coach who has a

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:36.839
<v Speaker 1>running philosophy with a quarterback who can't throw the ball downfield.

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 1>This all just leads to Christian McCaffrey. Dump offs to

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey. Handoffs to Christian McCaffrey. Maybe he's gonna break

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:47.400
<v Speaker 1>his own records. If you're if you're not going to

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:50.520
<v Speaker 1>take Christian McCaffrey at the first pick, who would you

0:43:50.520 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>take Barley? It's getting closer to Derrick Henry For me,

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards Hilaire, I want start running back from the

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>best offensive football. I'm fine with any of those three. Yes,

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:03.799
<v Speaker 1>I think you know there's you know you can be

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>brave out there and go some other way besides Christian McCaffrey,

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>if you feel like you're up to it. If you'd

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:11.399
<v Speaker 1>like to try the freshest format and fantasy sports, it's

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the Guillotine League. Guillotine leagues dot Com. Seventeen teams start

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:16.479
<v Speaker 1>the season every week, the low scoring team gets cut

0:44:16.560 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and their entire roster goes the waiver wire and everybody

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>else gets to feast on those players. Check it out

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot com private, private and public leagues for

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>YouTube play. We'll be back in moments. More Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 1>It's Fantasy Football Weekly, episode number five, year number twenty six.

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I am Paul Charchi and my co hosts are Matt

0:44:56.640 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Harrison and Scott Fish our number two guys. We're going

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to talk about teammates at the same position and who

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 1>you would rather have based on their draft position. So

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not just which guys better, which is usually pretty obvious.

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>The trickier question is based on where they would go

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in a draft, which also kind of equates to an auction,

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>how much you'd have to pay Who would you rather

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 1>have in that scenario. We begin in the a f

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>C with m Devin Singletary in round five or Zack

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>mosson round ten. Yeah. So I've done two drafts in

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the last two days, and Zack Moss went ahead of Devins.

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Look at what we have done, So look at what

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>this show is done to Zack Moss is stock. This

0:45:44.120 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is a weird question for me to. I think they're

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 1>both like seventh round or round right in that range. Well,

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 1>so when I looked, they were fifth and tenth. But

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I get that ADP says that I'm just saying the

0:45:53.920 --> 0:46:00.080
<v Speaker 1>last two drafts. So, UM, it's clearly moster right. If

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen is running less, so he's gonna get less

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of those nine yard touchdowns and there's more Gary's uh,

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's get in the passing game. It's Moss. We've

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>gone over Moss a billion times. I don't need to

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 1>keep now. You probably don't we you know we love

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 1>him on this show. Well, at least I do. You

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 1>guys might be just going along for the ride. I

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:19.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know Matt in Pittsburgh. The wide receivers Juju Smith

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Schuster in round three, Deonta Johnson round nine, or James

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Washington in round twenty, Well, Jujus price point is too

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:32.520
<v Speaker 1>early for me, especially since I'm not fully trusting him

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this season. You shouldn't pend. And if I'm doing the

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:37.120
<v Speaker 1>three five two, I'm not taking a wide receiver in

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:41.799
<v Speaker 1>round three. So it's between Deonta and James Washington from

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:48.720
<v Speaker 1>weeks nine through sixteen. Um, Johnson averaged or sorry, James

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Washington average six point to five targets, just over four

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 1>catches and seventy two yards per game with three touchdowns.

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:59.760
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty good. Over those exact same eight games, Deonta

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Jhnson averaged only five point eight targets, three point seven

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:06.600
<v Speaker 1>five receptions, and only forty one yards per game with

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:09.760
<v Speaker 1>only two touchdowns over that span. But we're drafting Deonte

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Johnson eleven rounds ahead of James Washington, yes, earlier. It's ridiculous.

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking James Washington super late. Yeah, I think you

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:18.920
<v Speaker 1>might be right about that. Man. Most drafts aren't even

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty rounds long, Scott. Let's go to New England wide

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:25.239
<v Speaker 1>receiver Julian Edelman around seven or Nick Kiel Harry in

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>round fifteen. So I put to kill Harry despite reports

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 1>he's been fatigued and Edelman's in his face and stuff,

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:35.840
<v Speaker 1>because the end of this last week he started showing

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:38.279
<v Speaker 1>up and making play. So I think I think maybe

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get there. He's the clear number two in

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that offense. He's a big body target for uh for

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton, and UH, I don't know that Cam's gonna

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 1>use Edelman the same way. Edelman is getting older. But

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing for me is in that seventh round.

0:47:52.600 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And of course I was looking at recent drafts for me,

0:47:55.800 --> 0:48:01.360
<v Speaker 1>uh zass, Zack Moss, Deonte Johnson, Will Fuller, Michael Gallup,

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:04.000
<v Speaker 1>j K Dobbins, all within like six seven picks on

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 1>either side. I'm like, I want all those guys more

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 1>than I want Element. So it's Niki Hill Harry almost

0:48:08.960 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 1>by a process of elimination. Let's go to Baltimore matt

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:18.360
<v Speaker 1>running backs, mark Ingram and round six or JK Dobbins

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in round eight. So Baltimore averaged thirty seven rushing attempts

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 1>per game last season and only twenty eight passing attempts.

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:27.120
<v Speaker 1>They were the most run heavy team in the league.

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>It's worth noting that they only averaged twenty five rushing

0:48:31.320 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts for running back last year part of that,

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and that was only good for the seventh most. Gus

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Edwards averaged eight carries per game. Yeah, he's out. Justice

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Hill averaged three and a half carries per game. He's

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:47.240
<v Speaker 1>really out. I feel like I just found eleven touches

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 1>for JK Dobbins plus Ingram, Gus and Hill were not

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 1>involved in the passing game at all. The three of

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 1>them combined for two and a half catches per game.

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:59.360
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens had the third fewest running back receptions in

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the league last year, and that's because they didn't have JK. Dobbins,

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:04.840
<v Speaker 1>who can catch out of the backfield. And we saw

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the we saw the beautiful catch in the back of

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the end zone on Twitter earlier this week. So I

0:49:09.640 --> 0:49:11.839
<v Speaker 1>think it's probably an even split on touches, with both

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 1>guys getting around fourteen fifteen per game. That means I'm

0:49:14.480 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>taking Dobbins two rounds later. Agree with all of them, Scott.

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Cleveland where Odell Beckham is going in

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the third round, Jarvis Landry in the sixth. This is

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 1>another process of elimination because I just like too many

0:49:26.160 --> 0:49:29.320
<v Speaker 1>other players in the third round and people all people

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:31.640
<v Speaker 1>hate Jarvis Landry for no good reason. Well, you don't

0:49:31.640 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 1>score touchdowns. That's a good reason. Well, you know, at

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, more than anything else in

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:39.880
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football, I want touchdowns. Yeah, Well, he has touchdown

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.279
<v Speaker 1>ten touchdowns the last two years, and that's exactly how

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:44.439
<v Speaker 1>many Odell Beckham Junior has in the last two years

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. So there's that. So there's that. But we

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but we have we have a history that shows Odell

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Beckham can get double digit touched Jarvis Landry's five six

0:49:54.280 --> 0:49:56.719
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns a year. Yeah, that is true. Back when David

0:49:56.760 --> 0:49:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Johnson was really good, Odell Beckham Junior was really good too.

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I get that. But but but what I'm saying, Wow, but

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:06.840
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying is very passive aggressive right there. Jarvis

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Lantry has eight plus catches every year, and he's got

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the most catches in the first six years of a

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:16.400
<v Speaker 1>career of all time. Is that true? That's true? You know,

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:19.399
<v Speaker 1>in fairness, who's ever, Who's ever? It's the most boring

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Who's ever? Said? Jarvis Landry sunk my draft? Nobody but

0:50:23.640 --> 0:50:25.920
<v Speaker 1>O'Dell sunk a couple of you know, many people's draft.

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:27.640
<v Speaker 1>That's why in the third round there are tons of

0:50:27.640 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 1>guys I love. In the sixth round. Sure, I'll take

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that safe wide receiver to wide receiver three for me.

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Michael Thomas is gonna obliterate that Jarvis

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Landry record. This is year six for Michael Thomas. So

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about teammates at the same position and which

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:43.200
<v Speaker 1>one we'd prefer to have based on where you have

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to draft them. We go to Indianapolis, matt where Jonathan

0:50:46.560 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Taylor is going in the fourth round, in Marlon Mack

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and the ninth. I just want to kind of answer

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 1>this one with a look like, come on, come on,

0:50:54.640 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys has the potential to be the

0:50:56.560 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 1>number one running back in football. You can get him

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:01.719
<v Speaker 1>in round four. Of that upside, we've seen enough of Mac.

0:51:01.760 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 1>It's Jonathan Taylor. Yeah, this is the first time we

0:51:05.680 --> 0:51:09.360
<v Speaker 1>haven't chosen the lowest available player when we've done this exercise.

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's because it's a round four guy that might

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:14.880
<v Speaker 1>end up being a top five running back. Jonathan Taylor

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is a special back. Marlon Mack isn't. And based on

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that alone is what I hear you say. Yeah, but

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:21.319
<v Speaker 1>I do believe Marlon Max is gonna be a thorn

0:51:21.440 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in the side, and he's gonna get more playing time

0:51:23.600 --> 0:51:27.879
<v Speaker 1>than any of us want to want to a bunch too,

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna we're gonna hate all of it, but

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Marlon max playing time is just a thorn in our side.

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's gonna want to start Marlon Mack on any rosters

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:38.560
<v Speaker 1>this year at all. Probably true. All right, Matt, let's

0:51:38.600 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 1>go to Houston. Will Fuller is going around seven Brandon

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Cooks and round eight. I'll take this woman stuff. Sorry,

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:45.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I do like O b J. That

0:51:46.040 --> 0:51:47.960
<v Speaker 1>was a joke with David Johnson. I have him is

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:50.799
<v Speaker 1>like apologize. You can hammer O b J. He's a

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:54.480
<v Speaker 1>big boy, you can take. Uh, this one is quite

0:51:54.520 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 1>easily Will Follward for me, and it's it's actually not

0:51:57.120 --> 0:52:00.880
<v Speaker 1>even close. I I can't touch cook Cook in the eighth.

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I can touch him in the tenth even. Honestly,

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:06.600
<v Speaker 1>there's just other players, uh for for me, Will Fuller

0:52:07.080 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 1>with a full offseason, give me the guy with tons

0:52:09.239 --> 0:52:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of chemistry with Watson without a fall offseason. I mean Cooks,

0:52:13.239 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Cooks doesn't have that. Um, this guy's uh the Cooks

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is you know, you're removed from four straight thousand yard

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 1>gate seasons. But Fullers, the guy with all the chemistry,

0:52:23.800 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 1>all the touchdowns, double digit fantasy points in two thirds

0:52:26.640 --> 0:52:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of his games with Deshaun Watson, and Deshaun Watson is

0:52:30.040 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 1>already singing his praises just really loud. So all right, Matt,

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:36.920
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Miami. Teammates Jordan Howard going in the

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:39.239
<v Speaker 1>eighth round or Matt Brita in the ninth. So I'm

0:52:39.320 --> 0:52:41.879
<v Speaker 1>cheating and I have exactly two answers to this one.

0:52:42.160 --> 0:52:45.279
<v Speaker 1>If it's a PPR league, you take Matt Brida. If

0:52:45.320 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it is less than a full PPR league, you take

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Howard. Reason Howard has only averaged one point two

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>receptions per game over the last three years. Brita didn't

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:57.800
<v Speaker 1>average a ton more. But he's one of the fastest

0:52:57.800 --> 0:52:59.680
<v Speaker 1>backs in the league and was sure handed when given

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the tunity in San Francisco. But I do think Howard

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:04.879
<v Speaker 1>will be the goal line back and we'll get most

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of the work near the stripes. So a non PPR

0:53:07.040 --> 0:53:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I lead Howard. In PPR, I'm taking Breed. By the way,

0:53:10.080 --> 0:53:11.839
<v Speaker 1>we were mentioned this two weeks ago when I did

0:53:11.920 --> 0:53:18.000
<v Speaker 1>vacated targets vacated running. Matt Brida is got sneaky upside.

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:21.560
<v Speaker 1>He sure does zekey upside. The game is among teammates

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:24.359
<v Speaker 1>at the same position, same team, which one is better

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to draft based on a DP. We're doing the a

0:53:26.400 --> 0:53:29.000
<v Speaker 1>f C right now. Denver Melvin Gordon in round four,

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay and round eight. Okay, so this this is

0:53:32.560 --> 0:53:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a pure cheapest option. If it's a split backfield and

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:38.759
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like it's gonna be fifty, you take the

0:53:38.800 --> 0:53:41.080
<v Speaker 1>cheapest option. I know that Melvin Gordon is the better

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:47.839
<v Speaker 1>pass catching back, but he is Melvin Gordon has had

0:53:47.920 --> 0:53:50.719
<v Speaker 1>three years over eight point five yards per catch, and

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, Philip Lindsay's best is five point six.

0:53:54.200 --> 0:53:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Even Royce Freeman out caught Philip Lindsay last year is

0:53:59.080 --> 0:54:02.799
<v Speaker 1>just on film. It's it's a different game. Honestly, um

0:54:03.000 --> 0:54:05.839
<v Speaker 1>two or thirty eight point pound. Royce Freeman was better

0:54:05.880 --> 0:54:08.319
<v Speaker 1>in the air. Through the air, get his name right,

0:54:08.400 --> 0:54:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it's Royce dropped the piano. Freeman. Royce dropped the piano.

0:54:13.480 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Freeman was better than Phil Lindsay in the past game

0:54:16.320 --> 0:54:19.800
<v Speaker 1>last year. But honestly, with a split backfield, I want

0:54:20.239 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and I do think it's gonna be like forty some

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:25.120
<v Speaker 1>catches to thirty some catches, so it's it's negligible, But

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I want the cheaper option in round eight, which is

0:54:27.040 --> 0:54:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay. I've taken the cheaper option in all but

0:54:30.239 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 1>two of these scenarios so far. Our final teammates at

0:54:34.040 --> 0:54:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the same position Oakland wide receivers first round rookie Henry

0:54:38.640 --> 0:54:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Ruggs round ten or third round rookie Brian Edwards round

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. I love those twenty two round drafts. By

0:54:47.520 --> 0:54:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, By all accounts, Edwards is ahead of Rugs

0:54:50.800 --> 0:54:53.400
<v Speaker 1>on the depth chart in Vegas right now, So why

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:57.719
<v Speaker 1>I take the guy twelve rounds later who's ahead on

0:54:57.719 --> 0:54:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the depth chart? And Edwards is not the burner that

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the Davis family seems to love. That's what Rugs is,

0:55:03.560 --> 0:55:06.200
<v Speaker 1>But he's the most complete wide receiver they have on roster,

0:55:06.600 --> 0:55:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and the guy out of all their wide receivers, including

0:55:08.920 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Renfroe and Tyrelle Williams. Brian Edwards is the guide

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:15.840
<v Speaker 1>woman roster. When we come back, which teammates at the

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:18.400
<v Speaker 1>same position are the better one to draft in the NFC,

0:55:18.920 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 1>including the very thorny Dallas wide receiver situation. Will break

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:28.799
<v Speaker 1>that down and a dozen other teammates at the same

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:57.280
<v Speaker 1>position when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Fantasy

0:55:57.320 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly is backball Church in Guilty Leagues dot Com,

0:56:00.760 --> 0:56:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish and Matt Harrison Shock Fantasy, You've got Empire

0:56:05.560 --> 0:56:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in Dynasty cheat Sheets, rankings, all kinds of good stuff. Oh,

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I got a promo code for the listeners to please

0:56:11.440 --> 0:56:14.719
<v Speaker 1>give that out. Peacock peacock like it all right, gets

0:56:14.719 --> 0:56:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you twenty five dollars for the whole year of Shock

0:56:18.080 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy all right. Promo code is known as where we

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>go there. It is promo code peak. Yeah, I don't

0:56:27.600 --> 0:56:31.320
<v Speaker 1>have to take that. You gotta spell that, spell that sound.

0:56:31.760 --> 0:56:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's got an S, a lot of cues,

0:56:34.800 --> 0:56:38.520
<v Speaker 1>some W in there. There's an H for sure. It's

0:56:38.520 --> 0:56:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a silent age. Which teammates at the same position is

0:56:43.239 --> 0:56:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the better one to draft? We just did the a

0:56:45.680 --> 0:56:48.480
<v Speaker 1>f C. We broke down a f C teammates and

0:56:48.520 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be based on ADP. We're not just

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:52.680
<v Speaker 1>saying which guy's better, We're just saying, based on where

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to take them in a drafter in auction,

0:56:55.000 --> 0:56:56.719
<v Speaker 1>who would you rather have? You know what I was

0:56:56.760 --> 0:57:00.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking during the break. This just screams you are trade

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:03.359
<v Speaker 1>down as much as possible. It really does. You know.

0:57:03.400 --> 0:57:08.560
<v Speaker 1>In the a f C we said trade down in six, seven, eight,

0:57:08.760 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 1>eight of the ten scenarios had to trade down. This

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:16.480
<v Speaker 1>also screams, don't spend more than fifteen in an auction. Yes,

0:57:15.920 --> 0:57:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it really does. Its validates almost everything we've been saying.

0:57:19.880 --> 0:57:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Trade down in draft, you don't spend too much in auctions.

0:57:23.280 --> 0:57:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, let's another one of those right there, which

0:57:27.840 --> 0:57:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to adalysis. Later in the segment proves our dalysis from earlier,

0:57:33.000 --> 0:57:35.280
<v Speaker 1>which deemates at the same position are the is the

0:57:35.320 --> 0:57:37.760
<v Speaker 1>better one to draft. We go to Dallas wide receivers

0:57:38.040 --> 0:57:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a Marii Cooper going in the third round, Michael Gallup

0:57:40.880 --> 0:57:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in the seventh, or Ceedee Lamb in the matt I

0:57:45.600 --> 0:57:48.360
<v Speaker 1>like all of these guys a lot and a lot,

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:51.640
<v Speaker 1>but unless Cooper falls to the fourth I won't take

0:57:51.680 --> 0:57:54.960
<v Speaker 1>him while doing the Gainesville. So it's down to Gallop

0:57:55.000 --> 0:57:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and Lamb. And with every report out of camp that

0:57:58.280 --> 0:58:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Ceedee Lamb is the most impressive thing that they've ever seen,

0:58:01.800 --> 0:58:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna swing for the fences and take

0:58:04.120 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Ceedee Lamb because this lines up to me kind of

0:58:07.600 --> 0:58:11.000
<v Speaker 1>like Randy Moss's rookie year he was passed on. He

0:58:11.080 --> 0:58:14.680
<v Speaker 1>goes into a situation with two established really good wide receivers,

0:58:14.880 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 1>get Chris Carter. Yeah, this looks like it could be

0:58:17.840 --> 0:58:21.280
<v Speaker 1>just like Seedee Lamb just explodes this year. Do we

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:25.120
<v Speaker 1>see a three one hundred game where Zeke gets a

0:58:25.160 --> 0:58:28.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred all three of those receivers and Jack gets three hundred.

0:58:29.040 --> 0:58:34.760
<v Speaker 1>You know when that last happened. Vikings Lions, Scott Mitchell,

0:58:35.080 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Parriman Morton, and Man Cooper, Gallop Lamb. I think to

0:58:45.960 --> 0:58:47.880
<v Speaker 1>meet Cooper is the least appealing out of those three.

0:58:47.960 --> 0:58:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I would rather have Gallop in round seven, who scored

0:58:51.160 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 1>about as many Fantasy points as Amari Cooper did last year,

0:58:55.120 --> 0:58:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and more consistently, and much more consistently. You don't get

0:58:58.000 --> 0:58:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the highs and the lows you get out of a

0:58:59.320 --> 0:59:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Marie Cooper. He's the plays a player I never end

0:59:01.720 --> 0:59:04.320
<v Speaker 1>up having. Let's go to the opposite. I take him everywhere.

0:59:04.840 --> 0:59:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I reached the heck up for him in our guillotine.

0:59:07.320 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I reached for him for for Mary Cooper, No for

0:59:10.560 --> 0:59:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Gallup with Gallup, Okay, yeah, he's perfect for guillotine format,

0:59:15.200 --> 0:59:17.520
<v Speaker 1>no doubt, because of the consistency. Let's go to the

0:59:17.560 --> 0:59:22.160
<v Speaker 1>giant Scott Sterling Shepherd Round ten, Darius Slayton, Round ten,

0:59:22.960 --> 0:59:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Golden Tate. At the end of round ten, I'll call

0:59:25.600 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it round eleven. Which one do you want? So it's Slayton,

0:59:29.240 --> 0:59:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's because like I don't. I know, he's not

0:59:31.720 --> 0:59:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the most consistent of them. He's just got the most upside.

0:59:35.080 --> 0:59:37.880
<v Speaker 1>He's he's the one that's that's splash year. He can

0:59:37.920 --> 0:59:40.280
<v Speaker 1>have the bigger games. He scored more touchdowns in both

0:59:40.320 --> 0:59:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of them last year. If I'm in round ten, it's

0:59:42.720 --> 0:59:45.640
<v Speaker 1>my wider super four or five. I've already got my starters.

0:59:45.680 --> 0:59:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I want the splashy upside guy. Yeah, I think that.

0:59:48.280 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, that's an over that's an overriding

0:59:50.040 --> 0:59:52.680
<v Speaker 1>draft strategy that we should probably should have mentioned earlier

0:59:52.720 --> 0:59:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in the draft strategy w C Baby. If side wins championship,

0:59:56.520 --> 0:59:59.479
<v Speaker 1>upside wins, and later in your draft that it should

0:59:59.520 --> 1:00:01.480
<v Speaker 1>be also should be swinging for the fences. Once you've

1:00:01.480 --> 1:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>got your established starters, you those you can three, but

1:00:04.720 --> 1:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>right throw the darts, uh and make him good. Matt.

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Chicago running back David Montgomery and round

1:00:10.960 --> 1:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>five probably lower uh in more recent drafts, or Tree

1:00:14.760 --> 1:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Cohen in round eight. The correct answer is avoid this

1:00:18.000 --> 1:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>backfield at all costs, or take Cordarrel Patterson in the

1:00:21.280 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>last round, dear draft, Or if I have to choose

1:00:23.960 --> 1:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>between the two, how about Spencer Ware off the board.

1:00:26.960 --> 1:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Free agent maybe, Uh, if I have to choose between

1:00:29.920 --> 1:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the two, though, I'm still going to probably take David Montgomery.

1:00:34.080 --> 1:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely going to be a little bit lower in

1:00:36.880 --> 1:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a DP right now because if he's probably six or

1:00:40.320 --> 1:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>seventh round, Tree Cohen might have moved up around, so

1:00:44.400 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>he's probably six or seven, and I think when all

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>are healthy, David Montgomery is the guy who's going to

1:00:49.640 --> 1:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>get the goal line work. He had eight teen carries

1:00:51.600 --> 1:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>inside the five last year, and he's probably gonna be

1:00:53.720 --> 1:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the guy who gets closer to twenty touches per game,

1:00:56.400 --> 1:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's a guy can get maybe in the sixth

1:00:58.400 --> 1:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>or seventh right now, So that's okay. This is a

1:01:00.960 --> 1:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>great time to draft him if you were planning on

1:01:03.400 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>if you even liked him a little, this is the

1:01:04.880 --> 1:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>time to draft. His value so low and it's possible

1:01:08.120 --> 1:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that David Montgomery doesn't miss a game. It's also possibly

1:01:11.880 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>as a setback on the groining. And we're talking about

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>this in October, so you know, there's there's plenty of risk.

1:01:16.200 --> 1:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And he certainly did not look like a special back

1:01:19.240 --> 1:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>last year, and there's nothing about what we heard in

1:01:21.200 --> 1:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>training camp suggested it looked any better. This year. I'm

1:01:23.840 --> 1:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>not saying he's special, no, I know neither. I'm saying

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity is there. The opportunity is the big thing, hey,

1:01:31.080 --> 1:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and opportunities a single most important part of fantasy football

1:01:34.560 --> 1:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>at every position. Scott's go to Detroit, will stay in

1:01:37.120 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the NFC North running back DeAndre Swift in the fifth round,

1:01:40.120 --> 1:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>or carry on Johnson in the ninth. So DeAndre Swift

1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>is dinged up a little, but I'm gonna let carry on.

1:01:45.440 --> 1:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Johnson asked to this answer this question when he was

1:01:48.000 --> 1:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>asked about how they're working together and what they're learning

1:01:50.600 --> 1:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>from each other. Carry on, Johnson said, I can't learn

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>anything from Swift because the way Swift's knees bend and

1:01:57.160 --> 1:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>hips work, I can't do any of them. So ready

1:02:01.200 --> 1:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>he comes up. It does a little shaky dick through

1:02:03.680 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever thing. I can't do that. Just shaky dick, shaky

1:02:08.080 --> 1:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>dick whatever thing. I can't do that. So I just said,

1:02:11.080 --> 1:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>why aren't you doing this? And carry on? Johnson's voice,

1:02:13.960 --> 1:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that's outstanding. I love that quote. I

1:02:17.720 --> 1:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and I totally missed that, all right. I agree, Matts

1:02:24.240 --> 1:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>go to Green Bay Aaron Jones in the second round

1:02:26.760 --> 1:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a j Dillon in the fourteenth round or Jamal Williams

1:02:29.880 --> 1:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen round. So I have a feeling this

1:02:32.440 --> 1:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>backfield is going to be pretty messy all season. And

1:02:34.800 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>by messy, I think they just get They all get

1:02:37.600 --> 1:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work. Um. So I'm going to take

1:02:40.680 --> 1:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Packers backs only in best ball leagues. I'm not taking

1:02:43.960 --> 1:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>them in leagues where I have to start one of them.

1:02:45.800 --> 1:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm only taking them in best ball leagues. And the

1:02:48.080 --> 1:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>guy had been taking in the last round of just

1:02:49.760 --> 1:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>about every bit best ball league recently is Jamal Williams.

1:02:53.360 --> 1:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>He had five receiving touchdowns last year and was easily

1:02:57.640 --> 1:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the second best receiving option on the field outside of

1:03:01.280 --> 1:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams last season. And let's recount all of the

1:03:04.400 --> 1:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>guys the Packers brought into bolster that passing game. I

1:03:08.720 --> 1:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have crickets on here. Here, here, take this. It's

1:03:12.200 --> 1:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it's of cricket. Sounds just like one of those Green

1:03:15.080 --> 1:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Bay crickets. Big there um and chart outline last week

1:03:18.880 --> 1:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that Packers wide receivers don't get targets near the goal line.

1:03:22.240 --> 1:03:25.439
<v Speaker 1>They had one inside the five last wild and it's

1:03:25.480 --> 1:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>because Jones got a lot of carries inside the five,

1:03:29.640 --> 1:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Dylan's gonna take a lot of those this year, and

1:03:31.800 --> 1:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams was getting a whole bunch of targets inside

1:03:34.440 --> 1:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the five. So I think it's Jamal Williams really late.

1:03:38.440 --> 1:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't want any part of Jamal Williams. Really. I

1:03:40.240 --> 1:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want a part of any of these guys much.

1:03:41.840 --> 1:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think if I had to pick, when I

1:03:43.120 --> 1:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>take a j Dillon and just hope that's only doing

1:03:47.160 --> 1:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>this in best Ball, Uh, Scott, let's go to Atlanta

1:03:51.040 --> 1:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones round two or Calvin Ridley and round four.

1:03:53.360 --> 1:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there's one of the toughest ones to decipher

1:03:55.680 --> 1:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>my first line. I hate this question because I absolutely

1:03:58.600 --> 1:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>love both of them for this year. I I think

1:04:00.880 --> 1:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>if we see both of them average ten targets game,

1:04:03.680 --> 1:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I would not be shocked out of the year. I think.

1:04:06.640 --> 1:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's tons of opportunities. So I'm giving it

1:04:09.400 --> 1:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to Calvin Ridley for the two round discount, just so

1:04:11.880 --> 1:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I can grab myself a running back or a stud

1:04:13.720 --> 1:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end in that second round. I'll take Ridley in

1:04:16.000 --> 1:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the fourth. I'm really surprised Lakwan Treadwell wasn't in that

1:04:20.520 --> 1:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in round seven, Dwell Russell gage before him. Alright, Matt,

1:04:25.920 --> 1:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>let's let's go to another one that might be THORNI

1:04:28.560 --> 1:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>or than it sounds at first, Michael Thomas in round

1:04:32.400 --> 1:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>one or Emmanuel Sanders in round ten. I don't think

1:04:36.840 --> 1:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>this is Thorny at all. It's Michael Thomas because he's

1:04:40.240 --> 1:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas. Manuel Sanders is nice, but he won't receive

1:04:44.200 --> 1:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>half of the Thomas target load. He's not a red

1:04:47.000 --> 1:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>zone guy like Thomas's. He's going to have a very

1:04:50.360 --> 1:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>fine fourth or fifth wide receiver slot on your roster

1:04:54.200 --> 1:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of year. Sanders hasn't topped five touchdowns in a

1:04:57.280 --> 1:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>season since Peyton Manning was his quarterback. He has top

1:05:00.280 --> 1:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to nine hundred yards in three years. He's missed eight

1:05:03.280 --> 1:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>games due to injury over the last three years. And

1:05:06.520 --> 1:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>as Scott said, round ten eleven, those those mid round

1:05:10.040 --> 1:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>guys you want the upside. I don't think Emmanuel Sanders

1:05:12.760 --> 1:05:16.919
<v Speaker 1>carries the huge upside that Michael Thomas does. Obviously, wait

1:05:16.960 --> 1:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>ten more rounds. Take trick one Smith mind brawl done

1:05:20.080 --> 1:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>with so trying to roll the dice on after said, yeah,

1:05:23.160 --> 1:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>whore's predicting breakout season. I don't care. And I think

1:05:28.960 --> 1:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>two months ago Michael Thomas was from in my drafts anyway,

1:05:32.120 --> 1:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>or it was going like pick three, pick four, pick

1:05:34.800 --> 1:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>five now later. Now, yeah, it's all running backs in

1:05:40.600 --> 1:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>those seven picks. I saw a quote from an analyst

1:05:43.200 --> 1:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the other day, and I wish I could remember who

1:05:45.000 --> 1:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>so I could credit him, But he said, I don't

1:05:47.200 --> 1:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>care if Michael Thomas is there with pick twenty four

1:05:49.440 --> 1:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of the twelve of the second round. So the job

1:05:53.280 --> 1:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>take two running backs to start your There's a lot

1:05:55.120 --> 1:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of people feel that way this year. It's go to

1:05:56.760 --> 1:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay, Chris Godwin will cost you a second rounder,

1:05:59.000 --> 1:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>or Mike Evans with a third rounder. Scott uh this one,

1:06:03.680 --> 1:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's Chris Godwin. I there's a love fest

1:06:06.840 --> 1:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for me and Chris Godwin, but for me, Godwin is

1:06:10.520 --> 1:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>just a far better fit with Brady. Godwin plays all over,

1:06:13.080 --> 1:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>he plays the slow which Brady loves to throw too.

1:06:15.360 --> 1:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>He's better on the short yard and stuff. Uh and

1:06:18.120 --> 1:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and reports recently are Brady and Evans are getting a

1:06:21.160 --> 1:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>little more chemistry, but they're they're just getting it now.

1:06:23.880 --> 1:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>It seems like I want the guy that we're in

1:06:26.240 --> 1:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the area where he's used to throwing too. You know,

1:06:28.360 --> 1:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we think of Mike Evans and he is a bit

1:06:30.120 --> 1:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of a downfield receiver Jamis Winston for his many faults.

1:06:33.880 --> 1:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, he had a cannon. The guy could throw downfield,

1:06:36.280 --> 1:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and Brady just doesn't have that in the arm anymore.

1:06:38.800 --> 1:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Like Evans was their lead pass receiver inside the infrared zone.

1:06:43.960 --> 1:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>So watch that there is that Matt's go to Arizona.

1:06:46.960 --> 1:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake will cost you a second rounder Chase Edmonds

1:06:50.040 --> 1:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a rounder. This might kind of surprise you. I'm gonna

1:06:55.320 --> 1:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>take Kenyan Drake in round two. That does, because I've

1:06:58.840 --> 1:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>seen him going round one and a lot of drafts.

1:07:01.960 --> 1:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>But I'm also going to take Edmonds and reach around

1:07:04.880 --> 1:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and take him in round thirteen because it's Kenyan walking

1:07:08.320 --> 1:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>boot Drake. Uh. He has all the attributes of a

1:07:11.320 --> 1:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>true fantasy stud. I'm still a tiny bit worried that

1:07:14.200 --> 1:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it was fool's gold because he had thirty three percent

1:07:16.880 --> 1:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of his Fantasy points in two games last year. So

1:07:19.720 --> 1:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>while I will invest in him in round two for

1:07:21.960 --> 1:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the huge upside, I will also require that I get

1:07:24.840 --> 1:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>his very talented handcuff in Edmonds later in the draft.

1:07:28.560 --> 1:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a cheating answer. Right there. Yeah, it is, let's

1:07:32.640 --> 1:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>pick one or the other. I did. I picked I'm

1:07:35.200 --> 1:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna take Drake. Then I'm gonna have to reach her.

1:07:38.240 --> 1:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Then the game is teammates at the same position, who's

1:07:43.000 --> 1:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the better one to draft based on their average draft position.

1:07:46.240 --> 1:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>We go to San Francisco, where he mostarts, going in

1:07:48.640 --> 1:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the sixth round, Tevin Coleman in the ninth Tevin Coleman

1:07:51.480 --> 1:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>could be going. Still, not taking him just not good

1:07:58.160 --> 1:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean he won't be fantasy viable in in that

1:08:00.760 --> 1:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of run offense where they spread it around. Absolutely,

1:08:03.920 --> 1:08:05.959
<v Speaker 1>but he's a guy that if he gets four yards

1:08:05.960 --> 1:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and carry, you're like, heck, yes, this is amazing. This

1:08:08.640 --> 1:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is the best Tevin covid. We're gonna get four yards

1:08:11.080 --> 1:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>for Gary uh No, it's moster. He's just too efficient.

1:08:15.000 --> 1:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Five point six yards per uh for per attempt last year,

1:08:19.640 --> 1:08:22.559
<v Speaker 1>twelve point nine yards per reception last year, which is

1:08:22.600 --> 1:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>just ridiculous. And that's no fluke. He was used seven

1:08:25.320 --> 1:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>eight nine yards per reception the year before that too.

1:08:28.479 --> 1:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Um and the Beat reporters have been talking about how

1:08:31.360 --> 1:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>most of it is the clear back he's I think

1:08:33.320 --> 1:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>he was too, but they're they're going to use a rotation.

1:08:36.120 --> 1:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>They absolutely, but you made me choose. I did, so

1:08:40.360 --> 1:08:42.479
<v Speaker 1>that's how and some people can make a choice on

1:08:42.520 --> 1:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this show where he most by the way, when he

1:08:45.280 --> 1:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>most asked for the trade, who blinked the team? Teams

1:08:51.280 --> 1:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>don't generally blink in those situations at the state. When

1:08:54.000 --> 1:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you get to that point, the team rarely blinks. He goes, Okay,

1:08:57.280 --> 1:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll pay you. They paid him. That says plenty about

1:09:00.200 --> 1:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the leverage that where he Mostard had final two teammates

1:09:04.080 --> 1:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>at the same position, Which is the better one to

1:09:05.800 --> 1:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>draft Dk Metcalf in the fifth round or Tyler Lockett

1:09:09.280 --> 1:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in the fifth round at well. Dk averaged five and

1:09:14.360 --> 1:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a half targets through the first eight games of the

1:09:16.240 --> 1:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>season last year, then seven targets over the final ten

1:09:19.160 --> 1:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>games including playoffs. Uh so he increased it by a

1:09:23.080 --> 1:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>target and a half. Locket averaged six point eight targets

1:09:27.320 --> 1:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>over the first date and seven point four over the

1:09:29.280 --> 1:09:31.599
<v Speaker 1>final ten. He didn't really increase it that much at all.

1:09:32.280 --> 1:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Those don't seem like a big difference, but increasing your

1:09:34.760 --> 1:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>workload by almost two targets per game as the quarterback

1:09:38.280 --> 1:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and staff started trusting Dk Metcalf more and more leads

1:09:41.120 --> 1:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>me to believe that there's untapped upside for him. And

1:09:43.920 --> 1:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we've seen Locketts upside and he's a really

1:09:46.160 --> 1:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>good solid wide receiver two on fantasy rosters. But Metcalf

1:09:50.200 --> 1:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>has the chance to vault into wide receiver one territory.

1:09:53.320 --> 1:09:57.599
<v Speaker 1>Bettcalf has elite elite in him, right. I mean we've

1:09:57.640 --> 1:10:00.639
<v Speaker 1>seen what Tyler Lockett can do, and it's good, it's

1:10:00.680 --> 1:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>not elite. DK Metcalf has the possibility of being a

1:10:05.760 --> 1:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>top five wide receiver and that body and I think

1:10:09.040 --> 1:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that's why I would rather take the upside in Dk Metcalf.

1:10:12.280 --> 1:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you on that one. Interestingly, we've gone almost

1:10:14.320 --> 1:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>all of the higher a DP guys in this segment.

1:10:17.800 --> 1:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Our final one is in Los Angeles among ram wide receivers,

1:10:21.600 --> 1:10:24.519
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup in the early fourth or Robert Woods in

1:10:24.520 --> 1:10:28.479
<v Speaker 1>the late fourth round. Let's stick with the higher a

1:10:28.600 --> 1:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>DP guys. I'm going Cooper Cup. Uh he he like

1:10:32.120 --> 1:10:35.519
<v Speaker 1>Woods can break plays Woods maybe the safe, consistent guy

1:10:35.600 --> 1:10:38.599
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't get hurt. But and cups. Cups has missed

1:10:38.600 --> 1:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>time injuries, concussions. But if you told me that, and

1:10:41.920 --> 1:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>he's a red zone machine, Cooper Cup is just a

1:10:44.000 --> 1:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>machine with targets. And if you told me a round

1:10:47.200 --> 1:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>four wide receiver ended this season as the number one

1:10:50.000 --> 1:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in league and and made me bet on it,

1:10:52.760 --> 1:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I bet Cooper Cup he has that in him. We

1:10:55.200 --> 1:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>talked about it last week. If there was one wide

1:10:57.120 --> 1:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver outside of the top ten, who you think could

1:10:59.400 --> 1:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>finish number one overall? Cooper Cup was the guy I forgot.

1:11:04.200 --> 1:11:12.639
<v Speaker 1>But but yes, I agree with whoever said that. But again, nice,

1:11:13.040 --> 1:11:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm never gonna get to talk. If you want to

1:11:17.560 --> 1:11:21.479
<v Speaker 1>try the freshest new format in fantasy football, it's called

1:11:21.479 --> 1:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the Guillotine League. Seventeen teams start the season. Every week,

1:11:24.840 --> 1:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the lowest scoring team gets cut and their entire draft,

1:11:29.920 --> 1:11:33.839
<v Speaker 1>their entire roster goes to the waiver wire. Pandemonium ensues,

1:11:34.200 --> 1:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>with the waiver wire bidding the last team standing wins

1:11:37.120 --> 1:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's Guillotine Leagues. At Guillotine leagues dot com,

1:11:39.880 --> 1:11:42.479
<v Speaker 1>play with friends, play with strangers, play for cash, play

1:11:42.520 --> 1:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>how have you like? At Guillotine leagues dot com. The

1:11:44.920 --> 1:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Shock Fantasy Crew is going to set up a Guillotine League.

1:11:47.520 --> 1:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Prey I like that guy. We will track that as well.

1:11:50.720 --> 1:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we will agree to disagree on

1:11:53.040 --> 1:11:55.479
<v Speaker 1>some of the hottest topics around fantasy football, and release

1:11:55.640 --> 1:12:09.839
<v Speaker 1>this week's Sleepers, the final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly

1:12:10.160 --> 1:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>bulcharching from duntin leagues dot Com. Scott Fish and Matt

1:12:14.160 --> 1:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Harrison with you as well. This is our final segment.

1:12:17.040 --> 1:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>A game that we play most preseasons is called agree

1:12:20.520 --> 1:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to Disagree. This is where each of us battles each

1:12:24.240 --> 1:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>other on a particular topic, and you know, a lot

1:12:26.320 --> 1:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of times we end up in lockstep. We convince each

1:12:28.280 --> 1:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>other of some of our best takes. Matt has convinced

1:12:30.720 --> 1:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>me on the upside of Austin Neckler, as one example,

1:12:33.600 --> 1:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>over the course of this preseason, and I've nudged him

1:12:35.600 --> 1:12:37.479
<v Speaker 1>up over the course of the preseason up my cheat

1:12:37.520 --> 1:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>sheet correspondingly. But there are other times that you're just

1:12:40.760 --> 1:12:43.479
<v Speaker 1>wrong and I'm not coming to your side of the

1:12:43.520 --> 1:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>table on a particular take. So when that's the case, um,

1:12:48.240 --> 1:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we agree to disagree. So we will have a battleground

1:12:52.160 --> 1:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>on different topics between each of us. We will begin

1:12:55.400 --> 1:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>with Scott versus Matt. The top it gives what is

1:13:01.800 --> 1:13:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the topic, Jalen reagor alright, who is on the pro

1:13:05.640 --> 1:13:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Reagor side. Oh you know, I am alright, Scott, Scott's

1:13:08.840 --> 1:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>pro every wide receiver. I'm Mr Positivity, alright, alright, Mr Sunshine,

1:13:14.160 --> 1:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you go first raining FSG Humanitard alright, lived as it

1:13:22.080 --> 1:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>may be, Jalen Reagor, I haven't around wide receiver forty

1:13:27.760 --> 1:13:30.519
<v Speaker 1>and you haven't met wide receiver fifty three, which is

1:13:30.680 --> 1:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that's too high? Dear Lord? What there are a hundred

1:13:36.200 --> 1:13:39.599
<v Speaker 1>and twenty eight vacated targets from that team? Alshan Jeffrey

1:13:39.720 --> 1:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>is people expect at this point him to land on

1:13:42.680 --> 1:13:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the pup for the first six weeks of the season.

1:13:45.120 --> 1:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't have faith into Sean Jackson anymore. I don't

1:13:48.080 --> 1:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>have faith in a A. F. S. Greg Ward is

1:13:50.760 --> 1:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>as good as you looked at the end of the season.

1:13:53.080 --> 1:13:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Camp reports have been glowing on Reagor, who is lining

1:13:55.720 --> 1:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>up all over the place with the ones. I'm not

1:13:59.280 --> 1:14:01.759
<v Speaker 1>saying he's gonna be a wide receiver one. I'm saying

1:14:02.160 --> 1:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>have him around wide receiver forty. He's a top end

1:14:05.120 --> 1:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver four on your team. That's that's where I

1:14:07.920 --> 1:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>have him. Sure Arts and Goddard are are their top

1:14:11.400 --> 1:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>two options, but went through for four thousand yards last

1:14:14.960 --> 1:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>year with all the rest of their guys out, what

1:14:17.680 --> 1:14:20.519
<v Speaker 1>what is Goddard and uh and it's gonna get a

1:14:20.600 --> 1:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand each and Miles Standers six hundred and then there's

1:14:24.400 --> 1:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing for anybody else. I think he's a wide receiver four.

1:14:29.040 --> 1:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I have him at at around wide receiver forty. Alright,

1:14:32.360 --> 1:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Matt agreed to disagree Jalen Reagor go. I will agree

1:14:35.880 --> 1:14:38.599
<v Speaker 1>with Scott on one thing. I think Jalen Reagor will

1:14:38.640 --> 1:14:42.679
<v Speaker 1>probably lead all Eagles wide receivers and catches, but he's

1:14:42.680 --> 1:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>going to end up fifth on the team in that

1:14:45.000 --> 1:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>category after Zach Ertz, Dallas Goddard, Miles Sanders, and Boston Scott.

1:14:51.560 --> 1:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Wrong on Boston, Yes, you at Boston market is Boston Scott.

1:14:57.640 --> 1:15:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Over the last seven weeks of the season and when

1:15:00.520 --> 1:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles wide receivers were absolutely decimated by injury last year,

1:15:05.360 --> 1:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz increased his passing attempts by a ton and

1:15:09.320 --> 1:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Wentz his first nine games he threw forty attempts in

1:15:12.320 --> 1:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a game only twice. In his final seven games, he

1:15:15.200 --> 1:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>topped forty passing attempts in every game. That's with no

1:15:19.960 --> 1:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers around, so who did he throw? Wouldn't that

1:15:23.080 --> 1:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>mean he's gonna throw that many more balls to Jalen Reagor,

1:15:25.439 --> 1:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>who did he throw to? Zach ERT's average ten targets

1:15:28.400 --> 1:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>per game a necessity, Dallas Goddard averaged eight. Miles Sanders

1:15:32.320 --> 1:15:37.559
<v Speaker 1>and Boston Scott each averaged five targets per game. Receivers

1:15:37.600 --> 1:15:42.519
<v Speaker 1>were like Ward way better. What do tight end and

1:15:42.640 --> 1:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>running back pass routes have in common? High percentage, low

1:15:46.160 --> 1:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>depth of target, high efficiency. The wide receiver group during

1:15:50.040 --> 1:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that time sounds like the kind of thing you do

1:15:51.640 --> 1:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>when you don't trust your wide receivers. Sounds like the

1:15:53.680 --> 1:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing you do when you want your offense

1:15:55.360 --> 1:15:57.439
<v Speaker 1>to function and you want to win games down the

1:15:57.439 --> 1:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>stretch to win the NFC East, which, by the way,

1:16:00.400 --> 1:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>they did. The wide receiver group only averaged fifteen targets

1:16:03.960 --> 1:16:06.519
<v Speaker 1>per game. Eight receptions and a hundred and two is

1:16:06.560 --> 1:16:10.519
<v Speaker 1>a group. If you spread that around, maybe Jalen Reagor's

1:16:10.560 --> 1:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>getting six targets a game, four catches sixty yards? Whoop

1:16:14.320 --> 1:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>de do Jalen now listeners at home? You get to

1:16:17.600 --> 1:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>decide who won. That's called agreed to disigree. You better

1:16:20.320 --> 1:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>put up a post gets to decide who the winner was.

1:16:24.840 --> 1:16:27.439
<v Speaker 1>You just heard the Jalen Reagor battle. Here comes a

1:16:27.560 --> 1:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson battle. Me and Matt I say, Lamar Jackson

1:16:32.200 --> 1:16:35.679
<v Speaker 1>is worth a first round pick. I should not even

1:16:35.720 --> 1:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>have to defend taking the highest scoring player in fantasy

1:16:40.400 --> 1:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>football last year in the first round. The next year,

1:16:43.680 --> 1:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>not only was the the highest scoring by ESPN scoring,

1:16:47.160 --> 1:16:50.639
<v Speaker 1>he was a hundred points better than Christian McCaffrey. There's

1:16:50.680 --> 1:16:52.559
<v Speaker 1>no doubt that he should go in the first round. Now.

1:16:52.600 --> 1:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Needless to say, Lamar Jackson is a massive differentiator at

1:16:56.760 --> 1:16:59.479
<v Speaker 1>his position, and that is the surest way to win

1:16:59.680 --> 1:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the lead. Get positional differentiation. How much better was Jackson

1:17:03.120 --> 1:17:06.799
<v Speaker 1>than Patrick Mahomes last year? He was a passing touchdown

1:17:06.880 --> 1:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half per game better. How much better was

1:17:10.439 --> 1:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>he than the average starting quarterback quarterback six Russell Wilson.

1:17:15.640 --> 1:17:18.519
<v Speaker 1>Jackson was a touchdown and a half and fifty passing

1:17:18.600 --> 1:17:20.799
<v Speaker 1>yards better. And if you were to slopt the quarterback

1:17:20.800 --> 1:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>position all the way to quarterback twelve, how much better

1:17:23.840 --> 1:17:26.759
<v Speaker 1>was he than Tom Brady last year? That same touchdown

1:17:26.760 --> 1:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half, that same fifty passing yards per game

1:17:29.680 --> 1:17:33.479
<v Speaker 1>and throwing twenty rushing yards better than Tom Brady. You're

1:17:33.479 --> 1:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>getting Tom Brady plus a touchdown and a half fifty

1:17:35.720 --> 1:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>yards and touch rushing yards. We said it over and

1:17:39.080 --> 1:17:41.799
<v Speaker 1>over again last year. Lamar Jackson's like having a starting

1:17:41.960 --> 1:17:45.599
<v Speaker 1>running back and the starting quarterback. There's no plausible reason

1:17:45.680 --> 1:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>for him to regress. He should go in the first round.

1:17:48.920 --> 1:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a plausible reason for him to regress. It's because

1:17:52.640 --> 1:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it always happens. Do you know the last time we

1:17:56.840 --> 1:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>had a quarterback finish number one in back to back

1:18:00.160 --> 1:18:06.599
<v Speaker 1>seasons Manning, No, I don't know. Dante Culpepper two thousand three,

1:18:06.840 --> 1:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>two thousand four. That was the last time we had

1:18:09.680 --> 1:18:12.759
<v Speaker 1>a number one and Culpepper, while he was a running threat,

1:18:13.680 --> 1:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't his running that propelled him that those years.

1:18:16.960 --> 1:18:19.400
<v Speaker 1>He had forty seven hundred yards in one of those seasons,

1:18:19.439 --> 1:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>so his passing ability, especially with Randy Moss, really helped

1:18:22.840 --> 1:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>propel him throughout those seasons. Throughout this offseason, John Harbaugh

1:18:26.240 --> 1:18:29.759
<v Speaker 1>has said that he wants to make their offense more balanced,

1:18:29.800 --> 1:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and by balanced, I think that means taking hits off

1:18:32.479 --> 1:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. Out of the one thousand thirty six plays

1:18:35.920 --> 1:18:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens ran last season, six hundred six team were

1:18:39.360 --> 1:18:44.479
<v Speaker 1>pass attempts. Lamar Jackson runs or sacks hundred and seventy

1:18:44.520 --> 1:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>six rushing attempts. For Jackson, he had more rushing attempts

1:18:47.320 --> 1:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>than Dak Prescott and Josh Allen combined. That's why I

1:18:50.280 --> 1:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>like it. That's not every rushing quarterback goes through this process.

1:18:56.880 --> 1:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>They had the year that is otherworldly. Then the coach

1:19:00.000 --> 1:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>says they need to be more balanced, and one of

1:19:01.800 --> 1:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>two things happened. They try to force him into being

1:19:04.120 --> 1:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>more of a pocket passer or he gets hurt. So

1:19:06.880 --> 1:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge risk in taking Jackson earlier. I'll take

1:19:09.360 --> 1:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen in round six, who also had a hundred

1:19:12.720 --> 1:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts last year and, by the way, more touchdowns

1:19:16.080 --> 1:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>on the ground than Lamar Jackson. All Right, our final

1:19:18.120 --> 1:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>agree to disagree? You know what, I gotta stop us here, Yes,

1:19:20.960 --> 1:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I gotta stop us here. I know we're doing a

1:19:22.960 --> 1:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>fun segment on agree to Disagree, but fun the listeners

1:19:26.880 --> 1:19:29.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know about this. I just needed to apologize to

1:19:29.479 --> 1:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you Charge and your family, and you matt and your

1:19:33.080 --> 1:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>family because when I found out that Matthew Stafford had

1:19:36.680 --> 1:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>gone to your house, Charge and kicked pepper and scraps

1:19:41.240 --> 1:19:44.919
<v Speaker 1>and then went to Batt's house and kicked Hayley. What terrible.

1:19:45.120 --> 1:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>That's my daughter. That's even worse. That's worth it's Hattie.

1:19:50.960 --> 1:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Hattie the dog is the daughter, and Hattie's a lot better.

1:19:56.479 --> 1:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And Hattie is like four pounds when teen, Like, what

1:20:01.160 --> 1:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? Your daughter's thirteen pounds thirteen years old?

1:20:04.960 --> 1:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>When I found out Matthew Stafford had done that to

1:20:07.560 --> 1:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>both of your dogs, and first, that's the only reason

1:20:10.920 --> 1:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you have from rank solo, right, that's the only possible reason. Yes,

1:20:14.240 --> 1:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I I like Matthew Stafford. And he was great to

1:20:17.680 --> 1:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the first half of last year before the injury, right,

1:20:20.600 --> 1:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>he was on paces and forty touchdowns and he's been

1:20:24.680 --> 1:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a four thousand yard touchdown or four thousand yard guy

1:20:27.120 --> 1:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>like every year of his career. And you gotta make

1:20:30.000 --> 1:20:32.519
<v Speaker 1>QB sixteen. It's just a lot of good qbs. That's

1:20:32.520 --> 1:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>all a lot of great weapon. You know what I'm

1:20:34.479 --> 1:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I am I'm nervous about. I'm worry not just last

1:20:37.240 --> 1:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>year's injury, just where he is in the ark of

1:20:39.080 --> 1:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>his career, with the injuries, the rumors of him retiring.

1:20:42.880 --> 1:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's just It's just there's a lot

1:20:45.320 --> 1:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of good guy. I like him. I like a lot

1:20:46.800 --> 1:20:50.719
<v Speaker 1>of other quarterbacks. Coaching staff that's probably leading the odds

1:20:50.760 --> 1:20:54.799
<v Speaker 1>for first coach fired. Maybe maybe you know it's it's

1:20:54.840 --> 1:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>he's still the Lions quarterback that worries me a little bit.

1:20:57.880 --> 1:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And and actually, you know, I like staff Is Stafford

1:21:00.080 --> 1:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>been a drafted by a different team, he'd have Super

1:21:02.080 --> 1:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Bowl rings. It's just that I can't trust the Lions yet.

1:21:06.120 --> 1:21:08.759
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Kenny, if they Stufford and Kenny Golladay

1:21:08.760 --> 1:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>were exactly, Kenny Golladay would have fourches receiver. Dang. Yeah,

1:21:15.120 --> 1:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Golladay is really good. And Marvin Jones is good too.

1:21:17.840 --> 1:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>He's got to stay healthy though. That's part of the deal,

1:21:20.439 --> 1:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is we gotta get Marvin Jones to stay stay healthy,

1:21:23.080 --> 1:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a big part of it. We wrap up

1:21:24.800 --> 1:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>every show with sleepers. We released three each show, we

1:21:28.960 --> 1:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>each release one. I've already given you just stone cold

1:21:32.400 --> 1:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>winners so far over the course of the Are you

1:21:35.240 --> 1:21:39.439
<v Speaker 1>precocking over there? I am? As a matter of John

1:21:39.439 --> 1:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>ou Smith and Zack Moss and Paris Campbell and Baker Mayfield,

1:21:43.560 --> 1:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>all guys are all guys excellent excellent sleepers for your team.

1:21:48.760 --> 1:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's begin with Matt You're sleeper this week. I've got

1:21:52.360 --> 1:21:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Dare talked nicely, thank you. We talked about some inside

1:21:57.920 --> 1:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the five numbers on the last week's show, and one

1:21:59.680 --> 1:22:01.719
<v Speaker 1>of the things that piqued my interest was the Tampa

1:22:01.760 --> 1:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>situation last year inside the five, Tampa's rushing attempt totals

1:22:05.240 --> 1:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>went to Peyton Barber with ten gone, then a gon

1:22:08.720 --> 1:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Bo with seven, then then Ronald Jones with four and

1:22:12.360 --> 1:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a gun was the only running back to receive a

1:22:14.960 --> 1:22:18.599
<v Speaker 1>target inside the five. He had to Peyton Barber is gone,

1:22:18.680 --> 1:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Arians seemed to trust Dare more than Rojoe last year. Plus,

1:22:23.120 --> 1:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Ronald jones terrible pass blocking ratings from

1:22:26.360 --> 1:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus last year and the fact that he's

1:22:29.160 --> 1:22:31.439
<v Speaker 1>looked if he at best catching the ball in camp.

1:22:31.800 --> 1:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>If Tom Brady's blown up once by a missed assignment

1:22:35.080 --> 1:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>by Rojoe, he may never see the field again. And

1:22:38.040 --> 1:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Dario Gunbala could be the Tampa version of James White,

1:22:42.040 --> 1:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>which is a pretty decent you know, flex play and

1:22:44.720 --> 1:22:48.759
<v Speaker 1>every everyone turns into that. Ye alright, Scott, You're sleeper

1:22:48.840 --> 1:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this week. Lavisca Chenult jr. Uh coaches, team writers, beat writers.

1:22:53.360 --> 1:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>They're all super impressed with him in camp. Gardnerman shoes

1:22:56.120 --> 1:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>calling him freak. Uh. If you've watched him, you know

1:22:58.920 --> 1:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>he's an absolute play maker, kind of kind of reminiscent

1:23:01.479 --> 1:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>of of Cordeo Patterson with the ball in his hands,

1:23:04.720 --> 1:23:07.479
<v Speaker 1>just ridiculous with the ball in his hands. Um, he's

1:23:07.520 --> 1:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>already running as the number two in that offense. D D.

1:23:10.400 --> 1:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Westbrook is hurt, keeling cole Is Rubert to be released.

1:23:13.680 --> 1:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Who's the other guy? Chris Conley? Hey, he was, he

1:23:18.120 --> 1:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>was for three games, for three games. We we have

1:23:20.840 --> 1:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>a beat on Chris Connelly on this show. Yeah, but Leavisca,

1:23:24.320 --> 1:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>he go get yourself some of visa. He's going so late.

1:23:28.080 --> 1:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>He's the number two there. I'm with you if you

1:23:30.439 --> 1:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>like Gardner Minshew at all. You know, and the game

1:23:32.920 --> 1:23:35.360
<v Speaker 1>scripts are just gonna be passing countily. Jacksonville could have

1:23:35.360 --> 1:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the worst defense in the league, four nets, not getting

1:23:37.840 --> 1:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy catches again or whatever. No, I think I'm with

1:23:41.360 --> 1:23:43.599
<v Speaker 1>you on that. And it's weird to see these these

1:23:43.680 --> 1:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>rookie receivers are going so late this year. And we

1:23:48.280 --> 1:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>know that, you know, the last five six years, rookie

1:23:50.680 --> 1:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>receivers called some pop and just like nobody thinks that

1:23:53.920 --> 1:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>even we're gonna pop this year, which is bizarre. My sleeper,

1:23:58.240 --> 1:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to play a game. See how many clues

1:24:01.200 --> 1:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you need to figure this out? Now, you guys already know,

1:24:03.280 --> 1:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>because already told you it is. I forgot my sleepers.

1:24:08.040 --> 1:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Average draft position, and I'm not kidding, is three hundred

1:24:12.400 --> 1:24:17.519
<v Speaker 1>sixty six. That sounds that is round of these thirty

1:24:17.520 --> 1:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>one round leagues. It is. It is round thirty one

1:24:21.280 --> 1:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>for this guy. So we're talking deep sleeper. He's going

1:24:25.439 --> 1:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>off the board as wide receiver one hundred five. Now

1:24:30.680 --> 1:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>this sleeper is a starting wide receiver on one of

1:24:35.080 --> 1:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the highest scoring offenses in the NFL. Oh, I got it.

1:24:39.800 --> 1:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>He was. He was a third round pick and so

1:24:43.720 --> 1:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>at wide receivers, so there was real equity put into him,

1:24:46.360 --> 1:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and people obviously liked him out of college. Now do

1:24:50.280 --> 1:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you have it yet, listeners, don't say it? Did you? Excellent?

1:24:55.080 --> 1:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>He's in his second year and in many times, second

1:24:58.160 --> 1:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>year is when it clicks for receivers. Years ago, it

1:25:00.760 --> 1:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>used to be three years, then over the past decade,

1:25:03.439 --> 1:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>really it's the second year for wide receivers is when

1:25:05.920 --> 1:25:08.559
<v Speaker 1>it clicks. This is this player's second year. Do you

1:25:08.560 --> 1:25:12.479
<v Speaker 1>know who I'm talking about? Lat Yet last year this

1:25:12.560 --> 1:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>mystery player lad his team in yards per reception, downfield

1:25:18.080 --> 1:25:21.479
<v Speaker 1>threatn for this mystery player, you know who it is.

1:25:23.240 --> 1:25:29.799
<v Speaker 1>His quarterback is one of the universally drafted top two

1:25:29.840 --> 1:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy football, and yet nobody's drafting Miles boykine I

1:25:41.000 --> 1:25:45.639
<v Speaker 1>love it. Miles Boykin, second year wide receiver, getting strong

1:25:45.720 --> 1:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>praise from offensive coordinator Greg Roman this week, saying that

1:25:49.160 --> 1:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>he sees a giant step coming for Boykin this year.

1:25:54.640 --> 1:25:58.599
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens were the highest scoring offense in football last year,

1:25:58.920 --> 1:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>and he's a starting wide receiver with all this room

1:26:02.479 --> 1:26:07.799
<v Speaker 1>to grow into the job. Miles Boykin one of my

1:26:08.080 --> 1:26:11.839
<v Speaker 1>favorite deep deep sleepers. John O. Smith's made deep sleeper

1:26:12.120 --> 1:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Zack Moss was, He's not anymore. This is super super

1:26:15.160 --> 1:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>off the radar, last pick of year draft Miles Boykin.

1:26:19.760 --> 1:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>By the way, uh uh twenty four four two? I know,

1:26:28.160 --> 1:26:33.559
<v Speaker 1>no kidding, super fast, he's he was a six ft yes,

1:26:34.479 --> 1:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>four four two, that's freakish, freakish Scott. Before the show

1:26:39.960 --> 1:26:41.640
<v Speaker 1>we were talking a little bit. We've got about a

1:26:41.640 --> 1:26:44.479
<v Speaker 1>minute and a half. Is there a player that you're

1:26:44.520 --> 1:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>already worried that we're all wrong about the player that

1:26:47.800 --> 1:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you think, you know what, this guy could be good,

1:26:49.840 --> 1:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>but you can't get yourself just quite change your rankings yet. Yeah,

1:26:52.920 --> 1:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I was, I was thinking about this earlier. I have

1:26:55.160 --> 1:27:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater ranked in the low twenties. Likes me maybe, Yeah,

1:27:00.720 --> 1:27:03.479
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's right. But the more I think

1:27:03.479 --> 1:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>about it, He's got all these weapons. Ian Thomas is

1:27:06.080 --> 1:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>reportedly looking great. He's got, you know, replacing Greg Olsen.

1:27:09.320 --> 1:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Thereel D J. Moore, J. Moore, Curtis Samuel, Yeah, yeah,

1:27:14.320 --> 1:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel, d J. Moore, Robby Anderson's now there on

1:27:16.800 --> 1:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the outside, Christian McCaffrey, a lot of good dump off

1:27:19.080 --> 1:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>options for him. And that Carolina defense is not good.

1:27:22.080 --> 1:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be behind a lot. Uh. Teddy Bridgewater didn't

1:27:25.800 --> 1:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>have great yardage totals with New Orleans last year, but

1:27:28.000 --> 1:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>they were before that. Yeah, and they were aheading a

1:27:30.200 --> 1:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of those games, and that those were like ten

1:27:31.680 --> 1:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>win Vikings teams too, um with good defenses. By the way, Yeah, yeah, yeah,

1:27:37.800 --> 1:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>yeah exactly. I think you know, I wouldn't be surprised.

1:27:40.720 --> 1:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I can't move them up my rankings, but I wouldn't

1:27:42.439 --> 1:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if at the end of the year, I'm like,

1:27:44.439 --> 1:27:46.719
<v Speaker 1>how did I not see this coming? All the weapons,

1:27:46.840 --> 1:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>bad defense? What's the real upside for Teddy Bridgewater? What

1:27:49.840 --> 1:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't see what coming? I could see him. I

1:27:53.040 --> 1:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>could see him moving up into that QB twelve thirteen

1:27:55.760 --> 1:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>fourteen range with with two yards a game, a couple

1:28:01.120 --> 1:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of touchdowns a game kind of guy that and and

1:28:04.080 --> 1:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>we started more weeks than we think we could. I

1:28:08.160 --> 1:28:16.599
<v Speaker 1>think his upside to me feels like quarterback because manager

1:28:16.800 --> 1:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely he may not complete a pass of more than

1:28:19.320 --> 1:28:22.599
<v Speaker 1>nine yards here. That's what I'm saying. I'm not moving

1:28:22.680 --> 1:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>my rankings at all. But if at the end of

1:28:24.600 --> 1:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the season that's what it is, you know we're gonna

1:28:27.640 --> 1:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll play this segment back and go well done. We

1:28:29.800 --> 1:28:32.120
<v Speaker 1>knew enough to know we were wrong in in August,

1:28:32.200 --> 1:28:34.559
<v Speaker 1>we didn't do anything about it. You might be right

1:28:34.600 --> 1:28:36.479
<v Speaker 1>about that. They're gonna be behind a lot. He's gonna

1:28:36.479 --> 1:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>pass a lot. He just needs all his receivers to

1:28:38.720 --> 1:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>be special after the catch because he can't deliver downfield.

1:28:42.040 --> 1:28:44.639
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of all good at that. That helps there's

1:28:44.640 --> 1:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a little something there. Thanks for listening to Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:28:47.520 --> 1:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>We're available as a podcast everywhere you enjoy. Podcasts were

1:28:50.360 --> 1:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>available over the air as well. We will talk to

1:28:53.160 --> 1:28:56.599
<v Speaker 1>you next week for more fantasy football action and our

1:28:56.640 --> 1:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>final preseason show. Look forward to that. And you need

1:29:00.320 --> 1:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a free chee cheek, please go to Guillotine leagues dot

1:29:02.200 --> 1:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>com where you get all of my player rankings. Fantasy

1:29:07.280 --> 1:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly is a production of I Heart Radio. For

1:29:10.240 --> 1:29:12.599
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart

1:29:12.720 --> 1:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

1:29:15.720 --> 1:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.