WEBVTT - Shocking Math: How Bitcoin Could Reach $43M (full breakdown)

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:05.119
<v Speaker 1>The shocking math how bitcoin will reach forty three billion dollars.

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>We're going to break down the math. Now, in life,

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>there are no such things on certainties. There's only probabilities,

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and we bet on those probabilities every single day. That's

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly what markets are. And Bitcoin has beaten the odds

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>over and over. It's been called dead hundreds of times,

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it's crashed dozens of times, and yet it keeps coming

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>back stronger every single time. And now today it's crossing

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>what we call the chasm as we see Blackrock and

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Fidelity adding millions of people. We have three US presidential

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>candidates openly discussing bitcoin, and so today for those of

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you with an open mind and are willing to understand

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that again, everything in life is a probability, I'm going

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to break down the math. I'm going to break down

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>the future potential of Bitcoin like it's never been done before.

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to show you the odds. I'm going to

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>show you the path it will take. We're going to

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>look at the different price points along the way, the timeframes,

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and of course how to play this. If you're a

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>huge bitcoin skeptic or you're a diehard bitcoin believer either way,

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>this is for you, So let's go. All right, welcome back.

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>If you're new to the channel, my name is Mark Moss.

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I make these videos, of course, to change the way

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you think about money, because almost everything you've learned is

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>wrong and it's changing. We're talking about bitcoin, we're talking

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>about a new form of money, and most people don't

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>understand it because as my good friend Jeff Booth, who

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>will hear about later, he likes to say that it's

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 1>very hard to see a new system, to understand a

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>new system when you're stuck in an existing system. So look,

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I get it. It's difficult. So have an open mind.

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Now if you want the short answer, where is it going?

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to break the down the math to how

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we get to forty three billion and for some of

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>us in our lifetime. All right, I'm going to break

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>down the math, the path, all that. But first I

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>want to tell you a story. Last night I was

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>watching a brand new TV show. I think it was

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>called The Tracker. It's not super good. It was okay,

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it was the very first episode that I saw. But

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>there's this guy and he goes and finds people like

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>people have rewards and bounties, things like that, but he

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>would throughout the show he kept saying, if we go now,

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>we have a ninety five percent chance, but if we

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>wait an hour, we only have a five percent chance.

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>If I hurry up and get you out now, I

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>think we have a fifty percent chance. But if we wait,

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and he kept talking about probabilities all the time, we

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>have a probability of this. Now if we wait, my

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>probability drops to this. And probably I don't know, three,

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>four or five times throughout the show he would do that,

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's how life is. So the first thing I

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>want to let you know is that all right. So

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the problem that I see too many people making is

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>they think very linear. Everything's black or white, it's this

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>or that, there's no way this can happen, or there's

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>no way this can happen. And that's not how life works. Okay,

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a world of possibilities. Everything is possible, and then

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>there's probabilities or percentages that we think that this can happen.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So you may be the biggest Bitcoin skeptic in the world,

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>but still ask yourself this question, are you one hundred

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>percent sure, one hundred percent guaranteed there's no way bitcoin

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>will ever succeed from here, And of course the answer

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is no, you can't say that. Now you might say

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a ninety percent chance, Okay, great, then that ten

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>percent you might want to listen, all right, does that

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>makes sense? So think about things in terms of and

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>let me break this down for you in what's going

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a masterclass. So the short answer is, like

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, forty three billion. If you just want to

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 1>shut it off right now, you could have just read

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the title. But let me break down the mas for you.

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>But more for than they said, how does it get there?

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And when? When does it happen? I bet those are

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the questions that you want to know, and that's what

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to break down. Okay, So if we start

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to break this down, the very first thing we have

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to understand is what is it? When in Silicon Valley

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>about fifteen years ago, when they were trying to raise

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>money for Uber, they would go, Hey, I have this

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>new app I'm building. I want to raise one hundred million,

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and they'd say, what is it? Right, I'm a venture

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>capital investor of investing in venture cap for probably over

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a dozen years now, that's what we do what is it?

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>First of all, what is bitcoin? Is it a brand

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>new technology? Sure, yeah, it's technology. What is it disrupting? So, okay,

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it's an app. Uber is an app. What is it disrupting.

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>It's disrupting the taxi industry, the limo industry, the ride

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>share industry. And then we look at how big those

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>markets are, and then we look at how much we

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>think you can pull from those We're going to break

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the math down in a minute. But first, what is it? So? Yes,

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a brand new technology, it's an app. What is

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>it doing? Well, it's sort of like money, a medium

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of exchange. The white paper says it's peer to peer cash,

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>electronic cash, so we exchange it for money and meaning

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>of exchange. It's also a store of value, as we

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 1>call an soov. All right now, it is winning the

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>war of store value, which eventually could evolve into the

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>next stage. I'm going to break that evolutionary path down

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for you so you can see the timeframe. But let's

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>just talk about the store value because I want to

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>simplify this, and I know it sounds crazy, but I'm

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>going to make it sound very conservative so we could

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 1>overshoot it. So let's just talk about the store of

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>value right now, all right, so what we can see

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>mini headlines that can continue to pull them. Goldman Sachs,

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest financial institutions in the United States

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and the world, says bitcoin will not could not should,

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but will compete with gold as store of value. This

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is Goldman Sacks. We know that Larry Fink, the largest

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>asset manager in the world from black Rock Now, went

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>on TV a month ago saying that bitcoin is a

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>flight to safety. Right, so it's a store of value.

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>We know this. We can see Kathy Wood, who runs

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest tech funds in Wall Street. She

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>says that bitcoin describing bitcoin as both. So it's both,

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it's multiple things. It's more things than we'll know in

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the future. Both a store of value and a risk

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>off asset, meaning we use it to store wealth, but

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we also use it to when there's times of risk

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>or high inflation. Wood emphasize that when compared to gold,

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the upward trajectory hints at the possibility of overtaking gold

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>as a more valuable investment in the future. Okay, so

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you can see this from any number of people. It

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is a store of value. It's winning the store of value.

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is like digital gold, all right, but it's better

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>than gold. I'm not going to break down all the

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>ways in this video. If you want a separate video

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>comparing bitcoin to gold, let me know. I can make

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>another video on that. But you have to understand that

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't compete directly with gold, because it's better from

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that standpoint. And again the markets tell us that that's

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>not just my opinion. If you're a goldbug, I am too.

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I've been at goldbug since two thousand and eight. I

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 1>own gold, I talk about gold all the time. But

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you still have to understand this. Don't be mad. This

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is what the markets tell us. As a matter of fact,

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we can see here the pace of inflows. Now we

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>have these new bitcoin ETFs, so the markets are now voting.

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>The pace of money going into the ETFs is remarkable.

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>In just fifteen days, In only fifteen days, the first

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen days open, the bitcoin ETFs attracted over twenty five

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, comparable to the market cap of the largest

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>gold producer, Bear Gold. Within fifteen days, more money went

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>into these bitcoin ETFs than the entire market cap of

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the largest gold producer. Think about that we can see

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 1>right here, this unparalleled growth to the second largest assets

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>under management AUM among US commodity ETFs, establishing them as

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the new digital gold. So they surpassed silver, and they

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>are growing way faster than gold ever did, and they're

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>catching up to At the rate they're at, they could

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>overtake gold in the next year. All right, So the

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>markets are telling us this, it's not just commentators, right,

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>But we have to also understand as a store of value,

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not competing in an industry, right, So uber was

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>competing against taxis, Uber was competing against limousines. Bitcoin as

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a store of value doesn't compete with industries. It's not

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>competing with Visa or PayPal. For people to make those

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>comparisons as ridiculous. It's a store of value, So it

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>competes against other store of value assets. That's what's scoring.

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>That's what it's actually competing against. And we can see

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that the market that it's going after, the market it's

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>competing in is value itself. Okay, so it's not It

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is a new technology, but it's not Visa, it's not MasterCard,

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not Facebook. It's competing against other store value assets

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>such as gold, for value itself. All right, hopefully that

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Now, we also have to realize that the

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>world has changed a lot, and what's happened is as

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the world has rapidly changed money and our technology into

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>store of value has not. So we are in the

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>digital revolution. I'm sure you know that by now. You're

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>watching me over the internet, so of course you're part

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of the digital revolution. What we've seen is that while

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the digital revolution has digitized everything, music, movies, books, videos,

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>everything's become digitized, our money hasn't. And actually, this cool image,

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>all these images were created by chat GBT. Pretty interesting

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and this shows us how all of these technologies have

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>become digitized, books, movies, music, et cetera. And the last

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>thing to be digitized that hasn't yet it's happening right

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>now is digitizing value, digitizing wealth. That's what we're doing

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, and it's a monetary evolution. We have to

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>understand that what we use as money today, well gold

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>was money for five thousand years, has been an evolutionary

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 1>process and this is the next step, the digitization of value.

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>This is where it's compute. That's how big the market is. Okay, now,

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>let me just break this down to something that you

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>can understand, so we can have something to build off of. Okay, So,

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>as I said, gold was money for five thousand years, right,

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So at the end of the day, we don't want money.

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I know it's a shocking statement to make. I know

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you want a lot of money. No, we don't want money.

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>What we want is the goods and services that money

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>buys us. We want food, we want clothes, we want

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a house, we want to travel, things like that. We

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>want the goods and services. Gold or money is what

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we use to get those things. And we can hold

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>our value, our wealth, our energy in that money until

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>we're ready to deploy it to get those goods and

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>service that we want. So if goods and services are

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>wealth and money is a way to acquire it, then

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>what we do is we take all the goods and

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.599
<v Speaker 1>services of the world, the wealth divided by all the gold.

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the price. It's a unit of account. Everything is

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>priced in gold or priced in money. So think about this.

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Gold was money. It was the store of value for

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>five thousand years. It was the unit of account. Everything

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>was priced in Now gold because of technology, the world

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>started evolving and we had global trade, taking off globalization.

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>But gold's very slow. If I want to pay from

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>California somebody in New York with gold, it takes a

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>long time to get that gold there. So what we

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>did is we put the gold in the banks, and

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the banks then used a ledger to say, hey, you

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>know from California. Now the guy in New York, now

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on the ledger shows he has the gold. The golden

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>actually move. They just changed the ledger. That was a

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>new piece of technology, all right, but that didn't actually

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>solve anything. And so what we did is we created

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>paper dollars, Fiat money, paper dollars that represented the gold

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in the bank. So we had one US dollar was

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>equal to twenty ounces of gold. Let me show you

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the chart. This is the gold price chart for the

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>last one hundred years. So what we can see since

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen hundreds, twenty US dollars equaled one ounce of gold.

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Then in nineteen thirty three, I've talked about this extensively,

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>because all the gold went into the bank, the government

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just took it all. They seized it all. They don't

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>want to say they seized it. They bought it from

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you forcibly. What they did is they revalued it to

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>now be thirty five dollars for one ounce of gold.

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>You can see that twenty and then it was thirty

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>five this whole time. Now, this red line here is

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>where we ended the gold standard and we no longer

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>had relation to the price of gold. But the reason

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>why I want you to understand this for right now

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>is because at this time all the dollars in existence

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>were divided by all the gold, and it was twenty

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars for every one ounce, and then it was thirty

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>five dollars. So they printed way too many of them.

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>That's why they had to seize the gold. Then they

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>took it was thirty five dollars for every one ounce

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 1>of gold. You're understanding this, But again, in nineteen seventy one,

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>we left the gold standard, and you can see by

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>this chart right here is where we left. Now, what

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I did is I took a trend line, and you

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>can see the trend line we were on. And if

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we hadn't left the gold standard here, we would have

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>about this much money in circulation today. This is the

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>M two chart. This shows how much dollars are in circulation. Okay,

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>so we would have about this much, but of course

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>they would have needed to get more gold. But then

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy one we got a new trend line and

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that took us to hear right around here. In the

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>year two thousand, we got a new trend line that

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>takes us to here. Two thousand and eight, we got

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a new trend line that takes us to here. In

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, we have a new trend line. And look

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>at that trend that we're on. Here's the problem. They've

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>added more of those paper currencies, but they didn't add

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>more gold because of course we're no longer on a

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>gold system, which is why you can see this right here.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, But you have to understand this to understand

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>where we're going. We had all the dollars in existence

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>divided by all the gold, and that's gone. But that's

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the way it works, and we have to go back

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to it. We are in a fifty two or in

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>about a fifty two year experiment that's gone horribly wrong.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll show you how it's gone horribly wrong in a minute. Okay,

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So now that you understand that, you hear a lot

0:12:57.679 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>of people talking about maybe going back to the gold

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>stand the rise of bricks. Bricks are going to launch

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>their own gold back currency. You've heard me talk about

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 1>that extensively. You have Jim Rickards and Peter Schiff talking

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>about we're going to go back to gold. And the

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>reason why is because gold was money for five thousand years.

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>For fifty years, we've tried this little fiat experiment. It's

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 1>failed horribly wrong, and so the only way that governments

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>will get trust back into fiat currency is to back

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it with something like gold. Again, you've heard that many times.

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>So this is how this would work. Let me break

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it down. In the United States, there's about twenty trillion

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars of currency of paper of fiat currency twenty tint

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the US supposedly, I don't know if I believe this

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>holds eight thousand tons of gold. So then what you

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>would do is you would take the eight thousand tons

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is two hundred and eighty two million ounces, So you

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>take the twenty trillion divided by the two hundred and

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>eighty two million ounces, and that would give you a

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>new gold price of seventy thousand dollars per ounce of gold.

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>At the twenty dollars per ounce of gold up until

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 1>ninety thirty three, the thirty five up to nine seventy one.

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 1>That's how it worked. And to go back to a

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 1>gold standard one hundred percent back this would be the

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>new math. That's why goldbugs want this to go back

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to a gold standard, and they want to hold gold

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 1>because they think they're two thousand dollars an ounce gold

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>will go to seventy thousand ounce. It'd be pretty amazing

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>if that happened, although Big one's going to do better.

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll break the math down now. We also have to

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>think globally, all right, because this is not just the

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>US the US dollars, the global observe currency bus of

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the euro dollar going on, so we have to think globally.

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So if we think globally, there's about eighty seven trillion

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars globally and about we don't really know because China

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really report it properly, but approximately one hundred and

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven thousand tons of gold in the whole world,

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all the gold in the world that's ever been brought

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>above ground is still above ground. It's not really a

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>consumable good. I think all the gold in the world

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>fits in like a football field. It's not even that much.

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>One hundred eighty seven thousand tons, which is six billion ounces.

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>So we take the eighty seven trillion dollars of currency

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>divided by the six billion ounces would give us about

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a thirteen thousand dollars price per goal. Does that make sense? Okay?

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So now that we've gone through that math, you're ready

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to understand the next step in the process. Okay, So

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you remember we've made a couple of cases here. Gold

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>was what we used to measure or price things in.

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Wealth is goods and services, not gold. Wealth is the

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>goods and services. The gold is what it was priced in,

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and so we had to divide the goods and services

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>by the wealth by the gold. So now what other

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>global assets are there? How do we measure how much

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>goods and services are out there? How much wealth is

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>out there? Well, there's a couple of ways we can

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>look at this. All of these global assets are well,

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the global assets right now for this

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>math in store of value assets. There's lots of assets,

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>but we don't store our wealth in all types of assets. So,

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>just for this exercise, being conservative, I know this sounds crazy,

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we're only looking at what we call store of value assets,

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>things that you would put your money into such as

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>gold is a store of value asset real estate. Sure,

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I have a house there, but I park my wealth

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in real estate as well, bonds, stocks, things like that. Okay,

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>so if we look at that. Here's a chart from

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Croasis. He did an amazing write up on this.

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>We're going to link to it in the description down

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>below if you want to read his rite up and

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>break down of this. But we have store of value

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>assets right here, gold, cars, other collectibles. So rich people

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>buy really old collectible cars, things like that, they store

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>their wealth in there. One of my buddies down the

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>streets got a couple Mustangs that are worth millions of dollars.

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Pretty cool, doesn't drive them fine? Art of course, stock market, right,

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>we buy stock to put our wealth in their real estate,

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, not just your home, but other real

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>estate that you invest in, bonds, and of course money.

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>If we add those up, we have twelve trillion dollars

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in gold, six trillion in collectibles, eighteen trillion in fine art,

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifteen trillion, and you do the math.

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>It totals nine hundred trillion dollars. If we add all

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that up. Now again back to the uber example, uber

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to disrupt taxis, limos vans. What percentage do

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we think it can get from each of those markets?

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>So conservatively, do we think bitcoin could capture fifty percent

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of the gold market cap? I think so, Golden Sacks,

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>this is going to overtake it. So fifty percent. That

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>puts bitcoin at six trillion, cars, other collectibles. It's not

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>going to take the whole thing. People like cars, people

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>like collectibles, people like fine art. But could it take

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.719
<v Speaker 1>five percent? I think that's reasonable, fine art five percent,

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>sure stock market fifteen percent, I think reasonable, real estate

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent. Okay, bonds thirty percent, money thirty percent. That

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>brings us to two hundred trillion dollars just at those levels,

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and this could happen over the next five, six, seven years.

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'll get more to the timeframe. We'll break

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this map down a little bit more. But that would

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>put it one bitcoin to ten million dollars. It's a

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>big number, ten million dollars just forgetting these pieces. Now.

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 1>We're not even adding all the other use cases, the

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>money exchanging, we're not including all the technologies being built

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>on bitcoin. We're just talking about store of value assets only,

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, so you can see that math. Now let's

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>keep going here. Now, remember there's no such thing as certainties,

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>there's only probabilities. So is this a probable outcome? But

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>what we do know is pretty much certain, ninety nine

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>percent certain that FIAT is dead, FIAT is crashing. FIAT

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>was an experiment. We're fifty two years into this experiment,

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>five thousand years of using sound money, fifty two years

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of FIAT, and it's dead. It's over. There's pretty much

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>no way I can continue from here. Like I said,

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to figure out a way to

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>bring some trust back into the system. So what options

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 1>do we have. Well, I did a video a couple

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>months ago in Amsterdam, or I gave a talk at

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a conference in Amsdam a couple months ago. Let's go

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>ahead and just play this clip so you can hear it.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.959
<v Speaker 1>We can see this system is shifting. If you're paying attention,

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>they're buying gold. The problem is that already failed before.

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>We live in a information world today. We need money

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>to transfer at the speed of our transactions over the internet,

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and gold can't do that. Gold requires trust. Since gold

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>can't transfer immediately, are someone to hold a ledger and

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>if someone's holding the ledger, we must trust that person.

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 1>But trust is lost. So if that doesn't work, if

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't go back to commodities, where do we go. Well,

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the next solution is central bank digital currencies, because that

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>should fix everything. Right, The CBDCs seem to be the

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>next logical step. But the problem is I would call

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>this not de evolution, I'd call it zero evolution because

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it's basically the exact same thing that we have right now.

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>It still allows US central banks to print unlimited amounts

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of money. So if we have a problem of inless

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>money printing, then we need to fix it. We need

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>a solution that has a fixed supply, doesn't allow anybody

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to have in this money printing. And in a multipolar world,

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>whether we're no longer in the current monetary order or

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the current international order that we have today, a US

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>led order with a US dollar reserve currency in a

0:19:54.800 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>paper fiat monetary system, moving to a multipolar world, how

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>does the world move forward when there is no trust?

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>In a world where trust is gone, it's almost like

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>we need a decentralized ledger that's trust lists. And so

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>in this new world order that we're going into, the

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>question is left, if not bitcoined, then what all right,

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>so you can hear from there like the options are

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>one we go back to gold, but gold already failed

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's old technology. We live in a world of

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>instant transactions and we need instant settlement, but gold can

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>never do that without adding debt and adding trust in

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the system, which there is no trust in the system anymore.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So gold doesn't work. The other option is well, a CBDC,

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>but that's basically still FIAT and the problem is the

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>unlimited money printing in the debt, so that doesn't fix

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>it either. So, as I put in the question at

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of debt presentation, if not bitcoined, then what

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's not guaranteed, but is it at least probable?

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's a twenty percent chance that people

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>move to it? I mean, we're certainly seeing that happen now.

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Is there a thirty, forty fifty percent chance. We'll come

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>back to that in a second. Let's look at some

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of the time frames that is happening on now. Remember

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I said this is an evolutionary process. One of the

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest problems that people have with understanding this is they

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>expect way too much too soon. Imagine you and I

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.239
<v Speaker 1>walking through a forest of redwoods and we find this

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>little tree like this big, and I'm like, oh my gosh,

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>look at this little tree. Look how cool it is. Can

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you imagine that this tree one day is going to

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>be as big as these other trees? And You're like, Oh,

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that's stupid, Mark, that tree will never be that big.

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Look how small it is. How could it ever grow

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that big? And I'm like, but give it time, give

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it a couple decades. It's like it'll get there. Right.

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>So you have to understand things take time, and there's

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>an evolutionary path that things have to go down. Another

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>image by chat GBT showing this evolutionary path. So what

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>am I talking about? Let's take a look at this

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary path. So remember, as I said money, If you

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>study thousands of years of history of money, rocks, feathers, seashells, gold,

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you understand it. It was always emergent and it was always

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>an evolution. Happens is it starts right here as a collectible.

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh this is a pretty cool rock. I think I'm

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>going to keep it. It's a collectible. Oh look at

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>this baseball card, This Pokemon card. I like this, I'll

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>collect it. Now, there's a lot of things that become collectibles.

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But if maybe, sometimes they could evolve to the next stage,

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>which could become a store of value. So baseball cards

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>are stores of value. Some people store millions of dollars

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in baseball cards, Pokemon cards, watches. Not all collectibles make

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the evolution to store value, but a lot do. Now

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>if maybe, if they have the right attributes of money, portable, divisible, durable, recognizable,

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>things like that, then maybe it could evolve to the

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 1>next stage from a store value to a medium of exchange. Okay,

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>so now it's big enough, it's a big enough asset class,

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it's widely accepted, it has that right attributes, like I said,

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and now people use it as a medium exchange. And

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>then maybe, if potentially, if it could, we could evolve

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to the next stage, which is a unit of account,

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>which means everything's priced in that thing. Now. Right now,

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>everything's priced in dollars. Oil's priced in dollars, gold priced

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in dollars. Most of the world prices things in dollars

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>because it is the currency of the world. Now some

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>countries have other currencies, but you get my point. You're

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>still pricing it in that currency. So this is the

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary path. I think we are somewhere right around here.

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>We've already checked all these boxes and we have a

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit ways to go. Now, what time frame are

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we looking at? All? Right? I showed you the path.

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>What is the time frame? Now? That evolutionary path doesn't

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>mean it's guaranteed. Remember life is about probabilities, but we

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>can continue to watch that now over what time frame? Now,

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>when you look back through technological revolutions, you realize they

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>happen about every fifty years. You've heard me talk extensively

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>about technology cycles. So this is a path. This is

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:52.719
<v Speaker 1>where bitcoin started right here, and we are sitting somewhere

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>right about here right now, we're in this path. You're

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>not too late. We still have all this to go

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>right here before we start to level out. And I

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>think we really see all this happen by about twenty fifty.

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know where you're at in your stage

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of life right now. You could be alive to see

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>this happen. Now, none of this is guaranteed, but this

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>is the most probable outcome going back to old technology

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of gold or what that's the question, and you can

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>see we're rapidly heading for this. Now we're literally living

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>through this. We're literally watching this revolution. We're watching this

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>financial revolution cycle end right in front of us. Okay, great,

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 1>So now you understand what it's attacking value itself. You

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>understand that's the evolutionary path and what that process looks like.

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>You understand the time frame. Now let's talk about the prices. Now.

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I talked about forty three billion, you know, in fifty

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>sixty years from now, but where is it in a

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>year from now, or four or five years from now,

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight years from now. Let's talk about that

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>for now, all right, So, how Finny was one of

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the main developers that developed bitcoin. He worked with Satoshi Nakamoto, which, yes,

0:24:57.840 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>nobody knows who he is, but we know lots of

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>the other helopers that worked on it with Satoshi, including

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>howf any Adam back, Nigsabo, et cetera. So how Finnie

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>was a developer. Now, back in two thousand and nine

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>when it was released, we just got a whole bunch

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of Satoshi's emails released to the public. We can see

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>this was January tenth, two thousand and nine, and he

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>said here announcing the first release of bitcoin. Pretty cool,

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>but we can see through those emails. I sort of

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 1>summarized it here so you can see it easier. How

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Finny predicted twenty two million dollar bitcoin. This was back

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and nine when it was first released.

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>He said, not based on mere speculation, but rather on

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a thoughtful analysis of bitcoin's potential as a global payment system.

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So he back into the math sort of the same

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>way I am. The collective value of bitcoin would align

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with the total wealth of the world. Wealth of the

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>world divided by the asset unit of account, which he

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>estimated to be within the range of one hundred trillion

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to three hundred trillion dollars. That was in two thousand

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and nine. Today it's about nine hundred trillion dollars. By

0:25:57.840 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>dividing this value among the limited supply of twenty one

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>mister bitcoin, Finney came up with a twenty two million

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>dollar price per bitcoin. That was in two thousand and nine,

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>when it was first invented. You could have picked it

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>up for a couple of pennies. But he saw that

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>vision that we're rapidly heading towards. What about let's hear

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>from Chamoth Chamoth is a prolific investor in Silicon Valley

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>early early, early into Facebook billionaire. Let's hear what he

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>had to say Bitcoin that falls into that category, because

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what that is. Thirty nine thousand. Where's it going?

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, can you play the clip in twenty twelve

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 2>and thirteen when it was at two hundred and everybody

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 2>was laughing at me on CFPC every time I would

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 2>talk about bitcoin, where's it going? It's probably going to

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and one hundred and fifty, then two hundred

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 2>thousand in what period I don't know, five years, ten years,

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 2>but it's going there. And the reason is because every

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>time you see all of this stuff happening, it just

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 2>reminds you that, wow, our leaders are not as trustworthy

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 2>and reliable as they used to be. And so just

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 2>in case, we really do need to have some kind of,

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, insurance we can keep under our pillow that

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 2>gives us some access to an uncorrelated hedge.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>All right now, mind you, this video is from twenty

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, so he's talking about it going to one hundred,

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty all the way up to a

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, which is certainly doing. He says a million

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>dollars by twenty forty. That's the timeframe he's on. What

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>else we have we have Fidelity. Fidelity is I think

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the second largest asset manager in the US. They do

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of research on bitcoin. It's the second largest

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin etf They predict a billion dollars for one bitcoin

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>by twenty thirty eight, twenty thirty eight. The director of

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Global Macro Fidelity Investments thinks a single bitcoin could reach

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>one billion by the year twenty thirty eight. A lot

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of what he's done is rooted and he's come up

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>with this from a bunch of angles. Specifically, he says

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it's rooted in Metcalf's law, which is that a network

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>continues to grow faster and faster and faster becomes more valuable.

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>And he says it will grow to about one million

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>per bitcoin by twenty thirty so one million by twenty thirty,

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>one billion by twenty thirty eight. Based off of that.

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Now fidealite, Like I said, they put out a ton

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of good research and data on this, one of which

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>is this Metscalf's law, and you can see how this

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>price arc is working. It doesn't go up hyperbolically forever. Right,

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't go up straight line. It starts to taper off,

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>but yet it still goes up. We have a million

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:29.959
<v Speaker 1>dollar bitcoin, you know, right about here, and you can

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>see that. I'll have this other chart right here that

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I think is really good fidelity put together. You can

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>get all this information directly off of their website. But

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>this shows the different analogs. So this is the price

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin price arc right here, and I know for

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin skeptics, I know it crashes, right, So it

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>goes super high, and then it crashes all the way

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>back down, and then it stays below the trend line.

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And then it goes super high, and then it crashes

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>all the way down again, and it stays below the

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>trend and it crashes. It goes super high, and it

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>crashes all the way down. Now some people go, well,

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>why do wouldn't I just sell here and buy right here.

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Sure you can certainly try that, or you could just

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>wait and sit and go along for the ride. Now,

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>what about me, where do I think it's going to go? Well,

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I think a million dollars by twenty thirty seems pretty

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>realistic to me. We'll see again in the world of

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>possibilities and probabilities. I think it's highly probable we'll get there.

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly not guaranteed, which is why I don't put

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent of my money in. We'll come back

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to that in a minute. But I think in the

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>next eighteen months one hundred to one hundred and fifty

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars bitcoin is kind of what I'm thinking. That's

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a two to three x return from here. I don't

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>know if any other asset I can put my money

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>into right now today that can get me that type

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of return. So that's kind of what I'm thinking. All right.

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So now that you have this information, what are you

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>going to do with it? What do you do? Well?

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>In the in the famous words of Satoshi Nakamoto, he

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>said that it might make sense to get some just

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in case it catches on. So back to the world

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of probabilities, all right, Just like that show I told

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you I was watching, everything's a probability. So do you

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>think that there is a fifty percent chance that bitcoin

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>gets to one hundred and fifty thousand dollars in the

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>next two years? Okay, and it's at fifty thousand today,

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.479
<v Speaker 1>that's a two x upside with a one x downside,

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty good odds you have fifty percent conviction of that.

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>How much money should put in? Maybe put in fifty percent,

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>hold the other fifty percent you can average in so

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you can you can buy it. You should secure it

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and hold it, and you can either lump some in,

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you can put that money in, or you can dollar

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>cost average in over time. So buy it. That's the

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>first thing. Do you have some do you have enough?

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>How much should you have it? Bait depends off your conviction.

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Now what we're seeing Wall Street with the ETFs, we're

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>putting two to five percent allocations in. You put two

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to five percent allocation in. Even if it drops by

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent, it's barely even going to be noticed. However,

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>if it goes to where we think it can, then

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio is going to be looking pretty dang good. Now,

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're crazy and you have a lot of conviction,

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>like I do, you might want thirty, forty five, fifty

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent allocation to bitcoin. Now, it also depends on

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>how much money you have, so those other factors you

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>need to figure that out for yourself. Buy it, then

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you need to secure it and hold it. The revolutionary

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>feature of bitcoin is that I can custody it and

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>secure it and store it myself, and so you should

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly do that. I recommend using a hardware wallet to

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>do that. Plenty of help online. Check that Out'll go

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to BTC sessions on YouTube. He can show you how

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to do that. And then again, like I said, should

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I buy it now just throw my cash in as

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a lumpsum or should I average in over time? It

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>depends on where your conviction is. But this video has

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>gone long. That's about as much as I can put

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>into it right now. But I'll make more videos. Let

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>me know which of these you want me to dig

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>into more. Let me know what you think. Leave me

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a calmed down below. Subscribe if you're not subscribed, and

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what I got to your success, I'm out