WEBVTT - The Icon

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>This show contains mature content and adult themes, it may

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>not be suitable for young audiences.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 2>It's not about career.

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 3>It's about believing in something. It's about prosperity, and it's

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 3>about caring and empathizing and wanting to create the best,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 3>the most true to life, the most real.

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's something that you wouldn't hear a lot of

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 4>Hollywood people say.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 3>That's why I don't hang out and talk to those

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 3>Hollywood people, because they're there to hurt me.

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Hurt my view from Variety and iHeart Podcasts. This is

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Variety Confidential, The Life and Legend of River Phoenix. I'm

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Tatiana Siegel, Executive editor of Film and Media at Variety.

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.639
<v Speaker 1>Over the course of the past three episodes, we've explored

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the life of the late actor, musician, and activist River Phoenix,

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>from his unconventional upbringing to the once in a generation

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>talent that led to a promising career in Hollywood. We

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>also went deep into the events surrounding his untimely passing

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>at the age of twenty three, and all these years later,

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>River Phoenix's death is still shocking. On the thirtieth anniversary

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of Standby Me, Rivers co star Richard Dreyfus told Variety, quote,

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>there are certain actors like Philip Seymour Hoffman. When Philip died,

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>what we were grieving about was not only that he died,

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>but that he took a very well known future away

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>from us. We knew he had all these great performances

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to come. That left a big hole. The same thing

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is true of River Phoenix. He was, without question, the

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>best of that group of actors that came up at

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that time. Movie stardom is not just acting talent. It's

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>not just your ability to move an audience. It's a

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>combination of a lot of things, and he had it.

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>He died so young that it was a real theft,

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a real robbery end quote. In our final episode, we'll

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>unpack how with only fourteen film credits, River Phoenix has

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>left an indelible mark in Hollywood and beyond. We begin

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>with addiction specialist and former host of Celebrity Rehab, doctor

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Drew Pinsky, who joins us to discuss the deadly combination

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that his celebrity status and opioids, and how River's tragic

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>death should be viewed as a cautionary tale. Doctor Drew

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>provides his perspective as a professional who has worked with

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a range of Hollywood actors but did not treat River

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix personally. Doctor Drew, You've seen more than your fair

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>share of celebrities struggling with addiction. Were you familiar with

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the circumstances of River Phoenix's death back in nineteen ninety three.

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 5>I was aware of it, and I knew people that

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 5>were around him, who had been around him that I

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 5>treated later.

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>He was only twenty three when he died, vising famous

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that young put one at a greater risk.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 5>Yes, and no. I mean we all are aware of

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 5>childhood stars and the potential for adverse outcomes there. And

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 5>as my friend Danny Bonaducci always schooled me, the child

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 5>stars that he saw did poorly came from childhood trauma,

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 5>came from problematic family systems. And then you add to

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 5>that the parentalization, the adultifying of kids, you know, making

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 5>them work in an adult environment, have adult responsibilities, that

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 5>in itself is traumatizing to kids. Kids need to be kids,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 5>and when you put them in adult roles, it's not

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 5>good for them. And on top of that, many of

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 5>these productions are so tight and sort of intimate that

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 5>they feel like a surrogate family to these young people oftentimes,

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 5>and then when the project ends, everyone just goes their

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 5>separate way, and it's often very startling to young people.

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.839
<v Speaker 5>It feels like another abandonment, another loss. So those were

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 5>the risks come from. Then, if you have addictive netics

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 5>on hand, they have a tendency to manifest in that

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 5>the kids starts looking for solutions to their pain and

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 5>they find their way to substances, and then they have

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 5>a second problem now, and that is the problem of addiction.

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 5>And if they're very famous and can keep people around

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 5>them or have you know who who either endorse or

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 5>can't restrain the use, then it will progress. Now were

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 5>things that was sort of a strange case. It was

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 5>stimulants and he had clearly had a cardiac arrhythmia and

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 5>went down, and there was a lot of I don't know's,

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't know the details of the event, but it

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 5>seemed like more could have been done, but everyone was

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 5>so fearful that his addiction, you know, his drug use

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 5>would be exposed, that he didn't quite get the care

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 5>he should have in the time, the manner he should have,

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 5>and he certainly didn't get addiction treatment that was effective.

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Can you walk us through how celebrity drug use often

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>starts like.

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 5>Everybody else le me Drake, like everybody else, everybody any added,

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 5>any addict. It typically starts an adolescence in young adulthood

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 5>that typically starts with cannabis. Alcohol use typically starts in

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 5>the home. That's where they get their first drink typically,

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 5>and a genetic disorder is activated. And if you add

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 5>trauma into that, then they for the first time in.

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 4>Their lives feel well because of the drugs, and they

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:30.799
<v Speaker 4>keep using and then they trigger this progression we call addiction,

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 4>which takes.

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 5>Over all the other priorities in their life. I mean,

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 5>the best example of the history of this and the

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 5>recovery is Robert Daddy Junior. He is by far had

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 5>the most serious life threatening addiction and did what he

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 5>needed to do, which was drop out, focused on his recovery,

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 5>and nothing but his recovery, not even contemplate coming back,

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 5>and then came back slowly with the direction of his

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 5>recovery community and staying in the program to this day.

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 5>And you know, he was in prison and he was

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 5>dying of opiate addiction, and he now has a flourishing

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 5>career because he did what he needed to do, but

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 5>when he was in his recovery, he didn't know if

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 5>he was ever going to act again. And the problem

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 5>with a lot of celebrities and treatment these days is

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 5>they don't stay in treatment long enough and they return

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 5>to work prematurely, both because they love their work and

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 5>it gives them a lot of sort of narcissistic gratification,

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 5>but also because they make a lot of money for

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 5>themselves and other people, and so they push to bring

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 5>them back to work, and that's the biggest liability for

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 5>recovery for treatment with celebrities.

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>According to the autopsy, River had been speedballing the night

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of his death, Doctor Drew, can you explain what speedballing is?

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 5>People is mixing a stimulant with heroin. It sort of

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 5>enhances and sustains the high. Very popular cocaine and heroin

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 5>is very popular back then. Unusual there usually hard to

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 5>know how he progress, but usually heroin is the primary

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 5>drug and then cocaine is just used as an adjuvant

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 5>trying to enhance things.

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>So, in your opinion, why do you think many of

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>these young celebrities like a River Phoenix are uniquely vulnerable

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to drug addiction.

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 5>They're not unique that there is nothing special about celebrity.

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 5>I cannot say that strongly enough. It's not as though

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 5>I have a separate diagnostic manual for celebrities. They are

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 5>the same. It's just like everybody. There's a context for

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 5>their addiction, and their context is if it's child's stardom.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 5>I explained how parentifying. You heard all that, right, So

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 5>they have some trauma coming in, then if they have

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 5>the genetics, then they go. And if then if they

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 5>have the power to avoid consequences, they progress. If they

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 5>are still dependent, or if they have people in their

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 5>lives like employers and things who can pull them asides

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 5>and put them in treatment, well they do better.

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>River's overdose death predates Matthew Perry's by a few decades.

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>It also comes after John Belushi's. And yet whenever these

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>celebrity drug overdose deaths happen, including Philip Seymour Hoffmann and

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Chris Barley and Heath Ledger and more recently Angus Cloud,

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes as such a shock, but it shouldn't.

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 5>Right right, Yes, recognitions, they potentially fatal illness, and I

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 5>have the only published research on this, and what we

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 5>were able to show in our research very clearly is

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 5>that people that seek celebrity have more childhood trauma, have

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 5>more narcissistic defense strategies, and tend to have more addictions.

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 5>And the big celebrities, the very powerful celebrities, construct their

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 5>lives in such a way that they dismiss people from

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 5>their inner circles who attempt to pull them aside and

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 5>get them to do something about their addictions. So the

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 5>addiction is able to spiral unrestricted, and when addiction progresses

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 5>without any constraints, it leads to death typically, And you

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 5>can't force people into treatment in this country. You know

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 5>that maybe people tried. I wouldn't be surprised if they did.

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 5>There are two aspects of addiction that everyone doesn't seem

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 5>to understand. It's progressive and it's potentially fatal commonly, so

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 5>a surprise when a drug addict dies is a lack

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 5>of understanding of what this disease is. Your probability, if

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.719
<v Speaker 5>you're an opiate addict, your probability of dying is significantly

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 5>worse than the majority of cancer patients. Why we can't

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 5>get that through to people, I don't know the fact

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 5>that we hand out drugs to people on the street

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 5>is nothing short of manslaughter. They will die. It progresses

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 5>no matter where you get the drug, no matter how

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 5>you get the drug. It's a progressive illness.

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Perry and River Phoenix were after working together in

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a Night in the Life of Jimmy Reardan. Do you

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>think it makes any difference to someone who sees a

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>friend go through addiction or even overdose in terms of

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 1>their own drug usage?

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it doesn't stop their addictions. Sometimes it gets

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 5>them to come to treatment because they you know, it

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 5>gets through their denial a little bit. What can happen?

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 5>But drug addicts are concerned with one thing and one

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 5>thing only, and that is doing drugs, and every other

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 5>brain system, all their other good judgment, all their other

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 5>good intentions, serves that distorted motivation. So to get through

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 5>that requires a lot, and somebody else's death sometimes gets there,

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 5>but not not necessarily. Not necessarily, And maybe it slowed

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 5>Matthew's down and he had a very different, very different

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 5>course of addiction than really Phoenix and Matthew Perry struggled

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 5>with treatment. Matthew tried treatment, tried very hard. Maybe that's

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 5>that's why he lived as long as he did. I

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 5>don't know, but there was some obviously some missteps along

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 5>the way.

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>In your opinion, has anything gotten better in Hollywood since

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>River's death, in terms of studios, producers, agents, all of

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>them being more supportive of young stars and getting them

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>help when they need it.

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:24.719
<v Speaker 5>You mentioned John Belushi early, right, And then people did

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 5>not understand addiction. Dan Eckert has talked about that. He's

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 5>talked about how well we knew we had did drugs,

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 5>but we didn't understand what addiction was. We didn't know

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 5>what was necessary to get better. And so since that era, yes,

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 5>things have gotten a lot better, and so we've come

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 5>to a more modern understanding of addiction. But I think

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 5>people still have this sense that people should be able

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 5>to be fixed or if they would just do treatment. Look,

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 5>on average, on average, for a bad alcoholic, it takes

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 5>four treatments and five years to get one year of sobriety.

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 5>That is on average, and that's alcohol and alcohol it

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 5>can be really horrible, of course, but not opiate addiction.

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 5>And so there's still a great deal of confusion about

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 5>the progressivity of these things and the seriousness of them,

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 5>and what's required to get well.

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>For anyone listening, whether it's a parent or a friend

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>or a family member, or around someone who has substance

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>abuse issues, what would you advise, what would you caution against?

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 5>Do not walk on eggshells, address it very directly, do

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 5>it from a place of love and concern. And there's

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 5>only and I mean only one thing you can do

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 5>that will contribute to the outcome, and that is you yourself.

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 5>Go to alan On or another codependency program, get a sponsor,

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 5>and work your program. Because the disease is interpersonal. It

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 5>takes every strength in every weakness, including other people in

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 5>that person's life, and pulls them in. The Audrey to

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 5>the plant in the little Shop of Horror is a

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 5>perfect model for addiction. If you go near the plant,

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 5>it eats you. That's how addiction works. Unless you have

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 5>somebody else there pulling you back, and that is your

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 5>sponsor or therapist or things like that. On your own,

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 5>it will find a way under your skin and every

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 5>good instinct you have will be used to maintain the disease.

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 5>So you must if you're actually care or you have

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 5>to leave with love and care, and don't leave out

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 5>of anger and rejection, because sometimes loss is something that

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 5>will catch their attention, but ideally in their lives, stay

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 5>in their life, but change the dance. And the only

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 5>way to change that dance is by your codependency being managed.

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 5>If somebody has a first ree relative with addictionary alcoholism

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 5>and they are starting to use, lose control of their

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 5>relationship with any substance, or they're using dangerous iliciit substances

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 5>can kill you. On their own, you're in big, big, big,

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 5>big trouble and they need treatment immediately, and to not

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 5>treat them as certain certain progressions, certain trouble and possible

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 5>death you yourself. The non addicts have to also have

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 5>a support system because you will get sucked in. It's

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 5>a cunning illness and it just gets it drags you in,

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 5>not intentionally, there's no intention behind it. It's all the

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 5>brain systems, including it or personal are directed towards getting drugs,

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 5>and so you'll get dragged in, I promise without without

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 5>some help. And that's why parents can't do this alone.

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 5>That's why I loved ones can't do this alone. You

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 5>can't because every good instinct you have, every important feeling

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 5>you have about that person will get used to get

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 5>to drugs. Period.

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>At the time of River Phoenix's death in nineteen ninety three,

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the actor had about a month left of filming on

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Dark Blood and had been slated to play the reporter

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in Interview with a Vampire, a role that Christian Slater

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>eventually stepped in to phil These unfinished works were a

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>stark reminder of a life taken too soon. The large

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and very public outpouring of grief surrounding Phoenix's passing was

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>also a testament to the actor's impact. According to Variety

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>reports published in the weeks following his death, simultaneous private

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>memorial services were held for him on November fourth. Actor

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Ione Sky, who co starred with River in A Night

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Life of Jimmy Reardon, organized one in Los Angeles,

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>while his family held another at their home in Gainesville, Florida.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>River's longtime agent Iris Burton called Variety after the memorial

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>service in Gainesville and described it as a quote love

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in end quote end quote, a meeting of a circle

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of friends end quote. In addition to family, those there

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>included girlfriend Samantha Mathis, his Sneakers co star Dan Ackroyd,

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and The Thing Called Love co star Dermott Moloney, Red

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Hot Chili Pepper's bassist Fleet and Rim frontman Michael Stipe.

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>As for the circumstances surrounding River's death, Burton told Variety

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the following quote, Being a young actor growing up so fast,

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>with so much being offered, and doing so many things

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is insanity. They should stop playing the field, stop playing around,

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>stop the partying, just concentrate on their work and their

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>good fortune. I hope they will all learn from this

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>tragedy end quote. A private, invitation only tribute was held

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>two weeks later, on November nineteenth, nineteen ninety three, at

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the Paramount Theater. Variety reported that the guest speakers included

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Sydney Poitier, Rob Reiner, Jerry O'Connell, Naomi Fohoner, Richard Benjamin,

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>John Borman, Christine Lati, Peter Bogdanovich, Helen Mirren, Iris Burton,

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and River's mother Heart Phoenix. Tom Cruise, who was on

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>location for interview with a Vampire, sent a note quote,

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll miss never having the opportunity to work with him.

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 1>End quote. Jonathan Price, who co starred with River in

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the uncompleted Dark Blood, wrote a touching paternal note, saying quote,

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I only knew him for eight weeks, but I felt

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I could know him forever end quote. Nearly three decades

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>after his death, River Phoenix's influence continues to reverberate throughout Hollywood.

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>From his fearless choice of roles to his commitment to activism,

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>he set a precedent for young actors to pursue meaningful

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 1>work while staying true to their values. To help us

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>understand the actor's lasting impact, Variety's executive editor Brent Lang

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>and chief film critic Owen Gleiberman join us now. Together,

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll discuss River's influence on the film industry, his enduring

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>cultural resonance, and the lessons his life and death have imparted.

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh On, when you think back to the nineties, who

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>were the other actors who were in the same league

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>as River.

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 6>There was definitely a new generation of actors coming together

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 6>in the nineties. I guess you could sort of say

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 6>that their forbear with Sean pen because he was that

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 6>one actor in the nineties who'd come up through that

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 6>kind of cheeseball culture but was much more serious, much

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 6>more moody, much darker. So the new generation was darker.

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 6>But then you had people like Matt Damon come Along

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 6>in a sense, who was a very serious actor but

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 6>also kind of an old school young leading man in

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 6>a way. I think someone like River Phoenix probably had

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 6>the potential to be that and might have become that.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think it's so interesting to talk about

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.360
<v Speaker 6>what would have happened had he not died. I think,

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 6>you know, he could have gone anywhere. He could have

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 6>been a very very big star. He could have had

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 6>leading man roles. I think the best way to think

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 6>about what would have happened to River Phoenix had he

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 6>lived is to follow the prototype of Brad Pitt. You know,

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 6>he went after the role. River Phoenix went after the

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 6>role that Brad Pitt got in A River runs through it,

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 6>and you can sort of see him following that trajectory

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 6>being this kind of good looking movie young star. And

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 6>people didn't take Brad Pitt that seriously at the start,

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 6>but he proved himself as an actor in movie after movie,

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 6>and I think River Phoenix would have had I'm not

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 6>saying he would have had the exact same kind of career,

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 6>but I think he would have had those kinds of

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 6>opportunity to be the leading man, to be in popcorn

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 6>movies to be in deadly serious indie movies the whole thing,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 6>or Phoenix had ever made comic book blockbusters or something.

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 6>I can't predict yes or no, but what I can

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 6>say is he would have had that opportunity. They would

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 6>have rolled out the red carpet for him to play

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 6>those kinds of roles, and at a certain point he

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 6>would have probably had to make a choice, you know,

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 6>am I going to Am I gonna do that mainstream

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:25.959
<v Speaker 6>Hollywood thing. My guess is that he would have because

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 6>I don't think he had the kind of chip on

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 6>his shoulder about that stuff that someone like Sean Penn does.

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 6>And I'm not dissing Sean Penn by saying that, because

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 6>Sean Penn, in a way has walked the straight and

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 6>arrow for decades as an actor, always taking just roles

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 6>that he thinks are are interesting, and there's a tremendous

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.479
<v Speaker 6>integrity to the way that he's done that. But then

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 6>there's also the thing that just says, all right, let's

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 6>go let's do a blockbuster, let's do a comic book movie.

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 6>Let's try that on. Let's see what it looks like.

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 6>Plenty of great actors have done that.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 5>Phoenix. I could see.

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 6>I could see him going that way because I just

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 6>think he had that kind of spark. I think he

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 6>was a very serious actor who didn't take himself that seriously.

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 6>He was not pretentious about himself, and I think he

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 6>kind of went with the flow.

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>And Brad, how about you.

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think if you look at basically Leonardo

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 7>DiCaprio's career, there's no reason that River couldn't have played

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 7>almost any of those roles. And I would assume he

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 7>would have been up for most of them. I mean,

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 7>I could have seen him. He was such a good

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 7>actor that he could have played the role that Leo

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 7>played in Titanic, or he could have played the role

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 7>that Leo nearly played in Boogie Knights that ultimately Mark

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 7>Wahlberg played. I mean, I think he would have been

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 7>up for basically anything.

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 7>I don't think he would have been sort of the

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 7>Russell Crowe burly man. It would have been more of

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 7>the kind of the sensitive star. But he really could

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 7>have done it all. And I think he also could

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 7>have straddled that gap between kind of the more commercially

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 7>minded fair and the more director driven stuff, because already

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 7>he had worked with really great filmmakers. He'd worked with Spielberg,

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 7>He'd worked with Sidney Lamett, He'd worked with Gus van Sand,

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 7>He'd worked with Rob Reiner. I mean, all of these

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 7>people are very serious minded directors, and it sort of

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 7>showed how in demand he was. He worked with Peter

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 7>Weir at Mosquito Coast. He was a Harrison Ford had

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 7>sort of had told Spielberg to cast him in the

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 7>Indiana Jones film, so he had the endorsement of a

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 7>lot of major industry figures at the time of his death.

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Brent. Now, let's listen to this interview from the

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>early nineties.

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 2>I started acting through auditioning and trial by uh basically.

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 6>Howl do you then when you started ten does that?

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Some television commercials and then later you get cast in

0:22:57.560 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 3>the film if you're lucky.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Really explain why I understand what I understand, I just do,

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and to try to figure it out I think would

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of ruin it, you know. I want to leave

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 2>it like a mine of gold, you know, without ever

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 2>mining it, you know, and selling it. I want to

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 2>sell it off. I don't want to talk about it.

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to understand it.

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 6>In a way that will.

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Exploit the pureness.

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 5>So I just leave it.

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand it, but I believe it.

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 6>You're a natural.

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying anything.

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 5>I'd say, Okay, thank you very much.

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>In many ways, River Phoenix's legacy continues through his brother Joaquin,

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>who was one of the biggest stars in Hollywood and

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>won the Best Actor Oscar for playing Joker in twenty twenty.

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>In his acceptance speech, Joaquin dedicated the award to his

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>late brother and even teared up toward the end when

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>he spoke about a lyric.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 8>River wrote, Now, I've been I've been a scoundrel in

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 8>my life. I've been selfish, I've been cruel at times,

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 8>hard to work with, and ungrateful. But so many of

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 8>you in this room have given me a second chance.

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 8>And I think that's when we're at our best. When

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 8>we support each other, not when we cancel each other

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 8>out for past mistakes, but when we help each other

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 8>to grow, when we educate each other, when we guide

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 8>each other towards redemption. That is the best of humanity.

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 8>I just want to he was when he was when

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 8>he was seventeen, My brother wrote this lyric. He said,

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 8>run to the rescue with love and peace will follow.

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>That was one of the most memorable Oscar moments that year. Brent,

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>what impact did River's death have on Joaquin's career.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 7>I don't actually really know what the impact was on

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 7>ja Quin's career, other than you know, when Joaquin Phoenix

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 7>accepted his Oscar, he quoted his brother and that sort

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 7>of says in a song that his brother had written,

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 7>and so that indicates that that his impact on his

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 7>brother was pretty seismic, and it continues. And I think

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 7>if you if you look at Laquin Phoenix and how

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 7>talented he is and just sort of generationally gifted he is,

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 7>it's it's possible that River Phoenix would have had an

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 7>even bigger career because I think that he had all

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 7>of the Jaquini ja Quing Phoenix's kind of chameleonic talents

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 7>and his ability to really like have this unearthed, this

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 7>kind of rich emotional life with his characters. But he

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 7>was a little more forward facing and a little more

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 7>charming frankly in a conventional sense. So I think he

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 7>could have had an even bigger career than his brother.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>And Owen, what are your impressions of the Phoenix brothers

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>performances side by side.

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's fascinating to think Hed River lived, you know,

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 6>of the idea of these side by side brothers both

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 6>having these blossoming careers, But I think it easily could

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 6>have happened because they're really such different actors. Joaquin Phoenix

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 6>from the beginning, My first memory of him was seeing

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 6>him in To Die For. He had that very Joaquin

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 6>quality that he still has. There is something dark about him.

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 6>He's drawn to playing you know, kind of twisted characters,

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 6>not that there was not a core of normality and

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 6>empathy to him. I mean he has that, That's why

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 6>he's a great actor. But you know, he definitely likes

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 6>to dance on the edge and on the edge of

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 6>darkness and all of that, and I think that River

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:55.719
<v Speaker 6>Phoenix has some of that. I mean, they came from

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 6>the same family, and I think both of them reflect

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 6>that strange upbringing they had, where you know, they were

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 6>raised by hippie parents who moved around all the time.

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 6>When River was three, his family joined the Children of

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 6>God religious cult. They were missionaries in Venezuela. He talked

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 6>about being sexually abused and was very negative about that.

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 5>Cult later on.

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 6>You know, it was a family with a very you know,

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 6>eccentric upbringing that I think left its mark. But I

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 6>think that River Phoenix probably could have ended up being

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 6>more of the leading man. But you know, to the

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 6>extent that he had this James Dean quality that is

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 6>very much a leading man quality. It's it's it is

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 6>the classic Hollywood tradition that goes back to Dean and

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 6>then through Robert Redford, actors like Brad Pitt. I think

0:27:55.680 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 6>River Phoenix was, you know, was on that spectrum. And

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 6>I think he would have had a lot of opportunities,

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 6>not just because he was very good looking, but because

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 6>he had it's that magical charisma that makes a star,

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 6>you know. He he could have had the opportunities to

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 6>do in the nineties, let's say, a romantic comedy. Would

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 6>he have taken that? Maybe, maybe not, but I think

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 6>he could have done it in a way that Joaquin

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 6>Phoenix was just not going to do that. I think

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 6>Joaquin would have ended up being, you know, relatively speaking,

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 6>the darker of the two. But who knows, because River

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 6>Phoenix was, as I said, very drawn to playing alienated characters.

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 6>It's just hard to say, but I think I think

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 6>he would have been He would have blossomed into a

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 6>true leading man. If that's not an outdated phrase.

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Brent, let me ask you, do you think River influenced

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the generation of actors that came after him.

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 7>I think of him as being really one of the

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 7>leaders of that generation of young stars who kind of

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 7>emerged in the latter half of the nineteen eighties. And

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 7>what he'd done very successfully was he'd shown that he

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 7>could do a number of different genres. He wasn't a

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 7>certifiable box office draw yet, but he was kind of

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 7>putting all the pieces together where you could see him

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 7>having a career that kind of was able to move

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 7>seamlessly between sort of more adult oriented, artistic types of

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 7>films and maybe some more commercially minded stuff. Of course,

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 7>that kind of depended on like the choice he made

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 7>in his career, and I think he was still sort

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 7>of trying to figure himself out as an artist. My

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 7>Own Private Idaho was really a very important film for

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 7>him because it gave him a kind of like underground

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 7>edgy cred, and it moved him from being a sort

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 7>of pin up for people to being a kind of

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 7>a more dangerous star. He was kind of reinventing himself

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 7>with that movie, but it's definitely not inconceivable that he

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 7>would have had a career that was very similar to

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 7>Leonardo DiCaprio, where you sort of started off with these

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 7>showy performances and then you kind of moved more into

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 7>mainstream fair And even at the time he died, he

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 7>was about to do interview with the Vampire, playing the

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 7>role that Christian Slater ended up playing, and that sort

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 7>of shows that Hollywood still saw him as one of

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 7>his kind of most promising twenty somethings year old stars.

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 7>If you look at this generation of actors. I mean,

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 7>first of all, I think what's interesting is if you

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 7>talk to a lot of this generation of actors, they

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 7>would probably cite River Phoenix as an influence of them,

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 7>which sort of shows just the extent of his impact,

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 7>not just on his death, which I'm sure people remember,

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 7>but also his life and his work. And I do

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 7>think that, you know, Timothy Shallomy definitely has a sort

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 7>of a similar appeal to River Phoenix. He's he seems sensitive,

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 7>sort of artistically minded, He's you know, obviously he's very attractive,

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 7>and there's almost a certain like femininity and to both

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 7>of them that is really appealing and I think really

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 7>comes through on film well. And actually, if you look

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 7>at a lot of the great stars, there is a

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 7>certain like femininity to them, even Rando and Dean, a

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 7>kind of a gentleness that all of those those actors share,

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 7>and I think River Phoenix really had that too. You

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:45.719
<v Speaker 7>want to kind of protect him when you see him

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 7>on screen, and that's why when he's in certain movies

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 7>and he you know, there's this scene and stand by

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 7>Me where he talks about the milk money being stolen

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 7>and he kind of breaks down, and it's a very

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 7>it really sticks with you because because because you do

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 7>want the best for that character, because there is something,

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 7>some quality in the actor saying those words that allows

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 7>you to forge this kind of like very intense connection

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 7>with him.

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>In addition to Timothy Shallomey, who else do you think

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>closely resembles River's acting style?

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 7>Definitely Jacob ELORDI. I mean, there's there's a lot of

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:24.479
<v Speaker 7>other actors that, I mean, even Tom Holland a little bit,

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 7>although I think River Phoenix was probably a better actor.

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 7>No offense to Tom Holland, but just that he kind

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 7>of had more range, but you know, definitely Tom Holland.

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 7>I think Barry Kyogan is probably a little more eccentric

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 7>than River Phoenix, but more aligned with Joaquin. Probably Chalomey

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 7>is probably the one who's the most most similar.

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh one, How do you think River influenced the generation

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of actors that came after him, including Joaquin.

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 6>I think River Phoenix might have had a real influence

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 6>on the actors who came after him in that his few,

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 6>sadly few years of prominence really did overlap with the

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 6>start of the American independent film movement, the American independent

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 6>film revolution. I mean, the American independent film movement had

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 6>gone back to the nineteen fifties, but I'm talking about

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 6>the revolution that started in the nineties, where these films

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 6>suddenly became talked about in a much bigger way. They

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 6>got seen, they became big movies, even as they were

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 6>carrying through a lot of the darker themes and themes

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 6>of alienation and questioning authority and questioning just everything about

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 6>life that you saw in the films of the seventies.

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 6>And so he kind of dovetailed with that, and I

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 6>think in that small handful of extraordinary performances that he

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 6>gave us. He showed the way for young actors. He

0:33:55.720 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 6>showed that young actors could embrace these kinds of roles

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 6>and find a kind of truth in them, because that

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 6>is what American independent film was supposed to be about.

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 6>Hollywood was about, you know, projecting a certain fantasy, but

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 6>indie movies were going to return us to the idea

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 6>of cinema really trying to find, you know, put its

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 6>finger on certain truths about things. And that happens with actors.

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 6>That's what actors do. It's actors who take us into

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 6>the truth of what they're showing us. And he just

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 6>had that quality. There was something very very pure about it.

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:35.720
<v Speaker 6>I first noticed him and noticed his talent in stand

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 6>By Me. But the movie that really made me wake

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 6>up and say, oh my gosh, I mean this guy

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 6>is a major actor was running on empty in nineteen

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 6>eighty eight. And the whole soul of that in the

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 6>movie is River Phoenix in his performance, because he is

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 6>the son who has now essentially grown up and he

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 6>wants to go to college and can he do that.

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 6>It's like he can't, he can't do that without putting

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 6>his family in danger. So it actually becomes this very

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:14.359
<v Speaker 6>very interesting situation and River Phoenix's performance, where I would

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 6>say it's very James dem like, is that this is

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 6>exactly the kind of role where you would expect the

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 6>kid to be kind of a rebel or now rebelling

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 6>against his parents, saying, you know, I want to go

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 6>to college. You know, you can take your hippie stuff

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 6>and I don't care about that. But he doesn't play

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 6>it like that at all.

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 5>He plays the.

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 6>Character as extraordinarily sincere and it's really very sleeve young man,

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 6>and there's something just very authentic about his performance. He

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 6>roots you in that movie. He makes the whole movie

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 6>work and it becomes actually a powerful experience. And I

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 6>think when you watch his acting in that movie where

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 6>he was only seventeen or eighteen when he shot it,

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 6>you see not only his extraordinary skill as an actor,

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 6>you just see the quality he had as an actor,

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 6>this quality of sincerity where he could be I don't

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.479
<v Speaker 6>know what the word is, the everyman, the person where

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 6>you know you just identify with him. He is. He's real,

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 6>but he's also in a way your best self. That

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 6>is part of the magic of what stardom is, where

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 6>you want to watch this person, but he's also projecting

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 6>almost this kind of down to earth moral quality he

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 6>had that I think had River Phoenix lived and thrived

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 6>into the nineties, the only thing I can predict about

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 6>his career is that he would have been extraordinarily successful,

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 6>because I think he had that double edged thing of

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 6>he was a fantastic actor and he was a very sexy,

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 6>good looking, glamorous star, and that gives you a lot

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 6>of power in both directions. I think any number of

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 6>filmmakers would have wanted to work with him. But beyond that,

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 6>I think by definition it's unpredictable because the way the

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 6>movie business works is you do a certain movie and

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:16.959
<v Speaker 6>it becomes big. Let's say, might be an indie film,

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 6>might be a Hollywood film, and then that role defines

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 6>you in a certain way, and everything you do after

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 6>that it doesn't have to necessarily just repeat that. But

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 6>then you're kind of taking off from that in this direction.

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 6>But I think he would have been huge.

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>River Phoenix's story is one of brilliant and heartbreak. He

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 1>serves as both an inspiration and a cautionary tale, reminding

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>us of the beauty and fragility of human life. As

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>we close this season of Variety Confidential. We honor River

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 1>not just as an actor, but as a person whose

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 1>light continues to shine through the lives he touched and

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the art he created. Thank you for joining us for

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>this season of Variety Confidential, the life and legend of

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>River Phoenix. Don't forget to subscribe and read more at

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Variety dot com. Variety Confidential is hosted by Tatiana Siegel

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and produced by Karen Mizugucci and Sidney Kramer. Written by

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Anna Moslim, Karen Mizugucci and Tatiana Siegal. Executive produced by

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Dea Lawrence, Variety's co editor in chief Cynthia Littleton, and

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Ramins A two day edited and mixed by Aaron Greenawald

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Variety Content Studio Executive Producer Alex Hughes. Please refer to

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>sources and citations on Variety dot com.