1 00:00:00,480 --> 00:00:03,320 Speaker 1: Hey, this is Bridget and I'm doing a live Ask 2 00:00:03,400 --> 00:00:06,080 Speaker 1: Me Anything over on Patreon in just a few weeks, 3 00:00:06,400 --> 00:00:08,680 Speaker 1: and I need your help to prepare. Just go to 4 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:12,760 Speaker 1: patreon dot com slash tangoty and submit your burning questions 5 00:00:12,800 --> 00:00:15,040 Speaker 1: and I will do my very best to answer them. 6 00:00:15,280 --> 00:00:17,800 Speaker 1: You do not need to be a paying Patreon member 7 00:00:17,800 --> 00:00:20,680 Speaker 1: to submit a question. So, got a burning tech or 8 00:00:20,720 --> 00:00:23,360 Speaker 1: social media question, I'll do my very best to answer it. 9 00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:25,919 Speaker 1: Or find somebody who can. Always wanted to know something 10 00:00:25,960 --> 00:00:28,280 Speaker 1: about me or my life or my work, I will 11 00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:31,560 Speaker 1: answer that too. Got questions about the business of podcasting 12 00:00:31,640 --> 00:00:33,839 Speaker 1: or how the sausage gets made, let's hear it. Have 13 00:00:33,920 --> 00:00:36,720 Speaker 1: a social media etiquette question? Oh these are my favorite? 14 00:00:36,920 --> 00:00:40,560 Speaker 1: Want to know which podcasters I'm secretly jealous of? Well, 15 00:00:40,680 --> 00:00:42,959 Speaker 1: if I've had a few lessons of wine, maybe I'll 16 00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:45,560 Speaker 1: answer that too. So just go to patreon dot com 17 00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:48,760 Speaker 1: slash tangoty and ask your burning question, and keep a 18 00:00:48,760 --> 00:00:51,800 Speaker 1: lookout for the official date announcement of my very first 19 00:00:51,800 --> 00:01:01,640 Speaker 1: ever live Patreon Ask Me Anything. I can't wait. There 20 00:01:01,640 --> 00:01:03,360 Speaker 1: are no girls on the Internet. As a production of 21 00:01:03,400 --> 00:01:11,080 Speaker 1: iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative, I'm bridgeitat and this is there 22 00:01:11,120 --> 00:01:16,080 Speaker 1: are no girls on the Internet. The movie Barbie has 23 00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:19,360 Speaker 1: already racked in a very impressive one hundred and fifty 24 00:01:19,400 --> 00:01:23,080 Speaker 1: five million dollars at the domestic box office on opening 25 00:01:23,120 --> 00:01:26,760 Speaker 1: weekend alone, and based on that success, there are even 26 00:01:26,840 --> 00:01:30,560 Speaker 1: more toy franchises being turned into live action films, one 27 00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:33,080 Speaker 1: of which is a live action movie version of my 28 00:01:33,200 --> 00:01:37,399 Speaker 1: personal favorite toy growing up, Polypocket. You know that whole 29 00:01:37,400 --> 00:01:41,720 Speaker 1: little miniature doll universe housed inside a cute little plastic compact. 30 00:01:42,280 --> 00:01:45,160 Speaker 1: I loved it, and the movie Polypocket is set to 31 00:01:45,200 --> 00:01:49,400 Speaker 1: be directed by none other than Lena Dunham of HBO's Girls. 32 00:01:49,840 --> 00:01:53,120 Speaker 1: So Lena Dunham was trending all this week after the 33 00:01:53,160 --> 00:01:56,720 Speaker 1: Polypocket movie was announced, which also means that a particularly 34 00:01:56,760 --> 00:02:00,240 Speaker 1: sticky piece of misleading content about her did too. Now 35 00:02:00,280 --> 00:02:01,840 Speaker 1: I have to give a little bit of a heads 36 00:02:01,880 --> 00:02:05,920 Speaker 1: up here. This claim is a particularly ugly one involving 37 00:02:06,080 --> 00:02:09,519 Speaker 1: sexual abuse. Last year, I did a deep dive into 38 00:02:09,560 --> 00:02:12,600 Speaker 1: this particular claim, where it originated and why it's stuck 39 00:02:12,639 --> 00:02:16,920 Speaker 1: around for so long. Now, I know people have a 40 00:02:17,080 --> 00:02:20,360 Speaker 1: lot of strong opinions and feelings about Lena Dunham, so 41 00:02:20,480 --> 00:02:22,239 Speaker 1: take a listen and let me know what you think, 42 00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:26,800 Speaker 1: and we'll be back with our regular Friday newscast next week. Today, 43 00:02:27,080 --> 00:02:29,839 Speaker 1: we are not trying to sort of demonstrate the way 44 00:02:29,880 --> 00:02:34,040 Speaker 1: that the media unfairly maligned somebody. We are zeroing in 45 00:02:34,080 --> 00:02:39,360 Speaker 1: on one specific misleading claim about none other than Lena Dunham. 46 00:02:39,960 --> 00:02:42,480 Speaker 1: I am in no way making a larger point about 47 00:02:42,480 --> 00:02:45,600 Speaker 1: the way that the media and society has portrayed her broadly, 48 00:02:45,960 --> 00:02:47,880 Speaker 1: but I do want to zero in on this one 49 00:02:48,120 --> 00:02:51,320 Speaker 1: specific claim and analyze how it became to be this 50 00:02:51,560 --> 00:02:55,520 Speaker 1: very sticky, persistent lie that still endures online today and 51 00:02:55,600 --> 00:02:57,400 Speaker 1: what that lies has about our culture. 52 00:02:57,800 --> 00:03:01,799 Speaker 2: Yeah, so why why this one specific thing? 53 00:03:02,160 --> 00:03:04,720 Speaker 1: Great question. So a little bit of background about how 54 00:03:04,760 --> 00:03:07,280 Speaker 1: I came to be making this episode. I used to 55 00:03:07,320 --> 00:03:09,880 Speaker 1: work on the social media team at MSNBC dot com, 56 00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:12,640 Speaker 1: and one of our kind of tried and true digital 57 00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:16,280 Speaker 1: engagement tricks was to post about someone, a public figure 58 00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:20,280 Speaker 1: that we knew our audience would engage with, positive or negative. 59 00:03:20,520 --> 00:03:22,720 Speaker 1: This is back in twenty fifteen, and our audience used 60 00:03:22,760 --> 00:03:26,040 Speaker 1: to love to hate on Putin, and so whenever we 61 00:03:26,120 --> 00:03:29,600 Speaker 1: posted something about Putin that posted that cast him in 62 00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:32,160 Speaker 1: a negative light, we could always expect that people would 63 00:03:32,200 --> 00:03:33,880 Speaker 1: really engage with that a lot. They'd be leaving like 64 00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:36,400 Speaker 1: mean comments like yeah, we hate him. They love to 65 00:03:36,400 --> 00:03:41,040 Speaker 1: hate on Putin. But hands down, no question, the public 66 00:03:41,080 --> 00:03:44,320 Speaker 1: figure that got the most hate on all of our 67 00:03:44,320 --> 00:03:47,520 Speaker 1: social media pages was Lena Dunham. I think, if I'm 68 00:03:47,520 --> 00:03:51,160 Speaker 1: recalling correctly, I think people disliked Lena Dunham more than 69 00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:54,480 Speaker 1: they disliked Putin, which is really saying something. And I 70 00:03:54,600 --> 00:03:56,920 Speaker 1: used to I worked on this podcast project where Lena 71 00:03:56,960 --> 00:03:59,160 Speaker 1: Dunham was one of our guests. And again, you know, 72 00:03:59,200 --> 00:04:02,480 Speaker 1: we had posted episodes with all different types of public 73 00:04:02,480 --> 00:04:05,680 Speaker 1: figures and celebrities, but when we posted our Lena Dunnam episode, 74 00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:11,280 Speaker 1: it was instant unanimous negative feedback. And so I noticed 75 00:04:11,320 --> 00:04:14,200 Speaker 1: whenever we would publish about her or post about her 76 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:18,280 Speaker 1: or feature her online, commenters would always repeat like a 77 00:04:18,360 --> 00:04:20,680 Speaker 1: laundry list of reasons they don't like her. You know. 78 00:04:20,800 --> 00:04:23,160 Speaker 1: Sometimes it would be the garden variety things that you 79 00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:25,960 Speaker 1: would expect, like oh, she's a spoiled brad, I hate her, 80 00:04:26,360 --> 00:04:29,200 Speaker 1: or you know, oh she's gross, which is pretty much 81 00:04:29,240 --> 00:04:32,520 Speaker 1: just kind of fat phobia, but by far the most 82 00:04:32,560 --> 00:04:35,719 Speaker 1: common thing I would see commenters say about Lena Dunham 83 00:04:35,760 --> 00:04:40,159 Speaker 1: online was this particularly persistent claim that she's a quote 84 00:04:40,160 --> 00:04:44,800 Speaker 1: sexual predator who admitted to molesting her younger sibling. And 85 00:04:45,080 --> 00:04:49,000 Speaker 1: you know, I'm always very interested in what I referred 86 00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:52,880 Speaker 1: to as sticky pieces of disinformation or misinformation or lies, 87 00:04:53,240 --> 00:04:56,040 Speaker 1: you know, things that really just seem to cut through 88 00:04:56,320 --> 00:04:59,800 Speaker 1: and persist. You know, I'm very interested in why these 89 00:04:59,839 --> 00:05:02,719 Speaker 1: things stick and to what end, and what their stickiness 90 00:05:02,800 --> 00:05:05,880 Speaker 1: tells us about our culture. And in that regard, you know, 91 00:05:06,080 --> 00:05:09,440 Speaker 1: this misleading claim about Lena Dunham is fascinating to me 92 00:05:09,839 --> 00:05:11,400 Speaker 1: because I think it tells us a lot about the 93 00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:14,520 Speaker 1: ways that our political and social climates intersect, which is 94 00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:17,880 Speaker 1: particularly important in today's climate. And I just want to 95 00:05:17,920 --> 00:05:21,480 Speaker 1: make it super super clear, because I can already hear 96 00:05:21,800 --> 00:05:25,640 Speaker 1: people who are listening thinking, why are you defending Lena Dunham. 97 00:05:25,839 --> 00:05:28,919 Speaker 1: She's awful? You know, what are you doing? Let me 98 00:05:28,960 --> 00:05:32,760 Speaker 1: be very clear, there are plenty of valid reasons to 99 00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:35,000 Speaker 1: not rock with Lena Dunham, some of which will be 100 00:05:35,040 --> 00:05:37,640 Speaker 1: talking about in this episode. So this is not me 101 00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:40,479 Speaker 1: trying to get anyone to think that Lena Dunham is good, 102 00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:43,800 Speaker 1: or it is not me saying that every single claim 103 00:05:43,880 --> 00:05:47,599 Speaker 1: about her is unfair or untrue, but the claim that 104 00:05:47,680 --> 00:05:50,960 Speaker 1: she sexually abused her sibling, I believe is a pretty 105 00:05:51,080 --> 00:05:53,680 Speaker 1: nasty thing to repeat about somebody. And I don't know 106 00:05:53,760 --> 00:05:57,800 Speaker 1: that people who repeat this particularly nasty lie know that 107 00:05:57,880 --> 00:06:00,400 Speaker 1: it initially started as a right wing attack on a 108 00:06:00,440 --> 00:06:04,800 Speaker 1: prominent liberal voice, But because of Lena Dunham's overall I 109 00:06:04,839 --> 00:06:09,239 Speaker 1: guess we'll say vibe, this claim has really taken root, 110 00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:12,000 Speaker 1: not just in right wing circles, but more generally too. 111 00:06:12,640 --> 00:06:15,520 Speaker 1: Like people who I believe probably have would never read 112 00:06:15,680 --> 00:06:18,599 Speaker 1: a right wing blog, you know, for any legitimate reason, 113 00:06:18,960 --> 00:06:22,040 Speaker 1: should probably be aware that they are repeating a lie 114 00:06:22,040 --> 00:06:24,559 Speaker 1: that was really cooked up in the right wing blog 115 00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:27,520 Speaker 1: a sphere. And I think that should be really concerning. 116 00:06:27,560 --> 00:06:30,000 Speaker 1: I think the ways that this claim has sort of 117 00:06:30,640 --> 00:06:34,800 Speaker 1: become true, that's scare quotes around that, and has persisted 118 00:06:34,839 --> 00:06:37,520 Speaker 1: for so long, should really be concerning for all of us. 119 00:06:37,880 --> 00:06:40,800 Speaker 1: So let's talk about how and why that happened and 120 00:06:40,839 --> 00:06:41,800 Speaker 1: what it means. 121 00:06:42,400 --> 00:06:47,000 Speaker 2: So for people like me who don't really know anything 122 00:06:47,040 --> 00:06:50,680 Speaker 2: about this, who is Lena Dunham? 123 00:06:51,040 --> 00:06:52,560 Speaker 1: So if you don't know who Lena Dunham is, I 124 00:06:52,560 --> 00:06:54,880 Speaker 1: will give you kind of a quick and dirty summary 125 00:06:54,880 --> 00:06:58,320 Speaker 1: of her background. Lena Dunham is an actor, producer, and writer. 126 00:06:58,680 --> 00:07:01,520 Speaker 1: She's the daughter of visual art Lori Simmons, who is 127 00:07:01,520 --> 00:07:03,240 Speaker 1: a very big deal in the art world because her 128 00:07:03,400 --> 00:07:07,040 Speaker 1: art is incredible. Lena rose to fame after making a 129 00:07:07,080 --> 00:07:11,000 Speaker 1: really strong film debut called Tiny Furniture, which is basically 130 00:07:11,040 --> 00:07:14,080 Speaker 1: a semi auto biographical movie about a young woman portrayed 131 00:07:14,080 --> 00:07:16,720 Speaker 1: by Lena, who disgraduated from college and is trying to 132 00:07:16,800 --> 00:07:20,760 Speaker 1: navigate adulthood. Laurie Simmons, her real life mom, plays her 133 00:07:20,760 --> 00:07:22,680 Speaker 1: mom in the movie, and in the movie, her mom 134 00:07:22,760 --> 00:07:26,880 Speaker 1: is also a visual artist and photographer who stages these 135 00:07:27,680 --> 00:07:30,600 Speaker 1: stages or pieces with tiny dollhouse furniture, just like her 136 00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:33,800 Speaker 1: mom does in real life. And Lena's real life sibling, 137 00:07:33,920 --> 00:07:37,200 Speaker 1: Cyrus Grace, plays Lena's character sibling in the movie too, 138 00:07:37,280 --> 00:07:41,040 Speaker 1: so it's very semi auto biographical. In twenty twelve, she 139 00:07:41,120 --> 00:07:44,480 Speaker 1: created and starred in HBO's Girls, which also explores kind 140 00:07:44,480 --> 00:07:47,960 Speaker 1: of similar themes young white women trying to navigate young 141 00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:51,080 Speaker 1: adulthood post college in Brooklyn, New York. Lena was born 142 00:07:51,080 --> 00:07:53,000 Speaker 1: in nineteen eighty six, so she is what you would 143 00:07:53,040 --> 00:07:56,840 Speaker 1: call a millennial and when Girls was debuting, it was 144 00:07:56,920 --> 00:07:59,880 Speaker 1: kind of peak like what are the millennials up to 145 00:08:00,200 --> 00:08:04,000 Speaker 1: content time? Right? And so Girls was this huge success. 146 00:08:04,160 --> 00:08:06,960 Speaker 1: Pretty early on, it got a lot of criticism for 147 00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:10,000 Speaker 1: how white the show was, because just like shows like 148 00:08:10,040 --> 00:08:12,560 Speaker 1: Sex and the City and Friends before it, it's just 149 00:08:12,720 --> 00:08:15,480 Speaker 1: for white people who are not really encountering a lot 150 00:08:15,520 --> 00:08:17,600 Speaker 1: of diversity that I know that you would find in 151 00:08:17,640 --> 00:08:21,960 Speaker 1: a city like Brooklyn, New York. But regardless, positive, negative, 152 00:08:22,000 --> 00:08:24,400 Speaker 1: whatever you thought, it was the kind of show that 153 00:08:24,480 --> 00:08:27,560 Speaker 1: people were talking about a lot like it was in 154 00:08:27,640 --> 00:08:30,360 Speaker 1: the discourse, which I think creates a certain kind of 155 00:08:30,480 --> 00:08:33,439 Speaker 1: gravy toss around anything. And just as a side note, 156 00:08:33,480 --> 00:08:37,319 Speaker 1: in case you're curious, I actually watched and enjoyed the show. 157 00:08:37,360 --> 00:08:38,840 Speaker 1: I'm not going to sit here and act like I 158 00:08:38,840 --> 00:08:41,280 Speaker 1: have not seen every episode or I am not going 159 00:08:41,360 --> 00:08:43,400 Speaker 1: to sit here and act like I did not immediately 160 00:08:43,760 --> 00:08:46,520 Speaker 1: go to a V club to read reviews immediately after 161 00:08:46,559 --> 00:08:50,520 Speaker 1: watching episodes, because, like I said, it was part of 162 00:08:50,520 --> 00:08:53,280 Speaker 1: a discourse. You know, the show created discourse, and I 163 00:08:53,360 --> 00:08:57,040 Speaker 1: will never deprive myself of discourse. Okay, if people are 164 00:08:57,080 --> 00:08:59,640 Speaker 1: talking about something, if there's articles and reviews to be 165 00:08:59,679 --> 00:09:03,760 Speaker 1: read I'm reading them, I'm engaging. So Girls explores themes 166 00:09:03,800 --> 00:09:08,040 Speaker 1: of sexuality, gender, and female friendship, and its highly anticipated 167 00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:11,360 Speaker 1: third season comes out in January twenty fourteen. Now, in 168 00:09:11,400 --> 00:09:14,800 Speaker 1: September of that same year, Lena releases a memoir essay 169 00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:18,280 Speaker 1: collection calls not that kind of girl. Lena was having 170 00:09:18,360 --> 00:09:20,440 Speaker 1: a really hot moment, and so the book was a 171 00:09:20,559 --> 00:09:24,160 Speaker 1: highly anticipated one. Random House purchased the rights in October 172 00:09:24,200 --> 00:09:27,079 Speaker 1: twenty twelve after a big bidding war, and bidding was 173 00:09:27,120 --> 00:09:30,320 Speaker 1: reported to have risen past three point five million dollars. 174 00:09:30,800 --> 00:09:33,400 Speaker 1: So it's one of those very hot, very big deal 175 00:09:33,400 --> 00:09:37,080 Speaker 1: book publishing projects. This was all happening against the backdrop 176 00:09:37,160 --> 00:09:41,400 Speaker 1: of a particular climate politically, culturally, and socially in the 177 00:09:41,400 --> 00:09:45,079 Speaker 1: mid twenty tens. If I had the ability to clear 178 00:09:45,200 --> 00:09:48,400 Speaker 1: music rights on this podcast, which my producer Tari can 179 00:09:48,440 --> 00:09:50,880 Speaker 1: tell you I bug her about pretty much every day, 180 00:09:51,080 --> 00:09:53,920 Speaker 1: this is where we'd be playing like maybe Katie Perry's 181 00:09:54,040 --> 00:09:56,960 Speaker 1: Roar or Shake It Off by Taylor Swift. You know, 182 00:09:57,400 --> 00:10:00,840 Speaker 1: some other twenty ten hit to really set the scene, Mikey, 183 00:10:01,320 --> 00:10:04,280 Speaker 1: what were some other like twenty ten hits, like hits 184 00:10:04,280 --> 00:10:06,400 Speaker 1: of the twenty tens, Oh, Rihanna. 185 00:10:06,480 --> 00:10:10,880 Speaker 2: Maybe Rihanna was in there. I feel like Tam and 186 00:10:10,960 --> 00:10:12,760 Speaker 2: Paula was in there. Maybe I'm getting a little like 187 00:10:12,880 --> 00:10:14,439 Speaker 2: late twenty tens. 188 00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:20,160 Speaker 1: So just imagine that some kind of music from that 189 00:10:20,280 --> 00:10:23,520 Speaker 1: era is playing as I paint a portrait of what 190 00:10:23,600 --> 00:10:26,920 Speaker 1: it was like in the mid twenty tens. So in 191 00:10:27,000 --> 00:10:30,160 Speaker 1: popular culture, the film Twelve Years of Slave won Best 192 00:10:30,200 --> 00:10:33,600 Speaker 1: Picture at the Oscars in twenty fourteen, which was hosted 193 00:10:33,640 --> 00:10:37,480 Speaker 1: by openly gay Ellen DeGeneres and was the most watched 194 00:10:37,520 --> 00:10:42,440 Speaker 1: Oscars since the year two thousand. By twenty fourteen, waves 195 00:10:42,480 --> 00:10:45,880 Speaker 1: of states are passing marriage equality legislation. The Supreme Court 196 00:10:45,920 --> 00:10:49,079 Speaker 1: decides not to hear cases on marriage equality appeals, thus 197 00:10:49,200 --> 00:10:53,840 Speaker 1: immediately legalizing marriage equality in Virginia, Utah, Indiana, Oklahoma, and 198 00:10:53,840 --> 00:10:57,000 Speaker 1: Wisconsin before it sent back to the courts and ultimately 199 00:10:57,040 --> 00:11:01,079 Speaker 1: legalized nationwide a year later. The Black Lives Matter movement 200 00:11:01,080 --> 00:11:03,920 Speaker 1: started in twenty thirteen and was really picking up. You 201 00:11:03,920 --> 00:11:06,280 Speaker 1: have the shooting deaths of Trayvon Martin and Florida, Mike 202 00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:09,160 Speaker 1: Brown and Missouri, and Eric Garner in New York and 203 00:11:09,240 --> 00:11:12,800 Speaker 1: the subsequent uprisings all over the country shows that this 204 00:11:12,920 --> 00:11:16,280 Speaker 1: movement has real momentum, and really it creates a national 205 00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:20,160 Speaker 1: conversation that is basically impossible to ignore. You'll remember that 206 00:11:20,200 --> 00:11:23,120 Speaker 1: when President Obama was asked about trayvon Martin, he answered, 207 00:11:23,400 --> 00:11:24,959 Speaker 1: if I had a son, he would look a lot 208 00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:28,440 Speaker 1: like treyvon Martin. Obama gave a televised speech announcing his 209 00:11:28,520 --> 00:11:31,320 Speaker 1: plans to use executive action to grant citizenship to about 210 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:34,320 Speaker 1: four point four million immigrants. So I have my own 211 00:11:34,360 --> 00:11:37,559 Speaker 1: feelings about Obama's immigration policies, which is a podcast for 212 00:11:37,600 --> 00:11:41,680 Speaker 1: another day. But the point is Republicans and right wingers 213 00:11:42,080 --> 00:11:46,839 Speaker 1: absolutely fucking hated this. We also get Obamacare in twenty ten, 214 00:11:46,920 --> 00:11:49,240 Speaker 1: and for the next few years, Republicans were fighting it 215 00:11:49,400 --> 00:11:54,040 Speaker 1: tooth and nail, including Obamacare's birth control coverage mandate. Mike, 216 00:11:54,080 --> 00:11:57,040 Speaker 1: do you remember that Georgetown law student and feminist activist 217 00:11:57,120 --> 00:11:57,840 Speaker 1: Sondra Fluke? 218 00:11:58,160 --> 00:12:01,160 Speaker 2: Boy, I'd forgotten, but now it's coming back to me. 219 00:12:01,320 --> 00:12:03,720 Speaker 2: What was the deal with Sandra Fluke? Why do we 220 00:12:03,760 --> 00:12:04,320 Speaker 2: know her name? 221 00:12:05,160 --> 00:12:08,239 Speaker 1: So in twenty twelve, Sandra Fluke was barred from testifying 222 00:12:08,280 --> 00:12:12,480 Speaker 1: about birth control during a hearing, and instead the only 223 00:12:12,559 --> 00:12:15,520 Speaker 1: people who testified about birth control was an all male 224 00:12:15,679 --> 00:12:19,920 Speaker 1: planel of clergy and then Rush Limbaugh called Sandra Fluke 225 00:12:20,559 --> 00:12:25,360 Speaker 1: a slut basically just per advocating for birth control. You know, 226 00:12:25,480 --> 00:12:27,840 Speaker 1: these were the times where the phrase we were using, 227 00:12:27,840 --> 00:12:30,280 Speaker 1: the phrase quote war on women a lot like that 228 00:12:30,440 --> 00:12:32,880 Speaker 1: was a phrase that we were using, which I think 229 00:12:33,080 --> 00:12:35,679 Speaker 1: captured something about what it was like to live through 230 00:12:35,679 --> 00:12:37,960 Speaker 1: that era. But in a way, it kind of almost 231 00:12:37,960 --> 00:12:40,719 Speaker 1: seems quaint now when you look at everything else that 232 00:12:40,840 --> 00:12:41,800 Speaker 1: is would have going on. 233 00:12:42,520 --> 00:12:46,120 Speaker 2: It does seem quaint now. I remember that war on 234 00:12:46,240 --> 00:12:51,800 Speaker 2: women phrase, and boy, if we thought that was a 235 00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:54,800 Speaker 2: war on women, buckle up for twenty twenty two. 236 00:12:55,080 --> 00:12:59,640 Speaker 1: This is a soul. It's funny because I wanted to 237 00:12:59,640 --> 00:13:02,080 Speaker 1: do this episode because I thought it was like a 238 00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:05,200 Speaker 1: little bit of a departure from everything happening in the news. 239 00:13:05,240 --> 00:13:08,120 Speaker 1: But it's so funny how it always comes back to this, 240 00:13:08,320 --> 00:13:08,520 Speaker 1: you know. 241 00:13:09,360 --> 00:13:12,760 Speaker 2: I feel like every time I look backwards to the 242 00:13:12,800 --> 00:13:17,080 Speaker 2: period like five, ten, fifteen years ago, I'm confronted with 243 00:13:17,280 --> 00:13:20,679 Speaker 2: how quaint my concerns felt, and how the things I 244 00:13:20,760 --> 00:13:25,080 Speaker 2: was alarmed about seems so much smaller than the things 245 00:13:25,120 --> 00:13:27,520 Speaker 2: that are just like normal shit in the news today. 246 00:13:28,440 --> 00:13:30,360 Speaker 1: Oh my god, tell me about it. 247 00:13:33,400 --> 00:13:34,599 Speaker 3: Let's take a quick break. 248 00:13:44,360 --> 00:13:48,400 Speaker 1: At our back. So we're talking about this war on women. 249 00:13:48,800 --> 00:13:53,360 Speaker 1: But back in twenty fourteen, you also have Beyonce performing 250 00:13:53,400 --> 00:13:57,600 Speaker 1: in front of the word feminist in giant letters like 251 00:13:58,200 --> 00:14:01,760 Speaker 1: decked out in Life at the Empty vvma's paired with 252 00:14:01,800 --> 00:14:05,880 Speaker 1: a sample of Chimamanda ngozio Adicia speech on feminism and 253 00:14:05,960 --> 00:14:09,679 Speaker 1: expectations for women and girls. We'd teach girls to shrink themselves, 254 00:14:09,760 --> 00:14:11,040 Speaker 1: to make themselves smaller. 255 00:14:11,400 --> 00:14:14,720 Speaker 3: We say to girls, you can have ambition, but not 256 00:14:14,800 --> 00:14:15,240 Speaker 3: too much. 257 00:14:15,720 --> 00:14:19,000 Speaker 1: And this I remember this. I remember coming into work 258 00:14:19,120 --> 00:14:21,800 Speaker 1: the next day after this aired, and it felt like 259 00:14:21,880 --> 00:14:25,840 Speaker 1: a big cultural moment for women and feminism. You know, 260 00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:29,760 Speaker 1: I think I've been I've identified like vocally as a 261 00:14:29,760 --> 00:14:32,640 Speaker 1: feminist for most of my life since I was a child. 262 00:14:32,680 --> 00:14:35,120 Speaker 1: But I think for a lot of people, when you 263 00:14:35,160 --> 00:14:37,720 Speaker 1: were asked like are you a feminist, it was something 264 00:14:37,760 --> 00:14:39,640 Speaker 1: you had to be a little bit wishy washy about. 265 00:14:39,640 --> 00:14:43,160 Speaker 1: And I feel like this moment with Beyonce, it felt 266 00:14:43,200 --> 00:14:45,640 Speaker 1: like a cultural moment where people wanted to say it 267 00:14:45,680 --> 00:14:51,040 Speaker 1: with their whole chests. Country pop sensation Taylor Swift famously 268 00:14:51,480 --> 00:14:54,360 Speaker 1: came out as a feminist in twenty fourteen in an 269 00:14:54,400 --> 00:14:57,680 Speaker 1: interview with The Guardian where she credits her friend none 270 00:14:57,720 --> 00:15:01,280 Speaker 1: other than Lena Dunham with her feminist awakening. And I 271 00:15:01,280 --> 00:15:04,840 Speaker 1: guess my point is this, this era really feels at 272 00:15:04,840 --> 00:15:08,320 Speaker 1: a time where things like progressivism and diversity and feminism 273 00:15:08,640 --> 00:15:12,760 Speaker 1: are becoming increasingly mainstream, and that they're becoming attached with 274 00:15:12,800 --> 00:15:15,480 Speaker 1: a kind of social currency. You know, it's not cool 275 00:15:15,520 --> 00:15:18,680 Speaker 1: to be aligned with old men dragging their feet and 276 00:15:18,720 --> 00:15:22,720 Speaker 1: blocking marriage equality, or calling college girls sluts for wanting 277 00:15:22,760 --> 00:15:24,920 Speaker 1: to be on birth control. None of that is cool. 278 00:15:25,120 --> 00:15:27,560 Speaker 1: But what is cool is being a feminist. It's cool 279 00:15:27,600 --> 00:15:29,440 Speaker 1: to be a feminist, it's cool to be an ally 280 00:15:29,920 --> 00:15:33,360 Speaker 1: and in twenty fourteen, Lena Dunham was a huge part 281 00:15:33,400 --> 00:15:37,360 Speaker 1: of this climate. So culturally, Lena Dunham's hit show Girls 282 00:15:37,400 --> 00:15:40,960 Speaker 1: and her writing explores, you know, themes of sexuality and 283 00:15:41,040 --> 00:15:44,040 Speaker 1: gender in these really frank ways. So that alone, you know, 284 00:15:44,120 --> 00:15:47,600 Speaker 1: creating work deposits that young women have an interiority that 285 00:15:47,720 --> 00:15:50,840 Speaker 1: is worthy of serious exploration and respect, is a thing 286 00:15:50,840 --> 00:15:53,200 Speaker 1: that is really taking off in the culture. You know, 287 00:15:53,320 --> 00:15:55,480 Speaker 1: Lena Dunham is not a size four, and yet she 288 00:15:55,600 --> 00:15:58,600 Speaker 1: is nude on screen and has these sex scenes. She 289 00:15:58,640 --> 00:16:00,600 Speaker 1: does a really great job of highlight the sort of 290 00:16:00,680 --> 00:16:03,800 Speaker 1: humor and awkwardness that kind a company exploring your sexuality 291 00:16:03,800 --> 00:16:06,240 Speaker 1: when you're young, you know what she's doing on screen. 292 00:16:06,280 --> 00:16:09,280 Speaker 1: It feels a little bit daring. After the success of Girls, 293 00:16:09,480 --> 00:16:12,720 Speaker 1: Lena starts Lenny Letter, a feminist newsletter where you know, 294 00:16:12,760 --> 00:16:16,680 Speaker 1: you have celebrities getting really, really raw but also talking 295 00:16:16,760 --> 00:16:19,400 Speaker 1: about feminist issues. You know, you have Jennifer Lawrence writing 296 00:16:19,440 --> 00:16:22,560 Speaker 1: about the gender pay gap in Hollywood and Kesha writing 297 00:16:22,600 --> 00:16:25,280 Speaker 1: about her abuse at the hands of her producer, doctor Luke. 298 00:16:25,920 --> 00:16:29,960 Speaker 1: This also translates politically. Lena positions herself as a vocal 299 00:16:29,960 --> 00:16:33,840 Speaker 1: feminist and a champion for feminist causes another familiar trip 300 00:16:33,920 --> 00:16:37,360 Speaker 1: down memory lane. Back around twenty fourteen, Planned Parenthood was 301 00:16:37,360 --> 00:16:41,640 Speaker 1: facing a lot of bs political attacks. Mike Pence was 302 00:16:41,680 --> 00:16:45,400 Speaker 1: not just someone who was being threatened with hanging and 303 00:16:45,440 --> 00:16:48,320 Speaker 1: a gallows by his own constituents. Back then, he was 304 00:16:48,320 --> 00:16:51,320 Speaker 1: the governor of Indiana, and he made attacking Planned Parenthood 305 00:16:51,520 --> 00:16:54,800 Speaker 1: and threatening to defund Planned Parenthood part a big part 306 00:16:54,840 --> 00:16:57,960 Speaker 1: of his whole overall thing. And we also had these 307 00:16:58,000 --> 00:17:02,000 Speaker 1: deceptively edited sting videos anti abortion extremists. You know, they 308 00:17:02,040 --> 00:17:04,840 Speaker 1: would do things like have somebody dress up like a 309 00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:07,480 Speaker 1: pimp and then go in with women to a planned 310 00:17:07,520 --> 00:17:11,080 Speaker 1: parenthood and try to get services. Basically, right wing types 311 00:17:11,119 --> 00:17:14,320 Speaker 1: were really trying to make planned parenthood and abortion and 312 00:17:14,359 --> 00:17:17,160 Speaker 1: the kinds of exploration of sexuality and gender that Lena 313 00:17:17,200 --> 00:17:19,919 Speaker 1: really does in her work. They were really trying to 314 00:17:20,000 --> 00:17:22,920 Speaker 1: brand that as something toxic that nobody would want to 315 00:17:22,920 --> 00:17:26,400 Speaker 1: be affiliated with. Only it wasn't really working. 316 00:17:27,080 --> 00:17:30,200 Speaker 2: Isn't it funny how Mike Tens built his whole career 317 00:17:30,520 --> 00:17:35,959 Speaker 2: on like attacking people and making people seem like evil villains, 318 00:17:36,560 --> 00:17:42,879 Speaker 2: and then he arguably rode out his career with members 319 00:17:42,880 --> 00:17:47,080 Speaker 2: of his own party chanting to hang him. You know, 320 00:17:47,200 --> 00:17:49,960 Speaker 2: isn't that funny that you reap what you sew? 321 00:17:51,000 --> 00:17:52,880 Speaker 1: You know, you live by the sword, you die by 322 00:17:52,880 --> 00:17:53,960 Speaker 1: the sword. What can I say? 323 00:17:55,320 --> 00:18:02,919 Speaker 2: Yeah? Exactly. You live by the jigged up outrage, you 324 00:18:03,680 --> 00:18:06,560 Speaker 2: die by the gallows. 325 00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:11,680 Speaker 1: So, in the wake of all these attacks on planned parenthood, 326 00:18:11,920 --> 00:18:14,560 Speaker 1: Lena becomes the face of a campaign to fight back 327 00:18:14,600 --> 00:18:17,600 Speaker 1: called Women Are Watching. She designs a hot pink shirt 328 00:18:17,680 --> 00:18:21,400 Speaker 1: that says Lena loves Planned Parenthood in supportive planned parenthood, 329 00:18:21,400 --> 00:18:24,560 Speaker 1: and she gets other aless celebrities like America, Frera and 330 00:18:24,600 --> 00:18:29,040 Speaker 1: Gabrielle Union to join in. Lena made this kind of cheeky, 331 00:18:29,359 --> 00:18:32,359 Speaker 1: kind of wink wink ad for the DNC in supportive 332 00:18:32,359 --> 00:18:33,639 Speaker 1: Obama in twenty twelve. 333 00:18:34,960 --> 00:18:37,160 Speaker 4: Your first time shouldn't be with just anybody you want 334 00:18:37,160 --> 00:18:39,800 Speaker 4: to do it with a great guy. It should be 335 00:18:40,000 --> 00:18:44,119 Speaker 4: with a guy with beautiful someone who really cares about 336 00:18:44,160 --> 00:18:46,880 Speaker 4: and understands women, a guy who cares whether you get 337 00:18:46,880 --> 00:18:49,440 Speaker 4: health insurance and specifically whether you get birth control. 338 00:18:50,200 --> 00:18:54,920 Speaker 1: It was funny, yeah, so it's playful, it's kind of funny, 339 00:18:54,960 --> 00:19:00,520 Speaker 1: it's a little edgy. So probably unsurprisingly, right wing types 340 00:19:00,760 --> 00:19:04,800 Speaker 1: did not like this ad. Ben Shapiro, who remember that 341 00:19:04,880 --> 00:19:07,520 Speaker 1: name because he will be important, later said that the 342 00:19:07,560 --> 00:19:11,919 Speaker 1: ad mocked versions. His whole screed about the ad is 343 00:19:11,960 --> 00:19:17,440 Speaker 1: pretty amazing, so he writes in Breibert. So Lena chose 344 00:19:17,480 --> 00:19:19,680 Speaker 1: to do it for the first time with Barack Obama 345 00:19:19,800 --> 00:19:23,680 Speaker 1: since he quote cares about and understands women. In fact, 346 00:19:23,680 --> 00:19:26,600 Speaker 1: he understands them so well that he exploits them for 347 00:19:26,640 --> 00:19:31,399 Speaker 1: insane commercials, comparing losing your virginity with voting. Obama has 348 00:19:31,520 --> 00:19:34,359 Speaker 1: young daughters, but that didn't stop him from releasing this 349 00:19:34,440 --> 00:19:37,560 Speaker 1: commercial because This is what Obama thinks of your daughters. 350 00:19:37,840 --> 00:19:42,040 Speaker 1: This is Obama's official campaign ad, paid for with his 351 00:19:42,160 --> 00:19:45,920 Speaker 1: campaign money, distributed by his campaign. If this ad were 352 00:19:45,920 --> 00:19:49,560 Speaker 1: any more demeaning to women who apparently care only about 353 00:19:49,600 --> 00:19:52,760 Speaker 1: having sex, if you listen to Lena you want to 354 00:19:52,880 --> 00:19:55,800 Speaker 1: do it, Dunham, it should be produced by Bill Maher 355 00:19:56,000 --> 00:20:00,359 Speaker 1: and star Bill Clinton. Oh wait, that's Obama's actual care campaign. 356 00:20:00,880 --> 00:20:04,680 Speaker 1: According to Barack Obama, this campaign isn't about the economy 357 00:20:04,880 --> 00:20:09,160 Speaker 1: or foreign policy. It's about free birth control as advocated 358 00:20:09,200 --> 00:20:14,080 Speaker 1: by unbelievably wealthy celebrities. If Obama goes any smaller in 359 00:20:14,119 --> 00:20:17,200 Speaker 1: this campaign, we're gonna need a microscope to find him. 360 00:20:18,960 --> 00:20:22,600 Speaker 2: Ugh, it's so over the top. I just need a 361 00:20:22,640 --> 00:20:25,719 Speaker 2: minute to choke down this vomit. It comes up at 362 00:20:25,680 --> 00:20:33,080 Speaker 2: any time Ben Shapiro's words appear. It's you mentioned that 363 00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:35,440 Speaker 2: he's going to be important later. When is that, like, 364 00:20:35,520 --> 00:20:40,040 Speaker 2: twenty twenty five, twenty thirty, When will he be important? 365 00:20:40,560 --> 00:20:42,800 Speaker 1: We're still waiting. I'm sure he's still waiting. I'm sure 366 00:20:42,800 --> 00:20:45,840 Speaker 1: he's been waiting his whole life to feel important. So 367 00:20:46,240 --> 00:20:49,760 Speaker 1: they did not like Lina's Obama ad in twenty twelve 368 00:20:49,800 --> 00:20:52,560 Speaker 1: and it. Actually, I find it so interesting how Shapiro 369 00:20:52,680 --> 00:20:55,680 Speaker 1: uses Lina's involvement to really shrink the issue of birth 370 00:20:55,720 --> 00:20:59,439 Speaker 1: control coverage, Like it is simultaneously a small issue that 371 00:20:59,520 --> 00:21:03,280 Speaker 1: is so small that it's unbecoming Obama to align himself with, 372 00:21:04,080 --> 00:21:06,320 Speaker 1: and it is also an issue that the right wing 373 00:21:06,680 --> 00:21:10,520 Speaker 1: was actively exploding and melting down over, you know, holding 374 00:21:10,560 --> 00:21:13,359 Speaker 1: hearings about it and making it a huge deal. So 375 00:21:13,640 --> 00:21:16,080 Speaker 1: you know, the math isn't really mathing on that one, 376 00:21:16,160 --> 00:21:19,800 Speaker 1: Like which one is Is it so inconsequential that nobody 377 00:21:19,840 --> 00:21:22,800 Speaker 1: should ever care about it? Or is it this huge 378 00:21:22,840 --> 00:21:24,639 Speaker 1: issue that you need to hold a million hearings about, 379 00:21:24,680 --> 00:21:25,359 Speaker 1: you know which one? 380 00:21:25,920 --> 00:21:28,240 Speaker 2: That's such a good observation. I ever thought about it 381 00:21:28,280 --> 00:21:33,399 Speaker 2: like that. But you're absolutely right. It's like so consistent 382 00:21:33,480 --> 00:21:36,720 Speaker 2: with their whole hypocrisy thing. We're on the one hand 383 00:21:37,160 --> 00:21:40,240 Speaker 2: when they're on the attack, like, oh, it's so inconsequential, 384 00:21:40,840 --> 00:21:44,760 Speaker 2: it's insulting to even bring up the concept of birth control. 385 00:21:45,280 --> 00:21:49,720 Speaker 2: And then you know, flip the screen and the only 386 00:21:49,800 --> 00:21:54,840 Speaker 2: thing that matters is abortion restrictions and preventing women from 387 00:21:54,880 --> 00:21:58,399 Speaker 2: having abortions. It's like two sides of the same coin, 388 00:21:58,480 --> 00:22:02,320 Speaker 2: but like one side is life or death for society, 389 00:22:02,440 --> 00:22:05,520 Speaker 2: and the other side is like trivial and brass. 390 00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:08,679 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's almost like some of these folks are not 391 00:22:08,960 --> 00:22:13,760 Speaker 1: genuine actors. It sounds like some of them are completely disingenuous. 392 00:22:14,320 --> 00:22:16,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, it does seem almost like that. I mean, like 393 00:22:16,720 --> 00:22:19,080 Speaker 2: that can't be it. There's got to be something more. 394 00:22:19,640 --> 00:22:21,040 Speaker 2: I'll keep thinking about it. 395 00:22:21,520 --> 00:22:24,840 Speaker 1: Keep thinking on it. Anyway. So at this point, Lena 396 00:22:24,960 --> 00:22:27,439 Speaker 1: is really proving herself to be somebody with a certain 397 00:22:27,520 --> 00:22:31,840 Speaker 1: kind of cultural cachet with millennial young women, and somebody 398 00:22:31,920 --> 00:22:34,120 Speaker 1: who seems to really know how to leverage it for 399 00:22:34,720 --> 00:22:37,720 Speaker 1: you know, big d democratic causes in a way that 400 00:22:37,920 --> 00:22:41,639 Speaker 1: actually cuts through. Like even though right wingers did not 401 00:22:41,800 --> 00:22:44,840 Speaker 1: like that ad, people talked about it, people wrote about it. 402 00:22:44,880 --> 00:22:48,560 Speaker 1: So lover or hater, Lena Dunham knows how to wield 403 00:22:48,680 --> 00:22:52,320 Speaker 1: her own specific kind of political, social, and cultural power. 404 00:22:52,720 --> 00:22:55,159 Speaker 1: And the vibe around that is that it's cool to 405 00:22:55,240 --> 00:22:59,360 Speaker 1: care about politics and it's cool to care about feminism. Importantly, 406 00:22:59,640 --> 00:23:03,080 Speaker 1: this is actually largely a phenomenon on the left. There 407 00:23:03,119 --> 00:23:07,600 Speaker 1: aren't really a lot of cool, young, culturally relevant political 408 00:23:07,640 --> 00:23:09,880 Speaker 1: celebrities on the right in the same kind of way. 409 00:23:10,560 --> 00:23:12,080 Speaker 1: Not to go on too much of a tangent. But 410 00:23:12,160 --> 00:23:16,040 Speaker 1: for a long time, people myself included, assumed that Taylor 411 00:23:16,160 --> 00:23:19,720 Speaker 1: Swift was a silent right winger because she pretty much 412 00:23:19,760 --> 00:23:22,800 Speaker 1: never spoke up about politics in interviews. When she was 413 00:23:22,840 --> 00:23:25,919 Speaker 1: asked if she was a feminist, she would say things like, oh, 414 00:23:26,040 --> 00:23:28,640 Speaker 1: I don't call myself a feminist because I never believed 415 00:23:28,640 --> 00:23:32,879 Speaker 1: in men versus women. But her friendship with Lena Dunham 416 00:23:33,040 --> 00:23:36,399 Speaker 1: gets tailored to be this loud and proud feminist who 417 00:23:36,440 --> 00:23:40,439 Speaker 1: actually speaks up about politics after a decade of staying quiet. 418 00:23:40,800 --> 00:23:44,520 Speaker 1: And it's basically almost like a right wing bogeyman come 419 00:23:44,560 --> 00:23:47,800 Speaker 1: to life. You know, your sweet blonde, conservative, country loving 420 00:23:47,840 --> 00:23:51,679 Speaker 1: young woman will become corrupted by a tattooed feminist with 421 00:23:51,720 --> 00:23:54,919 Speaker 1: green hair and will be pulled into identifying as a 422 00:23:54,960 --> 00:23:58,160 Speaker 1: liberal feminist. So you know, say what you will about 423 00:23:58,200 --> 00:24:01,359 Speaker 1: Lena Dunham. That is a certain type of cultural power, 424 00:24:01,480 --> 00:24:04,560 Speaker 1: and Homegirld knows how to use it. And you know, 425 00:24:05,040 --> 00:24:07,840 Speaker 1: when it comes to the culture, it was people like 426 00:24:08,000 --> 00:24:11,120 Speaker 1: Lena Dunham who had the relevance. And I can see 427 00:24:11,119 --> 00:24:13,600 Speaker 1: how this would be really threatening to write wing types 428 00:24:13,640 --> 00:24:16,479 Speaker 1: who historically have had a lot of political power. But 429 00:24:16,520 --> 00:24:19,439 Speaker 1: they aren't cool, They're not young or hip, and that 430 00:24:19,560 --> 00:24:22,679 Speaker 1: is a problem for them. So all of this is 431 00:24:22,720 --> 00:24:26,560 Speaker 1: the backdrop on which a website called Truth Revolt comes 432 00:24:26,560 --> 00:24:30,720 Speaker 1: to exist. And to understand this misleading claim that Lena 433 00:24:30,800 --> 00:24:33,440 Speaker 1: Dunham sexually abused her sibling and where it comes from, 434 00:24:33,880 --> 00:24:37,000 Speaker 1: we have to first start by talking about Truth Revolt. 435 00:24:37,480 --> 00:24:39,600 Speaker 2: Wait, so I was following along the whole way, but 436 00:24:39,720 --> 00:24:41,960 Speaker 2: all of a sudden, now we're talking about a website 437 00:24:42,080 --> 00:24:44,840 Speaker 2: called truth Revolt. What is truth Revolt? 438 00:24:45,200 --> 00:24:47,679 Speaker 1: Truth Revolt is a right wing website that was launched 439 00:24:47,680 --> 00:24:51,119 Speaker 1: on October seventh, twenty thirteen. According to c SPAN, Truth 440 00:24:51,160 --> 00:24:54,680 Speaker 1: Revolt is a politically conservative media watchdog and activist group 441 00:24:54,760 --> 00:24:59,359 Speaker 1: founded by conservative commentators Ben Shapiro and David Horowitz of 442 00:24:59,400 --> 00:25:02,439 Speaker 1: the d Horror Its Freedom Center as a counterpoint to 443 00:25:02,480 --> 00:25:07,160 Speaker 1: the politically progressive media Matters for America. Yes, Ben Shapiro 444 00:25:07,320 --> 00:25:10,240 Speaker 1: is the same person who wrote that breathless piece about 445 00:25:10,320 --> 00:25:14,159 Speaker 1: Lena's twenty twelve ad for Obama. And side note, a 446 00:25:14,160 --> 00:25:17,479 Speaker 1: lot of y'all probably know Ben Shapiro. He is pretty 447 00:25:17,480 --> 00:25:20,160 Speaker 1: famous for being you know, he's young. I think he's 448 00:25:20,160 --> 00:25:22,880 Speaker 1: thirty eight now. He's pretty famous for being this right 449 00:25:22,920 --> 00:25:25,159 Speaker 1: wing media figure, and he's been at it since he 450 00:25:25,320 --> 00:25:29,560 Speaker 1: was seventeen. I personally just find him awful. Like the 451 00:25:29,560 --> 00:25:31,440 Speaker 1: fact that I'm even talking about him on this show 452 00:25:31,600 --> 00:25:34,119 Speaker 1: is slightly annoying to me, because I just like don't 453 00:25:34,200 --> 00:25:36,960 Speaker 1: like talking about him. You know. I think one of 454 00:25:37,000 --> 00:25:39,159 Speaker 1: the reasons why I dislike him so much is because 455 00:25:39,520 --> 00:25:43,119 Speaker 1: his whole thing is culture war stuff, right, And so 456 00:25:43,520 --> 00:25:47,720 Speaker 1: he's the guy with a huge platform complaining about Disney 457 00:25:47,960 --> 00:25:51,399 Speaker 1: making a woke remake or something like that, or you know, 458 00:25:52,359 --> 00:25:57,600 Speaker 1: he's the person who's always complaining about culture because culture 459 00:25:58,640 --> 00:26:01,679 Speaker 1: tends to be a space where, you know, people who 460 00:26:01,720 --> 00:26:05,199 Speaker 1: are traditionally marginalized can have a little power and have 461 00:26:05,240 --> 00:26:07,399 Speaker 1: a little bit of a voice. And so he's constantly 462 00:26:07,440 --> 00:26:10,800 Speaker 1: complaining about culture. The thing that always comes to mind 463 00:26:10,920 --> 00:26:14,480 Speaker 1: when I think about Ben Shapiro, I will always associate 464 00:26:14,560 --> 00:26:17,840 Speaker 1: him with trying to lead a moral crusade against Megan 465 00:26:17,880 --> 00:26:21,400 Speaker 1: thee Stallion and Cardi B's song of the Summer Wet 466 00:26:21,440 --> 00:26:25,760 Speaker 1: Ass Pussy, and kind of self owning himself by saying 467 00:26:25,800 --> 00:26:28,480 Speaker 1: that the only reason so he says, Oh, I'm married 468 00:26:28,520 --> 00:26:31,200 Speaker 1: to a doctor I talked to my doctor wife, and 469 00:26:31,240 --> 00:26:33,680 Speaker 1: she assures me that the only reason that a woman 470 00:26:33,720 --> 00:26:37,400 Speaker 1: would have a WAP is if she had a vaginal infection, 471 00:26:38,119 --> 00:26:40,879 Speaker 1: which is just hysterical. I think about it all the 472 00:26:40,920 --> 00:26:41,560 Speaker 1: time and laugh. 473 00:26:42,480 --> 00:26:44,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's the funniest thing about him. It's the only 474 00:26:44,640 --> 00:26:46,600 Speaker 2: thing I think about when I think about him. It's 475 00:26:46,640 --> 00:26:53,000 Speaker 2: like perfectly summarizes his whole culture war thing where there 476 00:26:53,040 --> 00:26:55,320 Speaker 2: was like a video I don't even think it was 477 00:26:55,400 --> 00:27:00,080 Speaker 2: really edited of him like doing spoken word of the 478 00:27:00,160 --> 00:27:07,720 Speaker 2: lyrics of that WAP song and then him like commenting about, yeah, exactly, 479 00:27:07,800 --> 00:27:11,639 Speaker 2: you said to his wife, who apparently is a medical doctor, 480 00:27:11,680 --> 00:27:13,880 Speaker 2: saying that the only reason it might happen is because 481 00:27:13,920 --> 00:27:18,199 Speaker 2: of an affection. It was sad and shocking, and I 482 00:27:18,240 --> 00:27:21,600 Speaker 2: almost feel like like he was setting us up. But 483 00:27:21,920 --> 00:27:25,119 Speaker 2: like it's just too much humility. I think it just 484 00:27:25,200 --> 00:27:27,600 Speaker 2: truly is that embarrassing for him? 485 00:27:28,359 --> 00:27:30,880 Speaker 1: Yeah, I if folks have not seen so the video 486 00:27:30,920 --> 00:27:33,200 Speaker 1: that you're talking about, I definitely watched it one hundred times. 487 00:27:33,720 --> 00:27:37,600 Speaker 1: He is reading the lyrics on his show in disgust, 488 00:27:38,040 --> 00:27:40,200 Speaker 1: and so he's reading the lyrics to wet Ass Pussy. 489 00:27:40,480 --> 00:27:43,480 Speaker 1: But then somebody and I think he's trying to demonstrate 490 00:27:43,560 --> 00:27:46,199 Speaker 1: like this song is so immoral and like this is 491 00:27:46,200 --> 00:27:48,840 Speaker 1: what our girls are listening to, and YadA, YadA, YadA. 492 00:27:48,920 --> 00:27:52,040 Speaker 1: But then to a beat, somebody puts it to the 493 00:27:52,119 --> 00:27:58,600 Speaker 1: WAP beat and it kind of slaps lie. It's hilarious, 494 00:27:58,640 --> 00:28:01,280 Speaker 1: Like look it up. I I'll link it in the 495 00:28:01,320 --> 00:28:04,160 Speaker 1: show notes because I watch it. It's given me great joy. 496 00:28:04,200 --> 00:28:04,880 Speaker 1: I'll put it that way. 497 00:28:05,320 --> 00:28:07,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, And I think it's the best way to really 498 00:28:07,480 --> 00:28:10,120 Speaker 2: understand Ben Shapiro as a person and as. 499 00:28:10,040 --> 00:28:15,919 Speaker 1: A man exactly. And obviously this is it sounds so silly, 500 00:28:15,960 --> 00:28:18,439 Speaker 1: and it is silly, but it's also really important to 501 00:28:18,480 --> 00:28:22,920 Speaker 1: this particular story because turning culture into a political battleground 502 00:28:23,040 --> 00:28:25,560 Speaker 1: is a big part of how we got here With 503 00:28:25,640 --> 00:28:29,520 Speaker 1: this one persistent claim about Lena Dunham, so, Truth Revolt's 504 00:28:29,520 --> 00:28:32,639 Speaker 1: mission page states that its goals are to quote unmasked 505 00:28:32,720 --> 00:28:35,760 Speaker 1: leftists in the media for who they are, destroy their 506 00:28:35,760 --> 00:28:39,280 Speaker 1: credibility with the American public, and devastate their funding basis. 507 00:28:39,560 --> 00:28:42,560 Speaker 1: So essentially, truth Revolt was created, per the co creator 508 00:28:42,640 --> 00:28:47,280 Speaker 1: David Horbert's own mission statement, to manipulate media for political means. 509 00:28:47,720 --> 00:28:50,560 Speaker 1: Here's what he wrote on gon say the media win 510 00:28:50,680 --> 00:28:54,040 Speaker 1: elections for the left. It's not the left's competence in office. 511 00:28:54,160 --> 00:28:57,800 Speaker 1: Leftists have demonstrated none. It's not the left's ideas. Leftist 512 00:28:57,880 --> 00:29:00,960 Speaker 1: ideas have failed everywhere they've been tried. The left wins 513 00:29:01,000 --> 00:29:05,200 Speaker 1: for one simple reason. Leftists control the information distribution system 514 00:29:05,200 --> 00:29:08,080 Speaker 1: in the United States, and they use that system to 515 00:29:08,240 --> 00:29:12,720 Speaker 1: pillary conservatives, heartless bigots intent on harming the poor and 516 00:29:12,800 --> 00:29:16,520 Speaker 1: targeting minorities. The media must be destroyed where they stand. 517 00:29:16,840 --> 00:29:19,120 Speaker 1: That is our mission at Truth Revolt. The goal of 518 00:29:19,160 --> 00:29:22,280 Speaker 1: truth Revolt is simple, unmasked leftists in the media for 519 00:29:22,360 --> 00:29:25,360 Speaker 1: who they are, destroy their credibility with the American public, 520 00:29:25,520 --> 00:29:29,200 Speaker 1: and devastate their funding basis, Truth Revolt focuses on high 521 00:29:29,200 --> 00:29:33,280 Speaker 1: profile media members and holding them accountable. Truth Revolt also 522 00:29:33,360 --> 00:29:35,840 Speaker 1: seeks to stop the left dead in its tracks when 523 00:29:35,840 --> 00:29:39,120 Speaker 1: it comes to training the next generation on our college campuses. 524 00:29:39,920 --> 00:29:43,080 Speaker 1: Truth Revolt works to make advertisers and funders aware of 525 00:29:43,120 --> 00:29:47,280 Speaker 1: the leftist propaganda they sponsor and bringing social consequences to 526 00:29:47,320 --> 00:29:50,840 Speaker 1: bear to create pressure on such advertisers and funders. So 527 00:29:51,040 --> 00:29:54,560 Speaker 1: pretty obviously from their own statement, Truth Revolt specifically is 528 00:29:54,560 --> 00:29:59,400 Speaker 1: looking to quote unmasked leftists and target specific leftist public 529 00:29:59,440 --> 00:30:02,520 Speaker 1: figures in them media to make them toxic for brands 530 00:30:02,560 --> 00:30:04,880 Speaker 1: and funders to be associated with. And they're kind of 531 00:30:04,920 --> 00:30:08,480 Speaker 1: modeling themselves after places like Media Matters for America, who 532 00:30:08,560 --> 00:30:12,920 Speaker 1: monitor disinformers and bad actors and extremists like Tucker Carlson 533 00:30:12,920 --> 00:30:16,840 Speaker 1: and Steve Bannon to pressure advertisers to drop them. They're 534 00:30:16,840 --> 00:30:21,320 Speaker 1: also specifically focused around winning over young people like college students, 535 00:30:21,440 --> 00:30:25,720 Speaker 1: who we know are Lena Dunham's biggest audience demographic. So obviously, 536 00:30:25,720 --> 00:30:28,160 Speaker 1: I think it goes about saying that truth Revolt is 537 00:30:28,240 --> 00:30:31,840 Speaker 1: not just some you know, run of the mill media 538 00:30:31,840 --> 00:30:35,520 Speaker 1: outlet reporting the facts from their own statement. They are 539 00:30:35,520 --> 00:30:38,600 Speaker 1: a right wing outlet with a political acts to grind. 540 00:30:38,760 --> 00:30:42,520 Speaker 1: They are out for vengeance, they are out to dismantle 541 00:30:42,560 --> 00:30:45,200 Speaker 1: people take them down by their own admission. 542 00:30:47,560 --> 00:30:53,400 Speaker 2: This idea that like leftists are supported by this great 543 00:30:53,560 --> 00:30:58,480 Speaker 2: funding appreatus. I know so many broke ass leftists she. 544 00:30:58,600 --> 00:30:59,320 Speaker 1: Checking out of me. 545 00:31:00,160 --> 00:31:03,200 Speaker 2: Separating from their funding is like not even the thing, 546 00:31:03,360 --> 00:31:06,480 Speaker 2: like so many of them are broke, you know, Like 547 00:31:06,520 --> 00:31:09,560 Speaker 2: where what is this like big leftist funding in the 548 00:31:09,600 --> 00:31:11,320 Speaker 2: media that they're talking about. 549 00:31:12,000 --> 00:31:15,920 Speaker 1: Like, I mean, nothing that they say is accurate. You know, 550 00:31:15,960 --> 00:31:19,200 Speaker 1: they say that like, oh, the media is a tool. 551 00:31:19,280 --> 00:31:22,840 Speaker 1: Like the media, like the idea that that that that 552 00:31:22,920 --> 00:31:29,200 Speaker 1: mainstream media is a tool propping up leftist agendas. It's 553 00:31:29,200 --> 00:31:31,680 Speaker 1: just I gets such an unseerious claim. I don't find 554 00:31:31,720 --> 00:31:33,680 Speaker 1: it worthy of a retort. It's just it's just like 555 00:31:33,760 --> 00:31:37,800 Speaker 1: you can just read the newspaper in the wake of 556 00:31:38,320 --> 00:31:41,360 Speaker 1: the fall of Row, read the newspaper in the New 557 00:31:41,400 --> 00:31:43,360 Speaker 1: York Times today they I mean, I don't even want 558 00:31:43,400 --> 00:31:45,880 Speaker 1: to get into it, but yes, it's it's such an 559 00:31:45,960 --> 00:31:49,400 Speaker 1: unseerious claim that it's not even worthy of a response. 560 00:31:49,880 --> 00:31:53,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's it's like ludicrous. It's like who who owns 561 00:31:53,240 --> 00:31:58,720 Speaker 2: the media? We've got you know, NBC, you know, Jeff 562 00:31:58,720 --> 00:32:03,040 Speaker 2: Bezos owns the Washington Post. Like, these are not leftist people. 563 00:32:04,800 --> 00:32:07,480 Speaker 1: No, it's it's horseshit. Okay, So you might be wondering, 564 00:32:08,160 --> 00:32:10,760 Speaker 1: this website sounds sketchy as hell, But what does it 565 00:32:10,760 --> 00:32:13,560 Speaker 1: have to do with Lena Dunham. Well, the claim that 566 00:32:13,680 --> 00:32:17,880 Speaker 1: Lena Dunham admitting to molesting her younger sibling was initially 567 00:32:17,960 --> 00:32:20,320 Speaker 1: started on Truth Revolt. 568 00:32:21,240 --> 00:32:24,960 Speaker 2: Oh shit, so that's the connection here. This Truth Revolt 569 00:32:25,520 --> 00:32:30,800 Speaker 2: started this claim about Lena Dunham. I should have seen 570 00:32:30,840 --> 00:32:34,360 Speaker 2: it coming, but somehow they snuck it in on me. 571 00:32:35,520 --> 00:32:38,719 Speaker 1: It's true, and I should probably say that something that 572 00:32:38,760 --> 00:32:41,760 Speaker 1: we know about disinformation and the way that it spreads 573 00:32:42,120 --> 00:32:46,520 Speaker 1: oftentimes it contains some element or nugget of truth that 574 00:32:46,520 --> 00:32:49,480 Speaker 1: can be easily manipulated or taken out of context. And 575 00:32:49,520 --> 00:32:52,000 Speaker 1: that is definitely what's happening here. So let's look at 576 00:32:52,000 --> 00:32:55,880 Speaker 1: the facts. In September twenty fourteen, Lena Dunham released her 577 00:32:56,000 --> 00:32:58,520 Speaker 1: memoir Not That Kind of Girl. Now. I have read 578 00:32:58,520 --> 00:33:00,800 Speaker 1: the memoir a couple of times, so like I'm pretty 579 00:33:00,840 --> 00:33:02,600 Speaker 1: well versed on what it says and what it doesn't say. 580 00:33:03,400 --> 00:33:09,160 Speaker 1: And it does include passages of Lena describing sexual situations 581 00:33:09,240 --> 00:33:12,520 Speaker 1: around her younger sibling. I should say right now, Lina's 582 00:33:12,560 --> 00:33:17,000 Speaker 1: sibling is called Cyrus Grace Dunham and uses they them pronouns. 583 00:33:17,240 --> 00:33:21,120 Speaker 1: According to a twenty nineteen Atlantic profile of Cyrus, Cyrus 584 00:33:21,200 --> 00:33:25,080 Speaker 1: uses they them pronouns in professional contexts, and he him 585 00:33:25,120 --> 00:33:27,960 Speaker 1: pronouns with friends. But that was not the case when 586 00:33:28,000 --> 00:33:30,400 Speaker 1: this memoir was published. But as I read some quotes 587 00:33:30,440 --> 00:33:32,480 Speaker 1: from the memoir, I'm going to amend the quotes to 588 00:33:32,520 --> 00:33:35,880 Speaker 1: reflect that, so Lena writes about trying to get her 589 00:33:35,920 --> 00:33:38,560 Speaker 1: younger sibling to kiss her on the mouth and lay 590 00:33:38,600 --> 00:33:41,120 Speaker 1: on top of her. As Cyrus Grace grew, I took 591 00:33:41,160 --> 00:33:44,680 Speaker 1: to bribing them for time and affection. One dollar in quarters, 592 00:33:44,680 --> 00:33:46,640 Speaker 1: if I could do their makeup like a motorcycle chick, 593 00:33:47,040 --> 00:33:48,760 Speaker 1: three pieces of candy, if I could kiss them on 594 00:33:48,800 --> 00:33:51,440 Speaker 1: the lips for five seconds, whatever they wanted to watch 595 00:33:51,440 --> 00:33:54,440 Speaker 1: on TV. If they would just relax on me, basically 596 00:33:54,760 --> 00:33:57,680 Speaker 1: anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small 597 00:33:57,680 --> 00:34:01,960 Speaker 1: suburban girl I was trying. The memoir also includes this passage. 598 00:34:02,160 --> 00:34:04,520 Speaker 1: Do we all have uteruses? I asked my mother when 599 00:34:04,520 --> 00:34:07,440 Speaker 1: I was seven. Yes, she told me. We're born with 600 00:34:07,520 --> 00:34:10,040 Speaker 1: them and with all of our eggs, But they start 601 00:34:10,080 --> 00:34:12,280 Speaker 1: out very small, and they aren't ready to make babies 602 00:34:12,360 --> 00:34:16,359 Speaker 1: until we're older. I look at my Cyrus Grace, now 603 00:34:16,400 --> 00:34:19,160 Speaker 1: a slim, tough one year old, and at their tiny belly. 604 00:34:19,520 --> 00:34:22,000 Speaker 1: I imagine eggs inside of them, like the sack of 605 00:34:22,040 --> 00:34:25,160 Speaker 1: spider eggs and Charlotte's web, and their uterus the size 606 00:34:25,160 --> 00:34:28,440 Speaker 1: of a thimble. Does their vagina look like mine? I 607 00:34:28,480 --> 00:34:31,560 Speaker 1: guess so, my mother said, just smaller. One day as 608 00:34:31,560 --> 00:34:33,760 Speaker 1: I sat out on our driveway in Long Island, playing 609 00:34:33,800 --> 00:34:36,640 Speaker 1: with blocks and buckets, my curiosity got the best of me. 610 00:34:37,560 --> 00:34:40,480 Speaker 1: Cyrus Grace was sitting up, babbling and smiling, and I 611 00:34:40,560 --> 00:34:43,440 Speaker 1: leaned down between them and I leaned down between their 612 00:34:43,480 --> 00:34:46,760 Speaker 1: legs and carefully spread open their vagina. They didn't resist, 613 00:34:46,960 --> 00:34:49,799 Speaker 1: and when I saw what was inside, I shrieked. My 614 00:34:49,880 --> 00:34:53,719 Speaker 1: mother came running, Mama, Mama, Cyrus Grace has something in there. 615 00:34:54,320 --> 00:34:57,280 Speaker 1: My mother didn't bother asking why I had opened cyrus 616 00:34:57,280 --> 00:35:00,360 Speaker 1: Grace's vagina. This was within the spectrum of things that 617 00:35:00,400 --> 00:35:02,919 Speaker 1: I did. She just got on her knees and looked 618 00:35:02,960 --> 00:35:06,239 Speaker 1: for herself. It quickly became apparent that Cyrus Grace had 619 00:35:06,280 --> 00:35:09,440 Speaker 1: stuck six or seven pebbles in there. My mother removed 620 00:35:09,440 --> 00:35:13,160 Speaker 1: them patiently, while Cyrus Grace cackled thrilled that their prank 621 00:35:13,280 --> 00:35:17,640 Speaker 1: had been a success. So the book actually does contain 622 00:35:17,960 --> 00:35:23,320 Speaker 1: content that involves her describing these sexual situations with their sibling. 623 00:35:23,480 --> 00:35:27,160 Speaker 1: That is true, but she writes about doing this at 624 00:35:27,200 --> 00:35:31,239 Speaker 1: age seven with her sibling who was age one. On 625 00:35:31,280 --> 00:35:34,200 Speaker 1: October twenty ninth, twenty fourteen, about a month after her 626 00:35:34,239 --> 00:35:37,440 Speaker 1: book had come out, Truth Revolt published the passage that 627 00:35:37,520 --> 00:35:40,640 Speaker 1: I just read about the pebbles and the vagina under 628 00:35:40,719 --> 00:35:46,080 Speaker 1: the headline Lena Dunham described sexually abusing her little sibling. Now, 629 00:35:46,120 --> 00:35:49,880 Speaker 1: as Box points out, truth Revolt did two very misleading 630 00:35:49,920 --> 00:35:53,240 Speaker 1: things in their post, calling Donham a sexual abuser. One, 631 00:35:53,560 --> 00:35:57,200 Speaker 1: they really keyed in on this phrase they didn't resist, 632 00:35:57,400 --> 00:36:00,719 Speaker 1: which obviously becomes a lot more loaded when paired with 633 00:36:00,760 --> 00:36:04,799 Speaker 1: the headline about sexually abusing her sibling. Two, and this 634 00:36:04,880 --> 00:36:09,280 Speaker 1: is really important. Truth Revolt article originally stated that Dunham 635 00:36:09,560 --> 00:36:13,399 Speaker 1: was seventeen at the time, when Dunham in actuality said 636 00:36:13,440 --> 00:36:16,400 Speaker 1: that she was seven. So obviously, if you have a 637 00:36:16,440 --> 00:36:19,360 Speaker 1: seventeen year old describing these kinds of interactions with a 638 00:36:19,400 --> 00:36:22,879 Speaker 1: one year old, it is a very different situation than 639 00:36:22,920 --> 00:36:25,640 Speaker 1: if you have a seven year old, which she actually 640 00:36:25,680 --> 00:36:29,080 Speaker 1: says was her age doing them with someone who is one. 641 00:36:29,840 --> 00:36:33,160 Speaker 2: Yes, seventeen and seven are pretty different there. 642 00:36:33,200 --> 00:36:37,120 Speaker 1: Pretty different. So truth Revolt eventually does say that it 643 00:36:37,200 --> 00:36:42,719 Speaker 1: was a typo. I guess that's fine. The story is 644 00:36:42,760 --> 00:36:44,880 Speaker 1: then linked to by the Drudge Report, which, if you 645 00:36:44,920 --> 00:36:47,600 Speaker 1: don't know what that is because you're not older like myself, 646 00:36:48,160 --> 00:36:51,360 Speaker 1: it's basically a right wing news aggregator that can really 647 00:36:51,440 --> 00:36:54,200 Speaker 1: blow up stories. It was the first place to publish 648 00:36:54,280 --> 00:36:57,320 Speaker 1: the Bill Clinton scandal involving interna Monica Lewinsky back in 649 00:36:57,360 --> 00:36:59,880 Speaker 1: nineteen ninety eight. Once it's picked up by the drudge 650 00:37:00,360 --> 00:37:03,239 Speaker 1: the story gets a ton more traction. It makes the 651 00:37:03,360 --> 00:37:05,640 Speaker 1: rounds on you know, Truth for Both is kind of 652 00:37:05,680 --> 00:37:08,600 Speaker 1: a niche site. It makes the rounds on the wider 653 00:37:08,880 --> 00:37:12,319 Speaker 1: right wing blog and infosphere, and much bigger right wing 654 00:37:12,360 --> 00:37:15,799 Speaker 1: outlets begin to pick it up. The National Reviews Kevin Williamston, 655 00:37:15,840 --> 00:37:19,640 Speaker 1: for instance, declared there is no non horrific interpretation of 656 00:37:19,680 --> 00:37:23,320 Speaker 1: this episode, and The Daily Caller, another conservative outlet, rights 657 00:37:23,680 --> 00:37:27,480 Speaker 1: Dunham had admitted to the quote gleeful sexual abuse of 658 00:37:27,520 --> 00:37:32,200 Speaker 1: her infant sibling. Now that is initially really what seeded 659 00:37:32,480 --> 00:37:37,600 Speaker 1: the whole Lena Dunham sexually abused her sibling narrative. And 660 00:37:37,680 --> 00:37:42,400 Speaker 1: now it's out in the wider right wing blogosphere infosphere, 661 00:37:42,880 --> 00:37:44,719 Speaker 1: and now it is a thing. 662 00:37:45,440 --> 00:37:49,719 Speaker 2: It's so salacious it almost feels like Taylor made for 663 00:37:49,840 --> 00:37:55,480 Speaker 2: these kind of right wing outrage aggregators. 664 00:37:55,760 --> 00:37:59,040 Speaker 1: I mean, that is such a commonality of disinformation, and 665 00:37:59,080 --> 00:38:01,600 Speaker 1: it's something that I have to remember myself quite a bit, 666 00:38:01,920 --> 00:38:04,759 Speaker 1: it's not just folks on the right. I'm speaking about everybody. 667 00:38:04,840 --> 00:38:09,520 Speaker 1: Myself very much included that when you have these stories 668 00:38:09,560 --> 00:38:14,080 Speaker 1: that seem almost tailor made to trigger certain things inside 669 00:38:14,120 --> 00:38:16,320 Speaker 1: you or outrage you in a certain kind of way, 670 00:38:16,680 --> 00:38:18,560 Speaker 1: those are always stories that you should be a little 671 00:38:18,560 --> 00:38:21,680 Speaker 1: bit wary of because it's not a coincidence that they 672 00:38:21,719 --> 00:38:23,680 Speaker 1: are hitting you in this particular way. 673 00:38:24,320 --> 00:38:24,560 Speaker 4: Yeah. 674 00:38:24,680 --> 00:38:27,560 Speaker 2: Right, And you've mentioned that. Guests have mentioned that on 675 00:38:27,600 --> 00:38:31,040 Speaker 2: the show talking about ways to combat disinformation, Like when 676 00:38:31,040 --> 00:38:36,319 Speaker 2: you're feeling that emotional reaction, that should almost be a 677 00:38:36,440 --> 00:38:42,279 Speaker 2: signal to step back and evaluate, like who is writing this? 678 00:38:42,760 --> 00:38:44,960 Speaker 2: Where am I reading this? Is this something that I 679 00:38:45,040 --> 00:38:46,880 Speaker 2: want to share exactly? 680 00:38:46,960 --> 00:38:48,560 Speaker 1: And that's one of the elements about this that I 681 00:38:48,600 --> 00:38:52,520 Speaker 1: find so fascinating is how, obviously, if you are Ben 682 00:38:52,560 --> 00:38:56,480 Speaker 1: Shapiro or a right winger who has endured the last 683 00:38:56,520 --> 00:39:00,000 Speaker 1: few years where it seems like progressivism and diversity and 684 00:39:00,040 --> 00:39:03,359 Speaker 1: feminism and sexuality are all things that are becoming more 685 00:39:03,400 --> 00:39:06,279 Speaker 1: and more salient, and you're feeling less and less in 686 00:39:06,360 --> 00:39:08,640 Speaker 1: control and less and less relevant, and these things are 687 00:39:08,680 --> 00:39:11,520 Speaker 1: becoming more and more relevant. I could see why that 688 00:39:11,520 --> 00:39:14,960 Speaker 1: would prime somebody who is a right winger who feels 689 00:39:15,719 --> 00:39:18,239 Speaker 1: kind of threatened by this. I could see how that 690 00:39:18,239 --> 00:39:22,040 Speaker 1: would prime them to believe and amplify and spread this 691 00:39:22,120 --> 00:39:26,640 Speaker 1: particularly damaging lie about Lena Dunham. However, what I find 692 00:39:26,680 --> 00:39:29,719 Speaker 1: so fascinating about this is the way that didn't just 693 00:39:29,760 --> 00:39:33,480 Speaker 1: stay in right wing circles. It made the rounds, and 694 00:39:33,880 --> 00:39:35,240 Speaker 1: it still persists today. 695 00:39:37,600 --> 00:39:59,360 Speaker 3: More after a quick break. 696 00:39:49,880 --> 00:39:53,640 Speaker 1: Let's get right back into it. So the day that 697 00:39:53,719 --> 00:39:57,680 Speaker 1: Truth published their misleading article about her memoir, Lena responded 698 00:39:57,760 --> 00:40:01,200 Speaker 1: the following day, tweeting the right wing news story that 699 00:40:01,239 --> 00:40:04,080 Speaker 1: I molested my little sibling isn't just laugh out loud, 700 00:40:04,280 --> 00:40:08,600 Speaker 1: it's really fucking upsetting and disgusting. Her legal team sent 701 00:40:08,640 --> 00:40:10,839 Speaker 1: a letter that was obtained by The Hollywood Reporter to 702 00:40:10,880 --> 00:40:14,080 Speaker 1: Bradford Thomas, the author of the Peace and a Truth Revolt, 703 00:40:14,280 --> 00:40:17,400 Speaker 1: threatening to take legal action if certain statements were not removed. 704 00:40:17,880 --> 00:40:20,960 Speaker 1: The letter said, the story is false, fabricated, and has 705 00:40:21,000 --> 00:40:24,120 Speaker 1: the obvious tendency to subject my client to ridicule and 706 00:40:24,160 --> 00:40:26,799 Speaker 1: to injure her occupation. Now, the letter goes on to 707 00:40:26,800 --> 00:40:29,760 Speaker 1: say that the piece caused quote actual damage to Lena's 708 00:40:29,760 --> 00:40:33,000 Speaker 1: personal and professional reputation, which likely would be calculated in 709 00:40:33,040 --> 00:40:35,719 Speaker 1: the millions of dollars, punitive damages which can be a 710 00:40:35,800 --> 00:40:38,560 Speaker 1: multiple of up to ten times the actual damages, and 711 00:40:38,920 --> 00:40:41,920 Speaker 1: injunctive relief. The letter also says that the Truth Revolt 712 00:40:41,920 --> 00:40:45,600 Speaker 1: story contains quote outright falsified statements that are attributed to 713 00:40:45,640 --> 00:40:48,360 Speaker 1: Lena and her book. The statements do not appear anywhere 714 00:40:48,400 --> 00:40:51,840 Speaker 1: in the book, thus showing intent to harm, knowing falsity 715 00:40:51,880 --> 00:40:54,759 Speaker 1: as well as reckless disregard for the truth, any one 716 00:40:54,800 --> 00:40:58,320 Speaker 1: of which meets the malice requirement. Her attorney, Charles Harder 717 00:40:58,400 --> 00:41:01,480 Speaker 1: wrote in his letter to Truth Revolt Now. Ben Shapiro, 718 00:41:01,719 --> 00:41:06,120 Speaker 1: on behalf of Truth Revolt responded, he said, we refuse 719 00:41:06,200 --> 00:41:08,760 Speaker 1: to withdraw our story and apologize for running it, because 720 00:41:08,800 --> 00:41:11,800 Speaker 1: quoting a woman's book does not constitute a false story, 721 00:41:12,200 --> 00:41:15,120 Speaker 1: even if she is a prominent actress and left wing activist. 722 00:41:15,520 --> 00:41:18,160 Speaker 1: Lena Dunna might not like our interpretation of her book, 723 00:41:18,320 --> 00:41:21,360 Speaker 1: but unfortunately for her and her attorneys, she wrote that 724 00:41:21,440 --> 00:41:23,600 Speaker 1: book and the First Amendment covers a good deal of 725 00:41:23,640 --> 00:41:27,040 Speaker 1: material which she may not like. And I don't know. 726 00:41:27,080 --> 00:41:30,680 Speaker 1: I just find Ben Shapiro and Truth Revolt's response to 727 00:41:30,719 --> 00:41:35,080 Speaker 1: be so wild because Truth Revolt itself admitted that it 728 00:41:35,200 --> 00:41:37,720 Speaker 1: was a typo, saying that she was seventeen and not seven. 729 00:41:37,920 --> 00:41:40,160 Speaker 1: They said it was a typo, and so by definition 730 00:41:40,800 --> 00:41:43,560 Speaker 1: what they printed was not correct and was a false story. 731 00:41:43,560 --> 00:41:47,000 Speaker 1: I feel like Ben Shapiro's kind of, you know, puffed 732 00:41:47,080 --> 00:41:49,920 Speaker 1: up response really flies in the face of like what 733 00:41:49,960 --> 00:41:53,000 Speaker 1: the website actually said, which was that they printed something 734 00:41:53,000 --> 00:41:53,840 Speaker 1: that was not correct. 735 00:41:54,120 --> 00:41:57,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, and that's not like I wouldn't call that a 736 00:41:57,320 --> 00:42:02,480 Speaker 2: typo even if it was uninten which seems pretty unlikely, 737 00:42:02,520 --> 00:42:05,120 Speaker 2: but who knows, you know, maybe it was. But even so, 738 00:42:05,320 --> 00:42:09,960 Speaker 2: it's like, so it so changes the character and the 739 00:42:10,080 --> 00:42:14,319 Speaker 2: nature of the story that it's beyond a typo. It's 740 00:42:14,400 --> 00:42:19,960 Speaker 2: clearly creating a false impression that's absolutely true, and for 741 00:42:20,040 --> 00:42:23,560 Speaker 2: him to not even acknowledge that in part of his apology, 742 00:42:24,360 --> 00:42:25,879 Speaker 2: it just makes me wonder. 743 00:42:25,680 --> 00:42:28,000 Speaker 1: You know what, Oh, he didn't apologize, Oh right. 744 00:42:27,920 --> 00:42:31,080 Speaker 2: Excuse me. Yeah, so not an apology actually, just like 745 00:42:31,160 --> 00:42:35,839 Speaker 2: a continued attack. Yeah, that's great, the kind of kind 746 00:42:35,840 --> 00:42:36,719 Speaker 2: of guy we're dealing with. 747 00:42:36,800 --> 00:42:40,080 Speaker 1: Your Yeah, I mean, I agree with you. I'm not 748 00:42:40,120 --> 00:42:43,319 Speaker 1: going to speculate whether this was an intentional move or not. 749 00:42:44,040 --> 00:42:47,239 Speaker 1: I will say I have my suspicions, but they said 750 00:42:47,239 --> 00:42:50,320 Speaker 1: it was a typo. I'm gonna take them at that word. 751 00:42:51,040 --> 00:42:53,640 Speaker 1: You're so right that even if that was just a typo, 752 00:42:53,760 --> 00:42:58,080 Speaker 1: somebody to slip the one in there, not acknowledging the 753 00:42:58,120 --> 00:43:05,719 Speaker 1: way that that really charges the what you've written, and like, really, yeah, 754 00:43:05,760 --> 00:43:08,840 Speaker 1: it's it's really stunning that he won't even like on 755 00:43:08,880 --> 00:43:10,719 Speaker 1: the one hand that the website admits it, but on 756 00:43:10,760 --> 00:43:12,520 Speaker 1: the other hand it's like, well, we did nothing wrong. 757 00:43:12,560 --> 00:43:14,040 Speaker 1: It's like, well, can't really be both. 758 00:43:13,960 --> 00:43:17,439 Speaker 2: Yeah, Like, some omissions are more important than others. If, 759 00:43:17,560 --> 00:43:21,759 Speaker 2: for example, hypothetically, somebody wrote somebody meant to write Ben 760 00:43:21,800 --> 00:43:27,720 Speaker 2: Shapiro did not murder and eat his sister, but left 761 00:43:27,719 --> 00:43:31,040 Speaker 2: out the word not, it would really change the meaning 762 00:43:31,080 --> 00:43:31,720 Speaker 2: of the sentence. 763 00:43:32,080 --> 00:43:33,840 Speaker 1: It would just be a typo. And how dare you 764 00:43:33,880 --> 00:43:36,120 Speaker 1: insinuate that I apologize and say it with anything? 765 00:43:36,120 --> 00:43:39,120 Speaker 2: But yeah, right, it's just it's just a typo. And 766 00:43:39,320 --> 00:43:42,840 Speaker 2: also he's a right wing activist anyway, so that's somehow 767 00:43:42,880 --> 00:43:44,640 Speaker 2: relevant exactly exactly. 768 00:43:45,640 --> 00:43:47,799 Speaker 1: So an important question that I feel like is really 769 00:43:47,800 --> 00:43:50,200 Speaker 1: easy to get lost in all this is whether or 770 00:43:50,239 --> 00:43:53,120 Speaker 1: not what Lena actually wrote in the book not the 771 00:43:53,160 --> 00:43:57,160 Speaker 1: way that Truth Revolt initially spun it actually describes sexual 772 00:43:57,160 --> 00:44:00,640 Speaker 1: abuse or not. So first, I believe that it's really 773 00:44:00,680 --> 00:44:04,440 Speaker 1: important to listen to and center Lena Dunham's siblings Cybris 774 00:44:04,440 --> 00:44:07,919 Speaker 1: Grace and their voice in this conversation and really listen 775 00:44:07,960 --> 00:44:10,240 Speaker 1: to what they have to say about what this experience 776 00:44:10,320 --> 00:44:13,680 Speaker 1: was like for them. Lena Dunham's siblings Cybris Grace responded 777 00:44:13,719 --> 00:44:18,920 Speaker 1: on Twitter saying heateronormativity deem certain behaviors harmful and others normal. 778 00:44:19,280 --> 00:44:21,960 Speaker 1: The state and media are always invested in maintaining that. 779 00:44:22,320 --> 00:44:25,040 Speaker 1: As a queer person, I'm committed to people narrating their 780 00:44:25,080 --> 00:44:28,319 Speaker 1: own experiences determining for themselves what has it has not 781 00:44:28,360 --> 00:44:31,520 Speaker 1: been harmful. Today, like every other day, it's a good 782 00:44:31,600 --> 00:44:34,120 Speaker 1: day to think about how we police the sexualities of 783 00:44:34,160 --> 00:44:37,719 Speaker 1: young women, queer and trans people. And so yeah, I 784 00:44:37,719 --> 00:44:40,960 Speaker 1: think it's important to ground, you know, the conversation of 785 00:44:41,000 --> 00:44:44,719 Speaker 1: like what actually happened in how Cyrus Grace interprets it, 786 00:44:44,719 --> 00:44:47,160 Speaker 1: because it's their it's you know, it's their experience, and 787 00:44:47,200 --> 00:44:49,600 Speaker 1: I have to say, you know, I want to be clear, 788 00:44:49,680 --> 00:44:52,040 Speaker 1: I am no expert here. I am not a psychologist, 789 00:44:52,080 --> 00:44:54,279 Speaker 1: I am not a legal scholar. I'm a little bit 790 00:44:54,280 --> 00:44:56,400 Speaker 1: out of my depth when it comes to like whether 791 00:44:56,560 --> 00:44:59,560 Speaker 1: or not something could be categorized as sexual abuse. So 792 00:44:59,640 --> 00:45:02,120 Speaker 1: I wanted to summarize some people who actually know what 793 00:45:02,160 --> 00:45:05,200 Speaker 1: they're talking about. So first, according to the American Academy 794 00:45:05,200 --> 00:45:08,719 Speaker 1: of Pediatrics, touching and looking at a siblings genitals is 795 00:45:08,760 --> 00:45:14,480 Speaker 1: a quote normal common behavior in kids ages two to six. Vox, Slate, 796 00:45:14,560 --> 00:45:17,360 Speaker 1: and Gawker all spoke to experts who generally seem to 797 00:45:17,400 --> 00:45:20,400 Speaker 1: conclude that little children being curious about the bodies of 798 00:45:20,440 --> 00:45:23,520 Speaker 1: their sibling is a normal part of childhood development. Here's 799 00:45:23,520 --> 00:45:26,919 Speaker 1: a couple of those experts. Gawker spoke to Sam Rubinstein, 800 00:45:27,160 --> 00:45:30,960 Speaker 1: a psychotherapist who specializes in childhood abuse, who said, I 801 00:45:31,000 --> 00:45:33,680 Speaker 1: think you have to take into consideration her age, her history, 802 00:45:33,960 --> 00:45:36,600 Speaker 1: and the idea that age, unless you've gone through severe 803 00:45:36,640 --> 00:45:40,239 Speaker 1: sexual trauma, there's really almost nothing sexual about it. The 804 00:45:40,280 --> 00:45:42,840 Speaker 1: same explanation could be used for grabbing a dog's tail. 805 00:45:43,160 --> 00:45:46,000 Speaker 1: It's the same type of coercion. Just because it's in 806 00:45:46,040 --> 00:45:48,600 Speaker 1: the sexual venue, people want to attach something to it, 807 00:45:48,760 --> 00:45:51,399 Speaker 1: but it's almost totally different. It's an innocent type thing. 808 00:45:52,200 --> 00:45:56,080 Speaker 1: Slate spoke to Rich Savin Williams developmental psychologist and the 809 00:45:56,080 --> 00:45:58,520 Speaker 1: director of the Sex and Gender Lab at Cornell University, 810 00:45:58,719 --> 00:46:02,320 Speaker 1: who said, quote, this is clearly not a case of abuse. 811 00:46:02,640 --> 00:46:04,879 Speaker 1: Children have been doing this stuff forever and ever and ever, 812 00:46:04,960 --> 00:46:06,560 Speaker 1: and they will do it forever and ever and ever. 813 00:46:07,160 --> 00:46:09,880 Speaker 1: John V. Cafero, a professor at the California School of 814 00:46:09,880 --> 00:46:12,960 Speaker 1: Professional Psychology and an expert on sibling abuse, wrote in 815 00:46:13,000 --> 00:46:17,239 Speaker 1: a Washington Post column quote, to be clear, sexual curiosity 816 00:46:17,239 --> 00:46:20,759 Speaker 1: in children is normal. All children explore their bodies and 817 00:46:20,960 --> 00:46:23,920 Speaker 1: may engage in visual and even manual exploration of a 818 00:46:23,960 --> 00:46:26,160 Speaker 1: sibling at times. This is one of the ways that 819 00:46:26,239 --> 00:46:30,080 Speaker 1: children discover sexual differences between boys and girls, anatomies. Even 820 00:46:30,160 --> 00:46:33,200 Speaker 1: siblings of the same gender become curious about variations in 821 00:46:33,320 --> 00:46:36,640 Speaker 1: shapes and sizes of their sex organs. Two small children 822 00:46:36,680 --> 00:46:39,520 Speaker 1: exploring each other's bodies does not predestine them to a 823 00:46:39,520 --> 00:46:43,880 Speaker 1: life of emotional suffering. So you know, that might all 824 00:46:44,080 --> 00:46:47,520 Speaker 1: kind of sound like I am abssolving Lena of having 825 00:46:47,600 --> 00:46:51,480 Speaker 1: done anything wrong in this situation, right, But I actually 826 00:46:51,520 --> 00:46:53,600 Speaker 1: think that this is where things get a little bit tricky, 827 00:46:53,680 --> 00:46:56,840 Speaker 1: and this trickiness is exactly what drove me to wanting 828 00:46:56,880 --> 00:47:00,120 Speaker 1: to make an episode about this topic. So I should say, 829 00:47:00,000 --> 00:47:03,040 Speaker 1: I myself am a survivor of sexual abuse, and so 830 00:47:03,200 --> 00:47:05,960 Speaker 1: I know that when something can be difficult to talk about, 831 00:47:06,160 --> 00:47:08,839 Speaker 1: like most sensitive issues are, but I also know that 832 00:47:08,880 --> 00:47:12,799 Speaker 1: we really really do need to talk honestly and thoughtfully 833 00:47:14,040 --> 00:47:16,920 Speaker 1: about it. And you know what doesn't help us to 834 00:47:16,960 --> 00:47:19,480 Speaker 1: have conversations about tough issues in a way that's honest 835 00:47:19,560 --> 00:47:24,440 Speaker 1: and thoughtful and nuanced adding lies to the mix. This 836 00:47:24,520 --> 00:47:27,760 Speaker 1: is a deliberate tactic that bad actors and disinformers employ, 837 00:47:28,160 --> 00:47:31,279 Speaker 1: seizing on hot button issues, adding lies to the mix, 838 00:47:31,360 --> 00:47:35,799 Speaker 1: intentionally to derail those conversations. And honestly, this is what 839 00:47:36,000 --> 00:47:39,080 Speaker 1: really kind of gets me so upset about this issue, 840 00:47:39,160 --> 00:47:42,680 Speaker 1: is that we should not and cannot tolerate lies being 841 00:47:42,680 --> 00:47:45,799 Speaker 1: added to conversations that are as sensitive and important as 842 00:47:45,880 --> 00:47:50,320 Speaker 1: childhood sexual abuse, especially not as a way to score 843 00:47:50,480 --> 00:47:53,759 Speaker 1: cheap political points the way that Shapiro and Truth Revolt did, 844 00:47:53,960 --> 00:47:58,480 Speaker 1: because it really derails progress and are collective shared understanding. 845 00:47:58,840 --> 00:48:02,080 Speaker 1: There is no converse that is made better by the 846 00:48:02,120 --> 00:48:05,520 Speaker 1: injection of lies, and people deserve the truth like that 847 00:48:05,640 --> 00:48:09,200 Speaker 1: is a value that I will just like scream from 848 00:48:09,239 --> 00:48:11,920 Speaker 1: the rooftops over and over again. If you are adding 849 00:48:12,160 --> 00:48:15,520 Speaker 1: lies to a conversation, you are doing us all a disservice. 850 00:48:16,200 --> 00:48:18,400 Speaker 1: And so I also think that truth revolt really blowing 851 00:48:18,480 --> 00:48:21,160 Speaker 1: up what Lena did write on her memoir with inaccurate 852 00:48:21,200 --> 00:48:24,560 Speaker 1: information really makes it difficult to address a what she 853 00:48:24,680 --> 00:48:28,359 Speaker 1: actually did and b how she actually wrote about it. 854 00:48:28,560 --> 00:48:31,399 Speaker 1: And because of their lie, because of them starting off 855 00:48:31,440 --> 00:48:36,040 Speaker 1: this conversation with such an inflammatory, big, you know, you know, 856 00:48:36,160 --> 00:48:41,279 Speaker 1: defining piece of inaccurate content, Lena understandably is then put 857 00:48:41,320 --> 00:48:43,600 Speaker 1: in a position where she has to defend herself against 858 00:48:43,600 --> 00:48:46,480 Speaker 1: a claim that was not true that she sexually abused 859 00:48:46,520 --> 00:48:49,200 Speaker 1: her sibling when she was seventeen. So I think it 860 00:48:49,320 --> 00:48:53,399 Speaker 1: really turns the situation into a binary where she did 861 00:48:53,440 --> 00:48:55,759 Speaker 1: it is on one side, and no, she didn't is 862 00:48:55,800 --> 00:48:59,000 Speaker 1: on the other. And that again is a classic disinformer 863 00:48:59,160 --> 00:49:03,239 Speaker 1: derailing tech, flattening out conversations and stripping them of any 864 00:49:03,280 --> 00:49:06,840 Speaker 1: context or nuance that are required to have a thoughtful, 865 00:49:06,880 --> 00:49:09,879 Speaker 1: substantive conversation about something that is sensitive or a hot 866 00:49:09,880 --> 00:49:12,839 Speaker 1: button topic. And so I would actually argue that this 867 00:49:12,920 --> 00:49:16,000 Speaker 1: prevents us from having a public conversation about what Lena 868 00:49:16,040 --> 00:49:18,839 Speaker 1: actually did and how she wrote about it. We never 869 00:49:18,880 --> 00:49:21,239 Speaker 1: really got to have that conversation because of how much 870 00:49:21,280 --> 00:49:24,719 Speaker 1: oxygen truth revolts lie took up in the room, and 871 00:49:24,760 --> 00:49:27,359 Speaker 1: that is by design. And further, I would argue that 872 00:49:27,400 --> 00:49:31,200 Speaker 1: their injection of inaccurate information into the conversation, you know, 873 00:49:31,400 --> 00:49:36,040 Speaker 1: really just adds this this sine of inaccuracy. I would 874 00:49:36,080 --> 00:49:38,360 Speaker 1: be willing to bet that at least some people trying 875 00:49:38,360 --> 00:49:42,240 Speaker 1: to engage in a conversation probably have a misunderstanding about 876 00:49:42,239 --> 00:49:45,520 Speaker 1: the basic facts of what happened. And so I guess 877 00:49:45,680 --> 00:49:47,160 Speaker 1: all of this is to say, like, this is the 878 00:49:47,200 --> 00:49:49,160 Speaker 1: conversation that I wish we would have gotten to have, 879 00:49:49,880 --> 00:49:52,640 Speaker 1: because if experts seem to suggest that what Lena described 880 00:49:52,680 --> 00:49:55,799 Speaker 1: in her book is not abuse, I still don't think 881 00:49:55,840 --> 00:49:58,000 Speaker 1: it was great or good. And I still want to 882 00:49:58,040 --> 00:50:01,560 Speaker 1: talk about what actually happened with out that inflammatory lie 883 00:50:01,600 --> 00:50:02,839 Speaker 1: preventing us from doing that. 884 00:50:03,200 --> 00:50:05,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, I totally agree with you. Then, you know, the 885 00:50:05,840 --> 00:50:10,480 Speaker 2: injection of lies into any conversation degrades that conversation. It 886 00:50:10,520 --> 00:50:14,040 Speaker 2: makes it that much harder to have an honest conversation 887 00:50:14,160 --> 00:50:18,240 Speaker 2: about whatever it is. And you know, usually when people 888 00:50:18,360 --> 00:50:22,200 Speaker 2: are making up lies, they're doing it for some kind 889 00:50:22,200 --> 00:50:24,520 Speaker 2: of agenda. To like you said, take all the oxygen 890 00:50:24,600 --> 00:50:27,760 Speaker 2: out of the room to prevent discussion about something else, 891 00:50:28,000 --> 00:50:33,239 Speaker 2: or to discredit and smear and shame a woman who 892 00:50:33,239 --> 00:50:37,120 Speaker 2: they perceive as a leptist activists. And you know, I 893 00:50:37,160 --> 00:50:42,400 Speaker 2: don't have any strong feelings for or against Lena Dunham, 894 00:50:42,440 --> 00:50:45,080 Speaker 2: and I've actually learned so much and just like making 895 00:50:45,080 --> 00:50:49,239 Speaker 2: these episodes with you. But it is just so familiar 896 00:50:49,560 --> 00:50:54,640 Speaker 2: a trope of right wing shitheads making things up to 897 00:50:54,800 --> 00:50:58,600 Speaker 2: smear somebody who they perceive as an enemy and just 898 00:50:58,640 --> 00:51:02,560 Speaker 2: injecting lies into the conversation exactly. 899 00:51:02,600 --> 00:51:04,800 Speaker 1: So let's take a look at what she actually wrote 900 00:51:04,840 --> 00:51:08,840 Speaker 1: and why you know it's still not good. First, I 901 00:51:08,840 --> 00:51:12,880 Speaker 1: think it's definitely an issue with tone and framing. Childhood 902 00:51:12,880 --> 00:51:15,440 Speaker 1: sexual abuse is not a joke, and I think dealing 903 00:51:15,440 --> 00:51:17,640 Speaker 1: with it in this way that sort of jokey was 904 00:51:17,840 --> 00:51:21,080 Speaker 1: seriously bad on Lena Dunham's part. I would have never 905 00:51:21,120 --> 00:51:23,680 Speaker 1: written about my younger sibling the way that that Dunham 906 00:51:23,680 --> 00:51:25,879 Speaker 1: did in her book, and I can really see how 907 00:51:26,000 --> 00:51:29,000 Speaker 1: people feel it raises some questions about boundaries. You know, 908 00:51:29,880 --> 00:51:33,560 Speaker 1: did Lena see these experiences that involved her sibling as 909 00:51:33,600 --> 00:51:37,480 Speaker 1: hers and hers alone to freely share in a book 910 00:51:38,400 --> 00:51:40,880 Speaker 1: you know, why would she think that having a whole 911 00:51:40,920 --> 00:51:43,319 Speaker 1: section of her book dedicated to the ways that she 912 00:51:43,400 --> 00:51:48,520 Speaker 1: kind of, you know, foisted herself on her baby sibling, Like, like, 913 00:51:48,840 --> 00:51:51,080 Speaker 1: I guess like writing about that and as a way, 914 00:51:51,120 --> 00:51:53,759 Speaker 1: that's a kind of cute and sort of like defining 915 00:51:53,800 --> 00:51:56,640 Speaker 1: her as like a quirky character or like a jokey 916 00:51:56,719 --> 00:52:00,759 Speaker 1: thing is really I think inappropriate, and I think it's 917 00:52:00,840 --> 00:52:03,839 Speaker 1: fair to say that that raises some legitimate questions, you know, 918 00:52:04,280 --> 00:52:07,640 Speaker 1: was that harmful to Lena's sibling. I actually heard from 919 00:52:07,640 --> 00:52:10,560 Speaker 1: a listener after the first part of this series aired 920 00:52:10,840 --> 00:52:14,400 Speaker 1: last week, and this person left an Instagram comment and 921 00:52:14,440 --> 00:52:18,160 Speaker 1: they felt very strongly that what Lena described in her 922 00:52:18,200 --> 00:52:21,520 Speaker 1: book was actually child like childhood sexual abuse. 923 00:52:21,719 --> 00:52:25,279 Speaker 2: I remember you got that comment from that listener, and 924 00:52:25,320 --> 00:52:29,879 Speaker 2: it was pretty emotional and legitimate, And so I hope 925 00:52:29,880 --> 00:52:33,160 Speaker 2: that they're listening to this second part to get a 926 00:52:33,160 --> 00:52:36,120 Speaker 2: little bit more context for what we're trying to say. 927 00:52:36,760 --> 00:52:39,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, me too. I'm really happy that they left that comment. 928 00:52:39,360 --> 00:52:41,120 Speaker 1: And you know, I think it's one of those things 929 00:52:41,120 --> 00:52:43,760 Speaker 1: where it's like, I think it's a completely valid question 930 00:52:44,360 --> 00:52:48,080 Speaker 1: to ask about the behavior that Lena describes in the 931 00:52:48,080 --> 00:52:50,680 Speaker 1: book and the way that she wrote about and framed 932 00:52:50,719 --> 00:52:51,400 Speaker 1: that behavior. 933 00:52:52,000 --> 00:52:55,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, it is curious to me. You know, I haven't 934 00:52:55,800 --> 00:52:59,839 Speaker 2: read the book, but you did. What do you think 935 00:53:00,239 --> 00:53:03,560 Speaker 2: was her intention of writing that in the book? 936 00:53:03,880 --> 00:53:06,960 Speaker 1: Oh, that's a great question. The book. So for folks 937 00:53:07,000 --> 00:53:08,880 Speaker 1: who have read the book, they know that a big 938 00:53:08,920 --> 00:53:12,480 Speaker 1: part of it is that Lena slowly reveals herself to 939 00:53:12,520 --> 00:53:16,200 Speaker 1: be a very unreliable narrator, one who is kind of 940 00:53:16,280 --> 00:53:22,359 Speaker 1: like sardonically looking at and projecting commentary onto her her 941 00:53:22,400 --> 00:53:25,960 Speaker 1: own experiences. And so her experiences are presented and you 942 00:53:26,080 --> 00:53:28,400 Speaker 1: and you the reader sort of takes them at face value. 943 00:53:28,880 --> 00:53:31,640 Speaker 1: And then later in the book those many of those 944 00:53:31,640 --> 00:53:34,960 Speaker 1: experiences are revisited in ways that reveal her to be 945 00:53:35,160 --> 00:53:38,719 Speaker 1: an unreliable narrator about her own experiences, and in ways 946 00:53:38,719 --> 00:53:42,080 Speaker 1: that sort of present her as this like, yeah, this sarcastic, 947 00:53:42,200 --> 00:53:47,800 Speaker 1: sardonic person who is kind of like critiquing and commenting 948 00:53:47,840 --> 00:53:50,839 Speaker 1: on the way that she described those things. Early on. 949 00:53:50,960 --> 00:53:53,640 Speaker 1: There's this piece for Vox by Alex abad Santos that 950 00:53:53,719 --> 00:53:56,600 Speaker 1: I think perfectly summarizes what I'm trying to say. Alex 951 00:53:56,640 --> 00:54:00,400 Speaker 1: writes the way Dunham wrote the incident up in her book, 952 00:54:00,680 --> 00:54:02,839 Speaker 1: and the degree to which the writing style that has 953 00:54:02,880 --> 00:54:06,120 Speaker 1: made her such a success may have also led her astray. Here, 954 00:54:06,520 --> 00:54:10,240 Speaker 1: child molestation is an extremely sensitive topic. Kafaro, the sibling 955 00:54:10,280 --> 00:54:13,799 Speaker 1: abuse expert, wrote that sibling sexual abuse is far more 956 00:54:13,800 --> 00:54:17,200 Speaker 1: common than most people think, quote the most closely kept 957 00:54:17,239 --> 00:54:20,200 Speaker 1: secret in the field of family violence, but one study 958 00:54:20,239 --> 00:54:22,360 Speaker 1: finding that at least two point three percent of children 959 00:54:22,560 --> 00:54:25,800 Speaker 1: have been sexually victimized by a sibling. Dunham's treatment of 960 00:54:25,840 --> 00:54:29,239 Speaker 1: this very serious topic was not exactly sensitive, something she 961 00:54:29,280 --> 00:54:32,040 Speaker 1: herself has acknowledged to some degree. That is of a 962 00:54:32,080 --> 00:54:34,880 Speaker 1: piece with Dunham's greatest strengths and weaknesses as a writer. 963 00:54:35,200 --> 00:54:38,640 Speaker 1: She has a reputation for leaning into weird, awkward situations 964 00:54:38,640 --> 00:54:41,120 Speaker 1: on her HBO show Girls, and she's a master at 965 00:54:41,120 --> 00:54:44,560 Speaker 1: creating scenes, sexual or not, that make viewers cringe. This 966 00:54:44,600 --> 00:54:46,560 Speaker 1: is a book about Lena Dunham's coming of age and 967 00:54:46,560 --> 00:54:49,120 Speaker 1: a society that does not normally tell stories of girls 968 00:54:49,160 --> 00:54:52,799 Speaker 1: becoming women, and it highlights quite well how uncomfortable and 969 00:54:52,880 --> 00:54:55,200 Speaker 1: difficult growing up as a girl can be. And so 970 00:54:55,280 --> 00:54:57,319 Speaker 1: I think that piece really summarizes it. I think that 971 00:54:57,640 --> 00:55:00,600 Speaker 1: she was trying to lean into the fact the ways 972 00:55:00,640 --> 00:55:04,920 Speaker 1: that sexual experiences and physical experiences can be so cringey, 973 00:55:05,120 --> 00:55:09,200 Speaker 1: so awkward, so uncomfortable, And she does that really well 974 00:55:09,280 --> 00:55:11,520 Speaker 1: in other parts of her writing, but I think that 975 00:55:11,520 --> 00:55:16,839 Speaker 1: that same inclination I think really led her astray here 976 00:55:16,960 --> 00:55:20,360 Speaker 1: and I think it like it opens up such valid 977 00:55:20,560 --> 00:55:23,480 Speaker 1: criticisms of the way that she handled it. One of 978 00:55:23,560 --> 00:55:26,080 Speaker 1: my big questions as did that bit of the book 979 00:55:26,440 --> 00:55:30,760 Speaker 1: contribute to a culture where sexual abuse is further normalized. Again, 980 00:55:30,840 --> 00:55:32,480 Speaker 1: I'm not an expert in this field, but I think 981 00:55:32,520 --> 00:55:35,520 Speaker 1: they're all valid questions, And I think that's the bottom line. 982 00:55:35,520 --> 00:55:40,120 Speaker 1: When we allow disinformers to flatten out entire conversations with 983 00:55:40,200 --> 00:55:44,200 Speaker 1: inaccurate information, we don't really get to have the real 984 00:55:44,280 --> 00:55:47,600 Speaker 1: conversation about what actually happens. And I think it creates 985 00:55:47,640 --> 00:55:51,120 Speaker 1: the conditions that lead to Lena not really having to 986 00:55:51,160 --> 00:55:53,759 Speaker 1: be held accountable for what she actually wrote, because the 987 00:55:53,800 --> 00:55:56,840 Speaker 1: only thing anybody is really talking about is the lie 988 00:55:56,880 --> 00:55:59,560 Speaker 1: about what she wrote. And I think that Lena would 989 00:55:59,560 --> 00:56:03,760 Speaker 1: probably agree that, you know, how she handled this incident 990 00:56:03,800 --> 00:56:09,480 Speaker 1: in her memoir wasn't great because she apologized. She wrote, quote, 991 00:56:09,520 --> 00:56:11,359 Speaker 1: if the situation is described in my book have been 992 00:56:11,400 --> 00:56:14,200 Speaker 1: painful or triggering for people to read. I am sorry, 993 00:56:14,360 --> 00:56:16,799 Speaker 1: that was never my intention. I am also aware that 994 00:56:16,840 --> 00:56:19,839 Speaker 1: my comic use of the term sexual predator was insensitive, 995 00:56:20,000 --> 00:56:22,160 Speaker 1: and I'm sorry for that as well. She also went 996 00:56:22,200 --> 00:56:24,280 Speaker 1: on to say that her sibling is her best friend 997 00:56:24,560 --> 00:56:27,279 Speaker 1: and quote, anything I have ever written about has been 998 00:56:27,280 --> 00:56:28,440 Speaker 1: published with approval. 999 00:56:28,960 --> 00:56:33,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's I mean, it's hard to argue with that 1000 00:56:33,040 --> 00:56:37,319 Speaker 2: that it was not very sensitive. And you know, her 1001 00:56:37,320 --> 00:56:44,239 Speaker 2: apology is a reminder of how serious talking about sexual 1002 00:56:44,440 --> 00:56:49,440 Speaker 2: abuse is, you know, and so yeah, you probably shouldn't 1003 00:56:49,440 --> 00:56:52,640 Speaker 2: have written that, But it is so notable that this 1004 00:56:53,000 --> 00:56:58,680 Speaker 2: whole controversy and apparently allegations that you know, people can 1005 00:56:58,719 --> 00:57:02,520 Speaker 2: continue to hold against her of being a seventeen year 1006 00:57:02,600 --> 00:57:08,920 Speaker 2: old sexual predator did not come from the alleged victim 1007 00:57:09,160 --> 00:57:15,440 Speaker 2: her sibling, did not come from survivor justice advocates, but 1008 00:57:15,440 --> 00:57:19,520 Speaker 2: instead came from Ben Shapiro, like a vowed and an 1009 00:57:19,560 --> 00:57:23,640 Speaker 2: open right wing activist, you know, like you're not gonna 1010 00:57:23,720 --> 00:57:29,160 Speaker 2: convince me that he gives a shit about really anyone. 1011 00:57:29,680 --> 00:57:34,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, and a right wing activist who explicitly said that 1012 00:57:34,080 --> 00:57:39,760 Speaker 1: the intention of his media outlet was to attack prominent 1013 00:57:40,240 --> 00:57:43,720 Speaker 1: left wing folks, prominent liberal voices. Lena Dunnam is a 1014 00:57:43,720 --> 00:57:47,400 Speaker 1: prominent liberal voice that she certainly was when this all happened. 1015 00:57:47,440 --> 00:57:49,880 Speaker 1: And so I think that I also want to really 1016 00:57:49,880 --> 00:57:54,040 Speaker 1: lift up what you just said about these allegations not 1017 00:57:54,080 --> 00:57:57,200 Speaker 1: coming from Lina's sibling. I think the thing that really 1018 00:57:57,760 --> 00:58:00,640 Speaker 1: sticks with me about this whole situation is the way 1019 00:58:00,720 --> 00:58:06,400 Speaker 1: that Lena Dunham's sibling, their voice is almost universally ignored. 1020 00:58:06,760 --> 00:58:10,680 Speaker 1: You know, people often repeat this claim Lena Dunham's sexually 1021 00:58:10,720 --> 00:58:13,560 Speaker 1: abused her sibling, and when they do so, they often 1022 00:58:13,640 --> 00:58:17,240 Speaker 1: misgender Cyrus. And Cyrus has their own memoir called A 1023 00:58:17,280 --> 00:58:19,680 Speaker 1: Year Without a Name, where they talk about this specific 1024 00:58:19,680 --> 00:58:22,320 Speaker 1: claim and how hurtful it is to them, yet it 1025 00:58:22,400 --> 00:58:25,720 Speaker 1: never goes away. So I have a hard time believing 1026 00:58:25,720 --> 00:58:29,560 Speaker 1: that these people online actually care about centering or listening 1027 00:58:29,640 --> 00:58:34,640 Speaker 1: to Cyrus's experience or meaningfully amplifying the experiences of survivors. 1028 00:58:35,360 --> 00:58:40,440 Speaker 1: And so I just really believe in centering survivors, centering 1029 00:58:40,960 --> 00:58:43,840 Speaker 1: giving people space to be the experts of their own experiences. 1030 00:58:44,160 --> 00:58:47,560 Speaker 1: And so, yeah, the thing that really just really bums 1031 00:58:47,600 --> 00:58:51,120 Speaker 1: me out is that Cyrus Grace's voice is almost entirely 1032 00:58:51,160 --> 00:58:54,840 Speaker 1: erased when people talk about this. When people repeat, you know, oh, 1033 00:58:55,160 --> 00:58:57,680 Speaker 1: Lena Dunham did this to the to her sibling, I 1034 00:58:57,800 --> 00:59:00,479 Speaker 1: just feel like we just don't. It's it's so easy 1035 00:59:00,480 --> 00:59:04,120 Speaker 1: to not make space for Cyrus's voice, and I think 1036 00:59:04,120 --> 00:59:06,840 Speaker 1: what you said really helps us see how problematic that is. 1037 00:59:07,800 --> 00:59:11,240 Speaker 2: Yeah, Like having this conversation, I'm sort of wondering, is 1038 00:59:11,280 --> 00:59:13,920 Speaker 2: this a conversation about childhood sexual abuse or is it 1039 00:59:13,960 --> 00:59:16,560 Speaker 2: a conversation about a celebrity. 1040 00:59:16,880 --> 00:59:19,240 Speaker 1: Well, I would argue that, like I think, for a 1041 00:59:19,280 --> 00:59:24,040 Speaker 1: lot of people, because they don't like Lena Dunham for 1042 00:59:24,080 --> 00:59:26,960 Speaker 1: whatever reason, and some of those reasons are valid. The 1043 00:59:27,440 --> 00:59:31,280 Speaker 1: actual meat of the conversation caring about and believing and 1044 00:59:31,360 --> 00:59:34,200 Speaker 1: uplifting survivors of sexual abuse, that kind of gets pushed 1045 00:59:34,200 --> 00:59:37,040 Speaker 1: to the sideline because the real thing is finding a 1046 00:59:37,080 --> 00:59:38,880 Speaker 1: way to talk about how much we don't like Lena 1047 00:59:38,920 --> 00:59:40,760 Speaker 1: Dunnam and how awful she is, you know what I mean? 1048 00:59:41,040 --> 00:59:45,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, totally, Like I'm no stranger to add hominin attacks. 1049 00:59:45,880 --> 00:59:49,240 Speaker 2: You know, like if there's somebody I don't like, I'll 1050 00:59:50,440 --> 00:59:55,440 Speaker 2: happily you know, sign up for piling on for something 1051 00:59:55,640 --> 00:59:58,760 Speaker 2: shitty or stupid that they did. But it does feel 1052 00:59:59,160 --> 01:00:05,480 Speaker 2: very different when that piling on involves allegations of sexual 1053 01:00:05,520 --> 01:00:08,040 Speaker 2: abuse about some third person who's not even part of 1054 01:00:08,040 --> 01:00:13,640 Speaker 2: the conversation and is built on lies, and you know, 1055 01:00:13,680 --> 01:00:16,040 Speaker 2: like you said earlier, just sucking the air out of 1056 01:00:16,600 --> 01:00:21,280 Speaker 2: valid conversations in the space. Not valid, I don't mean valid, 1057 01:00:21,360 --> 01:00:23,440 Speaker 2: I mean truthful, you know. 1058 01:00:24,040 --> 01:00:26,800 Speaker 1: Right, So you know that's exactly what I think is 1059 01:00:26,840 --> 01:00:29,760 Speaker 1: happening here. So now that you know what actually happened 1060 01:00:29,840 --> 01:00:32,760 Speaker 1: versus the lie that truth revolt amplified about it, let's 1061 01:00:32,760 --> 01:00:35,360 Speaker 1: talk about exactly that. Like what is it that made 1062 01:00:35,400 --> 01:00:38,280 Speaker 1: this such a sticky narrative? And that's the thing that really, 1063 01:00:38,840 --> 01:00:41,640 Speaker 1: I don't know, it fascinates me about this claim because 1064 01:00:41,920 --> 01:00:45,200 Speaker 1: it has had real staying power. So question for you, Mike. 1065 01:00:45,440 --> 01:00:47,760 Speaker 1: Have you seen that meme where it's a black hand 1066 01:00:47,800 --> 01:00:51,400 Speaker 1: and a white hand like grasping hands and a gesture 1067 01:00:51,440 --> 01:00:54,080 Speaker 1: of unity and something that they agree about, like a 1068 01:00:54,120 --> 01:00:56,760 Speaker 1: shared commonality is written on the middle of their hands. 1069 01:00:57,240 --> 01:00:59,760 Speaker 2: Yeah, of course, it's a beautiful meme about coming together. 1070 01:01:00,120 --> 01:01:03,080 Speaker 1: So that meme pretty much explains what I think is 1071 01:01:03,120 --> 01:01:07,080 Speaker 1: going on here. Basically. On the black hand, you have 1072 01:01:07,720 --> 01:01:13,920 Speaker 1: you know, feminists, people of color, just general people on 1073 01:01:14,000 --> 01:01:17,120 Speaker 1: the white hand. Maybe I got right wing folks, and 1074 01:01:17,160 --> 01:01:19,840 Speaker 1: the thing that they're uniting over is that they all 1075 01:01:19,880 --> 01:01:22,320 Speaker 1: agree they hate Lena Dunham. That's kind of what I 1076 01:01:22,360 --> 01:01:25,040 Speaker 1: think is going on here, because even though the claim 1077 01:01:25,040 --> 01:01:27,320 Speaker 1: that Lena Dunham sexually abused her one year old sibling 1078 01:01:27,320 --> 01:01:29,920 Speaker 1: when she was seventeen, we know, started in the right 1079 01:01:29,960 --> 01:01:33,240 Speaker 1: wing blogosphere, it has really traveled out of those spaces 1080 01:01:33,280 --> 01:01:37,000 Speaker 1: and become a fairly widely accepted claim. And that's because 1081 01:01:37,080 --> 01:01:39,560 Speaker 1: Lena Dunham is just like a controversial figure. She's a 1082 01:01:39,640 --> 01:01:41,080 Speaker 1: lightning rod. Yeah. 1083 01:01:41,160 --> 01:01:44,600 Speaker 2: It really highlights how we can all come together to 1084 01:01:44,720 --> 01:01:47,080 Speaker 2: just like shit on women about shit that isn't true. 1085 01:01:47,320 --> 01:01:50,280 Speaker 1: Absolutely, to put it bluntly, a lot of people just 1086 01:01:50,320 --> 01:01:52,200 Speaker 1: don't like Lena Dunham. And so in that way, I 1087 01:01:52,240 --> 01:01:54,880 Speaker 1: think it was really easy for folks to project an 1088 01:01:54,920 --> 01:01:58,800 Speaker 1: inaccurate claim against her and have it really stick. And 1089 01:01:59,040 --> 01:02:01,200 Speaker 1: this also tells us to think kind of interesting about 1090 01:02:01,240 --> 01:02:04,240 Speaker 1: the way that inaccurate information works online. It can often 1091 01:02:04,280 --> 01:02:06,520 Speaker 1: speak to something that is already inside of us. And 1092 01:02:06,520 --> 01:02:10,360 Speaker 1: so if you're already primed to really hate Lena Dunham, 1093 01:02:10,560 --> 01:02:13,280 Speaker 1: when somebody comes along and tells you something that really 1094 01:02:13,320 --> 01:02:16,920 Speaker 1: squares what they're already held belief. It can really stick 1095 01:02:17,000 --> 01:02:21,640 Speaker 1: because our brains love information, even inaccurate information or false 1096 01:02:21,680 --> 01:02:25,720 Speaker 1: information that validates opinions or values that we already hold. 1097 01:02:25,880 --> 01:02:28,640 Speaker 1: So if your opinion is that Lena Dunham sucks, it 1098 01:02:28,720 --> 01:02:31,880 Speaker 1: sort of doesn't matter if she actually did joke about 1099 01:02:31,920 --> 01:02:33,920 Speaker 1: abusing her one year old sibling when she was seventeen 1100 01:02:34,040 --> 01:02:36,680 Speaker 1: or not. It will stick because it squares with our 1101 01:02:36,880 --> 01:02:39,320 Speaker 1: are already held belief. That's just how our brains as 1102 01:02:39,400 --> 01:02:43,000 Speaker 1: humans work. And another truism about disinformation is that it 1103 01:02:43,080 --> 01:02:48,400 Speaker 1: often seizes on legitimate existing tensions and pressure points and 1104 01:02:48,480 --> 01:02:53,360 Speaker 1: fractures that already exist, particularly within marginalized communities. If you 1105 01:02:53,360 --> 01:02:55,960 Speaker 1: listen to the episode that we did about and Father's 1106 01:02:56,040 --> 01:03:00,000 Speaker 1: Day or Vanessa Gien, this will probably sound familiar to you. 1107 01:03:00,400 --> 01:03:03,960 Speaker 1: It pits black women against white women, or the Latino 1108 01:03:04,000 --> 01:03:06,800 Speaker 1: community against the Black community. And I think Lena Dunham 1109 01:03:06,920 --> 01:03:11,120 Speaker 1: is a really interesting case study for this, because people, 1110 01:03:11,280 --> 01:03:15,040 Speaker 1: especially people of color, really do have some valid reasons 1111 01:03:15,040 --> 01:03:18,160 Speaker 1: to dislike Lena Dunham, and these reasons are often reflected 1112 01:03:18,200 --> 01:03:20,480 Speaker 1: in the kinds of tensions that I was just naming above. 1113 01:03:20,560 --> 01:03:23,400 Speaker 1: You know, a lot of the tensions occur along racial lines. 1114 01:03:23,720 --> 01:03:24,640 Speaker 2: Oh that's interesting. 1115 01:03:24,920 --> 01:03:26,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, So I want to talk about some of the 1116 01:03:27,440 --> 01:03:31,440 Speaker 1: valid reasons that folks have to sort of be predisposed 1117 01:03:31,480 --> 01:03:35,760 Speaker 1: to not like Lena Dunham and thus have this, you know, 1118 01:03:36,240 --> 01:03:39,640 Speaker 1: inaccurate claim really have a little bit of staying power. 1119 01:03:40,000 --> 01:03:42,640 Speaker 1: So one, I think that Lena Dunham has really come 1120 01:03:42,680 --> 01:03:45,360 Speaker 1: to represent a kind of I guess i'll call it 1121 01:03:45,480 --> 01:03:48,400 Speaker 1: white girl cluelessness that a lot of feminists of color 1122 01:03:48,680 --> 01:03:51,920 Speaker 1: were frankly sick of seeing amplified as the voice of feminism. 1123 01:03:52,000 --> 01:03:54,640 Speaker 1: You know, when the show Girls first premiered at HBO, 1124 01:03:54,960 --> 01:03:58,160 Speaker 1: there was so much fanfare cementing Lena Dunham, you know, 1125 01:03:58,240 --> 01:04:01,520 Speaker 1: as this voice of a general, the voice of young women, 1126 01:04:01,880 --> 01:04:04,440 Speaker 1: and I think there was some resentment around who we 1127 01:04:04,560 --> 01:04:07,520 Speaker 1: amplify and who we give lots and lots and lots 1128 01:04:07,520 --> 01:04:11,320 Speaker 1: of chances to. I often heard black feminists saying things like, oh, 1129 01:04:11,680 --> 01:04:14,240 Speaker 1: a black woman would never get as many chances to 1130 01:04:14,280 --> 01:04:18,000 Speaker 1: mess up like Lena Dunham has. Side note, Lena Dunham 1131 01:04:18,400 --> 01:04:21,360 Speaker 1: has had to apologize for so many things that there 1132 01:04:21,400 --> 01:04:25,200 Speaker 1: was actually a Twitter meme account called Lena Dunham apologizes 1133 01:04:25,360 --> 01:04:30,720 Speaker 1: that just creates randomly generated apologies for fictional Lena Dunham missteps. 1134 01:04:30,760 --> 01:04:33,720 Speaker 1: And I actually went to go look one up because 1135 01:04:33,720 --> 01:04:34,960 Speaker 1: I was like, oh, I should read one here on 1136 01:04:35,000 --> 01:04:38,040 Speaker 1: the podcast. That'll be funny, And so I googled Lena 1137 01:04:38,080 --> 01:04:41,560 Speaker 1: Dunham apology Twitter and I found the tweet. Lena Dunham 1138 01:04:41,600 --> 01:04:44,720 Speaker 1: issued an apology for her new HBO Max series Generation 1139 01:04:45,240 --> 01:04:48,640 Speaker 1: using real cat corpses in a classroom scene. But that 1140 01:04:48,760 --> 01:04:52,120 Speaker 1: apology tweet was actually real, that was actually her apologizing 1141 01:04:52,120 --> 01:04:53,280 Speaker 1: for something that actually happened. 1142 01:04:54,280 --> 01:04:57,800 Speaker 2: Wow, So we're just living in a universe where there's 1143 01:04:57,920 --> 01:05:02,240 Speaker 2: just one can't tell what is true Lena Dunham apologies 1144 01:05:02,480 --> 01:05:06,640 Speaker 2: or disinformation Lena Dunham apologies. It's just a miasma of 1145 01:05:06,720 --> 01:05:08,480 Speaker 2: Lena Dunham uncertainty. 1146 01:05:08,400 --> 01:05:11,320 Speaker 1: Exactly exactly is it art imitating life or is it 1147 01:05:11,360 --> 01:05:13,120 Speaker 1: life imitating art, or. 1148 01:05:13,040 --> 01:05:14,720 Speaker 2: Is it art imitating tech corpses? 1149 01:05:17,400 --> 01:05:19,160 Speaker 1: So this is a little bit of a tangent, but 1150 01:05:19,240 --> 01:05:21,040 Speaker 1: I just have to mention it because I think it 1151 01:05:21,400 --> 01:05:25,880 Speaker 1: was such a weird thing that happened along the kind 1152 01:05:25,920 --> 01:05:29,920 Speaker 1: of race and gender intra community tensions that I was 1153 01:05:29,920 --> 01:05:32,880 Speaker 1: just talking about before, and that is the whole thing 1154 01:05:32,880 --> 01:05:35,760 Speaker 1: that went down between Lena Dunham and Odell Beckham. It 1155 01:05:35,840 --> 01:05:39,320 Speaker 1: was just really weird. So if you don't remember what 1156 01:05:39,400 --> 01:05:42,360 Speaker 1: happened a few years ago at the met Gala, Lena 1157 01:05:42,400 --> 01:05:45,040 Speaker 1: Dunham attended and she was wearing a tuxedo and she 1158 01:05:45,080 --> 01:05:47,880 Speaker 1: would see it next to the professional athlete Odell Beckham Junior, 1159 01:05:48,280 --> 01:05:51,280 Speaker 1: and I guess Lena felt that he was ignoring her 1160 01:05:51,480 --> 01:05:54,120 Speaker 1: or not paying an appropriate amount of attention to her 1161 01:05:54,480 --> 01:05:58,320 Speaker 1: or something. And so after the event, Lena wrote in 1162 01:05:58,360 --> 01:06:01,640 Speaker 1: her newsletter, Lenny Letter, I was sitting next to Odell 1163 01:06:01,640 --> 01:06:04,320 Speaker 1: Beckham Junior and it was so amazing, and because it 1164 01:06:04,360 --> 01:06:06,640 Speaker 1: was like he looked at me and determined I was 1165 01:06:06,640 --> 01:06:09,160 Speaker 1: not the shape of a woman by his standards. He 1166 01:06:09,360 --> 01:06:13,360 Speaker 1: was like, that's a marshmallow, that's a child, that's a dog. 1167 01:06:13,840 --> 01:06:16,760 Speaker 1: It wasn't mean, he just seemed confused. The vibe was 1168 01:06:16,880 --> 01:06:19,560 Speaker 1: very much do I want to fuck it? Is it 1169 01:06:19,640 --> 01:06:22,920 Speaker 1: wearing yup, it's wearing a tuxedo. I'm going to go 1170 01:06:23,000 --> 01:06:25,400 Speaker 1: back to my cell phone. It was like we were 1171 01:06:25,440 --> 01:06:28,440 Speaker 1: forced to be together and he was literally scrolling Instagram 1172 01:06:28,680 --> 01:06:30,640 Speaker 1: rather than have to look at a woman in a 1173 01:06:30,680 --> 01:06:33,200 Speaker 1: bow tie. I was like, this should be called the 1174 01:06:33,240 --> 01:06:39,400 Speaker 1: Metropolitan Museum of getting rejected by athletes. So, yeah, that 1175 01:06:39,640 --> 01:06:44,040 Speaker 1: is a lot of projecting your own negative fantasies and 1176 01:06:44,120 --> 01:06:48,360 Speaker 1: perhaps insecurities on to someone who sounded like was just 1177 01:06:48,400 --> 01:06:51,240 Speaker 1: like minding their business on their phone at dinner. You know. 1178 01:06:51,400 --> 01:06:53,760 Speaker 1: Add to the fact that Beckham is a black man, 1179 01:06:53,920 --> 01:06:56,160 Speaker 1: and it kind of sounds like she is responding to 1180 01:06:56,200 --> 01:07:01,920 Speaker 1: this like perceived projection of a hyperst sexualized black man 1181 01:07:02,120 --> 01:07:06,120 Speaker 1: onto her, like she was like disappointed or felt some 1182 01:07:06,240 --> 01:07:10,160 Speaker 1: type of way that he was not behaving in a 1183 01:07:10,200 --> 01:07:13,640 Speaker 1: way like an over sexualized manner toward her. And yeah, 1184 01:07:13,640 --> 01:07:15,520 Speaker 1: it just feels like she like really projected a lot 1185 01:07:15,560 --> 01:07:20,080 Speaker 1: onto him. She eventually apologized on Instagram, but it was 1186 01:07:20,160 --> 01:07:24,280 Speaker 1: just a very weird thing that happened along very specific 1187 01:07:24,920 --> 01:07:28,720 Speaker 1: race and gender fault lines that we know sometimes can 1188 01:07:28,800 --> 01:07:31,120 Speaker 1: be legitimate tension points in our society. 1189 01:07:31,720 --> 01:07:33,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, yikes. That kind of remind me of what you 1190 01:07:33,960 --> 01:07:36,760 Speaker 2: were talking about from her book, where she establishes herself 1191 01:07:36,800 --> 01:07:44,920 Speaker 2: as an unreliable narrator and somebody who is dwelling in 1192 01:07:45,080 --> 01:07:49,160 Speaker 2: negative fantasies all the time. A. That has to suck, 1193 01:07:49,760 --> 01:07:54,920 Speaker 2: and B yeah, it does establish them as an unreliable 1194 01:07:55,040 --> 01:07:57,640 Speaker 2: narrator who is probably going to say some shit that 1195 01:07:57,680 --> 01:07:58,200 Speaker 2: they regret. 1196 01:07:58,520 --> 01:08:00,640 Speaker 1: Uh yeah, over and over and over again and have 1197 01:08:00,680 --> 01:08:02,840 Speaker 1: to apologize for it endlessly, to the point where it 1198 01:08:02,840 --> 01:08:03,520 Speaker 1: becomes a meme. 1199 01:08:03,960 --> 01:08:08,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, those did the cat corpses accept the apology? 1200 01:08:08,480 --> 01:08:10,880 Speaker 1: I wasn't able to find a response from the cat 1201 01:08:10,880 --> 01:08:12,600 Speaker 1: corpse community, but I will keep looking. 1202 01:08:12,640 --> 01:08:14,560 Speaker 2: Okay, I'll check in with some necromancers that. 1203 01:08:14,560 --> 01:08:17,680 Speaker 3: I know more. 1204 01:08:17,680 --> 01:08:30,439 Speaker 1: After a quick break, let's get right back into it. 1205 01:08:31,560 --> 01:08:34,599 Speaker 1: So I mentioned how Lena had a newsletter called Lenny Letter. 1206 01:08:35,080 --> 01:08:37,599 Speaker 1: Zenzi Clemens, with a black woman and a writer, worked 1207 01:08:37,600 --> 01:08:40,679 Speaker 1: with Lena on this letter and she publicly quit, citing 1208 01:08:40,760 --> 01:08:44,559 Speaker 1: Lena's quote well known racism as the reason why. Clemens 1209 01:08:44,600 --> 01:08:46,320 Speaker 1: said that she went to college with Dunham and her 1210 01:08:46,320 --> 01:08:48,200 Speaker 1: friends and that they kind of were in the same 1211 01:08:48,280 --> 01:08:50,719 Speaker 1: circles when they were in college, and that she would 1212 01:08:50,720 --> 01:08:54,839 Speaker 1: call their strain of racism quote hipster racism, which usually 1213 01:08:54,920 --> 01:08:58,000 Speaker 1: uses sarcasm as a cover, which, boy, do I know 1214 01:08:58,040 --> 01:09:00,639 Speaker 1: a little something about that from my own days in college. 1215 01:09:01,040 --> 01:09:03,680 Speaker 1: Clement's encouraged other women of color to stop working with 1216 01:09:03,720 --> 01:09:06,639 Speaker 1: Lena Dunham, saying it is time for women of color, 1217 01:09:06,880 --> 01:09:09,800 Speaker 1: black women in particular to divest from Lena Dunham. She 1218 01:09:09,840 --> 01:09:12,320 Speaker 1: could not have our words if she cannot respect us. 1219 01:09:12,439 --> 01:09:17,120 Speaker 2: Ooh boy, oh boy is right, and coming from an 1220 01:09:17,240 --> 01:09:20,800 Speaker 2: old friend or somebody who's known her since college and 1221 01:09:20,840 --> 01:09:24,000 Speaker 2: has worked with her, that seems like a pretty damning 1222 01:09:24,200 --> 01:09:29,560 Speaker 2: charge with more substance to it than out of context 1223 01:09:29,680 --> 01:09:31,760 Speaker 2: typo from her autobiography. 1224 01:09:32,200 --> 01:09:36,599 Speaker 1: I completely agree. And you can really see how again 1225 01:09:37,200 --> 01:09:41,400 Speaker 1: this you know, you having a black woman writer say 1226 01:09:41,439 --> 01:09:44,120 Speaker 1: this about Lena, you can see again how like these 1227 01:09:44,160 --> 01:09:49,160 Speaker 1: things really do pop up along certain pre existing tension points, 1228 01:09:49,160 --> 01:09:53,599 Speaker 1: you know, that really fall along racialized lines. And so another, 1229 01:09:53,880 --> 01:09:57,360 Speaker 1: probably the biggest, deepest example for myself personally, is the 1230 01:09:57,360 --> 01:10:00,439 Speaker 1: way that Lena handled a sexual assault allegation and made 1231 01:10:00,439 --> 01:10:03,880 Speaker 1: against writer and executive producer of Girls, Murray Miller that 1232 01:10:04,040 --> 01:10:08,040 Speaker 1: happened on the set. Basically what happened. Actress Aurora Parrino, 1233 01:10:08,160 --> 01:10:11,719 Speaker 1: whose mixed race, filed a police report accusing Girls writer 1234 01:10:11,800 --> 01:10:14,400 Speaker 1: and executive producer Murray Miller of raping her on the 1235 01:10:14,479 --> 01:10:17,799 Speaker 1: set of Girls in twenty twelve, when she was seventeen 1236 01:10:17,880 --> 01:10:20,439 Speaker 1: years old. Now, Miller said that she was making it 1237 01:10:20,520 --> 01:10:22,639 Speaker 1: up to extort him and try to get money from him, 1238 01:10:23,000 --> 01:10:27,919 Speaker 1: and Lena and her showrunner Jenny Kohner published this statement quote. 1239 01:10:28,479 --> 01:10:31,719 Speaker 1: While our first instinct is to listen to every woman's story, 1240 01:10:31,920 --> 01:10:36,000 Speaker 1: our insider knowledge of Murray's situation makes us confident that, sadly, 1241 01:10:36,320 --> 01:10:39,160 Speaker 1: this accusation is one of the three percent of assault 1242 01:10:39,160 --> 01:10:42,000 Speaker 1: cases that are misreported every year. It is a true 1243 01:10:42,000 --> 01:10:45,040 Speaker 1: shame to add to that number, as outside of Hollywood 1244 01:10:45,200 --> 01:10:48,120 Speaker 1: women still struggle to be believed. We stand by Murray 1245 01:10:48,160 --> 01:10:50,600 Speaker 1: and this is all we will be saying about this issue. 1246 01:10:50,840 --> 01:10:56,679 Speaker 2: Jesus Christ, it's bad, so bad. There's so many things 1247 01:10:56,720 --> 01:10:57,200 Speaker 2: wrong with that. 1248 01:10:57,680 --> 01:11:01,640 Speaker 1: Well, it gets worse, so obviously this statement makes it 1249 01:11:01,680 --> 01:11:04,760 Speaker 1: seem like, you know, Lena and her team have some 1250 01:11:04,840 --> 01:11:09,000 Speaker 1: kind of inside information that proves that this assault never happened, 1251 01:11:09,520 --> 01:11:13,280 Speaker 1: but come to find out that was all a lie. 1252 01:11:13,400 --> 01:11:16,479 Speaker 1: She made that up because in a twenty eighteen follow 1253 01:11:16,560 --> 01:11:21,000 Speaker 1: up piece called two Aurora an Apology, Dunham rights quote. 1254 01:11:21,720 --> 01:11:24,519 Speaker 1: When someone I knew, someone I had loved as a brother, 1255 01:11:24,760 --> 01:11:28,840 Speaker 1: was accused, I did something inexcusable. I publicly spoke up 1256 01:11:28,840 --> 01:11:31,599 Speaker 1: in his defense. There are a few acts I could 1257 01:11:31,600 --> 01:11:34,240 Speaker 1: ever regret more in my life. I didn't have the 1258 01:11:34,720 --> 01:11:38,759 Speaker 1: insider information, I claimed, rather blind faith in a story 1259 01:11:38,840 --> 01:11:42,040 Speaker 1: that kept slipping and changing and revealed itself to me 1260 01:11:42,160 --> 01:11:49,639 Speaker 1: nothing at all. So Yeah, Lena basically smeared a woman 1261 01:11:49,880 --> 01:11:53,919 Speaker 1: who said that she had been sexually assaulted by someone 1262 01:11:53,960 --> 01:11:56,760 Speaker 1: that she met on Lena's set, the set of her 1263 01:11:56,840 --> 01:11:59,720 Speaker 1: hit show. She lied about this woman for a long 1264 01:11:59,720 --> 01:12:05,000 Speaker 1: time and then eventually admitted that lie in this piece. Yeah, 1265 01:12:05,040 --> 01:12:08,040 Speaker 1: I just think it's really horrible and personally, this was 1266 01:12:08,080 --> 01:12:11,320 Speaker 1: the time, like I, as I said in the last episode, 1267 01:12:11,360 --> 01:12:14,640 Speaker 1: like I was a casual watcher of girls. I like 1268 01:12:14,680 --> 01:12:16,800 Speaker 1: a lot of Len Dunham's writing. But this is when 1269 01:12:16,840 --> 01:12:19,360 Speaker 1: she lost me for good because I just felt like 1270 01:12:19,760 --> 01:12:22,479 Speaker 1: it was such a calculate like when you when you 1271 01:12:22,560 --> 01:12:26,280 Speaker 1: call a woman of color a liar in public, you 1272 01:12:26,320 --> 01:12:30,479 Speaker 1: are doing something that is like you can't take that back. 1273 01:12:30,880 --> 01:12:33,240 Speaker 1: It's it's such a I don't even know how to 1274 01:12:33,240 --> 01:12:37,559 Speaker 1: put it, like it's it's such a big claim that 1275 01:12:38,000 --> 01:12:41,479 Speaker 1: is so because of we live in like a racist, sexist, 1276 01:12:41,520 --> 01:12:45,000 Speaker 1: misogynistic society. When you say a woman of color is 1277 01:12:45,120 --> 01:12:48,920 Speaker 1: lying about being abused or sexually assaulted in public, you 1278 01:12:49,000 --> 01:12:51,400 Speaker 1: are just making a big claim that is going to 1279 01:12:51,400 --> 01:12:53,679 Speaker 1: get a lot of attention that you can't take back. 1280 01:12:53,720 --> 01:12:56,519 Speaker 1: And so for me, that was the moment that Lena 1281 01:12:56,560 --> 01:13:00,479 Speaker 1: Dunham lost me forever. So Lena eventually took this with 1282 01:13:00,520 --> 01:13:03,439 Speaker 1: Aurora's mom Brittany, at a women in Hobbywood event to 1283 01:13:03,439 --> 01:13:06,760 Speaker 1: publicly apologize again last November. 1284 01:13:06,360 --> 01:13:09,240 Speaker 4: When Britney's beautiful daughter Aurora accused a friend of mine 1285 01:13:09,280 --> 01:13:12,040 Speaker 4: of sexual assault, I denied her experience publicly. 1286 01:13:12,680 --> 01:13:17,200 Speaker 1: So I remember this moment so viscerally watching it and 1287 01:13:17,280 --> 01:13:22,599 Speaker 1: thinking this is a capital B, capital M bad moment 1288 01:13:22,640 --> 01:13:25,519 Speaker 1: for women. Lena lied about a woman of color who 1289 01:13:25,600 --> 01:13:29,360 Speaker 1: opened up about her experience of sexual violence and just 1290 01:13:29,560 --> 01:13:33,400 Speaker 1: essentially publicly smeared her. Then a few years later, she 1291 01:13:33,520 --> 01:13:38,200 Speaker 1: brings this woman's mom on stage and performs contrition in 1292 01:13:38,280 --> 01:13:41,080 Speaker 1: this kind of like, oh gee, I'm just a kid 1293 01:13:41,120 --> 01:13:43,360 Speaker 1: with a lot to learn kind of way, when in 1294 01:13:43,400 --> 01:13:48,240 Speaker 1: reality she was the very powerful creator and showrunner of 1295 01:13:48,320 --> 01:13:53,280 Speaker 1: a highly successful business with her HBO show. So this 1296 01:13:53,360 --> 01:13:55,280 Speaker 1: idea that she was just like a kid who had 1297 01:13:55,320 --> 01:13:59,080 Speaker 1: a lot to learn, that's completely incorrect, and that framing 1298 01:13:59,400 --> 01:14:02,200 Speaker 1: is is so's so clearly self serving. I'm sure you 1299 01:14:02,200 --> 01:14:04,200 Speaker 1: could make the argument that it was a genuine moment 1300 01:14:04,360 --> 01:14:07,320 Speaker 1: of you know, apology that she wanted to happen in public. 1301 01:14:07,560 --> 01:14:11,240 Speaker 1: But I just it just really made me feel weird 1302 01:14:11,360 --> 01:14:14,400 Speaker 1: and I really didn't like it, and yeah, it just 1303 01:14:14,439 --> 01:14:15,160 Speaker 1: lost me forever. 1304 01:14:15,720 --> 01:14:20,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, and why her mom? Why not the woman herself? 1305 01:14:21,280 --> 01:14:24,080 Speaker 2: Like that just seems weird. I'm sure people have answers 1306 01:14:24,120 --> 01:14:25,720 Speaker 2: to that, but it seems weird to me. 1307 01:14:26,400 --> 01:14:29,679 Speaker 1: Yeah, And you can really see how all the different 1308 01:14:29,720 --> 01:14:32,200 Speaker 1: controversies with Lena Dunham that I just laid out really 1309 01:14:32,240 --> 01:14:36,160 Speaker 1: do exist along pre existing political, racial, and social tensions. 1310 01:14:36,200 --> 01:14:39,360 Speaker 1: You know, white women versus women of color, white women 1311 01:14:39,439 --> 01:14:43,200 Speaker 1: versus black men, these tensions that really do already exist 1312 01:14:43,240 --> 01:14:45,920 Speaker 1: in our society and always have, like way before Lena Dunnam. 1313 01:14:46,160 --> 01:14:49,719 Speaker 1: It's not like she created these things, but that tensions 1314 01:14:49,760 --> 01:14:52,240 Speaker 1: that we have already have a kind of a tough 1315 01:14:52,280 --> 01:14:56,439 Speaker 1: time talking honestly about. And when those tensions are present, 1316 01:14:56,760 --> 01:15:00,559 Speaker 1: it's just the textbook conditions for inaccurate or misleading information 1317 01:15:00,840 --> 01:15:03,360 Speaker 1: to fester and spread. And in a lot of ways, 1318 01:15:03,640 --> 01:15:06,440 Speaker 1: I feel like Lena Dunnam is like a walking embodiment 1319 01:15:06,560 --> 01:15:08,479 Speaker 1: of all of these tensions. And so it's not really 1320 01:15:08,520 --> 01:15:13,080 Speaker 1: surprising that a particular misleading claim about her would then sick. 1321 01:15:13,640 --> 01:15:16,200 Speaker 1: And I think that is why we see this claim 1322 01:15:16,880 --> 01:15:19,799 Speaker 1: have such stickiness, you know, this claim that she molested 1323 01:15:19,800 --> 01:15:22,280 Speaker 1: her sibling when she was seventeen. I think that is 1324 01:15:22,320 --> 01:15:25,120 Speaker 1: the reason why we see it being, you know, having 1325 01:15:25,200 --> 01:15:26,080 Speaker 1: such staying power. 1326 01:15:26,840 --> 01:15:31,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's so sad that, you know, all those 1327 01:15:31,120 --> 01:15:38,360 Speaker 2: societal tensions of racism, sexism, misogyn war just gets shoved 1328 01:15:38,400 --> 01:15:43,280 Speaker 2: through the side and it becomes a conversation about a 1329 01:15:43,320 --> 01:15:47,400 Speaker 2: single like a specific white woman and is she good 1330 01:15:47,479 --> 01:15:51,120 Speaker 2: or is she bad? And like, what a useless conversation exactly. 1331 01:15:51,240 --> 01:15:54,360 Speaker 1: That's exactly my point, Like, we don't have the conversation of, 1332 01:15:54,400 --> 01:15:58,439 Speaker 1: like was this harmful to survivors of sexual violence? Was 1333 01:15:58,479 --> 01:16:01,200 Speaker 1: this a harmful experience for Lena Dunhams sibling? Should what 1334 01:16:01,240 --> 01:16:02,559 Speaker 1: does it mean that she wrote about it in this 1335 01:16:02,680 --> 01:16:04,920 Speaker 1: jokey way. We don't have to get to have a 1336 01:16:04,920 --> 01:16:08,000 Speaker 1: conversation of like what can we offer survivors of childhood 1337 01:16:08,040 --> 01:16:10,000 Speaker 1: sexual assault? Or like how can we support them? Or 1338 01:16:10,000 --> 01:16:12,879 Speaker 1: how can we create the conditions to eliminate sexual abuse 1339 01:16:13,200 --> 01:16:15,840 Speaker 1: in our world? But those conversations are too big, too 1340 01:16:15,840 --> 01:16:18,760 Speaker 1: thorny two meety, we don't have the conversation of like, well, 1341 01:16:19,200 --> 01:16:22,920 Speaker 1: why would black feminists or black women have a bone 1342 01:16:22,960 --> 01:16:26,479 Speaker 1: to pick with white womanhood or white feminism, or in 1343 01:16:26,520 --> 01:16:31,759 Speaker 1: what ways have white women historically, you know, attacked black 1344 01:16:31,800 --> 01:16:35,760 Speaker 1: men or you know, like projected things onto black men 1345 01:16:35,960 --> 01:16:39,240 Speaker 1: that were harmful to them. Those are all the big, thorny, 1346 01:16:39,400 --> 01:16:43,160 Speaker 1: systemic conversation that's hard to have and that frankly, we 1347 01:16:43,200 --> 01:16:45,720 Speaker 1: are not equipped to have. We're not having it, and 1348 01:16:45,800 --> 01:16:50,040 Speaker 1: so that just gets conflated into Lena Dunham bad, Lena 1349 01:16:50,080 --> 01:16:53,360 Speaker 1: Dunham did this or Lena Dunham not bad Lena, Lena 1350 01:16:53,400 --> 01:16:57,280 Speaker 1: Dunham not did this right, Like, it just completely flattens 1351 01:16:57,320 --> 01:17:00,160 Speaker 1: the conversation so that we're not really able to have 1352 01:17:00,200 --> 01:17:03,519 Speaker 1: it be a thoughtful, substantive, nuanced conversation. And some lingering 1353 01:17:03,600 --> 01:17:06,040 Speaker 1: questions that I still have about this are whether or 1354 01:17:06,120 --> 01:17:09,280 Speaker 1: not people who say that Lena Dunnam abused her sibling 1355 01:17:09,640 --> 01:17:11,840 Speaker 1: do they know they're talking about incidents that happened when 1356 01:17:11,840 --> 01:17:14,720 Speaker 1: she was seven and not seventeen, Like how much did 1357 01:17:14,760 --> 01:17:19,560 Speaker 1: that particular specific lie seep into people's actual consciousness and 1358 01:17:19,600 --> 01:17:22,320 Speaker 1: their understanding of what happened? And maybe the answer is 1359 01:17:22,360 --> 01:17:25,600 Speaker 1: we'll never know. And I think that is ultimately the 1360 01:17:25,640 --> 01:17:29,040 Speaker 1: reason why this is such a big tactic for disinformers, 1361 01:17:29,120 --> 01:17:33,599 Speaker 1: liars and bad actors, just creating enough negativity around someone 1362 01:17:33,720 --> 01:17:37,519 Speaker 1: or something so that it ultimately doesn't really matter what 1363 01:17:37,760 --> 01:17:41,400 Speaker 1: actually happened at all, because all anybody remembers or thinks 1364 01:17:41,439 --> 01:17:43,719 Speaker 1: about when it comes up is the lie. 1365 01:17:44,160 --> 01:17:47,960 Speaker 2: Damn. Yeah, but I think you're you're right. I think 1366 01:17:47,960 --> 01:17:51,599 Speaker 2: we've seen time and again that's their goal, to create 1367 01:17:51,880 --> 01:17:58,519 Speaker 2: just the miasma of unspecific negativity and lies and not 1368 01:17:58,680 --> 01:18:04,120 Speaker 2: just spread lies, but reduce confidence in there being any 1369 01:18:04,160 --> 01:18:06,439 Speaker 2: sort of truth exactly right. 1370 01:18:06,479 --> 01:18:09,599 Speaker 1: It's so it's like creating the conditions where it's like, oh, well, 1371 01:18:10,080 --> 01:18:13,080 Speaker 1: the conversation is so muddled and difficult to follow that 1372 01:18:13,200 --> 01:18:15,720 Speaker 1: like what is the truth anyway? And so I think 1373 01:18:15,800 --> 01:18:18,200 Speaker 1: the further we get away from that where things that 1374 01:18:18,240 --> 01:18:20,800 Speaker 1: are not true can sort of become true, the worse 1375 01:18:20,920 --> 01:18:23,479 Speaker 1: off we all are. And I have to say, you know, 1376 01:18:23,800 --> 01:18:26,720 Speaker 1: this all happened back in twenty fourteen. Here we are 1377 01:18:26,960 --> 01:18:29,439 Speaker 1: nearly ten years later, and just last week. A v 1378 01:18:29,560 --> 01:18:32,280 Speaker 1: club published an article about Lena's new film project on 1379 01:18:32,400 --> 01:18:35,360 Speaker 1: June twenty third, and the top comments were all some 1380 01:18:35,560 --> 01:18:38,280 Speaker 1: iteration of the claim that she sexually abused her sibling, 1381 01:18:38,680 --> 01:18:42,320 Speaker 1: like it will never go away. It basically is true. 1382 01:18:42,360 --> 01:18:45,200 Speaker 1: Now whether or not it actually happened is just sort 1383 01:18:45,240 --> 01:18:47,160 Speaker 1: of a non issue at this point. 1384 01:18:47,720 --> 01:18:52,960 Speaker 2: That is grim all right, Well, so, so bridget what 1385 01:18:53,040 --> 01:18:55,960 Speaker 2: is the point of you telling us all of this? 1386 01:18:56,680 --> 01:18:58,840 Speaker 1: Oh, I'm so glad you asked. So here we are 1387 01:18:58,840 --> 01:19:01,439 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two, and we have seen more and 1388 01:19:01,560 --> 01:19:06,040 Speaker 1: more right wing extremists using very similar tactics, not just 1389 01:19:06,080 --> 01:19:09,719 Speaker 1: on public figures, but on more and more regular people. 1390 01:19:10,000 --> 01:19:12,400 Speaker 1: You know, look at things like libs of TikTok, that 1391 01:19:12,479 --> 01:19:15,639 Speaker 1: page on Twitter where people are regularly labeled as quote 1392 01:19:15,720 --> 01:19:20,000 Speaker 1: groomers or basically accused of some kind of like vague 1393 01:19:20,040 --> 01:19:25,479 Speaker 1: sexual impropriety against children. It's really gross and sad because 1394 01:19:25,920 --> 01:19:29,520 Speaker 1: we actually do have a sexual abuse problem in our society. 1395 01:19:29,960 --> 01:19:32,360 Speaker 1: So many of us are survivors of sexual violence or 1396 01:19:32,400 --> 01:19:36,240 Speaker 1: sexual abuse, and bad actors and liars who spread damaging 1397 01:19:36,320 --> 01:19:39,799 Speaker 1: lies and inaccurate content. They know this is a trigger 1398 01:19:39,840 --> 01:19:42,000 Speaker 1: and attention for so many of this like this is 1399 01:19:42,040 --> 01:19:45,320 Speaker 1: a pressure point in us that can be you know, 1400 01:19:46,000 --> 01:19:49,559 Speaker 1: poked at and inflamed, and it creates a situation where 1401 01:19:49,880 --> 01:19:52,400 Speaker 1: the sexual abuse of kids is a topic that is 1402 01:19:52,479 --> 01:19:57,320 Speaker 1: easily exploited and inflamed and can be weaponized against political opponents. 1403 01:19:57,680 --> 01:20:01,320 Speaker 1: And so ultimately, I guess in conclusion, there are plenty 1404 01:20:01,400 --> 01:20:04,559 Speaker 1: of reasons to not like Lena Dunham, including what she 1405 01:20:04,680 --> 01:20:07,320 Speaker 1: wrote about her sibling and her memoir. We don't need 1406 01:20:07,360 --> 01:20:09,240 Speaker 1: to add lies on it to talk about it. We're 1407 01:20:09,240 --> 01:20:12,440 Speaker 1: not better served when we add lies into a conversation 1408 01:20:12,520 --> 01:20:15,960 Speaker 1: as important and as sensitive as childhood sexual violence. And 1409 01:20:16,040 --> 01:20:19,120 Speaker 1: when we do that, we do a disservice to issues 1410 01:20:19,120 --> 01:20:22,240 Speaker 1: like sexual abuse that are so important and critical that 1411 01:20:22,280 --> 01:20:25,040 Speaker 1: we talk about. And ultimately, it's very concerning that we 1412 01:20:25,120 --> 01:20:27,960 Speaker 1: have a kind of media climate and ecosystem that create 1413 01:20:28,000 --> 01:20:31,639 Speaker 1: the conditions for this kind of damaging lie to persist 1414 01:20:31,720 --> 01:20:35,200 Speaker 1: for years and essentially become true even if it's not. 1415 01:20:35,840 --> 01:20:37,840 Speaker 2: It's a scary sentiment to end on. 1416 01:20:38,600 --> 01:20:40,439 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, that's that's all I got. 1417 01:20:41,439 --> 01:20:45,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, Well, let's all try to stick to the truth. 1418 01:20:46,040 --> 01:20:48,479 Speaker 2: Huh Is that so hard? Is that going to kill us? 1419 01:20:49,040 --> 01:20:51,680 Speaker 1: Is that so hard? Ben Shapiro, Let's just stick to 1420 01:20:51,720 --> 01:20:53,519 Speaker 1: the truth, shall we? Yeah? 1421 01:20:53,720 --> 01:20:54,320 Speaker 2: Seriously? 1422 01:20:55,080 --> 01:20:57,760 Speaker 1: And so I know this is a controversial topic, I 1423 01:20:57,840 --> 01:21:01,240 Speaker 1: started the series talking about out the fact that I 1424 01:21:01,320 --> 01:21:05,360 Speaker 1: knew this was going to be something people had opinions, on, feelings, 1425 01:21:05,360 --> 01:21:08,479 Speaker 1: on thoughts on. I welcome those thoughts. I really, really 1426 01:21:08,520 --> 01:21:11,000 Speaker 1: really want to hear what people have to say. Please 1427 01:21:11,040 --> 01:21:13,200 Speaker 1: don't come for me though I'm a baby. I don't know, 1428 01:21:14,080 --> 01:21:16,760 Speaker 1: like be cool about it, but like, I want to 1429 01:21:16,800 --> 01:21:18,880 Speaker 1: know what you think. You know, what are your thoughts 1430 01:21:18,880 --> 01:21:22,559 Speaker 1: on Elina Dunham, her memoir, all the things that we 1431 01:21:22,640 --> 01:21:24,400 Speaker 1: laid out today. I really want to hear your thoughts. 1432 01:21:24,400 --> 01:21:27,840 Speaker 1: So please you can email me, you can find me 1433 01:21:27,880 --> 01:21:30,600 Speaker 1: on social media. I want to hear what y'all think. 1434 01:21:33,560 --> 01:21:35,600 Speaker 1: Got a story about an interesting thing in tech, or 1435 01:21:35,680 --> 01:21:37,519 Speaker 1: just want to say hi? You can reach us at 1436 01:21:37,520 --> 01:21:40,240 Speaker 1: Hello at tangody dot com. You can also find transcripts 1437 01:21:40,240 --> 01:21:42,720 Speaker 1: for today's episode at tengody dot com. There Are No 1438 01:21:42,800 --> 01:21:44,840 Speaker 1: Girls on the Internet was created by me bridget Toad. 1439 01:21:45,240 --> 01:21:48,639 Speaker 1: It's a production of iHeartRadio, an unbossed creative Jonathan Strickland 1440 01:21:48,640 --> 01:21:51,400 Speaker 1: as our executive producer. Terry Harrison is our producer and 1441 01:21:51,479 --> 01:21:55,240 Speaker 1: sound engineer. Michael Almado is our contributing producer. I'm your host, 1442 01:21:55,240 --> 01:21:58,040 Speaker 1: bridget Toad. If you want to help us grow, rate 1443 01:21:58,080 --> 01:22:01,800 Speaker 1: and review us on Apple podcasts. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, 1444 01:22:01,920 --> 01:22:04,280 Speaker 1: check out the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you 1445 01:22:04,280 --> 01:22:05,200 Speaker 1: get your podcasts.