WEBVTT - Tesla's Vehicles Sales Have Investors Feeling Optimistic

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple Coarclay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, we've been talking a lot about Tesla this morning.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 2>There delivery numbers came in weaker than expected. We had

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 2>Dan Ives and Webbush Securities on earlier and he was

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 2>just saying, hey, relative to maybe the whisper number, they

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 2>came in a little bit better than expected. Here, let's

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 2>get the broad overview of what's happening at our good

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>friends at Tesla stops up about two point eight percent today,

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 2>but it's down about twenty four percent you to date.

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Return to Pierre Farragu, head of Global Technology Infrastructure at

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 2>New Street Research.

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Pierre, thanks so much for.

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Joining us here. How do you think about these Tesla numbers?

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 2>What does it mean for the near and intermediate term

0:00:59.040 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 2>story at Tesla?

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, as you said, there is a bit of a

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 3>positive surprise, like people tracking very precisely deliveries in various

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 3>markets while expecting slightly lower numbers. The surprise comes from

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 3>the US. The US did is a place where it's

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 3>the most difficult to track the number of Tesla being

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 3>delivered and the US bit expectations. So that's a model

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 3>while coming in doing actually quite well. That's good, But

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 3>then at the end of the day you have to

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 3>remember the big picture. We are down thirteen persons here

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 3>on air. So we are facing a situation where Tesla

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 3>is struggling to sell cars. A gross margin is in

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the latins. To me, Tesla facing good demons should be

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 3>able to defend like mid mid twenties ghost margin. So

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 3>we have like we are facing like a core business,

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 3>not to business that is really at a very low

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 3>point that is struggling. And so that's the difficulty. You have,

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 3>like one structural difficulty that is relatively that we understand

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 3>relatively well. It's that with their current product, Tesla has

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of saturated its opportunity. Tesla needs lower highs points

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 3>to keep growing and that's in the plan they're working

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 3>on it. And then you have a number of other issues.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, electric cars are less fashionable than they were

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years ago. The Tesla brand has suffered,

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 3>particularly in Europe where numbers are down like almost forty

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 3>percent on air and so it is definitely it's difficult

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 3>to quantify, but it is a significant headwind as well.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 3>And Overhall, you know, the economy is not the best

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 3>you can imagine for Auto DIMA.

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean when we look at the mag seven stocks,

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 4>we see Tesla as the primary laggard this year, down

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 4>about twenty three percent. And of course we know that

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 4>investors have really been vying for Mask's attention as has

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 4>been really politically involved. So as we're seeing these numbers

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 4>come through, what do things like moving forward? Are these

0:02:56.480 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 4>numbers a massive impact or are the Tesla loyalists still

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 4>out there? And is there some further positivity to come?

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you the Testla stock has been on a roller coaster.

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 3>It's like a very low performer this year, but it

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 3>was like a clear outperformer last last year. And as

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 3>you said, you know, it's following, it's following. You know,

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 3>the political care if I may say, of the CEO

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 3>in a musk and like this has created this situation.

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Now if you look at the stock, you know, since

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, like April first, what you see that what

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 3>tends to really move the stock is actually the new

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>flow around how the company is now focused on deploying

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 3>fleets of robot taxes. They've just started that in a

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 3>couple of weeks ago, like late late last months, and

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that's going to be the primary driver of

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 3>the stock going forward. Of course, there is a lot

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 3>of uncertainty on you know, how fast TESTA is going

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 3>to be able to deploy ROBOTEXI. I'll even make your

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 3>proffits like generate the profits out of the robotex Frietz.

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 3>But the size of the price is so gigantic and

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 3>so much more than yotel business that right, this is

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 3>probably what drives us start going forward.

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Pierre, thank you so much for joining us. Always appreciate

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 2>getting your thoughts there. Pierre fargu He's set of Global

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Technology Infrastructure at New Street Research.

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get back to Tesla. It's being we've

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 2>been talking about today. They reported some delivery numbers give

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 2>it a little bit light of forecast. Stocks up a

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 2>little bit today and Dan ives and what Bush Security

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 2>suggested that might be because the wish for numbers out

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 2>there were a little bit lower, so the company exceeded them.

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 2>So we're there. But there's surely been some negative sentiment

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 2>around Tesla stock. It's down twenty five percent year to date,

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 2>some concerns about Elon Musk and his commitment to the company.

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 2>But there's still a lot to like out there about

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Tesla if you look at the numbers. And that's what

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 2>our next guest does, Matt Winkler. He's editor in chief

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 2>emeritus of Bloomberg News. He founded Bloomberg News. To me,

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 2>that's the point here, and he joins us here on

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 2>our Bloomberg and Active Broker studio. Matt, thanks so much

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 2>for joining us. You've got to call him out today

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 2>with your colleague Hinte saying, Hey, if you look at

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 2>the numbers here at Tesla, it's an extraordinary story.

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Still.

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and I, by the way, thank you for having me.

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 6>And I would invoke our founder Mike Bloomberger himself, who

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 6>when he was Mayor of New York would say often

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 6>in God, we trust everyone else bring data, and so

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 6>the data compiled by Bloomberg shows that this ed startup

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 6>would call Tesla, founded by engineers Martin Eberhart and Mark

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 6>Tarpening in two thousand and three, is still the world's

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 6>low largest automaker, ninth largest public company, and worth more

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 6>than the gross domestic product of Saudi Arabia. And for

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 6>all its might as a global sales leader, Toyota Motor Corp.

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 6>Is about a quarter of Tesla's more than one trillion

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 6>dollar valuation as of today, after the very numbers that

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 6>you reported, and by the way, the stock is up

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 6>the most since June. Okay, so initially the media take

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 6>was negative, negative, negative, and people with the most at stake,

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 6>which is where the data is, say not so fast.

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 6>And there's a reason for that. You know what we

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 6>did my college pay and I is we asked that

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 6>very question. Okay, with all this negative news that is prevailing,

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 6>that is the prevailing narrative. Why is that, through thick

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 6>and thin every single month this year, Tesla is still

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 6>worth more than Toyota, and Bloomberg's own alternative artificial intelligence

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 6>function DSX tells there are plenty of reasons. One is

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 6>that if you just took out the vehicle itself. There's

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 6>still a trillion dollar market capitalization on the autonomous striving

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 6>that is coming soon to everyone through Tesla. So there

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 6>are all kinds of reasons why Tesla has the value

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 6>that it has. But I would like to share with

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 6>you something that I got from a Bloomberg user this

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 6>morning at an email. He said, we don't need AI

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 6>to understand why Tesla critics are losing. Critics are either

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 6>motivated by hate we've seen that politics, or a misunderstanding

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 6>of time. Tesla represents the most extraordinary array of products,

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 6>some of which are destined to become core components of

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 6>the future economy and life of humanity. That's from our

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg user, John Billings, who's in Washington, DC. So this

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 6>is a big part of the story that everybody misses.

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 6>And if you just look at quarterly sales reports, that's

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 6>not going to give you the picture. But I would

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 6>say even in that context, the Model Why was the

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 6>best selling vehicle in the world in twenty twenty three,

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty four, and poised to be certainly the best

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 6>ev selling vehicle in twenty twenty five and maybe again

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 6>repeat and the reason why the deliveries were slow in

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 6>the first in the second quarter was because they were retooling, renovating,

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 6>updating the model. Why sales are way up in Norway

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 6>and Spain by the way, so so much for the

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 6>demand problem.

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 4>How are you thinking about it in relation to peers?

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I know a lot of people have really

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 4>been clamoring for Musk to turn his attention back to Tesla.

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 4>And I mean when you think about some of these

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 4>numbers that were parsing, as you mentioned, and your story

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 4>that everything about Tesla these days has really been ranging

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 4>from bad to worse. So when you think about the

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 4>future of the company in comparison to peers, you know,

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 4>what are just some of the things that you expect

0:08:57.960 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 4>in terms of performance moving forward?

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 6>Well, let's just look at the past ten years. By

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 6>the way, twenty fifteen, most of the analysts that provide

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 6>forecasts were negative about Tesla. Barrish, don't buy the stock.

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 6>But what happened. Tesla's ninety seven point seven billion dollars

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 6>of revenue last year is more than thirty times it's

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 6>sales a decade ago. Now that outperforms even China's byd Okay,

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 6>which has been the star of late in the media narrative.

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 6>But if you look at something like Tesla's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, hamorgtization,

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 6>it's more than three hundred times the company's profit a

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 6>decade ago. Number two byd grew only fifteen times. You know,

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 6>if you look at Tesla's current market capitalization, it's thirty

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 6>one times it's value a decade ago, which is just

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 6>another way of saying that among the top ten automakers

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 6>that Tesla competes with, Tesla's revenue growth, it's profit, and

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 6>its market value are superior, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 2>Always brand value. Last question, One could argue the evaluation

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 2>has always had a big, big Elon Musk premium based

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 2>into it. His brand arguably has been diminished over the

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 2>last six months with his political actions in doge A.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Is that a concern or should it be a concern

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 2>for investors? And you think is there a long term

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 2>brand issue?

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 4>Do you think so?

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 6>I'm not qualified to answer that question, However, somebody who

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 6>probably is is Nicholas Coelis, who's the co founder of

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 6>Data Trek, and he's been covering the auto industry since

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 6>the nineteen eighties, which is kind of when I sort

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 6>of entered the picture and he says, there's something that

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 6>is no Algo spreadsheet can understand, which is why hero

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 6>led companies are often so valuable. Yep, yep.

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. All right, Matt, great column as always. Matt Winkler,

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Editor in chief, Emeritis, founder of Bloomberg News. I think

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 2>he drives around one of these Tesla things. I kind

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 2>of went there last time. I got my young youngest

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 2>a hybrid Honda, so I'm kind of getting there. But

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 2>give me the hey close, give me the gass.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 5>Mapple. Thank you so much.

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate that.

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app, Listen on demand wherever you

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I'd say one of the more competitive industries I see

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 2>out there day in and day out. As a wireless business.

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 2>You got the Big three, eighteen T Verizon, Team Mobile,

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 2>and I mean it's all on price. I mean it's

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 2>all kind of the same. I don't know that. Being said,

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I've been with Verizon since the beginning of wireless, so

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe likewise get no churing going there. John Butler, he

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 2>covers all this stuff for Bloomberg Intelligence. John Butler, senior

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 2>telecom anaists for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's based down there in

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 2>print in New Jersey. John, what's the state of the

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 2>wireless industry today? Again, you've got those big three? How competitive?

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 5>Is it? Hyper competitive? Paul?

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 7>It really is interesting. Just as you said, there's a

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 7>lot the Big three at and T verizing T Mobile.

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 7>They're always slugging it out with themselves. But now that

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 7>you've got the cable operators coming in offering wireless at

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 7>very enticing price points, and their brand strength is getting better,

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 7>and so they're becoming more and more of an issue

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 7>quarter and in quarter about well, we as analysts sort

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 7>of measure as the health of a telecom and any

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 7>given quarter as we look at the number of net

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 7>news smartphone subscribers that carrier ads or phone net ads

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 7>as they're called. And what we've seen every quarter is

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 7>the cable operators now are getting even up to half

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 7>the net ads in a given quarter, So they're becoming

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 7>a big factor. Having said all that, I'm impressed with

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 7>how the carriers are keeping their service revenue growth pretty steady.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 7>You know, telecom is not a growth business. So if

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 7>you're getting three to five percent growth in your service revenue,

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 7>it's a pretty good quarter. And I think we're in

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 7>for more of that this quarter with the exception of Horizon.

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 7>Then we can talk more about that if.

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:21.839
<v Speaker 5>You want, John.

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 4>When I think about wireless carriers and I think about

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 4>some of these phone providers, it feels as though everyone

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 4>has their brand that they stick to. And as we

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 4>were mentioning earlier, does it really feel like there's necessarily

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.959
<v Speaker 4>anything to entice people to hop around? But given all

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 4>of this in regards to marketing or really just being

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 4>able to drive demand, where are you seeing? Which company

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 4>are you seeing as the biggest leader here?

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 5>Team Mobile is the runaway hit Nora. It's amazing. They really.

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 7>Team Mobile Tuesdays, they have giveaways once a week. They're

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 7>brilliant marketers, just brilliant, And it's funny if you rewind

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 7>the clock fifteen years they had a near death experience,

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 7>Like I didn't think that carrier was going.

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 5>To make it. They brought in a very.

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 7>Dynamic CEO named John Ledger, who really turned around the brand.

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 7>He made himself the face of the brand. They branded

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 7>it as this sort of hip, counter culture, consumer friendly brand.

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 7>People just love it. And in the meantime, they've done

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 7>a great job updating the network and upgrading it so

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 7>and after buying Sprint, of course, they now have the

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 7>scale to really compete with AT and T and Verizon.

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 7>They've gone from a distant third in the industry to

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 7>now the second largest wireless carrier. And they just they

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 7>lead the industry and net ads quarter in in quarter out,

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 7>which is a testament to the power of their marketing.

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 2>All Right, I'm a Verizon wireless customer, been one since

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of this whole wireless thing. Me too, by

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the way, exactly, So what's the story for those guys

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 2>in terms of how they're dealing with the competition.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 7>I think it's easy to sort of play armchair CEO here,

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 7>but I think Verizon is making a bit of a

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 7>mistake by not meeting rivals in promotions. They really take

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 7>the high ground. They want to protect a premium brand image.

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 7>For years and years they had the best network out there.

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 7>I still think they have the edge there, but that

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 7>gap is closing, particularly in the minds of a lot

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 7>of consumers that don't follow the industry. T Mobile keeps

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 7>banging away that they have the best network in the US,

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 7>and so that sort of premium brand image that Verizon

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 7>had is beginning to erode.

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 5>And yet they're not meeting T Mobile or the cable.

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 7>Guys sort of you know, tip for tad on promotions

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 7>and so on the margin. In recent quarters at least

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 7>they've lost phone subscribers. Not a lot, but it's beginning

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 7>to really chip away for them, and it's chipping away

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 7>at their service revenue growth again because I just don't

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 7>think they're promoting enough.

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 5>John.

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 4>So you've got the big three, what is the leadest

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 4>with M and A in the space? Is there anything

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 4>left to consolidate?

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 5>Not much, Nora.

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 7>You know there's been where the telcos are really looking

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 7>for growth is on the broadband side, and you've seen

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 7>a lot of consolidation there with the Verizon most recently

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 7>buying Frontier, which is a big fiber provider. They really

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 7>have strength in several states across the US. AT and

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 7>T has done a really good job. They're buying Luman's

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 7>fiber business. So you've got consolidation there on the wireless side.

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 7>You've seen t mobiles snapping up a lot of the

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 7>independent and private prepaid brands like Mint Mobile is one

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 7>of their most recent They're buying TDS, which is a

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 7>small regional wireless carrier. So there really is nothing left

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 7>here or except for big transformational acquisitions, and they really

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 7>would be gigantic on that scale.

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 5>So I'm just not seeing it.

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 2>So John, just real quickly here, is this an r

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 2>POO story? Is this just raising prices to consumers? Is

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 2>that the growth story here for most of these big.

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 7>Guys, it's raising it's raising prices, Paul, Definitely, that's how

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 7>you're getting that three to five percent service revenue growth.

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 7>But I think another part of the story and one

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 7>to watch is that Telco expansion into broadband. They're doing

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:35.239
<v Speaker 7>a great job there expanding into fiber and both that

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 7>and fixed wireless access which is getting broadband over the air.

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 7>So I think we're going to see a lot of

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 7>growth and increasing amount of growth to be precise, in

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 7>coming quarters coming from that end of the business.

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, John, thanks so much for joining us. Always

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 2>appreciate getting update from you. John Butler. He's a senior

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 2>telecom analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's based down there in

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 2>our Princeton office looking at this the telecom stocks here,

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 2>they've actually got some decent returns this year. I was

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 2>looking at the AT and T, Verizon, T Mobile, AT

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 2>and T year to dates up twenty five percent, Verizon's

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 2>up nine percent, and T Mobiles up eight percent, and

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 2>on a trailing twelve month basis EIGHTE and T's up

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent, Verizon six percent, and T Mobile thirty three percent.

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.959
<v Speaker 2>So for stocks that kind of grow top line, as

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 2>John was saying, kind of three eight to five percent,

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 2>some pretty decent returns as they try to expand their

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 2>business lines away from their core wireline and wireless and

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:33.719
<v Speaker 2>get increasingly into broadbands. So we'll keep an eye on

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 2>some of those telecom names.

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarcklay and Android Auto

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Jeffrey Palmer joins as Senior vice president, head of Multi

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Asset Solutions. I'm not sure what that is, but I'm

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 2>going to say it has to do with some alternative investment,

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe some real investments like real estate. Jeff, thanks so

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 2>much for joining us here. Coeny Steers, I've known this

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 2>asset manager on the street forever, but I've never done

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 2>business with them because you don't really own media stocks,

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 2>which was my game. You guys own real estate reads

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that. Talk to us about your how you

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 2>guys look at the marketplace where you see opportunity.

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.719
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so thanks for having me this morning. So we focus,

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 8>as you mentioned, on real assets and alternative income strategies,

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 8>and those real assets strategies in particular real estate, infrastructure, commodities,

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 8>natural resource equities, in short, things that are exposed to

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 8>the real economy that have real ties to the economy,

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 8>inflation sensitive assets. So that's certainly been a really important

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 8>part of the world these days. And then that all

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 8>kind of fits in also to that alternatives universe that

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 8>we think offers diversification to your traditional stock and bond portfolio.

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 4>So I cover Reads for our equities teams. Super happy

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 4>to have you here.

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 8>As I'm looking at.

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 4>Read's performance this year, I mean, we're seeing shares that

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 4>didn't really do much. I'm looking at engageentsuff about four

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 4>tenths of a percent so far this year. What are

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 4>you seeing in terms of performance and opportunities within the

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 4>read space, any particular sub sectors that you're keeping an

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 4>eye on.

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so, I mean we should also kind of think

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 8>about the year has already been full of a whole

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 8>bunch of rotation. It was a pretty good first quarter

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 8>for reads. They've cooled off a little bit in the

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 8>second quarter, and that sort of is the mirror image

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 8>from the broader SMP. Broadly speaking, we think that reads

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 8>are pretty fairly valued, actually, you know, attractive relative to

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 8>broader equity markets. Within the reed space, you know, there's

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 8>certain areas that we like, and then within the within

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 8>the private real estate space, I would also add, you know,

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 8>there's areas like open air shopping centers that have become

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 8>you know, to us, we think our finding a bottom

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 8>and in that private space is a little bit different

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 8>than the listed space as well.

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 2>In private space, Let's just like I always made the

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 2>mistake of commercial real estate just oh it's office so

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 2>much more. I've now learned that through people kind of

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 2>pointing it out to me. Where do in commercial real

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 2>estate broadly defined, where do you guys see value in

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 2>the private side.

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so Nora will tell you that office is only

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 8>about three or four percent of the total listed index.

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 8>Now that's down and our team has been underweight office

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 8>for a long time, and so we've really benefited from

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 8>that trade. So within that space I mentioned in the

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 8>private space, that open air retail, it looks a little

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 8>bit better. In listed markets, we favored things like multi

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 8>family homes. Within healthcare maybe a little bit nicheer, but

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, senior living areas. Certainly, Data centers have been

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 8>a very important part. That's true not only in real estate,

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 8>but also things tied to that in the infrastructure space

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 8>as well.

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 4>So you mentioned open air shopping centers. Do you mind

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 4>just explaining to our listeners what exactly that is, because

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 4>I know a lot of people were talking for a

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 4>long time about the death of the mall, so.

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 8>Meat to that, and this is not quite the mall,

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 8>the renaissance of the mall, if you like. So think

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 8>about in some cases outlet centers or in some cases

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 8>open air outside where you have necessity based shopping center,

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 8>so it might have a grocery anchor or a big

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 8>box anchor, things that have durability to the Internet shopping cycle,

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 8>but then it's sort of built around an anchor store.

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 8>Those are areas where it looks like prices have bottomed.

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 8>There has not been new supply in the area for

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.199
<v Speaker 8>the reasons that you mentioned, because malls have been a

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 8>really tough spot. So yields are pretty good, earnings growth

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 8>looks pretty good in that area, and that's why we

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 8>find some interest in that space.

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Where is the capital markets as it relates to real

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 2>estate thesas? So, if I want to go out and

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 2>develop a multi family unit or some kind of piece

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 2>of commercial real estate, am I going to get where?

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Am I going to get the money to do that?

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 2>My local bank going to lend me that money for

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 2>a real estate deal.

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 8>So obviously the last few years have been really challenging

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 8>or real estate in general. Debt markets have really been tough. Actually,

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 8>I think the good news here is that at the margin,

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 8>the debt markets are starting to open up a little bit.

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 8>It just means, you know, losses are making their way through.

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 8>People are kind of realizing some of that, so we

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 8>are seeing some pick up and lending. There's going to

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 8>be pockets where that's possible and where there's challenges. So

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 8>you should think about this less as a national trend

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 8>and much more as a local and even in some

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 8>cases a hyper local sort of a trade to be

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 8>able to do it. But the debt, you know, the

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 8>debt financing is coming back, but it's been coming back.

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 4>Slowly, super quickly. I know you mentioned your underweight office

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 4>and have been for a while. Any other areas that

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 4>you guys are actively avoiding.

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, in certain areas, it's you know, we've certainly seen

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 8>an increase in supply sort of working its way through

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 8>and that's been you know, in some cases, you know,

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 8>apartments and some of those areas because you know that's

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 8>where the rent growth has been strongest. It's where there's

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.479
<v Speaker 8>been most resils in the cycle. But as that supply

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 8>comes through, it still takes some time to absorb. So

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 8>that would probably be an area where we've been a

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 8>little late.

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 2>Jeffrey, thank you so much for joining us. Jeffrey Palmas,

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 2>senior vice president, head of multi asset Solutions at Coming

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 2>In Steers and a proud graduate of Rutgers University. I'm

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 2>a huge fan of Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.239
<v Speaker 2>I ton of kids out of Rutgers over the year

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 2>and he traines here in a Bloomberg in Director Brokers Studio.

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal