WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Boeing Earnings, UK Banks, BRICS Summit

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 2>anchors all around the world. Straight Ahead on the program,

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>corporate earnings and Focus. We'll look ahead to results from

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the jetmaker Boeing and shipping giant ups. I'm Tom Busby

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 2>in New York.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Him Carolyn Hetge here in London, where we're charting the

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 3>potential rise of British banking ahead of some key earnings reports.

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm dek Prisner, looking ahead to next week's Brick Summit

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>hosted by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Let's all e struly head on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg eleven, TREEO, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg ninety two nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirius

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 4>XM one twenty one, and around the world Bloomberg Radio,

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 4>dot Com and the Bloomberg Business.

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 2>A good day to you. I'm Tom Busby. We begin

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 2>today's program with the troubled aerospace giant Boeing, the company

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>making headlines for all the wrong reasons of late a

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 2>crippling month long strike, mounting losses, layoffs, investigation since the

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 2>safety of its aircraft and more. And amid all that,

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Boeing officially reporting its third quarter earnings this Wednesday, although

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 2>some of those numbers were released last week. For more

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 2>and what we can expect, we're joined by George Ferguson,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Aerospace, Defense and Airlines analyst. George, thanks

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>for joining us well before we talk about what's wrong

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 2>at Boeing and maybe how to fix it, what do

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>you expect to see from the Q three earnings this Wednesday?

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think we've already seen I think the most

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 5>important part of Q three earnings, and that was when

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 5>Boeing disclosed their cash balances and they and cash use

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 5>for the quarter. Right, So during the quarter we saw

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 5>a use of it's about a billion three So that

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 5>was from operations I think a little bit better than

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 5>what we had expected for usage. There's going to be

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.119
<v Speaker 5>some capex that piles on top of that, which will

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 5>you know, give us our free cash flow for the

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 5>quarter again, probably something close to two billion ish in use.

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 5>They were down to about ten billion dollars in balances.

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 5>I think ten and a half, and so this is

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 5>a company that needs about ten billion dollars around the business.

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 5>So the big indicator here was that, you know, they're

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 5>they're at the point where they need to raise some money.

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of raising money now, they're now working on raising

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 2>upwards of twenty five billion with new shares convertible bonds.

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is this going to go ahead? It's credit

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 2>rating just above junk status? Is this what's next for Boeing?

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So I think you know, the company's calculus here

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 5>is that if they're right up against the edge of

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 5>what they need to run the company and they've got

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 5>a strike going on, you know, obviously there's going to

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 5>be well probably cast usage during the fourth quarter, so

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 5>they need to go into the markets and shore up

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 5>that liquidity position just to give them more leverage with

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 5>the union. And so I do think it's going to occur.

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 5>Right We've heard rumblings of them coming to the equity

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 5>market for up to twenty five billion. They filed the

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 5>shelf offering for twenty five billion. I don't think they

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 5>want to use all twenty five billion right now. I

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 5>don't think they want to be I don't think they

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 5>want to skimp either on what they get from the marketplace, right.

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 5>I think they want a couple quarters worth of liquidity

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 5>so they can get the union back to the table

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 5>and say, look, we've got a lot of staying power here,

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 5>so you better be ready to go, you know, a

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 5>quarter or more, you know, on this strike, which I

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 5>think is going to be very hard right for the

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 5>typical union rank and file. So you know, we kind

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 5>of see ten to fifteen billion worth of cash raise

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 5>again equity. The challenge will be that there'll be a

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 5>fair amount of dilution for current shareholders. There's about ninety

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars in market cap right now in the company.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 5>Ten billion dollar raise is something like eleven percent dilution,

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 5>so it's pretty significant. And that's why I think they

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 5>don't want to go all the way to the twenty

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 5>five billion dollar mark. I think equity sort of protects

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 5>their credit rating or helps them, you know, with their

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 5>credit rating, doesn't doesn't deteriorate their credit metrics. I'm sure

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 5>the agencies are also concerned about the strike, so I'm

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 5>not sure it gets them totally out of the woods

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 5>on pressure for their credit rating, but it's definitely a

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 5>lot better than them raising debt where I think the

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 5>credit rating agencies we just have to downgrade them as

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 5>soon as they did that.

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, but and it could happen right.

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 5>Good again, I think there's still under pressure for credit ratings.

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 5>The agencies have clearly been looking past current problems, right

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 5>because you couldn't do a net debt to EBITDA analysis

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 5>on them right now right, ebitdas quite low and their

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.679
<v Speaker 5>debts quite high. So the metrics are way out of whack.

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 5>And you know, the credit acies are looking through this period.

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 5>But the longer it goes on, the more they have

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 5>to worry about the financial challenges of Boeing. And I

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 5>think the less they can look through the period and

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 5>have to take some action.

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk a little bit more about that strike.

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 2>And I just want to be clear, this is just

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 2>their Pacific Northwest manufacturing, right. There is manufacturing going on elsewhere.

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So this is the machinist out of the Pacific

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 5>Northwest they're responsible for. They build most of the commercial

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 5>programs for Boeing, Right, so they would build the seven

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 5>sixty seven, they'd build the Triple seven, they'd build the

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 5>seven thirty seven of those airplanes, the seven thirty seven

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 5>is the most important airplane to Boeing commercial that's the

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 5>highest volume. It's where they generate their cash, make their

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 5>profits out of. So that's why this strike is so

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 5>debilitating to the company. They do manufacture seven eight sevens,

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 5>I think their second most important commercial platform. They make

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 5>them in the Carrollton in South Carolina near Charleston. That's

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 5>a non union plant, so it's not affected there is

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 5>you know what I've heard in the marketplaces, some of

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 5>those seven eight sevens come back up to Everett, Washington

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 5>and get worked a bit before they go to customers.

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 5>So we're not going to say that they're not impacted

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 5>at all by the strike, but I think they have

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 5>the capability to continue to deliver in decent numbers close

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 5>to their targets. That's seven eighty seven during the strike,

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 5>and then the defense network really isn't affected except for

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 5>KC forty six tanker. KC forty six tanker is the

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 5>US aerial tanker program, another program Boeing has had a

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 5>lot of problems on. Taking a lot of charges on

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 5>the airframe goes down a line in the Northwest in

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 5>the Seattle area up in Everett, and I think that's

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 5>largely machinist in union labor, and so that's probably impacted

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 5>as well by the strike, but a large portion of

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.679
<v Speaker 5>defense is not affected by the strike.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Affected. Wow, well Boeing's latest earnings this Wednesday ahead of

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street's opening bell our Thanks to George Ferguson, Bloomberg

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence Senior Aerospace, Defense and Airlines analyst. We move next

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 2>to the shipping and logistics company United Parcel Service UPS,

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 2>reporting its third quarter earnings on Thursday. Now, UPS coming

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 2>off a pretty rough second quarter after a drop in volume,

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 2>will the third quarter be any different?

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 6>For more?

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 2>We're joined by Lee Clasgal, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Transport, Logistics

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>and Shipping Analysts. So, Lee, thank you for being here.

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 2>What do you expect to see in UPS's third quarter

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 2>earnings this week?

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think this print's going to be a much

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 7>better print that we've seen in the first half.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 8>Of the year.

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 7>In the third quarter, revenues are supposed to be up

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 7>about mid single digits, same with earnings per share. That's

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.239
<v Speaker 7>good news, you know, because we're seeing earnings growth again

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 7>and we expect that to really accelerate into twenty twenty

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 7>five and a lot of that has to do with

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 7>what the company has been doing through its pricing initiatives.

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 7>The company has set a number of different search charges.

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 7>It's a volume specific surcharge, whether it's you know, charging

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 7>more for weird shape or heavy freight that's not really conveyable,

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 7>so it adds costs for UPS. And then they're also

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, they're constantly doing you know, not constantly, but

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 7>once a year they do a general rate increase or

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 7>a GRI and there's one on December twenty third, that's

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 7>around five point nine percent. And we expect Historically UPS

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 7>FedEx DHL, you know, they tend to heavily discount their

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 7>GRIS and we expect those discounts to be a lot

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 7>less this time around, just given all the labor inflation,

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 7>equipment inflation that they need to mitigate through pricing initiatives.

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Now that labor inflation you spoke about, they had settled

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 2>avoided to strike, yes, and but it really cost them,

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't it.

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 7>It did, and you know it was front loaded, and

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 7>that's something else that will benefit and in the second half,

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 7>the comparables will become a lot easier for them. On

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 7>that longer term contract with the team serves, So that

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 7>is good news, and you know, now they know kind

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 7>of what their costs are going to be as it

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 7>relates to labor and they can work through that. And

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 7>the company has been doing a lot of different things

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 7>in terms of increasing the overall productivity. They've also focusing

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:19.839
<v Speaker 7>more on some of what they would i esteem their

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 7>core business. They recently sold their freight brokerage business, which

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 7>is called Coyote. They sold that to RXO and that

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 7>should be a huge win for RXO because they can

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 7>really take that business maybe a lot further than YOUWPS

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 7>did because it really wasn't a focus for UPS management

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 7>over the years. It was more of a complimentary business

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 7>that probably works better outside of the UPS.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 2>They also made some acquisitions correct Mexico.

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 7>They do a lot of tucket acquisitions, and a lot

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 7>of the acquisitions that they're doing they're trying to get

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 7>kind of longer into the supply chain, if you will,

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 7>So you know some of the acquisitions they've done a

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 7>lot in healthcare industry. Healthcare is a is a very

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 7>interesting industry from a logistics standpoint because it comes with

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 7>higher margins. There's a lot of specialties that go on

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 7>and I'm sure everyone remembers during the pandemic, you know,

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 7>when we had the vaccines distributed. They had to be

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 7>super super cold, and you know, those kind of services

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 7>cost a lot more money than sending an envelope overseas,

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 7>and therefore it usually comes with higher margins, so it's

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 7>usually it's a very good business. And UPS and FedEx

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 7>are also looking at, you know, a step down from

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 7>the enterprise market, so the small to medium sized shipper,

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 7>which tend to have better margins as well. So UPS,

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 7>while they're divesting some businesses, they're leaning into other businesses

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 7>through these bolt on acquisitions.

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, I want to talk go back to something you

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 2>said about the search charges. Consumers are definitely pulling back

0:10:55.760 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 2>on their money. Fed X has said, UPS maybe had

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 2>said the same thing, that people are choosing a cheaper

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 2>option ground transportation instead of air freight to save money.

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is that being offset by these higher search charges?

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 2>And what does that mean as we head into the

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 2>most important season for them, you know, the holiday season?

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so I mean we're definitely seeing a trade down

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 7>effect to your point, So it maybe instead of having

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 7>expedited freight or freight that or a package that has

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 7>to go overnight. Maybe people are willing to take three

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 7>or five days. I know personally anecdotally. You know, when

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.319
<v Speaker 7>I when I'm doing online shopping, there's a lot more

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 7>options there, like of not having it overnight, and usually

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 7>when it's not overnight, then it's usually free, and I'm

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 7>always going to pick the free.

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Option, always only always always.

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I don't need a pair of pants that bad.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 7>I can wait a week. And so you know, you

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 7>are seeing that, you're also seeing an interesting shift. So

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 7>you know, we talked earlier that volumes are expected to

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 7>increase mid single ditch for their domestic market and slightly

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 7>up for their international market. Some of the volume growth

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 7>is coming out of China with these relatively new e

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 7>commerce providers like Sheen and Timu, And that's interesting because

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 7>they're kind of going under the radar with some duties

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.719
<v Speaker 7>where there's a deminimus rule. I know this again a

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 7>little wonky now, where if the value of the products

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 7>under eight hundred dollars, they don't face an extra duty.

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 7>And so a lot of freight is coming in from

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 7>China because you know, without a duty, and it's a

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 7>lot cheaper and kind of undercutting maybe things that people

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 7>could buy here in the United States. So the Biden

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 7>administration is looking at that and that that could change

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 7>some volumes on a negative aspect, because it's been a

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 7>good area of growth for the fedexes and eps's of

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 7>the world.

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Well ups third quarter earnings out this Thursday. That's ahead

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 2>of Wall Street's opening bell are thanks to Lee Glasgow,

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Transport, Logistics and Shipping analyst. Coming up

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg day Break, we again we'll chart the potential

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 2>rise of British banking with some prominent UK banks reporting

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 2>their latest earnings. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg.

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global look ahead

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 2>at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby in New York. Up later in our

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 2>program we'll look ahead to the sixteenth annual Brick Summit

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 2>in Russia. But first, ahead of upcoming earnings from some

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 2>of the UK's largest banks like Lloyd's and Barclay's, analysts

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>are turning more positive on the sector. Jeffries, Ubs and

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Goldman all bullish on British banking shares. Can the results

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 2>live up to the expectations for more. Let's go to

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak europe banker Caroline Hepger.

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Tom the boost to British banking brought about by high

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 3>interest rates could linger longer than thought, and Lissa turning

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 3>positive on the likes of nat West and Lloyd's, citing

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 3>the rewards of what they call the structural hedge, hundreds

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 3>of billions of pounds invested in the swaps market to

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 3>reduce sensitivity to interest rate movements. There's also a new

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 3>government in town if you haven't noticed, one determined to

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 3>bolster growth and bring in investment. That's something that UK

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 3>banks should be poised to profit from. Blueberg has been

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 3>speaking to Lloyd's CEO Charlie Nunn at the UK Investments

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Summit recently. None told Bloomberg's Farsi Laqua that he is

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 3>optimistic about Britain's future.

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 6>I think the really.

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 9>Important thing to get more investment in the UK is

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 9>first the clarity and a clear direction of the country.

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 9>And so the stability in the clarity this government's trying

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 9>to give, I think is really important.

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 6>Investors want to invest.

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 4>In the UK.

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 9>They're looking at the UK relative to Europe and the

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 9>US and Asia, and at the moment the UK looks

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 9>like a good destination. But the first thing is clarity instability.

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 9>The second thing is tell me where you're going to

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 9>invest alongside us, and do it in a way that

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 9>they us to bring private capital to work. We estimate

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 9>that there's about forty to fifty billion pounds worth of

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 9>investment per year for the next twenty years, so the

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 9>government can't afford that, but the private sector.

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 6>Really can make a difference. And then the third thing

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 6>is really enable the financial.

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 9>Services sector to unlock its potential to support that investment.

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 10>But Charlie, so you're one of the key components actually

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 10>try and get this foreign direct investment into the country.

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 6>Where would you deploy it?

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Where will it be deployed?

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, I know the government's going to come out with

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 6>their kind of industrial plan.

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 9>They're talking about eight sectors. Two examples that I think

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 9>there's huge opportunity. One is around the energy transition, and

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 9>the UK's already a leader around offshore wind, but floating wind,

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 9>onshore wind, the growth in solar, and then some of

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 9>the new technologies like carbon capture and hydrogen. There's huge

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 9>opportunities to invest and that also needs a clear plan

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 9>for the national grid and the electrical infrastructure. That's one

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 9>example of a huge opportunity for investment. Another's housing. So

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 9>the government's made a commitment to build a one point

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 9>five million new homes. We need more social and affordable

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 9>homes specifically, that's something we have called for as Lloyd's

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 9>Banking Group, and we really need to get the money invested,

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 9>start going behind breaking down the planning laws and building

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.359
<v Speaker 9>more homes and that'll be good for jobs and productivity

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 9>and create an environment that we can get the skills

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 9>for the investment in business.

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 10>Charlie, So, I guess a lot of people are concerned

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 10>by the fact that, of course this government needs banks,

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 10>as you say, to bring in private capital, to deploy

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 10>some of the money to help them actually also help

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 10>with the National Wealth Fund. At the same time they're

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 10>trying about taxing the banks.

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 6>So how do you square the two.

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 9>Well, see taxations a matter for the government to talk about,

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 9>but irrespective of whatever kind of political decision they take

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 9>on that. As Lloyd's Banking Group, as an example, we've

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 9>got a nine hundred billion pound balance sheet.

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 6>We do eighty to one hundred billion pounds worth of

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 6>lending per year. We have two hundred.

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 9>Billion pounds worth of pension assets we manage on behalf

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 9>of Britain pensioners. We need to put that money to

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 9>work and then we partner with some of the biggest

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 9>world's pension funds, private credit funds, and our job is

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 9>to bring our expertise to channel out into the UK.

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 9>So there's huge opportunity for us to continue to deploy

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 9>that capital in smarter ways that derives productivity, growth and

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 9>jobs to get the UK economy to being the fastest

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 9>growth economy in the G seven, which is a really

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 9>bold ambition.

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 10>A number of your competitors now Western Guard players have

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 10>done recent acquisitions showing basically that they really support this economy.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 10>Are you looking to do something likely as well?

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 9>So you know, we are now three years into the

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 9>five year strategy I laid out and the great uses

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.719
<v Speaker 9>it's very much a growth strategy and we're delivering well

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 9>against that. We're going to do an update in February

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 9>next year on the first checkpoint in that strategy and

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 9>I'm really pleased with the progress we've made. We've done

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 9>some Bolton acquisitions, but the core of our strategy is

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 9>an organic growth strategy and the great thing for Lloyd's

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 9>Banking Group is we are typically the number one or

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 9>number two player in every segment and product we participate in,

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 9>including in fact an investment in the UK project finance,

0:17:56.240 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 9>infrastructure finance, housing finance, where we lead in the UK. No,

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:04.479
<v Speaker 9>we'll look at acquisitions opportunistically. Our core strategy is organic

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 9>and we're.

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 6>Feeling good about where we're going.

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 10>What do you want on pensions?

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 6>Pensions?

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 10>But also there's a lot of talk on actually risk

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 10>taking and this takes years not months that the government has.

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so pensions are such an important part of the puzzle.

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 9>As I said, we are a leading pensions provider in

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 9>the UK two hundred billion pounds worth of pension money

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 9>and I think there's a few things that really matter.

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 9>The first is we need to get more of our

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 9>customers money into pensions.

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 6>About forty percent.

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 9>Of the UK households aren't on track for even a

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 9>basic living standard, and obviously giving them financial resilience is

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 9>good for the economy, so we need to increase enrollment

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 9>around pensions. The second thing is how can we invest

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 9>it safely and appropriately for them in high risk assets?

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 9>And actually that's more about conduct risk and fiduciary risk

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 9>than it is around changing or asking the investment managers

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 9>to invest more in those kinds of projects. We need

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 9>to look at how do you support customers to make.

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 6>Those choices in this country.

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 9>And that's something we're talking closely with the government and

0:18:59.359 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 9>the regulators about.

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 10>You know, the new Investment Minister, how many questions do

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 10>you think she'll feel from international investors about the budget?

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 10>Is this investment summit a little bit too soon as

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 10>we don't really know what happens to non darms, what

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 10>happens aster carried interest and other questions?

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 9>Well, no, And if the first thing to say is

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 9>you can hear the buzz in the room today, it's

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 9>great to see the excitement about investing in the UK

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 9>and have the international investors here. It's very very early

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 9>days for the new Investment ministrating four or five days in.

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 9>I know her ambition is to increase overseas investment into

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 9>the UK. And the kind of investors we're talking about

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 9>are the big international pension funds, the big international sovereign

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 9>wealth funds, the private credit funds, and they're going to

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 9>be looking for good projects with a good return with

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 9>a government and a country that's getting behind making those

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 9>investments successful, that's what will matter. It won't be some

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 9>of the things you're talking about, and so I hope

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 9>that she's really focused on engaging those kinds of organizations

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 9>and then working with our financial services sector which has

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 9>the expertise to put that money to work, and we're

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 9>d and financial service sector in the world.

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 6>Let me say that.

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 3>That was Lloyd's Bank CEO Charlie Nunn, perhaps Keir Starman

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 3>managing to calm the city's jitters with that investment summit

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 3>ahead of the autumn budget. So what is driving the

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 3>positive trajectory of the UK banking sector. It's something that

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>I've been talking to our finance reporter about, Harry Wilson.

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 11>I think there's a few things. Obviously, we're now heading

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 11>into a interest rate cutting cycle and people are looking

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 11>at what impact that's going to have on credit demand.

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 11>So obviously, on the one hand, falling interest rates aren't

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 11>that great for banks as they cut their margins. But

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 11>on the other hand, you could see a increase in

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 11>demand among customers for loans and that can be positive

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 11>in its own sense for the banks. So it's really

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 11>kind of a trade off there between those things. And

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.239
<v Speaker 11>then I think we also obviously we're looking out at

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 11>what the new government is going to mean for the

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 11>banking sector. So far it's being broadly positive, but obviously

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 11>we're waiting for the budget in the coming weeks.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 12>Yeah.

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, how's the sector performed to date? So we've just

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 3>come off Wall Street Bank earnings which have been very strong.

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 3>How is the sector in the UK performing well?

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 11>The share price has been very strong this year. So

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 11>among the number of the banks, we've got double digit increases,

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 11>you know, just to take one, but something like Bark

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 11>Pieces up around about fifty five percent at the moment,

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 11>Lloyd's up nearly thirty percent, that West over sixty percent.

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 11>One of the laggards relative laggards is HSBC that they're

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 11>less than about eight percent of the moment. But generally

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 11>the sector has been having a very good year.

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 3>And so then in terms of what we're expecting to

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.199
<v Speaker 3>come obviously, rate sensitive stocks light banks are in focus

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to interest rates. The Bank of England

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 3>has seen inflation four below the two percent target for

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 3>the first time since what twenty twenty one. April twenty

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty one, how do you think that will affect banks,

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 3>the loosening of central bank policy, the Bank of England

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 3>cutting interest rates.

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 11>I think one of the things we'll probably have to

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 11>be looking out for is particularly what banks they're around

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 11>cost cuts. So as as I mentioned, the cuts to

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 11>interest rates are actually you know, not seen that positively

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 11>for banks, particularly because it cuts into their margins. So

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 11>what we'll be then looking for is how banks adapt

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 11>to that. So you know, take one example, but we've

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 11>certainly seen at HSBT a lot of talk and speculation

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 11>around potential cost cuts as the bank looks to you know,

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 11>they're coming off a period in which they've had outsize earnings.

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 11>You know, this year or sorry last year was a

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 11>record year for their annual profits and so now that

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 11>we're that's likely to dampen. I think the focus among

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 11>the banks is probably going to be on how do

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 11>we cut our expenses given that we're probably going to

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 11>be expecting some kind of margin compression now in the

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 11>coming years.

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Also, as you say, ahead of the budget on the

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 3>thirtieth of October, we did hear from some British leading bankers,

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 3>including the CEO of Barclays. Are the UK Investments summited

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 3>only a few days ago. Has the new government done

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 3>something to bolster this sector? I mean, Barclay's was really

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 3>quite positive on the UK on investing in the UK.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.439
<v Speaker 3>What's the interplay between this new government and bankers in Britain.

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 11>It's very early days, so it's hard to say exactly

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 11>what we're going to guess. I mean, I think everything

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 11>kind of rests on the budget. Obviously, if there's some

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 11>particularly harsh tax writers for banks, and that could definitely

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 11>weigh under sector. I think at the moment, both sides

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 11>are feeling themselves out, basically trying to get a sense

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 11>of what the other's about. And I don't think as

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 11>yet that there's any particular sign that they was going

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 11>to be that's harsh in banks. But on the other hand,

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 11>you know, if we were to see some kind of

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 11>new bank tax in the budget, that could probably quite

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 11>rapidly change sentiment.

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, indeed, what are you on the lookout for in

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 3>terms of which of the banks might be of most

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 3>interest to you?

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 11>HSBC is the obvious, I think the probably the most

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 11>interesting one. At the moment, we've got a new CEO.

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 11>This is going to be his first set of results.

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 11>And there's an expectation now of some kind of at

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 11>least minor restructuring of the business, probably some major divisions

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 11>being combined, but also what they say about expenses and

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 11>the future strategy of the bank. For me HSBC is

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 11>going to be the one to watch this quarter. That said,

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 11>I think Barkleys could be an interesting one. We've seen

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 11>in the last few days. We've seen some very strong

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 11>results out of Wall Street. We've seen some very strong

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 11>trading results. Barclays is the UK bank of the highest

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 11>exposure to Wall Street, so this is clearly going to

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 11>be good news for Barklays and you get the sense

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 11>that they could have quite a good set of numbers.

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Co Q threes ces ben Kata Krishnan talked about the

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 3>US election posing risks globally, geopolitics posing risks globally. How

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 3>do you think banks are thinking about the election outcome

0:24:58.080 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 3>in the US? Is that a risk fact?

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 11>I think banks are relatively sanguine about it. You know,

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 11>they tend to take the views that whoever wins these elections,

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 11>that they'll adapt to whatever comes from it. Certainly, as

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 11>a sector, banks have proved pretty adaptable way over the years.

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 11>Whatever it's been thrown at them, whether it's market crashes

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 11>or whether it's changes in governments. I think they'll probably,

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 11>as they've always done, go with the flow. So it's

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 11>hard to say if one outcome is particularly negative for them.

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 11>I mean, you know, as a general rule, particularly if

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 11>you've got strong trading operations, a period of volatility actually

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 11>turns out to be pretty good for business. If a

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 11>Trump election led to a lot of market volatility, I

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 11>think that could be something that the banks would obviously

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 11>can well profit from.

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Many thanks to my Bloomberg colleague Carrie Wilson there for

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:52.479
<v Speaker 3>talking us through the outlook for the banking sector in

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 3>the UK. I'm Karine Hecger here in London, and you

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 3>can catch us every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak you

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 3>at beginning at six am in London. That's one am

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 3>on Wall Street.

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Tom, Thanks Caroline, and coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend,

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the Bricks Group of Nations hold their sixteenth annual summit

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 2>in Russia next week. We'll have more on what to expect.

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:27.360
<v Speaker 2>day Break Weekend, our global look ahead at the top

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>stories for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 2>in New York. The Bricks Group of Nations will hold

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 2>their sixteenth annual summit in Russia next week. Let's turn

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 2>out a Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast host Doug Chrisner for

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 2>a closer look Tom.

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 1>In the coming week, Russian President Vladimir Putin will be

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>hosting the Bricks Summit. This year's summit is especially important

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>because new members will be added. The founders that would

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>be Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa will formally

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>welcome four new countries. They are Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the United Arab Emirates. Now Saudi Arabia has been invited

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to join. It will be represented by its foreign minister.

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems like Russia in particular is intent on expanding

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>this alliance to counter the influence of the West, both

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>economically and politically. So for a closer look, let's bring

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in Bloomberg Salaia Mosen, senior Washington correspondent on the US

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>ECOGOV team, joining us from the nation's capital. So, Leah,

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 1>thank you for making time to chat with us. Can

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we start by taking a step back and looking broadly

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>at bricks, is it helpful to look at this alliance

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>as basically a countervailing force to the G seven.

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.719
<v Speaker 13>That is a really interesting way to look at it. Absolutely,

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 13>the G seven is knitted around Western countries. It is

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 13>US led and it's been a force of power for

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 13>quite a while. And these are countries that work together.

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 13>They work together through the global financial crisis, through COVID

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 13>and most recently through the Russia invasion on Ukraine and

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 13>falling in line with US led economic sanctions on Russia.

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 13>And that's the very thing that triggered a stronger bond

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 13>across the bricks and now bricks plus nations. And so

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 13>there is a reactive force there. It's the US led

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 13>coalition and the China led coalition. The relationship between the

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 13>bricks countries, though, is interesting because they don't always all

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 13>get along, but when it comes to finding a way

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 13>around the dollar, they found some common ground.

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about the dollar in a moment. Let's

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about the internal dynamics as we

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>know them, or as we understand them. You mentioned kind

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of maybe not seeing eye to eye. On one hand,

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we have Brazil and India democracies, I think we can

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>agree on that Russia China autocracies. I'm imagining that that

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>creates a bit of internal rivalry, does it not?

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely? Russia and China are running their countries very differently.

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.959
<v Speaker 13>There's always question about what would happen when there is

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 13>an eventual power transfer at hand. Brazil and India, they

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 13>have very different interests at hand. And then the countries

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 13>that you name that are now joining include a lot

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 13>of oil producing nations, and so those stakes are different

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 13>than what the other countries have.

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, both Saudi Arabia, although it's only been invited to

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>join the UAE, which has been given membership, and then Iran,

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So you're absolutely right not to leave out Russia in

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of oil producers. We've got two major military conflicts happening.

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>We've got Israel conducting war in Gaza and on the

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>northern border with Lebanon, Israel is fighting has be Lah.

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>How are these conflicts likely to enter the conversation.

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 13>The two sets of conflicts. On the one hand, it's

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 13>kinetic war, you know, bombs and blasts going on in

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 13>those two major conflicts. And then on the other hand,

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 13>between the China led coalition in the US coalition. It's

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 13>a proxy war through economic and diplomatic channels, and both

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 13>ways are damaging. Both types of wars are just proof

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 13>that the decades old global order established when World War

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 13>Two came to a close has started to come apart.

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 13>And so you'll hear a lot more about global or

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 13>geoeconomic fragmentation, which is coming against the backdrop of economic

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 13>populism and protectionism popping up in a lot of across

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 13>the globe, including the United States. We have two presidential candidates,

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 13>two parties, both of them have become protectionist parties, and

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 13>so we have overlapping and coinciding forces pulling apart of

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 13>the global order.

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>The other military conflict that we have to address is

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the Russian occupation of your I mentioned at the top

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of the conversation that the summit will be hosted by

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Russian President Vladimir Putin. To what extent is he going

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to try to gather more support for what is happening

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Russia's intentions in Ukraine?

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 13>Oh yeah, I mean, I think having allies, particularly with Russia,

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 13>the Russia's relationship with India and China is important for

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 13>Vladimir Putin. Right now, China has come out a little

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 13>bit more strongly in support of Russia. India is still

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 13>trying to toe the line a little bit. But those

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 13>relationships have limits to them, right If you just take

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 13>one example, that is that Russia was able to sell

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 13>a lot of its oil to India when the US

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 13>led coalition put a lot of caps on the amount

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 13>of oil Russian oil that could reach markets, and Vladimir

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 13>Putin after that ended up with a lot of Indian

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 13>rupees and he did not know what to do with

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 13>them because he cannot take that and buy the things

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 13>he needs, and so it didn't have the same exchange

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 13>ability value. And we're seeing similar data come through on

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 13>the Russia China relationship. But that being said, that's the technical,

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 13>sort of weedy stuff. Diplomatically, it's been hugely beneficial for

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 13>Russia to have a block of nations that is supporting

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 13>it in various levels of strength across the spectrum.

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Sole I'd like to pivot to how the dollar plays

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>into all of this. We've talked in the past, you

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and I about de dollarization, Whether the dollar is really

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>under threat right now, is the world's reserve currency. We

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>can talk about the challenges that you may see in

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a minute. First, I want to listen to a segment

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of a recent Bloomberg News interview with former President Donald

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump where the dollar was discussed. Here is Bloomberg editor

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in chief John Micklethwaite.

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 12>Can I ask you a particular thing about the dollar?

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 12>You've actually you've talked about wars at the New York

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 12>Economic Club. You said that if you lost the dollar

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 12>as a reserve currency, it would be like America losing

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 12>a wall. Yeah, you look at what you're going to

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:00.479
<v Speaker 12>do in terms of protectionism arrive country is to use

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 12>the other currencies and all that death is also going

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 12>to lessen the dollars status as of the world's reserve currency.

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 8>If you worry about the dollar is so secure, your

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 8>reserve currency is the strongest it'll ever be. The reserve

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 8>currency is under threat because you have Iran, you have Russia,

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 8>you have China. Once China is the one that you

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 8>have to worry about because.

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 13>They want it.

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 8>They want to have the wand be the thing of power.

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 8>So here's what I'm doing again. I hate to go

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 8>back to it. If somebody says, and I know countries

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 8>want to get out because they don't respect our leadership.

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 8>They look at this guy. They say, you've got to

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 8>be kidding. And she's worse than him, by the way

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 8>she's I never thought i'd say this. She is not

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 8>as smart as Biden. If you can believe, this is

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 8>not what we had four years of this, this lunacy,

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 8>and we can't have anymore. We're not going to have

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 8>a country left. Okay. Currency very important, yes, and if

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 8>you want to go to third world if you want

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 8>to go to third world status, lose your reserve currency.

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 8>We have to have that. We cannot lose it if

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 8>you'll go to third world status in this country, because

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 8>you take a look at the way things are running.

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 8>If a country tells me, Sarah, we like you very much,

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 8>but we're going to no longer adhere to being in

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 8>the reserve currency. We're not going to salute the dollar anymore,

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 8>I'll say that's okay. And you're going to pay a

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 8>one hundred percent tariff on everything you sell into the

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 8>United States. And we love your product. I help you

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 8>sell a lot of it into the United States, but

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 8>you're going to pay one hundred percent tariff. He will

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 8>then follow it up by saying, sir, it would be

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:37.919
<v Speaker 8>an honor to stay with the reserve currency. I will

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 8>be that will be like just playing that's not even chess,

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 8>that's checkers.

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Former President Trump there in conversation with Bloomberg editor in

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>chief John Micklethwaite. Let's bring in Bloomberg Solea Mosen, who

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 1>has been talking with me about the upcoming Brick summit

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in Russia. Sole, you've written a lot about dedollarization. Was

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>there anything in that conversation that you want to push

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>back again?

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 13>Well, one thing is that Trump is I mean, yeah,

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 13>he's right that countries are talking about moving away from

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 13>the dollar, but he's wrong that any country has actually

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 13>actively abandoned the dollar. No one has. If you just

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 13>I'll just give you two data points. Eighty eight percent

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:19.240
<v Speaker 13>of the world's foreign exchange transactions take place in the dollar.

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 13>The biggest rival that people talk about is China, and

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 13>that's who Trump by name has said, is gunning to

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 13>drop the dollar and make its own yuan the reserve asset.

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 13>Their figure, their equivalent figure is seven percent of global

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 13>foreign exchange transactions. So it's a very big disparity. So

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 13>no one has abandoned the dollar, and it's actually hard

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 13>to abandon the dollar. There's no clear alternative. The US

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 13>is so large and so deeply entrenched in the global

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 13>system with its currency that dropping the dollar would be

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 13>like the lingua franca not no longer being English. English

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 13>is no longer the universal language. Dollar is no longer

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 13>the universal currency.

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 13>That's how difficult it is.

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>So maybe we can call it aspirational to replace the

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>dollar as the global reserve currency. That said, could the

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 1>dollars dominance be challenged, even in a small way that

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 1>could maybe provide a little bit of disruption.

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 13>One thing that's important to state is that the and

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 13>US officials should not be complacent, and Trump is assuring

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:26.280
<v Speaker 13>that he would not be complacent with any discussion about

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 13>countries wanting to come together and move away from the dollar,

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 13>because it is such a privileged status for the US

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 13>and everyone who lives in the US. Every consumer benefits

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 13>from that status, and then companies and countries around the

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 13>world benefit from that too. The biggest threat to the

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 13>dollar's dominance is not externally that any other country could

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 13>take over or ditch the dollar. Really, the threats come

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 13>from internal problems are massive debt and deficits. Some of

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 13>the playing chicken with our public financing issues, making sure

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 13>that no one is abusing the privileged position that the

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 13>dollar gives us in the world, which is basically saying,

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 13>let's not overuse sanctions, let's not overuse the dollar as

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 13>a tool. Those are a couple of the key components

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 13>to remember there.

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Now, Former President Trump, in the conversation with John Micklethwaite,

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>was mentioning the Chinese currency, the ywan. Right now, given

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>everything that's going on in China, the challenges that the

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>economy has been confronted with, that seems like a long shot,

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it.

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 13>It is a long shot. China is, yes, the second

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 13>largest economy in the world, but it's number two by

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 13>a large, large gap. It would take numbers two, three,

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 13>and four, so China, Japan, and Germany to come together

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 13>and then you can be bigger than the US in

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 13>terms of economic size. The other piece to add there

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 13>is that China does not have the transparency and democratic

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 13>values that investors have been accustomed to for eighty years

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 13>now in the world reserve asset. The reason that investors

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 13>flee to the dollar and US assets in times of

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:10.359
<v Speaker 13>trouble or turmoil is because they know that it is

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 13>underpinned by a strong democracy. We have independent institutions, green

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 13>and fair elections, rule of law. Unless and because investors

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 13>are not conditioned to expect this, it will take a

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 13>lot for investors to change that. And I don't see

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:26.240
<v Speaker 13>that happening overnight.

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 1>And on top of that, the Chinese currency is not

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 1>free floating. It's managed, very managed by the PBOC exactly.

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 13>That comes down to the transparency angle. It's not market

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 13>forces that determine where the currency is at and what

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 13>is going on in the economy. It's also still largely

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 13>a managed economy.

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>So Leia, thank you so much for making time to

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 1>help us preview the Brick Summit. In the week Ahead,

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Saliya Mosen, Senior Washington correspondent. She's also the author

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of Paper Soldiers, How the weaponization of the Dollar change

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the World Order. I'm Doug. You can join us weekdays

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>for the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast, where we dive into

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the stories moving markets in the APAC region. It's available

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcast.

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Tom and that does it for this edition of Bloomberg

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 2>day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at five

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 2>am Wall Street Time for the latest on markets overseas

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:19.919
<v Speaker 2>and the news you need to start your day. I'm

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Tom Buzby. Stay with US. Top stories and global business

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 2>headlines are coming up right now.