WEBVTT - Guns Part 1: The Sudden Celebrity of Sir John Knight

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:21.396
<v Speaker 1>Bushkin. Over the next stretch of revisionist history, we have

0:00:21.436 --> 0:00:25.516
<v Speaker 1>a special treat for you, six episodes, all devoted to

0:00:25.596 --> 0:00:29.316
<v Speaker 1>one theme, an examination of the many, weird and strange

0:00:29.356 --> 0:00:33.916
<v Speaker 1>corners of the American obsession with guns. It's about what

0:00:33.996 --> 0:00:37.076
<v Speaker 1>we don't know, what we get wrong, how we screwed up,

0:00:37.236 --> 0:00:40.916
<v Speaker 1>and how utterly bizarre things get in a country where

0:00:40.916 --> 0:00:43.756
<v Speaker 1>guns stand at the center of our culture. Our journey

0:00:43.796 --> 0:00:47.636
<v Speaker 1>begins in seventeenth century England with a mysterious merchant named

0:00:47.676 --> 0:00:52.076
<v Speaker 1>John Knight, who inexplicably has become a twenty first century

0:00:52.156 --> 0:00:55.276
<v Speaker 1>legal celebrity. Then on to the New York City subways,

0:00:55.716 --> 0:00:58.436
<v Speaker 1>the hallowed halls of the Supreme Court, a little town

0:00:58.476 --> 0:01:01.716
<v Speaker 1>in rural Alabama, the south side of Chicago, and the

0:01:01.756 --> 0:01:06.076
<v Speaker 1>wild wob West Dodge City. To be exact, I'll show

0:01:06.116 --> 0:01:09.756
<v Speaker 1>you what it means to get out of Dodge. We'll

0:01:09.796 --> 0:01:13.156
<v Speaker 1>consider a what if involving the assassination of Robert Kennedy.

0:01:13.396 --> 0:01:16.076
<v Speaker 1>I'll shoot assault rifles in a range in the woods

0:01:16.076 --> 0:01:19.316
<v Speaker 1>of North Carolina and sit in the basement of the

0:01:19.396 --> 0:01:23.236
<v Speaker 1>University of Chicago Hospital as an er doc pours out

0:01:23.236 --> 0:01:25.556
<v Speaker 1>his heart to me. Now, as you may already know

0:01:25.836 --> 0:01:29.276
<v Speaker 1>you can hear this entire series starting right now by

0:01:29.276 --> 0:01:33.036
<v Speaker 1>becoming a pushkin Plus subscriber. You can subscribe on Apple

0:01:33.076 --> 0:01:38.236
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts or on our website Pushkin fm, slash Plus, or

0:01:38.636 --> 0:01:42.316
<v Speaker 1>hear the episodes weekly right here in the Revisionist History Feed.

0:01:42.676 --> 0:01:44.516
<v Speaker 1>We'd also love to hear from you as you listen.

0:01:44.676 --> 0:01:49.676
<v Speaker 1>You can write into our contact form at revisionististory dot com.

0:01:50.156 --> 0:02:03.076
<v Speaker 1>All right, here we go. It's sixteen eighty six in Bristol,

0:02:03.556 --> 0:02:07.196
<v Speaker 1>a major port and manufacturing center on the southwest coast

0:02:07.196 --> 0:02:11.476
<v Speaker 1>of England. A local merchant named John Knight, Sir John

0:02:11.516 --> 0:02:15.076
<v Speaker 1>Knight is riding up a steep road outside the city

0:02:15.356 --> 0:02:20.236
<v Speaker 1>to an Anglican church, Saint Michael's on the hill greystone

0:02:20.796 --> 0:02:25.436
<v Speaker 1>slate roof sturdy walls built during medieval times to withstand

0:02:25.476 --> 0:02:29.276
<v Speaker 1>the full brunt of hostile force. The city of Bristol

0:02:29.716 --> 0:02:35.676
<v Speaker 1>spread out below. Sir John Knight bursts in and then,

0:02:36.836 --> 0:02:55.796
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, John Lone. My name is Malcolm Gladwell.

0:02:55.956 --> 0:03:00.116
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Revisionist History, my podcast about things overlooked

0:03:00.396 --> 0:03:05.356
<v Speaker 1>and misunderstood. In this episode, I invite you to descend

0:03:05.396 --> 0:03:09.756
<v Speaker 1>with me into the deep and bottomless historical pit. That

0:03:09.956 --> 0:03:15.676
<v Speaker 1>is Sir John Knight, the irrepressible Englishman who has achieved

0:03:15.996 --> 0:03:20.076
<v Speaker 1>more than three centuries after his death, a sudden and

0:03:20.396 --> 0:03:42.636
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary celebrity. How was it that the John Knight case

0:03:43.276 --> 0:03:46.196
<v Speaker 1>came to such a promise? Who uncovered it? It doesn't

0:03:46.236 --> 0:03:48.196
<v Speaker 1>sound like this wasn't a case that was in There

0:03:48.196 --> 0:03:49.996
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a famous case name at the time.

0:03:50.516 --> 0:03:50.796
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:03:50.876 --> 0:03:51.436
<v Speaker 3>I hate to say.

0:03:51.436 --> 0:03:54.276
<v Speaker 4>It's like, you know, if you talk about history, like

0:03:54.316 --> 0:03:55.716
<v Speaker 4>you know, you can go to Africa and find a

0:03:55.796 --> 0:03:57.956
<v Speaker 4>rock with somebody's name on it. This is, you know,

0:03:58.036 --> 0:04:02.476
<v Speaker 4>founded by white guy in nineteen eighteen. No, it was existent, right,

0:04:02.516 --> 0:04:04.116
<v Speaker 4>it was there, It's always been there.

0:04:04.996 --> 0:04:09.676
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted to explain how that happened and why

0:04:09.716 --> 0:04:12.956
<v Speaker 1>he matters. And I know that this is something you've

0:04:12.956 --> 0:04:17.436
<v Speaker 1>thought about, so I naturally wanted to call you. First

0:04:17.476 --> 0:04:23.396
<v Speaker 1>question sulled for me. Who is the first modern legal

0:04:23.436 --> 0:04:27.476
<v Speaker 1>scholar to reference Sir John Knight?

0:04:27.996 --> 0:04:31.596
<v Speaker 5>Depends on what you mean by William Hawkins into seventy

0:04:31.716 --> 0:04:34.196
<v Speaker 5>six in his seventeen sixteen treatise.

0:04:34.716 --> 0:04:38.276
<v Speaker 1>I mean last fifty years his most recent celebrity.

0:04:39.876 --> 0:04:42.916
<v Speaker 5>Who well, I mean he was around in case law,

0:04:43.236 --> 0:04:44.916
<v Speaker 5>you know, not as common as he's been in the

0:04:44.916 --> 0:04:47.916
<v Speaker 5>twenty first century. But he was. He was always around

0:04:49.276 --> 0:04:51.716
<v Speaker 5>in case law to some degree. You know, shows up

0:04:51.716 --> 0:04:54.636
<v Speaker 5>in a major eighteen forty three case in North Carolina

0:04:55.076 --> 0:04:59.596
<v Speaker 5>and then another nineteen sixty eight North Carolina case, among others.

0:05:00.276 --> 0:05:03.476
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think, I you know, I was. I

0:05:03.516 --> 0:05:07.996
<v Speaker 1>got really interested in the way the Second Amendment debate

0:05:08.076 --> 0:05:13.316
<v Speaker 1>has been transformed, and instead of focus on history and

0:05:13.516 --> 0:05:15.276
<v Speaker 1>got the reason I got into is that I got

0:05:15.316 --> 0:05:17.116
<v Speaker 1>really fascinated by the Sir John Knight case.

0:05:17.836 --> 0:05:19.756
<v Speaker 6>Now oh, yes, right.

0:05:20.236 --> 0:05:22.676
<v Speaker 1>And everyone says, oh, the person you have to talk

0:05:22.716 --> 0:05:26.516
<v Speaker 1>to is Joyce Malcolm. So here I am, and here

0:05:26.516 --> 0:05:27.196
<v Speaker 1>you are.

0:05:27.556 --> 0:05:28.116
<v Speaker 5>Here I am.

0:05:29.156 --> 0:05:31.716
<v Speaker 1>When you were doing your book, your original work on this,

0:05:32.196 --> 0:05:34.676
<v Speaker 1>how did you come across the Sir John Knight case.

0:05:35.196 --> 0:05:37.756
<v Speaker 7>Ah, well, it's a long time gone out.

0:05:38.756 --> 0:05:41.636
<v Speaker 1>John Knight's name is spoken first only in the smallest

0:05:41.676 --> 0:05:46.476
<v Speaker 1>of historical circles. Then it gets repeated again and again

0:05:46.876 --> 0:05:50.036
<v Speaker 1>with increasing frequency in bigger and bigger rooms.

0:05:50.556 --> 0:05:52.876
<v Speaker 8>I was at a conference in d C where they

0:05:52.876 --> 0:05:56.236
<v Speaker 8>were discussing Second Amendment issues, and they had people giving

0:05:56.276 --> 0:05:58.956
<v Speaker 8>papers from all perspectives, and I was just there to

0:05:59.076 --> 0:06:02.116
<v Speaker 8>offer some historical input and I found myself having to

0:06:02.116 --> 0:06:05.516
<v Speaker 8>clarify some of the basic details and mis assertions have

0:06:05.556 --> 0:06:08.676
<v Speaker 8>been made about what had actually happened. So I said,

0:06:08.676 --> 0:06:10.276
<v Speaker 8>I happened to know about this because I've read a

0:06:10.276 --> 0:06:11.196
<v Speaker 8>lot of the sources.

0:06:11.476 --> 0:06:14.436
<v Speaker 1>Do we know what Sir John looked like, his family life,

0:06:14.756 --> 0:06:18.596
<v Speaker 1>his personal circumstances, Not really, but we do know something

0:06:18.596 --> 0:06:23.756
<v Speaker 1>of his character, principled to a fault, contentious, possess of

0:06:23.796 --> 0:06:25.956
<v Speaker 1>a steadfastness of mind.

0:06:26.196 --> 0:06:32.716
<v Speaker 6>Indeed, so he was a Bristol merchant, he was from

0:06:32.836 --> 0:06:36.996
<v Speaker 6>quite an important Bristol mercantile family, and perhaps because his

0:06:37.116 --> 0:06:42.356
<v Speaker 6>father had been a sugar maker, Sir John Knight appears

0:06:42.396 --> 0:06:44.436
<v Speaker 6>to have gone out to the West Indies and spent

0:06:44.476 --> 0:06:48.796
<v Speaker 6>a period of time there, apparently rather controversially, because when

0:06:48.796 --> 0:06:52.516
<v Speaker 6>he then applied a couple of years before we're deinning

0:06:52.556 --> 0:06:55.916
<v Speaker 6>with to be the governor of the Leeward Islands, he

0:06:55.996 --> 0:06:59.436
<v Speaker 6>appears to have been vetoed by the people there saying

0:06:59.436 --> 0:07:01.396
<v Speaker 6>that from their experience of him, he was the last

0:07:01.436 --> 0:07:03.956
<v Speaker 6>person that they wanted to come out as the governor,

0:07:05.036 --> 0:07:09.076
<v Speaker 6>and it may have been partly his resentment at that throwback,

0:07:09.236 --> 0:07:12.196
<v Speaker 6>people have suggested may have been one reason why he

0:07:12.316 --> 0:07:15.636
<v Speaker 6>turned against the government of James the Second, which up

0:07:15.676 --> 0:07:20.276
<v Speaker 6>until that point he had been very strongly supporting. So

0:07:20.916 --> 0:07:22.916
<v Speaker 6>he appears to have been a man of a short

0:07:22.956 --> 0:07:27.996
<v Speaker 6>tempera much disliked by many other people, highly manipulative.

0:07:32.796 --> 0:07:35.796
<v Speaker 1>But do we need to make friends of our heroes, No,

0:07:35.916 --> 0:07:38.876
<v Speaker 1>we don't. What we demand of our heroes is that

0:07:38.876 --> 0:07:43.036
<v Speaker 1>they serve some larger cause, that they stand for something

0:07:43.356 --> 0:07:46.516
<v Speaker 1>that their name would be uttered with reverence on some

0:07:46.756 --> 0:07:47.916
<v Speaker 1>grand stage.

0:07:48.436 --> 0:07:52.596
<v Speaker 9>I know you've had a substantial debate with your friends

0:07:52.596 --> 0:07:55.036
<v Speaker 9>on the other side about the Statute of Northampton.

0:07:55.676 --> 0:07:59.476
<v Speaker 1>Do you know who that is? Neil Gorsuch, Supreme Court Justice,

0:07:59.996 --> 0:08:03.956
<v Speaker 1>during oral arguments in November of twenty twenty one, posing

0:08:03.996 --> 0:08:07.556
<v Speaker 1>a question to the legendary appellate lawyer Paul Clement.

0:08:08.316 --> 0:08:10.196
<v Speaker 9>We haven't heard about that today, and I just wanted

0:08:10.196 --> 0:08:10.956
<v Speaker 9>to give you a chance.

0:08:12.596 --> 0:08:14.836
<v Speaker 10>Thank you, Justice Gorsich. I'd say just a couple of

0:08:14.876 --> 0:08:16.916
<v Speaker 10>quick things about the Statute of Northampton.

0:08:17.196 --> 0:08:19.116
<v Speaker 1>Wait for it. Wait for it.

0:08:19.836 --> 0:08:22.556
<v Speaker 10>First of all, I think that it was very clear

0:08:22.756 --> 0:08:25.956
<v Speaker 10>from the Knight's case and the treatises that this Court

0:08:26.036 --> 0:08:28.996
<v Speaker 10>relied on in Heller that by the time of the

0:08:28.996 --> 0:08:30.916
<v Speaker 10>framing of the Knight's Case.

0:08:41.196 --> 0:08:43.956
<v Speaker 1>When the final accounting is done of the twenty first century,

0:08:44.276 --> 0:08:47.956
<v Speaker 1>a handful of Supreme Court cases will stand out as landmarks.

0:08:48.516 --> 0:08:52.196
<v Speaker 1>The Citizens United Case from twenty ten, for example, which

0:08:52.196 --> 0:08:56.196
<v Speaker 1>freed corporations to spend enormous amounts of money on political candidates,

0:08:56.756 --> 0:09:01.396
<v Speaker 1>the decision to overturn abortion rights, and very high on

0:09:01.476 --> 0:09:05.356
<v Speaker 1>that list, a pivotal gun rights case that came before

0:09:05.356 --> 0:09:09.276
<v Speaker 1>the Court in late twenty twenty one.

0:09:10.916 --> 0:09:13.996
<v Speaker 10>We will hear argument this morning in case twenty eight

0:09:14.156 --> 0:09:19.276
<v Speaker 10>forty three New York State Rifle and Pistol Association versus Bruin.

0:09:20.236 --> 0:09:24.076
<v Speaker 1>New York Rifle and Pistol otherwise known as the Bruin Case.

0:09:24.716 --> 0:09:27.996
<v Speaker 1>Broome was about the Second Amendment to the Constitution, a

0:09:28.036 --> 0:09:32.396
<v Speaker 1>well regulated militia comma being necessary to the security of

0:09:32.436 --> 0:09:35.276
<v Speaker 1>a free state Comma the right of the people to

0:09:35.356 --> 0:09:40.476
<v Speaker 1>keep and bear arms comma shall not be infringed. What

0:09:40.516 --> 0:09:44.156
<v Speaker 1>does that sentence mean? For years and years scholars have

0:09:44.276 --> 0:09:46.556
<v Speaker 1>argued about that. We even weighed in on it here

0:09:46.556 --> 0:09:50.516
<v Speaker 1>at Revisionist History. If you remember in season three's Divide

0:09:50.556 --> 0:09:54.476
<v Speaker 1>and Conquer episode with an investigation of the significance of

0:09:54.516 --> 0:09:58.116
<v Speaker 1>the commas that surround the phrase being necessary to the

0:09:58.116 --> 0:10:03.036
<v Speaker 1>security of a free state. But then along comes the

0:10:03.076 --> 0:10:07.076
<v Speaker 1>Bruin Case. For one hundred years, a law has been

0:10:07.116 --> 0:10:09.316
<v Speaker 1>on the books in New York State that says you

0:10:09.356 --> 0:10:12.196
<v Speaker 1>can only get a handgun if you prove you need

0:10:12.236 --> 0:10:16.036
<v Speaker 1>one for some specific purpose. And the gun lovers of

0:10:16.076 --> 0:10:20.956
<v Speaker 1>New York are unhappy about this. They sue. The Supreme

0:10:20.996 --> 0:10:23.956
<v Speaker 1>Court agrees to take the case, and in November of

0:10:23.956 --> 0:10:27.356
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one, lawyers for both sides gather for what

0:10:27.436 --> 0:10:31.156
<v Speaker 1>is the first stage in all Supreme Court cases, oral arguments.

0:10:31.836 --> 0:10:35.356
<v Speaker 1>They're in the Court's Central Chamber on First Street, across

0:10:35.356 --> 0:10:39.276
<v Speaker 1>from the Capital, an imposing room in the grand Neoclassical

0:10:39.316 --> 0:10:43.956
<v Speaker 1>Revival style, forty four foot ceilings twenty four ionic columns

0:10:43.956 --> 0:10:48.196
<v Speaker 1>in marble shipped from Liguria, Italy. The justices are sitting

0:10:48.236 --> 0:10:51.476
<v Speaker 1>all in a row behind a long curved Mahogany table,

0:10:51.796 --> 0:10:53.636
<v Speaker 1>there to hear the lawyers on both sides of the

0:10:53.636 --> 0:10:58.716
<v Speaker 1>Bruin case present their oral arguments. The room's packed, A

0:10:58.756 --> 0:11:00.876
<v Speaker 1>sense of anticipation is in the.

0:11:00.836 --> 0:11:04.836
<v Speaker 10>Air, mister Chief Justice, and may it please the Court

0:11:05.436 --> 0:11:08.676
<v Speaker 10>the text of the second Amendment in Shrine's aright, not

0:11:08.756 --> 0:11:11.596
<v Speaker 10>just to keep arms, but to bear them, and the

0:11:11.676 --> 0:11:15.636
<v Speaker 10>relevant history and tradition exhaustively surveyed by this Court in

0:11:15.676 --> 0:11:20.076
<v Speaker 10>the Heller decision confirm that the text protects an individual

0:11:20.196 --> 0:11:24.396
<v Speaker 10>right to carry firearms outside the home for purposes of

0:11:24.476 --> 0:11:25.316
<v Speaker 10>self defense.

0:11:26.236 --> 0:11:29.156
<v Speaker 1>Paul Clement, lawyer for the gun rights group.

0:11:29.076 --> 0:11:31.396
<v Speaker 11>I'm happy to continue by point I missed a Clement,

0:11:31.796 --> 0:11:33.476
<v Speaker 11>I'm sorry to interrupt you.

0:11:33.956 --> 0:11:37.716
<v Speaker 1>That's Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Thomas would go on

0:11:37.756 --> 0:11:40.836
<v Speaker 1>to write the Court's majority opinion in the case. This

0:11:41.436 --> 0:11:44.316
<v Speaker 1>is the moment where he tips his hand shows us

0:11:44.716 --> 0:11:45.476
<v Speaker 1>where he's leaning.

0:11:46.036 --> 0:11:54.436
<v Speaker 11>If we analyze this and use history, tradition texts of

0:11:54.556 --> 0:11:56.356
<v Speaker 11>the Second Amendment, we're going to have to do it

0:11:56.396 --> 0:12:03.476
<v Speaker 11>by analogy. So can you give me a regulation in

0:12:03.716 --> 0:12:08.156
<v Speaker 11>history that is a base that would form a basis

0:12:08.196 --> 0:12:11.076
<v Speaker 11>for legitimate regulation today. If we're going to do it

0:12:11.076 --> 0:12:14.116
<v Speaker 11>by analogy, what would we analogize it to? What would

0:12:14.116 --> 0:12:14.716
<v Speaker 11>that look like?

0:12:15.996 --> 0:12:19.036
<v Speaker 1>If you were a law student armed with a yellow highlighter,

0:12:19.356 --> 0:12:24.196
<v Speaker 1>you would underline the words history and tradition. Why Because

0:12:24.236 --> 0:12:27.556
<v Speaker 1>Thomas is telling us something crucial here. He doesn't care

0:12:27.596 --> 0:12:30.236
<v Speaker 1>about the commas in the Second Amendment. He doesn't care

0:12:30.276 --> 0:12:32.996
<v Speaker 1>about the arcane theories of the legal scholars. He doesn't

0:12:33.036 --> 0:12:35.236
<v Speaker 1>even care about what the citizens of New York State

0:12:35.476 --> 0:12:38.556
<v Speaker 1>may or may not think about restricting handguns. He cares

0:12:38.596 --> 0:12:42.796
<v Speaker 1>about what the Founders thought when they wrote the Second Amendment.

0:12:43.436 --> 0:12:45.116
<v Speaker 1>And when he says you're going to have to do

0:12:45.156 --> 0:12:48.116
<v Speaker 1>it by analogy, what he means is the only way

0:12:48.196 --> 0:12:52.676
<v Speaker 1>to decide whether a restriction on guns is valid, is

0:12:52.796 --> 0:12:56.316
<v Speaker 1>consistent with the Second Amendment? Is did the Founders way

0:12:56.316 --> 0:13:00.356
<v Speaker 1>back when ever, consider a restriction that looks like this

0:13:00.476 --> 0:13:03.076
<v Speaker 1>New York law, would they have been okay with it?

0:13:03.716 --> 0:13:08.196
<v Speaker 11>And Clement agrees, So can you give me a regulation

0:13:10.516 --> 0:13:14.716
<v Speaker 11>in history that is a base that would form a

0:13:14.756 --> 0:13:17.916
<v Speaker 11>basis for a legitimate regulation today.

0:13:17.996 --> 0:13:22.556
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's what this case is about. We're arguing history here.

0:13:23.116 --> 0:13:25.316
<v Speaker 12>Mister Chief Justice, and may it please the court.

0:13:26.156 --> 0:13:29.236
<v Speaker 1>Then the attorney for the other side stands up, Barbara Underwood,

0:13:29.556 --> 0:13:31.756
<v Speaker 1>Solicitor General of the State of New York.

0:13:32.316 --> 0:13:35.676
<v Speaker 12>For centuries, English and American law have imposed limits on

0:13:35.796 --> 0:13:39.196
<v Speaker 12>carrying firearms in public and the interests of public safety.

0:13:39.716 --> 0:13:43.676
<v Speaker 12>The history runs from the fourteenth century Statute of Northampton,

0:13:43.756 --> 0:13:47.756
<v Speaker 12>which prohibited carrying arms in fairs and markets, and other

0:13:47.836 --> 0:13:52.516
<v Speaker 12>public gathering places to similar laws adopted by half of

0:13:52.556 --> 0:13:55.836
<v Speaker 12>the American colonies and states in the Founding period.

0:13:56.116 --> 0:13:59.876
<v Speaker 1>The Statute of Northampton. That's the third time we've heard

0:13:59.916 --> 0:14:02.756
<v Speaker 1>it mentioned in a case heard in the twenty first

0:14:02.756 --> 0:14:06.196
<v Speaker 1>century about a law passed in the twentieth century. The

0:14:06.276 --> 0:14:08.916
<v Speaker 1>court has asked for insight into how the Founders felt

0:14:08.956 --> 0:14:12.556
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteenth century, and the lawyers said, well, then

0:14:12.916 --> 0:14:16.956
<v Speaker 1>we need to look to the fourteenth century. Thirteen twenty

0:14:17.076 --> 0:14:21.116
<v Speaker 1>eight to be precise, your honor, during the reign of

0:14:21.236 --> 0:14:25.116
<v Speaker 1>Edward the Second, the English Parliament passed the Statute of Northampton,

0:14:25.636 --> 0:14:29.356
<v Speaker 1>which says that no man shall disturb the peace by

0:14:29.476 --> 0:14:34.996
<v Speaker 1>riding armed night or day, without quote forfeiting their bodies

0:14:35.036 --> 0:14:39.476
<v Speaker 1>to prison at the King's pleasure. The Statute of Northampton

0:14:39.836 --> 0:14:42.916
<v Speaker 1>is part of English common law. English common law is

0:14:42.916 --> 0:14:46.596
<v Speaker 1>what the first English settlers brought with them on the Mayflower.

0:14:47.116 --> 0:14:50.116
<v Speaker 1>English common law is what the Founding fathers learned in school.

0:14:51.036 --> 0:14:53.676
<v Speaker 1>You want an analogy from history, you want to play

0:14:53.796 --> 0:14:57.556
<v Speaker 1>early history, I give you a crucial law from thirteen

0:14:57.636 --> 0:15:02.316
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight, which absolutely the Founders knew about, that restricts

0:15:02.396 --> 0:15:06.636
<v Speaker 1>guns way more than anything. We're talking about in this court,

0:15:07.236 --> 0:15:13.116
<v Speaker 1>your honor cases are chess. This is check. The only

0:15:13.156 --> 0:15:15.396
<v Speaker 1>way the gun rights crowd can win is if they

0:15:15.436 --> 0:15:18.996
<v Speaker 1>can find their own bit of ancient history that trump's

0:15:19.316 --> 0:15:32.996
<v Speaker 1>the Statute of Northampton, and incredibly they do. John Lowe, Yeah, yeah,

0:15:33.276 --> 0:15:35.836
<v Speaker 1>going back to when you were doing your book, your

0:15:35.996 --> 0:15:38.676
<v Speaker 1>original work on this, how did you come across the

0:15:38.956 --> 0:15:39.876
<v Speaker 1>Sir John Knight case.

0:15:40.436 --> 0:15:44.556
<v Speaker 7>Ah, well, it's a long time ago now, but I

0:15:44.596 --> 0:15:47.756
<v Speaker 7>looked through all of the cases and there are these

0:15:47.796 --> 0:15:50.876
<v Speaker 7>little handbooks on what the law was at different times

0:15:50.916 --> 0:15:54.156
<v Speaker 7>that were published is to help justices of the peace

0:15:54.236 --> 0:15:57.356
<v Speaker 7>and judges. I looked through the laws. I did a

0:15:57.396 --> 0:16:05.116
<v Speaker 7>lot of manuscript reading and really investigating what Parliament was doing,

0:16:05.236 --> 0:16:06.636
<v Speaker 7>what was happening at that time.

0:16:07.036 --> 0:16:11.196
<v Speaker 1>Joyce Malcolm the Patrick Henry Professor of Constitutional Law and

0:16:11.236 --> 0:16:14.756
<v Speaker 1>the Second Amendment at the ntonin Scalia Law School at

0:16:14.796 --> 0:16:19.316
<v Speaker 1>George Mason University in Virginia. In a world where history

0:16:19.356 --> 0:16:24.196
<v Speaker 1>matters more than law or public sentiment, historians become heroes.

0:16:25.156 --> 0:16:28.916
<v Speaker 1>The magazine National Review once described Joyce Malcolm as the

0:16:29.076 --> 0:16:33.036
<v Speaker 1>nice girl who saved the Second Amendment. She quote looks

0:16:33.076 --> 0:16:37.476
<v Speaker 1>nothing like a hardened veteran of the gun control wars. Small,

0:16:38.076 --> 0:16:41.636
<v Speaker 1>slender and bookish. She's a wisp of a woman who

0:16:41.796 --> 0:16:45.876
<v Speaker 1>enjoys plunging into the archives and sitting through panel discussions

0:16:46.316 --> 0:16:51.156
<v Speaker 1>at academic conferences. Malcolm felt the argument over gun rights

0:16:51.396 --> 0:16:54.956
<v Speaker 1>had been set adrift from history. If we didn't know

0:16:54.996 --> 0:16:57.596
<v Speaker 1>what the founders thought, how would we know what we

0:16:57.716 --> 0:17:00.876
<v Speaker 1>should think. In her most famous book, To Keep and

0:17:00.916 --> 0:17:03.556
<v Speaker 1>Bear Arms, The Origin of an American Right, she set

0:17:03.556 --> 0:17:06.716
<v Speaker 1>out to answer that question, and while pouring through case

0:17:06.716 --> 0:17:10.396
<v Speaker 1>books from the eighteenth and nineteenth century, she found it

0:17:10.996 --> 0:17:14.956
<v Speaker 1>the key that unlocked the whole mystery. No more than

0:17:14.996 --> 0:17:17.676
<v Speaker 1>a handful of paragraphs and a short summary, but the

0:17:17.716 --> 0:17:24.956
<v Speaker 1>story it told was riveting. It's sixteen eighty six. England

0:17:25.076 --> 0:17:29.476
<v Speaker 1>is overwhelmingly Protestant, legally and officially dominated by the Church

0:17:29.516 --> 0:17:33.236
<v Speaker 1>of England, but for a brief period in the sixteen eighties,

0:17:33.676 --> 0:17:37.316
<v Speaker 1>the king was James the Second, who was Catholic, and

0:17:37.436 --> 0:17:41.116
<v Speaker 1>Church of England loyalists were outraged by the possibility that

0:17:41.156 --> 0:17:44.476
<v Speaker 1>the king might try and empower his fellow Catholics, and

0:17:44.596 --> 0:17:48.436
<v Speaker 1>one of those outraged Church of England loyalists was a

0:17:48.516 --> 0:17:52.556
<v Speaker 1>merchant from the coastal town of Bristol, a man named

0:17:53.636 --> 0:18:03.756
<v Speaker 1>Sir John Knight. One day, Knight rides up a steep

0:18:03.836 --> 0:18:06.916
<v Speaker 1>road outside Bristol to the Anglican Church of Saint Michael

0:18:06.956 --> 0:18:12.036
<v Speaker 1>on the Hill Sin the story goes waving his guns,

0:18:12.516 --> 0:18:16.756
<v Speaker 1>gives an impassioned speech. James the Second hears of it

0:18:17.236 --> 0:18:22.076
<v Speaker 1>and has Knight arrested charges him under the Statute of Northampton.

0:18:25.316 --> 0:18:28.156
<v Speaker 8>The information sets forth that the defendant did walk about

0:18:28.196 --> 0:18:30.396
<v Speaker 8>the straits armed with guns, and that he went into

0:18:30.476 --> 0:18:32.676
<v Speaker 8>the Church of Saint Michael in Bristol in the time

0:18:32.716 --> 0:18:36.396
<v Speaker 8>of divine service with a gun to terrify the King's subjects.

0:18:36.996 --> 0:18:42.916
<v Speaker 1>And what happens. The jury decides not guilty. Joyce Malcolm

0:18:42.956 --> 0:18:46.476
<v Speaker 1>reads this and it takes her breath away. Everyone thinks

0:18:46.516 --> 0:18:49.756
<v Speaker 1>that English common law, on which the American legal tradition

0:18:49.916 --> 0:18:53.436
<v Speaker 1>is based was hostile to people walking around with guns.

0:18:53.956 --> 0:18:57.836
<v Speaker 1>But that is not true. John Knight was acquitted. John

0:18:57.876 --> 0:19:01.036
<v Speaker 1>Knight goes up against the Statute of Northampton and John

0:19:01.116 --> 0:19:06.396
<v Speaker 1>Knight wins. One side says the Statute of Northampton. Check

0:19:07.156 --> 0:19:10.716
<v Speaker 1>The other side counters Night checkmate.

0:19:12.916 --> 0:19:16.196
<v Speaker 7>So there's been this big debate about what the Statute

0:19:16.276 --> 0:19:19.676
<v Speaker 7>of Northampton meant. But I can say that if it

0:19:19.836 --> 0:19:23.756
<v Speaker 7>was archaic by the seventeenth century, it was certainly archaic

0:19:24.116 --> 0:19:27.636
<v Speaker 7>by the eighteenth century, when we've got the Second Amendment,

0:19:27.676 --> 0:19:29.796
<v Speaker 7>and for sure the twenty first century.

0:19:30.316 --> 0:19:34.556
<v Speaker 1>The nice girl who saved the Second Amendment. And if

0:19:34.556 --> 0:19:36.916
<v Speaker 1>you read through the briefs file before the Supreme Court

0:19:36.956 --> 0:19:41.556
<v Speaker 1>in Bruin, what do you find John Knight. Everywhere we

0:19:41.636 --> 0:19:44.356
<v Speaker 1>hear about the famous case of Sir John Knight, we

0:19:44.436 --> 0:19:47.316
<v Speaker 1>get history lessons on John Knight. We learned that the

0:19:47.396 --> 0:19:50.716
<v Speaker 1>legal entanglement he found himself in after he burst into

0:19:50.756 --> 0:19:53.516
<v Speaker 1>the church at Saint Michael's on the Hill is the

0:19:53.556 --> 0:19:58.396
<v Speaker 1>most quote significant precedent quote in understanding a crucial turn

0:19:58.796 --> 0:20:03.156
<v Speaker 1>in Second Amendment law. During oral arguments, Neil Gore sutch

0:20:03.476 --> 0:20:07.236
<v Speaker 1>lobes as softball Paul Clement about the Statute of Northampton.

0:20:07.916 --> 0:20:12.076
<v Speaker 9>I know you've had a substantial debate with your friends

0:20:12.076 --> 0:20:15.596
<v Speaker 9>on the other side about the Statute of Northampton, and.

0:20:15.516 --> 0:20:19.796
<v Speaker 1>Paul Clement knocks the question out of the park John

0:20:19.876 --> 0:20:29.796
<v Speaker 1>Knight Baby. Then six months later comes the final ruling

0:20:29.996 --> 0:20:34.956
<v Speaker 1>in Bruin. Just as Clarence Thomas promised, It's all about history.

0:20:35.436 --> 0:20:38.676
<v Speaker 1>Eight pages on the perier between twelve eighty five and

0:20:38.796 --> 0:20:43.516
<v Speaker 1>seventeen seventy six, five pages on colonial America, nine pages

0:20:43.556 --> 0:20:46.956
<v Speaker 1>on seventeen ninety one to the Civil War, six pages

0:20:47.036 --> 0:20:50.476
<v Speaker 1>on the Path to reconstruction. One of the most important

0:20:50.556 --> 0:20:54.276
<v Speaker 1>cases of our generation, a landmark that once and for

0:20:54.356 --> 0:20:58.476
<v Speaker 1>all clarifies the most controversial of all the amendments to

0:20:58.516 --> 0:21:01.956
<v Speaker 1>the US Constitution. The debate is over now we know

0:21:02.676 --> 0:21:05.796
<v Speaker 1>with the founders under the sway of the Statute of Northampton. No,

0:21:06.036 --> 0:21:10.476
<v Speaker 1>they were not, the court rules history teaches us. Otherwise,

0:21:10.796 --> 0:21:12.916
<v Speaker 1>the founders would have frowned on the way in New

0:21:12.996 --> 0:21:15.756
<v Speaker 1>York State tried to regulate handguns. And we know this

0:21:15.876 --> 0:21:20.476
<v Speaker 1>because of one man's heroic acquittal. If you read the

0:21:20.476 --> 0:21:25.596
<v Speaker 1>brew and ruling, John Knight looms over it like a colossus.

0:21:26.036 --> 0:21:29.436
<v Speaker 1>John Knight, John Knight, John Knight. He pops up again

0:21:29.476 --> 0:21:32.836
<v Speaker 1>and again like a late seventeenth century whack them all.

0:21:34.276 --> 0:21:37.516
<v Speaker 1>I've been really drawn effect this morning. I was reading

0:21:37.556 --> 0:21:41.396
<v Speaker 1>over again this stuff about the Rex v. Knight, the

0:21:41.476 --> 0:21:44.836
<v Speaker 1>John Knight case. I call up a second amendment scholar

0:21:44.916 --> 0:21:48.916
<v Speaker 1>named Patrick Charles. Before long talk swung to John Knight.

0:21:49.076 --> 0:21:52.076
<v Speaker 1>Of course it did. There's no quitting John Knight. Once

0:21:52.116 --> 0:21:55.636
<v Speaker 1>you catch John Knight Fever, But you know that it's

0:21:55.676 --> 0:21:59.636
<v Speaker 1>a totally fascinating history taken in itself, but in context.

0:22:00.156 --> 0:22:03.356
<v Speaker 1>The idea that you know, in the middle of a

0:22:04.196 --> 0:22:10.876
<v Speaker 1>contemporary debate about how to handle the possess of dangerous

0:22:10.876 --> 0:22:14.996
<v Speaker 1>weapons in America, that we're spending our time obsessing about

0:22:15.036 --> 0:22:19.116
<v Speaker 1>a case from the seventeenth century in Bristol and England

0:22:19.156 --> 0:22:19.876
<v Speaker 1>is hilarious.

0:22:20.956 --> 0:22:23.156
<v Speaker 3>Yes, on the one level, you're you're absolutely critic.

0:22:23.436 --> 0:22:25.996
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Charles and I agreed that it was hilarious to

0:22:26.036 --> 0:22:28.316
<v Speaker 1>spend so much time on John Knight. And then what

0:22:28.396 --> 0:22:32.436
<v Speaker 1>do we do? We continue talking about John Knight. John

0:22:32.476 --> 0:22:36.116
<v Speaker 1>Knight is the groundhog who emerges from his musty English

0:22:36.196 --> 0:22:39.796
<v Speaker 1>lair every spring to cast a shadow across twenty first

0:22:39.836 --> 0:22:44.476
<v Speaker 1>century jurisprudence, the beaver who stealthily builds a legal edifice

0:22:44.876 --> 0:22:49.916
<v Speaker 1>out of mud and sticks. The constitutional scholar and a

0:22:49.956 --> 0:22:52.876
<v Speaker 1>founding member of the John Knight fan Club. David Copple

0:22:53.276 --> 0:22:56.196
<v Speaker 1>once combed through the library of an eighteenth century law

0:22:56.236 --> 0:22:59.276
<v Speaker 1>professor named George Wythe who taught law to a Supreme

0:22:59.276 --> 0:23:03.356
<v Speaker 1>Court justice, a couple of presidents, some founding fathers, and

0:23:03.436 --> 0:23:06.516
<v Speaker 1>he found that John Knight's name was all over law

0:23:06.556 --> 0:23:09.716
<v Speaker 1>books back then. Surely this is all all the founders

0:23:09.716 --> 0:23:12.436
<v Speaker 1>were talking about over a good pipe and a bottle

0:23:12.436 --> 0:23:17.876
<v Speaker 1>of claret in the drawing rooms of colonial Philadelphia. You

0:23:17.916 --> 0:23:19.756
<v Speaker 1>were in Bristol not long ago.

0:23:20.796 --> 0:23:23.796
<v Speaker 5>I was my wife and I were on vacation, and

0:23:23.916 --> 0:23:26.196
<v Speaker 5>as we were on our way from Cornwall to Wales,

0:23:27.436 --> 0:23:32.676
<v Speaker 5>I we did stop at Saint Michael Church in Bristol

0:23:32.796 --> 0:23:36.116
<v Speaker 5>where all this stuff happened, because I wanted to see it,

0:23:36.196 --> 0:23:38.916
<v Speaker 5>maybe see if Sir John Knight was buried in that graveyard.

0:23:39.716 --> 0:23:43.436
<v Speaker 1>David Copple, on vacation, says to his wife, we cannot

0:23:43.516 --> 0:23:47.236
<v Speaker 1>quit this storied isle without paying homage to the man

0:23:47.476 --> 0:23:52.916
<v Speaker 1>whose brave example saved America from the tyranny of restrictive

0:23:52.956 --> 0:23:53.756
<v Speaker 1>gun laws.

0:23:54.516 --> 0:23:57.636
<v Speaker 5>And it was interesting. It's not a huge cathedral type church.

0:23:57.756 --> 0:24:00.716
<v Speaker 5>It's a medium sized church, but it's up on the hill.

0:24:01.596 --> 0:24:04.356
<v Speaker 5>As I learned the hard way, because I was driving

0:24:04.556 --> 0:24:07.636
<v Speaker 5>a stick shift and getting up that very steep hill

0:24:07.756 --> 0:24:09.116
<v Speaker 5>was quite a challenge.

0:24:09.596 --> 0:24:09.916
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:09.996 --> 0:24:12.716
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but you're in the area and you couldn't resist

0:24:12.756 --> 0:24:15.156
<v Speaker 1>to stop by. And actually I kind of want to

0:24:15.156 --> 0:24:16.356
<v Speaker 1>see Saint Michael's myself.

0:24:16.916 --> 0:24:18.556
<v Speaker 5>Go ahead, tell me why you want to You want

0:24:18.556 --> 0:24:19.276
<v Speaker 5>to see it too.

0:24:19.356 --> 0:24:21.676
<v Speaker 1>Of course I do. I mean, who wouldn't want to

0:24:21.756 --> 0:24:23.996
<v Speaker 1>learn of this giant in the place of his birth

0:24:24.116 --> 0:24:28.396
<v Speaker 1>and death. But then, just as I was packing my

0:24:28.516 --> 0:24:31.396
<v Speaker 1>bags for Bristol, I thought, wait, let me check in

0:24:31.476 --> 0:24:36.516
<v Speaker 1>with a more disinterested historian of that period. I called around.

0:24:36.956 --> 0:24:40.796
<v Speaker 1>Someone recommended a man named Jonathan Barry of the University

0:24:40.836 --> 0:24:44.316
<v Speaker 1>of Exeter. When you, as a historian of this period,

0:24:44.916 --> 0:24:48.516
<v Speaker 1>see the way that John Knight has suddenly popped up

0:24:48.596 --> 0:24:53.676
<v Speaker 1>in American gun rights discourse, what's your reaction?

0:24:54.156 --> 0:24:56.956
<v Speaker 6>Well, I find it bizarre because nobody that's ever heard

0:24:56.996 --> 0:24:59.876
<v Speaker 6>of him or the case, and it has no implication,

0:25:00.116 --> 0:25:02.036
<v Speaker 6>you know, as far as I know. In the English

0:25:02.556 --> 0:25:04.516
<v Speaker 6>jurist Britain's not the land of Drews. But you know

0:25:04.876 --> 0:25:07.916
<v Speaker 6>it's it's of no significance.

0:25:07.876 --> 0:25:12.196
<v Speaker 1>Huh, England, John Knight is a nobody, But in the

0:25:12.236 --> 0:25:15.156
<v Speaker 1>hallowed halls of the Supreme Court three and a half

0:25:15.196 --> 0:25:21.476
<v Speaker 1>thousand miles away, he's a superstar. It's a puzzle, and

0:25:21.556 --> 0:25:35.636
<v Speaker 1>it is for puzzles like these that God invented revisionous history.

0:25:43.516 --> 0:25:46.516
<v Speaker 1>One of the problems associated with the coronation of John

0:25:46.596 --> 0:25:49.916
<v Speaker 1>Knight as the savior of the gun rights movement is

0:25:49.916 --> 0:25:52.316
<v Speaker 1>that our understanding of the details of his arrest and

0:25:52.356 --> 0:25:57.556
<v Speaker 1>acquittal was limited. We had the verdict, but not much else.

0:25:58.196 --> 0:26:01.516
<v Speaker 1>After all, it happened in sixteen eighty six. It's not

0:26:01.716 --> 0:26:05.076
<v Speaker 1>like there are digital records somewhere in the Bristol courthouse.

0:26:05.756 --> 0:26:08.716
<v Speaker 1>What was known about the case came from legal catalogs

0:26:08.716 --> 0:26:11.436
<v Speaker 1>from the eighteenth and nineteenth century, the kind that a

0:26:11.516 --> 0:26:15.876
<v Speaker 1>lawyer or a judge might subscribe to that offer brief summaries,

0:26:16.036 --> 0:26:19.156
<v Speaker 1>news briefings of the goings on in various court houses

0:26:19.156 --> 0:26:23.396
<v Speaker 1>around England. That's what Joyce Malcolm found in her Eureka moment,

0:26:23.996 --> 0:26:26.876
<v Speaker 1>a brief write up from a long ago legal newsletter

0:26:27.116 --> 0:26:28.556
<v Speaker 1>on a matter of Rex v.

0:26:28.756 --> 0:26:28.916
<v Speaker 12>Night.

0:26:29.636 --> 0:26:32.876
<v Speaker 1>It was about a paragraph long. But let's be honest,

0:26:33.556 --> 0:26:37.356
<v Speaker 1>one paragraph in a legal digest is not exactly the

0:26:37.396 --> 0:26:42.156
<v Speaker 1>strongest of foundations for completely overturning our understanding of the

0:26:42.196 --> 0:26:48.076
<v Speaker 1>Second Amendment. And, perhaps more ominously, the newly inaugurated members

0:26:48.316 --> 0:26:51.356
<v Speaker 1>of the Sir John Knight Fan Club tended to be lawyers,

0:26:51.876 --> 0:26:55.316
<v Speaker 1>and lawyers deal in black and white hard facts, the

0:26:55.396 --> 0:26:59.236
<v Speaker 1>letter of the law, tangible evidence. But now they had

0:26:59.276 --> 0:27:02.516
<v Speaker 1>crossed over into the land of history, and history is

0:27:02.556 --> 0:27:05.516
<v Speaker 1>not like the law at all. History is a living,

0:27:05.596 --> 0:27:08.476
<v Speaker 1>organic thing that gets rewritten all the time. I mean,

0:27:08.596 --> 0:27:11.436
<v Speaker 1>why do you think we call this podcast revisionist history

0:27:11.956 --> 0:27:15.316
<v Speaker 1>because historians love to say, wait a minute, I found

0:27:15.316 --> 0:27:18.396
<v Speaker 1>something new that makes me think we didn't quite realize

0:27:18.436 --> 0:27:21.396
<v Speaker 1>what we were talking about before. And in the case

0:27:21.916 --> 0:27:25.956
<v Speaker 1>of Sir John Knight, that something new was the Newsletter

0:27:26.316 --> 0:27:36.916
<v Speaker 1>of the Intrepid Roger Morris Rojamoris Roger Morris was a

0:27:36.996 --> 0:27:40.556
<v Speaker 1>journalist who wrote a private newsletter in the sixteen eighties

0:27:40.796 --> 0:27:45.356
<v Speaker 1>for a variety of well connected clients. Roger Morris knew

0:27:45.436 --> 0:27:49.836
<v Speaker 1>everyone and everything in late seventeenth century England. He passed

0:27:49.836 --> 0:27:52.756
<v Speaker 1>on high end gossip. He told stories no one had

0:27:52.756 --> 0:27:56.756
<v Speaker 1>ever heard before, about brothels and prostitutes and somebody bearing

0:27:56.796 --> 0:27:59.636
<v Speaker 1>their breast to the Moroccan ambassador. He wrote about how

0:27:59.676 --> 0:28:01.796
<v Speaker 1>the ice was so thick in the long cold winter

0:28:01.876 --> 0:28:05.196
<v Speaker 1>of sixteen eighty four that people roasted an ox on

0:28:05.236 --> 0:28:08.836
<v Speaker 1>the River Thames. He saw the King's baby and air

0:28:08.956 --> 0:28:11.916
<v Speaker 1>a close and reported and you have to love this

0:28:11.996 --> 0:28:16.796
<v Speaker 1>little bit of late medieval trolling. The child was a large,

0:28:16.836 --> 0:28:20.036
<v Speaker 1>full child in the head and the upper parts, but

0:28:20.116 --> 0:28:25.676
<v Speaker 1>not suitably proportioned in the lower parts. Roger Morris was

0:28:25.716 --> 0:28:31.676
<v Speaker 1>a gold mine, but there were a few problems. The

0:28:31.716 --> 0:28:35.196
<v Speaker 1>first was that Roger Morris's reputation did not extend beyond

0:28:35.236 --> 0:28:38.716
<v Speaker 1>the late seventeenth century. His newsletters ended up in an

0:28:38.756 --> 0:28:42.076
<v Speaker 1>obscure library in central London where no one paid attention

0:28:42.196 --> 0:28:47.316
<v Speaker 1>to them for several hundred years. Second problem, Roger Morris

0:28:47.716 --> 0:28:52.276
<v Speaker 1>was incredibly prolific. The Roger Morris archives extend into the

0:28:52.516 --> 0:28:55.516
<v Speaker 1>millions of words, so if you wanted to find out

0:28:55.556 --> 0:28:58.836
<v Speaker 1>what Roger Morris had to say about this or that,

0:28:58.876 --> 0:29:03.716
<v Speaker 1>you had to make a commitment. Third, and maybe the

0:29:03.716 --> 0:29:08.276
<v Speaker 1>biggest problem of all, Roger Morris's entire life work was

0:29:08.316 --> 0:29:12.116
<v Speaker 1>written in code. I mean, if you're could have dissed

0:29:12.116 --> 0:29:14.516
<v Speaker 1>the private parts of the heir to the throne, you

0:29:14.636 --> 0:29:16.156
<v Speaker 1>have to take some precautions.

0:29:20.516 --> 0:29:24.516
<v Speaker 8>There was an attempt by historian called Douglas Lacy to

0:29:24.636 --> 0:29:27.396
<v Speaker 8>try and to start to work on a volume.

0:29:27.956 --> 0:29:29.436
<v Speaker 1>That's the historian Tim Harris.

0:29:29.996 --> 0:29:33.796
<v Speaker 8>He did a book in the nineteen fifties. He couldn't

0:29:33.836 --> 0:29:36.476
<v Speaker 8>break the shorthand couldn't break the code. And it's too

0:29:36.516 --> 0:29:37.876
<v Speaker 8>much for one person's take.

0:29:37.716 --> 0:29:41.716
<v Speaker 1>On a cryptographer from Oxford had to get involved. Teams

0:29:41.716 --> 0:29:45.476
<v Speaker 1>of historians volunteered, passing the job down from one generation

0:29:45.596 --> 0:29:50.116
<v Speaker 1>to the next, until finally there it was a full

0:29:50.236 --> 0:29:56.596
<v Speaker 1>shelf of encyclopedia sized volumes offering hitherto unknown insights into

0:29:56.596 --> 0:30:00.156
<v Speaker 1>one of the most complex eras in British history. And

0:30:00.236 --> 0:30:03.956
<v Speaker 1>Roger Morris, it turns out, had a lot to say

0:30:04.316 --> 0:30:05.396
<v Speaker 1>about Sir John Knight.

0:30:05.996 --> 0:30:09.396
<v Speaker 8>It's a seven volume edition and there was a team

0:30:09.436 --> 0:30:12.036
<v Speaker 8>of us who did it, and now it's widely available.

0:30:12.076 --> 0:30:14.196
<v Speaker 8>And because it's widely available, people are looking at it

0:30:14.236 --> 0:30:15.916
<v Speaker 8>more and say, oh, there's not more we can find

0:30:15.956 --> 0:30:20.436
<v Speaker 8>out about this is John Knight case. It's an incredible source.

0:30:20.476 --> 0:30:23.796
<v Speaker 8>It has lots of very valuable information, and it's clearly

0:30:24.196 --> 0:30:27.516
<v Speaker 8>well informed and if you could check his information against

0:30:27.556 --> 0:30:29.996
<v Speaker 8>other sources, it's clearly accurate. But he also gives you

0:30:30.076 --> 0:30:32.316
<v Speaker 8>additional information which you won't get elsewhere.

0:30:33.236 --> 0:30:36.276
<v Speaker 1>So much additional information. Oh my god.

0:30:36.596 --> 0:30:41.836
<v Speaker 6>So he was a Bristol merchant. He was from quite

0:30:41.876 --> 0:30:44.396
<v Speaker 6>an important Bristol mercantile family.

0:30:45.356 --> 0:30:49.636
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Berry, historian at the University of Exeter. The Knights

0:30:49.796 --> 0:30:53.676
<v Speaker 1>ran sugar refineries, They had plantations in the Caribbean. They

0:30:53.676 --> 0:30:57.236
<v Speaker 1>were politically well connected and their sympathies did not lie

0:30:57.316 --> 0:31:00.876
<v Speaker 1>with the Catholic King of England, James the second, John

0:31:00.916 --> 0:31:05.316
<v Speaker 1>Knight hated Catholics. One day he learns that a group

0:31:05.356 --> 0:31:08.556
<v Speaker 1>of Irish Catholics are holding a secret mass in a

0:31:08.596 --> 0:31:12.756
<v Speaker 1>house in he arranges to have the priest arrested.

0:31:13.756 --> 0:31:15.996
<v Speaker 8>So he gets the Lord Mayor and other magistrates to

0:31:16.236 --> 0:31:19.876
<v Speaker 8>raid this Catholic chapel. A couple of weeks later, there's

0:31:19.876 --> 0:31:24.116
<v Speaker 8>an anti Catholic ritual in Bristol which the government suspects

0:31:24.116 --> 0:31:27.396
<v Speaker 8>the magistrates to Bristol and maybe Sir John Knight were

0:31:27.436 --> 0:31:31.436
<v Speaker 8>involved in encouraging. Where they parade through the city scoffing

0:31:31.516 --> 0:31:34.156
<v Speaker 8>the mass. They hold a piece of bread up in

0:31:34.516 --> 0:31:37.236
<v Speaker 8>the air, and they have someone dressed as a Virgin

0:31:37.276 --> 0:31:39.156
<v Speaker 8>Mary and someone dressed as a monk, and the monk

0:31:39.276 --> 0:31:40.756
<v Speaker 8>is fundeling the Virgin Mary.

0:31:41.036 --> 0:31:43.796
<v Speaker 1>The monk is fondling the Virgin Mary.

0:31:43.996 --> 0:31:45.956
<v Speaker 8>So the government is upset about this.

0:31:46.316 --> 0:31:49.116
<v Speaker 1>The King of England is a Catholic, remember.

0:31:49.156 --> 0:31:52.156
<v Speaker 8>And after that, Sir John Knight claims that he's threatened

0:31:52.516 --> 0:31:55.396
<v Speaker 8>and he is beaten up by a couple of irishmen.

0:31:55.476 --> 0:31:58.076
<v Speaker 8>So Sir John Knight was advised to retire to a

0:31:58.116 --> 0:32:01.876
<v Speaker 8>house in the country, but because he was in fear

0:32:01.916 --> 0:32:05.156
<v Speaker 8>of beaten up, he was quite They beat him and

0:32:05.196 --> 0:32:07.876
<v Speaker 8>kicked him when they attacked him. When he came into

0:32:08.196 --> 0:32:13.316
<v Speaker 8>Bristol subsequently, he came with a company of people carrying

0:32:13.356 --> 0:32:18.396
<v Speaker 8>swords and muscus in front before him, but he left

0:32:18.436 --> 0:32:22.276
<v Speaker 8>these at the walls of the city, because you're not

0:32:22.316 --> 0:32:25.596
<v Speaker 8>allowed to carry arms into the city Bristol. Bristol had

0:32:25.596 --> 0:32:26.756
<v Speaker 8>its own bylaws.

0:32:27.316 --> 0:32:30.636
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you heard that correctly. He checks his guns at

0:32:30.636 --> 0:32:33.996
<v Speaker 1>the gate. Now this is worth a slight digression.

0:32:34.156 --> 0:32:39.716
<v Speaker 6>We tend to forget how violent and militaristic seventeenth century

0:32:41.156 --> 0:32:44.676
<v Speaker 6>England in general, and a place like Bristol in particular were.

0:32:45.196 --> 0:32:46.556
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Barry Again.

0:32:46.876 --> 0:32:49.196
<v Speaker 6>One reflection of the fact is that Bristol was a

0:32:49.276 --> 0:32:53.436
<v Speaker 6>leading place for private tiering, where basically you capture the

0:32:53.476 --> 0:32:56.116
<v Speaker 6>ships of your rival traders, as it were, so you

0:32:56.236 --> 0:32:59.636
<v Speaker 6>load yourself up. Bristol is just beginning at this period

0:32:59.636 --> 0:33:04.356
<v Speaker 6>to get involved in the slave trade with Africa, which

0:33:04.436 --> 0:33:08.276
<v Speaker 6>of course both involved the use of military force, but also,

0:33:08.316 --> 0:33:10.596
<v Speaker 6>as you may know, the chief one of the chief

0:33:10.756 --> 0:33:14.516
<v Speaker 6>products that you actually took there to trade with was arms.

0:33:15.876 --> 0:33:18.156
<v Speaker 6>And one of the things that Bristol and places around

0:33:18.156 --> 0:33:20.436
<v Speaker 6>it were producing, in fact, were lots of arms. But

0:33:20.516 --> 0:33:25.356
<v Speaker 6>also they needed weapons, cannons for their ships and so on.

0:33:26.076 --> 0:33:27.956
<v Speaker 6>So we have to imagine the society in which there

0:33:27.996 --> 0:33:30.956
<v Speaker 6>are a lot of people that are used to using weapons.

0:33:31.516 --> 0:33:34.116
<v Speaker 1>So why would the nightcase represent some kind of turning

0:33:34.156 --> 0:33:38.596
<v Speaker 1>point in British attitudes towards guns. Bristol was a washing guns,

0:33:39.076 --> 0:33:40.836
<v Speaker 1>so much so that they were forced to put gun

0:33:40.916 --> 0:33:44.596
<v Speaker 1>control measures in place that put anything in America today

0:33:44.996 --> 0:33:45.516
<v Speaker 1>to shame.

0:33:46.156 --> 0:33:48.556
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think it's absurd to think that the

0:33:48.596 --> 0:33:51.116
<v Speaker 6>crucial issue here was about whether a man was bearing

0:33:51.236 --> 0:33:54.076
<v Speaker 6>arms or not because of lots of people wandering around

0:33:54.156 --> 0:33:54.996
<v Speaker 6>bearing arms.

0:33:55.476 --> 0:33:58.836
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, back to our story with Tim Herris.

0:33:58.596 --> 0:34:01.636
<v Speaker 8>And then on one day he goes to church, and

0:34:01.716 --> 0:34:03.996
<v Speaker 8>he does go with his attendant and goes with a

0:34:04.036 --> 0:34:08.076
<v Speaker 8>gun and sort, but he leaves these. He says, he

0:34:08.156 --> 0:34:10.836
<v Speaker 8>leaves these the porch with his attendant.

0:34:11.756 --> 0:34:14.916
<v Speaker 1>The church is Saint Michael's on the hill, his church,

0:34:15.436 --> 0:34:19.756
<v Speaker 1>the one overlooking Bristol. He gets off his horse, checks

0:34:19.756 --> 0:34:24.196
<v Speaker 1>his weapons at the door. It's not enormously significant here.

0:34:24.276 --> 0:34:27.476
<v Speaker 1>So here we have a case that Second Amendment types

0:34:27.516 --> 0:34:30.876
<v Speaker 1>are claiming, is this enormously important precedent for the right

0:34:31.276 --> 0:34:33.876
<v Speaker 1>of an individual to bear arms? But the individual in

0:34:33.956 --> 0:34:37.676
<v Speaker 1>question checks his arms at the door of the church.

0:34:39.796 --> 0:34:43.996
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's like this is nothing to do. He's

0:34:44.036 --> 0:34:46.156
<v Speaker 1>not even he's not waving his gun around or claiming

0:34:46.196 --> 0:34:49.196
<v Speaker 1>he can wave his gun around. He he quite willingly

0:34:49.916 --> 0:34:53.596
<v Speaker 1>adheres to local norms about where guns should and shouldn't

0:34:53.596 --> 0:34:54.436
<v Speaker 1>be carried.

0:34:56.156 --> 0:34:58.996
<v Speaker 8>Yes, that seems to be the case.

0:34:59.956 --> 0:35:03.876
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So Night enters the church and he shouts out,

0:35:04.116 --> 0:35:06.476
<v Speaker 1>the Catholics are trying to kill me, and they're going

0:35:06.556 --> 0:35:10.716
<v Speaker 1>to try and kill you too. Another quick digression. I

0:35:10.796 --> 0:35:14.316
<v Speaker 1>asked Jonathan Barry about that moment. One question before we

0:35:14.356 --> 0:35:16.036
<v Speaker 1>go on with the story, I want to go back

0:35:17.076 --> 0:35:20.076
<v Speaker 1>how Catholic was Bristol in this era?

0:35:20.196 --> 0:35:23.596
<v Speaker 6>So if almost almost non existent?

0:35:24.476 --> 0:35:28.316
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait wait, so wait, So John Knight is going

0:35:28.316 --> 0:35:31.676
<v Speaker 1>into this parish church and saying we're all in danger

0:35:31.716 --> 0:35:34.316
<v Speaker 1>of being God freed by the Catholics.

0:35:33.916 --> 0:35:37.516
<v Speaker 6>Somebody, and the number of Catholics in Bristol to have

0:35:37.676 --> 0:35:39.836
<v Speaker 6>conducted such a plot was minuscule.

0:35:40.196 --> 0:35:43.836
<v Speaker 1>So he goes into this church and he says he

0:35:43.916 --> 0:35:47.436
<v Speaker 1>tries to kind of whip the church up into a

0:35:47.476 --> 0:35:50.676
<v Speaker 1>frenzy about the Irish threat, and the government says, you've

0:35:50.676 --> 0:35:54.076
<v Speaker 1>gone too far. He's implying that the Catholic king is

0:35:54.116 --> 0:35:58.836
<v Speaker 1>somehow conspiring against his own people, and that's when he

0:35:58.876 --> 0:36:02.276
<v Speaker 1>gets in trouble with the law. Yes, he doesn't sound

0:36:02.356 --> 0:36:03.596
<v Speaker 1>very likable, Sir John Knight.

0:36:03.956 --> 0:36:06.236
<v Speaker 6>Nobody appears to have liked Sir John Knight.

0:36:06.796 --> 0:36:10.956
<v Speaker 1>No, the government goes out after John Knight because he's

0:36:10.996 --> 0:36:15.796
<v Speaker 1>a jackass. He's running around conjuring up ridiculous conspiracy theories

0:36:15.916 --> 0:36:16.796
<v Speaker 1>about Catholics.

0:36:17.476 --> 0:36:22.676
<v Speaker 8>So the charge. All the newsletter accounts I've read emphasize

0:36:23.436 --> 0:36:26.996
<v Speaker 8>that it's the words that he spoke in the church,

0:36:27.756 --> 0:36:32.436
<v Speaker 8>which and therefore this was proof of his disloyalty. That

0:36:32.636 --> 0:36:35.596
<v Speaker 8>was a key issue for why they wanted to arrest him.

0:36:35.996 --> 0:36:39.916
<v Speaker 8>That I decide to get him on the Statute of Northampton,

0:36:41.116 --> 0:36:44.716
<v Speaker 8>which is a statute from thirteen twenty eight, saying it's

0:36:44.716 --> 0:36:48.116
<v Speaker 8>a breach of the peace, and he pleaded not guilty.

0:36:48.276 --> 0:36:51.916
<v Speaker 8>He claims that he didn't take the gun or the

0:36:51.956 --> 0:36:56.196
<v Speaker 8>sword into the church, he left it outside. And the

0:36:56.276 --> 0:36:58.716
<v Speaker 8>church is actually just outside the wars of the city

0:36:58.716 --> 0:37:02.796
<v Speaker 8>of Bristol, as it was back then. It's Protestant church obviously,

0:37:03.476 --> 0:37:07.836
<v Speaker 8>and he leaves the gun and the sword outside, and

0:37:08.236 --> 0:37:11.876
<v Speaker 8>the jury said, he's got a proven track record of

0:37:11.916 --> 0:37:15.956
<v Speaker 8>being loyal to the government, and so they found him

0:37:15.996 --> 0:37:16.916
<v Speaker 8>not guilty.

0:37:16.956 --> 0:37:20.276
<v Speaker 1>Because he didn't brandish a gun in church. The jury

0:37:20.396 --> 0:37:23.756
<v Speaker 1>didn't find him disloyal because they knew he'd been loyal

0:37:23.796 --> 0:37:27.476
<v Speaker 1>to the previous Protestant king. He wasn't armed, so they

0:37:27.476 --> 0:37:30.516
<v Speaker 1>couldn't get him on that. He just didn't like Catholics.

0:37:31.076 --> 0:37:34.356
<v Speaker 1>And so what this is Bristol in sixteen eighty six.

0:37:34.716 --> 0:37:38.516
<v Speaker 1>No one in Bristol in sixteen eighty six likes Catholics.

0:37:39.036 --> 0:37:42.396
<v Speaker 1>The case against him is dead on arrival. And by

0:37:42.396 --> 0:37:45.036
<v Speaker 1>the way, no one knows this better than the government.

0:37:45.716 --> 0:37:49.716
<v Speaker 8>So they actually don't want to prosecute Knights. They actually

0:37:49.756 --> 0:37:52.876
<v Speaker 8>want Knight to apologize, and then they try and bury

0:37:52.916 --> 0:37:55.716
<v Speaker 8>the case. That seems to be what's implied in the

0:37:55.756 --> 0:37:59.036
<v Speaker 8>newsletter accounts I've read. That doesn't happen. They would have

0:37:59.036 --> 0:38:02.156
<v Speaker 8>preferred if he'd apologized, and they could have said, okay,

0:38:02.156 --> 0:38:02.716
<v Speaker 8>we'll let it go.

0:38:03.876 --> 0:38:08.036
<v Speaker 1>So to recap John Knight's episode in the Church of

0:38:08.036 --> 0:38:11.316
<v Speaker 1>Saint Michael has become a heroic moment to the American

0:38:11.356 --> 0:38:15.036
<v Speaker 1>gun rights movement, even though John Knight wasn't actually carrying

0:38:15.076 --> 0:38:17.756
<v Speaker 1>a gun when he entered the Church of Saint Michael,

0:38:18.076 --> 0:38:20.596
<v Speaker 1>even though the case against him had nothing to do

0:38:20.676 --> 0:38:23.756
<v Speaker 1>with guns, even though Bristol in fact had gun control

0:38:23.956 --> 0:38:27.396
<v Speaker 1>ordinances that puts every gun control ordinance in America today

0:38:27.396 --> 0:38:31.676
<v Speaker 1>to shame, And even though the whole brew was just

0:38:31.716 --> 0:38:34.516
<v Speaker 1>about him being a bigot who was terrified of a

0:38:34.556 --> 0:38:38.916
<v Speaker 1>Catholic conspiracy taking over Bristol, even though there were hardly

0:38:38.956 --> 0:38:42.676
<v Speaker 1>any Catholics in Bristol, and even though the whole case

0:38:43.356 --> 0:38:46.596
<v Speaker 1>was dead on arrival, and Knight could have apologized and

0:38:46.676 --> 0:38:49.596
<v Speaker 1>made it all go away, and just didn't feel like it.

0:38:50.716 --> 0:38:53.316
<v Speaker 1>But the only way you would know all this is

0:38:53.396 --> 0:38:56.076
<v Speaker 1>if you were willing to wade to the seven volumes

0:38:56.356 --> 0:39:01.876
<v Speaker 1>of Roger Morris's coded newsletters. And who has time for that?

0:39:03.196 --> 0:39:07.116
<v Speaker 1>I was reading the did you read there's a the

0:39:07.276 --> 0:39:11.796
<v Speaker 1>historian Tim Harris essay on I was amused to see

0:39:11.836 --> 0:39:14.316
<v Speaker 1>there was that. In his he talks about the Sir

0:39:14.436 --> 0:39:19.796
<v Speaker 1>John Knight case, about how when he goes to the church,

0:39:19.996 --> 0:39:23.916
<v Speaker 1>the Protestant church, to speak to what he thought of

0:39:24.076 --> 0:39:27.076
<v Speaker 1>was the threat being posed by the Catholics and Bristol.

0:39:28.276 --> 0:39:31.516
<v Speaker 1>He insists that he checks his weapons at the front

0:39:31.556 --> 0:39:34.076
<v Speaker 1>of the church, and he also says that when he

0:39:34.596 --> 0:39:38.116
<v Speaker 1>goes into Bristol, he abided by the bylaws of Bristol

0:39:38.476 --> 0:39:44.596
<v Speaker 1>and didn't carry his weapons into the past the city's limits.

0:39:45.516 --> 0:39:48.116
<v Speaker 1>I wondered how Joyce Malcolm made sense of all these

0:39:48.156 --> 0:39:52.236
<v Speaker 1>new facts. The Roger Morris newsletters were finally decoded more

0:39:52.276 --> 0:39:55.556
<v Speaker 1>than ten years after she wrote her opus to keep

0:39:55.636 --> 0:40:01.196
<v Speaker 1>him bare arms. So I'm just curious, think, how do

0:40:01.316 --> 0:40:03.996
<v Speaker 1>those sort of two facts fit into this story. So

0:40:04.036 --> 0:40:07.236
<v Speaker 1>even if we have if the Sir John Knight case

0:40:07.756 --> 0:40:13.756
<v Speaker 1>represents kind of affirmation of the individual right to peace,

0:40:13.796 --> 0:40:18.276
<v Speaker 1>will carry So John Knight himself is complying with some

0:40:18.316 --> 0:40:21.636
<v Speaker 1>pretty strict gun control laws, isn't he.

0:40:23.196 --> 0:40:26.476
<v Speaker 7>I think, to be honest that I think that Professor

0:40:26.516 --> 0:40:31.236
<v Speaker 7>Harris is wrong. First of all, because there was such

0:40:31.236 --> 0:40:33.796
<v Speaker 7>a There was all of these duties and requirements to

0:40:33.836 --> 0:40:37.876
<v Speaker 7>protect yourself. And in the in the judge's opinion in

0:40:37.956 --> 0:40:40.676
<v Speaker 7>the in there Sir John Knight case, he says that

0:40:40.756 --> 0:40:46.316
<v Speaker 7>the law allows gentlemen to go about with arms as

0:40:46.316 --> 0:40:50.236
<v Speaker 7>long as they're not you know, unusual and the dangerous weapons.

0:40:50.756 --> 0:40:54.276
<v Speaker 7>So the judge seems at odds with Professor Harris.

0:40:55.356 --> 0:40:57.836
<v Speaker 1>But what do you what do you make of Sir

0:40:57.956 --> 0:41:02.116
<v Speaker 1>John Knight's claim that he checked his weapons at the

0:41:02.116 --> 0:41:04.236
<v Speaker 1>front of the church and didn't carry his weapons into

0:41:04.276 --> 0:41:05.596
<v Speaker 1>the city of Bristol.

0:41:07.876 --> 0:41:11.636
<v Speaker 7>I find that pery odd because if that were the case,

0:41:11.676 --> 0:41:13.516
<v Speaker 7>if there was a law that he couldn't carry his

0:41:13.596 --> 0:41:16.316
<v Speaker 7>weapons into the city of Bristol at all, that the

0:41:16.316 --> 0:41:19.116
<v Speaker 7>whole city was what we would now call a sensitive

0:41:19.156 --> 0:41:22.876
<v Speaker 7>place that no one could wear. It goes against your

0:41:22.956 --> 0:41:25.316
<v Speaker 7>right to protect yourself. That I was against your right

0:41:25.356 --> 0:41:27.756
<v Speaker 7>to protect yourself in your house. It goes against the

0:41:27.836 --> 0:41:34.996
<v Speaker 7>judges ruling. And to be honest, Professor Harris is British.

0:41:35.516 --> 0:41:37.516
<v Speaker 7>They don't think much of the right to be armed.

0:41:38.836 --> 0:41:41.876
<v Speaker 1>The homicide rate in the United States, if you're wondering,

0:41:42.436 --> 0:41:45.636
<v Speaker 1>is four and a half times higher than the United Kingdom.

0:41:46.716 --> 0:41:52.036
<v Speaker 7>When I explored that right and told my British friends

0:41:52.116 --> 0:41:54.916
<v Speaker 7>about it, most of them didn't even realize they ever

0:41:54.996 --> 0:41:57.956
<v Speaker 7>had had a right to be armed. There's this whole

0:41:58.076 --> 0:42:01.196
<v Speaker 7>history and that they haven't looked at. And I think

0:42:01.236 --> 0:42:04.356
<v Speaker 7>it was because I said earlier, I asked an American

0:42:04.436 --> 0:42:09.596
<v Speaker 7>question we were interested in that. They weren't particularly interest

0:42:09.716 --> 0:42:14.876
<v Speaker 7>in a right to be armed, and so it wasn't

0:42:14.876 --> 0:42:18.516
<v Speaker 7>something that they had studied or been even very curious

0:42:18.556 --> 0:42:20.516
<v Speaker 7>about until I started to write about it.

0:42:20.956 --> 0:42:21.316
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:42:21.516 --> 0:42:24.516
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But if the British are interested in a right

0:42:24.876 --> 0:42:28.636
<v Speaker 1>to bear arms, then why are we drawing on British

0:42:28.676 --> 0:42:31.916
<v Speaker 1>Why is the British tradition relevant to the discussion of

0:42:32.916 --> 0:42:34.716
<v Speaker 1>American individual gun rights.

0:42:35.436 --> 0:42:37.716
<v Speaker 7>I think this was a history that was lost to them.

0:42:37.796 --> 0:42:40.676
<v Speaker 7>I think modern British people have a different view of it.

0:42:41.356 --> 0:42:45.476
<v Speaker 7>They're much more dependent on the state taking care of them,

0:42:45.676 --> 0:42:51.836
<v Speaker 7>particularly since World War Two. This is earlier British history

0:42:51.996 --> 0:42:55.036
<v Speaker 7>is the history that they really were not that familiar with,

0:42:56.356 --> 0:42:59.276
<v Speaker 7>you know, they were looking at other things, and I

0:42:59.316 --> 0:43:02.316
<v Speaker 7>think that one of I guess the contribution I made

0:43:02.356 --> 0:43:04.356
<v Speaker 7>was that I was an American that looked at British

0:43:04.396 --> 0:43:08.156
<v Speaker 7>history in English history with American questions, with the things

0:43:08.196 --> 0:43:09.116
<v Speaker 7>we were interested in.

0:43:09.756 --> 0:43:14.476
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and what is the Supreme Court? How did the

0:43:14.556 --> 0:43:17.476
<v Speaker 1>highest legal body in the land, in the landmark ruling

0:43:17.476 --> 0:43:20.316
<v Speaker 1>of New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. Bruin

0:43:20.916 --> 0:43:23.956
<v Speaker 1>handle the fact that their hero has feet of clay.

0:43:24.676 --> 0:43:25.956
<v Speaker 3>I know, I had a summarized summer.

0:43:26.356 --> 0:43:31.516
<v Speaker 8>See, I think that is it.

0:43:33.356 --> 0:43:38.396
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I asked Patrick Charles to read me the relevant section.

0:43:39.116 --> 0:43:42.996
<v Speaker 3>To the extent that there are multiple plausible interpretations of

0:43:42.996 --> 0:43:45.236
<v Speaker 3>Sir John Knight's case, we will favor the one that

0:43:45.356 --> 0:43:48.076
<v Speaker 3>is more consistent with the Second Amendments command.

0:43:51.436 --> 0:43:55.036
<v Speaker 1>Which, in other words, there's a whole long list of

0:43:55.036 --> 0:43:56.756
<v Speaker 1>ways we can make sense of this. We're going to

0:43:56.796 --> 0:43:59.996
<v Speaker 1>pick the one we like the most. Okay, that's exactly.

0:44:00.756 --> 0:44:03.516
<v Speaker 1>That's the one that makes our life easiest. And arguing

0:44:03.676 --> 0:44:07.396
<v Speaker 1>the case we've already decided we want to argue. It's like,

0:44:07.796 --> 0:44:09.076
<v Speaker 1>it's like history is cherry.

0:44:09.676 --> 0:44:10.956
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's so chery picked.

0:44:12.476 --> 0:44:16.076
<v Speaker 1>The Supreme Court decides to clear up the ambiguity over

0:44:16.116 --> 0:44:19.316
<v Speaker 1>the Second Amendment. Let us leave the verdict to history,

0:44:19.636 --> 0:44:22.996
<v Speaker 1>they declare. But then their hero turns out to have

0:44:22.996 --> 0:44:25.876
<v Speaker 1>feet of clay. So they shrug and go on with

0:44:25.916 --> 0:44:27.796
<v Speaker 1>the things that they had already made up their mind

0:44:27.836 --> 0:44:30.916
<v Speaker 1>to do before they tried to convince us that they

0:44:30.956 --> 0:44:34.716
<v Speaker 1>wanted to play historian and go to England and make

0:44:34.756 --> 0:44:38.076
<v Speaker 1>their pilgrimage to Saint Michael on the Hill and pretend

0:44:38.316 --> 0:44:40.916
<v Speaker 1>that the man whom they have chosen to symbolize the

0:44:40.956 --> 0:44:44.556
<v Speaker 1>grand tradition of American gun rights is something other than

0:44:44.596 --> 0:44:48.956
<v Speaker 1>a jackass. And after a far too many hours reconstructing

0:44:48.956 --> 0:44:52.476
<v Speaker 1>the history of this jackass, I realized that I had

0:44:52.476 --> 0:44:55.996
<v Speaker 1>fallen into the same trap that we've all fallen into

0:44:56.236 --> 0:44:59.076
<v Speaker 1>in his country when it comes to gun violence. We're

0:44:59.116 --> 0:45:04.676
<v Speaker 1>talking about the wrong things, telling irrelevant stories. And over

0:45:04.676 --> 0:45:07.956
<v Speaker 1>the course of the next five episodes of Revision's History,

0:45:08.156 --> 0:45:11.476
<v Speaker 1>I want to try and change that conversation. I'm going

0:45:11.556 --> 0:45:14.556
<v Speaker 1>to take you to North Carolina to shoot guns, Visit

0:45:14.636 --> 0:45:17.196
<v Speaker 1>an old man in Alabama with a crazy story to tell,

0:45:17.476 --> 0:45:21.996
<v Speaker 1>Revisit the assassination of Robert Kennedy on a one but

0:45:22.036 --> 0:45:26.916
<v Speaker 1>no more John Knight. I promise we've all had it

0:45:26.956 --> 0:45:34.036
<v Speaker 1>with John Knight.

0:45:35.756 --> 0:45:39.996
<v Speaker 8>What kind of person was he? Not sort of person

0:45:40.036 --> 0:45:41.636
<v Speaker 8>I want to have a drink with. It was a

0:45:41.716 --> 0:45:44.836
<v Speaker 8>nasty piece of work. Really, he was vindictive and spiteful.

0:45:44.876 --> 0:45:49.196
<v Speaker 8>He's a biggot, He's a trouble maker. He's obviously deliberately

0:45:49.236 --> 0:45:53.036
<v Speaker 8>going out to try and provoke trouble. In April sixteen

0:45:53.156 --> 0:45:56.116
<v Speaker 8>eighty six, when he gets his priests arrested because he's

0:45:56.156 --> 0:45:59.196
<v Speaker 8>staring things up. So yeah, not a nice piece of work.

0:45:59.276 --> 0:46:02.076
<v Speaker 8>That's my basic view of him. He's involved in the

0:46:02.076 --> 0:46:05.716
<v Speaker 8>slave traders, sugar refiner. I would hardly say that he

0:46:05.876 --> 0:46:09.436
<v Speaker 8>was the sort of hero figure the champions of American

0:46:09.556 --> 0:46:12.756
<v Speaker 8>liberty who wants to celebrate, although maybe that's not the point.

0:46:13.796 --> 0:46:30.676
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

0:46:14.996 --> 0:46:34.876
<v Speaker 1>Our revisionist history Gun series was produced by Jacob Smith,

0:46:35.516 --> 0:46:40.196
<v Speaker 1>bend A DApp Haffrey, Kiara Powell, Tally Emlin, and Liam Gistoo.

0:46:41.436 --> 0:46:44.836
<v Speaker 1>We were edited by Peter Clowney and Julia Barton. Fact

0:46:44.916 --> 0:46:49.276
<v Speaker 1>checking by Arthur Gomperts and Kashelle Williams. Original scoring by

0:46:49.356 --> 0:46:53.716
<v Speaker 1>Luis Garra, with vocals in this episode by the Magnificent

0:46:53.996 --> 0:46:59.796
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Herschenfeld. Mastering by Flon Williams. Engineering by Nina Lawrence.

0:47:01.156 --> 0:47:14.236
<v Speaker 1>I'm Malcolm Gladwins.