Speaker 1: This is Buck's first thoughts. The news you need to
Speaker 1: get for your day in forty five minutes. Make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe on the iHeart app before wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. One of the frustrations I have with what
Speaker 1: the Democrats do is they engage in so much propaganda
Speaker 1: and are so relentless that we forget what we've already learned.
Speaker 1: And that's something that's going on right now, and I
Speaker 1: want to dive into that today. There are things that
Speaker 1: are clear to anybody who has an understanding of what
Speaker 1: has come before us, what has happened previously in this
Speaker 1: country and in general. Democrats like to reject that. The
Speaker 1: same way they believe they can create a utopia, they
Speaker 1: also think they can create a new narrative of history
Speaker 1: in order to get us there, right, So they just
Speaker 1: change the facts from the past to control the facts
Speaker 1: in the future. But before we get into that, many
Speaker 1: of you are just starting out. You're buying a home,
Speaker 1: having babies and building wealth. Well, there's something you absolutely
Speaker 1: have to do now to secure your family's future. You
Speaker 1: got to put this on your to do list. Establish
Speaker 1: a will or trust at trust and will dot com
Speaker 1: at trust and will dot com. Setting up an a
Speaker 1: state plan is simple, convenient, and secure for as little
Speaker 1: as thirty nine dollars. You can nominate guardians for your children,
Speaker 1: determine who gets your stuff, and plan for future medical care,
Speaker 1: all for the comfort, all from the comfort of your home. Look,
Speaker 1: Hiring a traditional a state attorney can cost thousands, and
Speaker 1: using a one size fits all template is not nearly
Speaker 1: specialized enough. Trust and Will documents are designed by a
Speaker 1: state planning experts and customize for the state you live in.
Speaker 1: All right, I've used this website. It's so straightforward the
Speaker 1: whole process. You'll walk through it in minutes and you'll
Speaker 1: be all set up. Trust and Will is the most
Speaker 1: trusted name and online estate planning, the category leader on
Speaker 1: trust Pilot, and they've helped hundreds of thousands of people
Speaker 1: protect their families, assets, and legacy. Gain peace of mind
Speaker 1: at Trust and Will dot com slash buck. Just go
Speaker 1: to this website. Do it today, Get this done. Put
Speaker 1: it at the top of your to do list. Gain
Speaker 1: peace of mind at trust and Will dot com slash
Speaker 1: buck and get ten percent off plus free shipping of
Speaker 1: your customized legal documents. That's right. Just go to this website.
Speaker 1: Put it at the top of your to do list.
Speaker 1: Trust and Will dot com slash buck, go right now,
Speaker 1: this is really important. You'll get ten percent off plus
Speaker 1: free shipping at trust and Will dot com slash buck.
Speaker 1: Who does the Biden presidency remind you of so far? What?
Speaker 1: What figure from our past comes to mind? Everyone's already
Speaker 1: saying it, that's right. I wish I could say it was,
Speaker 1: you know, the god that had a special fondness for
Speaker 1: interns and and was just always trying to hold the
Speaker 1: ladies of America close, holding real close. Maybe give a
Speaker 1: little squeeze, just to know that they feel like he's there,
Speaker 1: you know, like like he's squeezing their hand. Obviously, that's
Speaker 1: what That's what good old Bill Clinton would walt. He
Speaker 1: just that's the only thing he'd squeeze. No, not him,
Speaker 1: Jimmy Carter, friends, that's who people are already thinking about
Speaker 1: with Joe Biden. Another guy who seemed like he was
Speaker 1: weighing over his head, not up for the job, and
Speaker 1: was able to create some of the things we're already
Speaker 1: seeing now. A sputtering economy, concerns about unemployment, kicking off inflation,
Speaker 1: gas lines, our enemies thinking that we don't actually know
Speaker 1: how to deal with them at home or abroad. Right,
Speaker 1: there are so many things you look at with Carter
Speaker 1: and Biden, and I know people are already taking it
Speaker 1: to that next step of maybe, just maybe there's a
Speaker 1: Republican who will come in after this as our second
Speaker 1: coming of Reagan. But for now, I just want to
Speaker 1: say that what we are seeing to me from the
Speaker 1: Biden administration makes us ask the question, is this guy
Speaker 1: actually captain obvious? Is this a guy Joe Biden who
Speaker 1: seems to not know what all the rest of us know,
Speaker 1: and then when he comes to the clear and obvious conclusion,
Speaker 1: wants a pat on the head. Okay, it turns out
Speaker 1: that when you are just talking about raising taxes and
Speaker 1: spewing a lot of Marxist claptrap, hiring doesn't go as
Speaker 1: well as people who are focused on only that in
Speaker 1: the economy think it will. Right, you had a couple
Speaker 1: of hundred thousand jobs outed in April instead of the
Speaker 1: million jobs that dal Jones was expecting. It was at
Speaker 1: least a half a million below most of the projections
Speaker 1: that I saw, an enormous job's miss. Why would that happen? Well,
Speaker 1: because it turns out that when you just talk about
Speaker 1: raising taxes and spending trillions and trillions of dollars, different companies,
Speaker 1: different businesses, say, how's that going to affect me? What's
Speaker 1: going to happen here? Maybe I'm gonna ride this thing
Speaker 1: out a little bit before I make any major decisions.
Speaker 1: I'll give you another example of the captain obvious administration here.
Speaker 1: It seems that Biden is just figuring out now that
Speaker 1: people won't work if you are paying them, won't work
Speaker 1: if you're paying them more then they would make from working.
Speaker 1: Biden is still pretending that this is not the case,
Speaker 1: but it's pretty obvious using that word again. Play fourteen.
Speaker 1: I know there's been a lot of discussions since Friday,
Speaker 1: since Friday's report that people are being paid to stay
Speaker 1: home rather than go to work. Well, we don't see
Speaker 1: much evidence of that that is a major factor. We
Speaker 1: don't see that. You look, it's easy to say the
Speaker 1: line has been because of the generous unemployment benefits, that
Speaker 1: it's a major factor in labor shortage. Americans want to work,
Speaker 1: Americans want to work. Just talking points. That's where this
Speaker 1: guy always falls into. It doesn't he's an idiot folks.
Speaker 1: He's not a smart man. I know that. He's the
Speaker 1: president of the United States, and the Democrats have created
Speaker 1: this whole fiction around him. For why are we supposed
Speaker 1: to be impressed by this guy again because he was
Speaker 1: Obama's vice president. Oh okay, that's really that's really a
Speaker 1: game changer. This is not somebody who understands macro or microeconomics,
Speaker 1: not somebody who's ever run a business. This is a
Speaker 1: guy who has been delivering speeches written by other people
Speaker 1: and spewing whatever is most popular in the moment as
Speaker 1: a Democrat for longer than I've been alive. That's what
Speaker 1: this guy is doing. That's all he knows how to do.
Speaker 1: He's essentially a talking points machine that goes wherever the polls,
Speaker 1: wherever the puppet tears around him tell him to go.
Speaker 1: That's what Joe Biden does. It's not a leader, he's
Speaker 1: not a thinker. Now he's the president. It's a remarkable
Speaker 1: state of affairs. Why wouldn't people stay home if they
Speaker 1: are receiving more pay from the government for doing nothing,
Speaker 1: And who's to say they're doing nothing? Maybe they've got
Speaker 1: a side hustle going. Maybe they're you know, doing some work,
Speaker 1: you know, under the table, or they're building out their
Speaker 1: dream job or their dream business or whatever. Who knows.
Speaker 1: But for a lot of folks who aren't making a
Speaker 1: ton of money by showing up doing hourly shift work
Speaker 1: at fast food restaurants or any number of places. For
Speaker 1: a lot of folks, it's a pretty clear it's a
Speaker 1: pretty clear calculation, and it should be clear to anybody.
Speaker 1: It should be obvious. Word of the day. What happens
Speaker 1: when you spend trillions of dollars? What happens when you
Speaker 1: spend trillions of dollars? You know, if you were in
Speaker 1: economics one O one class, you'd have people who were saying, well,
Speaker 1: you are debasing your currency. Your debasing your currency. We
Speaker 1: are led to believe somehow that's not happening. Meanwhile, lumber
Speaker 1: cost for home building is up, what is it, three
Speaker 1: hunder four percent something like that, way way up. Looks
Speaker 1: like the stock market right now, which was very high
Speaker 1: coming into this administration, might have stalled out. And the
Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal, as a piece from earlier today, if
Speaker 1: inflation is coming, here's what to do about it. Remember,
Speaker 1: once inflation hits and everybody sees it too late, too late,
Speaker 1: to really make it go away, you're going to suffer
Speaker 1: the consequences of it. But I think we're already seeing it.
Speaker 1: It's just the government and the people in charge of
Speaker 1: the levers at the FED are hiding this. Food prices
Speaker 1: going up, home building prices going up. Lumber has already
Speaker 1: told you there are a number of things where it's
Speaker 1: hard to hide what's really going on here. And then
Speaker 1: there's just the overall trajectory of the economy. All Joe
Speaker 1: Biden had to do, all the Democrats had to do
Speaker 1: this year for us to have a booming economy was
Speaker 1: stay the heck out of the way. That's all they
Speaker 1: had to do. Just get out of the way. And
Speaker 1: by get out of the way, I mean also stop
Speaker 1: all the neuroses and all the craziness with continued lockdowns
Speaker 1: and your mask obsession and all this stuff. Just let
Speaker 1: businesses go do their business and let the American people
Speaker 1: come back to their lives and their work. But no,
Speaker 1: Democrats want They want to meddle, they want to control,
Speaker 1: they want to dictate, and they want to spend. So
Speaker 1: there are these these intersecting levels of obviousness that we
Speaker 1: are seeing right now. And yes, we have. We have
Speaker 1: gas lines, we have inflation feed years, we have a
Speaker 1: stalled economic recovery. We have a Biden administration that is
Speaker 1: not a surprise to any of us who were paying
Speaker 1: attention and have been paying attention with the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: has become. And also what Joe Biden was saying during
Speaker 1: the campaign, and yes, the recovery is stumbling. Why is
Speaker 1: that happening because of Joe Biden's policies. This couldn't be
Speaker 1: any easier. You have an economy that is going through
Speaker 1: an artificial government mandated recession because of COVID and made
Speaker 1: it worse with the lockdowns than it would have otherwise been. Yes,
Speaker 1: there would have been some restriction on uneconomic activity from
Speaker 1: people who were scared and not going out as much,
Speaker 1: but a lot of this was a function of government
Speaker 1: policy and it was arbitrary. As we'd own it was
Speaker 1: dumb in so many cases. Florida did not shut down.
Speaker 1: Its economy is better off, has been better off than
Speaker 1: states like California, in New York, Texas. You've sort of
Speaker 1: come to the party a little late with Florida, but
Speaker 1: you're doing better than obviously other states are. But all
Speaker 1: you have to do if you're this administration is stop
Speaker 1: messing things up. But no, they think they're helping. This
Speaker 1: is the classic trap of the authoritarian democrat mindset. They
Speaker 1: believe they're making things better when all the indicators we
Speaker 1: can see are that dumbass Democrats with Biden leading the pack,
Speaker 1: are making everything worse. They are making it worse. They
Speaker 1: are extending and prolonging the pain of lockdowns. They are
Speaker 1: making people concerned about the value of the dollar, and
Speaker 1: about what taxes and not just corporate taxes, but all
Speaker 1: kinds of different changes to the irs code are going
Speaker 1: to do to our economy. This is what we face now.
Speaker 1: We can all see it, and it was all obvious
Speaker 1: from the beginning to anybody who pays attention, who knows
Speaker 1: history and believes that one plus one equals two. Turns
Speaker 1: out that shutting down infrastructure projects like the Keystone XEL
Speaker 1: pipeline for ideological reasons is a really shortsighted and stupid
Speaker 1: thing to do. Turns out that spending trillions of dollars
Speaker 1: sounds great to the people that are going to get
Speaker 1: all kinds of goodies from it, but to the overall economy,
Speaker 1: it's a disaster. When you pay people more to stay
Speaker 1: home than to work. Guess what they do. I mean,
Speaker 1: this does any of the surprise? Oh, when you defund police,
Speaker 1: turns out you get a lot more violence on the streets. Gee,
Speaker 1: who could have seen that coming? Oh that's right, absolutely everybody.
Speaker 1: This stuff is obvious to anyone who is not delusional.
Speaker 1: But the Democrats are the party of delusion. We don't
Speaker 1: see much evidence that the extra unemployment insurance is a
Speaker 1: major driver in people not rejoining the workforce. We actually
Speaker 1: see the data, and our analysis shows that lack of
Speaker 1: vaccination the lower rate, which is why I refer to
Speaker 1: the data in the week that it was taken. It
Speaker 1: has an impact, childcare has an impact, Schools reopening has
Speaker 1: an impact. But there's also the need to pay a
Speaker 1: livable working wage, and that's one of the reasons the
Speaker 1: President will talk about that this afternoon. But as Bank
Speaker 1: of America economists who are cited in a Bloomberg story stage,
Speaker 1: anybody making less than thirty two thousand dollars a year
Speaker 1: is better financially just taking the unemployment benefit. So is
Speaker 1: the White House creating an incentive just to stay home? Well, again,
Speaker 1: the majority of economists internally and acts externally of the
Speaker 1: White House. Don't feel that unemployment insurance something that was
Speaker 1: done at a time where to help unemployed people get
Speaker 1: through a very difficult economic downturn during a pandemic is
Speaker 1: a is the a major driver in our unemployment data.
Speaker 1: Notice how the absurd mediocrity Jen Saki Bomb immediately does
Speaker 1: this appeal to authority instead of engaging with the question
Speaker 1: that Peter Doocey a Fox News who it's a great
Speaker 1: it's a great gig, folks, to be the one person
Speaker 1: in the West Wing, and I know there's probably a
Speaker 1: few others. I don't know if one America's over there
Speaker 1: these days or anyone else. But to basically be the
Speaker 1: one guy with real access who gets to be a journalist,
Speaker 1: isn't that amazing? You get to ask real questions, You
Speaker 1: get to push for information and hold the administration into account,
Speaker 1: speak truth to power. Right, these are things that all
Speaker 1: journalists say they do when really they show up in
Speaker 1: the West Wing and they give Biden the equivalent of
Speaker 1: a foot massage every day. I mean, it should be
Speaker 1: embarrassing to them, but they know that this is what
Speaker 1: is necessary for their careers and also for the ideologically
Speaker 1: this is where they are, This is what they actually
Speaker 1: believe should happen. Right. So, while this is a total
Speaker 1: abdication of journalistic integrity, yeah, it's also deeply boring from
Speaker 1: the journos. As I said, the only member of the
Speaker 1: White House Press Corps whoever asks a real question seems
Speaker 1: to be Doucy for Fox News. And you can almost
Speaker 1: hear the groans coming from the supposed guardians of our
Speaker 1: democracy who sit around them. These legacy media journalists might
Speaker 1: as well be wearing Harris Biden twenty twenty four hats
Speaker 1: while they sit in the West Wing. I mean, their
Speaker 1: fourth est state cosplay, we speak truth to power is
Speaker 1: pathetic and grown inducing. It really is. It's just awful.
Speaker 1: They're all they're pandering for a pat on the head
Speaker 1: from Saki Bomb and they just gush at her every utterance. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's amazing. Finally have somebody who speaks truth from that podium. Sure, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's what's really going on here, oh my, And that
Speaker 1: they can engage on the clear math. It's a math question.
Speaker 1: How much does somebody make forty hours a week for
Speaker 1: fifty two weeks of work? How much does somebody or
Speaker 1: over the course of a few weeks. How much does
Speaker 1: somebody make with the state and federal unemployment benefits that
Speaker 1: they are currently getting thanks to the Biden administrations enormous
Speaker 1: spending decisions. Okay, that's why you have restaurants and other
Speaker 1: businesses who are saying, we have an employee shortage, and
Speaker 1: to say, you just have to pay them more. Okay,
Speaker 1: then your hamburger is going to start costing more. They're
Speaker 1: gonna have to pass this on to customers. This is
Speaker 1: just how it works. We all know it's It's remarkable, though,
Speaker 1: isn't it. The people who know the least about how
Speaker 1: to run a business are the ones making the most
Speaker 1: decisions now in the government about businesses. Not good friends,
Speaker 1: not good a major drag on the kinds of hiring
Speaker 1: and productivity we should be seeing. And then there's this
Speaker 1: Colonial pipeline situation. There are gas lines already. The Colonial
Speaker 1: pipeline was hit, the largest pipeline in North America and
Speaker 1: was hit with a cyber attack ransomware. They think it
Speaker 1: might originate from Russia. Now Russia was so scary into Trump,
Speaker 1: but now we're gonna have a very different tone about Russia. Right.
Speaker 1: We need to we need to talk to them, and
Speaker 1: we need to figure things out. But here is Biden
Speaker 1: yesterday addressing this. Because this people are waiting in lines.
Speaker 1: I mean, they're showing up at gas stations. I've been
Speaker 1: seeing the video of this on social media. They're shown
Speaker 1: up at gas stations told there's no gas. This happened
Speaker 1: to me a few times when I was in West
Speaker 1: Africa a long time ago. We're show up at a
Speaker 1: gas station they said there's no gas. Not something you
Speaker 1: expect to happen in Virginia, South Carolina. You know you don't.
Speaker 1: They don't expect to be driving around saying, hold on
Speaker 1: a second, you got no gas here? What's going on?
Speaker 1: Play clip one. Over the weekend, at my direction to
Speaker 1: the Department of Transportation, issued in evergency order to loosen
Speaker 1: restrictions on truck drivers in order to allow more fuel
Speaker 1: to be transported by a tanker. We're prepared to take
Speaker 1: additional steps depending on how quickly the company is able
Speaker 1: to bring US pipeline back to full operational capacity. The
Speaker 1: Federal Bureau of Investigation has determined Colonials network was infected
Speaker 1: by ransomware and it's a criminal act. Obviously, FBI released
Speaker 1: details of the attack so others can take steps to
Speaker 1: prevent being effective. My administration takes issue, this takes us
Speaker 1: very seriously. We have efforts underway with the FBI and
Speaker 1: DOJ Department Justice to disrupt and prosecute ransomware criminals, and
Speaker 1: my administration will be pursuing a global effort of ransomware
Speaker 1: attacks by transnational criminals who often use global money laundering
Speaker 1: networks to carry them out. No, they don't have time,
Speaker 1: they don't have resources to track down global money laundering
Speaker 1: and ransomware attacks against critical US infrastructure. They have insurrectionists
Speaker 1: to find. Why we need to go find all the insurrections.
Speaker 1: That's what the FBI is focused on. Oh and the CIA,
Speaker 1: as you know, is focused on other things these days
Speaker 1: too than getting the best people. Another CIA video came
Speaker 1: out that was pretty remarkable on recruiting who they're trying
Speaker 1: to recruit. But on the Colonial pipeline cyber attack, nobody
Speaker 1: really takes Joe Biden seriously when he says there will
Speaker 1: be consequences for this, Well, maybe he should have a
Speaker 1: government that focuses on what is important and what is necessary,
Speaker 1: like cyber infrastructure protection. And this is within the National
Speaker 1: Security Room. Right, So I'm not just picking one random
Speaker 1: issue and saying why not this when it's something else. No,
Speaker 1: how much have you heard Biden talk about climate change
Speaker 1: is an existential threat versus how much have you heard
Speaker 1: him talk about the need for not only pipeline cybersecurity,
Speaker 1: more pipelines. Oh no, that's right, he xed out the
Speaker 1: keystone XL. I am a former CIA analyst. You might
Speaker 1: know that if you listen to the show, you're following
Speaker 1: him at work. But it's been a long time, and
Speaker 1: I haven't been the agency in years, going on a
Speaker 1: decade now, because I've been doing radio for almost ten years,
Speaker 1: so I can tell you what it was like then,
Speaker 1: and that it's clearly just continued in this trend of
Speaker 1: wokeness that so many other corporations and entities and government
Speaker 1: agencies have. But just when you thought maybe they would
Speaker 1: have a little bit of a change in their approach,
Speaker 1: the official CIA YouTube account put out this video. This
Speaker 1: is a recruitment and pr video. But here's the kind
Speaker 1: of stuff that that they're now promoting at the Central
Speaker 1: Intelligence Agency, which I'll tell you because I'm honest about
Speaker 1: this stuff. There's a lot of paperwork and Latte's at
Speaker 1: the CIA, you know, there's there's a lot of sitting
Speaker 1: in meetings, and you got a lot got a lot
Speaker 1: of people with soft, stubby fingers, worried more about their overtime,
Speaker 1: and you know how soon they can get on the
Speaker 1: highway to get back home to you know, they're they're
Speaker 1: sixty sixty minute drive to get in or whatever. I mean.
Speaker 1: It's it's not as glamorous and sexy as the James
Speaker 1: Bond stuff. I can you already knew that, but I'm
Speaker 1: just telling you there is some really interesting stuff that
Speaker 1: goes on there there. If you want to do cool
Speaker 1: stuff in the CIA, it is possible, but you will
Speaker 1: constantly be surrounded by people that don't want that. I
Speaker 1: think that excellence is suspect. That's the best way I
Speaker 1: can put it to you, And that being mission first
Speaker 1: in a real way is something that makes people uncomfortable.
Speaker 1: You're supposed to go along with the bureaucracy, and because
Speaker 1: it is a bureaucracy, you have a lot of authoritarian
Speaker 1: leftists who spend all their time policing Hatch Act violations.
Speaker 1: Oh you said you like Ronald Reagan as a joke
Speaker 1: in a meeting you're not allowed to do that, you know,
Speaker 1: and just generally harassing you. So that that's really the
Speaker 1: mentality that you see in a lot of the ages.
Speaker 1: It's just true. There are leftists that run the CIA,
Speaker 1: leftists that run the State Department. And I'm sorry, but
Speaker 1: it's the truth. And actually no, I'm not sorry. The
Speaker 1: leftist mentality is inherently not as patriotic as it should be,
Speaker 1: and in many cases anti patriotic. And I know that's
Speaker 1: tough to hear because there are a lot of these
Speaker 1: federal agencies and institutions where you'd think, shouldn't we have
Speaker 1: superpatriots working there? We should, but we don't. A lot
Speaker 1: of people that believe in critical race theory, a lot
Speaker 1: of people that focus on diversity and inclusion as the
Speaker 1: primary mission. You know, you've seen some of the stuff
Speaker 1: even in the United States military now hurting military combat
Speaker 1: readiness because of a politically correct agenda. And you know,
Speaker 1: they'll trot out someone, they'll get some four star or
Speaker 1: some retired four star. Even worse, we're just politicians and
Speaker 1: they're all just trying to get on the board of raytheon.
Speaker 1: So do you think that they're really worried about whether
Speaker 1: we're gonna win the next war, or they worried about
Speaker 1: their stock options and being corporate friendly. These are speak
Speaker 1: speaking the truth. Friends. I know some people don't want
Speaker 1: to hear it. A lot of you are nodding your
Speaker 1: heads though, especially if you actually served. You're saying, yep,
Speaker 1: a lot of politicians with stars on their shoulders, just
Speaker 1: the way it is, and the same things. It's even
Speaker 1: more true at the Agency. It's even more true at
Speaker 1: the CIA. You got a bunch of leftists running around
Speaker 1: who view the CIA as because it has a reputation
Speaker 1: for a kind of intellectual elitism, which is largely undeserved. Again,
Speaker 1: I'm just I'm telling you the truth about these places.
Speaker 1: It's very hard to get a job at the CIA.
Speaker 1: And I was stunned by how much mediocrity there was.
Speaker 1: There there was there were also there were pockets of excellence.
Speaker 1: So and there are people. And I have to say
Speaker 1: this because I don't want you to get the wrong impression.
Speaker 1: You know, ten percent of that building do ninety percent
Speaker 1: of the work and of the reason why you can
Speaker 1: sleep safely at night, so to speak. And I don't
Speaker 1: just mean CIA, I mean the whole Intel community. And
Speaker 1: anybody working in it. More broadly, you know, it's one
Speaker 1: in ten people that are just there to do the
Speaker 1: job and stop the bad guys and beat our opponents.
Speaker 1: And then it's i'd say six out of ten who
Speaker 1: are just showing up, do what they're told, get a paycheck.
Speaker 1: And then three out of ten are Bernie Sanders loving
Speaker 1: leftists who think that the intelligence community is racist unless
Speaker 1: it focuses first and foremost on diversity inclusion. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's a big chunk, a big chunk. And you see
Speaker 1: this from the latest Humans of CIA video put out
Speaker 1: from their official CIA account. This is a guy who's
Speaker 1: an agency librarian, which is a thing. There is a
Speaker 1: library in the CIA. Here's what he talks about his
Speaker 1: view of being a member of the CIA mission. I
Speaker 1: always struggled with the idea that I might not be
Speaker 1: able to discuss my personal life at work. Imagine my
Speaker 1: surprise when I was taking my oath at CIA and
Speaker 1: I noticed a rainbow on then Director Brennan's lanyard, which
Speaker 1: I later learned was designed by Angel, one of the
Speaker 1: many employee resource groups here at the agency. I remember
Speaker 1: being stunned. Since then, however, I've learned that far beyond
Speaker 1: the resource groups. Inclusion is a core value here. Officers
Speaker 1: from the top down work hard to ensure that every
Speaker 1: single person, whatever their gender, gender identity, race, disability, or
Speaker 1: sexual orientation, can bring their entire self to work every day. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's what's really important here, talking about bringing your gender
Speaker 1: identity to work with you every day, not stopping the
Speaker 1: Chinese from dominating the globe, or stopping the Russians from
Speaker 1: shutting down our pipelines stealing all of our intellectual property.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm just wondering, at what point is it
Speaker 1: too much? Can we all agree that we just that
Speaker 1: it is human nature and it is in fact a
Speaker 1: moral position to in certain jobs. I'm not going to
Speaker 1: say all jobs, because people will fight with me over that. Fine,
Speaker 1: In some jobs, you really just want the person who
Speaker 1: has the greatest competency. You want the greatest competency possible.
Speaker 1: He say, what's an example of this. You are going
Speaker 1: to find out in a week whether your spouse survives
Speaker 1: a very serious brain surgery because of an aneurysm. Do
Speaker 1: you care if the brain surgeon is somebody who got
Speaker 1: the job because of diversity and inclusion, or do you
Speaker 1: want somebody who got the job because that person had
Speaker 1: the highest possible MCATs, the highest ratings as a resident,
Speaker 1: and then you know, in their specialty, and you know,
Speaker 1: what do you want? And I would put to you
Speaker 1: that the the CRT lunatics would say it's it's racism.
Speaker 1: If you don't agree that we still should take into
Speaker 1: account a person's gender, identity, skin or anything else in
Speaker 1: this process, or you know that it's an ism of
Speaker 1: some kind, racism, sexism, transphobia. I don't care. I'm telling
Speaker 1: you if if it is the true and objective belief
Speaker 1: that a person who is a transgender female living a
Speaker 1: polyamorous lifestyle from you know where, from and the name
Speaker 1: any country in the world, if that individual is the
Speaker 1: best brain surgeon for my loved one, I swear to
Speaker 1: you on all that is holy, that is who I
Speaker 1: would want operating on my spouse. But what I don't
Speaker 1: want is you know, uh, you know the super genius
Speaker 1: doctor named you know John, you know John Smith or
Speaker 1: something to be pushed aside because you know, we we
Speaker 1: gotta have a we gotta have more inclusive brain surgery
Speaker 1: residencies here at the hospital, and no like that. That's
Speaker 1: and that's a central that's a central fight, a central
Speaker 1: challenge now in society, and people white liberals on this
Speaker 1: issue are enormous frauds because they look at you right
Speaker 1: beyond this they no, no, it's not that's not right.
Speaker 1: I don't agree with that. I think it's not true
Speaker 1: that you can have the absolute best while changing standards
Speaker 1: for diversity and inclusion reasons. They will fight you on this,
Speaker 1: but this is this forces you to believe something that
Speaker 1: is illogical. If all that matters is competency, that's the
Speaker 1: end of the sentence, that's the end of the conversation.
Speaker 1: If competency plus diversity and inclusion is what matters, you
Speaker 1: can't say that all that matters is competency. Is this
Speaker 1: is just a simple function of logic. But as we
Speaker 1: see with so many other things with democrats and leftists,
Speaker 1: logic is the enemy reason. Truth is in fact the
Speaker 1: enemy of building the society that they think is more equitable.
Speaker 1: And that's how you have at the CIA, people who
Speaker 1: are are announcing how proud they are of the fact
Speaker 1: that the CIA is now recruiting people with an eye
Speaker 1: to making sure that they have a broad representation of
Speaker 1: of gender identities, and and that there's a I always
Speaker 1: want to know what is the proper what is the
Speaker 1: proper balance of racial and ethnic diversity in a federal
Speaker 1: institution like the CIA, because quotas, remember quotas are not allowed,
Speaker 1: because then that's too it's too clear that you're going
Speaker 1: to make decisions to hit those numbers. You can't have quotas.
Speaker 1: But so then what's what's the proper amount of diversity?
Speaker 1: And people who say this is just a principle that
Speaker 1: doesn't influence hiring decisions are either ignorant or wrong. They
Speaker 1: absolutely influence hiring decisions. And I've seen I've had conversations.
Speaker 1: I have conversations actually with a person who was in
Speaker 1: the federal government who was trying to get rid of
Speaker 1: an employee, but that employee fell in a protected category
Speaker 1: and it's basically impossible. And that person told me if
Speaker 1: I had done the things that the person in the
Speaker 1: protected category had as a federal employee, oh my butt
Speaker 1: would have been terminated a long time ago. This is
Speaker 1: the reality of what is going on. And I'm bringing
Speaker 1: it up because you know, you may think that, okay,
Speaker 1: we could we can sacrifice the CIA and the intelligence
Speaker 1: community to the PC gods and still be okay as
Speaker 1: a country. You feel that way about the military, because
Speaker 1: that's happening too. You feel that way about, as I said,
Speaker 1: brain surgeons, modern medicine, where the difference between the very
Speaker 1: best and just okay is actually the difference between life
Speaker 1: and death. I think that this is where we have
Speaker 1: to really push back and understand what kind of a
Speaker 1: country we want to live in, what kind of a
Speaker 1: society we want going forward? Do we want a place
Speaker 1: that rewards competency regardless of race, gender, identity, or any
Speaker 1: other characteristic, which is gonna it's gonna mean that, yes,
Speaker 1: you're you're going to have people who are from minority groups,
Speaker 1: from different people who are who are trans, people who
Speaker 1: are members of the LGBTQ community, who are at the
Speaker 1: absolute top of their fields. And we'll know, everybody will
Speaker 1: know that there's no other considerations involved, and so we
Speaker 1: can all understand, we can all agree that competency is
Speaker 1: the driving factor, or we can have one where the
Speaker 1: Left gets to play their social engineering games and people suffer.
Speaker 1: National security suffers, military readiness suffers. We see there's plenty
Speaker 1: of evidence about this. They don't fight back, they don't
Speaker 1: fight this, this critique with evidence, though they fight it
Speaker 1: with slanders. You're a racist, you're bigot, your misogynist, you're
Speaker 1: a transphope, whatever it may be. They just attack people
Speaker 1: to silence them. Feels pretty Stalinist. And if you look
Speaker 1: at the history of the Soviet Union, for example, you'll
Speaker 1: see that Stalin's fixation on power at the expense of
Speaker 1: those who were competent below him led to some pretty
Speaker 1: disastrous stuff when the Soviets were actually facing a determined
Speaker 1: enemy like the Germans got. When you hollow out your
Speaker 1: officer corps because you're executing everybody all the time, turns
Speaker 1: out your competency takes a nosedive. And that was a
Speaker 1: major problem that Stalin faced, certainly in the Well and
Speaker 1: honestly both World Wars, but he wasn't in charge in
Speaker 1: the first one. So that's something to keep in mind
Speaker 1: as well, that competency has long term implications in a society,
Speaker 1: and by the time we figure out, oh, well, you
Speaker 1: mean the Chinese, you're just building the most effective intelligence
Speaker 1: in the terry apparatus possible and not sitting around giving
Speaker 1: people diversity lectures be too late. When the Left figures
Speaker 1: that out, I think these whether the people that are
Speaker 1: complaining that he's going to be on Center Live. I
Speaker 1: think what's going on now is like they want someone
Speaker 1: to be one hundred percent compliant to whatever ideology they're
Speaker 1: a part of the idea, and any deviation of that
Speaker 1: is problematic. Whether it's because they think like I saw
Speaker 1: an article that said Elon Musk donated one hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty million dollars to some charity and they called him
Speaker 1: a cheap skate. It's hilarious. How hilarious is that? We wait,
Speaker 1: dill they see when I'm a billionaire, get ready with
Speaker 1: this cheap skate? No, my brother, but it's it was.
Speaker 1: It was such a article. It's just a poorly written
Speaker 1: knucklehead article. Yeah, it's again like you say, no one
Speaker 1: can be wokenough. You know, I'm torn because I like
Speaker 1: a warrior for a good cause, but I'm really in
Speaker 1: the tactics. You're not gonna nag people into behaving right
Speaker 1: in a way. That's you know, in fact, if you
Speaker 1: continue with this tone, even if you're right, you'll be
Speaker 1: very hard to hear. You can never be woke enough.
Speaker 1: I think that's important for everyone to know and to
Speaker 1: hear you can never be woken off. You can never
Speaker 1: be enough of a fauci i, you can never align
Speaker 1: yourself enough with the goals of the left to be
Speaker 1: truly secure, because it is all about power, it's not
Speaker 1: about principle. And if you have to be fed into
Speaker 1: the machinery, if the cancel culture would chipper, you know
Speaker 1: has has space for you, it's going to be a
Speaker 1: rough day. And I see this all over the place
Speaker 1: now in the media where people are They're no longer funny,
Speaker 1: they're no longer dynamic, they're no longer interesting because they
Speaker 1: can't be because they're so worried all the time. And
Speaker 1: when you bring this up, you'll have shrill, idiot leftists
Speaker 1: who you know, throw around their credentials from some who
Speaker 1: gives a crap undergrad institution or maybe even columbial journalism school,
Speaker 1: as though that indicates they have some wisdom or something
Speaker 1: special to add to the conversation, who say that there
Speaker 1: is no cancel culture, there's only accountability culture. They'll say
Speaker 1: these stupid, smug things, as if once again what is
Speaker 1: obvious is in fact not even true to them. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think these things are any human being who's paying
Speaker 1: attention can figure out that there's something really stifling and
Speaker 1: bad going on in America today, and it is coming
Speaker 1: from the left. They want censorship, they want big tech
Speaker 1: doing their dirty work. They want to ruin people's lives
Speaker 1: as part of just their intoxication with power in our
Speaker 1: culture and then our politics. And you have the people
Speaker 1: that are on that side. We'll look at you and say, oh,
Speaker 1: I don't even know what you're talking about. That's not
Speaker 1: even happening. You just don't want to be held accountable
Speaker 1: for anything. And this is why Elon Musk hosting Saturday
Speaker 1: Night Live, which is a garbage show with untalented people,
Speaker 1: just is I would watch it if it were good.
Speaker 1: I used to watch The Daily Show back in the
Speaker 1: day when John Stewart hosted, even though he was a
Speaker 1: small leftist propagandist, but he was good at it. Snls
Speaker 1: not even good at being a bunch of woe cry babies.
Speaker 1: They were lucky that Elon spent five minutes with them.
Speaker 1: More and more people figuring out that what I've been
Speaker 1: saying for a while about the need to go back
Speaker 1: to normal is critical, including even some Democrats, some leftists
Speaker 1: these days, and going back to normal as individuals but
Speaker 1: also as businesses is essential. I want to see small
Speaker 1: businesses having a renaissance this year, and I want to
Speaker 1: do everything I can to help. So if you have
Speaker 1: a small business, you need to check out Bambi because
Speaker 1: when you're running a business, HR issues can kill you.
Speaker 1: You've got wrongful termination suits, minimum wage requirements, labor regulations,
Speaker 1: and HR manager salaries aren't cheap an average of seventy
Speaker 1: thousand dollars a year. Bambi spelled Bambee was created specifically
Speaker 1: for small business. You can get a dedicated HR manager,
Speaker 1: craft HR policy, and maintain your compliance all for just
Speaker 1: ninety nine dollars a month. With Bamby, you can change
Speaker 1: HR from your biggest liability to your biggest strength. Your
Speaker 1: dedicated HR manager is available by phone, email, or real
Speaker 1: time chat. From onboarding determinations, they customize your policies to
Speaker 1: fit your business and help you manage your employees day
Speaker 1: to day, all for just ninety nine dollars a month.
Speaker 1: This is a month to month service, no hidden fees.
Speaker 1: You can cancel anytime. But you didn't start your business
Speaker 1: because you wanted to spend time on HR compliance, Let
Speaker 1: Bambi help get your free HR audit today. Go to
Speaker 1: Bambi dot com slash buck right now to schedule your
Speaker 1: free HR audit. That's bambee dot com, slash Bambie dot
Speaker 1: com slash buck. We can't mandate people do certain things,
Speaker 1: but we could certainly give them the best advice possible.
Speaker 1: And the guidance that the photograment has put out is
Speaker 1: for your safety, wearing a mask, getting vaccinated crucial. If
Speaker 1: you haven't done either, or if you're not doing either
Speaker 1: one of those two, you're in real trouble. But if
Speaker 1: you've been vaccinated, you're obviously far safer. We still want
Speaker 1: you to be as safe as possible. That's why the
Speaker 1: indoor policy should still be masking. But clearly, if you've
Speaker 1: been vaccinated fully and you're with folks who are also vaccinated, John,
Speaker 1: the risk does diminish dramatically. But again, to be safe,
Speaker 1: you could end up being a carrier not know it.
Speaker 1: And if somebody hasn't been vaccinated or doesn't wear a mask,
Speaker 1: guess what, there's still that potential of getting COVID. AJJS secretary,
Speaker 1: But Sarah is just another blathering buffoon here. You know,
Speaker 1: we never have government officials from the Biden administration even
Speaker 1: talking about how many people have already got COVID, how
Speaker 1: many people have been vaccinated, and so what they're insisting
Speaker 1: on is that you have at least two hundred million people.
Speaker 1: It's probably more like two hundred and fifty million people
Speaker 1: at this point should have no concerns whatsoever about this virus.
Speaker 1: They could still get it. I understand it's possible, but
Speaker 1: it's just unreasonable to continue to live in fear of this. Right,
Speaker 1: just do the numbers. Thirty percent of the country is
Speaker 1: fully vaccinated right now, a little over thirty percent, so
Speaker 1: that's one hundred million people. Now I can't tell you
Speaker 1: how many of those who have been infected are also
Speaker 1: those who have been vaccinated. There's going to be some crossover,
Speaker 1: but you've had at least one hundred and fifty million
Speaker 1: people who have had the virus, so you gotta be
Speaker 1: at half the country has no reasonable one hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty million people has no reasonable fear, should have no
Speaker 1: reasonable fear of this whatsoever. It's probably more like two
Speaker 1: hundred million. So two thirds of the country is basically fine.
Speaker 1: This is just back of the envelope math. But you
Speaker 1: can do it yourself. They tell you that thirty four
Speaker 1: percent I think is the number I saw this week
Speaker 1: are vaccinated, and they will tell you that or they're
Speaker 1: they're by their own figures, thirty million infections. They're catching
Speaker 1: maybe one in five. That's one hundred and fifty million
Speaker 1: infections over the course of the pandemic. So you're at
Speaker 1: one hundred million vaccinations, one hundred and fifty million infections.
Speaker 1: At least fifty million more people with natural immunity than
Speaker 1: have infections. So we're getting to a big chunk of
Speaker 1: the country that doesn't have to worry about this anymore,
Speaker 1: but they want us all to worry about it. All
Speaker 1: of you have to mask, all of you to do
Speaker 1: these things. You know, it's just it's not working, it's
Speaker 1: not smart, and they want to continue this. You think
Speaker 1: that vaccine passports have gone away. No, the HHS SECT
Speaker 1: remember this Health and Human Services. This is an agency
Speaker 1: that has weight to throw around on this issue. AJJ Secretary.
Speaker 1: But Sarah is saying that, you know, maybe we do
Speaker 1: have to ban people from buildings who have not gotten
Speaker 1: the shot play eight. How do we get to a
Speaker 1: point where we get everyone to be as safe as possible?
Speaker 1: You know, it was always difficult to get people on
Speaker 1: motorcycles to wear helmets for their own safety. It was
Speaker 1: tough at times to get people to wear seat belts
Speaker 1: for their own safety. What we're simply saying is the
Speaker 1: best guidance from those who are the experts in healthcare
Speaker 1: is be as safe as possible by wearing a mask,
Speaker 1: even if you're vaccinated. But yeah, if you're vaccinated, you're
Speaker 1: around people who are vaccinated, Clearly you're going to be
Speaker 1: far better off. It's a matter of just it's a
Speaker 1: matter of being using common sense. John and I can't
Speaker 1: tell you more than that, other than we want every
Speaker 1: American to be safe, and we want every American to
Speaker 1: get vaccinated. And the more we do that, the more
Speaker 1: we can say every American can stop having to worry
Speaker 1: about wearing a mask. So is it a choice? Are
Speaker 1: you making us? Because you're making us, but you're pretending
Speaker 1: it's a choice. And is it based on Dana or
Speaker 1: is it based on your unreasonable fear in your desire
Speaker 1: for control? Which one is it? Be? Sarah, That's what
Speaker 1: you really should ask the Biden administration. They can't have
Speaker 1: it both ways. You know, we're just encouraging you to
Speaker 1: be safer. No, you're not. You're making us You try
Speaker 1: to get on an airplane right now without a mask,
Speaker 1: they will remove you, and they will ban you from
Speaker 1: that airline forever, they say, and they'll point to the
Speaker 1: federal government. You know who's really responsible for this too?
Speaker 1: Our businesses afraid of being fined or being sued, or
Speaker 1: do businesses really want to harass every customer who comes
Speaker 1: in to wear a mask? At this point, which one is? It?
Speaker 1: Just wondering. They don't have an answer for you. It's
Speaker 1: stunning to watch this play out, and they've ignored all
Speaker 1: they've ignored all of what we saw over the wintertime. Remember,
Speaker 1: why do we go to two masks in January? Why
Speaker 1: did that really happen? If you believe it happened because
Speaker 1: they did some new, really high end testing on double masking,
Speaker 1: you're just not very smart. Why did they do it?
Speaker 1: We all know, you know you're listening to this show
Speaker 1: because masks were not working the way they told us
Speaker 1: they would. That's it. It's obvious. They can yell at
Speaker 1: me and say everything else they want. What they're gonna
Speaker 1: do now is say that you know there was a
Speaker 1: time when they would tell us that masks were more
Speaker 1: effective than even the vaccine. Remember the CDC director said
Speaker 1: that I would even say that this mask is more
Speaker 1: effective than a vaccine. Redfield. The guy was a moron,
Speaker 1: but he said that in front of Congress, no less,
Speaker 1: which is idiotic. Yeah, do I think that, you know,
Speaker 1: masks may end up preventing something like you know, or
Speaker 1: maybe useful in one percent of case reduction or something
Speaker 1: along the lines that we've actually seen from mask mandates.
Speaker 1: That's what they think, and that's within the margin of errors.
Speaker 1: You know, maybe is it worth it to harass the
Speaker 1: entire country and put us all through this for No,
Speaker 1: it is not. It's not. That's the problem. See that
Speaker 1: that's the difference in approach to all this. You know.
Speaker 1: They say, oh, well, you don't listen. I had to
Speaker 1: mask up in New York here all the time, did
Speaker 1: it didn't. Didn't end up with anything other than me
Speaker 1: getting COVID. I got COVID. So oh, but it's gonna
Speaker 1: protect you, it's gonna protect you. No, it didn't. It didn't.
Speaker 1: And there's a reason why this was not policy for
Speaker 1: dealing with dealing with respiratory viruses until until twenty twenty
Speaker 1: we all know that too, right, it's so obvious that
Speaker 1: nobody thought this was obvious until like five minutes ago. Yeah,
Speaker 1: think it through, folks, we all know. We all see
Speaker 1: even on this issue. Lemon and Cuomo over at CNN.
Speaker 1: Oh wait, I gotta tell you this is great. You
Speaker 1: know CNN has lost as of I think it was
Speaker 1: last Friday, the most recent for this past Friday's ratings
Speaker 1: plus two thirds of their audience from January. You just
Speaker 1: you can't watch these complete frauds who have nothing interesting
Speaker 1: to say, who have no insights to offer whatsoever. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're just what they would call them the UK newsreaders, really,
Speaker 1: and they read off the prompter, They ask a couple
Speaker 1: of dumb questions, they tell the audience what they think
Speaker 1: they want to hear. It's not interesting. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: deeply boring to watch people try to prop up the
Speaker 1: Biden administration. I think that is clear. I think that's ombious.
Speaker 1: And that's what we're seeing. That is what is playing
Speaker 1: out before US year. And so even Democrats are at
Speaker 1: least going to MSNBC. They want the real, unadulterated leftist
Speaker 1: radical perspective on America. Right, they want the actual activist
Speaker 1: socialist left ethos reflected in their news which they get
Speaker 1: from MSNBC. It's crazy, but at least there's an honesty
Speaker 1: to it, whereas it CNN there's still oh, we're just journalists,
Speaker 1: we're just journals. We're just providing you with the truth.
Speaker 1: In any moment. Now there could be another insurrection. You
Speaker 1: gotta be scared, mask up and get ready for the insurrection.
Speaker 1: It's just bad content. It's not worth listening. You don't
Speaker 1: learn anything. It's certainly not true. But that's what they
Speaker 1: do over there, plenty of it. Lemon and Cuomo agreeing
Speaker 1: though that this whole keep doing all the dumbass stuff
Speaker 1: we have to do, even after you're fully vaccinated. This
Speaker 1: is a big problem. You don't say play six. If
Speaker 1: you were going to say, I believe in the science
Speaker 1: and the scientists, then now on this side of the pandemic,
Speaker 1: then you must believe in the science and scientists as well.
Speaker 1: I agree, saying to you, if you're fully vaccinated, you
Speaker 1: don't have to wear a mask outside. If you want
Speaker 1: to travel, you can wear a mask, follow the protocols.
Speaker 1: But it is ninety nine point nine nine or whatever
Speaker 1: percent chances that you won't get you won't get COVID,
Speaker 1: then you should trust in that science as well and
Speaker 1: get back to your life. I could walk out of
Speaker 1: here and get hit by a bus. I want to
Speaker 1: live my life. I want to see my loved ones.
Speaker 1: So can we get back to some semblance of normalcy?
Speaker 1: And we cannot be afraid to go back into normal
Speaker 1: with you? But I willie help me argue one to
Speaker 1: five logic. I'll argue one point for your mom. Okay,
Speaker 1: this messaging about the vaccine has not been good enough.
Speaker 1: They still make you feel like it's not like every
Speaker 1: other vaccine that you've ever had in your life, where
Speaker 1: you may still get it. You should still wear a mask.
Speaker 1: You still have enough to be contagious, you can still
Speaker 1: spread it. You know. I get white people like your
Speaker 1: mom and my mom. Yeah, did not feel the confidence
Speaker 1: that we were supposed to have in getting this vaccine messaging.
Speaker 1: And I still don't think they're allowing the numbers and
Speaker 1: the science to rule, and they're giving people with vaccines
Speaker 1: even more latitude, especially now that you have people who
Speaker 1: don't want to get it. I know, I just trashed
Speaker 1: CNN and they deserve it. But what they said here
Speaker 1: is pretty much correct. So I'm just gonna know. I
Speaker 1: always tell you credit words due. Yes, yes, this is idiocy.
Speaker 1: Let's call it what is. Let's be clear about this.
Speaker 1: Let's not use the terminology they want. This notion that
Speaker 1: you're supposed to keep on doing this stuff where you're
Speaker 1: always are you afraid of getting measles? Well, you've had
Speaker 1: the MMR vaccination most likely if you went to public school,
Speaker 1: you certainly had to get You walk around afraid of
Speaker 1: getting measles? No? No, And I understand that what the
Speaker 1: lockdown left would say, it's oh, but there's not a
Speaker 1: lot of measles out there, and everything goes yeah, but
Speaker 1: that's because people who get the shot don't get measles.
Speaker 1: It's because it works. That's how we got to this place.
Speaker 1: So on an individual basis, yes, you don't really have
Speaker 1: to worry. And yes, on an individual basis, or if
Speaker 1: you if you look at the number breakthrough infections are
Speaker 1: not substantial enough to continue to perpetuate this. So it
Speaker 1: is a reasonable cost to incur to have breakthrough infections
Speaker 1: that the vaccinated in order to get more people who
Speaker 1: are willing to get the shot to go back to life. Faster.
Speaker 1: But here's the other problem that they won't really talk
Speaker 1: to you about, and they won't say it. The left
Speaker 1: is not willing, the Democrats, the Biden administration is not
Speaker 1: willing to let this go. For those of you who
Speaker 1: don't ever want to get vaccinated, I know there are
Speaker 1: a lot of you, and there's a sound argument, especially
Speaker 1: for those who are infected or at low risk, why
Speaker 1: should I get You want to get vaccinated, go get vaccent.
Speaker 1: Why should I have to get vaccinated? You know that
Speaker 1: this goes right to the heart of the issue. They're
Speaker 1: not going to just let it go, not under this
Speaker 1: Biden administration. So this fight will continue on in that way.
Speaker 1: If they really wanted people though to get this they
Speaker 1: get this shot and get it over with, they would say, okay,
Speaker 1: if you at the shot, you'll go. But then they
Speaker 1: lose control because a lot of people who won't get
Speaker 1: the shot will say, well, I've been vaccinated, and that
Speaker 1: would happen. I'm telling you, I think that on balance,
Speaker 1: it would be better if those people. It would be
Speaker 1: better if people believe that they had their normal lives back.
Speaker 1: It'd also be more scientific and more reasonable to have
Speaker 1: the normal lives back post vaccination, and then we can
Speaker 1: deal with Okay, if you don't want to get shot,
Speaker 1: let's see what ends up happening. I think a lot
Speaker 1: of I think it's greatly overstated that we have to
Speaker 1: worry about people from this virus who aren't in the
Speaker 1: high risk category. That's really what this comes down to.
Speaker 1: You know, if we get ninety percent of seniors sixty
Speaker 1: five and over vaccinated, this thing is done. For all
Speaker 1: intents and purposes. We should not even thinking about this anymore.
Speaker 1: It's like the flu. It's manageable. We go about our lives.
Speaker 1: That's a reasonable perspective on this, instead of we have
Speaker 1: the fauciite insanity which they're always gonna keep moving the
Speaker 1: goal post. It's never gonna end, folks, unless we make
Speaker 1: it in