WEBVTT - A Tale of Two Cities Emerges In Commercial Real Estate

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Along

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Kind the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Well, we've been keeping a

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>close eye on real estate, particularly commercial real estate. Or

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>next to guest is the leader of b d os

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>us site selection team. So has he been busy? My suspicion,

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>as he'll say, yes, let's ask him directly. Tom Stringer

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>joins us. Tom, thanks for joining. What's happening out there

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:44.919
<v Speaker 1>are companies still looking for sites, making plans, changing strategies. Well,

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>first of all, good morning, Fanny, thanks for having me.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>It's great to be back. And yes, you are right,

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we are busy. I mean, I think for the first

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>two months of the pandemic, folks were in shutdown and

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>wait and see mode and kind of a springtime turned

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>into summer, the wheel to commerce luckily started turning again,

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly on on large Catholic investment projects, and you started

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to see that. Obviously, today we have some great news

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in New York City with what Facebook announced with the

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Farley Post Office building taking a substantial block of space

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>in the Central Business District, which I think is really

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>probably great news for the brokerage communities across the country.

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And in the last week or so, you've had some

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>some major investments in manufacturing, certainly with Tesla and Nicolo

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 1>with the groundbreaking on their factories and the automotive sector,

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.559
<v Speaker 1>so wheels are starting to move, which is great news.

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Is your client, we should we should mention exactly so.

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So Tom, you know, I guess the debate is still

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>open about, you know, where people will work going forward.

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>A lot of us, most of us, a lot of

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>us are working from home right now, we have been

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>since March. Some folks unfortunately are unable to do that,

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and there are on on the front lines. But how

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>is it the thought process evolving about how this is

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>going to play out? Are we ever gonna go back

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to the office full force? It's a great an'swer, a

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>great question. I think the answer to that is probably not.

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that any time you can take right the

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>two biggest costs on corporate balance sheets or people, we

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>all get that and then obviously real estates number two.

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And anytime you can take your second leading cost and

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and maybe half it or reduce it by even as

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>much as the third um, that's a huge difference. And

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it also takes an account of people like working at

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>home to some degree. Some jobs people would certainly prefer

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to be back to the office. But that has really

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>been injected into the thought process on the corporate real

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>estate side that hey, we're going to have to tack

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit here at you know, try to reconfigure

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>how we utilize space. Is it going to be that

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>big open concept anymore? Will that work? Do we need

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a smaller footprint that's just going to be more hotel

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and meeting space and and let most people office out

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of their homes. So those discussions are really taking place,

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're probably going to see a reduction

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in overall office usage. But that's being picked up pretty

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>aggressively on the manufacturing and warehousing side right now. I mean,

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't find warehousing space really anywhere around the country

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in sizeable blocks anymore, which is is indicative of kind

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>of the rise of e commerce. Well, so you'd be

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in a great position to tell us are those all

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for server farms and for computers or the actual people

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that are Like, I'm fascinated by this for NATO stories

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>seven square feet in the middle of New York City

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>right by Pen I mean it is Penn Station basically,

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know that's ten million square feet in total.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>But is Facebook going to move people into that building

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>or is this another server farm? Yeah, no, that's a

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>good question. Um, we don't know what their internal plants

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>are yet. Focus has really been on the block of space.

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>But given where it is, given the locality, given frankly,

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the utility rates and the costs of utilities in New

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>York versus putting servers in in more cost effective jurisdictions

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>or even upstate New York to take advantage of things

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>like Niagara Mohawk power, the odds are that this is

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>really going to be a people dominated facility, which is

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>great news, but also are around the country there has

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of pick up really, as you point out,

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in computer capacity in server farms coming online to handle

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>just the demand of e commerce and the fact that

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:16.039
<v Speaker 1>really we're moving our infrastructure and architecture into the digital

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>world as opposed to physical plan But it's also being

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>picked up by warehouse I mean actual good old fashioned

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>inventory as really unsexy as that is, companies are building

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that into their models now because the consumer markets are

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>driving Hey, you need to have these types of prescriptions

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>on hand, these consumer products on hand, so that that

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of the death of the just in time inventory

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>models really taking hold. Hey, Tom, you know, let's talk

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>about New York City in particular. A couple of weeks ago,

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I came into the city for the first time since

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>early March, and I was just shocked at the number

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of vacancies, commercial vacancies along blocks that I'm very familiar

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>with where I know they were vibrant businesses just several

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>months ago. Where are we in terms of kind of

0:04:56.000 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>commercial vacancies and maybe even rates um in New York City. Well,

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you asked a really good question, because even though office

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and we're housing an industrial may be doing very well,

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>um certainly in the New York City marketplace right now,

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook being a big help to that. The retail

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and street level retail is a big issue, and that's

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>been an issue that's really been going on for two

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and three years prior to the pandemic with landlords just

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of holding out for higher price rents and small

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>mom and pop type of shops and able to make

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it and make it just on a commercial lease standpoint

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 1>that couldn't afford the rent. This is, along with the

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>lockdown and shutting them out of any revenue, has really

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>been a significant problem for the city and it probably

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>will be for the foreseeable future. Um. You know, the

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>programs that have come out of the Federal Reserve, the

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>p PP, the extensions of it right have been helpful,

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>but but it doesn't replace real revenue. It doesn't replace

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>real consumer demand. It's it's a band aid, um that

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that was designed to get us to right market demand

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>again that still has not come back yet. So I

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>think you point out a really good issue that that

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>retail and main street related issues for real estate not

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>just in the cities, but in the suburbs. I mean

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that they're going through the same issues right now. That's

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a problem. That's a problem that economic development is going

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to have to deal with. That that legislatures at the

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>both the federal, state local are going to have to

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>deal with and we've never done that for that. Yeah,

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to see. It's gonna be a big turn

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>on Tom as you're suggesting. Tom Stringer, Corporate real Estate

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Advisory Managing Director for accounting firm b DEO, giving us

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>his thoughts on the commercial real estate business again. The

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>big news in New York City was um Facebook taking

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>a huge piece of commercial real estate, the Farley Building,

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>which is right across street from Penn Station in Midtown Manhattan. Well.

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets magazine is out with a special issue focused

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>on diversity, where black men and women share their experience

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street. Lauren Simmons is one of the contributors.

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>She's the youngest black woman ever to work on the

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>New York Stock Exchange and she joins us now, Lauren,

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. We really appreciate it. Entrepreneur found

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>their CEO of Lauren Simmons, We really appreciate you joining

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>us here, Lauren, Wall Street. Why can't they seem to

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>make any steady progress at all on diversity? You know,

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it has to be an initiative that people

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>want to care about. And if you have people sitting

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>at the top that don't make this an importance, it's

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to be an importance. UM. I know that

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and twenty these issues have been brought

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>up again. And once these issues are brought up, it's

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>no reason to turn a blind light, like you should

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>be going above and beyond to to do better and

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to be better and to have more diversity inclusion within

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>your organization. But two thousand and twenties, since the first

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>time that these issues have been brought up in seventeen,

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>while I was still on the trading floor, it was

0:07:54.560 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the year of the Woman, and since up until we

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>have made marginalized efforts, as you know, bringing more women

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>into this space, let alone bringing more minorities. So, Lauren,

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>how long did you work on Wall Street and did

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you feel like there was any progress at all between

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>arriving and leaving. I worked there for two years, and uh,

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>there was one other lady who eventually joined the trading floor,

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and she was much older, had been on the trading floor,

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, back in the nineties, early two thousand and

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and had came back. So from my experience, no, specifically

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to the New York Stock Exchange, No, I don't think

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>there's been much improvement. So it's interesting, Lauren. You know,

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I've worked on Wall Street for about thirty years and

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>what I noticed and this is probably has some relation

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>to corporate America as well as the incoming classes, whether

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 1>at a college, whether their investment banking analysts or their

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>new sales and people are traders. There's a fair amount

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of diversity there, both gender diversity and all other types

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of diversity. Yet when you get ten years forward, seven eight, nine,

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>ten years forward, when there's managing director decisions, partnership decisions,

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 1>those ranks are really thinned out and it does look

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>much less diverse. What do you think the industry has

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to do to kind of keep those people in the workforce. Yeah,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.719
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think that there should be sponsorships. There

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>should be allies UM people actively involved in trying to

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>progress individuals careers. When I was on the trading floor,

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I love that the men and it was mutual on

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>both sides me. But then we were coming together, what

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>can we do to help you with your career? You know,

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you don't want to stay on the trading floor.

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>What do you want to do in finance? And they

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>introduced me to many different people and they were definitely

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>helpful and facilitating that, But I know that that's not

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the experience UM with throughout all of corporate America or

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>even within the financial industry. So I think there needs

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a bridge and to go from there. Lauren,

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>what did you learn from Wall Street and would you

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>ever work on Wall Street again? I learned so many things. Um. Obviously,

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>working on the train floor was a very fast pace

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>alpha mel environment and I was the only woman on

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the floor. Um. I think one of the best devices

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that Richard Rose and Wise It could give me while

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I worked at Rose bat Securities is you know people

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>are going to notice you regardless. And he didn't mean

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>anything by it, but he just said that, because I

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>am the other in the room, and you know I'm

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially the elephant the room, make sure that I have

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>something to say, something of substance to say when people

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>approached me, because people are going to notice me either way,

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's no way of hiding, um and encountering behind

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>other people. So I thought that was the best device

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that I would give. As far as you running back

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>to Wall Street, I I don't think so. I very

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>much enjoyed my experience there, um, but I have been

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>showed off into doing uh many more things that I'm

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>passionate about that are making a much brander impact. Lauren Simmons,

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We really appreciate your thoughts.

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>A fascinating story. Lauren Simmons, entrepreneur, founder and see of

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Simmons l l C. Featured it in the Bluemore

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Markets magazine. They have a special issue focused on diversity. Really,

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>uh suggest you take a look at that is where

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>black men and women they really share their experiences on

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street and again, Vannie, it's just you know, my

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>sense that, um, there's just not enough support to get

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>them through the ranks. Again, I think they do a

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent job getting people in the door, but keeping

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>them as a whole another story. Well, it's definitely a

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>question of willingness. And Lauren at twenty six, with that

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of experience under her belt, is you know, a

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>great ambassador for somebody who went out there and did

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that in spite of all the odds. I had a

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>conversation with her esterday and she was telling me that

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>she was the second black person to ever have worked

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>on the New York Stock Exchange, which, really, when you

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>think about it, the amount of people that have worked

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.839
<v Speaker 1>down there over the year is the entire history of

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the New York Stock Change heard the second black equity

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>trader down there is really quite something phenomenal, I think,

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you read the Diversity Issue magazine, you'll see

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that all of these people seem to be one off

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's just not good enough. No, it's not And

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>as as she was mentioning, um, as Lauren was mentioning here,

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>there really has to be support. And we've heard a

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk not just from the senior folks on

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street, but just senior management is c suite in general,

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the last decade plus about commitment to diversity,

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>but there it just doesn't bear out in the numbers,

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and we see that time and time again. And so

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that's why I think this Bloomberg Markets issue, there's a

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>really good job that goes below the numbers and really

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 1>talks to the people, interview some people that have worked

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street black men, men and women, and they

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>share their personal experiences and kind of really brings at home.

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's a good job by the team of Bloomberg Markets.

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna be looking forward to seeing what Lauren

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Simmons does next because she's clearly a trailblazer in her fields.

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So Thank you to Lauren Simmons for joining us and

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>speaking about her experience. It's time for Bloomberg Opinion. We

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>are joined this morning by Rachel Rosenthal, editor Bloomberg Opinion

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>based in Singapore, out with a fascinating column, and it

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>goes to that whole H one B visa issue that

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is making. It's always a political issue, but it's even

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a bigger one this year with President Trump looking to

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 1>rein that in and uh, interesting column. Um, Rachel's out

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>with this column, Big Tech wants you to believe in

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a skills gap. Titles suggest that maybe Rachel doesn't necessarily

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that. Rachel, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>I've always heard from Silicon Valley that these H one

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>B VISs are critical to their businesses because the US

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>does not produce enough skilled labor. What's the real take there?

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that? Um? Well, you know what, I

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>into Stanford, so in the heart of Silicon Valley, and

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I very much believe the same. And you know, I

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>think I would have agreed with you until about about

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>feed or ten weeks ago when I started researching this piece. Um.

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, you start looking at the data and it

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't really add up. UM. And you know, if

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at the number of graduates that we have

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>in computer science and engineering, if you look at the

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>number of them graduates overall, and then you look at

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the number of openings, the number of vacancies, patterns of

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>wage growth, and you look at a whole host of

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>other things. Um, you start to see some that the

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>thread really starts to unravel there, and you start you

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>have to kind of ask yourself the bigger question. You

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>know what, um, what do you tech companies want? And

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not just tech companies, it's companies across the tech industry.

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're tech workers and all kinds of fields

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that you know, I see you know, every kind of

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>company has I F workers for example, so um, they

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>could be in in retail, to restaurants. So UM. There

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of incentive to claim the there are

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>enough skilled workers because you can get a pretty serious

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>discount on on foreign labor um. And these are guest workers. UM.

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think. You know, there's a really fascinating paper

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>upon which a lot of my research was based, UM,

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>out of the Economic Policy Institute. It came out in May, UM,

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>indicating that you know, there are four wage levels for

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>each one vs UM, and the two lowest ones companies

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>can get a discount. UM. It was up to you know,

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty six percent for the lowest wage bracket and eighteen

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>percent for the second lowest. Now that was that that

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>they had to look at a narrowest place within the

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>DC metro area in a certain computer occupation. UM. But

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty telling to me that this kind of UM,

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this kind of discount can really add up and create

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>huge savings and create incentives for this narrative to persist.

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>So Rachel talked to us about degrees earned versus openings.

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So in the United States, for example, you know what

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>degrees are earned versus openings? Sure, um, So if you know,

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I went through a lot of data which is UM

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they're about uh, roughly five thousand stem

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>degrees UM in in the U s UM in the

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>latest year that they attracted, which was twenty eight keen UM.

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's up six from a decade earlier. So people

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>are you know, American students are getting lots and lots

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of degrees in in quote unquote STEM fields. And you know,

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you know those knees europe impuls would be like, oh, well,

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't all those graduates you know from abroad, and they're not.

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, what I found was that actually north of

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>nine d son of them were actually American citizens and

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>permanent residents. UM. Now that picture can change as you

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>go up the scale in terms of UM graduate degrees,

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's that's a little bit of a different metrics.

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But UM, you know, when you look at the bachelor's

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>degrees that are earned, a whole lot of them are Americans,

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Americans and permanent residents. And if you look at openings,

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have to consider that there are certain

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>openings that go that typically would go to UM someone

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>who had a specific type of degree that's called computer

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>science degree or related computer science engineering field. UM. But

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that you know, not everyone in these fields necessarily has

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to have a computer science degree. I'm sure. I mean

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs themselves is a very good example. UM. But

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I know, you know, just from my time at Stanford,

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I know a number of people who ended up in

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>tech who did not make during computer science UM. And

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 1>it was actually pretty interesting that you know, two thirds

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>of um I T occupation new entrants do not have

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a computer science degree. So then you have to consider

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the entire pool of UM American bachelor's degree owners as

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>potential people who could be trained. And I think UM

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for for this type of work. And I think that

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, that is really a key feature in some

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of the research that I've done, is you know, why,

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 1>what's the incentive to train someone when you've got you know,

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>ready to work cheaper labor that's coming in from abroad.

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>What do the tech companies say, UM, in response to

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of the economics of this the cheaper nature of

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>some of these foreign workers is what's typically the response? Sure,

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the typical response would never be

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to say they are cheaper. And I think that there

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>there is a tremendous backlash UM when Trump is issued

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 1>is executive were in June? Um, you know, And and

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of like really legitimate claims to

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>be made that you know, a lot of there's a

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of intelligence and innovation and entrepreneurships UM that and

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that America is built in the foundation of immigrants, which

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I a hundred percent beliefs. But you have to remember

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the hm vvs as holders are not immigrants, I mean

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 1>their guest workers, and and they are you know, get

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>trapped in what's a lot of people called some version

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of indenture labor because they are tied UM, they're sponsored

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.239
<v Speaker 1>by an employer UM, and it's really difficult to move

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>from one employer to another. So they you know, they

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're kind of stuck and you know, they

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have UM. You know, they could be here for

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>three years, they could be here for six years. Sometimes

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that six years gets extended, sometimes it doesn't UM. So

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's they're they're they're really suck. And I

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>think that you know, they because their company sponsors their

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>visa and because their visas side of their immigration status,

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and because their immigration status enables them to stay in

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the US, pay taxes, have families, and be part of

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, be part of the communities that they're part of.

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, they can't whistle blow on their companies. So

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, it's very easy to paint this

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>picture is UM, you know, anti immigrant UM, but it's

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>really not, because I think the system actually really hurts

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not only American workers but which want to be these

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the holders as well. What happens to the American workers

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>that don't get those jobs then? So you know, there's

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a number of things. You know, I think you could look. Um,

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've often casually wondered to myself like, why

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>are there so many you know, computer engineers and finance

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it was always just sort of a

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>curiosity to me that I never really thought twice about.

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if you think about it, when you

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>know you're not seeing um wage growth, um, you know

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that I should mention that the wages in the I

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>T sector, for example, are higher than the median UM

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>wages in the US broadly, but they're not necessarily growing.

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there's this idea that you know,

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>if you get a computer science degree or programming, you're

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know how to code, that you know,

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you've got a ticket to success. And I just,

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't necessarily know that that's that that's

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the case. Um, So you know, I think that, UM,

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is this is something that you know,

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you just have to consider all aspects of Rachel. It

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>is a fascinating bloombergiminion base, and we always love to

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>focus on these because they tend to put out a

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>little viewpoint that might differ slightly or even entirely with

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>what's out there sort of in the ether. So Rachel's

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks for that. Rachel Wilson's Hall is editor at Zloomberg

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Opinion and her piece today, big tech wants you to

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>believe in a bills gap subtitle, but what they really

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>want is a steady supply of cheap, dependent I T workers.

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that might be called capitalism poll. Yes, exactly,

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's certainly different from the narrative. What is the

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>latest between TikTok and the United States? What company is

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 1>interested in buying TikTok and will they be able to

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in Andrew Brown, Bloomberg New Economy editor, and

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in fact he is the editorial director of New Economy. Andy,

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>very great to have you. We've had so many reports

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of days. Fox reporting today that

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>several companies, including Facebook might actually be interested Axio, saying

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>other companies are interested in the one we knew about

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>yesterday Microsoft to any of these companies have a better

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>chance than any other. Look, I'm not I'm not really

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in a position of of weighing the merits of the

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>deal itself. Um. You know what, what what you have

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>here is a US president, um who has weighted into

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>this incredibly complicated corporate situation that touches on very fundamental

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>issues for the United States around freedom of speech, the

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>operations of a market economy, and he seems to have

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>decided in a in a peremptory, in almost arbitrary way,

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that a deal, some deal, whether it's with Microsoft or

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>some of Facebook or some of the other actors that

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:29.199
<v Speaker 1>you've you've mentioned, must occur by September fifteen. Otherwise one

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of the most popular apps in the United States right now,

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>an app that's been downloaded a hundred and sixty five

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>million times. Um an app that gen z uh folks

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>live by. It's gonna be it's gonna be close, it's

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna be closed down. And needless to say, um, Chinese

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>media absolutely outraged by what's going on. So Andy, let's

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 1>get to the heart of the matter. I think the

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>heart of the matter might be h security, national security,

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>and is there any evidence to suggest that there that

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>TikTok does represent a risk to the United States. Look,

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>there is no direct evidence that um uh, you know,

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>TikTok is giving us data to the Chinese government. There

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>is circumstantial evidence there are sort of there is what

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>ifs right. So what if the Chinese government said to

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to Bike Dance, which owns TikTok, you have to hand

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>over this data. Would would TikTok to well they the

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>company insists that it wouldn't. Um, it's actually highly unlikely

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that any company would say no to the to the

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government to such a request. So it's all it's

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it's all hypothetical, I mean, and that that hardly represents

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>smoking gun evidence that TikTok is a national security But

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:57.959
<v Speaker 1>having said that, there are really genuine questions, uh, and fears, um,

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know about data security and the Chinese government. I mean,

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>and these go back years. In two thousand and fifteen,

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you remember there was a there was the Chinese state

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>hack has got into the office of the U S

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Officer of Personnel Managers Management and installed data of four

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>million you know, US government federal government workers. More recently,

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>these accusations of state hackers have been getting into labs

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>and stealing trying to steal secrets on the development of

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen vaccines. So you know, there are legitimate concerns.

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>The question is is this the right way to address

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>these concerns exactly? And also you know, can the US

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>take a fee for doing so? I mean that's that's

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the part that you know, almost becomes a funny at

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that point, and Narricolo is just telling reporters right now

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that is not your TikTok deal. Fee to the United

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>States is a quote key stipulation. I mean, where did

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that come out of? Yeah, I I don't think the

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>the stipulations in this. I mean this is this is

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>this goes back to the sort of the this whole arbitrariness. Um,

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you know there are presidents, right, so some years ago, um,

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese owner of grind this this you know dating app,

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>was forced to sell after a review by Sippius, which

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>of course the U. S. Treasury body that that that

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>screens foreign investments. But but you know that this was

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>there was a process there. I mean it was it

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>was as all as all cipious processes are. It was secretive,

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>but nevertheless there was a process and companies could strategize

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>around that process. I mean, here you have, um, you know,

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially it seems like a decision coming straight out of

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 1>the the the West wing. The owner of the company,

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>John Yeming, he's been telling employees he has no idea

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>really what's going on? But he thinks the ultimate aim

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>here is to close down, um, his app and that

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>that's what he thinks. The end game is so andy.

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I know you have your ear close to uh, what's

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>happening on the ground in China. What's the response there?

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I know the Chinese media has had some response here,

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>But if you heard some other people that you trust

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>your sources about kind of how they view the Chinese

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>view of what's going on here. Yeah, I mean, well

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>we we we've all seen the Chinese you know, state

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>media reaction, China Daily going one about the smash and

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>grab rate and who Hi Jin, who's the editor in

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>chief of the Global Times, is saying this is this

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is open open robbery. I mean, um, look, this is

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, TikTok is the avatar of of of

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Chinese tech ambitions. I mean, Chinese people are incredibly proud

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of of of what it's achieved. It's the first Chinese

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>internet company, social media company to come into the United

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>States take on the huge these gigantic incumbents and when

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean this this is it is the

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>essence of the of the capitalist success story. And you

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>know in China. Essentially, the view is they're they're trying

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to trying to you know, close close down UM and

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and an app that UM has taken on, and just

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>beta American companies that you know, this is basically trade protectionism.

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>If this happens, you know, kind of new company keep

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>it as successful. Will will people just be fine with

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.959
<v Speaker 1>new ownership or you know, the people that have been

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok, especially the younger fans, have shown themselves to

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>be pretty politically active. Will they sort of boycott TikTok

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>if Microsoft buyser? I mean, you can't answer that, I guess,

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's an interesting question, right, Yeah, I'm I'm not

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the expert on that. I'm not even the expert on

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 1>on on TikTok. I don't I don't use it myself,

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but um, you know, it seems it seems to me

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that the concept is brilliant and simple. I mean, this

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>is sort of sharing goofy video, it's family fund UM

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>very much now a part of the lifestyle of a

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>generation of young Americans, and they're not understanding why this

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 1>app needs to be closed down either. I mean, this

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>is why you need to have a national debate, why

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a serious issue. How are we

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>going to handle in the long run, um, Chinese investments

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>in this area? How how are we going to deal

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>with with with Chinese companies that that access US data? Um?

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, the the the the approach now which is

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>is close it down? Um. I mean this is what

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:23.919
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese would do. I mean, you know, if the idea, um,

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, is to preserve freedom of speech in the

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>United States, to oppose the Chinese style of doing these, well,

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>you're actually acting rather like the Chinese would do exactly right.

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Always fascinating talking to Andy Brown. He has a great

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>perspective all things China. Andy Brown, editorial director for Bloomberg

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>New Economy, talking about that crazy news about TikTok? Is

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it going to be shut down? Is it going to

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>be sold? If it's gonna be sold, who's going to

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>buy it? Does President Trump and the government get an

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>investment banking fee? All kinds of things we are following

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. We'll have that more for you coming up.

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can sub

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>school ribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever a podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio