WEBVTT - NBA Trade Deadline REACTION, Anthony Davis to Wizards + Super Bowl DEEP DIVE | Nick Wright NFL

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What's Right in the Great Episode four twenty four.

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>This episode of What's Right when the Grid is presented

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to you by boost Mobile Demons. Good morning. We are

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:18.279
<v Speaker 1>on the eve of the eve of the eve of

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl, and big update in my world. I find

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>out from your baby's sister. Yes, there's not a baby anymore.

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>She's twelve. Yesterday she's like, so, when do you think

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>we're getting to Nana's. And I'm like, what do you mean?

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>She was like, Oh, I thought every I thought we

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody knew we're watching the super Bowl at Nana's.

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 2>I take it you will, well no, I I oh,

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm not.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, I don't know, and I do know.

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is, you know, this air little family laundry here.

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the assumption was, well, the Chiefs aren't playing,

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>so it will be a little more relaxed, which may

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>or may not be true. And I obviously love my

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>mom and love my wonderful sister and her family and

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>her kids. But watching the Super Bowl in the midst

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of young children running around and that and and that

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere does not seem like peak viewing experience. And so

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I said to your mom. I was like,

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>what what's going on with you know?

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 2>My mom?

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And Super Bowl? She's like and your Mom's like, that's

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>your mom talk to you? You talked to I said,

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it was fine, you talked to her.

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 2>So I.

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't know what's going on. I don't know, but I

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>do know that I there's all I it's just not

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a little little wrench in the gears that I

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't necessarily expect as we get ready for what should

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>be an awesome game. And we're gonna get to that

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in a bit. Also, NBA trade deadline stuff, all of

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>that coming up. But first straight to the voicemail brought

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to you by our friends at boost Mobile. The our

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>long national nightmare is over. Guys. The Kawhi Leonards snub that,

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, had everyone pearl clutching, had people that

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>dastardly Lebron James who stole Kawhi Leonard's All Star spot.

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>As it turns out, Kawi Leonard's gonna be an All Star.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>We all knew he was always gonna be an All Star.

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 1>It was all nonsense. The NFC wins the Pro Bowl,

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess should or throws a couple of touchdowns I

0:02:55.639 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't watch, and Jackson Hayes being suspended for a game

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>for a real shove of the Wizard's mascot is really unbelievable,

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like he had no reason to do it. I don't

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>understand it. The video is stunning. I don't get it.

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>It seems like a cheap shot. The Robin Lopez famously

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>used to fight mascots in every arena, but it was

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>all playful and like a mutual right this Wizard's mascots

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is running down and Jackson Hayes just like the late

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Sean Taylor to an unsuspecting wide receiver coming over the middle,

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>just body Jacks cool. I didn't get that one at all. Reminder,

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody like rate subscribe review to the show. Before we

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>get to the NBA trade deadline, it we are at

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the eve of the eve of the eve of the

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl. Reminder, our prop show, our gambling show for

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl, comes out on these channels tomorrow. But

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>let's get to the actual game right now.

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 2>So the super Bowl is a few days ago, a

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 2>few days away, and we'll eventually get to your picks.

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 2>But first off, we've got some questions for you, one

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 2>at a time. And the first one is is what

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>is the path to victory for each of these teams?

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay for Seattle, for both teams, I think it's actually

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty straightforward. And this isn't the only path obviously, but

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the simplest path for Seattle is that they are able

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to with their outstanding defensive line, hurry Drake may a

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:54.559
<v Speaker 1>bit get the Patriots into some third and long must

0:04:54.680 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>pass situations where the paths were outstanding the the first

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>two months of the year and have been a little

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>shakier since then. Let tank Lawrence Tee off on Will Campbell,

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>not let the Patriots stay ahead of the sticks with

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Romandre Stevenson, because as the Seahawks have been an elite

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>run defense this year, and trust their great secondary and

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>great scheme with Mike McDonald to fool a young, an

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>excellent but a young quarterback in Drake, may put him,

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>make him look the way he's looked a lot of

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>this postseason so far, and be able to play somewhat

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>on their script, hold the Patriots offense down and really

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>see put the Pats in the by kind of man

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we need to be throwing and we need to not

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>We need to have as many receivers and pass catchers

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>out in the route as possible, which means we can't

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>help our offensive line, we can't max protect, we can't

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>keep people into Chip and Seattle Tea's off on Drake May.

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Who And I just want to because this has become

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>quite the argument on the TV show and I don't

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>understand why, and I just want to emphasize the following

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>facts related to Drake May's struggles this postseason. In the

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>last thirty years, the second biggest drop off from regular

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>season passer rating to postseason passer rating in the last

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty years is Drake May these playoffs. In NFL history,

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the biggest drop off from regular season completion percentage to

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>postseason completion percentage is Drake May these playoffs. Drake May

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen regular season games turned the ball over eleven

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>times total. In three playoff games has turned the ball

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>over five times total. Drake May in seventeen regular season

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>games had eight fumbles, not lost, just total fumbles. Drake

0:07:52.480 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>May in three playoff games has six fumbles. Now those

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>regular season of postseason drop offs, some of that is

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a testament to how exceptional he was in the regular season.

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>There is no doubt about that. But a guy who

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>led the league in passer rating falling to what would

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>an eighty five rating is stunning. A guy who led

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the league and he might have been second and pass rating,

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a guy who led the league in completion percentage falling

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>to a completion percentage demons that is lower than Shador

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Sanders this season is stunning. It's fifty five percent. They've

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>played great defenses, he has made some excellent plays, and

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 1>he's been very good with his legs when he hasn't

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>fumbled and hasn't been sacked. But when I get to

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots say of it, the biggest key is gonna

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>be Drake May looking like Drake May, because he hasn't

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>yet this postseason. And the question for Seattle is can

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they continue that trend? Can they keep Drake May struggling?

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Because folks are correct that the Patriots have played a

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>murderer's row of defenses, But the end of that sentence

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is and their quarterback has looked like it has looked

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 1>like he has played a murderer's row of defenses. And

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Seattle is either the best or the second best defense

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they will have faced all year. It's them or Houston,

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>depending on who you prefer, and so it is not

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>unfair or nitpicking to say up to this point in

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, the Patriots have been winning in spite of

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterback play, which is in some ways a reason to

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>be very optimistic about their chances in this game because

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>they've gotten to the super Bowl without Drake playing well.

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:20.599
<v Speaker 1>But I think Seattle can present some really big troubles.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Seattle since Mike McDonald got there is fifteen and two

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>away from home, which is unreal. Seattle with Mike McDonald

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>facing young quarterbacks is nine and one in the last

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>four years. Quarterbacks the first time they face Mike McDonald's

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>defense have struggled massively. So those are all things that

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Seattle is positioned well for. And I think

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that that Seattle defense. The only guy all year long

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>demands who has been able to, oh, we're in a

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>must pass situation, watch me rip it is Stafford. He's

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the only one. And now they Baker had an awesome

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>game against him too, but they weren't down multiple scores

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>where like we must pass situation. It's not to say

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Drake may can't do it, but they have been the

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>league's best defense by most metrics throughout the year. So

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks path is simple, that d line be what

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it's been all year, and that secondary be what it's

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>been all year, and not put the game on Sam

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Darnold's shoulders. Okay, the Patriots path is simple as well.

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Drake May. Don't be afraid to run the ball. The

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>one place Seattle's defense struggles is quarterback scrambles. Drake May

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>has been excellent at it. Don't be afraid to tuck

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it and run, stay ahead of the chains. Make it

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>so Seattle can't sell out against the pass and put

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Sam Darnold in a spot where the pressure ratchets up

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>even further. Because the Patriots as good as Seattle, as

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>well as Seattle has coached, the Patriots will not be

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>out coached in this game. As buttoned up as Seattle is,

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>verbel and is going to get every game management decision right.

0:12:56.200 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And Josh McDaniels will have his guys as prepared as

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>can be. And I am looking closely at Nick emon Worri.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>They're awesome rookie safety who Mike McDonald that was his

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>one of his you know, his second first round pick

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Seahawks in who they took to play kind

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of that Kyle Hamilton role that he played with Baltimore.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>He hurt his ankle in practice yesterday and the video

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of him walking into the team hotel is. What's good

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is it's no crutches, no boot, no nothing like that.

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 1>What's bad is, uh, he's limping badly and he's a

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>key piece. And we know Drake May has excellence in him,

0:13:56.400 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>we just and we also know that, unlike other quarterbacks,

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Drake May can be having a miserable game and still

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>make awesome plays. That Houston game he fumbled four times,

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and in the midst of that through some of his

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>best passes of the season. So I don't think the

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Patriots can come from behind in this game. Like I'm

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>not talking about seven nothing, but I think that they

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>can't be behind the sticks and they can't be behind

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the scoreboard. But if it's close late, I think it

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>favors New England. But I also think Seattle's the team

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>more likely. If you're like one of these two teams

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is gonna have a ten point lead going into the

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter, my money in that situation would be on Seattle.

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>What are your other questions on this Who.

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you believe has the most to lose and the

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 2>most to gain.

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't really look at this as a spot where

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>anybody has a ton to lose, Like Seattle's the favorite,

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>but there's nobody would look at this like it's a

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>go ahead.

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 2>You don't think it's seen in Seattle having more to lose,

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 2>just how everybody probably expects them to win the game.

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, so listen, they are the favorite, and it does

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>seem like a disc for only being a four and

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorite. They have a disproportionate amount of

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>people picking them right. But I don't think if they lose,

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>people will be like they choked. So like I But

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>as far as most to gain, it is and this

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>is cliche, I guess, but it's obvious it's the coaches

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and the quarterbacks. Like Vrabel winning a Super Bowl. He

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>got to an AFC Championship game with Ryan Tannehill and

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the Titans, he got the number one seed a different

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>year with Ryan Tannehill and the Titans, and his first

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>year with the Patriots to come in and take over

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a four win team and win the Super Bowl. Some

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>people would say he's just the best coach in the league,

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's already considered one of the best, so for

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Vrabel it would be a pretty remarkable short coaching resume.

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>McDonald second year as a head coach, his final year

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>as coordinator in Baltimore, they win the defensive Triple Crown.

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>They're the one seed. Even in the playoff game they lost,

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>they only allowed seventeen points to the Chiefs. Takes over Seattle,

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>instantly transforms the defense. They win ten games last year

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and missed the playoffs despite that, and this your number

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>one seed with a brutal schedule, and then win the

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. I don't even know what the you know,

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>young coach comp is there. And then for the quarterbacks,

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 1>if the Patriots win Demons and Drake May plays well,

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>then absolutely no one will care that he has struggled

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>in the three playoff games beforehand, and you will have

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>people understandably arguing he's the best quarterback in the league.

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Like that's if in year two you either and we're

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna find out tonight if he wins MVP or comes

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>in second. But if in year two you're a top

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>two MVP finisher and then you win the Super Bowl

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and you play well in the Super Bowl, folks are

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>just gonna argue, you're the best quarterback in the league,

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and that's fair like the I, except he didn't win it.

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>He lost in the Super Bowl. He won MVP and

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>uh lost in the Super Bowl in year two and

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>then never got back to a super Bowl.

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>And and for Darnald, he's just it's the greatest quarterback

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>reclamation story in league history. It might already be that,

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>but if he wins.

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 2>Then, especially getting shipped off to another team and like

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, back to back and then getting all those wins,

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 2>winning a Super Bowl.

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, this is Jets, this is his fifteen

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>am I leaving one out Jets, Panthers, Niners, Vikings, Seahawks

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and so. But to your point, he goes to Minnesota

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a year ago is not you know, he's supposed to

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>be compete with JJ McCarthy to be the starter. McCarthy

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>gets hurt. They win fourteen games, they're playing for the

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>one seed the final week of the year. He plays poorly,

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>plays poorly in the playoff game. They don't really believe

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in him. Seattle then signs him. I call it a

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>huge mistake. I say they got worse going from Gino

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to McDonald. Yeah, and they win fourteen games, they are

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the one seed win the Super Bowl. And so those

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>are the guys who have the most on the line.

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 2>What else, what is the most important matchup in this game?

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Will Campbell against DeMarcus Lawrence or whomever's lined up against him.

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Patriots rookie left tackle Will Campbell, who has struggled mightily

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>this postseason, has given up a pressure rate of I

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>think above fifteen percent in every game he's played, gave

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>up a bunch of sacks first two games, didn't give

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>up a sack in the conference championship game, but PFF

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>still had engraded as a poor performance. That's where the

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>game can be lost is Will Campbell. That is with

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and DeMarcus Lawrence. That was a hell of a signing

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>by the Seahawks, who I think a lot of us thought, listen,

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>this guy was a really good player. But he's a

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty three year old edge rusher coming off an injury

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:38.959
<v Speaker 1>riddled final year with Dallas and he comes to Seattle

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and makes the Pro Bowl. Is not an All Pro,

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>but probably the you know, one of the most impactful

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 1>guys on their d line and the veteran leader there.

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>And I just wonder if he and Leonard Williams and

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the rest of that D line can put Drake May

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>in hell throughout this game, which kind of leads to

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>my actual prediction.

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 2>So go ahead, and what is your final prediction on

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 2>the game?

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Twenty seven to seventeen Seattle is how I see this

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>shaking out. I think that both quarterbacks have one turnover,

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>at least one turnover. But I think Drake, who is

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>flirting with the Joe Burrow record of nineteen sacks taken

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in a postseason, he's at fifteen. He's taken five in

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 1>every game that May is under constant duress that Stefan

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Diggs is not able to get off, that they find

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>enough ways to get Jackson Smith and Jig but lined

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>up in different spots to where he can get going.

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And there is a major Seattle defensive play, whether to

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>stripsack or a tipped pass pick, a major Seattle defensive

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>play that is caused by pressure on the quarterback that

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>gets this game going in the in a bad direction

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for Seattle. So I will swallow the four and a

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>half points and Seattle twenty seven New England seventeen is

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>my official pick, all right, So that.

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 2>Is gonna be weird for you without the Chiefs not

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 2>peening in the Super Bowl this year. It is.

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so they've played in five of the last six.

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>The one they didn't play in was Rams Bengals, and

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>my only I have such vivid memories from the and

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>I want to find it. I have such vivid memories

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 1>from all of the Chief Super Bowls and Rams Bengals

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a blur, and I'm trying except

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>for let me see if I can find it. Oh, sorry,

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>there it is, okay, lose. No, they lost in overtime

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of the AFC Championship game. Uh. And I had the

0:23:52.359 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>only thing I really remember vividly about that game, having

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>two bets related to Bengal sacks or Ram sacks on

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow. One was a big plus money bet on

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald over a sack and a half, and at

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:33.719
<v Speaker 1>halftime he had zero, and then the second drive of

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the second half he got one. I think it was

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>this part. I might I say I remember it vividly,

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but I might have it wrong, so maybe I don't

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>remember it vividly. One of those sacks where the quarterback

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>like goes down right at the line of scrimmage. But

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>they call it right behind, so he got a sack

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for it, and and the four plays later got another

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>one and hit that, you know it within five minutes

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>after it looking like we were in trouble, and I

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>had I had another. Well, he ced the game on

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a pressure, but that wasn't a sack. I had another.

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I basically bet I laddered the sacks in that game,

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>which was rams to have at least three and a half,

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>four and a half, five and a half and six

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half sacks, and they they got von Miller.

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I think was that the last one. Von Miller got

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>sack number seven on a play where there was a penalty,

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.239
<v Speaker 1>but it was a penalty on the Bengals, so the

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>sacks stood and I hit all those bets, but I

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>don't really I know that late the game obviously there

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 1>was a really ticky tac defensive holding penalty. You know,

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember the game, but it is it's insane. The

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have played in five of the last six. But

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it also will make the viewing experience very, very different.

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:23.159
<v Speaker 1>And again we'll see if you know what prop bets

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>we have on our gambling show tomorrow. But I would

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like to get to some of the NBA trade deadline

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:35.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff here in a moment. But first, today's show is

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by representing sponsor hard Rock Bet, Florida's sportsbook.

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>It's Big Game Week on hard Rock Bet, Seattle is

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a four and a half point favorite over New England.

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>For games like this, basic bets just don't cut it.

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Hard Rock Bet is loaded with special props you can't

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>find the rest of the year. Scoregami, opening kickoff, touchback,

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>all the off the wall bets that make every snap matter.

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>These only come around once a year, so you might

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>as well enjoy yourself here. If you haven't signed up

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>with a hard Rock Bet yet, there's never been a

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>better time. New sign ups can double their winnings on

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>their first ten bets max bet of fifty dollars. That's right.

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>If you would have won one hundred bucks on your bet,

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you could make that two hundred plus. You don't want

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to miss hard Rock BET's seven million dollars Big Game

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Bonus Party. Place a ten dollars Big Game parlay and

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you'll get a share of seven million in bonus bets.

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Win or lose. Every parlay counts, and the more you place,

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>the bigger your share. I already built mine. Now it's

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>your turn. If you're in Florida or New Jersey, the

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Big Game energy doesn't just live in the app. Head

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to a hard rock casino in person for drawings, giveaways,

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and all the excitement leading up to kickoff. Big Game

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Week is also the best time to be a hard

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>rock VIP. Hard Rock Bet is rolling out the red

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>carpet for its MVPs, private jets, Star hotels, big Game tickets,

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and more. Other VIPs can intend to invite only watch

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>parties with special guests, high end food, and tons of

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>exclusive merch. If you want to get in on the action,

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>check out the status match page at hard rock bet slash,

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 1>hard rock dot Bet, pardon me hard Rock dot Bet

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Slash Loyalty let them know where you play for a

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>shot at an instant upgrade to the best signature VIP

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>program in the industry. That's hard Rock Bet. Download the

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>hard rock Bet app and make your first deposit today.

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Payable and bonus bets not a cash offer offered by

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the Seminal Tribe of Florida. In Florida offered by Seminal

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Digital LLC and all other states must be

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty one plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play terms and

0:28:56.040 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling and Florida, call one eight

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>three to three play wise. In Indiana. If you or

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>someone you know is a gambling problem and wants help,

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>call one eight hundred and nine with it. Gambling problem,

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Call one eight hundred gambler. Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia.

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Demons, I kind of already addressed the Drake

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>May stuff, So let's get to some of the pre

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>playoff narratives here.

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, before the playoffs, you listed out your top five

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 2>storylines of the postseason, and they were, is this Josh

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Allen's year to break through? What if Rogers goes on

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 2>a run? What if the Eagles repeat? Which second year

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 2>quarterback goes on a run? Which NFC West team will

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 2>you think looked like they did in the regular season?

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 2>How do you think you did so far with them?

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? So listen, I mean the I mean, I think

0:29:55.120 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I think these were the storylines going in and if

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we address them all one by one, like is this

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen's year breakthrough? That? That was the question because

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>since they didn't, they fired the coach. I mean, was

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>was I putting too much emphasis on this postseason for them? No?

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't, and we haven't on this show. Talked about

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the Josh Allen interview right he was on the TV

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>show Tuesday after our.

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Pod was broken up about McDermott leaven the.

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>No what I'm saying, I'm no the interview he did

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>on First Things First and so the So I just

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>want to say something about our spot there because I

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>tweeted this, but I just want to spend a little

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>more time on it. I thought it was so telling

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that he agreed to go on the show. So the

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>way you know these radio row week of interviews work

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is you sign up with a sponsor. The sponsor, you know,

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>books you on a bunch of shows and then you

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of rinse and repeat throughout. But when you're a

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>guy like Josh Allen, every single show in the country

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>wants you, so there's gonna be more requests than actual availability,

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and so you can pick and choose. So it would

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>have been super easy for him to be like that

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>guy has been giving me a hard time for years.

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not you know, I'm not interested. And so not

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>only did he come on the show, but how good

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>natured he was and how self assured he was I

0:31:54.200 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>think is not only a testament to off the field

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the person he is, but I truly believe there is

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>an impact on his ability to win a championship in

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a positive way that we saw in those fifteen minutes

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we spent with him. And here's what I mean. I

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I have always believed that there are some guys that,

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>just since they were little kids, get a little tight

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in big spots, that when they're in the backyard playing bags,

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's the game winning point, they are gonna have

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>their worst shot of the night. And there are some

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>folks on the opposite end of that spectrum that just

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>always have been they are at you know, gamers, they

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>are at their best in the biggest moments. But most

0:32:52.160 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>people are circumstantial in that regard. Where success begets confidence,

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>which begets more success, and early failings begets lack of confidence,

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>self doubt, which leads to more of that. And the

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>example I've you know, I've used in the past is

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons I always felt Kobe, even though

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>he was not when you look at the numbers, like

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>very efficient on these shots, was never afraid to take

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the game winning shot. Was because he never once got

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:46.239
<v Speaker 1>nailed with that guy can't win because he won as

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a kid alongside check when the now by their second championship,

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Kobe was a huge part of it. But that first championship,

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Kobe was a role player. But then he was a

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>champion and nobody could ever hang it against him. And

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons I felt Peyton always struggled was

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>because he struggled early. It became a narrative and it

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 1>seemed like he got in his own head all believe

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you know forever that if some if, if Lebron had

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>somehow been if they had won the title when he

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>was a kid in twenty two in the seven finals,

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>there's no chance he has this series against Dallas, but

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't yet a champion, he had left his team.

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>There was all that on him. And then you saw

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 1>it for Lebron, this playout in real time. He had

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that series against Dallas and then they win the title

0:34:55.560 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the next year, and from that moment forward, by any imaginable.

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>He had the greatest ten year run of clutch play

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in the history of the league. Like it. The success

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 1>there beget other success. So the reason I say all

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that is this, there is so much noise now and

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>such a long year by year history of Josh coming

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>up just short in these spots that if he didn't

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 1>have that confidence, self assuredness and disposition, I think it

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>could drown him. But he has it, and I think

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that his ability to say I wasn't good enough, I

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't come through, but I know I will in the

0:35:54.600 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>future is really really positive for the Bills. And so

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, that's a little sidebar, but that was

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the obvious pre playoff narratives. The what if

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Rogers goes on a run was really just a thought

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>exercise on what it would mean. We never thought he could.

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>What if the Eagles repeat was also for me just

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a thought exercise. I never thought they could, and they

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:27.959
<v Speaker 1>end up losing in pretty bad fashion in a home

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 1>playoff game. They didn't really have any business losing to

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a Niners team that we then saw the next week

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>was not good. I shouldn't say not good, but they

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>were not a contended Yeah, which second year quarterback goes

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>on a run. We now there was gonna be one.

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Caleb had a shot, Caleb had like the amazing moments,

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>but Drake obviously is the one playing in the Super Bowl.

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And which NFC West team will look like they did

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in the regular season. The answer was kind of Seattle

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Rams. The Rams looked like they did in

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the regular season. They just couldn't get the last stop

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>they needed or the last conversion. In Seattle looked like

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the best team all year, and they were I thought

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it was the Rams. I was wrong. It was Seattle.

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So like you know, all to me, those all, uh,

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:29.439
<v Speaker 1>those all held up pretty well. Yeah, and I don't

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:33.800
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing. I guess The thing that maybe I should

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>have incorporated more was something related to Denver, the one

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Seeds Denver, you know, could they showed they beat the

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Bills and then they were in that game with the

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Patriots even though they didn't have their quarterback. So maybe

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I was just, you know, my big swing before the

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>year was high on the Raiders, low on the Broncos,

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and that was a giant double with I was just

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, I missed on both of those. All right,

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:04.840
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking about upgrading to the all new iPhone

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 1>seventeen Pro, design to be the most powerful iPhone ever,

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 1>But you're also thinking about the traffic on your way

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to the store transferring all your data. Good news, when

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you order a new phone online with boost Mobile, they'll

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>send an expert to your homer work to deliver your

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>brand new iPhone seventeen Pro and get you all set

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>up on boost Mobile within minutes. No Hasslet all visit

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 1>boostmobile dot com to get started. Delivery available for select

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>devices purchased at boost mobile dot com. Terms do apply,

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all right, DeMont, Let's talk trade deadline.

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 2>Uh? Yeah, so the Wizards are making moves. We know

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:40.879
<v Speaker 2>a couple months back they got Trey Young and they

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 2>went out and got Anthony Davis. Dallas got too late first,

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:48.280
<v Speaker 2>some second rounders and a handful of players. This Luca

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 2>trade just looks worse and worse by the month. Huh.

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is the final accounting of in out for

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the Luka trade. If we just if we don't worry

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:08.760
<v Speaker 1>about the salary filler guys like Kleiba and Markis Morris,

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Chris Middle like that. Ultimately, within three hundred and seventy days,

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 1>they flipped Luka, Doncic, four, Max Christi, the twenty twenty

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>six Thunder first round pick, the twenty twenty nine Lakers

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:48.959
<v Speaker 1>first round pick, and the twenty thirty Warriors first round

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:59.240
<v Speaker 1>pick which is top twenty protected and three second rounders,

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and they got thirty games out of Anthony Davis and

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:09.840
<v Speaker 1>no playoff run. It is an all time tragedy of

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a trade. So that's just that is what it is.

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It's an all time disaster. You got to see Ad

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and Kyrie play like twenty minutes together. It's just a tragedy. Now,

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:31.359
<v Speaker 1>luckily they got Cooper flag. But so for the MAVs,

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it is what it is. I am stunned Demons Dallas

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't get more for Anthony Davis. Yeah, and I'm stunned

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 1>now that we know the Warriors, the Warriors aren't getting

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the honest they traded for Chris STAPs like they cut

0:40:54.600 --> 0:41:01.719
<v Speaker 1>bait on that. I'm stunned the Warriors didn't trump the

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>MAVs offer. I'm sorry the Wizard's offer. Like Anthony Davis

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Warriors. I understand he's an injury risk. Listen,

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:13.760
<v Speaker 1>he's a huge injury risk. I get it, but that's

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting now ad with Steph A defense with Draymond and

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis, Like, I can get behind that. And it

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is very, very odd to me that this was Anthony

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Davis's market. I get he's on a huge contract, and

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I get that he is always injured, and it's weird injuries.

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 1>He barely hits his hand. It looks like torn ligaments.

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 1>He has to wear goggles now forever because of the

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>retina stuff. I know that. But man trading ad for

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Chris Middleton salary filler and two awful first round picks,

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and those are awful first. The thunder first this coming

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>year is gonna be pick you know, twenty eight or

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 1>worse or something. And a Warriors first that is top

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty protected is a disaster. And so I can't believe

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:28.759
<v Speaker 1>that's what Anthony Davis's value is. I do give the

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Wizard's credit for being like, screw it. We're not signing

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>any free agents anyway. We have a good young player

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and Alex sar Trey Young will be here next year.

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's there now, but he's not playing. So

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the Wizard's hope is nail, you know, get lucky in

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the lottery this year. Add either Darren Peterson or Carlos

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Boozer's kid or aj debants in the top three have

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys play Star plus Trey plus a

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>d and go make a run in the East. Like,

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate that at all. And Dallas is just

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>built around Cooper flag and you know, Barnico Harrison from

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the City. All right, let's go to some of the

0:43:17.520 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 1>other trade deadline news.

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:21.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's been a bunch of moves since our last

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:24.320
<v Speaker 2>show of so we'll start off with the heart and trade.

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 2>We know that there was a little bit of that

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:28.839
<v Speaker 2>going on with the last show, but it's official. Their

0:43:28.880 --> 0:43:30.839
<v Speaker 2>odds went up in the East for the playoffs, which

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 2>is weird because it's James Harden. How do we feel

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 2>about James Harden on the Cavaliers.

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I just don't understand why they do it.

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I've spent a lot of time on

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:47.919
<v Speaker 1>this on Tuesday show, on the TV show. The the

0:43:47.960 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>record of quitting and falling apart in the playoffs is

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 1>unmatched by any athlete in American sports history, just is.

0:43:56.880 --> 0:44:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And the understand the Clippers and Harden are playing nice

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, oh no, it's for both James Harden

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to stay in LA, they didn't want to give

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>him a contract extension, so he got out of there.

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And now the Calves this idea that well, the Calves,

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they've got to get Donovan to sign an extension this summer.

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And because of that, that's why you take on this

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 1>risky move. What's the list of superstars that are like, man,

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you, I loved playing with James Harden,

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I got a little taste of that and I

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was like, sign me up for more of it. So

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't understand it. Now for the Clippers,

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this is an awesome trade. You're buying low

0:44:56.760 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 1>on Garland. Now. Garland is undersized and has had foot

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:07.320
<v Speaker 1>issues with both feet, and so it is a concern,

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>don't get me wrong. But the Clippers don't have, you know,

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of flexibility here, and so they get a

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 1>lot younger and they get a scoring guard and you

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 1>hope his defensive issues don't matter as much when Kawhi

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Leonard he beats. The Zubats are on the team like that,

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 1>they can help you out. I know Zubots isn't you

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>know some monster defensive player like they have in Cleveland,

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 1>but you still hope that you can work around that,

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:40.719
<v Speaker 1>and so I like it a lot for the Clippers.

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why the Cavs did it.

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:43.319
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>We also just real quick, the Lakers actually made a move.

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if they make another one this one as

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>much as you know, I I think criticize fairly Polinka's

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:03.800
<v Speaker 1>lack of action at deadlines in the past. This isn't groundbreaking.

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But you traded away Gabe Vincent, who has just been

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:12.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst players in the NBA since he

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 1>got to the Lakers. I don't know why. I don't

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 1>know what happened. He was good with the Heat, but

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 1>with the Lakers, he is. He's played one hundred and

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve games, so he's injured. He'd been injured as well.

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:32.840
<v Speaker 1>In those one hundred and twelve games. He averages twenty

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:36.439
<v Speaker 1>minutes a game, So get dreal burn and gives you

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 1>five points, one rebound, one assist on thirty eight percent

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>from the field. Just a truly brutal production. So trading

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 1>him in a second for Luke Kennard, who again is

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a flawed player. But I believe producers correcting it. I'm

0:46:56.960 --> 0:47:00.479
<v Speaker 1>wrong I think right now he leads the NBA three

0:47:00.480 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 1>point percentage, Like he's shooting almost fifty percent from three.

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>He's always been an excellent shooter, and I just yeah,

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, listen, forty nine point seven percent this year,

0:47:14.480 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>forty four percent for his career. So it's not even

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you know something you're like, oh, it's fluky. He's an

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:27.960
<v Speaker 1>awesome shooter, and he doesn't have much playoff experience. But

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:32.719
<v Speaker 1>his playoff experience he did have prior to last year

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 1>in Memphis when he was brutal, he was solid. And

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 1>so this is a positive for the Lakers. Is it

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a needle mover? Probably not. Does it at all help

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:48.840
<v Speaker 1>your problems of being a horrific defensive team? Nah, I

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 1>forget about that. But putting shooting around Luke and Lebron

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is never a bad idea.

0:47:56.120 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 2>All right? Next, Jaron Jackson Junior traded to the Azz.

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:03.239
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to go.

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Through all of it, don't. The big piece in this is,

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 1>let me pull up the exact picks Jazz trade details.

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, when they say three future first round picks,

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it matters what those picks are, and one of them

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is Utah's pick. Uh So, let me see if the

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:34.879
<v Speaker 1>NBA dot com story has it, gosh darn it, put

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it in the dock if you guys can find it,

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 1>because trading like these are not nothing picks. Okay, here

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it is, I got it. So Memphis gets uh, the

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Lakers twenty twenty seven first rounder, not a uh, not

0:48:56.280 --> 0:49:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a huge pick, the best of the following four picks. Okay,

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 1>so they get whichever d which of these picks is

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the best twenty twenty seven, Minnesota's first that probably won't

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:15.759
<v Speaker 1>be that good, Cleveland's first that probably won't be that good,

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 1>or Utah's first unprotected, so you like that. Utah is

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:26.359
<v Speaker 1>saying we expect to be competing a year from now,

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 1>like because we're not gonna have our own pick, and

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a pretty juicy twenty thirty one Phoenix first. So they

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>got They got the Lakers pick next year, Lakers will

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 1>have Luca that won't be a great pick, the Jazz

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>pick next year that could be good, and the Sun's

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:55.040
<v Speaker 1>pick in twenty thirty one, which again demands not to

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 1>beat a dead horse. But that just objectively means Jaren

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Jackson June had way more, way more trade value than

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis, and that's that's surprising to me. Now he's younger,

0:50:11.320 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>but he also has you know, health issues. Health issues

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:18.319
<v Speaker 1>sounds awful. He's not the most durable player in the

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 1>league is, but not to the degree Anthony Davis's obviously,

0:50:22.800 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And so Utah is saying, all right, we're actually gonna

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:32.399
<v Speaker 1>start trying to win. Not right now though, because Utah.

0:50:32.560 --> 0:50:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Here's what's interesting about it. Utah only keeps their pick

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:43.359
<v Speaker 1>this year if it's in the top eight, and that

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a little interesting for them because

0:50:48.160 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, if you look at the whole league standings,

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Utah is has the sixth worst record, right so they

0:50:58.760 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 1>would need to stay there and not have teams jump them. However,

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 1>teams ahead of them in the standings, if you will, like,

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:18.279
<v Speaker 1>with better records, that could fall beneath them, Dallas, Milwaukee, Memphis.

0:51:18.840 --> 0:51:23.239
<v Speaker 1>So Memphis is you know, just got worse Dallas. I

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:27.720
<v Speaker 1>know Ad wasn't playing, but got worse Milwaukee. We'll see,

0:51:28.440 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what the what ends up happening with Giannis.

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:35.479
<v Speaker 1>So but u Jah wants to stay in that top

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>eight and then try to start winning. But Triple j

0:51:41.480 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and Walker Kestler to be a big team and Laurie Markanen.

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And the real story here is they think Keyante George

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:53.319
<v Speaker 1>is ready to start winning games, and then you have

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Ace Bailey. It's like, Okay, Utah's finally gonna try to

0:51:57.520 --> 0:51:59.760
<v Speaker 1>go start winning games. I don't mind that at all.

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And then the other ones, the Celtics flipping Simons for Vousovich.

0:52:08.880 --> 0:52:12.359
<v Speaker 1>That's more a financial move than a basketball move, but

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:18.239
<v Speaker 1>is fine like it's and Simons is replaceable obviously for

0:52:18.360 --> 0:52:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics.

0:52:19.120 --> 0:52:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I think he's more similar to other players on the team.

0:52:21.840 --> 0:52:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I think, correct, right, exactly. I think that's what I mean,

0:52:25.640 --> 0:52:27.880
<v Speaker 2>like a better guy to have.

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Correct that the Celtics have guards that can score, and

0:52:34.840 --> 0:52:37.280
<v Speaker 1>so adding a big and Vosovich I think is smart.

0:52:38.600 --> 0:52:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Chris paul Is traded the Raptors, but he's gonna get cut.

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I wonder where he and if somebody brings him on

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the buy out market.

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Somebody gotta get Chris Paul Man. Come on, yeah, come on, guys.

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree. I wonder if maybe the Lakers bring

0:52:54.560 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 1>him in in the buy out market. The Thunder getting

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Jared McCain, the TikToker is and you know, he went

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 1>for a real first, not a great first, but Houston's

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:14.400
<v Speaker 1>first this year in a bunch of seconds. So he

0:53:14.680 --> 0:53:19.440
<v Speaker 1>was awesome as a rookie, awesome, suffered a major injury,

0:53:20.120 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and now is marginalized as a rookie. He was fifteen

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a game on forty six percent in twenty six minutes

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a game. This year he's six a game on thirty

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:37.839
<v Speaker 1>nine percent. But what the thunder is saying is, you know,

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we hope a year from now he can get back

0:53:40.200 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to that form. And he's cost controlled, so you know

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it's fine. Kevin Herder the shooter goes to the number

0:53:46.640 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>one seed in the East Pistons. I like that move

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:56.240
<v Speaker 1>for them, and that's about as far down the list

0:53:56.239 --> 0:54:00.400
<v Speaker 1>as we're gonna go, and I it would have here

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Yannie is not getting traded. I don't want to spend

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:07.040
<v Speaker 1>too much time on it because by the time people

0:54:07.080 --> 0:54:09.319
<v Speaker 1>listen to this it could be dated, but it would

0:54:09.320 --> 0:54:14.560
<v Speaker 1>appear to me Jannie is not getting traded, which is bad,

0:54:14.719 --> 0:54:18.280
<v Speaker 1>right tweet. I mean they're gonna trade him this summer,

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess. But it's just a wasted year for all parties.

0:54:21.560 --> 0:54:22.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a weird spot.

0:54:23.719 --> 0:54:24.040
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's do some listener questions to Monsey.

0:54:26.400 --> 0:54:28.759
<v Speaker 2>Uh, scruff dog, says Nick, how do you think a

0:54:28.880 --> 0:54:32.080
<v Speaker 2>d will be remembered all all time? What if? Maybe

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:33.920
<v Speaker 2>all time? What if? Maybe?

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I mean I think he'll be remembered as a

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame player whose prime was shorter than it

0:54:43.160 --> 0:54:51.600
<v Speaker 1>should have been because of injuries and for a lot

0:54:51.640 --> 0:54:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of reasons didn't reach his full potential because and I

0:54:55.719 --> 0:54:59.840
<v Speaker 1>really like a D but his full potential was Lee MVP,

0:55:00.560 --> 0:55:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and he showed that in year three and he never

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:07.800
<v Speaker 1>quite got to that level. But he was a huge

0:55:07.800 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 1>piece of a champion and his story's not yet done

0:55:11.160 --> 0:55:15.920
<v Speaker 1>being written. But Washington, it's hard to see him playing

0:55:15.960 --> 0:55:20.719
<v Speaker 1>in super high leverage games anytime soon in Washington. All right?

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Next? Uh, Scott asked Nick. Would the Raptors getting Sabonis

0:55:24.760 --> 0:55:26.880
<v Speaker 2>help them get to the East Finals?

0:55:27.719 --> 0:55:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I mean, yeah. The thing is,

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Demanda Sabonis has been such a bad playoff player that

0:55:35.840 --> 0:55:40.959
<v Speaker 1>you and he gets exploited defensively so much, you don't

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:43.759
<v Speaker 1>really think that that gets you over the top. And

0:55:43.840 --> 0:55:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I know the Raptors are having a good year and

0:55:45.320 --> 0:55:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Scottie Barnes having his best year. I get all that.

0:55:47.760 --> 0:55:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't look at them as East Finals caliber.

0:55:50.680 --> 0:55:56.759
<v Speaker 2>Quite next Austin ass Is the OKAC first round pick

0:55:56.800 --> 0:55:59.600
<v Speaker 2>collection from the late twenty tens in early twenty twenties

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:02.120
<v Speaker 2>one of the best strategies of all time? Or was

0:56:02.160 --> 0:56:06.000
<v Speaker 2>it just lucking into SGA and the good scouting department.

0:56:06.200 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 1>A little bit of both? Like it was a good

0:56:09.680 --> 0:56:16.160
<v Speaker 1>strategy that they also then nailed the picks on and SGA. Listen, nobody,

0:56:19.200 --> 0:56:22.319
<v Speaker 1>no matter how optimistic you were about SGA after his

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 1>time with the Clippers, you didn't think best player in

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the league MVP was what was on the board, But

0:56:29.200 --> 0:56:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the thunder were on the bad end of that once

0:56:31.480 --> 0:56:36.359
<v Speaker 1>when they traded away James Harden. Even as optimistic as

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Daryl Morey was about Harden, nobody thought multi time scoring

0:56:40.560 --> 0:56:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Champ assist Champ MVP was where he was gonna be.

0:56:47.640 --> 0:56:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Go to Manny real quick.

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Manny asked, do you think Lebron still revisits the

0:56:52.239 --> 0:56:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Cavs return now that Harden is in town? Three guys

0:56:55.520 --> 0:56:59.960
<v Speaker 2>who need the ball on the same team.

0:57:00.640 --> 0:57:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Listen, Lebron and I have different historical opinions on guys

0:57:10.800 --> 0:57:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that I think Lebron should want to play with, and

0:57:13.000 --> 0:57:16.080
<v Speaker 1>guys Lebron wants to play with so I wouldn't want

0:57:16.200 --> 0:57:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Lebron playing with Harden, but I don't want Lebron playing

0:57:18.520 --> 0:57:21.960
<v Speaker 1>with Westbrook. So you know, I don't know how he

0:57:22.080 --> 0:57:27.040
<v Speaker 1>feels about it, but Lebron hardened Donovan Mitchell feels like

0:57:27.080 --> 0:57:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a weird fit like Lebron. Luca is a weird fit,

0:57:30.960 --> 0:57:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and Luca's demonstrably better than Harden but similar stylistically. So

0:57:37.560 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it does, but they I also

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I gotta see how this plays out and

0:57:43.640 --> 0:57:46.040
<v Speaker 1>see what the Calvs do with Harden in the offseason

0:57:47.680 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know, is that going to be a trade piece.

0:57:50.000 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I really don't know, all right. Our super Bowl Prop

0:57:53.600 --> 0:57:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Show coming to this all these feeds tomorrow morning, so

0:57:58.800 --> 0:58:02.080
<v Speaker 1>make sure you have subscribe to the YouTube feed, to iTunes,

0:58:02.120 --> 0:58:04.919
<v Speaker 1>to Spotify, get the alerts for when we go live

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:07.240
<v Speaker 1>when we post a new episode. But our super Bowl

0:58:07.320 --> 0:58:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Prop Show tomorrow. Big thanks for today's show to Blue

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Duck and the volume, and of course our great sponsors,

0:58:13.520 --> 0:58:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Hard Rock, Bet and Boost. Talk to you guys tomorrow

0:58:16.000 --> 0:58:17.600
<v Speaker 1>with all our Super Bowl bets. What's right