WEBVTT - How TED Talks Work: Featuring Roman Mars

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by square Space. Start

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>building your website today at square space dot com. Ter

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>offer code stuff at checkout to get ten percent off

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>square Space. Set your website apart stuff you should know.

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Tour Spring has sprung, everybody. This is Chuck and we

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>are hitting the road in April and May for some

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>live shows. If you live in Seattle, Portland, Houston, or Denver.

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Those are the ones we have so far. We're gonna

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>add a couple of more though, the Neptune Theater on

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>April eighth in Seattle, Revolution Hall in Portland on April ninth,

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna take a little break and we're gonna

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>go to Houston on a Warehouse Live and then Denver, Colorado,

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>May twenty nine. It's a Sunday labor I'm sorry, Memorial

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Day weekend at the Gothic Theater. And you can get

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>all the information for tickets at s y s K

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>live dot com and that is powered by square Space,

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>our buddies, and get this Seattle in Portland, you need

0:00:58.200 --> 0:00:59.959
<v Speaker 1>to get on it because tickets are going fast. It's

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna sell out soon. Houston and Denver tickets are going

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>on sale this Friday, that would be tomorrow. And I

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>believe we're even having a pre sale for Denver today,

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So I don't have that password yet, but if you

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>go to Facebook or Facebook page or s y s

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>K live dot com, we're gonna post the pre sale

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>password for today for Denver. We hope see you guys there.

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>We love you. Goodbye, Welcome to you Stuff you should

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>know from House Stuff Works dot com. Hey, and welcome

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. Sounded like Jonathan's Chickland.

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>Just then there's Charles W. Chuck Bryant, there's Jerry Stuff

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you should know in the house, Yes, sir, so Chuck.

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Before we get started, I think we should make a

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>clarification here because we inadvertently offended some people on our

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>makeup episode. I mentioned that it was International Women's Day,

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's not really a happy okay. I understand that.

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I realized that. And it's not like we said, hey,

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it's International Women's Day, what topics should we do? What topics?

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Screams women fresh International Women's Day makeup. It wasn't like

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>that at all. We selected makeup. It was International Women's

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Day and I didn't want it to go by unmarked yeah,

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was completely coincidental. So we we didn't

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>mean to offend anyone. And uh I hopefully our track

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>record as UH feminists stands up. But um so may

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple to all those who are offended. And you

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>know what, We're gonna do one on International Women's Day

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Equal Rights Amendments. Yeah, next year for International

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Women's Day, about International Women's Day, and maybe we'll do

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the e r A before then. Yeah it sounds great. Okay, good,

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>good job, buddy. All right, so let's let's get started.

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>How you doing, man? I was talking to Jerry before

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you came in about just life. There's a lot of life,

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>lots of stuff going on in every avenue. There's all

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this planning, like we're like working on dates for stuff. Yeah,

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's just like constant what going on. You're

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna melt down? No, I'm not. I'm hanging in there,

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm doing so by saying, uh, you got a

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty good brain trust in your brain? Good? I got Stanima,

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, I've got Stanman perfect. Well, there it is.

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>There's the crack in the dike. Everybody. I have a

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>crack in my brain today because if you remember we

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>were sent We mentioned the Crown Royal Rye whiskey off handedly.

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, I know what your stories, and they sent

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>us six bottles of Crown Royal, and um, I got

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>into it last night. How many bottles? Oh? Not, I

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't drink bottles? Please? Which one did you start with?

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Did you start with the Northern rye? Well, I'd already

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>tried it. I still have not. No, I've been like

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>really holding everything together, so I haven't had time to

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>sit down and like really enjoy some rye. Yeah, I

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>tried the rye, but um, they also sent this single

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>malt the yeah, the x O. Uh well we got

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>two different ones. Really, we got the same Ryan, then

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the same regular, and then each of us had a

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>different So you get a single, like a single malt whiskey,

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>single Mault Canadian whiskey. Nice. So I got into that

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit last night because I've been stressed and

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 1>now I'm I've got cobwebs. That's great, chunk. I was

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>googling at my desk earlier hangover blurred vision. Oh it's

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that bad, just to make sure I wasn't like it,

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't need to go to hospital for some condition. And

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>it said, Hey, don't worry, You're just hung over. That's

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>why you have blurred vision. She could listen to her

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>hangover episode. I know, I couldn't remember if blurred vision was.

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was. I think maybe if you

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>have a turpentine hangover, blurred vision is, but not from

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>com royal It maybe something else. All right, well, hanging

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.239
<v Speaker 1>on by threads, I'll carry us both in this episode.

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Then how about that she just kicked back and relax

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and turn right, turner, that's right. How do you remember

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the time when you realize that Ted wasn't someone's name? Yeah,

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>but was it immediate or had you heard of Ted

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for a little while before you're like, oh, there's not

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>actually a Ted. No. I think I caught onto the

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Ted Talks when most everyone else did. Was when they

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>became readily available and distributed on YouTube. It was like

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>two six, Yeah, that's when they really like, uh launched.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh you were early, that's early. Yeah. And I wasn't

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>like watching them all the time, but I knew what

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it was and pot this is certainly neat in a

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>version of what we do. Yeah, yeah, I'm I mean,

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember when I first saw a TED talk,

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>but I became aware of them as like a thing. Well,

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we weren't doing this later for sure, so I didn't

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>think that at the time. See, yeah right, so UM TED.

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, for those of you who don't know the

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>three of you, UM does not stand for it's not

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>a person name. It stands for technology, entertainment, and design,

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and UM. TED talks are talks originally about things that

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>fell under those three general topics, but have since expanded

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>tremendously and have become this kind of global creativity thinker

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>brand that falls very much in line with the the

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>idea and the feeling behind UM San Francisco and Silicon

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Valley uber UM, the building we work in, like all

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>like this, this whole kind of new technocratic idealism is

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the TED is very much a foundation of that, and

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>help and help foster it for sure, yea. Although it

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>covers wide range of topics now anything a technocrat would

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>be interested in it is well, and not even technology.

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>It incomes as all kinds of eythings. Yeah. Do you

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>remember our Long Now episode, the one about the ten

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand year clock that would if you, if you are

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at all interested in TED talks or this episode, go

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>listen to that one that will definitely be in your

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>wheelhouse to agreed. And they are eighteen minutes long. Uh,

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>because supposedly that is the length of the human u

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>uh span of intentions, attention span. That's right that I

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>love how everybody couches that. And supposedly, yeah, I mean

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is there did you look up as there science behind that?

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Couldn't find anything behind it. I'm sure that there is

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>some social science study about it that concluded that that's

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the case. That doesn't mean that's it's a neat construct

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think a selling point for Ted talks because, uh,

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this article points out, um, they are tailor made for

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>today because they're shortish and shareable and um, they're sort

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of perfect for our new social media age. Yeah. The

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>guy who wrote this article, Dave Russ, basically puts it

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like Ted is ready made for the digital age. Like

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you said, they're eighteen minutes long, they're shareable, and Ted

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>very presciently started sharing these things online for free in

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six, and that was a year after YouTube.

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And I remember when YouTube came around, it was like

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it was not a given that YouTube was always going

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to be here like it is today and so to

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>release all of your stuff, all your videos online back

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and six that had had a decent

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>amount of foresight. Very teddy, so teddy. All right, well,

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>let's go back in time a little bit, because this

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>very much surprised me. Uh not back to two thousand

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>four or even nineteen ninety four. Yeah, go ahead, jump, yeah,

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>like Van Halen is playing Panama on the radio and

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>your TV. Sure, the little angel kids smoking cigarettes and

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the very first ted talk happened. Yeah, isn't that crazy? Yeah?

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't like Ray Kurzwile strutting the stage, just

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>staccato releasing like different computer terms. It was a It

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>was basically the ultimate dinner party. Is how it was

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>put by a designer. Um, and his name is Richard

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Saul Warman. And I looked at Richard Saul Warman and um,

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>he is indeed a designer and publisher and author of

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 1>eight books, and uh, he decided that he wanted to

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>put together something where anyone could come and listen to

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>luminaries and basically a dinner dinner party like setting with

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the stage. Cool idea, like if you have a dinner

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>party and you put a stage in the corner. There's

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>your first TED conference, that's right. And what he said was,

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wanted to sort of have an anti conference.

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want someone up here with the power point.

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want someone up here lecturing for an hour. Uh.

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>The idea was to make him just to get smart

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>people together on stage and in the audience and have

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>them be kind of snappy and quick. And apparently he

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>would even like run you off the stage if you

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 1>were going too long or if he became bored. Yeah,

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's so Richard sault Warman. Well, I don't know.

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kidding because one of his books is called

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bored. Right, it's just like right. At the very

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>first HEAD conference there was a it's very cute and adorable.

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Now they featured a demonstration of the Sony Compact disc player. Yeah,

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>but dude, that's four Yeah. Yeah, man, I'm sure that

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>was like, what is this sorcery? One of the yeah,

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the first Um, you don't have to rewind. Yeah,

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that was a big innovation with Compact. It's so I'm

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>not sure if you're aware of that. Sure, the eight

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>track boy they tried, Yeah, what was the tex problem?

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>It was just too clunky. Well, I mean the advantage

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of being able to skip ahead. Yeah, that's like four

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>songs at a time. Though you couldn't skip like too

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>song number two or three. It would jump in like

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 1>groups of four. Oh, I don't recall that. Yeah, that's

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a big design for at least minded. Maybe I had

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a crappy Richard Saul Warman would never have released something

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>with that kind of a design flaw. The very first

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>or one of the very first demonstrations of the Macintosh

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>computer was at ted. That's huge. And uh, a little

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>mathematician by the name of Ben Wha Mandel brought famous

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>for his set. Yeah, he spoke there's a great Jonathan

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Colton song, yeah about him and his fractals. That's right,

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Mr Colton. Yeah. Uh who we've met, Oh yeah and

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 1>hung out with. He's a good dude, Yeah he is. Yeah,

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>he's been to our shows before, that's right. Uh. And

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>so six years later he took a little break because

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it was it didn't make him any money. Um. In fact,

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it even cost him money. Yes, to think

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>about this, you go to a conference where the compact

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>disc is being shown about five six years before it's

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>actual real release digital which he book Reader and ben

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Wa Mandel brought and no one wants to come. So

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>financially it was a flop, but he'd put together a

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>good conference, and like you said, he took six years

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Then he tried it again and

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>apparently this time it took. Yeah, that's when the eighteen

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>minute format came into play, and um, it became like

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 1>a really big ticket, like all of a sudden that

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>he had made a name for himself in his conference.

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>And these were in Monterey, California at first because that's

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>where he lived, until two thousand nine, they moved to

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Long Beach, and then in two thousand and fourteen they

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>moved ultimately to where they were bound to be in Vancouver.

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah for now. Um, they they If you go on

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the TED site and look up their conference schedule or whatever,

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it says that they hold it annually on the West

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>coast of North America. So they're not they're not locking

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>themselves into anything further than the West coast of North America.

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>What they're definitely saying is we're not coming York time zone,

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>even though the staff is partially based in any or. Yeah,

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>did you read that weight. But why article I sent you? Yep. Yeah,

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>well we'll talk about it some more later. So. Uh,

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Richards Saul Werman, being the the wander lustful designer that

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>he is, decided that he made Ted is success and

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>he was now bored with it, so he sold it.

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>He was he was older, he was looking for a successor.

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Well he found one and Chris Anderson, the birdman of

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Heat. Wouldn't that be funny? It was weird

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>fox hawk? Yeah. Uh no. Chris Anderson he ran a

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.319
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit or runs one called the Sapling Foundation, and he

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>ponied up a cool four million pounds to buy Ted. Dude,

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>he has made that back and then something, Oh I'm sure, well, no,

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>it's a nonprofit, right, He's made some money off. Uh.

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So Anderson took it over. Um started running it as

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a nonprofit and kind of brought that sensibility to it.

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>But he took the eighteen minute chunk idea, which is

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge cornerstone trait of Ted, you know, and ran

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>with it. He did. Um. He he was the one

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>who said we need to release these online. Um he uh.

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>He curates still to this day. From what I understand,

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>all of the speakers and the audience members. Yeah, so

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk a little bit about like making a TED

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>talk if you're ever invited to produce one, and attending

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the TED conference after this. So, Chuck, let's say that

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>UM TED came to you and said, Hey, I'm Ted,

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and uh I want you to speak at me. Yes, okay,

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So you just have signed up for a tremendous amount

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.359
<v Speaker 1>of work actually and a lot of stress and nervousness

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand of course. Uh. And actually we'll

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and tease this. Uh. Coming up at the

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>end of this episode, we are going to interview the

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Great Roman Mars of the Great Invisible Podcasts and part

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of the original cast of a chorus line. That's right,

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Roman spoke at one of the legit TED conferences,

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>not a TED X no Ted, but the real deal. Yeah,

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and we should say so, like, um, there's you may

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>have seen if you're familiar with TED, TED X TED Global,

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. UM and TED conferences are held

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>once a year, and this is the one that is

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>like the big mamajamma where like the guy who runs TED,

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Chris Anderson, picked you to to speak at it. It

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is UM and then there's ted X, and ted X

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>are basically like um local versions of ted and they

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>can either be huge like San Diego ted X is

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a bona fide legitimate conference. And then, um, I'm quite

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>sure that there's Toledo ted X. Do you think I

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think so. I think we might have been invited to

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it once. No, I think so. I don't think we

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>could make it. We were invited to a ted X

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>somewhere is either in Ohio or Indiana. Well, our old

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>friend Joey Ciara, formerly of Henry Clay People, now of

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>bakers Um, he went to Harvard and was trying to

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>get us to do a ted EX at Harvard at

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>one point. I don't know if that's when you're thinking

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of No, okay, nope, this is in a Midwestern states.

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Harvard is not in the Midwest. But does Joey still

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>at Harvard right though? No? No, no? He finished, Oh congratulations, Joey. Yeah,

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>he congratuated and then decided he wanted to go to

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>film school. So, dude, the guys all over the place,

0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>he's all over the place. Can I ask it's not

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the fakers, It's just fakers. He's just fakers. Where's the

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the was the great band? Okay, where is the the

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.479
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean? The Fakers? It's like Edie Brikell

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and New Bohemians that used to drive me crazy, the

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>same thing. They're not the Indigo Girls. Indigo Girls doesn't

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>strike me in the same way. And I get like Fakers,

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have to be the Fakers. The makes it

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a band name, you know, but Fakers is it's a

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>little more artistic. There's something different to it. But it's

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>just when you leave off the in front of a

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>band name, I notice that my antenna go up. It's like,

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>what are you trying to pull? I think originally the

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Eagles were just eagles. I think that's correct. Or did

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>they remain that and they were just mistakenly called the Eagles?

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I could see that, But I also see Glenn Fry

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and Joe Walsh and Don Henley not being ones to

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 1>correct somebody. You know, they're a little more easy going

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>than Eadie Brikell. Well, I think it's just Eagles. Still,

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>The Indigo Girls sounds weird, like are you doing tomorrow? Oh?

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to see Indigo Girls for some reason. I

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>know what you're saying, you know, But that's never stuck

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>out to me with the with them back to TED. So, uh,

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Roman can count himself among some very distinguished people like

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton and Bono and Richard Dawkins and Jane Goodall

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and Al Gore had They've had lots of very famous

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>people speak at TED conferences. Ted. Yes, So that's what

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:29.959
<v Speaker 1>we were saying. We're talking about TED X to Global

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the difference, and and Romans spoke at TED big big um.

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you are asked to speak at TED, UM,

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and you do agree, you are you're basically here's the

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>thing I didn't know about TED that I learned from

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>researching this. You are creating an eighteen minute presentation that

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>when you give this speech like you're speaking at verbatim

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>word for word. Yeah, it's a performance, it is, um

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and so like this thing is not like I've got

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>an eighteen minute speech I know pretty well. Like it's

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>not for the way, Yeah, for the most part, Um,

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it is someone who is an expert in their field.

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's say robotics for example, UM, And a robotics expert

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily a gifted public speaker. In fact, they

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>probably are not. So probably so part of the TED

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 1>process is to basically be matriculated and inculcated into this

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Ted atmosphere where you are coached and um and prompted

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and harangued and written and maybe spanked down the bottom

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>when you don't deliver a script down time. That kind

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Yeah, it's very like the reason if you've

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:46.719
<v Speaker 1>seen a bunch of Ted talks, the reason they all

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>seem the same is because of that reason they want

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>them to feel similar. But yeah, it's a format of

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a brand, yeah, which is a Roman kind of but

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>convention a little bit. And so we'll talk to him

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>about that. Can't wait. Yeah, it's gonna be great. Um.

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>But so what happens is and this is it surprised me. Um.

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Six to nine months before they give the talk, a

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>speaker will start working with the staff and producers and

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>editors to craft your story along with you, right, which

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting. I had no idea. Yeah, Um, I

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>brought up wait but why earlier? Tim Urban, the guy

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>who I believe runs that site, um, and it's a

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty interesting site. He's got some good stuff on there. Um.

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>But he did a Ted talk, the big one in Vancouver,

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess last year or in two fourteen maybe. Um.

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And he talked about how he kept putting off, you know,

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>coming up with an idea even let alone a script,

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>and he finally had like a flash of inspiration and

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>decided procrastination would be a great one to do. Yeah

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and he um he if you read this is called

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>doing a TED talk, calling the full story. He goes

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>into great details. He is a comic stret of like

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and you really feel it with him where you're starting

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to get anxious because you when when he showed up

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>for coaching a month or so out, Um, he showed

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>up to TED offices in New York and he did

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>his his his talk for the first time in front

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of TED staffers. Um. They it apparently wasn't very well received.

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>That's got to be the worst feeling in the world. Yeah.

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And apparently he up until the um the day he

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>gave it, he was rehearsing constantly. Do you remember the

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>time we did them the thing at the in the

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Inventor's Hall of Fame. It was the one time we

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>did a script and there was a script where like

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I had lines and you had lines that responded to

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>my lines, and there's no winging this and you and

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I just pounded it into our heads, did it over

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and over and over again, and then we we finished

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>rehearsing him. Right when we finished rehearsing that last time,

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we walked right on the stage and did it. There

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>was no down time or anything like that. It was

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>like we we worked out our brain muscles, but we

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>were hanging on by our fingernails. We weren't asked back

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>if I remember, it's it's not h It's not the

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>way we prefer to work. Because if you've seen us live,

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you know we have our notes, but we do you

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>like we do in the studio, and we we it's

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a general outline, but we are very much more comfortable

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 1>speaking in our own voice. Right, So this is this

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is what Ted. It's not like that. It's like we

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you have a script and you know it line by line.

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And they apparently have a question a couple of questions

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>like measuring sticks for whether you actually have something memorize.

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Did you did you catch those in the way up

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>wide posts? Yeah? In fact, he calls it um. There's

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>different levels of memorization. He goes over, and the one

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that you need to get to for Ted is called

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>he calls happy birthday. Yeah, like, when you know that

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>song so well, you can like to do your taxes

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>and sing it out. Wou So he's and this just

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>sends like I got nervous just reading this. Uh. He said.

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>If you record yourself saying the talk and play it

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.959
<v Speaker 1>back at double speed, can you say it out loud

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>while it's playing and stay ahead of the recording? That

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>just gives me anxiety. And number two, can you recite

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the talk with no problem while simultaneously doing an unrelated

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>task that requires attention, like following a recipe and measuring

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.959
<v Speaker 1>out ingredients into a bowl. Yeah, I mean imagine that's

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a great way to practice. Know and you have something cold?

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>But um boy, uh, I just don't even bother asking

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>us Ted, right, And I mean like that's that's the thing.

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like, fear of public speaking is an awful thing,

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and then it's it's exponentially amplified when you have a

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>script that you have to remember a word for word

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and line for line. And that's part of TED. And again,

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>like you said, I don't think they're doing this just

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to be mean. They're doing it because they have a

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>brand in a format and like you need to stick

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to the format when you're doing the the talk, right. Yeah.

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.959
<v Speaker 1>What I'm curious about and I couldn't find this anywhere

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 1>they probably don't like to talk about it is I

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 1>wonder if or how often they bail on people and

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>are just like you knows, from what I understand, uh,

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the TED people would not be afraid to do that. Really.

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know if they did that or they took

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the other approach, which is like, no, well, we're gonna

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>keep banging this out with you until you got it.

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Probably both, Yeah, I mean probably, but I'm sure they

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>give their full support and like really try to work

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>with you. But you know, I'm sure people have turned

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in ideas and they're just like that's actually not a

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>good idea, and the person wants to stick with it

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, Okay, we're gonna go with somebody else

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>or yeah. Well there's a couple of hallmarks of a

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>good TED talk that they work with you on, um,

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that you'll notice, uh. And one is that they want

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>to frame your story as a personal journey of discovery.

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 1>This I find is a little narrow, uh. And a

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 1>talk should feel like a quote little miracle end quote

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and change your audience's perspective on the world. Which that's

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem that I have with it, Like not

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>everything is a little miracle, and I don't think you

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>should force it into a little miracle box. Like something

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>can be interesting just on its face. Yeah, but if

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, then start your own conference. Like you know

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying, Like that's their thing right now, I

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>get it. That's why I don't like critics. Well, we'll

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>get to the criticism and I'll go off then. But

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to be really focused on like one specific thing.

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Obviously in eighteen minutes. You can't be too rambly, which

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is another reason why they would never ask us because

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we'd start talking about Cohen Brothers movies. May be like

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>they'd get the hook out. Have you seen Hail Caesar yet? No?

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Which is weird it is I'm usually like right in

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that theater on the first week. I guess it's an

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>allegory for Christ maybe, Oh really, I think so interesting. Uh,

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the other things that they will work with you.

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna use a teleprompter, like we said, it's

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>got to be memorized. Yeah, we don't use teleprompters even

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>when we're shooting videos. Do you use teleprompters? I do

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>for the what the stuff? I find it's too difficult

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>and distracting. I don't have enough confidence in my just

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>reading cold abilities. Love it. Sure, I can read all

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>day long. Uh they they you can't use note cards

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>if you want to uh to do that. Yeah, you're

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>not a robot. No, you might be a robot scientist,

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>but you're not a robot. Right. Yeah. They want you

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to make eye contact and be accessible, and they recommend

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>picking out some friendly faces in the audience. That's a

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that's big and these actually do translate to just about

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>any public speaking gig. Yeah. And what I think is

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>funny is having done shows with you, is you tend

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to pick out the least friendly face and afterwards you're like, well,

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is that guy on the second row he just kept

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.479
<v Speaker 1>yawning and he had his arm scrolls look or something. Yeah,

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it's so funny. It's easy to like obsess, like that

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>person we've lost. Um yeah, it's that is good advice

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to find some friendly people. You want to find more

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>than just like three. You definitely want to do like six, seven, eight,

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 1>scattered all around the audience so that you're looking around,

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and you've got your people that you're looking at, and

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you know they're thrilled and delighted that you're talking right

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to them for a second. But then they can also

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>get very uncomfortable if you're talking to them for most

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of the show, So you want to kind of spread

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that thing around. And then also it doesn't hurt to

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>just kind of look in the air to while you're talking,

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, or close your eyes and pretend you're not

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>there on stage speaking in front of people. We don't.

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>You don't really get that nervous anymore. I know what

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it depends. I have remember in uh in New York

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>at town Hall, I almost I almost had to tell

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you that you need to push me on stage. Yeah,

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>some are a little bit more nervy than others, but

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that goes away pretty quick quickly because our audiences and

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>our listeners are super supportive, Like you can't ask for

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a better room to walk into. Well, Plus we don't

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>have to win the crowd over. There's probably five people

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>who don't listen to stuff you should know at any

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>one of our shows. It's not like being a stand

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>up comedian. No one knows you, especially if you're an

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>opener and you have to win the crowd over. That

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a living nightmare to me. Yeah, that's well,

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I've never tried to stand up one of many reasons. Um.

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>And then they also say to you know, not be

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>too uh active, like use your hands and stuff. But

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you want to be fairly still. Yeah, you don't want

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:26.919
<v Speaker 1>to be running all over the stage. Remember when we

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>were on Solidade O'Brien one morning and my knee was

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 1>just going like five and they did like a full

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>shot of us for the whole interview. Not good. Yeah,

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it was weird because it was also like six am.

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>It was you probably had like six cups coffee. I

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>might as well just stay up. Oh. One thing they

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>point out this article I thought was interesting is that

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and maybe this answer is my question about working with people. Um.

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the most popular Ted's ever was from Susan Kane.

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Did you see that one? Yeah, it's great. She wrote

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a book called Quiet, The Power of Introverts in a

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>World that can't stop talking. So she is a self

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>described very famous introvert, and he was able to do it.

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, hers is very endearing and it kind of

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>gives you the idea that um, and this was This

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>was also mentioned by Tim urban on Wait but why

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that like those people are they want you to succeed.

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>They're not there to be like I can't wait for

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you to fail. Um. There. So there's a very encouraging

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>crowd at her her Ted talk. That's very sweet And

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it was I saw that because our old friend Bill

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates. It was on his list of ten favorite

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Ted Talks. And I went and watched it before we

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>interviewed him because you know or check this out introverts

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>l O L and I was like, sent from my iPhone,

0:29:55.880 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh busted. Um. Actually, Bill Gates and Steve Jobs were

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>very good friends. They were healthy competition. Well. In fact,

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates could arm wrestle Steve Jobs under the table

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and it drove Steve Jobs nuts. Did you know Bill

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Gates can jump over chairs though it was like one

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of his things that he's known for. Did you know that? Well?

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he told me. Okay, I didn't know until

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you told me he still does it once in a while. Wow,

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we should have him do that? And yeah, I thought

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that might have been a bad idea. Uh So, I

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>guess we should talk a little bit about the criticisms

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>since we teased it. Yeah, because there's plenty of it.

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's basically a sporting pastime to to take

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>down Ted. I just don't get it. These things are

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>so enjoyable to read to me. Yeah, Like, um, Frank

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>rich Rot one called Ted Talks are lying to you.

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And it was originally in Harper's, which I think is

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>where I read it a few years ago, and it's

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>reprinted on Salon now because Harper's is behind a paywall,

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and um, it's just beautiful. It's not just about Ted Talks.

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>It's about this whole idea of thing like Ted basically

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the commoditization of creativity, Um, just being uncreative, recycling of

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>established tropes and stuff. What did he called it? Uh?

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Was that him or Benjamin Bratton? Oh, it might have

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>been Bratton. It called it a megachurch infottainment for middle

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 1>brow classes, for middle brown masses. Right, okay, yeah, Well

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the big the big criticisa, Yes they are, Like, there

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of awesome Ted talks. Um. I don't think

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone disputes that. I think a lot of people who

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>criticized Ted believe that there's this unspoken sentiment that Ted

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is changing the world, and the critics point to Ted's

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>really not changing the world at all. It's basically saying,

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>here's this really cool ge whiz idea that you two

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>can understand, and um, go tell your friends about it

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and let the whole idea die there, And that that's

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>actually taking legitimate, great ideas from this roboticist and then

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>just spreading it out to the masses and fizzling out

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>rather than going the opposite way. Now, Ted, on the

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>other hand, is like, are you crazy. If you go

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to our conferences, most of the attendees are extraordinarily rich

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>philanthropists or investors or entrepreneurs who might take that roboticists

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>idea and actually manufacture it. But I think for the

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>most part, if you did tip for tat um, it

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>compared things that panned out from a Ted talk, the

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>things that just fizzled out or haven't haven't panned out yet.

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>They haven't panned out yet far and away exceeds the

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>ones that have. Yeah, I got no problem with that.

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I think TED talks and I think this is their

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>mission is. I think it's a conversation starter and should

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 1>not be looked at as anything more than that. Is,

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>let me break down something you may not have heard of, uh,

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and try to inspire you in eighteen minutes and start

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a conversation. Um. I don't think their mission should be

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>anything but that, so I agreed. Um. The The other

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>big criticism is that it's an extremely elitist organization and

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's not just elitist. TED itself is not

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>just elitist, but the people who really enjoy and get

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>into TED are also extremely elitist without even being aware

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of it. Basically like, if you read the weight but

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>why post um Tim is talking about going to TED,

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And when you go to TED, the whole, the whole

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>thing is you're one speaker on stage and the whole

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>conference is there. There's not multiple speaker speaking at once.

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>There's um like seventies speakers over the course of this week,

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and so everybody's there for you. But the people who

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't in the auditorium might be out on some artificial

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>turf under a fake tree watching it on TV, or

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in a giant ball pit watching it on TV. And

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like this is the antithesis of a hard life.

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Even though a lot of the TED ideas are talking

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>about how to solve problems that have hard lives, so

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 1>it's like very much ensconced and like to get to TED.

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>You pay a minimum of eight dollars uh two as

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>an attendee. Yes, well it's it's unless it's changed. That

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:22.919
<v Speaker 1>was I thought it was on a subscription model. Now,

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>so I saw six thousand dollar a year you become

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a member essentially, Okay, I didn't see that. I saw

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to attend it was undred or you could double that

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and be considered a donor, which I'm sure comes with

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>more perks or whatever. Um. But if you take the

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>if you take the meme between those two, the two

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>prices you would pay for that week long conference and

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.479
<v Speaker 1>you have to be invited to we should point out, well,

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>that's that's another thing. You have to pay at least

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>eight dollars and apply on top of that. And of

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>course they're not going to charge you if if you

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>don't make the cut, but you have to apply and pay.

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.040
<v Speaker 1>And in the application it's it's like we want to

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>know the real you, so sit down with a coffee

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and really think about who you are in explaining this

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 1>to us. In the application, it says that on the

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>tips for applying some fair trade coffee too. Probably, I'm

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>quite sure. I think that's just insinuated day. Um. But

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>if you take the mean of D and seventeen thousand, uh,

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 1>and you multiply that by the four hundred attendees at

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a TED conference, the TED conference takes in about seventeen

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>seventeen million, eight hundred fifty grand in a week. They

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 1>don't pay their speakers. They put them up in hotels

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>with roommates, and um there there if I saw this

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>thing on Joe Rogan, Eddie huang Um was on. He's

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>like a chef and he did a TED talk and

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>he had this nightmare story about his TED experience. Um.

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So they're raking in a bunch of money. And the

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>big thing that they put out is a one million

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:54.919
<v Speaker 1>dollar TED Prize every year, which Bono got one year

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and Jamie Oliver. So there's a lot of Ted's got

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff to be criticized. At the end

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of the day, I agree with you. The talks in

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 1>and of themselves, I have no problem with. Well, yeah,

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's a certain demographic that just doesn't want to

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>hear Bono talk about starvation or like he he needs

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>an extra million dollars for his foundation. You know, like

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:17.879
<v Speaker 1>that's who that million went to that year. I think

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton won one year too. Yeah, and Jamie Oliver again,

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like these guys could just cough up a million dollars

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>into their own foundations. So I would strongly recommend go

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 1>read the weight. But why doing a Ted talk post?

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Um read, Uh, we we have to talk about Ted,

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 1>which is a Benjamin Bratton Ted talk, which that's that's

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>cohones if you ask me. He did a Ted takedown

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:47.800
<v Speaker 1>at Ted x San Diego, which again is a big one.

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And then um read Ted talks are lying to you?

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Which is that Frank rich one that's about way more

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:56.720
<v Speaker 1>than Ted Talks. Yeah. I think part of my defense

0:36:56.760 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>here is tied to our own show. And uh, like

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:05.479
<v Speaker 1>we got an email that we're not even gonna read,

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>but we got an email a couple of weeks ago

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that you know, and we get them from time to

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>time where you you guys should do this, this and this,

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 1>this is where your show stinks and it should be this,

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm always like, go start your show then, like

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>this is what we do and we're not claiming to

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>do anything else, right, Yeah, And there's a there's definitely

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.959
<v Speaker 1>a difference between saying, hey, I think you guys should

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>have guests on more or whatever constructive criticism. But you know,

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:37.320
<v Speaker 1>if somebody comes along and just doesn't drive by jerk move,

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>which I want to see Erin Cooper make a photoshop

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of that, um, that doesn't help. So that's one of

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the things why I think the takedowns are enjoyable to

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 1>read because they make real sense in a lot of ways.

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And also go read on smart It was a Gawker

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>post from a couple of years ago, and it's very lengthy,

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 1>but it really kind of lays the foundation that's like

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the antithesis of the ted talk sentiment. You know. Yeah,

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel it's with social media. I feel like people

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>are just sitting and wait to take something down, and

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just tired of it. I have takedown fatigue. I

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 1>know what you mean, but I I don't have takedown

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>fatigue for thoughtful, sensible, reasonable takedowns. Agreed um. But I

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 1>think when the takedown is on something, it's not like

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:29.800
<v Speaker 1>they're exploiting anybody or you know, it's not like I

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>mean takedown child labor, not like a ted Talk. It's

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>my opinion. Uh, coming up after this break we are

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:41.320
<v Speaker 1>going to and now we've got a lot of interesting

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff to talk about with Roman Mars of Invisible right

0:38:46.040 --> 0:39:04.760
<v Speaker 1>after this. All right, well we are back with a

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:08.439
<v Speaker 1>rare interview, although we've been doing it more and more.

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 1>We had Bill Gates on, and now we have the

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>great Roman Mars of the wonderful, awesome Invisible podcast and

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Radio Topia podcast Network. Yeah, the guy is a podcast magnate.

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Hi Roman, Hey guys, how's it going great? How are

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you sir? I'm excellent, Thank you, thanks for having me on.

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm so glad to be in the company of

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates and yourselves. Well, you know, I wouldn't go

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that far, but uh so we did a podcast on

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Ted talks Um that we already recorded, and so you

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>obviously came to mind because you did your very own

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Ted Talk and not a Ted X or a Ted

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>triple X or whatever versions have. Yeah, you did the

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>real deal. Yeah, it was something else. It was really fun.

0:39:57.440 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend you do it if you get asked.

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:02.359
<v Speaker 1>And that was like one one year ago, right, Yeah,

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it was almost exactly a year ago. And Roman, what

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 1>was your Ted talk? On? My Ted talk was about

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the design of flags? How did you end up on that? Yeah. So,

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of times when you're asked to

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a TED Talk, you're you know, a scientist or a

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>social scientist or philosopher, who is really you know, when

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 1>you're asked to a TED Talk, you know exactly what

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Ted talk you're goin to give, because it's your life's work.

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Whereas I'm a journalist, I mean I tell stories. So

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>when they said do a design story, I had a

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of hundred because I do the radio show about it,

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:39.839
<v Speaker 1>and so I just had to pick one that I

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:42.320
<v Speaker 1>was most passionate about. And I tried lots of different

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 1>ideas and I had this world grand unified theory of

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:48.800
<v Speaker 1>design that I was going to present at some point,

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and I tried it out in different life settings and

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it just wasn't working. And I called him up and

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I said, I just don't know. I have this one.

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going okay, but I kind of want

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:01.439
<v Speaker 1>to talk about flags. And they said me, I can

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 1>tell by the sound of your voice you should do

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the flag one because you sound excited about it. So

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>I did and it was it was really fun. Well, yeah,

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I um, I've seen it a couple of times, and

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it's one of my favorite ones. And um, partially because

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of your passion, but partially because like you can, you

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>can literally since you winning over that audience as you

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>watch it, because they were a little stiff at first,

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and you could like as a as a viewer, like

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching it and nervous for you at first because

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you're a buddy, and then like you feel already audience

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>like literally warming up to you, and then before you

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>know it, they're like everyone's laughing at you. And it

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:42.760
<v Speaker 1>ended up being one of the one of the funnier,

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>more amusing Ted talks I've seen. Well, thank you so much. Yeah,

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I felt that too, ifect. In fact, I felt that

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the whole week because I gave my talk on a Thursday,

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and so I was there from you know, Saturday to Thursday,

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and then the last day it's a Friday, and so

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>all week when you when they see that you're a speaker,

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:04.359
<v Speaker 1>you can see it on your badge. The first thing

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 1>people ask you was what your talk is about? And

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 1>I was just a little shy about talking about it

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>because I know it's a little topic when people. I mean,

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the guy the next day, you know, he won a

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Peace Prize for freeing eighty thousand child slaves. You know,

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you're like, I'm gonna give my flag talk, you know,

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, so oh my god. And so I was

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>really sheepish about it. But um, one of the things

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I loved and my my sense of accomplishment was really um.

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I was just I was kind of proud that it

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 1>was sort of a small topic that I was passionate

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 1>about and it still won them over and I knew

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:45.879
<v Speaker 1>it would. It was. It was fun to do. Yeah,

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:47.879
<v Speaker 1>for those of you who haven't seen it, first of all,

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 1>watch it because it's as all Ted talks, it's under

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes, and it's um it's about the design. Um

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 1>about flag design, but even more specifically city flags of

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>United States kind of all around the world. But you

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>you really uh, I mean, you did a great job

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>for non flag enthusiast. I mean the first thing I

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>did was look up the Atlanta flag afterward, and of

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:12.360
<v Speaker 1>course ours is one of those with the state seal.

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh you have a phoenix on it. It does have

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a phoenix. Uh, yeah, I think it. I think there's

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a phoenix, but it's contained within the state seal, which

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Roman says is just bad design. Yeah. I mean. The

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>funny thing about the Atlanta flag, if you will allow

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:32.720
<v Speaker 1>me to digress, is uh, that is that it also

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>has a phoenix, you know, rising from flame, just like

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco flag does. Um. But actually I think

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it's designed a little a lot better. So if one

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 1>of us had to keep it, I would vote for

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta keeping it the way it is, whereas I think

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that San Francisco is an abomination. But if I think

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>we both kind of need to step aside for you know,

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the city of Phoenix, which has a phoenix on its

0:43:55.480 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>flag too, Okay, good so um, but I think Atlanta,

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:02.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, like as much as it is, it's still

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a cell. I think it's I think it's all right.

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought San Francisco's was tie died it would be

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 1>more appropriate. I think. So were you were you nervous

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>while you were preparing for this, like we oh, this

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is this is part of a larger episode on Ted Talks,

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things we ran across is that

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a very long, nerve wracking process. Yeah. I mean,

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's your typical typically you're you're contacted months and

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>months ahead of time, so I was contacted in August

0:44:32.680 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of the year before and performed it in March. So

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of months you're just trying to figure

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>out what you're gonna do, and you know, trying to

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 1>trying to do your best to write something early so

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that they have something to react against and UM, the

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 1>whole process is really nerve wracking. Even even people who

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>are really seasoned presenters UM run against this. They it's

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:03.280
<v Speaker 1>so prizing how the venue really really makes you nervous.

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:06.799
<v Speaker 1>The one thing you probably can't see is that it's

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the most well lit auditorium you've ever been in. So

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that makes performing in front a

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:18.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of people really uh easy is you have those

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 1>lights you know, in your eyes and you can't really

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 1>see anybody, and you're kind of just performing to yourself. Well,

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:27.359
<v Speaker 1>here you can see every face, and not only can

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you see every face, but you can see faces like

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates and Al Gore and it's super nerve wracking. Yeah,

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:42.319
<v Speaker 1>we've met the people you UM. One of the things, too,

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Roman that that was different about yours was that you

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:50.920
<v Speaker 1>defied convention by sitting down at your table and doing UM.

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Having audio and visual aids and you you make a

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 1>crack about it at the beginning, like who was this

0:45:56.120 --> 0:45:58.720
<v Speaker 1>guy who can sit down? He said, well, this is radio.

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Did you have a hard time talking them into that approach?

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Not at all. That was something that I had psyched

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>myself out. And a lot of people do psych themselves

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>out when they deal with TED because it's so prestigious

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and and so cool to be a part of it.

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:17.799
<v Speaker 1>But um, just like the flag talk itself, where I was,

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to do a little small thing

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:23.399
<v Speaker 1>and not the big, grand TED talk. I had said, Well,

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:26.839
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I I kind of do these live

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>presentations where I present it like a podcast where I

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:33.239
<v Speaker 1>have sound clips and interview clips and music clips and

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I sit down and it's kind of like being an

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>information DJ. And they were so excited about that that

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:42.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I didn't talk to him about

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it sooner. It was kind of, you know, it was

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>my fault in a way. So they they really want

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you to be yourself. They're trying to get you to

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>be yourself if you've never interesting. Yeah, so so like

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, you see all the different things that they do,

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's like there's a there is a lot of

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 1>qualities they're shared across ted talks, and so you think

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that they sort of insist on that. But what they

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>know how to do is if you're like a plant

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:12.879
<v Speaker 1>biologist and you've never given a talk before, they know

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>how to get you to give a good talk. But

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>if you've presented in lots of different ways before, you know,

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 1>they're totally happy to let you defy convention. They want

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you to defy convention. That See, that surprises me because

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 1>we we figured uh, and I understood why you were

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:31.399
<v Speaker 1>nervous that they were really strict about what is tad

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and what isn't. Yeah, they don't. They want to be,

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:37.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, a place of good ideas and understanding, and

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:41.399
<v Speaker 1>they have a certain way that they know that they

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:45.719
<v Speaker 1>can make anyone get there in a way using their methods,

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 1>and they're really smart about that. But if you have

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:51.960
<v Speaker 1>your own way and as long as the result is

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 1>good and they have confidence in that and you have

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 1>confidence in yourself, they're really happy for you to do

0:47:56.640 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it your own way. And they want to be surprised too.

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 1>There they're um, they're they're really delightful. But again, my

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 1>big problem was I had psyched myself out in some

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:08.520
<v Speaker 1>way to think. I was like, God, if I asked

0:48:08.560 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>them for the table and the sound stuff, They're going

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to be annoyed at me. And I'm just a podcaster

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and what am I doing here? And so and so

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>like so I was just really um. But as soon

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>as I brought it up, they were super happy to

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>do it. And and and I didn't want to be

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 1>any trouble and stuff, and you know, and I would

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:32.440
<v Speaker 1>talk to the the the the you know, the different

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:35.440
<v Speaker 1>set people and sound people and you know, the stage

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 1>manager of the you know, of the thing has like

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:42.919
<v Speaker 1>done the Academy Awards and and and they're like, you're

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:46.360
<v Speaker 1>don't worry, we can handle You're sitting at a table,

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. But like it's not it's not a big deal,

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. You know we you know, they just did

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Sounded Music Live last week, you know, so so it's

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not you know, it was just it was that

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>was the weird part was getting over and once you

0:49:02.800 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of like inside the fold, you realize that they're

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:08.279
<v Speaker 1>all on the team with you, trying to make you

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 1>be the best you can be. So Roman one of

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the things we ran across some research was there's a

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:18.920
<v Speaker 1>definite undercurrent in popular culture that people love doing Ted takedowns.

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:21.880
<v Speaker 1>They love writing articles about how snooty TED is and

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:26.279
<v Speaker 1>how elitist it is, and um, what was your experience

0:49:26.280 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 1>with that, Like, did you see what those people are

0:49:28.080 --> 0:49:30.399
<v Speaker 1>talking about and they just have it wrong? Or did

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:32.759
<v Speaker 1>you just did you not really encounter that? Because it

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:37.359
<v Speaker 1>sounds like your your experience is altogether positive. Well, yeah,

0:49:37.440 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 1>my my seriance was altogether positive. I must admit that

0:49:40.520 --> 0:49:43.200
<v Speaker 1>before I was involved in it, I don't know if

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I was really part of TED, you know, takedown, I

0:49:46.920 --> 0:49:49.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't have that sentiment. But I was skeptical because a

0:49:49.960 --> 0:49:54.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is it reeks of certain types of solutionism,

0:49:54.320 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>where you know, one you know, technical fix or design

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:01.080
<v Speaker 1>fix will save the world in some way that is

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:05.200
<v Speaker 1>believable for eighteen minutes, but then you know, you get

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 1>out in the real world and it seems it just

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 1>seems hokey and um and not applicable to actual, real

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:14.880
<v Speaker 1>lives and real people. And so I was kind of

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I skeptical in that way too, but

0:50:19.200 --> 0:50:21.799
<v Speaker 1>when I and it, and it's also just like I'm

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:26.319
<v Speaker 1>not of the world where you spend to go to

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:30.239
<v Speaker 1>a conference that is not my world for sure. So

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I went with a little bit of that, like thinking

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:36.319
<v Speaker 1>about that a lot when I was there, And what

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I left with was this real joy of being around

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:45.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand people who were really trying something and really

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to think optimistically about the world and wanted to

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:54.040
<v Speaker 1>learn and more curious. And I just felt, I don't know,

0:50:54.080 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I was sold on it. In so many ways it was.

0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And there was a very little hierarchy when you're there,

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty interesting. Um, You'll be standing in line,

0:51:05.680 --> 0:51:09.360
<v Speaker 1>um for something, and it'll be some you know, CEO

0:51:09.800 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 1>billionaire and uh, and they want to engage with you

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:16.799
<v Speaker 1>in lots of ways. You still, I mean, it's still

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 1>like normal people don't go to TED in a way

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like you don't. You don't have a lot of cause

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 1>to spend that type of money. Um so and and

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm one of those people that can't go unless you know,

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>they asked me to go. But um, in general, I

0:51:33.040 --> 0:51:37.840
<v Speaker 1>would say that I'm happy that those folks are engaged

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and trying to think about the world in lots of

0:51:39.600 --> 0:51:43.880
<v Speaker 1>different ways and trying to be inspired, and um, you know,

0:51:43.920 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 1>if we don't live up to it, all the time

0:51:46.880 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 1>after we leave um at least there's some effort in

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the right direction. So I liked it. Yeah. I liked

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 1>how you finish your episode, in particular because it was

0:51:58.320 --> 0:52:00.960
<v Speaker 1>about the design of city flag. Then you didn't say like,

0:52:01.040 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 1>this will change the world if you redesign your flag,

0:52:04.040 --> 0:52:07.319
<v Speaker 1>but you did say, you know, it can make a

0:52:07.320 --> 0:52:12.240
<v Speaker 1>difference if the city has a great flag behind them

0:52:12.280 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to rally around, and it can be a unifying thing.

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And I just, uh, I don't know. I appreciated that

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:20.439
<v Speaker 1>sentiment at the end for sure. Yeah. And and they're

0:52:20.480 --> 0:52:23.480
<v Speaker 1>interested in that. They want people to take some action

0:52:23.520 --> 0:52:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and do something, and that's something that they're really into.

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And there's like this year I went to something where

0:52:28.760 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody was putting together a museum of of lynching actually

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 1>like a civil rights museum about the history of lynching

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. And I don't know if this

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:39.719
<v Speaker 1>thing had been released yet, but they're raising money for it.

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And so as soon as the thing was over, everyone

0:52:43.120 --> 0:52:44.880
<v Speaker 1>there was like a Okay, we're gonna go upstairs and

0:52:44.960 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we go raise money for this. And they raised a

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:49.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of money for it that day. And it was

0:52:49.360 --> 0:52:51.640
<v Speaker 1>just something. It was like something to watch the power

0:52:51.680 --> 0:52:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of that room to get stuff done was was really

0:52:55.880 --> 0:52:59.360
<v Speaker 1>incredible and so you know, so I you know, I

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:03.360
<v Speaker 1>try not to overdue mine to the importance of it.

0:53:03.400 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 1>I was really cognizant of how small it was in

0:53:07.280 --> 0:53:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a certain way, but um, but I like people to

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:12.120
<v Speaker 1>think about it in a in a bigger way that

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:16.640
<v Speaker 1>well designed things and civic pride and having some pride

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is a big part of how we get things done,

0:53:19.160 --> 0:53:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, it leaves people with a little

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:23.680
<v Speaker 1>bit to think about, but also just just to be entertained.

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 1>That was my main goal. Cool was there? Um? I mean,

0:53:27.320 --> 0:53:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is there like an after party? Do you get feedback

0:53:29.560 --> 0:53:34.520
<v Speaker 1>from people afterwards and audience? Yeah, I mean it's it's great.

0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Ted is much better after you're done before you start,

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and because I had all week of just being super

0:53:42.480 --> 0:53:44.920
<v Speaker 1>nervous and thinking, got into some torp with the flag

0:53:44.960 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 1>talk and then then you're done and people kind of

0:53:48.040 --> 0:53:50.680
<v Speaker 1>know what you're about and uh, and they want to

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:52.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to you. And it's fun because you're like an

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:55.919
<v Speaker 1>expert of that thing, and so it's really it's really

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>enjoyable that give you. We had lots of good feedback,

0:53:58.640 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 1>lots of um and stuff, And I think that people

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:05.239
<v Speaker 1>liked the format change and I finally got a sense

0:54:05.280 --> 0:54:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of my role in the in the week, you know,

0:54:08.719 --> 0:54:11.440
<v Speaker 1>along with the really important kind of heavy hitters, like

0:54:11.440 --> 0:54:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they do like to have lighter and comic relief. And

0:54:15.440 --> 0:54:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, don't get me wrong, it's not

0:54:17.800 --> 0:54:19.759
<v Speaker 1>like I'm not a stand up comedian. It was just

0:54:20.280 --> 0:54:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was just enjoying. So it's you know,

0:54:23.800 --> 0:54:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Ted comedy. It's like NPR comedy is really similar and um,

0:54:29.200 --> 0:54:32.400
<v Speaker 1>but it but it was. It's it's super fun. So

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:34.920
<v Speaker 1>there's tons of parties and tons of like there's a

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:38.640
<v Speaker 1>big social part of Ted. Awesome. Um, what do you

0:54:38.640 --> 0:54:41.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like And you don't have to like get specific

0:54:41.239 --> 0:54:43.760
<v Speaker 1>if somebody like stuffed a bunch of money in your pocket,

0:54:43.800 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 1>but what do you feel like it did for Invisible

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and Radiotopia? I mean it exposed me to a bunch

0:54:51.239 --> 0:54:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of new people. They got to see the I know

0:54:54.160 --> 0:54:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have started listening to the show

0:54:56.280 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 1>after seeing the Ted talk. Um it's a little different

0:54:59.719 --> 0:55:02.680
<v Speaker 1>from me, which was it was kind of fascinating because

0:55:02.800 --> 0:55:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I do have a public show, in a public profile

0:55:06.080 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and a pretty popular show. It's not quite as popular

0:55:09.040 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 1>as uh it's Ted, but you know, we get we

0:55:12.040 --> 0:55:17.399
<v Speaker 1>get several million downloads amounts too, and so um, it

0:55:17.440 --> 0:55:22.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that huge like catapult from you know, obscurity as

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a social scientist and and and out there in the world.

0:55:25.160 --> 0:55:26.960
<v Speaker 1>But it was just nice. It was like a nice

0:55:27.000 --> 0:55:30.839
<v Speaker 1>compliment to the things that we already do and um.

0:55:30.880 --> 0:55:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And it was just also fun to present stories in

0:55:33.040 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a new way because you know, because we are a podcast,

0:55:35.680 --> 0:55:38.839
<v Speaker 1>we and we are a podcast often about visual things

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:41.879
<v Speaker 1>because we covered design, it was nice to have this

0:55:42.360 --> 0:55:46.759
<v Speaker 1>other presentational format that had um, had some pictures, you know,

0:55:46.880 --> 0:55:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so it's kind of it was just it was just

0:55:48.560 --> 0:55:50.840
<v Speaker 1>really fun, like it was a great experience for me.

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Nice man, thank you for talking with this Roman. We

0:55:54.520 --> 0:56:00.440
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. You are the Ted Talking List friend we have. Actually,

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. Hodgman did one too as well. He's

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:05.440
<v Speaker 1>done a couple. Yeah, he's done a couple. Oh. He

0:56:05.560 --> 0:56:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the only one I've seen of Hodgeman is it was

0:56:07.480 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 1>very sweet. He talked about meeting his wife. Oh nice

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:13.200
<v Speaker 1>was that that had to be a Ted X. Maybe

0:56:13.960 --> 0:56:16.240
<v Speaker 1>he's in Western Man, he's a he's he's a regular.

0:56:16.320 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's really fun. I'm going back this year as

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a TED mentor worked with other speakers and that was

0:56:23.320 --> 0:56:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that was pretty enjoyable too. So are you practicing clapping

0:56:26.760 --> 0:56:32.200
<v Speaker 1>your hands and going wrong, wrong, wrong for rehearsals. No, No,

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:35.520
<v Speaker 1>not exactly. It's very supportive. By One of the things

0:56:35.560 --> 0:56:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that you don't get about TED is because the videos

0:56:38.200 --> 0:56:40.919
<v Speaker 1>are edited, you don't see the all the mistakes. And

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:44.799
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee that everyone has made a mistake um in

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:47.439
<v Speaker 1>a TED talk. And one of the great things about

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the whole vibe of the room, and you might not

0:56:49.960 --> 0:56:53.399
<v Speaker 1>know this from watching it, is that the whole room

0:56:53.520 --> 0:56:56.719
<v Speaker 1>is like on your side. They're really really rooting for you.

0:56:56.800 --> 0:56:59.719
<v Speaker 1>They want to they want to be wowed, and so

0:57:00.040 --> 0:57:03.200
<v Speaker 1>if something technically goes wrong or you flub and have

0:57:03.320 --> 0:57:08.279
<v Speaker 1>to restart, the whole crowd just applauds and cheers and

0:57:08.360 --> 0:57:11.640
<v Speaker 1>just gets you going again. And it's really something. It's

0:57:11.680 --> 0:57:14.799
<v Speaker 1>like so like joyful. Have you ever had a room

0:57:14.800 --> 0:57:19.240
<v Speaker 1>full of billionaires clap for you? Yeah, But it's something

0:57:19.280 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't pick up from the presentation, which gets a

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:27.360
<v Speaker 1>little it's pretty slick. It's that that roughness that makes

0:57:27.400 --> 0:57:31.720
<v Speaker 1>people like they're really you can sort of rely on

0:57:31.800 --> 0:57:35.120
<v Speaker 1>them to lift you up. Um, and it's uh, it's

0:57:35.200 --> 0:57:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a it's a nice room to be

0:57:37.040 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in as an audience member and as a personal stage. Wow.

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Well that's good to know actually, because it seemed yeah,

0:57:43.640 --> 0:57:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seems like you're walking into a room

0:57:45.560 --> 0:57:49.600
<v Speaker 1>full of like a firing squad, not you, but just anybody,

0:57:49.600 --> 0:57:52.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's just so quiet and it just seems stiff

0:57:52.560 --> 0:57:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and um seem they hissed anytime you made a mistake. Exactly.

0:57:59.160 --> 0:58:02.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not like that. It's a it's exact opposite. We

0:58:02.160 --> 0:58:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I watched a train wreck of this talk this year.

0:58:05.720 --> 0:58:07.440
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of the it was the most kind

0:58:07.480 --> 0:58:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of amazing moment because people like stood up and cheered

0:58:10.440 --> 0:58:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and try to get this kid going, and it was amazing.

0:58:13.160 --> 0:58:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And it was such a disaster. It was like a

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:20.240
<v Speaker 1>performance arts. Like you're making my stomach hurt right now. Yeah,

0:58:20.280 --> 0:58:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I know, but it but it was but in a way,

0:58:22.480 --> 0:58:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it was like this catharic event for all six people

0:58:25.320 --> 0:58:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in the theater and it was it was it was

0:58:27.120 --> 0:58:30.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of fun. All right, Roman, thank you my friend,

0:58:31.120 --> 0:58:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and um people, really, I know. We we talked about

0:58:35.440 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 1>invisible more than we should as competitors, but it's a great,

0:58:41.160 --> 0:58:44.880
<v Speaker 1>great show and people should support that. In radiotopia, always

0:58:44.880 --> 0:58:46.920
<v Speaker 1>tell people if you don't, even if you don't think

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you like design, you should just try Invisible because it's

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:52.720
<v Speaker 1>much much more than that. Where can they go to

0:58:52.760 --> 0:58:55.400
<v Speaker 1>find you, Roman, They can find us on our website

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>at p I dot org or you know anywhere where

0:58:58.520 --> 0:59:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you get podcasts. Well, thank you for coming on. Thank

0:59:01.800 --> 0:59:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Yeah, my pleasure. I really appreciate it.

0:59:04.720 --> 0:59:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm a huge fan. It's very exciting to me. Thanks man.

0:59:07.560 --> 0:59:11.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well we'll talk to you soon. So Chuck.

0:59:11.360 --> 0:59:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh that's Ted Talks. Yeah, thanks Roman, that was awesome. Yeah,

0:59:14.760 --> 0:59:16.320
<v Speaker 1>what a cool dude. If you want to know more

0:59:16.320 --> 0:59:18.640
<v Speaker 1>about Ted Talks, well just type Ted Talks into a

0:59:18.640 --> 0:59:21.560
<v Speaker 1>search bar and start watching Ted Talks. There's a million

0:59:21.600 --> 0:59:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of them basically. Um, and you can also read the

0:59:24.600 --> 0:59:27.680
<v Speaker 1>article on how stuff Works about it. Yeah, um, and

0:59:27.720 --> 0:59:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I said how stuff works, which means this time for

0:59:34.400 --> 0:59:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this cremation. We did a great show

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:41.040
<v Speaker 1>on cremation quite a while ago. If we do say

0:59:41.080 --> 0:59:43.640
<v Speaker 1>so so, If we do say so, this from Emily.

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:46.320
<v Speaker 1>She says, Hey, guys, my dad was just listening to cremation.

0:59:46.680 --> 0:59:49.600
<v Speaker 1>My dad was cremated in two thousand four after passing

0:59:49.640 --> 0:59:53.200
<v Speaker 1>away to stupid idiot cancer. Uh. And my step mom

0:59:53.280 --> 0:59:56.680
<v Speaker 1>has really had a really interesting concept. She's really big

0:59:56.720 --> 1:00:00.560
<v Speaker 1>on recycling. She's known locally as the Queen of recycling

1:00:00.600 --> 1:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in Indianapolis. Wow, not bad. She found hundreds of teeny

1:00:05.000 --> 1:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>tiny medical bottles about the size of the last segment

1:00:08.600 --> 1:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of your pinkie with tiny rubber plugs. She hand filled

1:00:13.760 --> 1:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>like three hundred bottles with my dad's creamines and put

1:00:17.200 --> 1:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>them on the mantle of the lodge at which we

1:00:19.600 --> 1:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>hosted his celebration. We had a celebration instead of a

1:00:22.480 --> 1:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>funeral outdoors under fall leaves, with wine and live music.

1:00:26.840 --> 1:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>As he was locally loved as a folk musician Craig Laughlin,

1:00:31.760 --> 1:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>all who loved him could take a few of the

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>bottles of him with them. Pretty neat. That's a great party, favor.

1:00:39.080 --> 1:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's awesome. Since then, he's been to the

1:00:42.200 --> 1:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Vango Museum in Amsterdam, he's in the Bellaggio Fountain in

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas, and most recently he's mixed been mixed into

1:00:50.160 --> 1:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>black volcanics and in Iceland's snuff Alopicus Peninsula. It's called

1:00:57.280 --> 1:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>She even sent me how to pronounce its snail falls

1:00:59.720 --> 1:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and and it's this. I've also scattered him in every

1:01:03.400 --> 1:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>apartment I've lived in since, always in the very back

1:01:05.920 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>corner of a closet or in a crack somewhere. Um. Anyways,

1:01:09.640 --> 1:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the episode. Pretty informative and I'm sure my

1:01:12.040 --> 1:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>dad would giggle if you knew his body was flailing

1:01:14.080 --> 1:01:18.439
<v Speaker 1>around in the flames at the end. That's very cool. Yeah,

1:01:18.440 --> 1:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that's from Emily. And when I told her she was

1:01:19.920 --> 1:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>on listr mail, she just responded with a big uppercase

1:01:23.360 --> 1:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>expletive with an exclamation point. Shoot yep. And I was like, right,

1:01:30.800 --> 1:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that's cool. Thanks. Emily's very excited. That is really neat, Like, uh,

1:01:34.920 --> 1:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that's just a great story. Yeah, and you know what,

1:01:37.800 --> 1:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to send some of your dad's cream,

1:01:39.360 --> 1:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>anes will have him here in the studio with us. Yeah, yeah,

1:01:43.400 --> 1:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>why not. Okay, I can't play any folk music though, no,

1:01:46.480 --> 1:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>but we'll we'll, we would take good care of it.

1:01:48.440 --> 1:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And if you decided to do so, that's right. Okay,

1:01:51.560 --> 1:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks for that, Chuck, and thank you Emily. Either way,

1:01:54.560 --> 1:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>whether you take him up on it or not. UH.

1:01:56.720 --> 1:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>If you out there wanted to get in touch with us,

1:01:59.320 --> 1:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you can tweet to us at s y s K podcast.

1:02:02.360 --> 1:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>You can join us on Facebook dot com, slash stuff

1:02:05.120 --> 1:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>each snow, you can send us an email to Stuff

1:02:08.000 --> 1:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Podcast at how stuff Works dot com, and, as always,

1:02:12.560 --> 1:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>joined us at at home on the web, Stuff you

1:02:14.240 --> 1:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Should Know dot com. For more on this and thousands

1:02:21.800 --> 1:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of other topics, is it how stuff Works dot com