WEBVTT - AFC South Betting Guide: Coaching Changes, Division Winner, and Win Totals (Ep. 729)

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Betting Pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>your bets. It is me Joey f joep Zapia and

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>this is VP NFL. It's time to continue our NFL

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>preview series. If you've missed them, go back and watch

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>on demand on our Betting Pro channel. Subscribe today, help

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>us get to one hundred thousand subscribers. We can do

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it with your help. I believe in you. But today

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we have found ourselves in the South. It's hot here

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey. It's humid. I might as well be

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in the AFC South right now. That's how I feel.

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And I know what you're saying. This isn't the sexiest division.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>But if there's two guys who can make talking about

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the AFC South sexy, it's the Undertaker Andrew Erickson and

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>my man Terrell Fermit Junior. And we are going to

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about the AFC South, our favorite bets, the team totals,

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna win this bad Boy and more. And don't

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>forget before we jump into here this conversation with two feet.

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>The Betting Pros app is out for you. Got it

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>on iOS, got it on Android, got it everywhere. Seek

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>your sports books for free, bets, smarter, not harder about

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>game picks, product props, parlays, you name it. In fact,

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't even say it. It's so good, that's how

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>good the tools are. But again, we're talking about things

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>like the picktracker systems, we're talking about in season, the

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>prop at cheat sheet, all of the things that are

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna help you become a more successful wager or here

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>at your fingertips with the Betting Pros app, and so

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>much work is going in to the redesign of the

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>app and more tools to help you become successful. So

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.119
<v Speaker 1>there's no excuses right now. Download the Betting Pros app,

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>start to use tools like the picktracker to see what's

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>working for you's not what's working for other people, and

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>then you can just follow their picks too. Again, all

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of this is on the Betting Pros app. Sign up

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>today by downloading the bad Boy wherever you get your apps,

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>or go to Betting pros dot com and sink your

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>sportsbooks for free. All right, gentlemen, let's kick things off

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>here with what's going on since last we left this division.

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>The Houston Texans added some wide receiver help, which they

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>needed because Tank Dell. Unfortunately his career is in jeopardy.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>That's for sure. We have, of course, Stefan Diggs has

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>moved on, and they've brought in Jayden Higgins via draft,

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk via free agency, and Jalen Nole via draft too.

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>They traded Laramie Tunsel, the one good offensive lineman they had. Sure,

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>why not. Look, the offensive line hasn't been good basically

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>since C. J. Stroud got there, So Torell, I don't

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>know at this point if we should be worried about

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it or not, because it's never been any good and

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>yet they've still been a pretty good team. Stroud did

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>regress a little bit in year two, but that was

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>bound to happen. Sure, the offensive line was a big

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>part of that, but they did have a fantastic winning

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. So where the Houston Texans reloaded, restocked and

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>ready for twenty twenty five.

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I would love to say a clear cut yes,

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 2>but it's really just a yes because everybody else looks horrible.

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 2>Like you understand, you know those group of people that

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>just hang around with a bunch of people that bring

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:56.959
<v Speaker 2>them down.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 3>So that they look elevated. That's what the Houston sect

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 3>since look like here. They look like the.

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Pretty chick that's standing around with a bunch of sixes,

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe some fives, and she's really only a seven point five,

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 2>maybe that, but she looks like a ten, and the

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.839
<v Speaker 2>Texans look like a ten, even though the offensive line

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 2>has so many question marks, so many question marks. Trent Brown,

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Cram Robinson coming in, but they traded Lambretzonsel, their best

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 2>offensive lineman, and now there's question marks on all five positions.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Like regardless, if they figure it out and if CJ.

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Stroud is able to move on into year three with

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 2>playing behind a bad offensive line, I really do think

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 2>that the rest of the division being this bad is

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 2>really the only saving grace for the Texans.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>All Right. I love Jadon Higgins. I like Noel too.

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Jadan Nole is a nice player. I think that they

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>did a good job of bringing in more help at

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, but you need time to throw the football.

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>That's still the thing that I'm shocked that they didn't

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>do more this offseason to really improve the offensive line.

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I like the defense of the Texans. The head coach

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>ericson what'd you make of their offseason?

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, they fired Bobby Slick, which I think was the

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 4>right move to make, and they made an in team

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 4>higher across the offensive line, someone that comes from Cool

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Popovic coming from the New England Patriots, so I think

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 4>that or he has stems from the Nicle Patriots. Was

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 4>the assistant offensive line coach last season. So I think

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 4>there's really nowhere to go us but up when it

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 4>comes to the offensive line, Like you guys outlined two

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 4>years ago, it was they were all injured and that's

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 4>why they were bad. Last year, they stayed healthy, but

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 4>there was no creesiveness with it, so they were just bad.

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, for the worst offensive line again, well it's

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 4>been the case the last two seasons and the Texans

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 4>have won games and gone to the postseason and won

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 4>the division. So I think that you guys kind of

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 4>make a great point where this division is just really

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 4>weak and they're the best team in a weak division

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 4>and the defense is still really good. Yeah, like that's

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 4>the thing that has kind of I think that's kind

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 4>of what helped them last year overcome the offensive issues.

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 4>Now I think that we should expect the defense kind

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 4>of maybe take a step back, that won't be as

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 4>good in terms of creating turnovers, creating pressure. But at

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.239
<v Speaker 4>the same time, I just think that schematically, Nick Hayley

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 4>coming in as the offense ave coordinator coming from the Rams,

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 4>again also stemming from the New England Patriots getting Sky's

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 4>connection with Donte Karnakia like the offensive line king. So

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 4>I think that that just even if the personnel doesn't

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 4>look great, I think that's schematically it's going to be better.

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 4>It's going to give Shrouds more time. Even though there's

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 4>an average offensive line. I think it's going to do

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot to help them.

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look, you still got Hunter, you still got Anderson,

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you got pass rush there. You know you got Stingley,

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you got you got a lot here.

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 5>The CJ.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Johnson there came over last year. I still think

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that defense. I believe in them. The Jacksonville Jaguars another year,

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>another head coach. That's how things go in Jacksonville. Usually

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Liam Cohene comes over from the offensive coordinator job in

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Tampa takes over for the Jacksonville Jaguars as their new

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 1>head coach. They draft the two way player Travis Hunter,

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>They draft bas Shell Tuton. Is that enough of a

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>change to really change the stars for the Jaguars Andrew Erickson.

0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Would you make of the Jags offseason?

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 4>I think it was pretty positive in terms of who

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 4>they added. Adding Travis Hunter kind of fixed two team

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 4>needs they had. They needed another receiver and they really

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 4>need to need a defensive back, so they got two

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 4>positions with one player. So we'll see how things kind

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 4>of shake out with him, especially when we get into

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 4>our wild card bets. When it comes to Travis Hunter,

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 4>I think it's just really you gotta have some action

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 4>on Travis Hunter this season in some ways some form,

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 4>because he's too fun of a player to not bet

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 4>on him to do something great as a true unicorn

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 4>in the NFL. But I think that bringing in Liam

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Cullen just like what he did with Baker Mayfield. But

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 4>Trevor Lawrence, maybe he'll never live up to what he

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 4>was supposed to be coming out of Clemson as a

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 4>number one overall pick. But I mean, I can't say

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 4>that he's ever really been put in a situation where

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 4>it was a wheels up like this is the perfect

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 4>spot for him to succeed. I think William Cohen showed

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 4>last year with Baker Mayfield that hey, he can put

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 4>players in positions to succeed, So I would expect them

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 4>to be better than they were last year.

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody's down in in Liam Cone is

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a good offensive mind Terrelle. I'm just not sold in

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he's a good he's a head coach

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>or ready for that sort of job. I'm not. I

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't impressed with press conferences that he had. I wasn't

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>impressed with some of the the layouts of what his

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>plans were for the organization. I thought it was a

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>surprising hire, to say the least, to be honest with you,

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>especially when you see guys like Brian Flores, you know,

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>floating around who have head coaching experience, you know, great

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>defensive background. You know, maybe you can you know, get

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you know tighter as an organization, maybe a little bit

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>more discipline because discipline is kind of lacked in Jacksonville

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>for many, many years. So what do you make of

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Cohen and when you make of the draft? Here? Took

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Touton's an exciting player, we know that. But Travis Hunter,

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>can he withstand the season as a two way player?

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the big question.

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and shout out to my guy to in former

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 2>North Carolina A and c Aggie Aggie Pride. You know,

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 2>I got to show a little bit love for my

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 2>alma mater there. And there's a whole defensive side of

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 2>ball that I haven't heard anybody talk about this entire offseason.

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>And we're just gonna expect the Jags that have it

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 2>figured out there, Like is there a legit plan? And

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I understand they took a few guys in the draft

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>on defense and I help try to build out some

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 2>depth there, but I just don't trust that they're going

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 2>to be legit on the defensive side of the ball.

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 2>And then if Goldie Lots gets out there and starts

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 2>turning the ball over crazy, I just don't know what's

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna happen. Like there's the wheels could fall off for Jacksonville,

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville's pick near the top of the draft. It feels

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 2>like every year the past five seasons. I just don't

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 2>know how much more they have to give. And I

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.239
<v Speaker 2>think they did rush to Cohen higher.

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't don't. I don't know.

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I felt like I felt like there was more due

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 2>diligence that could have been done. And I'm just very

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 2>very interested to see what the changes are on the

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 2>defensive side of the ball. Yes, you're a good offensive mind,

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 2>but there's two sides of the ball here, and you've

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 2>got to be able to play defense in NFL.

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm skeptical, to say the least. The Indianapolis Colts.

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm also skeptical. Man. I had high hopes for the

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Colts last year. This was kind of my sleeper team

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that I will take in l on because I like

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Change Sichin as a as a football mind, and I

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>still do. I think it's been in a weird situation

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>here with Anthony Richardson. They brought in competition in the

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>one Jane Daniel Jones, your old friend from the New

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>York Giants there who worked in Minnesota for a short time,

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and now he is, I guess, competing for the number

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>one job. If Richardson falters, if he gets hurt again,

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it's Daniel Jones. They drafted Tyler Warren. Charvari's Ward was

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>brought in to help out a little bit at corner.

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of the major moves. Like Warren is

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a huge talent out of Penn State. I think everybody

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>thinks he can be a great player, but you know,

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you got to be as good as the guy throwing

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in the football. And that's been the problem here for

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>this team the last two years. Who's throwing the football?

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>How consistently and how's that working. We know the raw

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>athleticism of Anthony Richardson Turell, we know what it is. However,

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen him develop into a quarterback. I don't

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>doubt the kids work ethic. I just doubt the amount

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of reps he's been able to get between college and

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. I kind of almost wish NFL Europe was

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a thing where he could go out there and play

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>there for you know, a summer, and like figure things

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>out and maybe come back and get some more reps.

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>But that's the problem. It's like you're right into the

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>fire again with Richardson. So is he gonna sink or

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna swim?

0:09:58.559 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 3>This year?

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 2>This is the rock in a hard place because you're

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 2>deciding between Daniel Jones and Anthony Richardson, and you chose

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 2>to make this decision to have to pick between the two,

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 2>like you chose to put yourself in that situation. The

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Colts are a dumpster fire. I'm gonna just go ahead

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 2>and say it. I have no idea what the Colts

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 2>are gonna do because you have to give the ball

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to Richardson and you got it. At least see what

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 2>you have there, because everybody knows what you have in

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Jones. Daniel Jones has been under different coaches, albeit

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 2>he still played for the Giants. He's been under different coaches,

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 2>He's been under different offensive schemes, and it has not translated.

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 3>He's not good.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 2>And so if Anthony Richardson is not able to go

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 2>in there and make that leap and you at least

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 2>hey try by fire and play through them and see

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 2>if it works that. If it doesn't work, then all right,

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna move on as a staff and figure something

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 2>else out. That's gonna be what the Colts are gonna

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 2>have to do this season. Are you gonna be ready

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 2>to move on enough? And I don't think they are.

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that they're gonna take this and it's gonna

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 2>be Richardson, Jones, Richardson Jones, richards and Jones, Richardson Jones

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 2>all season and that's gonna kill the morale of the scene.

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Look, it's it's trying to figure out like if

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>you're setting the table Ericson, And you've got like this

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 1>fine china and it's really elaborate and decorative, but it's

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>super fragile, and you know, maybe it's not big enough

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for all the food you want to eat on it,

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>and you're not sure if it's gonna hold up. And

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>then there's Daniel Jones, who's the opposite of the Anthony

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Richards in China. It's that he is like the you know,

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the Dixie paper plate, like you kind of know what

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you're getting there, but you know that's kind of flimsy too,

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and you go to the cookout and you fill it

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>up too much. Next thing you know, it's starting to

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>flip over a little bit. It's not good. It's not

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the Dixie get you gotta get you to get you

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a second one, or you gotta get like the real

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>good brand. So Dixie's like the good one. It's like

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the store brand paper plates at the cookout. That's kind

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of what I feel like you're doing with Daniel Jones.

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So Ericson, who plays more games at quarterback this year

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>for the Colts? To me, that is the question that

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>informs your wagering decisions.

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 5>Man, that is a tough question to answer.

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 4>Who's gonna play more games, because it could really depend

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 4>on who stays healthiest because both these quarterbacks have dealt

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 4>with a lot of injuries throughout their NFL careers. I

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 4>think it's going to be I think it'd be close

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 4>down to a split. I think would be eight for

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 4>one guy and nine for the other guy, and maybe

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 4>it's eight all in a row and then the other

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 4>guy takes the second half of the season, or it's

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 4>more of a flip flop like Trail kind of outlined.

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 4>I just think with the Colts in general, they're a

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 4>team that's going through an identity crisis. Where are we

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:28.199
<v Speaker 4>trying to build Richardson up as our franchise quarterback because

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 4>he's still super young, and or we're trying to win

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 4>games with Daniel Jones because the GM and head coach

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 4>are on the hot seat. So you have these two

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 4>conflicting things going at it. And that goes to the

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 4>problem of having these two types of quarterbacks, because if

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 4>the Colts win with Daniel Jones, at the end of

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 4>the season, what are we winning? Okay, now you got

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 4>to pay Daniel Jones, Like, oh, that's great, We're feeling

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 4>to be fantastic firsus, Well, we should really get the

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 4>best to look with Kennon Richardson, and then you lose

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 4>all these games, but then the coach and GM get fired.

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 4>So it's really hard. And to Trell's point about them

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 4>being a dumpster fire. When I did their win lost projections,

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.719
<v Speaker 4>I was not kind to the Napolis Colts, thinking that

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 4>this could be disastrous. The one thing I will say

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 4>that works in their favor, and this is something that

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 4>I kind of looked a little bit more deeply at

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 4>as they're probably the one team in this division actually

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 4>has a good offensive line that you can actually feel

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 4>pretty confident in, so they were ranked fifth by PFF.

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.559
<v Speaker 4>They have two really good Star Wars players, specifically on

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 4>the left side at left tackle left guard. So I mean,

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 4>if the quarterbacks just feeding Jonathan Taylor and that's how

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 4>they're winning games, then maybe you could see, Okay, maybe

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 4>they make some noise, but I think I just leaned

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 4>towards the ladder of I think that this is going

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 4>to be probably more ugly than pretty at the end

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 4>of the end of the season.

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Your responses, both of you to any question regarding the

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Colts both were met with long pauses, which should tell

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody if you're wagering, you should have a long pause

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>before you wager on the Colts because it's unknown, because

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to invest in. This is look, this is

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:55.839
<v Speaker 1>real shows about investments. At the end of the day,

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to invest in the Colts, you want to

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>invest in the Ravens. You know what I'm saying. I

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's a question you got to ask yourself. And

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to invest in the Colts because I

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's enough value even to invest. Now, the

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee Titans, they're turning the keys over to the car

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to cam Ward number one overall pick in the draft,

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>l like a omanor also coming in their wide receiver.

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>They brought in Tyler Lockett this offseason. So the Titans

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to remake the offense, the will Lewis experiment hopefully

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is over Look. You got Pollard, you got Taj Spears ericson,

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you got some talent on the offensive side of the football.

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>The defense, I think, you know, we have some questions

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>about where they're going to be in terms of in

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of talent level and productivity. It's you know, still

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>working their way into this new regime. From last we

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>left them. So what do you make of the Titans

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>offseason and the rookie taking over at QB and cam Ward?

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 5>I think Kim Ward's kind of exciting.

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 4>I think that he could be a player that could

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 4>potentially win games for the Tennessee Titans, but I think

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 4>they'd also be a player in somewhat of a Will

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Levis fashion, can also lose games for his teams with

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 4>stupid turnovers, which we know Brian Callan was not a

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 4>fan of. I think my issue with the Titans and

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 4>not be able to back a okay first overall pick

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 4>rookie quarterback.

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 5>Does he have a CJ.

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 4>Stroud type of impact that jayde Daniels have of impact

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 4>in year one? Again talking about teams that go from

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 4>fourth to first in their division, the Titans are one

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 4>of those teams that you kind of have to at

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 4>least consider because of how weak this division is overall.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 4>But it goes back to me with Brian Callahan and

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 4>just how bad last year was. So do you guys

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 4>remember what the.

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 5>Titans record against the spread was last year for Brian Callen.

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it was only three. I think that

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 3>only one three.

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 4>They were two and fifteen. Oh it was two two

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 4>and fifteen against the spread, including which was a win

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 4>over the Patriots in overtime.

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, but turnovers will kill you, and

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a ton of turnovers last year with Leve

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>was trying to force balls everywhere. It was no good.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Terrell, Oh, go go ahead, I guess.

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 4>To my point is the Titans, it was pretty clear

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 4>that they were a dumpster fire last year and that

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 4>was that was we knew about this every single week.

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 5>His team is a dumpster fire.

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 4>And they still couldn't cover the spread, Like they were

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 4>unable to meet like ground level expectations, and they weren't

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 4>able to meet those. So, yes, cam Ward is now there,

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 4>but I just still don't know if Callahan has necessarily

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 4>the you know, if he has the what it takes

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 4>to be an NFL high coach.

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Look, Terrell, when you look at cam Ward, I think

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you see a guy who could be a future starter

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. There's no doubt about that. I like

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the kid, like, I think he's serious, which I really like.

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>He's very focused, you know, in a lot of ways,

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>opposite personality of a Shador Sanders, which is I think

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>why teams fell in love with cam Ward in the

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>process and why they fell out of love with schanor

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Sanders in the process. So is it enough. I don't

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>think so. On where ericson is. I just think the

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Titans are still gonna be a bottom feeder team in

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL until further notice, because I think a lot

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>more has to change besides just cam Ward.

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think the Titans go as far as

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 2>cam Ward can take them. So if cam Ward can

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 2>adjust to the NFL really, really fast, then I think

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the Titans, you know, might actually end up being a

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 2>good team. But my thing is, I don't expect to

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 2>see a quick adjustment, and it's just because how cam

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 2>wod plays football. Cam Ward and Will Levis actually are

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 2>more similar than people want to give them credit for.

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 2>And it's just that cam Ward is direct TV and

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Will Levis is basic Cable and cam Ward when he

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 2>makes those hero ball making decisions and he tries to

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 2>put the team on his back, more often than not

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 2>he's come out on top and he's been able to

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 2>get it done. But we see the moments where it's like, ooh,

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 2>if you do that in NFL, that that might not

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 2>be a good kid, that's gonna be a rough one

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's how the start of the season

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be. He's gonna have a bunch of those

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 2>turnovers that you're going to look and be like, oh,

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 2>is that Will Levis? Like they'll probably have the meme

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 2>where the guy is cleaning his glasses and be like,

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 2>is that Will Levis throwing that interception?

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Like that?

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 2>But as the season goes on, I think cam Ward

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 2>is going to grow as a talent. We seen him

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 2>do it in college and cart net Word to Washington

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 2>State to Miami like. He constantly grows and grows and

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 2>grows and becomes a better player. So I think the

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 2>NFL may catch him in the beginning, but towards the

0:17:58.520 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 2>end of the season, cam Ward is going to have

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 2>the sitean is looking a.

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Lot better, all right, Before we start to look at

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>how to make some money in this division, don't forget

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>about Novig. If you're looking for a smarter way to play.

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a new sports trading platform that's changing the game,

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's called Novig. It's legal in most states, including Georgia, California,

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and Texas. It's peer to peer, which means you're competing

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>against other users, not the house, and you can actually

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>get better odds and lines than traditional books. You can

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>set your own lines, which gives you control. Most sports

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>books don't offer that sort of thing, so there's no commissions,

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>no hidden fees. Seriously, it's just a coin deposit system,

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's real money and you can use the code

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>daily Juice for fifty percent off of your first coin

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>purchase up to twenty five dollars. Check it out today

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>at bettingpros dot com slash Juice. That's bettingpros dot com

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>slash Juice. Our colleague Michael Mayer in there every single

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>day on the Novig, so if you want to know

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>more about him on Novig, go and hit him up

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>on the discord right now. But again, check out Novig

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>today bettingpros dot com slash Juice. Use that promo code

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>daily Juice when you sign up for fifty percent off

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.959
<v Speaker 1>your first coin purchase up to twenty five dollars. All right,

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Houston Texans win total Terrell, we got five and a half,

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, nine and a half on the board.

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, you know, when you look at this

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>division how weak it is. I think it's you know,

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the definitely over seven and a half, that's easy. That

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:16.719
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half is the question. Can they get

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>over that? Can they be a ten win team? I

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>think they can a plus money at nine and a half.

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I'll take a ten and seven Houston Texans team to

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>win this division. I think that's all they need to do.

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, Trell I.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Think the same thing, and is a lot better because

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 2>towards the end of the season they have a little

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 2>bit more of a cupcake schedule. A bunch of those

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 2>home games are against teams that didn't make the playoffs

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 2>last year. So I think that it actually breaks well

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>for them to kind of, Hey, they may have their

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 2>hiccups in the middle of the season, but once they

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of get that continuity in the offensive line figured out,

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 2>and I know the defense is going to play well.

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 2>I trust the defense that they'll be able to rack

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 2>off some wins in the end of the season. So yes,

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 2>I think they finish at ten wins. I like the

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 2>overfoot sections.

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, because it's a bottom feed or division and

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it does seem very simple, you know, I don't want

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>to take things for granted. At the same time, Ericson,

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you smash this. I think you smashed the

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half between playing the teams in our

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>own division and some of the other games where you know,

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 1>they played the Kansas City Chiefs again, they played them

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>tough last year. You know, like this team shows up

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in big moments. They showed them in big moments against

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers where everybody was just writing them off and

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>they kicked their ass. So I'm very impressed again with

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the head coach is always there. I like them for

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the over nine and a half. I think ten is

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the number and I feel comfortable plus money.

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 5>What do you think, Andrew, Yeah, let's make it a

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 5>clean sweep. Yeah, for the nine and a half. They've

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 5>won ten games the last two seasons.

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 4>Despite twenty twenty two or excuse twenty twenty three, it

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 4>was the offensive line injury injuries. Last year it was

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 4>a receiver injuries all over the place. So yeah, even

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 4>if the defense maybe isn't top five, I just think

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 4>with better injury luck on the offensive side of the football,

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.959
<v Speaker 4>that the combination with CJ Strout entering year three, Demiko Ryans,

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 4>I think I've shown that he's a top ten NFL

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 4>head coach, and he's getting the most out of his players.

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 4>He's having them surpass expectations despite adversities when it comes

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 4>to injuries, and he's putting his players in positions to succeed.

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, I like the Texans all right.

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>The next one is Indiapolis Colts, and now I'm gonna

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>like the under on the seven and a half here

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a plus one hundred. Excuse me, the under seven and

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>a half at minus one twenty the overs plus one

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred for the Indianapolis Colts win total. I like the

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>under minus won twenty seven and a half. The reason

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is they're gonna play the NFC West this year too,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, so they got the Rams in there. The

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Colts have to play the Denver Broncos. Looking at this

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>sheet here, Kansas City Chiefs, San Francisco forty nine ers.

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the Arizona Cardinals are capable of beating them.

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So really like, even if they if they struggle in

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the slightest against this division, I mean, it's gonna be

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a long season for the Colts. So I think seven

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>wins is about where you get. I think that's the

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>high point for them. Andrew, what do you think?

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:48.199
<v Speaker 5>I think I'm taking the under here.

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that either Trell or I voice a

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of confidence that you got to slam the over

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 4>on the Indian of Us Colts.

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 5>I just can't do it.

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 4>With the variance that these two quarterbacks play with on

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 4>any given down, it could be touchdown for their team

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 4>or touchdown for the other team any given play, and

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 4>that's just not something that I want to be betting

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 4>on again. And talking about investments, and I think just

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 4>with the Colts last year, and something that I remember

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 4>writing the primer every single week when it came to

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 4>the Colts, they played a lot of close games. All

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 4>of their wins last year, of their eight wins came

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 4>in one score games, and so they were eight and

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 4>five overall in one score contest. So if that flips

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 4>and now they're losing more of these one score games

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 4>because they don't blow teams up, right, you're going down

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 4>to the fourth quarter and the culture all right, maybe

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 4>we can sneak out a win here. That's not a

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 4>winning strategy, oh as you're the chiefs, of course, But

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 4>for the Indian Ouplis Colts, I just don't think that's

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 4>going to work out for them. So yeah, I think

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to go with the under as well.

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>There's also no value in going over. It's not like

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they're giving you, oh it's plus three hundred for them

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to go over seven and a half wins, Like, there's

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>no value. It's like, Okay, you want to roll the

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>dice at Richardson figures it out, or Daniel Jones at

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a different spot, you know, maybe learn some things watching

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Kevin O'Connell run an offense, you know, and picked up

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>some little tricks of the trade in Minnesota. There's no

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>value on it, Torell. So I'm just gonna keep the simple.

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna just shade the under seven and a half

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>minus one fifteen with that schedule.

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, none of these teams really give any confidence that, hey,

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 2>the Colts can one hundred percent go win that game.

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Like even a game against the Raiders. No, I don't

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 2>think they feel really good about beating the Raiders. The Cardinals.

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 3>No, both of those games are at home.

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Like, I don't see a situation where I'm just like, oh, yeah,

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the Colts are really really good in that situation.

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't matter if Richardson or Jones is that quarterback

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 2>they did not figure out the defense last year, and

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 2>we'll see if they make strives to be better this year.

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 2>But they were giving up a whole bunch of points.

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 2>They would turned the ball over crazy, they were putting

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the defense in bad situations. I just don't think any

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 2>of those group problems for the Colts are gonna change.

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 2>This is an underladder. This is an underladder. You don't

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 2>just take the under on the wins total. You take

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 2>it as far as you can get, and then you

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>just free roll the rest of the season and see

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 2>how many wins they get.

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, you get the under five and a half a

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>plus two to fifty on the Colts, the under three

0:23:58.080 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half wins a plus seven hundred, which again

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think that I don't think they're gonna be that bad.

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>But the under five and plus two fifteen. Never know,

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe you throw a unit on there just for

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>s's and g's. The Jacksonville Jaguars, the numbers are three

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and a half, five and a half, seven and a half.

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>This is another one to me too, where you look

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>at the opening of this season, Terrell, they play the

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Panthers. Wh I don't think you're a pushover. I

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>really don't. Then the Bengals, the Texans, the forty nine Ers,

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Chiefs, they play Seattle, and then they

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>play the Rams, So there could possibly be one win here.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, like it could be one win before

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>they get to the buy in week eight. That's gonna

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>be unbelievably hard to dig yourself out from under that.

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>So again, seven and a half is the total here.

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go under minus one fifteen, That's where I'm going.

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>And the Colts was at minus twenty, like you're paying

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of juice, but just feels a safe

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>thing to me. Jacksonville Jaguars Torell Where is the win

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>total for you?

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 2>You don't make money betting overs in the Jacksonville Jaguars,

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Like that doesn't happen.

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Unless it's ea money like that, in which case.

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe yeah, and then you probably got over maybe an

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 2>over on interceptions prop maybe like maybe something like that.

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 2>But no, you don't bet over in the win total

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 2>in the Jacks and try to make money here. We're

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 2>not going to break the wheel. The Jags have not

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 2>taken enough strides. And as good as Travis Hunter is,

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 2>I think that there's a lot of more issues that

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 2>are wrong with the Jazz, and that's probably not Jags

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Jazz in the basketball realm with the Jags however, Yeah,

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 2>there's problems with the Jazz too, by the way. But however,

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm sitting here saying all this, say Travis Hunter is

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 2>a talent, it just doesn't feel like he's what they

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 2>needed because now you're just overstimulated with offense defense, offense defense,

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and you might break your shiny new toy.

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Like I just don't know. I don't think he was

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 3>the toy they need to go to the Jacks. Jags

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 3>under for me Ericson.

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I know the schedule gets a little easier for the Jaguars,

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>but when you're talking about a rookie head coach with

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a schedule that lines up like that in the first

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>seven weeks, I think that's a bad combination. And one

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>loss can learn to a lot of the loss that

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>rolls into another loss and next thing you know, things

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>getting ugly in Jacksonville already off the gate. And I

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be pessimistic here, it just feels like

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>same old Jags to me.

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that you're laying out the case for

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 4>people to wait on betting on the Jaguars, betting on

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 4>maybe a second half surge where their win total gets

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 4>beaten down because they're losing all these games to start

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 4>the year. So I know, when I did my projections,

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 4>I had them going over at eight wins. So but

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 4>that's also saying I'm not super confident that though this

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 4>is an easy over. So I agree with the things

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 4>that you guys have outlined. Defense I think is still

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 4>really suspect, and that their defense was relatively healthy last

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 4>year and it was still really really bad. So yeah,

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 4>the offense maybe can take a step forward, but does

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 4>that make up for the defense. The offensive line still

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 4>isn't in a it's not leaked by any means. It's

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 4>still probably a below average unit. So yeah, given the

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 4>schedule to open the year, I agree with you guys,

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 4>I think that I'm gonna have to make some adjustments,

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 4>and I.

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't know if I'm sold. I think you're what you're

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 1>saying is really logically sound, but I don't know if

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sold on it. Because the opening of the schedule,

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>two of the first seven games are on the road,

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:11.360
<v Speaker 1>then six of the next ten are on the road.

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 1>So like they're playing at home a ton to start

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the year, only two of those games are road games,

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>and then after that they are away a lot and

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the home games are tough. It's against the Chargers, it's

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna be against the Jets, who I don't think are

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a pushover there. Then they finish up eventually

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Titans there. They have the Titans twice in

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the schedule. But I don't know, man, Like I said,

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like the same old Jags to me.

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's good that they're starting now at home,

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>but if you start losing games at home, I don't

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>know if all of a sudden the Jaguars become road

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>warriors at some point. The Tennessee Titans. The numbers for

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>them two and a half, three and a half, five

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and a half, under, five and a half wins at

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>plus money. Yes, please, I would like to take that

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 1>one please plus one ten. Thank you very much. See

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that's it, that's easy. I'm gonna walk away from this

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>one a winner. Andrew Rickson, how about you?

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm just I will bet on the Texans as

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 4>the team that's going to win games and probably fade

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 4>most of the other ones except for maybe a long

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 4>shot division bet as we'll get into.

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, now, if you want to go into the three

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half to roll again plus three sixty, that's

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>very enticing if you think that they're a bottom feeder team,

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>which they very well might be. I think the Saints

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>are in that discussion. The Titans are going to be

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in that discussion again. So are you feeling lucky or

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>you want to play it safe when it comes to

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the Titans in twenty twenty five?

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Give me the over five and a half wins?

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Actually really six wins. I mean I'm not asking I'm

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>not asking for sen wins here.

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 3>I need six wins.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And if you look at their last six games,

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 2>they have games against the Jags twice, the Saints, and

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the Browns.

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel pretty all right about that.

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 2>In that sweet spot of where I think that cam

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Ward is going to be developed as a quarterback, I

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 2>think it's going to be really early for the ugly

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 2>for them early on. But then as he starts going,

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 2>he's going to start developing better. Maybe the defense is

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 2>playing better, maybe he's not turning the ball over and

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 2>giving the other team the ball. Inside the twenty like,

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's going to be a lot better

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 2>for them, So Tennessee, maybe it's a slow burn. Maybe

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 2>this is something that I wait and place actually live

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 2>where I can get a three and a half wins

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 2>total or something like that. But five and a half wins,

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I actually do think there'll be a six win team.

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 2>A six win team is still bad.

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah they are still bad. But I'm abouck over five

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half wins at minus one thirty, Oh thank you.

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the plus money at five and a half.

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the temptation. I don't think the Titans have

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>changed their stripes that much in one year. Although they

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>might cover more games winning, that's a different story. Let's

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the winner of this division.

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 6>Here.

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>The Houston Texans still plus money right now plus one ten,

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the Jags at plus three hundred, Colts at three ten,

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Santay Signs at plus seven fifty. Should we

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>all just say it together at the same time? One

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>two three the Texas Andrew, Okay, you're a little late there.

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 4>Do try from me, even try because this is the

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 4>same value you're getting for the Texans to win for

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 4>nine and a half games, right it's exact same odds.

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so wins win the divisions boom.

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 4>Done exactly, but you can bet them to win the

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 4>win total, and then you can take a long shot

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 4>on the Tennessee Titans at plus seven to fifty. I

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 4>think that this is a good value for this type

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 4>of team. Again, we talk about this is the worst

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 4>division in football, so why can't a rookie quarterback go

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 4>from worse to first? We see this every year except

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 4>for last year. So there are four teams that I

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 4>think that fit into this category. It's the Titans, Patriots,

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 4>forty nine Ers, and Bears. You guys were not with

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 4>me with the Bears, so we know that's not account.

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 4>You guys think the Patriots cannot sit the Bills.

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to sees the early show that we

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 2>haven't done already, but I think the Patriots are.

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Going to be Unseting the Bills I think is tough,

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>especially because the Bills don't have a tough schedule this year.

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So then it's the forty nine ers, so I

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 4>think are already favored to win their division.

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 5>So I guess maybe that's the layup.

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 4>But if there's a surprise team like why not the

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Titans to win the division and they tie with the Texans,

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 4>but they both win ten games because cam Ward is

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:58.479
<v Speaker 4>the prince that was promised.

0:30:58.480 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 3>So I think plus seven to fifty.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 5>I think that this is the value.

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Cool story, bro not right.

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Great.

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm returning that story right back to the library. I'm

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>not even going inside the library. I'm putting it in

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the drop outside, you know, opening the handle, even this

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>summer when it's hot and you put your hand on

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that silver handle and it's like a thousand degrees and

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting that book back in. That's what I'm doing.

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's fun story. It was a good I enjoyed it.

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed it.

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean one of these teams is going to finish

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 5>in first. I finished last. You guys are laughing to

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 5>me for every single one.

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 3>No no, no, no, no, you no, I get you right.

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Look the problem.

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 5>I think the Texans the Titans.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 3>It's a good pick.

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I think Titans is a good pick in terms of

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:35.479
<v Speaker 2>because I'm the same way with you. I think cam

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Ward by the end of the season is probably going

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 2>to go on a run. And if you're telling me

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 2>that there's a world of possibility where some eight and

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 2>nine team won this division.

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be surprised.

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 4>It also takes one blown block on the Texans worst

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 4>offensive line and CEJ starkn mis a bunch of games

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 4>and then this division's up for grabs.

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>That's so. But you could say that about the Buffalo Bills.

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 5>Too, You're not kidding.

0:31:57.480 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 4>But that's why the Titans are the best value because

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 4>it's plus seven to fifty, like most of the other

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 4>teams are not anywhere near this long.

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna sell me on a team figuring it out,

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be the team that's got a pretty good

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>offensive line and a team that with a quarterback that

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is a freak of nature athletically figuring it out, like

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>if Anthony Richardson figures it out.

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:23.479
<v Speaker 5>That's that's the you want to take the Colts over

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 5>the Titans.

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, I'm taking the Colts over the Titans if

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>if you if my hand was forced to the raging

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>hot silver of the book deposit drop, if I had

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to pick somebody, yeah, I'll pick the Colts as the

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>long shot here over the Titans because Richardson's a guy

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that could I mean Richardson's a problem. You know, a

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>guy who can flick the ball down the field seven

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>five yards and a guy that is that big, that's

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>wrong that fast. If the raw tools ever get figured out,

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem in this division. It's not a rookie

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>cam Ward, you know, slowly slugging away. And Shane Steichen's

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a very good football coach, much better than Callahan. So

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can go back to the Patriots too.

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>The Bills schedule is not only easier, but even tho

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>when they have the tough games, all the tough games

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>are in their building, which I think is a huge

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>advantage for Buffalo. So I just want to point that

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>out in terms of their schedule.

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 4>It's tough to envision the Patriots must Josh Allen misses

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 4>games or something like that.

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 5>It's really hard anything like the Patriots. But I will

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 5>say no on the Titans.

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 4>Wait to bet on them after Week one because they're

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 4>playing at Denver and they're probably gonna get killed.

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 5>So you got you got, you got all the Titans

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 5>bets still after.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Week I did you like to play that defense week

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>one as a rookie.

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 5>It's gonna be the CJ.

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Stroud Baltimore Ravens where he played in Baltimore as a

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 4>rookie in his first game, and he didn't look terrible,

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 4>but the scoreboards the other one.

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, let's get to some of our favorite

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>bets for this division. Some wild cards are gonna throw

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in here. I'm keeping it a little simple here. I

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>do have a special though, Brian Thomas a regular season

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>total receiving yards. I'm taking the over eleven fifty and

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a half at minus one fourteen. This is such a gimme.

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't again, I just I don't. I don't understand

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>where this is where my mind doesn't compute very well.

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Did we not watch what Brian Thomas did last year?

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Just because Travis Hunter's there, does not mean that Brian

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Thomas can't repeat basically what he did last season, if

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>not exceeded in his second season. So, especially with Liam

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>cohneair offensively just tweaking things a little bit, I think

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a smashover. I think he gets a thirteen

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred this year, so this is not close for me.

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 1>And then a FanDuel's special here the Titans to win

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>more than five and a half games and the Patriots

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to win more than seven and a half games at

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>plus one ninety five. Now this is interesting because if

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you can get the Titans to six, I'm very confident

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots are gonna go well over seven and a half.

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 5>Don't the Patriots play the Titans?

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Did he just get at me for having a Titans

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 3>win sod Over? I did.

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm gonna do the Titans win total, I'm

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>not taking minus money. I'm gonna pair it with something

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>else to get me to plus money that I think

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is a lock, which is a Patriots at least eight wins.

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 1>So seven and a half on the Patriots and then

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. Can he get the six? Maybe

0:34:57.640 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's the greatest bet, but if I'm

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 1>going to bet the Titans, I'm gonna do it responsibly

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>by getting into plus money and not taking that minus

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that Terrell want you want you to take? You you

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>want me to But I'm parlaying it with something that is, uh,

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I think a lock. So there you go. So no

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:19.479
<v Speaker 1>minus one thirty for me on the Titan six wins.

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the Titan six wins. I'm gonna take

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it along with the Patriots seven and a half over.

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's turn it over to you, Terrell. What are

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>your special bets here when you're looking at the twenty

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty five a FC South Division.

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm gonna just go ahead and add another one

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 2>to the car, just to see the steam come out

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:40.439
<v Speaker 2>of your ear. Give me a small a small point

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:42.879
<v Speaker 2>to sprinkle on the Titans to win the division here,

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 2>thank you?

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Ericson? All right?

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, Ericson and I are holding hands on the

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Texans as well. I would really just want to make

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 2>this bet because if Texas don't get the ten wins

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 2>in this division, I would just like to say, Wow,

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 2>the Texans is just gonna be able to textan like

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:56.839
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't matter.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 3>But this is a bad division. You should be able

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 3>to get the ten wins, all right, the Colts under,

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Colts under, and just.

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead and say keep wherever they let yep, okay, wherever, wherever,

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 2>wherever you take the underwin soldal ladder, go all the

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 2>way down plus seven hundred and three and a half

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 2>and have a day. Just have a day, because I'm

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 2>telling you that's the only thing that's going to make

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 2>you interested in watching colts football for the entirety of

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 2>the season is having an under on the win soldal Ladder.

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that mak O Ryans allows that team

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:31.879
<v Speaker 1>to fall below ten wins. They're a double digit win team,

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I think with that defense, I really do. And Shroud

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>is a good leader, good quarterback. Hopefully you can figure

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>out the offensive line. You can get them to work

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 1>well as a unit, even if you don't have the

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>talent to do it all right, Ericson, take us through

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>your favorite AFC South wagers for the year.

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 4>YEP, going to go with the Texans over nine and

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 4>a half wins at plus one ten, sprinkling the Titans

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 4>and win the division at plus seven to fifty. And

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 4>I think that I've been convinced that I like their

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 4>over on their win total to them, So I'm gonna

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 4>go over on Titans five and a half wins. And

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:02.879
<v Speaker 4>then for my fun bet that I teased earlier when

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 4>it comes to Travis Hunter, because I can't make my

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 4>mind when it comes to win losses with the Jacksonville Jaguars,

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 4>So I'm gonna go with Travis Hunter twelve to one

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 4>to win Defensive Rookie of the Year. And my rationale

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 4>behind it is we still don't know what he's going

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 4>to be doing. I know that the recent reports are

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 4>that they're putting him more on offense because they feel

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 4>more comfortable with him at defense. So I'm taking I'm

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 4>zooming out a little bit, and I think that his

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 4>deployment is going to be game plan specific, I think,

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 4>and depending on who else is available for the Jacksonville

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 4>Jaguars defense. So I mentioned earlier that the Jaguars defense

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 4>last year was the fifth health fifth healthiest in the

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 4>NFL in terms of adjusted games loss. So if they

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 4>have more defensive injuries, what are they gonna do. Oh,

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 4>we're gonna have to play Travis Hunter more on defense.

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 4>And when you look at their secondary last year, again

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:50.959
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the most passing yards in the NFL

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:53.320
<v Speaker 4>last year. So if they improve on defense, you know

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 4>who's gonna get a lot of credit for that, mister Travis.

0:37:55.719 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 5>Hunter, number two overall pick. And when you look at what.

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 4>That defense did last year in terms of just giving

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 4>up the yardage. So they had just six interceptions last season,

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 4>that was the third lowest interception rate despite ranking eleventh

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 4>and passes defended, and they were one of two teams,

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 4>the other being the Patriots to at least seventy two

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 4>passes defended without getting double digit interceptions. They also rank

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 4>thirtieth in opponent fumbles. This is my long way of saying,

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 4>the Jacksonville Jaguars defense is going to generate a lot

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.879
<v Speaker 4>more turnovers just based on the numbers, and who would

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 4>be my bet to cash are in a lot of

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 4>those turnovers. It would be Travis Hunter, the ballhawk who

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 4>could also play wide receiver, who was also playing defensive back.

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 4>Because that's how you have to win defensive rook of

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 4>the Year. You have to generate counting stats like interceptions,

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 4>like pick sixes. So that's kind of my sell for

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 4>Travis Hunter. I think that he's going to make big

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 4>plays on defense. He's going to get credit for the

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:53.800
<v Speaker 4>defensive improvements in Jacksonville, and whatever else he does on offense.

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Is this going to be cake or it's going to

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 4>be you know, layered onto the analysis of the voter's

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 4>minds of Oh, he's doing this on defense and he's

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 4>also playing offense. I think voters are going to trying

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 4>to find a way to vote for Travis Hunter in

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 4>any way they can. I think it's going to to

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 4>be on the defensive side, not necessary offense.

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>All right, there you have it, everybody. That's our take

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 1>on the AFC South. What's yours. Who's going to win

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>this division? Tell us drop your comments below who wins

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the South? And don't forget to subscribe to Betting Pros

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel. We're trying to get to one hundred thousand

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>this season. We could do it with your help. Ring

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 1>that belt to lit goos Ding too. See you never

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>miss a piece of content on the channel all season long. NFL.

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Take a deep breath. You can smell it, baby, It

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is coming quickly. We're going to be right in the

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>thick of it before you know it. We're gonna help

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you win a ton of money this year. That'll do

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it for us. But the story of the game goes

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>on for Terrell Firman Junior, for the Undertaker, Andrew Erickson.

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joey p. We'll see you next time. Kids.

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 6>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 6>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 6>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 6>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL also subscribe to our YouTube

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 6>channel at YouTube dot com Slash Betting Pros