WEBVTT - Plant Some Petunias: Hindenburg, 360, ESG

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Hello and welcome to

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast, your weekly podcast where we talk

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>about stuff related to money. I'm Matt Levin and I

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>write The Money Stuff com for Bloomberger Pain.

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and an

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 2>anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>What are we talking about today?

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 2>We're going to talk about the slow death of shorts

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 2>and specifically the retirement of Nate Anderson. We're going to

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>talk about evil bankers, my favorite cut. We're going to

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about ESG Evil ESG, Hindenburgh, Nate Anderson. This was surprising,

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 2>was it? I was surprised. I mean, I don't know.

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 2>You think about Jim Chainos retiring in twenty twenty three,

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>he had a pretty rough run towards the end. Nate Anderson,

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 2>I feel like has had a lot of wins. And

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>also he only started Hindenburg in twenty seventeen.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's a hard business, you know, running

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a short. So Nate Anderson, the founder of short focused

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>research from Hindenburg Research, announced that Hindenburg Research is no

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>more and he's going to tend to his garden or.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 2>Something, listen to some medium, listen to some.

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Medim I don't know. It's a hard job. And I

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>was trying to think about, like why now. And one

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>thing that occurred to me is if you read his letter,

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these people, a lot of people who

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.919
<v Speaker 1>like run these short research firms, sort of style themselves

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>as hedgehund managers, in part because that's like a cool

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 1>thing to say, I'm a Hedgehong manager. And like, actually

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the SEC case against Andrew Left is hilarious because they

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>like actually claimed that it was fraud for him to

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>call himself a hedgehond manager. Yeah, like imply that he

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>had clients because he was like talking about his clients

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>when he was just the third person, right, which I

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>thought was like a little nasty of the sec Yeah,

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it was like, I good enough, it is the kind

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of a Hedgehne manager. But like you know, it's called

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Hindenburg Research, and when you read his life, he like

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>describes it as a research firm. It's not a hedge fund.

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not like in the business and making short trades, right,

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>it's in the business of discovering bad stuff at companies,

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>discovering fraud or accounting malfeisms or whatever, and then generating

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>money from that somehow. And I don't know exactly how

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Hindenburg generates money. Like the original way I think he

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>was generating money was by going to the SEC and

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>submitting like whistleblower, what's the word quast step steps yes,

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And so he would like say to the SEC, hey,

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>there's front of this company and they would be like, oh, well,

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>there is run at that company. They'd find the company

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money and they'd give him some of

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 1>the money. Or that was the idea. And I think,

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't really know what Hindenburg does, but

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of these firms will sell research ideas

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to hedge funds, will then, you know, do the short trades.

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>They have more capital and more diversification than a short

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 1>only hedge fund would have. And like you know, we've

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>talked about Hunter Brook. Hunter is in the business of

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>finding bad stuff at companies and publishing them and then

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>among other things, bringing securitieslawaw suits. And they team up

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>with plaintiffs lawyers to bring lawsuits against these companies. And

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>if you were as in the business of like monetizing

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>fraudit companies by like having your own capital or your

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>investor's capital and doing short sales. Like that's a hard business, right, Yeah,

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of ways to blow up. Whereas if

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you're in the business of like monetizing whistleblower rewards, that's

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>less capital intensive. It takes kind of a long time. Yeah, uncertain.

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean it just seems like a hard way to

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 2>pay the bills.

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>What whistle lawer awards, Yeah, yeah it is. It's it's lumpy,

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>but like people have kind of professionalized it, more lawyers

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>than researchers, but some researchers have professionalized that made up

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>money in any case, Like if you think about like

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the landscape of these short research frames, like you kind

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of need all of those options. You read his letter,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>he talks about we've led to more than one hundred

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>prosecutions and like investigations, like he is measuring his success

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in getting regulatory and prosecutorial attention on the companies he targets. Right,

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not like we've caused stock prices to go down.

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It's we have brought fraud to light and how to

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>be investigated. And when I think about what is happening

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, Yeah, I've written a lot in the last

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks about how there have been a lot

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of like sec prosecutions, sec cases, a lot of other stuff.

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a big Justice Department anti trust case against KKR

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>filed this week. We're going to talk today about the

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>CFPP case against Capital One nice Tia. So a lot

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that is happening now because it won't happen

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>next week, right, Yeah, Like if you were in the

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>business of like alerting regulators through fraud, you might think

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a bad business starting next week

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 1>and going for four years.

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that's actually his calculation, but it

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>just feels like a week ago, if you said, oh,

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>this company is a fraud, that would have a big effect,

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and like starting in a week saying oh, this company

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is a fraud might not have a big effect.

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Well. Yeah, the thing is like there's no guarantee that

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 2>the stock will actually go down and your short will work.

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 2>You think about their last report was on Carvana alleging fraud,

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 2>and Carvana stock has done really well so far in January.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they could be wrong, right, They always be wrong.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>They are specifically in the business of waving their hands

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and saying to regulators, Hey, look at this company over here,

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a fraud. Right, Sometimes they will be wrong

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and the regulators won't look at it. But like sometimes

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>they'll be right and the regulators won't look at it.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And like, my suspicion is that the incidents of that

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>will go up soon because like you will have a

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>much less enforcement intensive regulatory regime everywhere in the US

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>economy starting next week.

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting.

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>That could be like way off base.

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 2>It's like my little sp but perhaps there's a political

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 2>angle here.

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he's thinking that. I just think

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it like I would, like, you know, i'd

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>be worried if my business model was calling regulatory attention

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to frauds because like I don't know, Like I don't

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>want to say the name. Never mind, I'm gonna move

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>right along. We're not gonna say, like some companies.

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 2>That I don't know, you even name some names. You

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 2>can do anything once anyway, you know, well really don't don't.

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't need that matter, all right.

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, moving softly along firs all In terms of how

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>they make money, there was an FT article talking about

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>this small New York based firm called Kingdon Capital that

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 2>works with Hindenberg on a number of its trades.

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>So, right, like you sell ideas to or a partner with, yeah,

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody who is not.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 2>And then you're the public face.

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're the public face of the short idea. But

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>also like they're the people who have like long short

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>capital because like just being a short seller, as Jim

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Chaina has found, is hard because slacks mostly go up.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is painful. Well related to this. So he's

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 2>winding up the firm, he's working through the last of

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 2>the ideas, and then they're handing off the tips on

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 2>suspected PAZI schemes to regulators. So there's probably some investable

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 2>ideas in there. And also maybe they'll get some of

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 2>these whistleblower rewards.

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I assume there's some tell where like like the

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>whistleblowers thick, really long time to come.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 2>How much can you make I'm interested.

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've given out I believe, several nine digit awards.

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Don't They've hid out hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars.

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I wonder what the average award is.

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, they paid out press basis for the big ones.

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but like they're not small. Like this

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of the way it works is kind of like

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the rack rate is kind of fifteen

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to thirty percent of what the SACI covers.

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 2>That's wild.

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you always get that and takes a long time

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's like controversial. But like if you bring them

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a big fraudt they get a big fund, you get

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a big check.

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, lumpy, Like you said, it kind of reminds me

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 2>of being a freelance journalist if that's how you make

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 2>your living. I'm too risk averse to ever just rely on.

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh but compared to like shorting stocks, yeah, capital.

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Intensive, Yeah, I think I'd rather just be a TV anchor.

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 2>In any case, what I'm excited about is that over

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the next six months, Anderson plans to work on a

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 2>series of videos and materials on Hindenberg's models so that

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 2>others can learn how the firm conducted its investigations. That

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>sounds like some good viewing and I don't know, maybe

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 2>more people will be inspired to take up the mantle

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 2>now that they have the tools.

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it a Barnes and Noble This weekend go on

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and I went to the business section and they're still

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>these like for dummies books like investing for dummies, and

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I was like picking them up and leaving through them.

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I really want like a Nate Anderson activist short selling

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for dummies. It sounds like you, you know, it's like

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>he's a good expert to record a series of YouTube

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>tutorials on how to be a short seller.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.679
<v Speaker 2>Well soon, so the firm has eleven employees, and also

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 2>in his letter, he said that for now I will

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 2>be focused on making sure everyone on our team lands

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 2>where they want to be next. So the alumni class

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 2>of Hindenburg Research, I mean, who knows if all of

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 2>them will go into short selling, but it'll be interesting

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 2>to follow that.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think the letter suggested that I've read between

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the lines a little bit to suggests that like there

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>will be a continuation of Hindenburg. It won't be called

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Hindenburg and he won't work there, but like several of

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 1>the people there will continue to kind of do the

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>same work in a similar format.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I want to know what he does next. Again,

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 2>only he.

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Suggested like like literal gardening.

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>And did he I read the part where he said

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 2>this has been really hard. I'm tired. And also I

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 2>want everyone to go get jobs. Now you think he's

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 2>really gonna get down in the dirt plant some petunias. Yes,

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 2>we should.

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Ask him, Yeah, we should have him. Nate, come on

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the pot. I met him once at a book party.

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Huge. I feel like there's he's at least the fifth

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>person I've mentioned and Matt has said, yeah, I saw

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 2>them at a book party. It seems like book parties

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 2>are sort of where you spent your free time. Barnes

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 2>and Nobles and this.

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Podcast and book parties are my social life.

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>The Barnes and Noble is like party is like my

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>actual social life is children's birthday parties. But like, but

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>now I'm in like the drop off phase of children's

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>birthday parties. So it's like I go to the children's

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>birthday party, I'm angle for two minutes. I leave. Yeah,

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I sit in my car and read a book. I

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>drafted Bardes and Noble and read a book.

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 2>You know it's gonna say so if you're looking to

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 2>find Matt out in the wild Capital one, Matt, I

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 2>knew you were a banker, but I didn't know you

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 2>were evil.

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I worked at Goldman at like the peak of Goldman

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is a great vampire squid wrapping its blood funnel around

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>humanity or whatever the line is. I was pretty evil,

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>but like you know, I was like evil adjacent and

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:34.079
<v Speaker 1>I always had a soft spot for evil.

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I could. It really came through in this column,

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 2>of course, we're talking about the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 2>It alleged that Capital One cheated customers out of two

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars by keeping them in the dark about a

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 2>savings program that offered higher interest rates on their deposits.

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>There's like really no dispute about what happened. Heret okay.

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>There's like three kinds of bank accounts whatever the treat

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>guns are like floating red bank acount. There's check accounts

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>pay basically you're interested. There's savings accounts which exists which

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>also seemed to pay zero interest. Like when I go

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to my bank and I like click on the they're like, oh,

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to open a savings account. I click on it, and

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like you could get interest as much as zero

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>point zero three percent with a million dollar bounce right.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a thing called the highield savings account,

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>which is distinguished from a regular savings account by paying

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>like something more than nominal interest. And in like twenty thirteen,

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Capital One opened highield SAVIS account called three sixty Savings

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and they were like, this is a highield Savis account.

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.319
<v Speaker 1>You'll get the best interest rate, and so people open

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>their accounts and they did this for like seven years,

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and the rate would go up and down with like

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, interest rates, and then in twenty twenty, in

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, they like quietly deprecated it, where they basically

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>said everyone who was in that account stayed in that account,

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>their rate dwindled to like zero point three percent, so

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>like a lot more than my bank is offering on

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>like regular SAVIS account, but a lot less than like

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>fed funds or like yeah, you know, really a lot less.

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And meanwhile they launched a different product called three sixty

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Performance Saving, which is difference from three sixty Savings, and

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>three sixty Performance Savings is the new product that they

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>marketed to new people, and they're like, oh, this will

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 1>have the highest right and it did in fact have

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>like a you know, PID like four percent or whatever.

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And so if you were like looking to open a

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>highield Saves account at Capital One in like twenty twenty three,

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>they were like, oh, yeah, here's our four percent rate

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>opened three sixty performance savings and you did, and they

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>got your money. But if you already had a three

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty saves account, your rate dwindled to nothing and nobody

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>called you to be like, hey, you should move your

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>money to the higher yielding exact similar product. And so

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>they got a lot of money. They had a lot

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 1>of deposits from people who just didn't notice and kept

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>their money at the low yielding thing. And the CFPB

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>says they saved two billion dollars in interest sixpence by

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>doing this.

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 2>So you seemed pretty sympathizic.

0:12:58.640 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, giggling now is.

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 3>Such a good Yeah?

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean your position seems to be like dah,

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 2>this is how banking works.

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>The point of a bank is like they take cheap deposits, right, yeah,

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't want to call it my bank. I

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>have no problem with them. But they offer me zero

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>points zero three percent on savings. Well, you know, because

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like they can do that, I.

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 2>Will say, okay, So this is how banking works. You

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 2>talk about how like the deposit franchise system is based

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 2>on people not knowing what the not checking.

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 3>The interest rates.

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Like banking theory is that when interest rates go up,

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the cost the deposits of banks doesn't go up as

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>fast because there's a thing called deposit beta. Like some

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:40.719
<v Speaker 1>people just don't move their money out or don't ask

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>for a higher interest rate, and certain banks can save money.

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's like really important to the stability and health

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>of banks that people don't demand every last basis point

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of market interest rates on their savings accounts because loosely speaking,

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the collapse of like Silicon Valley Banking twenty three is

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>like because people like demands of market rates on their

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>interest on their bank deposits.

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean you still see the after effects of that,

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 2>because you take a look at money market funds and

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I think they're still close to seven trillion dollars depending

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 2>on what you look like.

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And I like exaggerating when I say because SPV was

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>like had like solvency problems. Yeah, but like the aftermath

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of that was very much. People are like, ooh, my

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>regional bank, that's weird. And then they're like, oh wait,

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I can get more on a money market fund and

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's all on treasuries and it's safer than my regional banking. Yeah,

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>So like everyone moved their money to money market funds,

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and so the cost of funding for regional banks went

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>up so much because like basically all these deposit franchises

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>got like rerated to market interest rates. Yeah, and Capital

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>One it's not getting rerated to market interest rates because

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it was paying zero point three percent to all these

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>people who weren't paying attention.

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, quick segue. It seems like that is the dynamic

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 2>that's going to exist for a while because Okay, there's

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 2>seven trillion dollars in money market funds and it's just

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 2>not coming out, even though the FED has lowered rates

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 2>by like one hundred basis points. There's a bunch of

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 2>bullish people in the stock market who are saying that's

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 2>cash on the sidelines that belongs to the market. But

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 2>then you have people on the other side saying, like,

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 2>no trillions of that came in the wake of sb

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 2>BE collapsing because people realize that's a much better way

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 2>to earn interest on their savings.

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right, and like anecdotally, like that is

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>my experience. I had my saviors and accounts, and eventually

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>someone was like, you should really put that in the

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>money market, but like I'm not, that's not going into equities.

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 2>No, No, that would probably go back to banks.

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>But we'll go to the money market plans.

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 2>You're just going to stay there for the rest of

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 2>your life.

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Cool power to unless Capital One or someone else offers me.

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 2>A higher rate on not going to be capital one.

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 2>My question, So what you were saying this I like

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 2>a good trade. This is how banking works. And it

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 2>sounds like they weren't necessarily lying.

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>When they were lying at all, They just weren't calling

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>their customers proactively to be like, hey, we have a

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>better rate elsewhere.

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 2>But doesn't this doesn't this sound bad? It sounds like

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 2>they were basically told to keep this secret because you

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 2>put in block quotes that the bank this is according

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 2>to the cfp BE, the bank told frontline ambassadors associates

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>who work in the bank's physical branches, they must they

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 2>must not proactively mention the ability to convert three sixty

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 2>savings accounts to three sixty performance saving accounts to customers. Similarly,

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the bank forbade its ambassadors from forwarding three sixty saving

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 2>account holders to Bank Voice, the bank's units that handles

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>account conversions, unless the account holders asked directly about the

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 2>ability to convert accounts. That seems bad, Matt.

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like converting to judaism. You have to ask three times.

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>It's bad customer service. Yeah, there's no doubt about it.

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it fraud?

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Why did they launch three sixty performance Savings in the

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 2>first place?

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question. I assume the answer is because, like,

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you do want to gather deposits, and the way to

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>do that online as a bank is you do, like

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>legitimately advertise the best rate. Right, if you say our

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>highield save as account, you'ld four point three percent, come

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>join us, right, and then people do so. They would

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>advertise this new product to get new deposits in, and

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>they had to pay a market rate to do that.

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But like, well, I raise the rate on the old deposits.

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So you launched a new product and then the old

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>product can pay less and less than less. I was

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>also shady, right.

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>It seems it smells so stinky, Matt. And I was

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna say it seems like false advertising. But you do

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 2>point out that you know they advertise this is the

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:23.239
<v Speaker 2>best and the highest interest rate.

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it was like it's false advertising because in

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen they said it was the best rate and

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>then in twenty twenty three, I was like, well, this

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is different.

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Years, I guess, but if you know that, you know

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 2>the vast majority of deposits and who knows if it

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 2>was the vast majority are in there because you advertised

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 2>it as having the higher rates straight and then that changed.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Shouldn't you tell them?

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the CFPP says, and yes, if you're like a

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>good upsetting vide you're a bank, you know, it's like

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a different story. I had a friend when I was

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>at Goldman. I had a friend who managed his family's

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>cash balances. He would like put money at Hyta and

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>every like month he would check the rates on hoyotav

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's always someone who is better than someone else, right,

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>because like this is what you do. You advert has

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a high rate, you draw in money, and then you

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>figure people aren't going to pay close attention, so you

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>could have like not quite the highest rate right now.

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Usually they were all kind of fairly close to each other,

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>but like each month someone had a like essentially promotional

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>rate to get in money. And so if you move

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>your money every month, you could earn a higher rate

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>every month. But you had to be kind of weird

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>to do that and the banks for keep banking on

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>people mostly not being that weird and mostly like leaving

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>their money there even if they didn't offer the highest

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>rate all the time. And Capital One did a sort

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of extreme version of them. Yeah.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 2>Well, they report earnings next week. It'll be interesting to

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 2>see if there's any commentary on this on the call.

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I'm gonna say two other things about Capitol one.

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>On one is that before the pandemic, I would meet

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>people for coffee and they'd be like, where can we

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>meet for coffee near Bloomberg? And I had a whole

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>list of places, and they all close during the pandemic.

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And now when people say where can we meet for

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>coffee near Bloomberg, I'm like, well, there is a Capital

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>One cafe in our building, and that is the only

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>place I meet people for coffee. And it used to

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>have the advantage that it was kind of like large

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and quiet and so you could always find a seat.

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But then that stopped having that. Everyone meets at the

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Capitol One cafe.

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, So it used to be in h

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 2>and M. It's literally in the Bloomberg building. I love

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 2>the Capital One And I met your brother for coffee

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 2>isn't that bizarre. Yeah, we have a memory together at

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the Capital One Cafe. Uh Viil Donna Hirich was also

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 2>there and my brother Greg and some other guy. That

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 2>was quite a strange meeting of the mines. Capital One Cafe.

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a great place to get a kind of soggy sandwich.

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to bank there, but I believe you

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>get a disc of you do great stuff. I feel,

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, in addition to loving a good trade, I

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>sympathize at the Capital One because they provide me my

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>meeting space. The other thing I want to say is

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.239
<v Speaker 1>that what happened is the CFP brought a case right

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and like next week you'll be a new CFPV. This

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is like they are rushing to get everything out the

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>door before the new administration comes in. And you know

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:01.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the defendants in these cases are kind

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of saying that they're like, ah, this is the last

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>ditch effort by the CFPB to bring a politically motivated

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>case and like it won't really stand up and there

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>might be something to do to that. Like, I think

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.479
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is kind of a novel theory here,

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>because like the CFPB is not really alleging that they lied.

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>They should have been proactively telling customers about it. And

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see like what the new CFPB does and and

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of where this goes. But like this might go nowhere,

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and Capital one on the call might say this is nothing,

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and they might be right.

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Perhaps Nate Anderson had some political considerations in mind.

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps CFPB did as well.

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to talk about the SEC case against

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the Elon Musk no on this podcast.

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Thanks, we're short out time, but yeah, well you know

0:20:58.640 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 3>what we.

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Are going to talk about ESG, Yes and American Airlines.

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Turns out if I had did an AUTO like we're

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about Elon.

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 2>Would be crazy. I would just stare at you, slackshod

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 2>and walk out of the room. So American Airlines pilots

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 2>are assuming American Airlines in Texas for ESG. As you

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 2>point out, this plan by black Rock didn't have any.

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>American Airlines runs like a four O one K fund

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Yes pro one K plan for its pilots. Right and

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>one pilot brought a class action saying that this plan

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>violates its fiduciary duties to the beneficiaries to the pilots

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>because it is ESG and ESG environmental, social and governance

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>investing is not putting the financial best interests of the

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>pilots first. It is enacting Americans or black Rocks like

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>evil social goals rather than caring only about financial returns

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the pilots. As I pointed out in my column, there

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>are no ESG funds.

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this four on K plan.

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>They's just like, at no point does anyone make any

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>investment decision that's like, oh, we can't buy coal plants

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>because like they're not ESGA. Right, no ESG funds. But

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>what there is, though, is that there's regular index funds,

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and the index ones are managed by black Rock and

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Blackrock for a while not anymore. For a while, Larry

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 1>think the CEO of Blackrock would send like a yearly letter,

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>like a public letter to CEOs of public companies saying

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you need to care about your impact on communities and

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be very focused on climate change and

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>all these things that seemed in the very different days

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of like twenty twenty one to be like really good

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>marketing for Blackrock. Yeah. Oh, look at Blackrock. It's like

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>a socially responsible long term steward of capital, and it

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>thinks about things like climate change and social impact of

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>businesses and like, now that's all not allowed. And so

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>these pilots, you know, sued and the argument was that

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>by Blackrock out these letters and thinking about ESG and

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes of voting like in favor of like climate proposals

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>at portfolio companies, it threw its beneficiaries under the bus

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't putting their interests first. And also American

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>by hiring Blackrock and by not yelling at them to

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.880
<v Speaker 1>stop doing ESG violated its duties of loyalty to its pilots,

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and therefore, you know, is liable for like not running

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>its four h one k plan under the law. And

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>they brought this case in like this federal court in

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Texas with like a sort of famous conservative judge who like,

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you bring your conservative cases in Texas because he'll ruin

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>your favor. And he said, that's right. ESG by definition

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't prioritize investors' financial returns and so it's not allowed.

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>And uh, an American violated its duty of loyalty.

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's really interesting. I mean we've talked about ESG

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 2>on the podcast before obviously, and the question that I

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 2>always ask is like, what are the motivations of ESG.

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Are you investing to do good or because you think

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 2>that if you don't invest to do good eventually things

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 2>will happen to your business that are bad.

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that most mainstream ESG investors, certainly including black Rock,

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>would say it's the latter. They would say, formally, what

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we are doing is considering long term risks to the

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 1>businesses that we invest in. Climate change, and like the

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>transition away from fossil fuels is a giant long term

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>risk that we are analyzing and predicting, and so we

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>want companies to be positioned for it. We want airlines

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to think about how to you just feel more efficiently.

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>We want oil companies to think about transitioning to cleaner

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>energy because like that's the long term future. Yeah, And

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>like similarly with like social issues, right, it's like diverse

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>companies perform better, and diverse companies, like in a more

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>diverse world will perform better. And so when we take

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the long view, we think that diversity is important, even

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.479
<v Speaker 1>if it's like expensive. Now, I think that this has

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>always been the mainstream of how people who work in

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>ESG have described. Now there are two big cavists that

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>one is that a lot of people don't believe that.

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>And the judge talks about this, he's like, yeah, they

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>pay lip service to the idea that it improves financial returns,

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 1>but it's not real. And I think that, you know,

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>there is kind of evidence both ways, and like the

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>performance of ESCH funds is hard to untangle from like

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>influence into es CHI funds. You know, he cites like

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>ESG funds underperformed the S and P like in twenty

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty three or whatever. Again, no ESG funds in this portfolio,

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's an irrelevance iation but whatever, ye yah, yeah.

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>But the other problem with this is that I think

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone who worked in ESG, if you like pressed them

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>on this issue, would say it's about considering long term

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>risks to the portfolio. They also definitely benefited from, like

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>creating the impression that they were investing to do good. Right.

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>I think as an advertising matter, as a you know,

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>accumulating of assets matter, blackrock positioning itself as like a

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>steward of the environment was appealing to some people, whether

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>or not it improved their returns, right, Like they wanted

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the world to you know, they wanted like to fight

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>against climate change, and they had like the vague impression

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that putting their money at Blackrock would help in the

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>fight against climate change. And I think that like confusing

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>those two issues, confusing like are you investing for social good?

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Are you considering long term risks to your portfolio? Was

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like really beneficial to ESG investors during the rise of ESG. Yeah,

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And like there's really bad for them now because they're

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>getting lawsuits like this and they're getting pushed back from

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>like politicians saying, well, you're not actually putting your clients

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>interest first, You're like only trying to do, you know,

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>achieve your social goals, which I think is not what

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>they would have like officially said, but it's kind of

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>what they implied a little bit, So it's not on

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>them in trouble now.

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I do want to go back to the lip service thing,

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 2>because that just don't I don't, I don't know. So

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 2>the judge said that oftentimes Blackrock couched its ESG investing

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.679
<v Speaker 2>in language that specifically pledge allegiance to an economic interest,

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 2>but Blackrock never gave more than lip service to show

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 2>how I mean, how do you distinguish what is actually

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 2>a lip service. What if they were giving lip service

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 2>to the ESG part but actually only cared about the

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 2>economic impact. I feel like we can't know that.

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And like what I wrote is the Black cair

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>complex has a lot of skin in this game, right, Yeah,

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Like Blackrock and plays a lot of investment professionals who

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>are like rewarded for doing well, right, And so if

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>like they were constantly undermining the economic interests that they're

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>trillions of dollars of funds, they might stop doing that, right.

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Blackrock also like has a lot of clients, right, And

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>like it's clients range from you know, individuals to like

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>very sophisticated pension funds who have like you know, principle

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Asian problems, to like you know, big endowments, like all

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>sorts of clients who you know, it's the biggest asset

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>manager in the world. Presumably those clients like think it's

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>helping them make money, right, Like, like maybe they're all deluded,

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's weird to be like, you know, the people

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>who invested like trillions and trillions of dollars to the

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>black crack are all wrong about it trying to make

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.199
<v Speaker 1>them money. And I a judge in Texas am right,

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and I know that those people are all that like

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Blackrock is actually not looking after them. It's a strange

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>like like, what's the evidence that that it was only

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>lip service? Well, he doesn't really say, you know, there's

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 1>like test the money in a trial. Maybe he heard

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>something very convincing. But to me, like if Blackrock was

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.479
<v Speaker 1>not trying to make money for its investors, it's kind

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of weird that it's got so many investors.

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder what this means reputationally for Blackrock going forward,

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 2>especially the thing like on.

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>That point, like Blackrock is not involved in this lawsuit. Yeah,

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it's like a weird because it's like, right, like black

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Rock is getting its name drive through the mud and

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not even still.

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you you raise the point that it's possible

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty one corporate managers who might have been

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 2>afraid to be critical of ESG might have you know,

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 2>hired Blackrock for four one ks to curry favor with Blackrock.

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>A point in this lawsuit that's important. It's like Blackrock

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is one of the biggest shareholders of American and so

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>like can American criticized BlackRock's THEESGV.

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Is I mean you. You could on the flip side,

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 2>see a company considering, you know, who to hire for

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 2>their for one k, see what's happening in Texas and

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 2>be like, maybe we should just go with Vanguard or

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 2>like Fidelity or something because we don't want this rhcstoria or.

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Like the anti woke right right? Who I really like?

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's all these people like springing up to

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>like oh up this pie right, get all the.

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Anti Yes, But yeah, I don't know. I would love

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 2>to talk to Larry Think. Just sometimes I think about

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 2>who are the people I would love to talk to

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 2>in a completely honest setting like this? Yeah, I come on,

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 2>just like, do you regret it? I know that black

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Rock is backed away ESG.

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I could answer for that. Heats it. Yeah, he regrets

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it because he's a businessman, you know.

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Like he's a business common man.

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Like the story in this case that like Larry

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Think is like a crusader for my environmental justice. Who

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>will put that over the interests of money is like crazy?

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I know, back leaned into ESG because it was great

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>marketing and now they're leaning way out of ESG because it's.

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Terrible market But you know, if we asked Larry on

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 2>this podcast or in any other public forum, he would

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 2>be like, he wouldn't say that he regrets it necessarily,

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 2>he would say fancy words.

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>He would say, I think we are stewards of our investors' capital,

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and we consider the long term risks of that capital.

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>We thought and think that, like things like social contribution

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and climate change are material long term risks, and so

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>as sensible stewards of capital, we considered those risks, and

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I tried to convey that financial motivation and some letters

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and people are misinterpreting those letters. So I think it's

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>all true, but like those letters are kind of written

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to be misinterpreted.

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Larry Fink, come on the podcast, Go do It.

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Livian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to the money

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg.

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Dot com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 2>every day on Open Interest between nine to eleven am Eastern.

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>email to moneypot at Bloomberg dot net, ask us a

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>question and we might answer it on air.

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 2>You can also Subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 2>right now, and leave us a review. It helps more

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Ana Mazerakus and

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Moses and On.

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Francis Newdham is our executive.

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Producer, and Stage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts.

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>back next week with Mors Time