WEBVTT - Making Sense of Tesla's Deepening Crisis

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has been costing Tesla investors quite a lot

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of money lately. Tesla stock has lost of its value

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in a little over six weeks. That's about fourteen billion

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars of value wiped out, all because of a single tweet,

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Breaking news, real quick on Elon Musk. Uh It's a

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>tweet from Mr Musk. He's considering taking Tesla privates. How

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>about that, he's considering taking Tesla private at four and

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars a share. This week, we're bringing you a

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>special breaking news episode about everything that's gone on at

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Tesla since that tweet was sent. Hi, I'm brad Stone,

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And this week on Decrypted, we're taking a look at

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's current predicament. Elon Musk is a singular CEO, unfiltered

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>and unscripted. Now that strategy could have big implications for

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the future of the company. Tesla is facing not one,

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>but two government investigations from the SEC and the Department

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of Justice. We'll see how Tesla got here and what

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it needs to do to get out. This is part

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of a special season of Decrypted, where we explore the

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>unintended consequences of technology. Stay with us, so Dana let's

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>go back to the innocent days of early August, precisely

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>August seven. You had just gotten back from vacation, if

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I remember, and that is the day, that fateful day

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that Elon tweets quote a considering taking Tesla private at

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>four funding secured. You have a quick reaction that at

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>first people thought that it was a joke, and so

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>there was all these internal conversations here at Bloomberg about

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was he hacked? This is this a marijuana reference, like right,

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>because as some significance in marijuana culture, and um, you

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>know Tesla's PR team, they don't control his tweets. He

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a tweet ghostwriter. Um. And my understanding now

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>is that he was actually on a plane at the time,

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>so no one at Tesla PR could actually get a

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>hold of him. So we just assumed that it was true.

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>But the crazy thing was that the stock started to

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>explode higher than trading stopped, and no one could figure

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>out what was going on, And there was kind of

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>confidence that maybe Tesla and Ellen had put the kind

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of volatility of Tesla stock behind it, like as a

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>private company wouldn't be as susceptible to the hated shorts right,

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>which he has campaigned against for so long. Yeah, and

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Musk has talked quite openly for for years now about

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>wishing that Tesla was private, SpaceX is private. Um. The

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>volatility of the short sellers drives him bananas. He's always

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about burning the shorts. So it definitely seemed legitimate.

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.239
<v Speaker 1>And remember that was the day also that the Financial

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Times reported that the Saudis had taken some kind of

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>stake in the company. So the go private tweet was

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of seen as a reaction to that. And but

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it struck me immediately as odd because you know,

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>there's no more of a material announcement than the fact

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that you know, a public company might be going private.

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And yet he had tweeted it right, not you know,

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>not a filing with the SEC, not a press release

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>from your reporting, Like how unusual was that? And who

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>else that Tesla knew about this? It was pretty unusual. Um,

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think anyone that Tesla knew about it.

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean that was sort of one of my brain questions, like,

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>so who on the executive team, you know, what did

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>they know and when did they know it? Now it

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of appears that no one really knew. I think

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody was blindsided by it, even the board, his executives,

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the board, large institutional investors, and now in the ensuing days,

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of a scramble, uh to to document like

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>who is advisors? Right? And we report that both Goldman

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and Morgan Stanley are like involved in this deal, so

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems legitimate at this point, right. Yeah. I think

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for first, the sort of narrative arc went from this,

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this is crazy, he must have gotten hacked, or he's

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>joking too, Wow, Elon is going private? Okay, who's involved?

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And there was this appearance of forward momentum. We were

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>hearing from bankers that they were meeting with Elon, that

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they were flying to l A to meet with him.

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>People kind of felt like, well, if anyone can pull

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>this off, it's him. I mean, this is a man

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>who's been able to raise billions of dollars from the

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>capital markets, has a lot of long term, long horizon

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>investors on his side. SpaceX has had a great year.

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, Tesla has had challenges with the Model three,

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's still this wildly popular brand. I mean, there

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a sense that Ellen could potentially do

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>this right and ironically, we had just written a cover

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>story which you co authored, about the scramble to meet

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the Model three production goals. Uh. Great headline Hell for

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is a mid sized sedan and documented you know,

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>his sleeping at the at the factory and and rushing

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to meet these goals. And he had hit the numbers right.

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was there was a quarter where they

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>met met the Wall Street shade finally kind of got

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>into this state where they had, you know, even though

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>they had to build a tent and like manufacture production

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>line at the last minute, they were kind of at

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>there was a feeling that they had finally exited production

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>hell and that the cars were coming out, and you

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>started to see more cars on the road here in

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>California for sure. A little more than two weeks after

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the initial funding is secured tweet, Elon admits that in fact,

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>funding was not really secured. This was a Friday night

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 1>news dump, but late at night is when the company

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>posted a blog post from Elon Musk essentially saying we're

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be staying a publicly traded company and here's

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why we're not going to go into all

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of them. Take us through what happened then. So that

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>was really late on a Friday night, like so late

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know if East Coast Newspaper has made

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.799
<v Speaker 1>their deadlines. The thing that was remarkable about the blog

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>post is that he basically admitted that all of the

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>investors were not on board with the idea and that

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the prevailing sentiment was pleased, don't do this, which was

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>completely contradictory to what he had said previously, because not

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>only did he say that funding was secured, but he

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>was like, shareholders are on board and there's consensus and

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>it just needs to go before a vote. So he

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>was really contradicting himself in a way that was pretty remarkable.

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Very quickly, it was like, all right, so when is

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the first shareholder lawsuit? And you know, he pulled the

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 1>plug on a Friday. Within a week we had the

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>first of now several shareholder lawsuits filed that are that

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>are attempting to get class action status, right, and then

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the sec comes in, right, and they served Tesla with

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a subpoena, and the SECS interest is they're looking at

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, when did he send the tweet? Who knew it? Did?

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Was anyone involved? Did his board or his executives or

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>large investors have any heads up that this was coming. Well,

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>if nobody traded on the information is that, you know

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it has a crime been committed? I think that's really

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good question. I mean, the short sellers

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>would certainly argue that they were hurt, But how the

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>SEC views that. I'm not entirely sure. Then we we

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>come into early September, September six and Ellen, after this

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>plan has been scrapped and and Tesla sort of still

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>wobbly from all of these lawsuits and the investigation. All

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>this sort of negative attention is placed on the company.

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Ellen goes on a podcast called The Joe Rogan Experience. Boom,

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.679
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thanks for doing this, man, I really appreciate it. Hey, welcome,

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>It's very good to meet you. Nice to meet you too,

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and thanks for not lighting this place on fire. You're welcome.

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>How does one um just in the middle of doing

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>all the things you do create cars? Rockets has a

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>very profound conversation about very weighty issues. Is life of

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>simulation things things like that, the future of electric cars,

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>But all the attention is captured by the fact that

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>he smokes marijuana on this video podcast says that a joint. Okay,

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it's um marijuana inside of tobacco. Okay, so it's like

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>pot tobacco. Never had that. I think I tried one once.

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Come on, man, you probably can't because stockholders, right. I mean,

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it's legal, right, totally legal. Okay? How does that work?

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Do people get upset at you if you do certain things?

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Just tobacco and marijuana in there, that's all it is.

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Musk has you know, talked openly in the past about

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>mixing red wine and ambient In this very cheerful New

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>York Times interview that came in the middle of the

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Go Private drama, you know, the Times reported that he

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>was not sleeping well, that there was concerns about recreational

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>drug use, and so this whole narrative around his mental

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 1>health and his potential substance use and abuse was sort

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of out there. So you think, okay, he's pulled the plug.

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, you would think that he would know better

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>than to smoke pot at this particular juncture. Well, see,

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder if he's trolling us with this, right

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>he just because to go back to, you know, the

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>point we made earlier. He's unscripted, he's unfiltered, you know,

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 1>in a way he depends on the media. But maybe

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't really care about how he's portrayed. Of course

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>he cares too much, right, because he's so obsessed with it.

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>But it is in a way, is he poking a

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>finger in the eye of everyone who is so absorbed

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>by his behavior and his communication during this period? Well, right,

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>And then the conspiracy theories, theorists will have you believe

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>so that so he smokes pot late on a Thursday night.

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>The next morning, it's like, oh my god, musk smoke pot, Like,

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>this is so crazy. But then that same day they

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>filed an a K in which they revealed that their

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>chief accounting officer had resigned. So the stock started to tank,

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, well, it's the stock tanking because the

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>CEO smoke potter? Is it tanking because a finance executive quit?

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So the theorists, the conspiracy there is believe that musts

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>smoked pot specifically knowing that the media would then talk

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>about the pot and ignore the fact. Very trump Like,

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't it a little twitter or orchestrated misdirection? Yeah? And

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and I mean there's been a lot

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of parallels to Trump, just in terms of his use

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter and and the passion of his base. About

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a week after he smokes pot on the Joe Rogan podcast,

0:09:56.000 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>our colleagues report that the Department Justice has opened a

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>criminal investigation. Here is the latest in terms of the

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>d o J probe of Tesla. You saw Kate Kelly

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>on about fifteen twenty minutes ago talking about the fact

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that Goldmen and silver Lake have also been subpoeneded. Here

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the focus is on Elon musk Sweet in early August

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>when he said, so, this is on top of the

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>SEC subpoenas, on top of these, um, you know, these

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>these more formal shareholder lawsuits, um a criminal investigation because

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean? And does somebody go to jail

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>if if, if you know, the Department of Justice finds

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 1>evidence of criminality. Well, I think I think it's still

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>very early stages and we shouldn't, you know, shouldn't should

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>let the investigation play out. But it certainly is like

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>another It's like another friend. Right. My understanding is that

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the SEC kind of plods along and if

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they see anything that seems criminal, they flag it to

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>their colleagues at the DOJ, and then the d o

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>J opens its own inquiry. You know, we're not under

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 1>the impression that like FBI agents and like Blue Windbreakers

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>were like pounding on Elon's door and like hauling away computers.

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>But it does seem like the investigation is considering is

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 1>continuing now there. You know, there's multiple investigations on multiple fronts.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And what was striking about our colleagues report is that,

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, TESLA basically then put out a statement saying

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that we heard from the Department of Justice last month

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're cooperating. So they didn't deny that the Department

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of Justice is involved. There's some you know, splitting of

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>hairs about whether it's definitely criminal or civil. When the

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice gets involved, it means that there's concerned

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about possible criminal behavior. It doesn't mean that they will

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>file charges, doesn't mean that someone's going to jail, but

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it means that there is enough there that they're they're involved.

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And again, what they're investigating is the tweet and and

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the proclamation that funding was secured and then you know,

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>which moved the stock price. And then we find out

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>two weeks later that you know that that no, no

0:11:46.440 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 1>such deal ever existed exactly. So, Dana, we've talked about

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>these dramatic last few months in the lives of Tesla

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and Elon Musk, and we've talked about the consequences, the

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>unintended consequences of this ill conceived tweet from Elon Musk

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that he was had a plan to take Tesla private

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and had funding secured. So let's talk about a little

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>bit about what what it all means for Tesla and

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the future of electric vehicles and for Elon Musk's career.

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you do you think some of these probes,

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the criminal probe and the shareholder lawsuit are any any

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of a turning point for a company that seems

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to have had so many of these kinds of episodes.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess my question is what how does

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this impact their ability to raise additional capital. Musk has

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a laundry list of projects that he wants to complete,

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 1>a giga factory in China, a Model y cross over,

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the solar roof semi truck. I mean, all of his

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:52.959
<v Speaker 1>ambitions need more money. And this is a guy who's

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>been able to raise money from the capital markets. Hand

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>over fist for like over a decade now. But I mean,

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>do you really think he'll have a problem if, you know,

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>the next time he needs to raise money. I think

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it rides on how this quarter looks

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the fundamentals of Tesla's business, which is

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>making and selling cars. And so for all the drama

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>about Zelia Banks and smoking pot and grimes and this

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>tweet and the sec and the do o J like, fundamentally,

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the question, the existential question for Tesla is can they

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>become a mass market carmaker? Can they make cars in

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>high volume with high quality. And we're gonna find out

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>very soon in early October, they're going to release their

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>delivery and production figures, and they're they're kind of sounding good.

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>You know. I was thinking a little bit about whether

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>there had any have been any similar episodes in Silicon

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Valley history. Uh. The one, the one that kind of

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>sprang to mind was Steve Jobs at Apple back in

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousands. He had just come back to

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the company, he had turned it around, and him and

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>his his some members of his management team received you know,

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>some probably well deserved stock options which they then back

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>dated to uh to minimize some of the tax impact.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 1>You know, Jobs like Ellen maybe uniquely right is it

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>was a CEO who you know, was a visionary ahead

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of his time and really didn't care what you know

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the world thought, right, wanted to bend everyone to his

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>will and sometimes skirted the rules. Right, So it's different

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>than Twitter obviously didn't exist back then. It would be interesting, Uh,

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we had ever seen what Steve Jobs

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>would have been like on on on Twitter, um, he

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>probably would have stewed it. But but you know, somewhat,

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess what I'm saying is there's a little bit

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of a pattern here among these larger than life Silicon

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Valley figures. The other Jobs comparison is that Jobs was

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>also running Pixar at the time, or at one point

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he was simultaneously running both. Definitely he was for years.

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, even though everyone thinks about Musk and Tesla,

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>his real passion has always been SpaceX, And like SpaceX

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>has had a phenomenally successful year um and has been

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of largely drama free. Just on Monday, you know,

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Musk announced he's got this Japanese billionaire ready to pay

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars to go to the moon with him, right,

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Yusako Mazawa. And and that's interesting because, uh, you know,

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>despite all the turmoil around Elon Musk, it doesn't seem like, uh,

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, this particular business man has lost any faith

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in him. I mean, I wonder has Ellen lost any supporters?

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you think through these months of turmoil. We'll find

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>out when the next thirteen fs are filed whether Lard's

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>institutional shareholders have sold off their holdings. Um, you know,

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to say. I mean, you're not really seeing

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of public people break with him. I mean,

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>analysts like Gene Munster are like, Elon, you should apologize

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to the you know, to the cave rescue team. And

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean people are sort of calling on him to

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>tone it down. But you're not seeing like a big break. Um.

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that people want him to modulate his behavior,

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think they fundamentally recognize that Ellen is going

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to be Elon. So before we sat down to record

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, I put out a request on Twitter, uh

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to to listeners to ask them if they have any

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>questions for you, Dana, And we got a bunch of

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>good questions. Uh. We got one from a user at

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>temper worker um asking about the recent executive departures. Yeah,

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of an area that I really have

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>delved into this year because Tesla is not super transparent

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>about what their executive leadership is, you know, unlike an

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple or even an Uber. If you go to their website,

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no organ charts, so I created one on my own.

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And what's kind of striking is that like fourteen vice

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>presidents have left this year and they have not been

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>replaced by outside hires. In general, there this sort of um.

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>The positions are kind of shuffled around, and more and

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>more people are reporting directly to Ellen, so Ellen has

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of direct reports for a CEO who's not

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a full time CEO. And then the people who have

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>departed have been really high profile people. John McNeil, who

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>was you know, the president of like sales service and Deliveries,

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>he left, he's now the CEO at left, Doug Field,

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>who was the engineering chief left, he's now back at Apple.

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And there's been this kind of drip drip of pretty

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>significant departures at a time when like Tesla should be

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>doing pretty well. You know, a company like Tesla at

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>this age and its maturity should have like a deep

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>bench of talent, and they just don't have that right now.

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>A dana. Another Twitter question from a user calling himself

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>as one does at Twain's mustache. The Bloomberg story yesterday

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>about the d o J looking into, you know, connecting

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>a criminal investigation of Tesla. UH said that they were

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>looking into claims that Ellen had misled the market about

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the health of Tesla. Right, So that's markedly different, right

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>than UH an investigation into the timing of the tweet

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 1>or whether funding was secured. This is like, do you

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.360
<v Speaker 1>have an indication that this is a source of concern

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>here that maybe Tesla isn't as healthy as it is

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>professed to be. So our understanding is that the SEC

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is looking into two things, the tweet and sort of

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 1>public statements that Musk and the company have made about

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>delivery targets and production figures. I'm not under under the

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.479
<v Speaker 1>impression that the DOJ is looking into that, but certainly

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like, once the door is open, it's kind of

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a Pandora's box. Another question from a user calling him

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>or herself plans for Elon. I don't know if that's

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a big group or not. Are there SEC whistleblowers out

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>there or is there a d o J whistleblower? So

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's like, are there people inside Pesla that

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>might be the source? Yes, there is a former Tesla

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>employee who worked at the Giga factory named Martin Tripp,

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>who filed a whistleblower complaint with the SEC. Has hired

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.239
<v Speaker 1>an attorney, and he alleges that, you know, Tesla was

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>not being forefront, not being forthright about battery production figures,

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and there's a whole crazy story about him and the

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>police in Nevada got involved, and now he's been he's

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, he's trying, he's got to go fund me

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.479
<v Speaker 1>to raise money for his legal fees. His attorneys has

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.239
<v Speaker 1>been very has been very outspoken. The attorney is in

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 1>turn asking other whistleblowers to come forward. I think a

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>second person has also come forward, But yeah, that's there.

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>There are definitely whistleblowers. Whether any action results comes out

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>of that, I'm not entirely sure, but okay, Well, maybe

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, a user at j MT is asking us

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>about impending competition and how realistic are some of these

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>other companies like Audie that have talked about electric cars

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>now I I an analysis from Tony Sakanagi and an

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>analyst at Bernstein said that there was no credible competition,

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>at least on the near horizon. So what is the

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>environment out there for? So my sense is that, you know,

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>any time a legacy automaker like Audie comes out with

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>an electric car, the headline is always, you know, is

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>this is this the Tesla killer? But I went to

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the Audie event on Monday night, and you know, it's

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a compelling electric car. If you like an if you'd

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>like Audie, if you were a brand loyal to Audie,

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 1>you'll probably look at it. But the goal of Tesla

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>was always to accelerate the advent of electric transportation, and

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>electric cars are still such a small part of the

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 1>market that there's plenty of room for other automakers to

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>come in. I mean, the goal is to get people

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to switch from the internal combustion engine to electric. It's

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>not to get people to s which from a Tesla

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.719
<v Speaker 1>to an Audie. So, Dana, let's wrap up this discussion

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>going back to to your life covering Tesla. You in

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the in the last few months have gone through the

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>model three production hell months, You've gone through the funding,

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>secured tweets. You've gone through Elon's marijuana smoking podcast, uh,

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and now the SEC and perhaps d J investigations. What

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is what are the next few months look like? Are

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>things going to calm down on the Tesla beat? Yeah,

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that would be nice. Um. I think the next few

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>months are really about their ability to retain talent and

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>higher additional talent. It's about the next it's about the

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>current quarter and are they able to kind of hit

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>these numbers and then you're gonna just start seeing more

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>cars on the road frankly, and so what is the

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>consumer attitude about the car? Okay, Dana Hall. So we

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>will stay tuned to your reporting for Bloomberg News, will

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 1>be looking for the production and delivery numbers that Tesla

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>will be making available in early October, and of course,

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>as always, we will be paying attention to Elon Musk's

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter account. And that's it for this week's episode of Decrypted.

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. If you have a story about Tesla,

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>send us an email at Decrypted at Bloomberg dot net,

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>or you can reach out to us on Twitter. I'm

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>at Dana Hall and I'm at brad Stone if you

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't already Please subscribe to our show wherever you get

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts, and while you're there, I hope you take

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a minute to leave us a rating or a review.

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>This does so much to get us in front of

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>more listeners. This episode was produced by Pia Goodcary, Liz Smith,

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and Magnus Hendrickson. Special thanks to Akado and Vandermay and

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Emily Abusso. Francesco Levi is a head of Bloomberg Podcasts.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next week.