WEBVTT - The Science of Coincidence

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. Yeah,

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you all may remember Joe from Forward Thinking Um, one

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of our sister podcasts. I actually appeared on a couple

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of episodes talk about monsters with you guys right least

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>was it last October? So that was what we talked about,

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>monsters in the future of monsters. That was really fun.

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>That was that was a fun one. Got into some

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>of the uh the de sci fi possibilities for the

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 1>future in terms of monstrosity. And Joe's joining me this week,

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>going in for Julie to talk about the science of coincidence.

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>So I've got one for you. Tell me if you've

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>heard this one before. Lincoln and Kennedy. Oh, yes, you

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>know this. I was first exposed to this in middle

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>school when a teacher of mine get gave us a

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>list to these like it was some kind of really

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>important fact we needed to learn. But yeah, how about this.

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy, two American presidents, both

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>were elected to Congress in the year forty six. Lincoln

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen forty six, Kennedy in nineteen forty six. Both

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>were elected president in the year sixty, Lincoln in eighteen sixty,

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy in nineteen sixty. Each of their last names both

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>contains seven letters uh. And then there's this whole list

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of coincidences that keeps going. They were both shot in

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the head, they were both assassinated by Southerners. They were

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>both succeeded by Southerners. Their vice presidents were Southerners. Both

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>vice presidents were named Johnson. What are the odds? Yeah,

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I remember this being rolled out, perhaps in a history class,

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know that the list would start about

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>these coincidences, and I would kind of tune out after

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the first one or two. Um. And I guess that

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that kind of boils down to the type of p

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world, Like there there are people out there

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>who just tune out after the first coincidence or two,

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and then there are those who obsess about it and

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>see this as as something something really crucial and something

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>really telling about these two men, about the history of

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>this nation, et cetera. That might be the difference between

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>this Robert, because I did not tune out. I was

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>my mind was blown to uh, to borrow from a

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>popular phrase. Yeah, I I sat there in my desk like, wow,

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:31.399
<v Speaker 1>what are the odds? You know, must be some kind

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of ghost spirit controlling this. It just I was amazed.

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>There two twin souls are basically the same entity, reincarnated

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and and and tracked hunted by the same extra dimensional force. Yeah.

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Or there was some sort of like cosmic literature teacher

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to get me to observe parallels between the meaning

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>of these two men. Yeah, it's another one of course

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that comes to mind is the of Thomas Jefferson and

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.679
<v Speaker 1>John Adams, two individuals who, of course a very interconnected

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 1>in the history of the United States as well, both

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>instrumental in drafting the Declaration of Independence, which was signed

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to July fourth, seventeen seventy six. Both men died on

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the same day, July four, eighteen twenty six, exactly fifty

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>years to the day after the document was ratified. So

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that that you know that that kind of hits you like.

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I like that one because that one's nice and succinct.

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, what were the chances? You don't need a list, Yeah,

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it's right there. Yeah, I mean they were they were

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>good friends. So maybe there was you could imagine some

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>level of synchronicity about, you know, when you're giving up

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and sort of handing it over to the reaper. But

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>but the dates are are kind of compelling there. It

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>would be even crazier, though, if I found out now

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that you played John Adams in a production of seventeen

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy six. No, but I was in a production of

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>seven times. Here you go, I played Thomas Jefferson and

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>been a production of seventeen seventy six. So we're tied

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>into it too. There's no escaping the black hole of coincidence. Okay,

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I've got an even crazier coincidence. No, it's probably not.

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of dumb, but why do so many

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>action heroes have the initials JB James Bond, Jason Bourne,

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Jack Bauer, Jack Burton my favorite? Well, I mean, what

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>are the chances? Actually, we have no idea, do we? Yeah?

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>I haven't read any I mean maybe there's some really

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>deep statistical study on this out there, but uh yeah,

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe is it? Is? It? On one hand, is just

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>possibly pure luck. And we only pick up right on

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>there there being a j B here, a JB there

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>because we're also not taking into account all the other

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>j B initials out there, like like does Jim Bean

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>factor into this, Probably not, and all of the action

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>heroes that aren't j B s. Yeah, And then to

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>what extent is it just completely almost subconscious, you know,

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>because you have an action hero, and and by extension

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of action hero, you think of mythological hero and the

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>symbolic power of the hero and how it resonates through

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>through our culture and through through our our the way

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>we view the world, and and perhaps that ends up

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>informing it. You know, you have James Bond in your mind,

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you end up creating Jason Bourne and Jack

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Bauer in the same way. And I'm just purely spitballing here.

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>You could perhaps have the mythic hercules in your mind,

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and then when you need to create another, you know,

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>mythically strong hero, perhaps you go with the Hulk. That's

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of consonants. Yeah. We associate sounds with

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.919
<v Speaker 1>with ideas certainly. Yeah. Now another crazy one. And I

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>love this one, uh, in part because it involves Edgar

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Allan Poe. Of course, Edgar Allan Poe only wrote one

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>novel his entire career. You know, mostly known for his

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>his excellent short stories, but the novel in question published

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>an eight thirty eight the narrative of author Gordon Pym

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of Nantucket. I've never read it, never mean, I never

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>read it there, but uh, the fiction of this story

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is you have a crew of a ship called Grampus.

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>They wind up adrift with no food or water, and

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>so first they catch it toward us. They eat it,

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>but eventually they have to draw straws to see who

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>winds up has dinner. And uh, an individual named Richard

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Parker draws the short straw, so they stab him and

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>then they eat him. And then they build a house

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>on the boat so that they can bury him behind

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the wall. Yeah, I mean, you gotta play the greatest hits, right,

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Here's where it gets crazy. Years later, in four a

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>yacht named the minion Net leaves England, is headed towards Sydney, Australia,

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and it sinks in a storm. Four men wind up

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>adrift in a lifeboat. They catch a turtle. They eat

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it all right, But again you're probably thinking at this point, Okay,

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you know turtles, how hard are they to catch? There

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>are lots of turtles in the world, they're all tasty. Yeah,

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and if you're four men in a boat in the

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>middle of nowhere and you're hungry, you're gonna eat it.

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>No good deal. But then it turns to cannibalism, and

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>this too you might think, well, what a four guys

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in the middle in the middle of the ocean in

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.799
<v Speaker 1>a little boat. They're hungry, They've only had one turtle

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to eat. It's kind of inevitable, right, Well, this is

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>this is crazy. But aboard this vessel, you have a

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>seventeen year old named Richard Parker, the same name as

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the individual they ate in pose novel. This guy falls overboard,

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>drinks a bunch of seawater to quench his thirst. Uh,

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and so he starts going. He starts deteriorating really quickly

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>here and they side, well, he's he's about to die.

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to eat him, and they eat him.

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So you have these this fictional account of cannibalism seeming

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to inform this real life act of cannibalism years later

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and in almost identical circumstances. Yeah, and it's so gruesome

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you can really doubt that they staged it to happen

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>on purpose. Because of the novel. Yeah, Like I can't

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>imagine them being on the boat and someone saying, look,

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I read this book, and uh, there was a guy

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in the book named Richard Parker and they ate him in.

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Your name's Richard Parker. So I'm not saying we have

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to eat you, but come on. Yeah, it's like the

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>worst school play every exactly Alright. So, uh, in this

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about coincidence, and in this episode we're talking

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>about coincidence and the science of coincidence, how we perceive

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence. Uh, but let's let's get down to brass tacks.

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>What exactly is a coincidence? Yeah, and specifically, I think

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>we should think about what's the difference between a coincidence

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and just an improbable event? Um so of standard Oxford Dictionaries,

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>definition is a remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances without

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>apparent causal connection. Okay, So that's sort of playing up

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>on the like the two different things coinciding, like like

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the pim right, like the Gordon Pim example, or like

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson and Adams, you know, dying on the same day.

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Another way of putting it is that it's a concurrence

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 1>of events that is quote perceived as meaningfully related with

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>no apparent causal connection, um and and that quotes from

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a paper that we're gonna end up talking about later

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 1>in this episode. But I think that's something we should highlight,

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is that a coincidence has a perceptual element. It's something

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be important to us, like it has

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a psychic weight. But you know it, it kind of

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>comes back to what we're talking about earlier about the

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>two students in the classroom. One of them is just

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>enthralled by the Kennedy Lincoln coincidence list and the other is, uh,

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just tunes out on it. Because that that kind

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>of comes down to how we can look at coincidence

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in the life. You can either say it's just pure dumblock,

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is just a matter of statistics, And then there's the

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the the view that there's something else going on here,

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that there is some sort of connected, connective tissue that

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>we were just not privy to. And we have seen

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 1>some very you know, thoughtful and informed study on both

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>sides of the issue. Right there have been brilliant people

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>throughout the years who paid way more attention to coincidences

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>than we might today. I mean, we all experience coincidences.

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I would be shocked if was someone who would say, no,

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I've never experienced anything like a really weird concurrence. It

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>happens every single day. It happened to us we were

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about while we were researching these podcasts, so like

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>just strange topics coming up and seemingly unrelated episodes. Yeah,

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course that kind of gets down to that,

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>like the power of coincidence. Coincidence can can kill you,

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Coincidence can can make you rich. Coincidence can just be

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>this seemingly meaningless, little connective tissue between two things. Um,

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's a trapped It's so easy to fall into,

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>especially given how important causation and determination are in human culture. Right,

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>And we'll get more into that later, but I mean,

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you you almost can't fault an individual for for thinking

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>about these coincidences in terms of some sort of connection. Now,

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and you see it at every level. I mean, what

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is the meat cute and every romantic comedy, it's always

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>some kind of coincidence that brings people together. And on

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the opposite end, you've got famous scientists who have tried

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to investigate, you know, what's the meaning of coincidences. I

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>think one great example is the Austrian biologists Paul Camera.

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, if if you ever have that feeling like, wow,

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I think everything's connected, he did too. So Paul Camera

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>lived from eighteen eighty to nineteen twenty six and he

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>was a proponent of Lamarckian evolution. Have you ever I'm

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>sure you're familiar with this, the one to just give

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone a quick reminder, the idea that say giraffes, their

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>next grow long because they're reaching for those top those

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>top leaves, and so it's like one generation informing the next. Yeah.

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So normally, now what we believe is min Dalian genetics.

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, you inherit, you inherit your genetic traits from

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>your parents germ cells, and you pass those same genetic

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 1>traits onto your kids. And unless you have a certain mutation,

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that can be basically random. But the Lamarchian ideas where

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that you could you know, maybe if you work out

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot or something, your kids will be born with

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>bigger muscles or something will strain your neck trying to

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>reach something in this life, and in the next life,

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 1>your kids will have longer necks by virtue of your

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>your straining. Yeah, and so in one famous experiment, Camera

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>claimed to have caused male specimens of a of an

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>animal called the midwife toad to grow these black forearm

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>paths that some species of male toads have, and that

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 1>they used them to hold onto females during mating. Unfortunately,

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>some other scientists in the field examined Camera specimens and

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>found that the black pads on his toads had been

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>injected with artificial inc and so Camera denied responsibility for that.

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And I guess nobody really knows whose fault that was.

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>But the accusation here would be that he cheated, right,

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>which is important because we'll come back to cheating. Right.

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>But Camera wasn't only interested in toads and inheritance. He

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>was also interested in coincidences, like he kept a diary

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of daily coincidences. And just one example against it in

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a in a paper that we're going to bring up

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>in a bit, his brother in law tells him that

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>he attended to concert and held both the ticket for

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>seat number nine and the coach check ticket numbered nine. WHOA, yeah, yeah,

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, that itself doesn't seem all that interesting until

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you start making lists which Camera did, and he added

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>them up over time. And I have to admit, when

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you add it's it's kind of like the Lincoln Kennedy thing.

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>The first one isn't all that interesting until you start

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>adding them together, and then it really gets your attention.

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>There's this cumulative effect of this, like snowballing kind of attention,

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>getting significance of coincidences that pile up on each other.

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So Camera organized these thoughts into a hypothesis he called

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the law of seriality, uh. And he posited basically this

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:52.599
<v Speaker 1>underlying force in reality that was a quote world mosaic

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>or cosmic kaleidoscope that brings like objects and events together.

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So almost a kind of of emergent order, uh in

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the chaos yet show which I could buy into it.

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And we see in emergences as a major topic in

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 1>understanding and intelligence, evolution, etcetera. So why not coincidence? Sure?

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>But of course Camera wasn't the only scientist who has

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>been interested in coincidences and who has attributed some significant

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>role in the universe to them. Carl Young. Carl Young

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>loved coincidences. Carl So. Carl Young was a Swiss psychiatrist.

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>You've probably heard of him. As sort of like a

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the big names in psychology and psychiatry,

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>following Freud. You know, it's like the Mantle, I think

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>union and the big big tents. But Young was was

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>very much into sort of interesting borderline magical esoteric ideas.

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So he loved the paranormal. He was interested in meaningful

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>connections and mystical truths, eesp astrology, psychokinesis, all kinds of

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, and so naturally he was really interested

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in coincidences. And so he wrote a book called Synchronicity

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and a Causal Connecting Principle. And this book was actually,

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>uh it was I think extracted from a larger volume

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of his work and eventually published on its own. But

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I read this book when I was in college, and

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember thinking, at the time, yet again playing up

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>on my I guess I'm susceptible to this kind of thing.

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I wonder if he's onto something here.

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>It seemed really interesting. So what kind of coincidences did

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Young notice? Well, he gives one example. This is the

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>one that's always cited. It's it's it's his favorite example.

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>It's the Golden Scaub. So in a nineteen fifty one.

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was essay on synchronicity. Young told the

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>story that he had been seeing a female patient for psychoanalysis,

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and Young believed basically that she was languishing because she

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>was in sort of a prison of rationality. She was

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>just too rational. She she wouldn't quote open up to

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the human side of life. For Young, I think this

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>had a decidedly sort of supernatural tinge to it. And um,

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to uh and this is from a particular

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>translation quote sweeten her rationalism with a somewhat more human understanding.

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So one day she was in psychoanalysis telling him about

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a dream she'd had where someone gave her a golden

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>scar rub. And Young claims at that very moment, an

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>insect started knocking against the window of the office where

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>they were, and he opened the window and he caught

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the insect and it was a beatle. It was a

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>scarub type of beetle. And he said it was like

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a green color, but in the right light it reflected

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the light and looked gold. And then he presented it

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to her in this moment of you know, one of

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>those there are more things in heaven and Earth than

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>dreamt of in your fullosophy kind of moments, and and

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he hoped that this helped shatter her rationalism. And so

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that happened to me. If I

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>had just been talking about a beetle and then a

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>beatle started knocking against the window, I'd probably think that

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. But I don't know if I designed any

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>meaning to it. Yeah, it doesn't really smack of just

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Heaven sent beetle sent to you know, open up my

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>mind and make me more you know, in love with life,

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>because they're probably just a lot of beetles flying around

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>out of there. Sure, but Young commented that when coincidences

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>like these accumulate, it's what we were talking about earlier.

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>The more of them happened, the more we take note

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of them, uh, and with good reason, because it's harder

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to explain them away by random chance. The more they accumulate,

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you fill up that entire diary with them, right. Yeah,

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.239
<v Speaker 1>it has weight to it exactly. So Young came up

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>with this term synchronicity to describe the a causal connecting

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>principle that links meaningfully significant events that couldn't be connected

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 1>by physical causes. So he's not saying that there's like

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a there's like a you know, a ghost that put

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the beetle there, because that would be in some way causal. Instead,

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>he's saying there's another force in the universe other than causality.

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>It sort of runs parallel to causality that connects events

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>and and creates links of significance. But it's not physics, Okay,

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I kind of in making sense of it in

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>my own head, I thought of it in terms of

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>this room or recording in in which case we have

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>wires that are running outside of the walls, then running

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.239
<v Speaker 1>across the floor and under the table, and then there

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>are the wires within the wall that we cannot see.

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>And so the wires that are running outside of the

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>walls are are kind of like causality. We can we

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>can see them. We're in causality. We've our brain spends

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time making sense of cause and effect.

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But then there's this idea that there might be some

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>other force at work within the walls. We can't see it,

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not we're not privy to it. It's exact in

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 1>an ins and outs, but it's it's making things interconnected.

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it's these connections are popping up throughout our life,

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>throughout the times game. Yeah, causality connects events in the

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>physical realm, and according to Young, synchronicity would connect events

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 1>in sort of like the psychic meaningfulness realcom that it

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was this force it makes things have meaning and shows

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>us meaning by bringing unlikely events together. Okay, so this

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>would be kind of like in um, you seen Interstellar? Yes, okay,

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>so there's the whole bit in there about love. Is

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>this uh, this connecting force like that seems to line

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>up rather closely with this idea of synchronicity. Yeah, I

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>think that makes sense. So coincidences obviously have this power

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>over us. They captivate us, they seem significance. They make

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>us wonder if there is some kind of magical or

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>super psychic force at work. And sometimes it can be

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>hard to tell because we don't know how to analyze coincidences.

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, like there when something happens, like you get

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a number nine from the coach check and then you're

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>in seat number nine. There's really no reason to ask

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>why something like that happened, but you can perhaps ask,

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, did anything significant actually happen? Indeed, now

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about the the sort of supernatural end of

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the pool, the idea that there is some sort of

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.479
<v Speaker 1>of intrinsic synchronicity connecting these these events. And now we're

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna we're gonna look at a more critical and more

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>skeptical side of the pool. Right, So, several times so

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>far in this podcast we've referred ahead to a paper,

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and this is sort of a classic paper in statistics

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and mathematical analysis of coincidences, and it's called Methods for

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Studying Coincidences. It was published by the Journal of the

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>American Statistical Association in December nineteen nine. I think it

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>had been given at a been given as a presentation

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of years before. But it's by Percy

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Diaconis and Frederick Moss Stellar, and they were I believe,

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Harvard mathematicians, and Diaconis and moss Stellar offer four main

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>categories of explanation for seeming examples of synchronicity. You know,

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>they refer to camera, they refer to young and they say,

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>what what do we make of these events? And and

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>how can we tell if something is actually going on

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that's worth noting. So the first of the options is

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that there is an actual causal link. It's not a coincidence,

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>because there's a cause that to seemingly disparate events happen together. Uh.

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>The second one is psychology. It's something about the way

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>our brains work, the fact that we're noticing what seemed

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to be coincidences, and will definitely have more on that later.

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Another point is what they call the multiplicity of end points,

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is going to be about how how we

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>count something as a hit. And then the last one

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that they site is called the law of truly large numbers,

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to be about statistical context. So I

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>think we should go back and look at causes first.

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So when something happens that's seemingly just a huge coincidence,

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you should always consider the fact that there might be

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>a cause that's more obvious than you realize. Yeah, this

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>would of course be the birthday problem, right, which is

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:29.199
<v Speaker 1>a problem that that people will encounter just everywhere, right

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and in your workplace, at school, et cetera. I mean

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we can encounter it right here in the podcast Chamber

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe Win your Birthday July six, Minds October six, whoa synchronicity?

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you serious? I'm serious? Were sixteen sixteen. Okay, what

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>happened when you were sixteen? What city were you in? Oh, Paris, Tennessee.

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>I was in Tennessee too when I was sorry, I

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>was in fatal Tennessee. But still Tennessee, Tennessee. Man, something

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>weird is going on. Yeah, or but but worth noting

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>here is notice how we're we're singling in on the hits.

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>We totally missed the same day birthday by by many months,

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>but we're counting as a hit because we both had sixteen. Yeah,

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>so here's the birthday problem. Let's say you're in a

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>subway car and you're riding around with some random strangers,

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and because you are extremely rude, you start getting people's attention,

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 1>getting them to take their headphones off, and you you

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>ask the strangers in the car all of their birthdays.

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>That's not rude, that's just good manners. I mean, it's

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a it's a nice breaker. Okay, Yeah, you might want

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to know if today's their birthday, and you should offer

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>them this cake that you found on the ground. Exactly. Yeah,

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So how many people would you have to ask before

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>It's more likely than not that you'd find two people

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>with the same exact birthday. Well, let's see three sixty

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>five days in a year. Uh, so you'd think, well,

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe I need a talk to three d sixty five people, right,

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>or maybe twice that. Yeah, I mean I'm not good

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>at doing math like that immediately, but that's where I

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>would have gone the first place in my head. Okay,

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be like one in three sixty five

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>times two or something like that. But no, the answer

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>is twenty three. Okay, But we're not going to take

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the time to explain all the math. You can go

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>look that up online. It is well documented. Uh, this

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>is a classic problem. If you ask twenty three people

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>in a room, in a train car, whatever, you have

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>reached the fifty fifty odds that two of them will

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>have the same birthday. And one of the key points

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>here is that you're not starting with the specified birthday.

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>You're not saying how many people do I have to

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>ask before I find somebody with my birthday? You're just

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to find one match, right, Yeah, in this group

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of if you ask twenty three people, odds are two

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>of them will have the same birthday. What if you

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>want to find three people with the same birthday, that's

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>got to be astronomical, right I would think so. I

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>mean you think that would just multiply it. Yeah. No, Actually,

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>if your train car can hold people, chances are in

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>your favor you reach odds again if you ask a

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>D eight. So that just shows that the statistical probability

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of in this case, this is a birthday match occurring,

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:11.959
<v Speaker 1>he's actually uh, far greater than we we we may

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>get a credit at the surface. Yeah, I think the

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>point is that we are often surprised by events that

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>are not statistically unlikely at all, Like they just don't

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>match our intuitions. Basically, we we have exaggerated intuitions for

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>how unlikely some things are, especially it turns out particular

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>types of things, for example, things that happened to us.

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>This is a funny thing. We're we're way more surprised

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>about coincidences that happened to us than coincidences that happened

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to other people. Oh yeah, because we're all the center

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of our own stories, right, we're going to be We're

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>more interesting, We're more invested in this one. Um. I

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>mean just to come back to back to the statistical possibilities,

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just thinking back to how we both were

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>like whoa sixteen whoa Tennessee. But when you really break

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it down, like the chances of us scoring the same day,

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean the same date within a month, that's what

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>one and thirty one chance for the most part, and

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee what we could say, Well, we're both living and

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>working in Atlanta, so there's probably a reasonable chance that

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>we would come from a southern state, of which there

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are I mean, but not that many. There's very many

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>literature majors from Tennessee end up in Atlanta. That's not unusual, yea. Um,

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>but so hey, there could be another cause though. So

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that's just the apparent cause. The cause that's um readily available,

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you just haven't looked at the math. There could also

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>be a hidden cause. When something appears to be a coincidence,

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not actually a coincidence because there's an actual causal

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>link that you don't know about. Um. The classic example

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of this would be cheating and gambling. Yes, this is

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.239
<v Speaker 1>where a person rolls a dice, right, Yeah, So so

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you roll a pair of dice, you know, a hundred

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>times in a row. And let's say you you roll

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a seven nineties six out of those hundred times. Yeah,

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.239
<v Speaker 1>like the more the more every time you roll when

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you get the same number he gets, that gets even

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>more astronomical. That have happened? How could that possibly have happened? Well,

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously if there's a hidden cause, which is the dice

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>are loaded so that they will turn up a seven

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every time. So there you go. You don't

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>have to be a god to do it. You just

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>have to be a cheater with with a pair of

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>loaded diet exactly. And another example comes to mind. This

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was going back to Carl Young. Carl Young was associated

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>with the physicist of Wolfgang Polly, and Paully was famous

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>for coming up with the Poully exclusion principle, which is

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 1>important in quantum mechanics. I don't remember exactly what it

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>does right now, but it's something that's right. But yeah,

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>he um. So he was a known physicist and it

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>did really important work. But Paul, I think, was also

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of interested in the you know, strange synchronicity type ideas,

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and Polly, in addition to the Polly principle, which is

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>an actual principle of science, was known for the Polly effect,

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>which is a more anecdotal effect. But the story goes

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>like this everywhere Wolfgang Polly went, machines broke. Ah. This

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is the classic watch stopper scenario. Yeah, so he would

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>show up in a lab somewhere to test out some

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>equipment and what do you know, the equipment and working today.

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Can't figure it out, And then he'd leave the lab

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly it'd start working again. Uh. We don't know

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>how many of these stories are actually true, but this

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is a popular anecdotal legend, and we'll just accept that

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it's true for the purpose of the conversation that everywhere

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>he went it seemed like stuff wouldn't work. In fact,

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>there was even one anecdote I read about where some

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>people were working in a lab and their equipment stopped working,

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and they joked, is you know Wolf going here? Is

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>as he'd come down the hall. Uh. And then later

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>they found out that he just happened to have been

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>changing trains in that city on that day at the

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>time that their equipment malfunction. He has some long reaching effects.

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So whether or not that's true, right, let's go ahead

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and settle now on. But but if it were true,

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you could perhaps look for actual hidden causes. It might

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>not be a synchronistic coincidence that you know that the universe,

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the the Unice, the Unice Mundi is trying to tell

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Wolfgung Polly something about his relationship with machines or something.

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It could be perhaps that Polly had a habit of

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>scuffing around his office carpet before heading into the lab,

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and that led him to discharge a lot of static

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>electricity which could break some really delicate instruments. Or Polly

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is just really clumsy. Yeah, And of course it's also

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>not taken to account all the machines that are not

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>breaking in Polly's life, right, it's literally everything he touches.

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Does it just fall apart and rust, you know, before

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>his very eyes? Or is it just oh this thing broke?

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>How could that happen? How get a machine and this

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>little device made by human? How could this possibly stop working?

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>You know? So you end up that you end up

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>honing in on those instances where it doesn't work, right.

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's also i think probably not communicating the reality

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>about lab equipment, which is that it probably breaks all

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the time, and there's a lot of it. Any lab

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to have a lot of equipment, and all

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of it has a half life, and and and a

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>death point. Yeah. Um so, so yeah, that's the idea

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:30.479
<v Speaker 1>of the hidden cause. And then, of course those are

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>just some hypothetical examples we're offering. The true hidden cause

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>would be the one we haven't even thought of, you know,

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the cause that's an actual physical causal link that's causing

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>things to malfunction in police presence, but we can't even

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>guess what it is it might be there. Yeah, so

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we should move on to another one of

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the points that Diaconis and Mostell are making their paper,

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>which is the quote multiplicity of end points or the

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the cost of close point. Yeah, because

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>if we have already illustrated close counts and coincidence, Like

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about birthdays, we were looking for the

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>same day in the same month, but we settled for sixteen.

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we were looking for the same Tennessee town

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and oh my god, we accidentally went to the same

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>high school and didn't realize it. But we'll settle for

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>just the same state. And that's what we're doing. We're

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we're constantly looking for these these little coins as to

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>line up, and we'll settle for something that's close. And

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>if you settle for close the statistical possibilities just blow up,

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>such as with the birthday situation. Um, if you want

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to uh to, uh to, if you want to hit

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a near birthday match with a group of people, so

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're back on the back in the train

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>car and you're willing to to settle for all right,

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>let's see who on this train car has a birthday

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>within a day of each other. You know, we'll settle

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>for a close match. Then you only seven people are

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>needed for that chance. So yeah, so so coming down

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>from from a perfect match to a near match just

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>opens it up tremendously. And then, of course, when you

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>think about the accumulation effect that we were talking about earlier,

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it makes it much easier if you are accumulating close matches.

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>You keep building up close matches, and over time they

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>start to look significant because they just turned into hits

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in your memory. You know, you don't remember, well, that

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>was kind of close. You remember there's a hit, and

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>then another hit, and then another hit, and some of

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>these might be actual hits, some of these might be

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>close hits, but they all kind of blend together. Yeah,

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>this brings to mind like cold readings and uh, you know,

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and the whole psychic game right where you throw out,

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>oh i'm i'm I think there's somebody named Joe in

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>your life, and you know I have an uncle Joseph.

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>There you go, close becomes a perfect match and then

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in the blink of an eye, and then that is

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>how you reckon your memory. Okay. Then, also when studying coincidences,

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that this is another category of of Diaconis and Mustellar.

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>There's the law of truly large numbers. And this is

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a point about context. So let's say somebody encounters of

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>an event that is truly incredibly unlikely for a person

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to experience. So it's not one of those things with

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a hidden cause. It's not one of those things where

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the odds are actually, you know, much more probable than

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you realize. It's truly unlikely. You still have to consider context.

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You have to consider this event against the vast number

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of uncounted dice rolls of human experience that it is

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>nestled in. So here's an analogy. Let's say you're talking

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to a professional poker player and she tells you one

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>time she was playing five card poker and she was

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>dealt a royal flush on the opening bet. Of a

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>hand then to trade any cards. She just got a

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>royal flush. Now, the odds of being dealta royal flush

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>are about one in six fifty thousand. I think it's

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like sixty nine thousand or something like that, about one

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and six. But you wouldn't say to this poker player, oh,

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you must be lying or like you know, or you

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>must have been cheating in this game, because you understand

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that the anecdote is in context. If she's a professional

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>poker player, depending on how long she's playing, she might

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>have been dealt hundreds of thousands of hands in her life.

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And on top of that, she's one player out of many,

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and maybe not everybody has had that experience. So when

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:24.919
<v Speaker 1>considered in context, really improbable events start looking like, oh, okay, well, yeah,

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 1>this is the one chance in however many. Yeah, this

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the you know, it's bound to happen

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>eventually clause Right, Like ive enough people are trying a

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>given thing, it's gonna line up. The monkeys are going

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to compose the complete works of Shakespeare with thin enough time. Yeah.

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So there are improbable events, but there are just a

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of chances to achieve them. There are seven point

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>three billion people on Earth today and according to the

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Population Reference Bureau, there is an estimated a hundred and

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>eight billion people who have ever lived. So considering that

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>if there's an event that has a one in a

0:34:57.280 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>million chance per year of occurring in somebody's life, let's

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>say it's I don't know what the actual chance of

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>this is, but having a baseball bat thrown over a

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 1>wall and it hits you on the head or something, Uh,

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>it should still happen to seventy three hundred people every year,

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:16.359
<v Speaker 1>just given the population of the Earth, that that is

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the probability. If there's a one in ten billion chance

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of something ever occurring in a human's life, it should

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>still have happened to at least ten people in human history.

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>And it it kind of comes back around to the

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>idea of synchronicity, the union idea, because even though we're

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about about real numbers and uh, and just

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 1>our sort of our inability to really make statistical sense

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of the actual odds of things, uh, those actual odds

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of the computation of those odds, they kind of exist

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 1>within the wall. They kind of exist outside of our

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>perception and our understanding of life in the small sense

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in the individual sense. So in a way, uh, the

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>synchronoy city lines up well with with it with the

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>statistical likelihood of things happening. We're just we're just not

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>privy to it. Yeah. I think that connects back to

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there is a personal significance for us,

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>even if there is not a statistical significance. Again, it's

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>not surprising that somebody won the lottery. It would be

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 1>really surprising if you won the lottery. That's not actually

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 1>objectively surprising, it's just surprising to you, which of course

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 1>brings us to psychology. Yeah, and we save this for

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>last because I think this might be the most significant

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of all of these factors. And this is the fact

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes it's not even the numbers. Sometimes it's not

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>even the data. It's just that we are wired to

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:48.280
<v Speaker 1>bow at the altar of coincidence. It's how our brains work. Indeed,

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just how we survive. That's how we

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>make sense of the stimuli in our environment, that's how

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we form our memories, and that's how we plan for

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the future. Yeah, So let's look at some psychological phenomenon

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that that are sort of related to our tendency to

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>take note of coincidences and maybe a tribute to them

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 1>more magical significance than they might actually have. Uh, how

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>about you even heard of the batter main Hoff phenomenon. Yeah,

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 1>this is the frequency illusions. This is I guess the

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>famous example of this would be you just learn a

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:22.919
<v Speaker 1>new word, you know, you either encounter in a book

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, WHOA, I don't know that when you

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 1>look it up and your rather taken with it, and

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:30.479
<v Speaker 1>then it seems to pop up everywhere you just learned

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>about it, and it's all around you. So it's like

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>discovering a flower exists for the first time you've never

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 1>seen before, and then suddenly it seems to be growing

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in every pot across town. Yeah. Yeah, And so the

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>weird name actually comes from a West German terrorist organization,

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have anything to do with them. Really. I read

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that the origin of this was that the phenomenon supposedly

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:54.800
<v Speaker 1>got its name because a message board user somewhere online

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>told the story of encountering information about the bad or

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>mine Hoff gang and then just suddenly seeing that again

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>within like twenty four hours. Um, and I'm sure this

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 1>has happened to you. It's happened to me all the time.

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 1>This actually happened to me while I was researching these

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 1>podcasts were recording today. So in the other podcast we're

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 1>recording today, Uh, there's a mention of Prince Cheep, a

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>island off of the west coast of Africa, and I

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>had when I when I got to them in the research,

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I realized I had just been reading about that island

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>for the first time, like less than twenty four hours before,

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 1>for completely unrelated reason, not related to astronomy or anything. No,

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:35.760
<v Speaker 1>but see, Yeah, you see those kind of weird littal

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:39.959
<v Speaker 1>coincidences pop up, yeah all the time, And uh, I've

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:43.320
<v Speaker 1>often found that to be the case too, seemingly unrelated episodes,

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 1>but there'll be some little thread that connects them. Um.

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>You know. Another example the frequency illusion that I often

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>see is I'll I'll come across like a new concept

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>or a concept I wasn't that familiar with, and I'll

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:55.280
<v Speaker 1>do a deep dive in in it for a podcast

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>podcast such as h super Normal Stimuli was a big one,

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and after I researched it, I was just I was

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>just seeing it everywhere like it it kind of a

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.399
<v Speaker 1>topic like that of you know sufficient depth. It kind

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of changes the way you look at the world and

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>then you see reflections of it just all around you. Yeah,

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 1>and uh and and so it can be something as

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>simple as a as a word. It can be something

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, a particular place, a particular you know,

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a particular band, a particular work of a literature, or

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it can be uh, you know, a philosophical mindset suddenly

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 1>because you're aware of it, you're hyper aware of it,

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you're excited about it, You're going to see it in

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. Yeah, um, yeah, And there

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>there could be lots of reasons. One could be that

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 1>hidden causal connection. You know, there are actually reasons that

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you're investigating similar stories around the same time or reading

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>similar material that might use a new and unfamiliar word

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>around the same time, because you have interests and drives

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:57.839
<v Speaker 1>that are sort of unified by time. Uh. Also, the

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>authors of the paper we were talking about earlier, have

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 1>they have their own sort of mathematical analysis of this,

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 1>don't they? And they sort of explain how it's not

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 1>that unusual that you should, you know, at a certain point,

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 1>after acquiring a word for the first time, see it again. Yeah,

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's just sort of expected to happen. Yeah, they're just there.

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>There's a finite number of words, so you're going to

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>see them again. Um. And of course this plays into apophenia. Uh.

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>This is uh. This is a term comes to us

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 1>from German scientists Claus Konrad, who coined apophenia from the

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Greek appo away and uh uh and Finian to show

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>in n He was studying acute schizophrenia, during which connections

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and meanings seem to web together around unrelated details. So

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:47.439
<v Speaker 1>this is the basic idea here is we're always looking

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 1>for patterns and signals from our environment. I mean, that's

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>how we think, that's how we live, that's how we survive,

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly when it comes to assessing threats. Okay, um, And

0:40:57.480 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 1>so we have we often have this tendency to perceive

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>patterns and connections in random or meaningless data. Um. For instance. Uh.

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>One example that comes to mind here is you have

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:10.879
<v Speaker 1>some sort of silly police drama. On right, they're looking

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 1>at a map of the city and they have little

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>pins showing where the crimes are at. And then what

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 1>do they see. They see like a pentagram rights some

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of order. And of course in the show. It

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>always makes sense, right, Like the the Satanic Killer actually

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:25.359
<v Speaker 1>is trying to kill people so that his crimes look

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:27.839
<v Speaker 1>like a pentagram in a map. But you can see

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>that pentagram without any planning at all or some other symbol. Yeah,

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want to see that pentagram in the planning,

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you can see that pentagram in the planning of just

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 1>about anything. Um. But what this basically breaks down to

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is a false positive in statistics, a type one error

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 1>in cognition. And this is something that plays into religion, gambling,

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theory, and just are and also our need to

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>see faces everywhere. Right, it's the reason we see uh,

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>figures in the constellations in the sky, right. I mean

0:41:56.560 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>i'd say very few people these days actually think that

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 1>the stars were arranged to look like a figure from

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Greek myth. Yeah, because you think whoever was doing it

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>would do a better job. I mean, yeah, it's it's

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>not very good. It's kind of a crappy portrait, but

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 1>you know people saw it. Yeah, yeah, they saw the

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 1>pattern and we just can't help but see. Patterns were

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>pattern recognition engines, as we've mentioned before here. And there's

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the thing is there's an evolutionary advantage for us pattern

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>recognition apes in making that type one air because essentially

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you have you have you have a type one air

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and you have a type two right false positive, false negative.

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And the classic example is that of you know, rustling

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in the bushes on the on the prehistoric savannah, right,

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 1>because there's a possibility that a big cat is about

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.359
<v Speaker 1>to spring out of those rustling bush bushes and kill us.

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Or it could be the statistical noise of wind. Exactly.

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>A false positive just gets you hot and bothered over

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing and maybe a good laugh. I thought it was

0:42:55.960 --> 0:42:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a tiger and it was just wind. But a false

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:02.760
<v Speaker 1>negative that gets you killed. Yeah, so obvious. There's obviously

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a selection pressure to favor false positives. Yeah, exactly. So,

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:09.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so that just plays into how we think

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and how we behave as humans and are overwhelming tendency

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to see the pattern when there isn't one, to see

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the connective tissue between events, in this case, when there

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:20.879
<v Speaker 1>isn't any right. So yeah, and so in that way

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence can represent a pattern to us, we start

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:27.439
<v Speaker 1>thinking what does it mean? Yeah, I mean, and there's

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:30.759
<v Speaker 1>likely a connection between apophenia and creativity This is a

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 1>theory that was put put forth by Swiss neurologist Peter

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Bruger Uh in a two thousand one book, Hauntings and

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Poulter Guy's Multi Disiplinary Perspectives. And he was studying apophenian

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 1>patients suffering from psychotic episodes that were beginning to find

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 1>spontaneous meaning and random aspects of their life. And his

0:43:47.960 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 1>research revealed that high levels of dopamine disposes his patients

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to find meetings, patterns, significance where there was there was none.

0:43:56.160 --> 0:44:01.839
<v Speaker 1>So creativity apophenia, Uh, you know, it's what is creativity.

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:04.799
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately, you know, finding new patterns, new connections, new

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:09.359
<v Speaker 1>ways to arrange existing ideas and motifs uh into something new,

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>right of course, Yeah, I mean we often see that

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 1>as sort of the core of the creative principle. It's

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, understanding like, oh, this is connected to this

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>other thing. Very often the connections you see between events

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 1>or objects or ideas and say a literature class or

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>something like that, are they are still psychic phenomenon. It's

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:33.919
<v Speaker 1>something that we are putting together out of our need

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>defined meaning, that's right, and a lot of times that

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>meaning that we need to find. You know, we we

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 1>already have our our minds made up about what that

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 1>meaning is. This brings us to confirmation bias, which of

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 1>course is always a big one. This, of course is

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we have a tendency to search for

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 1>or interpret information in a way that confirms your preconceptions

0:44:55.280 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>about life, about about basically anything, which leads to statistical

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>errors that cloud your decision and problem decision making a

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>problem solving ability. Yeah, so this would come into play

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 1>if say you are already looking for a pattern of coincidences,

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>say you've had to like to sort of synchronous strange

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>events happen in one day, you're looking for a third

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to bias the way that you sample data.

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>It's probably going to make you look for things that

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 1>are sort of a close hit is something you might

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:32.319
<v Speaker 1>have ignored otherwise to confirm your pattern hypothesis that there's

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be something in line with this second thing. You know,

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the same like people dye in threes ideas just

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 1>thinking of that. Yeah, like you, if you're lucky, you'll

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:44.040
<v Speaker 1>get like to a list celebrities dying at the same time.

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But then often like that third one has to be

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>like a radio star for the days. You know, it's

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>something that doesn't really match up, but you'll take it.

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 1>It's totally fleets the prophecy exactly right. It's confirmation bias.

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 1>You're you're bringing it in because you've got to make

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it fit the pattern. Yeah, it's kind of like when

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you listen to an episode of This American Life and

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>like the they have the theme for the show, and

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 1>like the intro hits the theme, the second segment really

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 1>hits the theme. The third segment and the second third segment,

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>you know they mostly hit this theme, and that last

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:14.359
<v Speaker 1>one you're kind of like, I don't know close enough,

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:16.919
<v Speaker 1>close enough to close out the show, but you're really

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of strayed from the overall theme. Um. But then

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty much how we approach life in general, whether

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about belief in UFOs, ancient Egyptians and alien tech, Bigfoot,

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 1>or or you know, office conspiracies or whatever it happens

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to be. If you're looking for something to be true, uh,

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 1>you can find it. That So it plays into scientific analysis.

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>You have a you know, a theory you want and

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:45.399
<v Speaker 1>you want to see it proven out, and you subconsciously

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 1>scow your the results of the experimentation in your favor. Uh,

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to love that new movie that just hit

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the theaters, so you wind up looking for reasons to

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:57.360
<v Speaker 1>love it and focusing more on that and being perhaps

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a little less critical than you normally will. And then,

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of course there's a racial aspect too, right you You

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 1>if you happen to distrust members of another racial group,

0:47:05.200 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 1>you wind up focusing on the evidence that supports your

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>existing distrust rather than evidence that challenges it. Oh. Yeah,

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:16.439
<v Speaker 1>people are definitely likely to oversample stuff that confirms their

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>bigotry or biases. So yeah, if if you have a

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 1>preconceived stereotype, you're looking to make things fit evidence that

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't fit it, you just kind of like, yeah, that's noise,

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter. Yeah, I mean, for the most part,

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of maintaining the castle of you know, fortress

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:34.359
<v Speaker 1>sanity and fortress worldview and uh and and so you

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>want to to focus as much on the stuff that

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 1>keeps the walls up as possible. Yeah. Of course this

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 1>all works perfectly because post addiction is largely a result

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of the brain's task of continually integrating sensory stimuli and

0:47:47.160 --> 0:47:52.800
<v Speaker 1>reconciling conflicting information into a unified vision of reality, a

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 1>unified story again in which we are the central character. Yeah.

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's just simply how our memory. Yeah, I

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:01.360
<v Speaker 1>mean you always see the the pattern of clue is

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 1>left by the mystery writer once you've had the ending revealed.

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 1>You might not notice it while you're going through the

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:12.719
<v Speaker 1>novel to the first time. So there you have it. Coincidence. Um.

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>We we've kind of hit some of the the more

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:18.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, fringey ideas of what could be happening with

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this perceived synchronicity in life and what is actually going

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:24.959
<v Speaker 1>on when it comes to the statistics of the world

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:28.720
<v Speaker 1>around us and the way we perceive our world. Yeah.

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 1>So one of the authors of that paper we talked

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:34.880
<v Speaker 1>about earlier, Percy Diaconis, he had this quote that I

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:37.760
<v Speaker 1>saw in an interview or said, probability isn't a fact

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:41.320
<v Speaker 1>about the world, it's a fact about the observers and knowledge.

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:44.959
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's number one that seems very true,

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 1>but also it's um, it's a good way of informing

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:51.400
<v Speaker 1>this discussion we've had about what coincidence means when you

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 1>actually examine probability and statistics. Very often, the real magic

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:58.360
<v Speaker 1>is happening inside our heads, in our in our quest

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to construct meaning in sort of are are actually the

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 1>great links that we go through mentally to weave events

0:49:04.000 --> 0:49:08.439
<v Speaker 1>together and produce tapestries of significance in our lives. So

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 1>think about that the next time you know, some of

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:14.520
<v Speaker 1>these little coincidences pop up in your life and you

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:18.720
<v Speaker 1>start drawing those imaginary lines in the in the world

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:23.319
<v Speaker 1>of synchronicity. Hey. In the meantime, if you want more

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind, if you want

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to read blog posts, you want to see videos, you

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:29.279
<v Speaker 1>want links out of social media accounts, you should head

0:49:29.320 --> 0:49:31.759
<v Speaker 1>on over to Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:49:31.880 --> 0:49:34.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the mothership, and on the landing page for this

0:49:34.600 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 1>episode will make sure to include links to related content

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as outside content of note, And if you

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:43.839
<v Speaker 1>want to send us an example of some crazy coincidence

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in your own life, you can send it to blow

0:49:46.120 --> 0:49:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the mind at how stuff works dot com. For more

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:53.760
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics, visit how stuff

0:49:53.800 --> 0:50:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com