Speaker 1: Hey guys, Saga and Crystal here.
Speaker 2: Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election,
Speaker 2: and we are so excited about what that means for
Speaker 2: the future of the show.
Speaker 3: This is the only place where you can find honest
Speaker 3: perspectives from the left and the right that simply does
Speaker 3: not exist anywhere else.
Speaker 2: So if that is something that's important to you, please
Speaker 2: go to Breakingpoints dot com. Become a member today and
Speaker 2: you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad free,
Speaker 2: and all put together for you every morning in your inbox.
Speaker 3: We need your help to build the future of independent
Speaker 3: news media and we hope to see you at Breakingpoints
Speaker 3: dot com.
Speaker 1: Good morning, everybody, Happy Thursday. We have an amazing show
Speaker 1: for everybody today.
Speaker 4: What do we have, Crystal, indeed we do.
Speaker 2: Attorney General Pambondi grilled over her Epstein cover up and
Speaker 2: did not go all that well for her shifting narratives
Speaker 2: over that El Paso Airport enclosure. Sager has his own theories.
Speaker 2: You will be unsurprised to learn we've got the breakdown
Speaker 2: after bb comes yet again to DC and meets with
Speaker 2: Trump pushing for war with Iran body camera footage from
Speaker 2: a CBP shooting in Chicago that we've covered extensively here
Speaker 2: has been released and definitively proves that the government was
Speaker 2: lying from the start Cash Metel screwing up the Nancy
Speaker 2: Guthrie investigation. You'll probably not be surprised to learn about
Speaker 2: that either. A viral essay is warning that AI is
Speaker 2: about to change absolutely everything, and the author of The
Speaker 2: Nazi and the Psychiatrist is going to join us to
Speaker 2: talk about what we learned about human beings at Nuremberg.
Speaker 4: So that should be really interesting.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's exciting.
Speaker 3: His book, for those who haven't seen, was the basis
Speaker 3: of the movie Nuremberg with Russell Crowe and Ronny Malik.
Speaker 3: I thought it was an incredible film. I actually did
Speaker 3: not know that much about going and I not only
Speaker 3: researched some of what this guy wrote about in his book,
Speaker 3: but actually bought a few biographies himself. So the movie
Speaker 3: itself I highly recommend. I'm excited to talk to the
Speaker 3: author before we get to that. Thank you to everybody
Speaker 3: who has been supporting the show Breakingpoints dot com. Just
Speaker 3: this morning we were going through and looking at all
Speaker 3: of our Epstein coverage, which gets demonetized for several hours,
Speaker 3: meaning that we can earn no revenue despite the fact
Speaker 3: that these are racking up hundreds of thousands of views.
Speaker 3: Continue to do so because we don't have to care
Speaker 3: about YouTube bad revenue. But in order for that to
Speaker 3: be the case, we do need people to support the
Speaker 3: show Breakingpoints dot Com.
Speaker 1: If you're able to, if.
Speaker 3: You're just watching this on YouTube, then no worries, please
Speaker 3: hit subscribe on YouTube to our channel. And if you're
Speaker 3: listening to this a podcast, we share an episode with
Speaker 3: a friend, it really helps other people find the show.
Speaker 3: But with that, let's go ahead and start with Pambondi
Speaker 3: and her disastrous debut before the United States Congress.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so she was there to testify and took a
Speaker 2: lot of heat, mostly from Democrats, but also significant heat
Speaker 2: from Thomas Massey. Let's go ahead and take a listen
Speaker 2: to what he had to say.
Speaker 1: Who's responsible?
Speaker 5: Are you able to track who in your organization made
Speaker 5: this massive failure and release the victims names? Are you
Speaker 5: able to track who it was that obscured Les Wexner's
Speaker 5: name as a co conspirator in an FBI document? Do
Speaker 5: you have that kind of accountability?
Speaker 6: I believe Wexter's name was listed more than four thousand
Speaker 6: times about.
Speaker 5: I had Yeah, I already told you that this is
Speaker 5: where he's listed as.
Speaker 6: Finish my answer. Come on, let me finish my answer.
Speaker 6: We corrected that within forty minutes. He was already you're
Speaker 6: acting like everybody's trying to cover up.
Speaker 3: Westerner's name, reclaiming, reclaiming my time, I answer this question,
Speaker 3: reclaiming my time.
Speaker 6: Within forty minutes, Wexner's name was added.
Speaker 5: Back then forty minutes of me catching you red handed,
Speaker 5: red hand, there was one redaction.
Speaker 6: He's listed as a cocon and we invited you in.
Speaker 6: We and this guy has trumped arrangement syndrome. He needs
Speaker 6: to get You're a failed politician.
Speaker 4: Trump's derangement syndrome. Failed politician.
Speaker 2: She had a whole binder that was her burn book
Speaker 2: with research on all of the members who'd be questioning her,
Speaker 2: specifically the Democrats, but probably also Thomas Massey, so that
Speaker 2: she could, rather than responding to their question, say oh yeah,
Speaker 2: well what about when you voted for impeachment or what
Speaker 2: about when you did this, and deflect and distract and
Speaker 2: attack them, rather than actually responding to the queries that
Speaker 2: they're making.
Speaker 3: Here.
Speaker 4: You know another thing, that.
Speaker 2: I think it was Thomas Massey and maybe others as
Speaker 2: well that pointed out Zager and this hearing is. You know,
Speaker 2: you were given a list of victims from their lawyer saying, hey,
Speaker 2: here's the names of some of the women, the survivors
Speaker 2: that were involved. Please make sure that these names are
Speaker 2: redacted that email gets released. All of the women's names, yes,
Speaker 2: are there in that email.
Speaker 4: But it's not like.
Speaker 2: They just missed it and like, oops, we didn't see
Speaker 2: this for redaction. They redacted the lawyer's name and left
Speaker 2: all of the women in there. So he really had
Speaker 2: her and a number of them did had her dead
Speaker 2: to rights on what a screw up and how almost
Speaker 2: it seems intentionally malevolent the way that they were redacted
Speaker 2: and released these and.
Speaker 3: Even with Wexner to the extent that his name was
Speaker 3: in the files some four thousand times. When you redact
Speaker 3: his name as a co conspirator in the DOJ document,
Speaker 3: unredact the names of said victims. Again, Let's be very clear,
Speaker 3: as Massey pointed out to her directly, she violated the law.
Speaker 3: The law said you only get to redact national security
Speaker 3: and victim's name.
Speaker 1: That's it.
Speaker 3: Everything else needs to be unredacted. They violated the law
Speaker 3: on numerous occasions, and then even then they didn't do
Speaker 3: a very good job. So in some cases I would look,
Speaker 3: a name would be redacted in one exchange. In another
Speaker 3: case I would look and then you know, the very
Speaker 3: same email chain they forgot to redact it in this one.
Speaker 3: It's a clown show the entire thing. What was even worse, though,
Speaker 3: is that Bondi is doing this thing where you know,
Speaker 3: all Trump officials, when they're in an indefensible position, what
Speaker 3: do they do? Attack, attack, attack, Except she, because she's
Speaker 3: on such indefensible ground, ends up looking like a lunatic.
Speaker 3: And the best example is this clip where she shreds
Speaker 3: the politicians for asking her about doing her job and
Speaker 3: is like, hey, the dowj just hit fifty thousand. Why
Speaker 3: don't you guys care about that?
Speaker 6: Take a listen, the Dow has shattered fifty thousand for
Speaker 6: the first time. This is crazy. They said it couldn't
Speaker 6: be done in four years, Yet President Trump has done
Speaker 6: it in one year. National media and rents have fallen
Speaker 6: to a four year low thanks to Donald Trump. That's
Speaker 6: why they want to focus on Epstein and our most
Speaker 6: transparent president in the nation's history. The murder rate, as
Speaker 6: I said, has plummeted to one hundred and twenty five
Speaker 6: year low thanks to Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Well the Dow.
Speaker 3: First of all, nobody said that it couldn't be done.
Speaker 3: In fact, it's not even all that remarkable because as
Speaker 3: we learned on the Biden administration, great your gains in
Speaker 3: the S and P five hundred or the Dow jones
Speaker 3: does not mean that you are doing well all that
Speaker 3: financially at a middle class level. But second, that is
Speaker 3: the level that they have been reduced to. Is look
Speaker 3: at the stock market. And this has actually become a
Speaker 3: huge meme online. Is you know somebody will ask you
Speaker 3: a question, be like, hey, babe, did you do the dishes?
Speaker 3: But the Dows bitch, get off of my case, don't
Speaker 3: you know?
Speaker 1: I'm gonna try that next time you're wearing shoes at
Speaker 1: the house. The Dow is at fifty thousands day.
Speaker 3: Dare you ask me to take my shoes with rock
Speaker 3: salt off in my house?
Speaker 2: I mean, but and here's the thing though, I mean,
Speaker 2: she looks ridiculous to any reasonable person. The Dow thing
Speaker 2: was just utterly preposterous. But her response to all of
Speaker 2: them just so performative, you know, having the burn Book
Speaker 2: there so that she can, you know, she can have
Speaker 2: her little one one line zingers against this and that
Speaker 2: person rather than responding to their queries. It all looks
Speaker 2: utterly pathetic, but but there's only one person that she
Speaker 2: has to make happy. And I think Trump probably did
Speaker 2: like this performance. I think that stock market line probably
Speaker 2: hits really hard with the President of the United States,
Speaker 2: and that's why it's in there. I mean, it wouldn't
Speaker 2: surprise me if she was working directly, you know, with
Speaker 2: his top staff and communications team to come up with
Speaker 2: that line, to come up with the whole approach and
Speaker 2: all the you know, the burn Book research and all
Speaker 2: the rest.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I will say I know for a little bit
Speaker 3: in terms of some sources is that the White House
Speaker 3: in particular is really taking an interest in comms for
Speaker 3: the whole administration. And so you can see this right well,
Speaker 3: especially Epstein, this is the most sensitive thing that they're
Speaker 3: currently facing at a national level.
Speaker 1: So if this really is the best.
Speaker 3: They could come up with, like you, why don't just
Speaker 3: actually do your job, you know, then you would have
Speaker 3: no criticism to have to deal with that. Well, every
Speaker 3: day that this goes on, and this type of behavior,
Speaker 3: you are covering some major shit up.
Speaker 1: There's just no other explanation.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right. And I mean, and here's the
Speaker 2: other thing. No one else is Trump like. They all
Speaker 2: try to pull off like the Trump mode and they
Speaker 2: just end up looking silly. But look again, she needed
Speaker 2: to perform well for the president to save her ass
Speaker 2: and keep herself in the job. And I think he
Speaker 2: probably was just fine with this performance. Let's go and
Speaker 2: take a look at this was another moment. I mean,
Speaker 2: this is something I already knew, but it's just, you know,
Speaker 2: it really is stunning that they're posturing like, oh, there
Speaker 2: was no one else, no other crimes uncovered here, nothing
Speaker 2: for us even to further investigate, time to turn the page.
Speaker 4: It's a hoax, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 2: Well, a lot of the survivors were in the room,
Speaker 2: and so Primilegiapaul asked them, hey, you know, did the
Speaker 2: DJ ever reach out to you? Were you willing to
Speaker 2: speak with them? Did they ever reach out to you
Speaker 2: for any sort of investigation? And of course the answer
Speaker 2: is no, because they're not interested of course in you know,
Speaker 2: accountability for any of the powerful men that are implicated
Speaker 2: in this. They're interested in trying to cover the whole
Speaker 2: thing up and move on.
Speaker 4: Let's take a listen to that moment.
Speaker 7: To the survivors in the room, if you are willing,
Speaker 7: please stand, and if you are willing, please raise your hands.
Speaker 7: If you have still not been able to meet with
Speaker 7: this Department of Justice, please know for the record that
Speaker 7: every single survivor has raised their hand. Attorney General BONDI,
Speaker 7: you apologize to the survivors and your opening statement for
Speaker 7: what they went through at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 7: Will you turn to them now and apologize for what
Speaker 7: your Department of Justice has put them through with the
Speaker 7: un absolutely unacceptable release of the Epstein files and their information.
Speaker 6: Congresswoman, you set before Merrick Garland set in this chair twice.
Speaker 7: Attorney General Vond, I'm going to answer No. I'm going
Speaker 7: to reclaim my time because I asked you for question,
Speaker 7: and I will like a question to answer, which is,
Speaker 7: will you turn to the survivors. This is not about
Speaker 7: anybody that came before you. It is about you taking
Speaker 7: responsibility for your Department of Justice and the harm that
Speaker 7: it has done to the survivors who are standing right
Speaker 7: behind you and are waiting for you to turn to
Speaker 7: them and apologize for what your Department of Justices.
Speaker 5: Members members get to ask the questions, the witness gets
Speaker 5: to answer in the way they want to answer.
Speaker 7: Then, John, that's not accurate, mister chairman, because she doesn't
Speaker 7: like the answer. So, mister Chairman, I have asked she
Speaker 7: Grek Garland, this.
Speaker 1: I reclaim, will claim.
Speaker 4: Get in the gutter for her.
Speaker 2: Theatrics, get in the gutter for her, theatrix when she's saying, hey,
Speaker 2: can you apologize to these women that you've shown no
Speaker 2: interest in hearing their side of the story, and very
Speaker 2: see BONDI trying to use her little burn book. Oh well,
Speaker 2: what about Mary Garland? Merrick Garland came up, by the way,
Speaker 2: a lot from her in this hearing.
Speaker 3: Well it doesn't make First of all, the Meyrick Garland
Speaker 3: thing is really stupid because Meryre Garland did not come
Speaker 3: in from an administration that said we're going to have
Speaker 3: total transparency on this very issue. Merrick Garland did not
Speaker 3: gather a bunch of influencers at the White House some
Speaker 3: one year ago and hand out binders that said the
Speaker 3: Epstein files Part one. Meryrick Garland did not, you know,
Speaker 3: Mark Garland was not under the obligation to release all
Speaker 3: of this information here.
Speaker 2: He didn't say, this is all sitting on my desk
Speaker 2: and I'm just reviewing it and I have.
Speaker 3: The names of all thousands of people and the clients.
Speaker 3: Didn't she quite literally say she had the client list
Speaker 3: on her desk, like months before this entire thing even
Speaker 3: kicked off, where they said that there was absolutely nothing
Speaker 3: to see here.
Speaker 1: So that's not on Meyrick Garland.
Speaker 3: Now, should have other administrations, the Bush administration, Obama, Biden administra,
Speaker 3: Trump first Trump administration. Should they have all done Yeah, sure, okay, absolutely,
Speaker 3: knot's like we ever stopped talking about it at the time.
Speaker 3: But that is actually immaterial to the question. Now, you
Speaker 3: clearly did not meet with any of the people who
Speaker 3: were actually affected by Jeffery. Can you ever think of
Speaker 3: a similar situation where you have people who are purported
Speaker 3: victims who have been unmet but with the actual authorities
Speaker 3: in charge. These are the people who are supposed to
Speaker 3: protect you, and instead they're redacting the names of the
Speaker 3: people who are rich and who are powerful, who are
Speaker 3: directly implicated in this entire thing. So it was shameful,
Speaker 3: the entire Her entire performance was actually one of the
Speaker 3: worst I have ever seen on this issue. Look, you're
Speaker 3: saying it's gonna please Trump.
Speaker 1: I'm not.
Speaker 3: I just think, you know, not even Fox News or
Speaker 3: any of these other people could defend it. Nobody, It's indefensible.
Speaker 3: They cut away from it a Fox hut. So this is,
Speaker 3: by the way, extraordinary.
Speaker 1: In the middle of the day.
Speaker 3: Nobody is watching cable TV. The only purpose of cable
Speaker 3: TV in the middle of the day is for live
Speaker 3: events stuff like this. CNN, at MSNBC, and Fox were
Speaker 3: all carrying it live. As it started to go off
Speaker 3: the rails, they cut away to talk about I don't know,
Speaker 3: bad Bunny again.
Speaker 1: Right, But like that, that is is as tacit of.
Speaker 3: An admission as you are ever going to get from
Speaker 3: the Fox News network. All right, let's get to a four.
Speaker 3: This was another one her performance with Ted lu It's
Speaker 3: I mean, this woman is becoming unglued, like actually unhinged.
Speaker 3: Let's take a listen.
Speaker 8: Former Prince Andrew Donald Trump attended various parties with Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 8: I want to know whether any underage girls at that
Speaker 8: party or at any party that Trump attended with Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 6: This is so ridiculous and that they are trying to
Speaker 6: deflect from all the great things Donald Trump has done.
Speaker 6: There is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime.
Speaker 6: Everyone knows that this has been the most transparent presidency.
Speaker 9: He's the one. I'm gonna put up another document from
Speaker 9: a witness who called the FBI's National Threat Operation Center
Speaker 9: because I believe you just lied under oath.
Speaker 8: There is ample evidence into Epstein.
Speaker 6: Don't you ever accuse me of a I.
Speaker 8: Believe you just lie under oath. And this is all
Speaker 8: on videotape. You said there's no events crime. I'm showing
Speaker 8: you here is a witness statement who called into the
Speaker 8: fi's Threat Operations Center.
Speaker 1: Don't you ever accuse me of a crime?
Speaker 3: Look again, I can only say you should all be
Speaker 3: absolutely ashamed that this woman you know, is in any
Speaker 3: way in power and anything that can be I mean,
Speaker 3: I wish I could say, oh, Lutnik and her and
Speaker 3: all of them should be held to account, but they're not.
Speaker 3: You know. The one saving grace if you want to
Speaker 3: see these people pay, is if and I actually saw
Speaker 3: I think it was Mike Serna.
Speaker 1: Richie said this.
Speaker 3: He was like, Yeah, these BONDI hearings, this is what
Speaker 3: going to look like every single day if the Democrats
Speaker 3: take power.
Speaker 1: And it's true.
Speaker 3: I mean, I've like these people, every single person in
Speaker 3: the administration will be living on Capitol Hill if this,
Speaker 3: if the Democrats take even just the House in the midterms.
Speaker 3: So gear up for a preview because this is exactly
Speaker 3: what it's going.
Speaker 7: To look like.
Speaker 2: Well, and it got even worse after the fact. We
Speaker 2: learned something that is also pretty astonishing. Put a six
Speaker 2: up on the screen. So you know, lawmakers have been
Speaker 2: able to go in and view the unredacted Epstein files.
Speaker 2: They got four computers set up and so you can
Speaker 2: go in and search. And Jamie Raskin did that, Promila
Speaker 2: Giapaul did that, Thomas Massey, Rocana. There were a number
Speaker 2: of lawmakers who went in to conduct their own searches.
Speaker 2: And it turns out in that bird book you can
Speaker 2: see here this document. Keep this up on the screen.
Speaker 2: It says Gyapaul Pramila search history, and it has the
Speaker 2: list of all the searches that she made when she
Speaker 2: went in to view the unredacted files. More information has
Speaker 2: come out. It looks like they were tained the search
Speaker 2: history from all of the lawmakers that went in to
Speaker 2: view these files so they could use it to help
Speaker 2: inform her testimony here and so that they could keep
Speaker 2: track of what exactly it was that lawmakers were interested in.
Speaker 4: And what they were looking at, what they were searching for.
Speaker 2: And I mean this is very like, this is pretty
Speaker 2: outrageous behavior to be tracking and surveilling them in this
Speaker 2: manner when they're trying to view these files and hold
Speaker 2: the administration to account.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and also comes to a question of resources. It's like,
Speaker 3: that's what you're spending your time, your spy resources on
Speaker 3: on what we're searching on now.
Speaker 1: By the way, you know, it's funny, even with.
Speaker 3: My own cynicism, I never once thought, oh, they're going
Speaker 3: to keep track of all my keystrokes that I type
Speaker 3: into the dj website for all of the guess I
Speaker 3: have to now totally, I guess we should all be
Speaker 3: doing this on what I mean, I can't even the
Speaker 3: duc ducto or something. And make sure that you're on
Speaker 3: a lockdown mode enabled computer if you're in any way,
Speaker 3: if you're listening to this, you're a research or you're
Speaker 3: somebody who's in power. This is not something I mean, again,
Speaker 3: my own naivete never once was like, oh yeah, they're
Speaker 3: just going to keep records of everything that we're searching.
Speaker 1: Kind of makes sense though.
Speaker 3: All they have to do is link your IP address
Speaker 3: even if you're using a VPN. Apparently they have ways
Speaker 3: around it. Maybe someday next week we'll talk about this
Speaker 3: Paragon leak, because I'm obsessed with this story about you know,
Speaker 3: it's an Israeli a spy technology tool that was leaked,
Speaker 3: but just goes to the extent where signal WhatsApp and
Speaker 3: to end encryption. I mean, the Pegasus stuff seems to
Speaker 3: be old news at this point for their ability to
Speaker 3: crack into whatever you want. But this is what they're
Speaker 3: using it for, is to literally measure and look at
Speaker 3: the keystrokes and the clip the clicks of what you
Speaker 3: are you know, searching and making sure that you're pulling up.
Speaker 3: I mean, that is shocking behavior, right, like using a
Speaker 3: unique link to spy on members of Congress. Once upon
Speaker 3: a time, we used to be very upset about stuff
Speaker 3: like that.
Speaker 1: We do.
Speaker 3: We would be remiss if we didn't talk about some
Speaker 3: of the other little Epstein developments. Can we put a
Speaker 3: five up on the screen know what to make of this,
Speaker 3: but won't present it nonetheless, So the Ditch, which I
Speaker 3: hadn't heard of this website before, but you know they
Speaker 3: do some investigative reporting. So what they found is they
Speaker 3: gained access to Jeffrey Epstein's FedEx account, with records showing
Speaker 3: it was used for shipments long after his death and
Speaker 3: an address book that included a senior Israeli military officer
Speaker 3: now considered to be a quote strategic consultant for diplomatic matters.
Speaker 3: One of the shipments was actually sent less than two
Speaker 3: years ago, and it was delivered to a dissolved company
Speaker 3: that owned and operated Epstein's private jet. They were able
Speaker 3: to find this from an unredacted password of Epstein's FedEx account.
Speaker 3: They were able to log in look at the overall
Speaker 3: address book. But you have multiple individuals here where first
Speaker 3: of all, it shows a the address thing is live,
Speaker 3: which you know, again we're always talking about innocent explanations.
Speaker 3: Here could be used by his estate or you know,
Speaker 3: some of the other operators of the people who are
Speaker 3: like your trustees. However, you know, despite the fact that
Speaker 3: he died in twenty nineteen and they're using it as
Speaker 3: recently a summer of twenty twenty four, and they're sending
Speaker 3: products to all of these various different shell companies that
Speaker 3: were owned by Epstein. But the address book itself shows
Speaker 3: at some point he was sending or receiving things from
Speaker 3: this senior Israeli officer.
Speaker 1: So just another crumb that we have over there.
Speaker 2: And there's one war we wanted to put in the show,
Speaker 2: to put a seven up on the screen. So Columbia
Speaker 2: University Dental School is acknowledging that they admitted an Epstein
Speaker 2: girlfriend via quote an irregular process, and they're forced to
Speaker 2: admit this because there are all kinds of emails in
Speaker 2: here between you know, Epstein or his associates and members
Speaker 2: of the high level members of this dental school, where
Speaker 2: they're soliciting contributions. He's giving them hundreds of thousands of dollars,
Speaker 2: and very clearly in exchange, they're letting this woman who
Speaker 2: was not actually qualified to be in this dental school
Speaker 2: into the dental school. So, you know, and this was
Speaker 2: this was going on for quite a long time. There's
Speaker 2: all these exchanges about how they're easing her way in
Speaker 2: and she's not having to meet the requirements. They're like,
Speaker 2: don't worry about having to take the test, et cetera,
Speaker 2: et cetera. So you know he was able to and
Speaker 2: we also covered him, you know, paying the tuition of
Speaker 2: the Seaton Hall University tuition for the children of the
Speaker 2: Governor of the Virgin Islands. But Columbia University here happy
Speaker 2: to take his money and let in whoever he wanted
Speaker 2: to get into their schools just humanly.
Speaker 3: Well, even what I put together is do you remember
Speaker 3: that picture from the island with the dentist the dental
Speaker 3: chair with all the masks that were surning around there.
Speaker 4: Like the dentist. Thing keeping coming up.
Speaker 3: About dentistry, and I'm not depraved enough to find it myself.
Speaker 3: I've looked a little bit into it. I'm thinking, what
Speaker 3: do you think, like maybe the nerve gases I don't
Speaker 3: access to something.
Speaker 4: Like that, right, I have some darker thoughts in my head. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Maybe it's literally about like you know, removing by This
Speaker 3: is the issue with this story is you really start
Speaker 3: to descend into the depths of madness and you're like,
Speaker 3: what is true and what is For example, with the
Speaker 3: FedEx thing.
Speaker 1: You're like Okay.
Speaker 3: The innocent explanation is trustee, you know, a state or
Speaker 3: whatever is using it.
Speaker 1: What if he's alive? Right, that's another one. We were like,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean I would have given it,
Speaker 1: what a zero percent chance?
Speaker 4: Now we'll give it a one theory.
Speaker 2: That one I really thought was like, oh, that's just kooky, Like, no,
Speaker 2: he's not still alive.
Speaker 4: What are we talking about?
Speaker 2: Like you know, oh yeah, and so it was Elvis,
Speaker 2: you know it's and now I'm like, maybe, yeah, I
Speaker 2: would give it.
Speaker 1: I would maybe not zero, I'll give it one.
Speaker 2: I'm more like, yeah, ten to twenty's I don't I'm like,
Speaker 2: you know, And that's the thing, like you said, with
Speaker 2: the dentistry thing, you do start to feel like because
Speaker 2: then you see you see the ocean poor, you see
Speaker 2: the sulphuric acid, you see the way they talk to
Speaker 2: each other, love the torture video, all these weird references to.
Speaker 4: Beef jerky, like it's lap soda, grape.
Speaker 2: Soda, pizza, all of it, and you're like, there's no
Speaker 2: way these people are hanging out together and getting grape
Speaker 2: soda and pizza all the time, or that he's this
Speaker 2: into jerky, that it's like a priority matter that his
Speaker 2: assistants are constantly communicating with each other about we got
Speaker 2: to make sure we got.
Speaker 4: Enough jerky on the island.
Speaker 2: But then you asked hers like, am I just I
Speaker 2: don't know, but some of the things are so dark
Speaker 2: in there that you can't put anything, literally, anything.
Speaker 4: Out of bounds.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Can I just read you another one? Yeah, I know
Speaker 3: someone flagged this to me yesterday. Epstein July nineteen, twenty eleven.
Speaker 3: Quote said she felt God's presence next to her when
Speaker 3: she was in bed. She knows that Jesus watches over
Speaker 3: her and he helped save her life. Whoops, and then
Speaker 3: follow up whoops.
Speaker 4: Is another one. Yeah, people are flagging.
Speaker 3: From Epstein to redacted. Then two from Epstein. You should
Speaker 3: dress up as him when you see her. This is like,
Speaker 3: I mean, you know, not to sound like a nineteen
Speaker 3: eighty Satanic pan Like this is literally.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 3: I just there's so much of that, the torture video,
Speaker 3: I mean, all the famous stuff. But it's like every
Speaker 3: other day somebody will just send me one and I'll go,
Speaker 3: oh my god. First my instinct is is it real?
Speaker 3: Then I search it, I find that it is real. Yeah,
Speaker 3: and I'm like, what is happening?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I know there was. Did you see this new
Speaker 2: one about Leon Black that came up. It's an allegation
Speaker 2: from a lawyer about her, you know, the client she's representing,
Speaker 2: allegations against him. She says when she was sixteen that
Speaker 2: she was raped by Leon Black.
Speaker 4: I'm sure he denies all of this.
Speaker 2: Yes, the sounds of the lawyers that when she was
Speaker 2: sixteen she was raped by Leon Black. He bit her
Speaker 2: on her genitals, injured her, that she was bleeding, they
Speaker 2: wouldn't take her to the doctor, and then they flew
Speaker 2: her out the next day.
Speaker 1: So that was a twenty twenty three lawsuit. Yeah.
Speaker 4: Wow, And I mean I looked at same thing. I
Speaker 4: was like, is this real? Look it up? Yeah, it's there,
Speaker 4: is there in.
Speaker 1: The files, right, So, oh yeah, this is a July
Speaker 1: twenty twenty three story.
Speaker 4: Actually didn't even and you want to tell me it was.
Speaker 3: Dad down syndrome according to this alphaog according to the
Speaker 3: oh my god, well yeah, again he denies it, you know,
Speaker 3: will vigorously defend him.
Speaker 2: And this is part of you know, in terms of
Speaker 2: the cover up, right, they're telling us there's nothing here
Speaker 2: more to investigate. Okay, why maybe you should talk to
Speaker 2: the victims if in cee whether there's anything.
Speaker 4: No, there's nothing to investigate.
Speaker 2: Okay, Well, then we need to see you had a
Speaker 2: list of potential co conspirators. When and how was the
Speaker 2: decision made that there was nothing chargeable here, that there
Speaker 2: was no there there that we don't need to pursue
Speaker 2: this any further. That's not in these files, that has
Speaker 2: not been identified in these files. So where is that documentation?
Speaker 2: Because somewhere along the way there was a government decision
Speaker 2: that was made we're not going to look into this
Speaker 2: any further. We don't think there's any there there, or
Speaker 2: for whatever reason, we're moving on. Okay, how did that
Speaker 2: process occur? Because we don't get any of that there.
Speaker 2: Instead we get, you know, redacted lists of co conspirators
Speaker 2: that they have to be put on last in order
Speaker 2: to identify any of the people that they were looking at.
Speaker 2: And then we're just told don't worry about it, there's
Speaker 2: nothing to see here, no further investigations. It's just Epstein
Speaker 2: and just Maxwell, and there's no one else who's implicated
Speaker 2: in this massive crime, criminal enterprise whatsoever.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's right.
Speaker 3: Let's move on to some Many are calling the l
Speaker 3: Paso incident the big one. Some of us are hoping
Speaker 3: for that there is a potentially innocent explanation which with
Speaker 3: the more information I will give it some weight, although
Speaker 3: I still remain sketched out about the entire thing. So
Speaker 3: I do I think Royn and Emily man I have
Speaker 3: mentioned it. Yesterday everybody the world woke up to some
Speaker 3: shocking news. El Paso Airport was shut down for ten days.
Speaker 3: It's nothing like it in history, even including nine to eleven.
Speaker 3: And I'll explain a little bit. Let's put this up
Speaker 3: here on the screen. Is if you look at the
Speaker 3: no TAM, which was a no fly notice basically issued
Speaker 3: in the middle of the night at some three point
Speaker 3: thirty two am local time, you saw two areas where
Speaker 3: no fly traffic was allowed at all over the city
Speaker 3: of El Paso, and then this strange triangular shape which
Speaker 3: is near the border in the state of New Mexico. Now,
Speaker 3: the explanation initially was not given as to why the
Speaker 3: airspace was shut down, and the airspace shutdown was so
Speaker 3: extraordinary crystal that it went all the way up to
Speaker 3: some eighteen thousand feet and also put a complete ban
Speaker 3: on any aircraft, including metavac ambulances, from being able to
Speaker 3: fly in the city. Nothing like this had ever been
Speaker 3: issued in modern United States history, and it was given
Speaker 3: for a National security designation. Now, quickly explanations begun flying.
Speaker 3: Let's put B two up there on the screen. The
Speaker 3: initial explanation from the government in the early hours of
Speaker 3: the morning. Here is Secretary Sean Duffy, the Secretary of Transportation.
Speaker 3: He says, the FAA and the Department of War have
Speaker 3: acted swiftly to address a quote cartel drone incursion. The
Speaker 3: threat has been neutralized and their there is no danger
Speaker 3: to commercial travel in the region. Restrictions have been lifted
Speaker 3: and normal flights are resuming. So immediately, the first story
Speaker 3: we get is about these alleged cartel drones which are
Speaker 3: coming back and forth across the border. Immediately, I was
Speaker 3: calling bullshit on this because cartel drones and this is
Speaker 3: not a justification. I'm just telling you that this is
Speaker 3: how it is. The cartels use drones on the Mexican
Speaker 3: US side of the border all the time, not to
Speaker 3: drop drugs, but to surveil to make sure that if
Speaker 3: there's a border patrol agent here or somebody there. They
Speaker 3: see an open lane and they're like, okay, go like
Speaker 3: you can use the tunnel, or then now is a
Speaker 3: good time to send somebody over. This is a well
Speaker 3: known phenomenon. So in fact, let's put B four up
Speaker 3: there on the screen. One estimate recently put it at
Speaker 3: some three hundred carteil drones flying around the border daily,
Speaker 3: according to our own Department of Homeland Security. So what
Speaker 3: is it about this cartailed drone which makes it a
Speaker 3: worthy of a ten day no fly notice issued to
Speaker 3: the city of El Passo? All right, So what we
Speaker 3: get then is an explanation twofold one is that the
Speaker 3: drone it wasn't drones per se. It was the use
Speaker 3: of a new experimental laser technology. Let's go ahead and
Speaker 3: put B three pleas up on the screen. This was
Speaker 3: from Jennifer Jacobs over at CBS News, but this quickly
Speaker 3: became the official story. Quote the unexpected airspace closure in
Speaker 3: El Paso stemmed from disagreements over quote drone related tests.
Speaker 3: Pentagon had undertaken extensive planning on use of military technology
Speaker 3: near Fort Bliss. Two sources identified the tech as a
Speaker 3: high energy laser earlier this week, technology was used to
Speaker 3: shoot down.
Speaker 1: What appeared to be quote foreign drones.
Speaker 3: The flying material turned out to be a party balloon.
Speaker 1: Sources said one balloon was shot down.
Speaker 3: The FAA administrator then last night decided to close the
Speaker 3: airspace with without alerting the White House, Pentagon, or Homeland Security.
Speaker 3: They told officials the restrictions would be in place to
Speaker 3: ensure safety until issues with the department.
Speaker 1: Could be resolved.
Speaker 3: So this is my and again, when we get to
Speaker 3: the new revelation or at least the official story blaming
Speaker 3: this on CBP, it might be true, but the explanation
Speaker 3: basically is that in the middle of the night, we
Speaker 3: decided to start shooting experimental lasers into the sky at
Speaker 3: alleged cartel drones. Sorry, that's bullshit, it's not happening now.
Speaker 3: You don't just use directed energy or highly experimental lasers
Speaker 3: for no reason. So this is where my UFO radar
Speaker 3: was going off. Right, let's go and put my own
Speaker 3: TWEETB six please up on the screen and I'll give
Speaker 3: you a little bit of an explanation. So, as I
Speaker 3: initially showed you in that graphic that triangle shape over
Speaker 3: the Oregon Mountains, Desert National Monument is less than ten
Speaker 3: to twenty miles from the NASA White Sands Test facility.
Speaker 1: This facility has.
Speaker 3: Long been known as an area of like UFO spotting,
Speaker 3: going back to the nineteen sixties. I can even show
Speaker 3: you one B seven please. For example, I found this
Speaker 3: in the l Paso Times twenty nine SI UFOs over
Speaker 3: White Sands Range. This is from the l Paso Times,
Speaker 3: literally March five, nineteen sixty seven.
Speaker 1: I mean, what is that?
Speaker 3: Almost in the exact same type of timeframe for surveillance.
Speaker 3: So my point only remains that the official story does
Speaker 3: not make any sense whatsoever. You do not shoot highly
Speaker 3: experimental direct energy lasers into the sky for no reason
Speaker 3: in the middle of the night and then issue a
Speaker 3: panicked ten day shutdown over all airspace, cutting off the
Speaker 3: sixth largest city in Texas from the entire nation, which
Speaker 3: directly relies on air on air traffic to be able
Speaker 3: to bring in I mean, think about it. It's hours away
Speaker 3: from any other national center. Now, I'll give you the
Speaker 3: potential explanation. And again, given the new information coming to light,
Speaker 3: this is certainly possible considering the behavior of our great
Speaker 3: CBP officers. B five please up on the screen. This
Speaker 3: is the news story that has been released. According to
Speaker 3: a US official, the directed energy and laser counter drone
Speaker 3: technology was in CBP's control Customs Border Patrol when the
Speaker 3: balloon was mistakenly shot down near El Paso.
Speaker 1: In January.
Speaker 3: The Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth signed an agreement for
Speaker 3: the Pentagon to loan the directed energy counter drone platform
Speaker 3: to DHS. The official said the agreement was signed sometime
Speaker 3: in the last thirty days following the shootdown, is when
Speaker 3: the FAA closed the airspace and they said a US
Speaker 3: official could not go into specifics about what exactly the
Speaker 3: technology is, but it's some sort of direct energy laser.
Speaker 3: Quote is accurate to you. So again, this is a
Speaker 3: very very experimental technology. So the official story is a
Speaker 3: Pentagon gave this experimental laser, they gave it to CVP,
Speaker 3: and CBP shot it off in the middle of the
Speaker 3: night because they thought it was a cartel balloon and
Speaker 3: it ended up being a party balloon, literally like one
Speaker 3: of those balloons you what is it, like party city
Speaker 3: or something they fill up with helium. That's the official story.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 3: You tell me what you think I'm saying again because
Speaker 3: CBPS involved.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean it's possible.
Speaker 2: The story is so embarrassing that I'm inclined to believe it.
Speaker 2: And you see that, I mean, you see the way
Speaker 2: CBP operates like these people are absolute maniacs.
Speaker 4: The fact that the Pentagon gave them some sort of
Speaker 4: directed energy weapon is insane, completely insane.
Speaker 2: So yeah, if I'm the FAA guy that's running that
Speaker 2: airport and you see them shooting like space lasers and
Speaker 2: party balloons, I'd probably be like, you know what, we
Speaker 2: got to.
Speaker 1: Shut the shit down.
Speaker 2: We're doing it for I'm sending a message it's ten
Speaker 2: days until you all tell me what the fuck is
Speaker 2: going on because this is insane. Yeah, that does kind
Speaker 2: of add up to me. That does kind of add
Speaker 2: up to me, to be honest with you.
Speaker 3: I don't know, I just there's something about it that
Speaker 3: smells wrong.
Speaker 1: Cartel drone, wouldn't you come up.
Speaker 4: With a cover story than this though?
Speaker 3: Yeah, But I mean government party balloon, So look, government
Speaker 3: and competence is almost is usually the right answer. Yeah,
Speaker 3: I will just say again, for people who are in
Speaker 3: the UFO world, when it ends up being a balloon,
Speaker 3: it's like a meme.
Speaker 1: All right, it's literally like, oh, it's got to be
Speaker 1: a balloon.
Speaker 2: But it's always a blue Usually it's a weather balloon, though.
Speaker 2: I mean, at least that's a little bit less embarrassing then. Literally,
Speaker 2: when I saw the term party balloon, I thought maybe
Speaker 2: that was some sort of technical term that I just
Speaker 2: didn't know because I could not process the fact that
Speaker 2: they actually meant literally the like happy birthday balloon that
Speaker 2: you buy in the checkout on the way to the
Speaker 2: kid's birthday party.
Speaker 3: Right again, you might be right, and considering the CVPS involved,
Speaker 3: it could be true.
Speaker 1: I just there's something there's Look, maybe I want it
Speaker 1: to be true.
Speaker 3: It's near White Sands test facility. You have ten days shutdown.
Speaker 3: It's like a panic. You shoot, try to shoot something
Speaker 3: down with this brand new, fancy laser. There's no coordination,
Speaker 3: meaning there's a highly secret operation. Maybe you recover something,
Speaker 3: recover something, and then you recover it maybe quicker than possible,
Speaker 3: and you're like, oh, it was just a balloon. It
Speaker 3: was all big misunderstanding. And if you look at the news,
Speaker 3: everybody's already moved on. Everyone's like, oh, okay, you know whatever, Right,
Speaker 3: So I don't know. I'll give it seventy percent that
Speaker 3: it's CBP, I'll give it seven.
Speaker 1: But there's something there's something about I mean, how can
Speaker 1: you go from cartel cartel tree it too believed?
Speaker 2: It just it feels lasers classic this administration though, like
Speaker 2: they put out something that was idiotic, the drone, the cartel,
Speaker 2: because anyone who was covering, you know, the border instantly
Speaker 2: new like what are you talking? This happens all the time,
Speaker 2: like these drones are ever present, Like there's no way
Speaker 2: that this was just about some cartel drones, So what
Speaker 2: is really going on? And so then gradually, you know,
Speaker 2: you get this comedy of errors type situation that tumbles out.
Speaker 2: And yeah, so I mean to me, once I heard
Speaker 2: that it was CBP that had been given this, which
Speaker 2: again insane, this directed energy laser whatever they were given,
Speaker 2: then I was like, Okay, yeah, I think this probably
Speaker 2: does add up.
Speaker 4: So I shared your skepticism to begin with, but at this.
Speaker 2: Way, I'm like, it's probably the most likely explanation. I
Speaker 2: would need to see some other evidence of some other
Speaker 2: thing going on, and we haven't gotten that yet.
Speaker 3: No, And this is where look, patriots, whistle blowers and
Speaker 3: others in the Passo area, get in touch, all right.
Speaker 3: Let me know, I just want to know if it's
Speaker 3: and if it is a party balloon. Release the image.
Speaker 3: You know, this is a good point. This is a
Speaker 3: good up point by my friend Chris. Let me give
Speaker 3: him a proper shadowt Christopher Wolford. He's a huge fan
Speaker 3: of the show, UFO researcher. I talked to him all
Speaker 3: the time. Chris pointed out a good point to me.
Speaker 3: You've got high death four K imagery of these boat
Speaker 3: strikes out in the middle of the ocean. Yeah, release
Speaker 3: the footage, you know, let's put up, Let's.
Speaker 1: Put it all to bed, middle of the night, night
Speaker 1: vision all this next camera, Yeah, get it right next.
Speaker 3: You don't even pay for a subscription and the nest
Speaker 3: is recording you man, I'm glad they covered that yesterday
Speaker 3: because look like, I'm happy they did it for the
Speaker 3: whole Nancy Gothree thring.
Speaker 1: But the fact that this.
Speaker 3: Exists, you're like, yo, man, like this is the real Yeah. Also,
Speaker 3: they were like Google had to invent a whole new process.
Speaker 3: I'm like, oh great, I'm sure they'll never use it again,
Speaker 3: right right, I mean, we're living in The Dark Knight,
Speaker 3: you know, in The Dark Knight at the end whenever
Speaker 3: he hijacks everybody's phone and uses like everybody's phones frequencies.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's apparently the world that we live in. Like
Speaker 1: that was way ahead of its time.
Speaker 2: I mean, I think about the nest thing and it's
Speaker 2: extremely creepy because you know, it's like this camera that's
Speaker 2: there all the time.
Speaker 4: But let's be.
Speaker 2: Honest, we walk around these things with these things all
Speaker 2: do we bring them in the freaking bathroom with those
Speaker 2: like I mean, it's what you think that's different. You
Speaker 2: think they're not you know, Oh, there's no way they'd
Speaker 2: listened to us or spy on us.
Speaker 4: There.
Speaker 2: You were talking about the Israeli Techiragon, the Paragon that
Speaker 2: there was a they accidentally put out what a screenshot
Speaker 2: that showed like the control panel and you can see
Speaker 2: all the access to all the different social media what'sapp
Speaker 2: and whatever that they're able to get into.
Speaker 4: So yeah, we do live in that world. That is
Speaker 4: where we live now. That is where we live.
Speaker 1: Very scary, yes, indeed.
Speaker 2: Also, you know, I think at the image of the
Speaker 2: party balloon, that's too okay.
Speaker 3: And then PSA, because Ryan recently alerted to me to this.
Speaker 3: Remember that Washington Post journalists who had her phone seized
Speaker 3: by the government, So because she had lockdown mode enabled
Speaker 3: on her phone, the FBI was not able to crack it.
Speaker 3: And so I don't recommend lockdown mode to anybody unless
Speaker 3: they're involved kind of in the business that we're in
Speaker 3: in the potential of government surveillance. But I got to
Speaker 3: tell you, guys, like it does work, and if you
Speaker 3: are involved in anything like this, I actually do recommend,
Speaker 3: especially if you're a high level person in business, because
Speaker 3: these tools, it's not just used by the government. They're
Speaker 3: selling them, you know, two big businesses for corporate espionage purposes,
Speaker 3: and then you know it's much.
Speaker 1: Harder to prove and the stakes and all that.
Speaker 3: So really consider it, or at least look into lockdown
Speaker 3: mode and what it's able to do for you, because
Speaker 3: at least as of now, it seems to be one
Speaker 3: of the very few tools that we have right now
Speaker 3: that's left which can actually keep them from easily getting
Speaker 3: in to your phone. Turning down to Iran's major developments,
Speaker 3: after Prime Minister Nitan Yahoo rec visited Washington for I
Speaker 3: don't even it can't even keep track at this point
Speaker 3: of Donald Trump's president, I think it's number seven, the
Speaker 3: most visits by a foreign leader I think ever in
Speaker 3: a short period. So let's go and put this up
Speaker 3: here on the screen. Immediately after the meeting concluded. This
Speaker 3: is from Trump. I have just finished meeting with Prime
Speaker 3: Minister Netanyahu of Israel and various of his representatives. It's
Speaker 3: a very good meeting. The tremendous relationship between our two
Speaker 3: countries continues. There was nothing definitive reached other than I
Speaker 3: insisted that negotiations with Iran continue to see whether or
Speaker 3: not a deal can be consummated. If it can, I
Speaker 3: let the Prime Minister know that we will be a preference.
Speaker 3: If it cannot, we will just have to see what
Speaker 3: the outcome will be. Last time Iran decided they will
Speaker 3: be better off not making a deal, they were hit
Speaker 3: with midnight hammer that did not work out well for them.
Speaker 3: Hopefully this time they will be reasonable and responsible. Additionally,
Speaker 3: we discussed the tremendous progress being made in Gaza and
Speaker 3: the region in general. This is truly peace in the
Speaker 3: Middle East. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Speaker 3: So kind of middle Way, I guess you know A
Speaker 3: message there from Trump. Let's put this next one up here.
Speaker 3: This is some inside reporting allegedly Trump to Netanyahu, the.
Speaker 1: US prefers a deal with Iran to war for now.
Speaker 3: I do think obviously the big question is like a
Speaker 3: deal over what, and so this is where everything could
Speaker 3: fall apart. So, for example, the Iranians appear poised to
Speaker 3: want to make a deal on any nuclear related issues,
Speaker 3: as in they're willing to let it inspectors. In fact, I
Speaker 3: could put C five up here on the screen. This
Speaker 3: kind of broke After the meeting with Netanyahu, the President
Speaker 3: of Iran came out and said the country is willing
Speaker 3: to open up its nuclear site for any verification to
Speaker 3: prove it is not seeking to build a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 3: The president made the public pledge on Wednesday during a
Speaker 3: commemoration of the fortieth anniversary of the revolution. Quote, we
Speaker 3: have announced time and time again we are not seeking
Speaker 3: nuclear weapons. We are ready for any kind of verification,
Speaker 3: spoke to the US. Spoke as the US continued to
Speaker 3: enable build up. And what's difficult about this, though, is
Speaker 3: there framing this around nuclear But the problem is that
Speaker 3: there's a secondary issue which Prime Minister net and Yahoo
Speaker 3: and the Israelis are pushing is It's not just about
Speaker 3: nuclear it has to be about missile production, Regional missiles.
Speaker 3: Ballistic missiles are the only deterrent that they really have
Speaker 3: against the Israelis. That's it, and as we all saw
Speaker 3: during the Twelve Day War, they work actually pretty well.
Speaker 3: They were very able to defeat the Israeli missile defense stuff.
Speaker 3: If it wasn't for the United States, which was pouring
Speaker 3: billions into defending Israel, they would have been destroyed in
Speaker 3: the Twelve Day War, like on their own accord. That's
Speaker 3: why the Israelis care so much about the missis we
Speaker 3: shouldn't care that much about the missiles. We have troops
Speaker 3: there to protect Israel and that's the only threat that
Speaker 3: they really posed to us. But in general, this is
Speaker 3: a regional threat. So then becomes the question, why would
Speaker 3: we go all in for the missiles on the behest
Speaker 3: of the Israelis. All that really we care about is
Speaker 3: the nuclear issue. I don't know where this one is
Speaker 3: going to go. The Iranians are saying that they're willing
Speaker 3: to meet with us all of this, However, on the
Speaker 3: missile issue, from day one, they're like, this is not
Speaker 3: up for negotiation.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Period, it's not happening. And it seems that we keep insisting, insisting, insisting,
Speaker 3: and all of the groundwork is currently being laid for
Speaker 3: a major in a wider war.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, and I mean it's not even really worth seriously
Speaker 2: talking about the missiles because of course Iran is not
Speaker 2: going to like disarmed completely.
Speaker 4: They would be insane to do.
Speaker 2: That, right, That would be that that is not a
Speaker 2: serious proposal, which is exactly why the Israelis are pushing it,
Speaker 2: because they know there would be no deal that the
Speaker 2: Iranians would be willing to make on. Oh yeah, we'll
Speaker 2: just get rid of our ballistic missiles, so you can
Speaker 2: just completely attack us and we'll be vulnerable and defenseless
Speaker 2: and have zero de turn whatsoever.
Speaker 4: Sure, we're going to do that.
Speaker 2: But you know, there's some psychology at work here too
Speaker 2: with Trump because supposedly, in the twelve Day of war
Speaker 2: we destroyed their nuclear capabilities. So now here we are
Speaker 2: back he's now positioning this again as now it's no
Speaker 2: longer about oh my god, the brave protesters. Now it's
Speaker 2: back to being about the nuclear weapons. But nat Yahoo
Speaker 2: and whoever else is in his ear that wants to
Speaker 2: push them to war. Can rightly say yeah, but sir,
Speaker 2: if you're just negotiating on nuclear you claim that you
Speaker 2: destroyed that. So that's why you have to up the
Speaker 2: ante and also go after the ballistic missiles and your
Speaker 2: troops in the region will never be safe and secure
Speaker 2: and will never have regional stability unless we get Iranians
Speaker 2: to Iran to give up their ballistic missiles. So I
Speaker 2: don't know what the timing will be, but in my view,
Speaker 2: it's only a matter of time. I mean, we've seen
Speaker 2: over the course of this administration and prior ones as well,
Speaker 2: but this one has really up the anti They cannot
Speaker 2: live until, they cannot be satisfied, until this Iranian government
Speaker 2: is toppled.
Speaker 4: They will try every.
Speaker 2: Method they can, you know, whether it's the devastating economic
Speaker 2: sanctions which have been in place for years and years,
Speaker 2: trying to cripple them even further economically. You know, the
Speaker 2: intense maximum pressure that was applied here that Scott Bessett
Speaker 2: has been bragging about. That's what helped to foment the protest.
Speaker 2: You know, whatever inside agitators were used to help escalate
Speaker 2: those protests into violence.
Speaker 4: They are running through the.
Speaker 2: Playbook of everything they can do to try to topple
Speaker 2: this government, and so far they have been able to
Speaker 2: withstand all of the pressure that has come, which is
Speaker 2: why I sadly see it as only a matter of
Speaker 2: time before they decide, okay, well, there's no other play
Speaker 2: left in the playbook.
Speaker 4: We have to take kinetic action. Once again.
Speaker 1: This is what's really scary. Let's put to the next one.
Speaker 1: Shall we see four?
Speaker 3: Up here on the screen, the Pentagon is now preparing
Speaker 3: a second aircraft carrier to deploy to the Middle East.
Speaker 3: So Trump is ratching up the pressure on Iran to
Speaker 3: make a deal over the nuclear program. The carrier strike
Speaker 3: group is an immense amount of firepower, everybody. If we
Speaker 3: just rewind the clock, here's what happened. Originally, what happened
Speaker 3: was that we were on the verge of potentially striking Iran.
Speaker 3: Then the Iranians came out and said, if you do,
Speaker 3: we're going to hit back with everything that we have. Immediately,
Speaker 3: they issue a panicked order to withdraw a carrier strike
Speaker 3: group from the South China Sea and sail it some
Speaker 3: two weeks to the Persian Gulf to make sure that
Speaker 3: it's ready to deploy. Against Iran if needed now, a
Speaker 3: second carrier strike group. This would be an extraordinary show
Speaker 3: of force we haven't really seen in the region since
Speaker 3: the last time, or even really around October seventh. We're
Speaker 3: talking about billions. I mean, I can't even like quantify
Speaker 3: the amount of firepower that is in a single let
Speaker 3: alone two carrier strike groups that would be there, in
Speaker 3: addition to all of the bases that are around, in
Speaker 3: addition to a lot of already for deployed stuff which
Speaker 3: is in the Middle East at this time. This is
Speaker 3: what we would be needed for a full blown long
Speaker 3: term war now and even then, as we found out
Speaker 3: against the Houthis and others, it's not like it will
Speaker 3: hold up all that well. And I hate to crap
Speaker 3: all over our own military because I don't blame the
Speaker 3: individual service members, but it's the contractors and the culture
Speaker 3: that have led to where we are. So for example,
Speaker 3: today two ships in the middle of refueling collided. I mean,
Speaker 3: this is like amateur stuff, right, And I've talked about
Speaker 3: this with my friends who are in the military, who
Speaker 3: are like, our readiness is a disaster, Like we spend
Speaker 3: all this money, but we can't do basic stuff. Remember
Speaker 3: when we had to like push fighter jets off of
Speaker 3: the deck because they you know, they lost to various
Speaker 3: jets in high seas or something like that.
Speaker 2: Going back a decade wat the Hoist, by the way,
Speaker 2: it was.
Speaker 3: A collision and a bunch of people, a bunch of
Speaker 3: sailors died, and like our fire control, which is like
Speaker 3: one of the basics of the United States Navy, it
Speaker 3: was a you know, there's been multiple incidents at sea.
Speaker 3: And again it's not to denigrate the service members whatsoever.
Speaker 3: We're talking about a culture and about really an institution
Speaker 3: which is more focused on getting as much money from
Speaker 3: the taxpayer as possible for these high precision weapons, and
Speaker 3: they can't do the basics correctly. Like this is really
Speaker 3: what we're dealing with. And that's why it's scary, is
Speaker 3: because the Iranians message is now pretty clear. We will
Speaker 3: negotiate nuclear all day long. We will not negotiate ballistic
Speaker 3: missiles period and in exchange. What is going to happen
Speaker 3: is if you continue and if you strike us, we
Speaker 3: know we will lose, we know that, but we will
Speaker 3: make it as painful for you as humanly possible and
Speaker 3: extract an immense amount of blood and my price for
Speaker 3: Israel's you know, regional ambitions is zero American lives. That's
Speaker 3: what it should be. And again that's just my opinion.
Speaker 3: I hope you share the same opinion. This will be
Speaker 3: a massive problem for the Trump administration. But they keep
Speaker 3: boxing themselves into corners. Yeah, and if you box yourself
Speaker 3: into the Israeli position, you're done. There's no other option.
Speaker 3: And by the way, BB knows this. You think he
Speaker 3: really thinks they're ever going to make a deal on
Speaker 3: ballistic missiles of nose not.
Speaker 2: Of course, that's the point. That's the whole point is
Speaker 2: he knows they would never make that deal. That's the
Speaker 2: whole reason it's there. It's meant to be a poison pill.
Speaker 2: And as we've said before, you know, in previous build
Speaker 2: ups to various you know, conflicts and kinetic military action
Speaker 2: that Trump has started, it only takes one day of
Speaker 2: the neo cons whoever it is in the administration, BIB
Speaker 2: and his allies and the donors who give to trumpets
Speaker 2: that it only takes one day of them convincing him
Speaker 2: and his game on.
Speaker 4: And I think I think.
Speaker 2: Probably you know, I think the hold up is partly
Speaker 2: they didn't have assets in the region. They had to
Speaker 2: you know, move things into the region because they realized
Speaker 2: that the Iranians were not this time just going to
Speaker 2: do a performative retaliation, that there might be some you know,
Speaker 2: some real damage that comes from this. They're like, all right, well,
Speaker 2: I guess we better have more stuff in the region.
Speaker 2: And then I think the other hold up is Trump
Speaker 2: does not actually have the stomach for, you know, what
Speaker 2: babe wants.
Speaker 4: He does not actually have.
Speaker 2: A stomach for like some long protracted potential like boots
Speaker 2: on the ground, potential.
Speaker 4: US soldiers killed, et cetera.
Speaker 1: Thing.
Speaker 2: What he loves is the Venezuela model where he can
Speaker 2: come in. It's one day there's some big show of
Speaker 2: American military might and then you know, dramatic images of
Speaker 2: the of a Duro being captured, and then you know,
Speaker 2: he doesn't have any thoughts about what the second and
Speaker 2: third and fourth order consequences are those who come down
Speaker 2: the road.
Speaker 4: He doesn't really care about that.
Speaker 2: He gets his show from TV and then he gets
Speaker 2: to move on and you know and feel like he's
Speaker 2: this big tough guy and like he's showing America's might
Speaker 2: in the world.
Speaker 4: Et cetera.
Speaker 2: And I think he's having trouble. No one's really been
Speaker 2: able to sell him on a similar option at this
Speaker 2: point With Iran. The similar option was the twelve day war. Okay,
Speaker 2: we already did that, right now, What's the next thing
Speaker 2: that they can sell him that he can be convinced
Speaker 2: would be quote unquote painless from a US perspective. And
Speaker 2: the part of that that you know obvious is pretty
Speaker 2: obvious is even if it is being sold as being painless.
Speaker 2: First of all, again the medium and long term consequences,
Speaker 2: but second of all, very easy to miscalculate in that
Speaker 2: very easy to miscalculate on what the Iranian response will be,
Speaker 2: how things can escalate, what Israel would do that situation,
Speaker 2: et cetera. And the same at the same time, I
Speaker 2: wanted to keep our eyes on We're going to have
Speaker 2: Nathaniel Jasper on next week to talk about to talk
Speaker 2: about what's going on in the West Mangas and Nathaniel Jasper.
Speaker 2: Nathaniel Anyway, there's a been Without getting into all of
Speaker 2: the bureaucrat technical details here, the TLDR is that the
Speaker 2: Israeli government has put in place a variety of new
Speaker 2: measures to make it much easier for rallies to steal
Speaker 2: land from Palestinians and to continue the mass annexation of
Speaker 2: the West Bank. Now we've got a new let's put
Speaker 2: C six up on the screen here, We've got a
Speaker 2: new Oh. Trump is very concerned about this. You know,
Speaker 2: he's very worried about this. This hearkens back to the
Speaker 2: meetings that he used to have with Biden, where it was, Oh,
Speaker 2: Biden is very very unhappy. He's very disappointed with net Yaho, etcetera, etcetera.
Speaker 2: So Trump says he opposes Israeli annexation steps in the
Speaker 2: West Bank, but of course, aga there aren't any announcements
Speaker 2: of any steps that are being taken to stop them
Speaker 2: from moving in that direction. He's just you know, telling
Speaker 2: Barack Revied or whoever that this is not something that
Speaker 2: he's happy about.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the West Bank stuff is I mean, first of all, yeah,
Speaker 3: what's going on there is totally insane. But the irony
Speaker 3: is that this comes at the same time that Beebe joined.
Speaker 1: The Board of Peace, if you'll remember coming.
Speaker 3: What's C three up there on the screen, just to
Speaker 3: remind people, you know, Secretary Rubio and Netanyaho met while
Speaker 3: they were here in Washington, the US Secretary of State.
Speaker 3: Ahead of my meeting at the White House, I signed
Speaker 3: Israel's ascension as a member of the Board of Peace.
Speaker 1: We will continue strengthening.
Speaker 3: The unbreakable alliance between Israel and the United States. Well,
Speaker 3: you know, illegally annexing territory and taking fully control of
Speaker 3: it seemed to be a little bit of a violation
Speaker 3: of the Board of Peace right and also maybe of
Speaker 3: the original actual deal that was struck. And as long
Speaker 3: as you are not actually going to do something about it,
Speaker 3: then yeah, you do de facto have control. Also, look
Speaker 3: at our fanatical, insane ambassador who, by the way, he
Speaker 3: recently challenged Tucker Carlson to an interview, So I would
Speaker 3: love to see that one. Now, let's ask about Pollard Shaw.
Speaker 3: We let's let's talk about that for a very nice
Speaker 3: long period of time. If you check his feed, it
Speaker 3: is unhinged. Huckabee more recently has been talking like the Olympics.
Speaker 3: He'd be like, of course I'm reading between USA, but
Speaker 3: the next team I'm really rooting for is the Israeli
Speaker 3: bob sled team or something like. He is highlighting the
Speaker 3: athletes of Israel. More than our own athletes. It's crazy wow,
Speaker 3: as if they're like some great heroes or something. He's
Speaker 3: literally he seems to see himself as part of the
Speaker 3: Israeli nation, or I mean, considering his own Christian philosophy,
Speaker 3: maybe he does, like I really don't know, but it
Speaker 3: is psychotic.
Speaker 1: He of course was here.
Speaker 3: I also took notice in some of those meetings there
Speaker 3: were senior IDF generals who many of whom were present,
Speaker 3: and yet I didn't see any American military representatives on
Speaker 3: the other side of the table. Very worrying because of
Speaker 3: course these are the same people are gonna be offering
Speaker 3: all of these BS assessments around regional ballistic missiles and
Speaker 3: everything else. So look, I mean, I hate to be
Speaker 3: a broken record, but this is scary, like a second
Speaker 3: carrier strike group, even strategically, just think about it. I
Speaker 3: used to talk about this with the Ukraine and all
Speaker 3: the time we're going to pour you know, all of
Speaker 3: our financial like all of our financial assets, hundreds of
Speaker 3: billions of dollars, the entire swift system We're going to
Speaker 3: sacrifice on the altar of Ukraine. Iran is an even
Speaker 3: dumber case than that.
Speaker 8: Shit.
Speaker 3: It makes more sense for you to defend Ukraine than
Speaker 3: it does to go all in on Iran. This is
Speaker 3: like the wet dream of a lot of these you know,
Speaker 3: Middle East firsters who are like, this is the most
Speaker 3: important region.
Speaker 1: In the world.
Speaker 3: Like, no, it's not not even close. And you can
Speaker 3: just like two carrier strike groups this amount of firepower.
Speaker 3: Considering what's happening in the rest of the globe, it's
Speaker 3: it's just a disaster.
Speaker 1: It really is. From a strategic level.