WEBVTT - A More Civil Discussion.  Lanhee Chen talks to Armstrong & Getty

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's so that's came up the other day in conversation.

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking about this for years when it comes

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to presidential elections that, for instance, debate are are about

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the stupidest way to try to compare to candidates. That's

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>so called debates, which aren't debates. No, they aren't debates

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in any way, yet the media acts like they are

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and at the end they ask who do you think

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 1>one and and it's just the whole thing is stupid.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And now we've moved onto these town hall creations, which

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I like better than the debates. But um, we're we're

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>We've always just been wondering what what's the best way

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>to pick a president of the United States. Seems like

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>we go about it in a terrible way. Let's introduce

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>our guest, Lan Heatchen, the host of the podcast Crossing

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Lines with Lan Hea Chen, David and Diane Stephy, research

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>fellow Toover Institution, also the director of Domestic Policy Studies

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>and Lecture at Stanford University. Loan he how are you, sir?

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, get to be with you. Good morning. So

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end of our discussion last time around, the

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>topic came up of the primaries and how they've changed,

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and how they often yield on electable candidates, and and

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about what you thought would be the best

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>way for the parties to boil down the would be

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>candidates and pick somebody, Um, you want to start with

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the Jack's topics there, the so called debates are idiotic

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in our minds. What would be better than that? Well,

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys have a great point about debates. I mean,

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I've you know, I've been involved in four presidential campaigns

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and been in a senior role in two of them,

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and what I can tell you about these debates is

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.919
<v Speaker 1>that there's nothing more than theater and and the challenges.

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Instead of having a real discussion about issues, what you

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>really have are you know, one to two minute position

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>statements that are really about posturing and about trying to

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>appeal to certain constituencies rather than really trying to answer

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the questions. So I tend to agree that one of

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the problems we have is now we've got a primary

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>process where you literally have fifteen twenty debates before you

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>even get to people actually voting. And I'm just not

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>sure that's the best way to do it. I would

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>prefer a system where people actually get to answer questions

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>substantively that the town hall thing actually isn't bad because

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>there you get a little bit more insight and a

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit more detail. But even then, the way these

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>guys set it up, a lot of people in the media,

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>it's just about gotcha questions and that doesn't get us anywhere.

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And I I'm bothered by crowd response. That's always bothered

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>me in debates. It makes it more fun to watch.

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>It feels kind of weird when there's no crowd and

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just dead silent. But then it all becomes about

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>what line gets the biggest cheers or hoops or booze

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. And that's a heck of a way to

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>run a run a dog and pony show. Well, yeah, Lony,

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you've been involved in in campaigns, it would be pretty

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>easy to load a town hall audience with twenty people

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>who are in favor of puppy side, I mean, just anything,

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>and they cheer like crazy and people think, yeah, that

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>person is really popular. Yeah, I mean you saw You've

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>seen this every every time around in UM there were

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>debates in the Republican primary, for example. I recall there

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 1>being debates UH in New Hampshire for example, there was

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a debate in New Hampshire where Marco Rubio, um, you know,

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>had a gap essentially where he basically you know, the

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>knock on him when he was repeating the same thing

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>over and over again and people in the crowd were

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>booing and hooting, and it was pretty clear that Chris

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Christie's team, his campaign had basically packed the audience against Rubio.

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And there was another debate where Rubio had essentially packed

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the audience. And this is the kind of theater you

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>end up with, which is it's all about getting that

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>crowd response. You guys may remember in two thousand eight

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>there were YouTube debates. There were debates which essentially featured

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>questions from people on YouTube and it was the most

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>random thing ever. And that's what you end up with.

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>You end up with these situations which you know, to

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the ordinary person watching, they think, wow, gosh, well that's

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it seems like that person didn't do all

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that well and they don't realize all of the stagecraft

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that goes into it. So this is this is the

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>problem with the current system. Okay, so obviously we need

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>something see Spanish no audience, even handed moderation or extended

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>answers or is came up last time when we were

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>talking about this. Do we go backwards in time to

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>where the parties get together with the powerful alone in

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a room and make their own decision and who they

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>think ought to be representing their party. Would that be better? Well?

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I think in some ways it would produce an outcome

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>where you would ensure that the nominees of each party, um,

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably were people that had very similar profiles, right,

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So you would have people who had been in government,

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>who had experience, who you know, had had essentially good

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>relationships within the party. And I think in some ways

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that would produce a more more main streams that of candidates.

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that would ever happen in this

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>day and age. To go back to this question of

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>how to some candidates for a minute in the general

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>election when we have the general election, the debate structure

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in the general election where you've got two candidates, that

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the structure is set, the audience cannot respond to anything

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that's said during the debate. You've got usually pretty well

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>regarded journalists who are the moderators. That structure is not

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>bad in terms of comparing candidates, but really what we

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>need is we need an informational platform for the American

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>people to really see what everybody is about. And I

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>tend to think that will help a little bit, you know,

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>not not the smoke filled rooms process, but when will

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>we get more information out there that tends to be

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>the better idea? Boy, definitely, the dozen or more people

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on stage where they each speak for forty five seconds

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>is practically worthless. Lan he Chen is online host of

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the podcast Crossing Lines with Lan he Chen. So, yeah

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>again to the question of, you know, the primary process.

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>The word democracy is thrown around like a religious incantation

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>these days, as if more DeMont cristy is always better

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and always yields a better result. When that's not true. Um,

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's funny. I keep going back and see

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the bullet train in California. Oh yeah, for instance, or

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I remember being fascinating. I think it was.

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>One of my college professors pointed out that democracies are

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>very bad at ending wars because there's national pride involved

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in all sorts of things, and you have to build

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a consensus, whereas a dictator can just say this ain't

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>work and and and end it and he's not gonna

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>suffer for it probably anyway. So the idea of the

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>party elders of smoke filled rooms, those people getting together

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>with an outsized influencer, complete influence, and saying, look, Bernie's

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>never ever gonna win. We need somebody more reasonable than that.

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at X, Y or Z that has its appeal.

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, I could see that yielding over

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and over again candidates on both sides who are just

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>going to perpetuate the concentration of power in Washington, Washington,

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>d C. Deficit spending and and the scam continuing. So

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what I think. Yeah, and you

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>never really get disruption, and sometimes in a democratic process

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>what you need and want is distruction. You want people

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>who come along. I mean, for for all of the

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>discussion about Donald Trump, what what he was primarily into

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>dozand of sixteen was someone who came along and completely

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>disrupted the process. And I didn't be upset a lot

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of people, for sure, but to a certain degree, that

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>is what That is what people want every so often. Now,

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>every so often they want something different, and that that's

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>what democratic processes are designed to yield. The design to

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>be responsive to what people are feeling and what they want,

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and that has downside. Now, It's one thing when you

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about candidate you guys mentioned the bullet train. It's

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>another thing when you talk about policy and letting people

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>legislate every couple of years, things that may be completely different.

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>And I have a big problem with how significant the

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>initiative process, for example, has become in California or in

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>other states. The California is a perfect example. Will you

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>go to the ballot and you've got twenty different issues

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that you're expected to vote on, and who knows about

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>some of this stuff? I mean, it's absolutely ludicrous that

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we're asked to vote on sometimes, but that's the process.

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what happens. When you have a process that's

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>designed to be maximally democratic, you end up with like

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>voting on things that you have no clue what you're

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>actually voting on. That's not healthy for democracy well, and

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and the winner carries the force of law, and it's

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it's been a disaster for folks listening all over the

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>fruited plane and foreign lands. The initiative process in California

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>more democracy has been an unmitigated disaster because you get

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to special interest groups, whether their unions or whatever. They

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>higher good pr people. They got plenty and money to

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>pay for them. They spin the heck out of these

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>issues or paint rosy rosy pictures of this, that or

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the other, and the poor suckers at California you don't

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>have half a clue on transportation infrastructure, for instance. Vote

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>for something utterly idiotic and then it's just it's impossible

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to kill. So beware lanhi chan us with us crossing

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 1>lines with Lan Eachen, Go ahead. No, let's say it's

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>big business. I mean, that's where it comes down to you, guys.

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that the whole initiative thing is big business

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>for for people who work in the in the campaign industry,

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's what it's become. You've got signature gatherers, you've

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>got people who do the advertising, people who do quote

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>grass roots work. I mean, it's big business. And that's

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>why the entrenched interests will probably never want to really

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>change the system because they make a lot of money

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>off of it. Hey can we get before we run

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>out time? Four five seconds? Amoch? Can I get a

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>bottom line real quick on the previous thing? So would

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 1>you go with the current system with just different debates

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and such and let the lots of democracy into the

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>primary system. Or do you like super delegates kind of

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the older mix or what? What? What would you be

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>your bottom line? Yeah? I like cute things. One is

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I like a debate process that's got fewer debate with

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>rules that are designed for more civil discussion and people

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>actually hearing about issues. And I do like the you know,

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>some party elder element, whether it's super delegates, what people

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>who understand what the implications are for the parties having

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a slightly outsized voice, not as totally outside voice, but

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>as slightly outside So can we get forty five seconds

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>on the whole China trade thing? Tariff situation is a

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Trump on the right side of this? Well, look, I

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>think that at the end of the day, both the

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>United States and China need a deal. I think the

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Chinese need a deal worse because their economy is really struggling,

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and it just demonstrates how dependent they are on on trade.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>But but fundamentally, in the long run, it's not healthy

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>for either economy to have continuing conflict terrorists. In my mind,

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in the long run, probably not the right answer. I

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>think they end up raising costs for consumers here. But

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>in the short run, I think getting China to the

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>table and forcing them to recognize, hey, they've got to

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>make some changes. They can't stop being they can't continue

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>stealing intellectual property and requiring US companies to be in

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>joint ventures where especially their excuses to rip off our stuff.

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>That certainly is the right path, but it's not a

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>sustained along the tap out hope they could get to

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>some kind of systemic reformed seeing. Yeah, I don't think

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>anybody's thinking of this in the long term, but we'll see.

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Lan he Chen crossing lines of the line. Hea Chen,

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>look for the podcast for podcasts are distributed. Lani is

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>also a fellow with the Hoover Institution and heads up

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the Domestic Policy program at Stanford University. Lan he thanks

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>as always good stuff for all your food is out there.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm unwrapping a McDonald's steak, egg and cheese bagel. Look

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>at this steak and the juice running down the side.

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Get a little bit on a wrapper here, and then

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the fluffy egg and real cheese flowed over the thigh,

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>looking just so good. Grey old onions and a butt

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of bagel too, founds off a mcdonald' steak, egg and

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:49.719
<v Speaker 1>cheeze bagel for breakfast. Love It Up, I participate in

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:50.359
<v Speaker 1>McDonald's